WEBVTT - Oracle Shares Surge Most Since 1992 on Cloud Contract Wins

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Applecarclay, and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:23.080
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Investors are partying like it's nineteen ninety nine. Investors an Oracle,

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 2>that is. And that's because the last time the stock

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:33.199
<v Speaker 2>rally this much was nineteen ninety nine. Stocks up. As

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 2>John just said, nearly. You weren't even a line back then,

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 2>the two of you.

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 3>Oh go on, we remember the dot com bubble days.

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 2>So I want to bring in Annie Rograna, now Bloomberg

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:46.880
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence technology analyst. He was around in nineteen ninety nine,

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:50.919
<v Speaker 2>coming to us from our Chicago bureau. Okay, so we

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 2>know that you know it was a blowout quarter AI

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 2>just driving things there. But I want to talk a

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 2>little bit about traditional software, which is what this company

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 2>is all about, the fact that that's not really working

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 2>at Oracle. But it doesn't seem like investors care today.

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 4>On rug Yeah, so your Oracle is a very unique

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 4>company because it has your traditional software, but also a

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 4>few years ago it started a cloud business called Oracle

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 4>Cloud Infrastructure, something very similar to what Aws tees or

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 4>Microsoft Azure. And one of the advantages it has is

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:24.680
<v Speaker 4>it just rents out it's you know, servers for people

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 4>to go out and train their AI models or you know,

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:30.400
<v Speaker 4>run their applications on it. So this is really a

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 4>new business for them, you know, it just came up

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:35.040
<v Speaker 4>the last few years, and that's where the biggest growth

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 4>is and that's what's driving the stock.

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 3>That's what's driving the stock, and that's probably where Oracle

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 3>is driving its spending as well. What's happening with the

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 3>rest of the company, it's operations, its software business. Is

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 3>it still cutting costs for instance, and reducing headcount?

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think you're absolutely right about it. So the

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 4>advantage Oracle has compared to let's say a company like

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 4>core v for Nebus, is that it has a very

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 4>high margin database business and very high margin application business.

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 4>These businesses have gross margins, you know, let's say, north

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 4>of ninety percent. Now when you marry that with a

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 4>massive AI infrastructure business where you need to spend a

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:16.920
<v Speaker 4>lot of money, that's problematic for somebody that doesn't have that.

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 4>But Oracle has that luxury that it can spend billions

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 4>of dollars. You know, before yesterday we were thinking they're

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 4>going to spend you know, somewhere in the low thirty

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:29.080
<v Speaker 4>billion range, which was already higher than what they had guided.

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 4>And you know, even the street was expecting. They came

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 4>out and said they're going to spend over thirty five

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 4>billion and you know the next financial year. So that's

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 4>a lot of money going into expanding data center, buying

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 4>chips by you know, creating a new infrastructure to fulfill

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 4>this demand.

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Now, also we should note that a number of analysts

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 2>are raising the price target on Oracle. TD Cowan caught

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 2>my eye, raising the target to three hundred and seventy

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:56.359
<v Speaker 2>five dollars from three hundred and twenty five dollars a share.

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 2>But when you look at the competition here, Microsoft, Amazon,

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 2>on Alphabet, what does Oracle or how does Oracle differentiate

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 2>itself not only for the customer the client, but for investors.

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And one of the things I would say is

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 4>everybody is having a good time in this particular party.

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:16.919
<v Speaker 5>It's not just you know, one company that's gaining it.

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 4>It's just the size of their business is far smaller

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 4>than it is for let's say AWS or Microsoft. You know,

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 4>in the last financial year, the revenue was you know,

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 4>roughly about ten billion or so. Aws's rund rate is

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and twenty five billion. Microsoft's business is seventy

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 4>five billion. Google's business is fifty billion. So you know, please,

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, you've got to take that with the context

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 4>of how big Oracle's cloud infrastructure is compared to some

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 4>of the bigger vendors.

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 3>Out there, you know, honorog it feels like Oracle kind

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 3>of came from out of nowhere with its you know,

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 3>contributions to the AI space and being such a big player. Certainly,

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 3>the bookings of almost half a trillion dollars caught my

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 3>eye on It's more than four times what it was

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 3>the same time last year. Are there any other kind

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 3>of dark horses out there that you would be keeping

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 3>your eye on that could be the next Oracle, which

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 3>is already feels like it's the next in VideA.

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think one of the things you have to

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 4>think about it is it's not easy to come up

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 4>with this structure or a business like this, because you

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:17.359
<v Speaker 4>need billions of dollars to create a data center or

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:20.039
<v Speaker 4>to lease out a data center then buy equipment like

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 4>in Vidia chips and computing equipment. There are a handful

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 4>of companies like you know, Core beav of Nebus, which

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 4>are smaller neo cloud players that specialize in renting and

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:34.279
<v Speaker 4>VideA GPUs to customers. Now, the bigger vendors have the

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 4>capital that they are also expanding it. But again, as

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 4>I said, given the size of the increment that they

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 4>are seeing, you know, you're not getting that same growth rate.

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 2>Do you think there's a little over exuberance though in

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 2>the market today with Oracle stock up nearly forty percent,

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 2>especially with so much talk about whether or not we

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 2>are in an AI bubble and what happens if it

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 2>starts to deflate.

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 4>See, one of the things you have to remember is

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 4>for Oracle, at least they have this backlock of autos

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 4>coming in and it's coming you know. For example, one

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 4>of the biggest customers right now is OPENINGI If Opening

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 4>Eye continues to expand revenue at a good pace over

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 4>the next several years, they are going to be spending

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 4>a lot of money to train their models in order

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 4>to stay ahead.

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 5>So I think there is a lot of relationship over there.

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 4>If let's say you and I don't use chat GPT

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 4>as much, that would have an impact on opening Ay's revenue.

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 4>That would have impact downstream revenue on all the other players,

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, whether that's in video oticle.

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 5>But frankly speaking, we are not there yet, you know.

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking at the mag seven members and how they're

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 3>performing today. In video is up almost five percent, Amazon

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 3>down one point nine percent, Alphabet which is the parent

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 3>of Google up marginally up one point zero point one percent,

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 3>and Microsoft getting six tens of one percent.

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 6>It doesn't feel like this is a situation.

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 3>Where it's a zero sum game Oracle wins and Microsoft,

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 3>Google and Amazon lose, or is it no?

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 4>So there are a few companies that fall into this pocket,

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:03.559
<v Speaker 4>you know, and those include Amazon Web Services, Microsoft.

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 5>Google Cloud Code, viv Oracle.

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 4>And Mhibius for example. So these are the ones that

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:11.160
<v Speaker 4>are seeing extra spending right now. But when you look

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 4>at on the application side, you know, whether that salesforce

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 4>or workday, those guys are not seeing that benefit because

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 4>they're not in that infrastructure game. So there's a huge

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 4>difference between the two vendors, or between the two category

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 4>of vendors, right now we are more in the built

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 4>phase of AI, not the implementation phase of AI.

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's hard to believe, Scarlet, but this stock

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 2>and is now worth more than has a larger market

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:40.679
<v Speaker 2>cap than Walmart, Eli, Lilly, JP, Morgan Chase.

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:43.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that is pretty remarkable. And again it feels like

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 3>it kind of came from out of nowhere.

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 2>You're right on that very recently, which is why I

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 2>brought up you know, Amazon, Microsoft, right on your rog

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the fact that those were the names we

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:53.919
<v Speaker 2>were really talking about when it came to AI, and

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 2>then sort of Oracle comes out of out of the blue.

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:00.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but that's the whole point. This particular infrastructure. If

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 4>you're going to run large models, it's very unlikely you

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 4>can do it in house. I mean, you can do it,

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 4>but you require a lot of investment going in. You're

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 4>better off renting out data center capacity or computing capacity

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 4>from one of the cloud vendors. And Oracle has the

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 4>money to spend it, and they have the relationship with

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 4>Nvidia to get those GPUs, And on top of that,

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 4>they're offering this to customers and saying here's my equipment,

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 4>come and test it out the way you like it. Amazon,

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 4>on the other hand, for example, sells it as a

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 4>package and that's where you're not. You're seeing some distinction

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 4>and also the size. As I mentioned before.

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 6>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:48.239
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple Coarclay, and Android

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:07:56.000 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 6>We're keeping an eye on Novo Nordisk, the drug maker.

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 3>Remember they are the company behind Ozembic and Mogovi has

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 3>decided to cut nine thousand jobs and also cut its

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 3>profit forecasts as well.

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 6>So let's bring in Sam Fazzelli.

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 3>He is Bloomberg Intelligence, Director of Research for Global Industries

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 3>and Senior Pharmaceuticals, our go to guy for all things

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 3>on global drug makers, and Sam for Novo Nordisk. This

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 3>is part of a broader restructuring that the new CEO

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 3>is undertaking. Can you tell us a little bit more

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 3>about the changes taking place?

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah? Sure, and very nice to see you again. All.

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 7>So, the story here is that this is not the

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 7>first time they've lowered guidance for the year. I mean

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 7>this time there's an impact on the EPs front from

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 7>obviously the cost of restructuring, assuming they can get it

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 7>all done this year, but it's a pretty chunky one

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 7>nine thousand people, about eleven percent of the workforce, and

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 7>a lot of that coming from Denmark. If you read

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 7>the essence of the press release that they put at

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 7>there's a couple of things that they bring out.

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 5>They want to invest more on R and D.

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 7>Well, what I think this is telling you is that

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 7>the growth that they have planned for the next five years,

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 7>they may be thinking maybe that won't come as test

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 7>as we were expecting it because of competition from Lily,

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 7>compounders and other products potentially coming to market to the

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 7>pace that they were hoping. So if you want to

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 7>keep investing in R and D, you need to liberate

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 7>some cash. And also it looks like that they're also

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 7>thinking about changing the way that they're doing their marketing

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 7>because of the different channels that they're getting involved with

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 7>direct to consumer. That is not something that FORUMA has

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 7>done very often before. In fact, only Lily had done

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 7>it prior to this, also for obesity drugs. So maybe

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 7>the costs of that are different, and there's an element

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:37.319
<v Speaker 7>that that they've referred to in there, which is a

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:44.439
<v Speaker 7>culture of performance related reward, and you think to yourself, well,

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 7>what was it before? So it seems like that they

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 7>want to make it much harder. Focus on you've got

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 7>to deliver because we need the growth. So that's the

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:55.079
<v Speaker 7>interesting wle to watch, you.

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Know, Sam, I think to a lot of casual investors

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 2>who don't deep dive into you know, Novo Nordisk the

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 2>way you might say, would look at this and say, listen,

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:06.559
<v Speaker 2>they have the most popular weight loss drugs, right, will

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.959
<v Speaker 2>go vi o Zembek. Why is this company having these

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 2>problems when you drill down or is it just a

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 2>problem with having to scale too quickly? Is it that

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 2>the company isn't nimble enough to sort of change with

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 2>the times.

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 7>Well, Novodordis has been a poster child of how you

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 7>grow from a small company selling to a relatively basic

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 7>set of products twenty thirty years ago to one that's

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 7>become essentially one of the innovators in the space. They

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 7>brought the first jil we want to market, so we

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 7>can't hold them for that. It's just that I think

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 7>this growth that they had to go through where the

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 7>planning was done, you know a lot of I mean,

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 7>we have one hundred billion dollar market potential for or

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 7>obesity as a whole, right, so it's just difficult, I think,

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 7>to judge into this space. And maybe the previous CEO

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 7>had looked and said, I'm pretty sure we're going to

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 7>be fifty percent of that market. We need to plan

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 7>for that growth. And then two things changed. Competition from

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 7>really is superintense. They have what I would call it

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 7>a better drug in terms of the efficacy profile that's

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 7>been shown in head to A trials. And then of

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 7>course you've got on top of that, compounders that don't

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 7>seem to be don't seem to be going away. They

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 7>keep taking cheaper generics or generics manufactured. They'll try and

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 7>making the drugs. So that's where I think the new

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 7>Area issue is in that we all expected the FDA

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:32.959
<v Speaker 7>to really clamp hard down on that and they haven't

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 7>made issues, you know, statements, but they're allowing them. They

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 7>even found areas outside the US where these compound compounders

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:42.439
<v Speaker 7>can get their.

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:46.080
<v Speaker 5>Drugs from, which is counterintuitive. So those are the issues.

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:50.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So it feels like NOVA Nordics gave up its

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 3>first mover advantage, but has it lost its lead completely

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 3>in the US obsity market to Elila Lee permanently or

0:11:56.960 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 3>is this still very much a wide open contest.

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 7>No, I mean we have I can't remember what the

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 7>latest number is in terms of what percentage of people

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 7>who would benefit for these from these drugs who should

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 7>be able to get them around it. But it's not

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 7>in the big percentages. I'm pretty sure it's in the

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 7>single digit percentages. So there's a lot of room to

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 7>play for. I think our estimate, and I hope I'm

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 7>not completely off on this, was about one hundred and

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 7>eighty nine million people could be in these drugs by

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 7>twenty thirty. That's enormous. There's lots of other people coming

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 7>with orals with other things. It's not a matter of

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:34.199
<v Speaker 7>having lost the lead. Yes, really surprised. Within slightly different mechanism,

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 7>it's still the same but with a better drug. There's

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 7>still room for innovation here, which is what the company's saying.

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 7>We need to save to keep investing in that innovation.

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 7>So that's the area I think that they're highly focused on.

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 3>That Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 3>after this.

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:01.559
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern Apple Coarclay and Android Auto

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 2>It's a tough day for investors and Synopsis or the

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 2>chip design software provider missed Wall Street's estimates, hurt by

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 2>weakness and its design IP business. I want to bring

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 2>in naraje Ptel, now Bloomberg Intelligence senior software analyst, for

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 2>more on this. So give us the larger story behind

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 2>this disappointment. I think is an easy word to use

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:33.199
<v Speaker 2>for this. I mean, I don't know. I feel like contostors.

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah right, all right, Narage, what's your take?

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, this is a major shock to the investor community,

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 8>and I think you see it in the stock price.

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 8>Specifically the company's design IP business that's about thirty percent

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 8>of sales. It has been growing fifteen percent annually and

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 8>their leader in a subcategory called interface IP. This business

0:13:57.160 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 8>now is going flat. It was tracking to fifteen percent

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:04.319
<v Speaker 8>growth as of two Q and the remaining two quarters

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 8>are big shock. This quarter was down nine percent. Next

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 8>quarter it's going to be down some more. And this

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 8>catalyst came out of the blue, I would say for

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 8>a lot of the investor community because design IP has

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 8>a lot of tailwinds related to AI complex chip design

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 8>as well as all this advanced architecture that the semiconductor

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 8>design companies like in video, Broadcom, Intel are pursuing.

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 3>So can we blame or can the company blame factors

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 3>beyond its control and here and referring of course to

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 3>trade war tariffs for that or is this something that

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 3>Synopsis just wasn't prepared for.

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, there's a lot of interesting points there, Scarlett, and

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 8>I think when we're looking at trade war, yes, a

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 8>little bit of an issue. And the China Eda band

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 8>that initiated end of May that lasted about six weeks,

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 8>that was introduced by the Bureau of Industry and Security

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 8>in the US. But their major peer cadence and competitor,

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 8>which is second in market share, they reported several weeks

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 8>ago they had the same macro issues and they actually

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 8>tuned up their guidance. So this may be a little

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 8>more company specific than macro factors. And I think what's

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 8>hinting us that they made big investments to catch up

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 8>Intel foundry relative to some of the other competing founderies

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 8>with their IP and this hasn't returned any type of

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 8>scale on the revenue side for them, and this reality

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 8>really hit them this quarter and for the next several quarters.

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 2>So did the CEO Gazi say anything on that post

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 2>earnings call to give investors a little light at the

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 2>end of the tunnel here an indication of how they're

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 2>going to turn things around at Synopsis.

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think it was a little marky in terms

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 8>of the numbers to make a deal with Ansis that

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 8>was about thirty five million dollars in mid July. This

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 8>should have added about six hundred million in total revenue,

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 8>So the numbers didn't add up to their guidance of

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 8>seven billion. So a little light in terms of adding

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 8>this acquisition that closed. So that's going to be a

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 8>little bit of a digestion period, we think, and it's

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 8>going to take several quarters for the investor community to

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 8>settle in. And I think, you know, we're facing this

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 8>issue where they have a lot of AI related tailwinds.

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 8>You're building more complicated chips, you're using a lot more

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 8>interface IP for these chips, and they're the market leader

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 8>in this market, so things aren't adding up. I guess

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 8>when we look at, you know, the story and the

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 8>narrative that they've communicated over the last several quarters, the

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 8>AI story that we're hearing from Nvidia and Broadcom, and

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 8>some of the investments that are occurring across the ecosystem.

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 3>So very quickly here is there any bright Is there

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 3>any good news in this reported anything to hang your

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 3>hat on if you are a long term investor and

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 3>you don't want to give up yet.

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:09.400
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think this space is an oligopoly Cadence and Synopsis.

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 8>There's no new entrants, competitive pricesure pressure is very low,

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 8>there's no substitute for technology. You have to use their

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 8>tools to design chips, and the more advanced the chips get,

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 8>the more features you introduce. You introduce a lot of

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 8>verification and sign off steps to make sure all the

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 8>electrical characteristics are working. You're not generating too much heat.

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 8>You have mechanical structures, so you have to use their IP.

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 8>You have to use their EDA Electronic Design Automation tools.

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 8>They're thirty five percent share. Cadence is at thirty two

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:46.360
<v Speaker 8>percent share, and you have Siemen said about sixteen percent.

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 8>So you don't have a lot of alternatives here, and

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:52.880
<v Speaker 8>once you build on any of these platforms, it's very

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 8>hard to switch because your engineers are used to the

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:59.159
<v Speaker 8>type of data and the type of tool sets and

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 8>the type of bugs that they produce and go through

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:01.880
<v Speaker 8>their workflow.

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:05.200
<v Speaker 6>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:12.640
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am.

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:14.439
<v Speaker 6>He's done on.

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Apple, Coarclay, and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:24.919
<v Speaker 2>I am taking a look at Chewy right now, the

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 2>online pets supply retailer, taking it on the chin today.

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Profit falling in its fiscal second quarter, and that's despite

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 2>an uptick in sales. The company did add more customers

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 2>last quarter. Let's break this down though, with Diana rosserro

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Penya Bloomberg Intelligence as consumer staples analyst. So, Diana tell me,

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean this looks like a mixed quarterly report from Chewy.

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 2>What has gotten investors so hot and bothered here?

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 9>Yes, I think what investors were trying to see in

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 9>this report was that there was an inflection point in

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 9>the industry, and I don't necessarily think that they have

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:06.120
<v Speaker 9>founded in this report.

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Sales was higher than.

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 9>The company the investors expected, but margin guidance ebidult guidance

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:18.959
<v Speaker 9>was kept and that was, you know, a little bit

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 9>of any you know, bad news for the company and

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 9>the industry as at a whole.

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Talk to me about innovating in this industry, because I

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 2>would think that if you just stop innovating, that's when

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:33.679
<v Speaker 2>you start to have the problems. Is that starting to

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 2>happen with Chewi. I mean, it is a leader in

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 2>this space, but does it need to still be one

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 2>step ahead of the curve and innovate here?

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:43.959
<v Speaker 9>Well, yes, and I think that is one of the

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:47.640
<v Speaker 9>things that they were trying to communicate during their earnings call.

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 9>They are actually investing and that is going to probably

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 9>offset some margin momentum going forward at least the second

0:19:56.040 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 9>half of the year. They have led of offices now in

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:03.640
<v Speaker 9>four states.

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:05.640
<v Speaker 2>I've seen that, Yes, exactly.

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 9>They actually launched Chewy Plus, which is a membership program

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 9>and apparently has been very successful. And also they have

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 9>launched private brands with get Real, which is a fresh

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:22.680
<v Speaker 9>frozen dog food brand.

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 2>So the company also added a pretty decent amount of

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 2>active customers, right one hundred and fifty thousand on a

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:33.160
<v Speaker 2>sequential basis. So now it's total customer base is nearly

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 2>twenty one million. How much more room is there do

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:40.360
<v Speaker 2>you think to grow because we know people will spend

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 2>big on their pets.

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 9>Yes, and what we're seeing is probably gonna see a

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 9>greater contribution on the pricing side compared to the customer base.

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 9>And that again, that's another reason. While they did show

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 9>positive momentum on customer base, it was still you know,

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 9>in the mid single sit digits, which is not necessarily

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:07.399
<v Speaker 9>significant growth or growth that they had seen before. So

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 9>you know, we still see an equal contribution for the

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 9>customer base, but it's not necessarily as impressive as he

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 9>was years before.

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious if they talked at all on the post

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 2>earnings call about tariffs and how that might be impacting.

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 2>I would imagine a number of their products are coming

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:28.439
<v Speaker 2>from overseas, China in particular, when you're talking about some

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 2>of these pet toys as well.

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 9>Yes, and they did not quantify the hit that it

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:37.439
<v Speaker 9>was going to be on because of Good Soul, but

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:41.400
<v Speaker 9>they have mentioned that private label. Their private brands are

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 9>significantly affected by tariffs, and that is one of the

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:49.439
<v Speaker 9>reasons they probably help margin guidance for the year because

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 9>they they said that they're going to invest in pricing

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 9>and be more competitive.

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Who does Chewi see as their biggest competitor, I would.

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 9>Say Amazon, and also and mortar retailers like pat Smart

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:03.359
<v Speaker 9>and Petco And.

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 2>So what about the horizon? I mean, I don't know

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 2>how far they went out, but what are projected projections?

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 2>What kind of guidance are they offering investors?

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:17.360
<v Speaker 9>So they only have noted the annual guidance. They don't

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 9>necessarily want to speculate on other things. But you know,

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:25.719
<v Speaker 9>they they still think that there's a lot of momentum

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 9>in the industry, and I think investors are not necessarily

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 9>that they do not agree on the long term potential,

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:35.360
<v Speaker 9>but they're more worried about what the six months are

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 9>going to bring. The next six months.

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and in terms of profit, what what was the

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 2>pressure on profit? They said it was tied to share

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 2>based compensation. There were also some related tax issues. Can

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 2>you just tell us a little bit more about that?

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 9>Yes, that was another thing, and you know what they

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 9>mentioned there was, I mean, margins grew and you know

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:02.880
<v Speaker 9>it was it was gross margin was up ninety basis

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:05.919
<v Speaker 9>points year every year. But they mentioned that that was

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 9>going to be the high point of the manage expectation exactly.

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 9>And that is why what the you know, the investor

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 9>community was was phoning in.

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:23:29.400 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal