WEBVTT - Bill Gates Talks Nuclear Power, Tariffs and Disease Prevention

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio News.

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:11.719
<v Speaker 2>Hi Bill, thank you again for doing the New Economy Forum.

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 2>We'll begin, I think on greenery, and I've just read

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 2>your new State of the Transition report, and in that

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:23.759
<v Speaker 2>you start with a bold claim that basically the climate

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:28.480
<v Speaker 2>business in twenty twenty four reminds you, or seems at

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 2>the same inflection point that medicine was back in twenty

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:36.240
<v Speaker 2>twenty when you began the whole vaccines drive. And your

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:39.599
<v Speaker 2>argument is that we now have most of the technologies

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:43.159
<v Speaker 2>we need to fight climate change or to deal with

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:46.879
<v Speaker 2>climate And I wonder perhaps you just give us a

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 2>couple of examples. I know that you talk about a

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 2>lot of technologies like clean hydrogen, aviation fuel and so on,

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 2>but just give us a couple of examples of why

0:00:56.520 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 2>you think that, because it's a very big claim.

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, my key theory of change on climate is that

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 3>if the clean approach, the green approach, is more expensive,

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 3>that we won't get global adoption. Perhaps rich countries will

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:20.320
<v Speaker 3>subsidize clean approaches, but as you get into the middle

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:26.319
<v Speaker 3>income countries like Brazil, India and others, you know, they

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 3>would say, hey, we have we're not responsible for the

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 3>historic emissions and so slowing down are providing basic capabilities

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:42.960
<v Speaker 3>to our population. You know that we shouldn't be impeded.

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:46.680
<v Speaker 3>And so the way to square this is to innovate

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 3>in all the areas of emissions so that the new

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 3>approach that's clean costs less. That's either a zero green

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 3>premium or literally a negative green premium, and that's what

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 3>Breakthrough Energy was founded to do.

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 4>We have one hundred and thirty companies.

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 3>A good example is one that's working on the way

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:13.080
<v Speaker 3>that steel is made. You know. They're called Boston Metals.

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 3>They're actually working with partners in Brazil to build a

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 3>plant there that looks like it'll be able to make

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 3>very competitive steel, but in a very very clean way.

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:29.080
<v Speaker 3>You know. We have geothermal company called Fervo. We have

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 3>people who make windows called lux Wall that means you

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 3>don't have to heat or cool your building as much.

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 3>You know. So these one hundred and thirty companies are

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 3>driving forward this innovative approach, and we still have a

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 3>lot of work to do to take things that some

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 3>which are just at the lab, some of which are

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 3>still quite expensive, but volume is needed to bring the

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 3>cost down, like we saw with solar panels and batteries.

0:02:56.960 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 3>But we're on our way. You've got the IQ that

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 3>we're in every one of the areas of mission. I

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 3>see a path to zero, which means we can get

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 3>adoption where we need it.

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Quite interested, and you've backed quite a lot of green

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:14.919
<v Speaker 2>startups or a lot of people in this audience who

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:17.519
<v Speaker 2>are involved in that industry. You know, some of them

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:21.359
<v Speaker 2>get to scale, some of them don't. Have you reached

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 2>any conclusion about what is the fact of the success?

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, everything is is very domain dependent. You know, I

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 3>have to learn a lot about the history of steelmaking

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 3>or you know, different approaches for making cement, you know,

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 3>to understand, okay, why has that stayed the same for

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 3>so long? And now that we're getting lots of new

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 3>people looking at that, what are these these new techniques?

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, teaming up with large companies working in multiple geographies.

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 3>It's very you know, it's very science based. It's you know,

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 3>fund to meet those innovators. It's more capital intensive than

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 3>say the digital revolution, and you know, we can't underestimate

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 3>that means that the scale is tough. You know, we

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:17.719
<v Speaker 3>can run into geopolitical barrier sometimes, but on the whole

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, even though we won't meet the the highest goals,

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 3>we will start to get emissions down and will avoid

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 3>this being the primary thing that's slowing slowing down human development.

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 2>About nuclear you've been a big backer of nuclear through things.

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 2>I looked up kind of Google, Amazon, Microsoft, as you know,

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 2>they're all they're all beginning to invest money in nuclear things.

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Do you think the wind is changing? I suppose that's

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 2>a bad metaphor, but do you do you do you

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 2>think that there is a change in the way people

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 2>are looking at this.

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, there's certainly a number of countries, including the United States,

0:04:56.920 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 3>where both the public attitudes and the level investment in

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 3>nuclear fission are quite positive. You know, at the COP

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 3>twenty eight a lot of countries came together and talked

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 3>about tripling nuclear over the future. So that's very different

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 3>than going into decline. There's a big challenge though, which

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 3>is those third generation plants. You know, they have a

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 3>lot of pressure, they're very expensive, they're very complex. So

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 3>as a question, can we get to this fourth generation?

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 3>And so you have a number of companies trying to

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:34.160
<v Speaker 3>usher in much simpler designs, including the one I'm involvement

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:38.239
<v Speaker 3>called terror Power. There's several companies doing that. But yes,

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 3>the fact that the tech companies want to be customers

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 3>for green energy, and at least for a period of

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 3>time they're willing to pay a bit of a premium,

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:50.840
<v Speaker 3>and it's the volume of reactors go up then that

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:55.839
<v Speaker 3>premium goes away. That is extremely helpful to reboot the

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 3>nuclear industry around these fourth generation plants.

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 2>There is an issue, isn't there A lot of the

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:05.359
<v Speaker 2>attention has been on small, modular reactors or kind of

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 2>reviving old ones rather than building big new ones.

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 4>Is that a problem? It looks at it from the outside,

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 4>but I don't know.

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, if you get small, you can do a lot

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 3>of your labor off site, which is advantageous, but it

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 3>also means your efficiency is a lot less. And so

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 3>the approach terror Powers using is to have a medium

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 3>sized reactor three hundred and forty five megawatt electric in

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:37.280
<v Speaker 3>our roadmap. If utilities do want big ones, those are

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:40.039
<v Speaker 3>somewhat more efficient, but you know, first we want to

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 3>build dozens of our medium size reactor, and we've been

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.559
<v Speaker 3>able to move some of the labor off site, although

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 3>we still have some on site. But size it's very

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 3>tricky to get the efficiency as you get small, because

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:58.479
<v Speaker 3>it's the kind of the volume of the reactor is

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:03.720
<v Speaker 3>your value in the areas are costs. So it you know,

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:06.479
<v Speaker 3>different people are taking different approaches, and of course we

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 3>have digital design and simulation that is letting us build

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 3>far far simpler plants than ever before.

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 2>What about fusion, I know it's a question. I think

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 2>I'd probably ask you once every five years. Do you

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:21.559
<v Speaker 2>think that is it always seems to be five years away?

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 4>Or at least that is it? Is it now getting closer?

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 4>It's old.

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean one or two people recently suddenly saying that's possibilities.

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so break through Energy we're almost all my climate

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 3>work is we know, I'm the largest investor in be

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 3>funded for different fusion companies. The one that's furthest along

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 3>is pretty fantastic called Commonwealth Fusion Systems. That's spin off

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 3>essentially from MIT, and they're hard at work building their

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 3>prototype facility outside of Boston. And so it's you know,

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 3>you could say it's about six to ten years behind

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 3>the force generation fission, but it has a lot of

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 3>advantages and over time it could be even less expensive.

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 3>And so we're backing these companies and you know, they're

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 3>even using very advanced software to simulate how that works.

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 3>In the long run, fission infusion will be a substantial

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 3>part of power generation, complementing the renewables that are are

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 3>being built at high speed.

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:34.199
<v Speaker 2>Can I just contrast, because it's you've sort of alluded

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 2>to it a couple of times, the kind of gap

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:41.719
<v Speaker 2>between all the kind of business optimism, the scientific possibilities

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 2>that are now opening up with the political realities which

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 2>seem to be going in the in the opposite direction.

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 2>Just to give you an example, you know, you played

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 2>quite a big role in getting the Inflation Reduction Act

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 2>through in America. You personally went and persuaded Joe Mansion.

0:08:57.240 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, it was a big deal, and there was

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 2>there was kind of green within that. As we both know,

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 2>a good portion of that could well get dumped if

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 2>if Trump comes in, what do you think is the

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 2>most endangered technology out of the stuff that managed to

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:16.439
<v Speaker 2>get through under that bill.

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:21.719
<v Speaker 3>It'll be interesting because you know, what the Congress will

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 3>see is that that bill is causing a lot of

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 3>projects to be built in red states, and so ideally

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:35.079
<v Speaker 3>we'll get some bar by partisan defense of what's being

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 3>done there. I do think nuclear is particularly bipartisan because

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:42.319
<v Speaker 3>it has to do with energy security as well as climate.

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 3>But you could have some things like the electric vehicle

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 3>tax credit or the green electricity tax credits. You could

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:54.839
<v Speaker 3>have them come under attack. You know, I think I

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 3>think they're a good thing. I think they're ushering in

0:09:57.120 --> 0:10:03.439
<v Speaker 3>new industries. You know, they're general idea that taxpayers are

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 3>going to pay a lot of extra money for products

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 3>because they want to reduce emissions. That has been pushed

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 3>hard enough that there really is a backlash. We see

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 3>that in Europe, we see that the US. And that's

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 3>why this theory of UH innovation is the only way

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 3>you squared the imperative to get rid of the emissions,

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 3>but without having people say, hey, I'm not going to

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 3>pay for it. And actually, you know that can even

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 3>influence elections if you push too hard.

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 4>Do you think that thing? Though?

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 2>On the demand side, in a strange way, the demand

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 2>kick is being given. Now these technologies are un the way.

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 2>It wouldn't be terrible if they wouldn't help if they

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 2>went away, but it would if those kind of reliefs

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 2>were taken away.

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, you have you have different levels of maturity and

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 3>so you know, I'd say the electric vehicles even without

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 3>the subsidies over I'm they are going even to the

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 3>people park on the street at the low end, they

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 3>will get to a zero green premium. You have things,

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:14.199
<v Speaker 3>particularly industrial emissions like steel cement that we're just building

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 3>the pilot plants now, and so without governmental policy and support,

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 3>the transition of the industrial emissions would slow down a lot.

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 3>And you know that's that's very unfortunate if that takes place. Likewise,

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 3>in transportation, airlines are you know, the toughest part of

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 3>all of the emissions, and and they're you know, without support,

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 3>that will get pushed back.

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 2>So I ask you one kind of strangely capitalism related question.

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you have arguably been one of the worlds

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 2>will definitely been one of the world's most successful capitalists

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 2>of the post twenty five thirty forty years. Last week

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 2>I saw on the stage with Donald Trump and he

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 2>said that he wanted to use tariffs ten twenty percent

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 2>on everywhere, and his argument was this was very good

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:12.679
<v Speaker 2>for American business and your experience, Does that make sense?

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 3>No, it's certainly not the case. And the difficulty of

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 3>convincing voters that pre trade is overwhelmingly to their benefit.

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 3>It's unfortunate how difficult it is to make that case.

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 3>And so you know, I understand the politician who chooses

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 3>to take advantage of that, but you know, we we

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 3>will suffer. Overall, welfare will improve less as not only

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 3>will if US puts tariff on, of course, other people

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 3>will put tariff on as well, and the economic dynamism

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 3>and speed of innovation will be significant, significantly slow.

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 2>Just to push you on that dynam point, you know,

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 2>it's very easy to make the argument that this means

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 2>higher prices for consumers. But this issue of dynamism, the

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 2>sort of you've been involved in entrepreneurship, these things.

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:10.319
<v Speaker 4>Most of your life.

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 2>If you have less foreign competition, less foreign goods, that

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 2>must have an impact on it. I know it's back

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 2>to a creed you've believed in. But in practice that

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 2>is that argument possible to make?

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 3>Devoters Well, we should find articulate politicians who can make

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 3>the case. If you take most of the industries I

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 3>think about, like you know, inventing a new drug or

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:40.839
<v Speaker 3>writing a new piece of software, or birthing a new

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 3>climate technology, you have these gigantic fixed costs and the

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 3>fact that you can do that work and then sell

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 3>it on a global basis means that everybody's getting you know,

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 3>faster innovation and lower prices. And if you start to

0:13:56.559 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 3>fragrant markets because of either tariffs or regulatory barriers to

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 3>that trade, it absolutely takes away the lower prices in

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 3>high speed innovation.

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned health. It struck me maybe this is unfair,

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 2>but health is kind of the opposite to climate. Is

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 2>that at least there were incredible health gains in the

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 2>early two thousands.

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 4>It seems to have stalled a bit.

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 2>What's needed to create another global health boom?

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm actually quite optimistic. You know, both the diseases

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 3>in lower income countries and the diseases and rig countries,

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 3>we are seeing incredible advances, whether it's obesity drugs, long

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 3>acting drugs. You know, gene editing is still super expensive,

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 3>but the Gage Foundation is putting a lot of money

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 3>into trying to get that from millions of dollars to

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 3>hundreds of dollars. So we can take a disease like

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 3>sickle salad's prominent napka and as we do that, it

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 3>will benefit all the world's health systems. And then of course,

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, AI will be applied in health in the

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 3>upstreme discovery piece to speed up new drugs, but it

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 3>will also be applied in the in the downstream delivery,

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 3>sitting in the sessions, with doctors helping with follow up,

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 3>helping with paperwork, and so I think the health sector

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 3>will be an exemplar that AI can improve things quite dramatically.

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 2>There's one thing which is a little bit similar is

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 2>that issue, and you did it in your Netflix series.

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 2>This issue of trust is that there are these things

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 2>that appear very logical to do with health, and yet

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 2>people don't seem to believe it, COVID being the obvious example.

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 2>How do we deal with this sort of deficit of

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 2>trust when it comes to health. Is it just to

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 2>do with a deficit of trust in governments or is

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 2>it broader than that.

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, certainly I never expected as the pandemic came along that,

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, many people had warned about the idea that

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 3>that people would reach for over simplistic explanations, you know,

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 3>like attacking either myself or Tony Fauci, or you know,

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 3>attacking the idea of vaccines. I wouldn't have expected that,

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 3>and certainly a lot of people, particularly older people who

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 3>should have been vaccinated were not, So you know, those rumors,

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, literally caused hundreds of thousands of deaths. I'm

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 3>hopeful with that out of the way that we can

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 3>go back to, you know, a more scientific way of

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 3>looking at health innovation. You know, the when people see

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 3>the effects of things like these obese drugs, you know,

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 3>to remind them that, you know, we can improve health

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 3>pretty dramatically.

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 2>I agree the obystis are the obesity drugs are a very.

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 4>Good example in one direction.

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:12.919
<v Speaker 2>On the other hand, you have stuff about I don't know,

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 2>hurricanes and things like that. You still see that basic

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 2>trust that people used to have in quote unquote scientists

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 2>and governments is it's it's amazingly small compared with what

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 2>it was twenty thirty years ago.

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, they're like these latest hurricanes. Some people

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 3>blame me for those two. You know, I'm very busy,

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 3>you know it. Hopefully, you know, the basic decisions about

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:53.199
<v Speaker 3>what say and what's beneficial we maintain that, and you know,

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 3>I think progress, positive progress will help get people back,

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, looking at what experts are are telling them.

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:08.399
<v Speaker 2>The truth is One quick thing on health, the mosquito

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 2>borne diseases seem to be a little bit back on

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 2>the Rah Tanky and the West Nile stuff.

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 4>People, Are you worried about that?

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it just seems to be a slight blip

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 2>in an otherwise very positive picture.

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:25.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Of course. The biggest part of that, which is

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:30.239
<v Speaker 3>kind of invisible in middle income and rich countries, is

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:34.680
<v Speaker 3>the malaria burden, you know, which is killing about six

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.199
<v Speaker 3>hundred thousand kids a year. You know where you are

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:40.640
<v Speaker 3>in Brazil, Denghy's gone up somewhat. We do have new

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 3>tools to reduce mosquito populations, one that's still in the

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 3>lab called Jean Drive that the Gates Foundation funds and

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 3>should help us with all those mosquito born diseases. You know,

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:59.359
<v Speaker 3>what we see is when you get a lot of flooding,

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, we should get a bit more with climate change,

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 3>mosquitoes really thrive, and so places like Pakistan where you

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 3>have very little malaria then when they had the flooding.

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 3>Now it's come back in a pretty big way. And

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:20.199
<v Speaker 3>so you know that innovation pipeline is coming along. It

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:24.159
<v Speaker 3>should get even more money, but we will be able

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 3>to get rid of those vector born diseases in countries

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:30.439
<v Speaker 3>that want to embrace these new tools.

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 2>I'll ask you one last question about Brazil. I mean,

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 2>this is a place we've heard where, especially on the

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:39.959
<v Speaker 2>climate side, a very very high proportion, probably higher than

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 2>eywhere else, certainly above ninety percent coming.

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:43.400
<v Speaker 4>From renewable sources.

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 2>Do you see Brazil as the center of this climate

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:49.160
<v Speaker 2>It seems to be the center of both the pain

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 2>and the Amazon, but also on the creative side. Is

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 2>that something you've been following well?

0:19:55.440 --> 0:20:00.400
<v Speaker 3>Certainly. I at the UN General Assembly, the Keys Foundation

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:02.920
<v Speaker 3>had our Goalkeepers event and I gave them a word

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 3>to a loop for the work they've done in reducing malnutrition.

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 3>We've been talking with Brazil a lot about COP thirty

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 3>that's coming up, and you know that will be a

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 3>very important milestone both for climate mitigation and climate adaptation.

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 3>You know, Brazil has done some good pioneering things on

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 3>mitigation the deforestation. It's important that that, you know, get

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 3>under control, both for Brazil itself and for the world.

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 3>So there's a lot being learned there, you know. As

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 3>I said, one of our best breakthrough companies is building

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:46.440
<v Speaker 3>a steel plant with partners in Brazil. So Yes Agriculture

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 3>Innovation with imbrapa. Brazil is very strong, So it's it's fantastic.

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 3>You know that the issue is is a very important

0:20:57.040 --> 0:20:58.919
<v Speaker 3>issue and it you know, deals with kind of the

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 3>equity things that Brazil has been a global leader on.

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 2>That's one last thing on that, particularly on Brazil, you

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 2>now much more. It sounds like you're more optimistic about

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Brazil than maybe if you and I talked about it

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 2>twenty thirty years ago.

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 4>It's a more positive story.

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, Brazil's got a lot of assets, and

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's kind of a mixed story because

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>they've had, you know, challenges with governance and you know

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 1>who knows.

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 3>They're like the US. They have a party that's sort

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:39.159
<v Speaker 3>of against all climate things and for Amazon destruction, and

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:41.679
<v Speaker 3>you have a party who's who cares about that. So

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, I'm not an expert on what the balance

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 3>will end up being over time. You know, the whole

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 3>world has this problem that we do need to invest in.

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:59.400
<v Speaker 3>You know, Amazon force destruction. We're very good at measuring

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 3>it now because of satellite systems, but the exact policies

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 3>that will get us there, you know, still still somewhat challenging,

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 3>particularly if you get different parties in Power Bill.

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much for talking to us again, covered many,

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:17.400
<v Speaker 2>many subjects.

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 4>Thank you very much, on behalf of everyone here. Thank you,

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 4>thank you,