WEBVTT - Moody's Downgrade and Tariffs Impact Markets

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple CarPlay or Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.639
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube Now.

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 2>An extended conversation with Edward Yard Denny. He's your Denny

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Research definitive CJ. Lawrence a few years ago a long

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 2>tour of duty of must read at Prudential Bish Securities

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 2>and has been one of the true bowls of his

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 2>roaring twenties. Edgar Denny, How roaring are our roaring twenties?

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think things are looking better ever since April ninth,

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 3>which was the postponement of the so called Liberation Day,

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 3>and then of course on May twelfth there was another

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 3>postponement of the tariffs on China, and so the stock

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 3>markets had a v shaped recovery since then, and the

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 3>stock markets had a kind of a roaring twenty correction

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 3>followed by an amazing recovery.

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Let me translate the modesty you just heard their folks.

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:29.279
<v Speaker 2>Edgiar Denny defined bond equity currency commodity vigilantes. Edgar Denny.

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 3>The vigilantes spoke, didn't they absolutely. It was on April eighth,

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 3>the day before the postponement of the tariffs, so that

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 3>the bond yield basically went up from four percent to

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 3>four and a half percent. That got the attention to

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 3>the administration. Freaked them out, actually, and even the President

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 3>technology verbally said that, you know that the bond market's

0:01:56.360 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 3>reaction to his policies him to postpone the tariffs. He

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 3>subsequently denied that, but he said it. And it's pretty

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 3>clear that he had sort of a Bill Clinton moment

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 3>back in the early nineteen nineties. James Carvill and Robert

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 3>Rubin warrened Clinton that he had to have fiscal discipline

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 3>otherwise the bond market would come and get him. And

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 3>that's exactly what happened to Donald Trump on April eighth,

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 3>and then he reversed his policy or postponed his policy

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 3>on April ninth.

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 4>And we still have even though some of these terroriffsmen

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 4>rolled back, we still have teriffts that are well in

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 4>excess of kind of where we started the year here.

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 4>How does that impact economic growth inflation? How do you

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 4>kind of factor that in these days?

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, first and foremost, I've been observing and predicting a

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 3>continuation of the economy's resilience. It's been over the past

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 3>three years. We had the most widely anticipated recession of

0:02:57.200 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 3>all times that never happened. It was the good Doe

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 3>recession and the no show recession. And now we and

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 3>that was in expectations that the Titaningo monetary policy would

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 3>cause a recession.

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 5>We argued that that might not be the case.

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 3>And now, of course the whole tariff turmoil has got

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 3>people thinking that we're going to have a recession. But

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 3>those recession odds have been coming down, at least in

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 3>the part of the consensus, and that's because Donald Trump.

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 3>President Donald Trump has blinked several times on the terriff issue.

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 3>But as you said, it's still there. It's just not

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 3>as onerous as it was when it was initially announced.

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 3>But it doesn't mean that we're probably going to have

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 3>about of stagflation for a few months where the economy

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 3>looks somewhat weaker in the summer with more inflation.

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 4>So ed given that background, how do you think about

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 4>this whole allocation stocks, bonds, alternatives kind of where do

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 4>you see the best opportunity these days.

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, I've been bullish on this market since

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 3>the November of twenty twenty two, so we did call

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 3>the bottom in October, and it's hard to tell people

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:19.919
<v Speaker 3>to jump on board of this speeding train right now.

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 3>I would just stay invested in the stock market, and

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 3>I continue to recommend avoiding information technology, communications industrials and financials.

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 3>So I would stay with the stock market for sure.

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 2>The ambiguity here, I think is absolutely profound. And the

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 2>basic idea here is we have a global lifting yields.

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Whether I look at UK gilts, I look at the

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 2>real uncertainties in Japan in that and what's so hard

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 2>in the modern media is to understand the zeitgeist is

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 2>higher yields are bad.

0:04:55.120 --> 0:05:00.600
<v Speaker 3>Push against that, Well, higher yields should be, but they

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 3>haven't been bad. We have seen a global bull market

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 3>in stocks, even though we've seen bond yields increase. Now

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 3>my view is that to a large extent, bondieals of normalized,

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 3>they're back to where they should be. Twenty half percent

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 3>is the right bond yield for the US economy. That

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:22.359
<v Speaker 3>was the case before the Great Financial Crisis, and I

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 3>think it's the case against Now. You know, maybe we're

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:30.599
<v Speaker 3>getting some excesses in the UK, some excesses in Japan.

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 3>But you know, if you want to be US centric,

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:37.600
<v Speaker 3>which to be, I think these bondials are kind of normal.

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 3>But I do see a risk that there could be

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 3>a mini debt crisis the way there was in twenty

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 3>twenty three. In some ways, Tom, I hope there is,

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 3>because I think now's a good time for a debt

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 3>crisis to get the attention of the politicians in Washington,

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 3>that they got to get their act together.

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 2>As you'r Denny with us your DNNY research. We welcome

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 2>all of you in your commute across a nation. Good morning,

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg eleven three to zero in our global Wall Street.

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Good morning, I should say, good afternoon in England and

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 2>the city and in Paris as well. Thank you so

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:13.679
<v Speaker 2>much for tuning in on all of our audio products

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:18.159
<v Speaker 2>and of course on YouTube. Subscribe to Bloomberg podcast ed

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Your Denny's Dog in the Couch.

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 3>The Research is Subscribe to Bloomberg Max, Max you got

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 3>I got a note for Max.

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Say the dog the dog looks stressed ed. I mean,

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 2>I mean if I look at the dog, I mean

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 2>the tension in the market's really really affecting Max.

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 3>Right, Max really keeps me calm, He keeps me grounded.

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes he puts me to sleep, but.

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Says that about me too exactly.

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 4>Hey, you mentioned that a debt crisis. I mean, I've

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:54.160
<v Speaker 4>been in this market since the mid eighties. We've been

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 4>talking about deficits in the national debt and it just

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 4>doesn't match. Is really important. Yeah, can you give us

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 4>some context there?

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely.

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 3>Back in July of nineteen eighty three is when I

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 3>concocted the term bond vigilantes. And I went back and

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 3>read what I wrote, and I said, the bond vigilantes

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 3>are particularly upset about record two hundred billion dollar deficits.

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 5>And here we're looking.

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 3>At two trillion dollar deficits and talking about the bond

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 3>vigilantes once again. Behind me, I have a bookshelf, and

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 3>on the top shelf, I've got a bunch of books

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 3>from the nineteen eighties. You know, debt bomb, you know,

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 3>drowning in debt, all kinds of end of the world

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 3>kind of scenarios with debt. And here we are and

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 3>stock market basically at an all time high. So the

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 3>end of the world hasn't occurred yet, and you have

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 3>some very smart people like Ray Dallio basically arguing that

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 3>it's imminent that we're going to have a crisis, that

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 3>we might have a buyer strike.

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, this is important. I'm taking Paul's territory here, but

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 2>it's just too important. When people give you the doom

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 2>and gloom, isn't that the time where you acquire shares?

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 2>That's what John Templeton would say.

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, It's yeah, it's when your your gut hurts and

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 3>you just want to get out. Tom, I have to

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 3>brag I have a really good track record at calling

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 3>bottoms more so than tops. And that's because I have

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 3>a relative that I don't speak to it too often

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:38.319
<v Speaker 3>that always calls me at bottoms and said, Eddie, should

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:40.080
<v Speaker 3>I get out? All of a sudden, we're best friends,

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, so uh yeah, it's uh, it's it's when

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 3>you're your your uncle Max calls you up and says,

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, I know you follow the stock market?

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:55.599
<v Speaker 5>Should you get out? That makes the bottom ed?

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 4>What do you make in the where investors should be

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 4>positioned in the fixed income market here? Because you considered

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 4>a two year treasury, you make on your four percent,

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 4>or do you go out there and take some credit risk.

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, it's it's kind of weird, right. Credit

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 3>risk used to be high yield bonds, corporate bonds. Now

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:25.960
<v Speaker 3>suddenly we're all worrying about the thirty year treasury in Japan,

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 3>the thirty year treasury in the United States.

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:30.680
<v Speaker 5>So I.

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 3>Would stay I always stay short for now, but I

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:39.679
<v Speaker 3>think there could be a really great opportunity to jump

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 3>back into the bond market. You know, the ten year

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 3>could revisit born three quarters five percent here pretty shortly.

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:51.959
<v Speaker 3>If the bond agilantes are not pleased with what they

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 3>see coming out of Washington and that, you know, if

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 3>their view is the big beautiful bill is actually the

0:09:57.400 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 3>big ugly bill, we'll know that pretty quickly.

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 4>And one of the new areas that's been just seeing

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:06.199
<v Speaker 4>amazing growth on global Wall Street in the last I

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 4>don't know fifteen years or so, has been private credit.

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 4>How do you think about that when you talk to

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 4>your clients.

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 5>Well, I don't know. I like securities.

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 3>I like to buy securities where there's a liquid market

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 3>and I can get in and out and I know

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 3>what these things are worth. I really don't have a

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:31.559
<v Speaker 3>problem with private credit, but I wouldn't overdo it there.

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 3>I get a little suspicious when I see that the

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 3>private credit industry is starting to become very democratic and

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:42.439
<v Speaker 3>create ETFs that allow them basically to unload the back

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 3>stuff into ETFs.

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 5>So I think they've had a good record, but I'd

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:51.680
<v Speaker 5>be careful.

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 2>And just one final question here, and I think it's

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:57.439
<v Speaker 2>really really important for her. There's Center Force five hundred.

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 2>How does Edgyard Denny find a select group of stocks

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 2>within the standard imports five hundred to believe in? Is

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:10.719
<v Speaker 2>your method like free cash flow? Is it more economic

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 2>based almost a Shiller analysis? How do you go about

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:17.079
<v Speaker 2>choosing the security for the long run?

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, first and foremost, we don't pick individual stocks on

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 3>our forte so we basically tend to provide an opinion

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 3>whether we think the stock market's going to continue to

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 3>go up and which sectors within that are likely to

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 3>per form. So I think the short answer is yes,

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 3>based on the economic outlook. I started out on Wall

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 3>Street as the chief economist of E. F. Hutton, and

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 3>then in a few years later I became also the

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:50.439
<v Speaker 3>strategist at CJ. Lawrence, So sort of combining the two

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 3>disciplines that guide my work on sectors and industries. You know,

0:11:56.120 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 3>we've liked information technology, we've liked as semiiconductors, and they've

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 3>been one heck of a roller coaster ride, but basically

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:07.439
<v Speaker 3>it's been improfitable.

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 2>What's your SPX call here a year end or even

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 2>out twelve months.

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, I've been doing a lot of work

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 3>on that, and i just want everybody to know that

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 3>the DXY Dollar Index is very misleading index. It's a

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 3>fixed weight index, it's not a trade weighted dollar, and

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 3>fifty seven percent of it is the euro, So you

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:32.559
<v Speaker 3>might as well just look at the Euro dollar exchange

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:38.439
<v Speaker 3>rate when you're looking at DXY. I like the MSCI

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 3>organization actually puts out a daily trade dollar which is identical,

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 3>almost identical to what the Fed does. And to me,

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 3>the dollar remains at an upward trend. To me, the

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 3>dollars going sideways relative to develop develop the currencies. But

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 3>in terms of emerging the dollar is very strong. So

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm not in this. You know, you know, end of

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:04.119
<v Speaker 3>the world scenario for the dollar.

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:05.959
<v Speaker 2>Well, give me the sand first five hundred. Are you

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 2>out to seven thousand? Still? If you reaffirm that off

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 2>of all the tariff news.

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, I started out the year at seven thousand, and

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:19.079
<v Speaker 3>I think strategists were generally kind of near that kind

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 3>of level. Maybe I was at the high end and

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 3>Trump got me. So I did lower it to sixty

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 3>four hundred in our early March, and then in late

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 3>March I lowered it to six thousand.

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 2>We are I going to make some news today. I

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 2>can you give me seven thousand here you're on a

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 2>sleepy May morning.

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'll give you sixty five hundred, which is what

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 3>I've raised it to, with the possibility of getting back

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 3>up to to seven thousand, and I've told people I

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:53.199
<v Speaker 3>reserved the right to change my mind as often as

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 3>the president.

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Max just rolled over when he heard that. Think we

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:58.679
<v Speaker 2>said good morning to Max on the couch. For those

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 2>of you on Bloomberg, till the dog is come casual

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 2>here on a May morning. Ed your Denny thank you

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 2>so much with your Denny Research. Again, we protect the

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:11.679
<v Speaker 2>copyright of all of our guests research. Go to your

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:16.079
<v Speaker 2>Denny Research. It's a terrific value. Can't say enough about

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 2>the use of it. Off your cell.

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Phone, you're listening to the Bloomberg surveillance podcast. Catch US

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>or watch US live on YouTube.

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Joining US now from Europe alder schmediaan of course with

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 2>Barren bergerg wonderful to have you in our studio. Thank you.

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:46.479
<v Speaker 2>Is Brexit dead? Let's just start with that headline.

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 7>No, Unfortunately, Brexit is not dead. Brexit is there to stay. We, however,

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 7>are getting a little pain relief now with the UK

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 7>drawing it a little closer on a few issues to

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 7>the EU. Again, Brexit has been really bad for the

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 7>UK economy and now the day it will be slightly

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 7>slightly mitigated.

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Do we underestimate growth in the continent and in the

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 2>United Kingdom? I keep seeing Paul six months later. Oops, yep,

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 2>and up we go.

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 7>I mean, all in all, a relative to the circumstances

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 7>which are globally not all that good to put in,

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 7>the Europe is indeed holding up. What we continue to

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 7>overlook occasionally is that especially southern Europe is mostly not

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 7>all of it, but mostly doing well, reaping the rewards

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 7>of the harsh reforms after the Euro crisis, and that

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 7>in the UK already with Rishi Sunak and then Kiel

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 7>Stamer starting to reset relations with the EU, there is

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 7>also a bit of a dynamic in the UK.

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 4>Is the EU at all receptive to I don't know

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 4>some of the UK's overtures here. If I'm the EU,

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm like, now, you guys already voted well.

0:15:57.080 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 7>On the pragmatic level, the EU wants to strike the

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 7>and it is striking deeds. Of course, this is the EU,

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 7>the big EU relative to the smaller UK, which is

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 7>about one six of the size of the EU economy.

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 7>And as a result, the EU does not allow cherry picking.

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 7>That is for the UK to simply say, this is

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 7>the part we love, this is the part we don't

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 7>like about the EU. We want to have only the cherries.

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 7>But we do see pragmatic progress and in the age

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 7>of Putine and also in the age of Trump, we

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 7>know I have to say there is a clear Russia

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 7>now for the UK and the EU to work together

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 7>on the military but also easing some of the economic

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 7>pains from Brexit for the UK.

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 4>So we saw the plans coming out of Germany, you know,

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 4>several months ago about reinvesting in their defense, in their infrastructure.

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 4>That's fine for Germany. Can the rest of Europe do that?

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 7>The rest of Europe does not have the physical space

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 7>for that. But look at a map. Germany is much

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 7>closer to Russia, to US Ukraine than most of the

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:04.640
<v Speaker 7>rest of Europe, as is Poland. As is Poland has

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 7>a independently order. He raised its defense spending a lot,

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 7>so have the Baltics. Germany was in a way the

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 7>big missing country, the country with fiscal space not doing

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 7>enough yet, and it's now clothing the gap.

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 4>So is that suggests that the European accountry, like we

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 4>saw a lot of investors in the first part of

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:29.440
<v Speaker 4>this year move money out of the US into Europe

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:33.639
<v Speaker 4>in stocks and bonds and currencies. Is that something you

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 4>think is credible and is longer lasting?

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 7>Do you think, well, there was a bit of europhoia, yeah,

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 7>late February, early March, and that has passed. But that

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 7>was just a little overdone. The underlying another of this

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 7>is correct with Germany getting its act sort of together,

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 7>not never fully, but sort of together. With Germany using

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 7>its fiscal space to improve its growth prospects via infrastructure,

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 7>and with Germany doing more to defend itself and basically

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 7>also the rest of Europe against Putine. Europe is a

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:11.400
<v Speaker 7>more attractive place. And then you have the US problems.

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 7>You have Trump that, you have tariffs, you have the

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 7>distrust in US institutions, and as a result, the US

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 7>looks less and Europe looks a bit more attract I don't.

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Care about the economics. Do you see a boom year

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 2>for tourism in Europe?

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 7>There's so much a word, but yes, this is one

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 7>of part of the European economy which looks set to

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 7>grow quite nice. It's like a big part, right, It's

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 7>a significant part for Southern Europe especially, And indeed tourism

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 7>looks good. Industry, of course, and a few services are

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 7>still under the cloud of the Trump trade wars, but

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:52.439
<v Speaker 7>tourism is good. Welcome to Europe, I tell you it's

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 7>a great place, as of course, I really.

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 2>And I looked at the obligatory flight I called fifty

0:18:57.119 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 2>seven fifty six, which is United out of Newark, just

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.160
<v Speaker 2>happens to be the flight I look at, and they're

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 2>giving it away, pat are they ready? Three thousand and

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:08.119
<v Speaker 2>four dollars Holger Schmeeting Class.

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 4>And you're going, yeah, you're not.

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 2>We're not the It's like new low I mean, but I.

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 4>Mean, Holger, We've got the Euro at one spot one

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:18.919
<v Speaker 4>two here. We're not a parody for the Euro. How

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 4>high I mean? Is that reflective of the expectations for

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 4>Europe in general?

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 7>The Euro is still a bit undervalued if I compare

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:32.479
<v Speaker 7>it under If I compare what I say here in

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 7>New York for my hotel and for my t relative

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 7>to what I will pay in a major European capital,

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 7>and if I compare many other prices, the euro is

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:45.360
<v Speaker 7>still modestly undervalued. We will likely go towards one twenty

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 7>next year problem, and then we'll have to see if

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 7>the US gets his fiscal housing order or not. If

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 7>the US does not, five years from now, we might

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 7>be at one fifty.

0:19:56.640 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 2>A million years ago, the trade minister of France, her

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 2>name was Le Guard, called me up and said you

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 2>got to go to some meeting in New York and

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 2>it was an innovation in technology. They were setting up

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 2>a satellite out of CDG and in Paris. Okay, every

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 2>article is Europe's missed the boat in technology, Halger, How

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:20.880
<v Speaker 2>do the leaders of europe initial initiate catching up in technology.

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:26.160
<v Speaker 7>We will catch up in using the new technologies we've

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 7>always been good at that. The Internet wasn't quite invented

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.639
<v Speaker 7>in Europe, but the Internet of Things, yeah, this is

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 7>where Europe is very strong. The same will likely happen

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 7>with artificial intelligence. Unfortunately, partly because we don't have the

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 7>capital market and the institution to scale up the many

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:46.160
<v Speaker 7>startups we have as rapidly as it happens in the US,

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 7>we will not have the really, really big, immediate pioneer

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:53.919
<v Speaker 7>companies on artificial intelligence. But when it comes to using

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:58.920
<v Speaker 7>our highly qualified workforce YEAP to turn artificial intelligence into

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 7>something that's good for all of us, then European companies

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:03.640
<v Speaker 7>will be there.

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:07.400
<v Speaker 2>This has been wonderful, holdersating, Thank you so much for Fairenberg.

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:14.920
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen live

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, Just

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Angela Stent was my book of the Year. I made

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 2>my book of the Year a couple of years ago

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 2>on a February, I think Thursday. Her book is Putin's World.

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 2>It is the single one biography on the makeup of

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Vladimir Putin. We're honored that Angela Stent could join us

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 2>this morning. Angela, Chapter three of your book, Ambivalent Europeans.

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 2>Is Vladimir Putin an ambivalent European?

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 8>I think Vladimir Putin is by now a convinced Eurasianist,

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 8>even though he speaks Germany. He lived in East Germany

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 8>for five years. I think if you listen to what

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 8>the Russian talk shows are saying, and what even Putin

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 8>himself is saying, they're highly critical of the Europeans because

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.640
<v Speaker 8>they are now in a situation where the Trump administration

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:18.679
<v Speaker 8>has been able to accomplish what neither the Soviet Union

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 8>or post Soviet Russia was able to do, and that's

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 8>to split work from the US.

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Is President Trump helping or is he in the way

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:30.879
<v Speaker 2>of a constructive outcome?

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:35.479
<v Speaker 8>So I don't think he's helping at the moment, because

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 8>you know, having gotten the Ukrainians and the Europeans to say, yes,

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 8>we have to have a thirty day interim ceasefire before

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:45.679
<v Speaker 8>we can really negotiate. Pudin has refused to do this.

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 8>Apparently in the phone call yesterday they didn't even discuss

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 8>a ceasefire in two and a half hours. So that's

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 8>really not helping get us anywhere nearer to stopping the

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 8>killing and talking constructively about what comes afterwards.

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 4>In reality, Angela, I think just by looking at history

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 4>of the last one hundred years, Russia is not going anywhere.

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 4>They can keep at this for as long as anybody

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:17.400
<v Speaker 4>ken is there any leverage anybody has over Russia.

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:20.719
<v Speaker 8>So you know, there is a big package of sanctions

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 8>that's been prepared by bipartisan by the US Congress, Republicans

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 8>and Democrats. The Treasury Department has a sanctions packet ready

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 8>to go. Scott bestn't put it on President Trump's desk,

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 8>But nothing's happening. They're not imposing any sanctions, and that's

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 8>what Putin really wanted to avoid. And the other thing

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 8>that could be done would be to give Ukraine more

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:46.440
<v Speaker 8>arms to help it push back more because nobody thinks

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:50.119
<v Speaker 8>there's going to be another sup supplemental coming forward. So

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 8>the only other leverage there is, of course oil prices

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:57.360
<v Speaker 8>and sixty dollars or above oil prices is what keeps

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 8>the Russian economy going in the budget doing well. If

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:04.880
<v Speaker 8>oil prices remain low, certainly in the forties or even

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 8>the early fifties by next year, that will have a

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 8>fairly serious impact in Russia.

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:13.479
<v Speaker 4>Aside from President Trump, is there anyone in Congress who

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 4>feels like something needs to be done? Or is this

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 4>squarely on the President's desk at the moment?

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 8>I mean, Senator Graham has been one of the supporters

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 8>of the sanctions bill. There are a number of both

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 8>Republican and Democratic Congress people who think that we should

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 8>be imposing more sanctions. But every time there's talk of it,

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 8>it doesn't happen.

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I got as an amount of time, but

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 2>I've got there's so many important questions. Let me go

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:48.160
<v Speaker 2>to the Kremlin. How alone is Vladimir Putin? Is he's

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 2>calling every shot? I guess we assume that from your

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 2>wonderful book. But is there an after Putin? Is there

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 2>a process in Russia with Putin or after Putin?

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 8>So we have no idea about that, but it doesn't

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 8>look as if there is. Because every time you have

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:07.679
<v Speaker 8>an up and coming younger person who maybe be a

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:13.399
<v Speaker 8>successor they're not. So what Putin has the backing of Jusionping.

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 8>That's probably the single most important thing.

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:20.399
<v Speaker 2>Very quickly here, Professor stentt just as simple as I

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 2>can do, you believe in the domino theory here.

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 8>The domino theory that.

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 2>After Ukraine he looks at the Bultic States, after Ukraine

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 2>he looks at fourteen feet into Finland. I mean, is

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 2>they're a domino theory here. I do believe in it.

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 8>I don't think it would happen immediately, but if Putin

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:45.959
<v Speaker 8>wins in Ukraine, then Ukraine is in the last country

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 8>that Russia's going to attack.

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Angels stent thank you so much. I'll tell you, folks,

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:54.120
<v Speaker 2>it's a two book tandem on Russia. Stephanie Baker's wonderful book.

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 2>It's been hugely successful for miss Baker of Bloomberg in London,

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 2>punishing Putin In. The foundation before that is Angelus Stence

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Putin's World, Russia against the West. I can't say enough

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:12.679
<v Speaker 2>about the book as a one volume read, mesmerizing on

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:15.200
<v Speaker 2>the youth and the upbringing of Vladimir.

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:25.680
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:31.959
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch US

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:35.880
<v Speaker 1>live every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg Terminal.

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Daniel Tannembaum is a global traveler with Oliver Wyman and

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 2>joins us here. He is world expert on sanctions and

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 2>so much more. Does a disarray in the domestic issues

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:55.120
<v Speaker 2>of America does that diminish our execution of foreign policy?

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Den I think it does.

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 6>I talk to folks in the European Commission and the

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 6>British government. Often they are emotionally resigned to having the

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 6>deal and constrain issues like Russia without US involvement. In February,

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:13.119
<v Speaker 6>they were reluctant to believe it. I think everyone realizes

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 6>there's enough issues in the US going on that dealing

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 6>with Russia offensively is not a high priority. So I

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:24.680
<v Speaker 6>do think some of these domestic issues are having an impact,

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 6>But in a sense he is a unifier, but in

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:31.479
<v Speaker 6>not ways that benefit America. You're seeing trade deals get

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:35.959
<v Speaker 6>struck that don't involve the US, like Mercosre in the EU,

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 6>so it is creating an impact that may not be

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:41.119
<v Speaker 6>as beneficial to the US.

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:42.639
<v Speaker 2>In the end, Dan, what do.

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:45.160
<v Speaker 4>You make of the phone call President Trump and President

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:51.120
<v Speaker 4>Putin had yesterday regarding Ukraine. There's some different reporting about

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:53.680
<v Speaker 4>what actually was achieved. What's your read of that.

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 6>I think we kicked the can again. It doesn't sound

0:27:56.680 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 6>like any concessions were offered on the part of Russia.

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 6>You know, the big announcement that the president made that

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 6>President Trump made after the call was that there will

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 6>be more talks. Well, what was last week in Istanbul?

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 6>When they were already talks. I mean, if the whole

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 6>point is trying to force Russia to reverse course, talks

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 6>aren't going to do it. We saw today the UK

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:22.880
<v Speaker 6>and EU have announced additional sanctions that are significant, doing

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 6>it again without the US.

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:25.400
<v Speaker 2>The US has.

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 6>Yet to really at least publicly impose sanctions on Russia

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 6>since this administration has taken office. Again.

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Why, I mean, I understand Donald Trump and I don't

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 2>need to get into the Putin Trump thing. I think

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 2>we're all hit over the head by that constantly. Okay, war,

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 2>they invaded a country. Why is Europe? Why are the

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 2>US struggling with instituting sanctions on a country that's a

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 2>borderline frontier economy?

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 6>I think we should differentiate. It's not the country. I

0:28:57.160 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 6>think it's this administration. Congress has sanctions that are ready

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 6>to roll. There's actually a package that's been on the

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 6>President's desk for three weeks to impose additional sanctions on Russia.

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 6>He will sign that will apply additional pressure. How much

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 6>they'll hinder is a question the why. I mean, the

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 6>argument that the president is making is that additional sanctions

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 6>are unhelpful to the negotiations with Russia. And so that

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 6>is the argument. Anytime President Putin looks as if he

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 6>anytime President Putin looks as if he, you know, is

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 6>playing ball, it pushes off any sort of need for pressure,

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 6>and the president seems to believe that argument.

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 4>Is there any leverage that the US or the Europeans

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 4>really have against Putin? Kid just feels like if you

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 4>just look back at history over the last one hundred years,

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 4>these Russians can have some staying power.

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 6>They can, but you can lower the price of the

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 6>oil price cap, which has been at sixty dollars for

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 6>the last few years. Oil's trading at what's sixty five

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 6>a barrel, so you can begin to reduce the revenue

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 6>that Russia is generating from oil. You can go after

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 6>more third country actors, but we have yet to really

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:09.720
<v Speaker 6>see the US do anything publicly.

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean I don't have the romantic life of Dan Tanabon.

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, the Oliver. He doesn't have the

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Oliver and Women Gulf Stream because Hugh von Steinas has

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 2>it most of the time. I'm more interested in Dan Tannabon.

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen live

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 1>say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Right now, newspapers. We look at the newspapers, Lisa Matteo

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 2>and her team of interns looking at twenty thirty rags

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 2>to see what to do today. What do you got, Lisa?

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 9>Okay, I'm starting with the most glamorous sporting event in

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 9>the world. Low talking about the US. Oh, you know

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 9>the tennis tournament.

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 4>I know is the day to go see see.

0:30:57.600 --> 0:31:00.680
<v Speaker 9>Okay, So it generates one hundreds of million dollar every year, right,

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 9>it's getting this eight hundred million dollars. Makeover scheduled to

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 9>be completed in time by twenty twenty seven. For that

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 9>US open construction's already started. So what is actually happening? Okay,

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 9>so it's including this overhaul of Arthur Arthur sh Stadium,

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 9>so as Paul knows, sometimes gets a little crowded. You know,

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:19.320
<v Speaker 9>it's trying to send as Tito's and soda and he

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 9>needs more elbow room. Okay, so they're adding a little

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 9>bit more space, putting a few more seating in there.

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 9>They're also getting new building just for the players. So

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 9>the players get this new building, state of the art

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 9>training facility, luxury accommodations, cafes just for them. So this

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 9>has been going on. But the USA, how are they

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 9>going to pay for this? That's the question that everyone

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 9>is asking. Reserve funds, debt and it's not going to

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 9>require any more land in the park because they're they're

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 9>leasing that out.

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 2>To me, it was when I went, it was way

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 2>too packed. I mean, it was just no fun. The merch,

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 2>the merch going out of the store.

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 5>Pall was unreal.

0:31:55.920 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 4>It's it's phenomenal, but I mean there's vodka was something

0:31:58.920 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 4>that money did get the great Goose Honey Deuce cocktail.

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 2>That's what it was. That's where you go.

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 4>Yep, And that'll save you back twenty or twenty five bucks.

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 4>But it's it's worth it. But I go the first

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 4>Tuesday because then you get ze everybody and everybody's practicing.

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 4>Nobody's knocked out of the tournam. You can go to

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:17.480
<v Speaker 4>a practice court and see, like you know, a top

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 4>ten person playing in a practice round. It's about it. Yeah,

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:23.440
<v Speaker 4>it's the thing park. Yeah, but it's fine.

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:23.760
<v Speaker 2>It's no.

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 4>You take the Long Island Railroad drops your right there.

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 4>It is the take the l people are right to

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 4>the stadium in two grade and you go to the

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 4>day on the first Tuesday.

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:34.959
<v Speaker 9>I have to go.

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 8>It is a experience.

0:32:37.080 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 2>It is experience.

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 9>Literally, is there like live reporting you've never been to the.

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 4>Actually have fun? Yeah, okay, let's.

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 9>Go to Thursday night football.

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 7>Okay.

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 9>So in the past it's been like this place like this,

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:50.719
<v Speaker 9>dumping around right for games that are expected to not

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 9>view very well. But things have started changed under Amazon.

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 9>Bloomberg actually spoke with the head of sports and Advertising

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:00.720
<v Speaker 9>at Amazon Prime Video and they said view a Thursday

0:33:00.760 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 9>night football increase forty percent. Since Prime Video's first year

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 9>of streaming the show, so that more people are starting

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 9>to watch. The average viewer is also seven years younger

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 9>than other channels, so that's something.

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 7>That advertisers like.

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 9>But they also scored their strongest lineup, so they have

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 9>in week two the opening twenty four five season matchup

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 9>between Green Bay Packers Washington Commanders. They also have two

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 9>appearances from the Philadelphia Eagles. They have ten divisional matchups

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 9>on top of it, so there.

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 4>People are getting more comfortable now finding sports on streaming

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 4>and the answers.

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Football is leading the.

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 4>Way absolutely, I mean just say it always does, it

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:38.640
<v Speaker 4>always does.

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:43.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know why is Mets red socks. I

0:33:43.240 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 2>still don't understand the regional baseball thing, you know is.

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 4>A regional sport like hockey. Hockey is regional?

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, just football, just do it like Cony.

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 4>Time for one more here I do okay, quickly?

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 9>Okay, So the National Dazoo's new handas right. We've been

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 9>hearing about them, PANDAM, pandicam. They're actually warming up to

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 9>one another, so who knows. There could be a baby

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:11.959
<v Speaker 9>along the way. But it's going to be timed down. Yes, yes,

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 9>it's going to be much more time down the road.

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 9>But they're starting to show some signs of interest to

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 9>one another. So the zoo staffers are saying, you know what,

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:22.719
<v Speaker 9>this is a good sign. They're bleeding. Bleeding is like that,

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 9>I guess a mating sound. I don't know. It's kind

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:27.279
<v Speaker 9>of like a sheep's bad but a higher pitch. I'm

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 9>not going to do it for you, but they're starting

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:30.759
<v Speaker 9>to show that.

0:34:31.200 --> 0:34:36.319
<v Speaker 4>But reproductive possibility is how the Washington post Reproductive possibility

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:38.440
<v Speaker 4>only last brief hours.

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 9>They're very like they like to be alone pandas. I

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:44.360
<v Speaker 9>didn't realize that, so they're very like with the panda.

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:49.399
<v Speaker 9>But the males mature more slowly than females. Shocker, five

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 9>years old is when they start this this connection, and

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 9>they're a little bit younger than that. So we have

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:55.399
<v Speaker 9>some time, but there's a positive sign.

0:34:55.800 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to put a ball. Thank you so much

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 2>much for our sex education today.

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:07.799
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 1>weekday seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune in, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:22.920
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg Terminal