WEBVTT - Apple's AI Delay and Trump's Pro-Crypto Turn

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 2>From Mahard where Innovation, Money and power Collie in Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:17.759
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde.

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:34.560
<v Speaker 4>And Ed Ludlow, live from Bloomberg's World headquarters in New York.

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:36.519
<v Speaker 5>This is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up this.

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:40.560
<v Speaker 4>Hour, Apple's AI delay, a Bloomberg exclusive on Apple Intelligence

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 4>rolling out later. Post iOS update plus from Cryptocritic to

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 4>bitcoin backer. Trump vows changes at the SEC and if

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 4>re elected, to make bitcoin great again. And Deadpool's domination

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 4>the Disney film shatters box office records on opening weekend.

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 4>This is a really big important week for megancap earnings.

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:04.399
<v Speaker 4>Take a look at the Nasdaq one hundred. We're up

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 4>meaningfully in the session, but we're coming off the back

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 4>of three straight.

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:09.680
<v Speaker 5>Weeks of weekly declines.

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:12.040
<v Speaker 4>We were talking over the weekend about the NAZAK one

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 4>hundred being in correction territory. You have ten trillion dollars

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 4>or so of marketcap reporting across Microsoft, Apple, Meta, and

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 4>of course Amazon. We will get into that. Apple is

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 4>a name that we're watching really closely. It kind of

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 4>opened lower and it's been chopping, trading choppy, and now

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 4>it's modestly lower, basically flat. A Bloomberg exclusive, Apple's AI

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:36.400
<v Speaker 4>features have been delayed, and we'll miss the initial release

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 4>of iOS eighteen in September. According to Bloomberg's reporting, the

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 4>company plans to release Apple Intelligence by October, but will

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 4>make it available to software developers for early testing as

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 4>soon as this week, an atypical strategy for the tech giant.

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 4>I want to welcome back Bloomberg's Mark German explain the

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 4>reporting here because the detail is important.

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:00.559
<v Speaker 1>Mark, thank you so much for her. I mean great

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to be back Apple Intelligence. This is Apple's big initiative

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>for the upcoming year. This is Apple showing the market,

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>showing consumers that it too has generative artificial intelligence features.

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:14.639
<v Speaker 1>They announced these in June. The intention was to bring

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:17.920
<v Speaker 1>them to market with iOS eighteen and iPad os eighteen,

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>which will launch sometime in September. But now I'm told

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 1>those are being pushed back to iOS eighteen point one

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and iPad os eighteen point one. Now this is not

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 1>a big delay, but this means that they likely won't

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:33.239
<v Speaker 1>come pre installed with the iPhone sixteen when those devices

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>go on sale in September, and it also means the

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 1>features will come via software update by October, so it's

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>about a few week delay. It's not a huge deal,

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>but it shows that the company is still racing to

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 1>iron things out and fix bugs before this very important

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>public launch.

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to get into the stock story with my

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 4>next guess, but I think it's worth recounting the basics

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 4>of Apple Intelligence. So I've got iPhone fifteen Pro, which

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 4>I think in the end will qualify me to be

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:04.399
<v Speaker 4>able to get Apple Intelligence. But just explain the rollout

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:06.839
<v Speaker 4>broadly across what kind of device you need to have,

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 4>and then like what it's going to do.

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So, first of all, Apple Intelligence requires devices if

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:16.640
<v Speaker 1>you're on the Mac with Apple Silicon or if you

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>have an iPad or iPhone devices with a gigabytes of RAM.

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>So for the iPad, that means any iPad with an

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>M one chip.

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 3>Orneur and Apple start.

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Including M one chips with the iPad Pro and then

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>later the iPad Air beginning in twenty twenty one. Now

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone is where things get a little bit more interesting.

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Today there's only two iPhone models that will support Apple Intelligence,

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:40.839
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone fifteen Pro and the iPhone fifteen Promas that's

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>because those are the only two iPhones on sale right

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>now that include a gigabytes of RAM. Now that gets

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>interesting because there's going to be soon four more models

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that have a gigabytes of RAM. Those are all the

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 1>iPhone sixteen's, the regular one, the Plus, the Pro, and

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the Promax launching in September, so pretty soon a bunch

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>of more iPhones will include Apple Intelligence. That's so interesting

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>because that is probably going to spur people to upgrade

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>their iPhone give it. It's not going to come to

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>older models.

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Apple Intelligence includes a bunch of AI features. It's basically

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a cash all term for a lot of new AI

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 1>features coming to the Apple devices. That includes being able

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 1>to create images, integrate with chat, GPT, a new version

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>of Siri, the ability to have writing tools so you

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>can write something in an email and it will be

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 1>able to summarize it for you, shorten it, make it

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 1>more conversational, be able to summarize incoming text messages, transcribe

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 1>a voice memo or a phone call and then create

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 1>a summary for you. So just a bunch of different

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>AI features across the board. These aren't anything extraordinarily innovative

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>or brand new. Not a lot that we haven't seen

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 1>for other platforms before. But the deep integration and the

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>ease of use and the interface that you're going to

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>see on the Apple devices really takes it up a

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>notch against rivals.

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:03.279
<v Speaker 4>Apple Repoles fiscal thed quarder earnings Thursday after the market close.

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:04.720
<v Speaker 4>I heard a rumor that you and I are going

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:06.359
<v Speaker 4>to be seeming up on the top Live blog. That

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 4>might be news to you. Give me the Mark Germans

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 4>what to watch list for this Apple print.

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is an interesting one because you're really going

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to want to pay attention to the guidance that Apple

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:20.160
<v Speaker 1>CFO Luca Maistry and Tim Cook.

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:20.720
<v Speaker 3>Give on this call.

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>They're not going to give you numbers, but they're going

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to imply probably how the iPhone is going to do.

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:28.279
<v Speaker 1>So that's really going to be the most important part there,

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>because there was not a lot of new hardware launch

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>during the quarter that we really care about other than

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.359
<v Speaker 1>the new iPads. So all eyes are going to be

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>on that four looking.

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 4>Commentary Bloomberg's Mark German, it is incredible to have you

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 4>back here on Bloomberg Technology.

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 5>Thank you.

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 4>Let's stick with the Apple story and bringing Maxim Group

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 4>Managing Director tom Forte hold on the stock one hundred

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 4>and ninety five dollars price target. What we didn't necessarily

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 4>talk about in Mark's reporting is why it's important. A

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 4>lot of the run up in the stock over whatever

0:05:56.880 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 4>time period you might choose, is optimism that this is

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 4>come a real tangible effort on artificial intelligence. So your

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 4>response to that reporting, it's a matter of weeks in

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:11.160
<v Speaker 4>the rollout of Apple Intelligence, but it seems significant.

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 6>Sure, So when I think about my hold rating on Apple,

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:18.359
<v Speaker 6>the question becomes how much are investors potentially ahead of

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 6>themselves when thinking about the upgrade cycle for AI. I

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 6>certainly think they'll be an upgrade cycle for AI. In

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 6>our numbers, we're looking for essentially half the lift they

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 6>got from five G. And the reason we think it'll

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 6>be half the lift not as much of a lift,

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 6>is they have pressure from a regulatory standpoint in Europe,

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:40.160
<v Speaker 6>which is about twenty five percent of their sales, and

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 6>in China, which is about twenty percent in their sales,

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 6>and now we're seeing that they're going to have a

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 6>slower rollout of Apple Intelligence. So I think clearly there'll

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 6>be an upgrade cycle. I just don't think it'll be

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 6>as significant as what's already reflected in the shares.

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 4>One of the things we've been thinking about bobout technology

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 4>is basically, for every dollar put into AI, how many

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 4>dollars are comeing out for each of these companies. In

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:04.479
<v Speaker 4>the case of like the cloud players, it's a bit

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 4>more easy to do the math AI infrastructure investment top

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 4>line growth. But in Apple's case it seems like Apple

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 4>intelligence that they hope it spurs upgrade cycles, right because

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 4>you need the hardware that's compatible with it. As as

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 4>Mark outlined, what's your model for how a dollar in

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 4>translate to however many dollars out for Apple?

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 6>This is a good example where artificial intelligence can result

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 6>in sales. I think the challenge you've seen in enterprise

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 6>software is heavy level of investment spend for artificial intelligence

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 6>and not a near term twelve to eighteen month impact.

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 6>The size of the price for Apple here is about

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 6>fifty billion dollars. So if you look at the incremental

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 6>revenue they generated from iPhone, which is about half their

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 6>sales on five G, they added fifty billion a year

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 6>in annual revenue on the five G upgrade cycle. So

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 6>to the extent that AI spurs something similar. You could

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 6>be looking at an incremental fifty billion of revenue for Apple.

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 6>Translating that to EPs, we're looking at card mid to

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 6>high single digit EPs growth from flat growth.

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 4>We're talking the Tom Forte of Mattim Group, who has

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 4>a hold on the stock one hundred and ninety five

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 4>dollars price target earnings. Mark set out what he thinks

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 4>we should be looking for. A lesson learned in recent

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 4>quarters is maybe don't put too much emphasis on the

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 4>third party data, particularly maybe around China, because the third

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 4>party data tells us that the iPhone is slipping in

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 4>China to domestic handset makers, and yet the last earnings

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 4>on the call in particular, they said, no, we think

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 4>we've got growth back there those slightly in congruous or

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 4>competing data points. With that context in mind, what are

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 4>you bracing for for Luka Maistreet to say or otherwise?

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so similar, Mark said, I'm going to try to

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 6>reverse engineer essentially what the outlook is for iPhone sales

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 6>in the September recorder. So the expectation will be that

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 6>they'll have a new iPhone sixteen that I'll come up

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 6>in the September recorder. Yes, the software will lag into

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 6>the December recorder. But to the extent that that is

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 6>the commentary I'm looking for. And if you looked at

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 6>the June quarter, the same exercise suggested that iPhone sales

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 6>would be negative in the June quarter. So did we

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:14.679
<v Speaker 6>see a transition from negative to positive on the upgrade

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 6>cycle for AI?

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 5>Where's the biggest surprise going to be? In the Apple print?

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 6>The biggest surprise is going to be I think that

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 6>the incremental lift to iPhone sales from AI will not

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 6>be as significant as currently reflected in the stock stocks

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 6>trading it north of a thirty times pe the tech

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:33.319
<v Speaker 6>big tech peers.

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 3>Are more like twenty seven and a half.

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:37.319
<v Speaker 6>And I think right now investors are just expecting too

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 6>much of a boost for Apple from AI.

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 4>A story we discussed less and we've actually gone away

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 4>from with Amazon as well as ecosystem. You're a device user,

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 4>but you now use services. Do you think Apple moves

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:50.679
<v Speaker 4>back to that story with AI?

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 3>That is a great story for Apple.

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 6>So to the extent that incremental iPhone sales result in

0:09:56.320 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 6>incremental services revenue that could enable the company.

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 3>To perhaps support a higher multiple.

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 6>So ecosystem is very important to Apple and to the

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 6>extent that they can leverage AI to get consumers more

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 6>excited about their ecosystem. Here to advance our purchases on

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:15.199
<v Speaker 6>higher margin services that could be wonderful for the stack.

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 4>Tom Forte, Maxim Group Managing Director, great to have you

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 4>back on. It's a big week for big tech with

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 4>four of the magnificent seven megacaps posting their quarterly earnings.

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 5>What a calendar that is.

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 4>You might think your attentions are over in Paris with

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 4>the Olympics, but in the world of technology, you are

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 4>glued to Bloomberg Technology right through the course of the week.

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 4>And it's not just the megacaps, some of the chip

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:47.319
<v Speaker 4>names as well. Let's get the outlook with Brad Erickson,

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 4>Capital Markets Research analysts at RBC. I think in order

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 4>to look forward, I look back at last week in

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 4>alphabet and the lessons learned, the questions that investors posed,

0:10:58.080 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 4>and we've already talked about it in the show, but

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 4>I think it's a question about for every dollar you

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 4>put into AI infrastructure investment, how many dollars are you

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:07.839
<v Speaker 4>getting out in the near term for AI?

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 5>Is that how you'd approach this.

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 7>Week Yeah, I think that's going to be a key topic.

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 7>You know, we're not going to get a ton like

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 7>out of Meta or Amazon, for example, in terms of

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 7>what they're spending this year. People are already generally kind

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:23.960
<v Speaker 7>of understand that. I think we're going to be looking

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 7>at the marginal dollars, like you said, And I think

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 7>what's interesting is I think a quarter or two ago,

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 7>people were very focused on specifically what AI was driving.

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 7>But I think what we're learning more and more is

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 7>that AI is really sort of integrating into these models

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 7>and so you can't unpack it, which is okay because

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 7>then we actually can evaluate the dollar growth in these

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 7>companies and what is sort of justifying those CAPEX investments.

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 5>There are things that they're sort of idiosyncratic.

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 4>You know Meta's case, we kind of forget into massive

0:11:56.200 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 4>portfolio of social media companies. But they last quarter told

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 4>us about their plans for infrastructure, which wins out the

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 4>forward looking AI story or the backward looking history of

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 4>that company.

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 8>Oh.

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 7>I think people are definitely going to be looking forward right,

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 7>the story will be the same. We'll look at the

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 7>revenue trends and evaluate kind of what they're saying about

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 7>the ad market and their products in particular, and then

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 7>the focus on the call is going to shift to

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 7>Mark talking about his vision for AI and trying to

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 7>give people some comfort. I think this quarter in again,

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 7>why are they making such big investments where maybe we're

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 7>going to see you know, maybe a little bit of

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 7>sort of call it delayed gratification in terms of when

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:41.320
<v Speaker 7>we see those investments payoff. Right, he used the word

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 7>last quarter, multi year investment cycle. That's a scary term

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 7>for people. So we'll see what kind of performance he

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 7>puts up on the call later for this week.

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 4>For me, Brad, this is a week where being a

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 4>CEO or a CFO you kind of got to earn

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 4>that paypacket, Do you know what I mean? That it

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 4>comes down to community at the end of the day.

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 4>I found last quarter fascinating. How much kind of faith

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:06.959
<v Speaker 4>or credence do you put into the words spoken by

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 4>the people at the top.

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, you know, I think they're a little bit different cases. Right,

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 7>we cover Meta and Amazon, so maybe I'll stick stick

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 7>with my commentary there in terms of Mark Zuckerberg and Meta.

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 7>You know, I think one of the adages we've heard

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 7>lately is you want to buy Mark when he's feeling

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 7>maybe a little bit more confident, and sell him when

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 7>he's when he's feeling or so yeah, sorry, buy him

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 7>when he's feeling a little little bit less confident, sell

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 7>him when he's a little bit more confident. Last quarter,

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 7>I think they're delivering such high growth. They were twenty

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:45.680
<v Speaker 7>seven percent growth last quarter, twenty two percent this quarter.

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 7>You know, I think that that felt a little bit tough,

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 7>and obviously the stocks sold off. Historically, I think you've

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 7>seen that flip to the other side, So we'll see

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 7>what kind of tone we get out of him here.

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 7>But if he's basically talking to maybe more moderating growth

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 7>rate and feeling a little bit better about those investments,

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 7>that can be a positive sigence on Amazon's it's I

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 7>think much simpler. You know, we expect the Indijas to

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 7>come out with a very confident tone around AI. They're

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 7>not going to get into the game of sort of

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 7>promoting themselves or even speaking to how much AI is

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 7>exactly contributing. But I do expect their commentary to remain

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 7>very polish on AI in general.

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 5>So that's an interesting point.

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 4>What they said last quarter is that for aws revenue

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 4>run rate one hundred billion, but specifically for generative AI

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 4>revenue run rate in the billions, multi billions of dollars.

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 5>That seemed like enough.

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 4>So if you don't expect them to kind of over

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 4>exaggerate or expand on that, what do they need to

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 4>say this quarter to keep investors convinced?

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I think you know, previously they I think they

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 7>had been a little bit behind, certainly on even on

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 7>just the acquisition of GPUs necessary to train up their

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 7>models and their platfor so I think maybe give them

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 7>a little bit more color on progress forward progress and

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 7>aggression there will be super helpful. The other thing, too,

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 7>is that, you know, one of the things they emphasize

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 7>is when they say things like multi billion dollar run

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 7>rates for AID, they're really talking about broader AI, which

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 7>they've been working on for years, very much pre dating

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 7>the onset of generative AI last year. So again it's

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 7>a little bit hard to unpack, but that would be

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 7>the general forward commentary, I would say.

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 4>Brad Eggs and Internet analyst obviously Capital Markets. Great to

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 4>have you on the show. Thank you all right. Coming

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 4>up on BlueBag technology, France faces an Internet disruption. More

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 4>on the latest infrastructure attack as the Paris Olympics gets

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 4>Underwegh also taking a quick look at shares on Semi

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 4>up eleven and a half twelve percent, one of the

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 4>best performers in major enc's s and P five hundred

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 4>strong earnings basically second quarter adjusted earnings per share beat estimates.

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 4>You know, it's a name where their chips are more

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 4>related to kind of automotive industry. They have a wide

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 4>arrange use case not so much AI, but it's a

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 4>name that we track quarterly on this program. Good results.

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Technology. It's time for talking tech and

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 4>first up. Shares of Ali Barber rising today, the stock

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 4>hitting its highest than two months in Asia, trading investors

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 4>cheering the e commerce giant and their plans to charge

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 4>a higher service fee from merchants. Bloomberg reported that Ali

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 4>Barber is set to raise their software service fee to

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 4>zero point six percent, which will boost its core merchant

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 4>revenue plus SHAWM plans for an EV expansion. The Chinese

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 4>tech company has purchased a one hundred and thirty one

0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 4>acre plot of land in Beijing for one hundred and

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 4>sixteen million dollars in an effort to expand its electric

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 4>car production. Jarmi first entered the auto sector in March

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 4>and has already delivered thirty thousand vehicles so far, with

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:14.159
<v Speaker 4>the company on track to reach its initial goal of

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:19.119
<v Speaker 4>one hundred thousand cars by November. And another infrastructure attack

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 4>on France during the Olympics, this time a number of

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:25.920
<v Speaker 4>fiber optic cables carrying Internet services across the country were

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 4>cut overnight. Orange, the Olympic telecom partner, said the connections

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 4>into Paris and thus the Olympics were not affected. Just

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 4>on Friday, coordinated fires on French trail lines had disrupted

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 4>trains ahead of the opening ceremony. For more, let's bring

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 4>in Bloomberg's benoir Bertelo out in Paris. You know, this

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:47.400
<v Speaker 4>is a story benoir where there are many questions who, what, where,

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 4>when and why?

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 5>But what's the latest fleas.

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so clearly was a large scale attack under fiber

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 9>on networks during the night between nine am, one am

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 9>and three am toord middle of the night. There were

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:06.440
<v Speaker 9>nine places we are told across France where long distance

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 9>fiber optic cables were cut. So really this is the

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 9>highways of the Internet powering the network and thanks to

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:18.919
<v Speaker 9>redundancies there was no real impact, just a bit of

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 9>latency for some customers. But clearly this is the scale

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:28.119
<v Speaker 9>of the attack that's a sort of borrowing authorities in

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 9>France for the trains that the trains are back to

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 9>normal as of today and it's been slowly going back

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 9>to normal in the weekend, so so far, not really

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:42.719
<v Speaker 9>disruption of the Olympics. It's not been disrupting either the

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 9>train or the internet outage have been disrupting the Olympics.

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:49.159
<v Speaker 9>But really it's the scale of these attacks and the

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:52.639
<v Speaker 9>fact that they are targeted across France rather than on

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 9>Paris that is sort of interesting and surprising authorities.

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 4>Then the out and in question I suppose is is

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:06.399
<v Speaker 4>there a link between the rail nodes that were a

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:10.640
<v Speaker 4>victim of ars and attacks last week and the cutting

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 4>of fiber optic cables overnight. Is there any evidence that

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:16.439
<v Speaker 4>that is part of a wider and coordinated attack.

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:20.440
<v Speaker 9>So there is no evidence that we know of so far.

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 9>There are two separate investigations that have been started by

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:31.120
<v Speaker 9>the Parious Prosecutors Office. Clearly, it's what's similar is that

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:34.159
<v Speaker 9>there are there is a good level of intelligence on

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 9>where exactly to act, especially on the train attacks like

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 9>these really were important nodes in the network, but there's

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 9>no proof of or no indication so far of who

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 9>could have done this. The Interior Minister this morning said

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 9>they were advancing on this, but clearly there is no

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:55.719
<v Speaker 9>information of who could have done it and if there

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 9>is a link between the two attacks.

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 4>Away from the news head lines, it was a weekend

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 4>where I everyone watching the preyram was glued to their television.

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:10.159
<v Speaker 4>I really enjoyed the rugby seven's Congratulations to France on

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:14.120
<v Speaker 4>incredible performance. What's it like in Paris now Benoir. What's

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 4>the experience of being in the host city and host nation.

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 9>It's a great atmosphere in Paris, Kelly. Lots of Parisians

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 9>have feed the city, but it's a lot of people

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 9>from across France that are coming to see to see

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 9>the events and many tourists. Of course, the weather it

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:35.199
<v Speaker 9>is much better now, so that's that's great. Great location

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 9>across the city that they've chosen to put the events

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 9>location really in the middle of the city and it

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 9>turns out to be great. So so far, transports in

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:50.640
<v Speaker 9>Paris are fine, there was no security incident, thanksfully so far,

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:53.440
<v Speaker 9>so I would say good for those visiting in.

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 4>Paris, Bloomberg's Ben wir buttlo thank you so much. Great

0:20:56.760 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 4>to have you on the ground in Paris, Welcome back

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 4>to Bloomberg Technology, Ed Lovelow in New York City, and

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:11.160
<v Speaker 4>a very quick check in on the markets.

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 5>I mean, we know the story this week. It's a story.

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 4>About four of the biggest technology names reporting earnings and

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 4>then as that one hundred is basically flat in the session,

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 4>but the context is that it's coming off three straight

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 4>weeks of weekly declines. There was a lot of talk

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:28.159
<v Speaker 4>about how close we are to a technical correction, so

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 4>there is a lot at stake depending on how those

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 4>earnings reports go in the moment. One asset class that's

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 4>superin focus is crypto. Bitcoin around or just below sixty

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 4>eight thousand US dollars per token and other names miners

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:48.120
<v Speaker 4>or crypto adjacent names had been kind of interestingly high.

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 5>Now lower. Why will bitcoin.

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 4>Touch the highest level since mid June, after Republican candidate

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:58.160
<v Speaker 4>Donald Trump expanded his pro crypto agenda at Bitcoin twenty

0:21:58.200 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 4>twenty four over the weekend.

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 5>Is speaking at the conference this afternoon.

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.400
<v Speaker 10>I'm laying out my plan to ensure that the United

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:09.959
<v Speaker 10>States will be the crypto capital of the planet and

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:14.199
<v Speaker 10>the bitcoin superpower of the world, and we'll get it done.

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 4>Let's break it all down with Bloomberg intelligence analyst James Seffert,

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 4>who was at the conference.

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 5>You're looking fresh.

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:22.160
<v Speaker 4>After what I imagined with some late nights and wild

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:24.440
<v Speaker 4>afternoons over in Nashville.

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 5>I mean, we'll get to Trump. Just what was it like?

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 5>How is your weekend?

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:31.159
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean it was. There was a lot of

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 8>excitement in the air. I was. I've been to the

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:36.439
<v Speaker 8>conference the last few years, and I will say this

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 8>feels it makes sense. Right. We have the Bitcoin ETFs

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:40.640
<v Speaker 8>now that launched in January.

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 5>There's a lot.

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:44.440
<v Speaker 8>More big banks and big institutional players that if they're

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:47.159
<v Speaker 8>not fully involved in bitcoin, they're at least interested. I

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 8>mean the likes of I interviewed Robbie Mitchnick from Blackrock

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:52.920
<v Speaker 8>on stage. We had Yon van Neck, the CEO of

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 8>van Ck, State Street was there, Fidelity was there, you

0:22:57.040 --> 0:22:59.399
<v Speaker 8>name it. There's a lot of institutional, big time players

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 8>from the cheerful financial world that are now dipping their

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 8>toe or not fully jumped into the water on the

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 8>bitcoin side of things.

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>So I will say it's become more.

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 5>Mature, but it was still a lot of excitement.

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:11.920
<v Speaker 8>There was a lot of fun and people were amped

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:13.679
<v Speaker 8>up to have Trump and a lot of There was

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 8>over ten other congressmen and women at the conference too,

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:20.439
<v Speaker 8>so it was almost a little political party in a

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 8>way too.

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 4>So the headline is that Trump has promised to make

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 4>bitcoin great again, which is good for headlines as.

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 5>Sound bites go.

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 4>But also talked about SEC chair Gary Gensler and saying

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:36.399
<v Speaker 4>that he would basically replace him if he's reelected with

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:40.159
<v Speaker 4>somebody that loves crypto. How did that go down with

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:43.440
<v Speaker 4>the industry, investors, the community around bitcoin.

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 8>Yeah. He gave a rare long, rambling speech as Trump

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 8>often does, right, and the one thing that got the

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 8>crowd the loudest by far was him saying on day one,

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 8>I'm going to fire Gary Gensler. And let's be clear,

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 8>I'm pretty sure he doesn't technically have the ability to

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 8>do that, though it's pretty standard when a new president

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 8>and comes in they kind of turn it over and

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:03.919
<v Speaker 8>get the people they want at the heads of agencies.

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 1>But it doesn't matter.

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 8>It's a talking point and it's something that people love.

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 8>You also talked about stopping Elizabeth Warren and her quote

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 8>boons a whole bunch of other things out there that

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 8>the bitcoiner crowd wanted to hear. I guess actions speak

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 8>one of the words we'll see, but they definitely liked it.

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:24.159
<v Speaker 8>It was certainly a little bit different from his typical

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 8>trumb speech audience, but he hit the points he wanted

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 8>to hit.

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoiners seemed to love it.

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:32.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 4>James for Bloomberg Intelligence, who was there at Bitcoin twenty

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:38.159
<v Speaker 4>twenty four, Thank you. Let's keep a conversation going as

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:40.879
<v Speaker 4>the US election looms. Bloomberg's out to day with a

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 4>big take on Trump's own journey with crypto, going from

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:50.119
<v Speaker 4>skeptic to bitcoin cheerleader. I'm delighted to bring in Kristen Smith,

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 4>CEO of the Blockchain Association and DC based Trade Association.

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 4>You represent around one hundred of the industry's leading companies

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:01.399
<v Speaker 4>and you're quoted in that big take. But for me,

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 4>that's the story. It wasn't so long ago that former

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 4>President Trump was talking about that the criminality associated with

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 4>crypto and blockchain, his doubts about it, to now being

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:17.680
<v Speaker 4>all out. Has that changed the tide for your industry?

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:21.400
<v Speaker 11>Well, nobody ever goes from being pro crypto to anti crypto.

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 11>It's only the other way around. And I think that's

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 11>what we saw with Donald Trump, and it's what we're

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 11>seeing with folks on both sides of the aisle, both

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 11>who are in Congress today and who are running for

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:32.680
<v Speaker 11>Congress right now.

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 3>And I think the.

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 11>Reason for that is that when you don't know a

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 11>whole lot about crypto, you often have misconceptions about what

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 11>is used for or how it works. But as you

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 11>gain that knowledge and you begin to understand the power

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 11>of decentralized technology, you realize what tens of millions of

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:52.439
<v Speaker 11>Americans know is that this is something that could be

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 11>the foundation for a new financial services system or an

0:25:56.680 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 11>alternative to the big tech ecosystem in a way that

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 11>is better for users and consumers. And so there's a

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 11>real reason that people like this. And what we've seen

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 11>as a result of this is it's translating into the elections.

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:15.439
<v Speaker 11>The crypto voter is real and the crypto advocate is strong.

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 11>And I think that this is something we're going to

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 11>continue to see talked about heading into the elections.

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 4>As far Kristin we mentioned it, but I want to

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 4>actually play the SoundBite. This is former President Trump talking

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 4>about the SEC and Gary Againstler.

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:33.400
<v Speaker 10>On day one, I will fire Gary Gainst, who will

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 10>appoint a new SEC chairman who believes America should build

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 10>the future, not.

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 3>Block the future.

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 5>Caban taking office, I will.

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 10>Immediately appoint a Bitcoin and Crypto Presidential Advisory Council.

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 4>What is the Blockchain Association and the groups that you

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 4>represent reaction to that statement.

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 11>I think people are incredibly excited by that that statement.

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 11>You know, we have had both at the Blockchain Association

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:05.200
<v Speaker 11>and within our member companies a lot of outreach over

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 11>the past couple of years to the SEC to try

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 11>to have a reasonable conversation about how to bring regulation

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 11>to this space. And as a result, Gensler has just

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 11>come back with enforcement action after enforcement action, and it's

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:21.359
<v Speaker 11>costing the industry hundreds of millions, if not over a

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 11>billion dollars in legal fees just to deal with challenges

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 11>from the SEC. Right now, this is absolutely ridiculous. Isn't

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 11>how things should be done, And people are angry, and

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 11>so I think people are very excited that Trump has

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 11>come out this strong. I think what's interesting is we're

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 11>also hearing a lot of conversations on the democratic side

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 11>of the isle we have. We had Billy Fourteen members

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 11>of Congress wrote a letter to the DNC urging them

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:51.640
<v Speaker 11>to include something pro crypto in the platform. And there's

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:56.439
<v Speaker 11>a lot of outreach to the new nominee or presumptive nominee.

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:58.920
<v Speaker 11>I guess I should say on the Democratic side, Harris,

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 11>to see if can come out and do something pro

0:28:02.560 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 11>crypto as well. So this isn't a partisan issue, but

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 11>I would say Trump had a very strong showing over

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 11>the weekend, and people were incredibly encouraged by the acknowledgment

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 11>of the difficult time that we've had over the past

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:17.639
<v Speaker 11>three and a half years with Gary Gensler.

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 4>Christ On, the vice president. That had been reported she'd

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 4>also considered appeering out or speaking at Bitcoin twenty twenty

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:27.360
<v Speaker 4>four and then did not do so. Has the Blockchain

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 4>Association had any conversation or engagement with her campaign team

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 4>and would you hope to do so?

0:28:34.320 --> 0:28:35.679
<v Speaker 5>We absolutely hope to do so.

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 11>We have outreached both to her government team and her

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 11>campaign team right now, and I know she's had conversations

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 11>with some of the leaders within the industry already, and

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 11>so I think there's a lot of hope. I think

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 11>what's really interesting is typically when Donald Trump comes out

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 11>in support of a policy, the Democratic Party runs the

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 11>other way. But what we're seeing here is a competition

0:28:57.280 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 11>for which party can gain that value crypto voter. There's

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 11>a poll from a couple months ago, but I think

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 11>it's still relevant that one in five voters in swing

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 11>states considers cryptocurrency an important issue heading into the election

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 11>this fall. And I think that both sides are seeing

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:16.959
<v Speaker 11>those numbers and that there's a realization that there's no

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 11>upside to being anti crypto, that really both parties need

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 11>to be thoughtful about how to approach this so that

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:25.479
<v Speaker 11>we can get the right policy in place, so that

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 11>those voters will will go to the polls, but more importantly,

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 11>that we'll be able to keep the industry and the

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 11>community thriving here in the United States.

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 4>Christin Smith, CEO of the Blockchain Association, thank you. Another

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 4>story we're tracking. The US Justice Department says TikTok collective

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 4>users information on sensitive topics, making it a national security threat,

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 4>which justifies a law to ban the app in the US.

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 4>If byte Dance doesn't divest belan Thos, Mike Shephard is

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 4>back in. Mike let's just start by asking what is

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 4>new here and what is the latest.

0:29:57.400 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 2>So there are three key points that emerge in this

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 2>Justice Department filing, and that was the first detailed response

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 2>to TikTok's effort to overturn this law that was passed

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 2>in April and signed by President Joe Biden. It requires

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 2>the company to be sold by its Chinese owners by

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 2>January nineteenth. The government has been on the hook to

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:18.959
<v Speaker 2>demonstrate further in court why that's necessary. So there were

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 2>three key points that really emerged. One, you headed right

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 2>at the top is data collection. The company collects a

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:27.640
<v Speaker 2>lot of data on its one hundred and seventy million users.

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 2>That includes private messages, viewing habits, even users' location, and

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 2>that is information that is not adequately walled off from

0:30:36.200 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 2>China and from China's government, the government contends. Two, we

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 2>also see the government raising the flag of censorship. It

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 2>says that China could step in to exert control over

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 2>content on the platform, either censoring or promoting different kind

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 2>of content that could suit its government's interests. And then three,

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 2>we saw the government take on the whole question of

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:01.959
<v Speaker 2>free speech rights that TikTok has been raising as it

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 2>challenges this law. We're seeing that TikTok is saying this

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 2>is unfair, but the US government responded seeing that, look,

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 2>free speech rights do not apply when the algorithm and

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 2>data are being collected and owned by a foreign power,

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:20.480
<v Speaker 2>and that is really one of the key issues at

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 2>hand here.

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 4>I might will show the TikTok response, but very quickly

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 4>summarize it for us.

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 5>Well.

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 2>In brief, they are doubling down on their response that

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 2>this law violates free speech rights, and it also insists

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 2>that the government has yet to show adequate evidence of

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:39.480
<v Speaker 2>this national security threat that lawmakers talked about, that the

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Justice Department talked about in the briefing filed on Friday.

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 2>And to be fair to TikTok's point, so much of

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 2>that filing from late Friday was redacted, so only the

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 2>judge in the case we'll see those arguments made on

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 2>national security grounds because that information remains classified.

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 4>Still Boom bags, Mike Sheppard, thank you now, coming up

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 4>rated opening weekend record has been smashed by Deadpool and Wolverine.

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 4>Details on Disney's box office domination. Next, This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 4>It's going viral. Deadpool has dominated the weekend box office,

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 4>bringing in two hundred and five million dollars, making it

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 4>the best ever opening for an R rated film. Bloomberg's

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 4>Hannah Miller joins me on set, and what's so astonishing

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 4>about that is that's just the US and Canada, you know,

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 4>so global hit. But the numbers are ahead of forecast.

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 4>Here just give me the size and scope against everything

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 4>else I could have watched this weekend.

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, it's smashing records globally as well for R rated movies.

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 12>People are flocking to this film. There were very high

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 12>expectations from the get go. It has exceeded those expectations

0:32:57.360 --> 0:33:00.120
<v Speaker 12>in terms of box office performance. This is huge for

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 12>the film industry and for struggling movie theater chains.

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 5>You and I, full disclosure, have not yet seen it.

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 3>Not yet.

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 4>BlueBag Technology senior producer Jackie Lopez says the soundtrack is fire,

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 4>So that's really interesting. Deple one great, depl two. I

0:33:14.640 --> 0:33:17.200
<v Speaker 4>think we agree on that, right. We are not film critics,

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:20.560
<v Speaker 4>but for Disney, parent of Marvel, this is important.

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 5>I think I think so too.

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 12>So we saw a huge influx of Marvel films that underperformed,

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 12>they took a little break. This one came out it's

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 12>putting Marvel and Disney back on top again. When it

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 12>comes to box office performance.

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 4>What else was it up against. That's a big question

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 4>because you have something like Twister, it'd already been.

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:42.120
<v Speaker 12>Out, so with Twisters, we actually think it's going to

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:46.760
<v Speaker 12>take away audiences from Twisters, especially for IMAX showings. That's

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 12>been a huge draw for Twisters. There's also going to

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 12>be Imax showings from Deadpool and Wolverine, so we think

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 12>this is going to continue to dominate, you know, inside

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 12>Out too. We saw that drop as well. This is

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 12>the film that everyone wants to see right now.

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's Hanamella and New York on that New Entertainment beat.

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:04.520
<v Speaker 5>What a great gig.

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:08.359
<v Speaker 4>Another big story, Google streaming music player has long lagged

0:34:08.400 --> 0:34:11.360
<v Speaker 4>behind Spotify, Apple, and Amazon in US market share, but

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:15.239
<v Speaker 4>now things are changing for YouTube music. Bloomberg lustin Car

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:17.760
<v Speaker 4>has a few thoughts on that in today's Tech Daily.

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:20.759
<v Speaker 4>The breaking headline news of which is you spend twelve

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:24.440
<v Speaker 4>hundred dollars a year on Google subscriptions, which is wild.

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:28.279
<v Speaker 4>But again, YouTube music's not one that I use either.

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 3>What have you found out?

0:34:31.200 --> 0:34:33.320
<v Speaker 13>You know, it's interesting I found out that I've actually

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 13>been paying for YouTube Music this whole time, included in

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:39.719
<v Speaker 13>my YouTube Premium subscription. But like you, I've just never

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 13>really thought of YouTube as a music services. I subscribed

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 13>to Spotify. A lot of my friends use Apple Music

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 13>or Amazon service that's included in prime. And what I

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:52.080
<v Speaker 13>found is they've sort of put together this pretty unique

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 13>service that's differentiated by video. You know, if you use

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 13>YouTube Music, you get access to music videos, live concerts,

0:34:58.560 --> 0:35:02.080
<v Speaker 13>a lot of podcasts, material that just regular people upload

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:05.880
<v Speaker 13>to the video website, and that influences your sort of

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:10.240
<v Speaker 13>music algorithm and the song recommendations you get. You know,

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:14.560
<v Speaker 13>Alphabed just last week was saying how much subscription growth

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:16.720
<v Speaker 13>they're seeing. That's one of the big drivers they're seeing

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 13>is from music. They actually earlier this year surpassed one

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 13>hundred million subscribers for YouTube Premium and YouTube Music, so

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:26.720
<v Speaker 13>we're seeing a huge uptick. That's one of the areas

0:35:26.719 --> 0:35:29.880
<v Speaker 13>of growth in the music space where it's Apple Music

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 13>and some of the other providers are sort of lagging.

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 4>Right now, we're showing some pictures of what YouTube Music

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:36.800
<v Speaker 4>looks like, and I actually am a bit surprised. I

0:35:36.840 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 4>knew very little about YouTube Music, it seems something very

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:43.960
<v Speaker 4>similar or akin to Spotify.

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:46.879
<v Speaker 13>Well, it is a little bit similar in the sense

0:35:46.880 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 13>that they do have a lot of the streaming tracks,

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:50.840
<v Speaker 13>but again what's different is that it's connected to the

0:35:50.920 --> 0:35:54.239
<v Speaker 13>data that is sort of taken from you using the

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:57.720
<v Speaker 13>YouTube video website. So if you're searching something for YouTube

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:01.560
<v Speaker 13>and you come across sort of a late night talk

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:03.960
<v Speaker 13>show with a particular artist on that Let's say Bono

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:09.000
<v Speaker 13>is talking to ConA O'Brien, that will influence your songworkommendations

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:11.400
<v Speaker 13>on YouTube music, and suddenly you might see more Bono

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:15.280
<v Speaker 13>or even more ConA O'Brien podcasts. So it's this weird amalgamation.

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 13>And that is one thing that I think YouTube has

0:36:17.719 --> 0:36:21.480
<v Speaker 13>always struggled with, what is its identity. It's this massive platform,

0:36:21.680 --> 0:36:25.319
<v Speaker 13>but they've tried to carve out separate brands. They have

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 13>YouTube TV, which is for pay television, and this is

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:30.839
<v Speaker 13>YouTube Music, which is a standalone app. But again it's

0:36:30.880 --> 0:36:33.320
<v Speaker 13>trying to take advantage of some of that scale and

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:36.399
<v Speaker 13>sort of data that they've collected over the years from

0:36:36.400 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 13>your viewing habits on YouTube.

0:36:37.840 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 4>Proper well, so real quick viewing habits you have to

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:43.680
<v Speaker 4>kind of accept that the consumer has different habits and

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:46.280
<v Speaker 4>different markets around the world. Right, where is the growth

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:49.880
<v Speaker 4>for YouTube music coming from? Not necessarily here in North America.

0:36:51.600 --> 0:36:54.760
<v Speaker 13>It's coming from a lot of emerging markets where YouTube

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:57.719
<v Speaker 13>is gigantic, just the video website is gigantic. And I

0:36:57.760 --> 0:36:59.560
<v Speaker 13>think that's a key thing that that Google is really

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:04.279
<v Speaker 13>leading in. Of those one hundred million subscribers for YouTube subscriptions,

0:37:04.320 --> 0:37:07.080
<v Speaker 13>they don't break down the difference between YouTube's ads free

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:10.719
<v Speaker 13>video site that's one subscription, and the music player. The

0:37:10.760 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 13>way they've sort of grown both of them is by

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 13>merging them into this sort of all in one package

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:17.279
<v Speaker 13>that you can get just called the YouTube Premium plan,

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:20.279
<v Speaker 13>and that includes the music subscription. The thing is, you know,

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:23.320
<v Speaker 13>for me, I've been I subscribe to YouTube TV, Google

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:27.360
<v Speaker 13>Cloud Storage, YouTube Premium, but I still have not brought

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:30.800
<v Speaker 13>myself to use the music player. I still subscribe to Spotify,

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:32.919
<v Speaker 13>but I will say, just using it this past week,

0:37:33.360 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 13>it's pretty interesting. It's a lot different than what you

0:37:35.120 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 13>see from Apple and Spotify and Amazon, and I think

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 13>it's worth to go if you haven't tried it.

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 4>Theasting car, thank you very much. Mobile video editing app

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 4>cap cut is gaining popularity, putting pressure on long time

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:59.280
<v Speaker 4>creative software leaders like Adobe. Capcut is owned by byte Dance,

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:03.880
<v Speaker 4>TikTok's parent company, meaning the threat to ban TikTok would

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:06.720
<v Speaker 4>mark the end for capcut in the US as well.

0:38:07.000 --> 0:38:09.440
<v Speaker 4>That's bringing Bloomberg's Brady Fort He's been writing about this.

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:12.200
<v Speaker 4>You look at a sense of hower data and starting

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:16.239
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty pandemic it just usage of capcut is absolutely

0:38:16.320 --> 0:38:19.200
<v Speaker 4>rocketed and taking it to a new level.

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:19.720
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:38:20.160 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 14>So Adobe, maker of creative software like Photoshop, Premiere, all

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:26.879
<v Speaker 14>the others, they have long hoped to kind of get

0:38:26.920 --> 0:38:30.160
<v Speaker 14>a piece of this more casual content creative market.

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:32.799
<v Speaker 3>Cap Cuts been able to just go crazy with that.

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:34.840
<v Speaker 14>And why is that because they're almost the same company

0:38:34.840 --> 0:38:37.640
<v Speaker 14>as TikTok, right, And so it's here on TikTok and

0:38:37.640 --> 0:38:40.000
<v Speaker 14>you see a certain video format, you could say, hey,

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 14>let me recreate this. It is a format of editing

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:46.440
<v Speaker 14>that is so much simpler than what existed before it,

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 14>and it's picked up like three hundred million monthly active

0:38:49.200 --> 0:38:51.920
<v Speaker 14>users in a way that's pretty wild.

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:55.880
<v Speaker 4>So the risk is by association and same parent company

0:38:56.200 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 4>TikTok's fate, cap cuts is very closely tied to it.

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly right. I mean the bill.

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:04.239
<v Speaker 14>We had a senior lawmaker confirmed to us, Yes, this

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 14>wood can you know include cap cut.

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:08.720
<v Speaker 3>Cap cut is on my byte Dance.

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:11.400
<v Speaker 14>They share office space with TikTok in La, So yeah,

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:15.600
<v Speaker 14>all of the same risks apply. Will it be hard

0:39:15.640 --> 0:39:17.840
<v Speaker 14>to find someone to buy cap cut?

0:39:17.960 --> 0:39:20.920
<v Speaker 3>Would bite Dance even be open to that? That's not clear.

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:23.840
<v Speaker 14>What is clear is we have a lot of users

0:39:23.880 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 14>that would probably be not too happy if this app.

0:39:26.480 --> 0:39:29.360
<v Speaker 4>Went poof interesting for Adobe day, I mean what they've

0:39:29.400 --> 0:39:32.680
<v Speaker 4>struggled to why. And then also, you know, for cap cut,

0:39:32.719 --> 0:39:34.960
<v Speaker 4>it would basically take their legs out from underneath them

0:39:35.200 --> 0:39:36.480
<v Speaker 4>in this battle.

0:39:37.080 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 14>Well, it's a funny thing for Adobe because you might think, oh, well,

0:39:40.080 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 14>if cap cut goes away, it's good for them, But

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:45.520
<v Speaker 14>not really, because TikTok is also a place where, you know,

0:39:45.640 --> 0:39:48.760
<v Speaker 14>content creation is good for Adobe. The more social media

0:39:48.800 --> 0:39:52.400
<v Speaker 14>there is, the more you need creative content creation apps.

0:39:52.440 --> 0:39:54.960
<v Speaker 14>And so it's kind of a darned if you do,

0:39:55.040 --> 0:39:56.240
<v Speaker 14>darned if you don't. For Adobe.

0:39:56.239 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Here, as it relates to cap cuts existence.

0:39:58.320 --> 0:40:01.080
<v Speaker 5>Capcut making any money? Is it hundred bible.

0:40:00.840 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 14>Five million a year according to Censor Tower estimates, which

0:40:04.200 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 14>is I mean, you know, that's a lot in terms

0:40:06.080 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 14>of occurring revenue at this stage in the app's life.

0:40:08.719 --> 0:40:12.239
<v Speaker 4>That is no joke Blimdke's Brady Ford bringing this new

0:40:12.320 --> 0:40:14.399
<v Speaker 4>name to us. But go into the story and look

0:40:14.400 --> 0:40:17.080
<v Speaker 4>at the chart. I mean the growth relative to the

0:40:17.160 --> 0:40:21.680
<v Speaker 4>to the peers or competition is absolutely wild.

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:23.480
<v Speaker 5>What are you using right now?

0:40:23.560 --> 0:40:27.800
<v Speaker 4>I mean there's there's a frustration that text to video

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:31.040
<v Speaker 4>or is in particular, is not where we kind of

0:40:31.040 --> 0:40:33.640
<v Speaker 4>want it to be. It has limitations, and that's part

0:40:33.640 --> 0:40:34.879
<v Speaker 4>of the Adobe story as well.

0:40:35.600 --> 0:40:35.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:39.400
<v Speaker 14>Absolutely, And I think that the whole idea that text

0:40:39.440 --> 0:40:42.840
<v Speaker 14>to videos what's gonna destroy the incumbents.

0:40:43.160 --> 0:40:45.160
<v Speaker 3>I think that's actually quite a bit further out.

0:40:45.280 --> 0:40:48.280
<v Speaker 14>Cap Cut is this interesting thing where it's somewhere in between,

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:50.239
<v Speaker 14>where it uses a lot of AI, uses a.

0:40:50.239 --> 0:40:51.480
<v Speaker 3>Lot of templates in between.

0:40:51.800 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 14>I mean, I used to make documentaries before I became

0:40:54.120 --> 0:40:55.680
<v Speaker 14>more of a print journalist, and a lot of my

0:40:55.719 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 14>friends from that era are starting to switch.

0:40:58.200 --> 0:40:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Off of apps like Adobe.

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:01.279
<v Speaker 14>They're starting to go of these simpler things, and I

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:04.840
<v Speaker 14>think it's happening across the industry that the true text

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 14>to video AI. It's out there, it's coming. But what's

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 14>happening today is these simpler tools.

0:41:11.160 --> 0:41:12.400
<v Speaker 4>And you go back to the idea, if you're a

0:41:12.400 --> 0:41:14.560
<v Speaker 4>creator on TikTok, well, why would you not use something

0:41:14.600 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 4>this analogous like cap cart.

0:41:16.520 --> 0:41:17.879
<v Speaker 5>Yes, they've the stout parent as well.

0:41:18.120 --> 0:41:21.239
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's Brady Ford constantly unearthing things that I did not

0:41:21.360 --> 0:41:24.440
<v Speaker 4>know about. That does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology.

0:41:24.480 --> 0:41:26.720
<v Speaker 4>Stay with us this week we will continue to break

0:41:26.760 --> 0:41:29.560
<v Speaker 4>down the biggest technology earnings and my goodness, what a

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:31.960
<v Speaker 4>week it is in that context.

0:41:31.440 --> 0:41:32.920
<v Speaker 5>And don't forget to check out our podcast.

0:41:33.000 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 4>You can find it on the terminal as well as

0:41:34.640 --> 0:41:38.400
<v Speaker 4>online at Apple, Spotify, iHeart, and all of the Bloomberg

0:41:38.440 --> 0:41:39.680
<v Speaker 4>platforms from New York City.

0:41:39.719 --> 0:41:41.880
<v Speaker 5>This week, this is Bloomberg Technology.