1
00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:03,160
Speaker 1: To Max Mondori joins us. Max is the CEO of

2
00:00:03,560 --> 00:00:06,960
Speaker 1: s GMC Capital. He joins from Singapore. It's always a

3
00:00:07,000 --> 00:00:10,040
Speaker 1: pleasure Max. So much of this price action seems to

4
00:00:10,080 --> 00:00:12,360
Speaker 1: be driven by this idea that the Fed is getting

5
00:00:12,480 --> 00:00:15,920
Speaker 1: very close to some kind of an adjustment in it's

6
00:00:16,000 --> 00:00:18,279
Speaker 1: thinking when it comes to rate hikes. Maybe as soon

7
00:00:18,320 --> 00:00:21,520
Speaker 1: as December we become or we're faced with a less

8
00:00:21,520 --> 00:00:25,680
Speaker 1: hawk is fed. Do you think that's a possibility. Well,

9
00:00:26,000 --> 00:00:28,440
Speaker 1: definitely in terms of future rate hikes, we're going to

10
00:00:28,520 --> 00:00:30,960
Speaker 1: see a slowdown. They're probably gonna do a zero seventy

11
00:00:30,960 --> 00:00:33,040
Speaker 1: five now and then they're gonna slow down the pace

12
00:00:33,120 --> 00:00:35,400
Speaker 1: of hiking. But I was also normal they couldn't keep

13
00:00:35,440 --> 00:00:39,199
Speaker 1: going at seventy five apiece every time. The real question

14
00:00:39,360 --> 00:00:41,599
Speaker 1: here is in terms of messaging and in terms of

15
00:00:41,640 --> 00:00:45,639
Speaker 1: how long interest rates remain at elevated levels. Just keep

16
00:00:45,640 --> 00:00:47,120
Speaker 1: in mind, if we do get to that four and

17
00:00:47,120 --> 00:00:49,960
Speaker 1: a half five percent kind of band, that is quite

18
00:00:50,000 --> 00:00:53,240
Speaker 1: restrictive as a policy, and the market now is probably

19
00:00:53,280 --> 00:00:55,520
Speaker 1: a little bit over optimistic and expecting the Fed to

20
00:00:55,600 --> 00:00:59,400
Speaker 1: start cutting rates already as early as July August of

21
00:00:59,520 --> 00:01:02,680
Speaker 1: next year, when we think actually rates could remain higher

22
00:01:02,680 --> 00:01:05,800
Speaker 1: for longer in order for inflation to really come down

23
00:01:05,840 --> 00:01:08,880
Speaker 1: and put a humper own growth before Yes, future hikes

24
00:01:08,920 --> 00:01:11,640
Speaker 1: will be lower, but from here to a dabbish FED,

25
00:01:11,880 --> 00:01:13,640
Speaker 1: I think there's still a lot of time for us.

26
00:01:14,319 --> 00:01:16,520
Speaker 1: Do you sense that we are getting towards the end

27
00:01:16,560 --> 00:01:19,000
Speaker 1: of the inflation fight or perhaps just the end of

28
00:01:19,040 --> 00:01:23,880
Speaker 1: the beginning. Well, we've seen the peak, and I think

29
00:01:24,040 --> 00:01:27,319
Speaker 1: that's more or less given. I mean, of course, unless

30
00:01:27,319 --> 00:01:33,240
Speaker 1: something big geopolitically happens, but how quickly that will come down,

31
00:01:33,319 --> 00:01:36,160
Speaker 1: it's still a question mark. And the real issue here

32
00:01:36,240 --> 00:01:40,360
Speaker 1: is that for inflation to really decline meaningfully closer to

33
00:01:40,640 --> 00:01:43,959
Speaker 1: the FEDS target, unemployment in the US has to come up,

34
00:01:44,080 --> 00:01:46,160
Speaker 1: because that is the only way that you really are

35
00:01:46,200 --> 00:01:49,040
Speaker 1: going to be humpering growth and you're going to have

36
00:01:49,160 --> 00:01:51,680
Speaker 1: less demand in the system. And then, of course, if

37
00:01:51,680 --> 00:01:54,520
Speaker 1: that happens, that's bad news for living standards in general

38
00:01:54,520 --> 00:01:58,040
Speaker 1: and for US and valuations. Therefore, Uh, we're definitely in

39
00:01:58,120 --> 00:02:00,240
Speaker 1: a better position than we were a few months, right,

40
00:02:00,480 --> 00:02:02,040
Speaker 1: But there's still a lot of work to be done.

41
00:02:02,200 --> 00:02:05,880
Speaker 1: So you just mentioned geopolitical risk, and I'm wondering whether

42
00:02:06,080 --> 00:02:09,160
Speaker 1: the market is maybe a little too complacent, whether it's

43
00:02:09,400 --> 00:02:11,919
Speaker 1: what's going on in Ukraine, the notion of a dirty

44
00:02:11,960 --> 00:02:17,560
Speaker 1: bomb of some sort, or China and incursion on Taiwan.

45
00:02:17,639 --> 00:02:19,680
Speaker 1: I mean, do you think the market is too complacent

46
00:02:19,720 --> 00:02:24,519
Speaker 1: in measuring geopolitical risk right now? We believe the market

47
00:02:24,639 --> 00:02:27,160
Speaker 1: is too complacent. The issue with these risks is that

48
00:02:27,200 --> 00:02:31,600
Speaker 1: they're extremely binary. So um, if something should break out

49
00:02:31,600 --> 00:02:33,960
Speaker 1: into any of the risk that you have mentioned, whether

50
00:02:34,000 --> 00:02:36,440
Speaker 1: it's the Taiwan, whether it's a dirty bomb, clearly you're

51
00:02:36,440 --> 00:02:39,840
Speaker 1: going to have a massive repercaution. Negative reprocution on marketing

52
00:02:39,960 --> 00:02:42,440
Speaker 1: is going to happen extremely quickly. But if that does

53
00:02:42,520 --> 00:02:46,760
Speaker 1: not happen, then you've probably already seeing quite a few

54
00:02:46,960 --> 00:02:49,160
Speaker 1: of the economic risks, not all of them, but a

55
00:02:49,160 --> 00:02:51,400
Speaker 1: few of them already been discounted before. It's all a

56
00:02:51,520 --> 00:02:57,600
Speaker 1: question of the likelihood that investors put in the materialization

57
00:02:57,720 --> 00:03:01,320
Speaker 1: of such risks, and of course will depend in terms

58
00:03:01,320 --> 00:03:04,560
Speaker 1: of the narrative going forward. A rise and unemployment would

59
00:03:04,600 --> 00:03:06,600
Speaker 1: be one of the key things that causes the fit

60
00:03:06,680 --> 00:03:10,360
Speaker 1: to make a devilish pivot should that happen, though other

61
00:03:10,440 --> 00:03:13,800
Speaker 1: risks come into focus as well. What do you consider

62
00:03:13,840 --> 00:03:15,560
Speaker 1: to be the risk of a recession in the US,

63
00:03:15,639 --> 00:03:20,680
Speaker 1: and more broadly, well, we believe the US will enter

64
00:03:20,680 --> 00:03:25,119
Speaker 1: a recession and the unemployment rising is really the only

65
00:03:25,120 --> 00:03:28,160
Speaker 1: way for inflation to count down because you need to

66
00:03:28,200 --> 00:03:30,760
Speaker 1: get a demand down and need to get growth down,

67
00:03:30,840 --> 00:03:33,160
Speaker 1: and that's the only way that inflation is gonna come

68
00:03:33,200 --> 00:03:35,240
Speaker 1: down from the current levels to roughly in line toward

69
00:03:35,280 --> 00:03:39,280
Speaker 1: the fat things um with respect to economic risk. Of course,

70
00:03:39,480 --> 00:03:41,760
Speaker 1: that means that there's going to be less growth and

71
00:03:41,800 --> 00:03:44,000
Speaker 1: there's going to be less demand, But that's what you

72
00:03:44,040 --> 00:03:45,840
Speaker 1: need in order to get inflation down. You need to

73
00:03:45,880 --> 00:03:48,080
Speaker 1: call down the economy. You need to pull push on

74
00:03:48,120 --> 00:03:50,800
Speaker 1: the brakes, um and the fourth That's what we think

75
00:03:50,960 --> 00:03:53,000
Speaker 1: and that's actually going to be that news also for

76
00:03:53,320 --> 00:03:56,520
Speaker 1: leading standards overall, because we find employment increases that's never

77
00:03:56,600 --> 00:03:59,760
Speaker 1: good news. But again we believe that this period of

78
00:03:59,760 --> 00:04:04,360
Speaker 1: faith will need to materialize in order for fatther Reaches objectives. Max,

79
00:04:04,440 --> 00:04:06,360
Speaker 1: I'd like to get your view on China now that

80
00:04:06,440 --> 00:04:09,520
Speaker 1: we have the Party Congress in the rear view mirror,

81
00:04:09,560 --> 00:04:14,800
Speaker 1: and we know now that Washington is using kind of

82
00:04:14,840 --> 00:04:19,000
Speaker 1: bands on US chips and chip expertise as a way

83
00:04:19,000 --> 00:04:22,480
Speaker 1: of exporting that technology to China. Which has the potential

84
00:04:22,520 --> 00:04:27,279
Speaker 1: to really stifle a lot of development of advanced Chinese technology.

85
00:04:27,480 --> 00:04:30,400
Speaker 1: Give me your your sense of how significant this is

86
00:04:30,440 --> 00:04:34,880
Speaker 1: and what the repercussions could be. Well, it is definitely

87
00:04:34,960 --> 00:04:39,120
Speaker 1: very significant, first of all, in terms of relationships between

88
00:04:39,200 --> 00:04:42,120
Speaker 1: the U ask China. Clearly here we are escalating on

89
00:04:42,160 --> 00:04:46,400
Speaker 1: the negative side, and in terms of actual process of

90
00:04:46,440 --> 00:04:49,599
Speaker 1: growth for the industry within China, that's also negative news,

91
00:04:49,680 --> 00:04:52,240
Speaker 1: especially given that one of the plans and the objectives

92
00:04:52,480 --> 00:04:57,440
Speaker 1: of China is to improve their technological If you want advance, obviously,

93
00:04:57,440 --> 00:05:00,520
Speaker 1: if you don't have the correct access to semi conductors

94
00:05:00,520 --> 00:05:06,039
Speaker 1: and microchips, that becomes extremely hard developing domestic alternative. We

95
00:05:06,080 --> 00:05:09,280
Speaker 1: all know it's not that easy, uh, And therefore, in

96
00:05:09,320 --> 00:05:12,680
Speaker 1: this fast space environment, even losing out a few months

97
00:05:12,760 --> 00:05:16,840
Speaker 1: of normal growth and development probably needs light years in

98
00:05:17,279 --> 00:05:20,799
Speaker 1: other industries before we think it will have an impact.

99
00:05:21,000 --> 00:05:24,800
Speaker 1: It will have an effect. The question is China will

100
00:05:24,839 --> 00:05:29,400
Speaker 1: definitely try and see some domestic alternatives, but it's not

101
00:05:29,520 --> 00:05:32,039
Speaker 1: so easy. So the question is really how much of

102
00:05:32,640 --> 00:05:34,880
Speaker 1: help and support they're going to try and give to

103
00:05:34,960 --> 00:05:38,279
Speaker 1: this industry in order to figure out some local alternatives.

104
00:05:39,320 --> 00:05:41,720
Speaker 1: How do you view the investing environment in China at

105
00:05:41,720 --> 00:05:43,960
Speaker 1: the moment. You know, a number of stocks and other

106
00:05:44,000 --> 00:05:47,120
Speaker 1: assets are very very cheap, but there are a number

107
00:05:47,120 --> 00:05:49,760
Speaker 1: of risks as well. Are you looking at the space.

108
00:05:51,480 --> 00:05:53,680
Speaker 1: We're definitely looking at the space. So it is true

109
00:05:53,720 --> 00:05:56,120
Speaker 1: that from an absolute and relative point of view, valuations

110
00:05:56,240 --> 00:05:59,640
Speaker 1: are cheap. But it's also true, especially after the recent

111
00:05:59,720 --> 00:06:04,440
Speaker 1: cong risks, Uncertainty is very high, visibility is extremely low,

112
00:06:04,680 --> 00:06:08,800
Speaker 1: geopolitical risks are very high. Headlines rings remain high. We

113
00:06:08,839 --> 00:06:12,120
Speaker 1: have seen that it's unlikely that they're gonna turn particularly

114
00:06:12,160 --> 00:06:16,680
Speaker 1: market friendly anytime soon before. Not having a Chinese exposure

115
00:06:16,960 --> 00:06:20,440
Speaker 1: is is we believe not correct. But also we have

116
00:06:20,520 --> 00:06:23,080
Speaker 1: been trimming down of our exposure given the recent news.

117
00:06:23,120 --> 00:06:25,880
Speaker 1: And keep in mind that, yes, evaluations in China are cheap,

118
00:06:26,200 --> 00:06:29,320
Speaker 1: but after the reason fall we've seen in other markets

119
00:06:29,320 --> 00:06:32,400
Speaker 1: where you definitely have more visibility, you're also getting some

120
00:06:32,480 --> 00:06:37,000
Speaker 1: cheaper evaluations elsewhere. Uh. Therefore, we do keep looking at it.

121
00:06:37,080 --> 00:06:38,840
Speaker 1: We are in the market, but we have been scaling

122
00:06:38,880 --> 00:06:41,760
Speaker 1: down also because now a number of alternatives have started

123
00:06:41,760 --> 00:06:44,400
Speaker 1: to appear. So Max, when you have the morning meeting

124
00:06:44,600 --> 00:06:48,119
Speaker 1: later today at s GMC Capital and you talk about

125
00:06:48,160 --> 00:06:50,520
Speaker 1: the strategy between now, let's say in the end of

126
00:06:50,560 --> 00:06:53,360
Speaker 1: the year, give me thirty seconds on what that looks like.

127
00:06:55,120 --> 00:06:58,560
Speaker 1: Short term, you could see further bounce, but we think

128
00:06:58,600 --> 00:07:01,640
Speaker 1: that the market is likely to go to contest June lows. Again.

129
00:07:02,000 --> 00:07:04,520
Speaker 1: There will come a time of buying and there's going

130
00:07:04,560 --> 00:07:07,479
Speaker 1: to be great buying opportunities, but it's not now yet.

131
00:07:07,600 --> 00:07:09,280
Speaker 1: We need to be a little bit more patient. More

132
00:07:09,360 --> 00:07:12,560
Speaker 1: play needs to happen within the US economy. So we're

133
00:07:12,560 --> 00:07:14,760
Speaker 1: probably looking at you want you to over next year

134
00:07:14,920 --> 00:07:18,960
Speaker 1: and really start deploying the remainder quarter is probably still

135
00:07:18,960 --> 00:07:22,320
Speaker 1: the time to be cautious. Alright, Max Bondor We'll leave

136
00:07:22,320 --> 00:07:24,200
Speaker 1: it there. Thanks so much for joining us on Bloomberg

137
00:07:24,280 --> 00:07:29,160
Speaker 1: Daybreak Asia. Max Bondori is CEO of s GMC Capital