WEBVTT - People Are Broadcasting Their Resignations Online and Finding Community With Others Doing the Same

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:03.760
<v Speaker 1>It's Friday, December seventeen. I'm Oscar Ramires from the Daily

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Dive podcast in Los Angeles, and this is reopening America.

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>We've been seeing a lot of action with the Great Resignation,

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>as people quit their jobs for better opportunities. But people

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>aren't just leaving their broadcasting it to social media and

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:20.120
<v Speaker 1>finding a community with others who have done the same. Traditionally,

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>career coaches wouldn't recommend speaking ill of former employers online,

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>but all the rules have changed. Emma Goldberg, reporter at

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times, joins us for more. Thanks for

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>joining us, Emma, thanks for having me on. You know,

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:36.840
<v Speaker 1>throughout the pandemic and the latter half, we've been talking

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:38.880
<v Speaker 1>about the Great Resignation. You know, a lot of people

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>leaving their jobs, moving on. Hopefully it's bigger, bigger and

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:44.239
<v Speaker 1>better things. But what we're seeing in a lot of

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>cases is these big public displays of these resignations, people

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>broadcasting that they quit, you know, going out on social

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>media and you know, letting everybody know, or you know,

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>even videos of how they did it, different things like that.

0:00:57.280 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I know career coaches probably don't feel the best about

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 1>those tactics. But you know, all the rules have kind

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 1>of changed. So Emma, tell us a little bit about it. Yeah,

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 1>that's it's a great question. So I think, as you mentioned,

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>more and more people are starting to pick up on

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the fact that people are leaving their jobs. So the

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>quitting rate, which is the percentage of workers who are

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>voluntarily leaving their jobs, reached three this fall, which is

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>which is really high. There was one and fourteen hospitality workers,

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>for example, quit their job in August. But I think

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>what's notable about this moment is that it's not just

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>at the quitting rate is high. It's also really visible

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>because people are blasting it on social media when they

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:41.680
<v Speaker 1>leave their jobs. To that point, right, uh, Or I

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the rules have kind of changed. You know, that's

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily a lot of what career coaches would probably

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>want or really wasn't what was happening a lot. You know,

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you never wanted to disparage the company that you left

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>or a former boss or something, only because you know

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>it might look bad for the next employer somebody espec

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Now with social media, right, a lot of employers go

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>back and check those feeds. You know, if there's kind

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>of signs of troublemaking or anything like that. You know,

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:11.920
<v Speaker 1>they might want to steer away from hiring you. That's

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. Some of the career coaches that I spoke

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>with are pretty weary about this trend because they noted that, um,

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:22.079
<v Speaker 1>first of all, the labor shortage is not gonna last forever.

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>At some point, jobs are going to be in higher

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:29.240
<v Speaker 1>demands than workers and the others who that. You know,

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>regardless of whether workers are in demand or not, bosses

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and hiring managers are still most likely searching people on

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>social media before hiring them, and they're often going to

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.519
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit skeptical if they saw that person

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:47.640
<v Speaker 1>posting about a former employer or a former boss. Yeah,

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>but for them, for the employers you mentioned also to

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 1>you know that it's this tough balance, right, you know,

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 1>do I hire a dicey person maybe, or do I

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>risk the burnout of others in the company. And that's

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>a key thing, right because these staffing shortages obviously put

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:06.359
<v Speaker 1>more pressure on the remaining employees. You know, if we

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>if we keep that shortage and we keep that pressure

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>up on everybody else, is the burnout worse? Rather than

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>hiring somebody who might have posted something on social media

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly right. It's a tough kind of between a

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:21.360
<v Speaker 1>rock and a hard place for employers. But some of

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:23.519
<v Speaker 1>the experts that I spoke with said that at the

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, right now, what they're most worried

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:29.119
<v Speaker 1>about is these staffing shortages that are going to lead

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to burnout among their employees, and so sometimes they're willing

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 1>to go for those slightly dicier hires, even if it's

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>someone who, let's say, posted a TikTok ranting about a

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>former employer or former boss or the piece you profiled

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Gabby n l O she left her real estate job.

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I think she posted something to TikTok so her followers

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>could see how did her story go? Yeah, Gabby Um

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>is a really fun voice in this piece, and she's

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>someone who was working this really corporate job. She was

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>waking up every morning before five am and then going

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>on this commute to the office where she didn't always

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>necessarily feel like she was getting um the fulfillment and

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the meaning and the benefits that she wanted. So February

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemics we quit her job. She had about

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand dollars in savings and then she posted a

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 1>TikTok about it um what I'm calling a quit talk,

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>where she talked about why she decided to quit, and

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 1>it really resonated with followers, and she ended up starting

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>a podcast called Corporate Quitter that's kind of cheerleading other

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>people who are quitting their jobs as well. Did you

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>did she get another job? Or is the podcast the

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>only thing she does right now? Because the only reason

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 1>why I asked that is, like, you know, then there

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>was no danger really in posting that TikTok if she

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 1>changed career course, you know, she's making money elsewhere, so

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>it would be interesting to see that part of it.

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you're pointing to something really important, which is,

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 1>on the one hand, right now you have you have

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:02.720
<v Speaker 1>career coaches kind of urging people to make snabby choices.

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>But then you have workers who are saying that over

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the past year and a half, they've kind of questioned

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>their values, they've questioned what they want out of their

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>work and out of their working days, and they've decided

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:17.359
<v Speaker 1>that they don't want to go back to corporate life.

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:20.799
<v Speaker 1>So if they're posting something that kind of slams shut

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:23.039
<v Speaker 1>the door behind them, they're not mad about that, and

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 1>they're saying they've realized that they really want more agency

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and ownership over their careers, and in a lot of

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:32.480
<v Speaker 1>cases that means creative pursuits where it's actually to your

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>benefit to build a brand by posting UM. They worsen

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>even about quitting on social media, and to your point,

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, they post the stuff people are, you know,

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe tuning out some of the career coach guidance, you know,

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the things in that area, and they're finding a community

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>on social media. They're finding guidance on social media from

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>other people how they didn't and what they're doing next,

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and you know people take those cues and and use

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that advice as well. Yeah, that's exactly right. People are

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:05.919
<v Speaker 1>giving one another advice about how to quit. I spoke

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>with UM a young woman named g G. Gonzalez who

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.719
<v Speaker 1>left her investment management role, and she actually uses her

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>TikTok in part to kind of give people advice about

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 1>how they can make similar moves to what she did.

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think what's an important point is that for

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>all of these people who I ended up speaking with

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>for the piece UM, the post that they make about

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:27.599
<v Speaker 1>quitting are actually a really important part for them of

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 1>building their brands and allowing them to do the kind

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of creative work that they want to do. So it's

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:35.919
<v Speaker 1>sort of expanding their audience and um and and building

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and amplifying the platform that they have to talk to people.

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>And and they're you know, they're owning what it means

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 1>to be a quitter. To them, being a quitter is

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>is cool. Emma Goldberg, reporter at the New York Times,

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for joining us, Thanks for having

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:56.279
<v Speaker 1>me on. I'm Oscar Ramirez and this has been reopening America.

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget that. For today's big news stories, you can

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:01.480
<v Speaker 1>check me out on the daily I've podcast every Monday

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 1>through Friday. So follow us on I Heart Radio or

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcast. H