WEBVTT - OpenAI Part 5: Beware the Ides of November

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>In the fall of twenty twenty three, Sam Altman was

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>more powerful than he'd ever been. He and his armies

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of researchers had conquered new frontiers of technology and reaped

0:00:13.400 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the financial rewards. He had defeated those who challenged his power.

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:23.599
<v Speaker 1>Like Elon Musk, his dominance was cemented, or so it seemed.

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Though he occupied the throne, there was in fact a

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>powerful and mysterious board that governed him. They had the

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 1>ability to fire him, to dissolve the whole company if

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>they saw fit. On this board there were six people,

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and one of them was a woman named Helen Toner.

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 1>She was a researcher who studied AI systems, and you

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>can hear her passion here on the TED stage.

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 2>AI is already all around us, so we can't just

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 2>sit around and wait for things to become clearer.

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>In October, we're twenty twenty three, Helen co authored a

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 1>paper about various companies in the AI industry. As a researcher,

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:10.319
<v Speaker 1>Helen published lots of papers, but this one was not

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>like the rest, because this one mentioned open AI and

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:19.199
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't fully complementary. Here's my colleague, Sharene Gafari.

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Toward the end of this document, they contrast open Ai

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 3>with a big competitor.

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>The competitor is Anthropic, the rival company started by former

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>open Ai employees, so it was a bit of a

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:33.320
<v Speaker 1>sensitive subject.

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 3>And in part of that paper, basically they say that

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 3>Anthropic was more safe and contrasts that with the release

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:44.320
<v Speaker 3>of open AI's chat GPT. You could read parts of

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 3>it as sort of shining up Anthropic as a better

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 3>model or example of how to be safe in terms

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 3>of how it's releasing its Ai models.

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Now, Helen's paper only mentioned open Ai and Nthropic briefly,

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's overall pretty benign comment, but Sam didn't like it.

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>He was upset. According to our reporting, Sam started back channeling,

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>talking to one board member then another to try to

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>gain their support to vote Helen out. He would approach

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.959
<v Speaker 1>someone and say this other person agrees with me, when

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:24.519
<v Speaker 1>sometimes that wasn't the case. A source told us that

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:27.679
<v Speaker 1>at one point he said that a board member had

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>said Helen's obviously got to go, when in fact that

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>board member was on Helen's side.

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Sam started lying to other board members in order to

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 2>try and push me off the board. We were already

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 2>talking pretty seriously about whether we needed to fire him

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 2>after years of this kind of thing. All four of

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 2>us who fired him came to the conclusion that we

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:52.839
<v Speaker 2>just couldn't believe things that Sam was telling us.

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>That's Helen on the ted Ai show about six months

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:59.799
<v Speaker 1>after this all went down. This is the first time

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>she publicly and unambiguously accused Sam of lying. She said

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 1>that the board saw through his tactics and it pushed

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>them to take dramatic action. By the way, we did

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 1>talk to an Open AYE spokesperson about Sam's alleged back channeling.

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>They told us that this account significantly differs from Sam's

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 1>recollection of these conversations, and they did not respond to

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a list of questions that we sent them about this episode. Overall,

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:30.919
<v Speaker 1>here's my colleague Rachel Metz.

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:34.239
<v Speaker 4>Sam's trying to get them to remove Helen from the board,

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 4>but the board members feel like they're being manipulated and

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 4>perhaps hearing different people hearing different things. In the end,

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 4>instead of getting rid of Helen, the board decides to

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 4>get rid of Sam.

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>What happened with Helen's paper wasn't an isolated incident. It

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>was part of a bigger pattern of Sam's behavior. According

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to our reporting, the board members had lost trust in

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>him over time. Helen says in the interview that Sam

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>had a habit of misrepresenting and withholding information, even outright lining,

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>which made it difficult for the board to do its job.

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>That job is to uphold the mission of open AI,

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:19.359
<v Speaker 1>to ensure that advanced AI benefits all of humanity. And

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the board members were starting to believe Sam was a

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>threat to that mission, so they start turning on Sam.

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>In particular, one very important, very surprising board member goes

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>behind Sam's back, Ilia sitt Skiver. Ilia one of Sam's

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>co founders. He had been there from day one, and

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.719
<v Speaker 1>he was the AI researcher driving much of open AI's

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>technological progress. In fact, when Elon Musk goes on CNBC

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to boast about his own role at open AI, he

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>name checks Ilia.

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 5>I am the reason OpenAI exists. I was instrumental in

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:05.160
<v Speaker 5>cruiting the key scientists and engineers, most specifically, most notably

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 5>Ilia Soskayer, and ultimately decided to join opening And really,

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 5>Ilia joining was the was the lynchmann for Opening I

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:14.600
<v Speaker 5>being ultimately successful.

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 6>You're very disappointed.

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Ilia and Helen talked and two of the other board

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>members joined these conversations as well, and together they came

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>up with a secret plan. They would ambush Sam and

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>remove him from power for the good of humanity. You're

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>listening to Foundering. I'm your host Ellen Hewitt. In today's episode,

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>our final one for this series, will take you inside

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:49.479
<v Speaker 1>the events that rocked open Ai last November. We'll cover

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>how Sam Altman was thrown out of his own company

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and the series of chaotic events that followed. It's a

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 1>five day white knuckle boardroom drama, shock, betrayal, midnight negotiations.

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:08.559
<v Speaker 1>You may think you know the story of the open

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 1>Ai coup, but will help you understand what happened behind

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the scenes, how it all played out, and what it

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 1>says about Sam. The board members saw Sam as deceptive

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and manipulative. In this episode, we'll dive into that question ourselves.

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>When Sam says something, can we trust it? We'll be

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 1>right back. Sam has always emphasized that it's very, very

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>important that he be able to be fired. As an example,

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 1>he set it in front of his employees at an

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>all hands meeting in twenty nineteen. Here's Reid Hoffman, the

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:58.279
<v Speaker 1>co founder of LinkedIn and a famous venture capitalist. He

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:02.039
<v Speaker 1>had recently joined the Open Ai board, and Sam brought

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>him up to talk on stage.

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:06.839
<v Speaker 6>He ambushed me with the following question, which is, what

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:09.159
<v Speaker 6>will you do if I'm not doing my job? And

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 6>I was like, oh, I've never been asked this by

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 6>a CEO in front of a company all hands before.

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 6>This is the internal thought track. I was like, well,

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 6>I'll help you, right, because like, oh, help you do

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 6>the job the right ways, you know, because I'm like,

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 6>what the hell, Sam, what you're asking me this question?

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 6>And he said no, no, okay, say that doesn't work and

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 6>I'm still not doing my job.

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 7>What do you do?

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 6>I'm like, well, okay, I fire you, like we get

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 6>a new CEO. And he's like, okay, great, And I

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 6>was like, okay, Like, never been asked by a CEO

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 6>in front of the entire company whether or not I

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 6>would fire them if they weren't doing the job.

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Wow, that's refreshing. A CEO who wants to be held accountable,

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>A CEO who wants to be fireable. What a principled guy.

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>It makes you do a double take. On his media

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>tour in twenty twenty three, after the success of Chat GPT,

0:07:57.400 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Sam makes this point not just to his employees but

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>to the world. In speech after speech, he emphasizes just

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>how fiable he is and how good that is. He

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 1>told an interviewer, I serve at the pleasure of the board.

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I do this the old fashioned way. Or the board

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 1>can just decide to replace the CEO, he said at

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a Bloomberg conference.

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 8>The board can fire me. I think that's important.

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>The board can fire me. The board can replace me

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>whenever they want. It sounds so humble. He had made

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>this a part of his brand, and I think it's

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 1>meant to convey that open ai is a different kind

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 1>of company and he is a different kind of CEO.

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>There's another way that Sam signals his good intentions. Here

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:51.959
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't own any equity in open Ai. This is unusual.

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Most startup founders own a big slice of their company.

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>If the company becomes really valuable, that means the founder

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 1>gets rich. Sam originally didn't take equity because of a

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>specific rule related to open ai being a nonprofit. Then

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>he just didn't take any more. Here he is with

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 1>my colleague Emily Chang.

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 9>So to be clear, like if open ai, you know,

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 9>is massively profitable, you won't benefit financially.

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 8>One of the takeaways I've learned from questions like this

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 8>is that this like concept of having enough money is

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 8>not something that is easy to get across to other people.

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 9>It's hard for people to understand.

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 8>But I like, I have enough money.

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna make The thing is Sam's already rich, He's

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 1>a billionaire from his startup investments. But he often makes

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>this point that he has no equity, that he's not

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>doing open Ai for the money. It's another way for

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Sam to make himself sound non threatening. He uses it

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 1>to earn our trust by suggesting he can occupy this

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 1>very powerful position while remaining pure of heart. To his credit,

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I think he's being somewhat earnest here. He's acknowledging that

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>he has a lot of money already and will make

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>lots more Separate from open Ai. Focusing on money is

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a distraction, though. Even if Sam isn't

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>driven by money, he can still be hungry for other

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 1>perks that come with running open Ai. Power, fame, influence. Okay, Now,

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 1>this story picks up in November twenty twenty three. Sam

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:38.960
<v Speaker 1>is at the peak of his game. His company is

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 1>valued at eighty six billion dollars. Open ai just held

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>its first Developer's Day.

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 10>Please welcome to the stage, Sam Altman.

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 8>Good morning, Welcome to our first ever open Ai dev Day.

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 8>We're thrilled that you're here and this energy is awesome.

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Month Sam is speaking at APEC, an international conference where

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>world leaders are gathered in San Francisco. It's a Thursday evening.

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>He steps off the stage, then zips over to Oakland

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to a warehouse that's associated with a burning Man Camp.

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>He gives another interview, this time in front of a

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>bunch of artists.

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:25.079
<v Speaker 8>That desire to connect, that desire to know the human

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 8>behind it and be part of that community. I think,

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 8>in like a wash in a sea of tons of

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 8>machine generated art, debt, desire for the human connection will

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 8>go up.

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 11>Knock down.

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Sam's telling the artists that AI will actually be great

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>for them. That night, Sam got a text from Ilia

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>asking if they could talk the following day, Friday, at noon,

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Sam agreed he had no reason to believe anything was wrong.

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:58.199
<v Speaker 1>Next Sam flew to Las Vegas. According to the Wall

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Street Journal, he was hoping to catch a Formula one

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 1>race that weekend. He's really into race cars and owns

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>two McLaren's himself. So on Friday, he's in Vegas. At noon,

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Sam clicked on a link to a Google meet. He

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>was met with four board members of open ai, including

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Ilia and Helen. It was almost the entire board, but

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 1>one person was missing, Greg Brockman, president of open Ai,

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Sam's co founder and his closest ally. The board didn't

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>need Greg to be there. They already had four votes

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>out of six. Ilia delivered the news, Sam, You're fired.

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Sam was as shocked as anyone. The call was short.

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>At twelve nineteen, Ilia texted Greg asking to talk. At

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 1>twelve twenty three, Greg also clicked on a Google meet link.

0:12:57.520 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>They told Greg that he was being removed from the

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>board and that Sam was out. Things were kicking into

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>action fast. Open Ai published a blog post. It said

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:13.680
<v Speaker 1>that the board had done a review and decided to

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>remove Sam because he was quote not consistently candid in

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 1>his communications with the board, and they added the board

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:27.959
<v Speaker 1>no longer has confidence in his ability to continue leading

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>open Ai. Here's my colleague, Rachel Metz.

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 4>The first few lines of it, I didn't really understand

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 4>what was happening, and it took me a few seconds

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 4>to have that oh shit, mom.

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 12>L oh, we need to get back to some big

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 12>break you news that just crossed the wire, learning that

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 12>Sam Altman is leaving Open AI and we now have

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 12>a few more details on this. We're learning that the

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 12>decision was not voluntary.

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 3>At the point.

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>And here's my colleague Sharen.

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 3>This was one of the moments that I feel like

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:00.319
<v Speaker 3>will be a shocking news moment of my career for

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 3>a business tech story. This is about as dramatic as

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 3>it gets.

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>The most surprising part of this was that a major

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:12.079
<v Speaker 1>force behind this coup seemed to be Ilia.

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I mean Ilia plays a key role in

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 3>this whole ouster. He is the brutus to Sam Caesar

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 3>and this is a huge betrayal. I mean, this is

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 3>the guy that's been working side by side with Sam

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 3>with Greg Brockmann, right and they're riding high at the

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 3>peak of their success right now. They should be a

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 3>happy trio.

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 5>Like.

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 3>It's just sort of a complete dissolution of what from

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 3>the outside looked like such a successful.

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Partnership at two Ilia. We can't know what was going

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 1>on inside Ilia's head at that moment, but think about

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the enormity of this all the board had planned this

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 1>in total secrecy because they suspected Sam might outmaneuver them

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>if he knew. They hadn't even told Microsoft until a

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>few minutes before they told Sam. They decided it had

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to be cloak and dagger, an ambush, a stabbing at

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the Senate. Ilia was also turning his back on Greg Brockman.

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Greg was a staunch ally of Sam, so the board

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>had excluded him from their meetings about this plan, and

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 1>they booted him from the board. For Ilia, this had

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>to feel heavy. He and Greg had been close back

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>in the early idealistic days of open Ai. It was

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the two of them running things, Greg chugging away at

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the business and Ilia dreaming up their research projects. I

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>mean Ilia had officiated Greg's wedding. Now that relationship was severed.

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Right after the blog post went out, Greg tweeted that

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>he was resigning from open ai in solidarity with Sam.

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>The board announced that the interim CEO was Mira Murradi,

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>an open Ai executive, on Friday afternoon. Then well into

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the night, reporters were calling, texting, talking to sources trying

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to figure out what the hell was going on. Here's

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Sharene and Rachel again.

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 3>I was a scramble to figure out, well, why are

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 3>you saying that he's lied, and if so.

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>What did he lie about?

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 4>The board statement was so brief and so vague that

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 4>it left all this room open for speculation.

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Everyone was obsessed with one phrase from the memo, not

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 1>consistently candid. The board was all but saying that Sam

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 1>had been a sneaky liar, but they were also vague

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>about the details. Reporters weren't the only people who jumped

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>on this. A former open ai employee named Jeffrey Irving

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>tweeted that although Sam was always nice to him, he

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>lied to him on various occasions too, and he said

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>that Sam was deceptive and manipulative to others that he knew.

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:07.399
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey didn't respond when we asked him to clarify. The Internet,

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 1>especially Twitter, flooded with theories about why Sam had been fired.

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Many of them were completely speculative. Had Ilia glimpsed some

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of advanced AGI internally and freaked out and wanted

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 1>to hit a kill switch? The question became a meme

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>on social media. What did Ilia see? Anyway? While everyone

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>was trying to answer that, the weekend descended into chaos

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:40.479
<v Speaker 1>On Friday, Sam and Greg thought they were just going

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to pack up and start a new company, I guess,

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 1>and Open AI's board members were looking for a permanent

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:51.719
<v Speaker 1>CEO to take over. But on Saturday, a new idea

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:57.159
<v Speaker 1>came into the picture that Sam should come back. Investors

0:17:57.160 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and employees started pressuring the remaining board members to undo

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>their decision and reinstate Sam.

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 13>Back to the open AI story. It is still the

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 13>top story. What is happening within open AI HQ three

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 13>miles from where I'm standing? Is Sam Altman coming back?

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 9>On not?

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:16.879
<v Speaker 3>I'm parked hoodside of open Aey's offices on Sunday with

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 3>a handful of other AI reporters trying to see you know,

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 3>Sam's reportedly in the open a office negotiating a comeback.

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:27.159
<v Speaker 3>So I go there. I'm like, you know, hanging out outside.

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:30.679
<v Speaker 3>I'm like looking, can we see Sam coming out or leaving?

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 4>And like waiting for a new pope to be named?

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:34.879
<v Speaker 4>You know, you're waiting for the smoke signal to come up.

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:37.159
<v Speaker 3>Totally, it was like waiting for a smoke signal from

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 3>the pope.

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>The twists kept coming on Sunday night.

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 9>The situation it just continues to unfold, and it's chaotic.

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 9>Certainly has been for the last few days of boardroom

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:48.959
<v Speaker 9>coup investors pushing for Altman's return.

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 13>Okay, fast forward to present day. This is the latest.

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 13>After a game of musical chairs, Microsoft announces that Altman

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 13>and his co founder Greg Brockman will join Microsoft. This

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 13>announce on literally on the heels of a frenetic weekend

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 13>in Silicon Valley following the aftermath of Altman's firing on Friday, Microsoft.

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Shads in addition to hiring Sam and Greg, Microsoft actually

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 1>offers to hire any open ai employee who wants to

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>leave to join them. At the same time, the open

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 1>ai board has stayed firm even as talks were progressing

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>about maybe bringing Sam back. The board made a new

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 1>announcement late Sunday.

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 5>Emmitt Sheer was appointed interim CEO of open Ai after

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 5>the board quietly vetted candidates starting on Saturday night.

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Emmett Sheer the co founder of Twitch. The board had

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>been scrambling to find an interim CEO, and this is

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 1>who they got. Emmett was a funny choice for a

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>couple reasons. He was actually one of the other founders

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:53.120
<v Speaker 1>in that very first batch of y combinator with Sam

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 1>almost twenty years earlier, and he has also said publicly

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:02.239
<v Speaker 1>that he worries a lot about AI going rogue and

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:05.959
<v Speaker 1>destroying the world. You can hear a mix of confidence

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and fear in his voice on the Logan Bartlett podcast

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>when he talked in twenty twenty three about super intelligent AI, and.

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 7>That kind of intelligence is just an intrinsically very dangerous

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 7>thing because intelligence is power. Human beings are the dominant

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:22.360
<v Speaker 7>form of life on this planet pretty much entirely because

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 7>we're more smarter than the other creatures. It's like a

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 7>universe destroying bomb. Like this is not a figure it

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:31.399
<v Speaker 7>out later thing. This is like a big problem Southern Manhattan, Miami.

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Amidst all of this, things were getting really heated for Ilia.

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Of the four board members who voted to remove Sam,

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:43.640
<v Speaker 1>he's the only one who works at Open AI. He's

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>there alongside other employees, so he was experiencing the decision

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 1>in a much more direct way than anyone else on

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:51.399
<v Speaker 1>the board.

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 3>I think within the company also, you see a confusion

0:20:56.160 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 3>as to Ilia's motivations, you know, and I knew We're

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 3>hearing that sort of staff are bewildered or confused like

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 3>why did Ilia do this? And that if he has

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 3>a good reason that why doesn't he come out and

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 3>say it. Ilia is a very visible, well known and

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 3>previously seemingly well liked person at open Ai, and all

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:16.959
<v Speaker 3>of a sudden, you know, you have staff feeling like

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 3>who is this guy? Like why did he turn on Sam?

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 3>And why did he sort of screw our company? Or

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 3>and why did he you know, put us in this position?

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Now?

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Open Ai employees were confused and starting to get angry.

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>They were rapidly souring on the board, including Ilia. On Sunday,

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Ilia invited open Ai employees to an all hands meeting.

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 3>And basically no one shows up. Very few people, right,

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:46.880
<v Speaker 3>and it's clear that he just doesn't have the support

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 3>of his company, and you know, people are furious with him.

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 4>I think, in part, what all this did was show

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 4>the board members who had forced out Sam Altman that

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.400
<v Speaker 4>there was a lot more employee loyalty than they had

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 4>thought there was, and that they may have actually kicked

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:06.920
<v Speaker 4>off a complete revolt inside the company.

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>And Ilia was also getting other sorts of pressure. According

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:16.360
<v Speaker 1>to The Wall Street Journal, Greg Brockman's wife Anna had

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a tearful conversation with Ilia in the lobby of open

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:22.919
<v Speaker 1>Ai that Sunday evening. She was pleading with him to

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>reconsider his plan to change his mind and bring Sam back.

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Around one thirty am Monday morning, a group of fed

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>up open ai employees drafted a letter to the board.

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:38.919
<v Speaker 1>They said the way the board had fired Sam and

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>hadn't given an adequate explanation had shown they weren't capable

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of leading the company.

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:48.919
<v Speaker 4>I woke up early the next morning to see people

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 4>were signing petitions saying they were going to leave the

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:55.439
<v Speaker 4>company if Sam didn't come back. This is hundreds, quickly,

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:57.879
<v Speaker 4>hundreds and hundreds. In the end, almost all of the

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:01.679
<v Speaker 4>company's nearly eight hundred employees signed this, posting on social

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:04.679
<v Speaker 4>media that open ai is nothing without its people. This

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 4>becomes sort of a viral tagline that you see all

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 4>over on x and it seems organic and fast moving

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 4>and sincere.

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Soon Twitter is full of these declarations. Sam and Greg

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>start replying to the tweets with heart emojis. It was

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>an impressive display of loyalty.

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 13>Open Ai investors are still trying to return co founder

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.199
<v Speaker 13>Sam Outman to a leadership role at the company. At

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:36.360
<v Speaker 13>the same time, open ai staff are threatening mass mutiny,

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:41.440
<v Speaker 13>saying they'll follow Outman to Microsoft unless the board resigns Microhoe.

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>In addition to heart emojis and support and loyalty, there

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>was another factor at play as well. Money. Right before

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 1>the coup, open Ai had been organizing a share sale

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:58.880
<v Speaker 1>for its employees, letting employees cash out some of their equity. Now,

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>with all this chaos us that sale was in danger.

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>There was a lot of money at stake.

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 3>This could create a whole new class of basically overnight millionaires,

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 3>and they're looking forward to this, and then now you

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:13.719
<v Speaker 3>have the entire future of the company sort of up

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:16.880
<v Speaker 3>in the air. Certain investors are saying that they may

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 3>not continue with the tender offer if Sam doesn't come back.

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:25.479
<v Speaker 3>So you know, goodbye to that house you were planning

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:28.199
<v Speaker 3>on buying, or that early retirement you wanted to do.

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>So that's a pretty strong financial incentive to sign this letter,

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:38.159
<v Speaker 1>and you could imagine that if ninety five percent of

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 1>your colleagues had signed a letter, there's significant pressure for

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 1>you to sign it too. The craziest part of the

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>petition is that it includes Ilia's name. By Monday morning,

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 1>he has flipped. He tweeted, I deeply regret my participation

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>in the board's actions. I never intended to harm open AI.

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I will do everything I can to reunite the company.

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:07.439
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps Ilia was swayed by the outpouring of support for

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Sam from the entire company, or maybe he folded because

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>he realized his position was not looking strong here' Sharen.

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:18.919
<v Speaker 3>I think you know, if you're Ilia, you also he

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 3>was feeling so much pressure from his fellow colleagues and peers.

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 3>You know, you have this overwhelming flood of people sort

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 3>of making fun of Ilia and the board and or

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 3>saying like how could you do this, and just sort

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 3>of not taking this new leadership seriously. And so if

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 3>you're Iliah, you know you have to be like really

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 3>asking yourself if what the path forward is here? And so,

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, it kind of makes sense why he ends

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:45.880
<v Speaker 3>up reversing his decision and doing it complete when Ady

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 3>in a couple of.

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Days, once Ilia flipped back to team Sam, and after

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:55.159
<v Speaker 1>all those employees had signed that letter, that was the

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:58.159
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the end of this effort to fire Sam.

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:03.360
<v Speaker 1>The remaining board members realized they had lost. They gave

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 1>up on trying to get rid of Sam, and instead

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:09.920
<v Speaker 1>focused on trying to get some concessions, like keeping him

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:12.880
<v Speaker 1>off the board until an investigation could be done into

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:17.480
<v Speaker 1>his conduct. Monday and Tuesday were hectic days full of

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 1>negotiations on how to bring Sam back. In just a

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>few days, Sam had grappled his way into a dominant

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:30.160
<v Speaker 1>position once again. Now, the question in these tense negotiations

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't if Sam could be allowed back, it was how

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 1>do we please Sam?

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:38.879
<v Speaker 3>So all of a sudden, this board that orchestrates acup

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 3>sort of loses their leverage and Sam just seems like

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 3>kind of holds all the cards, and it becomes about, well,

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 3>how can we make a deal that Sam is amenable to.

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>By Tuesday night, they've reached a deal. The board is

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:57.919
<v Speaker 1>going to be overhauled. Helen is out, as is another

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>board member who voted against Sam. Ilia is off the

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>board too, though he's still working at open AI. New

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 1>board members will be found. Most importantly, Sam returns as

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:16.679
<v Speaker 1>CEO Greg comes back too. Greg tweets a celebratory picture

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to mark the occasion.

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 3>So, after Sam gets reinstated a CEO, Greg Brockman goes

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 3>on x and he posts this selfie with a bunch

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 3>of staff members like huddled behind him, and they're all

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:30.680
<v Speaker 3>grinning ear to ear and we're holding at peace signs,

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 3>and he posts we are so back, which just sums

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 3>up the mood so well. Right, they're jubilant, they're just

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 3>like partying. You know, this is a complete win, that's right.

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>They sent a company wide memo that night telling people

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to come to the office to party. It's an unbelievable turnaround.

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:56.919
<v Speaker 1>In just five days, Sam went from being ambushed to

0:27:57.000 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 1>being back as CEO, with his enemies cast out and

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:04.639
<v Speaker 1>an army of employees willing to give up their jobs

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 1>on his behalf. In this version of the story, Caesar

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 1>rises from the dead.

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 3>He really does come back, in my view, stronger than

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 3>ever because he not only has you know, this new

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 3>board that's that's he's helped hand select, but he has

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 3>the entire backing of his company and this implicit kind

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 3>of card that he can pull it if at any point,

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:33.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, he wants to, like Microsoft, will, We'll back

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 3>him up. We'll have a spot for him and all

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 3>the employees who want to leave and go start their

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 3>own version of the company. And so yeah, I think Sam,

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 3>in many ways, it's sort of like, if you come

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 3>for the King, you best not miss like they really missed.

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back. So after five dramatic head spinning days,

0:28:56.520 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Sam was back. It was late Tuesday night. That week

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 1>open Ai was actually off. It was a week of Thanksgiving,

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 1>so the employees breathed a sigh of relief and tried

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to enjoy the holiday. And once that week was over

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:14.959
<v Speaker 1>and people got back to work, there was still this

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 1>question that was never really answered. Why did Ilia and

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the others believe they should fire Sam. Sam and open

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Ai have never answered this question in a public transparent way.

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 1>As part of the deal to bring back Sam, open

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Ai agreed to hire a law firm to lead an

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>external investigation into the events that led to Sam's ouster.

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 1>The company was not required to share the details of

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the investigation publicly, so surprise, they didn't. They held a

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 1>press conference and summarized the findings, and.

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 6>The special committee recommended in the full board expressed their

0:29:56.360 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 6>full confidence in Sam Altman and Greg Brockman.

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 4>It was not super specific, but essentially it said that

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:05.400
<v Speaker 4>Altman had been cleared of wrongdoing.

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 3>There was not a lot, There was no smoking gun.

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 3>The report of the summary was very brief. We you know,

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 3>as reporters have not seen the full investigation.

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 1>The press conference was really short. My colleague Rachel recorded

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 1>this tape. You can hear her typing in the background.

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>When it's Sam's turn to talk. He sounds really mumbly

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and begrudging. He makes a half hearted apology to Helen Toner,

0:30:33.000 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's easy to miss when I.

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 8>Believe that a former board member was harmon opening after

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 8>the actions.

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 5>I think I could have.

0:30:38.920 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 8>Handled that situation with more grace and care. I apologize

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 8>for that. I wish I'd done it differently, and we'll

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:46.960
<v Speaker 8>learn from the future. I'm eager to move forward and

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 8>to begin the collaborate with.

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>After the investigation concluded with a whimper, two board members

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>who were kicked off, Helen Toner and Tasha McCauley, released

0:30:56.440 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a statement. It said, in part, as we told the investigators, deception,

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 1>manipulation and resistance to throw oversight should be unacceptable. It's

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a carefully worded sentence, but it's also pretty clear to

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>me that they're saying deception and manipulation played a big

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 1>part in them deciding to fire Sam. After all the

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 1>dust settled, Ilia remained a troubling question. Mark.

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 3>I think we still don't know Ilia's full motivation for

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 3>turning on Sam. I think he in particular being the

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 3>one who knows Sam so well, who's worked with him

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 3>so closely, And that is a big question of like,

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 3>why would you questions for the character of someone who

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 3>you seemingly have a good relationship with.

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Ilia left Open AI in May, half a year after

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the coup. He spent those six months in purgatory, still

0:31:55.240 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 1>an employee at the company, but rarely seen at the office,

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 1>no public appearances. When reporters tried to reach him, they

0:32:03.720 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 1>were sent to his lawyer, who almost never issued a statement.

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:10.880
<v Speaker 1>It got to the point where Sam even joked about

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>it on podcasts. Here he is on Lex Friedman in March.

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:16.080
<v Speaker 12>Let me ask you about Iliah.

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Is he being held hostage in a.

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 12>Secret nuclear facility?

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:20.479
<v Speaker 14>No?

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:24.560
<v Speaker 3>What about a regular secret facility? No, what about a nuclear,

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:25.479
<v Speaker 3>non secret facility?

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 6>Not that I mean this is becoming.

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>In the video, Sam is smiling. You can hear it

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 1>in his voice. He deflects this question. He says, it's

0:32:35.680 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a question for Ilia. In all of this, Ilia seems

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to have been the most tragic figure the brilliant scientist

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 1>who gave open Ai credibility and a competitive edge, who

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 1>has been able to predict many of the changes in

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 1>AI that made these recent advancements possible. But then he

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 1>attempted to overthrow Sam and failed, becoming a pariah among

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the staff, and ultimately he did this to himself, maybe

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 1>because of his beliefs about AI safety. Even though Sam

0:33:08.400 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 1>was back as CEO, some serious rifts remained within open AI.

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>After Ilia's departure was announced. His team fell apart. It

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 1>had been the team focused on preventing disaster scenarios from AI.

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 1>And what about Helen Toner, the board member who Sam

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:29.640
<v Speaker 1>tried to oust her paper helped kick off all of this.

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:33.479
<v Speaker 1>While since the coup, Helen has faced a lot of

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 1>online trolling. People treated her like the villain in this saga.

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 1>AI devotees castigated her as a decelerationist, someone who wants

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to slow down the advancement of AI. Martin Screlly called

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 1>her and the other board members quote the most disgusting

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 1>group of people who ever lived, which is funny because

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Martin Schrelly is commonly called the most hated man in America.

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I feel some sympathy For Helen, I think she may

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 1>have seen herself as doing her job, first as an

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:10.320
<v Speaker 1>academic in writing her paper, and then as a board

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:15.760
<v Speaker 1>member in pushing back against a brazen CEO. For several months,

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:19.879
<v Speaker 1>Helen was largely silent about the whole ordeal until May

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:22.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four, when she gave the interview to the

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 1>ted Ai Show. She sounds incredibly candid and confident in

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 1>her criticisms of Sam.

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 2>I think it's really important to know that has really

0:34:31.719 --> 0:34:36.440
<v Speaker 2>gone under reported is how scared people are to go

0:34:36.520 --> 0:34:41.360
<v Speaker 2>against Sam. They had experienced him retaliating against people retaliating

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 2>against them for past instances of being critical. They were

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 2>really afraid of what might happen to them. So it

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:50.400
<v Speaker 2>was very hard for those people who had had terrible

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 2>experiences to actually say that for fear that, you know,

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:57.959
<v Speaker 2>if Sam did stay in power as he ultimately did,

0:34:58.560 --> 0:35:00.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, that would make their lives miserable.

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Meanwhile, Sam almost immediately picked up where he left off.

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 1>He started doing press appearances again. He spoke at Davos

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 1>in January, just a couple months after the saga. My

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:18.680
<v Speaker 1>colleague Bradstone asks him the question that's on everyone's minds

0:35:19.000 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I sort.

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 11>Of smiled because you came to the Bloomberg Tech conference

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 11>in last June and Emily Chang asked it was something

0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:28.759
<v Speaker 11>along along the lines of why should we trust you,

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 11>and you very candidly says you shouldn't, and you said

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 11>the board should be able to fire me if they want,

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 11>and of course then they did, and you quite depthtely

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:39.760
<v Speaker 11>orchestrated your return.

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:42.960
<v Speaker 8>Actually, let me tell you something I the board did that.

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:47.160
<v Speaker 8>I was like, I think this is wild, super confused,

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:49.319
<v Speaker 8>super caught off guard, but this is the structure. And

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 8>I immediately just went to go thinking about what I

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 8>was going to do next. It was not until some

0:35:53.560 --> 0:35:55.960
<v Speaker 8>board members called me the next morning that I even

0:35:56.000 --> 0:35:59.800
<v Speaker 8>thought about really coming back. When they asked you to

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:02.880
<v Speaker 8>come back, I want to talk about that, but like

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:05.800
<v Speaker 8>the board did have all of the power there, No,

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:08.719
<v Speaker 8>you know what, I'm not going to say that next thing.

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:11.920
<v Speaker 6>I think you should continue.

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 1>The audience laughs when Brad reminds Sam that he had

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:21.399
<v Speaker 1>said the board should be able to fire him right

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 1>before he was fired, and Sam notably did not laugh.

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:31.120
<v Speaker 1>He didn't even crack a smile. He responds that the

0:36:31.160 --> 0:36:33.960
<v Speaker 1>board wanted to bring him back on they had all

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the power there, not him, And then a third person

0:36:37.680 --> 0:36:41.480
<v Speaker 1>on the panel, Anna Macanju, who's an executive at open Ai,

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 1>jumps in.

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 10>I would also just say that I think that there's

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:46.279
<v Speaker 10>a lot of narratives out there. It's like, oh, well,

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:48.879
<v Speaker 10>this was orchestrated by all these these other forces. It's

0:36:48.920 --> 0:36:51.439
<v Speaker 10>not accurates. I mean, it was the employees of open

0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:55.239
<v Speaker 10>Ai that wanted this, and that thought was the right

0:36:55.280 --> 0:36:57.239
<v Speaker 10>thing for Sam to be back, you.

0:36:57.200 --> 0:36:59.759
<v Speaker 8>Know, like, yeah, I think I'll say is I think

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:03.719
<v Speaker 8>it's important that I have an entity that like canfire this,

0:37:03.840 --> 0:37:05.960
<v Speaker 8>but that entity has got to have some accountability too,

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:10.240
<v Speaker 8>and that is a clear issue with what happened.

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:10.919
<v Speaker 10>Of course.

0:37:10.960 --> 0:37:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so Sam is saying his usual talking point that

0:37:15.000 --> 0:37:18.600
<v Speaker 1>it's important that he can get fired, but he's adding

0:37:18.640 --> 0:37:22.240
<v Speaker 1>a big caveat that the board needs to do things

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:26.080
<v Speaker 1>in the right way, and in this case they didn't.

0:37:26.480 --> 0:37:31.880
<v Speaker 1>He's criticizing the board. Reid Hoffman agrees with Sam that

0:37:32.000 --> 0:37:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the board was to blame for the whole fiasco. Reed

0:37:35.760 --> 0:37:38.600
<v Speaker 1>had actually been on the board of open Ai for years,

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:42.480
<v Speaker 1>but left in early twenty twenty three, just months before

0:37:42.480 --> 0:37:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the coup.

0:37:43.400 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 6>Well, when you look at the four board members who

0:37:50.560 --> 0:37:56.440
<v Speaker 6>got together and fired Sam. Three of them had never

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:59.000
<v Speaker 6>really had experience in other boards and understand kind of

0:37:59.000 --> 0:38:03.319
<v Speaker 6>board governance. They had so little experience that there were

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:06.320
<v Speaker 6>six board members. They didn't invite the fifth, Greg Brockman,

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:10.480
<v Speaker 6>because they presumably knew that he would disagree with them.

0:38:10.680 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 6>And you think, well, basic board competence is you don't

0:38:13.719 --> 0:38:16.239
<v Speaker 6>disinvite the board members who you can disagree with. You

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:18.799
<v Speaker 6>want to hear the disagreement, you want to talk about it.

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 1>So he's dismissing them as a bunch of amateurs, which

0:38:23.239 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't entirely true because a few of the board members

0:38:26.640 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 1>have served on other boards as well. We asked Reid

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to clarify, and he said they hadn't been on the

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 1>boards of fast growing tech companies. I can kind of

0:38:37.200 --> 0:38:40.399
<v Speaker 1>see where Reid and Sam are coming from. I'm sure

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 1>they really believe the board acted inappropriately, but I also

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:48.440
<v Speaker 1>can't help but see it as someone saying, we have

0:38:48.560 --> 0:38:51.560
<v Speaker 1>designed a system where I am accountable to you, you

0:38:51.640 --> 0:38:57.160
<v Speaker 1>should hold me accountable. Then when it actually happens, they're shouting, no, wait,

0:38:57.239 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I didn't mean it like that.

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:01.279
<v Speaker 3>It all sounds and nice to say We're going to

0:39:01.320 --> 0:39:04.480
<v Speaker 3>have this benevolent company that's kind of a nonprofit and

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:07.040
<v Speaker 3>kind of not and as his board that can fire

0:39:07.120 --> 0:39:09.719
<v Speaker 3>at CEO at any time. And then in practice that

0:39:09.800 --> 0:39:13.360
<v Speaker 3>turned out to be a lot less friendly than it

0:39:13.400 --> 0:39:14.680
<v Speaker 3>may be sounded initially.

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So I've spent a lot of time talking about Sam,

0:39:19.480 --> 0:39:22.320
<v Speaker 1>what shaped him when he was young, how he speaks

0:39:22.400 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 1>in public, how he acts in private, and over the

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:28.560
<v Speaker 1>course of the months I spent working on this podcast,

0:39:29.120 --> 0:39:31.759
<v Speaker 1>I've observed one thing that I think is key to

0:39:31.920 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 1>understanding Sam. Sam is slippery, especially when it comes to

0:39:37.640 --> 0:39:40.719
<v Speaker 1>his words. I think it's fair to say that when

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:44.320
<v Speaker 1>he says something, you cannot be sure that he actually

0:39:44.360 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 1>means it. An obvious example him saying he should be fired.

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:54.560
<v Speaker 1>He made it sound so clear, so obvious, no caveats.

0:39:54.920 --> 0:39:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Then he got fired, and all of a sudden, that

0:39:58.320 --> 0:40:03.680
<v Speaker 1>promise doesn't apply. Here's another example. Sam loves to boast

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 1>about how transparent he is. Here he is last summer

0:40:07.600 --> 0:40:11.000
<v Speaker 1>talking at a Bloomberg conference. This was in the middle

0:40:11.040 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of his big press tour of twenty twenty three.

0:40:13.480 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 8>You know me, for a long time public talking, I'd

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:19.480
<v Speaker 8>rather be in the office working but I think at

0:40:19.480 --> 0:40:22.919
<v Speaker 8>this moment in time, like people deserve basically as much

0:40:22.920 --> 0:40:25.520
<v Speaker 8>time asking questions as they want, and I'm trying to

0:40:25.520 --> 0:40:26.480
<v Speaker 8>show up and do it.

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:30.000
<v Speaker 1>But people deserve as much time asking questions as they want.

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Like Sam is actually framing his transparency as a moral imperative,

0:40:36.040 --> 0:40:38.879
<v Speaker 1>not just something he likes, but something he should do,

0:40:39.280 --> 0:40:43.560
<v Speaker 1>given how pivotal AI could be. It's reassuring to hear

0:40:43.640 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 1>him welcome questions and the way he says he'd rather

0:40:47.760 --> 0:40:50.719
<v Speaker 1>be working than be in an interview. It has this

0:40:50.800 --> 0:40:54.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of humble, awe shucks energy to it. He says

0:40:54.560 --> 0:40:57.759
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't like being on stage. He says he's sort

0:40:57.760 --> 0:41:01.840
<v Speaker 1>of a shy person. I'm sure some of it is earnest,

0:41:02.560 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 1>but he's smart enough to know. It also bolsters his image,

0:41:06.480 --> 0:41:09.560
<v Speaker 1>makes him non threatening. It reminds me of the way

0:41:09.600 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 1>he always writes his tweets in all lowercase, so friendly.

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Last year, Sam said it would be super unreasonable not

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to answer questions. He also said that he and open

0:41:22.280 --> 0:41:27.560
<v Speaker 1>AI deserve great scrutiny right now. But in more recent interviews,

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Sam seems to have changed his tune. Instead of answering

0:41:31.800 --> 0:41:36.520
<v Speaker 1>those questions about Ilia's whereabouts he deflected, and again in

0:41:36.560 --> 0:41:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that conversation at Davos, when Brad asked a question about

0:41:40.160 --> 0:41:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Sam's firing to the co panelist Ata Maconju, Sam jumped

0:41:44.640 --> 0:41:45.759
<v Speaker 1>in and blocked it.

0:41:46.360 --> 0:41:49.920
<v Speaker 14>Anna, you wrote a remarkable letter to employees during the saga,

0:41:50.000 --> 0:41:52.680
<v Speaker 14>and one of the many reasons I was excited to

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:55.680
<v Speaker 14>have you on stage today was to just ask you,

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 14>what were those five days like for you?

0:41:58.239 --> 0:41:59.839
<v Speaker 11>And why did you step up and write that.

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:03.560
<v Speaker 8>Ana can clearly answer this if she wants to, But like,

0:42:03.920 --> 0:42:05.520
<v Speaker 8>is really what you want to spend our time on,

0:42:05.640 --> 0:42:07.960
<v Speaker 8>like the soap opera rather than like what Ahi is

0:42:08.000 --> 0:42:08.319
<v Speaker 8>going to do?

0:42:08.360 --> 0:42:11.759
<v Speaker 14>I mean, I'm wrapping it up, but I mean I

0:42:11.800 --> 0:42:12.760
<v Speaker 14>think people are interested.

0:42:13.120 --> 0:42:15.400
<v Speaker 11>Well, we can leave it here if you want to, Yea,

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:18.360
<v Speaker 11>let's answer that question to talk about we can move on.

0:42:19.200 --> 0:42:21.960
<v Speaker 10>I would just say, for color that it happened the

0:42:22.040 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 10>day before the entire company was supposed to take a

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:25.800
<v Speaker 10>week off, so Friday.

0:42:27.000 --> 0:42:29.480
<v Speaker 1>That comment, do you really want to talk about this

0:42:29.520 --> 0:42:33.520
<v Speaker 1>soap opera? Is a perfect example of Sam's habit of

0:42:33.640 --> 0:42:37.520
<v Speaker 1>grabbing control of a conversation when he's asked a question

0:42:37.600 --> 0:42:40.799
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't like or doesn't want to answer. He not

0:42:40.840 --> 0:42:44.279
<v Speaker 1>only skates past it, he flips it back on the

0:42:44.280 --> 0:42:49.640
<v Speaker 1>interviewer and chastises them for asking Sam is a scold.

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:54.839
<v Speaker 1>I've noticed that he uses this tactic, especially when journalists

0:42:54.920 --> 0:43:00.480
<v Speaker 1>start asking him about interpersonal drama, messiness, instances where he

0:43:00.560 --> 0:43:03.680
<v Speaker 1>might come out looking bad. He did a similar thing

0:43:03.719 --> 0:43:07.600
<v Speaker 1>at a Bloomberg conference last year by colleague Emily Chang

0:43:07.800 --> 0:43:11.040
<v Speaker 1>asks him about Elon Musk, who has been bad mouthing

0:43:11.120 --> 0:43:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Sam and open AI, complaining that they are no longer

0:43:14.280 --> 0:43:15.480
<v Speaker 1>open now.

0:43:15.520 --> 0:43:17.960
<v Speaker 9>Obviously we've seen all the barbs that you and Elon

0:43:18.000 --> 0:43:21.080
<v Speaker 9>have been trading in public and in interviews, writing I

0:43:21.080 --> 0:43:24.520
<v Speaker 9>don't really well you're responding. You respond, you get asked

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:25.560
<v Speaker 9>about it by people.

0:43:25.360 --> 0:43:27.480
<v Speaker 8>Like me, to be mostly people like you to be honest.

0:43:27.680 --> 0:43:29.440
<v Speaker 8>Most other people ask about the technology.

0:43:29.440 --> 0:43:30.080
<v Speaker 14>But that is.

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:35.080
<v Speaker 1>True, most other people ask about the technology frustrated ouch.

0:43:36.880 --> 0:43:40.719
<v Speaker 1>His implicit message is pretty clear to me. It's virtuous

0:43:40.800 --> 0:43:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and high minded to want to talk about the technology,

0:43:43.760 --> 0:43:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the science. It's petty to ask about his relationship with Elon.

0:43:49.440 --> 0:43:52.520
<v Speaker 1>When Emily presses, he doubles down, like, I really.

0:43:52.320 --> 0:43:53.640
<v Speaker 8>Am happy to talk about this, that this is the

0:43:53.640 --> 0:43:55.480
<v Speaker 8>most important topic we can spend the rest of the

0:43:55.480 --> 0:43:55.960
<v Speaker 8>time on it.

0:43:56.920 --> 0:43:58.319
<v Speaker 1>I think the rest of the.

0:43:58.280 --> 0:43:58.799
<v Speaker 4>Time just some.

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:03.400
<v Speaker 1>In a taped interview ahead of this on stage conversation,

0:44:04.080 --> 0:44:07.719
<v Speaker 1>when Emily asked him a similar question about Elon, he

0:44:07.840 --> 0:44:09.240
<v Speaker 1>dismissed her in the same way.

0:44:09.800 --> 0:44:11.600
<v Speaker 8>I don't think this is in the top one hundred

0:44:11.680 --> 0:44:14.960
<v Speaker 8>most important things happening related to AI right now, for what.

0:44:14.920 --> 0:44:18.840
<v Speaker 1>It's worth it to me, it sounds like Sam means

0:44:19.080 --> 0:44:23.160
<v Speaker 1>he should only answer the questions he deems worthwhile, and

0:44:23.200 --> 0:44:28.560
<v Speaker 1>he dismisses questions by implying they're the wrong ones, unimportant questions,

0:44:28.840 --> 0:44:33.879
<v Speaker 1>not worth his time. The board fired Sam for being

0:44:34.120 --> 0:44:38.200
<v Speaker 1>not consistently candid, and while we may never know exactly

0:44:38.280 --> 0:44:41.960
<v Speaker 1>what they were referring to, we've seen many other instances

0:44:42.000 --> 0:44:46.360
<v Speaker 1>when Sam's actions didn't live up to his words. Sam

0:44:46.400 --> 0:44:50.960
<v Speaker 1>promised transparency, he promised that he could get fired. He's

0:44:51.000 --> 0:44:54.320
<v Speaker 1>walked both of those back. He talked a big game

0:44:54.440 --> 0:44:57.600
<v Speaker 1>about how poverty shouldn't exist and how we should give

0:44:57.680 --> 0:45:01.920
<v Speaker 1>money to everyone without conditions, but he set conditions on

0:45:02.040 --> 0:45:07.440
<v Speaker 1>financial help to his sister. Even the actress Scarlet Johanson

0:45:07.600 --> 0:45:11.840
<v Speaker 1>has complained about Sam's duplicity. She said that in twenty

0:45:11.880 --> 0:45:15.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, Sam asked her to lend her voice to

0:45:15.120 --> 0:45:19.320
<v Speaker 1>chat GPT. She said no, and then when an ai

0:45:19.440 --> 0:45:22.520
<v Speaker 1>voice was released, it sounded so much like her that

0:45:22.600 --> 0:45:26.840
<v Speaker 1>it confused even her family and close friends. Some of

0:45:26.960 --> 0:45:31.680
<v Speaker 1>open AI's promises have also eroded. Open ai started as

0:45:31.719 --> 0:45:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a nonprofit, but many critics, most loudly elon Musk, say

0:45:36.760 --> 0:45:41.320
<v Speaker 1>they're not anymore. Not really. The nonprofit board was supposed

0:45:41.360 --> 0:45:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to have power over Sam, power to even dissolve open

0:45:45.040 --> 0:45:47.680
<v Speaker 1>ai if they thought it was in line with the mission.

0:45:48.520 --> 0:45:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Those board members tried to exercise their power, and as

0:45:52.000 --> 0:45:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a result, they were removed. This pattern matters because Sam

0:45:58.120 --> 0:46:01.960
<v Speaker 1>and open ai are making more and more promises with

0:46:02.080 --> 0:46:06.080
<v Speaker 1>bigger and bigger consequences and asking us to take their

0:46:06.120 --> 0:46:12.080
<v Speaker 1>word for it. Meanwhile, Sam's ambition keeps growing. He once

0:46:12.160 --> 0:46:16.399
<v Speaker 1>considered running for governor of California. In addition to sitting

0:46:16.480 --> 0:46:20.360
<v Speaker 1>at the top of open ai, he's overseeing other projects

0:46:20.360 --> 0:46:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that connect to and support open ai, like a sam

0:46:24.200 --> 0:46:29.879
<v Speaker 1>Altman ecosystem. He has his universal basic income research in

0:46:29.880 --> 0:46:33.359
<v Speaker 1>case AI puts us out of work. He has world coin,

0:46:33.800 --> 0:46:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the crypto project that scans eyeballs in order to distribute

0:46:37.440 --> 0:46:41.239
<v Speaker 1>that income. He has a nuclear fusion company that will

0:46:41.239 --> 0:46:45.440
<v Speaker 1>create enough energy for AI. He's trying to raise enormous

0:46:45.440 --> 0:46:49.240
<v Speaker 1>sums of money to make chips that power AI. Someone

0:46:49.239 --> 0:46:52.759
<v Speaker 1>who knows Sam told me he wants to be world emperor.

0:46:53.320 --> 0:46:56.880
<v Speaker 1>The goal is to take over the world. Paul Graham,

0:46:57.000 --> 0:47:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Sam's former mentor, told a reporter, I think his goal

0:47:01.200 --> 0:47:10.920
<v Speaker 1>is to make the whole future. Foundering is hosted by

0:47:11.000 --> 0:47:16.280
<v Speaker 1>me Ellen Hewitt. Sean Wen is our executive producer. Rachel

0:47:16.320 --> 0:47:20.759
<v Speaker 1>Metz and Sharene Gaffari contributed reporting to this episode. Molly

0:47:20.840 --> 0:47:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Nugent is our associate producer. Blake Maples is our audio engineer.

0:47:25.640 --> 0:47:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Mark Million and Vandermy Seth Fiegerman, Tom Giles and Molly

0:47:30.239 --> 0:47:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Schutz are our story editors. We had production help from

0:47:33.719 --> 0:47:38.279
<v Speaker 1>Jessica Nix and Antonio muffaretch Thanks for listening. If you

0:47:38.400 --> 0:47:41.919
<v Speaker 1>like our show, leave a review, and most importantly, tell

0:47:41.960 --> 0:47:43.840
<v Speaker 1>your friends. See you next time.