1
00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:11,480
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. Good morning, I'm Nathan Hager.

2
00:00:11,680 --> 00:00:13,240
Speaker 1: I want to get a fuller view of what's been

3
00:00:13,280 --> 00:00:15,760
Speaker 1: happening in the market over the last several days. Joining

4
00:00:15,840 --> 00:00:19,880
Speaker 1: us now live Mike Wilson, Chief US equity strategist at

5
00:00:19,920 --> 00:00:22,600
Speaker 1: Morgan Stanley. Mike, it is great to speak with you

6
00:00:22,720 --> 00:00:26,079
Speaker 1: on this what looks to be a turnaround Tuesday. Have

7
00:00:26,200 --> 00:00:28,560
Speaker 1: we found bottom after the sell off or is this

8
00:00:28,600 --> 00:00:29,760
Speaker 1: a dead cat bounce for you?

9
00:00:29,800 --> 00:00:33,080
Speaker 2: Good morning, Good morning, Nathan. Look, I don't I mean,

10
00:00:33,080 --> 00:00:35,120
Speaker 2: nobody knows if this is going to be it or not,

11
00:00:35,240 --> 00:00:37,319
Speaker 2: but I will tell you that, you know, Friday look

12
00:00:37,479 --> 00:00:40,360
Speaker 2: like that may have been it because we held the

13
00:00:40,400 --> 00:00:42,800
Speaker 2: diner day moving average, you know, into the clothes, and

14
00:00:42,840 --> 00:00:45,479
Speaker 2: then you know, kind of gave that back quickly on

15
00:00:45,560 --> 00:00:49,279
Speaker 2: pretty good volume yesterday. So you know, look, we've been

16
00:00:49,640 --> 00:00:52,120
Speaker 2: We've been pretty clear in our guidance this year. We

17
00:00:52,200 --> 00:00:54,080
Speaker 2: felt like the first half was going to be tougher

18
00:00:54,680 --> 00:00:59,040
Speaker 2: after the strong finish, mainly because we saw mostly growth

19
00:00:59,160 --> 00:01:03,600
Speaker 2: negative features in the initial moves of the administration. But

20
00:01:03,680 --> 00:01:06,039
Speaker 2: in addition to that, something that doesn't get talked about

21
00:01:06,120 --> 00:01:09,800
Speaker 2: much is that earnings revisions have been you know, rolling

22
00:01:09,840 --> 00:01:14,320
Speaker 2: over for several months and led by the you know,

23
00:01:14,360 --> 00:01:18,200
Speaker 2: big tech gross stocks. So you know, that's the that's

24
00:01:18,200 --> 00:01:20,720
Speaker 2: a story that gets buried in the you know, in

25
00:01:20,760 --> 00:01:22,679
Speaker 2: the in the fine print for some reason, which is

26
00:01:22,720 --> 00:01:27,480
Speaker 2: that you know, this AI capex story is decelerating. Obviously,

27
00:01:27,480 --> 00:01:29,520
Speaker 2: the deep seek story that came out earlier this year

28
00:01:30,000 --> 00:01:32,360
Speaker 2: and and all of that is really what's what's weighed

29
00:01:32,400 --> 00:01:36,360
Speaker 2: on the kind of you know, US indices as much

30
00:01:36,400 --> 00:01:42,240
Speaker 2: as say doze the immigration enforcement in terraces and the like. So, look,

31
00:01:42,560 --> 00:01:46,399
Speaker 2: the growth story has been deteriorating, markets have quickly adjusted.

32
00:01:46,520 --> 00:01:48,520
Speaker 2: We've been using fifty five hundred as a low end

33
00:01:48,560 --> 00:01:50,680
Speaker 2: of our range for the first half. We're almost there.

34
00:01:51,360 --> 00:01:53,760
Speaker 2: You know, it's hard to predict things to the dollar obviously,

35
00:01:54,480 --> 00:01:56,880
Speaker 2: are what we're really focused on is the revision factors

36
00:01:56,880 --> 00:01:59,400
Speaker 2: and when they could next turn up or at least stabilize.

37
00:01:59,400 --> 00:02:01,280
Speaker 2: And we think there's a chance for that later this

38
00:02:01,360 --> 00:02:05,200
Speaker 2: month because the dollar has been weaker and rates have

39
00:02:05,240 --> 00:02:06,720
Speaker 2: come down a bunch, and those tend to work with

40
00:02:06,760 --> 00:02:08,000
Speaker 2: a little bit of a lead. So by the end

41
00:02:08,000 --> 00:02:10,079
Speaker 2: of this month we could see perhaps some of those

42
00:02:10,080 --> 00:02:13,400
Speaker 2: revision factors stabilized and that's really the positive canalysts that

43
00:02:13,440 --> 00:02:16,120
Speaker 2: we're looking for to kind of get buyers to come

44
00:02:16,160 --> 00:02:18,320
Speaker 2: in here in the meantime. You know, look, I mean

45
00:02:18,320 --> 00:02:21,040
Speaker 2: the markets have been very efficient in you know, focusing

46
00:02:21,080 --> 00:02:23,920
Speaker 2: on the areas which have had positive earning revisions, and

47
00:02:23,960 --> 00:02:29,640
Speaker 2: those areas being financial, software, consumer services, and media and entertainment,

48
00:02:30,040 --> 00:02:35,400
Speaker 2: and likewise punishing those areas with bad revisions like materials, energy,

49
00:02:35,960 --> 00:02:39,440
Speaker 2: some of the lower quality small cap areas, consumer goods, etc.

50
00:02:40,240 --> 00:02:42,639
Speaker 1: Is some of that bounce back that you're calling for

51
00:02:42,760 --> 00:02:46,079
Speaker 1: in earnings revisions going to be driven by tax cuts?

52
00:02:46,080 --> 00:02:48,800
Speaker 1: I only asked because we heard from the National Economic

53
00:02:48,840 --> 00:02:51,560
Speaker 1: Council Director Kevin Hassett saying that the economy is going

54
00:02:51,600 --> 00:02:55,280
Speaker 1: to take off in the second quarter with tax cuts.

55
00:02:55,840 --> 00:02:56,799
Speaker 1: Is that what your view?

56
00:02:57,680 --> 00:03:02,080
Speaker 2: No, we're not anticipating tax cuts packed estimates anytime soon.

57
00:03:02,160 --> 00:03:05,840
Speaker 2: I mean maybe later this year, once the legislative process continues.

58
00:03:05,880 --> 00:03:07,720
Speaker 2: But you know, the way we're the way we understand

59
00:03:07,800 --> 00:03:10,840
Speaker 2: it is is that these are not incremental tax cuts.

60
00:03:11,120 --> 00:03:14,400
Speaker 2: These are an extension of existing tax cuts. So I

61
00:03:14,440 --> 00:03:20,320
Speaker 2: don't I don't anticipate revision factors to increase because of that. Now,

62
00:03:20,360 --> 00:03:23,000
Speaker 2: of course, if the tax cuts don't get extended, that

63
00:03:23,040 --> 00:03:25,640
Speaker 2: would be a real negative that that's not our expectation

64
00:03:25,680 --> 00:03:26,160
Speaker 2: at the moment.

65
00:03:26,680 --> 00:03:30,400
Speaker 1: The President has talked about this as a period of transition.

66
00:03:30,639 --> 00:03:34,440
Speaker 1: If that's the case, what are we transitioning to and

67
00:03:34,800 --> 00:03:36,000
Speaker 1: can it support stocks?

68
00:03:36,440 --> 00:03:38,040
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean that's the that's just kind of the

69
00:03:38,040 --> 00:03:41,200
Speaker 2: bull case. You know, Secretary best And talked about this

70
00:03:41,360 --> 00:03:45,520
Speaker 2: last week and that there's no sort of Trump put,

71
00:03:45,880 --> 00:03:49,040
Speaker 2: but there may be a Trump call, meaning, you know,

72
00:03:49,320 --> 00:03:52,160
Speaker 2: the short term pain of some of the things that

73
00:03:52,240 --> 00:03:54,840
Speaker 2: need to do to rebalance the economy, which I think

74
00:03:54,920 --> 00:03:58,080
Speaker 2: is a good idea, could lead to benefits later. And

75
00:03:58,120 --> 00:04:00,640
Speaker 2: the most simplistic way of kind of explained that would

76
00:04:00,640 --> 00:04:03,720
Speaker 2: be that we shrink the size of government and that

77
00:04:03,880 --> 00:04:08,640
Speaker 2: sort of liberates the private economy ultimately via deregulation and

78
00:04:08,840 --> 00:04:11,080
Speaker 2: some of the crowding out that's been going on now

79
00:04:11,160 --> 00:04:13,839
Speaker 2: for several years. I mean, this is, by the way,

80
00:04:13,880 --> 00:04:16,520
Speaker 2: that's not a new phenomenon. The government has been growing

81
00:04:16,920 --> 00:04:20,520
Speaker 2: for the better part of my adult life. And so

82
00:04:20,720 --> 00:04:23,479
Speaker 2: you know, the fact that we're finally talking about maybe

83
00:04:23,560 --> 00:04:27,039
Speaker 2: shrinking the government, I'm not really sure you know who's

84
00:04:27,080 --> 00:04:30,560
Speaker 2: against that, because we know that's a that's an inefficient

85
00:04:30,560 --> 00:04:33,440
Speaker 2: way to allocate capital. And if you can get the

86
00:04:33,480 --> 00:04:37,520
Speaker 2: private sector doing that job instead, that's the payoff down

87
00:04:37,520 --> 00:04:39,719
Speaker 2: the road. We'll see how long it takes to get there,

88
00:04:39,720 --> 00:04:42,320
Speaker 2: but that's I think the explanation for what they're talking about.

89
00:04:42,640 --> 00:04:46,280
Speaker 1: Speaking with Mike Wilson, chief US equity strategist at Morgan

90
00:04:46,400 --> 00:04:50,240
Speaker 1: Stanley in your start to the week, note Mike, of

91
00:04:50,279 --> 00:04:52,680
Speaker 1: course you talked about putting your bottom for the S

92
00:04:52,760 --> 00:04:57,080
Speaker 1: and P five hundred at fifty five hundred, we're pretty

93
00:04:57,080 --> 00:04:59,719
Speaker 1: close to there. Now, what's the risk it could go

94
00:04:59,760 --> 00:05:00,599
Speaker 1: even lower than that?

95
00:05:00,960 --> 00:05:03,000
Speaker 2: Well, the risk is that this, you know, turns into

96
00:05:03,279 --> 00:05:06,440
Speaker 2: a hard landing. That's not our view at the moment.

97
00:05:06,800 --> 00:05:09,039
Speaker 2: I think, you know, we need to see more more

98
00:05:09,120 --> 00:05:12,880
Speaker 2: damage here. But it also becomes somewhat reflexive, meaning the

99
00:05:12,920 --> 00:05:16,360
Speaker 2: more the stock market goes down, the risk that that

100
00:05:16,400 --> 00:05:19,479
Speaker 2: turns into you know, consumer spending at the high end

101
00:05:19,680 --> 00:05:22,480
Speaker 2: coming down as well, so it becomes kind of self fulfilling.

102
00:05:23,080 --> 00:05:25,479
Speaker 2: So we're in we're just in that reflective period right now.

103
00:05:25,520 --> 00:05:28,280
Speaker 2: I would say, you know, as I mentioned earlier, there's

104
00:05:28,279 --> 00:05:30,720
Speaker 2: no quote unquote Trump put If you want to put

105
00:05:30,760 --> 00:05:32,360
Speaker 2: it that way, I think there is a FED put,

106
00:05:33,120 --> 00:05:35,599
Speaker 2: and I you know, I think if growth were to

107
00:05:35,640 --> 00:05:40,200
Speaker 2: deteriorate meaningfully, and you know Chair Powell talked about this

108
00:05:40,279 --> 00:05:42,760
Speaker 2: last week. I mean, they have a lot of firepower

109
00:05:42,880 --> 00:05:45,880
Speaker 2: to respond, So it's going to be, you know, one

110
00:05:45,880 --> 00:05:47,960
Speaker 2: of these one of these years where you just got

111
00:05:47,960 --> 00:05:51,200
Speaker 2: to be really paying attention minutes to minute, day to day,

112
00:05:51,200 --> 00:05:53,760
Speaker 2: week to week, kind of to the to the changes

113
00:05:53,800 --> 00:05:55,960
Speaker 2: here at the margin. The good news is that the

114
00:05:55,960 --> 00:05:59,599
Speaker 2: markets have quickly adjusted to kind of what we've been forecasting,

115
00:05:59,640 --> 00:06:01,960
Speaker 2: which is, you know, growth is disappointing in the first half.

116
00:06:02,520 --> 00:06:04,160
Speaker 2: And look at me. While the S and P is

117
00:06:04,200 --> 00:06:06,080
Speaker 2: only down eight percent, I mean a lot of stocks

118
00:06:06,080 --> 00:06:09,600
Speaker 2: are down twenty thirty, forty percent. So, like you know,

119
00:06:09,600 --> 00:06:12,880
Speaker 2: when these corrections happen, they happen quickly. And my guess

120
00:06:13,000 --> 00:06:16,080
Speaker 2: is that we're already seeing bargains in some areas that

121
00:06:16,279 --> 00:06:18,560
Speaker 2: you know probably will end up being being good entry

122
00:06:18,560 --> 00:06:19,640
Speaker 2: points right here right now.

123
00:06:19,839 --> 00:06:22,080
Speaker 1: Well, Mike, if you're looking for a FED put, do

124
00:06:22,120 --> 00:06:24,560
Speaker 1: you think we could get one this half?

125
00:06:25,080 --> 00:06:27,279
Speaker 2: Well, like I said, the downside, you know, the risk

126
00:06:27,400 --> 00:06:29,599
Speaker 2: is that we have a you know, the growth scare

127
00:06:29,640 --> 00:06:33,400
Speaker 2: turns into a recession scare, and and we're not there yet,

128
00:06:33,600 --> 00:06:36,200
Speaker 2: right And I think you know, Terry poul said that,

129
00:06:36,240 --> 00:06:38,320
Speaker 2: he said the economy's fine at the moment. What I'm

130
00:06:38,320 --> 00:06:41,560
Speaker 2: saying is is if it deteriorates quickly, I think the

131
00:06:41,600 --> 00:06:44,360
Speaker 2: FED will respond quickly. But that's a you know, they'll

132
00:06:44,400 --> 00:06:47,560
Speaker 2: respond to growth. Uh, then that they probably won't respond

133
00:06:47,600 --> 00:06:50,160
Speaker 2: to the stock market. So I think there's a there's

134
00:06:50,160 --> 00:06:53,039
Speaker 2: a put as it relates to the growth risk.

135
00:06:53,920 --> 00:06:57,680
Speaker 1: So in our last minute, where are you advising your

136
00:06:57,680 --> 00:07:02,760
Speaker 1: clients to reposition? If you are advising that, where should

137
00:07:02,920 --> 00:07:05,599
Speaker 1: people be putting their money to work at this moment?

138
00:07:06,120 --> 00:07:07,919
Speaker 2: Well, we're pretty comfortable right now. I mean, we we

139
00:07:07,960 --> 00:07:10,160
Speaker 2: have a focused list that's actually up on the year

140
00:07:10,760 --> 00:07:13,880
Speaker 2: close to seven percent, so you know, and that's that's

141
00:07:13,920 --> 00:07:17,960
Speaker 2: really a large cap quality somewhat defensive bid to it,

142
00:07:18,720 --> 00:07:21,000
Speaker 2: you know, And so we feel like we've been positioned

143
00:07:21,000 --> 00:07:24,280
Speaker 2: for this. And now the question is when do we

144
00:07:24,320 --> 00:07:27,840
Speaker 2: pivot to get more aggressive and get you know, kind

145
00:07:27,840 --> 00:07:31,360
Speaker 2: of go higher beta, maybe even go down the cap curve.

146
00:07:32,080 --> 00:07:34,040
Speaker 2: We're not there yet, but I mean that so we're

147
00:07:34,080 --> 00:07:36,400
Speaker 2: we think we're set up for it, and and and

148
00:07:36,400 --> 00:07:40,200
Speaker 2: and our portfolios are performing as a result. The key

149
00:07:40,240 --> 00:07:42,320
Speaker 2: question is, you know, when is the time to get

150
00:07:42,600 --> 00:07:45,600
Speaker 2: more aggressive like we did last fall kind of going

151
00:07:45,600 --> 00:07:47,760
Speaker 2: into the election and the FED cuts that we saw,

152
00:07:48,200 --> 00:07:50,560
Speaker 2: and you know, well, we'll let you know, We'll let

153
00:07:50,560 --> 00:07:52,040
Speaker 2: you know when we think it's time. We don't think

154
00:07:52,040 --> 00:07:54,120
Speaker 2: it's time yet. We think it's going to remain choppy

155
00:07:54,160 --> 00:07:56,560
Speaker 2: here at least for the next couple of weeks. And

156
00:07:56,880 --> 00:07:59,200
Speaker 2: as you know, we publish every week, so you know,

157
00:07:59,240 --> 00:07:59,800
Speaker 2: stay tuned.

158
00:08:00,360 --> 00:08:02,640
Speaker 1: Really appreciate you coming on with us to give us

159
00:08:02,680 --> 00:08:06,480
Speaker 1: your latest view. That's Mike Wilson, chief US equity strategist

160
00:08:06,640 --> 00:08:10,400
Speaker 1: at Morgan Stanley. We are very pleased to be joined

161
00:08:10,440 --> 00:08:13,920
Speaker 1: now by Mohammad Alarian, the chief economics advisor at Alliance,

162
00:08:14,040 --> 00:08:18,840
Speaker 1: President of Queen's College, Cambridge, and columnist for Bloomberg Opinion. Muhammad,

163
00:08:18,840 --> 00:08:21,800
Speaker 1: thanks so much for joining us this morning on Bloomberg Daybreak.

164
00:08:21,840 --> 00:08:24,640
Speaker 1: As we do see futures bouncing back just a bit

165
00:08:24,680 --> 00:08:27,120
Speaker 1: this morning from the broad sell off that we've seen

166
00:08:27,160 --> 00:08:29,880
Speaker 1: over the last several days. Do you think this is

167
00:08:29,920 --> 00:08:32,600
Speaker 1: as far as it's going? Could it go down further?

168
00:08:32,679 --> 00:08:34,679
Speaker 1: Good morning, Good.

169
00:08:34,520 --> 00:08:39,040
Speaker 3: Morning, Nathan. It's hard to tell it could go further

170
00:08:39,640 --> 00:08:42,200
Speaker 3: or consolidate. And I don't want to sound wishy washy,

171
00:08:42,400 --> 00:08:46,560
Speaker 3: but there are some really complex technicals here, and there's

172
00:08:46,600 --> 00:08:49,720
Speaker 3: a lot of policy uncertainty. So these are One of

173
00:08:49,840 --> 00:08:53,040
Speaker 3: these is a situation where the most important question is

174
00:08:53,040 --> 00:08:56,680
Speaker 3: an investor that you need to ask yourself is what

175
00:08:57,000 --> 00:09:00,400
Speaker 3: mistake can our fort to make? Because when the world

176
00:09:00,440 --> 00:09:03,640
Speaker 3: is so unpredictable, the probability of a mistake goes up.

177
00:09:03,679 --> 00:09:06,480
Speaker 3: No one wants to make a mistake, Nathan, but sometimes

178
00:09:06,480 --> 00:09:09,520
Speaker 3: mistakes are forced on you, and people have to make

179
00:09:09,559 --> 00:09:12,840
Speaker 3: sure that their mistakes are recoverable, because the good news is,

180
00:09:12,840 --> 00:09:16,640
Speaker 3: with time, most investment mistakes are recoverable.

181
00:09:17,080 --> 00:09:20,720
Speaker 1: Are you implying that it was a mistake to expect

182
00:09:20,800 --> 00:09:25,200
Speaker 1: that we would see broad stimulus right away from President Trump?

183
00:09:25,720 --> 00:09:28,680
Speaker 1: The market seemed to be pricing in after his election

184
00:09:28,760 --> 00:09:31,200
Speaker 1: in November, So.

185
00:09:31,120 --> 00:09:34,120
Speaker 3: I think, Nathan, the market understood that there were five

186
00:09:34,240 --> 00:09:38,679
Speaker 3: policy areas that the president intended to pursue that would

187
00:09:38,720 --> 00:09:43,640
Speaker 3: impact corporate profitability and financial markets. And you know them

188
00:09:43,760 --> 00:09:47,480
Speaker 3: is trade and tariffs in particular, It's about public sector

189
00:09:47,520 --> 00:09:51,120
Speaker 3: reform and what DOGE is doing. It's about energy, it's

190
00:09:51,120 --> 00:09:56,360
Speaker 3: about deregulation, and the view was that we will get

191
00:09:56,360 --> 00:10:00,440
Speaker 3: a big bang that the President would move on all

192
00:10:01,120 --> 00:10:07,360
Speaker 3: five simultaneously, and the markets would benefit from deregulation, they

193
00:10:07,400 --> 00:10:10,839
Speaker 3: would benefit from lower energy prices, and they would be

194
00:10:10,880 --> 00:10:14,640
Speaker 3: able to absorb the little disturbances that comes from tariff

195
00:10:14,760 --> 00:10:18,000
Speaker 3: and DOGE. As it turns out, we're getting the tariffs

196
00:10:18,040 --> 00:10:22,640
Speaker 3: under DOGE first and the others will come later, including

197
00:10:22,720 --> 00:10:25,520
Speaker 3: tax cuts. So the question that the market has to

198
00:10:27,320 --> 00:10:32,160
Speaker 3: deal with today, Nathan, is can we manage this bumpy

199
00:10:32,280 --> 00:10:35,920
Speaker 3: journey to a better destination? And that is what people

200
00:10:35,920 --> 00:10:36,960
Speaker 3: are trying to figure out.

201
00:10:38,080 --> 00:10:42,520
Speaker 1: As we try to figure this out, Muhammad, is US

202
00:10:42,600 --> 00:10:45,800
Speaker 1: exceptionalism something you've been talking about for quite some time

203
00:10:46,120 --> 00:10:46,960
Speaker 1: is that at risk?

204
00:10:47,080 --> 00:10:52,440
Speaker 3: Now? I think what's that risk? Is one of the

205
00:10:52,559 --> 00:10:57,120
Speaker 3: US's edges, And it's really important in financial markets, in

206
00:10:57,160 --> 00:10:59,760
Speaker 3: global in the global economy to understand what your edge

207
00:10:59,880 --> 00:11:04,640
Speaker 3: is is. And one of the US edges is predictability

208
00:11:05,000 --> 00:11:08,320
Speaker 3: and the rule of law. And the more these two

209
00:11:08,400 --> 00:11:11,800
Speaker 3: things are questioned, the more people are going to start

210
00:11:11,880 --> 00:11:16,560
Speaker 3: questioning economic exceptionalisms. The other elements of economic exceptionalism are

211
00:11:16,600 --> 00:11:21,000
Speaker 3: still sound. We have an incredibly entrepreneurial economy. We have

212
00:11:21,480 --> 00:11:26,000
Speaker 3: one of the best private sectors. We are relatively closed,

213
00:11:26,280 --> 00:11:30,760
Speaker 3: meaning that other countries can't force outcomes on us. So

214
00:11:30,840 --> 00:11:34,400
Speaker 3: there's a lot that's still going well for the US economy,

215
00:11:35,040 --> 00:11:39,640
Speaker 3: but there's a question about this edge of predictability, transparency,

216
00:11:39,679 --> 00:11:40,440
Speaker 3: and the rule of law.

217
00:11:41,040 --> 00:11:44,280
Speaker 1: We're speaking with Muhammad al Arian, columnists for Bloomberg Opinion

218
00:11:44,280 --> 00:11:50,360
Speaker 1: and president of Queen's College, Cambridge. Muhammad what brings us

219
00:11:50,480 --> 00:11:56,880
Speaker 1: exceptionalism back more strongly for the market as we continue

220
00:11:56,920 --> 00:12:02,000
Speaker 1: to watch these policy uncertainties play out For investors.

221
00:12:03,000 --> 00:12:07,360
Speaker 3: I'll quote a CEO friend of mine who simply said,

222
00:12:07,920 --> 00:12:11,719
Speaker 3: I just want to know what operating environment I am

223
00:12:11,720 --> 00:12:14,760
Speaker 3: in ore Tariff's going to stay and they're not going

224
00:12:14,840 --> 00:12:18,080
Speaker 3: to stay. Is there going to be a massive layoff

225
00:12:18,200 --> 00:12:21,080
Speaker 3: from the federal government or not? Is the federal government

226
00:12:21,160 --> 00:12:26,200
Speaker 3: going to honor the commitments in terms of contracts or not.

227
00:12:26,840 --> 00:12:30,840
Speaker 3: Clarity is what people want, Nathan, that you know, the

228
00:12:30,960 --> 00:12:35,120
Speaker 3: US is agile enough to operate in many different environments,

229
00:12:35,520 --> 00:12:38,640
Speaker 3: but what business leaders need is clarity. And you're starting

230
00:12:38,679 --> 00:12:42,360
Speaker 3: to hear this phrase wait and see over and over

231
00:12:42,440 --> 00:12:48,960
Speaker 3: again in corporate calls. Companies are just waiting to see

232
00:12:49,160 --> 00:12:52,160
Speaker 3: what's happening before they commit to major expenditure. The problem

233
00:12:52,360 --> 00:12:56,680
Speaker 3: is if they wait and see and if consumers not

234
00:12:56,840 --> 00:13:02,000
Speaker 3: feeling income insecure, then we could easily walk ourselves or

235
00:13:02,040 --> 00:13:03,600
Speaker 3: weigh ourselves into a recession.

236
00:13:04,440 --> 00:13:08,920
Speaker 1: Our investors finding clarity outside the US. Is that something

237
00:13:09,120 --> 00:13:13,839
Speaker 1: that could cause investors to think about putting more of

238
00:13:13,880 --> 00:13:17,760
Speaker 1: their money into assets outside the US.

239
00:13:19,240 --> 00:13:21,520
Speaker 3: That's happening, you know, There's been an enormous up ending

240
00:13:21,880 --> 00:13:25,320
Speaker 3: of all the consensus trades that were in place at

241
00:13:25,320 --> 00:13:26,800
Speaker 3: the beginning of the year. So in the beginning of

242
00:13:26,800 --> 00:13:30,680
Speaker 3: the year, consensus was favor US equities over the rest

243
00:13:30,720 --> 00:13:34,720
Speaker 3: of the world. It was usuels will go higher while

244
00:13:34,760 --> 00:13:38,840
Speaker 3: Germany yels will stay low. It was the dollar with strengthen,

245
00:13:39,480 --> 00:13:43,560
Speaker 3: especially against the Euro, which may reach parody. All those

246
00:13:43,600 --> 00:13:46,800
Speaker 3: trades have been turned on their head. People are favoring

247
00:13:48,400 --> 00:13:52,200
Speaker 3: foreign equities relative to US that massively outperformed the US.

248
00:13:52,800 --> 00:13:56,880
Speaker 3: We've seen a significant compression in the yield differential between

249
00:13:57,400 --> 00:14:01,079
Speaker 3: the US and Germany and the dollars weekend. It's another

250
00:14:01,160 --> 00:14:03,600
Speaker 3: half a percent week of today, and the euro, which

251
00:14:03,640 --> 00:14:06,160
Speaker 3: was expected to go to parody, is at one o nine.

252
00:14:06,679 --> 00:14:12,040
Speaker 3: So the market has seen a reason to exploit what

253
00:14:12,280 --> 00:14:15,920
Speaker 3: have been significant valuation difference is why not only because

254
00:14:15,960 --> 00:14:19,000
Speaker 3: there's a growth sca in the US, but there's the

255
00:14:19,120 --> 00:14:22,040
Speaker 3: hope for what's called the spot Nik moment in Germany,

256
00:14:22,040 --> 00:14:25,640
Speaker 3: in particular the Germany. Will we sorry go ahead?

257
00:14:25,840 --> 00:14:28,960
Speaker 1: Do you think we could see clarity from the Federal

258
00:14:29,000 --> 00:14:31,040
Speaker 1: Reserve or do you think the FED is going to

259
00:14:31,200 --> 00:14:34,840
Speaker 1: stay on the sidelines waiting for some of this policy

260
00:14:34,880 --> 00:14:37,479
Speaker 1: uncertainty to get ironed out from the Trump administration.

261
00:14:38,760 --> 00:14:42,080
Speaker 3: Chair Power made it very clear they do not see

262
00:14:42,080 --> 00:14:44,760
Speaker 3: a reason to move. They will also be in a

263
00:14:44,800 --> 00:14:45,960
Speaker 3: wait and see attitude.

264
00:14:49,200 --> 00:14:51,560
Speaker 1: Is that the right move? I mean, what could get

265
00:14:51,600 --> 00:14:52,960
Speaker 1: the FED off the sidelines?

266
00:14:54,160 --> 00:14:57,120
Speaker 3: So, Nathan, you know that for a very long time

267
00:14:57,960 --> 00:15:02,640
Speaker 3: of complaining that the FED is open reactive, that by

268
00:15:02,720 --> 00:15:06,520
Speaker 3: being so reactive, whether it's data dependence with wait and see,

269
00:15:07,040 --> 00:15:12,280
Speaker 3: it tends to add and accentuate volatility rather than act

270
00:15:12,720 --> 00:15:17,200
Speaker 3: as an anank of stability and as a nose star.

271
00:15:17,880 --> 00:15:20,560
Speaker 3: But this is the reality of the day's Fed, after

272
00:15:20,600 --> 00:15:23,440
Speaker 3: the big mistake they made in twenty twenty one twenty

273
00:15:23,480 --> 00:15:28,000
Speaker 3: two by cooling inflation transitory that become very reactive. So

274
00:15:28,040 --> 00:15:31,200
Speaker 3: we should not expect the FED to take the lead here.

275
00:15:32,560 --> 00:15:36,080
Speaker 1: We want to get into your latest column for Bloomberg Opinion.

276
00:15:36,120 --> 00:15:40,280
Speaker 1: Talking about the FED, you are arguing that the fixation

277
00:15:40,640 --> 00:15:44,600
Speaker 1: on the two percent inflation target is risky. Talk a

278
00:15:44,640 --> 00:15:46,880
Speaker 1: little bit more about that view and why you see

279
00:15:46,880 --> 00:15:48,200
Speaker 1: that risk, what the risk is.

280
00:15:49,720 --> 00:15:55,320
Speaker 3: You know, the two percent target is a historic accident.

281
00:15:56,040 --> 00:15:58,640
Speaker 3: It was something that in the Bank of New Zealand,

282
00:15:59,080 --> 00:16:01,160
Speaker 3: the Reserve Bank of Newton and came up during an

283
00:16:01,160 --> 00:16:06,400
Speaker 3: inflation targeting exercise and it stuck because the world entered

284
00:16:06,440 --> 00:16:10,920
Speaker 3: a massive phase of disinflation. The entry of China into

285
00:16:10,960 --> 00:16:14,440
Speaker 3: the global economy was a very positive supply shock. The

286
00:16:14,760 --> 00:16:18,360
Speaker 3: dismantling of the Soviet Union was a very positive supply shock,

287
00:16:19,160 --> 00:16:21,040
Speaker 3: and we didn't have to worry about inflation, and two

288
00:16:21,080 --> 00:16:26,360
Speaker 3: percent seem fine. Now we are having not favorable supply shocks,

289
00:16:26,520 --> 00:16:30,880
Speaker 3: but unfavorable supply shock. The global economy is fragmenting. Supply

290
00:16:31,040 --> 00:16:36,200
Speaker 3: chains are being rewired, we're having tariffs, we're having trade ward,

291
00:16:36,240 --> 00:16:40,320
Speaker 3: we have rapidization of investment tools. In a world like this,

292
00:16:40,560 --> 00:16:43,240
Speaker 3: you have to ask you the question, is two percent

293
00:16:43,440 --> 00:16:47,080
Speaker 3: still the right target? Because if you pursue the wrong target,

294
00:16:47,840 --> 00:16:51,880
Speaker 3: then you will sacrifice growth, you will sacrifice employment and

295
00:16:52,080 --> 00:16:55,760
Speaker 3: Ultimately you will undermine the independence of the FED.

296
00:16:55,880 --> 00:16:56,120
Speaker 2: Now.

297
00:16:56,280 --> 00:16:59,120
Speaker 3: I don't think the FED will change its inflation target

298
00:16:59,480 --> 00:17:02,480
Speaker 3: anytime soon, but it certainly needs to be thinking about

299
00:17:02,840 --> 00:17:04,719
Speaker 3: whether two percent is the right target.

300
00:17:05,800 --> 00:17:08,040
Speaker 1: Well, what would the market impact be if the FED

301
00:17:08,280 --> 00:17:13,800
Speaker 1: did decide to change its two percent inflation target move

302
00:17:13,920 --> 00:17:16,520
Speaker 1: things higher? How would the market react to that?

303
00:17:17,800 --> 00:17:19,960
Speaker 3: And that's the argument that's being used that if you

304
00:17:20,119 --> 00:17:26,200
Speaker 3: change it, then you will destabilize inflation expectations. I think

305
00:17:26,359 --> 00:17:29,800
Speaker 3: that argument has been taken to an extreme. Most of

306
00:17:29,880 --> 00:17:32,840
Speaker 3: us who believe that the FED should think about this

307
00:17:34,880 --> 00:17:37,919
Speaker 3: suggesting two things. One, the change wouldn't be massive. It

308
00:17:37,920 --> 00:17:40,800
Speaker 3: would include going to a band, not a point estimate,

309
00:17:41,320 --> 00:17:44,880
Speaker 3: and the lower end of that band would be either

310
00:17:44,920 --> 00:17:46,359
Speaker 3: two and a quarter in two and a half, so

311
00:17:46,600 --> 00:17:48,439
Speaker 3: call it a two and a half to three percent

312
00:17:48,560 --> 00:17:53,840
Speaker 3: inflation target. That is not something that will fundamentally decibilized market.

313
00:17:55,200 --> 00:17:57,880
Speaker 3: And on second thing that we argue is it can

314
00:17:57,920 --> 00:18:04,480
Speaker 3: be done in a phase manner that doesn't de stabilized markets.

315
00:18:04,760 --> 00:18:08,320
Speaker 1: I wonder if inflation expectations are starting to get unanchored

316
00:18:08,359 --> 00:18:11,840
Speaker 1: now when we're seeing a lot of survey data showing

317
00:18:12,560 --> 00:18:16,320
Speaker 1: three percent inflation expectations in the short to medium term

318
00:18:16,520 --> 00:18:18,920
Speaker 1: and a lot of worry as we've been talking about

319
00:18:19,280 --> 00:18:22,639
Speaker 1: that tariffs could raise prices longer term.

320
00:18:23,480 --> 00:18:25,560
Speaker 3: Yes, and we saw another one at four point eight

321
00:18:25,920 --> 00:18:29,600
Speaker 3: two weeks ago. So inflation expectations have moved up as

322
00:18:29,600 --> 00:18:34,359
Speaker 3: people have realized that we're having all these disruptions. I

323
00:18:34,359 --> 00:18:37,879
Speaker 3: think people have also realized that if the FED was

324
00:18:38,080 --> 00:18:42,200
Speaker 3: truly pursuing a two percent inflation target, we would be

325
00:18:42,359 --> 00:18:46,160
Speaker 3: speculating in the marketplace not about how many cuts are

326
00:18:46,160 --> 00:18:48,840
Speaker 3: we going to get next this year, but we'd be

327
00:18:49,000 --> 00:18:52,520
Speaker 3: speculating about when is the first hike. And we will

328
00:18:52,520 --> 00:18:55,720
Speaker 3: get the CPI report tomorrow, and my hope is that

329
00:18:55,800 --> 00:18:59,000
Speaker 3: it's not hot. But there was a sense in the

330
00:18:59,000 --> 00:19:02,800
Speaker 3: marketplace right now that actually two percent is not the

331
00:19:02,840 --> 00:19:05,159
Speaker 3: target being pursued, but no one quite knows what is

332
00:19:05,200 --> 00:19:08,920
Speaker 3: being pursued, and that's the danger that they right now

333
00:19:08,960 --> 00:19:09,760
Speaker 3: in this environment.

334
00:19:10,800 --> 00:19:14,840
Speaker 1: So with this idea that we could see inflation start

335
00:19:14,880 --> 00:19:18,840
Speaker 1: to get unanchored, what does that mean for the growth outlook?

336
00:19:18,960 --> 00:19:23,040
Speaker 1: When we're seeing so much concern in the market with

337
00:19:23,240 --> 00:19:26,480
Speaker 1: this sell off, that we could be heading into, if

338
00:19:26,520 --> 00:19:28,040
Speaker 1: not a slowdown or recession.

339
00:19:29,600 --> 00:19:33,840
Speaker 3: So let's speak numbers, Nathan. The US economy grew by

340
00:19:33,880 --> 00:19:37,760
Speaker 3: two point eight percent last year. Coming into this year,

341
00:19:38,200 --> 00:19:43,600
Speaker 3: the consensus forecast was two point five. I strongly believe

342
00:19:43,680 --> 00:19:48,080
Speaker 3: that we're going to have a massive round of revisions

343
00:19:48,080 --> 00:19:51,800
Speaker 3: to these forecasts, and that the consensus forecast will fall

344
00:19:51,840 --> 00:19:54,560
Speaker 3: from two and a half the somewhere between one and

345
00:19:54,640 --> 00:19:58,720
Speaker 3: a half and two. It's not recession. In fact, my

346
00:19:58,800 --> 00:20:01,879
Speaker 3: properlity of recession is twenty five to thirty percent. But it

347
00:20:01,960 --> 00:20:04,920
Speaker 3: is close to this notion of stall speed, which is

348
00:20:04,960 --> 00:20:09,320
Speaker 3: about one percent. So the US is looking right now

349
00:20:10,160 --> 00:20:13,600
Speaker 3: at slower growth, and the US is looking right now

350
00:20:13,720 --> 00:20:16,880
Speaker 3: at higher inflation than what was expected a few months ago.

351
00:20:18,520 --> 00:20:22,680
Speaker 3: It's the good old fashioned stackflation. It's the smell of stackfation.

352
00:20:22,760 --> 00:20:24,840
Speaker 3: I want to stress those of us who lived through

353
00:20:24,840 --> 00:20:28,000
Speaker 3: stackfas in the seventies and the early eighties think that

354
00:20:28,520 --> 00:20:32,440
Speaker 3: this is nothing, but it is a whiff of stackflation.

355
00:20:32,960 --> 00:20:35,119
Speaker 3: H an economy that has not had to deal with this.

356
00:20:36,800 --> 00:20:39,560
Speaker 1: Really appreciate the extended time this morning. Muhammed, great to

357
00:20:39,600 --> 00:20:42,520
Speaker 1: have you with us on daybreak this morning. That was

358
00:20:42,640 --> 00:20:45,040
Speaker 1: Mohammad Alrian with us this morning. He is the chief

359
00:20:45,080 --> 00:20:48,879
Speaker 1: Economics advisor at Alliance, President of Queen's College, Cambridge, and

360
00:20:48,960 --> 00:20:51,600
Speaker 1: of course he is a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion. You

361
00:20:51,640 --> 00:20:55,720
Speaker 1: can find his columns OPI, n GO on the Bloomberg

362
00:20:55,840 --> 00:20:56,159
Speaker 1: terminal