WEBVTT - Intel Gives Weak Forecast After Supply Shortages Hurt Sales

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg business Week, Daily reporting from the magazine

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:17.639
<v Speaker 2>that helps global leaders stay ahead with insight on the people, companies,

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 2>and trends shaping today's complex economy. Plus global business, finance

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 2>and tech news as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Daily Podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Steneveek on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:34.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I want to bring an Ivan fine Seth, research

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>director and chief investment officer at Tiger's Financial Partners. The

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:40.840
<v Speaker 1>firm has more than five hundred million dollars under management.

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Ivan has a by rating on the company's stock. Ivan

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>does just very like your immediate knee jerk reaction to this.

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Does your rating? Well, I know you can't answer that question,

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>but your knee jerk reaction. I'm not gonna ask your

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>knee jerk reaction to the numbers here. You're shaking your head.

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 3>It's not this quarter. It's not a quarterly story. It

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 3>is a major shift in the company. It's and they

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 3>have I think turned a major corner. But the stock

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 3>is also run up significantly from a lower twenty. It

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:15.959
<v Speaker 3>hit fifty five dollars, so I think it may have

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 3>gotten a little bit ahead of itself and it may

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:21.040
<v Speaker 3>pull back, but I think everything that's going on and

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 3>then the new CEO, lip Pretan is is as planned.

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, they are well positioned to benefit from AI

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:33.399
<v Speaker 3>data center demand, AI computer demand, their partnership with Intel,

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 3>money from the US government, so they are plenty flush

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 3>to invest in all of their key growth initiatives.

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:47.559
<v Speaker 4>So fundamentally, what's changed Ivan when it comes to this company?

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 4>You obviously sound really upbeat? Is it just a case

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 4>of having the backdrop because you know of the United

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 4>States government?

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 5>Is that what's done it? You know, kind of see

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 5>the ship everything.

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay, it's the it's first of all, it's the it's

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 3>President Trump's push on what's sold here is made here,

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 3>investing in US semiconductor manufacturing capacity here, expanding the Intel

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 3>foundry business, as well as the growth of data centers,

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 3>the growth of AI enabled PCs. So they are positioned,

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 3>I think perfectly to benefit from what it was in

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 3>the early innings of it going to be a long

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 3>game of the AI driven growth in both the tech

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 3>sector and the US and the global economy.

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:44.239
<v Speaker 1>So, okay, I just want to this is a different

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:47.639
<v Speaker 1>company than it was six months ago as a result

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>as a result of the US investment. And I'm wondering

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>what that position, what that type of what that investment

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 1>does for Liputan's position. Like you know, when you're the

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>CEO of a company and you come out with a report,

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you're you're obviously you got to worry about the board,

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you got to worry about shareholders. Now he's got to

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>worry about a phone call from President Trump because the

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>President likes to talk about how well the stock has

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>done since the US made that investment. What does that

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:19.119
<v Speaker 1>change the dynamic?

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 6>It doesn't.

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 3>But it's really funny that President Trump wanted to go

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 3>from deporting the guy to giving the guy money.

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Hey, that's the power of a conversation, right, But.

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 4>It also shows but it also shows how quickly things

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 4>can change, certainly from the White House perspective.

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, it highlights Trump's perspective on driving the US manufacturer

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 3>and infrastructure US leadership in all key areas, and semiconductors

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:53.119
<v Speaker 3>is a very important area, especially that Intel makes semiconductors

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 3>for the defense industry.

0:03:55.680 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, Okay, so does it make the defense business stronger?

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely? Hey, there's no better partner. One number one partner.

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't.

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 6>Well, it could be a tie US government and Nvidia.

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so let me go to the partners. Yeah, let

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>me let me ask this question a different way than Ivan.

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:18.720
<v Speaker 1>And that's about where Intel would be right now. If

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:21.279
<v Speaker 1>the US government had not made that investment. Would this

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>be a completely different picture? Would it have been a

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>completely different quarter?

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 3>Well?

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think this has helped.

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 3>I think this removes concerns, balanceet concerns that moved and

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 3>allows the company and the CEO to focus on business.

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 3>A partnership with Nvidia is great, and partnership with the

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:44.239
<v Speaker 3>USK it opens up doors. They're back working with Apple,

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 3>They're going to be working with everybody. And I think

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 3>you're going to see Intel as a major contender as

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 3>a semi conductor foundry semiconductor manufacturer to take on Taiwan Semiconductor.

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 4>So, okay, going back to Intel under sure in the aftermarket,

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 4>we continue to track the share price, I think down

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 4>about four or five percent as we speak. The forecast

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 4>for the first quarter top and bottom line disappointing. At

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 4>the same time, it's talking about the CEO saying demand

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 4>is quite strong, says the chip maker missed a lot

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 4>of opportunities, says production yields not up to his standards,

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 4>and then he goes on to say making our intel says,

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 4>the company making good progress in fourteen A production on

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 4>track for volume production in twenty twenty eight, has multiple

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 4>engineering engagements on fourteen A.

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:34.359
<v Speaker 5>Help me understand what that means.

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 3>These are different chips, the fourteen A, the eighteen A

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:41.600
<v Speaker 3>that they and the announcements that they made earlier this

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 3>month at the CEES they got their latest semiconductors on

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 3>track to go into production to meet a huge demand

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 3>for all semiconductors is outstripping supply. There's in fact, concerns

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 3>of memory shortage and process or shortage. So they got

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 3>the demand wind. Is that is a tailwind, and they

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 3>are back to innovating and developing and you know, winning

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 3>customers and working with key you know computer manufacturers, Key Hyperscaler,

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 3>you know cloud service providers. And I think that they

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 3>got a tremendous tailwind. The stock ringing up a lot.

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 3>It went from twenty to fifty five. Even if it

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 3>pulls back to forty five, you know, it's a buying

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 3>opportunity because I think that long term they are going

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 3>to be back I mean, I don't think even be

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 3>back to their former glory. I think they are going

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 3>to be one of the world's leading semiconductor developers, designers,

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 3>and manufacturers.

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 4>So the Foundry Services division their factory unit revenue of

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 4>about four and a half billion. It was a gain

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 4>of about three point eight percent ivan from.

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 5>The year before.

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 4>It currently relies on almost exclusively, as you know, Intel

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 4>product divisions for orders. It's looking to expand beyond that.

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 4>Is that crucial for the company's future growth.

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 3>It's crucial, But that is the opportunity, okay, to work

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 3>with everybody, because you got to realize that most of

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 3>the other semiconductor companies, even in Vidia, Apple, all of

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 3>the companies like Google, Facebook, Amazon, that want their own

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 3>processors qualcom, they're all virtual manufacturer. They don't actually manufacture.

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 3>They outsourced to companies like todd One semi Conductor and

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 3>hopefully companies like Intel to manufacture their processors.

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, is the US The US is, at least

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>from an investment protective, things have kind of quieted down

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit since the summer. But are there any

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>other companies, particularly companies within your universe that you follow

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>that could see in your view and investment by the

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>US government.

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 3>You know that I don't know. The other companies that

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 3>I like in the semiconductor sector are in Vidia and Quailcom.

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 3>And you know Invidia is pretty flush.

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they don't need so okay, they could they could

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>make an investment in the US government.

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I really think it was great how it turned

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 3>around after the meeting with Trump and Tan that Grump

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 3>wrote a check. And and also we have a lot

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 3>of government incentives to build UH semiconductor manufacturing capacity here. Yeah,

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 3>we have projects in Arizona, projects in Ohio. So ideally

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:41.119
<v Speaker 3>the US could be the semiconductor manufacturing capital for the world.

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 4>So in terms of going back to and you right, rightfully, so,

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 4>I even point out the run up that we've seen

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:50.559
<v Speaker 4>in Ivan shairs and Intel shares. You know, the Information

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 4>put out a story and it says Intel's forward even

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 4>a multiple has lifted to twenty times highest level since

0:08:57.120 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty one, well above the twelve and a half

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 4>times at which TSMC currently trades. This is what I

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 4>was trying to get to before with our simulcast, I

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 4>was talking market caps, but it has to do with valuation.

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 5>Intel now pricier than TSMC. Does that make sense?

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, I always say I wish we could solve the

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 3>mysteries of the stock market by dividing two numbers like

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 3>cash flow MO or even pe. Stocks go up for

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 3>everything that you really can't measure. And this is about

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 3>Intel's future. So we are going to see if all

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 3>goes well, a huge ramp up in revenue, in an

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:34.080
<v Speaker 3>expansion in margin and increasing cash flow, and then an

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 3>increase in profitability. So I think their foundry business will

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 3>ramp up significantly, and as their new processors come to market,

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 3>revenue and cash flow and profitability will ramp up also

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 3>ramp up significantly.

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Li Bhutan saying, you know, Intel face is an

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 4>execution challenge. We are laser focused as a team to

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 4>improve that. To be candid, it's just our execution that

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 4>needs to improve. Ivan finds that great stuff as always

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 4>so appreciated. He's, of course, chief investment officer over at

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 4>Tiger's Financial Partners, joining us on Intel.

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Stay with us more from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 1>up after this.

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily podcast. Catch us

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern Listen

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 2>on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 2>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>The World Economic Forum in Davos. I heard of it, okay,

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>he's called it quote boring. He slammed the group as

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 1>a body that's increasingly becoming an unelected world government that

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 1>people never asked for and don't want.

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 4>So he's like, I'm never going to go to that thing.

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 4>That's ridiculous. Why, like, who would waste their time there?

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 1>He were talking about is Elon musk Coright? Those are

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>things that he said about the World Economic Forum in

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the past. Yet today, for the first time we made

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>an appearance.

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 5>He showed up, didn't he?

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>He showed up, And do you think he was nice?

0:10:58.120 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 3>On news?

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 4>Hey, it's Elon busy at the factory. But listen, I'd

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 4>like to come to David.

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how it works. He was confirmed at

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the last minute edition for a Thursday afternoon session. He

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>spoke to Blackrock CEO Larry Fink. Here's just part of

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 1>that conversation.

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 7>We do have some the Tel's Optimus robots doing simple

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:20.559
<v Speaker 7>tasks in the factory, except probably.

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 6>Later this year.

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 7>By the end of this year, I think they will

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 7>be doing more complex tasks and still deployed in an

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 7>industrial environment, and probably sometime next year, I'd say that

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 7>by the end of next year, I think would be

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 7>selling humanoid robots to the public. That's when we are

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 7>confident that it's very higher liability, very high safety, and

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 7>the range of functionality is is also very high. You

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 7>can basically ask it to do anything you'd like.

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 8>You're already seeing that in Tesla car. Is this the

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:02.559
<v Speaker 8>software changes that you're doing?

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 6>And what is it? Every quarter now?

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 8>A software change that upbrates the ability of the robot

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 8>within the car.

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 7>Yes, the tails A full self driving software we updated

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 7>sometimes once a week. And recently some of the insurance

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 7>companies have said that it is actually so safe. When

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:27.719
<v Speaker 7>tells a full self driving so safe that, uh, they're

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 7>they're offering customers half price insurance if they if they

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 7>use tess a full self driving in the car and.

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 8>That could be monitored by the insurance company, can they

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 8>Is that part of the agreement?

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 7>Yeah? But I think self driving cars is essentially a

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 7>solved problem at this point, right, And Tesla's rolled out,

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 7>uh sort of robot taxi service in a few cities,

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 7>and well, I be very very widespread by the end

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:07.320
<v Speaker 7>of this year within the US, and then we hope

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 7>to get supervisor for self driving approval in Europe hopefully

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 7>next month quickly, yeah, and then maybe a similar time

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 7>timing for China hopefully.

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>There you have it. That was Elon Musk along with

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Larry Fink, the CEO of Black Rock. For more on

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 1>that appearance at Davos, we're joined by Max Chafkin. He's

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week senior reporter. He's co host of the

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Everybody's Business podcast. He's also the author of the contrarian

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Peter Teel and Silicon Valley's Pursuit of Power. He joins

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 1>us here in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker's studio. A lot

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of timelines laid out just in that

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>two and a half minutes, and that was just part

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>of what he said today. Uh, I know you're excited,

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Carol for the Optimist robots to be sold at the

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>next year because.

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 5>That room for one at my own.

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>They don't need a better method about just got to

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>plug him in right, charge them. They just do the dishes.

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Is that a real sick thing? Based on your observations

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of Tesla and where they are right now with these

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 1>optimist robots.

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 9>I don't think it's a realistic thing for any humanoid robot,

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 9>whether it's Elon Musk's humanoid.

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Robots or not.

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 9>I mean, there are prototypes of these things, but of

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 9>course it's a big jump from going from a prototype

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 9>to putting these in environments where unpredictable things have happened.

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 9>That's the reason why Elon Musk, for you know, ten

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 9>years or so, has been saying self driving cars are

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 9>going to happen next year and we're still not quite

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 9>there yet. There was a demo today in Austin, another demo,

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 9>but again, these are very controlled. We're not seeing the

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 9>kind of mass you know, mass market adoption, unsupervised kind

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 9>of robotics that Elon Musk that had been talking about

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 9>and that we're all, you know, frankly hoping for. It

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 9>would be nice to have a dishes doing robot in

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 9>our in our home, do.

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 5>It all, take the garbage out and everything. But you know,

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 5>it's interesting.

0:14:55.320 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 4>We had a conversation with Hannah Elliott today, the auto columnist.

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 4>It'll be in our weekend show, it will be in

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 4>our weekend show, and she recently went out in a

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 4>Mercedes that has kind of their two different programs really

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 4>when it comes to self driving, and she was blown away, but.

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't she drew a distinction for us and then,

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, giving a preview for our conversation that is Saturday.

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>There's a distinction between Mercedes technology that runs on Nvidia

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and Tessela's technology for FSD, which is fully supported by cameras.

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Mercedes technology that she writes about away has the cameras

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 1>but also additional sensors. It's more akin to a Weimo.

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 9>Right, Yeah, Weimo is betting on this, and as you said,

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 9>many other people are betting on these kind of multisensor approaches.

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 9>There are a lot of critics of Tesla, including some

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 9>very strong critics who basically say this is impossible. Elon

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 9>Musk's argument has been all along, hey, you drive with

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 9>two eyes, therefore cameras should be fine. I don't think

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 9>we know the.

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Answer that question. I mean that is that is the

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>argument he might. But I will say the brain, for

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 1>for uh as challenging as a lot of interpersonal relationships are.

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>The brain is so powerful when it comes to making

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>these split second decisions that having been proved I mean the.

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 4>Elon just now and yeah, the brain causes us to

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 4>often get distracted picking up our phone or reaching and

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 4>doing things.

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's that's a good point.

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 9>I don't know, well, I mean, I do think that.

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 9>And Musk made the point about insurance rates and full

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 9>self driving, right, we are seeing, whatever your view is,

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 9>in terms of the realistic nature of these kind of

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 9>robotaxi timelines, we're seeing huge advances in driver assistants. And

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 9>and that is where Elon Musk, you know, to his credit,

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 9>he doesn't he doesn't talk about it this way. But

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 9>if you just see Tesla's autopilot and full self driving

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 9>as a driver assistance system, you know, it's pretty promising.

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 9>You do have to be engaged, you have to be looking.

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 9>It's not a substitute for for your own eyes and

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:00.080
<v Speaker 9>your own judgment, but it could augment that process. And

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 9>and you're seeing kind of a distinction in terms of

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 9>how some automakers are sort of focusing on that path

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 9>while others are going the kind of weimow, you know,

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:12.920
<v Speaker 9>full self driving route. Musk I think is essentially keeping

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 9>both options open. He has the sort of robotaxi demo

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 9>in Austin but also there are many normal cars with

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 9>this software built in.

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 4>I guess, and I think part of the reason I

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 4>brought up Hannah is just how she was blown away,

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 4>But I think by the technology and how great it was,

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 4>and I just think about we talk about these robots,

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 4>could they possibly though I'm looking at advancements in technology

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 4>AI moving along pretty fast that it could actually happen

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 4>sooner rather than later, like is I.

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 6>Mean, anything's possible.

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 9>But you know, but even you know, Elon Musk even

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:49.160
<v Speaker 9>even talks about this. There is this thing where getting

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 9>ninety nine percent of the way is very easy, and

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:54.919
<v Speaker 9>that last one percent no one quite knows just how

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 9>it is. And we're talking again about big heavy machines,

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:01.399
<v Speaker 9>industrial robots. They are very advance and industrial robots in

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 9>factories that can do you know, fine motor skills. But

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:07.919
<v Speaker 9>the factories have you know, red yellow tape around them

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 9>because you don't want to get too close to the

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:12.360
<v Speaker 9>robot because these are heavy machines. They could hurt somebody.

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 9>And there's going to be a very high bar before

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 9>putting one of these optimists optimize in your home. It's

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 9>not especially it only has to do the dish, it

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 9>has to be better than your current dishwasher.

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:25.639
<v Speaker 1>We'll see what the consequence is if you do not

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:26.360
<v Speaker 1>call it by the.

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 4>Proper name, if they don't stack the dishes the way

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:29.439
<v Speaker 4>I like it.

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's a problem. They talk about relationship challenges. The

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>self driving car is a solved problem, is what Elon

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Musk said to Larry Fink earlier today. If if maybe

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>from a technological perspective, it's a solve problem, but you're

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>only seeing Waymos in a handful of cities. The robotaxis

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>from Tesla are only available in a handful of cities.

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>And is it a solve problem in your view?

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 9>No, it's obviously not a solve problem. It will be

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 9>a solve problem. We all have self driving cars. But

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:01.120
<v Speaker 9>you know, if from the point of view of Elon Musk,

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 9>from the point of view of Tesla investors, they have

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 9>a big lead. Elon Musk, in his mind, they are

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 9>just going to get there. You brought up the why

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 9>is he going to Davos right now? I think part

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 9>of the reason he's going to Davos is because a

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 9>lot of eyes are on Davos, because Donald Trump was there.

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 9>Elon Musk is really good at figuring out where the

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 9>news cameras are pointed where the kind of conversation is

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 9>and putting himself there. So he's going there and he's

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:27.920
<v Speaker 9>talking his book, he's talking about driverless cars. While there's

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 9>a lot of focus on this conference.

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 4>But having said that too, coming off of CES twenty

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:36.199
<v Speaker 4>twenty six, right, we talked too about the focus on

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 4>robots or robotics, and it does feel like that's where

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:40.440
<v Speaker 4>the world is going next.

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, there's definitely a lot.

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:44.159
<v Speaker 9>I mean, there's tons of investment here. And part of

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:47.879
<v Speaker 9>the reason is there are these amazing advancements in AI

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 9>and yet we haven't quite figured out how to commercialize them.

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:55.159
<v Speaker 9>So they are all sorts of efforts to find a

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 9>commercial you know, a way to make money on this thing.

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:01.160
<v Speaker 9>And of course humanoid robots want to these these options.

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 9>There are lots of humanoid robot companies in China right

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 9>now that are also racing to compete with optimists.

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 1>So mission accomplished for Elon at Davos, we're talking about

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 1>he made a lot of news, a lot was written

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 1>about him. We're talking about him right now. He got

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 1>the attention, but he could do that anywhere he goes.

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:21.399
<v Speaker 9>It's true, although I think he likes to, you know,

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 9>put himself at the center. And again, I mean Davos

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 9>has in a way that that it's hard for me

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:28.359
<v Speaker 9>to remember. It's been been a few years where with

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 9>Trump making these Greenland threats, him flying there, there was

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:35.160
<v Speaker 9>just so much attention on this thing, and it almost

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:37.719
<v Speaker 9>feels like Musk is trying to get himself, you know,

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 9>back close close to Trump as well, being in the

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 9>kind of even though they I think they just passed

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 9>like ships in the night, but but it's hard not

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:48.639
<v Speaker 9>to see, you know, their proximity is getting They didn't.

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 5>Fly there together, no, not yet, not yet.

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 4>Having said that, you know, we wrapped up the year

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 4>doing a really fun conversation with you, like kind of

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 4>the Elon Year in Review twenty twenty five, because there

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 4>was a lot if you think about when President Trump

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 4>gave me to the White House in doge. How are

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 4>you thinking about Elon this year right now?

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:08.399
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think the big question on the business side

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.479
<v Speaker 9>is SpaceX and the possible space X I PO. I mean,

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 9>we're we're going to see a lot of companies try

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 9>to do I POS. I think in the next year

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 9>or so for for lots of reasons.

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 4>You say possible, Is it a given or we shouldn't

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:21.680
<v Speaker 4>assume that it's definitely going to happen.

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean it hasn't happened. Yeah, I mean until they file,

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't.

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 6>I wouldn't assume it.

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 9>Lots of companies sort of talk about that, and and

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 9>you know, if the market changes, you know, I think

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 9>I think watching that SpaceX I PO, how much demand

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 9>is there? You know, how much is it worth? How

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 9>does that affect the rest of Elon Musk's empire, how

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 9>does that play with Tesla and the challenges of Tesla?

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 9>And then the other story, the big one is the

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 9>midterm and what is Elon Musk's role going to be

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 9>as we head towards this election.

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:50.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I thought I heard already some money.

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 9>Ten million dollars in Kentucky Center race.

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:56.439
<v Speaker 5>Yep, off and running. We'll be We'll be coming back

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:58.679
<v Speaker 5>to Max. We know that. Max Chapkin, Thank you so much.

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Business Week senior Report or co host of Everybody's

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 4>Business Podcast.

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 5>Check it out on the weekend.

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Listen live

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 2>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on Apple car

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:15.879
<v Speaker 2>Play and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:19.119
<v Speaker 2>can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 2>New York station. Just Say Alexa played Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:27.680
<v Speaker 4>Let's drive to the close, because certainly on our minds

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:30.720
<v Speaker 4>is what's going on with the consumer. We did get

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 4>some data today, US consumer spending rising solidly in back

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 4>to back games.

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 5>You kind of have that going on.

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:40.120
<v Speaker 4>We had jobless claims steady at two hundred thousand dollars

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:42.680
<v Speaker 4>in a sign of low layoffs, and the US economy

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 4>expanding at a revised four point four percent.

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:46.919
<v Speaker 5>In the third quarter.

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:50.400
<v Speaker 4>So you know, some reads on the economy, and we'll

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:52.400
<v Speaker 4>see whether or not this is all good for a consumer.

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 5>It feels like it should be, but it isn't always.

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 1>We'll see what Joe Feldman has to say, Senior managing

0:22:57.400 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 1>director and assistant director of Research at tells the advisory

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:05.640
<v Speaker 1>he joins us this afternoon. So consumer spending rises solidly

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:07.439
<v Speaker 1>in back to back gains. Carol went through some other

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:10.719
<v Speaker 1>data that we got today. Everything's fine for consumers.

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:14.200
<v Speaker 6>So far. The consumer seems pretty resilient.

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 10>We continue to hear that word from all the retailers

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 10>we speak with and you continue to really see it

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 10>in the data.

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 8>Now.

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:22.200
<v Speaker 10>I know there's some that are suggesting that it's really

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:25.880
<v Speaker 10>the bifurcation of the consumers, so that more affluent consumer is.

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:27.919
<v Speaker 6>Really doing a lot of the driving of the spend.

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:31.639
<v Speaker 10>But you know, when you aggregate it together, the numbers

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:33.120
<v Speaker 10>look okay, hey.

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:34.439
<v Speaker 4>You know, I love that you went there with the

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 4>affluent consumer, Joe, But what about Sacks which filed bankruptcy?

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:42.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean they play into the affluent consumer.

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Is that idiosyncratic or is that.

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 5>Like what's what's?

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 4>And I understand retails, you know, can have the wrong

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 4>product line or strategy, but what happened with Sax and

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 4>we've been talking about that a lot here at Bloomberg.

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, you know, I think management is a big part

0:23:59.359 --> 0:23:59.640
<v Speaker 6>of it.

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 10>You know, it really had not been managed quite well

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 10>under Richard Baker, who's that was the owner. I know

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 10>there was another, you know guy running at Mark Metric

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 10>was the CEO. However, Richard Baker really owned the company.

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 10>He was behind the whole thing, and everything he's touched

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:19.119
<v Speaker 10>has not done well. Lord and Taylor's gone now Sacks

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:22.399
<v Speaker 10>is gone, you know, and he's really not done a

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 10>very good job of running a retailer. He gets the

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:27.360
<v Speaker 10>real estate portfolio, and I think he's very good at

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:29.160
<v Speaker 10>real estate and understands that.

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 6>So what happened?

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 10>You know, look, prices maybe went a little too high

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 10>during the pandemic. I think the luxury brands thought they

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 10>could get away with more.

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:39.159
<v Speaker 6>They raised prices way too.

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 10>High, and they've been paying the piper since then as

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 10>things have started to recover.

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 6>And that sort of in the more affluent.

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 10>Consumer, not the high high end, but like that that

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 10>sort of aspirational customer is really what fell off.

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's like the mass affluent. Like, how would you

0:24:56.640 --> 0:24:57.399
<v Speaker 1>describe that person?

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 6>Joe, Yeah, sort of that mass half and I think

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:01.479
<v Speaker 6>is how you would describe it.

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 10>It's probably you know, if you think in terms of

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 10>income death stiles, maybe that you know that the seventy

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 10>to eighty, seventy to ninety those death siles right there,

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 10>that might you know, splurge on an item every now

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:14.639
<v Speaker 10>and then, but not really be the true you know,

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 10>luxury customer.

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:18.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's interesting that you say that, I that

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that customer and this is anecdotal, it's not you know,

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 1>we're not necessarily seeing this data. But in this low

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:28.199
<v Speaker 1>higher low fire environment. It seems like that group is

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>having a tough time finding a new job.

0:25:31.520 --> 0:25:35.159
<v Speaker 10>I think you're correct. The wage growth has started to

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 10>slow down a little bit. You know, when we speak

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 10>to like the retailers that we've covered, some of the grocers,

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 10>for example, they've talked about that middle income consumer feeling

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 10>more stress and seeing some change behavior in the way

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 10>they've been shopping. So if you're seeing that at grocery,

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 10>you know you're are definitely seeing that across the board.

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:53.719
<v Speaker 6>Now, we did have a good holiday season.

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 10>We've heard from a lot of retailers who pre announced

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 10>a few a week ago and numbers were better than expected.

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 6>To number wasn't so bad.

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:03.120
<v Speaker 10>So I don't mean to paint such a negative picture here,

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:07.919
<v Speaker 10>but it's not all, you know, rosy as rosy as

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 10>it might seem.

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you know, it's so funny.

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:11.920
<v Speaker 4>I was just looking at a couple of names. Walmart's

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:14.679
<v Speaker 4>up almost six percent so far this year. TJ max

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 4>Is down slightly, not even one percent. Retail stocks as

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 4>a whole were up only three percent last year, in

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 4>a year where we knew the S and P five hundred.

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:26.159
<v Speaker 4>We you know, strong gains double digit gains for the

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 4>US stock market overall. As for retail stocks this year,

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 4>Joe up nearly four percent year to date versus less

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:33.400
<v Speaker 4>than a one percent gain in the.

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 5>S and P five hundred. Where's the strength in retail?

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 11>You know?

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:38.920
<v Speaker 4>And as you start to look at twenty twenty six

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:41.359
<v Speaker 4>and how it might play out, can you make some

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 4>definitive calls or do you have to kind of wait

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 4>to see based on White House policy, the FED and

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 4>all that good stuff.

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, you know, well, coming out of twenty twenty five,

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:55.640
<v Speaker 10>we know that the value oriented retailers did quite well,

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 10>so Walmart, TJ actually two big ones that you just mentioned,

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 10>but that whole discount world really perform quite well. We

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 10>think heading into this year, at least right now the

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:07.880
<v Speaker 10>first half of the year, you may see those continue

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 10>to outperform. But from a stock perspective, investors are trying

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 10>to make that pivot towards discretionary. The one big, beautiful

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 10>tax bill should yield higher refund checks for most people

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 10>in the US, So there's an optimistic view that well,

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 10>if there's higher tax refunds, spring might not be so

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 10>bad in terms of spending, and there'll be a little

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:31.719
<v Speaker 10>more capability for everyone in the US to spend, and

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:35.360
<v Speaker 10>so that pivot back towards discretionary is really what you've

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:38.200
<v Speaker 10>seen with some of the stocks. You've also seen as

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 10>the Trump administration's talked a lot about trying to stimulate

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 10>housing in some ways, Home Depot, Low's Florin decre You've

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 10>seen those stocks really start to rebound. Everybody wants to

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 10>see that happen and see some better strength in those

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 10>sectors for those stocks to really continue to work.

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:58.119
<v Speaker 1>We're going to get Intel learnings a little later, and

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 1>we're not getting retailer yet at this point. But I'm

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:05.919
<v Speaker 1>curious from you where what are the companies you know,

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:07.639
<v Speaker 1>we got we got a lot of good picks from

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:11.399
<v Speaker 1>from Dana at the end of last year. What is

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a pick from you like to avoid? Where would you

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:15.120
<v Speaker 1>suggest people avoid?

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:20.120
<v Speaker 10>Well, the avoid I still think you kind of want

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 10>to be careful in the middle, and that's where like

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 10>the companies that are doing well, like a Walmart at

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 10>the cater day to that load a middle. But the

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 10>middle is trading down a little bit. They're okay, I worry.

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:35.359
<v Speaker 10>You know, there's a lot of question about Target. Are

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:37.199
<v Speaker 10>they going to be able to turn things around. You know,

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 10>they have an analyst day coming up in March, and

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 10>I think there's some hope that they will be able

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 10>to get to write the ship a little bit. But

0:28:43.600 --> 0:28:46.600
<v Speaker 10>there's been pressure there. Cole's is another one Dana talks

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 10>about that really has you know, not been able to

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 10>transform itself and keep pace. So those are a couple

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 10>of names like that. There may be some concern, but

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 10>I think there's a lot of hope around some of

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 10>the bigger discretion a like home Peoples.

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 6>Like I said, we still like Costco, we like Walmart,

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 6>So hey, what is definitely some room perhaps you run

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 6>up Target.

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 4>And I was trying to remember in my read in

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:11.479
<v Speaker 4>this morning, and Target does report earnings on March fourth.

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 5>March fifth, we get Costco.

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 4>February twenty fourth, we get Home Depot, February nineteenth, we

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 4>get Walmart.

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 5>So we're going to be getting a good read.

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 4>But on Target, there's a great story, interesting story, troubling

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 4>story on the Bloomberg how Target is facing a political

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:31.200
<v Speaker 4>maelstrom in its hometown of Minneapolis due to that immigration crackdown,

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:34.400
<v Speaker 4>disrupting operations and prompting calls for the company to take

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 4>a stance. But you've got staff skipping work over that crackdown.

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean, once again we see policy out of the

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 4>White House impacting companies. That's a real thing. And just

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 4>got about forty seconds here just quickly, if you would.

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 6>No, I absolutely agree, it is a real thing.

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 10>You know, Trump administration policies have a big effect on

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 10>how consumers feel and about sentiment.

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 6>Target in particular, to your point, has had this issue.

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 10>There's been a lot of so social issues that somehow

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 10>they're square in the center of it, and you know,

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 10>they're always upsetting somebody for some reason, which is quite frustrating.

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 10>I think for the management team, I'm sure it is.

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 10>You know, they get that taken out on them a

0:30:12.600 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 10>bit more than some other companies, all.

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 4>Right, And it does look like management, including the CEO,

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 4>is looking to kind of meet with some of the

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 4>officials involved in some of this stuff.

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 5>Joe, thank you so much.

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 4>I always appreciate you folks over at Telsey of course,

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 4>Joe joining us there.

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 5>This is Bloomberg.

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 1>up after this.

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily podcast. Catch us

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern. Listen

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 2>on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 2>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 1>New York City poised to get pummeled with more than

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 1>a foot of snow this weekend. It's a test for

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 1>new Mayor Zoro and Mom Donnie. A massive weather system

0:30:57.560 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 1>landing on the region, threatening power outages, airline delays, and

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>transit system of problems. We bring back Craig Allen, Bloomberg meteorologist.

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>He joins us from America, New York on a long

0:31:08.200 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 1>island Craig. As of Thursday morning, the winter storm watch

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:14.720
<v Speaker 1>has stretched more than eighteen hundred miles from eastern Arizona

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 1>western New York, affecting one hundred and twenty five million people.

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 1>How has it moved just since this morning?

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 11>It has expanded all the way to the eastern seaboard now,

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 11>so the I ninety five corridor is caught up in

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 11>the winter storm watch. And what's happening on the map

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 11>since I spoke to you yesterday afternoon at this time

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 11>is that the colors are deeper, they're brighter, there's more

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 11>of it, and that's never a good thing, because now

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 11>you're talking about intensity problems that will develop from it,

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 11>and it's now upgraded to a winter storm warning already

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 11>from New Mexico and Texas all the way across into

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 11>the Ohio and the Tennessee Valley. I am sure New

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 11>York and our entire corridor here is going to be next.

0:31:58.280 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 11>There's no way in my mind that we could miss

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:03.800
<v Speaker 11>out on at least six inches of snowfall here. And

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 11>I would think at this point that you know, twelve

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 11>would be our top number early on, But I would

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 11>not be surprised if we start looking at areas just

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 11>to the west of let's say, New York City, or

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 11>to the north of Washington, or just to the south

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 11>southwest of Boston that could see anywhere from twelve to

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 11>eighteen in terms of snow, depending upon the track of

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 11>the storm.

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's focus on the New York City region just for

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a second here, for selfish reasons. Twelve inches of snow

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 1>in New York. Would that all happen as of now,

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>based on your projections on Sunday, or would that go

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 1>into Monday too.

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 11>It'll go into Monday. This will be a long duration

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 11>storm once it redevelops. Because you're taking this storm that

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 11>I just gave you the parameters from all the way

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 11>across from the West coast over to the East coast,

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 11>and then redeveloping this storm right along the eastern seaboard

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 11>before it leaves on Monday. So this could turn out

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 11>to be almost a twenty four hour event. So there

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 11>may be times when the snow is coming down very heavily,

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 11>and then there may be times when there's a lull

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 11>and it's light and flurry ish and there's not too

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 11>much accumulating. It may even during those times it may

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:16.479
<v Speaker 11>even mix with a little bit of freezing rain or sleep.

0:33:16.680 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 11>Not a good thing, but it holds down the snow

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 11>snow accumulations and then pick up again. So, yes, this

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 11>is going to be a long duration type of event,

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:30.480
<v Speaker 11>and the plows will be cleaning and cleaning and cleaning,

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:34.239
<v Speaker 11>and that's our area. Think about the cascading effect that

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 11>goes all the way back through the rest of the

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 11>nation at the same time, because of all the snow

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:41.600
<v Speaker 11>and the ice that they are going to see as well.

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 4>How crucial are the next twenty four hours or next

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 4>forty eight hours.

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 11>Very Okay, let me tell you what they've done this

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 11>is almost unprecedented. They've taken Noah Air Force aircraft, and

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 11>they've taken hurricane hunters that usually go out during the

0:33:58.280 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 11>summer season and invest a fly into the hurricanes. They

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:04.960
<v Speaker 11>have flown them out on the Pacific coast and down

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:07.920
<v Speaker 11>in the Gulf of Mexico today and last night. They

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 11>started all these runs just to get more data into

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:14.920
<v Speaker 11>the system and try to get all the weather maps

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:18.359
<v Speaker 11>on the same page here. And that's why these next

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 11>twenty four hours, the data that they're taking in today,

0:34:21.040 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 11>the next twenty four hours will be so critical to

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 11>see the exact track of the storm because again, if

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:29.040
<v Speaker 11>you don't change over to any kind of freezing rain

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:31.479
<v Speaker 11>of sleet, this will easily be a foot or more.

0:34:31.920 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 11>If you do, then you're dealing with extreme ice and

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 11>power problems. So there's no win here. It's just a

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 11>matter of whether or not you're going to be digging

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:44.839
<v Speaker 11>out from snow or trying to get your power back.

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Is there any chance? Yeah? I mean, I was just

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:48.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna ask you which is worse, but it sounds like

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 1>it kind of doesn't matter. They're both. They're both No, Yeah,

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 1>they're both pretty bad here.

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:54.279
<v Speaker 6>What is it?

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Just very briefly, what is it about the system that

0:34:56.880 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 1>makes it so big?

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:04.640
<v Speaker 11>It has as three pieces of all coming together. With

0:35:04.680 --> 0:35:08.680
<v Speaker 11>these ingredients. You've got the Pacific system. Yesterday, Carol, you

0:35:08.719 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 11>mentioned that there was you saw the moisture down in

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:12.359
<v Speaker 11>the Gulf of Mexico. It's going to pick up that,

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:14.920
<v Speaker 11>and then it's going to get a shot of that

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 11>cold air that's coming down behind the system coming out

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:20.960
<v Speaker 11>of Canada. You put the three together at the right time,

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 11>and it all phases together, and you've got yourself one

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 11>whopper of a storm and that's being stages right now.

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:30.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I feel like that cold temperature.

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:33.480
<v Speaker 4>I feel like growing up when you really had cold temperatures,

0:35:33.520 --> 0:35:36.680
<v Speaker 4>that's when the storms were kind of the trickiest. Well, Craig,

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:38.759
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure we'll be reaching out to you tomorrow, So

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 4>thanks so much.

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 5>For the lt US update on that.

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 4>Craig Allen, of course, he is Bloomberg Meteorologist joining us

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:48.360
<v Speaker 4>from Merrick, New York out there on Long Island.

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:35:54.719 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 2>afternoons from two to five Pastern on bloomberg dot com,

0:36:02.560 --> 0:36:06.439
<v Speaker 2>the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:11.840
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg terminal