WEBVTT - Perrella on Bayer Agreeing to Buy Monsanto (Audio)

0:00:01.320 --> 0:00:04.840
<v Speaker 1>This is taking stock with Gadleys and grim Box on

0:00:04.920 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. Is it really over? Is buyer really going

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to pay sixty six billion dollars for Monsanto? Let's find

0:00:13.400 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>out more from Christopher Perella. He is US chemicals analyst

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:20.639
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Intelligence. Christopher, thank you very much for being

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>with us. Before we get to the details of the deal,

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>tell me exactly your perspective from the chemical business point

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:32.159
<v Speaker 1>of view. Why would the deal get done at a

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>time when crop prices are dropping? Doesn't that mean that

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>farmers have less money to spend on the very products

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>that buyer is looking to acquire. Oh, that's a good point, Pim,

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think the key here is to U to

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>give farmers and all in bundle of seeds and crop chemicals. Uh,

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>serve up an agronomic solution of farmers that you can

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>package and sell out and drive sales growth that way,

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>while the mark waits for crop prices to improve and

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:07.199
<v Speaker 1>thus the outlook for all these companies to improve. So uh,

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>it's uh, well, just let's start with some of the

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 1>nuts and bolts. The deal A good deal, I guess

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:15.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a good deal in the basics sense. It's going

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to get done. And there's been quite a bit of

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>back and forth. Right, it does here that it's going

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 1>to get done. Um. Some of the risks so behind

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the deal a lot of debt that has to go out.

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Buyer has to do some heavy lifting to finance this

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:33.479
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine billion in debt nineteen billion and mandatory convertible

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>bonds and rights issues. Um. And if they can maintain

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 1>investment grade rating, which is going to be a key

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to the deal, I think that helps them. Maybe uh

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>with the ECB and their corporate bond purchase program that

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 1>might that might also come into play as part of

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>this deal as well. Well. Perhaps what they could do

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>is they could actually sell the bonds directly to the

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>European Central Bank. Right, quite quite possible with the disclaimer

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>that I am not a credit anim us in Europe,

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>but that that that does seem like a reasonable suggestion.

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, So now go into a little bit of

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 1>detail in terms of the businesses that will be combined

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and what the future company might look like. Right. So

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:16.920
<v Speaker 1>from the egg perspective, which is the focus of this deal,

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you have Munsano, the leader in biotech seeds um and

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>buyers number three in the crop chemical world, So you're

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>combining seeds and sprays. But what it really does is

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>that farmers care about it. In turn, regulators care about

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>is it gives it. It's it's yield in the field

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:38.920
<v Speaker 1>for farmers. UM Whether you develop a biotech seed that

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>helps the plant grow better or that fights off disease

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>or pesticides, or if you develop a chemical that does

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>something similar doesn't matter to the farmer. It's it's all

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>about driving yields for the farmer, and regulators probably will

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>look at it from from a similar perspective In terms

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>of um. Seeds and crop chemicals really do compete against

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>each other. It's just a different avenues to to get

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>that yield. Uh, and higher yields higher income for the

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>farmers out in the field. Now that being said, those

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>two businesses put together, combined with buyers existing farm of business,

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's basically the company is going to be half

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:20.359
<v Speaker 1>pharmaceuticals and half a can biotech seeds, which raises a

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>number of questions about the long term viability of of

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:28.800
<v Speaker 1>of a model like that. So, uh, the big picture

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 1>that some are framing is that this is something that

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to reshape the farming industry a whole new

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>way of doing things. Uh, do you buy onto this

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>or is that? Is it really going to be that

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>much of a kind of landmark deal to make a

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>new kind of approach here. Um, it's not a new

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of approach. It's the the ongoing evolution. So I

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't say that it's a a leap forward so much

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>as it it's the way that the market seems to

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>be heading. With Syngenta pioneering the model a few years

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>back they started combining the seeds marketing, the seeds and

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the chemicals, UM Down and do Pont getting together to

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>create all three companies out of two but one of

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>which will be an exact lookalike with seeds and crop

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>protection chemicals put together. It's it's an evolution in terms

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of R and D where the the they're developing seeds

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>now that respond or that are tolerant of of certain chemicals.

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>So you're you're locking in a farmer not only to

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:36.919
<v Speaker 1>the seed, but then that seed is locking in hopefully

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:38.839
<v Speaker 1>your own chemical that the farmer is going to have

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>to use on that. That raises another regulatory issue down

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the road as well. But all these all these are

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>driving yield in the field for the farmer, and then

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of the evolution of the business is where where

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>it's headed. Is there a possibility that regulators will come

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>back and say, even though there's not a lot of

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:59.919
<v Speaker 1>overlap in the business of Buyer and UH and Monsanta,

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:02.799
<v Speaker 1>that the combined company is going to account for thirty

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:09.160
<v Speaker 1>percent of global crop inputs business, and that they just

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>will not allow that. Inasmuch as we've seen these other

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:17.600
<v Speaker 1>as you describe previous giant chemical deals right right, and

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and people should note that Monsanto Buyer is number four

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>in the line of chemical deals, behind Keim China's and

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>gentadpot and Pottish Corporate Agrium in the fertilizer space as well. UM.

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Some areas that that would probably engender regulatory scrutiny right

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>off the bat would be US cotton seed, where buyer

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>actually bought its cotton seed business from Montsanto about a

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:46.279
<v Speaker 1>decade ago. UH Canola, some swaving oils and and there's

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>some some crop chemical overlap as well. And then that

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:54.840
<v Speaker 1>also raises the regulatory um outlook of looking at these

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>deals in total, all four deals going off at the

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 1>same time, how does that reshape the market, and you

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 1>do raise a very very good point about the entire

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>global crop input market being UH controlled by one player

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:10.280
<v Speaker 1>there at that point. So there's a lot of a

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of question marks, UH from a regulatory perspective. With

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the steel where do you see the most growth for

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>this company? UH? Monsanto of course has UH I'd say

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>for people who are concerned about things like gene and

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:30.919
<v Speaker 1>genetically modified organisms and crops, Europeans seem to be have

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:33.039
<v Speaker 1>kind of led the way on on that one. Is

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:37.280
<v Speaker 1>it less of an issue in Asia? In Africa? The

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>concern about round up it's herbicide UH glyphosphate, right, the

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:46.039
<v Speaker 1>trade name is round up continues to spark not only

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>opposition from opponents of GMO, but more and more health

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and environment environment experts globally are jumping on the bandmag

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.239
<v Speaker 1>and at some point does that catch up with this company.

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>There's a great, great point, a very important issue there.

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:05.719
<v Speaker 1>The um, the growth um. Depending on the country and

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>depending on the politics of the country, the growth of

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>biotech seeds is either embraced or of the complete opposite

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of that um, depending on the region and how how

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>much they need UH. The the input, the yield there

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>from from the seeds. Um So, it's it's going to

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>be continue to be a good growth story or the

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>driving growth story is really the adoption of biotech seeds

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and the upgrading of those said seeds. UH. The roundup

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>product is the most applied herbicide in the in the world,

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and it is UH Monsano seeds are basically any genetically

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>modified seed and I'm generalizing a little bit, UH is

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>tolerant of that herbicide. It's a it's a key UH

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 1>input in the global agg business. And it's that it's

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>been that way for almost twenty years now at this point.

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Um So, there there is pushback and it depends on

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the region, but it's it's going to be a continued

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>growth driver for this new company going forward. Have we

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>seen this type of consolidation before in the chemicals industry? Uh?

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>This is UH this is sort of a unique time

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 1>in the chemicals industry in the last year or so,

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>UM not that I can remember. It's been a while

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>UH for for this level of consolidation. But as as

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:26.239
<v Speaker 1>growth slows and people are looking for better ways to

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>put their balance sheets to work, cheap debt and slow growth,

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a resulting in this wave of mergers here?

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>And what are you hearing from analysts beside yourself? You're

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:39.839
<v Speaker 1>certainly an analyst Bloomberg Intelligence, But what what? What is

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:42.319
<v Speaker 1>this sort of the consensus or is there a consensus

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:47.199
<v Speaker 1>on the street? Um? I think the the street consensus

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>could could be characterized as a coin flip between people

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>that like the deal and don't like the deal, So

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that I guess the consensus is there's an even lack

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:00.200
<v Speaker 1>of consensus on the street as as to the the

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 1>merits of the deal and who's getting the better of it.

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>A lack of consensus for a sixties six billion dollar

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>deal for mont Santo and UH and buyer. Is there

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>anybody left? I mean, every now and again I hear

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>be a SF might have been interested in a bid

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>for Monsanto? Is there anybody left left to buy? Um?

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Not really, you would have to go much smaller in

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 1>scale among the crop chemical companies, UH and the fertilizer

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>companies to where these deals are taking place. B A

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>s F has gone it alone. They actually have a

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 1>an R and D relationship with Montsanto, which I guess

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 1>they'll now have with their their fellow countrymen down the road.

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 1>There UM once those deals consummated. But there's there's only

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 1>really three or four large players of a global scale

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>in the market, with a sort of a mere mid

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>tier UH to follow. But there's not much left, all right,

0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Christopher Prela, you certainly covered that story up one side

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and down the other. Buyer agreeing to buy Monsanto in

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>a sixty six billion dollar deal will be the largest

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>take over the year if it goes through. I'm Cafe Mason,

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>pim Fox, and this is Bloomberg.