WEBVTT - Thoma Bravo to Pay $12.3 Billion for Dayforce, Nasdaq Fall Continues

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is live

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and Evvelow in San Francisco.

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up tech stocks They waiver,

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:28.159
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the NASA one hundred's worst losing streak in

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 2>five months. Concerns about AI valuations dominate that as we

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 2>speak with Tom of Bravo about its acquisition of hr

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 2>software provided day.

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 3>Force in what is set to become one of the

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 3>investment firm's largest ever deals.

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 2>And Google introduces new consumer gadgets including smartphones, a watch,

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 2>and wireless earbuzz with AI front and center. But first

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 2>we turn our attention to these markets. We have been

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 2>read throughout most of the training day, but certain stocks

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 2>are doing their best to lift us into the green.

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 2>We're off by only a tenth of a percent, but

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 2>still that's three days of an ASA one hundred, the

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 2>longest losing streak. Sains back in April in video doing

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 2>its best to pullus higher.

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 3>So two in fact is Palenteer.

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 2>But check out how much Plenteer has been down over

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:12.919
<v Speaker 2>the course of what had been a six day losing streak.

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Eroding seven hundred billion dollars worth more than seventy three

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars worth sorry of its market valuation, and we

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 2>have seen question marks over more broadly the evaluation among

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 2>so many of these AI winners.

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 3>But let's get a take on this.

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:30.959
<v Speaker 2>What prompted some of the questioning of the valuations and

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:31.759
<v Speaker 2>whether it will hold.

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 3>Denny Fish is with US portfolio.

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Manager of course, of the Global Technology and Innovation team

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 2>of rich Annis Henderson Investors. It's a firm with one

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 2>and fifty seven billion dollars in assets and management. It

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 2>just launched its own artificial intelligence ETF yesterday. We're looking

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 2>at some of the names Denny in that ETF. Tough

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 2>timing amid the current pressure on some of the companies.

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 3>What do you make of this questioning?

0:01:57.480 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so, you know, importantly, the reason we launched this

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 4>fund is we believe this is the most profound technology

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 4>shift that we will see in our lifetimes. So whatever

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 4>happens over the next couple of months is going to happen.

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:12.079
<v Speaker 4>But the direction of travel over the next twenty years

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 4>we think is very positive as it relates to AI.

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 4>And if we just you know, reflect back over the

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:21.920
<v Speaker 4>last twenty five years and the cloud, the social and

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 4>the mobile boom. You know, that was you know, twenty

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:28.239
<v Speaker 4>plus years of value creation. And you know, we think

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 4>AI has the potential to be even larger than that.

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 4>You know, and with that, you know, and and and

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, given you know your question on valuations, it depends,

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 4>you know, I mean, they're clearly pockets of the market

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 4>where things are more speculative and very highly valued. So

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:47.360
<v Speaker 4>you know, you you talked about Pollunteer for example, you know,

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:49.239
<v Speaker 4>is a good example of a company that trades it

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 4>a very elevated multiple, great company, great fundamentals, extremely high valuation.

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 4>And then you know, you can come back to names

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 4>like Taiwan Semi Canductor, or you know, the trades at

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 4>a team's earnings multiple, or you know Nvidia that's still

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 4>trades that are reasonable multiple given its earnings growth rate

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:12.399
<v Speaker 4>with really powerful secular trends, and you can get more

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 4>comfortable in areas like that, and so you know, our

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 4>whole goal also, you know, just to put a finer

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 4>point on this is you know, AI is going to

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 4>affect the entire economy. So the purpose of our fund

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 4>is it's going to be heavy with tech as you

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:28.959
<v Speaker 4>can see in terms of the top holdings, but also

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 4>you'll find you know, names and financial services, consumer, healthcare,

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 4>industrial and other areas of the economy as well.

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 2>It's about where you think AI is going to enable

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 2>enhancelled benefits. So I'm interested by the fact that you

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 2>got eaten in their Blackstone with thinking real estate, with

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 2>thinking power. How much has that not been priced into

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 2>these sorts of companies yet, Denny.

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think if we're looking you know, at the

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 4>next five to ten years, you can make a case

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 4>for you know, the companies that you know, we've populated

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 4>in the portfolio right out of the gate. And I mean,

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, you you mentioned power. You know, it's probably

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 4>the single biggest constraint to deploying data centers right now

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 4>at the scale that we need and the density that

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 4>we need is getting you know, power available. And then

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 4>once you can get the power available, then you have

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 4>to cool the data centers. And there's an entire ecosystem

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 4>around that that specializes in, you know, in those dynamics,

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 4>and you know, clearly we want to participate in that,

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 4>you know, over the longer term.

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 2>What's really interesting is about the application of AI. So yes,

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:35.559
<v Speaker 2>it's about the infrastructure that goes in and the power

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 2>that we talk about the real estate, but then it's

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 2>actually what it does for businesses. You talk about financials,

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 2>talk about healthcare. What do you make of this MIT

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 2>research report that everyone seems to be worrying about the

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 2>fact that ninety five percent of all pilots fail.

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, we're in that phase right now. And you know,

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, I was in the valley during the dawn

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.039
<v Speaker 4>of the commercial Internet, and there were a lot of

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 4>failures at that point in time too. And you know,

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:02.839
<v Speaker 4>during that period, you know, we had a boom, we

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 4>had a bust, and you know, and then it actually

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 4>created some of the most powerful companies on the planet

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 4>today and you know, laid the foundation for you know,

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 4>these these multi year trends. And so I think kind

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 4>of depends what you're doing. You know, there are clear

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 4>applications out there. Clearly people are getting you know, value

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:25.040
<v Speaker 4>out of things like chat, GPT, deep research co pilots

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 4>being widely deployed, and then you have a lot of

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:30.479
<v Speaker 4>experimental stuff that's going on in companies and it's the

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 4>nature of the beast that you know, you're generally gonna

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 4>you know, fail a little bit out of the gate,

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 4>and you learn from that the technology gets better, people

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 4>get sharper in terms of deploying the technology and figuring

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 4>out how to use it, how to change their behaviors.

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 4>And then you look back and you know, three or

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:49.719
<v Speaker 4>five years and you're like, wow, I kind of you know,

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 4>misforced for the trees, Denny, what.

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 3>Was interesting you referenced the dot com era.

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Just recently Intel was back at a profit in terms

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 2>of its price versus future profit.

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 3>It's valuation was akin to the dot com era. It

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:05.119
<v Speaker 3>was so high.

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:07.479
<v Speaker 2>What do you make of soft putting in money? I

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 2>know that's in the latest fund and also the government.

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so you know, Intel is an interesting one on

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 4>the valuation. The reason the multiple so high is because

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 4>earnings have absolutely collapsed. And so you know that that

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 4>pe equation, when the ego is a lot lower, the

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:26.039
<v Speaker 4>pe goes up a lot. So not necessarily because the

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:30.720
<v Speaker 4>market's been enthusiastic about Intel, but rather you know the

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 4>financial performance of the company. And then you know, I

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:35.920
<v Speaker 4>just think, you know, you know, SoftBank confessing in Intel.

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 4>It's it's a little bit curious, you know, potentially or

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 4>or particularly given that you know they have their ownership

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 4>in arm uh. You know, they're participating in Stargate.

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 3>UH.

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 4>They bought amp here. So it's it almost feels like

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of a hedge just because we're going

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:58.720
<v Speaker 4>to be undersupplied with semiconductor content for years. It feels

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 4>like and you know, that and power are very significant constraints.

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 4>And I think if you just kind of look at

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 4>the behaviors we've seen so far and some of the

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 4>assets of soft banks selling down kind of feels like

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 4>they're selling down some of their traditional holdings that they've

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 4>had and things like you know, T Mobile for example,

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 4>and they're redeploying that into AI infrastructure and then the

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 4>US government. You know, I just don't know, because I mean,

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 4>there's a reason a Taiwan semi conductor has done as

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 4>well as they've done. They've just they've had leadership now

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 4>for a decade. Their competencies are just you know, much

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 4>more pronounced than Intel. Intel has been in a hole

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 4>for a long time. You know, Pat Gelsinger gave it

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 4>a shot for you know, almost five years. We have

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 4>a lot of respect for lip Bhutan. We invested with

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 4>him at Cadence Design for years. Exceptional leader but you know,

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 4>Intel's not going to get fixed overnight, and there's nothing

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 4>the government can do to change the disparity between Intel's

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 4>process technology in Taiwan Semiconductor.

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 2>Danny Fish of Janis Henderson Investors, fascinating to have you

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 2>on and thanks for talking us through the new ETF.

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 2>What name isn't in that ATF is Apple Many Field.

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Perhaps it's lagging you on AI. Some other news coming

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 2>to us from Apple as Apple TV plus price is

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 2>going to be on the rise thirty percent to thirteen

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 2>dollars a month starting August the twenty first. Apple is

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 2>saying it's annual price, more broadly for streaming services is unchanged.

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 3>It's commenting on.

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 2>The streaming price hike in an email statement, we're off

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 2>by four tens percent.

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:33.479
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, we're going to be talking.

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 2>To Toma Bravo managing partner there hold in Spain is

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:38.959
<v Speaker 2>the private equity giant agrees to.

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 3>Buy HR software firm day Force. This is Blomberg Tech,

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Toma Bravo.

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 2>It's just announced that it's agreed to purchase HR software

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 2>day Force, paying seventy dollars a share in cash. Following

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 2>day Force a twel point three billion dollars. Leased to

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 2>say that blueberg Brief and kid Danny Berga joins us

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 2>for a key conversation on the.

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:12.079
<v Speaker 5>Mattap Carolin, thank you so much, and yes, let's underscore

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 5>how large this deal is. At twelve point three billion dollars,

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 5>it is the largest deal ever for Toma Bravo and

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:20.959
<v Speaker 5>certainly one of the biggest this year for this market.

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 5>I am pleased to say that joining Caroline and Us

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 5>now is Toma Bravo managing partner hold in Space Holden.

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much, and.

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 5>Your biggest deal ever at a time when your rivals

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 5>have kind of been languishing trying to even get deals done,

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 5>and when they do it's kind of in the single

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 5>digit billions. So why the size of deal and why

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 5>this one now?

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:44.319
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, well, thank you so much, first of all, Danny

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 6>for having me. It's a very exciting day, a very

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 6>exciting transaction for Toma Bravo. And look, we don't think

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 6>so much about, you know, the size of the deal.

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 6>We think a lot more about the fundamentals and what

0:09:56.840 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 6>we can do with the company. This company day for

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 6>us is an incredibly special company. We have followed it.

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 6>I met the founder who's still the CEO of the

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 6>company before he even merged his company into Sarridian in

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 6>twenty twelve. And so we've tracked this company for a

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 6>very long time. It's a very unique company in a

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 6>very important space. It's got product leadership in a big market,

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 6>and so we've followed this This deal has been in

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 6>the works for a long time with our firm, and

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:29.079
<v Speaker 6>it has all the characteristics and attributes that we look

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 6>for in to Mobravo in terms of the quality of

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 6>the revenue, in terms of the product leadership that it has,

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:39.319
<v Speaker 6>in terms of its AI roadmap, great management team, and

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 6>so we're just really excited to be able to have

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:42.680
<v Speaker 6>this opportunity.

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 5>Weld, And you've been following this company for a while,

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 5>but a lot of folks have had their eyes on

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 5>human capital management companies. Just earlier this year, Paychecks for example,

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:54.959
<v Speaker 5>acquired pay Core. A lot of public companies getting bought

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 5>up in human capital management. What are you seeing and

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:01.439
<v Speaker 5>what are your peer seeing that public markets are not well?

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 6>You know, that's an interesting question. You know, we've so

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 6>day Force really fits our profile very well because it's

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 6>because of its revenue quality characteristics. So you know, just

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 6>to go back for the history for a minute, because

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:17.079
<v Speaker 6>it's important to realize how unique this company is. When

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 6>David also founded this company, he codd an original product

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:25.080
<v Speaker 6>and his thesis was, you know, core HR systems and

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 6>then payroll systems and workforce management systems were all separate systems,

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 6>separate databases, separate architecture. And David came with a very

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:38.439
<v Speaker 6>innovative thought is why shouldn't all that exist in one database,

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 6>in one system. It provides a lot more customer value

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 6>one basically end the end unified platform and the employee

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 6>life cycle. So he came in and built a product

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 6>that does all of that, everything from recruiting performance management

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 6>to if I'm an hourly worker, I clock in and

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 6>I know in real time how much money I've earned,

0:11:57.559 --> 0:11:59.320
<v Speaker 6>and if I need to get paid, I get paid immediately.

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 6>They do the tax withholding for you. So it's a

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 6>really unique that value proposition that he built the company

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 6>on is still unique in this big growing market today.

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 6>And so look, we and this company has been probably

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 6>in the seventh or eighth inning of a services to

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 6>software transformation, and so what we're what we're really looking

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 6>to do is just accelerate what they're already doing as

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 6>a public company in a private context. And just to

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 6>answer maybe the last part of your question, this company

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:35.079
<v Speaker 6>is having a historic year, right So, a couple weeks

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 6>ago they announced their earnings. They forty percent year over

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 6>year bookings growth for the first half of the year.

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 6>Recurring revenue is reaccelerating, which is kind of unusual in

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 6>enterprise software right now, and the market kind of yawned,

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 6>and we think there's a big disconnect and a big

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 6>opportunity to basically continue on the path that the company's on,

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:58.719
<v Speaker 6>but accelerating it in a private context.

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 2>To be fat, anst hadn't yawned, there's only one cell

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 2>rating and they'd liked the earnings in many ways because,

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 2>as you mentioned, David, who set up this business thirty

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 2>years ago, has been able to take on the new iteration,

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 2>this generative AI. And I'm really interested, therefore, holden as

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 2>to how much generative AI can add value at this moment.

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Is that already baked in, because we're all questioning valuations

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 2>of generative AI related companies right now.

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:26.959
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So, generative AI is a huge part of our

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:29.199
<v Speaker 6>investment thesis here, as it is for most of our

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:32.319
<v Speaker 6>software companies. But we think, I mean, I'm just taking

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:36.959
<v Speaker 6>a step back in this human capital management space. Every

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 6>company in the world right now is thinking about how

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:44.839
<v Speaker 6>to maybe reorganize themselves, how to infuse AI into their organization,

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 6>maybe how to change their organizational structure and hierarchies to

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:53.560
<v Speaker 6>account for AI. What kind of skills are needed and

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 6>how much do they need to pay for those skills.

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 6>These are all people problems, and so we think this

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 6>space of general human capital management should be is a

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 6>great opportunity for AI. For those companies that have data,

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 6>they know how to protect the data, that have customer relationships,

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 6>and so we think it's a huge opportunity. They have

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 6>a really ambitious AI roadmap. They're already selling some AI

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 6>skews today, but there's a really ambitious roadmap for next

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 6>year to roll this, to roll out a bunch of

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 6>AI agents, and we think we can just help them

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 6>accelerate that path to basically an agentic AI human capital

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 6>management software company.

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 5>Well, then, just on that point, we would love to

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 5>get your views on an MIT related study that seems

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 5>to have gotten this market maybe a little bit worked up.

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 5>The study that ninety five percent of companies who took

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 5>on AI generative AI pilots, ninety five percent of them

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 5>sold zero return on investment. Given your work with these

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 5>types of companies and incorporating genitive AI ninety five percent,

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 5>does that number seem right to you?

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 6>Look, well, I would say we we focus. That's really interesting,

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 6>by the way, because I do think there has been

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 6>an issue with people really trying to measure ROI on

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 6>their projects. Everybody's using it, everybody is using it, everybody

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 6>knows it's the next big thing. But is ROI really

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 6>being you know, measured in it? And are people giving

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 6>customers things that they may not they may not want,

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 6>And so we've taken a very measured approach. We think

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 6>there's a real benefit to these SaaS companies that have

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 6>incumbency and they have data advantages. But I think at

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 6>that enterprise level, I think, look, obviously there's been a

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 6>lot of uh, the easy ones have been the call

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 6>center and product development. Those have been the two biggest

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 6>areas for AI. I'd say cases that have generated really

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 6>positive ROI. But I think there's also a lot of

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 6>sprawl too. There's a lot of tools being sold that

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 6>maybe aren't being totally utilized. You see that in some

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 6>of these earnings announcements. So I think it's just important

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 6>to be careful to ensure that there's connectivity between the

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 6>customer's roadmap and your roadmap. So we think it's really important,

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 6>but we are taking a little bit more measured approach

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 6>because if you sell something a customer that they're not

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 6>using or don't need, that creates problems down the road.

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 2>It's been great having you both join, in particular Danny Berger,

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 2>thank you for helping us bring the conversation, Tom a

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 2>brother managing partner Holden Spain fascinating, particularly on that MIT

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 2>report coming up. The CEO of Data Breaks joins us

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 2>to discuss the company's latest funding round and whapping valuation

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 2>of over one hundred.

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 3>Billion is a breen bag tech Data Bricks. It's raising

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 3>new funding and evaluation.

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 2>That tops one hundred billion dollars the series K investment

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 2>marks get this more than sixty percent increase in the

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 2>data analytics software providers value because it's.

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 3>A last raised money in December. Data Bricks CEO Ali

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 3>Godsi joins us.

0:16:56.960 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Now, extraordinary growth, but extraordinary growth in apples of ai

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 2>that you're currently building and helping with businesses translate their data.

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 3>How do you accelerate that?

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:08.119
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, that's why we did this investment round. We were

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 7>looking at the product portfolio and there's two areas we

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:13.199
<v Speaker 7>really want to invest in, and that's how we did

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 7>the fundraise.

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 8>One islake Base.

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 7>So agents and AI is also going to revolutionize databases.

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 7>I know we're thinking about how it's affecting society, but

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 7>the database market is one hundred and five billion dollars

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 7>TAM and what.

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 8>We saw in the data is that eighty percent of.

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:31.639
<v Speaker 7>The databases are now being created not by humans but

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 7>by AI agents. So that's why we want to invest

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 7>it in our database product called lake Base. And the

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 7>other side is a product we have called Agent Bricks,

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:41.959
<v Speaker 7>where we really investing it in how do we actually

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 7>help automate tasks with agents at enterprises with high quality

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 7>and high fidelity without hallucinations. So that's why we're doing this.

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 7>We're investing it in those two areas that we think

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:54.120
<v Speaker 7>have huge potential.

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 2>I can you kind of translate for audience, how different

0:17:56.640 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 2>the technology is needed to cater for an AIA rather

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 2>than a human.

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:04.919
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so the agents move much much much faster. You know,

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:08.920
<v Speaker 7>we think we're slower, we take our time. These things

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 7>just go all the time, right, there's no stopping and

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 7>they can do it in perils.

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 8>So there's many, many of them doing it.

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:16.239
<v Speaker 7>So what you need to make sure, For instance, if

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 7>you're providing infrastructure for them, like a database, you have

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 7>to make sure that the cost of that is low

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 7>because they're going to spawn up and try many many things.

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 7>It's almost like you can imagine that you have, you know,

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:30.159
<v Speaker 7>one hundred interns unleashed, running off trying lots of different things.

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:32.400
<v Speaker 8>So you'd like to lower the cost of it.

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 7>You want to make it super fast because if they're

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 7>trying to use a database and the database.

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 8>Is slow, now you've slowed down all of the interns.

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 8>So you don't want to do that.

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 7>So those are some of the things you have to

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 7>do differently, move faster, lower the cost, and let them

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:46.400
<v Speaker 7>experiment more because they're going to try lots of stuff

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 7>and then they're going to pick the best result. That's

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 7>not how humans operate because we're more expensive. We take

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:55.199
<v Speaker 7>our time, and then we're sort of you know, measure twice,

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 7>cut once kind of approach, which is not the case

0:18:57.280 --> 0:18:57.880
<v Speaker 7>with the agents.

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about expensive humans as you've been adding I

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 2>think about fifty percent by the end of this year, right,

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 2>adding three thousand to your headcount. How expensive are those

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 2>humans at the moment? Ali, given the talent wars we.

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 7>See, Yeah, I mean it's it's I thought already that

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:15.199
<v Speaker 7>things were very expensive a few years ago, and we

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:16.679
<v Speaker 7>pay top of the top of the market.

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 8>We compete with say Google, Meta and so on.

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 7>But I would say the last twelve months or six

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 7>months even have been insane. I mean, it just keeps

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 7>going higher and higher.

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:28.159
<v Speaker 2>Two hundred million, Hi, Ali, Like, are you having to

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 2>counteract that?

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 9>Yeah?

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 7>I mean, look, we're seeing insane offers out there. If

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 7>the talent is really that good, we will pay up. However,

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 7>it is also the other side of it, which is

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 7>they're going to work together with their coworkers, and you

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:43.239
<v Speaker 7>want to have equity and fairness. If you have two

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 7>people that have the same background, that they're equally good

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:49.640
<v Speaker 7>just because someone started six months ago, you don't want

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 7>to suddenly have them make one tent of the person

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 7>that's sitting right next to them. So if you don't

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 7>keep that equity in mind, then people get unhappy, they.

0:19:57.280 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 8>Talk, and then they will move around.

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:00.679
<v Speaker 7>And that's why we' seeing so much char learn in

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 7>the AI market right now. People are switching jobs, you know,

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:05.400
<v Speaker 7>from this company and then back again and so on.

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 7>So you want to also be a little bit thoughtful

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:09.360
<v Speaker 7>about it. But yeah, you have to pay up otherwise

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:11.200
<v Speaker 7>that's the price to pay right now, What.

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 2>About paying up for M and A because I know

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 2>that you've raised funds potentially to do that.

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:15.400
<v Speaker 3>What sort of.

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 7>Companies, Yeah, I mean, we're looking at across the board,

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 7>right like this database technology I talked about right late, Base,

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:24.360
<v Speaker 7>which is separated computer storage for postcrafts. That's that's came

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 7>through an acquisition that we did for you know, billion dollars.

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 7>So we were continuing to be very very interested in these,

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:33.919
<v Speaker 7>you know, in Burder's talent. AI is very interesting because

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 7>you know, on the one hand, we hear about these

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 7>companies that have crazy evaluations, right one hundred billion plus.

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 7>On the other hand, Yeah, but on the other hand,

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 7>there's a lot of startups that started three years ago,

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:47.679
<v Speaker 7>two years ago, and you know, if the if the

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:51.120
<v Speaker 7>revenue is not there and the business isn't working out,

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 7>but they have amazing talent and they have great, great

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:57.400
<v Speaker 7>ideas maybe they didn't just have channel distribution, that those

0:20:57.400 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 7>are great and you can actually get them for you know,

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 7>I guess in the big scheme of things that you

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 7>could say cheap.

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:06.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's just talk about these so called crazy valuations AALI,

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 2>because I know your phone has been running off the hook,

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 2>and then particularly the last few weeks, people wanting to

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 2>allocate more towards you.

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that would happen right here?

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Right now we suddenly see a slight rectification in valuations

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 2>in the public markets.

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Are things cooling down? Are you worried by.

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:25.879
<v Speaker 2>MIT reports reporting of a lack of impact of AI

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:26.880
<v Speaker 2>pilots for example.

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:30.160
<v Speaker 8>No, I mean, I've been pretty vocal about this as well.

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 7>You know, I'm very bullish on agents being able to

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 7>do all kinds of tasks. But we're looking at very

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:39.959
<v Speaker 7>early innings and some people are already declaring success as

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 7>if we were done.

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 8>We're not. We're at the very beginning.

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 7>When it comes to agents, for instance, one of the

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:47.879
<v Speaker 7>biggest challenges is that you know, when you unleash these agents,

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:49.920
<v Speaker 7>you know, the hundreds in terns that go off, they

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 7>make errors, and you know, right out.

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 8>Of the box you might have thirty percent errors.

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:56.159
<v Speaker 7>Would you hire a person that makes thirty percent of

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 7>a time completely crazy mistakes?

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:01.159
<v Speaker 8>No, So we have to get the quality up.

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 7>That's what Agent Bricks is focused on, how to we

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 7>iterate and improve the quality. So I do think we

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:09.160
<v Speaker 7>have to pace the investments and the expectations on the ROI.

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 7>What's timeline if we're thinking that, you know, these agents

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 7>are just going to work everywhere right now, and that's

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 7>not the case. It's going to take us years to

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 7>be able to see the impact of AI across the

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 7>board in organizations. You know, maybe even five years. It's

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:26.360
<v Speaker 7>still going to be very impactful. It's still something that's

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 7>investing in. But you have to get that timeline right.

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 2>Always talking straight to us, Sally god Sie, we so

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 2>appreciate it.

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 3>Day to Bricks CEO.

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Congrats on the series K Coming up, Google bets on

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 2>AI for its new devices. Will have the details what

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 2>the company has just launched. This is bloombag Tech. Welcome

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:57.680
<v Speaker 2>back to bloombag Tech. We take a look at these

0:22:57.720 --> 0:23:00.200
<v Speaker 2>markets because it's been a volatile day of trade.

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 3>More broadly, we could be on track for three days.

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 2>Of losses on the Nastak one hundred worst stretch of

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 2>losses going back to March of this year. We're currently

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 2>off by three tens a percent Meta, dragging us a

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 2>little bit lower Netflix one points perspective on the downside.

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 2>On the higher side is like some nvidio. Let's look

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 2>at a rebound for Pan Andeer as well, because it

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 2>had had six straight days of losses running into today.

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 2>We get a little bit of a reprieve, but only

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 2>a tenth of a percent. More than seventy billion dollars

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 2>of market cap wiped off of this retail fan favorite.

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 2>As people question that valuation, you know, looking at profit

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:35.440
<v Speaker 2>to price, price to profit in the future, well it's

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.920
<v Speaker 2>training almost two hundred times. Looking at Intel on the downside,

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 2>off by a quarter of percent one and a quarter.

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 2>That's as we question what dilution or discount the US

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:45.440
<v Speaker 2>government might get after the euphoria, the soft bank and

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:46.639
<v Speaker 2>the US are indeed.

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 3>Putting in money.

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 2>And we finished on Google having a rather nice day,

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 2>up by four tens percent, a come off of its highs.

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 2>But all of this is following Google's introduction of new

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 2>consuming gadgets including phones, earbuds, smart watch, all with the

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 2>company's latest Gemini AI.

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 3>Really at the heart of it all.

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:04.680
<v Speaker 2>We spoke with Rick Ostolo, his Google's SVP for Platforms

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 2>and Devices, about the company's launch event.

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 9>Gemini is a huge part of Google strategy. We've made

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:14.959
<v Speaker 9>so much progress with it. We've got the best models around,

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 9>we have the best AI assistant. We are just so

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:22.120
<v Speaker 9>excited about what we've talked about today. And I personally

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 9>love using the vo video model. You saw a video

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 9>of my dog talking in the show, which was really

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 9>fun to put together.

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 3>Ke poodle across something.

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:33.479
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, he was his Portuguese water dog who somehow speaks English.

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 9>But it was really really fun to put that together.

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 9>And this is kind of the power of AI. Now

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:42.399
<v Speaker 9>you can do things for fun, you can be a

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 9>lot more productive with it, and Gemini is the thing

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 9>that powers it all for us.

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:47.879
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Steph Curry is doing things with sports.

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 2>You had Alex Cooper there caller Daddy doing things with camera.

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:55.199
<v Speaker 2>I'm interested though, how this sets you apart. What are

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:57.679
<v Speaker 2>you offering do you think versus the competition? How am

0:24:57.680 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 2>I going to be able to use it in a

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 2>wholly different way than currently I could with a.

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 3>Competitive out of that?

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, well, I mean I think AI in general just

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:07.719
<v Speaker 9>transforms all of these products on the phone. It's going

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 9>to make it so much easier to interoperate with your phone.

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 9>You just talk to the AI and it'll do things

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:14.679
<v Speaker 9>for you. You can show your camera to the AI and

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:16.719
<v Speaker 9>it'll give you hints about what to do, like if

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 9>you're trying to do a project at home, like fix

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 9>some plumbing or fix some shelves, whatever it is, AI

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 9>can help. And we're really excited about our partnership with

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 9>Stephen Curry to apply this AI technology to personal coaching.

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:33.920
<v Speaker 9>And you know, he's I can't think of a better

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 9>person to work with than him. He has sleep coaches,

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:40.639
<v Speaker 9>nutrition coaches, fitness coaches, and he wanted to work with

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:45.159
<v Speaker 9>us to bring this kind of capability for personal coaching

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 9>to everyone. And so that's what that partnership is all about.

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:50.120
<v Speaker 2>We're really excited to work with stuff and in many ways,

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 2>what you were helping oversee the purchase of fitbit back

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 2>in the day, it's now in the main factor of

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 2>a watch that you've got on.

0:25:56.720 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 3>What form factors are we yet to see?

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:02.120
<v Speaker 2>We've got you've got the pods in your ears, you've.

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 3>Got the watch, you've got the phones right.

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:07.880
<v Speaker 9>And I think there might be a few coming next Well,

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 9>we're bringing Gemini to a bunch of surfaces you use

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 9>every day, but probably be used very differently, like automotive.

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:18.639
<v Speaker 9>There'll be Gemini in your car, on your television, in

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:21.399
<v Speaker 9>your smart speakers and smart displays. But I think a

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:24.200
<v Speaker 9>really exciting thing that'll come in the future is Gemini

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 9>and classes. So we're working on smart classes that'll run

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:29.439
<v Speaker 9>Gemini as the main way you interact.

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 3>And for a year that you think that that'll be

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:32.439
<v Speaker 3>coming out, is it?

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 9>It'll be sometime next year. It will be pretty exciting

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 9>to see.

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Costallone Google's SVP of Platforms and Devices. Let's talk a

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 2>little bit more about all of this. Carolina Milanesi, she's

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 2>the president and principal Analystic Creative Strategies.

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 3>We were in Brooklyn together yesterday. Were I love reading.

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Your report on this, and you said, look, Google avoided

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 2>any risky moves, so we didn't get the glasses in

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 2>the here and now. But the prowess you see is

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 2>that Gemini is just full force within these devices.

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, it's all about AI.

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 10>It's about really getting consumers to understand the power of

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 10>that AI can bring and as Rick was saying, it's

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 10>different things to different people. So what was amazing for

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 10>me yesterday will see the breath of people that they

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 10>were able to reach with all the guests that they had,

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 10>both from an age demographic but also from what is

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 10>the hook that you want? It can be editing, it

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 10>can be taking the best shot, it can be getting fitter.

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 2>And it can be photography. Andre de Wagner they had

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 2>over there. They had of course sports when it came

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 2>to Steph Curry or indeed Landon Norris was there. We

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 2>also thought about the way in which community is going

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 2>to use it for camera and for editing.

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 3>Is that really that important?

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 2>When do you think the camera is really going to

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:45.680
<v Speaker 2>be the standout feature of so.

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 10>Many camera is already the sendout feature for so many consumers.

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:52.159
<v Speaker 2>They take pixels had a better camera than anyone for ages.

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 3>That's what they kept on reminding us. But people are

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 3>still buying apples as dead it is.

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:59.400
<v Speaker 10>But it's about what you can do from an editing perspective. Now,

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 10>it's not just about taking the best shot and taking

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 10>the friction away that there is today in getting to

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 10>their editing. So being able to tell an AI agent

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:12.359
<v Speaker 10>Gemini or something else. How you want the picture to

0:28:12.400 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 10>look like, and what.

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:17.680
<v Speaker 2>It really compares and contrast with is Apple's lacking right

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 2>the fact that we're going to be so easily integrating

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Gemini AI from a spoken word perspective and it's Siri

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 2>is just so behind the curve. Do you think they're

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 2>going to eat any market share that?

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 10>I think it's always hard from a high end perspective

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:35.880
<v Speaker 10>to see churm from Apple to anywhere else because user

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 10>consumer have more device than just their phone, and so

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 10>you're talking about a difficult choice to make.

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 3>We also still have.

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 10>A very beginning of DEI shift. Consumers are not walking

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 10>into a store asking for an AI phone. We talked

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 10>about is for Apple in June, but I do think

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 10>that time is sticking for Apple and we need to

0:28:56.680 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 10>see something sooner rather than later.

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Instead, this almost helps Google show off the Android ecosystem.

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 2>You might not get a Google Pixel, but you might

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:08.880
<v Speaker 2>get a Samsung and probably through this demonstration you can

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 2>see how well integrated that it's going to be as well.

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 2>How do they navigate this sort of frenemie moment?

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think it's definitely first about the best of

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 10>Google on Pixel, and then you started to see Samsung

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 10>getting closer to their ecosystem and putting aside their aspirations

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 10>with Bisbee and really building on the power of Gemini.

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 10>So Motorola has been doing the same thing. So it's

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 10>definitely about the ecosystem, but also feeling that in my view,

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 10>Pixel is the answer to Apple within the Android world.

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 2>And they got a foldable phone, which in any way

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 2>goes head to head with the DOUGHI indorsed Samsung, but

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 2>Apple has.

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 3>No foldable right now.

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 2>I thought what was really interesting was when they put

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 2>them out on the market. Next week, we get the phones,

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 2>but watch us. A little bit later, I asked Rick

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 2>about whether it was a supply chain issue. He said, no,

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 2>are there any supply chain issues for these companies right now?

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:04.080
<v Speaker 2>It guess it's chip correct designed and house what made

0:30:04.120 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 2>my TSMC? How does this whole come together?

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 10>I think, to be honest with you, as a marketing

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 10>strategy is more of a supply issue. Is about getting

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 10>before Apple and after Apple. Right we know that the

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 10>expectation is beginning of September usually for Apple, and so

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 10>getting in with the mass market product before the iPhone

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 10>is out, and then with something that is more appealing

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 10>to steal a niche market but very powerful users with

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 10>the foldable towards holiday season.

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 2>I think what really resonated did in your note was

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 2>the confidence that Google had at this event. I mean

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 2>it was just celebrity filled. It felt like you were

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 2>at a TV event. That was the whole idea and

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 2>narrative of it. Have they got the right to be

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 2>this confident right now?

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 3>Do you think?

0:30:51.280 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 10>I think is empowering for them instead of always focusing

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 10>on chasing Apple, to actually feel confidence in the product

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 10>that they have, which are iterative from last year but solid.

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 10>And I think that finding the confidence in their branding

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 10>is very important and broadening the addressable market that they're

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 10>aiming for is not just tech buyers anymore, is mass

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 10>market consumers.

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Subway takes call a Daddy, had a lot for the

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 2>gen Z and the younger millennials. Currently, a Melnac loved

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 2>having a hair president and principal analyst at Creative Strategies

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 2>coming up, Runway CEO Christoval Venezuela is joining us to

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 2>talk about the company's blue tools for video.

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 3>And games creation. Says Blomberg Tech.

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 2>M AI startup Runway, which shook up Hollywood with a

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 2>video generation tools centering the world of gaming. Announcing today

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:06.960
<v Speaker 2>is Runway Game World's beta, which.

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 3>Takes a step towards real time game creation.

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Runway CEO and co founder Crystal Weal Venezuela joins us

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 2>now and because, well, how changeable or what a complete

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 2>shift is this for the gaming industry, because consumers are

0:32:21.880 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 2>going to be able to use it, but what does

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 2>it mean for the actual studios too?

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it's massive.

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 11>It's a big change in the same way that AI

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 11>was a big change for Hollywood as well. And now

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 11>it's important to understanding that organize. There are two parts

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 11>of how AI is affecting games. On the one end,

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:38.840
<v Speaker 11>you have the real time rendering component of it that

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 11>we're working towards, basically means you're going to be able

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:44.440
<v Speaker 11>to create pixels in a real time manner. And the

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 11>other one is the mechanics. Right, so how do games

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 11>manifest itself? What are the interactions that users would have

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:54.720
<v Speaker 11>with them? From consumers to preach everyone and so game

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 11>World for us, it's kind of fland exploration and our

0:32:57.200 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 11>first product and the mechanics of non linear stories with

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 11>AI creating these worlds in real time and having players

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 11>experiment with them.

0:33:04.640 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think about the first time that we

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 2>first started bringing you on the show and hearing from

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 2>how much you were well disrupting Hollywood.

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 3>But Hollywood has now come to embrace.

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 2>You, using Amazon, using it in the latest works that

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 2>they're doing, and creating Christa.

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 7>Well.

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 2>How has the gaming studio reaction been. Has it been

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 2>bristling or has it been accepting.

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 11>It's somehow very similar to what I think Hollywood went

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 11>through a year and a half ago. I think it's

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 11>totally new. It takes time, but now I think most

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 11>of them have started to embrace it and understand it.

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 11>It's a radical technology or changes how you do your

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 11>work and need to embrace it. You need to understand it.

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:42.959
<v Speaker 11>There's things that work really well, there's some things that

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 11>don't really work really well. But really it's about like

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:48.280
<v Speaker 11>using it more. And so I would say that games

0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 11>and the gaming world is where I would say Hollywood

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 11>was a year ago, and now as models progress get better,

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 11>become more usable, you start seeing most of those companies

0:33:58.760 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 11>now starting to adopt it.

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean you can see the impact because it's being

0:34:02.720 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 2>used in features by big tech companies and big filmmakers Christovelt,

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 2>But how are you measuring impact for those that are

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 2>about to take it on? We're all talking about this

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:14.640
<v Speaker 2>MIT study about whether or not ninety five percent of

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 2>these pilots for general to AI are failing. How do

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:20.759
<v Speaker 2>you prove out that your technology as value?

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, well you have to make sure it helps users somehow.

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:28.320
<v Speaker 11>And look there's a challenge. And I think the challenge

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:31.319
<v Speaker 11>that I think media and Vollywood recognize overtirement is these

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:33.799
<v Speaker 11>are not tools that will make moves for you. And

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 11>I think there was a big assumption another time where

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 11>like many people thought, you just came into runway tight

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:41.319
<v Speaker 11>movie and you get a movie out. Unfortunately, that's not

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:44.480
<v Speaker 11>what the tchnology is doing. It's much more about you

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 11>being in control and you friending the right time. But

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:49.879
<v Speaker 11>also you need to rewire your brain a little bit.

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:52.840
<v Speaker 11>You need to retrain the mental models of how this

0:34:53.000 --> 0:34:55.520
<v Speaker 11>STAMLA you can help you. And that takes time. And

0:34:55.560 --> 0:34:57.839
<v Speaker 11>so how we manage to do that change with our

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:01.720
<v Speaker 11>companies and customers and userss We help them and sometimes

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:04.760
<v Speaker 11>we go and work alongside them. We have technical artists

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:06.880
<v Speaker 11>that you can think about them as like for deploy

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 11>engineers that sit together with our companies and users and

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:14.759
<v Speaker 11>enterprises and help them understand how run we can fit

0:35:14.800 --> 0:35:18.360
<v Speaker 11>in particular parts of our workload. You're a left For example,

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:20.840
<v Speaker 11>it's our latest video generation model that allows you to

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:23.600
<v Speaker 11>edit video in ways that you just couldn't do before.

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:26.600
<v Speaker 11>And it works completely different from anything you've seen before,

0:35:26.760 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 11>and so it's not going to work based on what

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 11>you know you have to. There's an adjustment period, and

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:34.320
<v Speaker 11>that adjustment period is critical for me. It's very similar

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:36.840
<v Speaker 11>to perhaps how the cloud was a big change for

0:35:36.880 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 11>companies like it requires you to redo and reorganize some

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:41.759
<v Speaker 11>of your teams to prepurpolous.

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:44.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm talking about reorganizing teams.

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:46.759
<v Speaker 2>I mean Mark Zuckerberg's been busy at that, and we

0:35:46.840 --> 0:35:50.719
<v Speaker 2>understand that previously hid perhaps eyed up Runway wanting to

0:35:50.760 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 2>be able to buy that to bring in for the

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:55.760
<v Speaker 2>AI prowess. You not to back that's off the table,

0:35:56.200 --> 0:35:59.359
<v Speaker 2>But how many offers are you getting full runway? And

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:01.919
<v Speaker 2>how you putting your employees that you might not jump

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:03.960
<v Speaker 2>ship again.

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:06.800
<v Speaker 11>I've been working on this for like almost seven eight years,

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:09.479
<v Speaker 11>and I think we're now hitting an interesting inflection point.

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:12.080
<v Speaker 11>It's getting too exciting for us to think about not

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:15.000
<v Speaker 11>being independent like we want to remain independent. We have

0:36:15.040 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 11>the resources need, We have the best team in the

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:19.400
<v Speaker 11>world doing that, some of the best research in the world.

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 11>Now is an inflection point in both quality, adoption penetration.

0:36:24.600 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 11>It's a really exciting time to build Runway, and I

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 11>think there's still a long way to go for.

0:36:28.600 --> 0:36:30.320
<v Speaker 3>Us first gaming product.

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:32.279
<v Speaker 2>We thank you for talking us to game wels and

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:34.399
<v Speaker 2>so much more that you've been doing with the LF

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 2>model and plenty more. Crystaval Venezuela, CEO and co founder Runway,

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:41.280
<v Speaker 2>always great to catch up now. Sticking with AI deep Seek,

0:36:41.560 --> 0:36:43.759
<v Speaker 2>it just unveils and update to an older model that

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:47.319
<v Speaker 2>it says surpasses a seminal are one on key benchmarks now.

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:49.719
<v Speaker 2>Deep Seat said in a we chat post that the

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:52.760
<v Speaker 2>new version answers queries much faster and marks the startup's

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:57.799
<v Speaker 2>first step towards creating an AI agent and close to

0:36:57.840 --> 0:37:00.839
<v Speaker 2>the home in the US. Open AI CFO Sarah Fryar

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 2>has just told Bloomberg that the company could take a

0:37:03.520 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 2>page out of Amazon's playbook, following an approach inspired by Amazon,

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:10.680
<v Speaker 2>which found success renting out at spare Cloud computing capacity.

0:37:10.880 --> 0:37:13.879
<v Speaker 2>Open ai could in the future sell access to data

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 2>centers and other physical infrastructure needed for aims, showing KAfari

0:37:19.280 --> 0:37:22.239
<v Speaker 2>was there for that conversation bringing out teasing out those

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:24.880
<v Speaker 2>pieces of information because so far really does have to

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 2>think about the profitability of this business in the longer term.

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 3>That's right if you think about it.

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 12>So you know, I was also recently at a media

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 12>dinner with Sam Maltman when he said we planned to

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:36.840
<v Speaker 12>spend trillions on infrastructure in the near future and that

0:37:36.880 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 12>economists might call that crazy, but they are marching on.

0:37:40.360 --> 0:37:42.880
<v Speaker 12>So as open ai starts to put this immense and

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 12>precedence in amount of capital rate toward data center expansion,

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 12>they're building expertise in that. And I think the long

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 12>term play here as well, how could we in the

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:52.560
<v Speaker 12>future potentially market and capitalize on.

0:37:52.480 --> 0:37:54.799
<v Speaker 2>That expertise and be able to drive up revenues to

0:37:54.840 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 2>be getting better financing for the future of their own

0:37:57.160 --> 0:38:00.480
<v Speaker 2>infrastructure spend. At the moment, they've been funding that spend

0:38:00.719 --> 0:38:04.280
<v Speaker 2>by raising money and venture any nuance there, she really

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:05.920
<v Speaker 2>did talk about how they've been able to sort of

0:38:06.000 --> 0:38:07.359
<v Speaker 2>raise more than they anticipated.

0:38:08.160 --> 0:38:11.000
<v Speaker 12>Yes, you know, they were planning on ten billion, and

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 12>one piece of THEIRNCH funding around. She said that they

0:38:14.520 --> 0:38:19.120
<v Speaker 12>have actually gotten to eleven billion because of access investor interest,

0:38:19.520 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 12>and more broadly, they're actually looking beyond just you know,

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 12>equity financing at this point. They're also, as Friar told us,

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:30.959
<v Speaker 12>interested in debt and debt financing and they have said

0:38:30.960 --> 0:38:33.440
<v Speaker 12>that banks and private equity firms have approached them about this.

0:38:33.880 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 2>So interesting as we see how Metro has been financing

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:38.879
<v Speaker 2>some of its data center needs, getting into the world

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:42.319
<v Speaker 2>of private credit with Pimco and blue Out, what more

0:38:42.360 --> 0:38:44.839
<v Speaker 2>about the growth of the business when we're just coming

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 2>off the back of GPT five and some of the

0:38:47.680 --> 0:38:50.440
<v Speaker 2>throws around that. And they had to make some difficult choices,

0:38:50.480 --> 0:38:53.720
<v Speaker 2>particularly when it came to well, how nice the chatbot

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:55.840
<v Speaker 2>is the people and how they bring back other models

0:38:55.880 --> 0:38:56.399
<v Speaker 2>and they're like.

0:38:57.000 --> 0:38:57.440
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

0:38:57.480 --> 0:38:59.760
<v Speaker 12>So it was definitely a bumpy rollout, I think bumpy

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:02.640
<v Speaker 12>or they expected right. Also at that dinner, Alman you know, said,

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:04.480
<v Speaker 12>we know, we messed up on.

0:39:06.000 --> 0:39:07.280
<v Speaker 3>The emotional attachment.

0:39:07.320 --> 0:39:09.799
<v Speaker 12>I think they did not realize that people fully had

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:12.400
<v Speaker 12>to the older version of the chatbot, and they were

0:39:12.440 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 12>all sort of a lot of users were angry that

0:39:14.680 --> 0:39:19.880
<v Speaker 12>Opening initially deprecated the older model. However, I think overall

0:39:19.960 --> 0:39:22.719
<v Speaker 12>the bigger pictures that chat GBT is still you know,

0:39:23.239 --> 0:39:26.240
<v Speaker 12>the market leader right on consumer usage, just on chatbot

0:39:26.360 --> 0:39:30.279
<v Speaker 12>usage overall, and they still have this voracious demand as

0:39:30.320 --> 0:39:33.160
<v Speaker 12>Fryer put it, for the use of their products that

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:34.839
<v Speaker 12>requires intensive compute and.

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:37.280
<v Speaker 2>As racious demand to fund it as we were talking about.

0:39:37.480 --> 0:39:40.000
<v Speaker 2>And actually eventually retail want to be owning a piece

0:39:40.000 --> 0:39:43.680
<v Speaker 2>of this company more people democratization so spoken about eventually

0:39:43.680 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 2>they need to IPO.

0:39:44.600 --> 0:39:47.120
<v Speaker 3>But as a CFO, how is she thinking about that?

0:39:47.239 --> 0:39:51.239
<v Speaker 12>Sofra, I mean for Sarah fry Or, her job is

0:39:51.320 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 12>both to raise these funds right for open A, but

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:57.920
<v Speaker 12>also be able to allocate that compute for these customers.

0:39:58.200 --> 0:40:00.759
<v Speaker 12>Oftentimes they're having to decide in advance which customers are

0:40:00.800 --> 0:40:04.120
<v Speaker 12>actually going to get the compute power they need to

0:40:04.200 --> 0:40:05.840
<v Speaker 12>run all the chat shop t products.

0:40:06.120 --> 0:40:08.480
<v Speaker 3>So it's it's a mix of fundraising.

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 12>Of keeping customers happy, keeping consumers happy, and figuring out

0:40:11.560 --> 0:40:13.880
<v Speaker 12>all the right the financing and money for it.

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:16.600
<v Speaker 2>And then leave us to pulls showing KAfari talking us

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:19.400
<v Speaker 2>through what was a fantastic conversation that she had with

0:40:19.600 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Sarah Phire, CFO of open Ai. Now coming up SpaceX

0:40:23.360 --> 0:40:26.440
<v Speaker 2>other very highly valued private company tapping into luxury travel

0:40:26.480 --> 0:40:28.160
<v Speaker 2>as it expands its starlink services.

0:40:28.239 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 3>Were on that next as the bluebgg tech.

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX has steadily built up it's starlink in flight Wi

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Fi services for carriers like Air France, United, Virgin Atlantics

0:40:47.239 --> 0:40:49.839
<v Speaker 2>signing up. Now the company what's allying a Middle East

0:40:49.880 --> 0:40:52.359
<v Speaker 2>expansion as it holds discussions with the likes of Devi

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:56.759
<v Speaker 2>based Emirates, Bloombergs Space reporter Sana Pashanka joins us now

0:40:56.800 --> 0:40:58.840
<v Speaker 2>with the details. How big a coup could this be

0:40:59.000 --> 0:41:00.560
<v Speaker 2>to get in with the Middle East and flies.

0:41:01.800 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, it would be a really big moment for starlink.

0:41:05.960 --> 0:41:09.279
<v Speaker 13>As you mentioned, these are luxury airlines and a lot

0:41:09.320 --> 0:41:14.840
<v Speaker 13>of them are stopping points for really long haul international flights,

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:18.520
<v Speaker 13>So it could be, you know, bring in a lot of.

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:20.360
<v Speaker 3>Revenue for star languages.

0:41:20.400 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 13>SpaceX's most profitable unit.

0:41:23.960 --> 0:41:25.439
<v Speaker 3>Who has it been booting out the way?

0:41:25.680 --> 0:41:28.359
<v Speaker 2>Which have been the previous Wi Fi offerers, which I

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:31.919
<v Speaker 2>say many would say they've been frustrated with in the past.

0:41:31.960 --> 0:41:35.319
<v Speaker 2>His WiFi doesn't always feel that great on board.

0:41:35.680 --> 0:41:41.360
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, so the previous The legacy operators are via sat SCS,

0:41:41.360 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 13>Intel SAD which was actually SCS acquired Intel SAD and

0:41:46.040 --> 0:41:51.640
<v Speaker 13>also Hughes, and those legacy operators have historically relied on

0:41:51.920 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 13>geostationary satellites which are much further away from Earth to

0:41:56.960 --> 0:41:59.360
<v Speaker 13>provide that Internet connectivity to airplanes.

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:02.560
<v Speaker 3>What does the negotiation period look like.

0:42:02.920 --> 0:42:08.040
<v Speaker 2>How does Elon or indeed just SpaceX more broadly and

0:42:08.080 --> 0:42:10.160
<v Speaker 2>going over there win over these carriers.

0:42:10.160 --> 0:42:11.480
<v Speaker 3>What is it that they have to prove out.

0:42:12.600 --> 0:42:16.920
<v Speaker 13>So SpaceX It's been shown by third parties that Starlink

0:42:16.960 --> 0:42:20.719
<v Speaker 13>has delivered the fastest Wi Fi speeds across industry and

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:24.439
<v Speaker 13>compared to those legacy operators, and that is in part

0:42:24.480 --> 0:42:27.480
<v Speaker 13>because their satellites are much closer to Earth, so you know,

0:42:27.600 --> 0:42:31.360
<v Speaker 13>the Internet has less distance to travel to getting to

0:42:31.440 --> 0:42:36.040
<v Speaker 13>those planes. But Starlink has a couple of negotiation tactics

0:42:36.040 --> 0:42:40.720
<v Speaker 13>that they use. They don't really allow airlines to announce

0:42:40.760 --> 0:42:43.440
<v Speaker 13>that they're using Starlink unless they'll equip on their whole fleet.

0:42:43.840 --> 0:42:47.359
<v Speaker 13>They also have put in this request that airlines offer

0:42:47.360 --> 0:42:49.840
<v Speaker 13>it to free for everyone on board, which you know

0:42:50.200 --> 0:42:53.759
<v Speaker 13>some airlines have, but some airlines have pushed back on

0:42:53.840 --> 0:42:57.520
<v Speaker 13>because they just want to offer it to their loyalty

0:42:57.880 --> 0:43:02.040
<v Speaker 13>customers and their loyalty program. So you know, they have

0:43:02.120 --> 0:43:04.400
<v Speaker 13>a couple of requests that they put in, but it

0:43:04.440 --> 0:43:08.319
<v Speaker 13>seems like the negotiations are unique for every airline and

0:43:08.360 --> 0:43:09.200
<v Speaker 13>every operator.

0:43:09.800 --> 0:43:13.440
<v Speaker 2>Sana Pashanka bringing us the latest on that part of SpaceX.

0:43:13.480 --> 0:43:14.279
<v Speaker 3>We appreciate it.

0:43:14.600 --> 0:43:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Let's get back to the public markets right now, because

0:43:16.840 --> 0:43:18.800
<v Speaker 2>we're back under pressure then, as back one hundred is,

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:20.520
<v Speaker 2>you'll see down now for three straight days, two and

0:43:20.560 --> 0:43:23.520
<v Speaker 2>a half percent lower. We've been questioning above the board

0:43:23.520 --> 0:43:25.839
<v Speaker 2>the frothy valuations. One of them we've really been keeping

0:43:25.880 --> 0:43:29.359
<v Speaker 2>an eye out is on Palanteer. Now, its valuation, it's

0:43:29.400 --> 0:43:34.120
<v Speaker 2>multiple is extraordinary. I mean trades two hundred times future profits.

0:43:34.360 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 2>We're down fourteen percent in the last five days. In fact,

0:43:36.640 --> 0:43:40.360
<v Speaker 2>it's been low for seven straight trading days, the longest

0:43:40.800 --> 0:43:44.160
<v Speaker 2>sell off we've seen since March twenty twenty three. We'll

0:43:44.160 --> 0:43:46.600
<v Speaker 2>see how Alex Karp is responding to some of those shorts,

0:43:46.640 --> 0:43:49.399
<v Speaker 2>finally winning out some money, made about a billion one

0:43:49.400 --> 0:43:51.880
<v Speaker 2>point six billion in the period of loss.

0:43:51.960 --> 0:43:53.759
<v Speaker 3>Now that does it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech.

0:43:54.080 --> 0:43:56.719
<v Speaker 2>Don't forget to check out the podcast, It's The Bloomberg

0:43:56.719 --> 0:43:56.959
<v Speaker 2>Tech