WEBVTT - How AI Companies are Monetizing Intimacy, Ft. Bridget Todd 

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Cool Zone Media.

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to it could happen here. I'm Garrison Davis.

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Today we have a very special episode because we are

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:16.639
<v Speaker 2>talking once again to Bridget Todd, who we've had on

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 2>a few times. But Bridget has a new book, Love

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:25.240
<v Speaker 2>at First prompt to AI and the Future of Intimacy,

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 2>and we will be discussing how AI companies are trying

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:31.639
<v Speaker 2>to sell you love and how that might have a

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:36.559
<v Speaker 2>few problems beyond the sort of face conceit that I

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:39.159
<v Speaker 2>think you know everyone can pick up on, there might

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 2>even be more problems underneath the underneath the hood. So

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 2>thank you Bridget for coming on.

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much for having me. I'm thrilled to

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:47.919
<v Speaker 3>be back here. How did you.

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 2>First decide this is something that you want to, like

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 2>dedicate months of your life to researching.

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's a great place to start.

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 4>I think like a lot of folks listening, I would

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 4>hear these stories about individuals who would say things like

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 4>I am in love with chat Shept or I am

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 4>having some sort of intimate sexual.

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:08.680
<v Speaker 3>Relationship with an AI companion.

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 4>And I can admit that my reaction to a lot

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 4>of those those headlines where something is wrong with this

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 4>person this person is pathetic, or maybe this person is

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:22.319
<v Speaker 4>super lonely, super sad. They're putting themselves at great risk

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 4>for harm. And you know, I once had this therapist

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 4>who told me that judgment and curiosity could not coexist,

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 4>And so I realized I was really treating these stories

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 4>with such kind of knee jerk negative reaction and judgment.

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 4>And then I heard Mark Zuckerberg on a podcast talking

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 4>about how he thought in ten years time, while everybody,

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 4>including everybody listening, was going to have AI friends AI companions.

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 4>He said that most people don't feel like they have

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 4>enough friends to have a nourishing social life, and that

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 4>in the future it won't be a big deal.

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 3>If all of us have AI companion.

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 4>So what he didn't say is that it would be

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 4>AI that he owns, operates, and profits from. But I

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 4>got to thinking, you know, if Mark Zuckerbern and other

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 4>tech leaders are designing futures involving technology where they believe

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 4>this will be commonplace, whether the average person wants it

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 4>to be or not, we should really be looking to

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 4>the people who are already there to tell us what

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 4>brought them to experiencing intimacy with AI and what the

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 4>risks and ramifications. Might be it's time to stop treating

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 4>these people like pathetic freak shows and sort of listening

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 4>to what they're actually saying, because it couldn't behove all

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 4>of us to know where we could be headed.

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 2>No, the freak show aspect, I think is as a

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:39.080
<v Speaker 2>real inhibitor towards actually understanding this problem because I mean

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:41.239
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the first sort of like reports around

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 2>this sort of thing, you know, like AI girlfriends, right,

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:45.919
<v Speaker 2>it has this sort of freak element, you know, even

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 2>even the way that we maybe talk about this on

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 2>the show when we're like reporting at cees. You know,

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 2>we walked through all these you know, ridiculous AI gadgets.

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, we saw like you know, like an AI

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:02.679
<v Speaker 2>sex doll essentially that has a very like low quality

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 2>chat bought component that can't really you know, understand what

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 2>you're saying very often. But I think it is a

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 2>mistake just assume that this tech will always stay in

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:14.919
<v Speaker 2>its kind of janky form. This stuff is rapidly advancing.

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:16.919
<v Speaker 2>It is, it is, it is going to get better.

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm just kind of denying that I think sort of

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 2>pushes the problem, you know, down the road. Yeah, Like, no,

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 2>this is this, This is a real problem now and

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 2>this requires like regulation and intense, intense like intervention right now.

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 2>And just to kind of assuming that as it is

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 2>all like all these like little niche things, only you know,

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 2>crazy people are going to fall for this. The tech

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 2>is bad. I think that that is I think overlooking

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 2>what is legitimately like a you know, a society wide problem.

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I am so glad you said that, because one

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 4>of the researchers that I interviewed for the audiobook Love

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 4>at First Prompt is doctor Kate Devlin. She was really

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 4>one of the first people to sort of take seriously

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:57.839
<v Speaker 4>the intersection of AI and robots and intimacy. And when

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 4>she first started doing this, the place that she started

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 4>looking was exactly the kind of thing that you saw

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 4>at cees, right, these physical, life size sex bots that

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 4>were also enabled with a kind of at the time

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 4>low grade AI chatbot quality. If you were around a

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 4>few years ago, you probably saw so much breathless reporting

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 4>that was like, oh, men are going to be buying

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 4>these sex dolls and they're gonna not need wives and

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 4>girlfriends all that. Now that ended up sort of not

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 4>being the case. People do buy those sex dolls, but

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 4>they're really expensive, they're not really that practical, so they're

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 4>really kind of a super niche thing. What did take

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 4>off was the AI intimacy part of that.

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 3>That's what doctor Devlin really saw. She said.

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 4>The physical bop part of this is probably not going

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:46.919
<v Speaker 4>to take off in mainstream ways. The AI companion AI

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 4>intimacy chat bop feature of these physical dolls, that's what we're.

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 3>Gonna see kind of become more mainstream.

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 4>And you know, again, a lot of people listening probably

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 4>think this sounds really niche, But I think Pugh said

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 4>that one ten Americans already use AI for some form

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 4>of intimacy.

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 3>That's about as many Americans are left handed.

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, when you look at younger folks, folks under thirty,

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:12.359
<v Speaker 4>that number jumps to one in five who are already

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Speaker 4>using AI for some sort of emotional support. So this

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 4>idea that it's this niche thing, yeah only weirdos are

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 4>doing it really isn't align with what we're actually seeing.

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 2>This is I think part of the problem with like,

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, living in your own little Internet silo, right

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 2>because like you and your you know, blue Sky friends

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 2>might think that no one uses AI, knowing that you know,

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 2>serious knowing that I know would use AI.

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 2>It's there's this sort of like ideological like resistance to AI,

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 2>and I think that is a very isolating look look

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 2>at the world, because while that might be true for

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 2>you and your friends online or maybe your social circle,

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 2>there is millions of people who go through the world

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 2>every day who use these things and they just think

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 2>of it as like an extension of the Internet, right,

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 2>because that's what it is. For a lot of people,

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 2>like that is what it is. They don't have these

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 2>sorts of like moral frameworks around whether or not you

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 2>should use claude, whether or not you should use chat

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:07.119
<v Speaker 2>GPT that I think you see among a certain strain

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:10.280
<v Speaker 2>of like you know, like liberal like leftist online. And

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 2>the other thing that kind of that when that silo

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 2>produces is that it makes it so that I think

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to understand that for people using these tools

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 2>every day the same way you might use a search engine, right,

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 2>the same way you might use you know, of real

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 2>friends like bounce. Ideas off of how much that sort

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 2>of regular use can develop a sort of intimate component,

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:35.359
<v Speaker 2>the line between AI girlfriend and tool you talk to

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 2>online might not be as like clear as what some

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 2>people might first assume. I know, this is something that

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 2>you discussed in the book. I mean, that's that's one

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 2>of the things I think to be It's one of

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 2>the most interesting is like, how fuzzy this kind of

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 2>barrier actually is.

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 4>Oh. Yes, So even before I was deeply interested and

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 4>sort of consumed on this topic, one of the most

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 4>fascinating things that I witnessed and sort of saw with

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 4>my own eyes was when chat GPT changed models.

0:06:57.760 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, they had that four Oho model.

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So do you remember that was a model that

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 4>like people were really developing these intimate connections with because

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 4>it was so sickathantic, it was so kind of human, like,

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 4>quote unquote, when you asked it a question, it wouldn't

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 4>just say here's the answer. It would be like, dear,

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 4>you're so perceptive for even asking such.

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 3>A smart question.

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 4>And so what really deeply fascinated me was that when

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 4>open ai switched that model to make it less sickathantic,

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 4>less sort of glazing, less complimentary.

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 3>People who did not report.

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 4>That they were having any kind of intimate connection with AI,

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 4>who would not have said I have an AI girlfriend

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 4>or AI companion, Yeah, who were just using it exactly

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 4>as you described, like a search engine. Those same people

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 4>got online and expressed something like grief.

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely yeah.

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 4>I remember reading someone on a ao Reddit form saying

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 4>it feels as if my friendly cheerleader in my pocket

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 4>got replaced overnight with a terse, overworked secretary. And so

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 4>I think you're exactly right that our brains are designed

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 4>to project human qualities and human intimacy onto things that

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 4>we know are logically not human. And it really the

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 4>way that these things are designed really easily blurs that

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 4>line for folks.

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's trying to, you know, be as human

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 2>as as possible for its own for its own reason,

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 2>so that people use it more so that it's not

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, a cold emotionalist AI that that is maybe

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 2>a little bit hostile to the user. Obviously they don't

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 2>want that, so so yeah, they want to be approachable.

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 2>But I think the specific thing you're talking about, the

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:33.320
<v Speaker 2>switching from from one GPT model to the other, from

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 2>this like overly like you know, praising kind of like

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 2>it just almost almost annoyingly so model towards something that

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 2>is a little bit more cold. It produce these reactions

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 2>online with the people that are like basically acting like

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 2>a friend died and like that was essentially what it was.

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:50.680
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Imagine if you were talking to you know, a real

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 2>person online for like two years and then suddenly they

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 2>stop for suddenly they had a complete personality change, and

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 2>it's like like there was no way to talk to

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:05.199
<v Speaker 2>that other person again. That is basically the equivalent of

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 2>like what happened to a lot of people.

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 4>I think it's easy to make fun of that or

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 4>to other people who report this, but I don't think

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 4>that it's really right to discount the way that online

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 4>connections really do make people feel and really feel like

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 4>they are.

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Validating and feeling a need that people have.

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 4>You know, it's easy to say, oh, it's just an

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 4>online friend or an online community or an AI bot.

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 4>I've talked to people who said, oh, this video game

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 4>that I was obsessed with, it's gone.

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 3>And you know this has filled my life for two years.

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:55.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's real. Do you want to get into some

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 2>of the sort of problems beneath the surface of this,

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 2>beyond the sort of you know, maybe socially alienating aspects,

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 2>the issues of people having to turn towards these things

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 2>to kind of have have some connection, but actually now

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:12.319
<v Speaker 2>kind of discuss the motivations of the companies behind these

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 2>products and like why they are designing them this way,

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 2>and the sort of risks inherent towards having these sorts

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 2>of tools be run by and owned by companies with

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 2>like for profitence sideps.

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:24.719
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you really said it.

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 4>I think that we are spending far too much time

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 4>looking at individual users and sort of moralizing about what

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 4>brings individual people to this kind of connection with AI.

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 3>It kind of goes back to what you were saying about.

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:41.320
<v Speaker 4>You know, I'm not a big AI person myself, but

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:43.679
<v Speaker 4>I think that it goes back to this idea of

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 4>conversations about the ethics around AI use being hyper focused

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 4>on individuals, whether or not individuals are good or bad,

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 4>or pathetic or this or that if they use AI,

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 4>when really I think the conversation has to be about

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 4>the companies and what the companies from the people who

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:03.679
<v Speaker 4>run them are doing, how they are designing this AI.

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:07.839
<v Speaker 4>Because I can tell you AI chatbots like chatjetpt are

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 4>intentionally designed to keep you talking and to keep you

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 4>engaged because they want you to be more and more

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 4>locked into their AI. You know, I went through a

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 4>personal crisis myself where I was caring for my dying

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 4>father and was really thrust into a medical situation that

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 4>was way above my pay grate as a podcaster. And

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 4>I will admit that, in moments of extreme vulnerability, turned

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 4>to AI to try to get questions answered about navigating

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 4>insurance companies, navigating Medicare and medicaid, all of that. Sure,

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 4>And the way that chatchapt did not just give me

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 4>the answer or try to give me something that looks

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 4>like an answer, it was this seems really hard, are

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 4>you asking because you're dealing with this yourself. And so

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 4>it's the way that AI is designed to ask increasingly intimate,

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 4>sensitive questions of the people who use it with intention.

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 4>I think that it's not any wonder that individuals might

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:07.439
<v Speaker 4>find themselves becoming ensnared in that, because that's exactly how

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 4>they were designed by these for profit companies.

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if you're asking it like logistical problems, you

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 2>help help me navigate the process to file and insurance claim.

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, you using it as this sort of like

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, advanced like Internet assistant, but then in doing so,

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 2>it kind of latches onto, you know, vulnerabilities that they

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 2>can infer from the from the types of questions you're

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:31.559
<v Speaker 2>asking and try to like, you know, coax out more

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 2>information that I mean that that's like an incredibly insidious process.

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, you're you want you want it to help

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 2>with like a very you know, direct task, and then

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 2>in its sly way of of maybe doing that, it's

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 2>trying to introduce the sort of like personal therapeutic element.

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:50.679
<v Speaker 2>And like what happens to that data, Like what is

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 2>it what is it using that sort of record of

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 2>your own like personal experiences for.

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 4>I am sad to report? The answer is we don't

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 4>really know. Recently, I mean, that's really just what it is.

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 4>The FTC recently asked some of the major AI chatbot

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 4>companies to give clarity about how these companies are monetizing

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:13.559
<v Speaker 4>engagement and how they are using the sort of intimate,

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 4>personal sensitive information that is obtained with these conversations. So

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 4>we really don't know a ton, But to your point,

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, it's not just chat GPT knows when I'm lonely.

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 4>Chat GPT knows when I'm sad or scared. It's chat GPT.

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 4>This computer knows exactly what works on me when I

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 4>am lonely or vulnerable or scared, and so that to

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 4>me opens up an entire new level of potential for

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 4>surveillance and control. And so people have asked me a

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 4>lot of times, you know, is.

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 3>It so bad if people are.

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 4>Getting fulfillment or emotional support from AI? The question is

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:53.080
<v Speaker 4>really not if it's bad or good or pathetic or

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 4>not or whatever, It's what are the companies doing. Are

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 4>the companies behaving ethically? And are they really honoring the

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 4>deep sensitive nature of the information they are intentionally harvesting

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 4>from people often at their lowest or most vulnerable moments.

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna reckon to say probably not. I think that

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 2>the interests of these companies are probably slightly different from

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 2>your personal interests as a person or you know, obviously

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 2>like this is the sort of interests of like yo,

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 2>like a therapist or a friend. Immediate guesses is first

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 2>an evolution of advertising, like how search engine optimization has

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 2>transformed from companies trying to optimize for Google Search to

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 2>now trying to optimize for lllms like chat GPT and

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 2>to have your products be recommended to users by chat

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 2>GPT by creating posts online specifically intending for those posts

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 2>to be read by chat GPT and then regurgitated back

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 2>to the user. And for the past few months, open

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Air has been experimenting with ways to make direct purchases

0:14:56.320 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 2>through chat GPT, and of course companies pay open just

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 2>to put full ads at the bottom of your chat

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 2>GPT logs, oftentimes based on your query. The other thing

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 2>is more so kind of like you know, like the

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Walmart like Uber model, like they introduce a service that

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 2>is very cheap to start, possibly free, and then people

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 2>get hooked on the service and then they jack out

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 2>the price, which is kind of what open eyes made

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 2>model has been thus far. And I could I could

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 2>see that becoming a real problem if you have you know,

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 2>thousands millions of people who use this tool both as

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 2>like a tool online. You know, this is an extension

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 2>of types of things that the Internet has like been

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 2>operating on for years, but using them in this much

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 2>more personally manipult of way because of this sort of

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, emotional intimate component of like you're talking to

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 2>something that now just doesn't send information back to you,

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 2>but talks back to you like a person does. And

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 2>if that is the you know, one of the primary

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 2>ways you interact with the Internet, you can easily get

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 2>hooked on that, and then once they're hooked on that chat,

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 2>GPT can start boosting that price exactly.

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 4>And I think these products are only going to get

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 4>better and better at convincing us that you're talking to

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 4>a person, not AI. And I think the more that happens,

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 4>the easier it becomes to sort of forget that you

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 4>are actually disclosing intimate information to a private company, depending

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 4>on what AI are using, a company that has incredibly

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 4>cozy ties to the Trump administration.

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 3>So when people ask me like, is it bad to

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 3>be in.

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 4>A relationship quote unquote with AI, I said that do

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 4>you want to be in a relationship with Sam Altman?

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 4>Do you want to be in a relationship with Mark

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 4>Zuckerberg or Elon Musk or Donald Trump? That's really who

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 4>you are in a relationship with. And don't let the AI,

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 4>they're human like flattering, you know, back and forth, make

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 4>you forget that reality.

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Do you have any sorts of idea of what we

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 2>should do about the problem. I guess has governments started

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 2>to regulate the way that these ais communicate with people

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 2>is their efforts to kind of adopt our privacy policies

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 2>to this like new emerging threat.

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 4>I guess, yeah, that's a really good question. So I

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 4>would say the most clear cut legislation we see in China,

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 4>folksmen have heard that China's government just recently cracked down

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:19.959
<v Speaker 4>on AI companions and the ways that AI companions can

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 4>be designed to connect with people.

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:23.199
<v Speaker 3>They really cracked down on that.

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 4>Interestingly, in the United States, we're not really having that

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 4>conversation in the same way. It might not surprise you

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 4>to find out that the main legislative interest in the

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:37.719
<v Speaker 4>United States is really kind of focused on minors and

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:41.160
<v Speaker 4>this this kind of idea that miners are using AI

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 4>companions for things like inappropriate erotic role play.

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 3>And what's so interesting about that.

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 4>There's two pieces of legislation moving through right now, neither

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 4>of which have been you know, turned into law, but

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:57.639
<v Speaker 4>they really are quite concerned about minors and sort of

0:17:57.680 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 4>sexualizing minors. And when you actually look at the research

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:04.600
<v Speaker 4>about how miners use AI, things like sex and romance

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 4>are actually way down on the list. Much higher on

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:11.959
<v Speaker 4>the list is emotional support and advice. And so again

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 4>we are always going to this sort of most extreme

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 4>iteration of the way that AI intimacy is actually showing

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 4>up for people whether they are adults or miners, and

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 4>going right to legislating romance and sex when in actuality,

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 4>the much more common use case is things like emotionality

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 4>and advice.

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that is a really troubling instinct. There's a bunch

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 2>of the Internet you know regulation going on right now

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 2>is all, you know, focused on this sort of hysteria

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 2>in some ways. You know, there is real problems with

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 2>the way that the Internet exploits children, obviously, but the

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 2>way that we are going about it resulting in many

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 2>proposals to end up giving more of your information over

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 2>to these companies or the government doesn't feel like it's

0:18:57.600 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 2>going to solve many of the sort of base problems

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 2>and completely overlooks the main way that people use these tools.

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if I if I had a nickel for

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 2>every time I've seen a story about this is also

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 2>an extreme case, but not like a sexual one, but

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 2>like a kid, you know, discussing their like mental health

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 2>leading to a suicide attempt with an AI system, or

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 2>discussing something as extreme as like you know, a public

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 2>active violence like a shooting, and the AI essentially helping

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 2>coax them into being able to do that.

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:24.959
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 2>There, there's a bunch of problems that require like legitimate regulation,

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 2>but there's sort of like puritanical, you know, sex crazy

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 2>nature of our government and you know, specifically the Republicans,

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:41.119
<v Speaker 2>but but also just like American culture in general is

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 2>just going to be so ill equipped to actually handle this.

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 2>This sort of like a subtlety and nuance of a

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 2>lot of these problems.

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you really put that well.

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 4>And it's it's a little bit complicated because, as you said,

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 4>there are real problems. There are real legislative and regulatory

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 4>needs that we should be having real common versations about.

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 4>And I think it is so easy to get whipped

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:06.680
<v Speaker 4>up into a hysteria. It is so easy to say,

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 4>we just need some kind of legislation. I need to

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 4>feel like there is some sort of progress being made

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 4>on this complex, scary, sensitive issue, and so I will

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 4>get on board for legislation that is actually not really

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 4>that good, or legislation that doesn't even really meaningly address

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 4>the actual problem.

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:27.120
<v Speaker 4>And so I think that we're in this really thorny

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 4>place where even people that I think are reasonable, like

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 4>leftists whatever, can quite easily get on board with legislation

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 4>that really, in the end might change the Internet in

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 4>ways that we might not actually want because we were

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 4>so whipped up into this like moral panic about legislating

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 4>technology and the Internet.

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 2>The lack of focus on the specific companies. You know,

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 2>just talking about these things is like abstract technologies instead

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 2>of actually talking about No, these are like specific companies.

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 2>We are doing specific things and that the government can

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 2>regulate in a specific way. Will that be the Trump government,

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Probably not, But I don't think slash hope that Trump

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 2>won't be in power forever, full fee, and we may

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 2>as well use you know, these next two years to

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:26.879
<v Speaker 2>try to build more public support for actual, you know,

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:30.199
<v Speaker 2>sensible regulation at the federal level. When I was at

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:32.920
<v Speaker 2>d C going to that you know, Liberal convention, which

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:35.680
<v Speaker 2>I've talked about on the show last week, I did

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:38.399
<v Speaker 2>go to a panel with Representative Don Bayer, who's getting

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 2>either a master's or a PhD in computer science right

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 2>now specifically to help him do AI regulation, and he

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 2>said he's not optimistic about AI being regulated in a

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 2>serious way while Trump is in power because of you know,

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 2>how much these companies have tried to cozy up to

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Trump and Trump's trying to, you know, shut down your

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 2>state's attempts to regulate certain things. But he does have

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 2>hope that in our next Congress or in the next

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 2>presidential administration, there will be the opportunity to regulate these

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 2>companies on a federal level. And in the meantime, states

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:14.119
<v Speaker 2>can push for their own regulation, States can try to

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:17.399
<v Speaker 2>put certain safety measures in place. But I think right

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:19.679
<v Speaker 2>now it would definitely behoove us to take this technology

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 2>as a real legitimate threat, not something that's just gonna

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 2>go away in the next few years, not something that

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, the bubble's gonna pop any day now. Any

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 2>day now, it's gonna pop. As nice as that is

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 2>to you know, tell yourself, that is kicking the can

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 2>down their road in like, in like a real sense,

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 2>and this this thing is having very real impacts. I mean,

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 2>people are focused obviously on like the data center question,

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 2>but I think that that relates to the same base

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 2>problem is do we have an opposition to these things

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:49.159
<v Speaker 2>in this sort of abstract technological sense, or do we

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:53.159
<v Speaker 2>have an opposition to these tools being developed by and

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 2>for for profit companies who want to make money off

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:58.679
<v Speaker 2>of us. For me, that is the main problem. If

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 2>you want to be like a lunite that it was

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 2>also the lait it's main problem. They weren't opposed to

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 2>technology in this abstract sense, but the specific way that

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 2>it was transforming production to benefit capitalists instead of workers.

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:13.359
<v Speaker 2>And if we want to think about the Internet in

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 2>the same way, what's happening is that they're deploying these

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 2>technologies to benefit the people that own these tech companies

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 2>rather than regular people. And if we can think about

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 2>regulating on that basis, not just in complete opposition to

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 2>these things, I think that might actually have a lot

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 2>more positive outcomes because these things are going to get developed,

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:31.160
<v Speaker 2>the things are gonna get bult. I don't think we're

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 2>going to be able to totally shut down AI as an

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 2>industry in the next few years. I just don't see

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 2>that being possible. Think about like in the nineties, do

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 2>you think they could have shut down like the Internet

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 2>as an emerging technology, this is where all the capital

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 2>is going. The most hope that I have is looking

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:48.879
<v Speaker 2>at something like this stop Data Center movement as an

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to educate people about how these companies are profiting

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:56.959
<v Speaker 2>off of us, and maybe we can team up together

0:23:57.040 --> 0:24:01.719
<v Speaker 2>across party lines, across you know whatever, to actually have

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 2>a sort of a popular front against these tech companies

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:08.120
<v Speaker 2>so that the Internet and that you know, these advanced

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 2>tools can actually exist in a way that is democratically

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 2>decided and actually to the benefit of people and not

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 2>like three dudes who are overdosing on academy and every

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:18.120
<v Speaker 2>week in San Francisco.

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 3>I completely agree with you.

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 4>I think while we are all sort of like having

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:30.400
<v Speaker 4>this conversation, specific tech companies are increasingly making forays into

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 4>the most intimate inner parts of our lives. Open Ai

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 4>just announced their first ever consumer hardware product, and you

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:40.639
<v Speaker 4>could probably guess what that product is going to be.

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:43.880
<v Speaker 4>It's going to be a hockey puck sized smart speaker

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 4>that you put in your home that reacts to you

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 4>like what they said, call a human like AI companion,

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 4>an intimate AI companion, and it will have the ability

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 4>to mechanically, they say, follow you around from room to

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:58.959
<v Speaker 4>room in your house. And so while we're all kind

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 4>of having this conver station, you can bet your ass

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 4>these tech companies are increasingly trying to not just be

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 4>the most powerful AI companies, but the most emotionally supportive,

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 4>the most emotionally invasive.

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, we've all talked so much.

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 4>About the more kind of logistical elements of our digital selves,

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 4>you know, our intellectual property, our browsing data, who gets

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 4>to make money from that? But I firmly do believe

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:26.119
<v Speaker 4>the next iteration of the digital rights movement will be

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 4>about our inner emotional lives and who gets to commodify that,

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 4>who gets to profit from that? And so, you know,

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 4>as grim as that sounds, I completely agree with you

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 4>that I'm also incredibly optimistic about the moment that we're

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:43.160
<v Speaker 4>in when it comes to your average person's sentiment around

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 4>things like big tech data centers AI commodifying every resource,

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 4>whether that's our intimate emotional data or our environmental resources.

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 4>I am incredibly optimistic that we are sort of on

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:58.879
<v Speaker 4>the right page, collectively pushing back and saying, I don't know,

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:00.879
<v Speaker 4>these tech companies say that this is all gonna be

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 4>really great for us?

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 3>Is it actually yeah?

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Based on let me look out the window briefly, No, No,

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so.

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Let me look at my my magic Apall sources say.

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 2>No, signs points to nah. Is there any other kind

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 2>of a final points about your new audiobook that you

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 2>would like to tease to the to the listeners before

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:27.440
<v Speaker 2>we sign off.

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:33.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it is really accessible, and the conversation is dark

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 4>and hard and vulnerable, but also fun and funny and engaging.

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 4>I talk to people who actually say that they have

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.640
<v Speaker 4>experienced intimacy with AI, and so if you ever wanted

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 4>to go beyond the sort of clickbait headlines of some

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 4>of these stories that you might have skimmed on social media,

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 4>you hear directly from folks about what brought them into

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 4>connection with AI, which I find fascinating. I try to

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 4>ned Chatchypt into having sex with me in the audiobook.

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 4>If you want to find out if that worked or not,

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 4>check it out. And then also again I would say

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 4>reporting the book made me very optimistic. One of the

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 4>reasons why I'm so optimistic in this moment is that

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 4>I just think when you actually look at the research

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:13.119
<v Speaker 4>and listen to what people are talking about when they

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 4>talk about intimucy with AI, it just becomes incredibly clear

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 4>that AI can never replace humans. AI cannot replace human labor,

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:23.640
<v Speaker 4>AI cannot replace what people are looking for when they

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:27.880
<v Speaker 4>look for nourishing connections and relationships. And so I kind

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:32.639
<v Speaker 4>of ended the audiobook, feeling incredibly optimistic about the power

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 4>of human connection and the power of human labor, and

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 4>the desire that we all have to connect with each

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 4>other that we know will never be replaced by AI.

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 2>I've seen that Spielberg movie. I think I think it's possible.

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 2>I think it's possible. I think we could all have

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:48.880
<v Speaker 2>a kind of creepy seven year old AI bought soon.

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:50.159
<v Speaker 3>Oh my gosh.

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 4>I will say I am kind of low key obsessed

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 4>with movies like that, like AI or Ex Machina or

0:27:57.160 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 4>Blade Runner.

0:27:57.880 --> 0:27:58.880
<v Speaker 3>I think that we're all.

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 4>So it's it sounds like a niche thing, but when

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 4>you look at pop culture, we have been interested in

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:07.199
<v Speaker 4>people who have intimate connections with technology and AI for

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:09.119
<v Speaker 4>a really long time, myself included.

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:11.640
<v Speaker 2>No, I think that is a big part of how

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 2>these companies are able to kind of pass this stuff

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 2>off to people. It creates a sort of public buy

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:20.199
<v Speaker 2>in because of like the pop culture idea of these things,

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:22.159
<v Speaker 2>both the good and the bad. I think both the

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:25.360
<v Speaker 2>sort of apocalyptic versions of it make the company seem

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 2>more legitimate, and that makes investors excited because like, oh,

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 2>this is a should be a real thing, even if

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 2>it costses bad things.

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:31.679
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 2>It's this sort of like a you know, don't invent

0:28:34.320 --> 0:28:36.719
<v Speaker 2>the Torment Nexus book being like, oh this is this

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 2>is a great idea. But I mean also in like

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 2>the blade Onner sense, you know, these these sorts of

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 2>more like humanistic looks about like what does it really

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 2>mean to be human? You know, what actually is the

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 2>line between artificial intelligence and humanity. I think that that

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 2>sort of you know, very like armchair philosophizing as that's

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 2>in those sorts of films, that does does make it

0:28:57.040 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 2>easier for people to start to talk to these things

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 2>like could maybe be a person. In the more extreme cases,

0:29:02.560 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 2>there was that like Google developer a few years ago

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 2>who like who quitor got fire and was like, I've

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:10.719
<v Speaker 2>discovered that Google's AI is a real person, and I

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 2>think it can it can really like encourage people to

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 2>like want to almost create this sort of conscious humanity

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 2>within these tools, even if those you know, tools aren't

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 2>even there yet, but there's there's there's like a desire

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 2>to kind of if I talk to it enough, maybe

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 2>it will become human, which I again, this kind of

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 2>sorts back to where we started. There's these sorts of

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 2>like you know, very very kind of base problems with

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 2>the way that people use the internet to kind of

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 2>solve this sort of you know, social alienation and social

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 2>disintegration that we have in our society and culture. My

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 2>main issue is that the way that companies golome on

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 2>to that as an opportunity to make a lot of money.

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that's exactly what we're seeing.

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 4>You know, we have a loneliness issue that people have

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 4>described as an epidemic right here in this country. We

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 4>live under such oppressive struck sure that the idea of

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 4>doing the labor that it takes to maintain friendships when

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 4>you're working a million hours to be able to afford

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 4>your rent that's gone up one hundred dollars in the

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 4>last month seems impossible. And so all of these are

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 4>very real needs, and tech companies are not only making

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 4>those needs worse, but then selling us back a solution

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 4>in the form of technology that they own, operate, and

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 4>profit from. It's a real cyclical problem, but I don't

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 4>think we will solve it until we have those systemic

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 4>institutional conversations about how we can meaningly fix what's so

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 4>broken that is leading people to find this kind of

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 4>nourishment in technology in the first place.

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Easy, peasy, yeah simple. Where could people both hear more

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 2>about this in the audiobook and then also find you

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 2>elsewhere on the internet.

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 4>Well, you can check out the audiobook at love at

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 4>first prompt dot com.

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 3>You can get it wherever your audiobooks are sold.

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 4>I particularly like Libro FM because they give money to

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:00.960
<v Speaker 4>local bookstores and libraries. But you can also follow me

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 4>on Instagram at Bridget Marie in DC and check out

0:31:03.520 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 4>my podcast There Are No Girls on the Internet.

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Thank you Bridget for introducing a new horror to everybody,

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 2>one of our favorite things to do on this show.

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 3>Thanks so much for having me.

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 1>It Could Happen Here is a production of cool Zone Media.

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from cool Zone Media, visit our website

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Coolzonmedia dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever.

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 3>You listen to podcasts.

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 1>You can now find sources for It Could Happen here

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 1>listed directly in episode descriptions. Thanks for listening.