Speaker 1: I glad you with us eight hundred and ninety four
Speaker 1: one Sean you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 1: Eight hundred and by the way I'm from, I'm getting
Speaker 1: ahead of myself like Joe, because I'm thinking about throwing
Speaker 1: to this. I'm cracking myself up, all right. So I've
Speaker 1: gone through all impeachment papers. Let me tell you, Linda,
Speaker 1: you've read through them too. I spent them to you earlier.
Speaker 1: Today we got the Democrats that they're trying to ratch
Speaker 1: it up. The President said to fight, fight for you know,
Speaker 1: and then he also said, many of you will peacefully,
Speaker 1: patriotically march to the capital so that you could let
Speaker 1: your voices be heard. And I'm reading it and my
Speaker 1: eyes are glassing over here as the Democrats all this
Speaker 1: is with a foregone conclusion next week. Is them just
Speaker 1: trying to ratch it up to bloody up politically. Got
Speaker 1: to put all these these extra words in your speech
Speaker 1: these days because people will take it the wrong way.
Speaker 1: Democrats want to bloody up Trump so we can't run
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty four. That's what this is about. They
Speaker 1: don't care about how much time or money or the
Speaker 1: American people at all. When they're doing this all right,
Speaker 1: Lindsay Graham now is being very clear. We now know
Speaker 1: forty five United States senator senators believe it's unconstitutional. There
Speaker 1: are three arguments. One the constitutionality of this impeachment. Of course,
Speaker 1: that would include things like they don't have jurisdiction. A,
Speaker 1: because he's no longer president, you cannot remove him from office,
Speaker 1: and you know, it also includes other issues involving the constitution.
Speaker 1: Then it's the whole legal aspect. We have court documents,
Speaker 1: even the media mob all now and FBI investigators all
Speaker 1: saying that a lot of this was pre planned. Now,
Speaker 1: it doesn't mean that some of the people that went
Speaker 1: to the rally didn't allow themselves to get caught up
Speaker 1: in something they should never have been a part of,
Speaker 1: but that for them would have been spontaneous. But again
Speaker 1: we're down to like over the summer, the ninety nine
Speaker 1: percent of protesters weren't hurling bottles and molotov cocktails and
Speaker 1: rocks and bricks and injuring and killing, injuring over two
Speaker 1: thousand cops or twenty five hundred cops and killing twenty
Speaker 1: five people, and that was not condemned by liberal Democrats.
Speaker 1: So now you've got a problem. Is the whole well,
Speaker 1: incitement led to what happened at the capitol, narrative falling apart,
Speaker 1: and then the third aspect of this is, well, if
Speaker 1: this is your standard, okay, well we'll point out Chuck
Speaker 1: Schumer's threat to Supreme Court justices, Joe Biden's threat to
Speaker 1: beat the hell out of Trump, the comments of Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris after the burning down of the Minneapolis police precinct
Speaker 1: and the rioting that went on Minneapolis. If you be where,
Speaker 1: you take note, it isn't going to stop. It shouldn't stop.
Speaker 1: They shouldn't stop. We won't stop. Okay, well, that's now
Speaker 1: fair game. Nancy Pelosi's after what happened in Wisconsin and
Speaker 1: people rated the Capitol there. I didn't hear any Democrats
Speaker 1: all worked up over any of these things. And so
Speaker 1: it's a matter of okay, well, if that's your standard,
Speaker 1: then we need to be impeaching all of these people.
Speaker 1: Maxine Waters, I'm gonna take Trump out tonight. Great sounds
Speaker 1: like a threat to me. And so Lindsey Graham literally said,
Speaker 1: if the Democrats want to extend out what is a
Speaker 1: predetermined outcome, just to continue to waste taxpayer time and
Speaker 1: money and effort and divide the country further because mister
Speaker 1: unity Joe Biden won't speak out about any of this.
Speaker 1: That in fact, if they start bringing up witnesses, which
Speaker 1: is another sidebar to the whole Snap impeachment that Democrat
Speaker 1: Jonathan Turley keeps saying, you can't have that because well,
Speaker 1: we hadn't even established the facts of the case of
Speaker 1: what actually happened on January sixth, And now that the FBI,
Speaker 1: court documents, investigators, and even the media mob of reporting that, yeah,
Speaker 1: there's different groups. We've identified this one in Ohio, there's
Speaker 1: other group, and there's other state, and that they had
Speaker 1: plotted and planned the whole thing. That's very separate and apart.
Speaker 1: In other words, it would have happened because they planned it,
Speaker 1: and they're out there the night before. You saw the
Speaker 1: pipe bomb video planting pipe bombs the night before. So
Speaker 1: all of that is so Lindsey Graham is saying they
Speaker 1: if the Democrats want to call one witness, that they're
Speaker 1: going to open up Pandora's box. And what that means is,
Speaker 1: I think if they open up this can of worbs,
Speaker 1: I think he says he's going to bring the FBI
Speaker 1: in the questions this trial in if the House managers
Speaker 1: want to use this as a political commercial against Donald
Speaker 1: Trump and Republicans, and they want to call witnesses now
Speaker 1: they didn't call during the impeachment process in the House.
Speaker 1: This thing could go for weeks or months, and that
Speaker 1: would be bad for the country. So to my Democratic colleagues,
Speaker 1: if you vote to call one witness none were called
Speaker 1: in the House, get ready for a long trial. Well
Speaker 1: we only got a couple of seconds. But let me
Speaker 1: ask you. Do you anticipate witnesses being called and then
Speaker 1: being cross examined? I hope not. They didn't call any
Speaker 1: of the House. I think we know what happened that day.
Speaker 1: But if you open up that can of worms, we'll
Speaker 1: want the FBI to come in and tell us about
Speaker 1: how people actually preplanned these attacks and what happened with
Speaker 1: the security footprint at the Capitol. You open up Pandora's box,
Speaker 1: if you call one witness, I hope we don't call
Speaker 1: any and we vote and get this trial over next
Speaker 1: week when it starts. Now that goes right to the
Speaker 1: power of Nancy Pelosi. You know she's ahead of the
Speaker 1: sergeant of Arms and responsible for security of the Capitol.
Speaker 1: And then the question is, with all the knowledge ahead
Speaker 1: of time, why did they not they knew hundreds of
Speaker 1: thousands of people were going to march to the capitol.
Speaker 1: And why was the chief of police of the Capitol
Speaker 1: police denied the National Guard that was requested. We now
Speaker 1: know six separate times, all right, And then I would say,
Speaker 1: bring in Kamala Harris as a witness. And then how
Speaker 1: do you have presiding over the shift show a guy
Speaker 1: that already has declared that Donald Trump ought to be
Speaker 1: convicted at being pat Lahey? Why because John Roberts, who
Speaker 1: constitutionally would be the guy to preside over this, has said, no,
Speaker 1: not gonna happen. You're not dragging me into this. Not
Speaker 1: exactly a fan of Donald Trump's either, So now they're
Speaker 1: thinking about other ways to I don't hurt Trump. They
Speaker 1: now will Joe Biden revoked Donald Trump's access to intelligence
Speaker 1: briefings as past presidents usually get. They're usually considered former
Speaker 1: president has been considered, you know, as being kept in
Speaker 1: the loop on national security matters. Maybe just maybe that
Speaker 1: would be a good idea to do. But they just
Speaker 1: all this is it's a show. And if they want
Speaker 1: to bring in trial witnesses, I actually find if they
Speaker 1: brought in the right ones that I have a great
Speaker 1: list I'll put together that they ought to bring in
Speaker 1: and the questioning and where it ought to go. I
Speaker 1: have my own ideas on this, and I think if
Speaker 1: this is now the standard incendiary insurrection style language, there's
Speaker 1: an awful lot of people now that need to be
Speaker 1: added to the list of an impeachment trial. So we'll see.
Speaker 1: But it's really simply it's going to come down to
Speaker 1: all of all of that. And but I'll tell you
Speaker 1: another thing. This can happen, and I'll stick to the
Speaker 1: basics here. You know, everybody dropped the ball. Apparently there
Speaker 1: were indications, warnings, intelligence about this being preplanned. Why did
Speaker 1: not they Why did they not prepare for this? Why
Speaker 1: weren't why wasn't the guard brought up all of these things?
Speaker 1: I mean, it's it's pretty unbelievable. And Okay, they're going
Speaker 1: to edit their tapes. Donald Trump said to fight this
Speaker 1: goes back to oh targeted districts. And I think Sarah
Speaker 1: Panel still has this ongoing lawsuit with The New York
Speaker 1: Times over this. I thought it was supposed to be
Speaker 1: settled this summer. We're watching the case closely. I've just
Speaker 1: got my ole if the ball got busy. But a
Speaker 1: case of oh okay, targeted districts in a bullseye. Oh
Speaker 1: that means you're threatening people. No, that's Bob Beckel's invention.
Speaker 1: He's been on the air with us telling us we
Speaker 1: used to do that all the time. You target these
Speaker 1: districts for potential districts where you might be able to
Speaker 1: pick up a seat or two. Very common in politics,
Speaker 1: in other corruption news with Democrats because there you know
Speaker 1: their hypocrisy is breathtaking and morally bankrupt. But Joe Biden's
Speaker 1: head picked ahead the DOJ Criminal Division. Get this now
Speaker 1: we find out has ties to Hunter Biden, Axios reporting
Speaker 1: Hunter hired a new attorney to assist with what is
Speaker 1: now officially a federal criminal investigation and defense just a
Speaker 1: month before his father became president. On an auguration day,
Speaker 1: one of the lawyer's close colleagues was tapped to temporarily
Speaker 1: lead Justice Department's criminal division. Oh, how convenient for the Bidens.
Speaker 1: That move puts the new DOJ official a top of
Speaker 1: a powerful arm of the justice system, as his former
Speaker 1: colleague helps the president's son fend off a criminal probe.
Speaker 1: Can anyone say appearance of impropriety? Conflict of interest? Anyway?
Speaker 1: So Hunter Biden, by the way, why am I not?
Speaker 1: Why do I suspect this is not an accident? And
Speaker 1: imagine if Donald Trump did this, did any of this?
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, what would they say, what would
Speaker 1: they do if it was Donald Trump? That standard is
Speaker 1: never going to end anyway. I do have some election news.
Speaker 1: I've been saying for all of you out there that
Speaker 1: keep asking me, well, what can I do? What can
Speaker 1: I do? What can I do? And I've been saying, well,
Speaker 1: at the first level, you know, we've got to start
Speaker 1: with fixing and making sure and ensuring that we don't
Speaker 1: have that we fix and solve any issues that could
Speaker 1: raise questions about the integrity or prevent people from having
Speaker 1: confidence in election results. You know, I'll even you know,
Speaker 1: if you go back to two thousand, I think this
Speaker 1: is a fair statement. I don't think well, and this
Speaker 1: is sad. And this was what Florida got fixed thanks
Speaker 1: to Ron de Santis, because they also screwed up not
Speaker 1: only in two thousand, but two thousand and sixteen in Florida.
Speaker 1: We remember that show down there, but this time they
Speaker 1: had put the proper changes and check some balances in
Speaker 1: place and went along smoothly. And you know, but are
Speaker 1: we ever really going to know the exact accurate vote
Speaker 1: count in two thousand? I think it's I don't think
Speaker 1: anybody can tell us with any real confidence that this
Speaker 1: is the exact vote. Now we're the United States of America.
Speaker 1: Maybe you're never ever gonna have one hundred percent purity
Speaker 1: on this, but I mean, at least to get to
Speaker 1: the level we have confidence, because I don't think anybody
Speaker 1: could ever just look at two thousand and say it
Speaker 1: was five hundred twenty seven votes in Florida with any
Speaker 1: sense of complete accuracy. It just became what it became, dimpled, pimpled, hanging, swinging,
Speaker 1: perforated chads. Remember well, okay, so we now know that
Speaker 1: every state had these statutory requirements that partisan observers could
Speaker 1: observe the vote count. That didn't happen in any state.
Speaker 1: And remember that a lot of these last minute changes
Speaker 1: were made because of COVID nineteen, ignoring the advice of
Speaker 1: the great doctor Anthony Fauci, which was that people can
Speaker 1: safely vote in person with social distancing and masking, all right,
Speaker 1: so it was possible to do it, but one time
Speaker 1: nobody wanted to quote their favorite doctor who was I'm
Speaker 1: sure a nice guy, but got a lot wrong and
Speaker 1: I'm not even blaming him. So anyway, now we have
Speaker 1: some developments and this in Georgia. Remember the big issue
Speaker 1: down there was the issue of signature verification and voter
Speaker 1: ID requirements. Now the Senator Georgia, controlled by Republicans, is
Speaker 1: introduced a bill that will require voters to provide a
Speaker 1: photo ID when requesting and returning their absentee ballot or
Speaker 1: their early voting ballot, and which should be mandatory, absolutely mandatory,
Speaker 1: and they should have one signature verification standard, not two.
Speaker 1: So that happens down in Georgia. Then you have in Arizona,
Speaker 1: they've introduced a bill and that state legislature that would
Speaker 1: repeal Arizona's permanent early voting list, voters on the list
Speaker 1: automatically receiving mail in ballots for each primary in general election.
Speaker 1: Separate bill would remove people from the lists who failed
Speaker 1: to vote in the primary in general elections and two
Speaker 1: straight cycles. All right. They also need to add some
Speaker 1: we have to have photoid voter ID everywhere. And then
Speaker 1: in Pennsylvania lawmakers there they're now pushing forward a bill
Speaker 1: to repeal they're twenty nineteen no excuse absentee voting law.
Speaker 1: That's the one that was in direct violation of the
Speaker 1: Pennsylvania state Constitution. And there's a process of changing the constitution,
Speaker 1: which is a lot more difficult than a bunch of
Speaker 1: legislators making laws. And that's why it was, in my view, unconstitutional.
Speaker 1: But nobody wanted to hear that case at the level
Speaker 1: it needed to be heard at. So we'll watch, We'll
Speaker 1: watch all of these and you know, Tom Wolfe would
Speaker 1: likely veto any election integrity bill, and they have an
Speaker 1: open gubernatorial and Senate contest next year. It's gonna be
Speaker 1: a lot of interesting racists come next year. So that's
Speaker 1: happening now. Iran is saber rattling as they launched a
Speaker 1: new rocket showing advances in potential missile technology, and we've
Speaker 1: got Joe Biden showing more struggles cognitively. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: getting bad. And I know that people in the mob
Speaker 1: don't like when I say week freill and cognitively struggling.
Speaker 1: But I'll let you decide, as we always do next
Speaker 1: and as we roll along Sean Hannity Show. Now on
Speaker 1: the other side of this, the Democrats, of course, they
Speaker 1: want to keep the same COVID style voting system in
Speaker 1: place and expand massively mail in voting. Is that you know,
Speaker 1: we of HR one, which we've gone over in great detail.
Speaker 1: Democratic lawmakers now of dubbed the bill the Vote at
Speaker 1: Home Act, which seeks to massively expand vote at home
Speaker 1: ballot access. Now, I thought the New York Toilet Paper
Speaker 1: Times suggested, well, there's a greater chance of fraud with
Speaker 1: mail in balloting, etc. Now, I'm not saying that there
Speaker 1: isn't a way for you to improve voting systems, but
Speaker 1: you got to make sure that every person of voting
Speaker 1: that it's the person that says they're voting doing the voting.
Speaker 1: And there's got to be some type of verification. For example,
Speaker 1: you go to a Democratic national convention, you need a
Speaker 1: picture ID to get into the capitol. You need a
Speaker 1: picture ID, which by the way, I think is whole
Speaker 1: write and appropriate. And so if you don't have them,
Speaker 1: why would you get to vote without it? Or change
Speaker 1: the rules. But we're gonna let sixteen year old vote
Speaker 1: and we're not gonna have any signature verification. That doesn't work.
Speaker 1: I couldn't believe it this year. I go to vote.
Speaker 1: Give me the first three letters of your last name.
Speaker 1: H A. N. Okay? Is this you? Yes? Okay? Here's
Speaker 1: your sheet? Go vote? How was it? Nothing else? All right?
Speaker 1: Eight hundred ninety four one sewn? You want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the program. A lot on Biden's cognitive issues.
Speaker 1: Straight ahead news you won't hear, I can promise you
Speaker 1: from the mob, the media or big tech. Straight ahead
Speaker 1: twenty five till the top of the hour. Well, no
Speaker 1: Americans gonna should love this. This is not good. Tehran,
Speaker 1: the Iranian mullahs now and this is this is a
Speaker 1: typical pattern of these these evil regimes like North Korea.
Speaker 1: They've played this game all of the time. Iran in
Speaker 1: other countries. So they've launched a new rocket, apparently showing
Speaker 1: advances in potential missile technology. Right, there's two aspects of this,
Speaker 1: uranium enrichment and delivery systems. Is the missile delivery system
Speaker 1: the rocket developed under a government back program to send
Speaker 1: civilian satellite supposedly into orbit three hundred ten miles above
Speaker 1: the ground. According to the Iranian Defense Minister Space Department.
Speaker 1: The technology, though, however, that would be quite easily transferable
Speaker 1: to Iran's military missile program run by the Islamic Revolutionary
Speaker 1: Guard Corps. Now why are they doing it, Well, they're
Speaker 1: doing it for the same reason that Kim Jong UN's father,
Speaker 1: Kim Jong ill, was able to extort a fortune from
Speaker 1: Bill Clinton when Clinton wasn't it it's a good deal
Speaker 1: for American people. No, it wasn't a good deal for
Speaker 1: the American people because they weren't supposed to develop nuclear weapons.
Speaker 1: And guess what they did. This one hundred and fifty
Speaker 1: billion that Obama and Biden gave the Iranians and cash
Speaker 1: and other currency and dropping cargo planes full of cash
Speaker 1: and currency on their tarmac. Yeah, this is all you know,
Speaker 1: them raising the stakes to show their saber rattling for
Speaker 1: possible negotiations for even more money from Biden. And God
Speaker 1: only knows the concessions that are going to come China's way. Considering, oh,
Speaker 1: this seems to me that China has an awful lot
Speaker 1: of well contact with the Biden family. And let me
Speaker 1: tell you something. This is one thing, and they were
Speaker 1: actually a separate story apart from this, about how the
Speaker 1: Chinese government and their oppressive surveillance of their own people.
Speaker 1: Now they've been doing this forever. That is, they've they've
Speaker 1: got sophisticated spying mechanisms against all of us in this country. Oh,
Speaker 1: I think considering it wasn't that long ago that everything
Speaker 1: that Zero Experience Hunter and company were involved in with
Speaker 1: China and Joe's time in China was probably all recorded.
Speaker 1: And I'm imagining that's probably stuff that Joe and Zero
Speaker 1: Experience Hunter wouldn't exactly want in the public domain, and
Speaker 1: somehow they might it might become aware of its possible existence.
Speaker 1: Who knows, But that's that's why you don't. That's why
Speaker 1: family members of vice presidents shouldn't be getting wire transfers
Speaker 1: of three and a half million dollars from Russian oligarchs,
Speaker 1: the First Lady of Moscow, or Kazakhstan oligarchs or Ukrainian
Speaker 1: corrupt oil companies like Barisma. And that's where the quiddin
Speaker 1: a pro in the quo for Zero Experience Hunter came
Speaker 1: in there, and they shouldn't be taken out on shopping
Speaker 1: spree with Chinese nationals. It's like congressmen like Stalwart whatever
Speaker 1: his name is, shouldn't be hanging out with a Chinese spy.
Speaker 1: Fang Fang. It just can't make this up. What's that
Speaker 1: what you're saying in my ear? Swallow whatever his name is,
Speaker 1: the guy. Yeah, we still don't know the nature of
Speaker 1: this long term relationship with the Chinese spy. But don't worry.
Speaker 1: He's on the House Intelligence Committee with all of our
Speaker 1: government's secrets. Wouldn't and why is that? I don't want
Speaker 1: to know about his private life. I want to know though,
Speaker 1: if there's any pillow talk, just to use a phrase
Speaker 1: between the two. So anyway, there's one interesting thing in
Speaker 1: the Atlantic. I don't know what to make of this
Speaker 1: that tens of thousands of people in cities across Russia
Speaker 1: protesting the jailing of an opposition leader. I don't know,
Speaker 1: knowing the hostile actor that Putin is in the hostile
Speaker 1: regime that is Russia, I don't know how well that's
Speaker 1: going to work for people there that are out there protesting.
Speaker 1: That's that's kind of what happens when you lose freedom.
Speaker 1: But the pictures were pretty interesting. You don't get to
Speaker 1: see a lot of the world's unrest. There was a
Speaker 1: January thirty first rally that was just massive. It almost
Speaker 1: looked like a Trump rally. They're saying terms of its
Speaker 1: massive size. Now. So all the time we're going through
Speaker 1: this campaign cycle, what did I say about Joe? Wow?
Speaker 1: It was startling to me and startling to many people
Speaker 1: that I know and people that i'd meet and then
Speaker 1: asked me about what I thought about the presidential race
Speaker 1: that was then pending, and they'd ask, well, what happened
Speaker 1: to Joe? I mean, he just doesn't seem like the
Speaker 1: same guy. I mean, if you look at Joe Biden
Speaker 1: ten years ago versus today, it's it's startling. If you
Speaker 1: look at him four years ago versus today, I find
Speaker 1: it even more startling. And even Democrats and medium mob
Speaker 1: people that I know and Democrats like every time he
Speaker 1: speaks like, oh, please don't screw it up, please, please
Speaker 1: show don't screw it up please, They're like they're like
Speaker 1: hanging on eggshells there and it's obvious what's happening. Now.
Speaker 1: Occasionally they'll get him out there answer a few questions
Speaker 1: and and mostly though they just pictures him oval office,
Speaker 1: act like he's busy, and then he goes behind his
Speaker 1: desk and he signs what looks like a new executive order,
Speaker 1: something that he defined as being dictatorial. But yet he's
Speaker 1: signed more than three times the past, the three prior
Speaker 1: presidents before him. Pretty interesting, So you got to get
Speaker 1: the votes man anyway. So now we're finding out Daily
Speaker 1: Beast of all places, is reporting good for them. According
Speaker 1: to three sources with knowledge of the matter, a new
Speaker 1: president's communications staff as already probed reporters to see what
Speaker 1: questions they plan on asking the White House Press Secretary
Speaker 1: Jensaki when called upon during briefings. Now, the requests prompted
Speaker 1: concerns among the White House Press Corps IS members, like
Speaker 1: many reporters, are sensitive to the perception that they are
Speaker 1: coordinating with political communications staffers. One reporter raised the issue
Speaker 1: during an informal White House Correspondent Association zoom call on Friday, and,
Speaker 1: according to The Daily Beast and multiple sources, leaders at
Speaker 1: the meeting advised print reporters to push back against requests
Speaker 1: by the White House Press Team to learn the questions
Speaker 1: in advance or simply not respond to Biden's Biden teams inquiries.
Speaker 1: While the while it's a relief to see the briefing's return. Now,
Speaker 1: the press can't really do its job in the briefing
Speaker 1: room if the White House is picking and choosing the
Speaker 1: questions that they want. That's not a free press at
Speaker 1: off at all. And apparently it even mild league aggravated
Speaker 1: enough reporters. But apparently that's what's going on behind the scene.
Speaker 1: Not two issues here, one now that they're bringing up
Speaker 1: the issue of me saying Joe looks weak, frail and
Speaker 1: is cognitively struggling. Well, we've played our best of hits
Speaker 1: many times. I won't waste your time today and play
Speaker 1: it again. We'll play it enough in the next four years.
Speaker 1: But this is more recently, the more recent screw up.
Speaker 1: And if you listen very closely to what Joe is saying,
Speaker 1: you gotta listen closely. He says, not once, but twice,
Speaker 1: and we'll be able to get four hundred million doses
Speaker 1: and six hundred millions, and we're going to increase in
Speaker 1: fifty percent, and three hundred Americans are going to get
Speaker 1: a vaccine. Okay, misspoke, right, then he misspoke again. Okay,
Speaker 1: this to me seems like he's struggling cognitively. We'll let
Speaker 1: you decide, and we believe that we'll soon be able
Speaker 1: to confirm the purchase of an additional hundred billion doses
Speaker 1: for each of the two FDA authorized vaccine FISER and Maderna.
Speaker 1: That's one hundred million more doses of FISER and one
Speaker 1: hundred million more doses of Maderna, two hundred million more
Speaker 1: doses than the federal government had previously secured. Not in
Speaker 1: hand yet, but order. We expect these additional two hundred
Speaker 1: million doses to be delivered this summer, and some of
Speaker 1: it will come as early began to come in early summer,
Speaker 1: but by the by the midsummer that this vaccine will
Speaker 1: be there and the order, and that increases the total
Speaker 1: vaccine order in the United States by fifty percent, from
Speaker 1: four hundred million order to six hundred million. Okay, now,
Speaker 1: let's go just apart where he says three hundred Americans
Speaker 1: will get the vaccine. Listen, it's enough vaccine to fully
Speaker 1: vaccinate three hundred Americans by end of the summer, the
Speaker 1: beginning of the all. But we want to make it
Speaker 1: look that's I want to repeat, It'll be enough to
Speaker 1: fully vaccinate three hundred Americans to beat this pandemic. Three
Speaker 1: hundred Americans. When did I hear that? Right? I just
Speaker 1: want to make sure that I'm not hearing something I'm not.
Speaker 1: I'm not I'm hearing it right? Correct? He said three hundred.
Speaker 1: And he didn't send it once. He said it twice. Correct,
Speaker 1: that's right. He doubled down, doubled down on Really, he
Speaker 1: really should have circled back. He should have circled back.
Speaker 1: We're gonna get to that in the second good point.
Speaker 1: He's gonna circle back. You know, you can't make this up.
Speaker 1: You know what? Maybe for clarity because the mob is
Speaker 1: so angry at me. Well, I again, We're gonna let
Speaker 1: the American people decide. Is Joe seem as strong and uh,
Speaker 1: I don't know, vibrant, energetic, alert as he was when
Speaker 1: he left office four years ago as vice president. Because
Speaker 1: these are some of the highlights. Donald Trump don't understand healthcare.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump thinks healthcare as a privilege. Brock and I
Speaker 1: think it's a right for people that bad at kelt care,
Speaker 1: I'll lead an effective strategy to mobilize true in our
Speaker 1: subfage to pressure isolated, punished China. I'm running as a
Speaker 1: proud Democrat for the Senate I got in trouble when
Speaker 1: we're running again. The Senator who is a Mormon, the governor. Okay, tomorrow,
Speaker 1: superstar Tuesday, and I want to thank you all. I'll
Speaker 1: tell you what. I'm rushing the head, aren't I. We
Speaker 1: hold these truths to be self evident all men and
Speaker 1: women created by Go you know that you know the thing.
Speaker 1: You agree with me? Go to Joe three O three
Speaker 1: three oh. We choose truth over facts. Play the radio,
Speaker 1: make sure the television. Excuse me, make sure you have
Speaker 1: the record player on at night, the phone, make sure
Speaker 1: the kids hear words. Donald Trump does pose an excel
Speaker 1: sense to this. It's not hypothetical. All right. Now, I'll
Speaker 1: let you decide. Am I being uncharitable here? Unfair? Or
Speaker 1: is my observation that have you ever had Let's say,
Speaker 1: his fastball was the years in the Senate, And let's say, well,
Speaker 1: I'll be developed a medium fastball and a changeup for
Speaker 1: the time he's VP. I don't see any of those
Speaker 1: pitches anymore, just my own way of saying it. Now,
Speaker 1: we have a favorite phrase that keeps coming out of
Speaker 1: the White House official propagandist Press Secretary Jensaki, which is,
Speaker 1: let's circle back. We now have a whopping total. I
Speaker 1: on think we'll play them all now, but we can
Speaker 1: play a good number of them, she said at a
Speaker 1: whopping seventy seven times to date. I didn't include today. Listen,
Speaker 1: I can. I'll circle back. If there's more I can
Speaker 1: share with you, I'll circle back with you. If there's
Speaker 1: more to convey, I'll have to just circle back with you.
Speaker 1: We can circle back then. I'm happy to circle back
Speaker 1: with you. I can circle back. I will have to
Speaker 1: circle back on that one. That's an excellent question. Oh,
Speaker 1: such an important question. We will circle back with you,
Speaker 1: and we'll circle back with you. It's an interesting question,
Speaker 1: but we'll circle back. I'm happy to circle back, but
Speaker 1: I'll have to circle back with you on It's a
Speaker 1: good question. But we'll circle back with you on this today.
Speaker 1: We will certainly circle back with you more directly. I
Speaker 1: hate to disappoint you, but I will have to circle
Speaker 1: back with you on that as well. And last thing
Speaker 1: I just want to do before we get to your questions.
Speaker 1: I often know what I'm going to circle back. I
Speaker 1: hate to disappoint conservative Twitter, but I am going to
Speaker 1: circle back on a number of things. As we often
Speaker 1: do directly. Let's just circle back on everything, meaning I
Speaker 1: don't have any answers, great question, let me circle back
Speaker 1: with you and give you the official party line, and
Speaker 1: getting snarky because people are laughing at it. It is
Speaker 1: pretty darn funny, I'll tell you that. And now Political
Speaker 1: outlined why you haven't seen Biden do a national interview yet.
Speaker 1: There's no word now. Usually last year, for example, I
Speaker 1: had the honor of interviewing President Trump for the interview
Speaker 1: before the Super bowls a tradition that's gone on now
Speaker 1: for a while. And I'd never gotten that opportunity before,
Speaker 1: and I got the opportunity. I was glad to do it.
Speaker 1: It was a lot of fun actually, And anyway, there's
Speaker 1: no word if Biden is going to do a Super
Speaker 1: Bowl interview, we'll have to wait and see. And anyway,
Speaker 1: and you know, so we're just gonna watch a lot
Speaker 1: of these things. What is interesting is to watch how
Speaker 1: the Democrats now have turned on Mansion and turned the
Speaker 1: heat up on cinema because they're the two Democratic senators
Speaker 1: that said no, we're not breaking Senate norm and going
Speaker 1: along with your you know, mandate to end the legislative filibuster.
Speaker 1: So then there's Kamala Harris. We're not going to stop.
Speaker 1: We won't stop, we shouldn't stop. You beware take note.
Speaker 1: This was after you know, of course police precinct burned
Speaker 1: to the ground and the writing took place. Sounds like
Speaker 1: insurrection language if we use the Democrat in the media
Speaker 1: mob's definition. So we'll have to wait and see what
Speaker 1: happens there. Plans Now people are getting critical about how
Speaker 1: African Americans and Hispanic Americans are falling way behind in
Speaker 1: these vaccination efforts. You have researches at NYU publishing a bogus,
Speaker 1: ridiculous study about big tech and conservatives. Yeah, turns out
Speaker 1: it was funded by a Biden downer. How convenient. Pretty interesting.
Speaker 1: You have a Democratic congressman wanting to screen military recruits
Speaker 1: social media posts. Better have put everything in there that
Speaker 1: is politically correct. Pretty scary times we're living in, I'll
Speaker 1: tell you that. Anyway. So what's happening here? And then
Speaker 1: you got this whole thing with this guy John Weaver.
Speaker 1: I remember Weaver, wasn't he working He was working with
Speaker 1: Kasik and he was on the McCain campaign. I never
Speaker 1: knew him really well. Apparently calls saying that he knew
Speaker 1: all this stuff about him going back a long, long
Speaker 1: time and that it apparently was widely known. And you
Speaker 1: know of the eighty seven point four million dollars raised
Speaker 1: by the Lincoln Project by people that say they're Republican,
Speaker 1: but they really are supporting Joe Biden with the greatest
Speaker 1: socialist agenda in history, which is laughable. Fifty was used
Speaker 1: for independent expenditures, adds that expressly advocated the election to
Speaker 1: defeat a specific candidates, and most of it was against
Speaker 1: Trump and Republicans. Great times when you have Republicans that
Speaker 1: say they're not Republicans, well they're not conservatives either. You know,
Speaker 1: you've got the McCain supporters, the Romney supporters, the never trumpers.
Speaker 1: That's it an hour two Sean Hannity Show, eight hundred
Speaker 1: and nine four one sewn. You want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program. It's getting quite a bit of attention.
Speaker 1: The new White House Press Secretary Jensaki has her obvious
Speaker 1: obviously her most favorite praise, which is, we'll circle back,
Speaker 1: circle back, circle back. We now have counted a total
Speaker 1: of seventy seven time. She knows nothing and tells the
Speaker 1: mob and the media that is praising her and gushing
Speaker 1: at her every day that she'll circle back because she
Speaker 1: has no answers. Let's circle back, I can. I'll circle back.
Speaker 1: If there's more I can share with you, I'll circle
Speaker 1: back with you. If there's more to convey, I'll have
Speaker 1: to just circle back with you. We can circle back
Speaker 1: with them. I'm happy to circle back with you. I
Speaker 1: can circle back with me. I will have to circle
Speaker 1: back on that one. That's an excellent question. Oh, such
Speaker 1: an important question. We will circle back with you, and
Speaker 1: we'll circle back with you. It's an interesting question, but
Speaker 1: we'll circle back. I'm happy to circle back, but I'll
Speaker 1: have to circle back with you on It's a good question.
Speaker 1: But we'll circle back with you on this today. We
Speaker 1: will certainly circle back with you more directly. I hate
Speaker 1: to disappoint you, but I will have to circle back
Speaker 1: with you on that as well. And last thing I
Speaker 1: just want to do before we get to your questions.
Speaker 1: I often know what I'm going to circle back. I
Speaker 1: hate to disappoint conservative Twitter, but I am going to
Speaker 1: circle back a number of things, as we often do directly.
Speaker 1: We'll circle back with all of it anyway, here and
Speaker 1: weigh in on circling back. He's circling back as a guest.
Speaker 1: Mark Simone, morning show host on our affiliate, our Midday.
Speaker 1: I guess it's technically the right term here on our
Speaker 1: flagship New York station AM seven ten WR Rando Divine
Speaker 1: New York Post columnists. You know, Look, everyone has little
Speaker 1: phrases that you get into patterns, speaking patterns, Mark Simone,
Speaker 1: I'm sure you've done it occasionally in your long, successful career.
Speaker 1: I've done it many, many times. The audience likes to
Speaker 1: point it out, but for crying out loud, I mean
Speaker 1: the fawning on top of it. And meanwhile, she's got
Speaker 1: no answers to anything of substance. I didn't know you've
Speaker 1: been asking me this off the circle back to you
Speaker 1: with an oh man. Apparently they rig these briefings that
Speaker 1: reporters have to submit the questions in advance. So this
Speaker 1: is with the question in the van, she has to
Speaker 1: circle back. Who is he going to go? Ask Joe Biden?
Speaker 1: He doesn't even know where he is. He's upstairs watching
Speaker 1: Matlock while she's doing these briefings. She's got no personality
Speaker 1: at all. She's there for one reason. You look at
Speaker 1: her resume. She was Obama's press secretary, very tight with Obama,
Speaker 1: and he's really the guy running everything. So she's like
Speaker 1: this Manchurian press secretary and that personality. She wouldn't be
Speaker 1: the life of the party in a coma award. Where
Speaker 1: did they find her? By the way, that's Mark. That's
Speaker 1: Mark Simone's standard in life. The funniest thing, it's like
Speaker 1: a joke between me and Mark, is I'm a loser
Speaker 1: and I Mark, you can confirm this. I'm a total loser.
Speaker 1: I never really go out often, but when I show
Speaker 1: up at any event or even any restaurant, not exactly,
Speaker 1: always on the top of my priority list. I mean,
Speaker 1: I just cannot believe Mark is everyone. I've never met
Speaker 1: anybody that is out as often as you. I do
Speaker 1: not know how you do it. You got a TV
Speaker 1: show or radio showing to me go out, You're mob
Speaker 1: by thousands of fans. This is so are you? You
Speaker 1: got your y'all? Come on, you're like a legend. Stop
Speaker 1: um circle back on this yourself. I mean, it's it's
Speaker 1: it's bizarre, yeah, II Sean. Honestly, you would think after
Speaker 1: about the sixty fist circle back that the journalists in
Speaker 1: the room might just start getting a bit aggravated because
Speaker 1: they're they're not getting their questions answered. But they're not.
Speaker 1: You know, it's just the exact opposite of Kaylee mcinanny,
Speaker 1: who she had grown men in that press room standing
Speaker 1: up and shouting at her. And if she'd been a Democrat,
Speaker 1: they would have been accused of being you know, domestic
Speaker 1: terrorists and misogynists and man explainers and all the rest.
Speaker 1: But Kaylee mcinanny did her job superbly. And it's such
Speaker 1: a contrast to Jen Szaki. Kaylee mckinetnie was always on
Speaker 1: top of the material. She had these voluminous folders that
Speaker 1: were all divided up with the labels, and she would
Speaker 1: keep talking very coherently while she leaked through to find
Speaker 1: her material. She was so good, and yet she never
Speaker 1: got any thanks. She was always abused. Jen Zaki, on
Speaker 1: the other hand, you know, seems like a nice person,
Speaker 1: but this is basic incompetence. If she can't answer basic questions,
Speaker 1: I think this is like a window into the real
Speaker 1: b team nature of the whole Biden operation. All right,
Speaker 1: so you are both friends of the program, and you
Speaker 1: both know that I say, the week frail, cognitively struggling Joe,
Speaker 1: and we have our standard montage that keeps getting longer
Speaker 1: and longer and longer. We choose truth over facts, but
Speaker 1: they're day and we hold these choose to be self
Speaker 1: having All men and women have created equal and doubt
Speaker 1: by the oh, the you know the thing, the thing,
Speaker 1: you know the thing, God the creator of everything. So
Speaker 1: we have the latest Biden moment. We're gonna have it.
Speaker 1: And he says it not once, but twice, and his
Speaker 1: math is a little fuzzy. Here, you're much smarter than me.
Speaker 1: Mark Simon will give you first crack at this. But
Speaker 1: he says, we're gonna have enough vaccine, but three hundred Americans. Listen,
Speaker 1: this is enough vaccine to fully vaccinate three hundred Americans
Speaker 1: by end of the summer the beginning of the fall.
Speaker 1: But we want to make a look. That's I want
Speaker 1: to repeat. It'll be enough to fully vaccinate three hundred
Speaker 1: Americans to beat this pandemic. All right, three hundred. Now,
Speaker 1: he just went through fuzzy math explaining how we're going
Speaker 1: to increase the number of doses by fifty percent. He
Speaker 1: didn't know how to do simple math either. Okay, now,
Speaker 1: I get beaten up by the leftist media mob, and
Speaker 1: you know out let's say, I don't know daily bees
Speaker 1: toughing them posed the usuals. And because I say week frail,
Speaker 1: cognitively struggling. Am I wrong or is this some bizarre
Speaker 1: Hannity observation that only I see. Well, I don't want
Speaker 1: to make light of this, but if you talk to
Speaker 1: serious medical experts about cognitive stuff, I'll tell you that's
Speaker 1: one of the early signs getting numbers all mixed up
Speaker 1: and missing zeros and all that stuff. Sob I had
Speaker 1: to say it, that's a sign of that three hundred vaccines.
Speaker 1: So it's great. I mean that will take care of
Speaker 1: Dick's notch New Hampshire. Wipe it out there. Because this
Speaker 1: other story that they lost twenty million vaccines, I don't
Speaker 1: think anyboy. I'll bring this up in today's breathing they
Speaker 1: lost twenty million vaccines. PolitiFact corrected me, by the way,
Speaker 1: and said they are absolutely not lost. This is an
Speaker 1: actual quote from PolitiFact. They are making an effort to
Speaker 1: locate them. That that's the situation. But how do you
Speaker 1: how do you lose vaccines? Apparently they were sent out.
Speaker 1: They don't know if they were received, they lost them
Speaker 1: somewhere in the transit. So but again he you know,
Speaker 1: he doesn't know what's going on. He's you know, at
Speaker 1: least she'll circle back him. You won't see him again
Speaker 1: for the rest of the week. Yeah, Miranda, Well, it's
Speaker 1: funny I think with Joe Biden that he is obviously
Speaker 1: has a huge problem with numbers, and yet perversely he
Speaker 1: seems attracted to talking numbers all the time. If you notice,
Speaker 1: practically every time he gives a speech, there are lots
Speaker 1: of complicated numbers in it, and he likes to pretend
Speaker 1: he's masterball on on top of it, and invariably he
Speaker 1: just MUCKs it up. So I think I've sort of
Speaker 1: been surprised actually that he's much more in the public
Speaker 1: frame now since he's entered the White House and become president.
Speaker 1: And yet they haven't been too many slippers. And I
Speaker 1: think that's because he now has this team of people
Speaker 1: around him who are dedicated to protecting him and his
Speaker 1: cognitive failings from the public. And so if you notice,
Speaker 1: the most we see of him if he sits down
Speaker 1: at a table, fumbles around, finds a pen, and signs things.
Speaker 1: And then as he's doing it. He sort of mumbles
Speaker 1: through these post it notes that he has attached to
Speaker 1: them retells people, and it looks as if he's looking
Speaker 1: at it for the first time himself. Oh really, I'm
Speaker 1: signing us there's something deeper here. If in fact, this
Speaker 1: is a really significant decline cognitively now and everybody in
Speaker 1: Biden world is protecting him, Aren't we really talking about
Speaker 1: a level of dishonesty to the American people that is
Speaker 1: deep and it is profound? And may I add, with
Speaker 1: Iran launching their new rocket, showing their advancement and potential
Speaker 1: missile technologies and re engage their pursuit of enriching uranium, etc.
Speaker 1: Isn't that a little bit dangerous because it sounds dangerous
Speaker 1: to me if people really know something that we don't know.
Speaker 1: I'm just looking at the verbal you know, malaprops his
Speaker 1: constant inability to remember getting lost in the middle of
Speaker 1: every other sentence, if he's not with a teleprompter. If
Speaker 1: it's worse than that, what does that mean? You know?
Speaker 1: They always says Joe being Joe. Go on YouTube or
Speaker 1: someplace and go watch Joe Biden twenty ten, watch him
Speaker 1: ten years ago and meet the press. Right, it's a
Speaker 1: totally different guy. He's a different guy with a different voice,
Speaker 1: His eyes have a different look at him. He's just
Speaker 1: not the same anymore. I mean, as far as displaying
Speaker 1: weakness the rest of the world, I can only hope
Speaker 1: that at least they got Susan Rice or Obama or
Speaker 1: somebody behind the scenes really running things. But that's a
Speaker 1: pretty scary thought too. So we're really in a problem here.
Speaker 1: I don't know what we're gonna do about it. Twenty
Speaker 1: twenty two when we get a Republican Congress, all right,
Speaker 1: But here, this is the thing. Now. It was interesting
Speaker 1: during the campaign, nobody ever criticized me for calling him
Speaker 1: week frel and cognitively struggling. Now that he's president and
Speaker 1: I say it, and all of a sudden, it was
Speaker 1: like a united front against me, Miranda. Everybody started criticizing
Speaker 1: me saying it. And then what I did is I
Speaker 1: went on radio and TV and I played my longer
Speaker 1: montage and I said, Okay, I'll let you decide. Does
Speaker 1: this Does this sound like somebody that really is cognitively sharp?
Speaker 1: Because it doesn't to me. Now, in fairness, I look
Speaker 1: at somebody who's older like Bernie Sanders. I think he's
Speaker 1: even older than Joe. And this guy's got is, he's
Speaker 1: his faculties. He's full on, totally energetic. You know, he
Speaker 1: seems you know, he hasn't lost a step in ten years.
Speaker 1: And Mark's right when you compare the tape, it's dramatic, yes,
Speaker 1: But you know, during the campaign, Joe Biden was the
Speaker 1: Democrats problem. Now he's in the White House, he's all
Speaker 1: our problem, you know, like it or not. He is
Speaker 1: our president, and we just have to hope that our
Speaker 1: adversaries don't try and take advantage of that. I mean,
Speaker 1: you can be sure that China and Russia and Iran
Speaker 1: know all about they will know more about Joe Biden's
Speaker 1: cognitive problems than any American citizen does, apart from the
Speaker 1: people working right with him. And that's a real vulnerability
Speaker 1: to this country. And so, you know, much as we
Speaker 1: all suspect that there are deep cognitive problems and we've
Speaker 1: seen the evidence of it over and over, I guess
Speaker 1: we're all stuck in this charade at the moment this weekend,
Speaker 1: at Bernie's charade, because unfortunately that is the president and
Speaker 1: we just have to believe that this great dishonesty, that
Speaker 1: this deception that's been put on the American people by
Speaker 1: the Credit Party, that they know what they're doing. All right,
Speaker 1: Miranda Divine, New York Post Mark Simone, my fellow host
Speaker 1: on our flagship AM seven ten WR in New York. Sir,
Speaker 1: thank you, Miranda, Thank you eight hundred and nine for one. Shawn,
Speaker 1: your calls coming up. I'm gonna do a quick border
Speaker 1: hit with Andy Biggs in a minute, and then your
Speaker 1: calls twenty five to the top of the hour. Thanks
Speaker 1: for being with us, eight hundred and nine four one,
Speaker 1: sewn you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 1: One of the phenomenons we watched and learned the summer
Speaker 1: was we'd be watching let's see cities literally rioting and
Speaker 1: attacks against old federal courthouses and police precincts being overrun
Speaker 1: and even burnt to the ground like in the Minneapolis case.
Speaker 1: And Kamala Harris, she's raising money for the Belle of
Speaker 1: those people that were out there writing and saying we're
Speaker 1: not gonna stop. We shouldn't stop, They're never gonna stop. Beware,
Speaker 1: take note all these all the well, if we're going
Speaker 1: to use the Democrats standard that would be calls for insurrection.
Speaker 1: But putting that aside, you'd have fake news CNN, MS DNC,
Speaker 1: and they'd be out there and they'd have fires raging
Speaker 1: in the shots behind them. It's mostly been a very
Speaker 1: peaceful protest here. As we continue our coverage here or
Speaker 1: at fake news scene, n don't don't pay any mind
Speaker 1: to the massive, huge fire in the city behind us.
Speaker 1: You know, the autonomous Chaz Chops Summer of Love spaghetti
Speaker 1: pot luck dinner zone. Yeah, that wasn't ending peaceful either,
Speaker 1: literally taking over a police precinct there. And now we've
Speaker 1: got the re emergence. Shocking, I thought, because only Donald
Speaker 1: Trump was responsible for this, but they would just deny reality. Well,
Speaker 1: the same thing's happening with the Democrats parroting this new
Speaker 1: talking point that we've all watched the latest videos of
Speaker 1: people I don't see a lot of social distancing or
Speaker 1: mask wearing that are making their way to have been
Speaker 1: making their way to the southern border. There is a
Speaker 1: report out today on foxnews dot com that shows, you know,
Speaker 1: Biden has now expanded as push for open borders. One
Speaker 1: of the orders directs his executive orders the Department of
Speaker 1: Homeland Security to review migrant protection protocols, which Biden has
Speaker 1: promised to end. They're known as the Remain in Mexico policy,
Speaker 1: which would keep people south of the border while their
Speaker 1: immigration hearings are underway rather than admitting them into this country.
Speaker 1: They get a court date and then wow, lo and behold.
Speaker 1: Ninety nine point nine percent don't bother showing up for
Speaker 1: their hearing because I don't think the hearing will go well,
Speaker 1: nor are they willing to take the chance because they're
Speaker 1: already here. So anyway, so that by ending this key policy,
Speaker 1: ending catch and release, the Biden administration taking another significant
Speaker 1: step in stating the incentives and the loopholes where people
Speaker 1: can enter this country and remain illegally in preparation of
Speaker 1: amnesty of as many people as possible. The foxnews dot
Speaker 1: Com pieces pointing out that now we have immigrants in
Speaker 1: mass now literally lining the border wall in places like California,
Speaker 1: well pretty much California to Texas. I mean, you see
Speaker 1: in dramatic increases in the numbers of people that are
Speaker 1: showing up there every day. But yet the media is saying, oh,
Speaker 1: this is just a manufactured crisis. Your eyes must deceive you.
Speaker 1: Almost the same as them denying the riots the summer.
Speaker 1: President Trump must stuff holding the American people hostage. M
Speaker 1: stop manufacturing a crisis. This president just used the backdrop
Speaker 1: of the Oval Office to manufacture a crisis. Folks. The
Speaker 1: President has manufactured one heck of a political crisis for himself.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump is manufacturing a national security crisis. Will hear
Speaker 1: you say is that this is a manufactured crisis. It's
Speaker 1: not a national security crisis. The big scam of the
Speaker 1: whole address was that there's a crisis. There's not a
Speaker 1: crisis the ocean. That we have a crisis, their security
Speaker 1: crisis is absolute nonsense, all right? Joining us now Congressman
Speaker 1: Andy Biggs. He is the co chair of the Border
Speaker 1: Security Caucus also the head of the Freedom Caucus, and
Speaker 1: he led a tour last week of the US Mexico
Speaker 1: border in southern Arizona with eight members of Congress. Congressman,
Speaker 1: thanks for coming back and giving us a report. Is
Speaker 1: the media lying to us yet again? Oh yeah, Sean,
Speaker 1: they are. I mean, is exactly what you say. There
Speaker 1: are masses forming on the southern side of our border,
Speaker 1: which is northern Mexico. Of course, there are caravans being
Speaker 1: put together. Cartels are advertising again in Geo's are advertising again.
Speaker 1: Biden himself says not yet. Don't come over. I can't
Speaker 1: give us to you yet. They're waiting for his magic words.
Speaker 1: He's talking about giving a parole in one of the
Speaker 1: executive orders he's doing today. This is going to be
Speaker 1: far greater than the surge that we had just a
Speaker 1: couple of years ago, if you recall where it was
Speaker 1: a humanity crisis of humanity. And I just think that
Speaker 1: that they are denying this, and they're burying this, and
Speaker 1: that's it's a crying shame and it will be very bad. Yeah. Look,
Speaker 1: and now I don't see that there's a whole lot
Speaker 1: we can do at this point. Is there still talk
Speaker 1: of maybe taking down the border wall. I don't think
Speaker 1: they're going to take the border wall down now. But
Speaker 1: they've basically shut down the construction completely there there there's big,
Speaker 1: heavy equipment that stopped Sean. They've they've built roads that
Speaker 1: they so they could put in the fence in some places,
Speaker 1: and they were ready to put in fence in some
Speaker 1: very heavily traffic places. In fact that in one area
Speaker 1: they told me that's the heaviest traffic place. They just
Speaker 1: had to completely stop the fence. It's wide open. And
Speaker 1: now because they took down some fencing too, you know,
Speaker 1: like but it's four strand barbed wire or something like
Speaker 1: that through places with this grape fencing. Guess what, now
Speaker 1: there's nothing there in some of those places because the
Speaker 1: Biden administration has just stopped it cold in its tracks. Well,
Speaker 1: if you look at these new policies of Biden and
Speaker 1: now it's going to be a path towards legalization, is
Speaker 1: there anything the Republican Party in either Congress and your
Speaker 1: the House of Representatives or the Senate can do. Well,
Speaker 1: we have to rely on the Senate as a backdrop
Speaker 1: if we can. And because they're really close, we've got
Speaker 1: to rely on some people here who come from swing
Speaker 1: districts to maybe try to soften some of this. Oh
Speaker 1: what about Senator Cinema, she's in your state of Arizona.
Speaker 1: Where does she stand on this. She's I'm not sure
Speaker 1: where she is today, but she's in the past has
Speaker 1: been for some kind of pathway to citizenship. So those
Speaker 1: are lures, those are incentives to come out and bring
Speaker 1: more people in. And we're going to have to fight
Speaker 1: here and see if we can get some of these,
Speaker 1: it's a close. They're going to have to keep all
Speaker 1: their Democrats. If we can get four or five Democrats
Speaker 1: and keep all of our Republicans in the House, we
Speaker 1: might be able to stop some of the stuff. Let
Speaker 1: me ask you, is Governor Doocy going to run against Cinema?
Speaker 1: My understanding isn't g up in twenty twenty two. She's
Speaker 1: not up in twenty two. She's in twenty four. But
Speaker 1: Mark Kelly is up in twenty twenty. That's right, Mark
Speaker 1: Kelly's up. I stand corrected, Yes, sir, Yeah, I don't
Speaker 1: think Doocey is going to run for that seat. There's
Speaker 1: a there's a host of people kicking tires on that,
Speaker 1: that's for sure. Are you thinking about it yourself? Well,
Speaker 1: I'm I'm kicking some tires on it, Sean, That's for sure.
Speaker 1: I'm looking at it. Andy Bigs, Congressman Arizona, co chair
Speaker 1: Board of Security Caucus. Thank you for being one of
Speaker 1: us with the update. We appreciate it. Charlene is in
Speaker 1: Washington State. Charlie, glad you called. Sean. Thank you for
Speaker 1: taking my call. I appreciate it. I'd like to talk
Speaker 1: about Como's action on the nursing home decision. Yes, ma'am,
Speaker 1: I work in a medical office. It looks to me,
Speaker 1: like senior that the Democrats don't value senior citizen lives.
Speaker 1: We can't forget these people. They weren't at the end
Speaker 1: of their lives. They still had more memories to make
Speaker 1: with their families, and they died alone. They died without
Speaker 1: their families. This is going to be an open wound
Speaker 1: for their families forever, every Christmas, every lost birthday, every
Speaker 1: wedding that they're not at because a lot of these
Speaker 1: people they weren't going to be in a nursing home forever. Well.
Speaker 1: The sad part of all of this is, you know
Speaker 1: Cuomo out there saying, well, you die in a nursey gome,
Speaker 1: you die here, what difference does it make? You're dead?
Speaker 1: And there's more recent comments about restaurant workers, etc. Qualifying
Speaker 1: for the vaccine. We don't have enough anyway, I mean,
Speaker 1: it's and then frankly New York City State, like everything else,
Speaker 1: they botch distribution of the vaccine and it's just another
Speaker 1: typical mess. Nine of Cuomo's top health officials have left
Speaker 1: amid the vaccine rollout. Not only disagreement, but disaster. And
Speaker 1: it's kind of sad and it's unfortunate, but it is
Speaker 1: what it is. And that's look and even worse than that,
Speaker 1: and Rick Scott mentioned this earlier today, is that now
Speaker 1: states like Florida that balance their budget, every red state
Speaker 1: that funds their pensions, balances their budgets, where politicians are
Speaker 1: elected that are fiscally responsible, Now the taxpayers in those states,
Speaker 1: mark my words, are gonna have to pony up Cuomo
Speaker 1: demanding fifteen billion dollars for New York State, and my
Speaker 1: guess is he's probably gonna get it. Now. One thing
Speaker 1: that a lot of people won't pay attention to either.
Speaker 1: We'll see when Joe finally submits his budget proposals economic
Speaker 1: proposals what they mean. But I'm going to predict with
Speaker 1: a certain degree, with some certainty here is that Joe
Speaker 1: is going to once again exempt and allow people in
Speaker 1: blue states that elect high taxing governors and legislatures to
Speaker 1: once again deduct their state income tax and again not
Speaker 1: a benefit that any state with no income tax or
Speaker 1: a low income tax benefits from that. That means again
Speaker 1: red states will be funding these blue states that are
Speaker 1: fiscally irresponsible. Now when the president, President Trump now in exile,
Speaker 1: according to Jim Acosta, president Trump in exile now, when
Speaker 1: he got into office and he got rid of the
Speaker 1: state income tax tax deduction, well that didn't benefit Sean
Speaker 1: Hannity personally. But I said at the time and numerous
Speaker 1: times after, it was the right thing to do, because
Speaker 1: I don't think the people in Red States ought to
Speaker 1: be funding a special tax break. Only because I'm stupid
Speaker 1: enough to live in a state that elects irresponsible politicians
Speaker 1: that spend more than they take in. And my guess
Speaker 1: is they're going to give that money back again and
Speaker 1: look for the time being, as long as I'm here,
Speaker 1: it benefits me. But I don't think that should. I
Speaker 1: don't think it's fair to everyone in the Red States
Speaker 1: that are going to fund that. No, we pay enough
Speaker 1: taxes exactly. All right, good call. We appreciate you being
Speaker 1: with us. As we continue back to our busy phones,
Speaker 1: as we say hi to Carol is in California, the
Speaker 1: United Socialist Utopia of California. How are you, Carol? Hi, Sean,
Speaker 1: good to talk to you. Thanks for taking my call.
Speaker 1: So yesterday I was watching Martha McCallum and Rona McDaniel
Speaker 1: was on the RNC head and she seems to think
Speaker 1: from the interview that Trump is right back in with
Speaker 1: the Republican Party and she's all giddy about twenty twenty
Speaker 1: four and twenty twenty two and he's the most famous
Speaker 1: person in our party. Well, the Trump supporters are not Republicans.
Speaker 1: We're Trump supporters. And I am set up with the
Speaker 1: Republican Party with this going back and forth and how
Speaker 1: they treated us and how they treated President Trump, and
Speaker 1: I'm not going to the Republicans anymore. So I pray
Speaker 1: that the President understands that he needs to start a
Speaker 1: third party. That's the only way out of this mess
Speaker 1: with these people. Look, the problem is, you know, and Carol,
Speaker 1: this is an age old question because remember Reagan was
Speaker 1: hated by the establishment, and he gave a very very
Speaker 1: famous speech at Seapack in nineteen seventy five, and in
Speaker 1: that speech he raised the question rhetorically, is it a
Speaker 1: third party we need or a revitalized second party with
Speaker 1: no pale pastels but bold colored differences. The problem is
Speaker 1: if and Poles are bearing out exactly what you said,
Speaker 1: is that more people in the Republican Party would would
Speaker 1: go with the America First, Make America Great Again agenda
Speaker 1: of Donald Trump over a week Republicanism, establishment Republicanism. Now
Speaker 1: establishment Republicans are of the mind now that they think
Speaker 1: they're taking their party back, like Liz Cheney thinks she's
Speaker 1: going to take the party back, and they're fine to
Speaker 1: think that. They can, you know, try and guide the
Speaker 1: party in whatever direction their heart takes them. But they're
Speaker 1: not in touch with the rank and file of the
Speaker 1: Republican Party around the country. So Reagan also had the
Speaker 1: eleventh commandment, thou shalt not He did, and he said, look,
Speaker 1: if somebody is an eighty percent agreement with you, he's
Speaker 1: not your enemy. There's some truth to that too. There's
Speaker 1: a lot of wisdom of Reagan. But the Republican Party
Speaker 1: was way different back when when Reagan was astounding all
Speaker 1: this stuff. Now it's so fractured you can't trust them.
Speaker 1: They flip, they flop. Look at this mess on Monday.
Speaker 1: The president is going into an impeachment trial. We all
Speaker 1: you know, I'm not going to go into the mess.
Speaker 1: I'm a lawyer. They're they're alleging that he incited this
Speaker 1: an insurrection through using the voter fraud, the bad words.
Speaker 1: Don't say the bad words. He has a right to
Speaker 1: defend himself, which basically puts the whole election on trial,
Speaker 1: by the way, and they should just dismiss it. And
Speaker 1: here we have the usual suspects, the Republicans that are
Speaker 1: probably I'm only tell you this, and I'm only because
Speaker 1: I'm short on time. I could talk about this with
Speaker 1: you for a long time. And you know, it's sort
Speaker 1: of like, you know, Lincoln and Jesus. A house divided
Speaker 1: against itself cannot stand. The apostles got mad at Jesus
Speaker 1: because there are other are people that are that we
Speaker 1: don't know, that are curing people in your name. He's
Speaker 1: not against us, is with us right, And and Lincoln,
Speaker 1: a house divided against itself cannot stand. Look, here's the
Speaker 1: thing now, Republicans have their choice. What what the what
Speaker 1: the core and rank and file this country? They want
Speaker 1: bold conservatism. It's simple. We don't want we want constitutionalists
Speaker 1: on the bench. We want lower taxes, less bureaucracy, secure borders.
Speaker 1: We want energy independence, we want free and fair trade deals.
Speaker 1: And we want the biggest badass military on the face
Speaker 1: of the earth. And we don't want long protracted wars
Speaker 1: and a few nuances beyond that, that's it. It's simple,
Speaker 1: stick to the agenda. I gotta run. No good call, Carol,
Speaker 1: you raise great points eight hundred nine for one Sean
Speaker 1: coming up next our final news round up and information
Speaker 1: overload hour. Man, it's a super Bowl weekend coming up.
Speaker 1: This is gonna be a great super Bowl. I really
Speaker 1: haven't been paying attention all year to football. I did watch.
Speaker 1: I've been watching a couple of the playoff games. I
Speaker 1: had to see, you know, Brady versus I mean, this
Speaker 1: is a Green Bay Packers Aaron Rodgers and then the
Speaker 1: previous week against Drew Brees and watching that saga. Now
Speaker 1: it's my homes versus Brady, and I'm just sorry. I'm
Speaker 1: just that storyline alone has got me fully completely interested.
Speaker 1: And I'll be cooking up my super Bowl food on Sunday,
Speaker 1: and none of it's gonna be healthy, starting with my
Speaker 1: Philly cheese steaks. And I don't use Swiss cheese like
Speaker 1: John Kerry likes it when he he's not in his
Speaker 1: private jet emitting carbon emissions anyway, So that's gonna be
Speaker 1: pretty interesting. Our friend Eric Bowling and Brett Farve have
Speaker 1: now signed a deal for a podcast. Uh, and this
Speaker 1: is gonna be pretty cool. Uh and on this new
Speaker 1: network podcast one. It's a leading podcast platform which has
Speaker 1: become an extremely popular Eric has been a friend a
Speaker 1: long time. We worked together many many years together. And
Speaker 1: Brett Farve well known as a Green Bay packer, less
Speaker 1: known as a New York jet probably not as smart
Speaker 1: as decision, and I've been a jet fan for a
Speaker 1: lot of my life. Welcome both of you of the program.
Speaker 1: Hey Hannity, thank you Bowling. Appreciate the opportunity to promote
Speaker 1: the podcast. I got Brett sitting with me right here.
Speaker 1: We have I have no clue what the hell Brett
Speaker 1: Farve is hanging out with you for. I'm just trying
Speaker 1: to figure that part out. He's he's saying, am I
Speaker 1: you got doing this together? Or are you doing it?
Speaker 1: This is we're doing together? Yeah, we're in Atlanta right now.
Speaker 1: We got the Brave Stadium right over there, right out
Speaker 1: the window over there, and we're delivering the first podcast
Speaker 1: sitting next to each other. I won't be together every
Speaker 1: every week, but well, I mean it actually has worked out.
Speaker 1: I mean Boomerow Science and has been very successful as
Speaker 1: a broadcaster in New York on the fan. He's done,
Speaker 1: He's done a great job. And um, but so you
Speaker 1: guys have teamed up. Now is this a podcast audio
Speaker 1: only or audio video? Right? Right now, it's audio. I
Speaker 1: think it's going to be audio video very soon. No. Yes, yeah,
Speaker 1: they're giving me thumbs up in control Hannity this podcast.
Speaker 1: So look, you know, I come from the news, politics world,
Speaker 1: and obviously Brett Hall of Fame super Bowl quarterback, always
Speaker 1: in the discussion of the goat the greatest of all time.
Speaker 1: We decided we get along and we talk about everything.
Speaker 1: So we talked. We talked football, we talk politics, we
Speaker 1: talk news, we talk culture. We did a segment on
Speaker 1: on Puxtani phil and bitcoin and Ardashians, and we talk
Speaker 1: a little of everything. And okay, also if I want
Speaker 1: to also talk about bitcoin and algorithms and math problems. Yeah,
Speaker 1: he lost me the man, I'm right, hang on. Brett
Speaker 1: helped me out with this. I've had more friends telling
Speaker 1: me to get into bitcoin when it was nothing, and
Speaker 1: I don't stupid, but I don't understand it. No matter
Speaker 1: how going to get into something if I don't know
Speaker 1: what the hell it is right. This is how they
Speaker 1: explain it, Brett. It's well, it's a cryptocurrency, kay, I
Speaker 1: give you can I give you the basics right now, Sean,
Speaker 1: here we got all right, let millions of people listening
Speaker 1: to you. There are twenty one million bitcoin eventually that
Speaker 1: will be the most that will ever be allowed to
Speaker 1: be in circulation. They're not all mined yet. It's about
Speaker 1: sixteen million right now, we'll get to twenty one. Demand
Speaker 1: is soaring for the sixteen million that are out there.
Speaker 1: When it hits twenty one, Sean, they are cutting off
Speaker 1: all supply of bitcoin. That is it you've seen for
Speaker 1: the rest of eternity. Twenty one million will be the number.
Speaker 1: If demand keeps going up, if if PayPal and Target
Speaker 1: all says they'll take bitcoin. You got massive demand with
Speaker 1: a limited supply. What's going to happen? What's gonna happen? Hannity, Okay,
Speaker 1: So let me explain it, and then Brett can help me.
Speaker 1: Because I understand the cryptocurrency. I understand that it's a
Speaker 1: finite amount. You're gonna get to what twenty one million bitcoins?
Speaker 1: Whatever the hell? You said? All right? I got that part,
Speaker 1: and then I said, we'll explain it to me. How
Speaker 1: come it keeps going up up in price. I gotta
Speaker 1: understand supply and demand dictating price. But then everyone gets into, well,
Speaker 1: it's an algorithm. I'm like, okay, it wasn't my best
Speaker 1: topic in school. An algorithm, all right? I understand an
Speaker 1: algorithm is a math problem, and a math problem that
Speaker 1: never has a final answer. I have a hard time
Speaker 1: digesting Brett Farb. I'm right there with you. I need
Speaker 1: something like when someone says I have a quarter, hand
Speaker 1: it to me. I see that quarter I put in
Speaker 1: my pocket. I don't see. I don't I don't get
Speaker 1: something that is that I can't touch. Yeah, and you
Speaker 1: know what's sucks because you and I don't get it,
Speaker 1: we don't invest in it. And meanwhile, Bowling's gonna walk
Speaker 1: away with hundreds of millions of dollars in this steal,
Speaker 1: like Eric kiss. Yeah, I'm hoping to be a bitcoin
Speaker 1: billionaire someday. See you think I'm doing the show with him? Exactly?
Speaker 1: You may you'll vouch for like is what he said.
Speaker 1: We said on the show. I said, I like Brady
Speaker 1: plus three and the under fifty six and a half.
Speaker 1: I said, Brett, I go by the way, Brett, I
Speaker 1: suck at gambling, but I'm really good at investing. Andy,
Speaker 1: can you can you back me up on that? Listen,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna I don't know why, and I know Mahomes
Speaker 1: is he's he's like the new Brady. I mean, I
Speaker 1: mean it would be a hell of a story if
Speaker 1: he wins back to back Super Bowls, Right, yeah, I
Speaker 1: mean that's huge. It doesn't happen very often. And then
Speaker 1: you got Brady who's supposed to be an old man
Speaker 1: by this point, who I think is performing at still
Speaker 1: an extremely high level these games against the Packers, in
Speaker 1: the game against New Orleans was pretty amazing. Brett, Right, absolutely, absolutely?
Speaker 1: Who are you cooking? Boy? I I'm I think the
Speaker 1: favorite should be the favorite. And that's the Chiefs. Um
Speaker 1: you know everything. You can a forty three year old
Speaker 1: guy really win the Super Bowl as the starting quarterback
Speaker 1: with a new team and never got the practice with
Speaker 1: his team leading up to the season with the pandemic.
Speaker 1: Is that possible? Yes? Apparently? Yeah, that's right. That's that's apparently.
Speaker 1: If I was a Chiefs fan, that's what would scare me.
Speaker 1: Everything points to the Chiefs winning. You see, Mahomes is
Speaker 1: is such a franchise player, and Brett You're in this
Speaker 1: category too. There's certain guys when when the game is on,
Speaker 1: there's gonna be games I'm not interested in because the
Speaker 1: storyline doesn't intrigue me. But if it involves somebody like
Speaker 1: you or Joe Montana if you want to go, or
Speaker 1: Peyton Manning or Eli Manning or or Tom Brady, you know,
Speaker 1: or somebody like Gronkowski or I mean, Maholmes is already
Speaker 1: in that top line of NFL quarterbacks in my mind.
Speaker 1: So I'm fascinated and want to watch every Chiefs game.
Speaker 1: But man, I'm watching every Tampa Bay game. So I'm torn. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean I'm torn to now. Andy Reid is a
Speaker 1: really close friend and former He was my former coach
Speaker 1: way back guy. Oh, great guy, great guy. Had this
Speaker 1: been his first goal around for a Super Bowl win,
Speaker 1: I would definitely be one in his corner. But I'm
Speaker 1: gonna say I'm fifty fifty. I want to see a
Speaker 1: Chiefs win. I want to see the Bucks win because
Speaker 1: of Tom and in that whole scenario, because I've been
Speaker 1: there and I was close. Um, it'd be nice to
Speaker 1: see him do it with someone else what he's done
Speaker 1: so far up to this point is nothing short of incredible.
Speaker 1: The question is if he wins the Super Bowl, does
Speaker 1: he retire? He said no, he said, he said he
Speaker 1: wants to play forty. I heard that. But your body
Speaker 1: gets beaten up in football. That's what does the average
Speaker 1: uh length of a career in football? Three and a
Speaker 1: half year r Yeah, that's about three years. Yeah, So
Speaker 1: she's defied that by hey, hey, by the way, Handy,
Speaker 1: I'm sitting next to a guy who went two hundred
Speaker 1: and ninety seven consecutive starts in the NFL. Think about that, well,
Speaker 1: because I mean, you've been there. What's this week like
Speaker 1: for these guys, especially guys that haven't been there? Well,
Speaker 1: and you won the Super Bowl? You lost the Super Bowl?
Speaker 1: Yeah so this week, yeah, Sean this week. But but
Speaker 1: you have to you have to throw the asterisk in
Speaker 1: there of you know, everything's virtual. So there's not the
Speaker 1: there's not the long bus ride to practice, and you know,
Speaker 1: at the super Bowl city like like normal, it's a
Speaker 1: ghost town. And so you're doing interviews virtually usual. The
Speaker 1: media day as like a circus. So there's there's this
Speaker 1: almost like you have to prep the guys. Usually, you know,
Speaker 1: before the pandemic, you have to prep the guys. Look,
Speaker 1: you know this is gonna be a mad house. You
Speaker 1: gotta stick to stick to the buses and go to
Speaker 1: the places that we have designated for you to go
Speaker 1: because it's gonna be a madhouse. Now it's like it's
Speaker 1: totally the opposite. All right, guys, you know you're gonna
Speaker 1: be the only ones out and about, and uh, you
Speaker 1: gotta make sure you gotta wear your mask and you
Speaker 1: need to do all this stuff. We got protocol in place,
Speaker 1: blah blah blahu. So it's almost like a total one
Speaker 1: hundred and eighty degree difference than what it normally is. Uh,
Speaker 1: No one's getting getting booked to come in and as
Speaker 1: a celebrity and radio row and all that stuff. What
Speaker 1: about this For the first time ever a Super Bowl
Speaker 1: is in the city of one of the team's playing
Speaker 1: that no fans can go to. Well that's a good point,
Speaker 1: but still home team, no no fans at all. I
Speaker 1: thought there were some I don't know, Sean. Uh, well,
Speaker 1: let me ask you us. Do you know that you're
Speaker 1: sitting next to a guy Eric Bowling? It was a
Speaker 1: damn good baseball player and correct me of my memory
Speaker 1: faults me, mister bowling sir, Um, But didn't you get
Speaker 1: called up and for the Pittsburgh Pirates. I did. I
Speaker 1: was drafted by the Pirates and blew the Rotator cup
Speaker 1: pretty early. Um, you know, got into the other trading
Speaker 1: world Wall Street for a while, and then and then broadcasting.
Speaker 1: You played third base. If my memory serves me, correct, Yes,
Speaker 1: I did. Corner. You think I'm not paying atten everyone
Speaker 1: the things Hannity's not paying attention. Don't. You can't get
Speaker 1: anything by handy never all right? I hear you like
Speaker 1: to toss the football over a little bit of studio.
Speaker 1: I do. And every time I have a professional football
Speaker 1: player on set, they say, you know you're throwing it wrong.
Speaker 1: And but at that point I had, like Eric, I
Speaker 1: had a bad rotator, But I've been I've built built
Speaker 1: it back up because of my mixed martial arts bowing.
Speaker 1: You're gonna do the show them ask Eric how rich
Speaker 1: he is? Because how much do you have in bitcoin?
Speaker 1: For example? Don't lie, um I have I have? I
Speaker 1: have fifteen bitcoins and I about one hundred um ethereums,
Speaker 1: which is a little satellite of a big kind of
Speaker 1: it's it's not them. Look it's going to four hundred thousand.
Speaker 1: I know it's going to go to four hundred thous
Speaker 1: What would that portfolio be worth today if he cashed
Speaker 1: out today fifty million dollars? Oh my god, I wonder
Speaker 1: he's doing this for free, exactly doing it for free. Listen.
Speaker 1: First of all, I'm so I'm listen. I'm not as you.
Speaker 1: I would love people's success. Good for you. I'm proud
Speaker 1: of you. And what was the average price you bought
Speaker 1: in a nah said? So there, I started that six thousand,
Speaker 1: and I bought some nine. I watched to go to
Speaker 1: three thousand twice. Shot, it's a you know, it's it's
Speaker 1: a vault. Or you don't want to put your nest
Speaker 1: in it. You want to put stupid money and stuff
Speaker 1: that you weren't going to touch you, you know, just
Speaker 1: have fun with it. Put it there. Just you might
Speaker 1: hit a home run, just file man. But listen, you
Speaker 1: would you buy in now? Yes a question, Yes, yes
Speaker 1: you would, Yes, what's that today? Like thirty two is
Speaker 1: thirty five thirty five thousand? But but but there's so
Speaker 1: much demand, and when when people like us are talking
Speaker 1: about a radio and no one knows what bitcoin is
Speaker 1: or how to get it. And it's gonna It's got
Speaker 1: seventy five percent of the way of topping out all
Speaker 1: time supply ever, and no one knows about it. It's
Speaker 1: it's ripe, it's gonna run. I believe, all right, I
Speaker 1: gotta ask you is the key question. So you're starting
Speaker 1: this podcast together. First of all, congratulations, you're two great guys.
Speaker 1: Wish you the best. Um tell us about how people
Speaker 1: can find you. Let me give you the We just
Speaker 1: tape the segment. You can't steal this handedy. You can't
Speaker 1: steal this idea of It's called what's called date, debate
Speaker 1: or terminate. So we name three three people in the
Speaker 1: world and we have to decide to date, debate or
Speaker 1: terminate them. And I'll just leave you with this. One
Speaker 1: of one of the categories was lebron James, Shaquille O'Neill,
Speaker 1: and Michael Jordan. And you'll hear Brett Wayne on who
Speaker 1: he date, debate or terminate. You know there's another spinoff
Speaker 1: version of this, you know about kidding many exactly, yeah, exactly, Okay,
Speaker 1: I'm not going down your road to survive longer. Handed
Speaker 1: Mahomes or breeze. Who would you date, debate or terminate?
Speaker 1: I get the hell off Meg if you think I'm
Speaker 1: gonna answer this crapody bowling with far all right, John,
Speaker 1: talking with you, all right, Eric, not elations to both you.
Speaker 1: We'll be watching the game. Well, we'll reconvene soon. Thank you. Thanks.
Speaker 1: Now now that we have the democratic age of New
Speaker 1: York saying, oh, yeah, the nursing home deaths, yeah, up
Speaker 1: to fifty percent underreported. Wow, this is the victims family
Speaker 1: speaking out and and on this debacle. I miss her, everybody,
Speaker 1: and she's the reason why I have courage to fight.
Speaker 1: The family of Anna Martinez, who died of COVID nineteen
Speaker 1: in a West I Slip nursing home never got to
Speaker 1: say goodbye. The Harrison's grandmother and great aunt, both World
Speaker 1: War Two, Rosie the Riveters died together of coronavirus in
Speaker 1: a smith Town nursing homes. We weren't even notified that
Speaker 1: it was time to say goodbye. Just come get her,
Speaker 1: Come get her remains, Come get her body, Governor Cuomo,
Speaker 1: give us the number, Give us the number. He died
Speaker 1: holding the hand of his beloved wife. Our family is
Speaker 1: still waiting to have a funeral. And I think this
Speaker 1: is the biggest story of the pandemic. If the Governor
Speaker 1: Cuomo's administration had spent one one hundredth the amount of
Speaker 1: time with investigators in the nursing home so making sure
Speaker 1: they were protecting nar senior's, we'd have a lot fewer
Speaker 1: that's in New York State. It's up until this point.
Speaker 1: He hasn't apologized, I think in the very beginning, or
Speaker 1: if he had taken some accountability and said, I was
Speaker 1: trying to save some of the hospital beds for the
Speaker 1: patients that we needed, and that's why I made that
Speaker 1: mistake of putting COVID positive patients into nursing rooms for
Speaker 1: forty six days. By the way, if he had done
Speaker 1: at the very beginning, but he never has. And by
Speaker 1: the way, he's blamed everyone else except the person that
Speaker 1: signed the executive order Andrew call Well, it was an
Speaker 1: effect for forty six days. He's blamed God and Mother
Speaker 1: Nature and the President and the CDC and the New
Speaker 1: Year Post and Fox News. He's blamed everyone except the
Speaker 1: person that signed the mandate, the order putting those COVID
Speaker 1: positive patients into nursing homes. That's what gets my blood boiling.
Speaker 1: He still refuses to acknowledge that. The other day in
Speaker 1: one of the interviews, he actually said, we didn't need
Speaker 1: to put COVID positive patients into nursing homes, and I screamed,
Speaker 1: it just makes our grief even worse. So when will
Speaker 1: there be accountability? Oh well, that doesn't matter if they
Speaker 1: died here or there. Anyone's still dead. Pretty callous. At
Speaker 1: twenty five to the top of the hour, eight hundred
Speaker 1: and nine four one, Sean, you want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program. You know, we've been having the
Speaker 1: greatest calls lately. I mean they're always great, but it's
Speaker 1: like the cut above. I mean, I'm so interesting to
Speaker 1: hear the passion of so many of our fellow Americans,
Speaker 1: how engaged everybody is, and and I think there's there
Speaker 1: are millions and millions of us, tens of millions of
Speaker 1: us that understand the gravity of the moment. Like I
Speaker 1: actually had to spend time because it's my job, and
Speaker 1: I decided not to even go through it with you
Speaker 1: because I've read the democrats Shift show and their arguments,
Speaker 1: and it's like Russia, Russia all over again, breathless hysteria
Speaker 1: and and just flagrant, you know, hypocrisy. The stench goes
Speaker 1: to right straight to high heaven. It's just awful. And
Speaker 1: I watched this pretty simple arguments that yeah, it's unconstitutional.
Speaker 1: Nice try we also have a constitution with something like
Speaker 1: the First Amendment, so that'll be a big part of
Speaker 1: their arguments. And they got this other big problem that
Speaker 1: has emerged, which is court documents. Even the mob media
Speaker 1: having to acknowledge the FBI now is pretty confident that
Speaker 1: a lot of this was all pre planned. Now, did
Speaker 1: some people that were at the rally the one percent
Speaker 1: not the ninety nine percent you join in and what
Speaker 1: others had planned? Yes, they did. Were they planning on it? No,
Speaker 1: they weren't. They were stupid and got caught up in it,
Speaker 1: and they shouldn't have been there, and many of them
Speaker 1: will pay a price for it. But for the butt
Speaker 1: now that we're discovering there was an organized assault on
Speaker 1: the Capitol and that we missed all of the signs
Speaker 1: ahead of time. Again, I can't scream this loud enough.
Speaker 1: They better get a nine to eleven style commission and
Speaker 1: make sure this can never happen again. But it takes
Speaker 1: away the argument that this was a spontaneous riot incited
Speaker 1: by Donald J. Trump and his words of insurrection at
Speaker 1: the rally before hand, especially when ninety nine percent didn't
Speaker 1: even go anywhere near the Capitol. But it just is
Speaker 1: what it is, and so it'll happen, it'll play out.
Speaker 1: We already know what the conclusion is and this this
Speaker 1: will be their last chance to squeeze any little more blood.
Speaker 1: Just bloody him up a little bit more. Donald Trump
Speaker 1: beat him up, so it will be less viable as
Speaker 1: a candidate. So they think in twenty twenty four, that
Speaker 1: is yet to be determined. We'll see. Okay, let's say, Hi,
Speaker 1: Bobby is in Missouri. So I had long distance cousins
Speaker 1: and I had some that said Missouri and some that
Speaker 1: said Missouri. Like I say, do you have a preference
Speaker 1: missoury Missouri? Is that what you're calling him? Missouri? Yeah? No,
Speaker 1: it's great here. By the way, Roy Blunt has been
Speaker 1: great lately. I don't know what happened to him. It's
Speaker 1: like he woke up from the dead and he just
Speaker 1: appeared as somebody that's like finally speaking out, Roy Blount,
Speaker 1: your senator. I didn't hear what he's been saying. I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: what has he been saying. No, he's been he's been
Speaker 1: pretty outspoken about the Young Constitutional Impeachment Shift show that's
Speaker 1: coming to DC next week. Yeah, but you know, we
Speaker 1: really don't trust him to hold the line. We do,
Speaker 1: like what's on your mind today, let's go, let's stick
Speaker 1: to that. Yes there, Um, you know, I'm just really
Speaker 1: kind of perplexed how we can open the border, tear
Speaker 1: the wall down when we're not even allowed out of
Speaker 1: our houses. Um, and we're going to take care of
Speaker 1: these people when we can't take care of our own.
Speaker 1: We have people going to bed now at night, hungry children,
Speaker 1: and but we're gonna have thousands. It just doesn't make sense.
Speaker 1: They're coming from places that God knows what diseases they've
Speaker 1: got from, you know, no health care. It wasn't the
Speaker 1: border wall. In the Patriot Act, alongside of this five
Speaker 1: the courts that we commissioned, we gave up all of
Speaker 1: those rights of privacy to have protection. And now see politicians,
Speaker 1: and you you already know this, bobbing politicians always promised
Speaker 1: spending cuts, but they come later. You always get the
Speaker 1: tax cut, tax increases, You never get the spending cuts.
Speaker 1: You always get the amnesty, you never get the wall built.
Speaker 1: The only person that broke that trend was was Trump.
Speaker 1: When you talk about, you know, Joe Biden's mask mandate. Uh,
Speaker 1: From what I'm seeing, I'm not seeing a whole lot
Speaker 1: of social distancing and mask wearing in the caravan that's
Speaker 1: been making its way to the US. But but you
Speaker 1: bring up a good point, and that is I think
Speaker 1: I think we have to have secure borders. You got
Speaker 1: to vet people to come into this country. I happen
Speaker 1: to be a believer in merit based immigration policies like
Speaker 1: so many other countries Australia, New Zealand, etc. Would would adopt. Uh,
Speaker 1: and that would include making sure you don't have radical
Speaker 1: ties and associations. In the day and age of COVID,
Speaker 1: I would say, yeah, you ought to be tested for
Speaker 1: the coronavirus and have to prove you're negative before you
Speaker 1: come into the country. So we don't, you know, we
Speaker 1: don't have another super spreader event as they call them.
Speaker 1: These are all logical things. Now, illegal immigrants this was
Speaker 1: on Foxnews dot Com are now amassing along our southern
Speaker 1: border because they're waiting for Joe's open borders policies to
Speaker 1: clear the way for them to just enter the US.
Speaker 1: I don't know if they'll be wearing masks or not.
Speaker 1: In the last seven days, eight hundred arrests up in
Speaker 1: one agent in Texas in their sector, up from four
Speaker 1: fifty just a month ago. And now there's even talk
Speaker 1: of tearing the border wall down. So the answer to
Speaker 1: your question is, well, we have tens of thousands of
Speaker 1: Americans out of work, and the energy sector, we have
Speaker 1: high unemployment because of the pandemic and draconian shutdowns. Now
Speaker 1: we're going to legalize eleven million plus illegal immigrants that
Speaker 1: will be competing for the few jobs that are currently available,
Speaker 1: and all that's gonna do is hurt American workers and
Speaker 1: drive down wages, and it's going to hurt the whole country.
Speaker 1: And even the CBO yesterday was acknowledging that, yeah, we
Speaker 1: probably won't see unemployment rates that Trump left us for
Speaker 1: the longest time. So it's pretty frustrating. Bobby. I share
Speaker 1: your concern, and I think people have got to let
Speaker 1: their elected officials know how they feel. All right, two
Speaker 1: are busy phones Bruce, Wisconsin. Bruce, how are you glad
Speaker 1: you called? Thanks for having me, Sean say, I wanted
Speaker 1: to comment on a subject that you had touched on
Speaker 1: yesterday and one that's been kind of been floating around
Speaker 1: for the last few months, and that is regarding this
Speaker 1: forgiving of student loans. Kind of every time I hear that,
Speaker 1: I kind of cringe a little bit, just because I
Speaker 1: think that it's kind of a segregated class of people
Speaker 1: that are going to get that benefit if happens. But
Speaker 1: the unintended consequence that from my end, unless I'm wrong,
Speaker 1: is that if they were to have their debt forgiven,
Speaker 1: my guess is that they would all receive a ten
Speaker 1: ninety nine that year, and they would have a tax
Speaker 1: obligation due to the IRS. And I unless the Congress
Speaker 1: is going to amend that as well, I just don't
Speaker 1: see how this thing flies. I think you're one hundred
Speaker 1: percent right, Listen. I don't know. I know that I
Speaker 1: threw out I got two six hundred dollars checks. I
Speaker 1: forgot to tell everybody this like last week out of
Speaker 1: nowhere US Treasury. You know, I got the second six
Speaker 1: hundred dollar check. I'd never applied for any six hundred
Speaker 1: dollar check. The first one I remember throwing out. The
Speaker 1: second one, I just said it to my financial guy
Speaker 1: and said, I don't think. I don't think we're supposed
Speaker 1: to get this, and I frankly don't want it because
Speaker 1: I'd rather people that need it and deserve I'd rather
Speaker 1: they get more money. I don't need their listen, and
Speaker 1: I'm not saying I'm not over taxed, but this money
Speaker 1: is earmarks specifically for people, and I don't need the
Speaker 1: help right now, but there are Americans that do, or
Speaker 1: I'm gonna if they do cash it, I'll just take
Speaker 1: the six hundred and donate it to my local food bank,
Speaker 1: which has been needing more support than ever right now.
Speaker 1: And so I have no idea what am I going
Speaker 1: to get a fourteen hundred dollars check. I don't need
Speaker 1: their money, but people do need it right now through
Speaker 1: no fault of their own. And now we're going to
Speaker 1: add tens of thousands of hard working Americans that are
Speaker 1: losing their careers over this. And let me tell you,
Speaker 1: when you have a career job, you probably have committed
Speaker 1: to a mortgage, you're probably committed moneys for your kids
Speaker 1: to go to college, you probably have been saving for retirement.
Speaker 1: And I don't care what green new job they're promising
Speaker 1: it's not in existence, nor do I think it'll match
Speaker 1: the specific skills that people that work in the oil
Speaker 1: industry and energy sector have accumulated over decades and decades.
Speaker 1: So we're in for some serious, serious economic hardship in
Speaker 1: this country for people that deserve better. You know, I
Speaker 1: keep saying, you know, pretty soon, there's gonna be a
Speaker 1: lot of Americans and you'll see bumper stickers and hats
Speaker 1: and T shirts miss me yet, question mark hashtag Trump
Speaker 1: twenty twenty put on the back of the T shirt
Speaker 1: make America great Again. I could see that. Why don't
Speaker 1: we sell those land I guess the worst that could
Speaker 1: happen as we get just another cease and desist, something
Speaker 1: we're quite familiar with on this program. But it's sure anyway,
Speaker 1: last word, Sir bruce Um. Yeah, well, I mean, I'm
Speaker 1: I own a small business and I was fortunate to
Speaker 1: get some some grant money some smaller dollar months. But
Speaker 1: I still received a ten ninety nine grant or excuse me,
Speaker 1: a ten ninety nine form at the end of the year,
Speaker 1: and I have to pay taxes on the grant money
Speaker 1: I received. So if you start for giving student loans,
Speaker 1: those people better be prepared to get a nice, big
Speaker 1: tax bill right after that too. My understanding though is
Speaker 1: you'll you'll need to check with your professionals, because I
Speaker 1: don't know crap about taxes. But my understanding was those
Speaker 1: were loans that would convert to grants. The one I
Speaker 1: think you're describing you got if it was I guess
Speaker 1: pp what is it, PPP money, whatever it is, so
Speaker 1: you might want to look into that. I think there
Speaker 1: were loans originally, but we're considered to be loans that
Speaker 1: would then convert to be a grant. Did you know that? Yeah?
Speaker 1: I mean my specific ones were ones that were designated
Speaker 1: by the state state of Wisconsin. But you know that. Okay,
Speaker 1: that's that's that's different, separate and apart. I don't know
Speaker 1: what their policy is. I'm thinking anything that becomes like
Speaker 1: a loan that is forgiven and any type of an arrangement,
Speaker 1: you know, whether it's regular business not anything that's one
Speaker 1: that is considered instant income to the to the person
Speaker 1: who's being forgiven, and I just I see the irs
Speaker 1: was it would have their hands will here with having
Speaker 1: to administer this, because you know, otherwise you're going to
Speaker 1: have other parts of our country are going to be
Speaker 1: wondering why they're not on that same program in a difference.
Speaker 1: So just a lot of things I think that are
Speaker 1: going to confuse a lot more people. I think I
Speaker 1: just hope they leave that alone and don't go down
Speaker 1: that path. So the paycheck Protection programmers, what this is? Was?
Speaker 1: It was it was billed as a nearly trillion dollar
Speaker 1: business loan program for coronavirus from the federal government for
Speaker 1: coronavirus aid relief economic security to help businesses, self employed workers,
Speaker 1: sole proprietors, nonprofits, tribal businesses to continue to pay their workers.
Speaker 1: And it was I understand it was supposed to convert
Speaker 1: to a grant. That was my understanding. But don't you
Speaker 1: know check with your accountant that stuff. What the hell? Yeah,
Speaker 1: I can't give tax advice. What do I know. I
Speaker 1: can't even do my own taxes. Um, Bruce, thank you.
Speaker 1: All I say is pay well, we could probably take
Speaker 1: this discount of pay it. That's my answer every time. Um,
Speaker 1: I don't think. I don't think the I R S
Speaker 1: would be particularly forgiving if I took a deduction that
Speaker 1: was quote questionable Linda to you, I don't think deductions
Speaker 1: actually exist in the Hannity world. They really don't. They've
Speaker 1: been written awful long time ago. I know, maybe maybe
Speaker 1: I'm a fool. Maybe I should go in and aggressive.
Speaker 1: I just don't because I don't need the headache. It's
Speaker 1: just one headache, and I shouldn't have to live my
Speaker 1: life like that either, because of what I do for
Speaker 1: a living. But we already know that my privacy gets
Speaker 1: violated regularly. Yeah, well, people don't really understand when your
Speaker 1: personal text messages are released publicly by a judge, what
Speaker 1: that's like. Or to see that Muller's pit bulls are,
Speaker 1: you know, accumulating fifty pages of three zero two's on me?
Speaker 1: Because I'm in the I'm a member of the press
Speaker 1: and I'm asking questions. I've not noticed anyone in the
Speaker 1: press champion championing my rights for privacy, nor the intimidation
Speaker 1: tactics that are used. Pretty much, I would argue to
Speaker 1: stop the investigations that we successfully concluded accurately. But that's
Speaker 1: that's for another day. Let us go to Los Angeles.
Speaker 1: Frank is standing by. What's up, Frank? How are you? Hey? Sean? Hey, listen?
Speaker 1: You know all this stuff that's being said I still
Speaker 1: think we're nibbling around the edges. If no one checks
Speaker 1: into Fulton County, Georgia and what happened there, I would
Speaker 1: always say that, you know, people get they vote in
Speaker 1: the government that they deserve, but maybe they're not even voting,
Speaker 1: or maybe it's incorrect. So is anybody going to really
Speaker 1: investigate that? If not, If that's all fraud, everything else
Speaker 1: goes out the window in my opinion. Let me let
Speaker 1: me give you some good news on that front. You already.
Speaker 1: George's state Senate, controlled by Republicans, has now introduced a
Speaker 1: bill that would require voters to provide a photoid when
Speaker 1: requesting and returning even an absentee ballot. That's number one.
Speaker 1: In Arizona. A new bill has been introduced in the
Speaker 1: state legislature out there to repeal Arizona's permanent early voting
Speaker 1: list and votes on lists automatically receive mail in ballots. No,
Speaker 1: you would have to request one specifically, and I hope
Speaker 1: they add a like Georgia would add some type of
Speaker 1: voter ID requirement. In Pennsylvania, GOP lawmakers there they're pushing
Speaker 1: a bill that would repeal the unconstitutional twenty nineteen Pennsylvania
Speaker 1: no excuse absentee voting bill. So I have said this
Speaker 1: that if they don't do it now, and they don't
Speaker 1: fix it now, it'll be too late by the time
Speaker 1: twenty twenty two comes around. This is to ensure integrity
Speaker 1: and confidence in the system, and that the laws are obeyed,
Speaker 1: constitutions obeyed. And the other thing I would strengthen in
Speaker 1: all these states is if partisan observers are allowed to
Speaker 1: observe that you make, you make accommodations that that law
Speaker 1: can be fulfilled. No state did that. Okay, so there's
Speaker 1: some good news. We're making some progress. I'm staying on
Speaker 1: the topic that I promise you all right, that's gonna
Speaker 1: wrap things up at today Hannity. Please set your DVR
Speaker 1: ninety eastern Tonight, Fox News, Eric Trump will join us,
Speaker 1: Lindsay Graham and his admonition of Senate Democrats, the latest
Speaker 1: breakdown of all things corrupt, hypocritical media mob, Joe Concha,
Speaker 1: Grinnell and Gates, and much more, nine Eastern Hannity Tonight.
Speaker 1: We'll see you then, Thank you for being with us.
Speaker 1: Back here tomorrow