WEBVTT - Why are slurs making a comeback?

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Hey, folks, this is many here. I'm genuinely ecstatic that

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you're tuning in for episode three of No Such Thing.

0:00:06.519 --> 0:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Quick content warning, though this episode features language that may

0:00:10.360 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>be uncomfortable to hear. You probably guess this by the

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>literal title of the episode, but in many cases this

0:00:16.960 --> 0:00:19.439
<v Speaker 1>language is not censored. So if you don't want to

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>hear any of that, now's your chance to back out. Otherwise,

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>enjoy the episode. I'm Manny, I'm Noah, and this is

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>No such Thing a show where we settle our dumb

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 1>arguments and yours by actually doing the research. Today's episode

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>is about the return of slurs. We'll talk about why

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:39.480
<v Speaker 1>we think this is happening, we'll hear from some people

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:42.959
<v Speaker 1>who are using slurs again, and we'll also interview a

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 1>very special guest. There's no such thing, no such thing.

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 2>Touch thank touch touch than.

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, So I'm going to start here with kind

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>of an acknowledgment, an acknowledgment that a lot of us

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>were using slurs when we were in middle school, elementary school.

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 3>High school, high school.

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'm not going to go that far into college.

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:22.319
<v Speaker 1>I remember, specifically in middle school, you know, I was

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>in the Halo two lobbies like that. That was not

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:29.320
<v Speaker 1>a safe space, so to speak. You were getting racial slurs,

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:33.320
<v Speaker 1>homophobic slurs, the R word just flying left and right,

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:36.959
<v Speaker 1>every other word, especially when you would lose, which I

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 1>never did in middle school and in high school, in

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>my experience, you started to see the usage of these

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>words take a step back. And I remember this is

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>around the time when like people in your circles would

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 1>start coming out. And I remember one of my best

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>friends came out to us and he was someone who

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>was using the F word. But it made sense, right

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>because he was like.

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 4>From but remember to the community.

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, but I remember him taking me to the

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>side once and being like upset that I was using it.

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Back then, you're using the F word. You're not talking

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:19.679
<v Speaker 1>about gay people, and so this is what I'm trying

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:22.679
<v Speaker 1>to tell my friend at the time, and he's saying, actually,

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I know you're not talking about gay people, but the

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>word originated as a slur of gay people, and you

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:33.399
<v Speaker 1>mean to describe someone who's stupid or ignorant. But you're

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>saying this word that was meant to make me feel bad.

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:40.239
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, all right, that's fair. I'm not

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna argue with you. Yeah, I'm like, yeah, I'm all ears.

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:47.359
<v Speaker 1>I won't say I quit cold Turkey after that conversation, yes,

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>who can't. But that was a time when I was like, Okay,

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting to realize some of the nuances of these words.

0:02:54.680 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>And then yeah, progressively, since then, my usage died down

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:06.519
<v Speaker 1>almost completely. Now, fast forward what twenty years, Jesus Christ world,

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:09.519
<v Speaker 1>Fast forward twenty years. I'm in the Lower East Side.

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm watching the Lakers play against the Celtics. This is

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>going somewhere, I promised, and I'm at this bar. There

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>are some Celtics fans in there that are going fucking crazy.

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I was like, actually, like.

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 4>Whoa For context, for people who don't watch sports, there's

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 4>always been I guess reports and players accusing Celtics fans

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 4>of using slurs.

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, more specifically the N word.

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, in Boston sports.

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 3>Yes, Boston sports. Yeah, more widely.

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So they're in there. Lebron is you know. I

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>love Lebron, He's my king, my idol. But he was

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>he was maybe complaining a little bit too much about

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>a particular foul, and these guys were just letting it

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the I was blown away by what they were saying,

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, holy shit, we're in Manhattan. F word,

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>our word, your mother is blah blah blah. And I'm like, whoa,

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>now it's turn. I couldn't understand the power of these

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>words until they use them against Lebron James. No, but

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I was like, Okay, are these words back or are

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 1>these guys just Celtics fans? Like maybe these guys never stopped. Yeah, yeah,

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to tell. In that moment. When I really

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:25.840
<v Speaker 1>realized that these words were back is when I was

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>at a dinner and everyone at the dinner is uh,

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:32.719
<v Speaker 1>not just a liberal, but also more left than that,

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to be fair, like, so many of them are queer,

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:38.720
<v Speaker 1>so like if you're if you're queer.

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 3>Using that degree or an attempt to maybe.

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, But I was still surprised at the high usage

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:48.919
<v Speaker 1>rate within that conversation, and that's when I was like, Okay,

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>something's going on here. So that's kind of been my experience.

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:56.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious what your guys's experience with hearing these slurs are.

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, obviously we have a lot of the same friends,

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 4>so I've noticed it in our friend group as well.

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 4>But I'm seeing on Twitter like people are saying, like, hey,

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 4>if y'all noticed a lot more people are using the

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 4>R word. And then that new FX show the English

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 4>teacher was in the trailer.

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 5>The kids this year, they're not into being woken all

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 5>the way around.

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 1>They're saying the R word again.

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 4>So it's reached, you know, FX writer level of popularity.

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 3>Now it's not just the US thing.

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>But did you guys like use slurs growing up? To

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>be honest, and this is not me trying to.

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 6>I really like never used I'll say the only time

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 6>I've ever used our word is like if I'm by

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 6>myself gaming and it's it's it's at myself, like wow,

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 6>I'm frustrated, and I'll say it.

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>But like and I'm not gaming on I'm not on.

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 3>That live you're talking. That's darker, to be honest, it's

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 3>much darker.

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:56.160
<v Speaker 1>That's all I'm saying. I'm not I'm not doing this

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to pay myself in a nicer life. But when you

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:01.159
<v Speaker 1>were growing up, that was just never kind of part

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Like had friends who would use use them,

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 1>and but it was just like I just never.

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 4>Did our word for sure used to use it, I

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 4>would say, not as often, yeah, but I would say, yeah,

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:17.159
<v Speaker 4>high school, early college.

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 3>I was sort of like, all right, you gotta stop

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 3>saying that.

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 4>And then I feel like everyone had in your circles

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 4>people who would I don't even say, like police these words,

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 4>but like would call you out for using them m hm.

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 4>And I think, you know, you get tired of people

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:37.600
<v Speaker 4>calling you out, you eventually stop using it.

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's not like you're going to die on the celfa. Yeah,

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:43.919
<v Speaker 1>for what reason exactly? You know, all right, we've established

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the three of us are woke kings. We don't use

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the words anymore. But how do you ever like read

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>a tweet or something that has these words in it

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and find it funny? Like oh, yeah, yeah, okay, we're

0:06:56.839 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>on the same page about that. I'm asking because I

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>was maybe two years ago. I crashed through the TV

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>show Veep. Oh yeah, incredible show. I remember a specific

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>line that I found hilarious, Like I was laughing for

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>like I had to pause the show to laugh, And

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I remember thinking like, oh, I don't want anyone to

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>know that I laughed at this.

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 2>What was the line, Governor, It's so nice for me

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 2>to come with us, to come for Jonah jonan Oh

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Ryan has as much chance of becoming president as a

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 2>stack of retarded raccoons in a trench coat.

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>And it paints such a vivid picture that line.

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 4>With all of these words, right, like they're able to

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 4>communicate something so quickly, Like what other words could you

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 4>put in that place to get that joke across?

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's the way punchiness of it. Yes, well, I'm

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>only bringing this up for validation.

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I just want you to tell me that I'm allowed.

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>To laugh at this, Okay, So why is the question?

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Why do we think this is happening? Why are people

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>using slurs so freely? Again?

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 6>So, I mean I think it's just kind of a

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 6>blacklash to a kind of hyper policing of language I've

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 6>seen in the past, say, fifteen years. I mean it

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 6>goes back further. I mean, like in the nineties you

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 6>would hear it as just political correctness. You know, there's

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 6>a line of acceptability of what's okay to say or

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 6>not to say. We heard it recently about the election

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 6>with being told to use the word Latin X or

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 6>you know, people talk about homelessness or unhoused people and

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 6>it's like.

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, people experiencing homelessness.

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and it's these things that are ultimately harmless, but

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 6>they also don't necessarily do that much to help any

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 6>maybe disenfranchised groups. If you want to be called this,

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:39.680
<v Speaker 6>I'll call you that. If you don't, I'll try not to.

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 6>I guess there's a pendulum that swings, and you know,

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:45.679
<v Speaker 6>it'll go back and forth, and I'm sure we'll see

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 6>it change again in the future.

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>That to me would mean then that there's kind of

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>like an overlap. There's like people on the left and

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>people on the right, and there's a middle where it's

0:08:55.480 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>like anti political correctness like groups. Because I'm I'm mostly

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>interested in why people on the left are bringing these

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>words back. I feel like people on the right maybe

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>never stop saying them, or the usage rate dropped, but

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>not all the way. But like people on the left,

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it are. That's where I'm like, this

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 1>is interesting.

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 7>All right.

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>So we wanted to hear from some people who have

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 1>been using these words again after not using them for

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 1>a really long time, and so we did this call

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>out and we got a few responses. I do want

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to note like how hard it was to get people

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to agree to do this, Like everyone had a million

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:42.079
<v Speaker 1>questions whether they would be anonymous. Who are you telling

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:42.559
<v Speaker 1>about this?

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 4>Which is very interesting, right, because I think it speaks

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 4>to like to know as earlier point where we are

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 4>with this, that people are fine using it in their

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:54.559
<v Speaker 4>trusted groups, but they don't want to be outed as

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 4>using it to the public.

0:09:56.480 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that was the prevailing sentiment from everyone who responded,

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:03.559
<v Speaker 1>except one person who was like, if I'm going to

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>use these words, you should put my name on this,

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, I'm not gonna do that.

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 3>Maybe a protection.

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Protection You're.

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 6>That's interesting.

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>So we'll play a few sound bites of people who

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 1>sent in some voice notes to us about why they

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>use these words. Again, but one of the responses I

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 1>got is in text form, and I'll just read that

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>for you guys. I'm gay and a woman. I just

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>want to be clear this is I'm reading. I'm reading

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 1>someone's response. Let's just the Yeah, I'm gay and a woman.

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's funny if I call someone a

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>pussy as a slur, or if I say the word faggot.

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>A few years ago, some of my best friends started

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to throw around the R word. At first, I was

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>really shocked. I hadn't heard that word in years, I

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>couldn't believe my leftist progressive friends would say that. After

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 1>a few more times the shot or off, it started

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to feel normal. I don't freely or openly say it,

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and if I do slip up, it's definitely with shame,

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and only around people who have said it first. Some

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>groups of people simply have normalized it, and others continue

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to think it's extremely offensive, So it's definitely a gamble.

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>In another thing, I think it's become fully divorced from

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the concept of actual disability, kind of like how on

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>South Park they were all saying the word fagot to

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about motorcycle gangs and fully forgot it refers to

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>gay people. How is it?

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:36.319
<v Speaker 8>Do you boys think referring to gay people as fags

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:38.679
<v Speaker 8>and today's world is acceptable.

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 3>Because we're not referring to gay people. You can be

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 3>gay and not be a fag. Yeah, a lot of

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 3>fags aren't gay.

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 7>I happen to be gay. Boys.

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 3>Do you think I'm a fag?

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 6>Do you write a big, loud Harley and go up

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:50.199
<v Speaker 6>and down the streets ruining everyone's nice time?

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 3>No, then you're not a fag.

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 7>I'm a thirty year old white male. But to hear

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 7>people like project their own moral comp this on you know,

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 7>so your life is like is like really reductive. It's

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 7>more reductive than, in my opinion, like saying the thing

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 7>you know, because it's like, how the fuck do you know?

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 7>It has been either a white guy telling me that

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:16.319
<v Speaker 7>it's like you know, something you've never been through. It's

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:17.679
<v Speaker 7>like you neither has have been through it.

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, I am a twenty six year old woman

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 2>through our private contexts where I'm with my friends and

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 2>we know each other's values, and I wouldn't be friends

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 2>with them if I believed like they were bad people

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:34.440
<v Speaker 2>who dislike people with disabilities. That word in a way

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 2>that is very clearly ironic and not in a way

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 2>that's meant to disparage disable people. It can jopingly come

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:44.439
<v Speaker 2>up in like those private spaces, but overall, my feeling

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 2>is that I just want a word that carries the

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:49.599
<v Speaker 2>strength and stupidity and malice of the R word is

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:52.959
<v Speaker 2>an ablest and that's something that I hope is introduced

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 2>into the vernacula at some point.

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>For three guys who are looking for an answer to

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 1>why people are using these words. Again, we are in

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 1>luck because after the break, we're going to be talking

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:16.559
<v Speaker 1>to someone who did a story about this. All right,

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>we're back. This is Manny.

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm Noah Devin, and we have a.

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Very special guest. Mia DeGraf, is a deputy executive editor

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>at Business Insider, and she was actually the editor of

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 1>a piece about this very topic, the return of slurs.

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>And she also happens to be my girlfriend. So there's

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 1>some light nepotism going on here, but you're actually uniquely

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 1>qualified to talk about this.

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:41.959
<v Speaker 8>Yes, yes I am.

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Recently, Mia, you put together a story about this very

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>thing that we're talking about, the return of slurs. Tell

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>us how this story came about.

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so I'm on a team that it's you know,

0:13:56.160 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 9>I'm a health editor, but our work spans into psychology

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 9>as well. So a psychology reporter who I was speaking

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 9>with and she was like, I feel like everyone's saying

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 9>slurs and it's liberal, lefty people. And I was like, Oh,

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 9>this is so true, and it's a vibe shift that

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 9>I think everyone has seen you hear it around. It's

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 9>like on Twitter, like random people saying it, but I

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 9>haven't seen like a definitive article that really charts like

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 9>why this is happening. When this happened, can you measure

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 9>it in any way? So I was like, great, let's

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 9>get into it. It took us so long to try

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 9>and really piece it together because it's so kind of amorphous,

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 9>like it's just this thing that it's definitely happening and

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 9>you feel it and you see it, but it's hard

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 9>to really pinpoint where am why now.

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 4>It's not like a data point that's like, actually, you

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 4>know the R word is up.

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 9>Right well, because all of you know, I've been in

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 9>a science journalist for like ten years and everything we

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 9>do is like you know, using studies and data and

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 9>all that kind of thing, and this is the kind

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 9>of thing you just can't measure because it a moves

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 9>so quickly and be it's like really specifically developed online

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 9>and it's people who you can't really identify who they

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:13.479
<v Speaker 9>are or like they because this is what Julia Pukachevski,

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 9>the psychology reporter who came to me with this idea,

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 9>and our first port of call was just like calling

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 9>out to people to be like do you use this?

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 9>What do you think about it? And I had so

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 9>many responses. I posted an Instagram story and I had

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 9>hundreds and I really don't have that many Instagram followers,

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 9>so this is a high proportion and hundreds of people

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 9>coming in being like yeah, yeah, I use these sirs

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 9>and I find it really funny, Like most people who

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 9>responded to my stories, and these are people who I

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 9>would not have expected.

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 4>And I were like, what, like admitting to using it?

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, like what words do you use? And they're like, oh, yeah,

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 9>I say things are gay or I use insert random

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 9>suzz and I'm like why and they're like, because it's funny.

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 9>And then to each one, I'd be like, oh, can

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 9>we talk about it like officially and they'd be like.

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 4>No, that's so similarity to the issue we ran into, right, yeah.

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 9>This is like and I was like, okay, fine, whatever,

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 9>And then Julia tweeted about it. Her tweet got screenshotted

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 9>and meaned and just like she got completely dunked on Twitter,

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 9>people being like oh you cop and like what's da

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 9>da da da? But then and so then I was like, Okay,

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 9>well this is maybe slightly backfiring.

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I just sent her out into the.

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 9>But then it was so crazy because she was then

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 9>showing me like a lot of the people who were

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 9>donkey on her on Twitter, were then privately dming her

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 9>being like, I have actually lots of.

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 6>Thoughts about Oh that's exactly, That's exactly these types of

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 6>people I'm talking about.

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 9>So it was interesting, but it was definitely like something

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 9>that really identified like that something was there because it

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 9>was something that we'd seen online. I think the real

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 9>step up for us that made this like a big

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 9>story is that like movies and stuff there and it's

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 9>like becoming very mainstream, especially when you see like all

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 9>of the Democrats like really trying to get in on

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 9>memes and stuff, and then everyone's trying to use this

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 9>very like taboo transgressive language. And then Deadpool had a

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 9>joke about the R word and everyone's like posting about it.

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:14.880
<v Speaker 9>I was like, Okay, Ryan Reynolds is making this joke.

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 9>This is like such an old thing now, so like

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 9>we must be able to chart this.

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I can. I cannot bring myself to watch that movie.

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>What is the joke? And you I was not expecting

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:27.159
<v Speaker 1>to see you here. I thought you were you know, retired,

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>regarded retired. Oh he pronounced.

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 9>It pronounced retired to make it sound like the word.

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:38.120
<v Speaker 9>And then the guy's like what and then it's like this.

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 3>Is like when we were in elementary school.

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 9>And this is the kind of joke that you would

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 9>get in like a really bad like Seth Rogan movie

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 9>two thousand and three.

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 1>Yees, don't disrespect Seth like that. Now this is like

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>a Royan Reynolds movie from the two thousand Reynolds.

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 9>Still it's like it's swung right back. Oh my god,

0:17:58.520 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 9>I could do.

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 1>This again, blacking. I'm curious, like what were your findings,

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Like you set out to dive into why this is happening?

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Is there a real answer?

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 9>We went through one angle, which is like what is

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 9>the history of these words? Like when were they starting

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 9>to be used? So the R word didn't come about

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 9>as like a slur until like the sixties and seventies,

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:26.880
<v Speaker 9>and didn't really step up until like, you know, the nineties.

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 9>That's where I really got going. But then you can

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 9>see ways in which things started to get policed, like

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 9>like very specific ways, Like there was a black Eyed Peas.

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Song, Oh my, let's get it started.

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 9>I remembered it as they had changed it because it

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:52.680
<v Speaker 9>was offensive.

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:55.679
<v Speaker 3>True, Oh that's how I remember it.

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I just assume that's what it was.

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:00.719
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I know they changed it. Because it was going

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 9>to be in the two thousand and four NBA Finals

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 9>or something like, they were going to be playing that

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 9>song and then I guess the networks but like, we

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 9>can't have that word. So then they did a clean

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:26.640
<v Speaker 9>versions and then it made really big news that they'd

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 9>made a clean version, And it was kind of happening

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 9>at this time where there was beginning to be these

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 9>campaigns about whether or not you can use these words,

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 9>but that actually really turbo charged a conversation about it.

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 6>I'm curious, like how much of this shift, if you know, like,

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 6>is it coming from bottom up, from like the people,

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 6>or is it like kind of mandated by Like it

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:47.399
<v Speaker 6>makes sense that the NBA and all these corporate people

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 6>would want to be very safe, But then does a

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 6>shift like this where now it's acceptable for the Deadpool

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 6>movie to have this.

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Like is that influencing us or are we influencing them?

0:19:57.200 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 4>Do you know?

0:19:57.680 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 9>Like, I think one of the most interesting things about

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 9>this is that there are so many more bloodlines, and

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:04.679
<v Speaker 9>I think that's actually part of the reason why people

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 9>really wanted to harness this, like speaking of the bottom

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 9>of angle. It's like, you know, left wing people being

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 9>like I don't want you to make any assumptions about

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 9>who I am just because I look queer or am

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 9>left wing. All these ideas of the left being like

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 9>very pedantic and very kind of like gatekeeping what is right,

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 9>being like, no, I'm actually like I contain multitudes. I

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 9>guess you know, It's like I could be all different

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:34.160
<v Speaker 9>kinds of things. So there is that side of it.

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 9>But then you know, culture is a circle, so there

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 9>are like other things like with the NBA finals kind

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:44.879
<v Speaker 9>of shifting what that song was and that creating a

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 9>whole conversation. Like a few years later, there was a

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:54.360
<v Speaker 9>legal shift where Obama signed Rosa's Law, which basically meant

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 9>that you couldn't use the word mental retardation anymore.

0:20:58.440 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 10>Now.

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 5>Roses Law takes the idea a step further. It amends

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:07.199
<v Speaker 5>the language and all federal health, education, and labor laws

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 5>to remove that same phrase and instead refer to Americans

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:14.640
<v Speaker 5>living within intellectual disability.

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 9>That it was basically removing the R word from like

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 9>standard language, and that was like there was a huge

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 9>campaign for it, and that actually made this huge shift

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 9>and it was really part of like you know, the

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 9>Obama administration and this new kind of woke kind of

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 9>moment where people were talking about what you should and

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 9>shouldn't do, what you can and cannot say, you know,

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 9>and like Obama coming in, everyone's like this is a

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 9>new era of hope and like and we're doing the

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 9>right thing. And there was like literal laws being passed

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:45.400
<v Speaker 9>that was like we're going to be saying the right

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 9>thing as well as doing the right thing. So I

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 9>think there were like some logistical things that are top

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 9>down as well well.

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:54.719
<v Speaker 4>I feel like at a certain point, saying you shouldn't

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 4>say that thing.

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Was like radical and wild.

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 4>Like I remember this is like an early Kanye interview

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 4>when he's talking about how like in hip hop, like

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 4>it's cool to like call people gay, and like you

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 4>see f Wort and he's like, I have a cousin

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 4>who's gay.

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 10>It's like I would really discriminate, Like I use the

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 10>word fact, fact, fact, fact, like.

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 3>Always a condescendant.

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 10>I'm my cousin told me that another one of my

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:25.119
<v Speaker 10>cousins was gay. And at that point, it's kind of

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 10>when the turning point where I was like, Yo, this

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 10>is my cousin. I love him, Like I've been discriminating

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 10>against gays. It's like do I discriminate against my cousin.

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:35.880
<v Speaker 4>And it's just like this is not at a time

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:38.159
<v Speaker 4>when people were like homophobia and hip hop is like

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 4>to be a problem. But at the time, it was

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 4>like whoa, Like this dude's radical. He's like pushing against

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 4>the green in the same way that he's like I'm

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 4>wearing a poet. Yeah.

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 6>I was going to say, it makes sense. There's a

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 6>lot of other things around him, especially at the time.

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:51.879
<v Speaker 4>But then you know, and the means, why now you

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 4>have this opposite of like Okay, if everyone thinks that

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 4>that is the acceptable thing to do, then the new

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 4>way to stand out is to be like Hitler's actually

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 4>kind of cool.

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 10>You know.

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 6>It's like, what's the I'm supposed to say this out?

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so yeah. I think it was like there was

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 9>a shift where everyone started to be like, okay, actually

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:18.159
<v Speaker 9>we wanted to do things differently. And then you have

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:21.119
<v Speaker 9>just the advent of social media, which is huge, and

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:24.159
<v Speaker 9>like that's around the time of Obama, like you know,

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 9>Obama's presidency and that all kicking in and you start

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 9>to use Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and all of these spaces

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 9>where everyone is getting like instant feedback on things. So

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:42.639
<v Speaker 9>it might be that before, like you know, you're a

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:44.400
<v Speaker 9>high school friends or whatever, you're all kind of hanging

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 9>out and everyone's saying stuff in their own little echo

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 9>chamber just together, and it's you might find out that

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 9>someone didn't think that was cool, like three days later

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 9>when like Tom told Dan told you that, like, oh yeah,

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 9>she didn't think that was cool or whatever. But now

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 9>you're instantly getting people being like, oh yeah, that's awful,

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:03.919
<v Speaker 9>and this instant feedback loop. Who Suddenly people are like

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:07.919
<v Speaker 9>really second guessing themselves and starting to just kind of

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 9>expand their perspective of like people as well. Like being

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 9>on my I was exposed to so many more people.

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:17.680
<v Speaker 9>You know, you start to really see different people's experiences

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:19.160
<v Speaker 9>and perspectives way more.

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:19.439
<v Speaker 7>So.

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:22.440
<v Speaker 9>I think that actually created this Like that was something

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:25.120
<v Speaker 9>that we found through reporting the story, through speaking to experts,

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 9>they can really pinpoint that, like twenty ten to twenty twelve,

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:31.360
<v Speaker 9>there was a real shift in terms of people being like, oh,

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:39.359
<v Speaker 9>I can't just say this stuff and it has no ramifications.

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So we're seeing how the return of slurs is

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of a response or over correction of the sensitivity

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>levels of the twenty tens, you've got the Black Eyed

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 1>peas in the NBA, You've got Obama leading the effort

0:24:56.200 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of getting the R word out of medicine. Social media

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>appears and it opens people up to these new perspectives

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and then people are kind of just revolting against this

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>after that. But the piece also talks about the Red

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Scare podcast and the effect that it probably had on

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 1>the return of slurs. Like, we in this room know

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:19.359
<v Speaker 1>what that show is, but for people who don't, can

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:21.360
<v Speaker 1>you just take us down that path a bit?

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:23.719
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, the red Scare is something that's come up with

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 9>literally anyone everyone we've spoken to about this pretty much.

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 9>I mean some people not, but like most people who

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:35.199
<v Speaker 9>are like liberal online people were like, oh, well, obviously

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 9>the red Scare.

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:38.160
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I guess I'd like to take a hard line

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:40.119
<v Speaker 8>right now and say that I think it's fine to

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 8>say retarded, and that everyone who thinks it's not fine

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:46.920
<v Speaker 8>to say retarded it's probably pretty retarded.

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:51.439
<v Speaker 9>So the Red Scare was this podcast. It's two women

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 9>who turned themselves as bohemian layabouts. They're kind of like

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 9>really capture what you would call the bag left, where

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 9>they're kind of like coming at things from a socialist

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:07.200
<v Speaker 9>perspective and really taking issue with like the centrist part

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 9>of the Democrat Party that's like these kind of really polished,

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 9>flashy people who are also like raging war in the

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 9>Middle East and stuff. So they're like, you've got these

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 9>kind of liberal coded ideals and your winning elections, but

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 9>are you actually championing rights for like working people and stuff.

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 9>So that was kind of how they built up. They

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:31.639
<v Speaker 9>started in twenty eighteen, but they really exploded in twenty

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 9>twenty during COVID, where everyone's like sitting around and also

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 9>feeling very frustrated, like you have all of these like

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 9>big political things that are bubbling up, and they're actually

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:41.119
<v Speaker 9>just like speaking about it in a very kind of

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:45.199
<v Speaker 9>like lay about like kind of refreshing way, because you know,

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 9>everyone suddenly at home and we're all laying about, you know, like,

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 9>so they're talking about things, but they were doing this

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:57.640
<v Speaker 9>kind of thing that was this like transgressive language. They

0:26:57.640 --> 0:26:59.679
<v Speaker 9>were just dropping the art word left and right and

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 9>being and openly defending it, being like, I don't need

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:05.200
<v Speaker 9>to be polished, I don't need what you think. I'm

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 9>a perfect liberal, so I wouldn't say.

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 8>This Dasha, you were making the point that retard is

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 8>a descriptive, not an invaliative. Yeahfuire, It's not like saying

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:17.679
<v Speaker 8>the N word or the F word.

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 3>It's a word that describes what it means.

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:23.919
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of people and who responded to your

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:27.679
<v Speaker 1>survey cited them as like inspiration for why they are

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:28.880
<v Speaker 1>using slurs.

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 9>Well, it's really tricky, actually, I think anyone with language,

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 9>like it's hard to identity exactly when you started using

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:37.239
<v Speaker 9>a word or how you could try to construct it.

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 9>But I think ultimately people people would just say like, oh,

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:42.919
<v Speaker 9>well remember that, like it kind of lives in the

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:45.879
<v Speaker 9>same world as that. So it was definitely like a

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 9>point that people would cite as like, oh that existed,

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 9>And that's definitely a part of my understanding of this

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:54.919
<v Speaker 9>word of it coming back. But a lot of people,

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:56.919
<v Speaker 9>like I said, we had over one hundred people in

0:27:56.920 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 9>the survey, Yeah, like it came up a lot interesting

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 9>And there was Chapo trap House as well, it's another

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 9>dirtbag left podcast, Yeah, where they would just use these

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:12.199
<v Speaker 9>words kind of being like the whole identity of a

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 9>podcast is that they're liberal, so they're using these words

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 9>as kind of like a taboo type thing, and it really,

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 9>I mean it gained traction because I think taboo can

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:25.439
<v Speaker 9>feel very refreshing sometimes true, but also just like you know,

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:27.879
<v Speaker 9>you're not meant to say it. So people are people

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:30.679
<v Speaker 9>online and stuff are just drawn to taboo. Yeah, And

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 9>I find this at like in my work where I

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:36.479
<v Speaker 9>like work at a digital media company and it's like

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 9>metrics based. You're kind of looking at how many clicks

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 9>each story is getting and what engagement each story is getting,

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:46.920
<v Speaker 9>and every single time if you have a taboo, like

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 9>I work on health, if we write a story about poop,

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 9>like the numbers.

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Are crazy, I'm clicking on that.

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 9>But it's like we did just we didn't want a

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 9>story about a marathon runo who pooped herself while she

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 9>was running and there was a fox, and like it's

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 9>still the highest red story I've ever published, which is cities.

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 9>I think that's like a aside, but like people are

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 9>really drawn to taboo and it feels like, oh, it's

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 9>something I shouldn't do.

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 1>But I'm online and it was a thrill.

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, and it's private, like this red Scare podcast is

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 9>just on it's like it's in your ears. You feel

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 9>like you're sitting with them talking and they're just saying

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 9>it to you. Yeah, it doesn't feel like it's a

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 9>big public thing.

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 4>It's like your social circles that like, you know, hopefully

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 4>people feel like they're part of our social circle.

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 3>Yes, right, yeah, so it's like your friends.

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 4>It feels like your friends are using it, so you

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 4>may be more open to using it.

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:29:40.720 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, I feel like we have learned so much. Thank

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us, Thanks for having me. Yeah,

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>thank you, and I'll see you later. All right, So

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 1>we just talked to Mia. We learned a lot about

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>why slurs have returned. Curious, like where do we where

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 1>do we go from here? Do you think they kind

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>of stick around as this kind of fad or do

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 1>they go away soon? Is this like a pendulum? Like

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 1>where do where do you guys land on this?

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 4>I think it's going to be like we're you know,

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 4>we got another Trump presidency, So I think it's going

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 4>to be I think we're going to see things continueing

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 4>swing in this direction for a bit. And I think,

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 4>like all things, it's going to get old. And I

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 4>think it's already getting pretty old quickly. But I think

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 4>it's not going to be this shock value that people

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 4>think it is right now, and then it's going to

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 4>get less interesting for people to be able to use it.

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 6>I think as much as maybe the war on wokeness

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 6>has been won for the moment, I think it'll just

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 6>take different forms, both pro and anti, and that you know,

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 6>like me, as a guy in my thirties who never

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 6>really said these words, I'm I'm not really.

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 3>Going to adopt them now.

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 6>That would seem to be it would just be kind

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 6>of strange and and you'd be flacing. I mean, it

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 6>comes off as pretty try hard and like, yeah, you're

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 6>like regardless, you're trying to just be insulting. I guess

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 6>so for me my day to day, it's not going

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 6>to change anything.

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I wonder if like some of these words, like

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 1>not like slurs, but like a word like gay, Like

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I see a lot of straight people saying things are

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 1>gay now, and I think that's probably gonna stick around

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that like the power of the word

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:31.479
<v Speaker 1>is lost. I saw Ice Spice posted this meme that

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:34.959
<v Speaker 1>had the effort on it and then like very shortly

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 1>afterwards deleted it. So I wonder if like you still

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 1>can't be like a celebrity and doing it, or you

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 1>can but people call you out. You've got to be

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 1>like a pretty specific celebrity like Andrew Tate X. Yes, right,

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, you're either like you're either queer or you

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 1>hate women. This was No such thing by Many, Noah

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and Devin. Our guest today was Mia de Groff, deputy

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 1>executive editor at Business Insider. The theme song was produced

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 1>by me Many. Please visit us at No Such Thing

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>dot Show, where you can subscribe to our newsletter for updates,

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and consider leaving us a review on Spotify, Apple Podcasts,

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to our show. Next week on

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 1>No Such.

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 4>Thing, So, we're doing a podcast about whether or not

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 4>horses love running.

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 3>Okay,