WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: What Went Wrong in Seattle?

0:00:01.560 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>The following is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:04.080 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Are you ready for

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:10.959
<v Speaker 1>a Break? Yes? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely?

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Ready for a break? Yeah, and so much for that.

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>It's time for The Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, A bar Garcia, and Derek Eagleton.

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>It is Monday, September twenty four, twenty eighteen, Season fourteen,

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:33.480
<v Speaker 1>episode number forty six. Welcome to a new edition of

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>The Break, live from s WBC Mortgage Studios at the Star.

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Great show we got lined up for you guys today.

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:42.240
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna dissect that game from yesterday. It is gonna

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:45.839
<v Speaker 1>be great. It's always great when we have to. It

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 1>is a new edition because I think na, yeah, so

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>it's it is going to be a good show. We're

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna tell you guys what went wrong for the Cowboys yesterday.

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Dave will have one or two things that went right.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. We'll see. We could phil, we could

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:04.559
<v Speaker 1>be done in five five minutes if we just wanted

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to do what went right. We have top ten players

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 1>from the game going up on the website later. Well,

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:10.680
<v Speaker 1>we're really going to do that today. I don't know,

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>are you really going to do that today? One? Yeah,

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>we did, and I thought, you know, if you could

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 1>do it. Hey, sorry sorry it's not my original joke,

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>but well something else, if nothing else, fans would get

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>some jokes and some last today. Yeah, because they probably do.

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 1>They probably need it right now. It was a rough

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 1>one for the Cowboys. I mean, they lose this game

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty four to thirteen, and it was more of the

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>same really from the standpoint of the offense. I don't

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>think anybody was surprised by what you saw offensively, maybe

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>surprised that the Cowboys didn't do some of the things

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>that they'd done that were successful the week before, but

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>not surprised at the output and the and just what

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>happened with this offense? Um, what did you guys think?

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Just overall? I want to get and I'd like to

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>do this as we start to show day after game,

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>just want to get a big picture. What did you

0:01:57.200 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>think was the big picture takeaway from this game? Let's

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>start with you, Nick. Big picture to take well, I mean,

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the guy you've been talking about for six months, that

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:08.639
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about for six months, you finally got

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to see him up close and personal, and he was

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the best player on the field. He was a game

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>changer and he you know he was. That's why you

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 1>wanted to get him, not only to have him on

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:20.799
<v Speaker 1>your team, but to not have to face him because

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>he beat you in more ways than one yesterday. And

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>so you can talk about a lot of other things offense.

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll let him go that, but I'm just saying, Earl Thomas,

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you know that's why you wanted to go get him

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>because he went out and he played great for that game.

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Can imagine really good player? Oh man, he's an amazing player. Um,

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't disagree with that. Earl Thomas showed exactly why

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>you would want a player like that on your team.

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>He's exactly the type of player that this defense has

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>not had in the entire time that I've covered them,

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>just in terms of making plays. I mean, really, Darren

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Woodson is the last good safety they had. What was

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Darren Woodson? That? Though no disrespect to him, but I'm

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:00.079
<v Speaker 1>not saying same kind of player. I'm saying just a

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>really good safety, like somebody that was a different playing safe,

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 1>but I mean that one. I mean a guy that

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:11.679
<v Speaker 1>you can count on to flip the game for you. Yeah, anyway,

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Williams maybe early. Regardless of that. Regardless of that, my

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:19.639
<v Speaker 1>main takeaway, I can't look at the Seahawks here this.

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>My main takeaway is that this team cannot pass the

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>ball downfield to save its life, and it is beyond

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>a problem. That's I mean. I was sitting there in

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter yesterday. This team did exactly what it

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>wanted to in the run game, honestly, and that was

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>even with you know, I was worried about Bobby Wagner

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>getting his feet underneath him. Bobby Wagner played a good game.

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>He had some stuffs, he stopped them on third down early.

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>They still ran for one hundred and sixty six yards.

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>They ran for nine yards per per carry on the road,

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't matter even a lick. That's how bad

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the passing game was. Um what Dak finished with one

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:00.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty eight yards and I would be willing

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to guess I haven't done the math on it, but

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>like at least forty or fifty of that came, you know,

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>once the Seahawks had built a twenty four to sixth lead.

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Anemic doesn't do it justice. It's it is a problem

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that I don't know how to answer, and judging from

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>their answers last night, I don't think they know either.

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>And it's I got a bad feeling like it's going

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to be something we're talking about for most of this season.

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 1>So that's I don't know how anything else, but that

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>can be the big takeaway Camber. I'm just confused, like

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't I really don't know what to think about

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>this team anymore. And I know they have talent. They

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>do have players with a lot of talent, and I

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>just don't understand why it's not really working out. Why

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>can't they convert on third downs? And even usually Dak

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Prescott in his press conference, he always has like a

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 1>good answer to come back with, or like a good

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>political answer, you know, but he answered something last night.

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I felt that he's answered. I mean, he didn't even

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>really have an answer to everything that was going on.

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:03.159
<v Speaker 1>He I felt it very differently in the way that

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>he was answering his questions. And it's like, I don't

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>know what's happening here. I don't know why they can't

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>freaking move the ball down and score points. And that's

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a big problem right now, because you talk about the

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>defense being great. Yeah, some people think defenses win games,

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>but I don't. I think defense can help you. And

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>bringing a player, let's say, like Earl Thomas, and I've

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>changed my whole tune after last night. You know, I've

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>been one of the biggest just like Nick wanting to

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:35.840
<v Speaker 1>bring him over here. But my tune has changed completely.

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter. Why give up a draft pick or

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>whatever trade you want to make to get him over here.

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Why do that when even if he was here, your

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>offense is not scoring points, your defense is not gonna be.

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>You can't rely on your defense to be making plays

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 1>and scoring points for you. If your offense is not

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>working out, there's no point of making a trade like

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:02.159
<v Speaker 1>this and bringing someone great to make your defense even better.

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:06.799
<v Speaker 1>But I kind of disagree with that too after watching this. Basically,

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>you can't. And he's a great player and I really

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>like him, and everyone does and all that, but how

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:18.719
<v Speaker 1>often can you rely on a guy like that to

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>be making all this play every single game? Yesterday? It

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>was two interceptions that changed the game. That was the

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>difference in the game in my opinion, On top of

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the fact that by the way, the Cowboys safety who

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>was out there at the time. Cavon Frasier was a

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 1>big part of the fifty two yard touchdown you gave up.

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:35.280
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't happen if you've got a guy to calibover.

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Earl Tom Spector playing the Seattle still scores point for you. No,

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>they do. But but the thing is is that they

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 1>don't have a great offense either. So my argument there

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>is like, if you're playing downhill, you stop them from

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:48.599
<v Speaker 1>getting to midfield, you get a three and out early,

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you get a fair catch your ball, the balls at

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the forty forty five. Now you can go play downhill

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>for this offense to being as bad as it is.

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>And I get I get your point. But I'm saying,

0:06:57.400 --> 0:06:59.279
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to compete at all this year and

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe next year in the next few years, you've got

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:05.159
<v Speaker 1>to have an amazing defense and he can make he

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>can get you. You know, Baltimore won a Super Bowl

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 1>way back two thousand when you were like seven years old.

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>But I'm saying they didn't have great quarterbacks. They had

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>an unbelievable defense. Jim McMahon wasn't a great quarterback, but

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>he had a great defense, And I think that's the

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>only way you can compete. You have too. Okay, Okay,

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>picture this scenario. Earl Thomas is playing for your defense, right, Okay,

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>makes an interception for you, gets you the ball. Here.

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Now the offense, the Cowboys offen has the ball. They

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>move three plays, they're four second saying out of the field,

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't even get to the red zone, doesn't score a point.

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>What's the point of doing that? You're absolute? No, I

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>get your point, and let's not sugarcoat it. This offense

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>is laughably bad. It's atrocious. But this, and basically that's

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>my point is, at this point, three games into the season,

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting to think that this team will only go

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 1>as far as its defense can carry, right right, Which, yeah,

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't I'm not. I don't know if they're gonna

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>try to trade for Earl Thomas. I've said all along,

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't expect it to happen, and I still feel

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that way. But I feel better about making this defense

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>as good as it could possibly be, potentially winning some

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>turnover battles and giving the offense short fields more often

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>than not, because they sure as hell aren't gonna win

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a ton of games doing it the way they're doing it.

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Right now. That's the big thing is when you look

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>at a team like this that has struggles on offense,

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the turnovo battle becomes huge because it makes a difference

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>in just sometimes those turnovers actually turned into points. Sometimes

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:34.840
<v Speaker 1>those turnovers turned into field goals. Whatever the situation is,

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you need those turnovers and you can't give them up. Yesterday,

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys, I think they lost the turnovo battle three

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>to zero. Is that right? Yes? So? And with an

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>offense this bat, you're not going to win games when

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 1>you have a three zero So so let's say, for example,

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Earl Thomas was not on that team. Let's say, for example,

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Earl Thimis was on your team. I don't think there

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>was a safety on that field yesterday for either team

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>outside of Earl Thomas. That makes those two interceptions. Both

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 1>those plays were amazing plays. I don't think most of

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>those guys make so, that being said, like you change

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the whole complexion of that game by two interceptions not

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>being interceptions. That's a big defer. Cowboys don't have a

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver that can make a play, that can make

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 1>make that I'm serious. Both those catches were unbelievable play

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>hand eye coordination, I'm just saying, I've seen our defense

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>give turnovers and the Cowboys get the ball and they

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>still don't do anything with it. I'm just saying, and

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>you have a bad offense. But the problem is, like

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>they've said, the only chance you got right now unless

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>basically tooth in one of two exactly. I agree that

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the offense is gonna have to get appreciably better in season,

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>which I don't know if that happens. How does that happen? Yeah,

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>or they're gonna have to the defense is just gonna

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>have to play out of their minds. I think you

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>have a better shot of the defense playing out of

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 1>their minds then the offense getting appreciably better this season. Absolutely.

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I why costs though second round pick? Yeah, maybe you're right,

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 1>but it went up who knows. It's like if if

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>they if doing that doesn't even get you to the playoff,

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>was it worth it? Yeah? Yeah, because you're going to

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>get him for the next few years. You have to

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 1>only make this trade if you know you can resign

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>him if you're getting a long term deals on again. Yeah,

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>if someone just turned on like thirty seconds ago, they're like,

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 1>we're still just talking, like we've always talked. I don't

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 1>think it's anything closer, And if you're him, I'm less today.

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel less likely it's going to happen than I

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 1>did even Friday. Yeah, I really do no, And that's

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:25.079
<v Speaker 1>we're kind of getting lost in the weeds here. It's

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a fun thing to talk about, and you're you. You

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>make a great point, Amber, because as we sit here

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>in week three right now, it's hard to imagine this

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>team making the playoffs. Obviously there's a lot of time left,

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 1>but doing that deal for a team that might not

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:42.319
<v Speaker 1>make the playoffs could be risky, although I would argue

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>you get three more years of that. He does not

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>look like a guy that's planning on slowing down, and

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I still think that is your bet. Your best chance

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>for this team to be successful is to have a

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>top five ten defense and eke out what you can

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:59.199
<v Speaker 1>on offense, because even if this offense gets appreciably better,

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>it's clearly not jumping to the top of the league.

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean again, I mean that, and that's that is

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that is what is so disheartening to me as we

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:10.840
<v Speaker 1>sit here, is that the Cowboys run game, you know,

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Zeke had a fumble, Z Zeke maybe played

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>his worst game as a pro yesterday. Honestly, say that

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 1>this is why you lost, is that your best player

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>on the field was your worst. He was the best

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>player on the field, he had the best game of

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:28.439
<v Speaker 1>anybody on the team, and he actually had one of

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the worst games. It's hard to win like that, it is,

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>but well, you're right he did. I mean, he left

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown on the field that would have made it.

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 1>What seven to seven changed the whole complexion of the

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>first half. I have my doubts that it changes the

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 1>outcome just because it was so anemic the rest of

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the time, but you never know. And then obviously the

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>fumble in the open field when it was still possible

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>to make it a game. Having said that, they did

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:54.439
<v Speaker 1>exactly what they want to do on the ground, they

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I would have liked to see some more

0:11:56.960 --> 0:12:00.319
<v Speaker 1>design runs by Dak, but I'll even allow that when

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 1>you have a linebacker like Bobby Wagner, the Seahawks can

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of dictate that. But to see them put up

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and seventy rushing yards in a road game

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and still look that bad, Like, I don't know what

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to say, because typically in a Cowboys loss, You're like, well, yeah,

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>they took away the run, what do you want them

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to do? Like, that's kind of what we've always said.

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>They didn't yesterday and it didn't matter. But I think

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>what we saw yesterday is this team, constructed as it is,

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>has to be perfect to win. Because if you take

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>away the touchdown, if you if you look at that

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>touchdown as Ke stepped out of bounds, if he doesn't

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>step out of a bound, you get that score. If

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Randy Gregory doesn't have the dumb play where he hits

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the guy and and basically gives up three points, right,

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>you take those two things, that's ten points right there.

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>The Cowboys have to be perfect. They cannot have room

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:47.560
<v Speaker 1>for the stupid mistakes, right, They can't. They don't have

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>room for that if they're going to win. And that's

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>a hard thing to do to say, you're going to

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 1>go through a sixteen week season and you're not gonna

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:56.680
<v Speaker 1>have mistakes, like you're gonna play perfect every week. That's

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 1>where they are right now because they just offensively can't

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>get anything going. It's I mean, people don't want to

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>hear me talk about my college football team, but it

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>reminds me of watching LSU, Like there's there's talent there.

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>They can do things, but the minute it gets off

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of their schedule or what they want it to be,

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>it falls apart. Uh. You know, I think I speak

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for anybody listening to this when I say I don't

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:19.439
<v Speaker 1>want to hear about being behind the chains this week.

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I know we're going to Oh they talk about it

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 1>last I know. I know we're going to talk about

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>And I get it, like second and third and long

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:27.079
<v Speaker 1>is not where you want to be in football, but

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>good offense has overcome it all the time. It's part

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 1>of the game. Uh. And if you if third and

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>eight is a death sentence to your hopes of moving

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the ball downfield, you suck. Sorry, I'm sorry, there's nothing

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>else to say. WHOA. That's usually my quote is that,

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:45.319
<v Speaker 1>But and here we are, I mean, welcome to the

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>break the offense is. I just you know, when you

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 1>see thirty two carries for Carson for one hundred and

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:56.959
<v Speaker 1>two yards and you see sixteen carries for Zeke for

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>one twenty seven. I mean, but I'm going through the

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 1>play by plays and I'm not really finding a lot

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 1>of plays. I'm not I'm not trying to say, well,

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Cowboys. You know, I'm going to defend them.

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 1>But if you just go through the play by play,

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>you can't really find a ton of plays where you're like,

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 1>should have run there, should have run there. I mean

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>there's there's a couple of the Cowboys. Yeah, well, I

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>think the really I think the thing about it is

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>as far as I look at it, and and this

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 1>is going to go into a whole different conversation, but

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I just think that the Cowboys offense wasn't diverse enough.

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>We saw the week before and then it starts and

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>stops with this. We saw the week before how successful

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>they were and how much it helped the offense move.

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>When they use his own read, it just made a difference.

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>And to say that they didn't use it until I

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>think it was like the late third or early forth

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 1>before they get it one time. I mean it was.

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>It was a clearly a successful part of their offense

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>in week two. It just made no sense that they

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>want to go back to what else was big in

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>week two about like throwing the ball down the bild. Yeah,

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and honestly, you can even don't do it again, make

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>argument Synchy. You can even make arguments as far as

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>throwing it down the field that there was so much

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>pressure that they didn't have time to do it. I'll

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>even allow for that whatever, But the point is to me,

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the zone read. There's nothing about pressure. This is a

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>matter of fact, that would have slowed down the pressure

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>that was coming at you if you would hit them

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>with a few a few zone reads. I just think

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>that it's just it's baffling to me that offensively, it

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem like they're taking the things that are actually

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>successful and continuing to do them. It's almost like they

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>outthink themselves, like yeah, just like yeah, they're they're gonna

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>see that deep ball coming, So let's don't do that,

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>all right, We're gonna take our first break when we

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>come back. I do want to talk about this offensive

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>line because I think a lot of the problems that

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>they're having offensively is coming from the offensive line, and

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>this is supposed to be what we all thought was

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the best part of this team. We'll talk about that

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>when we come right back. This is Dallas Cowboys dot

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Com Radio. It can be hard to find the right

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>resource for learning about important financial matters. You search how

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to build savings, you end up reading about the one

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>weird ingredient from supermarkets that can make you taller. That's

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 1>why Bank of the America build Better Money Habits dot com,

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a safe little corner of the Internet for answering your

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 1>financial questions. Full of simple videos and tips, Better Money

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Habits can show you how to make the most of

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>your money without resorting to random searches that always seem

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>to lead to unbelievable photos of childhood stars grown up.

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>To learn more, visit Better Money habits dot com. I

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>definitely have an Instagram foody thing, but the low light

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>camera on my new Samsung Galaxy S nine from ATNT

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 1>is getting me a whole new world of likes and shares.

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Baskets of bread by candlelight, colorful fruit plates in full sun.

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Even a dimly lit cobb salad was recently hailed as

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>a masterpiece. Come in now and ask how to get

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>half off the new Samsung Galaxy S nine from AT

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and T. AT and T work for your thing. That's

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>our thing many time only see store for details or

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>att dot com s left Samsung du laputure supports F

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>one five mode and IF two formo duo labiatus installed

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>on the view camera Oh, I am craving a Doctor Pepper.

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I got some soda. I asked not for soda, I

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>asked for ice cold. Cravable Doctor Pepper. Its flavor is

0:16:57.320 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 1>more one of a kid than a foretold slot with

0:16:59.880 --> 0:17:04.439
<v Speaker 1>a first for speed. Stop settling for soda and start

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>demanding Doctor Pepper. I love sloughs. Will you crave a

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Pepper? Nothing else will do. Grab an ice cold

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty ounce of Doctor Pepper today. Doctor Pepper the one

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to work this big land. You need equipment with values

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:22.919
<v Speaker 1>rooted as deep in Texas soil as you are, like

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 1>John Deer compact tractors for the six year power train

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.199
<v Speaker 1>warranty in big features that help you work less so

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you have more time to do what you love. John

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Deer was first in the Texas fields, and we're proud

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to be on the field as the official agg and

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 1>turf equipment of the Dallas Cowboys. Find Texas sized deals

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>at my John Deer Dealer dot com. Slash football terms, conditions,

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>exclusions and warranty limitations apply. See Can You Love for details.

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Back to the Brink Welcome back. It is the second

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>segment of the show. We're talking about the Cowboy we're talking.

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about the Cowboys lost thirteen at Seattle. This

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>is what's what's what am I looking for? This is

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:07.399
<v Speaker 1>a representation of the team. It's okay, sorry, pretty and

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 1>get your stuff together over there? Please? It broke, man,

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:12.439
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'll just how did you break it? I

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:15.160
<v Speaker 1>was trying to tea he is always messing with I've

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:17.919
<v Speaker 1>never even touched this. Why do you always do that?

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:19.679
<v Speaker 1>What do you want for me not to do that?

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>You know what? He reminds me of. He reminds me

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of the guy that's in concert that's always like at

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>his mic and always fixing his mic as he's about

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>to seeing like Dave is all whatever, you bring your

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>own headphones down here. That's and what does it have

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:32.719
<v Speaker 1>to do with messing with the microphone? This is not

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 1>my fault? All right? Well you just stand there like

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>just gonna have it all the time, and now you

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 1>cut a compilation of how many times it's been Yeah,

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I like, what do you do that? What do you

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>think that the reason that this thing's broke? I'll have

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 1>to investigate after I didn't definitively say who sits there for? Rob? Rob?

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 1>It's fine, Yeah, just leave me alone. Let's just talk

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 1>about this game, all right. So let's get back into it.

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:06.919
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys at Seattle, and I wanted to talk about the

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:10.400
<v Speaker 1>offensive line. Do you think this offensive line is not

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:13.440
<v Speaker 1>good enough for them to have the type of offensive

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 1>strategy that they have, which is a run first type strategy.

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that you need to have an offensive

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 1>line that's playing better in order for this thing to

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:26.239
<v Speaker 1>have a chance that you have? Yes? Did I just

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 1>hear you right like they ran for one hundred and

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 1>seventy year? No? No No, But but my point is they

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>couldn't protect the quarterback. No. And if you can't protect

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback in this kind of offense, then you're even

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I think, even more at risk because even though your run,

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 1>if you ever get behind, you have no shot. I

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>am leary about going down this road because I have

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 1>not rewatched it. I don't know, but I'm bringing it

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>up because Dak himself brought it up last night. He said,

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:53.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm hesitant to criticize the offensive line even when I

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>don't have time, because when I go back and look,

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 1>some of that stuff is self pressure. Some of that

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:01.239
<v Speaker 1>stuff is on me, and self pressure. Tell me what

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>that means. Self pressure, as in the offensive line does

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>enough to give him time and he bails out and

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:10.199
<v Speaker 1>runs into pressure. I can think of one right off

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the top of my head, which we can talk about.

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Tyron Smith. He got his butt kick by Frank Clark yesterday.

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 1>But Frank Clark ripped around the outside and Dak felt

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:22.639
<v Speaker 1>it and started moving up and moved up out of

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 1>his protection, and Clark just dipped back around and sacked

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 1>him like he had time if he played that different.

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>But a lot of those those sacks are called coverage sacks,

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:33.439
<v Speaker 1>so he can say he can call it self pressure

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 1>all you want to, but it's also those receivers aren't

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>getting open. Are you sure about that? Though? Yeah, I'm

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure they're not. I mean, who's open, Who's sitting

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:42.880
<v Speaker 1>there going I'm wide open? I mean how many times?

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>And I have to go back and I have to

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>go back and watch it. I just know that in

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:49.479
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks, I've seen receivers open on several

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:51.639
<v Speaker 1>occasions and the quarterback didn't get him the ball. I

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen this is all twenty two for this game.

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Yet to be able to say that you're gonna find that,

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna find some receivers that are open at times.

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>You can find that all over the place. But you

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>know that that this offense isn't scheming these guys to

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 1>run free and all that. I mean, you saw a

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>difference between what Seattle does and how they get their guys,

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and they get guys you've never even heard of wide open,

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and the Cowboys are struggling to get anybody open. I mean,

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>it's it's ridiculous, full disclosed. Again. Like I I feel

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit uncomfortable because what we got. I got

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>in bed at two last night, I got up, I

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:24.120
<v Speaker 1>had to go to the doctor. I had to get

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 1>my dog from the vet. I haven't rewatched this game,

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:29.119
<v Speaker 1>but I bet when I do, I will see a

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 1>combination of all of the above. I think Dak, for

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason, especially two weeks on the road now, in

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:39.359
<v Speaker 1>these hostile environments against good defenses, he I think he's

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>a little gun shy. I think he's hesitant. I think

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the receivers probably don't do a great job of getting open.

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I think he misdiagnoses his pressure sometimes, and then when

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the defense builds up a lead and can tee off,

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and then I think the offensive line gets beat as well.

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it all ties together to be a disaster.

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you can scapegoat any one person, but

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 1>the receivers, the quarterback, and the offensive line between the

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:05.439
<v Speaker 1>three of them, I think they're all playing pretty poorly

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>right now. So what do you think it says about

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>this offense as Zeke ran so well, which is what

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>they want to do. They did what they want to

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>do that we wanted to do on the ground yesterday

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and they still couldn't get the offense to consistently run it.

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it goes to what one of

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:22.159
<v Speaker 1>the first things that Dave said on the show was

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that just how bad the passing game is, because it's

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:27.159
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a bend but don't break. I mean,

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna keep bending here and we're gonna give up

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:32.199
<v Speaker 1>some some runs to a really good running back, but

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 1>when it gets down to it, we're gonna eventually kind

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 1>of shut him down and we're gonna force, you know,

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:39.119
<v Speaker 1>the receivers to make plays and Dad to get him

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the ball, and over a long period of time in

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 1>this drive, you're not going to be able to do it.

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:47.120
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of what happens. They just don't have

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 1>guys that just win one on one that passed that

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:53.679
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson threw to Brandon Marshall on the sideline. I mean,

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 1>Cheeto can't cover the guy better than that. It was

0:22:56.400 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the most unbelievable throw dak Is ever made that throw.

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't make that throw and you need that every

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 1>once in a while, you need that, and he just

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't win the last time we've said that was

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 1>an amazing throw by Dak. I think that's part of

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the issue though here too, though, the way the Cowboys

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 1>have gone about the strategy of going with the kind

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of the receivers that are all here versus having an

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 1>amazing receiver, You're gonna have to have a quarterback that

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 1>can make that throw if that's going to be successful,

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>because they're more often than not, those guys are not

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:31.160
<v Speaker 1>necessarily going to be in situations where they're just running free.

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:34.160
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna be in situations where they got somebody close

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to him. But if you put the ball on a spot,

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>they can probably make a play, and Dak hasn't shown

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:41.360
<v Speaker 1>consistently he can put the ball on a spot it

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 1>goes back. I mean, there's amounting amount of evidence that says,

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:50.879
<v Speaker 1>when everything is great, Dak Prescott can be a pretty

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 1>damn good quarterback. If anything is off, he's not. And

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:57.640
<v Speaker 1>like I said, I mean that's not three games, that's

0:23:57.680 --> 0:24:02.440
<v Speaker 1>about ten games, right, And again, you know you don't

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 1>see you don't see those anticipation throws. You don't see

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 1>a throw that's like, well, what else can the cornerback do?

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Like you never see that. Um, everything has to be great.

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>The receiver has to be blatantly open or you know

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 1>something like that. Um, what he averaged four point nine

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>yards per attempt? And with the rules the way they

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:25.439
<v Speaker 1>are in the NFL, like the NFL is begging the

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>NFL is begging teams to have dynamic passing offenses. That's

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>what they want to the first two weeks of the season,

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>they had more more scoring in the NFL before. It

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 1>is it's the basis of this league right now, and

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:39.919
<v Speaker 1>all the rules are set up the way. If you

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 1>can't do better than I mean, like six, six point

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:46.119
<v Speaker 1>nine is could be better, you know, like you're aiming

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>for eight to eleven, Like eleven is like Pat mahomes territory.

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:54.919
<v Speaker 1>But either I mean four point nine, yeah, I know,

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>first round pick I mean, but he was supposed to

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>be good, and that's I mean. But again, hey, I'm

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:04.439
<v Speaker 1>saying he's got He threw for four touchdowns in the

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>first half of the game, and the Cowboys have four

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns this whole season. Yep. I mean, I'm not making

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:13.360
<v Speaker 1>excuses for the guy. I love Dak. I still do

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and too, I still despite all the evidence of the contrary,

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I still think he can be a good quarterback. Again,

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 1>he can be a good quarterback when everything's rolling the

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>right way for him. I don't know. I mean Russell Wilson.

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 1>The Seahawks ran for two point nine yards per carry,

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:33.199
<v Speaker 1>like Russell Wilson engineered most of that himself. Obviously, the

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks had a game plan to lean on the run,

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>but Russell Wilson was making plays out of thin air

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and has done that for a long time. I don't

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>know if Dak is that guy. I'm sorry, but I

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>mean again, I like Dak too, But I don't think

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:49.200
<v Speaker 1>when you say, when you say he's a quarterback, when

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>things are going well, he can be really good. But

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 1>if they're not going well, then it's really bad, Like

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that's not a good quarterback. Then if that's really the case,

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:00.640
<v Speaker 1>then that is not a good NFL quarterback. Because quarterback,

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:02.719
<v Speaker 1>your job is to make it right. Your job when

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:05.400
<v Speaker 1>it's third and eleven because this guy missed the block,

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 1>this guy had a penalty, and now you're behind the chains.

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:10.639
<v Speaker 1>It's your job to bring it back. It's not really

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the other way around. I honestly, I think we've seen

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 1>two decks. I mean, I think earlier in his career,

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I think there were some games where things weren't necessarily

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:22.479
<v Speaker 1>going well and he played well despite that. So I

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:24.639
<v Speaker 1>think it's we've seen and really you can see the

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:28.400
<v Speaker 1>dividing line after that Atlanta game. It's been a whole

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:31.239
<v Speaker 1>different player, it really has. So. But there's two RG

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:34.119
<v Speaker 1>three's I don't yeah true, there's one that there's a

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>ball cap and one hat was Rookie of the Year.

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you watch Houston, same things happening with

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:41.199
<v Speaker 1>Shaun Watson. Last year he was lighting the league on fire,

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and this year he has been anything but Hey, defensive

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>coordinator X. Your job this whole summer is to figure

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>out these teen quarterbacks that you have to face, and

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:55.160
<v Speaker 1>especially these five or six that you've never faced. Figure

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 1>them out. It happened all other guys. And it happened

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 1>again yesterday. I don't know if anybody else noticed, but

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Barkivous Mingo shouts out, Lsu sacked the hell out of

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Dack on one of those you know action waggles where

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the sleight of hand and the action in the back

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't fool anybody. And that's the third week in a row.

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>That's like, I know, take that stuff out of the

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 1>playbook because they know what they know what it is,

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:20.920
<v Speaker 1>they know what's got a lot of fans that are

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>upset about the fact that you can grab the quarterback

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>like that and throw him down like that, but you

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 1>can't do a textbook tackle and bring a guy to

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the ground. I'll tell you what's gonna happen. There's no

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:37.880
<v Speaker 1>makes it difference. Happened when when you know, a guy

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>just hits a quarterback like that and he just doesn't

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>throw it and he kind of bounces off and then

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:45.680
<v Speaker 1>he rolls over here. I mean, I really I don't

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>know anything different that Tyron Crawford could have done on

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 1>that play. I really don't. But you know, and I'll

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 1>show you the juxtaposition of that. I don't know if

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you guys saw the ending of the of the Saints game,

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Drew Brees was running around the corner trying to get

0:27:57.640 --> 0:27:59.680
<v Speaker 1>in the end zone. The guys that there were two

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 1>defends there. They both hit him. They didn't wrap him up.

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:05.640
<v Speaker 1>They hit him and he spun around and he went

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 1>into the end zone. And it's one of those things

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>where now guys can't even wrap up because if you

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>wrap up and you drive, there's a good chance you're

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna drive him back down and you're gonna fall on

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:17.359
<v Speaker 1>top of him, because that's the rule. Though, can you

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 1>do that like on the other side of the scrimmage.

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you can do that. I'm sure runner maybe

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 1>want to become a runner. All I'm saying, though, defenders

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:30.639
<v Speaker 1>are now having the second guess how they tackle because

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:33.959
<v Speaker 1>you can't even make what has been a textbook tackle. Literally,

0:28:34.320 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 1>this is text This is what they used to show

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>as this is what you do when you tackle someone.

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 1>You hit them not with your head, you hit them

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>with your shoulder. You drive backwards, you drive, and you

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 1>drive through the person into the ground. Like that's what

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 1>you do. That's a textbook tackle. I firmly believe that

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>NFL officials are calling these hits just based on optics,

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 1>like whether it looks nasty or not, or whether it

0:28:56.920 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 1>looks violent. Um to no it' I know, I wrote

0:29:01.200 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>a story about it. I was. I was impressed and

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 1>refreshed by Tyrone Crawford's honesty yesterday. He is he is

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 1>not a guy that wants to give a great sound

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 1>bite like he's he's a cautious interview, understandably so in

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>this day and age. But he did not hold back

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to all he's about that flag. He I mean, what

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't he say? He said, I don't know any other

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:22.080
<v Speaker 1>way to hit. Leon Lette told me that he would

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 1>have been flagged about two hundred times in his career

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 1>if that was a flag in his day. I'm not

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 1>going to change the way I hit. I can't afford

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:31.479
<v Speaker 1>to let these officials get in my head. You know,

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks are slippery again to your points, like if you

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>don't hit that way, they're going to get away from you, exactly.

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 1>M Bessie Russell Wilson. He's like, I'm sure the finds

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>come in my way. And I mean basically was like,

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't care, Like that's how I have to play

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>football to be successful at my job and I think,

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's like, I would prefer that money to

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 1>go to my family, but if they want to flag

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>me on some petty stuff, it is what it is.

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Changed the first half of the game. That was absolutely

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>huge point. That was it was I'm glad you said

0:29:57.560 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that because I don't really disagree, and that's I hate

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the flag. I think it's I mean, I don't really agree,

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 1>is what I mean. I hate the flag. I think

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>it's stupid. I think it's ruining the game. I can't

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>sit here and act like that's why the Cowboys lost.

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 1>It's not why they lost. But I'm just saying this

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 1>team is. Momentum is a big deal. Field position is

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 1>a big deal. They have their average starting field position

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 1>with their own twenty yard line. You get off the

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 1>field and dickon his punting in his own end zone.

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Now he could maybe boom at sixty yards, but you're

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:25.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be at like the forty or fifty rights. That's

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the type of play that you need to play downhill,

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 1>get a field goal, get a lead, get a touchdown.

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 1>That changes things. Do they win? I don't know, but

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying that's a big deal. All those things

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 1>add up The beautiful thing about football is like, you know,

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you play seventy snaps, it doesn't feel like they all

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>matter in the moment. They do. They all really do.

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 1>You know. That's something I learned when I started covering

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 1>this team is like when you're watching as a fan,

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a three hour game, it feels like forever, but

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>it's eight possessions, like it's not a lot. Having said,

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I still I can't bring myself to completely agree. I

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 1>hear everything you said. Seattle didn't score any points. It

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 1>was the first quarter. You know, you had a hole.

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>You had a hole two three and a half quarters

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to make a positive impact. After that, it sucked. It

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 1>changed the flow of the game. But I'm not can't

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 1>use that as an excuse for why they will. Just

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>remember this though, Seattle has been playing behind in the

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:21.239
<v Speaker 1>first two games, especially the second game, and you know,

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's not what their strength is. They can't run

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Carson thirty two times when they're behind. And if this

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 1>defensive line could have maybe got a lead, teed off

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 1>on him a little bit and actually split one of

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>their weaknesses, it could have been different. If you take

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the lead. That again, that doesn't change things, but there's

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 1>a big play in the game, and how much did

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 1>it affect the other guys later in the game of like, well,

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I can't do this, you can't hold them, can't hit them.

0:31:42.200 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Here goes back to the point which I mean, and

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's a coincidence that the Cowboys took

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>an early lead against the Giants last week. Either is again,

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 1>if I think we said it after a week one,

0:31:52.160 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 1>if the Cowboys are dictating the game, they can be

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. If the game is being dictated to them,

0:31:57.840 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 1>they look lost, all right. One of the thing I

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 1>want to ask you before we get Joan, I'm gonna

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 1>ask this question too. We talked about the offensive line.

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Knowing what you solved from that game, does that change anything?

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:12.480
<v Speaker 1>And now you go take you back to second round

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of the draft. Does that change anything that you do? Now?

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Can I throw out something as a part of that.

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 1>At about the same time as Connor William was giving

0:32:20.920 --> 0:32:24.120
<v Speaker 1>up a sack yesterday, Derwin James was catching an interception

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 1>in the end zone in the game that he was playing.

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Now again, they Derwin James was not there when it

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 1>was time for them to select in the second round.

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that even in the first right

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 1>they had, they would have had to move up two spots.

0:32:38.520 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 1>But I guess the point that I'm making is I

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 1>think there was there was certainly opportunity for the Cowboys

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to go and get a safety in the draft if

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 1>they felt like they wanted to get a safety. And

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that when you look at everything that happened

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 1>yesterday from the standpoint of the Cowboys safeties, from the

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 1>standpoint of the safety they were playing, from the standpoint

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:00.160
<v Speaker 1>of the guy that they ended up drafting, from the

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 1>standpoint of the guy that they could have drafted, I

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:04.719
<v Speaker 1>think there was a lot of stuff that suggested that maybe,

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 1>just maybe they should have gone up and gotten Derwin James.

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I hate that you're making me do this because it's

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 1>well documented how much I liked and wanted Derwin James

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and how stupid I thought it was that this Cowboys

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't address the safety position. But as we sit here

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 1>on Monday morning, drafting Layton vander esh looks pretty smart

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 1>because it doesn't sound like Sean he's going to be

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 1>playing for the foreseeable future. Could Joe Thomas do that? Maybe,

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 1>But you didn't know that at the time. I understand that.

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying what I'll ask you, like this, take

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Sean out of the mix. Is your bigger problem at

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:41.120
<v Speaker 1>safety or at linebacker? The linebacker corps has looked Goodith

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 1>just understood. I get it, and that's what it was.

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 1>This is the epitome of hindsight twenty twenty. I get.

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:52.680
<v Speaker 1>So I'll say I I hate this again. I wanted

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Derwin James. I think they probably made the right call

0:33:55.160 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 1>because you did not know any of that stuff at

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the time you had to make that pick. And we

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 1>have seen we have seen a small sample size. They

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 1>broke down yesterday, but through three games, safety has not

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 1>been as drastic of an issue as we thought it

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:13.800
<v Speaker 1>might be. But at that time, did you think which

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 1>did you think was a bigger problem linebacker safety heading

0:34:17.000 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 1>into the draft? Linemanbacker? Honestly, But I thought on the show,

0:34:21.040 --> 0:34:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought, when you talked about safety, you said they

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 1>have to address the safety position. Maybe it's not a draft,

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 1>they got to do it, and they didn't under standpoint

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:28.839
<v Speaker 1>of going out and even getting one of those other

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:30.759
<v Speaker 1>free agent safeties that was out there, right, But but

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you did nothing, which I'm firmly anti that they did. Not.

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they could have signed to any number of

0:34:36.360 --> 0:34:38.239
<v Speaker 1>free agents. They could have drafted somebody. There were a

0:34:38.280 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of them that were available up through the training camp.

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:42.279
<v Speaker 1>Irwin James, if you're gonna, if you're gonna say that

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:44.440
<v Speaker 1>they could have gotten him, do you just remember that

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't have Layton vander Esh and Connor Williams, because

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna you have to give up a second

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:52.319
<v Speaker 1>round pick, probably to move up three spots or well

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>at least a third probably gonna say maybe not a second.

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>If you had Derwin James, you wouldn't have Laton Vanderesh

0:34:57.000 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and Michael Gallup, which through three games, I'm sure a

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:01.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are sitting here like big whoop, Like

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Layton Vanderesh has ten tackles and Michael gall looks terrible. Which, okay,

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 1>we're three games in Layton Vanderesh. They made that pick

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:13.320
<v Speaker 1>because they can't trust Sean Lee to play sixteen games.

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:15.800
<v Speaker 1>And Sean Lee is thirty two. He's way closer to

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the end of his career than the beginning. It looks

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:21.240
<v Speaker 1>like a pretty smart pick right now. The news coming

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:23.959
<v Speaker 1>out right now, I mean, it seems very unlikely Sean

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:26.759
<v Speaker 1>is going to play against Detroit. I would guess he's

0:35:26.760 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna be out multiple report Well, Sean Sean said

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:34.959
<v Speaker 1>last night that you know, we'll see he didn't sounds

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 1>not sound optimistic. Rappaport came out this morning. Sources say

0:35:39.520 --> 0:35:42.800
<v Speaker 1>he'll likely be sidelined for multiple weeks. And Jason Garrell

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 1>talked this afternoon. But it doesn't sound like you know,

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 1>last week it was I'll be ready for some last

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 1>it was a cramp, yeah, and now it's a full

0:35:51.040 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 1>blown hamstring. So I have a hard time killing him

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:56.960
<v Speaker 1>for drafting Layton Vanderesh right now, and especially I thought

0:35:57.000 --> 0:36:00.360
<v Speaker 1>he played pretty well yesterday. Answer the question, do I

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 1>wish I had Derwin James? No, of course I wish James,

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 1>but not at that. This is different, And honestly I'm

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:09.000
<v Speaker 1>not I'm not making the claim one way or the other.

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Here's that playoffs telling you about. I'm not making the

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:13.560
<v Speaker 1>claim one way or the other. The point is that

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it does beg the question did the Cowboys

0:36:17.000 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 1>not do enough at the safety position, regardless of whether

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:24.280
<v Speaker 1>that was Derwin James, most way beyond the safety position.

0:36:24.800 --> 0:36:27.400
<v Speaker 1>And it's like I've been talking about safety positions since

0:36:27.719 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I can remember Dave and I have been going at it.

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 1>But this is past the safety position. This is all

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 1>about the offense. And I don't care why you guys

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:38.319
<v Speaker 1>say about making this defense great and yes they can

0:36:38.400 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 1>really help the Cowboys. I do believe that. Yes, right

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:45.080
<v Speaker 1>now you're relying on your defense, but at this point,

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:48.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at what you have, the safety position is the

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 1>least of my worries At this moment, I don't I

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:53.720
<v Speaker 1>don't put it in that category because I think yesterday

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and what we've seen in the first two weeks of

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:57.839
<v Speaker 1>the season, this defense was actually pretty good to hold

0:36:57.880 --> 0:37:00.919
<v Speaker 1>those teams to too much to like, you know, sixteen points.

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 1>You gotta you can't. You gotta separate the like just

0:37:03.640 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 1>because the offense is bad doesn't mean you just can't

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:08.960
<v Speaker 1>even focus on the defense. I mean, those are these

0:37:09.000 --> 0:37:12.360
<v Speaker 1>are two different conversations. Yes, absolutely, But I'm just saying,

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 1>if you're wanting to get somewhere and again, separate the two.

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:20.719
<v Speaker 1>You need the other to help you win games. As

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:24.160
<v Speaker 1>as of right now, the defense is pulling a ton

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:26.520
<v Speaker 1>of weight and the offense is doing very little things.

0:37:26.520 --> 0:37:29.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying, again, if if the Cowboys offense keeps

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 1>going in and out of the field, being there for

0:37:32.040 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 1>like a minute. It's like you're putting more work on

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:38.680
<v Speaker 1>your defense, You're wearing them off, and it's like, how

0:37:38.719 --> 0:37:41.160
<v Speaker 1>long are you gonna be able to keep this going?

0:37:41.280 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 1>How long can you keep relying on your defense? At

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 1>some point you have to help them and give them something.

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:49.839
<v Speaker 1>And even if you, like I said, even if they

0:37:49.920 --> 0:37:53.360
<v Speaker 1>get a takeaway and get an interception, give the Cowboys

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the ball back, what does that matter? Why does it? How?

0:37:56.960 --> 0:37:59.240
<v Speaker 1>How does that matter? If you're not able to score

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:01.920
<v Speaker 1>at you're being I mean, I think you're saying that

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 1>this team, this offense is like absolutely like ineffective when

0:38:06.000 --> 0:38:08.440
<v Speaker 1>they I mean, if they got the ball at midfield,

0:38:08.560 --> 0:38:11.600
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna score points, are they? Yeah, they're gonna score

0:38:11.600 --> 0:38:13.839
<v Speaker 1>They got the ball on the Giants half last week

0:38:13.880 --> 0:38:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and kicked a field goal with it? Is that not point? Okay?

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:21.799
<v Speaker 1>If you're gonna win games not even scoring field goals? Cool? Yeah,

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:25.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean Tennessee did because their defense was outstanding. Good

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 1>point every time, not every time. But they're gonna score touchdowns.

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 1>But they have they have a dynamic running back. They

0:38:32.120 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 1>can they can score. They just keep giving them the

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:37.239
<v Speaker 1>ball in midfield and see what happens. I mean, it's

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:40.359
<v Speaker 1>not gonna have any dynamic running back. Didn't help this,

0:38:40.680 --> 0:38:42.600
<v Speaker 1>but no, but no, Amber, I think I think the

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:44.400
<v Speaker 1>point of I think the point of it is. I

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:45.840
<v Speaker 1>think the point of it is, if you're gonna have

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a dynamic running game, if you're gonna be successful, and

0:38:48.520 --> 0:38:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't have if you've got a very very mediocre

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 1>quarterback play. Right if you got mediocre quarterback play, but

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you got a good running game, the only way, genus,

0:38:57.920 --> 0:39:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the only way, the only way you're gonna be successful,

0:39:00.520 --> 0:39:02.319
<v Speaker 1>in my opinions, if you have a great defense. And

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:05.319
<v Speaker 1>that's my point. The chances of this team being successful

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:08.480
<v Speaker 1>are better right now with them having a great defense.

0:39:08.520 --> 0:39:10.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's about the safety position. I think that is

0:39:10.480 --> 0:39:13.239
<v Speaker 1>the weakest link of this defense right now. You could

0:39:13.280 --> 0:39:15.440
<v Speaker 1>solve You could have solved that problem. I think I

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:17.440
<v Speaker 1>think you could have had a better safety position and

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:19.280
<v Speaker 1>this defense would have had a chance to be great

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:21.680
<v Speaker 1>enough to where you do give yourself a chance even

0:39:21.719 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 1>with an offense that's just ineffective. What would that very

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:28.680
<v Speaker 1>mixed feelings and again, you're just you're I'm just I'm

0:39:28.680 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 1>just really upset. No, that's I love it when you

0:39:31.200 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 1>bring like you're pissed off listening, And that's okay, because

0:39:34.120 --> 0:39:38.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people listening right combine like twelve hours,

0:39:38.880 --> 0:39:42.480
<v Speaker 1>we all agree, we all agree about the safety Yeah, no,

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you're probably right. Yeah, I don't know. We all agree

0:39:45.000 --> 0:39:48.080
<v Speaker 1>about the safety position. And I'm not arguing that well

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I am right now just because I'm so upset. It's like, again,

0:39:52.760 --> 0:39:54.839
<v Speaker 1>you look at the Cowboys offense and you see the

0:39:54.880 --> 0:39:57.600
<v Speaker 1>talent that you have. I truly believe that they are

0:39:57.760 --> 0:40:01.239
<v Speaker 1>capable of moving the ball, scoring points and getting this

0:40:01.320 --> 0:40:06.200
<v Speaker 1>team going. But when you see Seek putting up those

0:40:06.320 --> 0:40:09.120
<v Speaker 1>runs and looking at the numbers that they got and

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:12.600
<v Speaker 1>they're still coming out the game with the loss like that,

0:40:12.800 --> 0:40:15.799
<v Speaker 1>it's it's upsetting. And that's just where I'm going at

0:40:15.840 --> 0:40:18.080
<v Speaker 1>It's like when you see this offense not really producing

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:20.839
<v Speaker 1>what you expect them to or at least getting going,

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:24.880
<v Speaker 1>especially after what you saw worked last weekend. And remember

0:40:24.880 --> 0:40:27.440
<v Speaker 1>when I said, okay, maybe they'll go back look at

0:40:27.480 --> 0:40:30.719
<v Speaker 1>the film and clearly see what worked and what did it.

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that was a clear visual of the things

0:40:33.680 --> 0:40:37.239
<v Speaker 1>that you can do and make it work right and

0:40:37.360 --> 0:40:40.920
<v Speaker 1>what you. You know how to mess up the game anyways.

0:40:41.200 --> 0:40:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Just when you see those those calls and those things

0:40:43.760 --> 0:40:46.520
<v Speaker 1>happening on the field, it's just upsetting you. Like that

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:49.200
<v Speaker 1>um that Drake song that's out right now. I don't

0:40:49.239 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 1>listen to Drake. I'm upset you. Just all right, we're

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:57.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna take our final break pit. When we come back,

0:40:57.560 --> 0:40:59.120
<v Speaker 1>we get a phone call to one here from you

0:40:59.120 --> 0:41:02.439
<v Speaker 1>guys numbers eighty eight five five two two nine seven.

0:41:02.480 --> 0:41:04.919
<v Speaker 1>Again it's eight eight eight eight five five two two

0:41:05.000 --> 0:41:07.040
<v Speaker 1>nine seven. Let's hear from you guys well that when

0:41:07.040 --> 0:41:08.719
<v Speaker 1>we come right back. This is Dallas Cowboys dot com.

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Radio Cowboys fans know that the second best of anything

0:41:12.040 --> 0:41:14.880
<v Speaker 1>simply won't cut it, and your skincare should be no different.

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 1>A long time locker room favorite of the players and

0:41:17.160 --> 0:41:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the official men's skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys. Dallas

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:24.080
<v Speaker 1>based Jack Bell is the number one brand in the

0:41:24.160 --> 0:41:27.279
<v Speaker 1>country because Radio cowdus that help guys look, smell and

0:41:27.440 --> 0:41:30.600
<v Speaker 1>feel better. Visit get Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys

0:41:30.640 --> 0:41:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to get ten dollars off your first order of fifty

0:41:32.680 --> 0:41:36.280
<v Speaker 1>dollars or more. Jack Black Look good, Smell good, Feel

0:41:36.320 --> 0:41:39.600
<v Speaker 1>good official men's skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys. Star

0:41:39.680 --> 0:41:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Sports Tours is the only official fan travel partner of

0:41:42.760 --> 0:41:46.719
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys, offering exclusive game weekend travel packages with

0:41:46.880 --> 0:41:51.000
<v Speaker 1>sideline access and photo ops with current players, alumni and cheerleaders.

0:41:51.160 --> 0:41:53.319
<v Speaker 1>That's not all, though, You'll get to talk xs and

0:41:53.320 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 1>os with Senior Director of Player Personnel Will McClay and

0:41:56.280 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of course with yours truly me, Brian broad Us. You

0:41:59.239 --> 0:42:02.120
<v Speaker 1>can trust the Hull fan travel partner of the Dallas Cowboys,

0:42:02.120 --> 0:42:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and with us you'll travel like a pro. Is at

0:42:04.560 --> 0:42:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys Travel dot Com to book your travel package today.

0:42:08.320 --> 0:42:10.279
<v Speaker 1>Before there was a draft, you could size up a

0:42:10.320 --> 0:42:13.560
<v Speaker 1>cowboy by three simple factors. The crease at his hat,

0:42:13.560 --> 0:42:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the bend of his brim, and his unbending attitude a man.

0:42:16.760 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Stetson didn't just protect him from what life through at him.

0:42:19.760 --> 0:42:24.520
<v Speaker 1>It projected a rugged, unstoppable spirit. Stetson hats are still American,

0:42:24.560 --> 0:42:27.480
<v Speaker 1>made with pride. Right here in Texas. There's still the

0:42:27.560 --> 0:42:31.400
<v Speaker 1>unofficial crowd of all self respecting Cowboys, and Stetson is

0:42:31.440 --> 0:42:34.239
<v Speaker 1>proud to be on the field with America's team. Find

0:42:34.239 --> 0:42:37.640
<v Speaker 1>a retailer nearest you at Stetson dot com slash Cowboys.

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:40.399
<v Speaker 1>What does it mean to be a Dallas Cowboys fan?

0:42:40.800 --> 0:42:43.000
<v Speaker 1>It means you've got the passion and the heart to

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:46.160
<v Speaker 1>do your part supporting the Boys no matter what. That's

0:42:46.200 --> 0:42:48.960
<v Speaker 1>why when the game's on the line, you're on your feet,

0:42:49.040 --> 0:42:51.759
<v Speaker 1>whether you're at home or in the stands. Actually, you're

0:42:51.840 --> 0:42:54.839
<v Speaker 1>more than a fan. You are a member of Cowboys Nation,

0:42:55.040 --> 0:42:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and so is AT and T doing their part to

0:42:57.960 --> 0:43:02.120
<v Speaker 1>keep you connected to America's team all season law AT

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:06.399
<v Speaker 1>and T is a proud member of Cowboys Nation. Back

0:43:06.840 --> 0:43:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to the break, Tommy John started off, but okay, Derek's

0:43:13.560 --> 0:43:17.360
<v Speaker 1>inconsistent with sometimes sometimes okay, that's radio. You want to

0:43:17.360 --> 0:43:18.600
<v Speaker 1>mix it up. You don't want to do the same

0:43:19.880 --> 0:43:23.879
<v Speaker 1>one consistent. Sometimes they score, sometimes they don't. Anyway, Tommy John.

0:43:24.120 --> 0:43:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Really it's like this offense. Yeah, it's pretty inconsistent. But

0:43:26.960 --> 0:43:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Tommy John is not consistent. Because every time you go

0:43:29.239 --> 0:43:31.480
<v Speaker 1>to Tommy John dot com, you're gonna be able to

0:43:31.520 --> 0:43:34.040
<v Speaker 1>get twenty percent off your first order. You can also

0:43:34.080 --> 0:43:37.560
<v Speaker 1>get Tommy John underwear feels great, also says Cowboys down

0:43:37.560 --> 0:43:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the side. You can get that. I don't know if

0:43:39.640 --> 0:43:42.440
<v Speaker 1>you should wear it on game day, doesn't necessarily work,

0:43:42.520 --> 0:43:44.560
<v Speaker 1>but do it on a different day, you know, maybe

0:43:44.960 --> 0:43:48.000
<v Speaker 1>uh leading up to the game. Um, maybe Saturdays. Maybe

0:43:48.040 --> 0:43:50.799
<v Speaker 1>Saturday a good day. But anyways, get Timmy John dot

0:43:50.800 --> 0:43:53.440
<v Speaker 1>com Forward slash Cowboys twenty percent off the order. It's

0:43:53.480 --> 0:43:56.200
<v Speaker 1>best underwear you'll ever have. And it's got to know.

0:43:56.239 --> 0:43:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Weggie Guarantee rides up. They say, give them back? What

0:43:59.760 --> 0:44:02.000
<v Speaker 1>happens with that? This one was Weggie? What did he

0:44:02.040 --> 0:44:07.799
<v Speaker 1>take it back? Yeah? They just got a pile. No,

0:44:07.960 --> 0:44:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to smell him. Come on, man, I'm

0:44:10.000 --> 0:44:17.920
<v Speaker 1>just saying, I mean, come on, I'm so sad that

0:44:17.960 --> 0:44:21.839
<v Speaker 1>my microphone won't stay. You're still over there wrestling, Yeah,

0:44:21.920 --> 0:44:25.360
<v Speaker 1>but didn't magically fix itself, just like the Cowboys exactly.

0:44:25.440 --> 0:44:27.680
<v Speaker 1>It's like week two, the Cowboys are going into Seattle.

0:44:27.719 --> 0:44:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Everything's gonna be great. What I am? Oh? Man? All right,

0:44:34.080 --> 0:44:36.560
<v Speaker 1>let's get some phone calls. Um, I want to kind

0:44:36.560 --> 0:44:38.600
<v Speaker 1>of hear from a fan on this. Joe and Merrill

0:44:38.640 --> 0:44:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and Joe, what up, Joe? How's it going? Guys? I

0:44:42.440 --> 0:44:44.279
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to say that I was one of the

0:44:44.600 --> 0:44:46.640
<v Speaker 1>many fans trying to kick Tony Romo out of the

0:44:46.640 --> 0:44:50.880
<v Speaker 1>door and uh, Dak Prescott although he has not been

0:44:50.920 --> 0:44:53.160
<v Speaker 1>playing well, I don't think he should take most of

0:44:53.200 --> 0:44:55.799
<v Speaker 1>the blame. I mean he can't play offensive line or

0:44:55.920 --> 0:44:58.320
<v Speaker 1>can he account for not having a Chason Witten or

0:44:58.400 --> 0:45:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Dez Bryant on the outside. That because the coordinators have

0:45:01.680 --> 0:45:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to account for because right now you have one player

0:45:04.600 --> 0:45:08.080
<v Speaker 1>that scares any kind of defensive coordinator, which is Ezekiel Elliott.

0:45:08.360 --> 0:45:11.680
<v Speaker 1>So until this team can get someone else on offense

0:45:11.760 --> 0:45:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that poses any kind of threat to any opposing teams,

0:45:16.239 --> 0:45:18.840
<v Speaker 1>we're going to run into the same problem week after weeks.

0:45:19.320 --> 0:45:21.359
<v Speaker 1>And that's all I have to say to you guys.

0:45:21.400 --> 0:45:24.160
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think there's anything we could possibly do

0:45:24.280 --> 0:45:29.520
<v Speaker 1>midseason to bring someone in, um besides des Bryant. But um,

0:45:29.560 --> 0:45:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I just like to hear your thoughts on that and

0:45:31.239 --> 0:45:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Amber it goes down in the DM. Can I ask

0:45:33.239 --> 0:45:36.239
<v Speaker 1>you a question? Can I ask you a question? Was

0:45:36.280 --> 0:45:38.640
<v Speaker 1>he shooting a shot at you? He was trying? UM,

0:45:38.800 --> 0:45:40.759
<v Speaker 1>let me ask you this question. So you said the

0:45:40.760 --> 0:45:42.480
<v Speaker 1>only thing they can do is bring in Dez Bryant.

0:45:42.760 --> 0:45:44.799
<v Speaker 1>Was the same thing happening last year when des Brian

0:45:44.880 --> 0:45:48.719
<v Speaker 1>was here. I think he's gone already, man, But don't

0:45:48.760 --> 0:45:50.600
<v Speaker 1>do that. No, I really want to ask the question

0:45:50.600 --> 0:45:54.719
<v Speaker 1>because I think I've heard this from fans before. No, no, no,

0:45:55.000 --> 0:45:57.200
<v Speaker 1>because I want to hear from fans when they say,

0:45:57.280 --> 0:45:59.240
<v Speaker 1>and I've heard them say it on Twitter multiple times,

0:45:59.480 --> 0:46:01.959
<v Speaker 1>des is the answer to this problem. But I don't

0:46:02.000 --> 0:46:04.360
<v Speaker 1>see that because Dez was a part of this problem

0:46:04.440 --> 0:46:07.600
<v Speaker 1>last year. I don't think having Dez here solves your problem.

0:46:07.760 --> 0:46:09.640
<v Speaker 1>And I want to hear from someone who believes that.

0:46:09.880 --> 0:46:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Why they think that all of a sudden Deaz was

0:46:11.640 --> 0:46:14.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna be better when last year dead was here and

0:46:14.200 --> 0:46:18.120
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't the answer to the problem. I mean, I

0:46:18.400 --> 0:46:20.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I don't feel like the fact that he

0:46:20.200 --> 0:46:22.160
<v Speaker 1>said that, you know Witton and he didn't have Witten

0:46:22.239 --> 0:46:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and Dez. I mean Dak is one of the reasons

0:46:25.200 --> 0:46:28.200
<v Speaker 1>for that. I mean, the Cowboys made the decision that

0:46:28.239 --> 0:46:30.359
<v Speaker 1>they didn't think this could work together, so they went

0:46:30.400 --> 0:46:34.120
<v Speaker 1>with Dak, and that that they cut de Witt. That's

0:46:34.120 --> 0:46:37.680
<v Speaker 1>another lemonade question right there. But I gues you think

0:46:38.239 --> 0:46:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Jason Witten walks away to Monday night football if he's

0:46:41.080 --> 0:46:43.160
<v Speaker 1>got a quarterback that can that can throw him the ball.

0:46:43.200 --> 0:46:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't, honestly not if he did, I don't in

0:46:45.960 --> 0:46:49.120
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, he didn't have confidence in in this offense,

0:46:49.320 --> 0:46:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the calling, the quarterback, and he's like, you know what,

0:46:52.520 --> 0:46:54.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to Monday night. I agree with that. I

0:46:54.640 --> 0:46:57.520
<v Speaker 1>think that said all he had to said. The weapons

0:46:58.120 --> 0:47:00.919
<v Speaker 1>is part of this is, you know, because they said

0:47:00.960 --> 0:47:02.759
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna go here with Dak and we're gonna make

0:47:02.760 --> 0:47:04.840
<v Speaker 1>this friendly offense and we're gonna do this, but it's not.

0:47:05.040 --> 0:47:08.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not friendly because as you asked Amber, as you

0:47:08.080 --> 0:47:10.759
<v Speaker 1>asked Dak in the very first press conference of the

0:47:10.760 --> 0:47:14.040
<v Speaker 1>season of being after Carolina, you said, do you have

0:47:14.080 --> 0:47:16.200
<v Speaker 1>too many receivers running around? And he was like, no, no,

0:47:16.280 --> 0:47:19.279
<v Speaker 1>of course not, but they do. They do. They have

0:47:19.320 --> 0:47:22.920
<v Speaker 1>too many guys trying to figure this out, and nobody

0:47:22.960 --> 0:47:26.359
<v Speaker 1>gets in a flow. Nobody can do anything special. I mean,

0:47:27.680 --> 0:47:30.359
<v Speaker 1>you start off a game with three tight ends, are

0:47:30.400 --> 0:47:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you serious? And one of them barely even knows the position.

0:47:34.239 --> 0:47:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean that just that just tells you right there

0:47:36.640 --> 0:47:39.680
<v Speaker 1>that like and the other guy, I mean, you know,

0:47:39.760 --> 0:47:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll go back to him, I'll go back to Jarwin.

0:47:42.239 --> 0:47:45.439
<v Speaker 1>How big is Randy Gregory's penalty? Three points? No big deal?

0:47:45.600 --> 0:47:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Imagine it. Let's just say it plays out this way.

0:47:47.760 --> 0:47:50.440
<v Speaker 1>And imagine you're down eight driving with five minutes to go.

0:47:50.760 --> 0:47:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you have to force the ball to to Blake Jarwin,

0:47:52.880 --> 0:47:55.200
<v Speaker 1>who's made zero plays in the NFL. Do you have

0:47:55.280 --> 0:47:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to force it in there to him? You don't, you

0:47:57.160 --> 0:48:00.399
<v Speaker 1>can you played a little differently. It's just comes down

0:48:00.440 --> 0:48:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to it. They just don't have any guys that can

0:48:01.960 --> 0:48:06.800
<v Speaker 1>make any plays. Yeah, no, I mean I again, I'm

0:48:06.840 --> 0:48:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'm pretty high up in the Dak

0:48:08.640 --> 0:48:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Prescott fan club, But I don't know how you can

0:48:11.640 --> 0:48:15.000
<v Speaker 1>absolve him of this. There's plenty of stuff that he's

0:48:15.040 --> 0:48:18.120
<v Speaker 1>doing wrong. But that's the beautiful thing about what's happening

0:48:18.160 --> 0:48:21.320
<v Speaker 1>right now is that this bed has been perfectly made

0:48:21.360 --> 0:48:24.640
<v Speaker 1>by everybody in the organization. The front office didn't think

0:48:24.680 --> 0:48:27.680
<v Speaker 1>they needed to spend a premium on playmakers at safety,

0:48:27.920 --> 0:48:33.040
<v Speaker 1>at receiver, at tight end. What else have I mean,

0:48:33.440 --> 0:48:36.480
<v Speaker 1>they went in this direction. This was the mode, and

0:48:36.520 --> 0:48:39.839
<v Speaker 1>it has not worked out through three games really at all.

0:48:40.880 --> 0:48:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Some of the plenty of that's on the quarterback, plenty

0:48:42.760 --> 0:48:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of it's on the offensive line, a lot plenty of

0:48:45.840 --> 0:48:47.279
<v Speaker 1>it is definitely on the fact that they don't have

0:48:47.320 --> 0:48:49.680
<v Speaker 1>a reliable playmaker in the passing game. I mean, you

0:48:49.760 --> 0:48:53.840
<v Speaker 1>tell me, I think I thought this yesterday. Like good

0:48:53.880 --> 0:48:57.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff has generally happened when they've thrown it to Alan Hearns.

0:48:57.719 --> 0:48:59.680
<v Speaker 1>But when I say good stuff, I mean like a

0:48:59.680 --> 0:49:02.440
<v Speaker 1>fifth teen yard game. You know it's not it's not

0:49:02.520 --> 0:49:05.120
<v Speaker 1>anything that is gonna make Sports Center. Well, right now,

0:49:05.200 --> 0:49:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the best playmaker on offense outside of is Equel Elliott

0:49:08.280 --> 0:49:12.239
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of Oh you know, I was gonna

0:49:13.000 --> 0:49:16.480
<v Speaker 1>right there, and quite frankly, Tavan Austin, they're not. I

0:49:16.560 --> 0:49:19.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're they're integrating him enough into the offense

0:49:19.080 --> 0:49:22.840
<v Speaker 1>to say he's the second best, second most productive offensive player.

0:49:22.920 --> 0:49:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I think he needs to be. He needs to have

0:49:24.600 --> 0:49:27.239
<v Speaker 1>a way more opportunities with the ball in his hands

0:49:27.239 --> 0:49:29.600
<v Speaker 1>than he does. I want to say, his carry against

0:49:29.600 --> 0:49:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the Giants was for fifteen and he had an eighteen

0:49:32.040 --> 0:49:35.200
<v Speaker 1>yard So he's averaging fifteen yards a carrier right now? Yeah,

0:49:35.200 --> 0:49:37.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't. Yeah, they don't. They don't use him enough,

0:49:38.520 --> 0:49:41.160
<v Speaker 1>which I'm not being facetious when I say this. Are

0:49:41.160 --> 0:49:43.359
<v Speaker 1>they afraid that they're gonna break him? Like? Are they

0:49:43.400 --> 0:49:45.960
<v Speaker 1>afraid that he can't stand up against an NFL defense?

0:49:46.000 --> 0:49:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Because that's the only explanation I can come and touch

0:49:48.120 --> 0:49:52.839
<v Speaker 1>the ball eight times yesterday for forty yards, I mean,

0:49:52.960 --> 0:49:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and and a lot of those is some punt returns

0:49:55.000 --> 0:49:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and some wide open spaces and all that. So I

0:49:57.520 --> 0:49:59.960
<v Speaker 1>mean how many of those were returns though, I mean

0:50:00.120 --> 0:50:02.839
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't count those in the same way before offense. Yeah,

0:50:02.920 --> 0:50:05.719
<v Speaker 1>if your offense is having problems, that's where you need

0:50:05.760 --> 0:50:07.799
<v Speaker 1>to be using anymore. But but also, I mean this

0:50:07.880 --> 0:50:12.640
<v Speaker 1>helps my unlimited maths skills. Four for twenty so that's

0:50:12.680 --> 0:50:15.480
<v Speaker 1>also five. So I mean an offense, he got the

0:50:15.480 --> 0:50:18.200
<v Speaker 1>ball four times twenty yards. Now one of that was

0:50:18.200 --> 0:50:20.560
<v Speaker 1>was a run, you know, or a three yard pass.

0:50:20.840 --> 0:50:23.560
<v Speaker 1>What would tax rating be like without that bad rule?

0:50:23.719 --> 0:50:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Like if if that little pop pass counts as a

0:50:26.440 --> 0:50:29.560
<v Speaker 1>touchdown pass, you take that away? Was it looked like? Then? Again,

0:50:30.040 --> 0:50:34.240
<v Speaker 1>both those interceptions aren't on him either. All I'm saying

0:50:34.360 --> 0:50:37.359
<v Speaker 1>is when he went down Phil, we've seen good things happen. Yeah,

0:50:37.360 --> 0:50:39.680
<v Speaker 1>when he's taking the ball on the reserve on the reverse,

0:50:39.760 --> 0:50:42.200
<v Speaker 1>we've seen good things happen. When he had the little

0:50:42.480 --> 0:50:44.799
<v Speaker 1>the little pass there yesterday for the touchdown, we saw

0:50:44.800 --> 0:50:48.040
<v Speaker 1>good things happen. He is he is giving them good

0:50:48.080 --> 0:50:50.880
<v Speaker 1>production when he has the ball in his hands on offense,

0:50:51.280 --> 0:50:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and to say he went through a game and only

0:50:53.040 --> 0:50:56.400
<v Speaker 1>had it four times in an offense that that wasn't

0:50:56.400 --> 0:50:59.680
<v Speaker 1>functioning and wasn't consistently being able to move the ball,

0:50:59.800 --> 0:51:02.800
<v Speaker 1>that to me just seems like a miss. Given given

0:51:02.920 --> 0:51:05.759
<v Speaker 1>the lack of success everywhere else, it certainly would be

0:51:05.840 --> 0:51:07.799
<v Speaker 1>nice to see him get more of an opportunity. But

0:51:08.080 --> 0:51:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think it actually helps Zeke even more when

0:51:11.800 --> 0:51:14.000
<v Speaker 1>teams have to factor in that there's this other guy

0:51:14.040 --> 0:51:18.719
<v Speaker 1>whipping around May yeah, I mean it just to me, Yeah, okay,

0:51:19.280 --> 0:51:20.799
<v Speaker 1>make sure you gotta go out there to stop him

0:51:20.840 --> 0:51:22.760
<v Speaker 1>just in case he gets the ball. That only helps

0:51:22.840 --> 0:51:24.960
<v Speaker 1>like that, there's nothing wrong with that. If they say

0:51:24.960 --> 0:51:27.759
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna stop Tavan, awesome, Great. That means that's one

0:51:27.880 --> 0:51:30.320
<v Speaker 1>less guy is dedicated to trying to stop Ezekiel Elliott.

0:51:30.400 --> 0:51:33.000
<v Speaker 1>So I just I don't see the downside of having

0:51:33.040 --> 0:51:35.319
<v Speaker 1>him way more involved in the offense. But for whatever reason,

0:51:35.440 --> 0:51:37.360
<v Speaker 1>it's the same thing in the zone read for whatever reason,

0:51:37.600 --> 0:51:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and they may they must have some I don't pretend

0:51:40.239 --> 0:51:42.279
<v Speaker 1>to be smarter than these guys. They do it every

0:51:42.320 --> 0:51:44.640
<v Speaker 1>day all day. They must have some reason. Buff for

0:51:44.680 --> 0:51:47.160
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason, they're deciding that those two things are things

0:51:47.160 --> 0:51:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that they just don't want to do. Yeah, yeah, all right,

0:51:50.719 --> 0:51:53.360
<v Speaker 1>real quick, before we end the show, let's talk about

0:51:53.360 --> 0:51:57.160
<v Speaker 1>this defense, because overall the defense has played really well

0:51:57.200 --> 0:51:59.640
<v Speaker 1>for the first two weeks. Yesterday they had a lot

0:51:59.680 --> 0:52:02.759
<v Speaker 1>more moments when it wasn't what we've seen so far

0:52:02.840 --> 0:52:05.080
<v Speaker 1>this year. Are you at all concerned or are you

0:52:05.160 --> 0:52:07.840
<v Speaker 1>backing off how good you think this defense can be?

0:52:08.400 --> 0:52:10.640
<v Speaker 1>H Do you think it was just a bad day.

0:52:10.840 --> 0:52:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know if it was a bad day. Seriously,

0:52:13.400 --> 0:52:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think it. I think they played all right,

0:52:15.520 --> 0:52:18.400
<v Speaker 1>but we're asking them to play phenomenal and this is

0:52:18.760 --> 0:52:20.680
<v Speaker 1>this defense is to me just not built to be

0:52:20.760 --> 0:52:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a phenomenal defense. It's been to be pretty good. You're

0:52:23.600 --> 0:52:25.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna get beat by a Pro Bowl quarterback at times.

0:52:25.600 --> 0:52:28.319
<v Speaker 1>He beat them with some with some throws. Um. I

0:52:28.360 --> 0:52:31.160
<v Speaker 1>think they played well enough to win a game. Two

0:52:31.280 --> 0:52:33.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred and ninety five yards of offense, two point nine

0:52:33.600 --> 0:52:37.680
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry, uh, twenty four points. They were negative

0:52:37.840 --> 0:52:41.080
<v Speaker 1>which they're negative three in turnovers, which can't have that

0:52:41.120 --> 0:52:43.920
<v Speaker 1>from the offense. It's also, if there's one valid criticism,

0:52:43.960 --> 0:52:46.120
<v Speaker 1>they're not getting the ball enough they have no picks

0:52:46.120 --> 0:52:48.440
<v Speaker 1>through three weeks. Yeah, and they talked about that in

0:52:48.480 --> 0:52:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the in the locker room after the game. Third down,

0:52:50.320 --> 0:52:53.800
<v Speaker 1>that's not gonna cut forty four percent, you know, seven

0:52:53.800 --> 0:52:55.919
<v Speaker 1>out of sixteen. They could have got off the field

0:52:55.920 --> 0:52:59.759
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better there, but I can't, and I

0:52:59.760 --> 0:53:02.160
<v Speaker 1>mean what And they had a busted coverage for a

0:53:02.160 --> 0:53:05.560
<v Speaker 1>fifty two yard touchdown, which is uncharacteristic of a Rod

0:53:05.600 --> 0:53:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Marinellie Deep. They really don't give up chunk touchdowns. And

0:53:08.480 --> 0:53:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that's how you know that they're having problems is when

0:53:10.520 --> 0:53:14.000
<v Speaker 1>they do. And I don't think it's a coincidence that

0:53:14.080 --> 0:53:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Heath was getting his ankle x rayed when it happened.

0:53:16.800 --> 0:53:19.319
<v Speaker 1>And if you saw the play, the corner released a guy,

0:53:19.560 --> 0:53:22.200
<v Speaker 1>you could tell corner was playing up safety was suppose

0:53:22.239 --> 0:53:25.600
<v Speaker 1>a deep and Cavon just wasn't there. A classic It

0:53:25.680 --> 0:53:28.400
<v Speaker 1>is a classic case. And I'm I'm not making excuses.

0:53:28.400 --> 0:53:30.719
<v Speaker 1>I got in a lot of hot water for quote

0:53:30.800 --> 0:53:33.600
<v Speaker 1>unquote making an excuse for Randy Gregory yesterday, which I

0:53:33.640 --> 0:53:36.040
<v Speaker 1>was not trying to do. But what did you say?

0:53:36.160 --> 0:53:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I said, this is the third youngest roster in the NFL,

0:53:38.960 --> 0:53:41.359
<v Speaker 1>and Randy Gregory's playing his fourth game in the last

0:53:41.360 --> 0:53:44.279
<v Speaker 1>two years. Dumb stuff like that happens in those types

0:53:44.280 --> 0:53:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of situations and people just did not which but in

0:53:48.760 --> 0:53:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the same bit's true. But it's also just like you

0:53:50.840 --> 0:53:52.919
<v Speaker 1>gotta be smart than that. In the same vein well,

0:53:52.960 --> 0:53:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you gotta be better at safety than that. But when

0:53:55.160 --> 0:53:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Xavier Woods and Cavan Frasier have three combined starts at

0:53:58.400 --> 0:54:02.399
<v Speaker 1>the position in their careers on the road, these things happen.

0:54:02.480 --> 0:54:05.280
<v Speaker 1>It's not an excuse for it. I'm trying to explain

0:54:05.800 --> 0:54:07.960
<v Speaker 1>how that stuff happens. I mean, you don't have Earl Thomas,

0:54:08.000 --> 0:54:10.839
<v Speaker 1>you don't even have Kenny Vaccaro. You've got guys who

0:54:10.840 --> 0:54:14.400
<v Speaker 1>are learning the positions though, and Cavan I love what

0:54:14.480 --> 0:54:17.440
<v Speaker 1>he does, but he really shouldn't be playing a lot

0:54:17.480 --> 0:54:21.120
<v Speaker 1>of deep safety. He is a third to fourth safety

0:54:21.440 --> 0:54:24.520
<v Speaker 1>on your team. Great special teams guy can play some

0:54:24.640 --> 0:54:27.759
<v Speaker 1>nickel coverages and dime packages, but doesn't need to be

0:54:27.800 --> 0:54:29.799
<v Speaker 1>about there playing and doing all that kind of stuff.

0:54:29.800 --> 0:54:32.279
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't have that kind of range and every he

0:54:33.000 --> 0:54:35.480
<v Speaker 1>is beat up right now. He is not one hundred

0:54:35.480 --> 0:54:37.600
<v Speaker 1>percent healthy. He's fighting through what he's playing. I think

0:54:37.600 --> 0:54:40.200
<v Speaker 1>with the shoulder injury that he's just gonna wait to

0:54:40.320 --> 0:54:42.759
<v Speaker 1>the season. I mean, he's not healthy. He's not healthy.

0:54:42.920 --> 0:54:47.319
<v Speaker 1>Which I'm gonna remember this game too, because anytime the

0:54:47.400 --> 0:54:51.759
<v Speaker 1>storyline is just that obvious, don't bank on it. Like

0:54:51.920 --> 0:54:54.360
<v Speaker 1>NFL teams play, the players are too talented and the

0:54:54.360 --> 0:54:56.680
<v Speaker 1>coaches are too smart. We saw that throughout the NFL

0:54:56.719 --> 0:54:59.279
<v Speaker 1>this week. Yeah, well one hundred percent. But I mean, oh,

0:54:59.320 --> 0:55:02.279
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys are going to have fifty sacks because the Seahawks. No,

0:55:02.400 --> 0:55:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks are going to spend all weeks scheming away

0:55:04.680 --> 0:55:07.279
<v Speaker 1>to give Russell Wilson time to do his job. Two

0:55:07.280 --> 0:55:09.920
<v Speaker 1>sacks is good. I mean, you know, the pass rush

0:55:10.120 --> 0:55:14.360
<v Speaker 1>was fine considering his release time was insane, but it's

0:55:14.440 --> 0:55:16.680
<v Speaker 1>never gonna be that obvious in the NFL. These people

0:55:16.760 --> 0:55:19.400
<v Speaker 1>get paid way too much money to figure out ways

0:55:19.400 --> 0:55:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to work around it. So I thought, I thought the

0:55:24.719 --> 0:55:28.360
<v Speaker 1>defense was fine, that you could win a game with

0:55:28.400 --> 0:55:30.960
<v Speaker 1>your defense playing that way, but the offense just didn't

0:55:30.960 --> 0:55:33.080
<v Speaker 1>meet him halfway. All right, guys, appreciate you joining us.

0:55:33.080 --> 0:55:34.919
<v Speaker 1>We're back tomorrow. We're gonna do a little bit more

0:55:35.120 --> 0:55:37.040
<v Speaker 1>in breaking down the bigger picture of some of the

0:55:37.040 --> 0:55:39.239
<v Speaker 1>stuff we saw yesterday and starting to look forward a

0:55:39.239 --> 0:55:41.279
<v Speaker 1>little bit as to how the Cowboys recover from this

0:55:41.520 --> 0:55:44.000
<v Speaker 1>get themselves ready for this next opponent, who, by the way,

0:55:44.239 --> 0:55:49.319
<v Speaker 1>the Detroit Lions beat the New England Patriots like there

0:55:49.320 --> 0:55:51.800
<v Speaker 1>will be. That game just got a lot more interesting

0:55:51.800 --> 0:55:53.560
<v Speaker 1>than we thought it was last week. We'll talk about

0:55:53.600 --> 0:55:55.680
<v Speaker 1>that tomorrow. This is for Nick Even, Dave helm and

0:55:55.719 --> 0:55:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Amber Garcia on Derek Eagels and this has been The

0:55:57.440 --> 0:56:02.279
<v Speaker 1>Break live on Dallas Cowboys dot Com. Rank you. This

0:56:02.320 --> 0:56:05.120
<v Speaker 1>has been a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com and

0:56:05.280 --> 0:56:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys Football Club