WEBVTT - AI Spending Ripples Across Tech Stack; Nvidia Acquires Hugging Face

0:00:05.670 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Tech is live from the heart of Silicon Valley

0:00:09.740 --> 0:00:12.020
<v Speaker 1>with Ed Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:00:14.730 --> 0:00:17.349
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up from chips to servers

0:00:17.430 --> 0:00:21.329
<v Speaker 2>to software. AI spending is rippling across the tech stack.

0:00:21.530 --> 0:00:24.810
<v Speaker 2>What earnings from Broadcom, Snowflake and HPE tell us about

0:00:24.829 --> 0:00:27.250
<v Speaker 2>the strength of the AI boom? We'll discuss with the

0:00:27.330 --> 0:00:31.470
<v Speaker 2>CEOs of Snowflake and HPE later this hour. Plus, NVIDIA

0:00:31.630 --> 0:00:34.730
<v Speaker 2>has agreed to acquire Hugging Face in a transaction valued

0:00:34.810 --> 0:00:38.410
<v Speaker 2>about $ 13 billion. We speak with Hugging Face co-founder... Thomas

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:42.500
<v Speaker 2>Wolfe about the deal and self-driving tech startup Wave reaches

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:45.919
<v Speaker 2>a deal with Uber to offer robo taxis in London

0:00:46.220 --> 0:00:49.500
<v Speaker 2>with a human in the driver's seat. Wave CEO later

0:00:49.900 --> 0:00:53.779
<v Speaker 2>this hour. This is what technology stocks are doing high

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 2>on the Nasdaq 100 modestly six tenths of one percent.

0:00:57.190 --> 0:01:00.630
<v Speaker 2>It is earnings from software to chips to other parts

0:01:00.670 --> 0:01:04.330
<v Speaker 2>of the infrastructure stack that we're focused on. In Snowflake's case,

0:01:04.590 --> 0:01:06.490
<v Speaker 2>this is a blowout. The stock is on track for

0:01:06.530 --> 0:01:09.929
<v Speaker 2>its best day since May and trading at a 2021 high.

0:01:10.790 --> 0:01:13.810
<v Speaker 2>AI is translating into faster growth. The revenue outlook up

0:01:13.860 --> 0:01:17.900
<v Speaker 2>to $ 6 billion for the year. HPE, strong AI server demand,

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 2>but not as strong as Dell. And there wasn't the

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:22.339
<v Speaker 2>read-through from that name. We're going to speak to the

0:01:22.380 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 2>CEOs of Snowflake and HPE later in the hour. Then

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:29.890
<v Speaker 2>there's Broadcom. Huge AI chip growth ahead. Doubling in fiscal 27.

0:01:29.890 --> 0:01:34.089
<v Speaker 2>Doubling again in fiscal 28. but not huge enough for

0:01:34.130 --> 0:01:36.370
<v Speaker 2>this market. And that's where I want to start today's show.

0:01:36.610 --> 0:01:40.110
<v Speaker 2>Let's get more with Bloomberg's Dina Bass. Broadcom is a

0:01:40.190 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 2>custom silicon story, right? And they posted some big numbers

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 2>in terms of what's going to come, but it just

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:48.100
<v Speaker 2>wasn't enough for this market. It was a high bar.

0:01:49.300 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 3>Sure.

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 4>First of all, their forecast for the current quarter, their

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 4>fiscal fourth, was pretty lackluster in terms of both regular

0:01:55.860 --> 0:01:58.630
<v Speaker 4>sales and AI chip sales. And so it That came

0:01:58.670 --> 0:02:01.310
<v Speaker 4>out initially right after the bell and the stock headed downward.

0:02:01.670 --> 0:02:04.110
<v Speaker 4>Then we got into the call and CEO Hock Tan

0:02:04.170 --> 0:02:08.220
<v Speaker 4>gave the forecast that you just repeated about AI chip

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 4>growth for fiscal 27 and 28 doubling each year, which

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:16.419
<v Speaker 4>You know, again, seemed to at the time, please, investors more.

0:02:16.460 --> 0:02:19.300
<v Speaker 4>The stock started coming back. But this morning it's back

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:22.820
<v Speaker 4>down again. And, you know, there are some concerns. One,

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:26.250
<v Speaker 4>in light of NVIDIA's blowout quarter last week that neither

0:02:26.310 --> 0:02:29.030
<v Speaker 4>the Q4 numbers nor perhaps the forecaster may be good

0:02:29.070 --> 0:02:32.420
<v Speaker 4>enough compared to that. Two, some of this was priced

0:02:32.460 --> 0:02:35.740
<v Speaker 4>into the stock already. There's also concern being raised about

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:39.090
<v Speaker 4>where that AI chip growth is coming from. You know,

0:02:39.100 --> 0:02:42.750
<v Speaker 4>Tan basically said that most of it is coming from

0:02:42.850 --> 0:02:46.230
<v Speaker 4>Anthropic and OpenAI, who are set to become the company's

0:02:46.270 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 4>number one and number two customers in 27 and 28, respectively.

0:02:50.180 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 4>So there's some concern about those two as the customers.

0:02:54.740 --> 0:02:59.020
<v Speaker 2>The stock's down 6% right now, pretty much on track

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:01.750
<v Speaker 2>for its biggest drop since the first week of June.

0:03:01.750 --> 0:03:05.490
<v Speaker 2>$ 115 billion in fiscal 27 on AI chips, $ 230 billion

0:03:05.630 --> 0:03:09.730
<v Speaker 2>in fiscal 28. Those are big numbers, but like NVIDIA

0:03:09.790 --> 0:03:14.070
<v Speaker 2>is doing now $ 100 billion of revenue overall in a quarter.

0:03:14.210 --> 0:03:16.910
<v Speaker 2>Is there any sense that this custom chip game is

0:03:17.030 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 2>chipping away at NVIDIA's lead in that market, that they're

0:03:19.660 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 2>gaining market share on Broadcom's side?

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:25.340
<v Speaker 4>It does seem to be chipping away at pieces of it.

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:28.620
<v Speaker 4>We've had a lot of discussion from OpenAI over the

0:03:28.660 --> 0:03:30.740
<v Speaker 4>last couple of weeks about the ways in which they

0:03:30.820 --> 0:03:33.750
<v Speaker 4>are going to use the custom chip that they're building

0:03:33.850 --> 0:03:37.070
<v Speaker 4>with Broadcom. But also at the same time, OpenAI will

0:03:37.090 --> 0:03:41.470
<v Speaker 4>talk about how much NVIDIA they're using. So there is that.

0:03:41.630 --> 0:03:43.690
<v Speaker 4>The other issue for Broadcom is that even in the

0:03:43.730 --> 0:03:48.410
<v Speaker 4>custom chip market, they're facing greater competition. Google TPU had

0:03:48.470 --> 0:03:50.970
<v Speaker 4>been their largest customer, or it still is, but is

0:03:51.010 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 4>set to be replaced by Anthropic. And Google just signed

0:03:53.820 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 4>a deal with Broadcom's competitor, Marvell. Also more competition for

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 4>Broadcom for MediaTek. Both of those companies are backed by NVIDIA.

0:04:02.170 --> 0:04:05.740
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Dean Abbas, thank you very much indeed. Stay with Bloomberg.

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 2>We're going to break down the other earnings. We're going

0:04:07.500 --> 0:04:10.060
<v Speaker 2>to speak with the Snowflake CEO, Sridhar Ramaswamy, and the

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 2>HPE CEO, Antonio Neri, later this hour. By the way,

0:04:14.620 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 2>when we came to air, there were some headlines on

0:04:16.700 --> 0:04:21.270
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg terminal about chatbot outages. Curiously, the headlines all

0:04:21.310 --> 0:04:25.309
<v Speaker 2>hit at the same time. DownDetector is saying that users

0:04:25.350 --> 0:04:29.789
<v Speaker 2>are reporting issues with open AI platforms and SpaceX AI

0:04:29.950 --> 0:04:33.919
<v Speaker 2>is saying that Grok is experiencing issues and is investigating

0:04:33.980 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 2>the outage. And Anthropic is saying all within the same

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:41.610
<v Speaker 2>time span, it's investigating Claude errors and working on a fix.

0:04:41.990 --> 0:04:44.190
<v Speaker 2>Those all hit the Bloomberg terminal literally at the same

0:04:44.230 --> 0:04:46.550
<v Speaker 2>time before the show started. We're trying to work out

0:04:46.589 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 2>what's going on. with all of the chatbots around the world.

0:04:50.620 --> 0:04:53.140
<v Speaker 2>Let's get back to the AI story. Our next guest

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 2>says we're seeing strong evidence of AI adoption and broadening

0:04:56.960 --> 0:05:00.750
<v Speaker 2>from hardware to select software at the infrastructure layer. That's

0:05:00.810 --> 0:05:04.950
<v Speaker 2>clear evidence of it as AI becoming increasingly integrated into

0:05:04.990 --> 0:05:09.210
<v Speaker 2>business models. Alliance Bernstein, Somatic Innovation Equities, Chief Investment Officer

0:05:09.250 --> 0:05:11.550
<v Speaker 2>Lei Chu is back with us on Bloomberg Tech. The

0:05:11.589 --> 0:05:14.610
<v Speaker 2>common theme across all of those earnings we outlined, Lei,

0:05:14.650 --> 0:05:17.510
<v Speaker 2>is that AI demand seems very strong. Is that what

0:05:17.570 --> 0:05:17.950
<v Speaker 2>you see?

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:18.740
<v Speaker 5>Yes.

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:22.380
<v Speaker 6>In fact, we continue to see AI solidly moving into

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:26.060
<v Speaker 6>the adoption phase. And at this moment, when you look

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:30.280
<v Speaker 6>across the board, the general trend actually is demand is

0:05:30.380 --> 0:05:34.919
<v Speaker 6>outstripping supply. So when you see companies actually from the

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 6>commentary versus the numbers, the common theme what we are

0:05:37.820 --> 0:05:41.570
<v Speaker 6>seeing is that Demand is so strong that supply simply

0:05:41.610 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 6>cannot keep up. And that's not just for this year,

0:05:44.420 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 6>but it's for multiple years to come, whether it's at

0:05:47.380 --> 0:05:50.280
<v Speaker 6>the chip level or other parts of the infrastructure as well.

0:05:51.900 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 2>I want to go back to NVIDIA last week just

0:05:53.820 --> 0:05:57.270
<v Speaker 2>as an illustrative example, because they said that they would

0:05:57.310 --> 0:06:00.630
<v Speaker 2>have top line growth of 70 percent in the next

0:06:00.670 --> 0:06:04.969
<v Speaker 2>fiscal year. But that was a forecast modeled on supply,

0:06:05.070 --> 0:06:09.060
<v Speaker 2>their ability to supply, not growth modeled on demand. I

0:06:09.140 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 2>found that math very interesting. How did you interpret it?

0:06:13.110 --> 0:06:15.090
<v Speaker 6>Yes, and then so this is actually we're at a

0:06:15.130 --> 0:06:17.790
<v Speaker 6>very interesting moment and then that moment where you're seeing

0:06:17.830 --> 0:06:20.530
<v Speaker 6>some volatility in the market as well. The market by

0:06:20.550 --> 0:06:24.110
<v Speaker 6>and large, we often, generally speaking, we reward bid and

0:06:24.130 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 6>raises and we want to see estimate revision, particularly in

0:06:28.140 --> 0:06:32.500
<v Speaker 6>technology sector and fast growing sectors. But currently, we're in

0:06:32.580 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 6>this really interesting dynamic where the demand is so strong,

0:06:36.060 --> 0:06:39.170
<v Speaker 6>but we simply do not have enough supply to support that.

0:06:39.550 --> 0:06:43.029
<v Speaker 6>So we're in this interesting transition phase where for the

0:06:43.070 --> 0:06:46.290
<v Speaker 6>near term, you don't see as much estimate revision, even

0:06:46.330 --> 0:06:50.410
<v Speaker 6>though the demand outlook is extremely strong. But that just

0:06:50.450 --> 0:06:54.370
<v Speaker 6>means we just have to look at everything in the

0:06:54.410 --> 0:06:57.770
<v Speaker 6>context of valuation as well, and then in the context

0:06:57.810 --> 0:07:00.870
<v Speaker 6>of horizon. You know, when we think about long term

0:07:00.930 --> 0:07:04.900
<v Speaker 6>durability of growth and profitability and combine that with a

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:08.380
<v Speaker 6>reasonable valuation. And that's when you find the best performing stocks.

0:07:08.500 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 6>And that's what we are really focused on.

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 2>We started the conversation with your writing about how this

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 2>is broadening out.

0:07:15.700 --> 0:07:15.940
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:19.500
<v Speaker 2>Basically from chips to other layers of the stack. How

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:22.580
<v Speaker 2>do changes in portfolios reflect that right now?

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:26.710
<v Speaker 6>I think we are in the adoption phase. So when

0:07:26.750 --> 0:07:28.850
<v Speaker 6>you're in the adoption phase and then you look back,

0:07:28.910 --> 0:07:32.620
<v Speaker 6>we started simply at the physical infrastructure layer. But as

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.340
<v Speaker 6>we move to adoption phase, and you've already seen it,

0:07:35.380 --> 0:07:38.980
<v Speaker 6>we went from the broadening out, even at the infrastructure layer,

0:07:39.060 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 6>we have gone from simply GPU to TPU to CPU

0:07:42.700 --> 0:07:45.390
<v Speaker 6>to the networking layer. But now we're in the phase

0:07:45.430 --> 0:07:48.590
<v Speaker 6>where you're also seeing as enterprise and consumers starting to

0:07:48.730 --> 0:07:52.450
<v Speaker 6>use more AI, you will see opportunities at the infrastructure layer,

0:07:52.590 --> 0:07:55.810
<v Speaker 6>at the software layer. at the cybersecurity layer and many

0:07:55.890 --> 0:07:59.210
<v Speaker 6>other areas as well. And actually, I also think we're

0:07:59.230 --> 0:08:02.550
<v Speaker 6>starting to see evidence of AI being adopted in some

0:08:02.570 --> 0:08:06.030
<v Speaker 6>of the industries. So if you look so far, what

0:08:06.050 --> 0:08:10.250
<v Speaker 6>we have seen is Some industries, such as infotech, financials,

0:08:10.570 --> 0:08:14.290
<v Speaker 6>or healthcare, these are historically some of the fastest adopters

0:08:14.390 --> 0:08:18.070
<v Speaker 6>of new technology. And we do believe that AI is

0:08:18.210 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 6>once-in-a-lifetime transformative technology. Whoever uses it to their advantage will

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:27.940
<v Speaker 6>be able to increase their profit pool, accelerate their growth.

0:08:28.220 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 6>And we're actually seeing early evidence of that. So you

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 6>see the portfolio naturally transition following along this type of

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:38.189
<v Speaker 6>transformation and along the curve of adoption.

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:43.830
<v Speaker 2>Alliance Bernstein, Sphematic Innovation Equity, CAI, Laichu, back on the show.

0:08:43.870 --> 0:08:47.490
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much indeed. Coming up, NVIDIA is going

0:08:47.510 --> 0:08:50.410
<v Speaker 2>to acquire Hugging Face in a transaction valued at about

0:08:50.410 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 2>$ 13 billion. We're going to speak with Hugging Face's co-founder,

0:08:54.080 --> 0:09:02.890
<v Speaker 2>Thomas Wolff, about the deal. This is Bloomberg Tech. NVIDIA

0:09:02.980 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 2>has agreed to acquire Hugging Face in a transaction valued

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 2>at about $ 13 billion, confirming earlier Bloomberg reports. Here to

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 2>discuss is Hugging Face co-founder Thomas Wolff, back on Bloomberg Tech.

0:09:15.260 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 2>There's a piece of this that's really interesting, that Hugging

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:21.540
<v Speaker 2>Face continues to be Hugging Face, right Thomas? Owned by NVIDIA,

0:09:22.210 --> 0:09:25.089
<v Speaker 2>but is an open platform. Could we start with the

0:09:25.130 --> 0:09:27.970
<v Speaker 2>mechanics of that? How Hugging Face is going to run

0:09:28.030 --> 0:09:31.700
<v Speaker 2>under the proposal that you and Clem and the others agreed?

0:09:32.140 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Do you and Clem stay with Hugging Face and the

0:09:35.700 --> 0:09:37.580
<v Speaker 2>specifics of how you're going to structure this?

0:09:39.910 --> 0:09:40.370
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, of course.

0:09:40.410 --> 0:09:43.530
<v Speaker 8>So, I mean, the first thing to say is we

0:09:43.790 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 8>are staying indeed, like all the three co-founders are staying.

0:09:47.420 --> 0:09:51.819
<v Speaker 8>You know, we're doubling down with six years at least

0:09:51.900 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 8>retention at Hugging Face and the idea is all the

0:09:54.660 --> 0:09:57.250
<v Speaker 8>team is going to join. And the goal is really,

0:09:57.530 --> 0:10:02.110
<v Speaker 8>as Jensen said it in his tweet and interview this morning,

0:10:02.250 --> 0:10:03.890
<v Speaker 8>and as you can read it on the blog post

0:10:03.950 --> 0:10:09.100
<v Speaker 8>as well, is to keep an open, independent, compute agnostic

0:10:09.340 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 8>platform and infrastructure for Hugging Face. So practically for our user,

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:17.630
<v Speaker 8>this is going to change. really very little. The main

0:10:17.670 --> 0:10:24.140
<v Speaker 8>difference is we'll have the backing, this power of NVIDIA

0:10:24.540 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 8>to be able to double down and to accelerate our work.

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:33.470
<v Speaker 2>What is it that Hugging Face is going to be

0:10:33.530 --> 0:10:37.310
<v Speaker 2>able to do now, Thomas, like either scaling or in

0:10:37.350 --> 0:10:40.069
<v Speaker 2>the speed of movement that you just wouldn't have otherwise

0:10:40.110 --> 0:10:41.850
<v Speaker 2>been able to do independently?

0:10:44.510 --> 0:10:49.179
<v Speaker 8>I think we've been extremely efficient along our journey. We've

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 8>been able to, we've raised a very minimal amount if

0:10:52.420 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 8>you compare to any AI company nowadays. We've raised less

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:58.830
<v Speaker 8>than half a billion dollars. I think we've been able

0:10:58.850 --> 0:11:02.670
<v Speaker 8>to achieve amazing results with that. We scaled to 3

0:11:02.670 --> 0:11:05.630
<v Speaker 8>million models on the hub, like 18 million users. We

0:11:05.650 --> 0:11:08.989
<v Speaker 8>have a We have 200,000 companies using us. And I

0:11:09.030 --> 0:11:12.910
<v Speaker 8>think the idea is now what we realized this year

0:11:12.950 --> 0:11:16.330
<v Speaker 8>was that, on the one hand, open source was having

0:11:16.350 --> 0:11:20.650
<v Speaker 8>a huge moment, like open source was really on the rise.

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 8>And also, when we were attacked, you remember earlier this summer,

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:28.060
<v Speaker 8>we realized that open source was actually critical for safety

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:31.319
<v Speaker 8>and critical for many aspects. Happy to dive into that

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:35.300
<v Speaker 8>from safety to company being able to do research to technology.

0:11:36.030 --> 0:11:38.740
<v Speaker 8>basically a company be able to own their data. And

0:11:38.770 --> 0:11:42.420
<v Speaker 8>we thought, okay, we have a few choice here. Either

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 8>we raise more money and we double down or we

0:11:45.420 --> 0:11:48.699
<v Speaker 8>find someone who share our value, share our mission very

0:11:48.740 --> 0:11:51.980
<v Speaker 8>deeply and we partner with them. We were very lucky

0:11:52.020 --> 0:11:56.350
<v Speaker 8>that Jensen was active receptive to this discussion.

0:11:57.250 --> 0:11:59.390
<v Speaker 2>So it sounds like, you know, Hugging Face looked at

0:11:59.630 --> 0:12:03.209
<v Speaker 2>a strategy for the future and approached NVIDIA or Jensen

0:12:03.250 --> 0:12:05.050
<v Speaker 2>and NVIDIA approached Hugging Face?

0:12:06.050 --> 0:12:09.450
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, we approached him. Very open discussion. I think everything

0:12:09.470 --> 0:12:10.210
<v Speaker 7>was on the table.

0:12:11.610 --> 0:12:15.189
<v Speaker 8>We often have, you know, this offer to invest, to

0:12:15.490 --> 0:12:19.390
<v Speaker 8>basically raise more money. And the discussion was, OK, where

0:12:19.429 --> 0:12:22.069
<v Speaker 8>should we go? And at some point we were, you know,

0:12:22.290 --> 0:12:24.610
<v Speaker 8>we're so aligned. There is so many things we can

0:12:24.650 --> 0:12:27.860
<v Speaker 8>do here that let's go all the way.

0:12:29.740 --> 0:12:34.239
<v Speaker 2>What was interesting, as outlined by Jensen in his various communications, like,

0:12:34.260 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 2>for example, a blog post on LinkedIn, is that the

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Hugging Face community will still have the same choices, right?

0:12:41.380 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Including the cloud platform backing, the inference platform. In other words,

0:12:45.780 --> 0:12:51.890
<v Speaker 2>there is no mandatory requirement to use NVIDIA Compute. Was

0:12:51.929 --> 0:12:55.350
<v Speaker 2>that something that you guys on your side insisted on,

0:12:55.770 --> 0:12:57.730
<v Speaker 2>or what's the backstory to that?

0:12:59.590 --> 0:13:01.220
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean, we'll talk about that.

0:13:01.250 --> 0:13:05.380
<v Speaker 8>But the idea really here is Jensen believed like us

0:13:05.740 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 8>in the power of community, the power of collaboration. You know,

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 8>he wrote this great letter about open source model. He

0:13:12.860 --> 0:13:17.809
<v Speaker 8>thinks really widely. We have this same, you know, wide

0:13:17.850 --> 0:13:22.570
<v Speaker 8>scope of thinking. We think there is a huge collaboration

0:13:22.650 --> 0:13:25.090
<v Speaker 8>that we think actually open source models have to be

0:13:25.130 --> 0:13:30.980
<v Speaker 8>built through collaboration that transcends normal competition. So here also

0:13:31.500 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 8>there is a very big alignment in how we think

0:13:34.740 --> 0:13:40.179
<v Speaker 8>about these problems. Now the exact specifics will be defined

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 8>very soon.

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:45.830
<v Speaker 2>This is a slight tangent or an aside, but last

0:13:45.870 --> 0:13:47.250
<v Speaker 2>week you were on the show with me and we

0:13:47.260 --> 0:13:50.990
<v Speaker 2>were talking about your robotics business. How does the robotics

0:13:51.050 --> 0:13:56.050
<v Speaker 2>business transfer with NVIDIA? Because you had massive demand for

0:13:56.090 --> 0:14:01.030
<v Speaker 2>Microdot quite quickly. NVIDIA's got massive scale. They are a

0:14:01.050 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 2>hardware company as well. Explain the opportunity there.

0:14:06.550 --> 0:14:09.050
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think you're also the same, you know, you've

0:14:09.090 --> 0:14:12.650
<v Speaker 8>seen Jensen on stage with some ducks, you know, there

0:14:12.670 --> 0:14:15.130
<v Speaker 8>was this Disney, not really ducks, but what they were

0:14:15.190 --> 0:14:19.970
<v Speaker 8>called BDX robot last year, GT. We know Jensen also

0:14:19.990 --> 0:14:23.750
<v Speaker 8>love robotics. We love robotics as well. We see here

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:26.420
<v Speaker 8>also it's very, you know, it's something that we can

0:14:26.500 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 8>keep developing very similarly to how we've been building it

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:33.950
<v Speaker 8>at Hugging Face. I think the surprising news for us

0:14:34.030 --> 0:14:38.690
<v Speaker 8>was that this robotic release almost eclipsed or even, you know,

0:14:39.110 --> 0:14:43.140
<v Speaker 8>was even more successful than some rumors about.

0:14:42.860 --> 0:14:44.700
<v Speaker 7>The join, the acquisition.

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 8>And so it's, I think, a good indication of, you know,

0:14:49.820 --> 0:14:52.210
<v Speaker 8>how we'll be able to manage these different things going

0:14:52.270 --> 0:14:53.310
<v Speaker 8>on forward in the future.

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Thomas, this is a deal, right? $ 13 billion, $ 1 billion

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:03.540
<v Speaker 2>of which is tied to employee retention through stock. How

0:15:04.020 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 2>did this discussion go around regulation, antitrust? How do you

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:12.050
<v Speaker 2>think that your competitors, NVIDIA's competitors, will view this deal?

0:15:12.490 --> 0:15:15.770
<v Speaker 2>And what level of confidence or concern is there on

0:15:15.790 --> 0:15:18.990
<v Speaker 2>this passing through the regulatory process with ease?

0:15:22.420 --> 0:15:23.900
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, all of that is a bit early to tell

0:15:23.940 --> 0:15:28.540
<v Speaker 8>your answer, right? We announced this just today, Ed. I

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:33.670
<v Speaker 8>think it's a process we'll see. We're quite confident. We think,

0:15:33.710 --> 0:15:37.510
<v Speaker 8>you know, there is a really nice path where basically

0:15:37.550 --> 0:15:42.850
<v Speaker 8>Hugging Face continues to operate as this independent, open platform

0:15:42.890 --> 0:15:45.970
<v Speaker 8>that's been in the past. We think this is a

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 8>very good direction.

0:15:47.540 --> 0:15:48.620
<v Speaker 7>It makes a lot of sense.

0:15:49.660 --> 0:15:52.970
<v Speaker 8>Now, you know, I'm not yet to be to be

0:15:53.710 --> 0:15:56.370
<v Speaker 8>answering really like deep regulation questions right now.

0:15:57.670 --> 0:16:00.460
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so I appreciate that. Very quickly, what do Hugging

0:16:00.540 --> 0:16:03.540
<v Speaker 2>Face staff feel about this? What's the response internally then?

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.890
<v Speaker 8>I mean, ecstatic, you know, you maybe saw the picture

0:16:07.950 --> 0:16:12.130
<v Speaker 8>we shared on Twitter, you know, Jensen joined our old hands.

0:16:13.010 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 8>For a lot of the team members, it was kind

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:20.460
<v Speaker 8>of a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, basically, to talk with Jensen. I

0:16:21.100 --> 0:16:24.850
<v Speaker 8>think the whole team is really very excited about this

0:16:25.330 --> 0:16:26.530
<v Speaker 8>new direction.

0:16:27.030 --> 0:16:28.490
<v Speaker 7>Everyone is ready to.

0:16:28.450 --> 0:16:32.330
<v Speaker 8>Go 10 years again, like building to the next step

0:16:32.450 --> 0:16:36.170
<v Speaker 8>of open-source models. We think this is a great chance

0:16:36.220 --> 0:16:39.220
<v Speaker 8>for the whole open-source model ecosystem, to be honest.

0:16:39.260 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 7>We think it's kind of incredible.

0:16:42.430 --> 0:16:45.950
<v Speaker 2>Thomas Wolfe of Hugging Face, back on the show a

0:16:45.990 --> 0:16:48.910
<v Speaker 2>week later after the confirmation that NVIDIA has acquired Hugging

0:16:48.950 --> 0:16:52.180
<v Speaker 2>Face for about $ 13 million. Thank you so much. Coming up,

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:54.780
<v Speaker 2>we're going to go to London. London riders are about

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 2>to get robo-taxi access through the UK capital.

0:16:57.500 --> 0:16:59.780
<v Speaker 7>I'm going to talk to the CEO of Wave.

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:02.020
<v Speaker 2>About a deal with Uber that's making that possible. This

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:13.180
<v Speaker 2>is Bloomberg Tech. Self-driving technology startup Wave has reached a

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 2>deal with Uber to offer robotaxi rides in London with

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 2>a safety driver. It's the latest move in the global

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:23.070
<v Speaker 2>race to commercialize autonomous ride hailing. Wave CEO Alex Kendall

0:17:23.109 --> 0:17:25.730
<v Speaker 2>is back with us on Bloomberg Tech. You know, Alex,

0:17:26.590 --> 0:17:29.090
<v Speaker 2>in covering this industry, I know that this is a

0:17:29.130 --> 0:17:32.230
<v Speaker 2>source of frustration. But the first question is always, what's

0:17:32.270 --> 0:17:35.130
<v Speaker 2>the path for the safety driver coming out of the vehicle?

0:17:35.510 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Take that and explain the London case study to us.

0:17:40.130 --> 0:17:43.020
<v Speaker 3>Hi, Ed. Well, firstly, as you know, London is an

0:17:43.220 --> 0:17:47.340
<v Speaker 3>incredibly difficult place to drive. It's a 2,000-year-old city. It's

0:17:47.380 --> 0:17:51.750
<v Speaker 3>full of narrow roads, frequent pedestrians and cyclists. And so

0:17:52.270 --> 0:17:54.730
<v Speaker 3>I'm delighted that we've been able to bring our technology here.

0:17:54.750 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 3>We've been learning to drive here for a decade, and it's,

0:17:57.890 --> 0:17:59.660
<v Speaker 3>I think, one of the hardest places in the world

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.790
<v Speaker 3>to learn to drive. But we're starting with a supervised

0:18:02.830 --> 0:18:06.270
<v Speaker 3>service this week with safety operators. And the path to

0:18:06.350 --> 0:18:09.250
<v Speaker 3>launch a driverless service is really three things. The first

0:18:09.390 --> 0:18:12.260
<v Speaker 3>one is to move to a scalable vehicle platform. Our

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 3>business model works with automakers so that they build the

0:18:15.580 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 3>robot taxis, no retrofits or built-in mass production hardware. Second,

0:18:20.540 --> 0:18:24.160
<v Speaker 3>of course, validating the safety metrics we need for driverless operation.

0:18:24.180 --> 0:18:27.980
<v Speaker 3>And third, We've got a permit today for supervised operations,

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 3>and we're working with regulators towards a driverless permit. So

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:33.880
<v Speaker 3>those three things, which we're working on very quickly over

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 3>here in London.

0:18:35.859 --> 0:18:38.119
<v Speaker 2>At the same time, you know, you have multiple projects

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:40.940
<v Speaker 2>in parallel, right? There is the driverless platform of Nissan,

0:18:41.230 --> 0:18:45.010
<v Speaker 2>for example, where there's a future in London, but other

0:18:45.050 --> 0:18:47.670
<v Speaker 2>cities come into play in the R &amp; D of that.

0:18:48.190 --> 0:18:49.290
<v Speaker 7>Explain that relationship.

0:18:50.810 --> 0:18:53.949
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's right. We've... We've looked to build a business

0:18:54.010 --> 0:18:56.990
<v Speaker 3>where we want to provide intelligence across anyone who wants

0:18:57.010 --> 0:19:00.370
<v Speaker 3>to build intelligent machines. And uniquely, we've got an AI

0:19:00.410 --> 0:19:03.409
<v Speaker 3>that can scale from consumer vehicles to robo-taxis. So we

0:19:03.470 --> 0:19:05.550
<v Speaker 3>are deploying our AI in consumer vehicles with a number

0:19:05.570 --> 0:19:09.250
<v Speaker 3>of leading automakers like Nissan and Stellantis. And of course,

0:19:09.869 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 3>as of today, starting robo-taxi services today in London. And

0:19:13.780 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 3>by the end of the year, we'll be scaling this

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 3>to Tokyo. And we've agreed with Uber to take it

0:19:18.260 --> 0:19:19.620
<v Speaker 3>to 10 cities beyond that as well.

0:19:20.390 --> 0:19:22.810
<v Speaker 2>It's amazing. Alex, it's been almost 10 years since I

0:19:22.850 --> 0:19:26.670
<v Speaker 2>left London and moved to SF. What's your relationship like

0:19:26.710 --> 0:19:29.340
<v Speaker 2>with that city, with the mayor? But also, you know,

0:19:29.380 --> 0:19:32.580
<v Speaker 2>under a new government with Andy Burnham, is there a

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:37.500
<v Speaker 2>pathway for sort of comprehensive framework regulation for your industry

0:19:37.660 --> 0:19:39.300
<v Speaker 2>in the UK and other UK cities?

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:43.290
<v Speaker 3>One thing people might not realize is that earlier this year,

0:19:43.350 --> 0:19:46.929
<v Speaker 3>the UN published a technical regulation that allows for a

0:19:46.970 --> 0:19:50.770
<v Speaker 3>global framework for high levels of autonomy and consumer vehicles

0:19:50.970 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 3>and robot taxis. And many countries around the world, UK, Europe, Japan,

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 3>all sign up to these regulations. And they also provide

0:19:58.380 --> 0:20:01.950
<v Speaker 3>a basis for in the US as well. So this

0:20:02.010 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 3>is fantastic. And then the UK itself has been adopting these.

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 3>There was an act passed in 2024, and we've been

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:11.500
<v Speaker 3>working with Transport for London and government here to bring

0:20:11.540 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 3>this into fruition. So we're pretty happy with how this

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 3>is growing. And London is one of Uber's five largest

0:20:16.780 --> 0:20:20.639
<v Speaker 3>markets by revenue. So it's a really important market to

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 3>bring autonomy into. I think Londoners are going to love

0:20:22.820 --> 0:20:27.260
<v Speaker 3>this service. And what we've got is a safe and

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 3>responsible plan to bring this technology, introduce it to Londoners

0:20:31.140 --> 0:20:33.220
<v Speaker 3>and people through the UK with regulators here.

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:37.199
<v Speaker 2>You know, the Uber relationships, key to underscore, right, it's

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:40.190
<v Speaker 2>through the Uber app. You said a moment ago that

0:20:40.250 --> 0:20:43.510
<v Speaker 2>there's a plan for 10 cities with Uber going forward.

0:20:43.530 --> 0:20:45.990
<v Speaker 2>Are any of those cities in the United States, Alex?

0:20:47.210 --> 0:20:49.230
<v Speaker 3>We will be bringing it globally, including to the US.

0:20:49.270 --> 0:20:52.510
<v Speaker 3>We haven't announced any other specific cities yet, but stay tuned.

0:20:52.550 --> 0:20:53.889
<v Speaker 3>I'll give you a call when we do, Ed.

0:20:55.619 --> 0:20:58.439
<v Speaker 2>Real quick, how are you guys doing on the funding side?

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:01.660
<v Speaker 2>There was reports that some Wave staff sold off stock

0:21:02.100 --> 0:21:04.780
<v Speaker 2>on the Pisces exchange, for example. Is that an employee

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:08.109
<v Speaker 2>liquidity thing? Are you out there doing secondaries? What's going on?

0:21:09.590 --> 0:21:14.070
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we're well funded. We've raised almost $ 3 billion of cash.

0:21:14.130 --> 0:21:17.449
<v Speaker 3>We just did our second employee liquidity round. We've got

0:21:17.470 --> 0:21:20.390
<v Speaker 3>a great global team. And actually, one of the things

0:21:20.430 --> 0:21:22.530
<v Speaker 3>I think we're well set up to do is to

0:21:22.570 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 3>really continue with our frontier embodied AI science. We've been

0:21:26.580 --> 0:21:29.300
<v Speaker 3>the first team to build vision language action models and

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:33.209
<v Speaker 3>world models for robotics, and now bring this new contrarian

0:21:33.230 --> 0:21:36.210
<v Speaker 3>approach to the technology to market, as well, of course,

0:21:36.290 --> 0:21:40.100
<v Speaker 3>continuing to grow in production applications like in consumer vehicles

0:21:40.140 --> 0:21:43.679
<v Speaker 3>all around the world and for robo-taxi services. So it's

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:46.109
<v Speaker 3>full steam ahead. It's been a phenomenal year for our

0:21:46.130 --> 0:21:48.310
<v Speaker 3>team so far, and this is a pretty proud moment

0:21:48.350 --> 0:21:48.729
<v Speaker 3>for us.

0:21:49.650 --> 0:21:52.510
<v Speaker 2>Alex, just very quickly, what you just said, world models,

0:21:52.609 --> 0:21:55.350
<v Speaker 2>remind the audience what Wave's core competence is.

0:21:57.090 --> 0:21:59.609
<v Speaker 3>What we've built is an end-to-end AI driver. So it's

0:21:59.650 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 3>a single neural network that's capable of reasoning and making

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 3>decisions in real time. It can generalize across any vehicle

0:22:05.980 --> 0:22:08.540
<v Speaker 3>we work with, small, large vehicles all around the world.

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:11.060
<v Speaker 3>We're the first company to have driven this technology in

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:15.149
<v Speaker 3>over 500 cities, zero shot. So no high-definite maps. It's

0:22:15.190 --> 0:22:17.470
<v Speaker 3>an AI that's capable of driving any vehicle all the

0:22:17.490 --> 0:22:18.250
<v Speaker 3>way around the world.

0:22:19.410 --> 0:22:21.700
<v Speaker 2>Alex Kendall, Wave CEO, back on the show. It's great

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 2>to have you now deployed modestly in London. Coming up,

0:22:24.700 --> 0:22:28.400
<v Speaker 2>snowflakes earnings, beating analyst estimates, a big move in the stock.

0:22:28.420 --> 0:22:31.389
<v Speaker 2>We're going to speak to the CEO, Sridhar Ramaswamy. That's next.

0:22:31.910 --> 0:22:34.389
<v Speaker 2>Halftime here in the city of San Francisco. And this

0:22:34.410 --> 0:22:42.220
<v Speaker 2>is what markets look like. This is Bloomberg Tech. Welcome

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:45.440
<v Speaker 2>back to Bloomberg Tech. The NASDAQ 100, really tech-heavy index,

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:48.700
<v Speaker 2>pushing up to session highs, a gain of more than 1% now.

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 2>A lot of what's happening in the market is Fed

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:53.530
<v Speaker 2>speak and what the Fed will or won't do in

0:22:53.550 --> 0:22:56.590
<v Speaker 2>terms of the outlook for rates. But earnings is also

0:22:56.710 --> 0:23:00.609
<v Speaker 2>a very big part of this story. Elsewhere, what is

0:23:00.650 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 2>happening in the release of different generations of AI model,

0:23:04.180 --> 0:23:07.659
<v Speaker 2>also massively important. Meta's up 4%. This one was a

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:10.659
<v Speaker 2>big news item this morning. It's launched its latest and

0:23:10.700 --> 0:23:13.420
<v Speaker 2>most powerful AI model to date, with the company's chief

0:23:13.500 --> 0:23:18.220
<v Speaker 2>AI officer hailing it as, quote, competitive with Anthropix model and, quote,

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 2>better than OpenAI's GPT 5.6 Sol, particularly when it comes

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 2>to coding. Bloomberg's Riley Griffin's with us. Yeah, I did

0:23:27.710 --> 0:23:29.210
<v Speaker 2>a double take at the screen right on the stock

0:23:29.230 --> 0:23:30.909
<v Speaker 2>move because I was like, is there a direct causal

0:23:30.930 --> 0:23:34.030
<v Speaker 2>relationship here? But very simply, Meta is out with a

0:23:34.070 --> 0:23:37.430
<v Speaker 2>powerful model. They're talking it up, and the market seems

0:23:37.470 --> 0:23:38.610
<v Speaker 2>to believe them. What do we need to know?

0:23:38.890 --> 0:23:43.010
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Chief AI Officer Alexander Wang and I spoke yesterday,

0:23:43.109 --> 0:23:46.429
<v Speaker 1>and he's saying this is the biggest performance jump to date,

0:23:46.570 --> 0:23:50.330
<v Speaker 1>putting it on par with competitors like OpenAI and Anthropic,

0:23:50.730 --> 0:23:56.669
<v Speaker 1>performance improvement for coding and agentic capabilities. Notably, this is

0:23:56.750 --> 0:24:00.400
<v Speaker 1>not the highly anticipated model from Meta called Watermelon. Yes,

0:24:00.540 --> 0:24:02.120
<v Speaker 1>you got that right, Ed.

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:03.020
<v Speaker 7>It is Watermelon.

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:06.680
<v Speaker 1>It's still coming. Alex wouldn't speak to when, but that's

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:09.859
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the big model release. Some have said towards

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:11.790
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year. This is not that, but

0:24:11.810 --> 0:24:12.610
<v Speaker 1>it's a big improvement.

0:24:13.700 --> 0:24:16.230
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so like the business model for meta is so interesting.

0:24:16.290 --> 0:24:20.310
<v Speaker 2>With OpenAI, you have ChatGPT. With Anthropic, you have Claude

0:24:20.390 --> 0:24:24.980
<v Speaker 2>and the coding tool. How does meta charge or get people,

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:28.770
<v Speaker 2>everyday people, businesses to use these powerful AI models?

0:24:29.070 --> 0:24:31.369
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so they are charging this as a closed model.

0:24:31.390 --> 0:24:34.389
<v Speaker 1>That means developers can't just download those building blocks and

0:24:34.430 --> 0:24:36.869
<v Speaker 1>build upon it. It's going to cost as much as

0:24:36.930 --> 0:24:41.710
<v Speaker 1>the prior version, MuseSpark 1.2. Developers can access it via

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 1>its API platform. That's essentially a way to use Meta's

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>services via Meta. This is not the open source kind

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:54.340
<v Speaker 1>of technology that Mark Zuckerberg has developed. preached in his

0:24:54.400 --> 0:25:00.970
<v Speaker 1>most recent manifesto, that 6,500 word document that he put

0:25:01.070 --> 0:25:04.370
<v Speaker 1>out in which he promoted open source. So that's kind

0:25:04.390 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 1>of notable here. They need to show a return on

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>investment for the billions upon billions that they're spending to

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:11.139
<v Speaker 1>try to catch up.

0:25:12.369 --> 0:25:15.229
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Riley Griffin on Meta, which is up 4%, more

0:25:15.250 --> 0:25:18.070
<v Speaker 2>than 4% in the session. Thank you so much. Snowflake

0:25:18.130 --> 0:25:20.990
<v Speaker 2>reported its second quarter earnings yesterday after the closing bell,

0:25:21.330 --> 0:25:24.719
<v Speaker 2>beating analyst estimates and raising its full year forecast for

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:29.100
<v Speaker 2>product revenue. Shares right now up almost 20% on track

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:32.220
<v Speaker 2>for their best day since late May and trading at

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:36.429
<v Speaker 2>their highest level since December of 2021. What's going on?

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:40.050
<v Speaker 2>Let's speak to Snowflake CEO, Sridhar Ramaswamy. You've had three

0:25:40.109 --> 0:25:44.250
<v Speaker 2>straight quarters of accelerating product revenue growth. And it seems

0:25:44.290 --> 0:25:46.369
<v Speaker 2>a strange question, Sridhar. Good morning to you. Welcome to

0:25:46.410 --> 0:25:51.010
<v Speaker 2>the show. How much of that is AI? Hi, good morning.

0:25:51.270 --> 0:25:52.169
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, indeed.

0:25:52.270 --> 0:25:53.990
<v Speaker 7>This quarter was pretty amazing for us.

0:25:53.990 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 5>$ 1. 49 billion in product revenue, up 37% year on year.

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:02.920
<v Speaker 5>We are doing this while also expanding operating margin by

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:07.609
<v Speaker 5>400 basis points to 15%. About half of the beat,

0:26:07.700 --> 0:26:11.210
<v Speaker 5>the overperformance came from AI. And what's nice about this

0:26:11.270 --> 0:26:15.730
<v Speaker 5>moment is that AI is actually driving a nice feedback

0:26:15.810 --> 0:26:20.150
<v Speaker 5>loop because more customers are bringing data onto Snowflake using

0:26:20.210 --> 0:26:23.060
<v Speaker 5>our AI products, Cocoa and Cowork, to get things done,

0:26:23.540 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 5>which in turn is driving consumption.

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:26.659
<v Speaker 7>On the platform.

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:29.859
<v Speaker 5>Which sets up this very nice flywheel of people wanting

0:26:29.900 --> 0:26:33.340
<v Speaker 5>to do more with Snowflake. And it's an effect that's

0:26:33.380 --> 0:26:36.149
<v Speaker 5>pretty profound. It also gives us confidence about where we

0:26:36.190 --> 0:26:38.670
<v Speaker 5>are headed. That's why we raised the full year guidance

0:26:39.010 --> 0:26:41.590
<v Speaker 5>by 5% to 36% for the year.

0:26:43.170 --> 0:26:45.770
<v Speaker 2>What is Cocoa?

0:26:45.810 --> 0:26:48.189
<v Speaker 5>Cocoa is a coding agent for data. It comes as

0:26:48.250 --> 0:26:52.090
<v Speaker 5>part of Snowflake. I've used it to write software as well.

0:26:52.390 --> 0:26:55.169
<v Speaker 5>But what it specializes in is any job that you

0:26:55.210 --> 0:26:57.850
<v Speaker 5>want to do with Snowflake goes five to ten times

0:26:57.910 --> 0:26:58.830
<v Speaker 5>faster using Cocoa.

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I know the answer. I was reading so much

0:27:02.900 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 2>because the surprise that jumps out off the page, right,

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:10.929
<v Speaker 2>is the momentum. 2,000 accounts added in that quarter. The

0:27:11.050 --> 0:27:15.050
<v Speaker 2>overall usage is really high in a market that is competitive.

0:27:15.350 --> 0:27:17.510
<v Speaker 2>There are many coding agents out there. Why do you

0:27:17.550 --> 0:27:19.170
<v Speaker 2>think that Coco is standing out, Sridhar?

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 5>Because it's the easiest sell for Snowflake as a company.

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 5>I literally go to our customers and say, if your

0:27:26.220 --> 0:27:30.140
<v Speaker 5>data team uses Cocoa, you can make things go five

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:31.200
<v Speaker 5>to ten times faster.

0:27:31.609 --> 0:27:34.109
<v Speaker 7>And we publish benchmarks on this. We are good at

0:27:34.210 --> 0:27:34.689
<v Speaker 7>what we do.

0:27:35.300 --> 0:27:39.639
<v Speaker 5>Compared to off-the-shelf models and even harnesses from the foundation labs,

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:43.980
<v Speaker 5>Cocoa is just a lot more effective on Snowflake jobs

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 5>because it understands so much about Snowflake.

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:49.020
<v Speaker 7>And that's really the magic.

0:27:49.660 --> 0:27:52.340
<v Speaker 5>Plus, we don't have things like per-user subscriptions. And a

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 5>lot of the other products do. Cocoa is included for.

0:27:54.859 --> 0:27:58.070
<v Speaker 7>Free with Snowflake. It's a consumption model.

0:27:58.570 --> 0:28:02.169
<v Speaker 5>And it just makes this a very, very compelling product

0:28:02.190 --> 0:28:04.010
<v Speaker 5>for every data team on the planet.

0:28:04.890 --> 0:28:07.619
<v Speaker 2>That business model is interesting. So if you added 2,000

0:28:07.619 --> 0:28:11.810
<v Speaker 2>accounts in one quarter, where does that show up or

0:28:11.890 --> 0:28:13.629
<v Speaker 2>translate into revenue growth?

0:28:15.619 --> 0:28:17.899
<v Speaker 5>First of all, it shows up in AI revenue because

0:28:17.980 --> 0:28:21.030
<v Speaker 5>people that are using Cocoa consume tokens.

0:28:21.380 --> 0:28:22.609
<v Speaker 7>That's the first starter effect.

0:28:22.950 --> 0:28:25.950
<v Speaker 5>But the bigger effect is that they are doing all

0:28:25.990 --> 0:28:28.790
<v Speaker 5>kinds of things on Snowflake. They are bringing more data

0:28:28.830 --> 0:28:33.169
<v Speaker 5>into Snowflake. They are optimizing and debugging their pipelines. They

0:28:33.450 --> 0:28:37.869
<v Speaker 5>are setting up things like interactive tables that can power dashboards.

0:28:37.890 --> 0:28:40.210
<v Speaker 5>They're creating agents that go into cowork and can get

0:28:40.270 --> 0:28:44.090
<v Speaker 5>deployed to business users. It's the second and third order

0:28:44.140 --> 0:28:47.180
<v Speaker 5>effect of COCO that's most interesting for Snowflake.

0:28:48.610 --> 0:28:52.550
<v Speaker 2>Remaining performance obligations, RPO, came in below at least Wall

0:28:52.570 --> 0:28:56.790
<v Speaker 2>Street's consensus estimates and expectations. How would you ask the

0:28:56.830 --> 0:29:01.290
<v Speaker 2>market to interpret that figure, or what kind of emphasis

0:29:01.310 --> 0:29:01.990
<v Speaker 2>would you put on it?

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:05.180
<v Speaker 7>I wouldn't put a lot of emphasis on it.

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 5>We are seeing this trend where the bigger renewals are

0:29:08.580 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 5>getting pushed.

0:29:09.260 --> 0:29:12.870
<v Speaker 7>Out by a quarter to the latter part of this year.

0:29:13.930 --> 0:29:19.330
<v Speaker 5>We are pretty confident that RPO will increase, especially in Q4,

0:29:19.450 --> 0:29:24.780
<v Speaker 5>by a lot. Revenue is the leading indicator that drives everything.

0:29:24.860 --> 0:29:26.580
<v Speaker 5>And as you know, that's very, very healthy.

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:30.180
<v Speaker 2>We talked about Cocoa in the context of the other

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 2>coding platforms that are out there. Generally speaking, a lot

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:37.370
<v Speaker 2>of the analysts ask about Databricks, right? And Databricks is

0:29:37.430 --> 0:29:41.500
<v Speaker 2>talking about, you know, it's 80% growth. it's crossing $ 7

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 2>billion in ARR. Where are they doing well against you?

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:47.660
<v Speaker 2>Where do you feel you're doing well against them?

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:50.959
<v Speaker 7>It's a big market, first of all.

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:56.100
<v Speaker 5>Our strength has always been in the context of a cohesive,

0:29:56.720 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 5>easy to use, trusted data platform. Their heritage is more

0:30:00.740 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 5>that of catering to developers, wide open code bases, sprawl

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:09.580
<v Speaker 5>of data, and not as much attention paid to things

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:14.270
<v Speaker 5>like governance and disaster recovery. And Snowflake is the place

0:30:14.420 --> 0:30:18.150
<v Speaker 5>where enterprises have put their most valuable data, the one

0:30:18.190 --> 0:30:20.810
<v Speaker 5>that they use to run their business, which is what

0:30:20.870 --> 0:30:25.010
<v Speaker 5>sets us up super well to move upstream. Yes, technology

0:30:25.050 --> 0:30:28.570
<v Speaker 5>is important, but I have so many meaningful conversations with

0:30:28.650 --> 0:30:31.330
<v Speaker 5>our customers about how we can transform how their sales

0:30:31.370 --> 0:30:35.130
<v Speaker 5>teams operate or how we can help them optimize their

0:30:35.170 --> 0:30:38.980
<v Speaker 5>supply chains. I would say that we are leveraging AI

0:30:39.340 --> 0:30:41.740
<v Speaker 5>to do the kinds of things that we honestly would

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:43.740
<v Speaker 5>not have imagined possible three years ago.

0:30:44.140 --> 0:30:45.860
<v Speaker 7>I'm very happy with where we are headed.

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:49.270
<v Speaker 5>Snowflake is becoming a lot more than a tech provider

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:52.590
<v Speaker 5>that's largely invisible. We are able to drive real outcomes

0:30:52.610 --> 0:30:53.390
<v Speaker 5>for our customers.

0:30:54.190 --> 0:30:57.510
<v Speaker 2>Sridhar, I like that. AI is clearly driving more usage

0:30:57.550 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 2>of Snowflake. So slightly differently, what can a customer do

0:31:00.620 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 2>today with their data within Snowflake that they weren't able

0:31:04.980 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 2>to do even a year ago?

0:31:06.100 --> 0:31:13.790
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, if you look at customers like United Rentals or Indeed,

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:17.790
<v Speaker 5>which is among the world's biggest job sites, Indeed has

0:31:17.850 --> 0:31:22.910
<v Speaker 5>rolled out COCO and COWORK to their employees in over

0:31:22.910 --> 0:31:27.490
<v Speaker 5>60 countries and 28 languages. Ready access to data, ready

0:31:27.670 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 5>access to reasoning, Ready access to being able to do

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:33.800
<v Speaker 5>anything else that the data team wants to do on

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 5>top of Snowflake that simply would not have been possible

0:31:37.340 --> 0:31:40.830
<v Speaker 5>a year or two ago. That represents the frontier of

0:31:40.930 --> 0:31:42.810
<v Speaker 5>what is possible with AI and data today.

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:47.180
<v Speaker 2>Snowflake CEO Sridhar Ramaswamy, the stock up 20% on track

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:50.540
<v Speaker 2>for its best day since May, highest level since December 2021.

0:31:50.540 --> 0:31:53.020
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much. A piece of news that we

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 2>broke this morning. 137 Ventures' early bets on SpaceX are

0:31:58.060 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 2>proving worthy with the 2020-14 vintage fund of SpaceX now

0:32:03.620 --> 0:32:06.969
<v Speaker 2>worth more than eight times the money that investors originally

0:32:07.010 --> 0:32:10.010
<v Speaker 2>put into it. That's net of fees and other charges.

0:32:10.070 --> 0:32:10.590
<v Speaker 7>Investors.

0:32:11.030 --> 0:32:14.330
<v Speaker 2>received back or were distributed $ 2. 5 billion worth of the

0:32:14.350 --> 0:32:18.130
<v Speaker 2>space company shares last quarter by 137. And a source

0:32:18.150 --> 0:32:21.270
<v Speaker 2>says the venture firm's total assets under management is now

0:32:21.550 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 2>over $ 20 billion, which includes investments in Anduril and Cognition.

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:27.900
<v Speaker 2>You'll remember 137 was one of the big sort of

0:32:27.940 --> 0:32:30.780
<v Speaker 2>winners of the SpaceX IPO that we covered on the

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 2>show at the time. A quick update on what's going

0:32:34.260 --> 0:32:36.820
<v Speaker 2>on with various AI model outages that we started the

0:32:36.860 --> 0:32:40.620
<v Speaker 2>show with. OpenAI is now saying it's applied mitigation and

0:32:40.660 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 2>is monitoring recovery of its platforms. And Fropic has just

0:32:44.290 --> 0:32:47.970
<v Speaker 2>said several of its models have recovered after experiencing errors,

0:32:48.030 --> 0:32:51.350
<v Speaker 2>but the companies continue to work to address disruptions, particularly

0:32:51.390 --> 0:32:55.490
<v Speaker 2>with its Opus 4.8 and Opus 5 offerings. Grok, the

0:32:55.530 --> 0:32:59.450
<v Speaker 2>chatbot from Elon Musk's SpaceX AI, said, is also confronting outages.

0:32:59.730 --> 0:33:04.690
<v Speaker 2>That's according to the company's status page. Coming up, HPE

0:33:04.780 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 2>shares are falling despite booming AI demand and a raised outlook.

0:33:08.380 --> 0:33:11.420
<v Speaker 2>We're going to speak with HPE's CEO, Antonio Neri. This

0:33:11.500 --> 0:33:25.110
<v Speaker 2>is Bloomberg Tech. HPE shares under a little pressure despite

0:33:25.150 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 2>a strong quarter and an even better outlook. Revenue jumped 34%

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 2>fueled by demand for AI infrastructure, but was still a

0:33:32.420 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 2>little short of Wall Street's expectations that were very high.

0:33:36.020 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Joining us now is HPE CEO Antonio Neri. Actually, for me,

0:33:40.290 --> 0:33:45.470
<v Speaker 2>you raised forecasts a lot. What were the reasons behind that?

0:33:45.810 --> 0:33:46.730
<v Speaker 2>What's changed?

0:33:47.990 --> 0:33:50.690
<v Speaker 9>Well, good morning, Ed, and thanks for having me. First

0:33:50.710 --> 0:33:53.650
<v Speaker 9>of all, we are incredibly proud of the results we posted.

0:33:54.550 --> 0:33:58.610
<v Speaker 9>And the results are a reflection of the exceptional demand

0:33:58.650 --> 0:34:02.070
<v Speaker 9>we see and the excellent execution by our teams, which,

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:06.140
<v Speaker 9>you know, if we think about the underlying drivers of that,

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:09.380
<v Speaker 9>the strong demand in networking, strong demand in traditional servers,

0:34:09.719 --> 0:34:13.500
<v Speaker 9>and expanded profitability. But what we are doing is raising

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:17.620
<v Speaker 9>the demand on the confidence on that durability which gave

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:21.370
<v Speaker 9>us the confidence not only to raise, once again, our

0:34:21.450 --> 0:34:25.210
<v Speaker 9>guy for 26, but also the guy for 2027 on

0:34:25.250 --> 0:34:28.450
<v Speaker 9>a bigger base. So for us, it's to continue to

0:34:28.489 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 9>stay focused on that. And the stock reaction is day one,

0:34:32.580 --> 0:34:36.700
<v Speaker 9>but look, it takes some time. for investors to digest it.

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:39.219
<v Speaker 9>But we are not worried about that. Generally, it tends

0:34:39.260 --> 0:34:40.540
<v Speaker 9>to recover very, very quickly.

0:34:41.060 --> 0:34:43.589
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Right now, the stock's down 6%, which would be

0:34:43.610 --> 0:34:46.430
<v Speaker 2>its biggest drop since late June. But it had been

0:34:46.469 --> 0:34:48.710
<v Speaker 2>down 12%, which would have been the biggest drop since

0:34:48.770 --> 0:34:54.090
<v Speaker 2>April 2025. You talked about a specific contract with an

0:34:54.270 --> 0:34:58.280
<v Speaker 2>unnamed hyperscaler. This is a market where people want the details.

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:01.660
<v Speaker 2>So I ask you, Who is that hyperscaler? But what

0:35:01.860 --> 0:35:05.080
<v Speaker 2>is significant about that arrangement that the market should be

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:06.100
<v Speaker 2>excited about it?

0:35:07.560 --> 0:35:10.380
<v Speaker 9>Well, there were two news yesterday that I think the

0:35:10.420 --> 0:35:13.839
<v Speaker 9>market should be very excited about it. One is the

0:35:13.940 --> 0:35:20.280
<v Speaker 9>strategic expansion with Oracle, which will allow us to actually

0:35:20.360 --> 0:35:24.419
<v Speaker 9>build a gigawatt scale infrastructure as Oracle continue to grow

0:35:24.460 --> 0:35:28.570
<v Speaker 9>their AI footprint. And that will include all our HP

0:35:28.630 --> 0:35:34.299
<v Speaker 9>Juniper products, meaning scale-out QFX switches and scale-across, which are

0:35:34.380 --> 0:35:38.339
<v Speaker 9>PTX routers. That demonstrates the level of innovation and time

0:35:38.380 --> 0:35:41.340
<v Speaker 9>to market with the latest technology. So we're very proud

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 9>about that. And that's a driver into the future. And

0:35:46.460 --> 0:35:49.969
<v Speaker 9>even in that business, we have not even considered yet

0:35:50.170 --> 0:35:54.270
<v Speaker 9>the yet-to-be-released Helio stack, which will include our scale-up switches.

0:35:55.260 --> 0:35:59.350
<v Speaker 9>On the Cloud and AI, your reference to that multi-billion

0:35:59.370 --> 0:36:02.150
<v Speaker 9>dollar deal with a hyperscaler, we cannot.

0:36:01.910 --> 0:36:02.630
<v Speaker 7>Share because of you.

0:36:02.650 --> 0:36:06.310
<v Speaker 9>It's a server contract. Yeah, it is a traditional server contract.

0:36:06.950 --> 0:36:10.730
<v Speaker 9>But interestingly enough, it's going to be used internally. So

0:36:10.890 --> 0:36:14.130
<v Speaker 9>think about the hyperscaler as an enterprise customer who is

0:36:14.150 --> 0:36:17.190
<v Speaker 9>going to use our servers to do their own AI

0:36:17.370 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 9>inferencing for their own needs. And that's, again, another proof

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:25.820
<v Speaker 9>point that we have the technology to support any customer

0:36:25.989 --> 0:36:28.990
<v Speaker 9>in any use case. So we are excited about both.

0:36:29.690 --> 0:36:32.330
<v Speaker 9>And that's why it points to durability of the demand,

0:36:32.390 --> 0:36:35.029
<v Speaker 9>because the other trend that we have seen is huge

0:36:35.150 --> 0:36:37.469
<v Speaker 9>growth in enterprise on adoption of AI.

0:36:39.030 --> 0:36:41.470
<v Speaker 2>Antonio, I don't know if it makes it any easier

0:36:41.630 --> 0:36:44.490
<v Speaker 2>for you, but I did ask Jensen Wong about circular

0:36:44.530 --> 0:36:48.480
<v Speaker 2>financing earlier this week on the show. In the Oracle arrangement,

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:52.580
<v Speaker 2>Oracle gets warrants, and so inevitably the questions are raised,

0:36:52.739 --> 0:36:54.900
<v Speaker 2>is this or is this not circular financing?

0:36:56.660 --> 0:37:00.020
<v Speaker 9>The warrants we are providing actually scale with the amount

0:37:00.380 --> 0:37:04.930
<v Speaker 9>of infrastructure we're going to build. So as more infrastructure

0:37:05.050 --> 0:37:08.270
<v Speaker 9>gets deployed, the warrants come with it, which means it

0:37:08.489 --> 0:37:12.390
<v Speaker 9>strengthens the partnership between the two companies to grow together.

0:37:12.750 --> 0:37:15.990
<v Speaker 9>And so we both will benefit. It's not the circular

0:37:16.010 --> 0:37:20.290
<v Speaker 9>financing you're referring to, but it's about incentives on both

0:37:20.330 --> 0:37:21.490
<v Speaker 9>sides to grow together.

0:37:23.330 --> 0:37:27.049
<v Speaker 2>Let's get away from the numbers and just ask what's

0:37:27.100 --> 0:37:32.220
<v Speaker 2>the story here with what's happening in AI build-out, right?

0:37:32.260 --> 0:37:35.420
<v Speaker 2>When NVIDIA had its earnings last week, they gave a

0:37:35.480 --> 0:37:38.859
<v Speaker 2>growth forecast that was modeled with supply, their ability to

0:37:38.900 --> 0:37:42.330
<v Speaker 2>supply the market. And the status of demand running ahead

0:37:42.350 --> 0:37:45.520
<v Speaker 2>of supply is quite well known. What is the situation

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:48.420
<v Speaker 2>for HPE? Is it such that you can say, okay,

0:37:48.460 --> 0:37:52.530
<v Speaker 2>here is what we can comfortably supply or confidently supply

0:37:52.570 --> 0:37:55.030
<v Speaker 2>to the world, but it would be greater were supply

0:37:55.070 --> 0:37:55.870
<v Speaker 2>chains improved?

0:37:57.190 --> 0:38:01.549
<v Speaker 9>That is the same story, actually. It is exactly the

0:38:01.590 --> 0:38:05.210
<v Speaker 9>same framework. So if you think about Q3 results on

0:38:05.310 --> 0:38:11.370
<v Speaker 9>revenue and the demand, obviously demand significantly outpaced revenues, and

0:38:11.410 --> 0:38:15.980
<v Speaker 9>that revenue growth was 34% in the quarter. And underneath that,

0:38:16.060 --> 0:38:19.000
<v Speaker 9>if you think about networking, we grew 10%, but order

0:38:19.020 --> 0:38:22.890
<v Speaker 9>demand grew 36%, so three and a half times faster.

0:38:23.530 --> 0:38:26.690
<v Speaker 9>But as you go forward now, You know, look, I

0:38:26.730 --> 0:38:30.410
<v Speaker 9>have done 35 quarters as a CEO. Normally, we put

0:38:30.469 --> 0:38:33.360
<v Speaker 9>guides that we want to not only achieve, but beat.

0:38:33.640 --> 0:38:36.359
<v Speaker 9>And that is the confidence that we factor in our

0:38:36.400 --> 0:38:40.880
<v Speaker 9>supply chain ability to deliver on that number. So related

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:44.779
<v Speaker 9>to Q4, we're going to grow revenue almost $ 2 billion

0:38:44.940 --> 0:38:48.020
<v Speaker 9>quarter over quarter. And then on the bigger base, we're

0:38:48.040 --> 0:38:49.620
<v Speaker 9>going to grow 14% to 17% because we have negotiated

0:38:52.130 --> 0:38:56.570
<v Speaker 9>multi-year agreements with our suppliers that actually brings the capacity

0:38:56.610 --> 0:38:59.060
<v Speaker 9>that we need to deliver against that number. But the

0:38:59.100 --> 0:39:02.360
<v Speaker 9>reality is that demand will continue to outpace supply, and

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:05.320
<v Speaker 9>that's a good thing because what we're doing with customers

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:08.180
<v Speaker 9>and working with them, we're interlocking when the supply becomes

0:39:08.260 --> 0:39:11.930
<v Speaker 9>available and the timing to deliver that revenue and obviously

0:39:12.010 --> 0:39:13.069
<v Speaker 9>the technology for them.

0:39:14.300 --> 0:39:16.529
<v Speaker 2>HPE CEO Antonio Neri, thank you so much for your

0:39:16.550 --> 0:39:20.089
<v Speaker 2>time this morning on the earnings beat. Now coming up,

0:39:20.190 --> 0:39:24.450
<v Speaker 2>Blue Origin turns to another Jeff Bezos venture for its talent.

0:39:24.850 --> 0:39:36.120
<v Speaker 2>Really interesting story next. This is Bloomberg Tech. A framework

0:39:36.219 --> 0:39:39.020
<v Speaker 2>for light touch regulation of AI has been agreed to

0:39:39.060 --> 0:39:41.140
<v Speaker 2>by the members of the G20 out of a tech

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:44.440
<v Speaker 2>and innovation summit held in North Carolina. The so-called Carolina

0:39:44.480 --> 0:39:48.540
<v Speaker 2>Principles call for nations to apply sector-specific approaches to rulemaking.

0:39:48.969 --> 0:39:52.089
<v Speaker 2>avoid creating new regulatory bodies for AI governments, and urge

0:39:52.210 --> 0:39:56.310
<v Speaker 2>closer collaboration between governments and private industry. Here's Commerce Secretary

0:39:56.330 --> 0:39:59.050
<v Speaker 2>Howard Lutnick on the need to embrace the AI build-out.

0:39:59.910 --> 0:40:04.529
<v Speaker 10>Basically, if your community embraces data centers, you're going to

0:40:04.590 --> 0:40:08.740
<v Speaker 10>have great economics, you'll have more power will be built,

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:11.399
<v Speaker 10>and the price of power in your community will go down,

0:40:11.700 --> 0:40:15.440
<v Speaker 10>and you'll have the economic power of their paying taxes.

0:40:16.080 --> 0:40:18.750
<v Speaker 10>and they're making your community better. So if your community

0:40:18.930 --> 0:40:22.750
<v Speaker 10>doesn't embrace a data center, some other community will.

0:40:25.710 --> 0:40:27.370
<v Speaker 2>A quick look at Tesla shares, up more than 7%.

0:40:27.370 --> 0:40:30.230
<v Speaker 2>That puts them on track for their best day since

0:40:30.290 --> 0:40:33.930
<v Speaker 2>late June, trading at their highest level since mid-July. Not

0:40:33.969 --> 0:40:36.319
<v Speaker 2>really clear why. We know there's a big cyber cab

0:40:36.360 --> 0:40:42.400
<v Speaker 2>event in Texas, 5.45 p.m. Eastern Time, according to some

0:40:42.420 --> 0:40:44.779
<v Speaker 2>Tesla staff that posted about it on X. We know

0:40:44.820 --> 0:40:46.629
<v Speaker 2>that we're going to get a closer look at cyber cab.

0:40:46.650 --> 0:40:49.770
<v Speaker 2>They have a really limited... robo-taxi footprint right now in

0:40:49.810 --> 0:40:53.049
<v Speaker 2>the city of Austin. Maybe we'll learn more. But for

0:40:53.130 --> 0:40:56.350
<v Speaker 2>one reason or another, the stock is really soaring this Thursday.

0:40:57.670 --> 0:40:58.330
<v Speaker 7>This is a big one.

0:40:58.390 --> 0:41:01.050
<v Speaker 2>Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin is turning to another one of

0:41:01.090 --> 0:41:04.630
<v Speaker 2>his companies for talent. Over the last year, dozens of

0:41:04.710 --> 0:41:08.529
<v Speaker 2>veterans of the Amazon Leo satellite venture have moved to

0:41:08.550 --> 0:41:11.950
<v Speaker 2>Blue Origin. That's according to their LinkedIn profiles. Bloomberg's Spencer

0:41:11.969 --> 0:41:15.180
<v Speaker 2>Soper joins us with the story. I mean, in some ways,

0:41:16.250 --> 0:41:20.029
<v Speaker 2>It's only natural, isn't it, that some alumni, some veterans

0:41:20.110 --> 0:41:24.290
<v Speaker 2>of one Bezos space-focused enterprise would jump to the other one?

0:41:24.330 --> 0:41:25.190
<v Speaker 2>Or is it a surprise?

0:41:26.830 --> 0:41:27.730
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I don't think it.

0:41:27.730 --> 0:41:30.759
<v Speaker 11>Would be a big surprise. I think what it highlights

0:41:31.080 --> 0:41:36.720
<v Speaker 11>is if you look at the differences between Amazon founder

0:41:36.760 --> 0:41:44.910
<v Speaker 11>Jeff Bezos and Amazon's current CEO, Andy Jassy, Bezos definitely

0:41:45.050 --> 0:41:49.270
<v Speaker 11>has a reputation for having a long term vision, an

0:41:49.330 --> 0:41:54.610
<v Speaker 11>insatiable curiosity and a commitment to projects, to funding projects

0:41:54.850 --> 0:41:59.549
<v Speaker 11>through their, you know, through their entirety. Whereas Jassy has

0:41:59.610 --> 0:42:03.870
<v Speaker 11>a reputation as being more of a financial steward. He's

0:42:03.890 --> 0:42:07.109
<v Speaker 11>going to watch the watch the outflow, watch the investments grow.

0:42:07.370 --> 0:42:09.009
<v Speaker 11>And he's going to be very mindful, like, when are

0:42:09.030 --> 0:42:11.589
<v Speaker 11>we getting a return on this? And if it's not

0:42:11.810 --> 0:42:13.930
<v Speaker 11>showing a return, he's going to cut it. So I

0:42:13.950 --> 0:42:18.180
<v Speaker 11>think that if you're a space engineer, you're just going

0:42:18.200 --> 0:42:22.980
<v Speaker 11>to see Bezos as a more stable company. You know, Bezos'

0:42:23.020 --> 0:42:26.620
<v Speaker 11>Blue Origin is a more stable place to be, whereas Amazon,

0:42:26.640 --> 0:42:28.620
<v Speaker 11>you're going to feel like, you know, a piece of

0:42:28.680 --> 0:42:30.340
<v Speaker 11>a disposable appendage.

0:42:32.510 --> 0:42:35.430
<v Speaker 2>The other sort of leadership factor here is Dave Limp, right?

0:42:35.489 --> 0:42:38.540
<v Speaker 2>So he was the devices chief at Amazon. He's now

0:42:38.560 --> 0:42:41.939
<v Speaker 2>the CEO of Blue Origin. How wide does this sort

0:42:41.980 --> 0:42:44.660
<v Speaker 2>of Amazon alumni network reach at Blue?

0:42:46.020 --> 0:42:50.239
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean, Amazon casts a long shadow and there's

0:42:50.260 --> 0:42:53.190
<v Speaker 11>a lot of people and Seattle is still a fairly

0:42:53.250 --> 0:42:55.750
<v Speaker 11>small town, especially when you get into the field of

0:42:57.550 --> 0:43:01.270
<v Speaker 11>rocket science. You're talking tens of thousands of people in

0:43:01.290 --> 0:43:05.310
<v Speaker 11>this Profession nationally. So it's it is fairly small and

0:43:05.330 --> 0:43:09.899
<v Speaker 11>there's connections. But I really think that Bezos is going

0:43:09.920 --> 0:43:12.200
<v Speaker 11>to Bezos versus Jassy is going to be a much

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:16.730
<v Speaker 11>bigger factor in people calculating their career choices than than

0:43:16.910 --> 0:43:20.149
<v Speaker 11>than any kind of subordinates further down the right down

0:43:20.190 --> 0:43:20.870
<v Speaker 11>the management chain.

0:43:22.260 --> 0:43:25.460
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Spencer Soper, thank you very much indeed. That does

0:43:25.540 --> 0:43:28.000
<v Speaker 2>it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech. A few late

0:43:28.020 --> 0:43:30.339
<v Speaker 2>minute additions, a lot going on. And later today, we're

0:43:30.580 --> 0:43:32.739
<v Speaker 2>going to speak with OpenAI CEO Sam Altman.

0:43:32.739 --> 0:43:33.200
<v Speaker 3>3.30 p.m.

0:43:33.239 --> 0:43:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Eastern, 12.30 p.m. Pacific time. Do not miss it. Recap

0:43:37.280 --> 0:43:39.180
<v Speaker 2>the show on the podcast. You can find it on

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:43.730
<v Speaker 2>the terminal as well as online on Apple, Spotify, and iHeart.

0:43:44.310 --> 0:43:45.189
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech.