WEBVTT - OpenAI Targets Banking, Warner Bros. Considers Sales Options

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is a

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:16.439
<v Speaker 1>live from Coast to Coast with Caroline Hide in New

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:20.240
<v Speaker 1>York and Edla Low in San Francisco.

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 3>Open ai is working on financial models that could one

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 3>day replace the grunt works of junior bankers. Plus, President

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 3>Trump announces a rare Earth's deal with Australia to counter

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 3>China's dominance, and Warner Brothers Discovery says it has expanded

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:43.480
<v Speaker 3>a strategic review of the business to maximize shareholder value.

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 2>And that's where we started.

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 3>It was the breaking news of the morning that move

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 3>markets Warner Brothers Discovery off session highs up nine percent.

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 3>They are looking at a range of strategic options, including

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 3>moving forward with the existing plan to split the business

0:00:56.360 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 3>into cable TV and then studios and streaming option spin offs,

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:03.959
<v Speaker 3>selling some all of it. We will get a lot

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 3>more on this story later in the program. It is

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 3>the big move of the day. Another top story that

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 3>we are watching. Open ai is building out financial models

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 3>that could one day replace the grunt work of junior

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 3>bankers across the banking sector, with the help of a

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 3>secretive project inside the startup. Let's get to Bloomberg's chief

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 3>Wall Street correspondent Strida Nadaranjan. This is based on a

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 3>document the Bloomberg's scene on Project Mercury and conversation with sources.

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 3>What is project Mercury? What is it the open AI

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 3>is working on here?

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Good question ed.

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:40.679
<v Speaker 4>According to our reporters in Dubai spoke to sources, a

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 4>open AI got their hands on some document and the

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 4>so called Project Mercury is effectively open AI hiring ex

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 4>investment bankers as contractors, people who can help with the

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 4>modeling to us who can help the AI with training

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 4>it on how to write prompts, how to execute models,

0:01:56.960 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 4>and how to make sure that they could get into

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 4>a position where they can do some of the tasks

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 4>that are currently performed by associates and analysts on live

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 4>deals such as financial modeling. Their work on PowerPoint presentations

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 4>and Excel is something that takes up most of the

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:15.079
<v Speaker 4>work hours for a lot of these junior bankers. It's

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 4>a lot of repetitive tasks. It's a lot of simple

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 4>task and there is very little strategic work there and

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 4>perhaps not even a whole lot of analytical work there.

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 4>So if you could use technology to replace some of that.

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:29.360
<v Speaker 4>The hope is that you could free up some of

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 4>these junior bankers to do some of the bigger picture stuff.

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 4>So it will need an evolution of their skill set,

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 4>but also could put them into better use that would

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:42.519
<v Speaker 4>not leave them jaded early in their career.

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Srere.

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.639
<v Speaker 3>I know the team over at Liquidity are probably watching

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 3>the show right now, worried about their audience as well.

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 3>This is the origin of the please fix meme, right

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 3>This is investment bankers, junior analysts who spend eighty or

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 3>one hundred hours a week working in x sell on

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 3>these types of tasks. You cover Wall Street inside and out.

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 3>You know these people just explain earlier at the top

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 3>of the show, I say grunt work. Go deep into

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:12.519
<v Speaker 3>the grunt work that open AI wants to displace with

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 3>custom financial models.

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you have to think about when you're working

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:19.079
<v Speaker 4>in a live deal, what really are the requirements if

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 4>you are dealing with the client, you want to come

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:26.679
<v Speaker 4>up with material with presentations, whether it is suggesting potential transactions,

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 4>coming up with valuation models. Industry comps looking at the

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 4>overall landscape out there that is effectively a lot of

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 4>open source research that needs to be done. That is

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 4>using a lot of your Excel skills and making sure

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 4>that you can do the modeling. That is inputting numbers

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 4>again and again, replacing numbers, putting in new estimates, and

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 4>coming up with figures that could outline various scenarios for

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 4>your clients. That is stuff that you could argue that

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 4>technology can do, can replace you in doing that, and

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 4>can do it better. And that's where the real promise

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 4>here comes. But also remember, and this is something where

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 4>you spoke about liquidity, but anyone who's followed this space

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 4>for long knows that when you talk about junior banker

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 4>workers about those eighty two hundred dollars work weeks, often

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 4>that figure is magnified because bankers, once they finished their work,

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:22.720
<v Speaker 4>are waiting for hours on end, waiting for feedback from

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 4>their managers, who then come back with immediate responses and

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 4>fixes that you need to do, and there is a revision,

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 4>and you follow that cycle repeatedly till your manager is satisfied.

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:34.920
<v Speaker 4>So perhaps what you also need is an AI solution

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 4>that can take care of that manager who will stop

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 4>focusing on those very little, small font level changes and allow.

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 2>You to focus on big picture stuff.

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 3>An Open AI spokesperson said the company employs a range

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 3>of experts to work generally or models that didn't really

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 3>address our reporting specifically. Bloomberg Street, Madarajan, thank you very much.

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 3>In other news, President Trump announced a rare earth steal

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 3>with yesterday I aimed at countering China's dominance in the

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 3>supply chain for critical metals. The move comes ahead of

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 3>expected trade talks between the US and China, with the

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:12.799
<v Speaker 3>President expressing optimism about reaching a fair deal.

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 5>I expect we'll probably work out a very fair deal

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 5>with President Jiev China, so most of you will be

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 5>with us. It's going to be very exciting, and I

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 5>think we're going to work out something that's good for

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 5>both countries.

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:31.559
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Senior Tech editor Mike Sheppard joins us from DC

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:34.359
<v Speaker 3>A fair deal go into what a fair deal is

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 3>to the best of our knowledge and our reporting, and

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 3>what happens next.

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 6>Well, the fair deal will be in the eye of

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 6>the beholder, and the number one beholder here, of course,

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.039
<v Speaker 6>is President Donald Trump. And it's important to note that

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 6>during that same conversation yesterday with reporters, he reiterated his

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 6>threat of triple digit tariffs against Chinese goods if Beijing

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:56.720
<v Speaker 6>did not come with a satisfactory offer in his eyes.

0:05:56.880 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 6>And we have seen the President and his advisors in

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 6>recent days lay out some of their key points and

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 6>key sticking points in the negotiations. Of course, first and

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:09.839
<v Speaker 6>foremost is rare earth. It is something that has dominated

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 6>the conversation for the past two weeks since China imposed

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 6>export controls on these minerals that are so crucial to

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 6>various points in the supply chains for autos, for consumer technology,

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 6>and even defense materiel. Now ed what we're watching also, though,

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 6>is pressure in other areas. Yesterday we saw Jamison Greer,

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 6>the US Trade representative, take aim at another area where

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 6>China has tried to exert its influence over the supply chain,

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 6>an area where it has an advantage, and that is shipping.

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:42.919
<v Speaker 6>And he warned that sanctions against US units of a

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 6>South Korean company were are counter to these kinds of conversations.

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 3>The deal with Australia is being interpreted in DC at

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 3>least as kind of a counter move to what China

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:54.799
<v Speaker 3>has been doing.

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 2>What's our reporting on.

0:06:55.960 --> 0:07:00.159
<v Speaker 6>That, well, it very much is a countermove. The the

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:02.919
<v Speaker 6>Trump administration is trying. This is the latest in a

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 6>series of steps to try to break China's grip on

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 6>the rare earth's market and reduce US dependence on China

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 6>as a source of critical minerals. Now, this is a

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 6>long term play, and the US has tried to put investments.

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 6>It has already had three government moves to invest in

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 6>companies that specialize in rare earths. We saw one just

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 6>a few weeks ago when Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 6>visited Washington and met with President Donald Trump the US,

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 6>and that's a ten percent stake in a Canadian miner

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 6>called Trilogy, and also the opening of a road. But

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 6>this is a longer term play.

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 2>It will take a while.

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 6>Australia, though, is promising what it says is a faster

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 6>pipeline to these rare earth elements. It says that it

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 6>can provide thirty to forty out of the fifty critical

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 6>minerals that the US has identified as being needed most.

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 6>And it likes to refer to itself as the world's

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 6>periodic table and has all that expertise in mining. How

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 6>quickly can be brought to beer and whether this functions,

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 6>there's some sort of pressure in the trade negotiations between

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 6>US Treasury Secretary Scott Besson and his Chinese counterpart later

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 6>this week. Remains to be seen, but it is certainly

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 6>something that the President will try to bring to his

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 6>conversation with Shijimping, expected to take place next week.

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 3>Bloemberg's Mike Shepard, thank you very much. Let's bring in

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 3>Rob Funnels, senior portfolio manager at Tortoise Capital, who argues

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 3>the US needs to develop its rare f supply chain

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 3>in the same way that it refall.

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Energy supply chains.

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 3>Tortoise Capital has approximately nine billion dollars in assets under management,

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 3>the focus energy and power infrastructure. So to start, Rob,

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 3>your reaction to the deal that the President did with

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 3>Australia on rare earths and what it signals to you

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 3>more broadly about what they'll do in supply chain.

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, Well, as you highlighted, so the supply chain is

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 7>really important. You need more rare earth minerals to come

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 7>to the US for consumer electronics and really just the

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 7>evolution of everything including AI, and so the rarer supply

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:02.199
<v Speaker 7>chain needs to really develop, kind of like the energy

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 7>supply chain is evolved. And if you think about the

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 7>energy supply chain in the US. The US is the

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:09.439
<v Speaker 7>largest energy producer in the world. AI is going to

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 7>need a lot of electricity. The US has a lot

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 7>of natural gas, and so that's a benefit, and that

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 7>allows the US to maintain its AI dominates because of

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 7>the natural gas and the ability to produce low cost

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 7>electricity in the US. And that's just because of the

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 7>supply chain for in the energy sector is very well developed.

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 7>So where Earth needs to follow a similar fashion.

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 3>A big story on the Bloomberg Terminal today written by

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 3>McCall calligue Common Rhinikey is titled AI Boom transforms utilities

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 3>from haven to storing growth stocks, and we're looking at

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 3>the idea that the utility sectors up more than forty percent,

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 3>third best performing group in the s and P.

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Five hundred.

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 3>This is, to an extent, your wheelhouse. You are trying

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 3>to participate in what's happening in AI broadly through energy,

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 3>infrastructure and production. When you make of that reporting, Rob.

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 7>I think it's very I think there's a lot of

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 7>room to run if you just think about all these

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:05.599
<v Speaker 7>cool things that AI does and the fascinating things that

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 7>AI does. Really the foundation of all of that are

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:11.679
<v Speaker 7>two things. It's data and it's electricity basically, and those

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 7>are the foundational elements. And so it has taught us

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 7>what we're doing is we're investing in the critical enablers

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:20.679
<v Speaker 7>basically and the infrastructure that enables all of these great

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 7>AI opportunities going forward. So there's a lot of investment

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 7>opportunities and electricity, as you highlighted, we need a lot

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:28.079
<v Speaker 7>more electricity.

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 2>Basically.

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 7>The next decade is going to be the age of electricity.

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 7>We think that electricity is going to become the new oil.

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 7>The US is going to maintain and it's global AI

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 7>dominance because of its ability to produce low cost electricity.

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 7>So companies like in my backyard Eenergy, it's actually a

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 7>classic example of what you're talking about. It's going to

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 7>actually increase its growth rate by almost fifty percent because

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 7>there's new AI data centers coming to Kansas City, Missouri,

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 7>where I happen to live. But this is happening all

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 7>over the place. We even have bitcoin miners basically, and

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 7>this is really the interesting part if you think about it,

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:07.319
<v Speaker 7>bitcoin miners are actually converting, transforming from being bitcoin miners

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:10.680
<v Speaker 7>to data center operators. Why well, because they have the

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 7>electricity and the ability to simply transform their business and

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 7>become really an entirely new business model, and then their

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 7>valuations are being uplifted as well. Companies like Riot Platforms,

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:26.719
<v Speaker 7>Wolf are Tero, Wolf are a couple of examples who

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 7>of companies that have been doing this.

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 3>What you are trying to participate in tangibly, rob is

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 3>the building of data centers or what will power them.

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 3>But when I look at the portfolios that you manage

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 3>and some of the ETF products, you've kind of broadened

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 3>out to some of the names that we would more

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 3>classically associate with servers.

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:48.959
<v Speaker 2>Dell is an example.

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 3>What prompted you to make that move go beyond the

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 3>energy thesis?

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 7>Well, we just think if you think about AI, AI

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 7>is the future, right, AI is the future economy, so

0:11:58.320 --> 0:11:59.439
<v Speaker 7>if electricity is.

0:11:59.360 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 2>The new oil.

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:02.320
<v Speaker 7>But if you think about really what we're looking at

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 7>is we don't think we think what's underrepresented investor portfolios

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 7>is simply this the enablers, the infrastructure, the companies that

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:11.719
<v Speaker 7>are enabling all of this AI development. So what does

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:15.680
<v Speaker 7>that mean, Well, that means data storage devices, network switches.

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 7>Those are just a couple of examples electricity. Electricity generation

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 7>are another couple of examples, cabling as well as servers,

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 7>and so all of this underlying infrastructure is really really important.

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 7>It's the foundation really for the future of AI, and

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 7>it's these enablers that we think aren't represented in investor portfolios.

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 7>So we created a product called the Tortoise AI Infrastructure

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 7>Active ETF that really offers investors a way to invest

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:43.320
<v Speaker 7>in the active enablers.

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 3>Rob Bummel, Senior portfolio manager at Tours's Capital, thank you

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 3>so much for joining us here on Bloomberg Tech. Now

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 3>coming up, let's get back to that story. Warner Brothers

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 3>Discovery says it's reassessing its strategic options as multiple parties

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:01.439
<v Speaker 3>are said to be so birkling the media giant. We

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 3>have more on that next. This is Boomberg Tech. I

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:12.679
<v Speaker 3>told you at the top of the show. Shares of

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 3>Warner Brothers Discovery are up significantly after the company revealed

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 3>it's expanding a strategic review of the business. The owner

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 3>of CNN, HBO and the Warner Bros. Movie Studio had

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 3>been planning to split into two companies anyway, but it's

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 3>now considering a wider arrail of deal. Scenarios including sale

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 3>and spin off options in light of quote unsolicited interests.

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:39.560
<v Speaker 3>Let's get to our media editor Felix Gillette. Some of

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.560
<v Speaker 3>this we knew about, some of it not. So the

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 3>point is is that Warner Brothers, Discovery It's board and

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 3>leadership are recognizing that the market's putting some value in

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:53.559
<v Speaker 3>its different properties. Just go through each of the options

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 3>that the board says that it's considering.

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean, I think now it's officially for sale.

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 8>We knew that it was basically the was happening, but

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 8>now the options they're looking at is. You know, earlier

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:06.839
<v Speaker 8>this year they announced this reorganization. They were going to

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 8>set it up the company so that there was going

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 8>to be the studios and the streaming business on the

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 8>one hand, separated from the legacy cable TV channels. Then

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 8>you have you know, David Ellison from Paramount from Paramount

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 8>Skydance jumping in and saying, oh, I'd like the whole

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 8>thing before the split. And now they're saying, Okay, we

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 8>have interest from other parties for potentially the whole thing,

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 8>potentially parts of it. In the meantime, we're going to

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 8>go ahead with this reorganization as we soared through the

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 8>different options, but you know, presumably there'll be a lot

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 8>of interest in the studio streaming side, less so from

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 8>the legacy cable TV channels.

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 3>Right, this jump of ten percent puts the stock on

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 3>track for its best stays since early September, the stock

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 3>of the entity known as Warner Brothers Discovery. That's a

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 3>nice timeline. It shows us like the evolution of what

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 3>is now Warner Brothers Discovery. There are media reports out

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 3>there this morning Felix about the names that could be

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 3>circling Weird reported Paramount Skuydeounce, but it's probably broadened that, right.

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean, I think the other names that are

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 8>being tossed out there that analysts have mentioned Netflix, you know,

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 8>Comcast potentially you know in Amazon and Apple. Anyone that

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 8>has a streaming service has to take a look at

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 8>this because you know, Warner Brothers Discovery has one of

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 8>the biggest, richest libraries of IP and the planet. They've

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 8>got Harry Potter, they've got the DC universe with Batman

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 8>and the Superman. They've got you know, the Hobbit universe

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 8>with all the Lord of the Rings stuff. So that's

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 8>just you know, some of the franchises. Everyone needs to

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 8>take a look at this, and so there is to

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 8>be interesting real.

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 3>Quick Netflix after the bell. What's the one thing we

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 3>need to look out for.

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 8>I think look at the advertising numbers. You know, they've

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 8>invested a lot in live events. They've had a very

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 8>strong quarter in terms of engagement. Our franchises are really

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 8>kicking in the high gear. They had Squid Game, they

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 8>had you know, the most popular movie in their history

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 8>with K Pop Demon Hunters. So look for that engagement.

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 8>They won't be talking subscriber numbers. But I'd be very

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 8>curious to see if the same thing about advertising growth.

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 3>All they've been saying to Wall Street is judge us

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 3>by financial metrics.

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Move on from subscribing numbers.

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't know that we can Bloomberg's Felix to that,

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much. Call Weave has no plans to

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 3>bump up it's nine billion dollar bid to data Center

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:42.359
<v Speaker 3>provide a core scientific despite concerns and opposition from shareholders

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 3>that the offer was too low. CEO Michael and Trader

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 3>told Bloomberg's Tom Giles earlier in London, the price is fair.

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 9>We're very comfortable that the way that we have priced

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 9>it is appropriate for us. If there's someone else that

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 9>would like to step in, they can step in. But

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 9>you know, we're excited, we think it makes sense. We

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:05.639
<v Speaker 9>continue to think it makes sense, and you know it

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:07.919
<v Speaker 9>will go to a vote, but you won't see us

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 9>bump our price or increase our price.

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Let's get the analysis.

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Intelligence Senior techanalyst Aanar rag Rana. In July, when

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 3>this bid came in, you wrote that it was prudent

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 3>because of the share price performance of core Weave.

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 2>In August, you.

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 3>Wrote that actually they might have to think about upping

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 3>the bid a bit because a pushback. On October thirtieth,

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 3>shareholders are going to vote on it either way.

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:31.880
<v Speaker 2>What's the current thesis, Sanaag.

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, and I think you've given what the CEO is

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.440
<v Speaker 10>publicly saying. It doesn't look like they're going to up

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 10>the offer, and so you know, I think this is

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 10>probably going to end in probably a stalemate, unless the

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:47.120
<v Speaker 10>shareholders feel that gold Beab is the right place for them.

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:47.439
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 10>Having said that, if you look at the data center space,

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 10>there is a lot of demand. So I don't think

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 10>both parties will regret. You know, which other direction it

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 10>goes frankly.

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:59.360
<v Speaker 3>So Anraik help educate our audience. You said, the right

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 3>place for them. What is it that core Scientific does

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 3>differently from core Weave, which we call on this program

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 3>neo cloud.

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:10.920
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so for colviv it's in the mean the simplest

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 10>way is they're going to rent out GPUs for you

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 10>to help with your computing needs. In the case of

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 10>core Scientific, they're helping create those data centers. Then the

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 10>core weav is going to put their GPUs inside. So

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 10>it's a slightly different business, but at the end of

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 10>the day, it's part of the same value chain. It's

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 10>all getting funded by a lot of AI workloads that

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 10>are out there. So both both companies have their own

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 10>space in the ecosystem. They do slightly different things.

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 3>Real quick, Anna Rag core Weave on the demand side

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 3>and the supply side is doing a lot of deals.

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Can they cope with all of this?

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 10>I think the biggest question is at what pace can

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 10>people go out and create these data centers and install

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 10>the GPUs and get their revenue out of it. We

0:18:56.720 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 10>actually have so much now in terms of evidence of

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 10>rbos or bookings coming in from multiple vendors. You know

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 10>whether that's Microsoft Meta or open Aye. The problem is

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 10>how do you go out and then delivered on it?

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 3>His researches must read on the Bloomberg terminal. Anaagrana of

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:18.920
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Intelligence, thank you very much. Meanwhile, Amazon says its

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 3>cloud services have now been fully restored after a fifteen

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 3>hour outage that impacted a variety of websites and apps,

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:30.400
<v Speaker 3>but its reputation has taken a hit. Bloomos Matt Day,

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 3>who covers Amazon and AWS, joins us and that was,

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:35.439
<v Speaker 3>you know, the headline of your day to story today.

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:39.119
<v Speaker 3>We've looked at how analysts have reacted to this. How

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:44.200
<v Speaker 3>severe was this outage compared to AWS historic outages for.

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 11>Example, So it looks like it's at least they're most

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 11>significant in several years. We've got to go back to

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:49.679
<v Speaker 11>about twenty twenty one for one. That's even in the

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 11>same ballpark. Fifteen hours is a lot like the TYPICALWS hiccup.

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 11>You know, they'll announce something is on the fritz, you know,

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:58.400
<v Speaker 11>the a couple of stats updates later, maybe a couple

0:19:58.440 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 11>hours later, things are back.

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 2>This this was a big one.

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 11>This took out their biggest data center region and took

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:05.400
<v Speaker 11>it out for most of the day throughout the US

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 11>East Coast workday. This is a really big deal for

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 11>company that prides itself on on uptime and reliability.

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 3>What was difficult in covering this in real time during

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 3>the show yesterday was Amazon shares were higher, so you're like, okay,

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 3>that's an interesting reaction of the market. But what helped

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 3>us understand it was the scale of which AWS or

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 3>the Internet relies on. AWS just explain their position in

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:29.880
<v Speaker 3>cloud computing and maybe by extension, why it was so

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:30.919
<v Speaker 3>severe and widespread.

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.919
<v Speaker 11>Therefore, so Amazon basically invented the business of selling rented

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:36.680
<v Speaker 11>computing power. They are the largest actor in that space,

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 11>something like a third of the market, and really just

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:43.160
<v Speaker 11>the Internet goes through their data centers, especially in Northern Virginia,

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 11>right you know Apple streaming your phone bill. Sometimes I

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 11>try to pay mine yesterday it was not down. So

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 11>they're just a key hub for so much of capitalism, frankly,

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 11>and if it's not them, it's one of their rivals

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 11>like Microsoft or Google.

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:58.880
<v Speaker 3>And over a two day basis, this tocks up four

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 3>percent and a rag honor of Bloomberg Intelligence. Just on

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:04.639
<v Speaker 3>the show and in your story, you cite his research,

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:07.919
<v Speaker 3>which is that what could the potential reaction of customers

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 3>be here to AWS. Maybe they'll look at spreading their

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 3>workloads across different cloud providers.

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:16.400
<v Speaker 11>You can see some hedging bets, which is the trend

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 11>we've seen in recent years anyway, to be bor rather

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 11>within companies, rather than relying on a single cloud provider.

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 11>They might take a step back and move their business

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 11>among the big guys. And that's definitely the risk for

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:27.640
<v Speaker 11>Amazon coming out of an event like we owed yesterday.

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Matt Day, who's visiting us in San Francisco from

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 3>Seattle and has been all across the AWS outage. Thank

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 3>you very much. Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. Let's go

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 3>to check in on defense tech stocks now. With both

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 3>Northrop and Lockheed Martin out with their earnings results, Bloomberg

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 3>TV's markets correspondent Norah Melinda joins us to break them down,

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 3>and let's start with Northrop.

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 12>Well, and it seems as there are a lot of

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 12>high expectations heading into this report. Now, the company did

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 12>raise it's earning's forecast for the year, but what Wall

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 12>Street is really parsing right now is the fact that

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:05.880
<v Speaker 12>it cut its full year sales guide to a range

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 12>that was below the average analyst estimate, and so work

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 12>is still continuing to accelerate at the company, specifically on

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 12>its sentinel missile program. But you are seeing people being

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 12>quite critical right now, particularly about that cut to its

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 12>full year guide.

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 3>Lockheed is maybe the bigger fish, and there are headlines

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 3>coming out from the call.

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:24.919
<v Speaker 2>What do we need to know?

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 12>Yes, lots of headlines flying here for Lockheed Martin. They

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:30.919
<v Speaker 12>did have better than expected earnings that they reported, but

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:34.120
<v Speaker 12>they did trim their free cash flow guide down a bit,

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:35.639
<v Speaker 12>and so that's what you are seeing a lot of

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 12>people hinging on right now. The CEO did say that

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 12>he sees the Golden Dome US missile defense project as

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 12>a driver of future growth here, and he did say

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:47.440
<v Speaker 12>that the company has a record one hundred and seventy

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 12>nine billion dollars in backlog. Lots of parts here.

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:54.680
<v Speaker 3>All important things we've been tracking all year long. Bloombogs,

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.160
<v Speaker 3>Norm Melinda, thank you very much. Speaking of defense tech,

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 3>German defense tech company Helsing was featured at the Bloomberg

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Tech Summit in London earlier today. The company's co CEO,

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:07.199
<v Speaker 3>Torsen Ray sat down with Bloomberg text Tom McKenzie and

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:10.360
<v Speaker 3>discussed remaining issues with the supply chain as well as

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:12.880
<v Speaker 3>a potential defense tech bubble.

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Listen to this.

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 13>I think there's definitely a bubble right now, and the

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:20.160
<v Speaker 13>reason for it is what I said earlier in twenty

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:23.679
<v Speaker 13>twenty one, not a single EUROPEANBC in particular wanted to

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:27.119
<v Speaker 13>touch defense. Now everyone has moved into defense, and you know,

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:30.680
<v Speaker 13>including the crypto caravan that's moved from crypto now into

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 13>defense and is trying to spend its money there.

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 3>Let's get to semiconductors. Texas Instruments is set to report

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 3>third quarter results after the closing bell to day is

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:43.439
<v Speaker 3>and this way where the tariff uncertainty could cloud the

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:46.360
<v Speaker 3>company's outlook. Here with more Bloomberg Z and King, who

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 3>leads coverage of the chip industry for US. It's a

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:54.119
<v Speaker 3>China story with Texas Instruments, a business where more analogue

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 3>types of chips are in demand or they're not.

0:23:57.000 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, I mean fundamentally, the numbers for this company are

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 14>great on the way back, ten percent a quarter in

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:06.400
<v Speaker 14>terms of revenue growth sounds pretty good. The concern, as

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:08.880
<v Speaker 14>you say, is what's going on whether some of that

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 14>kind of rebound in orders is related to China and

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 14>people getting ahead of what they see as increasing trade

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:19.359
<v Speaker 14>barriers and TI not being able to serve China, or

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 14>you know the various you know things that are at

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 14>play in terms of the variables, and so that's what's

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 14>driving the sentiment around the stock.

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 3>Help the Bloomberg Tech audience understand the supply chain. We've

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 3>talked a lot about how in the context of high

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 3>performance compute GPUs that go in stage centers and on

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 3>shoring effort, what's going on with Taiwan, But with those

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 3>more analog type chips, is it the same story that

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 3>it's a supply chain dependent on China or in an

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 3>end market dependent on China.

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:51.880
<v Speaker 14>At the moment, the supply chain is dependent upon Texas Instruments, right.

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 14>This is a company that's in everything. If you've got

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 14>an on and off switch on a device, there's going

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 14>to be some form of Texas Instruments chip in there.

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 14>The issue has come as as China has been restricted

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 14>from going high end shift in terms of the digital

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 14>products you just mentioned, has shifted its emphasis to try

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:11.119
<v Speaker 14>to make more kind of analog and embedded processing stuff,

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:14.680
<v Speaker 14>which is a competitor. TI throw in trade tensions, and

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:17.680
<v Speaker 14>the concern is that China will try more and more

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 14>to domesticate its own supply and that won't eventually be

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:24.120
<v Speaker 14>good for TI, says, don't worry about it. We understand

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 14>how competitive this is. We'll just get better.

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 3>We've heard a lot from the President about AI chips,

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 3>and a lot of those AI chip company CEOs have

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 3>some influence in DC. Do this leaders at companies like

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 3>Texas Instruments have the same influence and does the President

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 3>think about them as much?

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 14>Well, all we can do is talk about what TI

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:46.880
<v Speaker 14>is doing. They are, in many senses, the perfect picture

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 14>that Trump wants to have of the world, and that

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 14>they're building factories in this country. They're building in Sherman, Texas,

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:58.640
<v Speaker 14>not too far from their headquarters. They've bought a plant

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 14>in lehi and U which they're refitting, and they're saying, look,

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 14>you know, we're investing in the US. So in that sense,

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 14>they're doing the right thing for this administration. Obviously, the

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 14>economics of that will have to be seen and how

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 14>they play out, but for now they're there.

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 3>Bimbos and King, thank you very much for a wider

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 3>look at the tech sector. Beth kindig Iofund lead tech

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 3>analyst joins us sin. Beth, you have come on this

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 3>program many times and we have talked about Nvidia principally

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 3>lead edge AI accelerators and GPUs. But as you listen

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 3>there to Ian's preview of Texas instruments, how focused are

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 3>you on that portion of the chip market more analogue

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 3>semis that go into all manner of things we rely

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 3>on each day.

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 15>It's great to see you again, Ed, you have it

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 15>exactly right. I'm very, very hyper focused on the AI market. Therefore,

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 15>the companies I track are a little bit different than

0:26:56.600 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 15>the broader semiconductor industry. For example, we have Vertive Recording

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:05.119
<v Speaker 15>this week, we Anthhonol. Now those are both key suppliers

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:09.159
<v Speaker 15>into AI systems. Whether or not those suppliers will be confirmed,

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:12.440
<v Speaker 15>you know, for more and more orders, that's always a question,

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 15>but ultimately they are key components within the AI systems

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 15>that in video shipping. I'm very excited to see initial

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 15>reports around the health of the AI market, especially like

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 15>you just spoke about, because some people believe it's an

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 15>AI bubble.

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 3>The onshoring of the supply chain story focused on those

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:39.639
<v Speaker 3>bigger names at first, right, you know, in Video is

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 3>very aggressive to point out all of its capital commitments

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 3>to this nation and taking the first Arizona produced chips

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:49.199
<v Speaker 3>from TSMC.

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 2>That's been in the headlines.

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 3>But do you see evidence that there is opportunity for

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 3>investors to invest into something being built out in America

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 3>that goes beyond and Invidia.

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 15>Yes, I would say in general, you know, the onshoing

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 15>process will take years. In terms of truly domesticating our

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 15>domesticating our supply chains, that will take years. And that's

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:20.119
<v Speaker 15>not actually my central focus. My central focus could be

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 15>best encapsulated by the fact that in Vidia they're having

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 15>one of their biggest product moments ever, which is a

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 15>huge statement. As you know, I've covered this stock very

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 15>closely for many years. They have Blackwell, Black Whele alter shipping,

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 15>but they're moving from eight GPUs to seventy two GPUs

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 15>and that's that piece that I'm explaining is a big

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 15>moment for Nvidia. What that means is that the supply

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 15>chain should erupt in the upcoming quarter and the next

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 15>quarter because that complexity has just.

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 16>Gone up nine x.

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 15>So I'm very very focused there less on timing of

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 15>onshoing this manufacturing right.

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to be in Washington, DC next week for

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 3>GtC DC, the second edition of the Year of GtC.

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 3>When those kinds of events happen, how high is the

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 3>bar for Nvidia to come out and say something on

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 3>the product or technology side that moves the needle for investors.

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, I guess I'll be a contrarian again and I

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:22.479
<v Speaker 15>will say, yeah, if Nvidia can give us more on Reuben,

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 15>knowing that Blackwell but black Well Aulter shipping, they're shipping

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 15>in volume, I'm very positioned for that.

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 16>Anything forward looking for in video.

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 15>At this point, let's just say we have this conversation

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 15>this time next year. I would want to hear more

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 15>about Reuben, which may actually come more in March.

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 3>The big news story, I suppose the last twenty four hours,

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:46.320
<v Speaker 3>beyond the ADWS outage, which I don't know how that

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 3>impacted you, has been rares you know, the specific headline

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 3>an American deal with Australia, which is kind of being

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 3>interpreted as this countenance to what China is using as

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 3>levers in the negotiation. How do you look at the

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:04.720
<v Speaker 3>markets in the moment and how they're reacting to rare

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 3>earths and the news flow of the day.

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 15>I certainly would have loved to have owned some of

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 15>those rare earth stocks.

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 16>Some are up, you know, almost four hundred percent this year.

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 15>Look, you know, China's using it as a bargaining chip

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 15>in response to US restricting our excellent design companies. You know,

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 15>these two economies have battled it out for decades. And

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 15>so even though these these things are important to track,

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 15>we are so interdependent at this time with China and

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 15>other regions that you know, I don't think it's something

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 15>that you would exit AI stocks for. If anything, you know,

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 15>I would just look at this as many global powers

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 15>are concerned about how are we going to keep up

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 15>the manufacturing because demand is so so high, demand is

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 15>outstripping supply. That piece is much more important to me

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 15>as an investor than all the little nuances as to

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 15>how we get there and supply.

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 3>You use the phrase bargaining chip a pardon the pun

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 3>on your behalf, But the calculus for people like David

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 3>Sachs is that that is the negotiation rare effs on

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 3>the China side in exchange for access to deprecated chips

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 3>on the US side, and principally in Vidio deprecated chips. Right,

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 3>do you have a better sense, bef of where that

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 3>negotiation is heading.

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 15>I could see it being resolved favorably for both sides.

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 15>You know, we've heard from in Nvidia's CEO that he

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 15>would really.

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 16>Like to restore those relations.

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 15>So even if you take some of our industry leaders,

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 15>they all want to see, you know, as much working

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 15>together as possible.

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:47.720
<v Speaker 16>Of course, is that reasonable.

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 15>I do think that geopolitically, AI will continue to be

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 15>a point of tension. Is just so powerful in terms

0:31:56.360 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 15>of what it can do for GDP, And I think

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 15>it just goes back to that, which is because it's

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 15>so powerful as to how it can grow GDP, it's

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 15>a really the best investable opportunity of our lifetime. And

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 15>that's the piece I would really focus on.

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 3>Bethkindg of Io fund, I always appreciate the deep analysis,

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much. With no end to the US

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 3>government shut down insights, some companies that are looking to

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 3>go public are seizing an unusual opportunity. Guidance from the

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 3>SEC lets them file less detailed paperwork and have those

0:32:37.560 --> 0:32:41.960
<v Speaker 3>filings automatically declared effective after twenty days. I want to

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 3>get out to Bloomberg's IPO. Reporter Bailey Lipshaltz, this is

0:32:45.880 --> 0:32:49.240
<v Speaker 3>the subject of the hashtag ECM watch column, which I

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 3>am a religious reader of and if you're watching this,

0:32:51.840 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 3>you also should subscribe. But it's really interesting. Like for me,

0:32:56.360 --> 0:33:00.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, that sounds very spacky. Explain the mechanism here.

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 3>You can file more limited paperwork and then it just

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 3>kind of poop.

0:33:05.880 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 2>It just lingers ed.

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 17>And this is a route or strategy that we've seen

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 17>a few companies that are on file publicly, something that

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 17>you wouldn't do without kind of the path to going

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 17>public well plotted out. So we saw these companies flip

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 17>public thinking about in avon or beta technologies and basically

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 17>you're stuck kind of in a limbo. And so the

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 17>way to work around that with this new sec guidance

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 17>is you come up with the share price range that

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 17>you're willing to accept and then market and you come

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 17>up with a number of shares you want to sell,

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 17>You file that publicly with Edgar through US regulators, and

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 17>then twenty days from now it's effective and that would

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 17>enable you to price your IPO and sell those shares,

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 17>which is different than a so called delaying amendment, which

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 17>really allows companies to kind of have a complete hold

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:55.160
<v Speaker 17>on that process, which normally you would file, wait fifteen

0:33:55.240 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 17>days for a seasoning period, then come out with a

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 17>price range, meet with investors, and then sell it week later.

0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 17>This is a bit more difficult, but obviously a working

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 17>strategy that we're seeing some companies use.

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 3>One of the cool points in the reporting is that

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:12.239
<v Speaker 3>wool Street has been surprised by this, like we're saying

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:15.560
<v Speaker 3>an unusually high number are able to go through in

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 3>this shutdown. By the way, there you go hashtag ECM watch,

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:20.040
<v Speaker 3>don't miss it.

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Just explain why this is a surprise.

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:26.440
<v Speaker 17>It's a surprise because a lot of bankers and lawyers

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 17>would want to run a tightly choreographed process. When you

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:34.040
<v Speaker 17>use this workaround, you're exposed to the market with the

0:34:34.080 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 17>expected valuation and the expected IPO size.

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:38.120
<v Speaker 2>For twenty days.

0:34:38.440 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 17>So that's not normal if bankers and lawyers don't really

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 17>like having that over a seven day period.

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:45.480
<v Speaker 2>So when you have a market that.

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:48.120
<v Speaker 17>Is living truth social posts, a true social post, or

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:50.320
<v Speaker 17>press conference to press conference, or in the thick of

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:53.280
<v Speaker 17>earning season, if you're a company that's using this workaround.

0:34:53.320 --> 0:34:56.920
<v Speaker 17>To go public, you're exposed to broader market risks, geopolitics

0:34:56.960 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 17>and otherwise, and you're also exposed to earnings from your peers.

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:02.240
<v Speaker 17>So if you're looking to go public at a sixteen

0:35:02.360 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 17>multiple and your peer group underperforms and drops a twenty percent,

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:07.919
<v Speaker 17>all of a sudden, your price looks a lot more

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:10.280
<v Speaker 17>wonky than you would have expected. And it's also difficult

0:35:10.320 --> 0:35:11.440
<v Speaker 17>to get investor attention in.

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech. I think you mentioned Navon.

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:17.839
<v Speaker 3>There are other tech names out there that are kind

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 3>of call in the situation, just very quick case studies.

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, Navon using a tight price range. They're expected a

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:27.279
<v Speaker 17>price later next week, towards the Halloween date. That'll be

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:30.840
<v Speaker 17>interesting type book. And then Beta Technology is a el

0:35:31.000 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 17>evotal company using a broad range with Cornerstone, it's going

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:35.839
<v Speaker 17>to be a different one that a price a couple

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:36.520
<v Speaker 17>of days after that.

0:35:37.400 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 2>You've got to get it done by Halloween.

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 3>It's basically the biggest holiday of this part of the

0:35:41.560 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 3>year for many people. Bloomberg's Bailey Lipschaltz, great job, Thank

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:48.880
<v Speaker 3>you very much. VM Software, owned by private equity firm

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 3>Insight Partners, agreed to buy Security AI for about one

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 3>point seventy three billion dollars in cash and stock, adding

0:35:55.719 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 3>software that helps secure corporate data used in AI applications,

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 3>make software for backing up and recovering data after ransomware

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 3>attacks and other breaches, and it's looking to protect clients

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:09.319
<v Speaker 3>from new threats posed by AI. The deals expected to

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 3>close the first week of December. Okay, coming up, Touro

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 3>CEO Andre Hadad joins us talk about the company's plan

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 3>to attract drivers with a low commitment alternative to owning

0:36:21.080 --> 0:36:46.279
<v Speaker 3>a car. That's next, This is Windberg tech car sharing marketplace.

0:36:46.400 --> 0:36:49.960
<v Speaker 3>Touro is launching what it calls a low commitment alternative

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 3>to car ownership carsoers. We be able to rent cars

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 3>for months of the time. But the program comes as

0:36:56.200 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 3>US car sales remains strong despite tarris and economic uncertainty.

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 3>There is a lot to discuss with Touro's CEO, Andre Hadad,

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 3>who's here with us in San Francisco. Okay, let's just

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 3>start by explaining the mechanism. How does this work?

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:10.600
<v Speaker 2>So it's pretty simple.

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:13.279
<v Speaker 18>You know you're if you've known Turo, you know that

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:16.879
<v Speaker 18>we offer car rentals now for many years. Typically our

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:19.799
<v Speaker 18>car rental trips were a few days at a time

0:37:19.920 --> 0:37:23.080
<v Speaker 18>typically for travel. Now you can actually book a car

0:37:23.280 --> 0:37:25.400
<v Speaker 18>for multiple months at a time, and you pay on

0:37:25.440 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 18>a monthly basis, as if you're paying a monthly lease

0:37:29.120 --> 0:37:33.080
<v Speaker 18>or a monthly financing repayment on a monthly basis. But

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:36.799
<v Speaker 18>there's no upfront commitment, so there's no money down, So

0:37:36.920 --> 0:37:39.919
<v Speaker 18>money down, Yeah, there's no deposit, there's no commitment for

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:43.120
<v Speaker 18>an extended period of time. You can sign up for

0:37:43.600 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 18>one month and extend for another few months, or you

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 18>can sign up for three months and extend or reduce.

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 3>But here's the disconnect Andre that it's I know it

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:54.360
<v Speaker 3>is a peer platform. In other words, the cars on

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:57.640
<v Speaker 3>Touro are owned either by individuals or as you and

0:37:57.680 --> 0:38:00.680
<v Speaker 3>I have discussed, people that have made a business as

0:38:00.680 --> 0:38:04.600
<v Speaker 3>having a small fleet of vehicles. How does that tension

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 3>work of somebody saying, Okay, here's my car, I'm going

0:38:07.560 --> 0:38:08.880
<v Speaker 3>to rent it out for a few months.

0:38:09.480 --> 0:38:11.720
<v Speaker 18>Well, there's a lot of people on tour as you mentioned,

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 18>that are now professional hosts who are running a business

0:38:16.200 --> 0:38:18.799
<v Speaker 18>on top of our platform, and they're really interested in

0:38:18.920 --> 0:38:22.720
<v Speaker 18>getting maximum utilization for their vehicles, and they're also able

0:38:22.760 --> 0:38:26.719
<v Speaker 18>to acquire vehicles from their neighbors and from their friends

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:29.840
<v Speaker 18>and from their family members. We call them co hosts,

0:38:30.239 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 18>so it's not just their own cars. Typically, these power hosts,

0:38:35.000 --> 0:38:38.000
<v Speaker 18>as we call them, they have a few cars of

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:41.040
<v Speaker 18>their own, but they're actually fleet sizes much larger because

0:38:41.040 --> 0:38:44.440
<v Speaker 18>they are co hosts for many other car owners who've

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 18>given them their cars so that they can monetize them

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:49.840
<v Speaker 18>on their behalf. And so these hosts are looking for

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:53.200
<v Speaker 18>ways to maximize their utilization. So they're very excited about

0:38:53.200 --> 0:38:56.040
<v Speaker 18>the launch of monthly because it enables, you know, multi

0:38:56.160 --> 0:38:58.919
<v Speaker 18>months of utilization and one trip instead of having lots

0:38:58.920 --> 0:39:01.240
<v Speaker 18>of different trips on a month basically sets the price.

0:39:01.960 --> 0:39:05.680
<v Speaker 18>Our hosts set the price, so we actually guide them

0:39:05.719 --> 0:39:08.279
<v Speaker 18>to provide the most effective price. So we give them

0:39:08.320 --> 0:39:11.120
<v Speaker 18>recommendations on pricing, and we find that many of our

0:39:11.160 --> 0:39:15.719
<v Speaker 18>hosts are following our recommendations. For this launch, we have

0:39:15.800 --> 0:39:18.960
<v Speaker 18>dramatically lowered our monetization, so now our trip fees are

0:39:19.000 --> 0:39:22.040
<v Speaker 18>down to zero on monthly trips, so.

0:39:21.960 --> 0:39:22.759
<v Speaker 2>We're submit for you.

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:25.920
<v Speaker 18>Then in the long run, well, we're actually monetizing our

0:39:25.960 --> 0:39:28.880
<v Speaker 18>trips only on the host side and with the sale

0:39:28.880 --> 0:39:32.040
<v Speaker 18>of protection, so there are three ways we monetize our trips.

0:39:32.080 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 18>We've got our trip fee, our protection fee, and then

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:37.319
<v Speaker 18>our host fees. We've kept the host fee, we've kept

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:40.000
<v Speaker 18>the protection fee, but we've zeroed out our trip fee

0:39:40.080 --> 0:39:42.320
<v Speaker 18>because we want to make sure that these monthly rentals

0:39:42.360 --> 0:39:43.800
<v Speaker 18>are as affordable as possible.

0:39:43.840 --> 0:39:45.799
<v Speaker 3>In the time that I've known you, you've always been

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:49.720
<v Speaker 3>directed by data and evidence. What do you see about

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:52.520
<v Speaker 3>the future of car ownership? The threat that I see

0:39:52.560 --> 0:39:55.359
<v Speaker 3>to Toro has been what Tesla proposes to do right,

0:39:55.480 --> 0:39:58.879
<v Speaker 3>operate a robotaxi fleet where Tesla owners can submit their

0:39:58.920 --> 0:40:02.840
<v Speaker 3>car to anticipate in a row. It's actually fleet X. Essentially,

0:40:02.960 --> 0:40:05.240
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of car ownership questions.

0:40:05.120 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 18>A lot of car ownership questions. As you mentioned in

0:40:07.000 --> 0:40:10.400
<v Speaker 18>the beginning of the show. While car sales are resilient,

0:40:10.520 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 18>they're still down from their peak, and we've never recovered

0:40:13.080 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 18>from the peak of twenty seventeen when we hit seventeen

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 18>and a half million vehicles sold in the country. And

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:20.880
<v Speaker 18>I believe that we've really reached peak car. You know,

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:23.640
<v Speaker 18>we're never going to go back to seventeen and a

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:27.400
<v Speaker 18>half or eighteen or larger numbers because people are looking

0:40:27.440 --> 0:40:30.840
<v Speaker 18>at different ways to access cars, and we believe that

0:40:30.920 --> 0:40:33.040
<v Speaker 18>Turo has a big role to play now that we've

0:40:33.080 --> 0:40:37.320
<v Speaker 18>expanded our product offering to attack you know, much larger TAM.

0:40:37.400 --> 0:40:40.080
<v Speaker 18>You know, the car ownership TAM is a trillion dollars,

0:40:40.120 --> 0:40:42.080
<v Speaker 18>whereas the car rental TAM is only one hundred billion.

0:40:42.120 --> 0:40:44.400
<v Speaker 2>So we're pretty excited about this launch. Andre, you and

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:45.240
<v Speaker 2>I have a tradition.

0:40:45.400 --> 0:40:48.680
<v Speaker 3>It's where I ask you about IPO and given that

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:52.680
<v Speaker 3>circumstances have changed on over the last year, Yes, what's

0:40:52.680 --> 0:40:53.560
<v Speaker 3>the latest thinking.

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:56.440
<v Speaker 18>The latest thinking is, we still don't think it's the

0:40:56.520 --> 0:40:59.439
<v Speaker 18>right time for us. You know, we're taking a lot

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:03.280
<v Speaker 18>of big decisions internally to retool some parts of the business.

0:41:03.560 --> 0:41:05.920
<v Speaker 18>We're excited about this slanch, as I mentioned, we think

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:09.080
<v Speaker 18>it expands our opportunity much larger and much larger market.

0:41:09.680 --> 0:41:12.400
<v Speaker 18>We think that's going to help accelerate our growth and profitability.

0:41:12.520 --> 0:41:14.319
<v Speaker 18>So we look forward to be back and talking about

0:41:14.320 --> 0:41:15.520
<v Speaker 18>the API at some point in time.

0:41:15.719 --> 0:41:17.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'll hold you to that commitment.

0:41:17.680 --> 0:41:21.080
<v Speaker 3>Andre Hadad turo Ceo, thank you very much for joining us.

0:41:21.480 --> 0:41:24.440
<v Speaker 3>That does it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech. The

0:41:24.440 --> 0:41:28.160
<v Speaker 3>big story in the markets has been Warner Brothers Discovery

0:41:28.200 --> 0:41:30.520
<v Speaker 3>the board coming out, saying they're looking at a range

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:34.120
<v Speaker 3>of strategic options, including sticking with an existing plan to

0:41:34.160 --> 0:41:38.759
<v Speaker 3>split the business, maybe spinning something off, maybe considering a sale.

0:41:38.920 --> 0:41:44.040
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg then reported that those circling include Netflix and Comcast,

0:41:44.160 --> 0:41:48.880
<v Speaker 3>adding to the prior reporting that Paramounts Guidance was also

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:51.759
<v Speaker 3>thinking of a bid. When we broke that news in

0:41:51.800 --> 0:41:56.600
<v Speaker 3>the last hour, it was Comcast shares that reacted more strongly. Netflix,

0:41:56.640 --> 0:42:00.799
<v Speaker 3>of course, team reports earnings after the bell, so is

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 3>treading water. For that reason, Warner Brothers Discovery on track

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:07.839
<v Speaker 3>for his biggest jump since early September. Don't forget check

0:42:07.880 --> 0:42:09.799
<v Speaker 3>out the podcast. Loads of you have been coming up

0:42:09.840 --> 0:42:11.959
<v Speaker 3>to me all over the country saying that you listen

0:42:12.040 --> 0:42:13.719
<v Speaker 3>to the show in the form of the pod, and

0:42:13.760 --> 0:42:16.200
<v Speaker 3>you know where to find it online. iHeart Spotify and

0:42:16.280 --> 0:42:19.440
<v Speaker 3>on Apple and of course on all the Bloomberg platforms.

0:42:19.960 --> 0:42:22.600
<v Speaker 3>Much more to come this week. Stay with us. This

0:42:22.760 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 3>is Bloomberg Tech.