WEBVTT - From the Vault: Goblet of Eggnog

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. My name

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:14.320
<v Speaker 1>is Robert Lamb. We're mostly off this week for the holidays,

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:16.600
<v Speaker 1>so we have a vault episode for you today. This

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to be one from a few years back.

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>This is this one originally published twelve fifteen, twenty twenty two.

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>It is our episode on the invention of eggnock. So

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>let's drink up.

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind, production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 3>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. My name

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 3>is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. It's that time

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 3>of year again. And by that time, I mean it

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 3>is the holidays. We're knee deep, perhaps waist deep in

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 3>the holidays, and there's no going back. We might as

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 3>well just push forward at this point, like it's just

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 3>as much just as much effort to keep going as

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 3>it would be to turn back. So once more, we

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 3>have a holiday episode for you. It's actually going to

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 3>be our third installment in our Holiday Invention series, where

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 3>we more or less give the invention treatment to various

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 3>holiday decorations, traditions, and toys. This year we're going to

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 3>be looking in earnest at eggnog.

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:28.759
<v Speaker 4>Is eggnog an invention. Sure, we can stretch the definition.

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 4>I think that's okay.

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 3>I think so. I mean, we did an invention, a

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 3>full blown invention episode about the Matai, which we you know,

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 3>we had Jeff Beach bombarry on as a guest to

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 3>talk about that. Eggnog is not something that occurs naturally

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:45.959
<v Speaker 3>in the world. It must be made at some point.

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 3>There had to be a first or something like a first,

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 3>and you know, we'll get into that. And it's one

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 3>of those things that has a number of different customs

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 3>and cultural details surrounding it. Now, Joe, I'm not sure

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 3>what your relationship with egnog happens to be, because I

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 3>don't know that we've ever really spoken about this. I

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 3>don't think we've had eggnog together before, not that I recall,

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 3>but my family's general approach is will generally buy a

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:14.639
<v Speaker 3>carton of almond nog each year, largely for our son

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 3>because he gets super into it. And if I have

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 3>a chance to visit a like an upscale cocktail place

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 3>or a nice restaurant, then I will jump at the

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 3>opportunity to order an eggnog if they have one on

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 3>the menu. In the past I've made it down to

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 3>New Orleans for the start of beach Bumberry Sippings Santa

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 3>festivities at beach Bumberr's Latit Tude twenty nine. They also

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 3>have pop ups all over the place, and they'll generally

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 3>have at least one holiday teaki beverage on there that

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 3>is at least eggnog esque.

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 4>In form I'm picturing piles of crushed or pellet ice

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 4>with kind of a frothy, creamy gryme about them and

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 4>some nutmeg sprinkled over top.

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, the nutmeg is will discuss is pretty essential.

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 3>So I did make it down there this year, but

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 3>I did make it over to a tiki bar in

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 3>our area, Decatur's sos t Bar, and I enjoyed a

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 3>frozen take on a classic eggnog. Generally a rich drink

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 3>though so once twice three times per year, Max. That's

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 3>generally enough from me, uh huh. Now. Before we came

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 3>in here, though, I mentioned to my wife that I

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:25.639
<v Speaker 3>was about to record the eggnog episode, and she was

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 3>kind enough to provide me with an entire glass of

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 3>eggnog here for me to consume during this episode. The

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 3>listeners at home, you'll have to take my word for it, Joe,

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 3>I think you can see it on the video feed here.

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 4>Wait, is this full booze eggnog?

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 3>Or well you might well presume that, but I couldn't

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 3>possibly comment, Yes, creamy, rich, hint of nutmeg, beautiful.

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 4>I have no eggnog in the house. A cute cute

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 4>Joe Peshi and Home Alone saying eggnog, eggnog dressed as

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 4>a cop like eggnog is the most disgusting substance on Earth.

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 4>And you know what, as a child, that was pretty

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 4>much where my head was at. I was like, yeah,

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 4>Joe peshe in Home Alone is correct. I found the

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 4>idea revolting, not just revolting, I think, I think I

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 4>probably found it borderline nauseating to think of a drink

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 4>made out of eggs. Something changed over the years. Now

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 4>I find it quite delightful.

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 3>So was the eggs that threw you off?

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well you're gonna drink eggs?

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:33.599
<v Speaker 4>So I think about eggs. There's something that you know,

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 4>I liked eggs scrambled like they make them at the

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 4>cracker barrel. You know, I'm thinking of like a thick

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 4>yellow curd like substance, and always in savory context. I mean,

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 4>I know, obviously now that eggs are used in all

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 4>kinds of baking and sweet contexts, but that's not how

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 4>I thought about them when I was a kid. So

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 4>the idea of drinking a sweet egg based beverage was

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 4>absolutely vile to my brain.

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:04.679
<v Speaker 3>I can understand that. I mean, especially even the name

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 3>is a bit potentially off putting. It's very forward with

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:10.679
<v Speaker 3>the egg. What you were about to drink contains eggs,

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:14.359
<v Speaker 3>and then the nog also can throw one for a curve.

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 3>I do like some of the archaic spellings of eggnog

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:20.919
<v Speaker 3>that I've encountered researching this episode. Oftentimes the way we

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 3>encounter it now it's egg n og, but some of

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 3>these other spellings will be egg n ogg. I like

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 3>the double the double g's occurring in both parts of

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 3>the word.

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 4>That's just symmetry. That's good branding.

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 3>Yes, Now, before we proceed, I guess we should go

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 3>ahead and drive home exactly what eggnog is. We've alluded

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 3>to it a little bit already, but technically it's a

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 3>milk egg drink or a milk egg punch. And we've

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 3>of course reached the points as a civilization where you

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 3>can have something that is identifiable as a nog without

0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:59.919
<v Speaker 3>the presence of egg or dairy. But historically this is

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 3>the realm from which this beverage arises.

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:06.159
<v Speaker 4>Right, So you're you mentioned almond nog. I guess that

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 4>is equivalent in the same way that you might have

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 4>almond milk. It is a substitute for milk.

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, though, I guess it's even more like some people

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 3>get up in arms, especially the dairy industry. I know

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 3>about things that are not milk calling themselves milk. And

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 3>even more to the point, I guess something like a

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 3>soy nog or an almond nog is going to have

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 3>neither eggs nor dairy, and so it is even further removed.

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:31.280
<v Speaker 3>But yet it's still very much in the spirit of

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:33.840
<v Speaker 3>of of the classic nog. So I think it more

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:34.600
<v Speaker 3>than qualifies.

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:38.719
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, nog is a thick, creamy, sweet drink.

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it's a state of mind. It's it's it's a

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 3>holiday tradition. Now, one of the sources I'm going to

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:48.839
<v Speaker 3>refer back to several times in this episode is the

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 3>excellent book Imbibe exclamation Point by David Wandriche, which is

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:56.720
<v Speaker 3>a text that we've referenced in the show in the past.

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 3>It is one of, if not the best books you

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 3>can pick up on the history of the American cocktail.

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 3>This is a great book. It cites, among many others,

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 3>the legendary professor Jerry Thomas, who lived eighteen thirty through

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 3>eighteen eighty five, the New Orleans bartender who wrote the

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 3>Seminole Bartender's Guide and helped popularize cocktail drinking in general.

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 3>Were go into more depth on this in an older

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 3>episode or episodes that we did together on Mixology.

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 4>I think we ended up talking about absentth a lot

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 4>in those.

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that would make sense, And I know Jerry Thomas

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 3>also comes up in the recent episode on ice the

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 3>interview that I did. But according to Wondrich, basic milk

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 3>punches go back to the late sixteen hundreds, and to

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 3>give you an example of what a milk punch consists of.

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 3>And again this is not an egg milk punch, This

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 3>is just a milk punch Wondriche includes a recipe from

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 3>Jerry Thomas. Jerry Thomas would have you know, brought up

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 3>together a bunch of these different recipes for drinks and

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 3>put them in his own book at the time. This

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 3>particular recipe from Jerry Thomas calls for sugar water, brandy, rum,

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 3>and shaved ice. A little nutmeg goes on top, and

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 3>Wandritch includes a quote from this is an eighteen seventy

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 3>three quote from the Brooklyn Eagle that states that this

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 3>punch was quote the surest thing in the world to

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 3>get drunk on, and so fearfully drunk that you won't

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 3>know whether you are a cow, yourself or some other

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 3>foolish thing.

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 4>Hmmm, that's that's good. No. One thing I have to

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 4>point out is that when you listed the ingredients, you

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 4>did not list milk. So I assume these are the

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 4>things that are added to the milk.

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yes, okay, yeah. The milk would would also be

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 3>be an important part of this. So already we're kind

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 3>of in the territory of what we think of when

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 3>we think about eggnog, but of course there are no

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 3>eggs there now. When it comes to eggnog itself, Thomas

0:08:57.320 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 3>was very much of the opinion that eggnog was quote

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 3>a beverage of American origin, and Wondrich states that quote

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 3>the drink's earliest mentions come from a seventeen eighty eight

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 3>Philadelphia newspaper, and all the other mentions are American and

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 3>if early European travelers to the United States viewed it

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 3>as one of the novelties Americans were inflicting on the

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 3>art of drinking. By the eighteen sixties, it was a

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 3>drink of comfortable middle age with a wide, if strictly

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 3>seasonal popularity. When Thomas added that in the North quote

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 3>it is a favorite of all seasons, he was certainly

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 3>overstating the case.

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 4>So you bring up that mention in the seventeen eighty

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:39.199
<v Speaker 4>eight newspaper, and this name drop of eggnog as a

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 4>recipe is also referenced in a great source I found

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 4>that was aimed at unearthing the etymological history of eggnog,

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 4>because it's obvious why the word egg is in the name.

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 4>There are eggs in it, but what exactly is anog? Could,

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 4>as the Simpsons proposed, you equally whip up a cauldron

0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 4>of corn nog.

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 3>Cornnog sounds a delicious like it brings to mind like

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 3>corn puddings.

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 4>I think it occurs in the Simpsons episode with the hurricane,

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:10.319
<v Speaker 4>when the stores are there's a run on the quickie

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 4>mart and the only things left on the shelves are

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 4>corn nog and wadded beef. But anyway, diving into the

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 4>history and etymology of eggnog or corn nog whatever, what

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 4>have you? Any nogs? My source here is a December

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 4>two thousand and nine article called the Origins of Eggnog

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 4>Holiday Grog by the American linguist and language columnist Ben Zimmer,

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 4>who is brother of the excellent science writer Karl Zimmer,

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 4>who's been a guest on the show.

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 3>Before Huh Crazy.

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 4>So here's what Ben Zimmer says about nog. The word

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 4>nog first shows up as a regional term in England,

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 4>specifically in the region of East Anglia, so it's the

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 4>eastern part of the country containing Norfolk, Suffolk and Cambridgeshire,

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 4>and it referred that term there referred to a type

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 4>of beer. We know this because of a letter written

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 4>from the County of Norfolk in the year sixteen ninety

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 4>three by a man named Humphrey Prideaux, who described quote

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 4>a bottle of old strong beer, which in this country

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:20.959
<v Speaker 4>they call nog. So nog is high gravity beer. It's

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 4>strong stuff. But to take one step back, why would

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 4>the East Anglians call strong beer nog. Zimmer identifies a

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 4>couple of hypotheses here. One is that it comes from

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 4>the word noggin, which we today think of as antiquated

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 4>slang for head for your head. But before that nogin

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:46.119
<v Speaker 4>meant a small mug or a small drink of spirits.

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 4>So perhaps noggin was shorter, was shortened to nog, and

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 4>it came to refer to the beer inside the mug

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 4>instead of the mug itself. And we do that kind

0:11:56.120 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 4>of metonymy with words today like did you have one? Oh,

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 4>I drank two glasses. You're not saying you literally drank

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 4>the glass. The glasses mean the wine inside the glass, right.

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:11.200
<v Speaker 4>But another idea is that the word nog for strong

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 4>beer comes from a Scottish word nug or nuged ale,

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:18.960
<v Speaker 4>which means ale that you heat up by sticking a

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 4>hot poker in it, which is funny enough to imagine

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 4>in itself, but I can also see how that would

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 4>correspond to a drink with strong alcohol alcohol content, because

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:32.440
<v Speaker 4>drinks with higher alcohol content are often said to taste

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 4>warm or even to burn.

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 3>Hmmm, yeah, this is this is interesting. It brings to

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 3>mind you the images of some of these older drinks

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 3>where you'd you would you would stick the hot poker

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 3>or some sort of hot metal into it. I think

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 3>there's a scene in the excellent TV series The Nick

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 3>where you see some of the characters getting a drink

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 3>of this fashion.

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 4>M Okay, So so far, we've got the idea that

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 4>you start with either a little mug called a noggin

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 4>or a type of beer warmed with a hot poker

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 4>called a nug And somehow one of these terms gets

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 4>poured it over into this East Anglian word nog, which

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:12.680
<v Speaker 4>means strong beer. But how does that actually get connected

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 4>to the sweet, milky, eggy drink we are familiar with.

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 4>We don't know for sure, but the link in the

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 4>chain seems to be alcohol. Because while you can buy

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 4>kid friendly nog in the dairy issle these days, everything

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 4>I've been reading suggests that early eggnog was boozy. That

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 4>was a primary characteristic of what the noog was. It

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 4>had a lot of alcohol in it.

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely, that's exactly what I saw in all of

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 3>my research. Nobody's talking about eggnog is something that is

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:45.079
<v Speaker 3>then spiked. It is inherently spiked.

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 4>And Zimmer reports that a Maryland clergyman named Jonathan Bouchet

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 4>is alleged to have written the first known reference to

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 4>eggnog and a poem in seventeen seventy five, but this

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 4>poem was not published until about thirty years later, so

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 4>we don't know when it was actually written for sure.

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 4>But the relevant section of the poem goes like this,

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:12.199
<v Speaker 4>fog DRAMs in the morn or better still eggnog. This

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 4>is nog with two g's at night hot suppings and

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 4>at mid day grog my palate can regale. So you

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 4>see the context here is fully alcoholic grog refers to

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 4>a spirit or alcoholic beverage. Then there's that line, fog

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 4>DRAMs in the morn or better still eggnog. A dram

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 4>usually refers to a small drink of whiskey, and according

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 4>to Miriam Webster, fog DRAMs are quote DRAMs resorted to

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 4>on the pretense of their protecting from the danger of fog.

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry, boss, I had to have another whiskey before

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 4>work or the fog could have killed me on the

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 4>way here.

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 3>All right, Well, yeah, this is making sense. Is an

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 3>early morning drink though, because you get your your fog

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 3>protection you get a couple of eggs in there, maybe

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 3>you know this is a breakfast that you're drinking down exactly.

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 4>So Bouchet may have written that in seventy seventy five.

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 4>It's hard to say for sure, but according to Zimmer,

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 4>the earliest at rock solid references to eggnog where we

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 4>know the date of their publication, appear in a handful

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 4>of newspapers in the year seventeen eighty eight, as you

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 4>mentioned earlier. Now one is a March seventeen eighty eight

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 4>report in the New Jersey Journal, which and I love

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 4>that this is what some newspaper articles consisted of at

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 4>the time. It says, a young man with a cormorant

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 4>appetite meaning like gluttonous, A young man with a cormorant

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 4>appetite voraciously devoured last week at Connecticut Farms thirty raw eggs,

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 4>a glass of eggnog, and another of brandy sling.

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, is this what newspapers were back in the day.

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 3>Did you have like a gluttony page where you're like,

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 3>what's everybody overeating in New Jersey?

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 4>Stop the presses. We've got to get this story, this

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 4>hot story about the guy who ate thirty eggs in there. Okay,

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 4>so whatever eggnog is at the time, he had some

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 4>Another article is from October seventeen eighty eight in the

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 4>Independent Gazetteer of Philadelphia, where a writer was complaining about

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 4>an upset stomach and wrote, quote, when wine and beer,

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 4>punch and eggnog meat instantly ensues.

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 3>A quarrel, there's wisdom to that. I think.

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I've only ever heard the liquor before beer kind

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 4>of thing. I've never heard it taken out to four

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 4>different things with like punch and eggnog in there.

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, we were looking back at a time when

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 3>drinking was a little more robust throughout the country. I think.

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. So anyway, yeah, I love the fact that newspapers

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 4>not only used to report on what some guy aded

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 4>a form, but also what gave me an upset tummy.

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 4>So it sounds like an alcohol beverage known as eggnog

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 4>was in common parlance in the colonies and the young

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 4>United States in the late eighteenth century. But Zimmer also

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 4>documents how an early example of eggnog was associated with

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:17.679
<v Speaker 4>Christmas celebration by citing a piece in the Virginia Chronicle

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 4>from January seventeen ninety three, which reads as follows. On

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 4>last Christmas Eve, several gentlemen met at Northampton Courthouse and

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 4>spent the evening in mirth and festivity when eggnog was

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 4>the principal liquor used by the company. After they had

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 4>indulged pretty freely in this beverage, a gentleman in the

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 4>company offered a bet that not one of the party

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 4>could write four verses extempore, which should be rhyme and sence. Okay,

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 4>He's like, we're so drunk, I bet none of you

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 4>can write four lines of poetry that will make sense

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 4>and rhyme. So what did they come up with? While

0:17:55.720 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 4>one guy belts out the following, 'tis eggnog, whose golden

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:05.919
<v Speaker 4>streams dispense far richer treasures to the Ravish sense, the

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 4>muse from wine derives a transient glare, but Eggnog's drafts

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 4>afford her solid fare. So move over, wine. The muses

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 4>are no longer interested in you now they will only

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 4>be singing to people who are chug and agnog.

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 3>Eggnog doesn't seem to have a personification, though, like there's

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:28.400
<v Speaker 3>no like satyr of eggnog.

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:30.400
<v Speaker 4>Right the Dionysus of eggnog.

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I suppose it's you know, he was before its time.

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:37.639
<v Speaker 3>I think he would have approved of egnog, especially based

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 3>on these historical references to agnog.

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 4>So do we know exactly what they were putting in

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 4>eggnog at the time. Well, there's a book from seventeen

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 4>ninety nine called Travels through the States of North America

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 4>and the Provinces of Upper and Lower Canada during the

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:56.360
<v Speaker 4>years seventy ninety five, ninety six and ninety seven by

0:18:56.400 --> 0:19:01.160
<v Speaker 4>an Irish writer and explorer named Isaac Weld, And this

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 4>passage actually reminds me of earlier when you were citing

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 4>I think David Wondrich who said that sometimes people from

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 4>Europe might encounter eggnog and think, oh, you know, what

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:16.880
<v Speaker 4>crimes they're committing against drinking culture here in the Americas.

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 4>And I wonder if there's a little bit of that

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 4>kind of raised eyebrow going on in this passage. But

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 4>we'll see what you think. So Weld is writing about

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:29.479
<v Speaker 4>a stop at an inn near Baltimore, Maryland, where he writes, quote,

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 4>several travelers had stopped at the same house that I

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 4>did the first night I was on the road, and

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 4>we all breakfasted together preparatory to setting out the next morning.

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 4>The American travelers, before they pursued their journey, took a

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:46.880
<v Speaker 4>hearty draft each. According to custom of eggnog, a mixture

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 4>composed of new milk, eggs, rum, and sugar beat up together.

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 4>So eggnog it should be heavy, sweet, exploding with alcohol,

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 4>drunk in large quantities in the morning before setting out

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 4>on a long journey.

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is I mean it really it forces you

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 3>to rethink egnog because I think a lot of people

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 3>are probably like like me, You grew up exposed to again,

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:15.880
<v Speaker 3>the grocery store eggnog, and there's this kind of sense

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 3>that eggnog is this drink for everybody. Eggnog's this drink

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 3>for kids. And as you get older, then you're perhaps

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:25.679
<v Speaker 3>in a situation where you can have the eggnog with

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:29.879
<v Speaker 3>something added to it, eggnog plus you know, if you like.

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 3>But this is but the historical truth of eggnog is no,

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:38.640
<v Speaker 3>this is the thing that the really drunken adults are

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 3>having sometimes first thing in the morning.

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 4>Also regarding famous eggnog recipes from the early days of

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 4>the United States, there is a famous recipe for eggnog

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 4>that is alleged to come from George Washington's kitchen papers.

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 4>You'll find this if you google George Washington's egnog. I've

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:01.919
<v Speaker 4>seen some serious day out cast upon its origins, like

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 4>whether it was actually Washington's. But according to the Farmer's Almanac,

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 4>this famous recipe goes as follows. It's one quart cream,

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 4>one quart milk, one dozen tablespoons sugar, one pint brandy,

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 4>half a pint rye whiskey, half a pint Jamaica rum,

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:22.439
<v Speaker 4>and a quarter pint sherry. And then you mix the liquor,

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 4>separate the yolks in the whites of twelve eggs, add

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 4>sugar to the beaten yolks. Mix well. Then you add

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 4>milk and cream, slowly beating, beat the whites of the

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 4>eggs until stiff peaks form, then fold slowly into the mixture.

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:39.119
<v Speaker 4>Then you let it sit in a cool place for

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 4>several days. Then quote taste frequently. And I could be wrong,

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 4>but I believe this is the recipe that our colleague,

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 4>our colleague Alex Williams uses when he makes his famous

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:54.919
<v Speaker 4>eggnog for all of our coworkers.

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it definitely is This is definitely the recipe he

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 3>would use, and it is quite lightful. But yeah, I

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 3>encountered the same thing. Looking at the actual history of this,

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 3>there's some doubt as to whether George Washington actually serve this.

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 3>And then there are some accounts that say, well, it

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 3>looks like maybe there's evidence that eggnog was served at

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:21.439
<v Speaker 3>Mount Vernon, But as far as the precise recipe, I

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 3>don't know that there's a lot of data to back

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:26.880
<v Speaker 3>that up. Yeah, though we will have we will touch

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 3>on at least one former US president who did have

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 3>a recipe for egnog and did serve it and drink it.

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 3>All right, all this being said, before we proceed with eggnog,

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 3>I think we can at least consider the possibility of

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:44.880
<v Speaker 3>predecessors that, Yes, even if egnog is something that emerges

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 3>in North America, there are at least things not unlike

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:53.440
<v Speaker 3>egnog that one can encounter, say in at least late

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:55.959
<v Speaker 3>medieval and post medieval Europe.

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:59.199
<v Speaker 4>Oh, yes, some gorgeous textures to imagine.

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 3>Yes, let's go back to the late Middle Ages and

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 3>drink some hard milk. So European holiday traditions, which of

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 3>course inform holiday traditions and Colonial America and beyond are

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 3>a mix of Christian traditions, more ancient traditions, and a

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 3>great deal of regional variability. I was, in fact just

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:23.159
<v Speaker 3>researching the Hooden or Hoden Horse of Kent for the

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 3>Monster Facts series, and I think that's a great example

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 3>of this. It brings to mind various costume street wandering

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 3>traditions as well as caroling and was sailing. Wassaile, of course,

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:38.119
<v Speaker 3>is a door to door ritualistic and communal hot drink

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 3>that typically contained mulled cider ale or wine and spices.

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 3>But then there is the tradition of the passet posset

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:53.160
<v Speaker 3>the passet. Yes, The Smithsonian magazine website has a nice

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 3>article about this titled Past the Posset colon the Medieval

0:23:56.960 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Eggnog by Lisa Brahman, and according to this article, it

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 3>apparently dates back to late medieval Europe, and it looks

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 3>like some of the examples come to us from the

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 3>post medieval world and beyond. Anyway, the passet itself is

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 3>a drinking vessel, as Brayman points out, and you see

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 3>mention of it even in Shakespeare's Macbeth, in which lady

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 3>Macbeth poisons the posets of the guards outside Duncan's quarters.

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 4>Oh I forgot about that.

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:28.239
<v Speaker 3>I had as well. When the author here brings it up,

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:30.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, oh, yeah, I do remember that line vaguely.

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:34.959
<v Speaker 3>But you encounter so many archaic courts if you're reading

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 3>or performing Shakespeare that you can't stop to wonder. Overall,

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 3>it's enough to be like, okay, this means drinking vessel. Okay,

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 3>what's the next strange word that doesn't quite register for me?

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:48.119
<v Speaker 3>Let me translate that one in my head. But this

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 3>is You can actually look up examples of this vessel

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 3>online the pauset, this posset, and you'll find that some

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 3>of the main examples of this it looks curiously like

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:03.159
<v Speaker 3>an ornate tea pot with handles on both sides, a

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 3>wide lidded aperture at the top, with a with a

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 3>with a lid on top, and the stem for it,

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, like that like a t kettle. It feeds

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 3>from the bottom of the vessel rather than from the

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 3>middle or the top of the vessel.

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm.

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 3>The reason for this design, according to Brayman, is that

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:24.359
<v Speaker 3>you can drink directly from the stem to get at

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 3>the liquid contents of the of the of the liquid

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:30.360
<v Speaker 3>it contains, but also you can take the lid off

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:32.680
<v Speaker 3>the top and go at the top of it with

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 3>a spoon, because basically you're gonna have a mixture of things.

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 3>You're gonna have a fluid beneath and kind of a

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 3>chonky chonky, creamy perhaps cheesy layer at the top.

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 4>So this is like, it's like a curdled milk drink

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 4>that has that has cheesy, floaty solid bits on the

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:57.160
<v Speaker 4>top you want to get with a spoon.

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 3>Yes, the way that Brayman describes it as quote both

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 3>a drink and a dessert with a layer of thick,

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 3>sweet gruel floating above the liquid. Okay, so okay. On

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 3>one hand, I realized that could potentially be interpreted as gross.

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 3>But on the other hand, I think it's not that

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 3>different from a lot of sort of frothy dessert things

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 3>we have today. I think about certain milkshakes, certain smoothies,

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 3>certainly especially the older school cappuccinos, where the foam cap

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 3>on top was maybe a little firmer, and you might

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:33.719
<v Speaker 3>have to go at that with a spoon as opposed

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 3>to drinking it. So I kind of reject the idea

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 3>that this potential hygiene issues aside of late medieval ages,

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't think this is necessarily that gross of an

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 3>idea that you could have some sort of like a

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 3>thick portion on the top of your beverage that requires

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:53.360
<v Speaker 3>a spoon. It's just like a little different to imagine

0:26:53.680 --> 0:27:00.119
<v Speaker 3>this bizarre container for its consumption. Though nowadays I do

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 3>want to point out we do have things like the

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 3>spoon straw, which is like a plastic usually like a

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:08.880
<v Speaker 3>plastic straw and spoon combined so that you can do both.

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:10.919
<v Speaker 3>They did not have this technology in the late medieval

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 3>period to my knowledge. Therefore they had to use a posset.

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, you know, it is the same principle as a straw,

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 4>which I don't find unusual. But I have to say,

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 4>it is funny to imagine somebody like drinking out of

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 4>the stem of a tea kettle.

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:27.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah, it does seem like you might burn your

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 3>mouth with this. So recorded recipes, many of these came later.

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 3>I believe they called if you were going to fill

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 3>the pauset, it would call for a great deal of

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 3>egg and cream. They might also call for beer, sugar,

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 3>and also thickening agents such as bread, biscuits, oatmeal, and

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:48.880
<v Speaker 3>almond paste. In some cases, the upper portions are said

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 3>to take on a cheesey quality, which actually brings to

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 3>mind modern cheese milk tea drinks, which are quite delightful.

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 3>If you haven't had one, I know this is something

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 3>that can be kind of hard to imagine. Why should

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 3>my milk tea taste like cheese? Well, it's it's not

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:09.159
<v Speaker 3>what you're imagining if you're imagining something that turns your stomach.

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 3>It's not like cheddar cheese on the top of your tea.

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 3>It's something sweetier and creamier, but with that slight cheesy

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 3>twist to it, not like provolone right right now. I

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:26.880
<v Speaker 3>should also mentioned there are more contemporary pauset dishes, such

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 3>as you often see recipes for something called a lemon pauset,

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 3>but this seems somewhat more refined compared to what is

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 3>described here. This is not something you drink out of

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:38.720
<v Speaker 3>a strange tea kettle. It's something you spoon out of

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 3>a dish. But is it eggnog? Well, in many ways,

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 3>if not most ways, no, But it also sounds like

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 3>the sort of thing that if you were a time

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 3>traveler from an eggnog having culture and you went back

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 3>to the late medieval ages and you're like, where's my eggnog?

0:28:56.920 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 3>And people are like, what are you talking about? You

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 3>might cover the posset and be like, oh, well this

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 3>will work, this will do. Now my holiday is complete.

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's a liquidy egg and milk or egg and

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 4>cream type thing.

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Right, And I think it's not crazy to imagine that

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 3>this sort of precedent for this sort of drink and

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 3>the sort of taste sensations that it brings about, that

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 3>this could feed into the very American traditions that would,

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 3>according to Thomas, bring about the American eggnog.

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 4>So I assume after we get out of this early

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 4>period where mentions are scarce and don't really explain much

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:37.960
<v Speaker 4>about eggnog except like the Irish guy who's clearly not

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:40.959
<v Speaker 4>familiar with it, we get into a period where there

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 4>is more extensive writing on eggnog, maybe like in actual

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 4>cookery manuals.

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah, there's a lot more material once you were

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 3>a certain point. And wonderch has a whole chapter on

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 3>egg drinks in his book im Vibe. As he writes it,

0:29:56.960 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 3>there quote neither punches nor part of the lineage of

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 3>cock tails, and this is also somewhat how Jerry Thomas

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 3>and the people of his day would have classified them.

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 3>One of the things that really amazed me about all this, though,

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 3>is that Wondridge points out that egg drinks were once

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 3>far more common and kind of a daily affair, but

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 3>that few survive today. This kind of comes back to

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 3>your example earlier about egg nog for breakfast, why not perfect,

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 3>keep the fog away, etc. Now, now I should point

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 3>out this is the two thousand and seven books, so

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure if we've seen anything in the way

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 3>of a resurgence of egg drinks. It might be the case, though,

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 3>given the spirit of cocktail making and it's tend to

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 3>re explore older fashions and even remake them with modern twists.

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't feel like it's tremendously uncommon to find at

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 3>least a single egg drink on a fancy cocktail menu,

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 3>though to be sure, you probably won't find them on

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 3>just random restaurant cocktail menus, Like I don't know if

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Chili's offers an egg drink.

0:30:57.480 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 4>I'm trying to think, what are the standard egg drinks

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 4>other well, I guess there are like drinks I don't

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 4>usually get, but like, aren't there like sours and fizzes

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 4>and stuff that have that have egg whites in them.

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Wondred points out that the major survivors include the

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 3>nineteenth century Tom and Jerry drink. This would be not

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 3>getting into the proportions, but it's like sugar, eggs rum, cinnamon, cloves, allspice.

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:24.479
<v Speaker 3>There's the sherry flip, which is basically egg, sugar and sherry,

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 3>and he discusses his elsewhere in the book. But of

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 3>course there's the Ramos gin Fizz, which is pretty famous

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 3>New Orleans drink that contains gin, simple syrup, lemon juice,

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 3>lime juice, egg white, heavy cream, orange flower water, and

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 3>club soda. It's one that famously requires a great deal

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 3>of shaking. You may receive a dirty look from the

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:47.720
<v Speaker 3>bartender when you order it because of all the shaking

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 3>it's going to require. Sometimes they are to pass it

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 3>off to another bartender to continue shake shaking it. But

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 3>it is also a delightful drink. But yeah. He Wonderage

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 3>points out though that even though we only have so

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 3>many drinks that kind of survived, there was this time

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 3>where where egg based drinks. Egg egg based alcoholic drinks

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 3>were consumed on pretty much a daily basis and were

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 3>as popular as eggnog drinks are during the holiday year round.

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 3>So just imagine, imagine a world in which eggnog is

0:32:23.120 --> 0:32:26.360
<v Speaker 3>stocked at the grocery store year round to meet people's

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 3>demand for it, and everybody's having it boozed up. Not

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 3>that they bought it at the grocery store, they made it.

0:32:33.040 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 3>You get my point.

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 4>That's that sounds like a magical time, a very rich,

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 4>rich time.

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, But as Paul Clark points out in the Imbibed

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 3>magazine article, elements egg cocktails, changing tastes and salmonella scares

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 3>pretty much chased raw eggs out of the bar. And

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 3>this would be kind of this would be the reason

0:32:54.360 --> 0:32:57.400
<v Speaker 3>that only so many egg drinks kind of survived this

0:32:57.600 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 3>period of time in which, on one hand, yet changing taste.

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 3>You can imagine, perhaps you know, there are new fads

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 3>in cocktails, new ingredients are more readily available for cocktails,

0:33:09.080 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 3>and then there's this whole issue of salmonella.

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:15.120
<v Speaker 4>Salmonella concerns, of course, remain relevant to this day, and

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:16.960
<v Speaker 4>we'll come back to those in just a few minutes.

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 3>Wondrich also points out there was a great deal of

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 3>variation when it came to eggnog recipes, which I imagine

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 3>is going to be the case with any popular drink,

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:28.240
<v Speaker 3>even if the recipe isn't secret. See the Invention episode

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:30.440
<v Speaker 3>we did about the my Tie for examples of this.

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 3>On both counts. If the recipe is secret, people are

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 3>going to try and recreate it, and even if the

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:38.480
<v Speaker 3>secret is if there's no secret, if the recipe is

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 3>well known, you're going to end up having deviations anyway.

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 3>For instance, anywhere you go today the my Thie recipe,

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 3>there's no telling what a restaurant will actually serve you

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 3>if you order a my Tie, even though the original

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 3>recipe is very well known at this point, or it's

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 3>very easily obtained if you have a desire to seek

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 3>it out. But these regional differences in eggnog, this would

0:34:03.640 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 3>really make people emotional. A Wondred show points out this

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:11.239
<v Speaker 3>account where there's a judge who encountered eggnog in an

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 3>inn and it didn't have whiskey enough in it, and

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:16.759
<v Speaker 3>therefore there was this huge altercation.

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, I mean again, going back to stories about ends,

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:21.960
<v Speaker 4>you don't say what time of day this is, But

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:24.919
<v Speaker 4>this eggnog might have been his morning eggnog, which sets

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:26.800
<v Speaker 4>the tone for the entire day. It's like, you know,

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 4>if you don't get your coffee right in the morning,

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:29.919
<v Speaker 4>that's bad news.

0:34:30.600 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. If I don't get my heavily alcoholic eggnog in

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 3>the morning, I'm no good now. Sometimes those regional differences, though,

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 3>are going to be entirely based on what is available

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 3>to you, And a great example of this is the

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Texian version of eggnog. He includes the recipe in the

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 3>book Is It Stems? It Stems from General Thomas Green

0:34:53.160 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 3>of the Army of the Texas Republic from eighteen forty three.

0:34:56.640 --> 0:35:00.920
<v Speaker 3>The recipe serves about one hundred and sixty for seven

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 3>gallons of mez cow, seven gallons of donkey milk, thirty

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 3>dozen eggs, and a large loaf of sugar.

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 4>I love that sugar used to come in loaves.

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, if you're making eggnog for one hundred and

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 3>sixty and a number of these recipes do call for

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:23.600
<v Speaker 3>large vats of eggnog, but this is quite a lot.

0:35:23.680 --> 0:35:26.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, seven gallons of mezcal, seven gallons of donkey milk.

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 4>I've never tasted donkey milk. I don't even know what

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:29.719
<v Speaker 4>that would be like.

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 3>I again two thousand and seven book, but Wondrich mentioned

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 3>that donkey milk was becoming popular at the time in

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:39.399
<v Speaker 3>Europe due to this. I supposely it had some health

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 3>advantages to it. I don't know if that's true. I

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 3>don't know if it's still popular as an alternative milk.

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't think I've seen it in myself in health

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:50.279
<v Speaker 3>fied stores. But then again, I'm not really in the

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 3>market for donkey milk anyway. Well, Wondrich roughly translates the

0:35:55.200 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 3>recipe for modern drinkers in that book. He of course

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:01.239
<v Speaker 3>says you can use cow mil instead of donkey milk,

0:36:02.239 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 3>and he also recommends grating a little chocolate on top.

0:36:06.719 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 3>So Jerry Thomas apparently chronicled six different eggnog recipes, and

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:13.560
<v Speaker 3>wonder Wich includes recipes for three of them in his book.

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:17.279
<v Speaker 3>Roughly speaking, these are the contents of these three that

0:36:17.360 --> 0:36:21.200
<v Speaker 3>he shares. There's Baltimore eggnog, eggs sugar, nutmeg, brandy or

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:25.839
<v Speaker 3>rum wine, egg whites and milk. There's eggnog individual, which

0:36:25.920 --> 0:36:30.000
<v Speaker 3>calls for sugar, cold water, egg cognac, Santa Cruz, rum

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:35.320
<v Speaker 3>and milk. And then there's General Harrison's agnog. This is

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 3>ninth American President, William Henry Harrison, and this was said

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 3>to be one of his favorites. It called for egg sugar,

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:47.520
<v Speaker 3>hard cider, and lumps of ice. Important to note here

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:50.719
<v Speaker 3>that cider drinking was part of his brand. His whole

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 3>image that he tried to put out was like, I'm

0:36:54.239 --> 0:36:56.800
<v Speaker 3>not really at home in this old Washington environment. I

0:36:56.960 --> 0:36:58.440
<v Speaker 3>just want to sit on the porch and drink some

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:02.760
<v Speaker 3>hard cider. Won't you have some of my hard cider

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:05.319
<v Speaker 3>based aggnog and vote for me? Yeah?

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 4>That was him saying like, I'm just a you know,

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:11.440
<v Speaker 4>a hard working frontiersman. I'm not one of these elites.

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but I don't know. I mean, I appreciate hard cider,

0:37:16.239 --> 0:37:18.840
<v Speaker 3>but this sounds horrific. I don't think I would I

0:37:18.880 --> 0:37:21.920
<v Speaker 3>would want any part of this. So General Harrison, no,

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:22.279
<v Speaker 3>thank you.

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:26.239
<v Speaker 4>General Harrison also died about some like thirty days into

0:37:26.320 --> 0:37:30.800
<v Speaker 4>his first presidential term. Yeah, he's the one who he

0:37:30.880 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 4>didn't really make it very far. And their speculation about

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:36.560
<v Speaker 4>why he died, but one of them is that he

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:41.800
<v Speaker 4>may have succumbed to the fact that the water supply

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:44.919
<v Speaker 4>at the White House at the time was heavily contaminated

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:45.880
<v Speaker 4>with raw sewage.

0:37:46.600 --> 0:37:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Huh interesting. I had a whole tangent for this episode

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 3>about twelfth US President Zachary Taylor, who fell ill with

0:37:54.080 --> 0:37:56.759
<v Speaker 3>a fatal illness on July fourth of eighteen fifty after

0:37:56.840 --> 0:38:01.760
<v Speaker 3>a DC fundraiser that he had tended where he quote

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:05.680
<v Speaker 3>drank freely of iced water and chilled milk. According to

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:10.400
<v Speaker 3>biographer K. Jack Bauer in the book Zachary Taylor's Soldier,

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:15.880
<v Speaker 3>Planter Statesman of the Old Southwest. So I've seen this

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:19.480
<v Speaker 3>described as copious amounts of cherries and iced milk. Apparently

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:23.480
<v Speaker 3>he preferred drinking chilled milk. That was his thing. That

0:38:23.560 --> 0:38:26.279
<v Speaker 3>was the hardest drink that Zachary Taylor was known to

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:30.840
<v Speaker 3>imbibe himself. But I cut most of this out because

0:38:30.960 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 3>he wasn't drinking, as far as I can tell, a

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:37.440
<v Speaker 3>cherry chilled milk concoction. It was just chilled milk and

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 3>then also a lot of cherries.

0:38:39.520 --> 0:38:41.320
<v Speaker 4>And probably plenty of raw sewage.

0:38:50.600 --> 0:38:51.640
<v Speaker 3>Is it time for salmonella?

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:55.839
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, that's a great transition. So eggs and salmonilla.

0:38:56.000 --> 0:39:01.359
<v Speaker 4>Salmonilla remains probably the main reason we have reservations about

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:06.360
<v Speaker 4>raw egg based food and drinks today. Salmonella is a

0:39:06.600 --> 0:39:11.360
<v Speaker 4>genus of bacteria named not after salmon the fish, but

0:39:11.520 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 4>after an American veterinarian named Daniel Elmer Salmon. Though it

0:39:16.239 --> 0:39:19.040
<v Speaker 4>was not discovered by him, it was named after him

0:39:20.040 --> 0:39:25.400
<v Speaker 4>basically because a species of Salmonella was discovered by an

0:39:25.440 --> 0:39:30.320
<v Speaker 4>assistant in a lab who worked for salmon. The assistant's

0:39:30.400 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 4>name was Theobald Smith, but of course the boss gets

0:39:33.000 --> 0:39:37.400
<v Speaker 4>all the glory. Some zero types of salmonella are responsible

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:41.839
<v Speaker 4>for really serious and historically significant diseases, such as typhoid fever,

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:46.640
<v Speaker 4>but multiple types of salmonilla will result in infections of

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:51.560
<v Speaker 4>the intestinal tract, so salmonilla infection or salmonellosis, is one

0:39:51.600 --> 0:39:56.880
<v Speaker 4>of the most common food born illnesses, often characterized by fever, diarrhea,

0:39:57.040 --> 0:40:02.880
<v Speaker 4>severe stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, and headache. And because salmonella

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 4>is often transmitted through the fecal oral route, the risk

0:40:06.640 --> 0:40:09.880
<v Speaker 4>of contracting it is higher when people don't have access

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:14.160
<v Speaker 4>to clean drinking water and effective sewage disposal. Though salmonella

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:18.280
<v Speaker 4>can also be transmitted between animals and humans, so animal

0:40:18.400 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 4>vectors such as eggs from infected chickens can be a

0:40:22.800 --> 0:40:27.040
<v Speaker 4>major source of salmonellosis in humans as well. Now, on

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:29.360
<v Speaker 4>the other hand, one thing to remember is that most

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:33.640
<v Speaker 4>eggs are fine. Most eggs are not infected with salmonilla.

0:40:34.440 --> 0:40:37.319
<v Speaker 4>I don't know what the exact proportion is, but one

0:40:37.400 --> 0:40:40.520
<v Speaker 4>figure I saw kicking around from the two thousands was

0:40:40.600 --> 0:40:45.400
<v Speaker 4>a CDC estimate that roughly one in every twenty thousand

0:40:45.560 --> 0:40:49.120
<v Speaker 4>chicken eggs in the United States was contaminated. That number

0:40:49.239 --> 0:40:51.920
<v Speaker 4>may be different today. If so, it's probably somewhat lower

0:40:52.000 --> 0:40:55.800
<v Speaker 4>than that. But you know, I'm not saying you should

0:40:55.880 --> 0:40:58.399
<v Speaker 4>go about eating raw eggs. There is definitely risk there,

0:40:58.480 --> 0:41:01.560
<v Speaker 4>but also like the odds are pretty low that any

0:41:01.640 --> 0:41:05.040
<v Speaker 4>given egg is going to make you sick. Also, eggs

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:08.040
<v Speaker 4>are fine if you cook them to the proper temperature

0:41:08.440 --> 0:41:11.480
<v Speaker 4>for the proper time. One hundred and sixty degrees fahrenheit

0:41:11.640 --> 0:41:16.120
<v Speaker 4>will kill just about anything instantly. Also, you know, even

0:41:16.160 --> 0:41:19.040
<v Speaker 4>lower temperatures, if held for a sufficient amount of time,

0:41:19.120 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 4>will be enough to basically sterilize eggs. This is you

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:26.040
<v Speaker 4>can look up charts on the amount of time eggs

0:41:26.120 --> 0:41:28.520
<v Speaker 4>need to spend at a certain temperature in order to

0:41:28.560 --> 0:41:33.560
<v Speaker 4>make them safe. However, eggnog is traditionally not made with

0:41:33.800 --> 0:41:37.040
<v Speaker 4>eggs that are cooked at all, but rather with raw ones.

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:42.040
<v Speaker 4>So is there any risk, Well, yes, obviously if you

0:41:42.120 --> 0:41:45.480
<v Speaker 4>are just drinking raw eggs straight up, there is some

0:41:45.880 --> 0:41:50.359
<v Speaker 4>risk of salmonilla infection. One example of this, I mean

0:41:50.400 --> 0:41:53.080
<v Speaker 4>it happens all the time, but one example one case

0:41:53.120 --> 0:41:56.800
<v Speaker 4>study I dug up with an interesting secondary finding. This

0:41:57.000 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 4>is a study published in the Lancet in nineteen seven

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 4>by Steer at All called person to person spread of

0:42:05.120 --> 0:42:11.400
<v Speaker 4>Salmonella typhimurium after a hospital common source outbreak. So the

0:42:11.440 --> 0:42:15.799
<v Speaker 4>abstract reads, in September nineteen seventy three, diarrhea caused by

0:42:15.880 --> 0:42:20.680
<v Speaker 4>Salmonella typhemurium developed in thirty two people in a main hospital.

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:26.360
<v Speaker 4>Both epidemiological and microbiological evidence indicated that raw egg beaten

0:42:26.440 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 4>in milk for eggnog was responsible for the infection. However,

0:42:32.080 --> 0:42:35.640
<v Speaker 4>six patients and eight employees had not had eggnog, and

0:42:35.760 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 4>their illness developed after the source of infection had been

0:42:39.120 --> 0:42:43.040
<v Speaker 4>recognized and removed. Most of these people had had direct

0:42:43.200 --> 0:42:47.680
<v Speaker 4>contact with an infected patient and presumably acquired the infection

0:42:48.160 --> 0:42:51.440
<v Speaker 4>by person to person spread. It's concluded that person to

0:42:51.520 --> 0:42:56.080
<v Speaker 4>person spread of Salmonilla typhemurium can occur in hospitals and

0:42:56.160 --> 0:42:59.440
<v Speaker 4>can be a hazard to patients and staff. So initially

0:42:59.520 --> 0:43:02.560
<v Speaker 4>a bunch of people in a hospital got salmonella from

0:43:02.680 --> 0:43:06.960
<v Speaker 4>drinking eggnog, but then those people gave secondary infections to

0:43:07.120 --> 0:43:11.040
<v Speaker 4>others who didn't even touch the nog. Also, I wanted

0:43:11.080 --> 0:43:14.120
<v Speaker 4>to share another medical journal article I found just because

0:43:14.239 --> 0:43:17.080
<v Speaker 4>I thought it was very weird. This is called Eyelid

0:43:17.320 --> 0:43:22.840
<v Speaker 4>absess in an eggnog Drinker by Marcus and Wolverson, published

0:43:22.920 --> 0:43:26.840
<v Speaker 4>in the British Medical Journal nineteen eighty nine. Short story

0:43:26.960 --> 0:43:29.040
<v Speaker 4>is a seventy two year old man showed up at

0:43:29.040 --> 0:43:32.400
<v Speaker 4>a hospital in England with a huge abscess swelling on

0:43:32.560 --> 0:43:37.040
<v Speaker 4>his left upper eyelid, which they eventually determined had spread

0:43:37.120 --> 0:43:40.320
<v Speaker 4>to an infection of the bone in his forehead, the

0:43:41.160 --> 0:43:44.080
<v Speaker 4>bone above where his eye was. So he was put

0:43:44.160 --> 0:43:47.440
<v Speaker 4>under general anesthesia and the absess was drained. They did

0:43:47.520 --> 0:43:49.760
<v Speaker 4>a culture of the pus and it revealed the presence

0:43:49.960 --> 0:43:54.600
<v Speaker 4>of a type of salmonella. They eventually did another procedure

0:43:54.719 --> 0:43:57.719
<v Speaker 4>to take care of the swelling in the bones of

0:43:57.840 --> 0:44:00.920
<v Speaker 4>the face, and he eventually made a full recovery. The

0:44:01.080 --> 0:44:05.520
<v Speaker 4>man had no gastrointestinal symptoms, and the authors say that

0:44:05.680 --> 0:44:09.960
<v Speaker 4>there had been recent cases of salmonilla infection related to eggs,

0:44:10.440 --> 0:44:12.440
<v Speaker 4>so they asked him about his diet, and here I'm

0:44:12.440 --> 0:44:16.080
<v Speaker 4>going to read from the case report. His diet consisted

0:44:16.120 --> 0:44:18.800
<v Speaker 4>of West Indian and European food, but he said that

0:44:18.880 --> 0:44:22.279
<v Speaker 4>he cooked all eggs well. When he was seen in

0:44:22.360 --> 0:44:26.839
<v Speaker 4>the outpatient department, he was specifically asked if he drank eggnog,

0:44:27.280 --> 0:44:31.000
<v Speaker 4>and he then admitted drinking it frequently, using a recipe

0:44:31.080 --> 0:44:36.319
<v Speaker 4>of raw eggs, brandy, sugar, milk, and vanilla essence. Now,

0:44:36.480 --> 0:44:38.920
<v Speaker 4>the authors say they could find no previous evidence of

0:44:39.040 --> 0:44:43.200
<v Speaker 4>this particular type of salmonella causing an eyelid absess, but

0:44:43.680 --> 0:44:47.640
<v Speaker 4>that there are other known cases of this bacterial infection

0:44:48.600 --> 0:44:52.200
<v Speaker 4>spreading from a gut infection originally to a secondary infection

0:44:52.360 --> 0:44:55.320
<v Speaker 4>elsewhere in the body, such as in the bones, especially

0:44:55.440 --> 0:44:59.840
<v Speaker 4>the long bones, especially in patients with underlying medical conditions

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:04.360
<v Speaker 4>and in patients over seventy years of age. And finally,

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:07.280
<v Speaker 4>the author's write quote from nineteen eighty one to nineteen

0:45:07.360 --> 0:45:11.640
<v Speaker 4>eighty six, the proportion of salmonilla infections caused by salmonella,

0:45:11.760 --> 0:45:14.480
<v Speaker 4>and then they're talking about a specific type here. Salmonella

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:19.040
<v Speaker 4>in teriditis rose from eleven percent to twenty eight percent.

0:45:19.400 --> 0:45:22.760
<v Speaker 4>This rise was due mainly to a rise in phage

0:45:22.880 --> 0:45:26.640
<v Speaker 4>type four infections. Transmission of this phage type has been

0:45:26.680 --> 0:45:30.120
<v Speaker 4>increasingly associated with poultry, and it is now known to

0:45:30.160 --> 0:45:36.080
<v Speaker 4>be transmitted in eggs. Egg born Salmonilla in teroditis is

0:45:36.200 --> 0:45:39.280
<v Speaker 4>destroyed by thorough cooking. The raw egg in the eggnog

0:45:39.400 --> 0:45:43.440
<v Speaker 4>may have been the vehicle of infection. Unless specifically asked for,

0:45:44.000 --> 0:45:48.120
<v Speaker 4>a history of eggnog drinking may not emerge on dietary questioning.

0:45:49.680 --> 0:45:52.160
<v Speaker 4>But okay, now, I'm sure a lot of people out

0:45:52.160 --> 0:45:56.560
<v Speaker 4>there are wondering, Wait a minute. Okay, Obviously, you know

0:45:56.680 --> 0:45:59.120
<v Speaker 4>you mix up a bunch of raw eggs and you

0:45:59.360 --> 0:46:02.399
<v Speaker 4>just drink that, that definitely is putting you at risk.

0:46:02.719 --> 0:46:06.000
<v Speaker 4>But if you put alcohol in the eggnog, surely that

0:46:06.080 --> 0:46:06.719
<v Speaker 4>would be safe.

0:46:06.840 --> 0:46:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:46:07.120 --> 0:46:09.120
<v Speaker 4>Doesn't alcohol kill germs?

0:46:09.880 --> 0:46:13.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? And we're talking a lot of alcohol in some

0:46:13.200 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 3>of these recipes.

0:46:14.600 --> 0:46:19.040
<v Speaker 4>Now, frustratingly, I have not been able to put together

0:46:19.239 --> 0:46:23.600
<v Speaker 4>a very clear answer on the exact relationship between alcohol

0:46:23.719 --> 0:46:27.160
<v Speaker 4>content and raw egg safety. Instead, I've sort of assembled

0:46:27.239 --> 0:46:31.200
<v Speaker 4>some different conflicting data points, but I'll share a few

0:46:31.239 --> 0:46:35.279
<v Speaker 4>of the results I came across. So one thing I

0:46:35.360 --> 0:46:38.000
<v Speaker 4>found is a study in the International Journal of Food

0:46:38.080 --> 0:46:43.440
<v Speaker 4>Microbiology published in nineteen ninety called survival of pathogenic microorganisms

0:46:43.520 --> 0:46:47.320
<v Speaker 4>in an eggnog like product containing seven percent ethanol. This

0:46:47.520 --> 0:46:51.439
<v Speaker 4>is by notermans at all, so this is a lab test.

0:46:51.600 --> 0:46:55.640
<v Speaker 4>They say, let's make some boozy eggnog and directly inject

0:46:55.719 --> 0:47:00.239
<v Speaker 4>pathogenic microorganisms in there and see what happens. They say

0:47:00.560 --> 0:47:05.399
<v Speaker 4>a liquor consisting of whole egg sacros meaning sugar twenty

0:47:05.480 --> 0:47:11.680
<v Speaker 4>five percent and ethanol of seven percent was artificially contaminated

0:47:11.800 --> 0:47:19.800
<v Speaker 4>with Salmonella teriditis, salmonilla, typhomurium, Staphylococcus aureus, three different strains

0:47:19.960 --> 0:47:25.520
<v Speaker 4>Basillus sirius, and Listeria, and they say, after three weeks

0:47:25.560 --> 0:47:29.840
<v Speaker 4>of incubation at twenty two degrees celsius, twenty two degrees

0:47:29.880 --> 0:47:34.400
<v Speaker 4>celsius is about seventy one degrees fahrenheit room temperature, the

0:47:34.520 --> 0:47:39.800
<v Speaker 4>numbers of salmonilla, Staphylococcus aureus, and of the Listeria species

0:47:39.840 --> 0:47:42.879
<v Speaker 4>they use decreased by more than three log base ten

0:47:43.080 --> 0:47:45.920
<v Speaker 4>units and if I understand correctly, I believe that's a

0:47:46.040 --> 0:47:50.320
<v Speaker 4>ninety nine point nine percent reduction in the number of

0:47:50.440 --> 0:47:53.719
<v Speaker 4>bacteria units. There they say under such conditions, however, the

0:47:53.920 --> 0:47:58.600
<v Speaker 4>total number of micro organisms increased three log ten units.

0:47:59.239 --> 0:48:01.759
<v Speaker 4>Then they say had four degrees celsius. So I think

0:48:01.760 --> 0:48:06.640
<v Speaker 4>this would be simulating refrigerator temperatures. The decrease of pathogenic

0:48:06.719 --> 0:48:10.200
<v Speaker 4>microorganisms was much slower, and a decrease of three log

0:48:10.239 --> 0:48:14.920
<v Speaker 4>based ten units was observed only after seven weeks of incubation.

0:48:15.760 --> 0:48:20.279
<v Speaker 4>So this study finds eggnog without alcohol incubated at room temperature. Yeah,

0:48:20.320 --> 0:48:24.239
<v Speaker 4>that's you allow populations of salmonilla and staff to explode.

0:48:24.960 --> 0:48:27.840
<v Speaker 4>But in this study, the presence of seven percent straight

0:48:27.920 --> 0:48:31.960
<v Speaker 4>ethanol significantly reduced the amount of salmonilla staff in listeria

0:48:32.400 --> 0:48:34.960
<v Speaker 4>over the course of three weeks at room temperature and

0:48:35.080 --> 0:48:38.120
<v Speaker 4>over the course of seven weeks at fridge temperature. However,

0:48:38.400 --> 0:48:40.480
<v Speaker 4>other microorganisms can grow.

0:48:41.080 --> 0:48:43.799
<v Speaker 3>I'm pretty sure this recipe for egnog that they used

0:48:43.920 --> 0:48:47.480
<v Speaker 3>is the doctor cushion catheter, right, recipe for agnog with

0:48:47.560 --> 0:48:48.960
<v Speaker 3>all of these added diseases.

0:48:50.760 --> 0:48:55.239
<v Speaker 4>M you can just imagine Christopher Lee drooling over it. Well,

0:48:55.280 --> 0:49:00.480
<v Speaker 4>the Stanton twins dance, but the amount of alcohol clearly matters.

0:49:01.440 --> 0:49:05.960
<v Speaker 4>One highly cited informal experiment. This was not published in

0:49:06.040 --> 0:49:08.000
<v Speaker 4>a scientific journal as far as I can tell, but

0:49:08.080 --> 0:49:12.600
<v Speaker 4>it was done and reported on by NPR for Science Friday.

0:49:12.680 --> 0:49:15.839
<v Speaker 4>It was done in the late two thousands by microbiologists

0:49:16.040 --> 0:49:20.840
<v Speaker 4>at the at Rockefeller University named Vince Faschetti and Raymond

0:49:21.080 --> 0:49:24.960
<v Speaker 4>Schuck and it was covered on Science Friday. And apparently

0:49:25.400 --> 0:49:28.640
<v Speaker 4>these researchers used a recipe that the staff at the

0:49:28.760 --> 0:49:31.719
<v Speaker 4>university would make every year, which originally traced back to

0:49:31.840 --> 0:49:36.239
<v Speaker 4>the great American microbiologist Rebecca Lancefield. So this is her

0:49:36.440 --> 0:49:41.080
<v Speaker 4>original eggnog recipe. She had worked at Rockefeller University decades earlier.

0:49:41.160 --> 0:49:44.239
<v Speaker 4>Apparently they're still making her eggnog years after she passed away.

0:49:45.520 --> 0:49:49.720
<v Speaker 4>And the recipe includes raw eggs, but also cream, sugar,

0:49:49.840 --> 0:49:53.440
<v Speaker 4>and a lot of hard liquor. The liquors in this

0:49:53.640 --> 0:49:57.320
<v Speaker 4>version are bourbon and rum. NPR reported that the alcohol

0:49:57.719 --> 0:50:01.920
<v Speaker 4>concentration of the final drink was about twenty percent, and

0:50:02.040 --> 0:50:03.439
<v Speaker 4>the way they would do it is every year they'd

0:50:03.480 --> 0:50:06.839
<v Speaker 4>make it before Thanksgiving and then enjoy it around Christmas time,

0:50:06.920 --> 0:50:10.480
<v Speaker 4>so it had an incubation period in the refrigerator of

0:50:10.600 --> 0:50:15.040
<v Speaker 4>about six weeks. So for this experiment, the researchers made

0:50:15.080 --> 0:50:18.560
<v Speaker 4>their usual knog, but they deliberately spiked it once again

0:50:18.600 --> 0:50:21.120
<v Speaker 4>with salmonilla. They just you can watch a video of this.

0:50:21.239 --> 0:50:26.360
<v Speaker 4>They're just injecting this orange juice into the eggs. It's disgusting,

0:50:27.680 --> 0:50:29.759
<v Speaker 4>they say. They put in the amount of salmonella you

0:50:29.760 --> 0:50:34.319
<v Speaker 4>would expect from including about somewhere between one and ten

0:50:34.560 --> 0:50:39.400
<v Speaker 4>contaminated eggs, and then they took samples at various stages

0:50:39.440 --> 0:50:43.239
<v Speaker 4>of preparation and incubation to see what grew over the

0:50:43.320 --> 0:50:47.000
<v Speaker 4>course of the next three weeks. So egg plus salmonilla

0:50:47.080 --> 0:50:51.120
<v Speaker 4>with no alcohol, that's just it formed a solid mat

0:50:51.360 --> 0:50:55.600
<v Speaker 4>of salmony. Just huge boom, millions of bacteria. Disgusting.

0:50:56.160 --> 0:50:57.840
<v Speaker 3>You can need your spoon and your poset for that

0:50:57.960 --> 0:50:58.719
<v Speaker 3>one ugh.

0:50:59.600 --> 0:51:03.520
<v Speaker 4>Egg plus salmonella plus alcohol with the sample taken immediately

0:51:03.640 --> 0:51:08.360
<v Speaker 4>after mixing give you a modest reduction, but still plenty

0:51:08.400 --> 0:51:11.359
<v Speaker 4>of salmonilla growth. This would still absolutely make you sick.

0:51:12.280 --> 0:51:16.200
<v Speaker 4>Egg plus salmonella plus alcohol, but one day after mixing,

0:51:16.719 --> 0:51:20.040
<v Speaker 4>still plenty of salmonilla, but less than the one taken

0:51:20.160 --> 0:51:24.919
<v Speaker 4>right after mixing. One week later, there was noticeably less

0:51:25.000 --> 0:51:27.799
<v Speaker 4>bacterial growth, but they said still probably enough to make

0:51:27.840 --> 0:51:31.080
<v Speaker 4>you sick. But then the sample from three weeks later

0:51:31.400 --> 0:51:36.400
<v Speaker 4>there's nothing, no bacterial growth at all. So somewhere between

0:51:36.800 --> 0:51:41.240
<v Speaker 4>one week and three weeks this batch went from biohazard

0:51:41.520 --> 0:51:47.640
<v Speaker 4>to presumably safe. Though I noticed that the Science Friday

0:51:47.760 --> 0:51:51.200
<v Speaker 4>report made a joke about like the researchers themselves are

0:51:51.280 --> 0:51:54.360
<v Speaker 4>joking about this. They said, you know, we could really

0:51:54.480 --> 0:51:58.480
<v Speaker 4>commit to our result and just drink it, but maybe not,

0:51:59.200 --> 0:52:03.200
<v Speaker 4>which makes sense, right, like why risk it? And that

0:52:03.719 --> 0:52:05.719
<v Speaker 4>kind of spirit comes through in a lot of the

0:52:05.960 --> 0:52:09.480
<v Speaker 4>other sources I've seen talking about whether alcohol will render

0:52:09.600 --> 0:52:13.600
<v Speaker 4>your eggnog safe, because it seems clear there's evidence that

0:52:13.719 --> 0:52:16.800
<v Speaker 4>at least in some cases, even if you got unlucky

0:52:16.880 --> 0:52:20.440
<v Speaker 4>enough and got a contaminated egg, given enough alcohol and

0:52:20.640 --> 0:52:24.640
<v Speaker 4>enough time, the nog would probably be safe. But there

0:52:24.680 --> 0:52:27.080
<v Speaker 4>are a lot of variables here, and so it seems

0:52:27.160 --> 0:52:29.640
<v Speaker 4>like a bunch of public health and food safety sources

0:52:30.080 --> 0:52:33.439
<v Speaker 4>are still cautious. They're still kind of cagy about giving

0:52:33.480 --> 0:52:36.360
<v Speaker 4>the green light on this, and they default to saying

0:52:36.440 --> 0:52:38.520
<v Speaker 4>that if you want to be sure you're safe, you

0:52:38.560 --> 0:52:41.719
<v Speaker 4>should use pasteurized eggs from a carton which have been

0:52:41.760 --> 0:52:44.960
<v Speaker 4>rendered safe by preheating in the facility where they were packaged,

0:52:46.280 --> 0:52:49.800
<v Speaker 4>or they also recommend cooking the eggs basically like sources

0:52:49.880 --> 0:52:53.400
<v Speaker 4>citing experts at the FDA or the USDA say that

0:52:53.800 --> 0:52:56.840
<v Speaker 4>you can't always count on alcohol to kill potential bacterial

0:52:56.960 --> 0:52:59.520
<v Speaker 4>content of raw eggs, and if you want to be safe,

0:52:59.600 --> 0:53:01.879
<v Speaker 4>the eggs should be cooked. You can do this by

0:53:02.080 --> 0:53:04.880
<v Speaker 4>like mixing the eggs and milk together and gently bringing

0:53:04.960 --> 0:53:07.720
<v Speaker 4>up to one hundred and sixty degrees fahrenheit while stirring

0:53:08.280 --> 0:53:11.360
<v Speaker 4>to kill any possible bacterial content before you add the

0:53:11.400 --> 0:53:15.759
<v Speaker 4>other ingredients. So personally, I don't know exactly where we

0:53:16.160 --> 0:53:18.880
<v Speaker 4>are left here. I will say it looks like some

0:53:19.120 --> 0:53:24.440
<v Speaker 4>experiments do show that alcohol content will at least often,

0:53:24.600 --> 0:53:27.400
<v Speaker 4>maybe not always, but will at least often neutralize the

0:53:27.560 --> 0:53:31.960
<v Speaker 4>main bacteria that people are worried about, meaning salmonilla, given

0:53:32.080 --> 0:53:35.200
<v Speaker 4>enough alcohol and enough time. And I will say that

0:53:35.360 --> 0:53:38.320
<v Speaker 4>I also, just speaking for myself, not giving advice to

0:53:38.400 --> 0:53:43.120
<v Speaker 4>other people, have personally drunk eggnog made in this way

0:53:43.280 --> 0:53:46.239
<v Speaker 4>with raw eggs but with lots of alcohol content, and

0:53:46.440 --> 0:53:50.319
<v Speaker 4>personally I felt fine about it. But it also looks

0:53:50.400 --> 0:53:53.640
<v Speaker 4>like some experts still have concerns that this might not

0:53:53.800 --> 0:53:55.920
<v Speaker 4>always work, and caution that if you want to make

0:53:55.960 --> 0:53:58.440
<v Speaker 4>sure you're safe, you should cook your eggs or use

0:53:58.480 --> 0:53:59.560
<v Speaker 4>a pasteurized product.

0:54:00.200 --> 0:54:02.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean this is also enough to make one rethink

0:54:03.200 --> 0:54:04.839
<v Speaker 3>eating raw cookie dough and so forth.

0:54:06.000 --> 0:54:08.000
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, I mean, well, it's true, I guess of

0:54:08.080 --> 0:54:10.560
<v Speaker 4>anything with raw eggs in it, like, there is always

0:54:10.760 --> 0:54:14.640
<v Speaker 4>some small amount of risk. You know, some small proportion

0:54:14.960 --> 0:54:17.879
<v Speaker 4>of eggs out there are going to be infected. Most

0:54:17.960 --> 0:54:20.800
<v Speaker 4>eggs are fine, but some are going to have salmonella

0:54:20.880 --> 0:54:23.640
<v Speaker 4>in them, So you're always running that risk. And I guess,

0:54:24.400 --> 0:54:26.759
<v Speaker 4>I guess some of the difficulty comes from not just

0:54:27.400 --> 0:54:29.759
<v Speaker 4>whether or not you will accept the risk, but from

0:54:29.840 --> 0:54:33.399
<v Speaker 4>not knowing exactly how risky it is. Like you can't

0:54:33.440 --> 0:54:35.880
<v Speaker 4>come up, you don't have a number, you know, to

0:54:35.960 --> 0:54:38.919
<v Speaker 4>say like, Okay, I have this percent chance of getting

0:54:38.960 --> 0:54:41.320
<v Speaker 4>salmonilla if I do this instead, you just have a

0:54:41.520 --> 0:54:44.600
<v Speaker 4>vague sense that I have some small chance, and I

0:54:44.680 --> 0:54:46.600
<v Speaker 4>don't know exactly what that chance is.

0:54:47.440 --> 0:54:49.719
<v Speaker 3>But in a way, that's It's the holiday season. It's

0:54:49.760 --> 0:54:56.440
<v Speaker 3>about it's about thinking about your chances of survival. A

0:54:56.520 --> 0:54:59.480
<v Speaker 3>winter festivity that is supposed to get you through the

0:54:59.600 --> 0:55:03.040
<v Speaker 3>darkest portion of the year and hopefully see about the

0:55:03.160 --> 0:55:04.880
<v Speaker 3>resurrection of the living world.

0:55:05.840 --> 0:55:08.080
<v Speaker 4>That's quite beautifully put. But on the other hand, I'll

0:55:08.120 --> 0:55:10.719
<v Speaker 4>just say, like, you know, if you're not your yeah,

0:55:10.880 --> 0:55:13.040
<v Speaker 4>just cook your eggs or just use the past yourized thing.

0:55:13.080 --> 0:55:16.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's fine now. Last year unstuff to blow

0:55:16.040 --> 0:55:19.000
<v Speaker 3>your mind. We did an entire episode looking at the

0:55:19.280 --> 0:55:24.680
<v Speaker 3>major award leg lamp from a Christmas Story, the nineteen

0:55:24.680 --> 0:55:28.560
<v Speaker 3>eighties holiday classic film, and you know, looking at this

0:55:28.760 --> 0:55:35.239
<v Speaker 3>leg shaped lamp and finding predecessors to this in the

0:55:35.320 --> 0:55:38.640
<v Speaker 3>ancient world. In a similar way, I would like to

0:55:39.400 --> 0:55:42.320
<v Speaker 3>at the close of this episode on eggnog, consider the

0:55:42.400 --> 0:55:46.600
<v Speaker 3>nineteen eighty nine holiday film Christmas Vacation, which of course

0:55:47.080 --> 0:55:52.000
<v Speaker 3>starred a great cast Chevy Chase, Beverly Dangelo, Randy Quaid,

0:55:52.600 --> 0:55:56.160
<v Speaker 3>among others. But there are at least a couple of

0:55:56.239 --> 0:55:59.360
<v Speaker 3>key scenes in this movie in which the Griswold family

0:55:59.719 --> 0:56:03.520
<v Speaker 3>drink eggnog from glass goblets made in the likeness of

0:56:03.719 --> 0:56:07.640
<v Speaker 3>the Wally World moose. These are you can actually buy

0:56:07.719 --> 0:56:10.000
<v Speaker 3>these now, this is an actual product. But in the

0:56:10.080 --> 0:56:13.400
<v Speaker 3>movie they are these these little glass goblets, and they

0:56:13.520 --> 0:56:17.399
<v Speaker 3>have big glass moose antlers on either side, and there's

0:56:17.440 --> 0:56:20.799
<v Speaker 3>a big droopy moose snout on the front. You hold

0:56:20.840 --> 0:56:23.759
<v Speaker 3>it by the ear and you sip your eggnog that way,

0:56:23.880 --> 0:56:26.360
<v Speaker 3>or you gulp it, as it happens to be the

0:56:26.440 --> 0:56:27.440
<v Speaker 3>case in some of the scenes.

0:56:28.080 --> 0:56:31.000
<v Speaker 4>I imagine the moose face has to be facing out

0:56:31.160 --> 0:56:34.040
<v Speaker 4>or else the snout would sort of prevent you from

0:56:34.400 --> 0:56:35.960
<v Speaker 4>from getting it to your lips.

0:56:36.400 --> 0:56:38.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah, you'd have to hold the glass in just

0:56:38.280 --> 0:56:42.040
<v Speaker 3>the right way. It's a ceremonial vessel. And I started

0:56:42.080 --> 0:56:43.759
<v Speaker 3>looking around as thinking, I don't know, I don't know

0:56:43.800 --> 0:56:45.399
<v Speaker 3>if there's going to be something in the ancient world

0:56:45.480 --> 0:56:48.680
<v Speaker 3>that matches up with this. But luckily, once more, eighties

0:56:48.760 --> 0:56:52.920
<v Speaker 3>holiday movie prop design is in line with the manufacture

0:56:52.920 --> 0:56:56.160
<v Speaker 3>of artifacts in the ancient world. I would like to

0:56:56.239 --> 0:57:02.200
<v Speaker 3>discuss the ryton. This is generally spelled r hytn and

0:57:02.280 --> 0:57:04.960
<v Speaker 3>it is a style of head cup that appears in

0:57:05.120 --> 0:57:09.680
<v Speaker 3>various forms throughout the ancient world, according to Mara Abd

0:57:09.880 --> 0:57:13.719
<v Speaker 3>el Maghwud al Kadi in Forms and functions of rytons

0:57:13.920 --> 0:57:17.919
<v Speaker 3>in Ptotomaic Egypt. According to this author, they were likely

0:57:18.120 --> 0:57:21.960
<v Speaker 3>Persian in origin and were particularly popular during the Acaimenid

0:57:22.040 --> 0:57:25.400
<v Speaker 3>dynasty of five point fifty through three point thirty PCE.

0:57:26.200 --> 0:57:28.240
<v Speaker 3>You can look up images of the ryton and the

0:57:28.320 --> 0:57:31.120
<v Speaker 3>various versions of the ryton that appear in different times

0:57:31.200 --> 0:57:34.960
<v Speaker 3>and different cultures. One can roughly compare these two a

0:57:35.080 --> 0:57:39.360
<v Speaker 3>drinking horn like you know, the hollowed horn of a beast,

0:57:39.920 --> 0:57:42.400
<v Speaker 3>but the design and function here is a little more involved.

0:57:42.440 --> 0:57:45.680
<v Speaker 3>So imagine a drinking horn in which the slender part

0:57:45.720 --> 0:57:48.360
<v Speaker 3>of the horn, the tapering part of the horn, is

0:57:48.400 --> 0:57:52.360
<v Speaker 3>in the likeness of an animal's head, or in the

0:57:52.720 --> 0:57:55.960
<v Speaker 3>like the front half of an animal. And we don't

0:57:56.000 --> 0:57:58.120
<v Speaker 3>have time in this episode to really dig into the

0:57:58.200 --> 0:58:02.439
<v Speaker 3>variation and the different cultural takes in this episode. But again,

0:58:02.600 --> 0:58:05.120
<v Speaker 3>this would have been a realistic drinking vessel. This would

0:58:05.280 --> 0:58:08.360
<v Speaker 3>not be something you would bust out, I would imagine

0:58:08.400 --> 0:58:12.320
<v Speaker 3>for your just everyday consumption. This would be for ceremonial drinking.

0:58:13.040 --> 0:58:16.919
<v Speaker 3>And there are essentially two types of ryton. In one form,

0:58:17.600 --> 0:58:20.760
<v Speaker 3>you drink from the slender part of the ryton, holding

0:58:20.840 --> 0:58:24.200
<v Speaker 3>it above one's head or roughly you know, above one's

0:58:24.240 --> 0:58:27.160
<v Speaker 3>head or at least parallel with one's head by either

0:58:27.360 --> 0:58:30.760
<v Speaker 3>twin handles on the side, or from some other kind

0:58:30.800 --> 0:58:33.920
<v Speaker 3>of of handle that's a fixed to the object, or

0:58:34.080 --> 0:58:37.840
<v Speaker 3>even from sort of the horn itself. In other forms,

0:58:37.920 --> 0:58:40.560
<v Speaker 3>one drinks from the wide portion of the ryton, So

0:58:40.680 --> 0:58:43.320
<v Speaker 3>the whole thing is more like a traditional goblet, except

0:58:43.960 --> 0:58:47.720
<v Speaker 3>many of these designs would require you know, gripping by

0:58:47.720 --> 0:58:51.000
<v Speaker 3>the horns or by the or the antlers that are

0:58:51.040 --> 0:58:52.880
<v Speaker 3>on it. If there are antlers on it, and you

0:58:53.000 --> 0:58:55.280
<v Speaker 3>might not be able to set it down, it might

0:58:55.320 --> 0:58:56.600
<v Speaker 3>not have a bottom to it.

0:58:58.920 --> 0:59:02.520
<v Speaker 4>Wow, well that that almost suggests a certain way to drink.

0:59:03.040 --> 0:59:05.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and again this would be highly ritual, so it's

0:59:05.920 --> 0:59:08.919
<v Speaker 3>not about setting your drink aside and then doing other things.

0:59:09.000 --> 0:59:11.600
<v Speaker 3>You're not going to do any paperwork. This is probably

0:59:11.640 --> 0:59:13.760
<v Speaker 3>part of some ritual I don't know. You can easily

0:59:13.840 --> 0:59:15.680
<v Speaker 3>imagine some sort of warrior's feast, etc.

0:59:16.440 --> 0:59:19.760
<v Speaker 4>Right, you can't drink it while you're podcasting. It's maybe

0:59:19.840 --> 0:59:23.880
<v Speaker 4>to drink from while people stand around you chanting drink Right.

0:59:25.560 --> 0:59:28.280
<v Speaker 3>So there are various beautiful examples of the ryton, but

0:59:28.680 --> 0:59:31.920
<v Speaker 3>the one that really brought to my mind the Wally

0:59:32.000 --> 0:59:35.560
<v Speaker 3>World mug is the Stag's Head ryton, dating to four

0:59:35.680 --> 0:59:39.720
<v Speaker 3>hundred BCE. This is a silver artifact that actually made

0:59:39.720 --> 0:59:42.880
<v Speaker 3>headlines just last year due to its three point five

0:59:42.920 --> 0:59:46.760
<v Speaker 3>million dollar appraisal value and its presence among stolen antiquities

0:59:47.200 --> 0:59:50.640
<v Speaker 3>that were found in the possession of billionaire Michael Steinhardt.

0:59:51.520 --> 0:59:54.560
<v Speaker 3>You can look up articles on that again from just

0:59:54.680 --> 0:59:57.800
<v Speaker 3>last year. The item was apparently eluded from a museum

0:59:57.920 --> 1:00:00.600
<v Speaker 3>in Turkey originally, but I'm unsure exactly actly when the

1:00:00.680 --> 1:00:04.680
<v Speaker 3>looting occurred, other than sometime during the twentieth century during

1:00:04.720 --> 1:00:08.400
<v Speaker 3>a time of unrest, which that only narrows it down

1:00:08.480 --> 1:00:12.200
<v Speaker 3>so much concerning the twentieth century, though it does seem

1:00:12.240 --> 1:00:15.120
<v Speaker 3>to be of ancient Greek manufacturer somewhere in the region

1:00:15.160 --> 1:00:18.240
<v Speaker 3>of the Black Sea, probably from the fifth century BCE.

1:00:19.240 --> 1:00:22.920
<v Speaker 3>And with this one, you'd apparently drink from the stag's

1:00:22.960 --> 1:00:26.720
<v Speaker 3>lower lip while holding it aloft, though not by the antlers,

1:00:27.680 --> 1:00:30.320
<v Speaker 3>as is visible in many photos of this particular artifact.

1:00:30.480 --> 1:00:34.919
<v Speaker 3>There's this curved handle behind the neck. Oh, I see it. Yeah,

1:00:35.680 --> 1:00:38.800
<v Speaker 3>So the question remains, is the Wally World mug a

1:00:38.960 --> 1:00:44.040
<v Speaker 3>ryton No, it's not. No, it's not. Yes, it's first

1:00:44.040 --> 1:00:46.480
<v Speaker 3>of all, it's not horn shaped. It also doesn't you

1:00:46.560 --> 1:00:49.480
<v Speaker 3>don't drink from the moose's lips though that alone wouldn't

1:00:49.520 --> 1:00:53.920
<v Speaker 3>disqualify it from being a ryton. As we previously noted, though,

1:00:54.120 --> 1:00:57.160
<v Speaker 3>I've included a picture for you, Joe, of a ryton

1:00:57.840 --> 1:01:01.360
<v Speaker 3>that would involve you drinking from the wide portion as

1:01:01.360 --> 1:01:03.960
<v Speaker 3>opposed to the beast lips you can sort of see.

1:01:05.560 --> 1:01:07.720
<v Speaker 3>So this one would be very much a situation where

1:01:07.760 --> 1:01:09.960
<v Speaker 3>you have this kind of like I don't know, bronze

1:01:10.040 --> 1:01:12.480
<v Speaker 3>or golden chalice, and you wouldn't be able to set

1:01:12.520 --> 1:01:15.479
<v Speaker 3>it down because instead of having a flat surface, flat

1:01:15.560 --> 1:01:18.640
<v Speaker 3>bottom on the bottom of your goblet, there is like

1:01:18.720 --> 1:01:22.280
<v Speaker 3>the head of a ram down there. Yeah, so you'd

1:01:22.280 --> 1:01:24.400
<v Speaker 3>have to lay it on its side, I guess, in

1:01:24.480 --> 1:01:26.680
<v Speaker 3>which case you would either spill what you were drinking

1:01:27.120 --> 1:01:28.680
<v Speaker 3>or you would have to have consumed it all.

1:01:29.360 --> 1:01:32.200
<v Speaker 4>Once again, the medium is the message here. This is

1:01:32.320 --> 1:01:36.560
<v Speaker 4>technology that shows that by necessity, shows you a way

1:01:36.600 --> 1:01:37.040
<v Speaker 4>to use it.

1:01:37.520 --> 1:01:41.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. However, I will say the Wally World mug is

1:01:42.080 --> 1:01:44.600
<v Speaker 3>the likeness of a moose head. It is the likeness

1:01:44.600 --> 1:01:48.840
<v Speaker 3>of an animal's head. It also is a ceremonial drinking vessel. Clearly,

1:01:48.880 --> 1:01:50.840
<v Speaker 3>the Grizwolds are not drinking out of these year round.

1:01:50.880 --> 1:01:54.680
<v Speaker 3>They're busting them out for the holidays, and just as

1:01:54.760 --> 1:01:57.240
<v Speaker 3>some of these artifacts, such as the stag, were decorated

1:01:57.320 --> 1:02:00.200
<v Speaker 3>with warrior images and images of battle, and we can

1:02:00.240 --> 1:02:02.920
<v Speaker 3>imagine the ceremonies they involve, probably a ligne with some

1:02:03.000 --> 1:02:06.479
<v Speaker 3>sort of warrior ethos. We do see Clark Griswold drinking

1:02:06.560 --> 1:02:10.280
<v Speaker 3>copious amounts of nog while working cousin Eddie up for violence,

1:02:10.800 --> 1:02:13.600
<v Speaker 3>though curiously I had to go back. I was imagining this,

1:02:14.000 --> 1:02:18.440
<v Speaker 3>remembering this scene incorrectly, the scene where Clark Griswold is

1:02:18.640 --> 1:02:20.680
<v Speaker 3>throwing back a whole bunch of eggnog and talking about

1:02:20.720 --> 1:02:23.960
<v Speaker 3>how he wishes somebody would kidnap his boss. He's curiously

1:02:24.120 --> 1:02:28.200
<v Speaker 3>not drinking from one of the moose goblets in this scene.

1:02:28.520 --> 1:02:30.400
<v Speaker 3>Oh so, I don't know. I don't know what the

1:02:30.480 --> 1:02:32.400
<v Speaker 3>reason for that is. You'd think you'd want him drinking

1:02:32.440 --> 1:02:35.479
<v Speaker 3>out of the moose. Maybe it's just because it's harder

1:02:35.560 --> 1:02:37.640
<v Speaker 3>to hold. I don't know.

1:02:38.200 --> 1:02:40.360
<v Speaker 4>Maybe it's to show in a subtle way that Clark

1:02:40.480 --> 1:02:44.320
<v Speaker 4>is actually coldly calculating in the scene and he's not

1:02:44.480 --> 1:02:46.000
<v Speaker 4>as drunk as it would suggest.

1:02:46.800 --> 1:02:50.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's a whole topic for another time. Trying to

1:02:50.640 --> 1:02:53.960
<v Speaker 3>figure out Clark Griswold. How do we feel about Clark Griswold,

1:02:54.480 --> 1:02:57.800
<v Speaker 3>about his motivations and his desires in Christmas Vacation.

1:02:59.200 --> 1:03:08.000
<v Speaker 4>Clark is neutral, evils cousin Randy Quaid. I'd say chaotic neutral.

1:03:08.040 --> 1:03:11.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think so. All right, So again, not really

1:03:11.240 --> 1:03:14.440
<v Speaker 3>a Ryton in Christmas Vacation, But I think we might

1:03:14.560 --> 1:03:18.160
<v Speaker 3>well imagine a scene from an alternate dimension in which

1:03:18.880 --> 1:03:22.160
<v Speaker 3>there's a scene in Christmas Vacation in which Clark Griswold

1:03:22.280 --> 1:03:27.360
<v Speaker 3>holds aloft the mighty Wally the moose Ryton, this big

1:03:27.680 --> 1:03:31.240
<v Speaker 3>glass moose head or perhaps it's silver in this scenario,

1:03:31.280 --> 1:03:34.080
<v Speaker 3>a big silver moose head. Perhaps you grip it by

1:03:34.600 --> 1:03:37.760
<v Speaker 3>the antlers, and he's allowing cousin Eddie to then drink

1:03:38.000 --> 1:03:41.280
<v Speaker 3>nourishing nod from the lips of the moose before he

1:03:41.400 --> 1:03:46.480
<v Speaker 3>sends him out into glorious battle against the enemies of Christmas. Bravo.

1:03:47.480 --> 1:03:48.320
<v Speaker 3>All right, that's all I have.

1:03:51.600 --> 1:03:52.840
<v Speaker 4>God bless us everyone.

1:03:53.240 --> 1:03:56.360
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I will say also, I fortunately finished my egg

1:03:56.520 --> 1:03:59.240
<v Speaker 3>nog before we got to the draining of abscesses, so

1:04:00.000 --> 1:04:03.880
<v Speaker 3>hopefully that calibrates the podcast episode for anyone out there

1:04:03.880 --> 1:04:06.600
<v Speaker 3>who's like, oh, well, Rob's having an eggnog. I should

1:04:06.600 --> 1:04:09.400
<v Speaker 3>have an eggnog for this listening experience. I hope that

1:04:09.480 --> 1:04:12.000
<v Speaker 3>you too, were finished before the abscesses were drained.

1:04:12.720 --> 1:04:13.840
<v Speaker 4>Why are you saying that, Rob?

1:04:13.880 --> 1:04:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Are you saying that?

1:04:14.640 --> 1:04:17.360
<v Speaker 4>Otherwise it would suggest the mental image that your glass

1:04:17.440 --> 1:04:21.560
<v Speaker 4>of creamy mixture is what's out coming out of the abscess.

1:04:21.560 --> 1:04:26.760
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that it is a goblet of holiday puss, which

1:04:26.840 --> 1:04:29.600
<v Speaker 3>you might be drinking from the glass ahead of a moose,

1:04:29.760 --> 1:04:32.560
<v Speaker 3>which doesn't help, or from the lips of a moose.

1:04:32.680 --> 1:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Right on.

1:04:33.160 --> 1:04:35.240
<v Speaker 4>I guess Merry Christmas everybody.

1:04:36.000 --> 1:04:37.480
<v Speaker 3>All right, Yeah, we're going to go and close it

1:04:37.520 --> 1:04:39.120
<v Speaker 3>out here, but we'd love to hear from everyone out

1:04:39.160 --> 1:04:40.919
<v Speaker 3>there if you have. I mean a lot of people

1:04:41.000 --> 1:04:43.160
<v Speaker 3>out there are going to have some sort of holiday

1:04:43.320 --> 1:04:47.520
<v Speaker 3>tradition involving some manner of eggnog. We didn't really have

1:04:47.600 --> 1:04:49.640
<v Speaker 3>time to get into all the variations, but I know

1:04:49.720 --> 1:04:52.720
<v Speaker 3>there are some. I think I've had, like a Puerto

1:04:52.800 --> 1:04:56.919
<v Speaker 3>Rican variation of eggnog before that was quite delightful. There's

1:04:56.920 --> 1:05:02.240
<v Speaker 3>so many different regional variations. Familytions, Please write in. We'd

1:05:02.280 --> 1:05:04.560
<v Speaker 3>love to hear your take on all of this. In

1:05:04.680 --> 1:05:07.080
<v Speaker 3>the meantime, we'll remind you that Stuff to Blow Your

1:05:07.160 --> 1:05:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Mind is a science podcast with our core episodes on

1:05:10.320 --> 1:05:13.200
<v Speaker 3>Tuesdays and Thursdays. On Wednesdays we do a short form

1:05:13.280 --> 1:05:15.240
<v Speaker 3>artifact or monster fact. On Mondays we do a listener

1:05:15.280 --> 1:05:17.680
<v Speaker 3>mail episode, and on Fridays we set aside most serious

1:05:17.720 --> 1:05:20.080
<v Speaker 3>concerns and just talk about a weird film on Weird

1:05:20.200 --> 1:05:21.000
<v Speaker 3>House Cinema.

1:05:21.640 --> 1:05:25.840
<v Speaker 4>Huge thanks to our audio producer, Max Williams. If you

1:05:25.840 --> 1:05:28.160
<v Speaker 4>would like to get in touch with us with feedback

1:05:28.240 --> 1:05:30.520
<v Speaker 4>on this episode or any other, to suggest a topic

1:05:30.600 --> 1:05:32.640
<v Speaker 4>for the future, or just to say hello, you can

1:05:32.720 --> 1:05:36.080
<v Speaker 4>email us at contact at stuff to Blow your Mind

1:05:36.280 --> 1:05:36.760
<v Speaker 4>dot com.

1:05:38.800 --> 1:05:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

1:05:48.280 --> 1:05:51.040
<v Speaker 2>more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

1:05:51.240 --> 1:05:53.960
<v Speaker 2>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you're listening to your favorite shows.