1
00:00:00,280 --> 00:00:02,920
Speaker 1: Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve Camray.

2
00:00:03,160 --> 00:00:07,320
Speaker 1: It's ready. Are you welcome to Stuff you should know

3
00:00:07,880 --> 00:00:10,680
Speaker 1: from how Stuff Works dot Com? Brought to you by

4
00:00:10,880 --> 00:00:15,520
Speaker 1: Consumer Guide Automotive We make Garbine easier. Hello, and welcome

5
00:00:15,560 --> 00:00:18,240
Speaker 1: to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark, as staff writer here

6
00:00:18,280 --> 00:00:20,920
Speaker 1: at how Stuff Works dot Com. With me is my trust,

7
00:00:20,960 --> 00:00:23,600
Speaker 1: the edit, Tricks, the Intrepid, Candice Gifts and how are

8
00:00:23,600 --> 00:00:27,440
Speaker 1: you Candidas? Well, I hope you are feeling intrepid right now.

9
00:00:27,480 --> 00:00:30,360
Speaker 1: We're about to enter some grizzly territory. Let's talk about

10
00:00:30,440 --> 00:00:33,960
Speaker 1: Jack the Ripper, shall we? Indeed? Okay, so specifically, could

11
00:00:34,040 --> 00:00:37,560
Speaker 1: Jack the Ripper have been an artist? Ah the artists

12
00:00:37,600 --> 00:00:40,560
Speaker 1: formerly known as Jack the Ripper a k a. One

13
00:00:40,760 --> 00:00:44,600
Speaker 1: Walter Sickert, a British impressionist painter. He would have been

14
00:00:44,600 --> 00:00:47,360
Speaker 1: twenty eight around the time of the famous Ripper murders,

15
00:00:47,440 --> 00:00:51,600
Speaker 1: also called the Canonical murders. These take place back from

16
00:00:51,680 --> 00:00:54,480
Speaker 1: August thirty one November nine, just as had the scene

17
00:00:54,520 --> 00:00:56,080
Speaker 1: for you, and it would have been more than just

18
00:00:56,200 --> 00:00:59,680
Speaker 1: doves crying and that dank and depraved east end of

19
00:00:59,760 --> 00:01:01,880
Speaker 1: line done in the Whitechapel District. It would have been

20
00:01:01,920 --> 00:01:05,679
Speaker 1: the sound of prostitutes. Um More specifically, his prey of

21
00:01:05,800 --> 00:01:12,280
Speaker 1: choice was the alcoholic, drunk, middle aged and unattractive prostitutes.

22
00:01:12,720 --> 00:01:15,080
Speaker 1: It's the unattractive part that really gets you, you know.

23
00:01:15,200 --> 00:01:18,080
Speaker 1: I mean, it's bad enough as it is, but unattractive

24
00:01:18,160 --> 00:01:22,240
Speaker 1: to the problem is is Jack the Ripper was never caught,

25
00:01:22,760 --> 00:01:26,360
Speaker 1: and as such, a kind of field of amateur investigation

26
00:01:26,400 --> 00:01:30,240
Speaker 1: called ripparology has grown up over the centuries um of

27
00:01:30,560 --> 00:01:33,640
Speaker 1: people who dedicate their time trying to figure out who

28
00:01:33,800 --> 00:01:36,520
Speaker 1: Jack the Ripper was, right, right, right, And over the

29
00:01:36,600 --> 00:01:39,399
Speaker 1: years police departments in London to have fingered about a

30
00:01:39,520 --> 00:01:43,440
Speaker 1: hundred seventy suspects in the case, but no one's ever

31
00:01:43,480 --> 00:01:47,400
Speaker 1: been definitively convicted of the crime. And back in two

32
00:01:47,440 --> 00:01:51,160
Speaker 1: thousand two, someone who wasn't even a real ripparologist sort

33
00:01:51,160 --> 00:01:53,280
Speaker 1: of took a stab at the case, no pun intended,

34
00:01:53,600 --> 00:01:56,920
Speaker 1: and that was crime novelist Patricia Cornwell. And she was

35
00:01:56,960 --> 00:02:00,480
Speaker 1: the one who named Walter Sickert. And she had you know, um,

36
00:02:00,680 --> 00:02:04,240
Speaker 1: hard evidence and some sort of I don't know, loosely

37
00:02:04,320 --> 00:02:06,920
Speaker 1: based evidence, and the loosely based evidence was sort of

38
00:02:06,920 --> 00:02:12,120
Speaker 1: relevant to her to her interpretation of Secrets art. Now actually, um, yeah,

39
00:02:12,760 --> 00:02:16,880
Speaker 1: she considered some of Secrets paintings confessional, like he had

40
00:02:16,919 --> 00:02:21,160
Speaker 1: actually painted, um or used the murdered prostitutes that he

41
00:02:21,480 --> 00:02:24,600
Speaker 1: murdered as models for some of his paintings, and that

42
00:02:24,680 --> 00:02:27,640
Speaker 1: that um, he was either tawning police or getting this

43
00:02:27,720 --> 00:02:30,200
Speaker 1: off his chest through these paintings, or he could have

44
00:02:30,200 --> 00:02:33,160
Speaker 1: been super authentic because he was taught under the school

45
00:02:33,320 --> 00:02:37,280
Speaker 1: of American painter James Whistler, who recommended that secret paint

46
00:02:37,360 --> 00:02:39,600
Speaker 1: from life. So, um, if you wanted to paint dead

47
00:02:39,600 --> 00:02:43,000
Speaker 1: prostitutes only made sense. Awesome first, what better way to

48
00:02:43,000 --> 00:02:45,280
Speaker 1: do it than? Yeah than that? Now? Actually, in a

49
00:02:45,400 --> 00:02:50,119
Speaker 1: nine FBI psychological profile of Jack the Ripper, um, one

50
00:02:50,120 --> 00:02:52,639
Speaker 1: of the one of the points they concluded was that

51
00:02:52,919 --> 00:02:57,480
Speaker 1: the Ripper probably would have um either gotten some of

52
00:02:57,520 --> 00:03:00,480
Speaker 1: his rage out in between murders by drawing pictures of

53
00:03:00,520 --> 00:03:05,000
Speaker 1: brutalized women, are writing, you know, fantasy stories about brutalizing women,

54
00:03:05,080 --> 00:03:08,320
Speaker 1: so sicker kind of fits that bill. But really, one

55
00:03:08,360 --> 00:03:11,520
Speaker 1: of the problems with basing your theory on art is

56
00:03:11,560 --> 00:03:16,280
Speaker 1: that artists so widely open to interpretation, especially impressionism. Yeah,

57
00:03:16,360 --> 00:03:18,440
Speaker 1: and that's what's kind of wild about this point of

58
00:03:18,480 --> 00:03:21,440
Speaker 1: Cornwell's argument. The painting that she was using as her

59
00:03:21,440 --> 00:03:24,079
Speaker 1: most damning evidence was called the camed in Town Murder,

60
00:03:24,120 --> 00:03:25,880
Speaker 1: and this featured a man sitting on the edge of

61
00:03:25,880 --> 00:03:28,160
Speaker 1: a bed and while he's dressed, there's a woman in

62
00:03:28,200 --> 00:03:32,360
Speaker 1: bed whose neket and ostensibly dead, and she was saying, look, look,

63
00:03:32,360 --> 00:03:35,360
Speaker 1: this is it, y'all. This is the ultimate tantamount confession.

64
00:03:36,080 --> 00:03:39,000
Speaker 1: But another critic pointed out that the painting has an

65
00:03:39,000 --> 00:03:42,320
Speaker 1: alternate title, and that is what shall we do for rent? Right?

66
00:03:42,360 --> 00:03:46,680
Speaker 1: So the the murderer and murdered woman go uh to

67
00:03:47,040 --> 00:03:49,880
Speaker 1: a desperate couple down on their luck, just with the

68
00:03:49,960 --> 00:03:53,760
Speaker 1: change of the time, right right, very here, scu a tonue.

69
00:03:55,240 --> 00:03:59,200
Speaker 1: She she didn't base her theory entirely on her interpretation

70
00:03:59,240 --> 00:04:03,280
Speaker 1: of secrets, though she actually um with her vast millions

71
00:04:03,640 --> 00:04:06,760
Speaker 1: um purchased some paintings to try to find clues and

72
00:04:06,800 --> 00:04:10,520
Speaker 1: actually tore one apart, which the curator of the Royal

73
00:04:10,560 --> 00:04:15,800
Speaker 1: Academy in London later called monstrously stupid publicly um that action.

74
00:04:16,040 --> 00:04:18,640
Speaker 1: But she also had some hard evidence. Yeah, she has

75
00:04:18,640 --> 00:04:22,920
Speaker 1: an empty DNA in her bag, mitchondrial DNA and the

76
00:04:23,080 --> 00:04:26,040
Speaker 1: glitch with this is that monicondrial DNA only comes from

77
00:04:26,040 --> 00:04:28,720
Speaker 1: our mother's lineage, so it's discounting your your father's and

78
00:04:28,839 --> 00:04:31,599
Speaker 1: put into you essentially, So using that to confirm the

79
00:04:31,640 --> 00:04:36,200
Speaker 1: identity of someone is only half right. It's and it

80
00:04:36,240 --> 00:04:39,640
Speaker 1: turns out it left about fifty thou people in London

81
00:04:39,680 --> 00:04:42,560
Speaker 1: at that time it could have produced a match. Strangely though,

82
00:04:42,640 --> 00:04:44,560
Speaker 1: one of them was Walter Sicker. And the way she

83
00:04:44,600 --> 00:04:48,080
Speaker 1: found a match was she compared um some secrets DNA

84
00:04:48,360 --> 00:04:51,840
Speaker 1: with DNA samples taken from the Ripper letters. Now, from

85
00:04:52,040 --> 00:04:54,800
Speaker 1: the time of the murders till about nineteen sixty, hundreds

86
00:04:54,800 --> 00:04:58,160
Speaker 1: of letters came in ostensibly written by Jack the Ripper. Um.

87
00:04:58,200 --> 00:05:01,960
Speaker 1: Most ripperologists don't think he out any of them. But um,

88
00:05:02,040 --> 00:05:06,040
Speaker 1: she Cornwell found that Secret had written one or two

89
00:05:06,080 --> 00:05:08,359
Speaker 1: of them. Uh. Now she kind of jumped to a

90
00:05:08,400 --> 00:05:10,800
Speaker 1: conclusion saying that you know, in her opinion that meant

91
00:05:10,800 --> 00:05:14,720
Speaker 1: he was the Ripper. But uh a ripperologist, um kind

92
00:05:14,720 --> 00:05:17,880
Speaker 1: of put it into perspective. Thanking Cornwell for all of

93
00:05:17,880 --> 00:05:21,159
Speaker 1: her hard work and research improving that Walter Secret was

94
00:05:21,200 --> 00:05:23,760
Speaker 1: indeed one of the people who wrote fraudulent Jack the

95
00:05:23,839 --> 00:05:26,920
Speaker 1: Ripper letters so well, that was rather tongue in chic

96
00:05:27,040 --> 00:05:29,359
Speaker 1: and if you want to learn more about this case,

97
00:05:29,400 --> 00:05:32,000
Speaker 1: there's so much more to learn. Check out Could Jack

98
00:05:32,040 --> 00:05:34,360
Speaker 1: the Ripper have been an artist? On how stuff works

99
00:05:34,480 --> 00:05:38,360
Speaker 1: dot com? For more on this and thousands of other topics.

100
00:05:38,600 --> 00:05:41,440
Speaker 1: Is that how stuff works dot com. Let us know

101
00:05:41,520 --> 00:05:44,400
Speaker 1: what you think. Send an email to podcast at how

102
00:05:44,480 --> 00:05:49,680
Speaker 1: stuff works dot com. Brought to you by the reinvented

103
00:05:49,720 --> 00:05:52,440
Speaker 1: two thousand twelve Camray. It's ready, are you