WEBVTT - Apple Sinks, TikTok Starts Courtroom Battle With US

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:09.600 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 2>From Mahart where Innovation, Money and power Collie in Silicon Valley, Nbon.

0:00:15.240 --> 0:00:19.760
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 4>Live from New York and San Francisco. This is Bloomberg

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:39.560
<v Speaker 4>Technology coming up this hour. Apple sinks of the warning

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:42.520
<v Speaker 4>of warnings are there of weak demand for the new

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:44.160
<v Speaker 4>iPhone sixteen Pro model.

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:49.520
<v Speaker 5>Plus the European Union's most influential tech enforcer resigns. Details

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 5>about the surprise move out of Russell's.

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 6>And TikTok's courtroom battle where the US government.

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 4>Begins its freedom of speech versus national security.

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Apple is a big points drag to the downside.

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 5>We're off session lows, but on track for our biggest

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:05.320
<v Speaker 5>drop intraday.

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 7>Since August fifth.

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 5>TF Security is International out with a research note a

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 5>survey of early pre order data saying initial sales of

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 5>iPhone sixteen generation the Pro thirty.

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:17.199
<v Speaker 7>Seven million units.

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 5>That would be a drop of thirteen percent year on

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 5>year for the first weekend of sales for the fifteen generation.

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:25.680
<v Speaker 5>That's care some panic in the market. There's several other

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 5>analyst notes out today alongside TF International citing concerns from

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 5>China to the timing of Apple Intelligence release. One calmer

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 5>voice is Bloomberg Intelligence is Anna rag Rana, who joins

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 5>us from Chicago.

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 7>Now, and Ana rag.

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 5>You're basically saying, we can't determine now that this is

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 5>anemic demand. It could be oversupply of the available handset.

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 7>What's your thesis? So when you look at it.

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 8>A few weeks ago, we heard that Apple was talking

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 8>to with supply, do we increase the shipments for this

0:01:56.200 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 8>particular model by about ten percent? So, you know, frankly speak,

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 8>there's lots of puts and takes. At this point, we

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 8>think it's still too early to basically call this a dud.

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 8>So we're going to wait for another thirty days. Thirty

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 8>five days, here's some official comments from Apple when they

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 8>actually announce their earnings to really figure out what shipments

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 8>could be for the next financial year.

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 4>Can you give us context as to how much you

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 4>look at your securities. How much does this sort of

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 4>pre order data tend to fluctuate with reality?

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 8>You know, it does fluctuate, and you know where sometimes

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 8>there are supply constraints, sometimes there is spikes and demands

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 8>in the earlier side of it, which is why I'm saying,

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 8>if you look at it for a twelve month cycle,

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.239
<v Speaker 8>you know it could vary quite a bit before. I

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 8>mean seasonally fourth quarter is fourth or the December quarter

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 8>is the big quarter for Apple, and this is where

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 8>we could see some jump because of some improvement in China.

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:57.119
<v Speaker 8>On the other side, it could go the exact opposite

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:00.959
<v Speaker 8>way if China is weak of consumers, is not very good.

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:04.640
<v Speaker 8>So there is so much dependent on the next thirty

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 8>to ninety days more than just you know, the first

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:08.639
<v Speaker 8>three days and.

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:12.519
<v Speaker 5>Away from the early pre order data for iPhone. Other

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 5>analysts talk about China in the context of domestic competition.

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 7>Now that you've seen what.

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:20.959
<v Speaker 5>Huawei has to offer, how do you model that domestic

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 5>competition in China?

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 8>So I would say that if you look at it,

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:27.679
<v Speaker 8>there was a big spike in demand because of Huawei

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 8>releasing its five G phone. Now there has been many

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 8>years since they didn't do that, and then because of that,

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 8>there was a you could say, a pull forward in

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 8>demand for them of the normal refresh cycle for that

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 8>particular brand. For Apple, Apple has to fight quite a

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 8>bit now to gain market share again in China. And

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 8>I think we you know, if there are going to

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 8>be any discounts from Apple anywhere in the world, we

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 8>think it's going to be in China at this point. Now,

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 8>the new form that came out from ourweh the twenty

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 8>eight hundred dollars one. I don't think that does that

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 8>damage to Apple's iPhone sales because it's two different categories.

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 4>Frankly, we're seeing weakness and supplies to Apple as well,

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 4>Anna Rag.

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 6>At the moment, what's.

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 4>The next data point, what's the next read we should

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 4>focus on.

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:13.839
<v Speaker 8>I think when the company announces their results and then

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 8>you will get some official comments as to how those

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 8>pre orders are. I think that's far more important than

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 8>this time. The second thing we want to see is

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:25.039
<v Speaker 8>when are the AI features coming out and what kind

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 8>of buzz is around it, because I think that can

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 8>change consumer sentiment very quickly if there are cooler things

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 8>that people can play with the phone, and that can

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 8>help drive some of the sales as well.

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 4>Anna Rag, So please to get as ed put it

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 4>your calm voice on today's show with Meg Intelligence, Anna Rograna. Meanwhile,

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 4>let's just pivot to the EU because the top tech

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:48.280
<v Speaker 4>legislation enforcer, Thierry Breton has resigned.

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 6>Now let's her post it on X.

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 4>Bretton antline the surprise move, saying France was asked to

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 4>provide a different nominee for the European Commission, writing quote,

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 4>in light of these latest developments for the testament to

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 4>questionable governance, I have to conclude I can no longer

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:08.239
<v Speaker 4>exercise my duties in the College. For more, Bloomberg's John

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:12.280
<v Speaker 4>Paicelli joins US now from Brussels. Bretton really had a

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 4>key hand here and shaping the ease response to what

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 4>seemed to be growing power of US tech. He was

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 4>the enforcer of the Digital Services Act.

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 6>Why is he out.

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Well seems to be mostly because he and Bonderlion didn't

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 3>go didn't get along well together. I mean, if you

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 3>read the letter, he clearly said that vonderlyon president. The

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:40.719
<v Speaker 3>European Commission demanded that requested the France propose a different

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 3>candidate due to personal reasons that Bretton himself was not

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 3>familiar with. So he has always been a bit of

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 3>a heavy hitter, a bit of a maverick within the Commission.

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:56.039
<v Speaker 3>He certainly loved the limelight and that probably wrapped some

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 3>people the wrong way. At the end of the day,

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 3>you of course actually have had that to a Byton's

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 3>spearheaded some of the u's most important rule books when

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 3>it comes to tech and digital regulation. But those things

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 3>are done, those laws exist, the bureaucrats enforcing them are

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 3>in place. So even if Briton is not there in

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 3>a way, his spirit, his ghost will keep living. So

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 3>that's not necessarily a big worry for the Commission.

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 4>Well, his ghost leve On and Stephan Sir John, who

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:27.720
<v Speaker 4>Maconn has already tapped.

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 3>Well, we don't know yet because it depends on what

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 3>kind of portfolio so John will get, and that's not clear.

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:38.279
<v Speaker 3>It's going to be for sure media than what Burton

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 3>will have gotten. That was essentially the offer on the table,

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:45.599
<v Speaker 3>right Maconn was told for personal reasons, I don't like Burton,

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 3>according to what Breton says. Therefore you get a media portfolio.

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 3>If you propose another name and Stephan Sir John towards

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 3>in threads in and let's see what portfolio gets. It's

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:00.600
<v Speaker 3>supposed to be a big one. So well, it might

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:02.839
<v Speaker 3>be not to do with digital issues.

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 5>There are some issues vonder Lene and the new term.

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 5>Right four hundred and fifty million people, most in the EU,

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 5>A lot of them watched this program. Jan what's kind

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 5>of on her gender informing a new commission and the

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 5>team that she wants to assemble.

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 3>Well in the agenda and the team she wants to

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 3>assemble at two diffil matters, we know that she's not

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 3>very pleased with the fact that most member countries member

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 3>states put to put forward male candidates as opposed to

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 3>two candidates of both male and female. She wanted to

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 3>guarantee a gender balance within the college the way they

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 3>call it, but so far should the count is skewed

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 3>in favored men. When it comes to the actual agenda,

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 3>we kind of got a glimpse of what it might

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 3>contain last week when the landmark Drugy Report was unveiled

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 3>by Mario Dragi, former Preme Minister of Italy and President

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 3>of the European Center Bank ear Slemont. Lion Is made

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 3>bay clear that she will use that pro competitiveness agenda

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 3>to forge next mandate.

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 5>Regulation of technology has been a top priority for this term.

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 7>How big a priority.

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 5>Will it be for the next five year term.

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 3>It depends on how much Underlon decides to actually clave

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 3>to the Letter of Drugs Report, because if you go

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 3>by that document, the time for regulation is kind of uh.

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 3>The time of regulation was the past, where the future

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 3>has would be all about encouraging innovation, competitive competitiveness, big

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 3>mergers of national champions center telecom and defense contractors. So

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 3>it should be less about regulation and much more about

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 3>building technology, at least encouraging European technology companies to emerge.

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 3>So if that's what happens, regulation will be kind of

0:08:56.200 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 3>the backbone the bedrock on which a new end of

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 3>agenda would be built, which would be much more about

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 3>innovating regulating.

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg's gen Bob Bacelly. Great to have you on the

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 5>show from Brussels. Thank you very much. Let's get to

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 5>another top story. Shares of Trump media down in today's

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:19.079
<v Speaker 5>trading following another shocking development in the US presidential campaign yesterday,

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 5>when members of the Secret Service engage what law enforcement

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 5>described as a rifle wielding potential assassin near former President Trump.

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 5>Gunfire erupted at his Palm Beach course while he was

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 5>playing golf. In the immediate aftermath, Trump emailed supporters to

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 5>declare he was quote safe and.

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:39.439
<v Speaker 7>Well and on dj T carry.

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 5>I think it's worth pointing out real quick that on

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 5>Friday he had said he wouldn't sell out of his shares,

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 5>and that's been a factor in that name as well.

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 7>What we got coming up.

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:51.199
<v Speaker 4>Coming up a US appeals court ed is hearing challenges

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 4>to the TikTok BANLRD. We're going to be joined by

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 4>Doug Kaladas follow at the Harvard Belfa Center on what

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 4>to expect.

0:09:57.840 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 6>Meanwhile, just checking on some shares for a moment, because

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 6>Boeing is moving.

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:03.719
<v Speaker 4>We understand, of course that they are looking at a

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 4>hiring freeze. They're instituting that and considering temporary furloughs after

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.959
<v Speaker 4>some employees went on strike Friday. This is according to

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 4>a memo to employees from the CFO Bran West.

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 5>This is Blue Meg Technology, Ali Barber and Small Arrival

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 5>JD dot Com, both under pressure as investors a weighing

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:40.599
<v Speaker 5>the potential fallout from US plans to begin taxing packages

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 5>worth less than eight hundred dollars. Washington's latest move to

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 5>clamp down on tax free imports of Chinese goods is

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 5>closing a loophool that Temu and Shean have employed for

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 5>years to ship hundreds of millions of packages into the

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 5>US annually, helping them carve out a market at the

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 5>expense of Amazon.

0:10:57.400 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 7>We'll keep tracking that.

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 5>Today, TikTok is making its fight against the US ban

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 5>to the next level in the American court system. The

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:07.199
<v Speaker 5>US Court of Appeals for the DC cirguit will hear

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 5>arguments against the new law signed by President Joe Biden

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 5>banning TikTok in the US if it's China based parent company,

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 5>byte Dance, does not divest ownership by January nineteenth. Dougkladas

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 5>is a Harvard Belfa Center fellow and former chief of

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 5>staff to Senator Amy Klobuchar, and joins US now. And

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 5>at the heart of the argument from TikTok is the

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 5>First Amendment that the law impinges upon the freedom of

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 5>speech of TikTok's one hundred and seventy million or so

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 5>users in the United States.

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 7>How successful is that argument going to be we'll find

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 7>out ed this is the top case.

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 9>On the one side, you have first Amendment writer of

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 9>free expression, which the courts are likely they don't like

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 9>to circumscribe that narrowly. They're going to give that a

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 9>broad read. At the same time, you have what the

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 9>US government is saying is a unique security threat that

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 9>has unprecedented reach and depth. So you have strong arguments

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 9>on both sides, and everyone's watching to see which way

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 9>it'll come out.

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 5>Doug, We the three of us, have discussed this before,

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:13.199
<v Speaker 5>and we will discuss it again. Why does the political

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 5>engine not take into account more the wishes of the

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:20.079
<v Speaker 5>user base one hundred and seventy million Americans who like

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 5>using TikTok.

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 9>It's very difficult for lawmakers to go against the will

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:30.560
<v Speaker 9>of the voters, but it happens when there's a serious

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 9>enough threat that they're willing to reach across the aisle,

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 9>hold hands and do something difficult together.

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 7>When there's law has passed.

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 9>You saw Democrats and Republicans in both chambers vote for

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 9>an overwhelming numbers, which gives everyone cover. It's very difficult

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 9>to criticize one party when the other party is doing it.

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 10>Just as much.

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 6>Do you think it will be justified in banning.

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:54.839
<v Speaker 7>I don't know.

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 9>I think this is a very difficult case to predict.

0:12:57.240 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 9>It's you know, people have said we're in uncharted territory here.

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 9>It seems like the First Amendment questions are very profound.

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 9>At the same time, the Justice Department has laid out

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:11.839
<v Speaker 9>when many believe are very compelling reasons that TikTok is

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 9>a threat to national security. Of course, a lot of

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 9>this justification is done in classified filings that we as

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 9>the public do not have access to. TikTok's own lawyer

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 9>dom have access to this, so much of us will

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 9>be decided behind closed doors by the judges and the

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:31.200
<v Speaker 9>US government, and we'll find out what happens shortly after

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 9>the election if they hear to the timeline.

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 4>Talking of timeline, it feels like things have changed quite

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 4>a lot since last we spoke. The fura around it

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 4>has died down, and I'm wondering more broadly, whether you

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 4>think the focus from lawmakers is is ardent, whether their

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 4>data will be as proven out from a security threat perspective,

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 4>and whether a band would fix that.

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 9>So prior to passing the law, the Executive brings and

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 9>Congress gathered a great deal of information, and the filings

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 9>lay this out. There's testimony from a lot of national

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:08.439
<v Speaker 9>security officials, a lot of public reporting about some of

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 9>the links between TikTok and the Chinese Communist Party, and

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 9>they've made the case. The question is whether the First

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 9>Amendment permits this type of really draconian restrictions. This is

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 9>an unprecedented action by the US government against a media outlet.

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 9>But they're saying that the facts of this case are unique.

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 9>I think we know enough about the facts, notwithstanding the

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 9>classified filings, to have a sense of really what the

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 9>stakes are here. But no matter which way the case

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 9>comes out, people are going to be unhappy. I think

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 9>even if the government proves its case and they find

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 9>that n security reasons are strong enough to justify the action,

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 9>there's a precedent that's going to be set for what

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 9>the federal government can do with regard to technology and

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 9>platforms that a lot of people can be wried about

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 9>and could possibly be abused by the government in the future.

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 9>It's often said that tough cases make bad law, and

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 9>that may be what happens here.

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 5>Doug, as a student of the law, I love this bit.

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 5>But the courts will balance the freedom of speech argument

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 5>against the national security interest argument. This is what the

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 5>DOJ says. Given TikTok's broadreach within the United States, the

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 5>capacity for China to use TikTok's features to achieve its

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 5>overarching objective to undermine American interests creates a national security

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 5>threat of immense depth and scale. How difficult or not

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 5>will it be for the US to prove that national

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 5>security threat?

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 9>So it depends on what legal standard the court employs.

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 9>There are different levels of scrutiny how closely they look

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 9>at the government's motivations and justifications. If they apply what's

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 9>called strict scrutiny, the bar is quite high, and the

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 9>government has to show that there's a really compelling government

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 9>government interest and that the law is narrowly tailored.

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 7>To meet that aim.

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 9>They go to great length and they're briefing to try

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 9>to lay out the case. But it is a high war.

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 9>And again, this is a case that is so unique

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 9>that the presidents that are on point don't seem quite right.

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 9>We know that the government can prevent foreign ownership of

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 9>radio and television companies, but they do that under the

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 9>licensed authority. They have much more restricted powers when it

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 9>comes to print sources. So is TikTok more like a

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 9>print source or is it more like a radio or

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 9>television station.

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 7>It's only different.

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 9>And that's what the court is going to have to

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 9>contend with.

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 6>Just briefly.

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 4>We've heard, of course from TikTok. The argument remains the same.

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 4>This band would devastate seven million businesses. They also talk

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 4>with the one hundred and seventy million Americans that Ed

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 4>already referenced. You understand the world of lobbying, having worked

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 4>in that world previously, what will it be like behind

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 4>the scenes.

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 9>So what's interesting about the effort, the lobbying effort before

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 9>the bill was passed, was that TikTok put a lot

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 9>of money and resources and effort into trying to prevent

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 9>a law from passing, and it was entirely in effective.

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 9>Now we can talk about tactics, and they took some

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 9>steps that people believe backfired. But it seems more important

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 9>the fact that it is a foreign company, and fundamentally,

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 9>foreign owned entities have different rights under the US Constitution.

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 9>They are restricted in some methods they can use to lobby.

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 9>And there's a lot of US type companies that don't

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 9>love TikTok and we'll be quite happy to see it

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:23.199
<v Speaker 9>go away. And they also have their own lobbyists, so

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 9>it goes both ways.

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 4>Once who don't love them, perhaps competitors half in PATHA

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 4>center fellow Diclidis, thanks for joining us.

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:32.880
<v Speaker 6>Now let's talk about China a little more.

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 4>It's claimed a breakthrough in the development of homegrown chip

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 4>making equipment, an important step in.

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 6>The overcoming US sanctions.

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:42.160
<v Speaker 4>Now the Ministry of Industry and It advised state linked

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:46.120
<v Speaker 4>organizations to use a new laser based immersion lithography machine

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 4>with a resolution of sixty five nanometers all better. Basically,

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 4>it's a significant step up from the previous most advanced

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 4>indigenous equipment, which did around ninety nanometers.

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 5>Apple shares are under pressure or off session loads, but

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 5>down almost three percent. A TF Securities survey showing that

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 5>pre order sales for the iPhone sixteen generation down about

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 5>thirteen percent year on year from the fifteen demand, not

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 5>what we thought it would be. Continued to track it

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 5>because supplies under pressure as well.

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 4>Cara Yeah, Mark German writing over the weekend that really

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 4>was the health side of the equation that stole the show.

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 4>But as Apple of course sinks this morning following last

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:35.399
<v Speaker 4>week's product launch events, the company still hasn't resolved their

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 4>legal fight with Massimo court. There's a blood oxygen detection,

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 4>of course that that company offers, which prompted a US

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 4>ban on Apple watches featuring the technology. Now, Massimo has

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 4>partnered with Google and Qualcom to develop a reference platform

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 4>to help bring more smart watchers to market with their

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 4>biosensing capabilities joining us now.

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 6>Jokiani, the CEO of the company, and what is this about.

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:02.199
<v Speaker 4>You have impressive health features, but Apple watched we just

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:05.199
<v Speaker 4>heard the new unveiling they're getting sleep apnea and the like.

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 6>How do you compete their Joe.

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 1>Well, we compete based on good science. We have continuous,

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>accurate SPO two palsphorate. We can even measure hydration a

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:21.120
<v Speaker 1>pulsephrate variability.

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Nobody else has that.

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:25.680
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I don't understand how you can do sleep

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>apnea without SPO two. I know clinically it's not done.

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 1>So it'll be interesting to see if Apple's promising things

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>they can't deliver again like they did with their SPO two,

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:39.879
<v Speaker 1>or they really have figured out how to do it

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:40.880
<v Speaker 1>without SPO two.

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 7>Time will tell.

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 4>So you're offering this platform with Quilcom, You're helping Google

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 4>offer more smart watches, more health features. It feels as

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 4>though that Joe, Look, if you don't think that Apple

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 4>can deliver what it promises, does that mean more cord action.

0:19:57.359 --> 0:19:59.640
<v Speaker 6>Where does your fight currently stand with Apple and it's

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 6>smart one.

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, we, as you know, enjoined Apple from selling SPO

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to in the US. Uh, there's a trade secret case

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:11.399
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be reheard, and if we win that,

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:15.399
<v Speaker 1>then we'll have a broad injunction against them on photo

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>platismography so they can't even do pulse rate and a

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 1>rhythme detection.

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 2>And then if we win our patent.

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Case, which is about how do you do photo pedtasmography

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:30.679
<v Speaker 1>with very low battery consumption, then that'll be even a

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 1>wider injunction. So potentially our injunction could go worldwide and

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:39.119
<v Speaker 1>much broader. However, what's really cool is this partnership with Google,

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 1>which I'd love to tell you more about if we're

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 1>excited about it. Every Android user now can have a real,

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>scientifically based, continuous, accurate wearable with this reference design we're

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>creating with them, and I think in the next couple

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:00.159
<v Speaker 1>of years you're going to see a slow slewth of

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>products from luxury products to smart watches from the typical

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 1>Android world. That will be an incredible offering for our

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 1>mutual customers.

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 4>I hate to say, Joe, because we've only got a minute,

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 4>so I ask to be brief. But you've got some

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 4>fascinating things happening. You've got a proxy battle going on

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 4>at the moment. They want to see more governance, want

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 4>to have more board oversight.

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 6>How do you fight Poltan?

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, you saw that Polton was found to have lied

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to our shareholders. The court, a federal judge found multiple

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:37.159
<v Speaker 1>lives held them in contempt. So you've got someone who

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:40.919
<v Speaker 1>has no integrity that talks about governance. Yeah, you have

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>us who've done everything right morally right, not just even legally,

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and we've made all this progress from bringing the business

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:53.439
<v Speaker 1>through COVID and now this incredible Google partnership. I think

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 1>this should be ninety one percent to nine percent. Only

0:21:56.840 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 1>person voting for him should be him.

0:21:59.280 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Joe.

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 6>We wish you can have more information from you. Maybe

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:02.880
<v Speaker 6>we'll get you back.

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:04.679
<v Speaker 4>After the vote comes September the nineteenth.

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 6>Free.

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 4>Thank you, Jokani CEO, Masimo. This is bloom meg Technology.

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 4>Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. I'm Caroline Hide, New York and.

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:24.439
<v Speaker 7>Ed Ludlow here in San Francisco.

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 5>Another megacap named Microsoft just announced that Voda Phones signed

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 5>a large deal to use AI Assistance for Office and

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 5>unveiled a range of new AI tools designed to help

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 5>workers create Excel charts, prioritize emails, and collaborate with one another.

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 7>Listen to this.

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:44.120
<v Speaker 11>You can think of core Pilot as the UI for AI.

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:48.199
<v Speaker 11>It helps you break down these silos between your work artifacts,

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:53.640
<v Speaker 11>your communications, and your business parcesses. And we're just getting started.

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg's Dina bas Is here with the details, and diner

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 5>I point out that when Microsoft started its presentation about

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 5>eleven New York time stock was modestly lower.

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 7>It is now modestly higher.

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 5>But in Vodaphone's case, it's kind of evidence finally of

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 5>how workers might use AI in the workplace for actual stuff.

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 7>Give us the details.

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 12>Sure, yeah, and this is you know, this is a

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 12>pricey offering Microsoft. If you do this, they're asking me

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 12>to pay thirty bucks a month per user, in addition

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 12>to what you already pay for office licenses.

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:27.440
<v Speaker 2>So part of what they're trying to do today is twofold.

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:30.360
<v Speaker 12>They want to demonstrate new features, and there's some discussion

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 12>of that, but they also want to demonstrate new customers

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:35.439
<v Speaker 12>that people are actually using this and that it's helping

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 12>them do things that it's saving them time.

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 2>And so you know, one of the things they mentioned around.

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 12>Vodaphone, which has been trying it out with a smaller

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 12>group of people, is that those early trials found that

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 12>workers saved about three hours a week per person, which

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:52.120
<v Speaker 12>may sound modest, but it's a start. I think that

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 12>that's one of the things they really have to demonstrate

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:57.879
<v Speaker 12>is that these are useful tools and not just like

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 12>a fun thing or something that companies going to spend

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 12>money on and not really know how to use effectively.

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 4>Call them copilots, call them agents. Everyone's discussing it. You've

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:12.360
<v Speaker 4>got salesforce now Microsoft and ultimately Microsoft competing against its

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:14.360
<v Speaker 4>own technology.

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 6>Provider here open ai. How does it distinguish itself sture.

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:20.159
<v Speaker 2>That's a lot of what we're hearing today.

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 12>The event today is focused not on consumers but on

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 12>corporate customers, and it heavily leverages Microsoft's you know, long

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:31.880
<v Speaker 12>standing stronghold in the corporate commuting space, which is office

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:35.479
<v Speaker 12>of course. So the copilots that are being discussed today

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 12>are for things like Excel, Teams, Word Outlook, email, and

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 12>the idea is that you know, whether it's competing with

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 12>open Ai, or Salesforce or other business software companies. The

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:52.400
<v Speaker 12>real kind of you know, stronghold beachhead that Microsoft has

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 12>with corporate Customers's office, so to the extent that they

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 12>can create useful artificial intelligence features that work with our

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 12>that's something that no one else can offer. One of

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:06.640
<v Speaker 12>the biggest strongholds that really people have not been able

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 12>to replace Microsoft in is Excel spreadsheets. You know, financial analysts,

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:13.479
<v Speaker 12>people who really live in Excel say, you know, for

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 12>the most part, can't really use anything else. And Microsoft's

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 12>been trying to figure out how to get the AI

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:22.600
<v Speaker 12>copilot working well and in a useful fashion and what

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 12>they hope will be a critical fashion that Excel and

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 12>they announced you know, some new features around that today,

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 12>and in particular that they're going to integrate the Python

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 12>programming language, which is really popular for data work, into

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 12>the Excel AI copilot in a way that lets people.

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:42.439
<v Speaker 2>Use it without having actually no programming code.

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:45.919
<v Speaker 12>You could just make a regular you know, English language

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 12>or plane speech queries.

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:50.680
<v Speaker 5>You've covered this company for a long time, and I

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 5>always reflect in Microsoft's history that they're really good at

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 5>selling stuff software you could probably get otherwise for free

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 5>somewhere else the co Pilot's thirty dollars per month per use.

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:02.679
<v Speaker 5>So if you have a company with thousands of employees,

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 5>you think they'd start having immense revenue growth. When does

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 5>the street think they will?

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:12.119
<v Speaker 12>Everyone's trying to figure that out, and it's it's going

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:14.120
<v Speaker 12>to be even harder because let's be clear that when

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:17.119
<v Speaker 12>Microsoft reports earnings, it's not as if they're breaking it

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:19.120
<v Speaker 12>out in such a way where you can say, oh, this,

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 12>you know, this increase in Office is due to to Copilot.

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 12>Again, they gave some numbers today, but they don't you know,

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 12>they're positive for Microsoft, but not terribly specific. And so

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 12>they said, for example, the Copilot customers increased by more

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:38.360
<v Speaker 12>than sixty percent quoter on quoter, the number of clients

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:41.120
<v Speaker 12>with more than ten thousand users doubled, But we don't

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:43.440
<v Speaker 12>know what that translates into into raw numbers.

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 2>We don't know what that translates into revenue.

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 12>And also I began by saying thirty dollars per user

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:52.639
<v Speaker 12>per month, that's the list price. Most corporate customers they

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:55.880
<v Speaker 12>use Office do that through a multi year enterprise agreement,

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 12>and there is you know, the way agreements work in

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 12>this industry, there there's discounting, so we don't really know

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 12>if they're you know, particularly for these early customers, or

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:07.720
<v Speaker 12>they're giving them any sort of promotional pricing.

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 6>Diana Bass, thank you very much.

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:14.160
<v Speaker 4>Indeed, let's keep the discussion going across Microsoft and more

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:17.880
<v Speaker 4>broadly and a Mentionment Portfolio Manager, Fidelities, Select Semiconductors Portfolio,

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:20.439
<v Speaker 4>and plenty of others as well. Adam, it's great to

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 4>have you because some of the funds that you help

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 4>manage have a sizable exposure to Microsoft.

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 6>Are they owning their moat at the moment?

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:30.439
<v Speaker 7>Thanks for having me.

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:33.920
<v Speaker 13>Look, you know, as you talked about in the segment before,

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 13>you know, we're pretty early in AI and thirty dollars

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:38.639
<v Speaker 13>per user per month is a lot to ask, and

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 13>even if it's being discounted, you know, we're talking about

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 13>something that's going to take a while to play out,

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:49.200
<v Speaker 13>and having these tools be used and people figure out

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 13>how to use them.

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:51.679
<v Speaker 7>Will take a while.

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 13>But the use cases are rolling out and we're going

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 13>to see this over the next you know, several years

0:27:57.000 --> 0:27:57.359
<v Speaker 13>for sure.

0:27:57.800 --> 0:27:59.639
<v Speaker 6>The question is what's priced in?

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 4>And I was discussing on Earlier, which has had a

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 4>massive rally last week and the chip designer a new

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:09.880
<v Speaker 4>call on the street saying that the price is already.

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 6>Reflecting a lot of the upside here.

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 4>Is that the case for the MAG seven for technology

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 4>more broadly, as we start to see rates getting cut.

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:20.159
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, sure, I mean to talk about the MAG seven

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 13>in one case is hard, right. There's seven different companies.

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 13>They all have different businesses. Three of them have cloud

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:29.879
<v Speaker 13>businesses of course, so they overlap, but outside of that,

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:31.360
<v Speaker 13>they're very different businesses.

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 7>And I think, you.

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 13>Know, just centering in on AI in general, I think

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 13>there is a lot of you know, consternation in the market.

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 13>Clearly you're talking about the FED and interest rates and

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 13>the macro environment, which is, you know, one whole piece

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 13>of what's going on and something I need to pay

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 13>attention to as a portfolio manager.

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 7>But from a technology perspective and just.

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 13>Generative, AI is evolving and we're still really early days

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 13>in this. I know the market has this desire to

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 13>sort of have instant gratification that we're just going to

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 13>see it all all of a sudden.

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 7>This is a super complex problem.

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 13>We need to roll out all this infrastructure, get the

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 13>compute in place, train these models, retrain the models and.

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 7>Then roll them out over time. This is going to

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 7>take some time.

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 13>So you know, in terms of what's priced in, it's

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 13>it's really hard to talk about it. You know, broadly speaking, clearly,

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 13>there's some stocks that have been overpriced, you know, that

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 13>have priced in a lot of their upside. If you

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 13>look back in twenty three, just as an example, there

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 13>was this dynamic where everyone was an AI winner. Well

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 13>look at you know, fast forward to twenty four, you've

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 13>seen some separation. You know, you mentioned Inteller as an

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 13>early example. That stock was up ninety five percent in

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 13>twenty twenty three. That stock is down sixty.

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 7>Percent this year.

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 13>So we're starting to see a separation of not everyone's

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 13>gonna win and they're gonna be winners, there's gonna be losers.

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 13>And yeah, certainly there's there's certainly stocks that have priced

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 13>in a lot of this goodness and then there's some

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 13>that haven't.

0:29:57.320 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 5>Adam, it's called eli in ings, and you've talked about

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 5>not maybe seeing something immediately to the satisfaction faction of

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 5>the market. But now the earning season's out the way.

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 5>We've discussed what kind of jacket Jensen was wearing and

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 5>how bullish a signal that was is this story in

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 5>tact for you, the big picture AI investment cycle story.

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 13>I mean, once again, it's it's hard to say, you know,

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 13>broadly speaking, to capture every company, but I think in

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 13>terms of AI, you know, I still think we're very

0:30:27.440 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 13>early in this in this cycle, and there's some companies

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 13>that I think are going to massively benefit here, and

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 13>we're going to continue to see this out. And and

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 13>I think, you know, when I look back, you know,

0:30:40.960 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 13>June period, it felt like kind of everyone was in

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 13>the boat, and now there's a lot of skepticism, there's

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 13>a lot of concern, and that's really healthy for the market.

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 7>But I think, you know, this is going to be

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 7>a journey.

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 13>There's going to be a bumps along the way, and

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 13>and and the stocks also, you know, disconnect with the

0:30:56.320 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 13>fundamentals at different times. You know, stocks sometimes price in

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 13>too much, sometimes they get too negative, and so you know,

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:05.719
<v Speaker 13>you got to think about it from that perspective as

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 13>you manage money.

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:10.240
<v Speaker 5>And in my job for for my investors, Adam, every

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 5>day I think not just about the GPU bought high

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 5>bandwidth memory etheranet as well, you know, areas of the

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 5>market that perhaps appreciated in that supply chain. What are

0:31:21.600 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 5>the areas that you feel right now underappreciated or misunderstood.

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 7>Sure, I mean that that's a there's a long answer

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 7>to that.

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 13>But but you know, I think you know, overall there's

0:31:32.240 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 13>been this emphasis on chips, and I think you know

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 13>where people are getting it wrong a little bit is

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 13>these are really data centers, right, these are supercomputers.

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 7>You know, Nvidia doesn't sell a chip.

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 13>You know, if you look at Blackwell, they have seven

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 13>different chips that day designed. It's a full system and

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 13>it's a full stack solution with software, the algorithms, and

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 13>the libraries that are really important to make all this work.

0:31:56.720 --> 0:32:00.240
<v Speaker 13>So but within that, you know, as you mentioned high

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 13>bandwidth memory. Without high bandwidth memory, that's crucial to making this.

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 7>You know, evolution of AI happened.

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 13>You know, there's a lot of interconnects that are super

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 13>important in terms of networking. You mentioned Ethernet that's important,

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 13>so is in Finamon. There's other interconnects like you know

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 13>Esteri Labs makes that went public back in March, that

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 13>is super important, and optical interconnects as well. So there's

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 13>a ton of things that make this happen, but people

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 13>need to be thinking about it, not on a chip

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 13>by chip basis, but more.

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 5>On a systems level. Telary Portfoilio manager Adam and Benjamin.

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 5>Great to have you here on Bloomberg Technology.

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 7>Really appreciate it.

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 5>Now coming out, We're gonna be joined by LTK president

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 5>Amba Ben's box talk about the state of the creator economy,

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 5>even as TikTok's future in the United States is up

0:32:46.920 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 5>in the air. This is Bloomberg Technology. Okay, time for

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:05.000
<v Speaker 5>talking tech and first up. SpaceX's Polaris Dawn Cruz splash

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 5>down off the coast of the dry Tortugas, Florida yesterday.

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 5>This after their historic first commercial spacewalk on Thursday. The

0:33:12.720 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 5>SpaceX capsule hurtled through the atmosphere before gliding into the

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 5>ocean for landing. Plus AI startup GROC has partnered with

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 5>oil producer a Ramcodes to build out data centers in

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 5>Saudi Arabia with the hopes of becoming a hub for

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 5>companies across the Middle East, Africa and India. Aramco will

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 5>fund the development that is expected to cost quote in

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 5>the order of nine figures and a Jeff Bezos back

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 5>group says it's setting up a program to attract investment

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 5>into South African power grids. The Global Energy Alliance for

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 5>People on Planet says it will work with partners for

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 5>investments to repair and upgrade the grids, needing nearly eighteen

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 5>billion dollars for the introduction of renewable energy.

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 6>Carol, Now, let's talk about the creator economy ed as.

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:57.320
<v Speaker 4>Today is LDKAS twelfth annual conference, bringing together nearly four

0:33:57.400 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 4>hundred top global creators to discuss the state the feature

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:03.720
<v Speaker 4>the industry. LTK co founder and president Ambaven's Books joins

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 4>us now.

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 6>And I'm a congrats.

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:08.720
<v Speaker 4>A lot of ye is under the belt of this event.

0:34:09.239 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 4>What are the concerns, what are they worried about?

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:13.880
<v Speaker 14>Do things top of mind for our creators?

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 10>This year and last month we just had three billion

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 10>dollars invested in LTK creators on the LTK platform. We're

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 10>continuing to see dollars rotate in as our creators think

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 10>about preparing for the future of their business. The two

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 10>things their top of minor community. Where are they going

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 10>to retain, nurture and grow that community. We know that

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 10>for a creator, the plot is that they have to

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 10>have a community that they can access and that has

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 10>high trust with them that they're engaging with constantly.

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:39.320
<v Speaker 14>So, first of all, in the community side.

0:34:39.160 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 10>Where are those where is that community being built, and

0:34:41.080 --> 0:34:43.880
<v Speaker 10>how are they going to continue to engage them. On

0:34:43.920 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 10>the other side, we released a massive suite of AI

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 10>tools for both our creators and our brands.

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:51.880
<v Speaker 14>Today are the type of tools that's not AI for

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:52.839
<v Speaker 14>tech's sake.

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 10>These are the things that are moving their business forwards.

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:57.359
<v Speaker 10>This is driving efficiencies, it's doing work for them, it's

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:00.480
<v Speaker 10>taking subjectivity out of the decision making, and we expected

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:03.799
<v Speaker 10>to drive big outcomes for both brands and creators. We

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:07.759
<v Speaker 10>now see that the vast majority of every single demographic

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:10.360
<v Speaker 10>in the United States says that they are shopping from creators.

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:14.320
<v Speaker 10>Creator guided shopping has arrived, and lt K is a platform.

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:15.400
<v Speaker 14>That powers creator commerce.

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:19.239
<v Speaker 4>If they're not building community in the way that they

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:22.720
<v Speaker 4>were on the normal platforms, what is happening?

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 6>And but how are they driving dollars?

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:26.880
<v Speaker 10>Well, it's a great question connected to a lot of

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:29.960
<v Speaker 10>the conversations today. Over the last decade, they've spent their

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 10>time really investing in social media platforms because those platforms

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 10>actually used to be the place where they could collect,

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 10>nurture and grow that community and meet them every day.

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 10>And what we've seen is that over the last several years,

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:44.399
<v Speaker 10>especially acutely over the last year, these platforms have moved

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:45.759
<v Speaker 10>from being people based.

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 14>To interest space.

0:35:46.880 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 10>We see that people are spending more time on these platforms,

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:55.279
<v Speaker 10>but they are reporting much less of a productive experience there.

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:57.360
<v Speaker 14>They really are missing out on the human connection.

0:35:57.680 --> 0:35:59.560
<v Speaker 10>So lt K has been investing in a place for

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 10>creators to actually keep their audiences, grow them, reach them

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 10>on a daily basis. Because the job that social media

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 10>platforms have they've really abandoned as they've of course leaned into,

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:12.720
<v Speaker 10>as they would their revenue model, which they're not created

0:36:12.760 --> 0:36:15.719
<v Speaker 10>to help a creator reach their community. They're created to

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:19.040
<v Speaker 10>be an advertising product. And so we filled that void

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:21.040
<v Speaker 10>for these creators and so they're.

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:21.719
<v Speaker 14>Doing it on their LTK.

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:24.600
<v Speaker 10>LTK is now shipped to become a video first platform

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 10>that striving major outfrome comes for these creators. In the

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:29.840
<v Speaker 10>last month, we've made some shifts that have resulted in

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 10>people watching over five minutes at a time on a

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 10>creator's channel. Through video, we know that connection with their

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 10>audience is really important. High trust is why this industry exists.

0:36:39.239 --> 0:36:42.600
<v Speaker 5>And why it works amber Exactly a week ago, I

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:45.120
<v Speaker 5>was in the Steve Jobs Theater at Apple Park for

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 5>the new iPhone event and let's say hundreds thousands, hundreds

0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:52.960
<v Speaker 5>of creators there. They all use different technology to make

0:36:53.000 --> 0:36:55.280
<v Speaker 5>their content and they will publish it in different paces.

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 5>But I just found myself thinking, like, what a crowded field?

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:01.400
<v Speaker 5>Do you get that sense that there are now just

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 5>so many creators that the value is a bit of

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:05.000
<v Speaker 5>a question.

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 10>You know, they're actually millions of creators with over a

0:37:09.520 --> 0:37:12.359
<v Speaker 10>million followers, So as you think about those of consequence. Today,

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:15.360
<v Speaker 10>LTK works with three hundred thousand creators, and that's globally,

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:16.520
<v Speaker 10>about half of them.

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:17.279
<v Speaker 14>Are here in the US.

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:20.400
<v Speaker 10>We're working with professional creators, and really, for a brand today,

0:37:20.400 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 10>they don't have to depend on looking at follower accounts

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 10>or views to understand the influence of a creator. Then

0:37:25.040 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 10>come to LTK and see what their community is actually doing,

0:37:27.680 --> 0:37:29.319
<v Speaker 10>not just from top of funnel, but all the way

0:37:29.320 --> 0:37:32.920
<v Speaker 10>through to actually purchase behavior, which is becoming increasingly important

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:35.480
<v Speaker 10>for these brands, especially in this economy. They're looking for

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:37.759
<v Speaker 10>ROI and those are the types of metrics that they need.

0:37:37.960 --> 0:37:39.960
<v Speaker 10>What I love in what you're mentioning is actually the

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 10>suite of tools that's required for a creator to do

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:44.960
<v Speaker 10>their work does depend on the likes of Apple, and

0:37:45.000 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 10>so that's been fuel to this whole industry. The fact

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 10>that I have every tool that I need in my

0:37:49.600 --> 0:37:52.640
<v Speaker 10>pocket right now for free is incredible, and so we're

0:37:52.640 --> 0:37:55.600
<v Speaker 10>really excited about the innovation that we're seeing from even

0:37:55.719 --> 0:37:56.920
<v Speaker 10>the hardware in the industry.

0:37:58.239 --> 0:38:00.680
<v Speaker 5>LTK President Amavn's books. Great to have you back here

0:38:00.680 --> 0:38:01.840
<v Speaker 5>on Bloomberg Technology.

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:02.359
<v Speaker 7>Thank you.

0:38:05.440 --> 0:38:07.879
<v Speaker 5>Now for a look at last night's Primetime Emmys. TV

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 5>drama Showgun gave Disney the top Emmy for the first

0:38:11.160 --> 0:38:14.759
<v Speaker 5>time in nineteen years. The show, film primarily in Japanese,

0:38:14.840 --> 0:38:17.200
<v Speaker 5>set a record for the most wins by a single

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:20.440
<v Speaker 5>show in one year, with eighteen across the Primetime Emmys

0:38:20.440 --> 0:38:23.879
<v Speaker 5>and last week Creative Arts Awards, while HBO claimed Top

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:27.359
<v Speaker 5>Comedy with Hacks being out Hulu's The Bear, Disney earned

0:38:27.360 --> 0:38:30.879
<v Speaker 5>the most awards of any entertainment company. Let's get more

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:33.400
<v Speaker 5>and bring in bloombergs Lucas Shaw, who leads our screen

0:38:33.440 --> 0:38:36.560
<v Speaker 5>time coverage and Late Sunday Night for you. Showgun for me,

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:38.920
<v Speaker 5>it's been one of the top of the year. But

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:42.120
<v Speaker 5>there's a success story for Disney in there as well.

0:38:42.280 --> 0:38:45.279
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, I mean to put it in perspective, Barbeiger was

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:48.040
<v Speaker 15>both at the Emmys and then also at the Disney

0:38:48.040 --> 0:38:51.480
<v Speaker 15>after party. That is not something that he usually attends.

0:38:51.520 --> 0:38:53.239
<v Speaker 15>I think he was there because he knew this was

0:38:53.280 --> 0:38:56.440
<v Speaker 15>a big night for the company. You know, the winning

0:38:56.520 --> 0:38:59.239
<v Speaker 15>poper Awards with the Oscars and Emmys hasn't historically been

0:38:59.360 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 15>sort of a part of the Disney strategy. They're making

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:06.319
<v Speaker 15>these big popcorn pictures, big commercial television shows based on

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:09.360
<v Speaker 15>things like Marvel and Star Wars. But FX in particular

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:11.399
<v Speaker 15>just had a huge night. Even though The Bear didn't

0:39:11.440 --> 0:39:14.279
<v Speaker 15>win Best Comedy Showgun and the Bear combined, I think

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 15>when twenty nine Awards, it was enough to make FX

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:17.839
<v Speaker 15>the top network on.

0:39:17.800 --> 0:39:19.720
<v Speaker 6>Television, top network.

0:39:19.760 --> 0:39:23.000
<v Speaker 4>You've been speaking with top leadership there as well. At

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:25.400
<v Speaker 4>the moment we've been done and Waldron, she was at

0:39:25.440 --> 0:39:29.080
<v Speaker 4>your event last year as well, screen Time, and I'm

0:39:29.120 --> 0:39:31.359
<v Speaker 4>just really interested in You've got this event coming up

0:39:31.719 --> 0:39:35.879
<v Speaker 4>of course in la October ninth and tenth, we're all

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 4>gonna be there, We're gonna be broadcasting live. Can you

0:39:38.600 --> 0:39:40.279
<v Speaker 4>just quickly tell us what we're gonna expect to said

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:41.880
<v Speaker 4>more about Disney's prowess.

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:46.000
<v Speaker 15>Sadly know Disney this year because they have an executive

0:39:46.080 --> 0:39:49.439
<v Speaker 15>leadership retreat in Florida the same week as screen Time,

0:39:49.480 --> 0:39:51.640
<v Speaker 15>but we'll have people from just about every other company,

0:39:51.640 --> 0:39:54.720
<v Speaker 15>top leaders from Netflix and Amazon. We'll love the CEO

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:57.799
<v Speaker 15>of Comcast, We'll love the CEO of Live Nation. You know,

0:39:57.840 --> 0:40:01.279
<v Speaker 15>some fun celebrities as well, Snoop Dogg, Harry Washington, and

0:40:01.440 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 15>the creator of South Park among them. You know, we're

0:40:04.040 --> 0:40:07.120
<v Speaker 15>going to be talking about just the crazy time this

0:40:07.200 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 15>is in the business of media and entertainment, you know,

0:40:10.280 --> 0:40:15.120
<v Speaker 15>with companies merging, fighting and really unsure about the future

0:40:15.400 --> 0:40:16.839
<v Speaker 15>of the key of their business. You know, you guys

0:40:16.840 --> 0:40:19.240
<v Speaker 15>were talking about Apple. Apple at least knows what its businesses,

0:40:19.280 --> 0:40:20.880
<v Speaker 15>makes a lot of money that way. A lot of

0:40:20.880 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 15>these TV and movie companies are still trying to figure

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:25.719
<v Speaker 15>out this streaming thing still.

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:29.200
<v Speaker 5>One such drama is Disney and Direct TV. Right, Carrie,

0:40:29.200 --> 0:40:32.000
<v Speaker 5>just fifteen seconds, Lucas, More dramas come.

0:40:33.400 --> 0:40:35.800
<v Speaker 15>Definitely more carriage flights to come, but not for Disney

0:40:35.840 --> 0:40:36.760
<v Speaker 15>in the near future.

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:41.719
<v Speaker 6>That was quick, Lucas Shaw, So on it.

0:40:42.080 --> 0:40:45.400
<v Speaker 4>We Thank you up late on early for us and

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 4>Blombog screen time is happening October ninth and tent You

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:51.200
<v Speaker 4>do not want to miss it live with Lucashaw and

0:40:51.280 --> 0:40:52.560
<v Speaker 4>a few helpful others.

0:40:52.760 --> 0:40:54.720
<v Speaker 6>That does it. For this edition of Bloomberg Technology.

0:40:54.719 --> 0:40:57.800
<v Speaker 5>They had Yeah what a frantic starts the week recap

0:40:57.800 --> 0:40:59.880
<v Speaker 5>on the podcast. You know where to find it terminal

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:02.840
<v Speaker 5>on Apple, Spotify, and iHeart online the team out in

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 5>New York City. Good morning from the team out here

0:41:05.120 --> 0:41:07.440
<v Speaker 5>in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology.