WEBVTT - President Trump Announces Apple and Intel Chip Collaboration

0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Tech is live from the heart of Silicon Valley

0:00:09.600 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 1>with Ed Lulow in San Francisco.

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 3>President Trump posts about a chip agreement between Apple and Intel,

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:22.960
<v Speaker 3>sending Intel Soaring will have the details.

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:23.920
<v Speaker 2>Plus we speak with.

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:26.639
<v Speaker 3>The CEO of Anderil after the company wins a production

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 3>contract for autonomous fighters with the US Air Force and

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 3>SpaceX shares full for a second straight day after a

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 3>forty nine percent jump, still in high orbit as the

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 3>company concludes its first full week of trading. Thursday, June eighteenth,

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Tech Intel is at a record high after the

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 3>President of the United States posted a very long truth

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 3>social which included a reference to an agreement between Intel

0:00:57.240 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 3>and Apple for chip design and chip manufacturing. Simple story.

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 3>There is some background to it that Bloomberg News has

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 3>reported in the past. It also talked about Nvidia, terror

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 3>fab and a lot more. But it's Intel where we

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 3>focus and Bloomberg's and King is with us along with

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Intelligence Senior analyst man Deep Singh, and we're going

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 3>to start with ian an agreement. What do we know?

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 3>What do we do not know?

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:31.320
<v Speaker 4>Well, we've previously reported that Apple was exploring using Intel

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 4>as a second source for manufacturing some of its chips.

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:37.399
<v Speaker 4>What the president is saying, and you know, we have

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 4>to be careful because not everything he says immediately comes true.

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 4>That this has actually reached a firmer stage. And if

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 4>that's the case, and that's clearly a boost for Intel's

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 4>efforts to become a manufacturer for other companies.

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 3>Ian really quickly, you reported with Mark and Ryan in

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 3>May that Apple was looking at its options. Explain the

0:01:58.600 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 3>basics of that report.

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 2>That's right right now.

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 4>There are Apple is completely dependent upon TSMC right for manufacturing,

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 4>so obviously that's a choke point, something that they wish wish,

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, they would like to have a solution to

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 4>have options. So you would look at Samsung and you

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 4>would look at Intel as potential backups or potential supplemental manufacturers.

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:21.360
<v Speaker 4>And that's what we understand is going on. Apple has

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 4>always been smart about the supply chain.

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 3>That's the reporting in the details, let's get the analysis.

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 3>Mandy's singing, who leads our technology research team a Bloomberg

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:32.919
<v Speaker 3>Intelligence What are you making of this? Right? Ean outlined

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 3>that actually in May there was a sense that Apple

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 3>was looking at options but you have the President of

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 3>the United States saying there's an agreement. How much can

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 3>you model for that the president's statement.

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:48.399
<v Speaker 5>Look, I mean, there's no doubt that Intel is now

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:53.399
<v Speaker 5>well positioned to be a double digit revenue growth company

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 5>given what we have seen so far with the CPU

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 5>demand that has taken off with Agent and now you know,

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 5>the fab side of things would get a real kicker

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 5>for if Apple was to use it for manufacturing. And

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 5>you know, when you have one design WRIN, it follows

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 5>with you know, multiple companies that want to use your manufacturing,

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:22.359
<v Speaker 5>and that's where it could be very exciting if actually

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 5>Apple ends up ramping up in volume.

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:29.079
<v Speaker 3>Here I note that Apple shares are a percentage point.

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Tim Kok this.

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 3>Year, the outgoing CEO soon to be executive chairman of Apple,

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 3>game in interview to Wall Street Journal where he said

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 3>they're going to have to raise prices because of the

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 3>commodity environment. But what do you interpret here, mandeep on

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 3>the Apple side of this story with Intel their ability

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 3>to kind of reindustrialize here in America.

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 5>On the chip side, well, look right now, when I

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 5>look at TSMC's capacity and video has already prepaid. You

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 5>know what one hundred and twenty billion dollars for TSMC capacity.

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 5>So even an Apple which used to get proferential treatment

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 5>at TSMC, right now, I think they're feeling that Nvidio

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 5>probably has a bigger lock in in terms of PSMC

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 5>manufacturing capacity. And from an Apple standpoint, I think diversification

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 5>and really appeasing the president here makes a ton of sense.

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 5>So from that perspective, I think psmc's monopoly is a

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 5>problem for a lot of you know, they're big customers,

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 5>including Apple, and it makes sense that they're looking to

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:34.479
<v Speaker 5>diversify here.

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:39.040
<v Speaker 3>In finally, to you, there's kind of two parts that

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 3>Intel's foundry story. There's the process, the technology process, and

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 3>then the sort of solidity of whether they have any customers.

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 3>Where are they at with both of those things.

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:51.559
<v Speaker 4>Right What they've said is that their process is getting

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 4>better and better, getting closer to the industry standard, which

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:58.679
<v Speaker 4>would be TSMC yield being very important. They're the amount

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 4>of good chips you make for the run. In terms

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:03.599
<v Speaker 4>of customers, they've said, look, we're not going to talk

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 4>about it. We're hopeful we've got a couple of big

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:08.840
<v Speaker 4>irons in the fire that might come to fruition in

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 4>the second half of this year. But we're not going to.

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Talk about it. We're going to leave it up to them.

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 4>We're not going to get ahead of ourselves and.

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 2>So on that.

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 3>Now, I point out that neither Intel nor Apple have

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 3>commented so far on the president's post Bloomberg Zy and

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 3>King and Mandeep seing of a Bloomberg intelligence Thank you

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 3>both very much. Let's brought in the conversation beyond chips.

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 3>Then that's that one hundred pushing higher two percent in

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 3>the session. We're kind of trading near those records of

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 3>recent weeks.

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:34.719
<v Speaker 2>I would say there's a lot going on in the market.

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 3>Semiconductors are a big part of the market right now,

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 3>but the Intel story is a catalyst and driver of that.

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 3>There is the SpaceX part of this market, and then

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:45.599
<v Speaker 3>there is the role of the retail investors. The AI

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 3>trade has been expanding. Investors are looking across software infrastructure,

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 3>the next generation of tech leaders for the market's next

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:54.679
<v Speaker 3>growth engine.

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.359
<v Speaker 2>Could those be IPOs? So much to discuss.

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:01.159
<v Speaker 3>Ankor Crawford portfolio manager ourgas with us. You know, I

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 3>always say this one one session of market does not

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:08.040
<v Speaker 3>make really interesting though. How we're ending this short training

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:11.720
<v Speaker 3>week in the US, with so many factors for you

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 3>right now, what is the main driver of psychology for

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 3>the technology sector?

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:19.599
<v Speaker 6>Gosh, you know, I think that what I find is

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 6>people are finally understanding how significant this AI trade is

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 6>going to be, and that's what's getting reflected in some

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 6>of the moves that you're seeing.

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 2>In the market.

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 6>You know, the impact of the shortages of the supply

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 6>chain are also becoming very obvious, whether you see what's

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 6>happening in memory or the optical supply chain, and so,

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 6>you know, I feel like the market is fully understanding

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:49.719
<v Speaker 6>the kind of supply chain implications and the demand implications.

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 6>You're going to have a CEO on later who recently

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:57.359
<v Speaker 6>commented that token pricing for him went up to x

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 6>in over the last we'd got to x in in

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 6>the next six months. Well, that is an indication of

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 6>supply demand balance. And you know, clearly we are significantly

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 6>we need significantly more tokens and we have significantly more

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 6>demand for the intelligence then we have supply.

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 3>It's so interesting where like the kind of raw data

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:23.239
<v Speaker 3>sets or and thotal data sets that the markets tracking

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 3>are so different now to what they were. I don't

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 3>know you tell me, like as recently as last year

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 3>or two years ago, and I.

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Want to talk about SpaceX.

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, how big a factor has that IPO been

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 3>for you and your team and how have you sort

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 3>of responded to it.

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 6>Well, it's not necessarily a factor, but it's clearly an

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 6>incredibly significant company that has a very open ended story

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 6>alongside with it. We've never really seen a business like

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 6>SpaceX before in our careers, would I would argue there,

0:07:56.080 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 6>you know, humanity hasn't seen a business like SpaceX. So

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 6>you know, we have found a significant place in our

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 6>port on our portfolios for SpaceX, in part because we

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 6>do see incredible appreciation as we look out three and

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 6>five years now. The day to day trading on it

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 6>is you know, who knows. There's a lot of things

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 6>that affect that day to day trading, but we are

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 6>very bullish on its prospects.

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 3>The retail investors tied a big role head we spites

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 3>cheld SWEBC.

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Let's get his take.

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 7>As a breakthrough event, I think for the retail investor

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 7>who is allocated roughly twenty percent of the deal, which

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 7>is triple a typical IPO. So it's great to see

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 7>retail having a meaningful seat at the table. It created

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 7>a tremendous engagement with our clients and broadly with retail clients.

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 7>Demand was off the charts, and that demand continues. We've

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 7>seen in the three days following the IPO nearly seven

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:54.479
<v Speaker 7>billion dollars of additional orders come from our clients.

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Child schwebc West.

0:08:57.679 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 3>Is it the retail traded driving trading right now?

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 6>I'm not really sure what's driving it. I think that

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 6>there's a lot of different aspects that.

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 3>Appreciate the honesty. I don't think anyone knows anger was

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 3>driving it.

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 6>Oh, we shouldn't make it up then, and so I

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 6>don't know. All I can say is that sometimes the

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 6>market kind of thinks about the next day or the

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 6>next week, and for something like SpaceX, I think what

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 6>you have to do is look at the long arc

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 6>of time to understand what they are doing and the

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 6>significant mote that they have created with you know, Starship,

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 6>and the reusability of Starship when that comes to fruition,

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 6>and the different business models that will get unleashed. And

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 6>it is incredibly exciting to see this company now be

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 6>accessible to not only retail but also institutional investors like us,

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 6>and how.

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 3>Do you assess the role the on the rights has

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 3>played in it in getting the story of the perspectives

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 3>across to the valuation and economics of this company.

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 6>I think they did a fantastic job. I don't think

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:07.679
<v Speaker 6>it could have gone any better. And you look at

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 6>just how you know they made the management available. There

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 6>were several different you know, kind of knowledge knowledge of

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 6>zooms and that that investors could could get on and

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:24.560
<v Speaker 6>to understand the story more completely. That they priced it

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:28.199
<v Speaker 6>correctly so that you know they were leaving some economics

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 6>on the table for what its true value will be.

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 6>So I actually think they did the most beautiful job

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 6>on this IPO, and it was a tricky one because

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 6>of the valuation kind of the perception. There was a

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 6>very divided, I think opinion on SpaceX. There's some that

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 6>love it, some that hate it. Retail was a bit skittish,

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 6>it felt like to me, at least through the conversations

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 6>that I had. But so I think they actually, Donder

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 6>writers did a beautiful job on this. I hope they

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 6>repeat it with the upcoming IPOs of opening Anthropic.

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:07.319
<v Speaker 3>Really appreciate it and we're going to have that conversation

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 3>about anthropic and open AI Later in the program, Anka

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 3>Crawford of ALGIA back on Bloomberg Tech, Thank you very much.

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 3>Big news crossing the Bloomberg terminal. Amazon is in talks

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 3>to sell its custom made AI chips for use in

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 3>other companies data centers, trying to cut into invidious dominance.

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 3>This is based on an interview in Paris with Amazon's

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 3>AI chief, who said the company has begun discussions with

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 3>potential customers but declined to name them. We're talking about

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 3>Peter DeSantis here. He said he views AI infrastructure as

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 3>rapidly evolving. In the stock hitting session highs on that

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg report.

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:42.679
<v Speaker 2>Coming up.

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 3>Andreil just won a production contract for autonomous fighters with

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 3>the US Air Force as the Pentagon pushes for a

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 3>fleet of up to one thousand autonomous combat jets. We're

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 3>going to be speaking with Andreil's CEO, Brian Ship.

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 2>That's next. This is Boomberg Tech.

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 3>Andreil is having a major week. The defense tech startup

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:13.680
<v Speaker 3>just on a production contract for autonomous fighters with US

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.319
<v Speaker 3>Air Force, secured a key role in the race to

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 3>provide software for those aircraft and is moving towards scale manufacturing.

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 3>Is the Pentagon pushes for a fleet of up to

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 3>one thousand autonomous combat jets. All of that comes as

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 3>defense stocks and military technology remain in focus amid the

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 3>fallout from the US around conflict and what is a

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 3>fragile new diplomatic agreement joining US now live on Bloomberg

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 3>Tech and Real CEO Brian Schimp. You know, I think

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 3>Andreil's in this place, and it's in its evolution of

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 3>life cycle where you're trying to manage winning new contracts

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 3>and put out new technology and ramp what's already out there.

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 3>Just talk about those that trio of news you put

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:58.199
<v Speaker 3>out and how you pulled it off.

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 8>So you know, we were extremely excited to be awarded

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 8>this production contract for the Air Force Loyal wing Man

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 8>fighter jet.

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 2>And you know this.

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:12.319
<v Speaker 8>Is really about taking it from prototype technology which we've

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 8>been validating, we've been flying multiple times a day into

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:18.959
<v Speaker 8>now an operational capability. So this is both the hardware

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 8>side where we've already started to produce these out of

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 8>our facility in Ohio, our Arsenal one facility, and we

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 8>are now confirmed to move this into a production aircraft, right,

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 8>so really start to ramp this next year. So it's

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 8>super exciting, but that challenge is real, right, and we

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:40.320
<v Speaker 8>know the defense industry has had struggles ramping production to

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 8>the demand we're seeing around the world. But this is

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 8>something we've systematically invested in and everything we're showing is

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 8>that we're hitting every ramp that we've promised to hit.

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 3>There's like the established systems fury and there is the

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 3>next phase of product and contract. How difficult a decision

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 3>is it to a US sign resource to know where

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 3>to put teams and capital right now?

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 8>You know, we're we're seeing demand through the roof across

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 8>the board, right, and this is everything from weapons programs,

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 8>aircraft programs, you name it. We're seeing just a massively

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 8>increased demand across the board. But we've been able to

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 8>scale incredibly well. Right, We've doubled headcount every year. You know,

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 8>we are continuing to be able to resource these successfully, right,

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 8>and I think we're just an incredibly attractive place to work.

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 8>So for us, the challenge isn't really you know, where

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 8>do we put resources, it's just you know, running through

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 8>it as fast as we can, which we've demonstrated the

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 8>ability to do year over year for you know, the

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 8>past near decade now, so that part we're not as

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 8>concerned with. But you know, I think a huge credit

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 8>to the Air Force on this. You know, they have

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 8>decided to move out and I think the fastest fighter

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 8>jet programs in the nineteen fifties, like this is just

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 8>an immensely fast pace and I think it shows that

0:14:57.360 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 8>the government can move when it wants to and then

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 8>is can respond to that pace. And it's just an

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 8>incredibly exciting time to be able to deliver these capabilities.

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 3>How to winsle this translate to the to the revenue

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 3>run rate? You know that that big announcements, big deals,

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 3>but for the financials of this company, it's immediate or

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 3>it's a distant opportunity.

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 8>These types of programs give you know, just this amazing

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 8>base of growth for the next you know, five years, right,

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 8>And so this is about how do we lock in

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 8>that growth and success we've seen to date into something

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 8>that's going to be producing and delivering for the next decade.

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 2>And that's something.

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 8>That I think really you know, when we look at

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 8>the financials for the out years, when we stack in

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 8>all the types of big programs that we're working on now,

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 8>it more or less gives US an extremely solid base

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 8>that we're going to continue to grow on and compound

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 8>on in the future. You know, Brian, I appreciate this

0:15:56.520 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 8>is about autonomous fighters. Every time you come on the program,

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 8>I get a flood of request to ask you about

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 8>subterranean and actually I get.

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 3>The sense that you don't. It's not even that exciting

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 3>to you, guys. So what are the next domains, the

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 3>next big bets that you probably can't talk as much about,

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 3>but everyone wants me to ask you about.

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, we're doing, you know, an immense amount of work

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 8>in space. You know, there's a huge number of areas

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 8>where you know, this is becoming the next generation warfighting domain.

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 8>I think the Space Force is talking a lot more

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 8>about the adversarial activities that Russia and China are doing regularly.

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 8>You know, they are constantly maneuvering around space, threatening the

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 8>US's and Allied satellites. And I think there was an

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 8>open source report of Russia maneuvering against the satellite that's

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 8>a commercial SATELLITEES used to provide intelligence to the Ukrainians.

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 8>So this is an area that's you know, an active

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 8>growth area that is incredibly important for the US to

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 8>have leadership in and deter the adversarial activities that you know,

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 8>our adversaries are doing every day. The other area we're

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 8>just seeing an immense amount of growth in is on

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 8>the weapon side.

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, you can read all the reports.

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 8>Everyone is well aware now of what's been sort of

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 8>a poorly kept secret for a long time, which is

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 8>the US has amazing weapons, right like that, that's been

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 8>obviously true. But the inability to produce these at scale

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 8>to supply our allies, the huge delays that exist in

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 8>delivering these is a major strategic issue for the US

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 8>and our allies. And so that is translated, you know,

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 8>out of the conflict in Iran into you know, an

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 8>immense amount of demand to bring build up next generation

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 8>weapons capabilities that can be produced at scale.

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:38.119
<v Speaker 3>So looking at the Irong conflict, but you know, what

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 3>is the lesson that you think is learned here for

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:46.399
<v Speaker 3>the Pentagon on these types of technologies and war preparedness.

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so I think, you know, there's a lot of

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 8>different lessons you can take away, but one of the

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:54.439
<v Speaker 8>biggest ones was really you know, when you look at

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 8>the number of strikes, the number of ammunitions consumed in

0:17:57.160 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 8>the first thirty days of the conflict, it was something

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 8>around ten times the amount we consumed in the entirety

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:06.159
<v Speaker 8>of the Gulf War. Right, and we're shooting, you know,

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:10.439
<v Speaker 8>nearly a decade of tomahawk production in a week. Like

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 8>these are really serious quantities of munitions consumed in these

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 8>modern conflicts, and it parallels what you know has been

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 8>seen in every conflict that's played out in the last

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 8>several years. You know, particularly as you look at Ukraine,

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 8>where the amount of munitions consumed is staggering.

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 2>So I think this question of how do.

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:31.439
<v Speaker 8>You actually get the inventory the stockpiles and have the

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 8>producibility that you need, that becomes one of the critical questions.

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 8>And you know, the US again its amazing weapons, but

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 8>for the vast majority of scenarios you can you can

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 8>deal with things that are sort of lower price and

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 8>more fit for purpose and the types of you know,

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 8>uses you're realistically going to have and what you need

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 8>to convey to your adversaries you have the resiliency to do.

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 8>And so that that is probably the biggest shift I've

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 8>seen out of this conflict, which is really looking at

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:04.199
<v Speaker 8>and excite tolerating how to get to more producible capabilities quickly.

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 8>And you know we've got you know, maybe a half

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 8>dozen or more different programs that have initiated out of.

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 3>That, Brian, we just have thirty seconds. You've said Arsenal

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 3>two could be built outside of the United States. Big

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 3>market for you is Australia. Taiwan is a big factor

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:27.880
<v Speaker 3>in Anderal's guiding mission. Are those realistic locations.

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean we we have.

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 8>I think the reality in the world is that our

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:36.920
<v Speaker 8>allies are going to look to have more control over

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:39.160
<v Speaker 8>the production and supply of weapons. I think that's correct,

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 8>and I think production capacity for the Allied nations is

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:45.200
<v Speaker 8>a contribution in and of itself, and so I think

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 8>for the administration they want the Allies to be prepared

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.119
<v Speaker 8>to contribute. So the idea that they are also producing

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 8>and contributing to the Allied stockpiles is hugely advantageous. I

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 8>think that's been a very consistent message from the administrations.

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:01.119
<v Speaker 8>We've seen immense support for that. You know where we

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:03.479
<v Speaker 8>put it exactly. You know, we have a factory up

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 8>and running in Sydney, Australia making ghost Shark, and then

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 8>we're constantly evaluating the right way to help any given

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:11.879
<v Speaker 8>country on what they need, how they want us to

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 8>work with their local partners in industry, and so it's

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 8>a very nuanced process. But the reality is we think

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 8>of allied production as a critical dimension of providing that

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 8>deterrence that we're here to.

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 3>Do andreal CEO Brian Shim Microsoft is cashing in on China.

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:31.640
<v Speaker 3>Unlike its competitors, the AI cloud maker is selling it's

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 3>Azure cloud models to Chinese tech companies including TikTok Parent

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 3>bike Dance, which is on track to spend a billion

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 3>as Microsoft's top client blue most Matt Day has more.

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 3>So there's the idea that this is a typical right

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 3>doing business in China full stop.

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 2>But in the AI domain, what.

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 3>Are the models that the Microsoft is able to sell

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 3>into that market?

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 9>So Microsoft, because of its long standing partnership with Opening I,

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 9>has some unique ability to sell products in the term

0:20:57.760 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 9>of the terms under which it sells products.

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 2>We understand that there's been.

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 9>Some friction between Microsoft and Open Eye over Microsoft sales

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 9>in China, but they can they can list some of

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 9>their biggest models.

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 3>Is this big business for Microsoft, Matt Like we said,

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 3>a billion dollars potentially, But where does that stack up

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 3>against the rest of its revenues.

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 9>A big number, but not hugely significant to Microsoft at

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 9>a global scale. You know, they said China accounts for

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:21.160
<v Speaker 9>something like a percent and a half of their revenue,

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 9>so not super significant. But you know the company is

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 9>internally talking about, you know, Microsoft being the only place

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 9>where you can get top model companies on the US

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 9>West Coast and the Chinese East coast, so they think

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 9>it's a big deal internally.

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 3>So this is according to our reporting and sourcing. Other

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:39.359
<v Speaker 3>Chinese tech companies are are in the mix here. But

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 3>what have the companies said about it officially?

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 9>So they haven't said much. They have said all these

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 9>companies developed their own models. I think the lesson here is,

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 9>you know, companies tend to use just about everything. Folks

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 9>are developing their own models if they have the scale

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 9>and also accessing you know, whatever they can. And in

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 9>the case of someone Microsoft's customers, you know in China

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:58.639
<v Speaker 9>they're tapping into models served from from Singapore or other

0:21:58.680 --> 0:21:59.400
<v Speaker 9>cloud regions.

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:04.199
<v Speaker 3>Mean most about day, very important report, Thank you very much.

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 3>The big technology story out there today is Intel and Apple.

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:11.199
<v Speaker 3>The President of the United States saying on truth Social

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 3>there's an agreement between the two for Apple to work

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:19.200
<v Speaker 3>with Intel on domestic chip manufacturing here in the US.

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 3>Neither company has commented that Intel shares trading now at

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:25.119
<v Speaker 3>a fresh record high. Apple was actually paired most of

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:27.679
<v Speaker 3>its advance, so four tenths of a present had been

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 3>up one and a half percent. Would also note that

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Apple's current CEO seem to.

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 2>Be executive chair.

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 3>Tim Cook, gave an interview to The Wall Street Journal

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 3>last night saying that Apple have to raise prices because

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 3>of where commodities memory is at right now. Maybe that's

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 3>a factor.

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Not clear.

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 3>We'll continue tracking the stories. There's a bigger story in

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:50.400
<v Speaker 3>technology and markets. For years, one of the most reliable

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 3>fuels for the massive big tech rally was steady share buybacks.

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 3>The AI race is proving so expensive that repurchase programs

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:01.959
<v Speaker 3>are kind of evaporating. Michael Raine joins US from New

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 3>York to explain this shift, and like there's two parts

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:07.880
<v Speaker 3>of it. It's like capex is, you know, is expensive,

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 3>impacts the shared buyback program, but also like loads of

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:14.119
<v Speaker 3>companies are issuing new equity, new stock.

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 2>Explain it all.

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, Yeah, It's really just an amazing paradigm shift for

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 10>these stocks. You know, when you think about it, Alphabet

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:27.360
<v Speaker 10>Google alone over the previous five years had bought back

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:30.680
<v Speaker 10>something like two hundred and eighty billion dollars in their

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 10>own stock. Now they're going the opposite direction, planning to

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 10>sell about eighty five billion worth of shares to help

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:40.919
<v Speaker 10>fund this capex. And I really, you know, it is

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 10>fascinating because these buybacks were really a driver of the

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 10>market for a long time. But it really kind of

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:51.640
<v Speaker 10>exposes the notion that, yes, shareholders investors are happy when

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 10>they hear about buybacks. They're happy to have a new

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 10>buyer of the stock and shrink that share count and

0:23:56.600 --> 0:23:59.120
<v Speaker 10>boost EPs. But at the same time, it really does

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 10>signal that maybe these companies didn't have something better to

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 10>spend this money on. Now they do as far as

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 10>building out all this spending all this capex to build

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 10>out the data centers, and investors, you know, for now

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 10>are happy that there's a better plan for all this

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:17.160
<v Speaker 10>cash that they generate. You know, time will tell if

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 10>that stands the test of time and these investments prove

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 10>to be positive returns on investments, But for now, you know,

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:27.199
<v Speaker 10>the market's happy with it. Obviously, the chip maker stocks

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 10>are thrilled about it, and we're really just you know,

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:33.160
<v Speaker 10>in all of a major paradigm shift in how these

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:35.120
<v Speaker 10>companies manage their stock.

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:39.359
<v Speaker 3>Float, invokes Michael Reagan, Thank you very much. Indeed, following

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 3>the blockbuster to public debuy of SpaceX, investors are welcoming

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 3>a massive distribution event that is pumping fresh liquidity back

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:51.920
<v Speaker 3>into private markets like the vcs needed that big i PO.

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 3>It comes to a critical inflection point as a historic

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:59.919
<v Speaker 3>wave of multi billion dollar AI model companies prepare pertend

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:01.640
<v Speaker 3>to cross that IPO threshold.

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Joining us now is matt.

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:06.640
<v Speaker 3>Wick Tyler, head of Late stage Growth at Wellington Management.

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 3>What a time to be you and on your desk?

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 3>Should we start with SpaceX? You know, to so many

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 3>participants in this market, it presages this great IPO year.

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Is that what you expect?

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 3>I think that's exactly right.

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 11>If you rewind the clock and you look back to

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 11>just March of this year, when I was last here

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:32.959
<v Speaker 11>with you, we were talking about the fact that the

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 11>first of the big ones to go out will be SpaceX,

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 11>and that this year's activity will be driven by the

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 11>megacap private companies that are now going public.

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:43.959
<v Speaker 2>And we had that in SpaceX.

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 11>And again, if you rewind the clock and we think

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:48.399
<v Speaker 11>about the conversation you and I had back in March.

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 11>We were talking about the fact that we believed I

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:53.239
<v Speaker 11>believe that SpaceX would perform well. And I think we're

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 11>sitting here today, not quite a week into their trading, saying, oh,

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:58.680
<v Speaker 11>SpaceX is performing as expected.

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 3>Mister Reagan just raised really interesting points, which is like,

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:06.679
<v Speaker 3>it's not just IPOs. Generally, this market could be flooded

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 3>with equity. It's not universal that it's a good time

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 3>to go public. I spoke to Ali Godsey, the Data

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 3>Bricks CEO, very recently.

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:17.879
<v Speaker 4>His his take three mega IPOs that have been rumored.

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 3>One of them happened, you know, So letting those kind

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 3>of go through the system and see how that sort.

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:25.160
<v Speaker 9>Of plays out and things stabilize a little bit.

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 2>I stand by what I said.

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 12>I think for most other companies, you know, it's probably

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 12>way best to wait it out.

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think Wellington's on the cap table of

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Data Bricks, right, But that's one view, right, There's so

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:40.919
<v Speaker 3>much will happen that Data Bricks might not for that reason.

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, there's a lot in the pipe, there's a lot

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 11>coming down but I think what the precipice tipping point

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 11>will be for the next batch of companies will be

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 11>how these first three, the three mega ones that we

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:56.679
<v Speaker 11>talk about, how they perform, and I believe the subsequent

0:26:56.760 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 11>two that are coming will likely perform very similar to Space,

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:03.120
<v Speaker 11>which is with a lot of enthusiasm not just from

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:06.360
<v Speaker 11>retail investors but also from institutional investors. And I think

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 11>that is the setup that the next batch of companies,

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 11>maybe a Data Bricks as an example, would be looking

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 11>for before they decide to come to the market, just purely.

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:17.119
<v Speaker 2>As case studies.

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 3>You know, if anthropic and open AI goes go next,

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:24.199
<v Speaker 3>that what they've said in their limited ability to speak publicly,

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 3>is and IPOs the only mechanism to raise capital at

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:31.239
<v Speaker 3>the levels they need. Find that really confusing because you know,

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 3>they both did such ginormous private rounds so recently. The

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 3>private market seems very willing to support that growth.

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:41.960
<v Speaker 11>The private market is there's just not sufficient capital to

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 11>support the capital intensity as we're just hearing about of

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 11>these model companies in perpetuity, and the private markets do

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:52.920
<v Speaker 11>not offer enough liquidity for the investors in these businesses

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 11>to ultimately get liquid without ultimately going public. And to

0:27:57.080 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 11>put that in kind of understandable terms, the private market

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 11>transacts in a full year what the public market transacts

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:09.680
<v Speaker 11>in a week, and so the volume of liquidity available

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 11>to public market companies is dramatically different to what's available

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:15.880
<v Speaker 11>on the private side.

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:20.400
<v Speaker 3>How much are private market investors in these leading frontier

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:24.120
<v Speaker 3>labs now needing to model for and take into account

0:28:24.119 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 3>political risks? I'm talking, of course about the administration's intervention

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:32.159
<v Speaker 3>in certain use of technology, but it's not just the US, right,

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 3>We're talking about jurisdictions.

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Like the EU.

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:36.880
<v Speaker 11>I think that it is a factor that people are

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:39.719
<v Speaker 11>now starting to incorporate in their thinking for how some

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 11>of these technologies will evolve. And I think it's a

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 11>big open question mark as to what the future of

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 11>the model builders as an example, looks like with respect

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 11>to regulatory action. But what I do feel confident is

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 11>I do feel confident that it is in everybody's interests,

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:58.480
<v Speaker 11>the model builders themselves as well as the governments to

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 11>support and ultimately enable this, because if we if the

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 11>United States or China or the governmental agencies are not

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 11>promoting this, we will be left behind and we will

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 11>give up the advantages that are accruing to the top

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 11>builders today. So I think it will resolve. It's a

0:29:14.080 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 11>question of how it resolves.

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 5>Matt.

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 3>I'd really appreciate your insight here, even if the answer

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 3>is no. How closely did you read the SpaceX prospectus,

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 3>the story they were trying to tell, and then extrapolate

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 3>out to how that might apply to everyone else? Open

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 3>AI and throp at data Bricks, you know, it was

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 3>so interesting to see their term numbers and how they

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 3>see the world in the very distant future.

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 11>I would say that SpaceX is unique, and SpaceX is

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 11>unique because Elon Musk is unique. And so when I

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 11>think about the SpaceX story and I think about the

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 11>market cap that SpaceX is currently trading at, I think

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 11>people are willing to for Elon. Say I believe in

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 11>your vision of the future, and I believe you Elon

0:29:57.760 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 11>can deliver on that vision. And I would say that

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 11>it is a relatively unique place in the market. There

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 11>are not many other entrepreneurs or CEOs I can think

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 11>of who could go out and tell a story that's

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 11>five ten years out in the future and get credit

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 11>for that story today.

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 3>So I think when you think.

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 11>About the model builders going out as the next generation

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 11>or the next IPO candidates. I think those companies will

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 11>more likely trade on fundamentals than maybe where SpaceX is

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 11>trading today, which is again a little bit of the

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 11>Elon magic dust around ability to convince the world that

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 11>he will be the person who gets us into the future.

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about that in the future then when you

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 3>come back trading on the numbers, not the names. If

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 3>those AI companies go public, mattwi Hiler ahead of late

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 3>stage growth at Wellington, thank you so much. Now coming up,

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 3>as the AI ratshifts from model to infrastructure rumbles, vetting

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 3>big on compute, Rumble, Yes, that's right, CEO Chris Polowski

0:30:55.320 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 3>joins us. Next, this is Bloomberg Tech. The story's still here.

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 3>The AI boom is fueling an intense race for the

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 3>infrastructure behind it. Rumble, best known as a video sharing

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 3>and cloud services platform, is looking to capitalize on that

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 3>trend through its acquisition of Northern Data and the launch

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 3>of Quake Ai, a new platform combining cloud compute and

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:31.080
<v Speaker 3>AI infrastructure. Joining us now is Rumble CEO Chris Pavlovski.

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 3>There is a lot here, let's unpack it all. So

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 3>the company is going to change its legal name to

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 3>rum Group. This is based on the close of the

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 3>acquisition of Northern Data. Let's go back to the genesis

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 3>of the idea, why you did this, what the opportunity was.

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 13>Well in twenty thirteen, but it wasn't twenty twenty one

0:31:51.640 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 13>where we took on our first investment, and that was

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 13>I guess around March April of twenty twenty one. In

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 13>the idea was that we had to build our own infrastructure,

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 13>and we did that over the last four to five years.

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:08.480
<v Speaker 13>We built our entire infrastructure for Rumble to sit on.

0:32:09.120 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 13>And with all that being said, we have all this

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 13>excess capacity for the video platform. So it was actually

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 13>in twenty twenty one when we went public as a

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 13>spac under ticker rum that we said that we had

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:26.080
<v Speaker 13>three core pillars to the business. One was going to

0:32:26.080 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 13>be the advertising platform, one was going to be the

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 13>video platform, and one was going to be infrastructure as

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 13>a service.

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 2>And it is.

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 13>Now at this point in time where we launched Rumble

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 13>Cloud back in twenty twenty four. Now with the acquisition

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 13>in Northern Data, we really kind of put a jet

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 13>pack on that infrastructure as a service business and We're

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 13>ready to take on the world on cloud with Quake AI.

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:52.160
<v Speaker 2>So that's kind of been the genesis of what we've done.

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 13>It's going to be our largest business unit going forward,

0:32:57.360 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 13>the cloud side.

0:32:58.160 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 2>So we're really excited to.

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 13>Step on the gas on the AI compute as a

0:33:02.080 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 13>service and all the other services that we offer.

0:33:05.440 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Can we expand on that a little bit?

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:08.800
<v Speaker 3>So there's two cool businesses right The video platform that

0:33:08.840 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 3>we know is Rumble and then quake Aid instru Space

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 3>And you just said that that will be the larger part.

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 3>How has the kind of growth trajectory changed here? Why

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 3>is it that it is the bigger part? And what

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 3>does the outlook look like?

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 13>So actually Northern Data just released a couple of days

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 13>ago that they increased their outlook to one hundred and

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 13>seventy to one hundred and ninety million euros for twenty

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 13>for the full year this year.

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 2>So that's that's increased.

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 13>But when you add on top the video platform, you

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 13>add on top the deal that we just announced a

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:44.600
<v Speaker 13>couple of weeks ago with together Ai, and then you

0:33:44.680 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 13>add on top increased outlook with Northern Data, it starts

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 13>to look fundamentally much different than it looked in the

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 13>last couple of years.

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Mind you, we have grown quite a bit.

0:33:57.120 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 13>It was in twenty twenty one and twenty twenty two

0:33:59.840 --> 0:34:05.040
<v Speaker 13>were like sub ten million of revenue, So we did.

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:08.399
<v Speaker 13>We posted over one hundred million in the last year.

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 13>And now when you add all these assets together, and

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 13>you add everything that we put together, it's going to

0:34:13.200 --> 0:34:15.920
<v Speaker 13>be fundamentally a money from business going forward here in

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 13>twenty six and the rest of twenty six and twenty

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:19.400
<v Speaker 13>seven and beyond.

0:34:20.480 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 3>You said in the statement that you'll give further details

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:25.960
<v Speaker 3>about products and then also how you brand this. But

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:29.560
<v Speaker 3>what can you say about like different business lines. I

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:33.400
<v Speaker 3>get Quaki's infrastructure, but what areas are going to be

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 3>new for you? What is it that you're going to

0:34:35.000 --> 0:34:38.120
<v Speaker 3>be able to sell other than the big cluster of

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 3>h two hundreds that you've got.

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:41.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so we have that big cluster.

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 13>But what's really exciting for me is the unmonetized properties

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:49.080
<v Speaker 13>that we have. We have one hundred and eighty megawatts

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 13>in just outside of Atlanta, Georgia that is completely unmonetized.

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 13>Right now, we have over two hundred megawatts of unmonetized

0:34:56.400 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 13>assets that we're looking to monetize as fast as possible.

0:35:00.560 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 13>So our first goal is to get these things monetized.

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 13>And as you as you know, like the latest generationships

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:12.560
<v Speaker 13>out there, you're seeing companies make roughly ten million annually

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:16.399
<v Speaker 13>on omegawatts. So the fact that we have over two

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 13>hundred megawatts of unmonetized assets, that's something that we want

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 13>to jump all over as fast as possible and get

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 13>those monetized.

0:35:23.680 --> 0:35:25.080
<v Speaker 2>In twenty seven and twenty eight.

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:28.880
<v Speaker 3>Just note that the stocks kind of pushed a little

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 3>higher again, about four percent during the course of our conversation.

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 3>Chris Pavlovsky Rumble, I really appreciate you being on the show.

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:38.400
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much. A year ago, President Trump's eldest

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 3>son stood in Trump Tower and introduced the T One,

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 3>a gold colored US made smartphone from Trump Mobile. The

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:50.719
<v Speaker 3>device is finally out and maybe not living up to

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:51.400
<v Speaker 3>all its promises.

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Bloombergs.

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 3>Dane Wolman, our consumer tech editor, joins us in the team,

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 3>as we can see in the video, has had its

0:35:57.680 --> 0:35:59.239
<v Speaker 3>hands on the T one.

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Main takeaways please.

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:05.799
<v Speaker 12>Yes, so the phone is out, it's real, does not

0:36:05.880 --> 0:36:08.480
<v Speaker 12>quite live up to the pitch for what it's worth,

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 12>not exactly gold mustard colored and we think really not

0:36:13.320 --> 0:36:16.680
<v Speaker 12>made in the US. Other sites have done teardowns of

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:18.600
<v Speaker 12>the device and it appears to be an exact match

0:36:18.640 --> 0:36:22.240
<v Speaker 12>for an HTC device that's the Taiwanese brand, a certain

0:36:22.280 --> 0:36:25.359
<v Speaker 12>model that came out about two years ago, and it's

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:30.280
<v Speaker 12>a serviceable phone. It's a mid priced, mid range Android phone,

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 12>and in some ways the specs are actually quite decent.

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:37.360
<v Speaker 12>In some ways, not the camera. Camera performance in particular lags,

0:36:38.080 --> 0:36:40.759
<v Speaker 12>but there are better options at this price range. And

0:36:40.920 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 12>worth noting that the software support is one of the

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:47.640
<v Speaker 12>biggest just areas of uncertainty. It chips with Android fifteen

0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:51.200
<v Speaker 12>and most Android phone makers are already on Android sixteen.

0:36:51.239 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 12>This week, Android seventeen started rolling out to certain devices,

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:56.880
<v Speaker 12>So that's actually one of the biggest points in the

0:36:56.920 --> 0:36:59.200
<v Speaker 12>review is if you're going to just now buy a

0:36:59.239 --> 0:37:01.040
<v Speaker 12>new device that you might be holding in your hands

0:37:01.520 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 12>using for a few years, don't you want the security

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 12>of the assurance of a having the most recent, up

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:12.080
<v Speaker 12>to date software and knowing that it will continuously be

0:37:12.200 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 12>updated while you own the device.

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:18.280
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's tech editor Dana Wolman, thank you so much. Sticking

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:22.839
<v Speaker 3>with phones. Apple is preparing a second generation iPhone Air

0:37:23.280 --> 0:37:26.759
<v Speaker 3>set to debut next spring. Sources say the prototype has

0:37:26.800 --> 0:37:30.080
<v Speaker 3>a second rear camera and the company's working to improve

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 3>the battery life. The new Air will run on a

0:37:32.360 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 3>version of the A twenty pro processor. That's the same

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:40.799
<v Speaker 3>chip coming to this Fool's iPhones. Shares of Take two

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:43.360
<v Speaker 3>pushing a lot higher, training at their highest level in

0:37:43.400 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 3>about a month, gain of five percent. On the day,

0:37:46.160 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 3>the parent company of Rockstar Games announced it would begin

0:37:49.120 --> 0:37:53.800
<v Speaker 3>taking pre orders for Grand Theft Auto six next week.

0:37:53.960 --> 0:37:57.280
<v Speaker 3>The highly anticipated game has already been pushed back twice,

0:37:57.760 --> 0:38:01.000
<v Speaker 3>causing hits to the company's stock price. The pre ordered

0:38:01.080 --> 0:38:04.239
<v Speaker 3>date and the release of the final cover art suggests

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:07.440
<v Speaker 3>it won't face another delay. I don't want to jinx it.

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 3>That's the read. The game is scheduled to launch this November.

0:38:13.160 --> 0:38:15.239
<v Speaker 3>Sticking with entertainmentt's take a look at today is a

0:38:15.239 --> 0:38:18.759
<v Speaker 3>big number. Over one hundred and sixty million dollars. That's

0:38:18.760 --> 0:38:22.040
<v Speaker 3>the amount Toy Story five is expected to bring in

0:38:22.080 --> 0:38:25.319
<v Speaker 3>at the box office this weekend. The new installment is

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:28.440
<v Speaker 3>tracking to have the best debut of the Pixar franchise,

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:32.040
<v Speaker 3>and it's not the only blockbuster expected to pull audiences

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:34.840
<v Speaker 3>to cinema this weekend. Let's bring in Bloombergs, Felix Jellette

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:38.279
<v Speaker 3>on the screen Time team, Toy Story five, What do

0:38:38.320 --> 0:38:38.759
<v Speaker 3>we need to.

0:38:38.719 --> 0:38:43.120
<v Speaker 14>Know Jasey's origin story We've already got late year, and

0:38:43.719 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 14>you know, it's basically more fun. It's part of this

0:38:47.760 --> 0:38:50.160
<v Speaker 14>pack schedule for the summer. I think if you're a

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 14>theater owner, you're finally breathing a sign and relieve. It's

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:56.600
<v Speaker 14>probably the best summer lineup that Hollywood has ruled out

0:38:57.080 --> 0:38:58.640
<v Speaker 14>since the pre pandemic days.

0:38:58.920 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 2>And Toy Story is a big part of it.

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:04.200
<v Speaker 3>I watched The Mandalorian two days ago with my wife

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:06.680
<v Speaker 3>and we were one the two of only three people

0:39:06.719 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 3>in that room, So I get the box office weekend.

0:39:09.840 --> 0:39:12.440
<v Speaker 3>What else is on the on deck apart from Toy Story?

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:14.759
<v Speaker 3>And do you need to watch Toy Story one, three, four?

0:39:14.840 --> 0:39:15.200
<v Speaker 2>First?

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:17.799
<v Speaker 14>You should just for the fun, okay, but you don't

0:39:17.800 --> 0:39:18.080
<v Speaker 14>have to.

0:39:18.760 --> 0:39:20.959
<v Speaker 2>What else do we have? I mean, there's a new Spider.

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:24.800
<v Speaker 14>Man movie, in new Minion's movie, new Christopher Nolan movie,

0:39:24.880 --> 0:39:28.879
<v Speaker 14>Odyssey's Coming Out, Moana Live Action.

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:31.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, super Girl.

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:34.279
<v Speaker 14>There's really a pack lineup, and in addition, to all

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:36.480
<v Speaker 14>big studios. You're also getting a lot of help this

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 14>year from some of the smaller players at A twenty

0:39:38.640 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 14>four with back rooms, you know, some of these YouTube

0:39:41.920 --> 0:39:44.760
<v Speaker 14>creators that are coming out with these low budget horror

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:48.920
<v Speaker 14>movies that are doing terrifically. And you know, even Amazon

0:39:49.000 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 14>chipping in with Project Hail Mary. All of it's adding

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:53.760
<v Speaker 14>up to a very strong summer lineup.

0:39:54.920 --> 0:39:57.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Bloomberg's Phoenix Chullette, thank you so much. Now before

0:39:57.719 --> 0:40:00.960
<v Speaker 3>we go, the New York Knicks ticket parade is underway.

0:40:01.040 --> 0:40:03.160
<v Speaker 3>Let's go over to City Hall Plaza in New York

0:40:03.440 --> 0:40:07.920
<v Speaker 3>where Bloomberg's Randall Williams is standing by. Tell the Bloomberg

0:40:08.000 --> 0:40:12.200
<v Speaker 3>Tech audience absolutely everything that is going on that they

0:40:12.239 --> 0:40:14.400
<v Speaker 3>need to know and what the vibe is right now

0:40:14.520 --> 0:40:18.440
<v Speaker 3>in New York City.

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 1>This is a basketball party unlike anything I've ever seen.

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:26.239
<v Speaker 1>New York City has been waiting fifty three years to

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:29.200
<v Speaker 1>party like they're partying right now, all the way up

0:40:29.200 --> 0:40:31.239
<v Speaker 1>down the street, all the way here to City Hall.

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:34.040
<v Speaker 1>And So when you think about what the Knicks means

0:40:34.080 --> 0:40:37.440
<v Speaker 1>to this culture, you think about Rucker Park, you think

0:40:37.440 --> 0:40:41.000
<v Speaker 1>about Dykeman, these street courts that have birthed so many

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:43.560
<v Speaker 1>street stars in basketball. And now you think about the

0:40:43.640 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Knicks today, Jalen brunts and Karl Anthony, Towns, Jose Alvarado,

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:50.560
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey and New York hometown kids, there is not

0:40:50.640 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a story you could write better. And for what it

0:40:52.680 --> 0:40:54.840
<v Speaker 1>means for the NBA. The NBA has been taking a

0:40:54.920 --> 0:40:57.640
<v Speaker 1>beating in previous years in terms of the conversations about

0:40:57.640 --> 0:41:00.320
<v Speaker 1>TV ratings. Everyone's been saying, oh, you know, the league

0:41:00.360 --> 0:41:02.279
<v Speaker 1>is down, the league is down. Well, the Knicks played

0:41:02.280 --> 0:41:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the San Antonio Spurs, they beat them in five, and

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the ratings were up. So they were up so high

0:41:07.160 --> 0:41:09.760
<v Speaker 1>that they were on par with some of Michael Jordan's

0:41:09.800 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 1>numbers in terms of excuse me, not quite as as

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Michael Jordan's numbers, just.

0:41:14.160 --> 0:41:14.839
<v Speaker 2>Right below it.

0:41:14.880 --> 0:41:17.080
<v Speaker 1>And so when you think about that, for the the

0:41:17.160 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 1>NBA is elated.

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:19.560
<v Speaker 2>Jalen Brunson is elated.

0:41:19.600 --> 0:41:21.239
<v Speaker 1>They're going to be here right behind me at City

0:41:21.280 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Hall giving all their speeches and that's going to be

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a wrap on the NBA season. Next week will be

0:41:25.680 --> 0:41:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the NBA Draft and we'll go into the summer league.

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 1>But the NBA is thrilled. The New York Knicks are thrilled,

0:41:30.800 --> 0:41:33.919
<v Speaker 1>and of course New York City basketball fans are having

0:41:33.960 --> 0:41:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the time of their life inbox.

0:41:36.360 --> 0:41:41.040
<v Speaker 3>Randall Williams live outside New York City Hall Bloomberg Tech audiences.

0:41:41.080 --> 0:41:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Why are you covering basketball?

0:41:42.120 --> 0:41:44.600
<v Speaker 3>I remember twenty eighteen and twenty twenty two when the

0:41:44.640 --> 0:41:47.960
<v Speaker 3>Warriors won and the tech sector in Bay Area going wild,

0:41:48.000 --> 0:41:49.960
<v Speaker 3>So New York City would do that for you as well.

0:41:50.640 --> 0:41:53.680
<v Speaker 3>That does it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech. More

0:41:53.719 --> 0:41:57.840
<v Speaker 3>live pictures, New York City, Knick's Parade, our top stories

0:41:57.840 --> 0:42:01.320
<v Speaker 3>in the markets. Intel is up trading at a record

0:42:01.360 --> 0:42:03.200
<v Speaker 3>high because the President of the United States said on

0:42:03.239 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 3>truth Social that it has an agreement with Apple to

0:42:06.080 --> 0:42:08.839
<v Speaker 3>bring chip manufacturing for the iPhone maker.

0:42:08.840 --> 0:42:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Back to the United States.

0:42:10.200 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 3>SpaceX down eight percent, one hundred and seventy seven dollars

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:15.520
<v Speaker 3>a share, But remember this is only the fifth day

0:42:15.520 --> 0:42:18.719
<v Speaker 3>of trading since the Blockbuster IPO. The price at one

0:42:18.840 --> 0:42:22.120
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty five dollars a share and its valuation

0:42:23.120 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 3>is still out of this world. This is a story

0:42:25.640 --> 0:42:27.840
<v Speaker 3>that won't go away, but we are a long way

0:42:28.160 --> 0:42:30.840
<v Speaker 3>from the lock up period fully expiring, so we're going

0:42:30.880 --> 0:42:33.840
<v Speaker 3>to track the mechanics of it. Remember, It's a short

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:37.840
<v Speaker 3>trading week in the United States. Friday is a holiday

0:42:37.960 --> 0:42:40.440
<v Speaker 3>for some and many, so recap today show on the

0:42:40.480 --> 0:42:42.600
<v Speaker 3>podcast You know exactly where to find it on the

0:42:42.640 --> 0:42:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg platforms, The Terminal and online Apple Spotify. iHeart what

0:42:47.800 --> 0:42:49.919
<v Speaker 3>a week this is Bloomberg Tech