WEBVTT - BI Weekend: Live Nation Suit, Micron Earnings, Kimmel Return 

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio, Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is Bloomberg Intelligence

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>with Scarletfoo and Paul Sweeney.

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:16.080
<v Speaker 2>How do you think the FED is looking at tariffs?

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:17.440
<v Speaker 2>The uncertainty of terriffs.

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 3>Let's take a look at the sectors and how they performed.

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 2>A lot of investors getting whipsaled every day by news.

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Events, breaking market headlines, and corporate news from across the globe.

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 3>Could we see a market disruption of market event?

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>So people just too exuberant out there?

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 3>You see some so called low quality stocks driving this

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 3>short term rally.

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence with Scarletfoo and Paul Sweeney on Bloomberg Radio, YouTube,

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Originals.

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 2>On today's Bloomberg Intelligence Show, we dig inside the big

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 2>business stories impacting Wall Street and the global markets. Each

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 2>and every week, we provide in depth research and data

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 2>on some of the two thousand companies and one hundred

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 2>and thirty industries our animalts cover worldwide. Today, we'll look

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 2>at why the Trump administration is warning about tiele on

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 2>all use during pregnancy. Plus we'll look at what's in

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 2>store for the telecommunications company T Mobile after naming a

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:08.839
<v Speaker 2>new CEO. But first we begin in the anti trust Space.

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 2>We recently heard that the US Federal Trade Commission and

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:15.119
<v Speaker 2>seven states have sued Live Nation Entertainment and its ticket

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 2>Master subsidiary. It's for failing to prevent the use of

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:21.680
<v Speaker 2>automated ticketing bots and large scale resale operations. From more

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 2>co hosts, Scarlettfield and I were joined by Jennifer Ree,

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:28.400
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence Senior litigation analyst. We first asked for Jens

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 2>first impressions on the latest news.

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think, first of all, not too much of

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 4>a surprise, because they did recently sue a much smaller

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 4>entity over the same law, which is called the Better

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 4>Ticketing Online Sales Act or the Bots Act, and Live

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 4>Nation was mentioned an awful lot in that lawsuit, so

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 4>it sort of led to the conclusion that there might

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 4>be another suit brought. And President Trump did order the

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 4>Federal Trade Commission to better enforce this act back in

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 4>an executive order in March, and they have a report

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 4>due to the President on September twenty seventh, so saying

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 4>what if they done to better enforce the act. So

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 4>I think it's not a surprise that a big lawsuit

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 4>came down before that report is due.

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, you talk you talk to a lot of

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 2>nation people, and I've known them for a long time.

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.799
<v Speaker 2>I think they want to clean this stuff up. They

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 2>want to take out the middleman, the scalper. They want

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:17.359
<v Speaker 2>to simplify the fees because they know the feedback is

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 2>terrible from their customers. But this is still a thing,

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 2>isn't it.

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 4>I mean yeah, no, right, Well, first of all, antitrust

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 4>cases tend to be backward looking, so what they may

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 4>be taking efforts today, but we're looking at what they've

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 4>been doing since twenty eighteen. Essentially. The other thing is

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 4>they do say that, and they have said that to

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 4>the Department of Justice and to Congress as well. But

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 4>if you look at what's been alleged in this lawsuit,

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 4>they're an awful lot of statements and documents cited to

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 4>when their internal business communications going on. That suggests that

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 4>they've kind of turned a blind eye to the broker

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:52.079
<v Speaker 4>activity because they profit from the resale market of those

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 4>tickets as well. How did they do that well, because

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 4>they sell the primary ticket and take fees, and then

0:02:57.560 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 4>the brokers buy in bulk and then they put it

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 4>they resell on Ticketmaster's resale arm. Ticketmaster charges just to

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 4>list it and then they take another fee when the

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 4>ticket's actually sold, So they're basically double dipping on the

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 4>same ticket.

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:10.640
<v Speaker 2>How is this different?

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 3>I know that's not good. How is this different from

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 3>what ticket resellers, vivid Seats or access or any of

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 3>those other companies that consumers have the option of using,

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 3>how they operate and how they collect fees.

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 4>So this is about whether they knowingly resell these tickets. Now,

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 4>a reseller could sell a ticket that's been bought improperly

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 4>by a bot but not know it. They could implement

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 4>security measures, not understand the extent to which the bots

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 4>in the scalpers have been able to technically go around

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 4>those security measures, and then, you know, in an honestly

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 4>attempt to provide a place to resell tickets, resell the tickets.

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 4>In this case, what the FTC is saying is that

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 4>Ticketmaster knowingly did this, and they didn't step in the way,

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 4>They didn't implement any of the rules that they have

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 4>internally to.

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 2>Let it happen.

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 4>They let it happen. So it remains to be seen

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 4>whether some of the other resellers have that same kind

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 4>of evidence internally. It may be that they're doing what

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 4>they can to prevent the conduct and in that case

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 4>it may not violate the Bots Act.

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 2>How about the Department of Justice, what are they doing

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 2>with this company? I mean, is there talk of breaking

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 2>up Live Nation from the Ticketmaster?

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 4>The Department of Justice has been going after this company

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 4>for years, ever since Live Nation acquired Ticketmaster, which yes, Paul,

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 4>I know you worked on that deal, right, and that

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:27.600
<v Speaker 4>was done with the consent order, meaning Live Nation promised

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 4>to behave a certain way if they were allowed to

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 4>buy the company, and essentially it's been alleged and investigated

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 4>and found twice now that they violated that. So now

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 4>the Department of Justice has just sued them and said,

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 4>you're engaging in all kinds of anti competitive activity by

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 4>virtue of your strong position kind of in every aspect

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 4>of the live concert and live event industry. And you

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 4>know the only answer at this point is to force

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 4>you to sell Ticketmaster because when we impose behavioral conditions,

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:56.160
<v Speaker 4>you just ignore it.

0:04:56.960 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 3>How do you see this resolving. Is this going to

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 3>be something where they battle it out to the very

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 3>end and get a verdict or are they going to

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 3>try to settle.

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think two different answers depending on the lawsuit

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 4>I think on the FTC lawsuit over the Bots Act

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:14.840
<v Speaker 4>probably ends in a settlement because the penalties are astronomical,

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 4>you know, over fifty three thousand dollars per violation, and

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 4>we're talking about probably five million violations a year, accounting

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 4>and counting right starting in twenty eighteen. So that probably

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 4>ends in a settlement for a fraction of what ultimately

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 4>could be fined the Department of Justice suit. I suspect

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 4>Live Nation will fight and fight for many years. That

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 4>goes to trial in front of a jury in March.

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 4>So we're actually probably going to have a verdict in

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 4>the first quarter unless they managed to finacle a settlement,

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:42.799
<v Speaker 4>which I understand they're trying hard right now to settle

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 4>with the Trump administration. But if they don't, it goes

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 4>to trial in March. We'll have a jury verdict. I

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 4>think it'll be hard to find a jury that's not

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:52.600
<v Speaker 4>going to be inclined to rule against Live Nation if

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 4>they've ever tried to buy a ticket.

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 3>For an event like how many finds one who's completely

0:05:56.520 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 3>impractive about this and has no real firsthand experience exactly.

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.720
<v Speaker 2>Now, I look like as old stock analysts I am,

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 2>I look at the stock, it's a twenty six percent

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 2>yeah day. Is that the market telling me we've got

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 2>an administration in office right now that might be open

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 2>to a deal. Is that kind of what it's saying.

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 4>I think so. I think there are those out there

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 4>that think Live Nation may be able to get some

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:19.119
<v Speaker 4>sort of a deal. You know, we know they're making

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:22.359
<v Speaker 4>a lot of efforts to do so in doing things

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 4>the way seem to be have been successful for others

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:28.719
<v Speaker 4>with this administration, and I do think that's the sentiment.

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:32.159
<v Speaker 4>But and also it's a long way away from something happening.

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 4>Even if they lose this jury trial in March, then

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 4>the judge has to decide on a remedy, then they appeal,

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 4>that remedy probably gets stayed pending the appeal, So we're

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 4>really not looking at an impact for a couple more years.

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 3>In the meantime, you have artists trying to you know,

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:49.039
<v Speaker 3>limit how they sell their tickets as well, and that

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 3>just creates confusion for consumers too, you know, like they'll

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 3>release a you know, slate of tickets and then hold

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 3>off and then release another slate of tickets, and if

0:06:57.720 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 3>you want to transfer tickets to someone it's very different

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 3>goal on the Ticketmaster app because they want to make

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 3>sure that you're an actual person on the bot. I mean,

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 3>it just gets difficult for people who just want to

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 3>go see.

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:09.279
<v Speaker 4>A show, right, And that's why this is a politically

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 4>popular cause. You know, this is the one thing that

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 4>leads me to think maybe the DJ won't settle with

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 4>Live Nation despite the efforts, because this is really you know,

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 4>the Taylor Swift fiasco brought it all to the forefront

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 4>more than ever. Springsteen whor's Springsteen Right. There have been

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 4>other issues since then, and it is politically popular. See

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 4>what happens there.

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 2>The only way you know, musical folks can make money

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 2>is touring, right.

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 3>And don't get Spotify doesn't pay you anything.

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 2>No, I mean, it's it, that's why you got. I mean,

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 2>I saw Clapton, Eric Clapton.

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 3>And the dude's eighty was sitting the entire time, no.

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 2>No standing most of the time. Sounded great. You know,

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, but I mean, yeah, you know, there's

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 2>either selling their catalogs for hundreds of millions of dollars, right,

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 2>and they're still touring.

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 4>And merch merch tons and tons, and that's the problem

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 4>with these astronomical ticket prices that doesn't go back to

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 4>the artist, you know, it's just going to the middle

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 4>man or going to Live Nation or Ticketmaster, whoever the

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 4>reseller is.

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Jennifer Ree, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Litigation Analyst,

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 2>we move next to news from the memory chip maker Micron.

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 2>This week, shares of the company fell after its forecast

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 2>for the first quarter failed to impress investors, and this

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 2>comes despite revenue and profit expectations being higher than estimated.

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 2>In the backdrop, Micron stock has nearly doubled this year,

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 2>rising at a faster pace than most of its chip piers,

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 2>reflecting AI fueled optimism for more. Co host Scarlettfield w

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Anden I were joined by Jake Silverman, Bloomberg Intelligence Semiconductor analyst.

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 2>We first asked Jake why investors were disappointed with Micron.

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 5>I think it has a lot to do with just

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 5>very high expectations coming into the quarter. But overall, look,

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 5>I mean, the fundamentals of the business remained very strong.

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:51.559
<v Speaker 5>I think the commentary on the call for management was

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 5>very positive, and so I think we're going to continue

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 5>to see an up cycle and memory at least for

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 5>the near term.

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:00.959
<v Speaker 2>So what is the call here, what's the street looking

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 2>for for this name? Again, A stocks just as you mentioned,

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 2>ripped this year up ninety four percent year today. What's

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 2>the call here?

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, No, I mean, I think investors are really looking

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 5>at high bandwidth memory, They're looking at AI, They're looking

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 5>at data center related revenue. In the last fiscal year,

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 5>data center related revenue was fifty to six percent of sales.

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:25.719
<v Speaker 5>So as demand continues for that, we also have to

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 5>keep in mind that, you know, there's traditional products as

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 5>well that are an important part of the business, that

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 5>includes smartphones and PCs. Investors really want to see continued

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 5>pricing strength. And as demand continues to grow for high

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 5>bandwidth memory, which is very important for AI, and as

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 5>capacity for that shifts over to high bandwith memory, it

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:51.439
<v Speaker 5>can further constrains the supply because it has lower yields,

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 5>it has larger die sizes, so there's only so much

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:58.079
<v Speaker 5>capacity industry and it's shifting over in favor of AI,

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 5>and that's just constraining supply for traditional products. Which given

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 5>the supply and demand, the importance of supplying demand balancing

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 5>the industry, it would suggest that as long as demand

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 5>for AI continues to grow, we'll see further pricing increases.

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:14.559
<v Speaker 3>So that's a lot of conditions. I mean, you talk

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.679
<v Speaker 3>about memory chips, which Micron is the biggest US maker of.

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 3>We know that this business is kind of famous or

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:24.199
<v Speaker 3>infamous really for merging between booms and busts, and that

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 3>results in these price wings to compensate for the previous

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, plethora of chips or dearth of chips. How

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 3>does the AI revolution change this dynamic?

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 5>No, And as I said before, really I want to

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 5>put emphasis on the fact that high bandwidth memory demand

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 5>constrain the supply for other products, specifically with DRAM. But

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 5>DRAM now accounts for about eighty percent of sales for

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 5>the company, so it's vastly more important than what we're

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 5>seeing in NAND. But the other twenty percent of sales

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 5>in NAND, we're also seeing strength for enterprise solid state drives,

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 5>which are also important for AI. So yeah, look, I

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 5>mean I think historically we've seen cycles up cycles tend

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:08.439
<v Speaker 5>to last somewhere between seven to ten quarters, but we're

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 5>now extending beyond that. I mean, we're looking at, based

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 5>on the guidance, at least twelve quarters and then based

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 5>on the potential for further increases in pricing, it could

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 5>extend all the way through the next fiscal yeur at

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 5>a minimum. So yeah, I mean, really it's just kind

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 5>of an almost unprecedented situation, or at least not something that

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:28.959
<v Speaker 5>we've seen in a very long time. And it really

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 5>just comes from structural tailments from AI, both on demand,

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 5>which is improving pricing via different products like high manWith memory,

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 5>but also just because like I said before, it's just

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 5>constraining overall supply, and that's not just unique to Micron,

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 5>that's true for both Skee Heinex and Samsung as well,

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 5>and the three of them account for the vast majority

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 5>of DRAM demand in the industry in nand as well.

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Drake, that's kind kind of where I wanted to

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 2>go the competitive landscape here. It feels like there's again

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned kind of three names there. Is that really

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of what's driving? Are those three companies driving this business?

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, so eske Heinez has really had the lead

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 5>in high bandwidth memory, Micron has become sort of a

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:14.560
<v Speaker 5>very fast follower, and now there's reports that Samsung will

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 5>be supplying into Nvidia's Blackwell Ultra platform, which might pave

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 5>the way into Rubin for them as well. So I mean,

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 5>I think this three company dynamic that we'd seen for

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:27.079
<v Speaker 5>a very long time. Obviously you've had some Chinese competitors

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 5>come on, but this three company dynamic that we saw

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 5>in traditional DRAM seems to be now shaping up again

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:39.319
<v Speaker 5>for high bandwidth memory. So I think those past dynamics

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 5>that we've seen are going to be the dynamics going

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:42.199
<v Speaker 5>forward again.

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Jake Silverman, Bloomberg Intelligence semiconductor analyst, coming

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 2>up a look at how US drug Makropfiser is trying

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 2>to carve its share of the BCD DRUB market. You're

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 2>listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in depth

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:57.319
<v Speaker 2>research and data on two thousand companies and one hundred

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 2>and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence VI A B.

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:03.319
<v Speaker 2>I go on the terminal. I'm Paul Sweeney and this

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 2>is Bloomberg.

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Intelligence with Scarlet Foo and Paul Sweeney

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio.

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 2>We move now to the news in a pharmaceutical space.

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 2>This week, the US drugmaker Pfizer said it will pay

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 2>four point nine billion dollars for the obesity startup met Sarah,

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 2>it's a bid to catch up the rival drugmakers after

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 2>failing to compete with its own weight loss medications From

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:31.200
<v Speaker 2>work co hosts Scarlett Foe when I were joined by

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:34.679
<v Speaker 2>Sam Fazzelli, Bloomberg Intelligence, Director of Research for Global Industries

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 2>and senior pharmaceuticals analysts. We first asked Sam to give

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 2>us some context on why this deal is important.

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 7>Obesity is one of the key causes of a whole

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 7>variety of diseases, cardiovascular, cancer, mental health. So if we

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 7>can treat it, if we can prevent it, if we

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:56.479
<v Speaker 7>can reduce it, it's brilliant for the entirety of society.

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 7>Here there is a deal where Fizer thinks they've got

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 7>something that's going to be able to give them a

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 7>chance at playing in this very important area and very

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 7>massive market. Right. So the drugs are interesting, they're relatively

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 7>early stage. We're looking to see with some new data

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 7>coming up, whether some of the promise that we've seen

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:18.679
<v Speaker 7>earlier for these drugs that the company has, which the

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 7>latest stage one is still in phase two they need

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 7>to start the phase three in twenty twenty six, whether

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 7>they are as competitive as they looked in the earlier trials.

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 7>There were some questions on efficacy less so than side

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 7>effect profile. So we'll have to wait and see how

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 7>that pans out.

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 3>Sam, can you get into the science a little bit

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 3>and maybe you know, keep it basic for folks like

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 3>Paul and me, because Metzara is described as the next

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 3>generation hopeful in obesities. They use these long acting analogs

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 3>versus GLP one and I'm wondering for people who might

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 3>be holding out for matsera's treatment what that means versus

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 3>the currently available zip bound or we go vi.

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 7>Yeah. Yeah, So the latest stage drug is very similar

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 7>to we go v and similar to zepetite or zip bound,

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 7>and the Amlin drug is a little bit early stay

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 7>earlier stage. There are companies we are more advanced drugs

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 7>in that world, but they all kind of feed into

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 7>the same pathway, which is the pathway that talks between

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 7>your food intake and your society centers in your brain

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 7>and your insulin centers in your pancreas it tries to

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 7>balance of eaten enough, let's stop eating now and let's

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 7>release some insulin make it more sensitive so that we

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 7>can deal with the onslaughter sugar that comes into our blood.

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 7>That's where they are, is that's central to that space.

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 7>There's cells in the gut that release glucle like JLP ones,

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 7>grouking like peptize the cells in other parts of the

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 7>body who are responding to it. So that's where these

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 7>things sit, and amlin is just one of those agents

0:15:57.280 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 7>in the middle of it.

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 5>Say, I'm just kind of stepping back.

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Is GLP one drugs in general, there's a certain level

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 2>of efficacy today, there's a certain level of say, side effects,

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 2>whether it's large or something else today. Is there a

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 2>room for improvement on both efficacy and side effects going

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 2>forward with these drugs?

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean with it's the balance that's the most important.

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 7>With efficacy, I think we're pretty much there. I mean,

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 7>you know, there are folks that we know that go

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 7>on a drug for a week or two and they

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 7>lose four or five kilograms. That's fine. You don't want

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 7>to lose much faster than that, because I don't think

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 7>it's particularly healthy if you lose weight at a much

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 7>higher speed. And also you don't want to get much

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 7>lighter than a aty kilo or ninety kilo or seventy five

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 7>kilograms depending on your size. So the key is how

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 7>do you get there. If you get there by having

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 7>lots of side effects, then your probability of staying on

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 7>the drug is lower, but we want you to stay

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 7>on the drug. So it's a very very tight balance.

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 7>And then of course you have to figure out what

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 7>am I happy taking a weekly injection, which I think

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 7>a lot of people are not. Don't have a problem

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 7>with it, But what if Mitcera is right and push

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 7>it to once monthly, if some of the other competitent

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 7>is coming along with once every three months. Now, those

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 7>are things that we have to wait and see how

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:08.919
<v Speaker 7>the data shows in terms of that balance of just

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 7>referred to.

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Sam Fazeli, Bloomberg Intelligence, Director of Research

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 2>for Global Industries and senior pharmaceuticals analysts. Staying in the

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:19.679
<v Speaker 2>pharmaceutical space. This week, the Trump administration linked thiland on

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 2>to autism and urge pregnant women to avoid the common

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 2>pain medication, and this comes despite the lack of widely

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 2>accepted scientific evidence supporting the risk. For more co host

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Scarlett Field and I were joined by a Hunter Bloomberg

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence senior equity analysts for biopharmaceuticals. You first asked Ann

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:38.639
<v Speaker 2>about the science behind the latest news.

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 8>There are a lot of studies on it. It's certainly

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 8>driven by an increase in finding a solution for the

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 8>increased rates of ADHD and autism. I think it's really

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 8>important here to qualify or quantify what we're talking about

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:55.399
<v Speaker 8>with frequent Thailand all use, and most of the studies

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 8>are looking at measured as more than twenty eight days

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 8>over the course of your pregnant see, so that is

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 8>a lot of tile and all use. We're not talking

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 8>about you have a high fever and you take it

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 8>for a day or two. This is this is kind

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:12.919
<v Speaker 8>of more long term use. There is a correlation between

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 8>tile and all use and these disorders and children, and

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 8>I'll probably lose listeners if I go too deeply. But

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 8>correlation is not causation. Those are two separate things. And

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 8>while there's a lot of literature out there, a lot

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:29.119
<v Speaker 8>of clinical studies, I would argue that the best ones

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 8>look at sibling analysis, so they compare a mother who

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 8>had frequent use during one pregnancy and not the next,

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 8>and that's the best way to kind of look at this.

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 8>And in those studies there was no findings of increased risks,

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 8>and there have been several There was a two and

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 8>a half million dollars a two and a half million

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 8>children study in Sweden, as well as a more recent

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 8>one out of Japan. Unfortunately, randomized trials are are difficult

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:58.439
<v Speaker 8>to do, there's just too many variables. But the sibling

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:00.639
<v Speaker 8>analysis is probably the best we have.

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 3>So And when I think about the companies that are affected,

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 3>certainly ken View, which owns the Talnyl brand. Tailanol's generic

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 3>name is a seed of menaphin, and there are many

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 3>other companies that make a seed of menaphin as well.

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 3>Are we seeing them impacted in any way?

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 7>You know?

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 8>This is even for ken View, this is maybe a

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:20.920
<v Speaker 8>high single digit portion of sales, and that's thailenol overall,

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 8>So you assume that the pregnant population is a much

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 8>smaller percentage of those sales. And I'd argue even you know,

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 8>before all of this, a lot of physicians, certainly mine

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:34.679
<v Speaker 8>when I was pregnant, recommended only taking tilenol when you

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 8>have one of those you know, high fevers, So I

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:41.879
<v Speaker 8>wouldn't expect it to truly be a material impact to

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 8>any of these companies.

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Is there anything else out there that is at risk here?

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean from just the FDA, I mean your coverage here,

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:51.880
<v Speaker 2>because I know there's a lot of uncertainty about which

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 2>drugs are you know, kind of favored by this administration,

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 2>which ones aren't. Is that Are you seeing that in

0:19:57.280 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 2>your coverage of your companies?

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 8>Well, for pregnancy in particular, I'd say, are there are

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 8>no favorite drugs? You know, you certainly were never suggested

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 8>to take aspirin and Tylenall was one of the few

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 8>things that was considered okay. But overall, you know, anytime

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 8>you get a lot of media attention on any drug

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 8>from politics or anything else, it's typically not a great

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 8>thing for the companies. But I think it does tend

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 8>to even out as it passes.

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 3>You are our senior equity analyst for biopharmaceuticals. When the

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 3>Secretary of Health, Robert F. Kennedy Junior, speaks, does he

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:32.680
<v Speaker 3>tend to move companies in your universe?

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 8>I would argue, yes, for better or for worse, I'd

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 8>say they definitely move, but I would say that they

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 8>go back to a steady state.

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 7>Okay.

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 3>So it's an immediate knee jerk reaction and then things

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:45.160
<v Speaker 3>calm down exactly.

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:47.919
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Ann Hunter, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior equity analyst

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 2>for Biopharmaceuticals. We move next to some news in the

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:54.199
<v Speaker 2>luxury space. This week we heard that The Finished Company,

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 2>or A Health, is raising eight hundred and seventy five

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 2>million dollars in a new Series E financing round, and

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 2>it's now closing in on a roughly eleven billion dollar valuation.

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 2>That's after selling about three million rings over the past year.

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:09.880
<v Speaker 2>For more, co host Scarlett fil When I were joined

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:13.640
<v Speaker 2>by Mark German, Bloomberg News Managing editor for Global Consumer Tech,

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 2>we first asked Mark for more background on the Aura

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 2>ring maker.

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 9>They want to scale production, they want to scale R

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:23.959
<v Speaker 9>and D, they want to move into new regions, they

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 9>want to get into new retail stores, they want to

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 9>add new software features, so they're looking to grow quickly.

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 9>This nearly eleven billion dollar valuation. This is a pretty

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 9>specific hardware company. They really make one thing, and if

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 9>you look at their market cap now after that raise,

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:44.119
<v Speaker 9>you compare it to other companies that are known for

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:50.200
<v Speaker 9>really one type of hardware product. Peloton, Eye, Robot, Sonos

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 9>bows Or is now worth more than all of them. Combined,

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 9>which is pretty crazy to think about. So so far

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 9>this looks to be a success store. It's not a

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 9>very old company, but it's a company doing effective things

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:06.920
<v Speaker 9>and they're clearly building a product that people like. They've

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 9>sold three million units in the last fourteen fifteen months

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:13.719
<v Speaker 9>or so. They've sold five and a half million rings

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 9>to date. They're due to cross one billion in revenue

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 9>in twenty five, a billion and a half in twenty six.

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 9>They did five hundred million in twenty four, so they

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 9>seem to be growing quite nicely.

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, not being into the ring fit ring

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 2>business myself. Fit ring, I like that fit ring. I mean,

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 2>this seems like something that your friends at Cooper Tina

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 2>could come out with tomorrow and copycat. How do you

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 2>think that's the competitive landscape?

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, the competitive landscape is interesting. There's a few smaller

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:46.120
<v Speaker 9>players that are also doing smart rings. Samsung rolled out

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 9>what they call the Galaxy Ring last year, and for Samsung,

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 9>who's actually been a dud, the functionality is just not

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 9>on par with Aura. What Aura has is a very

0:22:56.600 --> 0:23:00.920
<v Speaker 9>strong brand, They have very strong functionality, and they have

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 9>that big first mover advantage. But you're right, if Apple

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 9>comes out with a ring, They're gonna eat Aura's lunch.

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 7>You know.

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 9>Aura's perspective is that they have this gigantic and tried

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:19.360
<v Speaker 9>and true in legal proceedings patent portfolio, and so they

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 9>feel that if Apple were to come out with a ring,

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 9>or another company were to really hit the nail on

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 9>the head with the ring, that they would be able

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 9>to defend their patents. And they've shown to be able

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 9>to do that. They have some cases in front of

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 9>the International Trade Commission and other organizations right now for

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 9>some of the other competitors, So we'll see what happens.

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 9>I don't anticipate Apple coming out with a ring anytime soon.

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 9>I will say that this ten billion dollar valuation is

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 9>a little bit of a double edged sword. On one hand,

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 9>that's amazing for the company. On the other hand, it

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 9>puts them in territory where they're probably not going to

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 9>be acquired or bought in, which would spur another company

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 9>like Apple if they wanted a ring, develop one versus

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 9>buy them. And definitely they're gonna have to make a

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 9>decision in the next couple of years whether they're going

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:10.440
<v Speaker 9>to go public via an IPO spat or if they're

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:11.719
<v Speaker 9>going to stay private all right.

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to Mark German, Bloomberg News Managing editor for Global

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Consumer Tech, coming up a look into the current succession

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 2>plan at T Mobile. You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Radio, providing in depth research and data on two

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 2>thousand companies and one hundred and thirty industries. You can

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 2>access Bloomberg Intelligence via Big on the terminal. I'm Paul Sweeney,

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:31.240
<v Speaker 2>and this is Bloomberg.

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Intelligence with Scarlett Fou and Paul Sweeney

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:44.159
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio.

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 2>We next moved to some news in a telecommunications space.

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 2>This week, we heard that T Mobile is promoting Chief

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 2>operating Officer Shriney Gopalon to the top job. He replaced

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 2>CEO Mike Sievert, who will become vice chairman. And this

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 2>comes as T Mobile competes for customers market that now

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 2>also spans home internet and satellite service.

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 10>For more.

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 2>Co host Scarlett Field and I were joined by John Butler,

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence senior telecom analyst. We first asked John if

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:12.920
<v Speaker 2>he's surprised with T mobiles changeover.

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 10>Not at all. This was incredibly well broadcast. Shriney has

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 10>been hitting the conference circuit. So at this time of year,

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:25.200
<v Speaker 10>all the major investment banks hold these conferences, and he's

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:28.679
<v Speaker 10>been in almost everyone sort of out there telling the

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 10>T Mobiles story. And in my mind it answers one

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 10>of two questions. Right with any incoming CEO, You're like,

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 10>can they manage the company effectively? And can they manage

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 10>the stock effectively? Can they get that narrative out spin

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 10>a good story? And he is really good at that.

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:51.159
<v Speaker 10>So he's answered the second question, and I think in

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 10>some ways he's answered the first as well.

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Talk to us about the wireless business these days, it's

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 2>just a brutally competitive business. Just give us the lay

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:03.679
<v Speaker 2>of the land there between AT and T, Verizon, T Mobile,

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:05.159
<v Speaker 2>and I don't know anybody else who might be out.

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 10>I mean, the big three are still dominant. Paul and

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 10>T Mobile has executed beautifully over the past few years.

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 10>You know, they've done a very good job of sort

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:18.680
<v Speaker 10>of securing the lead in terms of subscriber growth by

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 10>you know, marketing on this hip counterculture brand image. They

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:31.440
<v Speaker 10>continue to be, I think, having an outsized impact on consumers.

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 10>When you think a wireless it really is a consumer

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 10>retail business. They all have thousands of stores. They advertise

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 10>on the Super Bowl, they have giveaways, and I think

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 10>T Mobile, more than most, really does that well. And

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 10>I think the Big Three, because of their scale set,

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:51.359
<v Speaker 10>it sort of sets this sort of wide mote for

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:54.679
<v Speaker 10>any newcomers that want to come in. So T Mobile

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:57.199
<v Speaker 10>as number two in the industry, I think is going

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 10>to remain firmly in that place, if not move into

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:03.119
<v Speaker 10>the number one position over the next several years.

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:04.159
<v Speaker 3>Number one Verizon.

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 10>Number one is Verizon still, so I'm a Verizon person.

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:11.120
<v Speaker 3>I am too, But I just went to Italy and

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 3>how did it? What did you do for your phone needs?

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Fine, it's just a lot. I have a plan that

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:17.399
<v Speaker 2>just ports over to an international.

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 3>Okay, because I do uh huh all of my offspring.

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:24.679
<v Speaker 2>That's the only thing that I still pay for the Yes, no.

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 3>One wants to give that up. Why pay for your

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:28.879
<v Speaker 3>own cell phone service when dad will pay for it.

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 3>I switched over to T Mobile because of the giveaways, Yes,

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 3>because of the free iPhone last cycle, and also because

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 3>you get free data and free international texting when you're

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:41.400
<v Speaker 3>overseas up to five gigabytes, so that means I never

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 3>have to buy an international data parison shopping.

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:46.360
<v Speaker 10>That is the single biggest hook I hear. So when

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 10>people come to me and they're like, I'm a T

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 10>mobile subscriber, they have all these giveaways and they have

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:52.880
<v Speaker 10>international goal.

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 3>That makes a big difference because when I was on

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:56.880
<v Speaker 3>AT and T, I was paying ten dollars a day

0:27:56.920 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 3>and that adds.

0:27:57.440 --> 0:27:59.400
<v Speaker 10>Up really quickly, does it really?

0:27:59.440 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 4>You know?

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:01.439
<v Speaker 3>And then only one person the family can get it

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 3>because you know, not everyone's going to get.

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 2>It right and yeah, four offspring plus an next wife

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 2>you're still thinking for Well, there you go. Charlie Pellett

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:11.399
<v Speaker 2>is on the T Mobi. He always tries to sell.

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 3>Me to get Charlie also knows the great deal. That's

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:15.159
<v Speaker 3>the secret here a Bloomberg Charlie was.

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Tracking the strange parts of the world where he probably

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 2>needs that kind of stuff. So what's the future of

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 2>wireless in this country? Is it just our poop growth?

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Average revenue per user? And is that kind of the

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 2>story for.

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:29.359
<v Speaker 10>That is So that is a great question, that is

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:32.639
<v Speaker 10>what's driving growth? Now for a telco, you start of

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:35.120
<v Speaker 10>run out of room for adding new subs and so

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 10>you need to drive that up that average revenue per

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 10>user and they're doing it with the giveaways we were

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 10>just talking about. They actually charge modestly for those. In

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 10>some cases they're selling you phone insurance. T Mobile is

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 10>now pushing into the advertising business, but the real avenue

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 10>of growth to watch for them going forward is broadband.

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 10>They are making more and more inroads into the market

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 10>and T Mobile it's what I'm watching with the new

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 10>CEO here to see what he does in fiber broadband,

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 10>because if T Mobile has had any sort of a

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:13.959
<v Speaker 10>misfire over the past decade, it's not getting into fiber

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 10>broadband in a bigger way in the way that AT

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 10>and TM Verizon both have through sizeable and aggressive acquisitions.

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 10>So it'll be interesting to see what he does there.

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:29.960
<v Speaker 10>My call is he's going to start building quickly and aggressively,

0:29:30.040 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 10>would be my guess.

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 2>A R thanks to John Butler, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Telecom analyst.

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 2>We move next to the media entertainment space. This week,

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Late night host Jimmy Kimmel returned to television. ABC parent

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Walt Disney had pulled the show off the air. That's

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 2>after Kimmel said conservatives were trying to score political points

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 2>off the fatal shooting of conservative activists Charlie Kirk. In

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 2>his return, Kimmel didn't shy away from poking fun at

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 2>President Donald Trump and FCC Chairman Brendan Carr and making

0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 2>an impassioned case for free speech for more and all

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 2>this scarlet field. When I were joined by Githa Ranganath

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 2>and Bloomberg Intelligence senior media analyst, we first asked Githa

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:08.600
<v Speaker 2>what this news means for late night networks and whether

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 2>they still make money.

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 6>They don't make a whole lot of money, Paul, not anymore.

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 6>It used to be that, you know, late night television

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 6>would bring in a lot of ratings, would bring in

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 6>a lot of AD dollars. That has really changed. We've

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 6>we've seen linear TV kind of hemorrhage viewers now over

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 6>so many years, and late night has no exception. So

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 6>if you just kind of look at, you know, Jimmy

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 6>Kimmel's show, for instance, it generates roughly about fifty million

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 6>dollars in AD revenue. Compare that to a few years

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:38.719
<v Speaker 6>ago when it used to generate close to about one

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 6>hundred and fifty million. So definitely AD revenue going down,

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 6>and most of these late night shows are losing money.

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 6>Just given the programming budget for these shows. So not

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 6>really a needle mover in a financial sense for Disney.

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 3>Okay, But in a cultural sense, it is because these

0:30:57.480 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 3>are shows that define the networks, and so thank you

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 3>for putting numbers to that, because I think there's a

0:31:03.600 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 3>lot of concern or skepticism from certain corners of American

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 3>communities that question whether Stephen Colbert's show should have been

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 3>canceled for financial reasons, as CBS asserts it was. Keita,

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 3>Is ABC going to pay some kind of price for

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 3>allowing Kimmel to go back on air because the President,

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 3>for instance, alluded to making more money off the company

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 3>for doing so.

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's certainly possible. I mean, we've seen President Trump

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 6>kind of go after you know, the broadcast networks threatened

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 6>to kind of revoke licenses, so he goes after anybody.

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 6>He uses his power, you know, the courts, to attack

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:41.480
<v Speaker 6>anybody who says anything unflattering about him. But that's, you know,

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 6>definitely possible from a Disney perspective. Though you have to

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 6>remember this is a very very diversified company, So yes,

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 6>ABC is definitely a very important asset. But again, if

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 6>you put some numbers around this, scarlet. It makes up

0:31:56.640 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 6>only about they generate of Disney itself generates about nine

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 6>to one hundred billion dollars in revenue every year. ABC

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 6>is about five billion, five to six billion in revenue,

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 6>so it's just about five percent for the company. So again,

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 6>you know, small potatoes in the context of the company's financials.

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 6>But yes, you bring up a very important point about

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 6>culture wars. Unfortunately, I think Disney is in a losing

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 6>position whichever way, because they're either going to anger you know,

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 6>the conservatives or the other end of the spectrum.

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 4>So it's just tough.

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, very quickly get that. In the days following kimmel suspension,

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 3>a number of people canceled or threatened to cancel their

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 3>Disney plus streaming services. Do we have a sense that

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 3>this might get kind of noisy when it comes to

0:32:39.920 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 3>the earning supports and the streaming numbers and subscriptions.

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 6>I mean, we've seen this kind of backlash before happen,

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 6>you know, in the case of certain programming and you

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 6>know with Netflix, with other streaming services. Typically we haven't

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 6>really seen it reflected in the numbers, even though there's

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 6>a lot of noise around it. So yes, maybe a

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:00.720
<v Speaker 6>little bit of up and down, but I don't think

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 6>it'll have again any big needle moving effect on the

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 6>Disney Plus subscriber numbers.

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 3>Ah.

0:33:05.440 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Iight, Keith, Well we got you here. I have to

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 2>ask do we have any news on succession to Bob Iger?

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 6>Hmmm, not yet, Not yet, Paul, I mean, that's the

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 6>biggest question always for Disney. He is supposed to retire

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 6>by the end of twenty twenty six. There is a

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 6>lot of rumblings that it might be somebody internal, you know,

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 6>we keep hearing about Dana Walden. Of course, nothing certain

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 6>just yet.

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:30.719
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to KEITHA. Rung Anathan Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Media Analyst.

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:32.480
<v Speaker 2>We move next to some news in the food and

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 2>beverage industry. The coffee giant Strawbucks announced it will close

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 2>stores and eliminate nine hundred jobs in a one billion

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 2>dollar restructuring effort under new chief executive officer Brian nicchol.

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 2>For more, co host Scarlett Ffuh and I were joined

0:33:43.680 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 2>by Michael Halen, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Restaurant and food service analyst.

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 2>We first asked Michael for his take on this week's news.

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 11>This was very clearly communicated to the street. Back in

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 11>April on their fiscal call, Management said that you know,

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:01.120
<v Speaker 11>we expect more restructuring charges. Is we're going to continue

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:05.800
<v Speaker 11>to evaluate our store base. Really, management wanted new CFO

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 11>Kathy Smith to be involved in the process, so this

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:11.839
<v Speaker 11>was not a surprise, all right.

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:13.799
<v Speaker 2>A shout out to my Starbucks on Route thirty five

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:15.879
<v Speaker 2>and Wall Township, New Jersey. They do a great job,

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:20.279
<v Speaker 2>great folks, very efficient, very good Mike. What does this

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 2>company need to do? What do they say is under

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:24.960
<v Speaker 2>to do list to turn this company around? What are

0:34:25.000 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 2>you looking for?

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, it's more operations in marketing and we're starting to

0:34:30.239 --> 0:34:33.760
<v Speaker 11>see things kind of inflect here. We think fiscal twenty

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:38.759
<v Speaker 11>six should be a nice bounce back year. So you know,

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 11>first it's with the operations, right, so it's eliminating menu items,

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 11>increasing labor, which baristas. We're very happy about, creating a

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 11>smart queue for mobile orders, right, so the stores aren't

0:34:53.160 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 11>as chaotic and baristas aren't serving you know, mobile orders

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:01.120
<v Speaker 11>for somebody thirty miles away before it help someone inside

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 11>the store. And then service standards, right, they're rolling out

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 11>these green Apron service standards this year. It's a big

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:13.880
<v Speaker 11>investment on training and really nailing the consumer experience in

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 11>the store. And then from there it's the marketing and

0:35:15.960 --> 0:35:19.359
<v Speaker 11>marketing seems to be working. They pulled back on discounts

0:35:19.400 --> 0:35:21.799
<v Speaker 11>and what they're doing is more marketing. You'll see some

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:25.400
<v Speaker 11>TV ads right. They're doing more digital marketing, and we

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:27.640
<v Speaker 11>think that's a smart move. It seems to be paying

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:34.319
<v Speaker 11>early dividends. Starbucks non rewards member transactions are up. Non

0:35:34.440 --> 0:35:39.319
<v Speaker 11>discounted rewards members transactions are up, and we think these

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 11>are a sign that sales are going to inflect higher

0:35:41.760 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 11>in the coming months.

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Okay, but this is taking a while. Paul and I

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:47.520
<v Speaker 3>were just saying that Brian Nickel owns this now he's

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:50.080
<v Speaker 3>been CEO for a year and they're still in turnaround mode.

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:52.000
<v Speaker 3>They're still in kind of like let's figure out our

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 3>path forward. Investors, please be patient. Are investor is going

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 3>to continue to be patient for another six months to

0:35:58.640 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 3>one year?

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:01.279
<v Speaker 11>I don't think they're going to be patient for six

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:03.320
<v Speaker 11>months to one year. In terms of the stock price,

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 11>I think Brian Nichols job is very much safe. You know,

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 11>you can't turn around an aircreraft carrier on a dime, right,

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:14.279
<v Speaker 11>This is a massive organization eighteen thousand stores just here

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 11>in North America over forty thousand globally. So yes, this

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 11>is taking longer than a lot anticipated you know, myself included.

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:26.239
<v Speaker 11>You know, our investor is going to be happy if

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:28.799
<v Speaker 11>they don't see same sore sales inflect here in the

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:32.400
<v Speaker 11>first quarter of fiscal twenty six. No, they're not going

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 11>to be happy, and you're going to see it reflected

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 11>in the share price.

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:35.359
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:36:35.440 --> 0:36:38.719
<v Speaker 11>So yeah, I mean I think they're they're making the

0:36:38.800 --> 0:36:42.879
<v Speaker 11>right moves. This has been a longer turnaround than most

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 11>had expected. But you know, I think Brian Nichols pressing

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 11>all the right buttons right now.

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Michael Halen, Bloomberg Intelligence senior restaurant and

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:53.960
<v Speaker 2>food service analyst. That's this week's edition of Bloomberg Intelligence

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 2>on Bloomberg Radio, providing in depth research and data on

0:36:56.719 --> 0:36:59.200
<v Speaker 2>two thousand companies and one hundred and thirty industries. And

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 2>remember you can that is Bloomberg Intelligence via b I

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:04.440
<v Speaker 2>go on the terminal, I'm Paul Sweeney. Stay with us.

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 2>Today's top stories and global business headlines are coming up

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 2>right now.

0:37:10.040 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 7>M