WEBVTT - Sacred Honor

0:00:01.240 --> 0:00:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome America. Congratulations. You live in the greatest country on

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the face of the planet. We have more prosperity than

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>we've ever had before than any other people ever. We

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 1>have a lot to be grateful for. But you know what,

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:20.759
<v Speaker 1>to have that privilege and to be stewards of a republic,

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>it requires vigilance, It requires oversight, It requires challenging the

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>status quo. You know what, the United States of America,

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>we're different than everybody else because guess what, we get

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:38.639
<v Speaker 1>to actually challenge. We get to actually have a first Amendment,

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>we actually get to have a second Amendment. We actually

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>get to challenge those in power, and that is so

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>unique in the world. I'm Jason Chafit's filling in for

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:52.559
<v Speaker 1>Sean Hannity, thrilled to do so. We got a lot

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of great guests, and one of them, we're kicking this

0:00:56.280 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>hour off with Brett Tolman. Now, Brett Tolman happens to

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>be one of my favorite people on the planet. He's

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>like a true cowboy, a rancher, loves his horses more

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>than well, just about anything else. He's a hunter. He's

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a former US attorney for the District of Utah. He

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>heads up right on crime. And he's just a funny,

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>good guy who actually knows his stuff. And he worked

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate in judiciary, so he knows it from

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 1>that angle. But being the US attorney he helped prosecute

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>in the Elizabeth Smart case. You've heard him, probably seen him.

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>But one of the smartest legal people out there. And

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>thrilled to have Brett Tolman joining us on the Sean

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Hannity Show. Brett, welcome, Thank.

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 2>You, Jason.

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Great to be with you.

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Now, you better not fail after that. If that intro,

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>you better not say no comment or something like that.

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I built you up like you couldn't be any higher

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>on the pedestal. So let's make sure we knock this

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>one out of the park. You know, I'm a guest here,

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>so you know I want to get invited back. So

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>all right, we got we got to talk about, you know,

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately Charlie Kirk, it's hard to believe this case continues

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>on and on and on, as probably far too many

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>people know. I was there when it happened. I saw it.

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I was looking directly at Charlie when he was assassinated.

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>First question I have for you, because there were a

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 1>couple the judges has made a couple of rulings here.

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:47.360
<v Speaker 1>One is about the fate of the death penalty, which

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you about. The other one was

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>about reprimanding the prosecutor for violating a gag order. But

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>my first question is why in the world is this

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>taking so long? I mean, swiftness helps both sides, right,

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>it's why is this case taking.

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Foreff Well, Jason, I agree with you.

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this is a case in which, you know,

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 3>justice prolonged is justice denied. And the longer it goes,

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 3>it actually, you know, it benefits the defense because the

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 3>issues arise, more time to think about potential motions, they

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 3>can send their investigators out, they can they can stir

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 3>issues like they've done, you know, to date. And this

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 3>last one is an issue they made. The defense made

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 3>some misstatements and they mischaracterize the forensic evidence surrounding the

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 3>bullet and so the government, which I think made an

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 3>unforced there. But the government went on you know, the

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 3>media and tried to correct that. And that's that's an

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 3>example of when you take too long, you're just you're

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 3>just waiting to create more issues for the defense to

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 3>try to capitalize on.

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 4>It.

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>So, I'm not a huge fan of gag orders. Explain

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to me why we even have to have a gag

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>order and why can't the prosecutors actually work and be

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>able to say, hey, let us clarify from our side

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:19.239
<v Speaker 1>of the view. You you are the ones that talked

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>about it. Now, how come we don't get to talk

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:23.160
<v Speaker 1>about exactly.

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm not a fan of gag orders. I will tell

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 3>you that the only time a gag order is really

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 3>necessary is when you're trying to protect identities of witnesses,

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 3>potential you know, cooperators, right, the safety of individuals.

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 2>We don't have that in this case.

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:42.279
<v Speaker 3>We don't have that. In fact, we have one of

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 3>the more renowned assassinations that's occurred in our country. We

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 3>have all kinds of media that's already been you know,

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 3>it exists, it's there, everybody knows what's going on.

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 4>This is the case.

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 3>It's an example of you don't need the gag order.

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 3>Try the case, get in there, push it, you know,

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 3>be be resolved to make decisions quickly. This judge, you know,

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 3>historically and my experience with him, I've been in that courtroom.

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:11.719
<v Speaker 3>The decisions were not you know, they didn't take this

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 3>long and there wasn't as much hand ringing, And I

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.720
<v Speaker 3>think it could be an example of just the overwhelming

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 3>nature of the case itself and the dynamic that we

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 3>now see where you have the assassination of one of

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 3>the more famous peoples in this country, of really good man,

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 3>a friend of mine and of yours, And so I

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:35.280
<v Speaker 3>think all of that you weigh that in the balance

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 3>of a judge, and unfortunately, I think they believe that,

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, more thoughtfulness and more process might be what's

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:45.720
<v Speaker 3>needed in a high profile case, but that's not what

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:46.239
<v Speaker 3>we need.

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 2>And I think cases like O. J.

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:51.479
<v Speaker 3>Simpson and others kind of prove that that's sometimes a

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 3>recipe for disaster.

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, and we haven't even begun the process of jury

0:05:57.160 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 1>selection and how long that's going to go on. And

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, they can argue a change of venue. You know,

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>given that in Utah County where this uh, you know,

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:11.119
<v Speaker 1>where this assassination happened, they're going to argue that ninety

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>nine percent of the people already know about this. But

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 1>where do you see that going.

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a good question. I mean, look at the

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 3>last couple motions. You had a motion to do something

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:29.599
<v Speaker 3>that's never done, and that is to actually confront one

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:31.919
<v Speaker 3>of the witnesses in the case at.

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:33.920
<v Speaker 2>The preliminary hering, and in this case.

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 3>The friend or boyfriend of the defendant, and they filed

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:42.159
<v Speaker 3>a motion to do it that should have been ruled

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 3>on immediately when they filed it, Like, that's never granted

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 3>they can use here say it's a preliminary hearing. You

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 3>don't get to confront the witness.

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 2>At that stage.

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 3>And yet that's an example of how you know it's

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 3>been dragged out. Let's let's stop this, let's get this moving,

0:06:57.279 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 3>get to jury selection, get past the venue. You you

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 3>dismissed that motion almost immediately as well, because it's just

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:09.480
<v Speaker 3>as notorious in any other county in Utah.

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think they need to it again. It's it's

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>solely up to the judge, right, I mean, he's got

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to accelerate this now. The other thing that your judge

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>did is said that the death penalty can stay in

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>play here. What's your take on that ruling?

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it was a good decision what the defense was

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 3>trying to do for your audience there, and Esen said,

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 3>there's a violation of the gagoger because the prosecution went

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:39.559
<v Speaker 3>to the media. And between you and me, Jason, if

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 3>you're going to go to the media, don't go to

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 3>TMZ first, right, good?

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I hear you.

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean go to a sources that perhaps you know,

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 3>Fox News would be the appropriate.

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 2>One in my view, because you're just trying.

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 3>To correct a record and you're not trying to do

0:07:56.280 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 3>anything to jeopardize, you know, our prejudice. The case, the

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 3>court found that there was a violation of the gag order,

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 3>so a sanction has to be given. The defense said, well,

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 3>the sanction should be we take the death penalty off

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 3>the place, which is absolutely random and outrageous.

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 4>You would not remove.

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 3>A potential penalty based on a misconduct by the prosecution.

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 3>An appropriate sanction would be, you know that particular evidence

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 3>might not be visited, or there might be evidence that

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 3>you allow in that you might otherwise not based on

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 3>the conduct or misconduct. But for here, they're overreaching and

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 3>they wanted to get rid of the death and I

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:39.679
<v Speaker 3>so the judge is very good, this is an example

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 3>of what he should should do in other instances and

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 3>just immediately rule on it and say no, we're not

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 3>getting rid of one of the potential penalties that are

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:49.079
<v Speaker 3>involved in an assassination.

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, I just hope that they accelerate this because it

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>is taking far too long and justice needs to be

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>served for a variety of reasons, and they need to

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>get on with it. All these motions they can continue

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>in perpetuity in my opinion. All right, let's transition here, Brett,

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 1>while I still have you here, I want to talk

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>about some of these attacks on President Trump. I mean,

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>you got these judges that are really really going after

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump for all the wrong reasons. But the appellate court,

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the Appeals Court issued a writ of mandamus. I don't

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>even know what that is. I should, but I don't

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 1>explain to us what that is. This has to go

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>back to Judge James Boseburg. He's a gem. Explain to

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 1>us what's happening there.

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, there are rare instances in which an

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 3>appellate court can actually take a look at something, even

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 3>if it doesn't, you know, even if it doesn't get

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 3>pushed to them through a final judgment. But if they see,

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 3>for example, a judge that violates an order below based

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 3>on a ruling that they've made, then there are extraordinary

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 3>things that can happen from an appellate court. One of

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 3>those is a rid of mandamus, in which the court says,

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 3>get in here, everybody will get in here on this issue,

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 3>because you violated our order. It is rare, it's unusual.

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:23.079
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting to see that there's some activity. It gives,

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, there, I'm hopeful based on some of the

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 3>rulings of the Supreme Court, and I'm hopeful that the

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 3>message starts to get I mean, we thought that that

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 3>nationwide injunctions were over based on two rulings of the

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 3>Supreme Court, but we see they still try they're still

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:44.319
<v Speaker 3>trying to do those and so it's also a way

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 3>to expedite getting it up to the Supreme Court for

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 3>a final ruling. And then I mean, if they if

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 3>they violate after that, we will be in fairly unchartered ground.

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 3>And the question will be at one point, is a

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 3>judge in capable of issuing, you know, or deciding on

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 3>an issue, and at that moment, if they refuse to follow,

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 3>that's absolutely grounds for impeachment. That's why impeachment is there,

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 3>because if a judge continues to issue unconstitutional and unlawful orders,

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 3>that's that's that's why we put in, you know, in

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 3>the Constitution of a basis to getting rid of individuals

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 3>that wouldn't follow law.

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I do feel like this is this is one

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of those cases where they just unrelenting and what appears

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:38.679
<v Speaker 1>to be such driven political points as opposed to if

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you play and you look back at what Josh Holly did.

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it was yesterday and going after one of

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>these activist judges. I don't know if you saw that clip,

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 1>but he was pretty good. I think we have this

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>cut to.

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:57.719
<v Speaker 5>What I said I did.

0:11:57.760 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 6>You didn't resign from Jones Day, Senator.

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 5>I did not resign from Jonesy because of any particular representation.

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:05.959
<v Speaker 6>All right, So it wasn't it wasn't a moral You

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 6>had no moral.

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 5>Quandaries, Absolutely not, Senator.

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 4>I had no moral.

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:11.319
<v Speaker 6>Quandaries with any of the cases at Jones Day. That's

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 6>your testimony, Senator.

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:15.840
<v Speaker 5>I left the firm in January of twenty twenty one

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 5>because I was offered an opportunity to return to public service.

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:22.680
<v Speaker 5>It's an opportunity the firm supported and that I took.

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 6>You had no quandaries with them representing in the Trump

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 6>litigation you have, Senator, that's your.

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:30.560
<v Speaker 5>Testimony, Senator, I did not leave my firm because of

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 5>that representation. I left my problem firm. Senator. I left

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 5>the firm months later because I received an opportunity to return.

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 6>No problem with that. And you have no problem representing

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 6>the bondholder. So your your testimony is you're you're happy

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 6>to represent anybody who comes your way. Donald Trump, you

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 6>bet the bond holders, you bet hedge funds, you bet whoever.

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 6>That's that's your testimony. So I'll make sure I got

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 6>it right, Senator.

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 5>Throughout my career, I have adhered to the code of

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:57.560
<v Speaker 5>ethics that all lawyers are bound by.

0:12:57.600 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 6>Sure, but the code of ethics allow you to make

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:01.680
<v Speaker 6>money from anybody. I'm listening. You can choose your clients.

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:03.679
<v Speaker 6>I'm not accusing you of any ethical violations at all.

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm not.

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 6>I'm just trying to figure out why you thought it

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 6>was important to have these hedge funds as your clients,

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 6>and if you had any moral quandaries. And your testimony

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 6>is you didn't have any moral quandaries, which is fine,

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:15.959
<v Speaker 6>But I just wonder if that's the best judgment.

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of this exchange. I don't know

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the whole case and what she's dealing with. But I

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>thought Holly was actually pretty good at making this point.

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 3>It was very good. You know, you're getting under someone's

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 3>skin when they continue every sentence they begin it with senator, Yeah, tell,

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 3>isn't it?

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 4>Yes?

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 3>Right, it's a tell for sure? But she what what?

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Where they're where they're struggling is.

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 3>People are vocal, and before they get into a nomination hearing,

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 3>they're posting, they're telling people, and we're learning that there's

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 3>extreme bias on the left, extreme bias.

0:13:56.960 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 2>And what I mean by that is they look at

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 2>you look at the you know, the reflection pool in

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 2>front of the Lincoln Memorial.

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Right, any other generation, any other president that decides this

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 3>thing needs to be cleaned up and made beautiful, they're

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 3>going to be praised from either side. Yeah, with Trump

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 3>doesn't matter. And you see then when we're nominating or

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 3>getting people that are in positions or we're trying to

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 3>question individuals who have been on the.

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Left and their.

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Vocal critics, it's at a depth of level and emotion

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 3>that we don't necessarily experience on the right. They experience

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 3>it on the left because they know that they are

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 3>hanging their their ability to hold onto power is hanging

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 3>in the balance on all of this, and if it's

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 3>not what the American people want, and so they push,

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 3>and they use hyperbole and exaggeration, and they outright lie

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 3>and use deception. And then above that, Jason, the thing

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 3>that is so hard for me is is this notion

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 3>that violence is okay?

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Have Yeah, No, it's we got Brett. We could talk

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot more about this. I love that you're in

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the fight and understand this so well. Thank you so

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us with Sean Handy. Stay with us.

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 4>We're going to be right back, John Hannity.

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, I want you to check this out when

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you have a chance. Jason in the House, Jason in

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the House. That's all you need to remember. You can

0:15:56.360 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>catch me on Instagram, Facebook, h X, and you go

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to Jason Inthehouse dot com. You can check out all it.

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I've written five books, four of which are New York

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Times bestsellers, including The Deep State, and the one that

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm really excited about that's more recent is They're coming

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>for you. That's what we're talking about with AI and

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>how they're going to use these tools. We got a

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>lot more coming up with Sean Hannity, Stay with us,

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back.

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 6>The one thing you can always count on, Sean Hannity

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 6>is back on the radio.

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, he'll be back soon soon. If I'm Jason Chafits,

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:04.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm filling in for Sean. It's Tune twenty six. We're

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>getting ready for fourth of July, and we got something

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>special here with America two fifty. You're gonna love. I

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 1>think our next guest here, his name is a Bradley Devlin.

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>He's the politics editor at the Daily Signal. And if

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you're not following at Daily Signal, you should be a

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 1>lot of good content, a lot of good stuff there.

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go to this cut number one because

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:30.879
<v Speaker 1>this is going to set up what we're going to

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:35.199
<v Speaker 1>talk about with Bradley Devlin. This is sacred honor, the

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>declaration that defies, that defines a nation. It's the trailer,

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and so let's go to cut one.

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:46.880
<v Speaker 7>We hold these truths to be self evident, that all

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:52.360
<v Speaker 7>men are created equal, but they are endowed by their

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:57.640
<v Speaker 7>creator with certain unalienable rights. But among these are life, liberty,

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 7>and the pursuit of happiness.

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Sure these rights, governments are instituted among men.

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 4>Deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 7>That whenever any form of government becomes destructive.

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Of these inns, it is the right of the people

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new.

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:25.120
<v Speaker 7>Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 7>powers in such form as shouted them seem most likely

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 7>to affect their safety and happiness.

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 1>For the support of this declaration, for the firm reliance

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 1>each other our lives.

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:42.159
<v Speaker 7>Are fortunes, and our sacred honor.

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Bradley Devlin is, like you said, he's of politics editor

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:54.199
<v Speaker 1>at The Daily Signal and he's also a documentary filmmaker.

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I recognize Senator Mike Lee in there, just because he's

0:18:56.920 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>got that distinctive voice. Bradley, we welcome to the Sean

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 1>Hannity Show. Tell us what you've done, why you did it,

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:06.439
<v Speaker 1>and where people can see this.

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, Jason, it's good to be with you, and thank

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:14.360
<v Speaker 4>you to you and your team for playing the trailer. Yes,

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 4>you heard Mike Lee, you heard Senator Eric Schmidt from Missouri.

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:22.360
<v Speaker 4>You had heard Representative Brandon Gill from Texas, and you'll

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 4>hear a few other voices special guests when this thing

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:28.640
<v Speaker 4>premieres on July second. The reason that we did this

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:33.719
<v Speaker 4>is because America Face is a real choice. You know,

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 4>there was just a Gallup poll this morning that came

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 4>out that's just forty five percent of gen Zer's reporting

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 4>report lacking meaning or purpose or both their lives. And

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 4>they are getting to the age that the founding fathers

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:50.159
<v Speaker 4>were when they made that pledge, that solemn pledge, that

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:53.160
<v Speaker 4>pledge of their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 4>for their unalienable rights. Jefferson was thirty three, Madison was

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 4>twenty five, Monroe is just eighteen at the time. And

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 4>we made this to try to inspire people to a

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 4>higher form of politics, to recover the virtues that our

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 4>founders displayed through their political action, to save this country,

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 4>to save the republic that they entrusted to us. Because

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:19.400
<v Speaker 4>every generation has to recommit themselves to that pledge, that

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:22.400
<v Speaker 4>pledge of their sacred honor for those rights, for life, liberty,

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:24.919
<v Speaker 4>and the pursuit of happiness, because if it goes wrong.

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:29.119
<v Speaker 4>Marx was twenty nine, Engels was twenty seven when they

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:32.679
<v Speaker 4>wrote The Communist manifesto. Fidel was thirty and Chae Guervo

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 4>was twenty seven when Cuba had its revolution. So it

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 4>could go one or two ways for this country in

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 4>the next two hundred and fifty years. We could lose

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 4>it a whole lot quicker than that.

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 1>And that's why we made this well, I mean, the

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 1>timing couldn't be better. It is so needed and so desperate.

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's go back to that poll, because you know, generations,

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>they have different experiences. Like it's hard for me to believe.

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:02.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm still having a hard time like admitting it. But

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I have six grandkids and we got a three year

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 1>old grandchild and she's just so cute, so wonderful. Well,

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:12.119
<v Speaker 1>she knows how to take that phone of her mom.

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 1>She doesn't have her own phone, but she dicks her

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 1>mom's phone. She can type in the four digits. She

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>knows the four numbers, and then she hits the little

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>green button and that's the face time and then she

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:26.160
<v Speaker 1>can see my picture and she'll hit it and I'll

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 1>get a couple of times a day I'll get this

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>sweet little grandchild will be facetiming me because she's already

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and she's three and so like the whole world is

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>so different that the it's just upside. It's just different

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>than how, you know, the rotary phones that I had

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>when I was growing up. So but this, this pole,

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>this gallup pole, it really is disturbing. Walk us through

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 1>what this generation, these new younger generations are going through.

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, this is you know, I'm so glad that your

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 4>grandchildren are using it to connect with their family. But

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 4>most people aren't riting that technology in this way. They

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 4>are using it and becoming more isolated and more insular.

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 4>And as they become more isolated and more insular, they're

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 4>feeling lonely. They don't feel like they're part of something higher,

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 4>part of something meaningful, part of something as a collective,

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 4>whether that's a community or a locality, right, your local

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 4>rotary club or a church, or it's something bigger. It's

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 4>the nation, right, it's this country that every generation has

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 4>fought to defend. And I see these trends and how

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 4>familiar they are to other episodes in history that we

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 4>just talked about. Right, Marx and Angles are writing the

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 4>Communist Manifesto amongst a large upheaval in Europe and the

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 4>beginnings of the Industrial Revolution. How do we adjust to

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 4>that major change. You can go one or two ways.

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 4>We can you know, answer the call of the Enlightenment

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:59.239
<v Speaker 4>and mix that modern and ancient thinking into something like

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 4>the Founding, or it can go terrible and we get

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 4>something like the Russian Revolution and the Communist Manifesto a

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 4>few decades before it. Or we have the communist revolutions

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 4>that follow the upheaval and the destruction that was World

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 4>War Two. And here we are today, Jason, in a

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:20.679
<v Speaker 4>very similar situation. We have Ai. Right, Pope Leo chose

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 4>his name because he's hearkening back to the previous Pope Leo,

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 4>who was in the middle of the Industrial Revolution. He says,

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:28.760
<v Speaker 4>we're going to go through something similar here with the

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 4>AI Revolution, and we need to make sure that we're

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 4>protecting human dignity, reminding each other what it means to

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 4>be human and what it means to be human. I

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 4>think is encapsulated so well in our Founding story. It's

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 4>a political story. The Declaration of Independence is this culmination

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 4>of one of the greatest political acts in history. It's

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 4>not just principles that come out of nowhere. It is

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 4>a fierce contest of ambitions and convictions and interests, and

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 4>they have to navigate that as a collective and as

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:03.400
<v Speaker 4>a collective that's really operating together as the first time.

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:07.160
<v Speaker 4>They're figuring out the hierarchy in that room and Independence

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 4>Hall in Philadelphia, and they're figuring out what their collective

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:15.360
<v Speaker 4>identity is based on the heritage they had received from Britain.

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 4>And so here we are. We need to recover what

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 4>it means to be an American, what it means to

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 4>be human, even at a more fundamental level, and that's

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 4>how we're going to be able to address these problems

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 4>that are emerging from this technological revolution that's happening right

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 4>before our eyes.

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the technology itself, it can be good, right think

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:40.679
<v Speaker 1>of what it advances in medicine and the research that

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:42.439
<v Speaker 1>you can do. But it can also be bad. It

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>can be at downright evil, and I think it's scary

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:48.360
<v Speaker 1>in many ways. I wrote an op ad a few

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>months ago for Foxnews dot com and the op ed

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>was basically, it's the one issue artificial intelligence that's scaring everybody,

0:24:56.640 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and yet each political party, no political party, has taken

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>a definitive stance on how it fits in today's culture.

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>And if we don't adhere and stay true to the

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>principles in our founding documents, then shame on us because

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:15.159
<v Speaker 1>it will overwhelm us. I just posted up Jason in

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the house. You go to my x account, and I

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 1>tweeted out Mark Theesen. He had something that came that

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 1>was the research done by the Washington Post about how

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>AI is being trained up to be very leftists, that

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:34.719
<v Speaker 1>only x AI is being trained to have more of

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:37.679
<v Speaker 1>a balance in its approach. But if you think that

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:40.400
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be relying on AI to do everything,

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and that they are the evil sides, that evil forces,

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:48.120
<v Speaker 1>if you will, that aren't going to do you think

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 1>they're just going to sit by and let this happen. No,

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>they're going to want to manipulate these models and redefine

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>history and redefine who we are as a people. And

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 1>that is a thing. And then you've got this whole generation,

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and Bradley, I want you to talk about this. You

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>got this generation that gauges the success of their life,

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:13.120
<v Speaker 1>their worthiness based on how many likes and how many

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>people are following them like it's a contest. And it's

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 1>so destructive to a young generation into an older generation.

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 4>I mean, so many great points there, Jason, And especially

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 4>when it comes to getting the getting the shock, the

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 4>hit of having the likes pour in or the reposts

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 4>pour in. I mean, this is what it's all about.

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:43.679
<v Speaker 4>They have isolated themselves and now they've replaced real community

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 4>with a fake community, a fake community that can only

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:50.880
<v Speaker 4>register its presence or its love for you in the

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:52.959
<v Speaker 4>form of likes and clicks and all of that. And

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:57.680
<v Speaker 4>AI has a very similar function. Not only is it leftist, Jason,

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 4>of course we expected that. We saw it is a

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:03.360
<v Speaker 4>black George Washington. When Google first came out with his AI,

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:08.920
<v Speaker 4>everybody saw how ridiculous that was. But it's also a flatterer.

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 4>And that's what's so dangerous too. We've seen this really

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:16.920
<v Speaker 4>be a cancer on the minds of so many young people,

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:18.919
<v Speaker 4>so many people in gen Z and even Jen Alfin

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 4>now who have committed terrible acts against themselves, even up

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 4>to suicide, because AI has ed them on. And that's

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 4>what it's a flatterer. And so the first impulse that

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:31.919
<v Speaker 4>you have politically when you see a problem like that,

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:34.440
<v Speaker 4>it's going to be what's a limiting principle? And I'm

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 4>not inherently against limiting principles. You want to be able

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:39.919
<v Speaker 4>to find a place where you can stake your flag

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:42.479
<v Speaker 4>in the ground and stake it deep so that it

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:46.919
<v Speaker 4>lasts for generations. But what the Founding story tells us

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 4>about how to confront these problems, even for people in

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:54.359
<v Speaker 4>my age demographic, young folks around you know, twenty to

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 4>thirty five, is it's not a limiting principle. It's a virtue.

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 4>It's the highest virtue in politics, and that's prudence. It's judgment.

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 4>It's cultivating that judgment and being a flatterer as Ai

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 4>is to you telling you, no, that's perfect. Oh, do

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 4>more of that? Yeah, yeah, just one more bite of

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 4>that apple, mister Eve or mister Adam and missus Eve.

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:24.920
<v Speaker 4>That is what can really derail you. The Founders are

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 4>not flatterers in any way, shape or form. They were strong,

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 4>great men, and I think the miracle of the Founding

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:34.400
<v Speaker 4>is that there were so many great men of history

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 4>in a single room. And so we need to recover

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 4>that sense of who we are and develop that virtue

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 4>of prudence by understanding our history and knowing our history

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 4>so that we're not replacing a real community with fake communities.

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 4>Whether or not that lives in a chatbot or on

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:54.479
<v Speaker 4>your favorite social media program.

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 1>So what I hear you saying, and I totally one

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent agree. You got to get the principle's right,

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, I had when I served in Congress, we

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 1>had this. I kind of teach this to young staffers Washington,

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 1>DC is often run by twenty year olds, right, And

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I'd say, and I would drop on the board, the whiteboard,

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and at the top I'd write principle and then I'd

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:22.720
<v Speaker 1>put a line under it, and then I'd put policy

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>underneath that, and it's It was a reminder visually for

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 1>them and for me to just say, principle over policy.

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I can answer any policy quench question if you get

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the principle right. And I think that's the issues that

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 1>people are facing today can be answered. And I maybe

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 1>it's an oversimplification and somebody could help me here, but

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>if you get the principle's right of how you want

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 1>to lead your life and what you want to do.

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 1>And the second part of that is at least for

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:02.239
<v Speaker 1>me personally, I believe in prayer, and I believe in

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Jesus Christ, and I believe in a religion and a

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>higher being in the reality of Jesus Christ, and that

0:30:12.600 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>prayer and that ability to communicate and to be inspired

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:21.719
<v Speaker 1>is something that drives me and that informs me, and

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 1>they can keep me centered if I don't get off direct.

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 4>Ugh, I mean absolutely, and just the prayer to be

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 4>thankful for the existence of God in the first place,

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 4>because without God, there is no principles to which we

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 4>can find, and there is no objective truth. There is

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 4>no enduring, eternal thing that we can point to and

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 4>orient ourselves in the world. Right, And that's what that's

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 4>what makes the declaration so powerful is it's this mixture

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 4>of modern political philosophy and ancient political philosophy all infused

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 4>with Christian teaching that tells us not only to just

0:30:57.480 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 4>go to the policy, but to go to the principle.

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 4>And not only did just go to principles, but go

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 4>to first principles. Right, we talk about how this may

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 4>build off built off of consent we the people. Well,

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 4>consent is actually a second order principle from equality.

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 1>That is Bradley where Bradley Devlin, congratulations, Politics editor editor

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 1>at the Daily Signal, and you've got a documentary sacred

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 1>honor the Declaration that defines a nation coming out. I

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 1>believe you said July second, So watch for that. Thanks

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us on the Sean Hannity Show.

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Do appreciate it. We'll be right back, Kennedy.

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Watch keep it an eye on breaking news and bringing

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 3>it to you first.

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 4>Sean Hannity.

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Tay, Congratulations to the United States. I think the country

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 1>has been doing a heck of a job, a great

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 1>job and hosting the World Cup. I think people coming

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 1>all over the world watching their teams play. I think

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 1>it's been exceptionally well orchestrated. The security line seem to

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 1>be good, they seem to be working, and the USA

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:39.959
<v Speaker 1>team's doing really well. You're seeing a surge of patriotism

0:32:40.480 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 1>that's flowing through like you've never we haven't seen in

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 1>some of these other leagues and whatnot. In the next game,

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:52.160
<v Speaker 1>market July first, eight pm Eastern, that's when the US

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 1>will be taking on Bosnia and Herzegovnia, and it's going

0:32:57.320 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to be a great game. Congratulations is the US. We'll

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 1>be right back, Stay with us. MHM.