WEBVTT - EP. 34 CLIP* 50/50 in Open Relationships

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>In my last relationship, and I talked about this last

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>week too, Like I mentioned open, this is before we

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>did this? Was this before we did the recording? I

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:16.239
<v Speaker 1>feel like it was you had his email and I

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>saw he was still communicating with some bitches that I

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:21.279
<v Speaker 1>had actually forbid him. Like I would never like say

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you can't be friends with these people, but these particular

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:26.439
<v Speaker 1>two people, like they've vandalized ship, They've done dumb ship.

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>So I'm like, and once we start elevating and these

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>people are still in your life, like they see red

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>when they don't get their fucking weight. So I don't

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:36.840
<v Speaker 1>ever want that type of person around me man or woman,

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>And you should feel the same way. But he was

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>still communicating with them, So I'm like, listen, you want

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>an open relationship, Like that's how I started the conversation,

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Like do you? So, then that way you won't feel

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>like you're having a sneak. You won't have to do

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>this via email. You could just text them or call

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>them on the phone in front of me if you

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>wanted to, just as long as you know I'm on

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the same type of time. But that's not something that

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>and maybe this is, uh, this is would you say

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 1>that an open relationship, you see that more in the

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>white community as opposed to black Like, how many people,

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>how many black people beyond an open relationship? What the

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>guy and girlfriend relationship? Big big lariously. I don't know.

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>We have a ton of couples and open relationships. But

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I've met mostly white people. Yeah, mostly white people, like

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>usually weird white people. But are they still together? I

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>feel like this, this would be the um case study.

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Most of them are married, or that's what I'm saying, Like,

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I feel like relationships like that may last longer because

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>what do you have? You have nothing to hide. I

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>think with regard to that, it starts that way if

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>that any point later in the relationship you introduce it,

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>not unless you're just very open with everything else like that.

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>That was a conversation in my last relation because he

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>he was like, you know, before we break up, maybe

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 1>we should try and open relation. I'm like, no, because

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>when we first met, you were doing you and I

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>was doing me this much waiting on you, so you

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>no longer have that opportunity. I would do something like

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>that with a new person, where we set those ground

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>rules one yeah, like that, I can't I can't do

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that because you've lost that grace. And then I would

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:40.079
<v Speaker 1>say to you, as you meet new people and men especially,

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>it's like, maybe don't reveal everything, but like talk about

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that last relationship and how like this became a problem

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>and like we maybe should have started at the beginning

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and then maybe it could have seen how it went

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>versus like you literally see him still sneaking and you're like, yo,

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:55.919
<v Speaker 1>so do you want to open relationship for I can't

0:02:55.960 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>see you like yes, like what the fun? And then

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>just see his reaction too, because it's like you'll see

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 1>like he'll either he'll either get insecure and be like

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>want to protect his side, bitches, or he'll be like

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:18.359
<v Speaker 1>and not want you to do it, or he'll be like, hey,

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>all right, I got three other people I'm already talking to,

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Like go ahead, you can talk to people and then

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:26.239
<v Speaker 1>we can see where this goes. Like but not to

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:29.519
<v Speaker 1>just but like as far as like what happens long term,

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 1>it's like I haven't really been able to follow up

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>like with people that I met like online or like

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>that I talked to you that we're in open relationships.

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>But it's like oftentimes it just seems like if it

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>started that way, it's better and it has a long

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>term potential versus like whenever it gets introduced later as

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>a ditch effort to save the relationship. No, it's like

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>having a kid to save your marriage. It's like, yeah,

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>it's too your it's too gone, like you guys know,

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>because I think it's another misconception, or maybe I said

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>that before, but it's like people don't think that individuals

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>and open relationships are committed to one another. Like y'all committed,

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>y'all committed to whatever it is together, whatever it is,

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, that's that's an importance, And it just seems

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 1>like a stronger a stronger relationship as far as I'm concerned.

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:22.159
<v Speaker 1>That's the projection. That's the projection where they project in

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 1>their ego what they would think. Oh, if I'm in

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 1>that situation, then we're not committed to each other. Because

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>my version of commitment is you do exactly what the

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>funk I want you to do whenever the funk I

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>want you to do it. That's insecurity. That's ego projecting.

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>That should happen to me all the time. It literally

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>it would hurt. It would hurt my heart though, because

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 1>people would be coming at me straight up, don't even

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>know me. They're like, and then they just straight up

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>killing me, just like you are this, you are that,

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:49.919
<v Speaker 1>you need Jesus, you need this, you need that. You

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know it's this child. They're in fake ass monogamous

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>relationships where where he's sucking a bunch of business and

0:04:58.080 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>then one day you like, funk that I'm gonna go

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>a nigger, Like that's just what happens, and it's just

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>is And here's a lot to tell your stad was

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>all about it. Yeah you okay. So I was saying

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:15.359
<v Speaker 1>something earlier and she just I think I got the

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:18.600
<v Speaker 1>indicator that she disagreed. I was talking about the long

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>term thing, like if you start with it, it's good.

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 1>If you try to introduce it later, it's bad. She

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 1>had to rebuttal to that. I think. I'm just thinking

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 1>about the people that we do know, and I don't

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>think they I don't think any of them started out

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>in an open relationship, like we're the only ones I

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 1>know that have started that, But they did start with

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:44.719
<v Speaker 1>open communication and openness, so like they may not have

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 1>been actively having sets with other people, but they were

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>able to openly communicate about things that they wanted and

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>what they just anything communication wise, if you're able to

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>communicate with and be honest with your partner, then I

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's okay to introduced this idea, like, hey,

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:06.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're both always horny, maybe we should other people?

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>What do you think, you know, or whatever it might be.

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I think if you're able to openly communicate with your partner,

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>then I don't think there'd be anything wrong about bringing

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 1>up this idea. Yeah, that's probably a projection of mine too,

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 1>because based on based on my experience with having its

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 1>start and then it be you know, successful, So like

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 1>that's probably just that's that's my subjective experience. I mean,

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 1>like we were openly communicating. We weren't in an open

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:36.040
<v Speaker 1>relationship when we started dating. Was it was unspoken