WEBVTT - Mueller Investigation Targets Manafort (Audio)

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Special Investigator Robert Mueller. His investigation into possible Trump campaign

0:00:04.880 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>collusion with Russia and also into possible obstruction of justice

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>appears to be moving quickly and aggressively. Mueller's office has

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>executed an early morning no knock search warrant at former

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:19.439
<v Speaker 1>Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort's home and appears to be

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 1>digging deeply into Manaforts business dealings over many years. According

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to CNN, Mueller is looking at Manaforts business dealings go

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>back going back to two thousand and six. Meanwhile, The

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Journals reported that Mueller's office has questioned Deputy

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General Rod Rosenstein about President Trump's firing of James

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Comey as FBI director as the investigation heats up. Here

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to talk with us about it are Jeff Kramer, a

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 1>managing director at the Berkeley Research Group, and Bradley Moss,

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a partner at Mark's Aid PLC. Bradley they certainly seemed

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>to be focusing a lot in Robert Mueller's office on

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:00.959
<v Speaker 1>Paul Manafort, the former Trump campaign manage her. What does

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 1>this tell us about what Mueller is trying to do

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>as he moved the investigation forward? Absolutely so it's always

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>been kind of understood that there were two easy pieces

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:14.959
<v Speaker 1>of low hanging fruit for mueller investigation. One was Paul

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Manafort and one was Michael Flynn. Both of them had

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>legal exposure on issues that were separate from whatever may

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>or may not have happened in terms of the campaign

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and the alleged collusion. But it gave First Director Coma

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>when he was running it. Now Robert Muller as he's

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>running it and into apply pressure and price and trying

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to gain some leverage on these two senior level Trump

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>officials who would have obviously insight into what had gone

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>on during the campaign. And for Paul Manafort in particular

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>between the years of alleged issues between possible money laundry

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and reporting obligations with respect to him being a foreign

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>agent for I believe a political party in Ukraine. It

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>all just it was all too easy for Robert Muller

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to focus on him, Michael Flynn to an extent to

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>begin their potential prosecution. Jeff they picked, according to The

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>New York Times, the investigators the FBI picked the lock

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>on man of fororts home to get in, which means

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>they got a no knock warrant. What do you need

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>to convince a judge to give you a subpoena for

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>no knock warrant? Um? Yeah, I mean it's uh, it

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>is an extra hurdle. You basically have to show to

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the judge that if you didn't have the no knock warrant,

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that someone might be destroying evidence. Um, you don't see

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>it too much. You see it a lot in uh

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>in certain kind of violent crime cases, gang cases here

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>in Chicago, organized crime cases and the like. But they

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>clearly convinced a judge that if it was just a

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>regular search warrant h that evidence might be evidence might

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>be destroyed. So yeah, they picked a lock and apparently

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>woke up his wife. So it was very unusual, uh,

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Mark the Bradley rather the The Times also reported that

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>they have the prosecutor is told Manaford that they were

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>going to indict him. Um, why would they do something

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>like that? Uh? Two possibles is one. It might just

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:12.399
<v Speaker 1>be a ploy in the sense of trying to see

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 1>if they can intimidate and possibly guarantee the extent that

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>they can use that as a means of leverage to

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 1>get him to be more cooperative and to provide more information.

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Of what is arguably the more pertinent and larger target,

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>which is whatever did or did not happen during the campaign.

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>And the other part is it's a standard tactic that

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>prosecutus will often use to kind of give potential criminal

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>defendants more or less a preview um in order they're

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to get them to complete guilty and avoid the

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:43.839
<v Speaker 1>necessary expense of the whole simial trial the law. Let's

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>give them a preview of here's what we expect to

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>be able to indicte you for into prosecuting and convict

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you for. And he was what other episodes is going

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to be. It's not really given the defendense anything they

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't ultimately go anyways, because it's the entitled to it

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>in the context of the trial. So it's either one

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>of those, we don't know enough which one it is,

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>or it's a combination of both. I think time will

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>talent see where exactly the Mueller was going here and

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>what he was planning to use leverage wise. With respectrum Manaphort, Jeff.

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>That raid came a day after Manafort was interviewed by

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:17.919
<v Speaker 1>the staff members of the Senate Intelligence Committee. Could some

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>of Mueller's aggressiveness. His team's aggressiveness be the result of

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the multiple investigations in the Senate in the House that

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:30.479
<v Speaker 1>might hurt his investigation. I think there there could be

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>something to that. I mean, this is a little bit

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.720
<v Speaker 1>unique where you have an investigation, but you have several

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:38.479
<v Speaker 1>bodies also looking at this. I don't want to say,

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, mudding the waters if you will um with

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>other witnesses. So well, I'm sure Director Mueller is somewhat

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>coordinating and knows what's going on with the other piece

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:51.719
<v Speaker 1>of the investigation. It does make it a little tougher.

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you had your druthers, if you were

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a prosecutor or an investor FBI agent, you want to

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 1>keep these things clean. So that does make it does

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>make it harder. And therefore because it as a result, uh,

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Director Mueller I think is going very hard and no

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:10.159
<v Speaker 1>nonsense approach. I mean we saw that with the team

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>he has constructed, which Franks is one of the better

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>prosecutorial investigative teams going on in the country right now. Well, Brad,

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>what look at it from the other side, If you're

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 1>on the congressional side of this, one of the one

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>of the committees that's investigating. You see Mueller acting very

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>aggressively here, apparently trying to move very fast. Are you

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>more or less inclined to want to take your time

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and let Mueller give Mueller space or do you want

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 1>to get your stuff into the into hearings more quickly. Well,

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's it's competing um institutional interests and congret

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>ends are in constitutional prerogatives. I mean, obviously Congress, even

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>in their most arrogant nature, wouldn't want to interfere in

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:54.719
<v Speaker 1>getting the way of what Mr Mueller is doing. But

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, they have their own prerogatives, they

0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>have their own views on how this should be investigating,

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and what they in their respective authorities and rights as

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 1>the heads of different committees in the Senate and the House,

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>should be allowed to investigate. And we've seen there's already

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a little ruined fight possibly between Mr Mueller and the

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Senate Judiciary Committee over whether or not um to high

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:18.119
<v Speaker 1>level a FBI official to be allowed to testify before

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Senate Judiciary without the circumstances of the firing of Director Combe.

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 1>So it's this is not unheardably seen this problem in

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the past. It was most notably an issue during a

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Roan contra. We're talking with Bradley Moss of Mark Zad

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:33.919
<v Speaker 1>and Jeff Kramer of the Berkeley Research Group about the

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>investigation into possible Trump campaign collision with Russia and possible

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>instruction of justice being conducted by Special Counsel Robert Mueller

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and his team of prosecutors. The Wall Street Journal reported

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>that those investigators have spoken with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein,

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>who happens to be the official who over who appointed

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and oversees Special Investigator Mueller because Attorney General Jeff Sessions

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:02.679
<v Speaker 1>is recused from the Russia investigation. Jeff, it's a little

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>bit unusual to have investigators ask questions and you know,

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>interrogate the person who oversees their office, isn't it. Yes,

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, irony abounds on this one because as you say,

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Uhdud roses eignd appointed Mueller and now Mueller and his

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>investigators are talking to him. But you'd have to, I mean,

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>if you're if the question is was the president's firing

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>of Jim Comey related all or is it a bullet

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>point in a prosecution for obstruction of justice? You have

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to talk to the guy who wrote the memo upon

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:44.239
<v Speaker 1>which the President said he relied. So it's a logical interview.

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>It's an interview that had to happen. But it's certainly

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>uh an odd one. Uh, certainly given the situation, Brad.

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>You spoke before about Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley saying

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the Senate Council's preparing subpoenas for two FBI officials that

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the d o J is preventing from being interviewed over

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the COMI firing. How much strength do congressional subpoenas have

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>compared to those of Robert Mueller, let's say, and will

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>there be a fight over these subpoenas? Oh, they're there.

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 1>They go through a slightly different process that Congressional subpoenas

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>are different in the sense that if someone refuses to

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>comply with the congressional subpoena, then Congress has to actually

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>more or less go to the d o J to

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>enforce it and to seek criminal contempt um charges against

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the individuals who declined it. Whereas of Robert Mueller issues

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:38.719
<v Speaker 1>of subpoena, he is working out of the d J,

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:40.959
<v Speaker 1>so he he doesn't have to go to that entire

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>bureaucratic process. He can more or less circumvent it. He

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 1>is the person who would see the charges. But I

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:50.079
<v Speaker 1>think there will be a bunch way some type of

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>resolution behind the scenes, as the various inclustional UH players

0:08:57.240 --> 0:08:59.839
<v Speaker 1>kind of butt head in terms of these various UH

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>is the information we're going to copy fire? I think

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>right now just a lot of political posture. Well, Jeff,

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the things though, I mean you mentioned irony.

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a bit confusing sometimes when you have a

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of you know, you have senated how's committees working,

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you have the Attorney General confused recused, you have the

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Deputy Attorney General appointing a special prosecutor. They're all racing

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>against each other to some degree to get information. And

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 1>if in fact, you know, how is it, you know,

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>how is it that somebody like Rosenstein ends up being

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a witness in this but isn't recused himself from the investigation,

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and then all would happen. Yeah, he might have to be.

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>And there's a lot of ways this plays out, And

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:41.839
<v Speaker 1>as you indicated, Uh, there's a lot of a lot

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>of cooks in this kitchen. If it does get to

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the point where this is a couple of steps on

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:49.679
<v Speaker 1>the line, Roseneside could be a witness and if they

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>think there's obstruction and legal minds different whether or not

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that charge can be brought against the sitting president. But

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>let's put that to the side for a second. Um,

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 1>roses I would have to presumably recuse him self from

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>technically overseeing h. Mueller's investigation. Uh. And then we go

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to the third person. Uh, and she's been in d

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>O J for a long period of time. But there

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>would have to be someone else appointed other than the

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:17.199
<v Speaker 1>a G and the Deputy Attorney General. Uh. So that's

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, they say that's a few steps down the line, um,

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>but you know it's not out of the realm of possibility.

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>If again, charges can indeed be brought by the president

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>in the first instance, Brad, this very in aggressive investigation

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 1>of Mueller's almost scorched earth tactics in some instances. Are

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:40.439
<v Speaker 1>there any downsides to this? Well, yes and no. I

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 1>mean the concern of going this hardness fast is that

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:46.439
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be an accusation in the post of

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the media by certain parties that he's on a mission

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>to find and purge traps and is not a mission

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>to find someone the prosion to justify his missing. On

0:10:57.320 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, the part of the reason he is

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>it's like you're probably going this hard, this fast, because

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the longer drags out, the longer he faces the problem

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stars face during the Clinton years, which

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>is the investors just kept going and kept going and

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>kept going, and it became a political of atross and

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>its own right, and it seems like he was just

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna go forever. I don't think that's what Robert Mueller's

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to do. I think He's trying to get to

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>whatever the underlying facts are, what the prosecutions need to

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 1>be brought to bring and that's the end of it.

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:28.839
<v Speaker 1>He wants to end it. So, Jeff, I mean, it's

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>probably impossible to figure out a timeline, but you know,

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:35.439
<v Speaker 1>in about forty five seconds, do does it look like

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Mueller might be moving towards indictments based on what we're

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>hearing now, I think you'd have to say yes. And

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I agree with the statement that was just has just made.

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.199
<v Speaker 1>Mueller has a reputation as being no nonsense. He's going

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:48.679
<v Speaker 1>to go forward. It's either there or it's not. And

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's not to come full circle he is

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>going to the low hanging fruit with Manafort um, and

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I think those charges are probably going to be brought.

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty straightforward. If he made a certain amount of

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:02.319
<v Speaker 1>money overseas and didn't declare that, or worked with certain

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:05.679
<v Speaker 1>groups and didn't declare that, that's a viable charge independent

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 1>of anything going on in the White House. So I

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 1>think we are looking at charges relatively soon against Mr Manafort. Well,

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>our thanks to Brad Bradley Moss at Mark's Aid PLC

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:18.439
<v Speaker 1>and Jeff Kramer, Managing director at the Berkeley Research Group,

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:21.320
<v Speaker 1>for being on Bloomberg Laud Day to talk about Robert

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Mueller's investigation into possible obstruction of justice and possible Trump

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>campaign collusion and who knows what else. Uh, We're gonna

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>be following this story obviously, and I'm sure it's not

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the last time in Bloomberg Law we're going to be

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about it.