WEBVTT - From the Vault: Anthology of Horror, Volume 4

0:00:05.720 --> 0:00:09.039
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. This is

0:00:09.160 --> 0:00:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and it's time for

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 1>a vault episode. This one originally aired on October. It

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:21.279
<v Speaker 1>was the fourth one of our Anthology of Horror episodes. Yeah,

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:24.480
<v Speaker 1>this this has become a tradition, and uh, this one

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:25.920
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of fun. I think we talked about

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>an episode of the Outer Limits revival, Hammer House of Horror,

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the Simpsons Tree House of Horror, creep show and are

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:34.839
<v Speaker 1>You Afraid of the Dark? You know what, we actually

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>never got around to the Hammer House of Horror segment,

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>we did? We not? We that maybe that one will

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>be brand new this year. That's right, that's right, because

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>this is publishing I believe October, uh my birthday, and

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>we are probably doing a um an Anthology of Horror

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>episode later in this month. So yeah, maybe it'll be

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>time for Hammer House of Horror to to uh to

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 1>hit the airwaves. Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind,

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the production of My Heart Radio. Hey, welcome to Stuff

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to Blow your Mind. My name is Robert Lamb and

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe McCormick. And it's still Halloween season, so we're

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>going into the anthology territory. That's right. We have a

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:24.759
<v Speaker 1>long tradition here on stuff to blow your mind of

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>taking short spooky stories around this time of year, uh,

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>snipping them out of their host, drying them, and then

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>stuffing them with science to create an informative and entertaining

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 1>Halloween sausage. We did this for a few years based

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>on creepy pasta stories, and then we kind of felt

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>like that well was running a little dry, so we

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:46.319
<v Speaker 1>turned to an even richer and deeper treasure trove of

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>horror fiction, and that is horror and sci fi anthology series. Uh.

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>A lot of these are shows that aired on TV.

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>A lot of them are also films that feature, you know,

0:01:57.080 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>several different stories in an anthology format, and there's just

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous amount out there. We're We're talking the likes

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of The Twilight Zone, The Outer Limits, Tales from the

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Dark Side, Tales from the Crypt, Monsters, Black Mirror, and

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>just so many many more. Uh. Plus there's the highly

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>popular Simpsons Treehouse of Horror episodes, as well as various

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>against cinematic horror anthology such as The Vault of Horror.

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>So this is gonna be volume four and then we're

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna do volume five this year. We did volume one

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand eighteen, minted volumes two and three and

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen, so we're continuing the tradition. And uh and

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>again yeah, I just have to say, there's just so

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>much out there in terms of horror and sci fi

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:41.679
<v Speaker 1>anthology television. Uh, and then there's this an additional ton

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of horror and sci fi anthology cinema. So once again

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 1>this year I found myself just combing through contenders that

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I'd either forgotten about, was half aware of, or just

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:54.920
<v Speaker 1>had flat never heard of. Like like a lot in

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>horror especially, I feel like the horror anthology genre tends

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to feel like low hanging fruit. But but the kicker

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>is that when well done, there's nothing else quite like it. Well, yeah,

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that's true. I mean there's almost an ancient

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>memory aspect to a horror anthology because it feels like

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>people sitting around a campfire, going around the circle, each

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>taking a turn to tell a story. Yeah, and the like,

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the literary short story provides wonderful opportunities that full length

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>or episodic mediums don't provide. Like a lot of times

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you can really put a particular idea in the forefront.

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:31.639
<v Speaker 1>You can put a particular twist in the forefront. Uh

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>And it can work better than it would if you

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>tried to build an entire you know, uh TV series

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:41.119
<v Speaker 1>around this, or an entire feature leath length film around us.

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I was actually just thinking the other day about the

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>good things about having a short format for horror, because

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>we watched a new horror movie that came out this year.

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>It was a Shutter original film called Host. It was

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>like a Zoom horror movie. It takes place entirely on Zoom,

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>but the characters do a say on and there's demonic shenanigans,

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and the movie is about an hour long. And I

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>thought that worked fantastically because it's, you know, it's not

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>a super deep film. It's not especially like thoughtful or interesting,

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>but just for an excellent little boo frolic, an hour

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:20.119
<v Speaker 1>is a perfect length. Uh And, And I wish more

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>horror movies would just kind of embrace that and say, no,

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to be as long as it's supposed

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to be. We're not gonna pad this out to eighty

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>six minutes. We're gonna be an hour long. I mean,

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>if it's good enough for Attack of the Crab Monsters.

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>An hour run time is good enough for you. Yes, yeah, yeah,

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 1>I definitely thought about that when I watch when I

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>will watch for the first time Frankenstein and Bride of Frankenstein,

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>like just shorter format, but then they got everything in.

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, if you're a horror director out there, don't

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 1>worry about patting it out. I mean, if your movie

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>is only fifty four minutes long, I think that's great. Now.

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned zoom based horror earlier. In a bit later

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>on in the episode we're gonna discuss episode of the

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>nine nineties revival of the Outer Limits, I want to

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>mention that there this is not the episode we're gonna

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>be talking about, but there is an episode called dead

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:13.279
<v Speaker 1>Man Switch that's that's extremely good, and it has to

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>do with individuals humans that are put into uh separate

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>bunkers during an alien invasion and each one is functioning

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>as a dead man switch for the planetary defense system.

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>But the fun thing about it is all these people

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 1>are solely communicating with each other via this like you know,

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>closed network television, basically a zoom scenario. Uh So it's

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a it's a very interesting piece to watch during this

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:44.039
<v Speaker 1>time of increased zoom meetings, etcetera. All right, well let's

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>just jump right in here to our first selection. This

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>is from the Night two horror anthology film Creep Show. Uh,

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>this is the Lonesome Death of Jordi Verrel. Alright, so

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 1>sidebar before we get started on the plot. This segment

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 1>stars Stephen King in the flesh. He's the actor in it.

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>So I've got to ask what are your favorite Stephen

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>King acting spots? And and I'll announce mine. He's got

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>a cameo in a movie called Sleepwalkers. If you've never

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>seen it, I think it came out in the eighties

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 1>or early nineties, and it is about shape shifting cat

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 1>demon things that suck the life essence out of young women.

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 1>And then I think they can turn invisible, they can

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>like look like different things, and their weaknesses that if

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:37.719
<v Speaker 1>they're attacked by cats they die. But anyway, in Sleepwalkers,

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:41.600
<v Speaker 1>there is an amazing scene that features a cameo by

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Stephen King as a perturbed cemetery caretaker who is angry

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that that perverts keep coming into his cemetery at night.

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>But it also contains cameos by Toby Hooper and Clive Barker. Oh,

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:58.839
<v Speaker 1>I love it when we have scenes like that, and

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a fitting like is Lee cameo for for Stephen King? Um,

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 1>because I remember, probably during like the height of my

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>my my young obsession with Stephen King novels. Uh, the

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>TV series Golden Years came out, which I don't think

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>is anybody's favorite of Stephen King project. I don't think

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>they ever finished it. You know, it went maybe a season,

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe less in a season, but I remember there being oh,

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>it's like a goodness, I'm having a hard time he

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>remembering what the gist of it was a man aging

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>rapidly I think, or aging backwards, one of the two. Um.

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>It had. One of the best things about it was

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 1>it had David Bowie's Golden Years as the theme music.

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:45.239
<v Speaker 1>But there's a scene where Stephen King shows up as

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 1>a as a bus driver and at the time I

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>was like, this is amazing. That's Stephen He's the author

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and he's the bus driver. Um. Of course he would

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>go on to have so many more interesting cameos and things. Um.

0:07:57.680 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>For instance, I never saw this, but he has a

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty whacky one in the TV version of the shining.

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>He's this band leader, like this really um energetic band,

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>big band leader with a pencil thin mustache. He looks

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 1>fabulously greased back hair, got a pencil mustache that that

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>is not a good look for Stephen King. I don't know,

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's he kind of has the like the

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>face for for facial hair. Though he can make most

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>of it work. I feel it kind of works. He

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>does better full beard, I mean full beard. He looks

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>appropriately shaggy and kind of right early with the pencil mustache.

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 1>He looks like maybe he would be the guy who

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>would be discovered in the cemetery. Now in terms of

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>just his acting roles, go like things where he's not

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>just a cameo but he's actually playing a bit part.

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>He had a really fun one in the biker drama

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Sons of Anarchy. Uh several years back. He played a

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>guy who makes bodies disappear. So he's, you know, just

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of this stern but creepy guy in a in

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>a basement that will uh you know, make that make

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:00.079
<v Speaker 1>that body disappear when you need it to, and he

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>insists on listening to eighties music while it happens. Well,

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen that either, but but I'll have to

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>look it up. All right, Well, let's get into two

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 1>creep show here, So creep show for anyone who's not

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 1>familiar with it, with Stephen King and George Ramiro's tribute

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to pre code horror comics of old. I think I

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>may have covered the crate in a in a previous episode.

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure, but it has some wonderful segments, but

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>they're all like sort of mean, uh grizzly uh segments

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>that are you know, very much in the vein of

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>classic tales from the Crypt and so forth, where uh

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>there are bad people that do bad things and get

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>their come up. It's usually in grizzly ways with a

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit of gallows humor thrown in. And like we said,

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>not only is this written by Stephen King, but this

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 1>segment also stars the author as well. Again, it's the

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Lonesome Death of Jordy veryl And it's a little bit

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the Color out of Space and a little bit the Blob.

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>It's about a redneck who comes in contact with space goo. Uh.

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Then after coming in contact with space goo, some sort

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of alien plant or plant like organism takes over his

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:11.079
<v Speaker 1>body and then he makes the terrible mistake of climbing

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>into a hot bath to ease his discomfort. The alien

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>plant infection overtakes him and he ends up following papahanming

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Way into the sunset. Then we hear on the t

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:26.079
<v Speaker 1>V that rainy weather is moving in which will spread,

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:29.959
<v Speaker 1>no doubt, spread the alien plants even wider across the earth.

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:34.199
<v Speaker 1>You know, this connects to several other horror stories, uh,

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 1>in interesting ways. One that I didn't think of until

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>just now is the way that it connects to, especially

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the late nineteen seventies remake of Invasion of the Body Snatchers,

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 1>which is very good and which characterizes the spores that

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>come down and possess the humans and turn them into

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the replicants. Uh, they're very plant like. I mean, obviously

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>they're not from Earth, so they're not exactly of the

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Kingdom of the Plants, but there's clearly a similarity with

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>plants and an affinity for plants among the aliens. And

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the ending of the Jordy Viril segment makes me think

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>very much of the beginning of the Invasion of the

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Body Snatchers remake because in the opening credits to the

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Body Snatchers remake. There is this sequence that just kind

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of shows these filaments almost blowing in the wind, and

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:31.439
<v Speaker 1>it accomplishes a very sinister visual connotation without any words

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>or any explanation, just of the idea of biological material

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of drifting and through through the air, through space

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>carried on currents of various kinds. Yeah, and of course

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the cans instantly think to other sort of plant based

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>horror properties, such as the Day of the Triffids, which

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>we've mentioned on here before. That's a big one about

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>plant plant like aliens overtaking the earth or troll too.

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 1>That's right, that's right. So this Jordy viral episode, it

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>raised the question for me, are there any plants that

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>can grow on or in the human body under you know,

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:09.439
<v Speaker 1>sort of normal circumstances, because obviously like a dead body

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>filled with dirt, you could grow some some plants, and

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>that if you had some sort of somehow had an

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>outfit that had like lots of dirt pockets, you could

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 1>grow grow that way. Also wanted to, you know, avoid

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 1>discussing bacteria and fungi, sticking to just good old plants,

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>which again seems more in line with the plant like

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>organisms that we're dealing with in this short um, and

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>we're not counting things that might look like plants but

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 1>are in fact tumors or what have you. So for

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the most part, plants don't want to be on us

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>or inside us, unless, of course, their seeds are traveling

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>on our hair or garments, or if their seeds are

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>traveling through our digestive systems. Otherwise, there's just not much

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of an in game going on with the inside of

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the human body or even like on the exterior of

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the human body. Uh. You know, seeds need to get

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in the dirt. But sometimes things go wrong, as horribly wrong.

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:08.319
<v Speaker 1>As reported in by the BBC and various other outlets,

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a man named Ron vet and I believe uh had

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>been battling emphysema, and he underwent an X ray as

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:19.079
<v Speaker 1>his condition worsened. The doctors then discovered that a p

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 1>had gone down the wrong um, you know, the wrong

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>pipe and sprouted in the warm, moist environment of the

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>patient's lung. It had only grown a half an inch long,

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>but you know, still it was enough to cause some concern.

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:36.439
<v Speaker 1>Surgeons removed it. Uh and UH, we should stress here

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>that what was happening is that the P was sprouting

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>as if it were under the soil, reaching up for sunlight.

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Thus it grew in the darkness of a human body

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:48.560
<v Speaker 1>as if it were going to sprout out of the

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 1>body and find the sun. Now an energy terms, it

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>couldn't keep growing like that forever, right, because eventually it

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>would need sunlight in order to supply new energy. But

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 1>of course, a P like any other uh, you know,

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>like the yolk of an egg or something, has some

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>chemical energy built into it that can propel that initial

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:11.199
<v Speaker 1>sprouting from the dark place. Uh. Fortunately, it would probably

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>eventually not be able to find sunlight, but it still

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 1>would I guess, be some kind of gross thing in

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>your lung. So it's a good thing they took it out.

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>But in the spirit of of making the familiar strange,

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I think we should dwell for a minute on the

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>idea of seeds using bodies, such as human bodies for dispersal.

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>We don't dwell on this as a parallel to any

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of botanical body horror because it just seems so normal. Well, yeah,

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, sometimes you just eat fruit with seeds in it.

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 1>But this is really kind of strange. The more you

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>think about it. So of course there are evolutionary pressures

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>on plants that caused them to find methods of seed dispersal,

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>not just to produce seeds of for a new generation

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of plants, but to try to get them physically away

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 1>from the parent and uh. And this is because, like

0:14:56.760 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the kin shared genes of the parent and offspring, plants

0:14:59.840 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to want to be forced to compete directly with one

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>another for resources, and these resources would include soil space, water,

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>nutrients in the soil, access to sunlight. If you can

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 1>get the kids out of the house, that's good because

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>then you're not fighting over food. And competition of this

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>kind can be reduced by dispersing seeds, and nature of

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>course has lots of ingenious solutions for this. We've talked

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 1>about some on the show before. For example, you know

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>all the different structures the parachute or wing like structures

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>that seeds sometimes sprout in order to ride on the

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:36.479
<v Speaker 1>wind to or to drift like the like the filaments

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 1>in in invasion to the body snatchers. Then there were

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>even exploding seed pods like you would find on the

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>sandbox tree or Hera crepitans. And so this is a

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>tree that has thorns all over its trunk. I think

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I've read somewhere that it's called the Monkey Can't Climate tree,

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and it produces seed pods that look kind of like

0:15:56.600 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 1>tiny pumpkins, and they explode when they're right, literally explode,

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>sending a ballistic propulsion of seeds up to distances of

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>like a hundred meters away according to some reports. But also,

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned earlier, a lot of seeds rely on

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 1>animals to be dispersed, and this is known as zoo cory.

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>So there's epizoo cory, which is the transport of seeds

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>on the outside of the animal, so you think of

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>like the burrs that get stuck on a dog's fur,

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>stuck to your socks. One example of this is the

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>burdock plant, which was apparently the inspiration behind the invention

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of velcrow, invention of the loop and fastener system. But

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>then there's also, of course what's known as indo zoo corey,

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the transport of seeds inside of the animal, and this

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>usually involves creating a tasty fruiting body containing the seed

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>waiting to get eaten, traveling around inside an animal's digestive system,

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>then being released in the animals species to grow in

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a new place. And so if you eat some tasty blackberries,

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>you are, in a way, Jordi Varrel, you are the

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>host of this plant that is using your digestive system,

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 1>using and your your legs, your mobile body in the

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 1>dispersal of seeds as part of its reproductive cycle. In fact,

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:14.119
<v Speaker 1>there are even some seeds that are somewhat obligate in

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>this way. They need to be primed to grow inside

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>an animal's digestive system. Blackberries would be an example, which

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I think usually needs some time in a bird's gizzard

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 1>before they will grow. But all the stories you read

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 1>of like okay, well you know my cousin knows a

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>guy who swallowed a watermelon seed and it grew a

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>watermelon inside his stomach. That that's not true. I could

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 1>not find any evidence that anything like that ever happens.

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 1>But while it's unlikely that you would grow a plant

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>from a seed in your body while you are alive,

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>could it happen after you're dead? Again, you mentioned earlier,

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Rob that if a seed was maybe in your pockets,

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>in your pockets were full of soil, it could grow

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>out of that. But could it actually grow from inside

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>your body? Well, I could not find a verified example

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:05.119
<v Speaker 1>of this. I found a disputed claim about a fig

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:08.399
<v Speaker 1>tree that grew out of a murdered man's stomach in

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:11.439
<v Speaker 1>a cave in Cyprus, But it looks like that that

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:15.639
<v Speaker 1>account is has has generally been refuted. But I was

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>reading an article that talks about that that rumored story

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>in Life Science by Laura Geigel, and the author here

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>consulted a soil science professor from Oregon State University named j. Knohler,

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:29.439
<v Speaker 1>and it was Nhler's opinion that such a thing is

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 1>actually plausible. He said that seeds can sometimes emerge from

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>dead animals, so he imagines they could likewise emerge out

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of a dead human um. But he said it wouldn't

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:42.880
<v Speaker 1>have to be in their stomach. It could actually grow

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 1>from any part of the dead person's digestive tract. It

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 1>could be in their large intestine, small intestine. And the

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 1>way it breaks down would work like this, So you

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 1>have a dead, decaying body all around the plant seed

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that would sort of help it out with nutrients, very

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>possibly with the third party of fung us involved. So

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:04.680
<v Speaker 1>microscopic fungi in the soil would help decompose the dead

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:07.879
<v Speaker 1>body breakdown. You know, the fungus would break down fats

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and proteins into simpler constituent nutrients, and then the fungus

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>would share these nutrients with nearby plants, possibly even seeds

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that are among the decaying organic material of the body

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>in a symbiotic relationship. So they would exchange simple sugars

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that the plant produces for these nutrients that they're getting

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:30.880
<v Speaker 1>from decomposing the body. But I wanted to think about

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>another way of possibly framing infection by an alien plant,

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 1>apart from directly becoming the host or substrate of the

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 1>plant itself, And that's the idea of infection via a

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>plant vector. Or to put it as a question, would

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>you let a zucchini flower cough in your mouth? And

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I was looking around for for answers to this question

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>can you get infected from a plant? And I found

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 1>an article by a plant pathologist and diagnostician at Iowa

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 1>State University named Dr Lena Rodriguez Salamanca, and she said

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>that sometimes her lab receives questions from the public, including

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the question of can I catch and infectious disease from

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a plant? The answer is in most cases no. You know,

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 1>pathogens that are specialized to infect plants, and of course

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:20.120
<v Speaker 1>there are many of these. Plants can be infected by fungi,

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:23.919
<v Speaker 1>by viruses, by bacteria, just like animals can. But usually

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>a pathogen that is specialized for one kingdom of life

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>is not just going to jump, you know, from that

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:31.639
<v Speaker 1>one into another kingdom of life and infected. It is

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>not adapted to that. But there are cases of a

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>few known opportunistic pathogens that will make this jump, and

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>this is especially true for people with compromised immune systems.

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 1>So one example is an infectious bacterium known as a

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>pseudominous erugenosa and Rodriguez Salamanca says that it can cause

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 1>a weak soft rot on plants such as lettuce, and

0:20:57.200 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>this bacterium has been known to jump the kingdom barrier

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes infect people with compromised immune systems. This can

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 1>lead to infections of the urinary tract, of the lungs,

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the blood, and wounds including burns, but for most people

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:13.439
<v Speaker 1>it does not represent a threat. But then there are

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:17.639
<v Speaker 1>other ones. For example, there is a fungal infection caused

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 1>by the fungus Sporothrix shanky i, which thrives on the

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>dead thorns of a rose stem, and this has given

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>rise to the name rose pickers disease or rose handler's disease.

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:32.439
<v Speaker 1>So if you're handling a rose and you, you know,

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>get pricked by one of these dead thorns that has

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:38.439
<v Speaker 1>the fungal infection, or get a scratch, this way, the

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>fungus can get into your scan, potentially into your lymph system.

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>And apparently you can also inhale spores of this fungus

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and this can cause all kinds of problems infections of

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the skin, of course, but of the eyes, the lungs,

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the nervous system, bones, and joints. And then finally she

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 1>mentions that there are infectious agents of plants that can

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>produce secondary byproducts that are harmful to humans, and she

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:06.919
<v Speaker 1>gives the example of fungi that attack corn. The phrase

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 1>she used specifically is ear rots, which is a new

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of words quick for me. But this includes the

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:20.679
<v Speaker 1>genus Fusarium, and these fungi produced secondary microtoxins including quote

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:26.360
<v Speaker 1>few Monison's z r alinone and the aptly named vomitoxin,

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:29.399
<v Speaker 1>which yes, that that is what it sounds like. And

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:31.439
<v Speaker 1>of course these are byproducts that can affect you in

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of ways. She talks about how most of

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the things like this, like like Aspergillis flavius also is

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 1>a is a contaminant that you could find in grains

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that produces secondary micotoxins. A lot of these things that

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 1>produce these secondary microtoxins that can harm you would be

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 1>found specifically, not in like leafy plants like let us,

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:53.879
<v Speaker 1>but on grains. And she she mentions, you know, you

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:56.160
<v Speaker 1>don't need to be too worried because they're like grain

0:22:56.200 --> 0:23:00.920
<v Speaker 1>producers monitor for the presence of these organisms. So yes,

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>it is in fact possible for a human to catch

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>a disease from a plant, much in the same way

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that we could catch a disease from a mosquito or

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 1>a bat, but fortunately it's not very common. All Right

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>with that, we're gonna go ahead close the book on

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Ajority Veril and I think we're gonna go and take

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 1>our first break. But when we come back, we will

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>unlock another entry in horror anthology history. Thank thank Alright,

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:30.920
<v Speaker 1>we're back. Is it time to go to the Outer Limits? Yeah,

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the Outer Limits. Uh So, I mentioned

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:35.639
<v Speaker 1>that we would be looking at an episode from the

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:40.439
<v Speaker 1>nineties revival of the Outer Limits UM. Not to be

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>confused with the original series from the from the nineteen sixties. Uh.

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>This is a series that ran through two thousand and two. Now,

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I watched a few of these on TV back in

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the day, but via Amazon Prime watch Party, we've been

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>watching an episode a week with a couple of friends,

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and I have to say, the nineties Our or Limits

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 1>has everything I love. You've got really cool sci fi concepts,

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you have great monster makeup, a little nineties cheesiness, uh

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 1>sprinkled in there, and some really fun performances as well,

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>sometimes by people you've you've never heard of, but oftentimes

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:17.919
<v Speaker 1>by people that went on to have uh you know,

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:21.639
<v Speaker 1>key roles in um in various sci fi properties or

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:24.399
<v Speaker 1>uh you know they did they did additional television work,

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>So you never know who you're gonna get. Like, for instance,

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>I haven't watched this yet, but there's an episode where

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Gary Busey shows up playing a televangelist. There's a one

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:37.640
<v Speaker 1>where Michael Ironside shows up playing a mutant. Uh, it's

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:40.160
<v Speaker 1>is you just never know who's going to be in there. Yeah,

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of oh that guy in it. Yeah.

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Basically name an actor who is doing TV during this

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 1>period of time, and there's a great chance that they

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 1>were on an episode of The Outer Limits. So during

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the Outer the nineties Outer Limits run they did a

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:56.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty two episodes. That's compared to forty nine

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>episodes from the original nineteen sixties series. And again, I

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 1>certain I haven't watched them all, but this is a

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>really good one we're gonna be talking about. It's an

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 1>episode that is probably a bit heavy handed, as these

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of things tend to be. UM, but this is

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 1>also rather pronounced as it was essentially a n commentary

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>about climate change denialism. That's very early. Yeah, yeah, you know,

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:23.879
<v Speaker 1>earlier than say an Inconvenient Truth and um and the like.

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>But we'll get into something like the basic where it

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>fits into the basic timeline of of climate change understanding

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>here shortly. But but first of all, just so everyone

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 1>can find it if you're interested in watching it, it's

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 1>titled to Tell the Truth, and it was written by

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Lawrence Myers and directed by Neil Fernley. It stars Gregory

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Harrison as Dr Larry Chambers. You may remember Gregory Harrison

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:49.359
<v Speaker 1>from various TV shows. I think he's like like on

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Trapper John m D or something. Um and uh, you

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:56.120
<v Speaker 1>know various other shows. Uh, a kind of a soap

0:25:56.160 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 1>opera vibe. Yeah, yeah, definitely and uh and in this

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 1>he plays a terraforming botanist on the off world colony

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of Janice five. And I love how perfectly on the

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 1>nose that the title is, I mean the name of

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the colony and or planet is because this is an

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>episode that is concerned with truth, denial and the mistrust

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 1>of information. Yes, and it has characters whose faces change

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and who are not what they seem. Yeah. So here's

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the deal. The Janice five colony is going pretty well.

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>It has a bright future, but doctor Chambers is concerned

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 1>by some of the geologic evidence. Geologic evidence that includes

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:37.159
<v Speaker 1>the remnants of an extinct shape shifting alien civilization. But

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:39.680
<v Speaker 1>five years ago he got it really wrong. He predicted

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 1>CycL cyclical catastrophe. Uh, and he thought it was gonna

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 1>be a volcanic catastrophe, but then this didn't come to fruition.

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Now he's come to believe that the cyclical threat that

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 1>is facing this planet is actually solar and that in

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:56.439
<v Speaker 1>another and then another devastating solar storm is just on

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the horizon. So he urges that the colony be moved

0:26:59.880 --> 0:27:02.920
<v Speaker 1>or even evacuated. Yeah, there's a great fake out beginning

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>where a couple of characters appear to be looking out

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:07.439
<v Speaker 1>a window and then they see the sky it fills

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 1>with these shimmering auroras and that turns into fire everywhere,

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and you you think, oh, no, are our main character

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:16.439
<v Speaker 1>is going to be killed right at the beginning. But

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 1>though it turns out it is a simulation they're looking at.

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 1>But I was wondering, why, why if they're simulating the

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 1>future of the climate, or they're simulating solar activity, does

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:33.159
<v Speaker 1>it create a video display of what is simulating would happen?

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I guess it's just a robust simulation um

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>package they have there. Yeah, that's a really good simulation.

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Usually simulation spit out like some numbers. Yeah, this one

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:45.919
<v Speaker 1>does it full like I'll give you, I'll give you

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a movie. So I mean, I guess it's all about,

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, creating something you know, visual that of course

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the audience can get into. But also these colonists, because

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 1>even sympathetic members of the colony have their doubts about

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Dr Ambers. After all, he got it wrong once before

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and then there's this added detail that he recently lost

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:07.920
<v Speaker 1>his wife and then even went missing for a couple

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 1>of weeks in the in the wilderness. So this there's

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:13.199
<v Speaker 1>this lingering question can he be trusted? Is he acting

0:28:13.240 --> 0:28:17.680
<v Speaker 1>out of sort of just nihilistic hatred for the colony?

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Plenty of and also just plenty of the colonists don't

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:23.159
<v Speaker 1>want to go through all of this again, and the

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>higher ups also have a lot invested in the situation.

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>One thing I think this episode models extremely well is

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that when the care so Dr. Chambers is trying to

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:37.680
<v Speaker 1>convince these characters that his simulation is correct, and when

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>characters find the implications of his conclusions unpalatable, like well,

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to have to move or you know whatever,

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not in their interests to try to evacuate. Most

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of the substance of their disagreement is not really about

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>what he's saying, but it's about him as a person.

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 1>So they say, like, you've got a psychological reason that

0:28:56.240 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>you would make all this stuff up? You know that

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 1>They start like talking about his person history and attacking

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 1>his character and saying, who is this guy? Can we

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 1>really trust him? Very reminiscent of how similar debates in

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 1>reality play out. But also I've just got to say

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite parts of this episode was the

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 1>repeated threatening visits from this guy named Fenton, who has

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 1>just really got it out for Dr Chambers. He seems

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>to be a neighbor of his who is some kind

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of security employee. Uh but he he looks basically like

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 1>a diminutive evil ken bone. Yeah. I love Finton in

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>this because he's I mean, he he works, he's a

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 1>gain a character, but he also you know, he's not

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 1>particularly threatening, and he does he also has a great

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 1>toady vibe to him, Like, I'm totally buying that in

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>this off world colony where where it's later explained that

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of people go here that didn't

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 1>have a shot at ascending uh into the you know,

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 1>into into higher levels back on Earth, like this is

0:29:57.120 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 1>their shot, And you totally buy Finton as a guy

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 1>who you know, probably wouldn't be head of security or

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 1>a major security player anywhere else, but here on on

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Janice five, he's got a shot. Well, even on Janice five,

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 1>he's not the head of security. He answers to the

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>guy with the beard, I can't remember what that guy's

0:30:12.200 --> 0:30:15.520
<v Speaker 1>name is but yeah, he's he's some kind of cop

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 1>or something. But it was just really funny how he

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>repeatedly shows up to be like this threatening figure, but

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>he's this cute little nerd. Now, um, the key individual here,

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 1>like the key antagonist I guess you would would call him,

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 1>is the head of the colony, Franklin Murdoch, and he's

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 1>played by the terrific William Atherton. Now Atherton is best

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>known for playing Uh. First, there was a character in

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 1>die Hard named Thornburgh, but most famously I think he

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 1>played Walter Peck in four's Ghostbusters. He he was just

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a perfect nineteen eighties weasel. Yeah, he has a special

0:30:58.520 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 1>knack I think for playing arrogant bureaucrats. So in die

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Hard he's a sleazy, opportunistic reporter and in uh in

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Ghostbusters he plays the villainous e P A agent. Yeah, yeah,

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 1>which is which is is always weird now when I

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:19.320
<v Speaker 1>rewatch Ghostbusters to think about Ghostbusters, because yeah, he has

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 1>just played as like a straight villain, or at least

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a sub villain in the film despite representing the you

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 1>know now in battled US Environmental Protection Agency, which is

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>there too, Especially in the film, like he's acting to

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 1>protect New York City from environmental damage from from things

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 1>like unlicensed nuclear accelerators and and this containment system that

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 1>even Egon describes as something that can't be turned off

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 1>without quote dropping a bomb on the city. I mean,

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I think there are a couple of ways you could read.

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Of course, I love Ghostbusters and the character is very funny.

0:31:56.200 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 1>You could read it as that the politics of the

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>movie are conservative. That's another way of reading it is

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 1>just that like this is a comedy where the protagonists

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>are are dangerously irresponsible people, and that that's sort of true. Yeah, yeah,

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean certainly, like if you really analyze the character

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of Peter Bankman, um, you know, how how likable is

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 1>he really? Uh but you know, Bill Murray, he makes

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 1>it work, Yeah he does. He does now again now

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>now Peck and Ghostbusters is definitely an arrogant jerk. I

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 1>don't want to get past that point. And Atherton brings

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 1>some of that same energy to this performance, but this

0:32:34.640 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 1>time he is definitely the face of anti environmental forces. Uh.

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think he's he's actually well presented here instead

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of being just a pure money grubbing heel Murdoch is

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 1>presented as being someone who opposes Chambers for several reasons. So,

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 1>first of all, Murdoch has a position of power and

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:57.800
<v Speaker 1>importance here on the colony that he would never have

0:32:57.880 --> 0:33:00.719
<v Speaker 1>achieved on Earth. He has this this really little monologu

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 1>where he talks about it. I think he's talking is

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 1>he He's not talking to Fenton, He's talking to another

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 1>character Will mention in a little bit. Also, Murdoch, like

0:33:09.400 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 1>all the other colonists, has in an economic stake in

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the colony's success, but he also stresses that this does

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 1>not rank above the importance of his own life. Murdoch,

0:33:19.080 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 1>seemingly quite authentically in one of these things, proclaims that

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 1>also Janice five is his home and he doesn't want

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to leave it, So he has that, um, you know,

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 1>tying him to the current situation. And then finally he

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 1>is concerned that is convincing his Chambers. Maybe he has

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 1>been wrong before and he might be wrong again for

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:45.240
<v Speaker 1>very human reasons. I mean, this episode, actually, like you're suggesting,

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:49.480
<v Speaker 1>raises a lot of very interesting and legitimate real life

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 1>concerns about saying how to communicate scientific conclusions that would

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 1>motivate action in the real world, because there are a

0:33:56.840 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of difficulties there. But I mean one of the

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 1>difficulties I think is that science, unlike most other epistemological methods,

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 1>is very upfront about uncertainty, so like it builds in

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the fact that, like, you know, I'm trying to tell

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you that this is a conclusion with x probability instead

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:17.759
<v Speaker 1>of just saying, like, here's how it is. And it

0:34:17.800 --> 0:34:20.720
<v Speaker 1>turns out that even though that is probably the best

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 1>method that you can use for actually figuring out what's true,

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:28.359
<v Speaker 1>it is not particularly convincing to motivate people to do

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>things that they don't want to do otherwise because it's like, oh,

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, you're acknowledging you're not certain. Then you know,

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 1>how can how can we make all these costly decisions

0:34:37.960 --> 0:34:40.319
<v Speaker 1>on the basis of your conclusion? Yeah? Yeah, I mean,

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:42.440
<v Speaker 1>like there's a there's a line in there where one

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:44.879
<v Speaker 1>of the columns is saying, you're asking us to ruin

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 1>our lives again, like you've already done it once before,

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and now you're asking to do it again and and

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and we can't even be certain about it. As a

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:56.800
<v Speaker 1>brief aside about the scientific premise of the episode. I

0:34:57.120 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 1>was interested in chambers suggestion that, so what happens on

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:05.440
<v Speaker 1>on Janice five on the planet is that Chambers believes

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:09.759
<v Speaker 1>every one thousand years, basically the planet is sterilized and

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 1>nearly all life is wiped out by solar activity. That

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that just bombards the surface of the planet with radiation

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and uh and and you know, wipes everything clean and

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 1>then life has to bounce back. And I was wondering,

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:26.239
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, how would it be possible for complex

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 1>life to even evolve on such a planet? And I

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 1>was trying to I was trying to make it work.

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:33.239
<v Speaker 1>One way I thought of is well, maybe years are

0:35:33.400 --> 0:35:36.319
<v Speaker 1>longer on Janice five than they are on Earth. So

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 1>a thousand years is actually a much longer period. Uh.

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 1>So I was looking at, you know, what, what's a

0:35:41.760 --> 0:35:44.520
<v Speaker 1>what's a planet that has a really long orbital period?

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:47.880
<v Speaker 1>In our Solar system? Neptune takes a hundred and sixty

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 1>five years to orbit the Sun. So if Janice is

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:54.400
<v Speaker 1>like Neptune, then a thousand Janie years would be a

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:57.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty five thousand Earth years. But the crazy

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:00.120
<v Speaker 1>thing is that's still the blink of an eye in

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 1>evolutionary time. Uh. And sometimes it can be hard to

0:36:03.080 --> 0:36:07.240
<v Speaker 1>put that in perspective. But if you consider it like this, so, uh,

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the if the evolution of life on Earth fits into

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, we don't know exactly when the first cells

0:36:12.320 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 1>arose or or the chemical evolution that gave rise to

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:17.799
<v Speaker 1>the first cells happened, but if you put it in

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:21.720
<v Speaker 1>basically the last four billion years, more than twenty four

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:26.240
<v Speaker 1>thousand periods of a hundred and sixty five thousand years

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:29.640
<v Speaker 1>could fit into that. So it makes you think, well,

0:36:29.719 --> 0:36:32.360
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to take this premise seriously that somehow

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:36.959
<v Speaker 1>complex life evolves on a planet that is sterilized every

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:41.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand years or so, either that sterilization has to be

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:44.280
<v Speaker 1>taken into account in the biology of the life that evolves,

0:36:44.280 --> 0:36:48.000
<v Speaker 1>like it goes dormant somehow to avoid the sterilization. Uh,

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 1>And that possibility, I think is raised in the episode,

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:55.359
<v Speaker 1>or it evolves at rates that are that are unthinkable

0:36:55.440 --> 0:36:58.839
<v Speaker 1>given the kind of evolution we understand here on Earth. Yeah,

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting, you know, it's it's a very thoughtful show,

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:05.920
<v Speaker 1>even with its occasional hokiness, you know, and and necessary

0:37:06.000 --> 0:37:09.839
<v Speaker 1>leaps in you know, in the fantastic um. But but yeah,

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:12.320
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting to think about the idea of say comparing

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 1>it to for the organisms that that depend on cyclical

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:20.360
<v Speaker 1>forest fires. Uh, it's just part of the environment that

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 1>they live in. That's a very good point of comparison.

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:25.040
<v Speaker 1>And actually a similar idea comes up in the three

0:37:25.040 --> 0:37:27.839
<v Speaker 1>Body Problem by c Chin Lou. Oh. Yeah, that's right,

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 1>in the simulation that they're working with, right, with the

0:37:32.920 --> 0:37:36.359
<v Speaker 1>world with multiple suns, right, the ideas that they're they're

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 1>unpredictable times when the environmental conditions of their home planet

0:37:41.040 --> 0:37:46.440
<v Speaker 1>become basically unsurvivable and the aliens have to disappear, have

0:37:46.560 --> 0:37:49.480
<v Speaker 1>to sort of like go into a hibernation or dehydration

0:37:49.600 --> 0:37:52.880
<v Speaker 1>state in order to just like ride out the uninhabitable

0:37:52.920 --> 0:37:56.600
<v Speaker 1>period and then re emerge once the planet becomes less hostile.

0:37:56.960 --> 0:37:59.320
<v Speaker 1>So this is the basic set up for the the episode.

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:01.120
<v Speaker 1>And I want to dress here by the way, when

0:38:01.200 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 1>this is where the audio realm uh Janice five the

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 1>name of the colony this is. This is not Janice

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:10.799
<v Speaker 1>like the uh as in Janet or anything. This is

0:38:10.840 --> 0:38:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the two faced got And so that's the sort of

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the Yeah, So from anyway, anyway, from here, the episode,

0:38:19.160 --> 0:38:21.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, takes a couple of I thought really satisfying

0:38:21.280 --> 0:38:23.760
<v Speaker 1>twists and turns. I don't want to spoil too much

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>in this episode in case you want to want to

0:38:25.520 --> 0:38:27.560
<v Speaker 1>see it for yourself, and I recommend you do. But

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 1>let's just say that some folks are accused of being

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:33.840
<v Speaker 1>shaped shifting aliens that survived, uh, you know, like they

0:38:34.120 --> 0:38:36.959
<v Speaker 1>living in the depths of the earth or something um.

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:39.960
<v Speaker 1>And we're forced to wonder if Chambers will be proven

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:42.360
<v Speaker 1>right or wrong and what it will mean for the

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 1>people of the colony. Now again, this episode is an

0:38:45.600 --> 0:38:48.320
<v Speaker 1>obvious treatment on the of the dangers of climate change

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:51.719
<v Speaker 1>and the role that climate change denialism plays in our society.

0:38:52.440 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 1>To put everything in an historical framework, the greenhouse effect

0:38:56.760 --> 0:39:01.480
<v Speaker 1>was described by French physicist Joseph Fourier in eighteen twenty four.

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:05.279
<v Speaker 1>BBC has a nice breakdown of key moments after that

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:09.600
<v Speaker 1>in a Brief History of climate Change, which brings up everything.

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 1>It brings up everything through because you know, that's that's

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 1>when the timeline came out. But it's a nice handy

0:39:14.840 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 1>reference point for some of the stuff we're talking about here.

0:39:18.960 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 1>But they hit a few key points from the later

0:39:21.000 --> 0:39:26.000
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century. U. S. Scientist Wallace Brocker put the term

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:29.480
<v Speaker 1>global warming in the title of a science paper, popularizing

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:33.279
<v Speaker 1>the term, and in nineteen eighty seven the Montreal Protocol

0:39:33.360 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 1>came into effect to protect the ozone layer, and in

0:39:36.239 --> 0:39:40.680
<v Speaker 1>night the inter Governmental Panel on Climate Change formed to

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:44.120
<v Speaker 1>colate and assess the evidence. And of course the i

0:39:44.200 --> 0:39:48.520
<v Speaker 1>p c C continues to collect and assess the evidence

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:51.759
<v Speaker 1>on on the state of climate change even today. I

0:39:51.760 --> 0:39:57.000
<v Speaker 1>think their most recent major update and report was in furteen.

0:39:57.040 --> 0:40:00.359
<v Speaker 1>It was the fifth Assessment Report, and it it paints

0:40:00.360 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a pretty dire picture. Now. One thing that this BBC

0:40:03.160 --> 0:40:05.479
<v Speaker 1>timeline also points out, and this is something that Carl

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Sagan wrote about in The demon Haunted World as well.

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Margaret Thatcher gave a speech to the u N in

0:40:11.239 --> 0:40:15.719
<v Speaker 1>nine and urged a global treaty, stating, quote, we are

0:40:15.760 --> 0:40:18.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing a vast increase in the amount of carbon dioxide

0:40:18.560 --> 0:40:21.360
<v Speaker 1>reaching the atmosphere. And then she goes on to to

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:24.840
<v Speaker 1>point out that the future changes will quote likely be

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 1>more fundamental and more widespread than anything we have known hitherto.

0:40:29.960 --> 0:40:33.040
<v Speaker 1>And as Sagan pointed out, Thatcher, no matter what else

0:40:33.400 --> 0:40:36.680
<v Speaker 1>you know think about her in her politics, was is

0:40:36.960 --> 0:40:39.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the few heads of state we can point

0:40:39.280 --> 0:40:41.840
<v Speaker 1>to that had a science background. She was a research

0:40:41.920 --> 0:40:45.319
<v Speaker 1>chemist with a chemistry degree from Oxford. A weird thing

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to remember. Yeah, in in the demon Haunted World, Sagan

0:40:49.360 --> 0:40:52.400
<v Speaker 1>brings us up because he's talking about science and politics

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:56.320
<v Speaker 1>where they meet, and the idea here is that Margaret Thatcher,

0:40:56.719 --> 0:40:59.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, whatever else her her politics might mean, or

0:40:59.840 --> 0:41:02.000
<v Speaker 1>what you know, other details regarding her place in history,

0:41:02.560 --> 0:41:07.320
<v Speaker 1>she perhaps had an advantage in understanding these dire warnings

0:41:07.360 --> 0:41:11.799
<v Speaker 1>coming from the scientific community because of her own scientific background. Yeah,

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:15.000
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting. I mean, it is not all that common

0:41:15.120 --> 0:41:19.319
<v Speaker 1>to see world leaders, major political leaders coming from a

0:41:19.360 --> 0:41:23.480
<v Speaker 1>scientific background, I think, doesn't I think Angela Merkel has

0:41:23.520 --> 0:41:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a scientific one of the few other ones you can

0:41:26.239 --> 0:41:28.279
<v Speaker 1>easily point to. Yeah, But I was trying to think

0:41:28.280 --> 0:41:30.920
<v Speaker 1>of other examples, and it come up very very short.

0:41:31.760 --> 0:41:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that is interesting. And I'm not saying necessarily

0:41:35.040 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that one needs to be a scientist to be a

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:40.160
<v Speaker 1>political leader. I mean that that also seems like a

0:41:40.600 --> 0:41:45.240
<v Speaker 1>unreasonable demand, and it's not necessarily true that scientific careers

0:41:45.239 --> 0:41:47.120
<v Speaker 1>would provide all of the kind of skills you need

0:41:47.160 --> 0:41:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to be a good political leader. But it seems like

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:51.760
<v Speaker 1>it would be good to have at least a higher

0:41:51.760 --> 0:41:55.759
<v Speaker 1>proportion of people with scientific backgrounds involved in politics. I mean,

0:41:56.480 --> 0:41:59.560
<v Speaker 1>it's strange to just like look at the professional backgrounds

0:41:59.560 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of people who become politicians and notice how uniform it

0:42:03.640 --> 0:42:05.239
<v Speaker 1>is most of the time. I mean, at least in

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the United States, politics is overwhelmingly dominated by lawyers and

0:42:09.640 --> 0:42:13.640
<v Speaker 1>people from business. You kind of wonder how different our

0:42:13.680 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 1>politics might be if there was a more representative sample

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:19.640
<v Speaker 1>of people from other fields, of people from the sciences,

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of teachers of labor leader. Isn't so forth that all

0:42:23.280 --> 0:42:26.440
<v Speaker 1>like became political leaders. Also, Yeah, I mean, at the

0:42:26.520 --> 0:42:30.520
<v Speaker 1>very least, you want leaders who listen to trusted scientists.

0:42:31.120 --> 0:42:33.759
<v Speaker 1>You you know, you want scientists to um and uh

0:42:33.800 --> 0:42:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and scientifically minded people to be in positions to speak

0:42:36.719 --> 0:42:39.439
<v Speaker 1>to scientific topics and then have that be a part

0:42:39.800 --> 0:42:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of the you know, the upper political consideration. And I

0:42:43.000 --> 0:42:45.279
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's a controversial statement to make on of

0:42:45.320 --> 0:42:49.120
<v Speaker 1>science podcast. Um. But let's come back to this Outer

0:42:49.200 --> 0:42:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Limits episode. So this came out in which curiously and

0:42:53.160 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 1>this you know, I don't know what degree this is, uh,

0:42:55.800 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 1>this is actually um, you know, essential, but it's curiously

0:42:59.640 --> 0:43:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the same year that the rate of average global surface

0:43:03.360 --> 0:43:07.719
<v Speaker 1>warming began a slowing trend that lasted till now. As

0:43:07.760 --> 0:43:11.279
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca Lindsay points out on climate dot Gov, this really

0:43:11.320 --> 0:43:14.200
<v Speaker 1>just meant that quote the rate of average global surface

0:43:14.200 --> 0:43:18.279
<v Speaker 1>warming from through two thousand and twelve was slower than

0:43:18.320 --> 0:43:21.000
<v Speaker 1>it had been for two to three decades leading up

0:43:21.000 --> 0:43:24.480
<v Speaker 1>to it, but the big picture of long term warming

0:43:24.680 --> 0:43:29.040
<v Speaker 1>continued unchanged. Still, climate change deniers at the time took

0:43:29.280 --> 0:43:32.680
<v Speaker 1>took what climate scientists described as a temporary pause or

0:43:32.760 --> 0:43:37.879
<v Speaker 1>hiatus as proof that quote global warming stopped in Oh yeah,

0:43:37.880 --> 0:43:40.239
<v Speaker 1>I remember seeing that claim a lot floating around on

0:43:40.280 --> 0:43:42.959
<v Speaker 1>the internet. Yeah, so again, that might just be pure

0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:46.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously this this episode was probably written uh

0:43:47.280 --> 0:43:49.000
<v Speaker 1>prior to ninety eight, and I don't know what the

0:43:49.000 --> 0:43:51.719
<v Speaker 1>exact production history on on the script was. That it

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:54.480
<v Speaker 1>might just be you know, pure coincidence that had happened

0:43:54.480 --> 0:43:57.239
<v Speaker 1>exactly that year, but maybe not, who knows. I would

0:43:57.280 --> 0:44:01.080
<v Speaker 1>tend to think coincidence because I doubt that people, I mean,

0:44:01.080 --> 0:44:03.440
<v Speaker 1>climate change was not as much of a salient issue

0:44:03.560 --> 0:44:06.520
<v Speaker 1>or political controversy at the time, and there wasn't the

0:44:06.600 --> 0:44:09.759
<v Speaker 1>same like period data to latch onto and denying it

0:44:09.880 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 1>yet Yeah, but the idea of calling it a pause

0:44:12.640 --> 0:44:15.480
<v Speaker 1>or hiatus could be really kind of misleading. I mean

0:44:15.680 --> 0:44:17.279
<v Speaker 1>it seems like actually, what I was just talking about

0:44:17.280 --> 0:44:19.920
<v Speaker 1>goes both ways. It would be good, I think, to

0:44:20.000 --> 0:44:23.600
<v Speaker 1>have more scientists involved in political leadership, but it would

0:44:23.640 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 1>also probably be good to have more people who are

0:44:26.719 --> 0:44:31.160
<v Speaker 1>experienced with rhetoric and messaging involved in science. Yeah, because

0:44:31.160 --> 0:44:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean that honestly. Yeah, that that's kind of confusing

0:44:33.920 --> 0:44:36.480
<v Speaker 1>terminology to throw out there. And and even if you

0:44:36.520 --> 0:44:38.880
<v Speaker 1>don't have an agenda, if you don't have, uh, you know,

0:44:39.280 --> 0:44:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a dog in the hunt, and of course this will

0:44:40.920 --> 0:44:43.680
<v Speaker 1>discuss everybody has a dog in this particular hunt. Um,

0:44:43.960 --> 0:44:45.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can see how you might misinterpret that.

0:44:46.480 --> 0:44:50.960
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, Yeah, this was the idea was pushed by

0:44:50.960 --> 0:44:53.120
<v Speaker 1>some that this means, oh well, global warming has stopped,

0:44:53.200 --> 0:44:56.040
<v Speaker 1>like it's over. Uh, you were freaking out over nothing. This.

0:44:56.160 --> 0:44:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Despite that global warming is a human cause, condition still

0:44:59.719 --> 0:45:03.840
<v Speaker 1>saw two thousand twelve as the warmest fifteen year period

0:45:03.920 --> 0:45:07.200
<v Speaker 1>on record at that time, with greenhouse gases climbing to

0:45:07.320 --> 0:45:11.080
<v Speaker 1>new record highs. The oceans were warming, sea levels were rising,

0:45:11.280 --> 0:45:14.000
<v Speaker 1>ice was melting. Now, as we've discussed on the show before.

0:45:14.960 --> 0:45:18.759
<v Speaker 1>Part of this comes down to a misunderstanding, willful or otherwise,

0:45:19.120 --> 0:45:22.880
<v Speaker 1>on how science functions. Science is not a tool that

0:45:23.000 --> 0:45:25.840
<v Speaker 1>works or doesn't work, and then maybe cast aside like

0:45:25.880 --> 0:45:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a crooked drill bit or something that needs to be replaced.

0:45:29.480 --> 0:45:32.239
<v Speaker 1>The part in to tell the truth about Chambers having

0:45:32.280 --> 0:45:36.280
<v Speaker 1>gotten it wrong before certainly smacks of the common climate

0:45:36.560 --> 0:45:39.840
<v Speaker 1>denialism mantra of but what about the warnings of the

0:45:39.840 --> 0:45:42.680
<v Speaker 1>new ice Age and other such criticism, right, you know,

0:45:43.080 --> 0:45:46.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot wrong with with that approach, obviously, ranging

0:45:46.920 --> 0:45:50.560
<v Speaker 1>from the treating uh you know, of all science and scientists,

0:45:50.960 --> 0:45:53.879
<v Speaker 1>regardless of area focus is kind of a monolith like, oh,

0:45:54.040 --> 0:45:56.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is what science is doing. Is what

0:45:56.200 --> 0:45:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the scientists are doing. And I found a scientist that

0:45:58.680 --> 0:46:02.520
<v Speaker 1>says otherwise because also gets into the cherry picking and

0:46:02.680 --> 0:46:06.040
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, assuming that air and recalibration are not

0:46:06.200 --> 0:46:09.440
<v Speaker 1>part of the scientific process. One of the real difficulties

0:46:09.440 --> 0:46:12.600
<v Speaker 1>with scientific communication is that you can always make a

0:46:12.680 --> 0:46:15.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of confusing reference to the past, like you can

0:46:15.760 --> 0:46:20.799
<v Speaker 1>find controversy on essentially any issue. Uh you know, there's

0:46:21.320 --> 0:46:25.359
<v Speaker 1>no scientific issue I can think of where through through

0:46:25.400 --> 0:46:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the entire history of the awareness of the issue. All

0:46:28.280 --> 0:46:30.919
<v Speaker 1>scientists have had it right and been on the same

0:46:30.960 --> 0:46:34.600
<v Speaker 1>page about it. So if you're interested in generating the

0:46:34.600 --> 0:46:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the idea of confusion or controversy about any particular scientific conclusion,

0:46:39.880 --> 0:46:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and you want to make references to, well, when have

0:46:42.200 --> 0:46:44.640
<v Speaker 1>people said different things about this issue in the past,

0:46:44.960 --> 0:46:46.920
<v Speaker 1>you can always find something like that. And in some

0:46:47.000 --> 0:46:52.480
<v Speaker 1>cases issue scientific consensus about issues develops and changes very rapidly.

0:46:52.480 --> 0:46:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think about the ways that um for example,

0:46:56.320 --> 0:46:59.839
<v Speaker 1>current recommendations about how best to battle the coronavirus, about

0:47:00.440 --> 0:47:03.880
<v Speaker 1>UH masks and social distancing and all that stuff. People

0:47:03.920 --> 0:47:07.360
<v Speaker 1>who are kind of people who are opposed to following

0:47:07.600 --> 0:47:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the current best guidelines about those things will make reference

0:47:11.120 --> 0:47:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to what people were saying in the earliest weeks of

0:47:14.280 --> 0:47:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the of the pandemic. You remember this, right, like, like

0:47:17.440 --> 0:47:21.560
<v Speaker 1>initially scientific guidelines were not recommending people wear masks. That

0:47:21.719 --> 0:47:25.359
<v Speaker 1>changed very quickly. We did a very early episode where

0:47:25.440 --> 0:47:28.799
<v Speaker 1>we about the coronavirus, where we we we mentioned that,

0:47:29.160 --> 0:47:31.320
<v Speaker 1>though I should also point out that we also drove

0:47:31.360 --> 0:47:33.840
<v Speaker 1>home that you know we're recording this on such and

0:47:33.880 --> 0:47:37.239
<v Speaker 1>such date, at such and such point in this pandemic.

0:47:37.840 --> 0:47:41.319
<v Speaker 1>Be aware that that you know, everything may change as

0:47:41.360 --> 0:47:43.960
<v Speaker 1>this story develops. It can be a really frustrating thing.

0:47:44.000 --> 0:47:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the evidence now for the effectiveness of mask

0:47:46.680 --> 0:47:49.000
<v Speaker 1>wearing too slow the spread of the virus is very good.

0:47:49.080 --> 0:47:51.799
<v Speaker 1>It comes from multiple kinds of studies. Studies looking at

0:47:51.800 --> 0:47:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the effects of mask mandates at the population level, studies

0:47:55.280 --> 0:47:57.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at the effects of physical barriers on the propagation

0:47:57.960 --> 0:48:01.280
<v Speaker 1>of droplets and aerosols, and control environments, how it spreads

0:48:01.280 --> 0:48:04.040
<v Speaker 1>between hamsters and things like that. The bottom line from

0:48:04.080 --> 0:48:05.919
<v Speaker 1>all of this research up to now is that there's

0:48:06.040 --> 0:48:07.840
<v Speaker 1>very good reason to wear a mask if you go

0:48:07.880 --> 0:48:10.280
<v Speaker 1>out in the public setting or anywhere near people outside

0:48:10.280 --> 0:48:13.759
<v Speaker 1>your household. But no matter how much evidence accumulates in

0:48:13.760 --> 0:48:16.600
<v Speaker 1>that column, there's always going to be this historical reference

0:48:16.680 --> 0:48:19.160
<v Speaker 1>point where people can say, hey, wait a minute, Like,

0:48:19.400 --> 0:48:21.719
<v Speaker 1>the experts weren't saying that at the beginning of March,

0:48:22.880 --> 0:48:25.680
<v Speaker 1>so how can we be sure that they're right now?

0:48:25.760 --> 0:48:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Why is what scientists are saying about the coronavirus, or

0:48:28.400 --> 0:48:31.040
<v Speaker 1>about climate or anything now better than what they were

0:48:31.040 --> 0:48:33.759
<v Speaker 1>saying in the past. And it can seem confusing, But

0:48:33.920 --> 0:48:36.320
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, the answer is actually pretty simple,

0:48:36.640 --> 0:48:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's that now we have better evidence. There's more evidence,

0:48:39.680 --> 0:48:43.799
<v Speaker 1>more relevant evidence, better quality evidence. That's the difference. Yeah,

0:48:43.800 --> 0:48:47.120
<v Speaker 1>this makes me think about the fact that science can

0:48:47.160 --> 0:48:51.680
<v Speaker 1>be very susceptible to political weapons when those weapons are

0:48:51.760 --> 0:48:55.080
<v Speaker 1>leveled at it, because science, science is ultimately this thing

0:48:55.160 --> 0:48:58.840
<v Speaker 1>that is that is taking place and analyzing, you know,

0:48:58.920 --> 0:49:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the fundamental aspects of the larger world, the cosmos, whereas

0:49:03.360 --> 0:49:07.879
<v Speaker 1>politics is very much a condition of of social dynamics.

0:49:08.200 --> 0:49:11.480
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, these political weapons, these singers and

0:49:11.480 --> 0:49:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and got your points and basically anything that might be

0:49:14.719 --> 0:49:18.279
<v Speaker 1>used from by one political opponent against another, like, those

0:49:18.320 --> 0:49:20.200
<v Speaker 1>are things that are designed to work within a social

0:49:20.239 --> 0:49:22.600
<v Speaker 1>context for the most part, into a certain extent, within

0:49:22.640 --> 0:49:27.360
<v Speaker 1>illegal context. But but sciences is like the world beyond

0:49:27.920 --> 0:49:32.200
<v Speaker 1>this domed colony of of law and society. And I wonder,

0:49:32.280 --> 0:49:34.000
<v Speaker 1>now that I've said that out loud, I wonder if

0:49:34.000 --> 0:49:36.800
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of the the beauty of this, uh, this setting,

0:49:36.800 --> 0:49:39.920
<v Speaker 1>in this outer limits of episode, because the people in

0:49:40.040 --> 0:49:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the colonists are literally living inside a bubble of their

0:49:42.719 --> 0:49:46.080
<v Speaker 1>own construction, uh, you know, of their own design, and

0:49:46.280 --> 0:49:51.360
<v Speaker 1>trying to evaluate threats that exist outside, like literally outside

0:49:51.680 --> 0:49:55.399
<v Speaker 1>the sphere of their immediate domain. All right, we're gonna

0:49:55.400 --> 0:49:57.239
<v Speaker 1>take a quick break. We'll be right back with more

0:50:00.800 --> 0:50:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and we're back now, of course in this Outer Limits episode. Um,

0:50:04.280 --> 0:50:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, as as as we we've pointed out before,

0:50:07.520 --> 0:50:09.560
<v Speaker 1>there's this stark difference between what's going on with Dr

0:50:09.640 --> 0:50:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Chambers and what's going on with us, because well, it's

0:50:12.960 --> 0:50:15.560
<v Speaker 1>just in the show, it's just Dr Chambers preaching to

0:50:15.640 --> 0:50:18.600
<v Speaker 1>a crowded room and making a case with difficult evidence.

0:50:18.640 --> 0:50:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Though climate change data is certainly complex, but but in

0:50:21.680 --> 0:50:25.839
<v Speaker 1>our world it is a case of overwhelming scientific consensus. Um,

0:50:26.480 --> 0:50:30.000
<v Speaker 1>it's especially as far as climate scientists are concerned. Yeah,

0:50:30.000 --> 0:50:32.000
<v Speaker 1>there's no doubt about that. I mean, we've talked about

0:50:32.040 --> 0:50:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the consensus on this issue and and the studies measuring

0:50:35.160 --> 0:50:37.560
<v Speaker 1>it in previous episodes. I think we talked about that

0:50:37.600 --> 0:50:40.040
<v Speaker 1>in one of the episodes we recorded after you came

0:50:40.080 --> 0:50:42.680
<v Speaker 1>back from the World Science Festival in the previous year,

0:50:42.719 --> 0:50:46.759
<v Speaker 1>and we discussed one of the panels about science communication

0:50:46.800 --> 0:50:49.319
<v Speaker 1>and about climate change. But yeah, there's no doubt at

0:50:49.320 --> 0:50:52.719
<v Speaker 1>all that almost all climate scientists are people with expertise

0:50:52.719 --> 0:50:55.360
<v Speaker 1>in the relevant fields, are on the same page with

0:50:55.440 --> 0:50:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the broad strokes of climate change. It is a problem

0:50:58.840 --> 0:51:01.560
<v Speaker 1>it is majorly through thing. It is caused in large

0:51:01.600 --> 0:51:04.640
<v Speaker 1>part by the products of human industry, and yet it

0:51:04.680 --> 0:51:07.279
<v Speaker 1>can certainly feel at times like it's just one doctor

0:51:07.360 --> 0:51:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Chambers pleading with the rest of the colony because there

0:51:09.560 --> 0:51:13.400
<v Speaker 1>is significant and UH and and dangerous lack of commitment

0:51:13.440 --> 0:51:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to combating the problem, especially in the United States, and

0:51:16.560 --> 0:51:19.640
<v Speaker 1>a great deal of anti science and anti climate science

0:51:19.719 --> 0:51:23.560
<v Speaker 1>worldview UH is often found here, especially in places of

0:51:23.600 --> 0:51:29.280
<v Speaker 1>significant political power. Yeah, the anti science sentiment is extremely dangerous,

0:51:29.560 --> 0:51:33.040
<v Speaker 1>like just this year in we've seen the results in

0:51:33.160 --> 0:51:37.880
<v Speaker 1>real time um UH with the coronavirus as failure to

0:51:37.880 --> 0:51:40.800
<v Speaker 1>listen to scientists and take advisory is about mask wearing

0:51:40.800 --> 0:51:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and social distance thing seriously have led to outbreaks and

0:51:44.160 --> 0:51:47.759
<v Speaker 1>surges that have cost human lives first and foremost, but

0:51:47.840 --> 0:51:50.799
<v Speaker 1>also cost time and money. Uh. You know, it can

0:51:50.840 --> 0:51:53.840
<v Speaker 1>still be difficult to gauge such threats, but it's certainly

0:51:54.040 --> 0:51:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a more i think, readily understandable situation compared to climate change,

0:51:58.080 --> 0:52:00.000
<v Speaker 1>which you know, one of the issues there is again

0:52:00.320 --> 0:52:05.319
<v Speaker 1>complex climate science dealing with you know, longer periods of

0:52:05.360 --> 0:52:09.080
<v Speaker 1>time UH, as opposed to everything happening within the space

0:52:09.080 --> 0:52:11.440
<v Speaker 1>of a few months. Though at the same time, we

0:52:11.520 --> 0:52:15.239
<v Speaker 1>are also living in a time of dangerous climate alteration,

0:52:15.719 --> 0:52:19.960
<v Speaker 1>as we endure rising seas, intense hurricanes, and increased droughts

0:52:19.960 --> 0:52:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and heat waves. It's perhaps more pronounced now than ever before,

0:52:24.719 --> 0:52:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and and not everyone has their head in the stand. Certainly,

0:52:27.800 --> 0:52:30.960
<v Speaker 1>according to a report from the Yale Program on Climate

0:52:31.000 --> 0:52:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Change Communication and George Mason University's Center for Climate Change Communication,

0:52:35.760 --> 0:52:39.480
<v Speaker 1>almost six and ten Americans are either alarmed or concerned

0:52:39.600 --> 0:52:42.160
<v Speaker 1>by global warming, which the authors pointed out as being

0:52:42.160 --> 0:52:46.279
<v Speaker 1>a major shift. As for the rest, though well, researchers

0:52:46.280 --> 0:52:48.759
<v Speaker 1>and thinkers have been exploring these questions for years. Again,

0:52:48.800 --> 0:52:50.560
<v Speaker 1>we have a we have we have passed episodes to

0:52:50.600 --> 0:52:53.520
<v Speaker 1>get into this a bit. Why do we deny the evidence?

0:52:53.880 --> 0:52:58.120
<v Speaker 1>You know? Why? Why deny um climate change? Now? Certainly

0:52:58.160 --> 0:53:00.880
<v Speaker 1>there's much to be said for just how unpleasant the

0:53:00.920 --> 0:53:04.400
<v Speaker 1>reality is. No one wants to be a part of

0:53:04.400 --> 0:53:06.480
<v Speaker 1>a problem like this, or to dwell on a future

0:53:06.520 --> 0:53:11.960
<v Speaker 1>of massy stabilization, relocation, and extinction. We as humans are

0:53:12.000 --> 0:53:14.800
<v Speaker 1>in many ways just poorly wired to deal with threats

0:53:14.800 --> 0:53:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of this magnitude and scale. We're better with the short term, uh,

0:53:19.040 --> 0:53:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, but but but what are what are we

0:53:20.640 --> 0:53:23.200
<v Speaker 1>ultimately to do. I mean, one of the things we've

0:53:23.200 --> 0:53:26.080
<v Speaker 1>talked about in previous episodes about this is the idea

0:53:26.239 --> 0:53:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that identity protective cognition plays in why people respond negatively

0:53:31.960 --> 0:53:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to to climate science. And this is the thing that

0:53:34.520 --> 0:53:37.080
<v Speaker 1>we should be sympathetic about. I mean, everybody engages in

0:53:37.200 --> 0:53:41.560
<v Speaker 1>identity protective cognition. Everybody engages in forms of motivated reasoning

0:53:41.600 --> 0:53:45.240
<v Speaker 1>on various issues to try to protect their their picture

0:53:45.360 --> 0:53:47.799
<v Speaker 1>of the integrity of their self and how they fit

0:53:47.880 --> 0:53:51.520
<v Speaker 1>into a social system. So uh. And this is one

0:53:51.560 --> 0:53:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of the dangers of scientific issues becoming politicized, is that

0:53:55.680 --> 0:54:00.319
<v Speaker 1>once an issue becomes politicized, the social and idea they

0:54:00.480 --> 0:54:05.080
<v Speaker 1>connotations of the sides of that issue become more relevant

0:54:05.120 --> 0:54:08.160
<v Speaker 1>than the evidence does. And unfortunately, this can happen really

0:54:08.239 --> 0:54:11.200
<v Speaker 1>rapidly with issues that don't happen to have any particular

0:54:11.320 --> 0:54:15.839
<v Speaker 1>like political values or implications attached to them inherently. I mean,

0:54:16.040 --> 0:54:18.680
<v Speaker 1>there are examples. I was just thinking about, how do

0:54:18.719 --> 0:54:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you remember how at some point this year suddenly it

0:54:22.200 --> 0:54:27.160
<v Speaker 1>became a political issue with a political valence. Whether or

0:54:27.280 --> 0:54:32.360
<v Speaker 1>not hydroxy chlora quinn was an effective therapeutic for COVID nineteen,

0:54:32.880 --> 0:54:34.759
<v Speaker 1>which when you step back and think about that, that's

0:54:35.160 --> 0:54:37.520
<v Speaker 1>it's like crazy that that is not an issue that

0:54:37.600 --> 0:54:42.000
<v Speaker 1>really has any particular political implications. It doesn't implicate any

0:54:42.040 --> 0:54:46.799
<v Speaker 1>fundamental values. It just happened to get politicized because of

0:54:46.840 --> 0:54:49.759
<v Speaker 1>who was talking about it, what ways, and you know

0:54:49.800 --> 0:54:52.400
<v Speaker 1>how that was appearing in the media. You know, if

0:54:52.480 --> 0:54:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump had come out and said it, said that

0:54:55.200 --> 0:54:57.759
<v Speaker 1>it was not effective, it could have been politicized in

0:54:57.800 --> 0:55:01.200
<v Speaker 1>exactly the opposite way. You know. It's like weird, how

0:55:01.280 --> 0:55:05.320
<v Speaker 1>how totally contingent things like this can be. But unfortunately,

0:55:05.480 --> 0:55:09.560
<v Speaker 1>once a scientific question gains political connotations, it can be

0:55:09.680 --> 0:55:12.799
<v Speaker 1>very hard to take them off, just kind of stuck there.

0:55:13.280 --> 0:55:15.680
<v Speaker 1>And people don't want to believe in things that they

0:55:15.719 --> 0:55:19.719
<v Speaker 1>think of as beliefs inappropriate for a person such as themselves,

0:55:20.280 --> 0:55:22.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, and and so that that's one of the

0:55:22.640 --> 0:55:25.240
<v Speaker 1>real dangers. I mean, the best thing to do about

0:55:25.280 --> 0:55:29.680
<v Speaker 1>science is to try to prevent scientific questions from acquiring

0:55:29.719 --> 0:55:32.719
<v Speaker 1>a political connotation. To begin with, you have to do

0:55:32.800 --> 0:55:35.840
<v Speaker 1>your best to try to make sure that, uh that

0:55:36.080 --> 0:55:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a a scientific message or the communication of a scientific

0:55:39.120 --> 0:55:44.560
<v Speaker 1>conclusion is not associated with anybody of any particular political affiliation.

0:55:45.239 --> 0:55:47.960
<v Speaker 1>But that can be very hard to do. Yeah, absolutely,

0:55:48.080 --> 0:55:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean it like issues can be asymmetrically politicized, right.

0:55:52.080 --> 0:55:55.160
<v Speaker 1>All all it takes is basically one major political figure

0:55:55.760 --> 0:55:59.799
<v Speaker 1>to to decide to make a scientific question a politicized

0:56:00.080 --> 0:56:02.879
<v Speaker 1>you and you know they can usually do it. But again,

0:56:02.920 --> 0:56:06.480
<v Speaker 1>in all this communication is key, you know. And uh

0:56:06.680 --> 0:56:08.279
<v Speaker 1>and and a lot of this episode of the Outer

0:56:08.320 --> 0:56:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Limits is about like trying to communicate um uh, the

0:56:12.120 --> 0:56:15.000
<v Speaker 1>nature of science to people that have their doubts, uh,

0:56:15.080 --> 0:56:18.759
<v Speaker 1>that are denying what's going on. Uh. So I looked

0:56:18.760 --> 0:56:22.160
<v Speaker 1>at a paper for a little more in this titled

0:56:22.200 --> 0:56:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Understanding and Countering the Motivated Roots of Climate Change Denial,

0:56:26.080 --> 0:56:31.120
<v Speaker 1>is by Gabriel Long Parodi and uh Irena Fagina, published

0:56:31.120 --> 0:56:35.400
<v Speaker 1>earlier this year in Current Opinion and Environmental Sustainability. The

0:56:35.400 --> 0:56:39.600
<v Speaker 1>paper focuses on communication approaches to reach climate change deniers

0:56:40.200 --> 0:56:42.360
<v Speaker 1>in peer viewed studies from the past two years, with

0:56:42.360 --> 0:56:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a special focus on what the authors described as people

0:56:44.719 --> 0:56:47.960
<v Speaker 1>engaged in quote motivated denial. This means the people in

0:56:48.040 --> 0:56:51.200
<v Speaker 1>question have access to the facts, but they still deny

0:56:51.320 --> 0:56:54.560
<v Speaker 1>them on some level. They make a choice to deny

0:56:54.680 --> 0:56:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the science and cling to another view of reality that

0:56:57.640 --> 0:57:00.560
<v Speaker 1>flies in the face of scientific consensus, but he's easier

0:57:00.600 --> 0:57:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to accept. Yeah, And again, to be fair, I mean,

0:57:02.920 --> 0:57:05.680
<v Speaker 1>obviously I think people should accept the scientific consensus on

0:57:05.760 --> 0:57:08.120
<v Speaker 1>climate change, but I think a lot of the people

0:57:08.200 --> 0:57:10.640
<v Speaker 1>who deny it are not doing so, like out of

0:57:10.680 --> 0:57:14.240
<v Speaker 1>a conscious perversity, thinking like I won't accept the facts.

0:57:14.520 --> 0:57:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the fact is that motivated reasoning changes how

0:57:17.880 --> 0:57:21.680
<v Speaker 1>facts appear to us. Things that are perfectly reasonable to

0:57:21.720 --> 0:57:25.640
<v Speaker 1>believe just suddenly don't seem plausible to you because of

0:57:25.840 --> 0:57:29.000
<v Speaker 1>motivations you have. Yeah, Yeah, because I mean, in one hand,

0:57:29.040 --> 0:57:34.560
<v Speaker 1>there's the responsibility of what human U invoke. Climate change means.

0:57:34.600 --> 0:57:37.400
<v Speaker 1>It means accepting your part of the problem, and then

0:57:37.440 --> 0:57:39.920
<v Speaker 1>it also means accepting that the problem threatens much of

0:57:40.040 --> 0:57:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the stability and normalcy that you hold dear. And furthermore,

0:57:44.040 --> 0:57:46.160
<v Speaker 1>you may feel the need to speak out and act

0:57:46.240 --> 0:57:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. And it can be easier, you know,

0:57:49.680 --> 0:57:52.800
<v Speaker 1>on on some level, to simply live in denial like

0:57:52.880 --> 0:57:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that is an easier mental construct, uh to to erect

0:57:56.640 --> 0:57:58.840
<v Speaker 1>in the mind as opposed to dealing with all of

0:57:58.880 --> 0:58:02.560
<v Speaker 1>these additional change is uh to the the world you've

0:58:02.560 --> 0:58:06.200
<v Speaker 1>grown accustomed to now Chambers does end up being accused

0:58:06.200 --> 0:58:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of being an alien shape shifter at one point in

0:58:08.600 --> 0:58:12.920
<v Speaker 1>this Outer Limits episode, but he never reverses this charge

0:58:12.920 --> 0:58:16.080
<v Speaker 1>on the colonists, which is which which is worth worth noting,

0:58:16.160 --> 0:58:17.880
<v Speaker 1>especially because it ties in a little bit into what

0:58:18.280 --> 0:58:20.800
<v Speaker 1>um the authors here in the study discussed that I

0:58:20.840 --> 0:58:22.520
<v Speaker 1>think they would agree that this was the right move.

0:58:22.920 --> 0:58:27.400
<v Speaker 1>One of the key points to say the aliens right, well, yeah,

0:58:27.480 --> 0:58:30.400
<v Speaker 1>essentially not to say say, oh, climate change denire is

0:58:30.400 --> 0:58:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you're a bunch of aliens. There's something wrong with you.

0:58:32.600 --> 0:58:34.480
<v Speaker 1>You're you're you're broken in some way. You know that

0:58:34.480 --> 0:58:38.160
<v Speaker 1>that That's one of the key points and climate change communication, uh,

0:58:38.360 --> 0:58:42.960
<v Speaker 1>they point out is to is not to dismiss deniers outright,

0:58:43.280 --> 0:58:47.720
<v Speaker 1>but to acknowledge their opinions and beliefs. And they they

0:58:47.800 --> 0:58:50.920
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge that this can be difficult obviously, but they point

0:58:50.960 --> 0:58:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to four different strategies that that seem to show promise

0:58:54.720 --> 0:58:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and or seem to work. Okay, what are the strategies

0:58:58.320 --> 0:59:01.600
<v Speaker 1>all right? The first is reframing solutions to climate change

0:59:01.720 --> 0:59:04.960
<v Speaker 1>as ways to uphold the social system and work towards

0:59:05.000 --> 0:59:08.600
<v Speaker 1>its stability and longevity. Now, in the Outer Limits, Chambers

0:59:08.600 --> 0:59:10.240
<v Speaker 1>does this, of course by pointing out that if they

0:59:10.280 --> 0:59:14.200
<v Speaker 1>don't act, the stability of the colony will be threatened. Um.

0:59:14.280 --> 0:59:16.880
<v Speaker 1>If if he could have, you know, actually had an

0:59:16.880 --> 0:59:19.880
<v Speaker 1>honest discussion with Murdoch, he might have told him, Look,

0:59:19.960 --> 0:59:23.240
<v Speaker 1>this will ruin your prospects of profits from the colony.

0:59:23.480 --> 0:59:26.280
<v Speaker 1>It will endanger your power. It's going to threaten this

0:59:26.360 --> 0:59:29.080
<v Speaker 1>home that you hold. Dear. Uh, you know this is

0:59:29.160 --> 0:59:32.400
<v Speaker 1>this is a threat to all the things we we

0:59:32.560 --> 0:59:35.360
<v Speaker 1>value here. Yeah. So I think this is saying, like,

0:59:35.800 --> 0:59:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, to be factual in representing what the threats are,

0:59:39.440 --> 0:59:42.800
<v Speaker 1>but to emphasize the kinds of threats that are particularly

0:59:42.880 --> 0:59:46.000
<v Speaker 1>salient to people with the political identity who are more

0:59:46.040 --> 0:59:50.200
<v Speaker 1>likely to deny climate change. So, to use a Simpsons example,

0:59:50.200 --> 0:59:52.560
<v Speaker 1>if you were trying to convince members of the Simpsons

0:59:52.560 --> 0:59:56.040
<v Speaker 1>family not to make a foolish investment in a tobacco farm,

0:59:56.080 --> 0:59:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you might appeal to Homer in particular by saying, if

0:59:58.560 --> 1:00:00.160
<v Speaker 1>you do that, you're not going to have of a

1:00:00.240 --> 1:00:03.080
<v Speaker 1>budget for beer or to pay the cable bill, right,

1:00:03.200 --> 1:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, like you you single out the issues that

1:00:05.760 --> 1:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>are actually most salient people. Yeah. I think a good

1:00:09.840 --> 1:00:12.280
<v Speaker 1>example of this is we we we we see this

1:00:12.320 --> 1:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>in the realization, for instance, that climate change is a

1:00:15.160 --> 1:00:20.040
<v Speaker 1>national security issue as well as a purely environmental one. Yeah. Yeah,

1:00:20.040 --> 1:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not just about saving the earth or saving the environment,

1:00:22.640 --> 1:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>but safeguarding things like our supply chains, etcetera. So um

1:00:26.360 --> 1:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>so yeah. One of the ideas here is don't just

1:00:29.240 --> 1:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the idea of like, we need to save the planet,

1:00:31.040 --> 1:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>like you know, that's going to carry with it. I mean,

1:00:33.800 --> 1:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>that's true, uh, you know, but but but that how

1:00:36.840 --> 1:00:40.200
<v Speaker 1>does it need to be tweaked to to to meet

1:00:40.240 --> 1:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the world view of the person on the other side.

1:00:42.920 --> 1:00:45.880
<v Speaker 1>And that gets into the second piece of advice they have,

1:00:46.160 --> 1:00:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's reducing the ideological divide by incorporating the purity

1:00:50.160 --> 1:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>of the earth rather than how we harm or care

1:00:52.880 --> 1:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>for it. So this is more about putting I guess

1:00:55.120 --> 1:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>you could say, the hopeful spin on it and emphasizing

1:00:57.680 --> 1:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>our ability to make changes and perhaps even our responsibility

1:01:02.040 --> 1:01:05.320
<v Speaker 1>to to look after the earth. That is going to

1:01:05.400 --> 1:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>fall in line with various religious world views rather than

1:01:08.920 --> 1:01:12.320
<v Speaker 1>just the shame point of realizing that we've done a

1:01:12.320 --> 1:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of harm and that we need to change our ways.

1:01:15.280 --> 1:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Now the author is going to point out to other

1:01:17.240 --> 1:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>areas one number three, Rather having conversations about the scientific

1:01:21.400 --> 1:01:25.400
<v Speaker 1>consensus around climate change with trusted individuals. Now, I think

1:01:25.440 --> 1:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that's easier said than done. Um Uh. Take outer limits

1:01:29.080 --> 1:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>for example, Chambers is mistrusted. Uh. And you know who

1:01:32.840 --> 1:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>who else are you going to talk to here? If

1:01:34.280 --> 1:01:38.400
<v Speaker 1>you cherry pick you're trusted individuals? Um? You know that

1:01:38.480 --> 1:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>can Those trusted individuals can include climate deniers or people

1:01:41.800 --> 1:01:45.960
<v Speaker 1>with without perhaps with sometimes with a scientific background, but

1:01:46.040 --> 1:01:49.880
<v Speaker 1>not a scientific background in climate science. I mean, I

1:01:49.920 --> 1:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>think this ties in very much to what I was

1:01:51.640 --> 1:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>just talking about with identity protective cognition, Like you don't

1:01:55.400 --> 1:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>want to embrace the belief that you see as antithetical

1:01:58.000 --> 1:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to people in your social group who have the kind

1:02:00.760 --> 1:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>of integrity that you value, and so yeah, I think

1:02:03.240 --> 1:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the best and most important ways to get

1:02:05.520 --> 1:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>around this is to show, hey, people like you, people

1:02:08.520 --> 1:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>who you socially identify with, they they also agree with

1:02:12.800 --> 1:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the scientific consensus here. And then the fourth point they

1:02:16.040 --> 1:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>bring up is encouraging people to explosively discuss their values

1:02:19.200 --> 1:02:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and stance on climate change prior to engaging with climate information.

1:02:23.320 --> 1:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>So the idea with this one is that quote self

1:02:26.040 --> 1:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>affirmation is challenged when people face climate change because it

1:02:30.440 --> 1:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>requires them to consider their contribution to the problem, which

1:02:33.560 --> 1:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>can threaten their sense of integrity and trigger self defense.

1:02:37.240 --> 1:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>And finally, you know, they say, you want to stress

1:02:39.520 --> 1:02:42.120
<v Speaker 1>solutions that match in individual's values and don't threaten their

1:02:42.120 --> 1:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>sense of identity or their way of life. And now,

1:02:44.280 --> 1:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of course, if we as we've discussed before, this also

1:02:46.400 --> 1:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>underlines the horror of politicization of climate change and the

1:02:49.600 --> 1:02:52.479
<v Speaker 1>attempt to try and uh and bake in climate change

1:02:52.520 --> 1:02:56.400
<v Speaker 1>denial into a political worldview. Once something like this becomes politicized,

1:02:56.600 --> 1:03:01.080
<v Speaker 1>it's difficult to unpoliticize it. Lisa Freeman wrote an excellent

1:03:01.120 --> 1:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>piece on COVID and climate denialism for The New York

1:03:03.840 --> 1:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Times earlier this month that touches on the work of

1:03:06.680 --> 1:03:10.640
<v Speaker 1>John Cook, research assistant professor at the Center for Climate

1:03:10.680 --> 1:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Change Communication at George Mason University and founder of the

1:03:13.840 --> 1:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>website Skeptical Science Um. Cook argues that ideology and tribalism

1:03:20.400 --> 1:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>tend to come before facts and people's beliefs about climate change,

1:03:24.000 --> 1:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and that means a lot of the power here falls

1:03:26.080 --> 1:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>two people of influence within an ideology, and that means

1:03:30.160 --> 1:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>that leadership is crucial to overcoming climate change denialism, And again,

1:03:35.040 --> 1:03:37.600
<v Speaker 1>isn't that what we see in this Outer Limits episode.

1:03:37.720 --> 1:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Murdoch is the leader of the colony, and while he

1:03:40.600 --> 1:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>admits that he actually briefly you believes Chambers, or at

1:03:44.040 --> 1:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>least entertains the idea that Chambers may be correct, he

1:03:47.400 --> 1:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>otherwise works against him at every turn, and the people

1:03:50.560 --> 1:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>look to Murdoch. Uh. Furthermore, Murdoch is a sort of

1:03:54.000 --> 1:03:56.680
<v Speaker 1>head of state in the off Roll Colony doesn't only

1:03:56.800 --> 1:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>argue against rationally against Chambers, he also ultimately engages in

1:04:01.120 --> 1:04:05.200
<v Speaker 1>more underhanded tactics, including the use of disinformation. Yeah, they

1:04:05.280 --> 1:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>try to personally discredit Chambers with with attacks on his

1:04:10.000 --> 1:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>what I would say, his character, but attacks on his biology. Yeah,

1:04:14.200 --> 1:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I would say character and biology the first character and

1:04:16.920 --> 1:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>then ultimately biology itself. Um. If we look to our

1:04:21.680 --> 1:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>current situation in October twenty with with COVID and climate change,

1:04:25.760 --> 1:04:27.920
<v Speaker 1>it it's kind of interesting how to tell the truth

1:04:28.000 --> 1:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>forecast our current leadership situation. Um so so so Again,

1:04:33.800 --> 1:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>this is one of those episodes. Even though it came

1:04:35.200 --> 1:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>out in the nineties, it's still is very relevant today.

1:04:39.120 --> 1:04:42.720
<v Speaker 1>According to cook Um, however, only ten percent of Americans

1:04:42.720 --> 1:04:46.040
<v Speaker 1>are outright dismissive of the science on climate change, and

1:04:46.040 --> 1:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>that seems to correl correlate well with the twelve percent

1:04:48.600 --> 1:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>of Americans who are not concerned about COVID. Friedman writes,

1:04:52.200 --> 1:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>quote this means, he said, referring to Cook, the solution lies, uh,

1:04:56.440 --> 1:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>not in persuading those already steeped in science denial, but

1:04:59.400 --> 1:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>innocula sing the other nine of the public from scientific disinformation.

1:05:03.800 --> 1:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>He likened the challenge to eradicating polio, an incurable disease

1:05:07.840 --> 1:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that was all but eliminated in the United States through vaccinations.

1:05:11.400 --> 1:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>In the case of climate and COVID, he said, that

1:05:14.120 --> 1:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>means using facts and research combined with vivid analogies to

1:05:18.040 --> 1:05:21.920
<v Speaker 1>explain the techniques used to mislead the public. And this

1:05:22.000 --> 1:05:24.840
<v Speaker 1>is one of the things that Cook does through Skeptical Science,

1:05:24.840 --> 1:05:26.640
<v Speaker 1>which if you want to check out the website, it's

1:05:26.640 --> 1:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>just Skeptical Science dot com. Uh. He provides useful, real

1:05:30.680 --> 1:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>world analogies to counter climate denial arguments. And he also

1:05:34.800 --> 1:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>wrote an illustrated book titled Cranky Uncle Versus Climate Change.

1:05:39.000 --> 1:05:42.920
<v Speaker 1>How to Understand and respond to Climate science Deniers. You know,

1:05:42.960 --> 1:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to end on too dark a note here,

1:05:44.920 --> 1:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>But but I do seriously worry about because as as

1:05:48.440 --> 1:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>difficult as it is to prevent scientific issues from becoming

1:05:52.000 --> 1:05:55.280
<v Speaker 1>politicized in the first place, when you're just dealing with leaders,

1:05:55.320 --> 1:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, trying to make sure that like major media

1:05:58.040 --> 1:06:03.920
<v Speaker 1>figures and politicians don't start injecting political valences and trying

1:06:03.920 --> 1:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to get people to align politically around something that's not

1:06:06.720 --> 1:06:09.160
<v Speaker 1>really a political issue. It's just a scientific question with

1:06:09.200 --> 1:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>a factual answer. Um, that's hard enough. It seems like

1:06:14.400 --> 1:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>nowadays things are going to be even harder than that,

1:06:17.320 --> 1:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>because you essentially have the distributed capability through the Internet

1:06:22.280 --> 1:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and virality and social media to do the same thing

1:06:25.560 --> 1:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to politicize issues. I mean, I already see worrying signs

1:06:28.680 --> 1:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of how sort of like emerging out of the depths

1:06:32.000 --> 1:06:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of the Internet, you'll get weird conspiracy theories politicizing whatever

1:06:35.960 --> 1:06:40.600
<v Speaker 1>vaccine we end up with, for for COVID nineteen, Yeah, yeah, exactly. Um,

1:06:40.880 --> 1:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, and to a wonderful extent, like one of

1:06:43.480 --> 1:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the great things about a show like The Outer Limits

1:06:46.200 --> 1:06:51.479
<v Speaker 1>is that essentially it's always about people having conversations about uh,

1:06:51.520 --> 1:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, science, fictional threats, and and and and and

1:06:55.480 --> 1:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>given the you know, short format, you have to boil

1:06:58.280 --> 1:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>everything down to a simple scenario like two people trapped

1:07:01.600 --> 1:07:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in a room or in this case, uh, you know,

1:07:03.640 --> 1:07:07.840
<v Speaker 1>one scientist speaking to the community in this colony. But

1:07:07.880 --> 1:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>of course, in reality, we have a far more complicated

1:07:10.760 --> 1:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>communication system. There's a greater number of players involved, there

1:07:14.080 --> 1:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>are different communications systems involved, uh networks though, the way

1:07:18.240 --> 1:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>that different voices become um uh you know, more pronounced

1:07:22.080 --> 1:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>in our culture, it's it's it's it's far more complicated

1:07:24.640 --> 1:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>than what we have in the Jan's five example. But

1:07:28.680 --> 1:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>but I think it works nicely to still as as

1:07:32.320 --> 1:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>an example of the the sorts of problems that we

1:07:35.160 --> 1:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>encounter as humans. I mean, I guess we've sort of

1:07:37.480 --> 1:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>been saying that one of the best outcomes, if we

1:07:40.000 --> 1:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>could enact it with scientific issues that have political ramifications,

1:07:43.480 --> 1:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>is to not allow them to become politicized in the

1:07:45.880 --> 1:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>first place. But if that's not really possible, you know,

1:07:48.920 --> 1:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>if you can't prevent issue people from trying to politicize issues,

1:07:53.560 --> 1:07:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I think the question is what does the mental vaccine

1:07:57.000 --> 1:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>against the politicization of scientific issues, Like, how do you

1:08:01.200 --> 1:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>best plant that sort of like, uh, that meme or

1:08:05.160 --> 1:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>that seed in somebody's brain that will grow into, uh,

1:08:08.720 --> 1:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>grow into a sort of mental immune system that rejects

1:08:11.680 --> 1:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>these politicizations of scientific issues when it encounters them. That,

1:08:15.440 --> 1:08:18.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, so people know how to recognize when it's

1:08:18.160 --> 1:08:21.519
<v Speaker 1>happening and stop it before it infects them. Yeah, that

1:08:21.680 --> 1:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>is the that is the the ongoing problem that we're

1:08:24.400 --> 1:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>continuing to struggle with. And this is the point where

1:08:26.960 --> 1:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>we would have the narrator of the Outer Limits jump

1:08:30.080 --> 1:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>back in and nicely summarized the struggle that we've just

1:08:33.320 --> 1:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>witnessed on the screen. But of course, the fallible humans

1:08:36.439 --> 1:08:41.639
<v Speaker 1>failed in their attempt. Yeah, alright, we're gonna go ahead

1:08:41.680 --> 1:08:46.639
<v Speaker 1>and close out this volume of the Anthology of Horror,

1:08:46.880 --> 1:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>but we will be back with part five, Volume five,

1:08:51.840 --> 1:08:56.320
<v Speaker 1>when we will explore even more episodes from TV and

1:08:56.479 --> 1:09:00.680
<v Speaker 1>film horror sci fi anthology history and discussed some of

1:09:00.720 --> 1:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the science and culture surrounding them. In the meantime, if

1:09:04.000 --> 1:09:05.559
<v Speaker 1>you would like to check out other episodes of Stuff

1:09:05.560 --> 1:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to Blow your Mind, you can find us wherever you

1:09:07.400 --> 1:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>get your podcast, wherever that happens to be. We just

1:09:09.680 --> 1:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>asked that you rate, review, and subscribe if you have

1:09:11.840 --> 1:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the power to do so. And if you want to

1:09:13.600 --> 1:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>find us just really quickly, you can just go to

1:09:15.800 --> 1:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff to Blow your Mind dot com that will shoot

1:09:17.439 --> 1:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>you over to the I Heart page for our website,

1:09:20.000 --> 1:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and if you so desire, there's a toggle there for

1:09:23.000 --> 1:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>our store and just takes you to a T shirt

1:09:25.240 --> 1:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>store where you can buy a shirt with a monster

1:09:27.439 --> 1:09:29.439
<v Speaker 1>or our logo on it. I think they're trying to

1:09:29.479 --> 1:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>move those petrifying Gaze shirts which have a wonderful design.

1:09:33.560 --> 1:09:35.559
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, my my son, my son did that one.

1:09:35.600 --> 1:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know he bought one, so yeah, we're

1:09:38.800 --> 1:09:40.840
<v Speaker 1>well I bought one for him. So somebody bought one,

1:09:41.120 --> 1:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>but it's me. Uh. If you want to buy one too,

1:09:43.760 --> 1:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>you can get it on everything. A sticker, you know what,

1:09:47.160 --> 1:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a shirt bags, there's no tellent, it's good stuff. Face mask,

1:09:50.880 --> 1:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you can get a face mask with our logo on it.

1:09:52.720 --> 1:09:55.600
<v Speaker 1>We're in a monster renaissance. Huge things. As always to

1:09:55.640 --> 1:09:58.719
<v Speaker 1>our excellent audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson. If you would

1:09:58.720 --> 1:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>like to get in touch with us with feedback on

1:10:00.640 --> 1:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>this episode or any other to suggest topic for the future,

1:10:03.400 --> 1:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>just to say hello, you can email us at contact

1:10:05.920 --> 1:10:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and Stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. Stuff to

1:10:15.720 --> 1:10:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Blow your Mind is production of I heart Radio. For

1:10:18.360 --> 1:10:20.559
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts for my heart Radio, visit the i heart

1:10:20.600 --> 1:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you're listening to your

1:10:23.360 --> 1:10:25.000
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows. B