WEBVTT - Tellurian's Souki Expects Higher LNG Prices Globally in Two Years

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg pim L Podcast. I'm pim Fox

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>along with my co host Lisa A. Bramowitz. Each day

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for you and your money, whether you're at the grocery

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>store or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p and

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:32.599
<v Speaker 1>L Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot Com. Yes,

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.240
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna talk about liquefied natural gas now because we've

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>got a pioneer when it comes to the energy industry.

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>My guest is Sharif Suki. He is the co founder

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and the chairman of Tullurian and he is the founder,

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>former founder and former chief executive of Shanir and Sharif

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>joins us in our studio here in UH. Great to

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>have you with us, sir, Thanks for coming in. Thank

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you very much. You're the only trail blazing energy pioneer

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>that I can think of. It is also run a

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>chain of restaurants UH and managed to have a Hollywood

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Um the film colorization company already in your past. Maybe

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 1>just give people a little snippet of how you came

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 1>to create Shaneer and the world of liquefied natural gas. Well,

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's a lesson and always keeping your options

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:21.959
<v Speaker 1>open and learning as much as you can as you

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>go along, so you never know what's going to prepare

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 1>you for what. But I think in the mid nineties

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 1>I was looking for a niche to invest in and

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:34.839
<v Speaker 1>to raise money, which is the scale that I hand

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>into a sector there would be changed by technology. That's

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>how I end up ended up being at the energy business.

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>And slowly I learned and um Chanel was founded in

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety six and um I had twenty years and

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>there huntil two thousan fifteen and then sure if you

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>left Shaneer last year after carl Icon had some issues

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>with the company, and now you've started this new venture

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to Laurian talld Us about that, what a what are

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>you trying to do with Tolaian? Well, I think the

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>major disagreement with garn at the time was simply whether

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 1>you would pay dividends out or whether you read invest

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:17.079
<v Speaker 1>the money to continue the growth of the company. So

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:20.399
<v Speaker 1>I had the view that the market has just been

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:24.080
<v Speaker 1>started and that although it didn't look so good for

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years, it would come back, and that

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>we needed to continue to go to a company. Carl

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>had a different opinion and we agreed to separate, to

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>go out separate ways Solan. So when they freed me,

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I had the opportunity to create to Louian In February

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand and sixteen. About three months after that,

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I was fired functioner and to pick up where the

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>things that she Knew did not want to pursue at

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the time. So we founded a company, found another site

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that took a team that we were funding, a Chineer,

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:02.119
<v Speaker 1>but that j Knew decided to continue the funding led

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 1>by Martin Houston, and Martin has become my partner. We

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>found it two looking together and we identified a good side,

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>took our old team back, both BECTORL and ge t

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>to collaborate with us again and developed a pretty good

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>site for a plant for a big processing for a

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>big processing plant, a big liquefaction facility in Louisiana with

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the capacity to export twenty six million tons, which is

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>really replicating the success that I had antinue with the

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty four million tons plant at Sebin Pass. Can you

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>speak a little bit about the supply and demand that

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>currently exists in natural gas because to turn it into

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>liquefied natural gas requires this major investment in process. Uh.

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>And then there is not really a global pricing uh

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>platform for for natural gases there. I mean, it costs

0:03:55.680 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>different things in different countries. You exactly right. Uh. So

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a number of things that happened that are different

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>from when I started the effort of The first thing

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>is that it has become very clear than the United

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>States is the low cost producer of natural gas and

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>at the same time the low cost manufacturer of liquid

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>faction facilities. So we have a constan advantage compared to

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the countries in the world. The second

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>very important thing that has happened is that the natural

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>gas business on a global business is increasingly becoming a

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:32.160
<v Speaker 1>very liquid market, thanks in great part to liquid fu

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:35.839
<v Speaker 1>natural gas. So we the advent of Australia first and

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:39.280
<v Speaker 1>other United States has two major new players into the

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:43.919
<v Speaker 1>energy business. You now have twelve cargoes per day available

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>for sale on a global basis, with about forty bcf

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>a day and and by to see if you've got

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>to tell people at the British thermal units in cubic

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>feet cubic feet. So that's why we needed you, so

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to to put it in perspective, UM, the in two years,

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>when old liquor faction facilities under construction currently will come

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>on the market, the market will be able to produce

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty BCF fifty billion cubic feet of natural gas every day.

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 1>The entire consumption of the United States is about seventy

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:21.679
<v Speaker 1>five billion cubic feet, so two thirds of the market

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>on a global basis that is on the water at

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>any given time. UH. It's two thirds of the size

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>of the American market. It is larger than the European market.

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's a very very significant floating market that is

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>extremely flexible in terms of what direction it can go into.

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Because those are allowed ships and there's probably two hundred

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and twenty of those today and in two years there'll

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>be two hundred and fifty loaded with not liquefied natural gas.

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:56.359
<v Speaker 1>They can basically go to wherever they need it. And

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 1>sure if just in our last minute or so here,

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:03.239
<v Speaker 1>where do you see prices for UH natural gas and

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and and liquid natural gas over the next five to

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:08.720
<v Speaker 1>ten years, Well, in the United States, I don't see

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>anything different than what we have today. So some workedween

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 1>two fifty and three donors in m MBTU. On a

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>global basis, the the excess inventory is being solved very

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 1>very very quickly because low prices generate new demand, so

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>demand year on year for that liquid natural gasses up

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and on that basis, we're gonna have a very very

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 1>tight system by two. Thank you. So I see higher

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>prices for global prices very quickly, higher prices for global prices.

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much for joining us. A pleasure. I

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 1>look forward to having you again because we didn't even

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>get into the whole kind of history of how the

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>liquefied natural gas came about and also some of the

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 1>challenges that you that you faced. Much appreciated for joining

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:53.480
<v Speaker 1>A shriek Tuki. He is the co founder and chairman

0:06:53.480 --> 0:07:09.039
<v Speaker 1>of Tlaurean. Thank you very much. Our topic is the

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>world of retail and joining us as Bert Flickinger. He

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>is managing director Strategic Resource Group and he can be

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>followed on Twitter at Bert Underscore Flickinger. Bert. Great to

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>have you with us here in the studio. You know, uh,

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Peter Barnes is in our Bloomberg one oh six one

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>studio in Boston, and maybe you could talk a little

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>bit about the geographical issues that are facing retail because

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I was reading that in the support area of Boston,

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>for example, it's attracted you. If you want to get

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>retail space, you're gonna end up paying top dollar for that.

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>But a lot of other places are not so hot.

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>To give us the the lowdown precisely, pim Southport, South

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Street seaports just booming in terms of customer accounts. They

0:07:57.520 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>got Primark from the UK, which is drawing a lot

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>of customers. They're doing off price full line department stores.

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Sex Fifth Avenue downtown is one of the great Sex

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Fifth Avenue stores in Boston is really really one of

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the birthplaces of retail. Ben Camarada for t j X Incorporated. Um,

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>are you taking me to Fi Leans basement too? But

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>MRV wish to the great Chris Baldwin today at BJ's

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Wholesale Club and a lot of great retailers, George de

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Mulis and his Where where did all those great retailers go?

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Because we got the results all right, Michael Core's stock

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>moves higher because they beat analyst estimates up like Ralph

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Lauren the same story. But Macy's, J C. Penny Nordstrom,

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Cole's what what kind of market are they facing? Tailor

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>two cities Nord from is making a lot of on

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 1>characteristic mistakes, similar to mistakes Target made in Canada, and

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:59.079
<v Speaker 1>Canada's turning around to be really tough for Nords of Penn.

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>J C. Penny wins are Frank Blake Retailer Turnaround of

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the Year Award. Marvin Ellison is doing a great job

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>with Steve set Off, former CEO of Sacks on the board,

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Mike Alman, who u cleaned up the company when Bill

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Ackman and Steve Roth left Penny on death store step

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Penny's got great apparel, great price points five seven nine

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars co exclusive with Disney Nike's coming in Adi DA.

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>But Sophora is the real story at j C. Penny.

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 1>When we were Paris, Sephora attracts more custos as many

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>customers consumers as the Eiffel Tower and the Eiffel Towers

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>opened more hours per day than Sephoras because they can't

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>control the Saphour crowds on Shaunsliz Sophor Cosmetics for Cosmetics

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>over six million customers a year. Sephora, Shawnsalise, Macy's is

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>doing a lot of exciting things. So we're seeing this

0:09:54.520 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 1>accelerating retail ice age consolidation where Barney's, Niemon Marcus Bergdorf

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 1>could file for bankruptcy, Bonton Group, Macy with its blowing

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 1>deal's company net consolidators as well, be Northstrom, as well

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>be Hudson Bay Sacks. So while it's tougher time now,

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>as you said, earnings up, sales soft, we see that

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 1>bouncing back, but they really have to do what's for

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 1>is doing so well in the UK when we're talking

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to one of their co directors, what so foreign Harvey

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Nichols are doing in London in terms of digital special

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:32.320
<v Speaker 1>exciting events to your present point before going on air,

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>making clothes that people want to buy, great styles, great fabric,

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>great fit. The leaders are really in London and people

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:44.679
<v Speaker 1>need to see that. And as you referenced, they're really

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 1>really exciting development with young designers too. But Bert, if

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm a retail investor or even an institutional investor, should

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I just sit on the sidelines for now and wait

0:10:56.320 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>until these these big big name company these like Macy's

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and Pennies and Nordstrom's get their act together. Peter, You're

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:09.319
<v Speaker 1>completely correct, sit on the sidelines until after Holiday seventeen.

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 1>The bankruptcy will start when they have to pay their

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>bills when the vendors don't fill up Tin Cup and

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Tin Cup Week in February of eighteen, and then Macy's

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and a number of the other son Nords from Hudson

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Bay Sachs will be the real winners. And that's probably

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:29.439
<v Speaker 1>the time to invest off off price. Anytimes a good time,

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>uh particularly with t j Ax. Well I was gonna, well,

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, Peter. Well. I was also going to ask about,

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:38.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, any specialty retailers that you like. You know,

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking about the foot lockers of the world, or

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the bed baths and beyond. How are they survive, how

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>are they doing? Are they okay? And are they safe

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:49.439
<v Speaker 1>places for investors? These days they're okay, But it really

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 1>depends on World World Cup and big athletic events in

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>off price what we really like. There was an article

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>in Barance this weekend that the dead on b JS

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 1>is trading at nine and UH five eighths per cent.

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Dynamic new leader and Chris Baldwin and uh b J's

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 1>in the entire southeast and northeastern seaboard of the US

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>is really doing well and saving customers money, both individual

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>as well since institutional or commercial customers. Well, since you

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>mentioned wholesale clubs, I gotta ask you about Costco because

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean that is the you know, that's the leader, right,

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Costco is the leader. Lost Jeff Bradman, who was even

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:33.440
<v Speaker 1>better than Sam Walton in terms of everything Jeff Bradman

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and his dad did was a winner. They betted a

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:40.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand in retail save families at Costco UH five six

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand a year. During the supermarket strike the last decade,

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Brotman would let about eight to ten Latino families when

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>we were in the market sign up on one Costco

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>membership card. They couldn't shop in the neighborhood supermarkets. Costco

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 1>has has stores that do up to five six million

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:01.959
<v Speaker 1>a week high volume stores anywhere outside our pack and

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>save client in New Zealand and UH. Costco can beat

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>anybody and anything. And my former Procter and Gamble teammate

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Mike Parrott's doing a great job as their chief merchant.

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Hey Bert, Let's finish up though on with the online retailers.

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, where do these companies hide in the face

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:26.439
<v Speaker 1>of competition from Amazon, I mean, can they survive? Uh?

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Even the well costco has its special niche obviously, but

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 1>what about the rest of these retailers. How do they

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:35.679
<v Speaker 1>how do they compete against the Amazons of the world.

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna I'm gonna channel Peter. To Macy's credit, they

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>moved from the twentieth largest online retailer. Macy's dot com

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 1>is now ranked number seven in retail Richard Baker and

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>his team at Hudson Babe but guilt in off price

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 1>for sex fifth avenue and sex says off fiveth. So

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 1>a combination of bricks and clicks with I'm your channel's

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>great way to survive. But you're you're right, there's gonna

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>be darwinning destruction for the people that don't to it

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 1>ouch Darwinnie and destruction. You know, everybody, Let me just

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>focus on Walmart. I know we did. You know we

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:09.319
<v Speaker 1>talked a little bit of Amazon. Walmart is serious about

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>online right very stock is up eight eight for Walmart

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 1>stock is up eighteen percent so far this year. They

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>pay a two and a half percent dividend and they're

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>not going quietly into the night. Not going quietly, and

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>it might be a Peter Barnes good good investment for now.

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>In eighteen Doug McMillan hand picked from Mr Sam Walton

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>out of Jonesboro, Arkansas. Uh, one of the first person

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>in seventeen years, Pim and Peter top merchant top store operators,

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>completely turning the company around. What and Walmart had a

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of nepotism with Sam Walton's son Robbed and brother

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>in law running dot com. Now they have professionals running it,

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and Walmart will win on land and online. All right,

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I gotta tell you, I think sometimes my wife is

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>single handedly helping to keep t J Max and Walmart

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>up there because she's that those places all the time.

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Your wife as smart as their summer interns of Goodbye Anywhere,

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and they find the best fashions for for ten dollars.

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>This is your great producer, does uh? Sam Lang best

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>bargain's best prices. Peter, thanks very much. Bert Flickinger is

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 1>managing director Strategic Resource Group, and I want to thank

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>of course Peter Barnes, my guest host today. Let's turn

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>our attention now to yield. How do you get yield

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>in the yield starved environment? For example, the thirty year

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>right now pays two point seven nine the ten year

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>pays well, it doesn't pay very much more pace two

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>point to one percent. And for people that are looking

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>for yield, where are they gonna go? Well, maybe they're

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna stop in Joel Beam's office. He's managing director senior

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>portfolio manager at Salient and the topic is real estate

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>investment trust. Joel, thank you very much for being with us,

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me give us the lay of the

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>land when it comes to real estate investment trust. Because

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>we know that the income gets passed through untaxed to

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the recipient, and the recipient pays the tax. But there

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>are a wide variety of reeds out there. Give us

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>some some understanding. Indeed, it's a trillion dollar market cap

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and the the property exposure that's possible to access through

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 1>this marketplace is quite diverse, and it really reflects the

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 1>main street property markets. So there are shopping centers, office buildings, warehouses,

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>specialty um reachs like things that an't like prisons for instance.

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's all manner of commercial property available in

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that trillion dollar market. What what do you specialize in

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>or what what do you recommending that people pay attention to? Currently,

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>we pay attention to the main food groups. So you

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>know it's largely it's it's uh industrial property, office property, UM,

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>retail hotels, so fairly standard fare um for us, and

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I think right now they're there's you know, actually there's

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>quite a lot of dispersion that's come back into our market.

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:06.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the prices have generally been a little bit

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:08.440
<v Speaker 1>homogeneous over the last few years, and this year is

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:10.719
<v Speaker 1>particularly with the retail sector you see getting knocked out

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>of bed. It's um, it's been a really interesting opportunity

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to pick up some stock. And Joe Peter here in Boston,

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:20.640
<v Speaker 1>you do right, and your most recent research note though

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>that people have to be really careful about the you know,

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:27.439
<v Speaker 1>chasing yield here. Uh, you have to be kind of

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 1>selective can expand on that and so what what is

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the risk right now in the reach space? Well, there's

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:39.199
<v Speaker 1>always risk, um, this is nothing is riskless. And UM,

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you know our our sector you know, certainly has some yield.

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:46.639
<v Speaker 1>The stocks that trade at lower multiples and you know, um,

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, I have a greater opportunity to get more

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of your return and current yield and less in growth.

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 1>And if you um aren't careful, you know, sometimes you

0:17:56.480 --> 0:17:58.640
<v Speaker 1>can get exposed to companies that might have a dividend cut,

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe they're overpaying. So you know, we all want yield,

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 1>but remember you can't We can't give you, and you

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>can't find what the Earth doesn't provide. And we are

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>in a low yield environment across the investment landscape, so

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 1>one must always be careful. And um, you know that's

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 1>my short advice somewhere. Yeah, and as with metals, which

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:19.360
<v Speaker 1>we were just talking about in the last segment, Um,

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>your space is very interest rate sensitive and and we

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>have the Fed placed yet again to raise interest rates

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>potentially by the end of the year. How does that

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>play into all this? Well, long term real estate shouldn't

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and doesn't really correlate with rate changes except that right now,

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:38.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're living in an extraordinary time where the

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>entire investment landscape seems to be priced at a premium,

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>so as the overall return landscape moves, and that's primarily

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>risk free rates. Right, Um, there are certain sectors that

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 1>might be susceptible to it from a you know, from

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 1>a buying and selling in the markets every day point

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 1>of view. Long term, Um, you know, a bond can't

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>raise the rent um, like we can say on a

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>commercial property that we own. So so there isn't correlation

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 1>over the long term, but it's extremely important right now

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 1>where it seems well established that many things are expensive,

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>it's important to have a strategy. Um, you know, I

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.880
<v Speaker 1>think the passive fad in today's environment is way long

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:17.120
<v Speaker 1>in the tooth. Can you speak about one particular read

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>at all, Chatham Lodging Trust. They're based in Palm Beach, Florida,

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:24.679
<v Speaker 1>and I think that they kind of quality. I mean,

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 1>I know they're in your fund, but there are a

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 1>read that's focused on the hospitality industry. Yeah, we think

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:33.919
<v Speaker 1>it's a great company that's been a little bit choppy,

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, performance wise, but the business is plotting along.

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>In our in our strategies, we try to have our

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 1>common stock hotel investments with limited service hotels because the

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:46.680
<v Speaker 1>margins are better. Um so, you know, really great brands

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:50.199
<v Speaker 1>like like Marriott Residents In and Hilton Garden In. You know,

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:54.439
<v Speaker 1>really nice margins, great business. And in our more credit

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 1>oriented investments, we like we like more full service hotels,

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:00.400
<v Speaker 1>like we have a big investment in Ashford hospit Mentality

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Prime that you probably saw just to quickly. I just

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>said like that the dividend the yield on on Chatham

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Lodging Trust symbol is c l dt uh six and

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:16.160
<v Speaker 1>a half percent. Right now, Peter and Joel, you are

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at harvesting some gains here, are you not? We

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:22.680
<v Speaker 1>do that all the time, sir, so so what but

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 1>but specifically you're talking about harvesting gains and preferreds. Why? Well,

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's as I mentioned earlier, it seems well

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>established in the credit space, in particular that you know,

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>valuations are elevated and there seems to be you know,

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>really more you know, really more downside risk than than

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 1>upside opportunity for a lot of credit instruments. So we

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:44.719
<v Speaker 1>are absolutely for years have been in block and tackle

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>mode sort of selling low yield where there's no more

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>upside in the price, and we've been trying to source

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:53.159
<v Speaker 1>and buy opportunities for you know, a fair return and

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>some price stability and and upside. I want to thank

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you very much for spending time of this coming in

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>a very interesting Joel Beam is a managing director senior

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 1>portfolio manager at Salient. The topic of course is reets

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and just to mention that they manage the salient reats strategy.

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 1>It's called the Select Income Fund. Joining us is Eric Lacel.

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>He is the chief economist for URBC Global Asset Management.

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:31.360
<v Speaker 1>They've got a mirror three billion dollars under management and

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:35.439
<v Speaker 1>joining us from Toronto. And you know, Eric, maybe you

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:37.959
<v Speaker 1>could give us a sort of non US perspective of

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:42.199
<v Speaker 1>how the US economy looks to you and what is

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 1>it's uh, what are some of its strengths and some

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of its weaknesses at the moment, Well, thanks for having

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>me to to me, it looks like it's doing pretty well.

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 1>I won't say it's necessarily broken, unambiguously clear of that

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:57.399
<v Speaker 1>two percent to hurdle that has proven so hard to

0:21:57.440 --> 0:22:00.040
<v Speaker 1>overcome over the last eight or nine years, but is

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>an economy running towards the top end. I think of

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 1>what we've grown used to and you can see that

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>demonstrated in quite a lot of measures. Granted, the hard

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:09.880
<v Speaker 1>data maybe not quite performing online with the soft data,

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 1>but overall it looks like there's been a pickup. I

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know if we can attribute all of that back

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 1>to the election in November, just because there's a global

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 1>element to this, and there's a part of it that

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>started way back last summer. But I would say moving

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>fairly well right now. And I should say, as as

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:25.400
<v Speaker 1>someone living to the north of the U. S. It's

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:27.640
<v Speaker 1>something that's been beneficial to Canada as well. It's helped

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Canada move quite nicely forward to but Erica Peter Barnes here,

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the rise in the equity markets has

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>been attributed to the expectation that the new president's agenda

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>will get past and we'll help to stimulate the economy

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 1>even more if if if that, assuming that's what it needs.

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>But we haven't actually seen much of that agenda move forward,

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and it looks like the markets are really kind of

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>hanging on tax reform. What about all that? Right Well,

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 1>I think that's absolutely fair, and I'll circle around to

0:22:58.119 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>that in a moment, but I would really make the

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>comment at same time that do keep in mind there

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:04.360
<v Speaker 1>are some other things that work here. If financial conditions

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 1>in general are very favorable. There's a bit of a

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:09.360
<v Speaker 1>rubber ball bounce effect from a tough start to two

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand sixteen and so on, So there are other things

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:14.880
<v Speaker 1>that work. I would say that what's maybe underappreciated by

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the White House legacy. If I can say that so

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>far is there does seem to be a shift in

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:22.359
<v Speaker 1>the deregulation environment. Not a lot of legislation, but a

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of executive orders. They could change in terms of

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:27.639
<v Speaker 1>the temperature in the room as well. And when I

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 1>look at various measures of concern about regulation, those are

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>already coming down. So I think there's been some progress there.

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 1>There's been that big boost in confidence, and don't make

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 1>me try and link it back coherently to some sort

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 1>of policy change, but that seems to have been linked

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 1>in part to the change of political landscape as well,

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:46.120
<v Speaker 1>And then you're absolutely right, will we get tax cuts

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look likely this year. I'm still budgeting for something

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand eighteen, but that something has slowly been

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 1>whittled down to a much less exciting something than one

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:56.399
<v Speaker 1>might have imagined in the fall of last year. So

0:23:56.560 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I think there might be a bit of help in

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eighteen. But other factors are and maybe the

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 1>most important and so far undiscussed one is that perhaps

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:05.959
<v Speaker 1>a bit of that secular stagnation is fading, really just

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>for for chronological reasons, if nothing else. And this idea

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that a negative confidence shock was maybe one of the

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>things that did in the global economy back in two

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:17.159
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight, two thousand nine, and maybe there's been

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>a positive confident shock, and whether it makes sense that

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>it happened or not, it has happened, and that might

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:24.120
<v Speaker 1>be helping to pull us out of that secular stagnation

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:26.639
<v Speaker 1>as well. And a good and a good point to

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>pivot to the FED with, because you know, obviously the

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:34.919
<v Speaker 1>FED helped help this recovery along, most analysts would agree,

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>but now the FED is trying to, you know, reduce

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>its accommodation. What about what's your outlook for FED policy

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.439
<v Speaker 1>going forward for the rest of the year, right, I

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:48.120
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't say I have an overly provocative one. It involves

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:50.919
<v Speaker 1>the assumption of probably a rate hike and probably a

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:53.439
<v Speaker 1>bit of draw down on the bond side, So fairly

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 1>in line I would say, with where the market sits

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 1>right now. But to me that the big question, certainly

0:24:58.040 --> 0:24:59.919
<v Speaker 1>as investors, is just whether or not this is the

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>right decision, whether it's a policy error or not. And

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I sit firmly in the camp that thinks this is

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the right thing to do. Granted, lots of ambiguity about

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>what neutral or natural is and where eventually this all ends.

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>But it does certainly make sense that rates are going up.

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't get too too concerned about the low wage story.

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 1>It seems to me that this is clearly an economy

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 1>getting fairly tight, and so it's it's probably the right

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:22.959
<v Speaker 1>thing to do in and so far the FED has

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:25.199
<v Speaker 1>acted reasonably in the market seems to be judging that

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 1>as well. Hey, Eric, whatever camp you're in, I'm assuming

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>that it's using Canadian lumber to build the houses, right,

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to build the cabins. That's right, all right, I'm leading

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>you know where I'm leading you. I'm leading you down

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the NAFTA path, because you know, everyone thinks NAFTA and

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:44.880
<v Speaker 1>then you know, unless the President pays a visit to uh,

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you know the well. I mean, I guess I was

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:51.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna say Wisconsin or northern Michigan in order to uh

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of talk about the timber trade or indeed even

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:58.639
<v Speaker 1>the the oil and energy trade from Canada Mexico is

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 1>always the in the headline, what's your view of any

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>possible renegotiation for for NAFTA and making it actually better? Yeah,

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is a timely subject in the sense

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that the official negotiations start next week, to my knowledge,

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and so we will learn much more shortly. We learned

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 1>a fair chunk last month, of course, when that that

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 1>big eight teen page report came out of out of

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the White House proposing various NAFTA changes, And so in

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:25.399
<v Speaker 1>terms of how that plays out, I'll confess I'm a

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>little concerned. And it's not that anyone's proposing to tear

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:30.479
<v Speaker 1>NAFTA up. It's not that giant new tear ups are

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 1>being proposed for any particular area. I worry more about

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 1>almost the foundation of NAFTA and some of the aims there,

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and in particular some of the subtle changes. You're eliminating

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:43.360
<v Speaker 1>a trade resolution panel that that's actually quite important. Right now,

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>disputes are resolved in an impartial way. If disputes instead

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:49.919
<v Speaker 1>are resolved by national courts, you get much less predictable

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:53.879
<v Speaker 1>and maybe much less free trade oriented outcomes. And similarly,

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the proposals in there is to allow what

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 1>are called safeguard exclusions, and really what that means is

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:01.920
<v Speaker 1>if any sector is hurt by free trade, they can

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 1>put tariffs on and these basic point of free trade is,

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:07.440
<v Speaker 1>isn't the hurt sectors, but sectors do get hurt along

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:09.959
<v Speaker 1>the way be a comparative advantage. And so I do

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 1>worry that NAFTA could continue with no new tariffs but

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:15.919
<v Speaker 1>really be substantially defangd So consider me somewhat concerned. And

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:18.920
<v Speaker 1>of course that's hugely relevant for both Mexico and Canada.

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 1>They are number two and three in terms of global

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>trade linkages with the U S right after China. So

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>it is a big deal, and I think that there

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 1>are some more pernicious changes proposed than maybe the surface

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:31.200
<v Speaker 1>would suggest. Yeah, and the president's target is the sixty

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar trade deficit with Mexico. So what sectors of

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 1>trade between the US and Mexico do you think are

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 1>most at risk? And all of this, I suppose the

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 1>motor vehicle one is is a side that gets the

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>greatest attention, And indeed Mexico has been hugely successful in

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of picking up a lot of production and manufacturing there.

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 1>To me, though, I think this will get very complicated

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:56.719
<v Speaker 1>very quickly, given the supply chain linkages and the reimporting

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and re exporting of products that were made in one

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 1>country and back to the other. It really manufacturing and

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:04.199
<v Speaker 1>autos being one of the flagship is the is the

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 1>obvious one there. But you know, you do worry a

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit though about one of the aims that the

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 1>US has here, which is that this goal to to

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 1>achieve a more balanced trade trade balance, and so that

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that's a noble goal, but it's not clear whether a

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 1>government can really achieve let me let me break in, Eric,

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>because there's is there there's no evidence that having a

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:24.160
<v Speaker 1>trade balance one way or any other necessarily affects whether

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>your economy is doing well or the people in your

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>country are actually living well well. I agree with me,

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:31.639
<v Speaker 1>and you know, Barry, I can Green would argue that

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 1>the exorbitant privilege is if you're the world's reserve currency

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 1>in the US certainly is then you almost by definition

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 1>right a trade deficit, and so I think it will

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>be hard to eliminate. And simultaneously, the White House wants

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 1>more business investment and fiscal stimulus, and of course that

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 1>means less aggregate national savings, and of course you need

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to be a national net saver if you're going to

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 1>run a current account surplus. So I'm not sure they'll

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 1>be able to achieve that. That worries me a bit

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 1>as well. Well. I was not asking that Ontario and

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the linkages in the Ontario economy with the United States,

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>because if you stand at the Acida Bridge, you know,

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>or the Bluewater Bridge with their building, I mean, it's

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 1>basically a unified economy. It really is, yeah, massively, So

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 1>that's right. And I can say from the Canadian perspective

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 1>that three quarters of Canadian exports go to the U S.

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 1>And gosh, it represents at least a quarter of Canadian GDP,

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 1>so huge on that side. Not quite as big on

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the U S side, just because the U S economy

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 1>is so much bigger, but these are hugely integrated. There

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>would be massive consequences both for the border states in

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the US and also for Ontario in particular, but some

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 1>of the other manufacturing and exporting hubs as well. So

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a big deal for all of us. It's

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a middling sized deal I think for all of you.

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Were slightly reassured that behind the scenes, one hears that

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Trump isn't focused on Canada. Canada is getting caught up

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and there's nevertheless, thanks very much. Eric la Cell, chief

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 1>economist RBC Global Asset Management, joining US from Toronto. Thanks

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 1>abramoids one before the podcast, you can always catch us

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>worldwide on Bloomberg Radio