WEBVTT - The Future of Copyright and IP: Part 1

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking, either and welcome to Forward Thinking, the podcast

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that looks at the future and says alone and board

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>on a thirtieth century night. Will I see you on

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the prices right? I'm Jonathan Strickland, I'm Lauren, and I'm

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Joe McCormick. And how are you guys doing today? I'm

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>not too bad? Pretty good? How about you? Oh, I'm

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>all right. I'm actually very excited about the episode we're

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>doing today because it is an excellent topic that came

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:40.919
<v Speaker 1>in from a listener. Our listener, Dave sent us an

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:44.879
<v Speaker 1>email asking us to do an episode on creativity and

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>intellectual property and what the future holds for them. Hey,

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and just so you guys know, this is going to

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:52.959
<v Speaker 1>be a two part episode of Forward Thinking. We originally

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>planned on it just being a one part episode, but

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>then we got to the end and realized it was

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>longer than the longest thing that was ever long. So, uh,

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 1>this is a little bumper to let you know. This

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:08.040
<v Speaker 1>is part one. Check out part two next time. Lauren,

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 1>would you be kind enough to read Dave's email? Absolutely,

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:15.279
<v Speaker 1>Dave says, Hey, forward Thinkers, I really appreciated Jonathan's recent

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>text Stuff episode exploring creativity and intellectual property issues with

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Mark Hustler of Negative Land, and I'm wondering what all

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:24.639
<v Speaker 1>three of you might have to say about a related topic.

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Side note, Jonathan, excellent job on that. Oh yeah yeah,

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and Nol as well. That was a really really fun episode. Um,

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>so go listen to that. Back to Dave's email, Today's

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>artists face many new and seemingly insurmountable challenges to creating

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 1>truly original works after so many decades of postmodernism, mass media,

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>and computer assisted Sky's limit creation, where millions of artists

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>have already explored the past, present, future, and furthest reaches

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of the imagination. Is every new picture, sound, and story

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>now pretty much doomed to resemble something else that came before?

0:01:57.360 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>And how does copyrate law play into this? Are any

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>amos contemporary works really so different from lesser known works

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>at the same variety or are they just lucky to

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 1>have gone viral for whatever reason? Are the creators and

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>or owners of popular media unfairly privileged and protected? Should

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:17.640
<v Speaker 1>other artists have more leeway to adapt iconic works and

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 1>sharing their overall success? Specifically and most importantly, will there

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>ever come a time when I can sell my Harry

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Potter e Studied Universe spinoff on Amazon? Thanks for all

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the great podcasts, Dave. And then in a ps he

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>gave us the lyric suggestion which Jonathan used, which like

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:39.799
<v Speaker 1>an automaton, you followed his command like like someone who

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't have to try and figure out the lyric. Thirty

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:46.359
<v Speaker 1>seconds before we hit record, I used the suggestion. Well,

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 1>thanks Dave for this excellent suggestion. I think this is

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>a really great topic. This is actually something that we

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>were wanting to talk about anyway, So I I thank

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you for giving us the willpower to do it. Yeah,

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>you read our minds and sent us of really terrific emails.

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>That thinks, But I guess we should back up and

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 1>before we can talk about the future of creativity, copyright,

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>intellectual property, look at what's the reality today and how

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>we got to where we are. Yeah, I mean you

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>have to have an understanding of what what all these

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>terms actually mean, because people throw them around a lot.

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>A lot of terms, you know, copyright or trademark or

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>patent or fair use. These are terms that that get

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:29.519
<v Speaker 1>used pretty liberally, and I don't think that everyone necessarily

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>has a full understanding of what they actually mean. Right,

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>So let's say that I write a book. All right,

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you write a book, and then I trademark that book.

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Now you can't do that? Well, well, no, hold on,

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>hold on, I patent that book. You can't do that either. Okay,

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>what if I make an invention and I copyright that invention,

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that's I would be more of a patent thing, you know.

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Wh Why don't we just define these things? Okay, and

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>let's let us state that this is we're talking about

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the US here, although a lot of international law kind

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of falls in line with what we're talking about. But

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>your mileage may vary depending upon what country you happen

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>to live in. But uh, some of the decisions that

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>have been made in US copyright history have been in

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>part to bring it in line with international standards. So

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:20.160
<v Speaker 1>first we have to define what a copyright is. A

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>copyright is a protection for an original work of authorship

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>that's set down in a fixed tangible medium, according to

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the United States anyway, So we'll get into more of

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>that in a second. It makes sense you have to

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>have sort of created this work in some way that

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you could show somebody. It can't be just an idea

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>you had, right, You can't. You can't think of an

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:43.720
<v Speaker 1>idea for example. I remember this happened to me and

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:46.600
<v Speaker 1>my wife. I chatted with her on we were on

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>a subway train and I turned to her and I

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>just said, apropos of nothing. I said, um, uh, if

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I die before you, you know I I've filled out

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>my my Oregon donation card. If I did before, you,

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>please promise me you won't fall in love with whichever

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>guy gets my heart. And then she said, that's the creepiest,

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>weirdest thing you could say to me right now. And

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 1>then about about a year and a half later, a

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:12.720
<v Speaker 1>movie came out with essentially that premise, and David d Kovny, am,

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I right. I maybe I don't remember everything that. I

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>don't remember who was in the movie, but I do

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>remember the premise was that. No, I think you're thinking

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:24.160
<v Speaker 1>of that Benicio del Toro movie. It may very well be.

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 1>All I know is that the premise was woman in

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>manner in love, one of them dies, the other one

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.039
<v Speaker 1>falls in love with the person who receives the heart

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 1>from the original partner. And uh. And so I could

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:40.279
<v Speaker 1>not claim copyright on that. I didn't set that idea down.

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I didn't write it down in any sort of fixed

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 1>tangible medium. I simply that I made a joke to

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>my wife. But of course then I joked that someone

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>on the train must have written that movie that they

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>stole my brilliant idea, which obviously it was me just

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>being silly. But if I had fixed that down in

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a tan will medium, then that work would be protected

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 1>under copyright, assuming in fact that it is an original work.

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:10.720
<v Speaker 1>That's the That's another important distinction. So, but also, you

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>can't just copyright anything that's made of language. You can't

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>copyright like a word or a name or something, right,

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 1>it has to be more significant than that. It can't

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 1>be a title, you know. You can't copyright a character name. Yeah,

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you can copyright a poem or a short story or

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:31.239
<v Speaker 1>a novel or a play or anything along those lines.

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Piece of software, a piece of software you can copyright.

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>And this copyright, by the way, exists the moment you

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 1>set it down in a fixed tangible medium. It doesn't

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 1>have to be that currently exists. Yeah. Now if it

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>is registered, that's going to make it easier for you.

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Should you ever have to pursue a claim of infringement

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that someone else has infringed your copyright. That registration will

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>make it much easier because you can refer to an

0:06:57.240 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>official document showing that you registered the with the government.

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 1>They have acknowledged that you are the author of that piece,

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and therefore that gives you an advantage in any sort

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of courtroom situation. If I were to write something down

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 1>not register it, Joe reads it, I haven't published it

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>in any way, haven't It's it's still there. Technically it's

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>under copyright. But if Joe goes out types out an

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>exact copy of what I've done and then registers it

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to the government, yeah, the government assumes that you, Joe,

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>are the original author and that I am out of luck.

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>So that's copyright. But let's hear about more of my

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>nefarious schemes. So like the trademark. Well, let's say I

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>want to open a food truck business, and I want

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to sell Hamburgers out of a food truck.

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>And let's just say, because I just really happen to

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>like Scottish culture, I call my food truck McDonald's, after

0:07:54.600 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the McDonald clan of Scotland. Old Yeah, and I side

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that it would be really cool to have a red

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:06.239
<v Speaker 1>background with some like yellow arches on the truck because

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>that makes people hungry for hamburgers. So what you're what

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>you are suggesting, unfortunately, would be a trademark infringement. Trademarks

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>are words, phrases, symbols, or designs that distinguish the source

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>of goods from one party from all other parties. And

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>it's essentially to say, when you see this particular symbol,

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you know that the goods or services you are are

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>purchasing come from this one particular source and no other.

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:36.559
<v Speaker 1>And therefore, if you were to try and copy that

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>in any way, it would be as if you are

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:44.319
<v Speaker 1>put portraying yourself as that other entity, which is wrong.

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>You can't do that. I mean, you could do that,

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>but you're gonna get sued like crazy. It's kind of

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 1>like the business equivalent of making a fake I D Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty much is. And uh, technically there there's actually a trademark,

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and then there's a service mark. Service mark is really

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>for a companies that provide services, not physical goods, but

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 1>we tend to use the term trademark for both because

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>it's the more common just the more common term, but

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:12.439
<v Speaker 1>at any rate that's trademark. So we've got copyright and

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.680
<v Speaker 1>trademark sorted right. So copyright is any any work that's

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>been put down in a tangible medium that, by the way,

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to just be written. Working also includes music.

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I didn't mention that, but arks, and yes as well,

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:25.959
<v Speaker 1>anything that is that tangible thing. You can have that

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 1>as a copyright. The trademark is more of a business

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:31.839
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing that's associated with a particular purveyor of

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>goods or services or both. But then we've got the

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:37.719
<v Speaker 1>third one, the one that you also mentioned as a

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>possibility if you had created an invention of some sort.

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>The protection for inventions is a patent. So patents are

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of a limited protection. It gives you a certain

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>period of time during which your idea of an invention

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 1>is protected, but it's publicly filed, so anyone can go

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and see what how your invention, at least from a

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:05.199
<v Speaker 1>very high level works patents. By the way, if you've

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:10.199
<v Speaker 1>never read one, try one. They are interesting. Okay, I

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>really enjoy pat They can often be very obduse and

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 1>difficult to understand. They're great if you like sequences of

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>numbers and letters within parentheses, yes, and diagrams that are

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:26.319
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily helpful. Right and for those versed in the

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>art or or some similar phrasing, you will you will

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.679
<v Speaker 1>come across that a lot as well. But patents are

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:37.599
<v Speaker 1>very useful. They in return for filing this public declaration

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:41.559
<v Speaker 1>of how your your invention works, the government provides protection

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>for your inventions. So should someone else try and make

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 1>essentially a similar invention that does what your invention does

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>using a very similar methodology, you can pursue a patent

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:58.319
<v Speaker 1>infringement claim against them, right right. For for example, I

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:03.559
<v Speaker 1>think Michael jack And patented the specific stage shoe that

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>he used to do that leaning trick in Smooth Criminals. Um, yeah, yeah,

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>And it was a It was a shoe that had

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 1>a little device inside of it that would hitch into

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 1>a specialized hitch in the stage and allow him to

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 1>brace against that to do that. Let'll tell you how

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>many tomes of broke my nose trying to recreate that

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:24.319
<v Speaker 1>particular move, not realizing I needed special shoes. On the

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 1>other end of things, I believe that w D forty

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 1>has never patented their formula because they don't want anyone

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to know what's in it. Yeah, you don't have you

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>have to have to patch your stuff. If you don't

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>patent your invention and someone reverse engineers it, then you

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 1>don't have that protection from the US government or whatever

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>government you happen to, you know, belong to be part of,

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 1>oversee you, etcetera. Uh, then that's that's a different issue altogether.

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 1>But on the other hand, once that that that protection

0:11:56.440 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>period is over, then it's fair game. Any comp editor

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>can come in and create an invention using that same design.

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Can you patent something that doesn't work? Yes, it's supposed

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>to work. It's supposed to work. But here's the thing

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>is that if you're in the patent office and you

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:15.839
<v Speaker 1>receive patents, it's not like you can go out and

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:19.839
<v Speaker 1>build everything that someone has created. So you could just

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>sit there all day filing patents on designs for things

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>that might not work at all. Why don't you do

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a search for patents for perpetual motion machines if you

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>want examples of stuff that does not work, and you

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:35.080
<v Speaker 1>can sometimes claim like like partial responsibility for someone else's

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>patent if you have a patent for similar It gets

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:40.560
<v Speaker 1>very tricky. It does and there are also other elements

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that you have to consider, like depending upon the government,

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:45.959
<v Speaker 1>they define patents in very specific ways. For example, you

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:50.320
<v Speaker 1>can't patent something that's a natural occurrence, right, You can't

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>patent the sunrise, something along those lines exactly. So, uh,

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 1>there are definitely limitations built in so people don't try

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:00.439
<v Speaker 1>to take advantage of the system. But some times we

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 1>have to write those afterward after someone has taken advantage

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of the system. Yeah, okay, Well, let's get a quick

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 1>history on where copyright comes from, because obviously we did

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 1>not have this in ye old ancient times. This is true, Well,

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>we had him in semi yield ancient times. The printing

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:21.839
<v Speaker 1>press actually pushed copyright into being um first in the

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>mid fourteen hundreds in Italy, when the Venetian Senate began

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 1>granting printing licenses, essentially like monopolies on certain works to

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:33.560
<v Speaker 1>particular printers and authors. Over in England, after a few

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:37.079
<v Speaker 1>similar licenses were granted, Henry the Eighth started a proud

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 1>tradition of royal decrees that gave the government power over

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>what was printed and who printed it. Big surprise from Hank,

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>you know right right. The Church wasn't enough for him

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:50.439
<v Speaker 1>he had to have all the printed words to so

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:54.199
<v Speaker 1>much censorship. Yes, and before this, obviously it was not

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a big concern because if you wanted to copy of work,

0:13:56.559 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>you pretty much first needed to go to a monastery. Yeah, monks, yes,

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, because you probably couldn't write. If you could, yeah,

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>you were probably a monk, and so was. It probably

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>took you a few years to copy out a book.

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Total monkey business. Oh anyway, So for over a hundred

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>years in England that that privilege of of printing went

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>to a company called the Stationers Company. And uh, that

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 1>was up until these laws got struck down during some

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>age of enlightenment kind of ideals that were going around

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the country at the time. That was a whole lot

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>of like information wants to be free kind of stuff.

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Sound familiar to anyone who's paying attention today, Yeah, yeah,

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 1>but in a British accent obviously. Um and uh, Stationers Company,

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>if you can imagine this, was faced with a sudden

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>influx of competition and not too excited about it. So

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>they petitioned Parliament a whole bunch of times in the

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 1>next few years, um to to try to impose new

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>printing regulations, and the one that uck was their attempt

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>to profit by pushing authors to the front lines of

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 1>their fight, and that one was the Statute of Anne

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of An uh so called because it was passed during

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Queen Anne's reign. Yes, yes, uh so. In seventeen ten,

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the British Parliament signed into law the act that protected

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the owners of original works for fourteen years. So yeah,

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Actually at the time, at the time, some people were saying,

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that's really long. That's a long time. Fourteen years. You

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>mean I can't I can't take advantage of someone else's

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>work until fourteen years after it was set down. I

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>guess to be fair, people didn't really live past their

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>sixties at that time. You can't understand why we were laughing.

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>You will in a bit. So after that the work

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>would pass into what we call the public domain, which

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>is when you can have free use of that that

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>original work. Uh So. Others would actually see their works

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>become public domain within their own lifetimes, often not always obviously,

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>if they published lay in their lives, they might not

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 1>live to see that, but they would also have the

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to make money off of that freely for fourteen years.

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>With the protection of the government should anyone come in

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and try to undercut them by selling copies, and whatever

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>printing press they were using also had protection by the government,

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>which made the stationers happy. Maybe not as happy as

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>they could have been, um, but happier. And and we

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>mentioned all of this history because first of all, I

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's it's just fascinating that, um that the that

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the profit of a particular company was in play and

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>copyright law this early, from the very beginning. And um,

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and be that that that statute of ann directly influenced

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the law that was created here in the United States.

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>That's correct. And in the United States, it's part of

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the US Constitution. It's an Article one, section eight, clause eight,

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>which gives the government the power to quote promote the

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>progress of science and useful arts by securing for limited

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>times to authors and inventors the exclusive to their respective

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:04.159
<v Speaker 1>writings and discoveries end quote. So kind of patents and

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>copyrights being that's that's the groundwork being laid for the

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 1>United States to establish its own offices to oversee that

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of stuff. Um. Now, in Congress pass the Copyright

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Act of it would have been Yeah, it would have

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:21.400
<v Speaker 1>been odd to do a different year at that point,

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:25.120
<v Speaker 1>which granted copyright for fourteen years just like the Statute

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of ann and allowed for a fourteen year renewal option

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 1>should the author of the work still be alive or

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the owner of the work still be alive. Yeah, so

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>corporate interests aside. Looking at the language in the U.

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>S Constitution kind of gives us an idea of the

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 1>thinking behind copyright law, which is that it's there to

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:49.399
<v Speaker 1>incentivize good creative work. Right. If the thinking goes like this, Uh,

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 1>if an author or creator of any type feels that

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>he or she is not going to be able to

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>profit from their work, then why would they ever go

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>into it? Why would a poor in the effort, the talent,

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the possibly the money in creating this there was never

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 1>going to be any return. Speaking as an artist, I

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>think that that still happens a lot anyway. But anyway, Yeah,

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Actually I wouldn't put it in exactly those terms because

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of times artists and and people

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 1>who are pursuing creative works one way or another that

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 1>enrich our culture would still want to pursue those works

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 1>even if they weren't going to make a lot of

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 1>money off of them. But they need to be able

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>to make something in order to devote time that would

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>otherwise have to be spent working a job to stay alive.

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 1>And from the government's perspective, the the motivation for creating

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:48.439
<v Speaker 1>art can't be assumed any way. They can only protect

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:51.399
<v Speaker 1>it in this way, right the only protected by saying

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll make sure that if you register the stuff, we

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>will totally have your backs. If someone else steals it,

0:18:57.600 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>we got you. Yeah, yeah, you can go after them

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 1>and you can cite this and then that will be

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>your basis for your claim. Obviously, the government can't go

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:08.879
<v Speaker 1>out and figure out all the actual internal motivations for

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:13.440
<v Speaker 1>someone to engage in creating art. But um, the other

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>thing that it creates an incentive for with this fourteen

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>years and potential fourteen more for renewal. By the way,

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of copyright holders didn't bother with renewing their

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>copyright once it expired. The thought was that it also

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:32.399
<v Speaker 1>could encourage these creators to continue creating because the amount

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 1>of time they could they could expect to earn money

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:40.159
<v Speaker 1>off of any given creation was limited. They couldn't, you know,

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 1>they couldn't hope to strike oil or strike gold or

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>however you want to think about it and create that peace.

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>That gets so much a claim that that right. And

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:55.160
<v Speaker 1>then from a cultural perspective, it means that we as

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 1>as people who consume this art and however we might

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 1>do so, would continue to benefit from the artist's talent

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and creativity. So there's there's kind of a balance there.

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 1>There's a public good and there's also a protection for

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the the author. So it's a balance that has been

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:19.920
<v Speaker 1>very delicately managed and sometimes not so delicately managed because

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 1>as it turns out, there have been a lot of

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>changes to that original copyright. How long years? Okay, so

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>eight one there was a change in the law where

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>it was extended to twenty eight years of protection with

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>then the option for a fourteen year renewal or extension,

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and then in nineteen o nine that was extended to

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight years of protection with a renewal of a

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>further twenty eight years. So, uh, you know, it's we're

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>seeing it start to creep up. That lasted for a

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>really long time. That's essentially fifty six years of protection. Uh. Yeah.

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 1>There was a particular um iconic character protected by copyright

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>whose copyright would have expired in nineteen eighty three had

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 1>this stayed true, that character is Mickey Mouse. I was

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>about to say, are we about to talk about the

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>mouse we are specifically to be to be really specific,

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the steamboat Willie version of Mickey Mouse, all right, that

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:28.399
<v Speaker 1>would have entered public domain in three had nothing changed.

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>So there was some pressure, let's say, from various entities,

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Walt Disney Company not being leased among them, to extend

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 1>copyright protection beyond this because now we have corporations that

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>can own intellectual property. So we're no longer talking like

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>when we're talking about owners of intellectual property. It doesn't

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>have to be the author the you know, the outher

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:54.359
<v Speaker 1>can sign over or sell intellectual property. You know it

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>can it can descend to one of their children, or

0:21:57.240 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 1>they can sell it to a corporation exactly. And corporation

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 1>is unlike people don't have a lifespan, like they can die,

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:06.920
<v Speaker 1>but they don't die of old age. No, they die

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>like empires. Yeah, so there's no there's no point where

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 1>a corporation is just going to wither away due to

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>being too old. So they no, they don't. They can

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 1>get creaky, but it's a different thing. So because of that,

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the corporations want to be able to ensure being able

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>to earn revenue off of their assets, which means they're

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>going to try to protect them. So in nineteen seventy

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>six we saw the greatest extension of the term of

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>copyright protection, which was the life of the author plus

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>fifty years on top of it, so you would never

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 1>be able to use the original work of an author

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>within that author's lifetime plus another fifty years. Works for

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Higher had seventy five years of protection completely works for Higher.

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:57.119
<v Speaker 1>That's where a corporation or other entity hires an an

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 1>artist or author to create something but belongs to that entity,

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the author gives up ownership of it. The Revision of

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>US Copyright Act also established copyright protection for unpublished works

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and codified the concept of fair use, but will cover

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 1>fair use in a little bit so comes around. The

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 1>US became a BURN Convention b E r N E

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Convention signatory, which created formal copyright relationships with twenty four

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>countries and eliminate the requirement of copyright notice for copyright protection,

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:32.719
<v Speaker 1>meaning that's where any work in a fixed tangible medium

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:35.639
<v Speaker 1>is under copyright. Once you have written a poem on

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a napkin, it belongs to you. Yes. Uh So, in nine,

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Congress amends the Copyright Act to automatically renew the copyright

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:46.399
<v Speaker 1>of any work they've been published before ninety eight, so

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that extra renewal ends up being tacked on. Some renewal

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>is no longer a thing at that point is just assumed.

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>And then in the sunny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>has passed, which increase is the length of protection for

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:04.119
<v Speaker 1>the life of the author plus seventy years. I think

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>it's nine years for works that are essentially works for

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>higher owned by another entity. Uh So that extends their

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 1>protection automatically. And uh and and and of course there

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>are a whole lot of smaller bills and and court

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>cases that have laid down more specific things about copyright

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of for example, about a sampling pieces of music and

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>a new song, or the public's ability to rent audio books,

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 1>or um whether displaying a cashed website is an infringement

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:34.679
<v Speaker 1>of copyright. This is this is where things get kind

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of crazy. It's sort of like when we talk about

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. It adds a whole new level of complexity

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:44.119
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of these these different concepts. Right because

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 1>in order for the Internet to work, certain things have

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to happen, and it's there are things that, in taken

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:54.160
<v Speaker 1>from a very black and white view, might violate something

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:57.680
<v Speaker 1>like copyright or they're also these are where you start

0:24:57.720 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 1>seeing those weird terms of service where a company will

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 1>say we want to have ownership of all the stuff

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you create. But really it's it's not necessarily the company

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 1>wants to own it. It's that the company needs to

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 1>have your permission to actually show it that kind of stuff.

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 1>It gets complicated, and then we're gonna make it more

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:16.360
<v Speaker 1>complicated by bringing in the concept of fair use. Yes,

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>all right, to do it. Complication go. Fair use is

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a pain in the butt, alright, so it shouldn't be

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:25.879
<v Speaker 1>fair use. Fair use is something that absolutely needs to

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 1>exist because otherwise we would be unable to comment on

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:32.920
<v Speaker 1>anything that was created by someone else. Right. So, let's

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 1>say you want to create a video that's a film review.

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>You want to say, hey, the newest Star Wars movie,

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it was terrible and here are the four

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 1>reasons why, and so you want to show some scenes

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>from it. Can you do that? That's an excellent question

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 1>and the answer is maybe sometimes occasionally, like should the

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:00.879
<v Speaker 1>creator of the film be able to sue you for

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:04.639
<v Speaker 1>using their work in a commentary on their work. Well,

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>whether they should be able to or not as immaterial.

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:11.159
<v Speaker 1>You can sue anyone for anything. I mean, under the

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 1>spirit of fair use. Oh, under the spirit of fair use,

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>then that should not happen, assuming that you are, in fact, uh,

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 1>following the basic tenants of fair use. So let's let's

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about what fair use is. This is when, under

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>specific circumstances, you're allowed to use an original work that's

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:30.959
<v Speaker 1>under copyright that's held by somebody else. So you are

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 1>not the author or the owner of that intellectual property,

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>but you wish to make use of some of that

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:39.719
<v Speaker 1>for some reason. There are certain conditions where you are

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>allowed to do that. It's completely legitimate. But it's fair

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>use is a defense, right, it's a It's a defense

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:49.399
<v Speaker 1>you use when a copyright holder claims that you have

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 1>infringed upon their copyright and then you say no. The

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>instance being referred to is a case of right. So

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:00.440
<v Speaker 1>here's the issue. This is something that's just cited on

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 1>a case by case basis in the court. So you

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>can't just say, hey, I followed the rules here and

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 1>therefore I'm I'm good to go because there are all

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:14.439
<v Speaker 1>these other cases that did the same thing. The lawyer

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>could argue that, but it shanna go to a court.

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>So there there was well, it's going to go to

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 1>a court. If you stand up for it, you could

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>settle out of court. Yeah, a lot of these cases

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 1>do settle out of court because court cases are expensive,

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and settling often will just mean that you either stop

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>doing whatever it was you're doing, take it down, stop whatever,

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 1>or hand over any revenue generated from said thing to

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the owner of the original copyright, which is there's there's

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 1>a whole discussion that we could have about that, but

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:47.199
<v Speaker 1>it was interesting. There was a court case in two

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 1>thousand fourteen in which one case, the lawyer the judge

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 1>actually approved of an arithmetic approach to uh TO to

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 1>figuring out whether or not h a an instance was

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:03.639
<v Speaker 1>fair use. That's saying that there are four criteria that

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go over in a second to determine

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 1>fair use, and if three of the four criteria were met,

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:10.680
<v Speaker 1>at least three of the four, it was fair use,

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and that would be that. However, it then went to

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 1>a superior court that reversed and remanded that decision, saying

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 1>that fair use can't be broken down in a logical

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 1>way like that, because why would we let that happen.

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>We don't want your logic, We want more court cases. Yeah,

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:26.439
<v Speaker 1>so it has to be decided on a case by

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 1>case basis to be fair. It is a very individual

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of issues. Yeah, it can be certainly. Yeah, well,

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean we should hear what the criteria are. But

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of course the effect of saying it has to be

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 1>decided on a case by case basis, at least seems

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to me is that that just allows whoever has legal

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 1>resources to bully the other person into doing whatever they want.

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>It means it's so vague, so vaguely defined, even with

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 1>this criteria, that you can never be certain that what

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 1>you are doing is going to fall all under fair

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>use unless you get sued, go to the court, defend

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 1>yourself and win. That's the only way you can come

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 1>out of it. Saying here's an example of fair use.

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Is if the court decides in your favor, So you

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>can't you can't look at it and say, well, because

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 1>it falls it very clearly meets these criteria, It totally works.

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 1>It still is going to be something decided in a

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 1>court or you're gonna settle out of court. So here

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the four criteria. The first is whatever the what is

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the purpose and character of the use of that original work.

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 1>So the purpose of the use is for something like

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>scholarship or for a commentary criticism, that kind of thing

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 1>like your film criticism example, this could mean that it

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 1>it could be fair use under this particular criterion. Uh,

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 1>parody falls under this, but not satire. And the difference,

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 1>according to US law is that parody is something that

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 1>ends up commenting upon the original work itself, where a

0:29:55.600 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 1>satire is a more broad commentary on some other topic

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and is only using the original work in order to

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 1>get attention, and so they say that it's less transformative.

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>So if you're talking about a song like It's kind

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 1>of interesting because weird al it's always referred to as

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 1>parody songs. A lot of songs aren't parody. Well, permission

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 1>from there being only one exception, and that is one

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 1>that's contested where where the story is he yes, he

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 1>did get permission, and then the other side says, no,

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>he did not. But otherwise yes, that's exactly true. He

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 1>does get the permission. But if it were parody, he

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't necessarily need that that permission and it could still

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 1>fall under fair use. Um. This is the part where

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 1>we talk about being transformative as well, right right, yeah,

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 1>And that's the kind of thing where um, why like

0:30:50.240 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 1>SNL or Mad Magazine or something like that can get

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 1>away with portraying characters from other shows because it's a

0:30:56.200 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>parody exactly, it's a commentary on culture right now. The

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>second one is the nature of the copyrighted work, So

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 1>fair use tends to apply more readily to cases where

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 1>you're using information from a nonfiction source. So if you

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>are citing, like it could even be citing a review

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>or citing um uh, a news item or a speech,

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 1>something along those lines, as opposed to taking elements from

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 1>a source of fiction, whether that's a poem, short story, play,

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 1>whatever it may be. This makes sense to me because

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 1>if you were to be too strict about what people

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 1>could copy from nonfiction sources, that could in cases seem

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to lead to people being able to restrict the use

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 1>of facts or like restrict the use of pieces of

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 1>true knowledge, sure, which I mean obviously that's untenable, Like

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 1>if you are the author of a study that finds

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 1>out some important new fact about the universe. Obviously, it

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be good to have people, you know, plagiarizing your

0:31:59.160 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 1>work wholesale. But people need to be able to refer

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 1>to your find dame. Well, yeah, that's the whole basis

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 1>of science, right, because if you're not able to do that,

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 1>then suddenly you can't. You can't end up testing claims

0:32:12.560 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 1>because be fear of being sued for copyright infringement. I

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 1>mean it would be it would be broken, would be

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a broken system. Yeah, you can't copyright the results of

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 1>your experiment, right. And then ultimately there's also uh an

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:29.080
<v Speaker 1>even more focused version of this for unpublished works, because

0:32:29.200 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a general belief that the right of the first

0:32:33.040 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 1>public appearance of any work should go to the creator

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 1>or owner of that work. And therefore, if you were

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 1>to try and make fair use of something that had

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>not yet been published, that would be a harder argument

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 1>for you to make in a court. They would they

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 1>would say, well, this hadn't even been the general public

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 1>had not had a chance to see the original work yet,

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 1>so that doesn't that's stealing. Yeah, Okay, what about the

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 1>difference between if I want to write about my favorite novel.

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm want to write a blog post about tech War,

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 1>my favorite novel um and I want to quote from

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:13.480
<v Speaker 1>it to show why the pros is so vivid and beautiful.

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Does it make a difference if I quote a paragraph

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>versus a single sentence versus the entire book, Yes it does.

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Substantiality does does make a difference. As the third criterion,

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Uh so this the the amount and substantiality of the

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 1>portion used in relation to the copyright work as a

0:33:32.160 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 1>whole is something that is under consideration. So the rule

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 1>of thumb is the less you use, the better off

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you are. Right, the more you use, the more you're

0:33:41.280 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 1>treading on stealing and less on fair use. Also, it's

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:48.240
<v Speaker 1>not just the amount, but is it the heart of

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the piece. So in other words, if you end up

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 1>publishing something that is the most important aspect of that work,

0:33:56.320 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 1>whatever it may be, then it's harder for you to

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 1>defend that as fair use than if it were some

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 1>just random part of the not random, because that would

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 1>make no sense. But some other less notable element of

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 1>that work. Sure, sure, And that's under the argument that

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you are less likely to infringe upon an author's possible

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:19.840
<v Speaker 1>profits from their work if it's if it's a relatively

0:34:19.920 --> 0:34:22.920
<v Speaker 1>non significant part, then if it is a very significant part,

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and that'll that'll fall under the fourth one as well.

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 1>But the other interesting thing to note here is that

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people seem to think that there's some

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:33.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of hard and fast rule about how much, for example,

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:37.280
<v Speaker 1>how much music you can play before it's an infringement,

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 1>before it's an infringement. Like yeah, like, oh, if it's

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 1>just fifteen seconds or five seconds, you're fine. No, there's no.

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 1>It probably should be, but but there's not. Yeah, there's not. Well,

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:50.640
<v Speaker 1>also then people would argue, like, well, which fifteen seconds

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 1>or how long is the song? If it's a remote song,

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:56.399
<v Speaker 1>fifteen seconds is a significant part of that piece. If

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 1>it's meat loaf, you wouldn't even notice, Um, but no,

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's not the case you couldn't even tell

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 1>what song it was from fifteen seconds. You wouldn't even

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:08.239
<v Speaker 1>know what album it came from, like it's one of

0:35:08.280 --> 0:35:11.399
<v Speaker 1>the Beat of the Hell albums, and just not sure which, Um, yeah,

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:15.360
<v Speaker 1>it's it's. There is no time limit that you know,

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:18.279
<v Speaker 1>there's not a safety zone. Yeah. Yeah. In in a

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:20.719
<v Speaker 1>one case that was settled in two thousand four, a

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 1>two second sample of a song was deemed an infringement. Yeah,

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that's ridiculous. I agree. Yeah, this this is a This

0:35:28.120 --> 0:35:30.320
<v Speaker 1>is actually a huge problem or was a huge problem

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:33.640
<v Speaker 1>at a certain point in the hip hop industry. Oh yeah, yeah,

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and we'll we'll talk more about how artists are kind

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 1>of shifting this away a little bit. Like the fourth

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and final criterion for a fair use is the effect

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 1>of the use upon the potential market for or value

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of the copyrighted works. So if your work, your transformative work,

0:35:51.719 --> 0:35:56.400
<v Speaker 1>were to have some impact upon the sales of the

0:35:56.440 --> 0:36:00.719
<v Speaker 1>original work, like a negative impact, like maybe someone wrote

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:03.680
<v Speaker 1>a cool song and you took that cool song and

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:08.400
<v Speaker 1>made it even cooler song that's way more awesome, you

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 1>might not be able to argue fair use because you

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:15.239
<v Speaker 1>may have potentially affected the revenue the original authors could

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 1>have expected from his or her piece. But yeah, this

0:36:18.320 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 1>also goes back to that idea of you don't share

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:23.399
<v Speaker 1>the heart of the work, right, like you were saying, Lauren,

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:26.719
<v Speaker 1>if if I were to give away the important part

0:36:26.760 --> 0:36:28.840
<v Speaker 1>of a book, like I don't know, if I were

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to be one of those jerks who explained who kills

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Dumbledore in the Harry Potter series before anyone's even had

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:37.920
<v Speaker 1>chance to read it. And I've done so in a

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:40.320
<v Speaker 1>in a way that is using a lot of the

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:43.799
<v Speaker 1>original work. I don't know that I could argue fair

0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 1>use on that. Sure, if you just post a one

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:50.560
<v Speaker 1>sentence spoiler on the Internet, that's not infringement. You're just

0:36:50.800 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a goat hugger. But if you but if you published

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:57.759
<v Speaker 1>perhaps the entire chapter that that thing happened in, that

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that would be infringement exactly. Yeah, So comment on something

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:05.000
<v Speaker 1>is not copyright infringement. Right, If I comment on something,

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 1>if I say the Last Wars movie was terrible, I'm

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:10.680
<v Speaker 1>not making use of any of the copyrighted work. I'm

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 1>just referring to it. That's clearly not a case of

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 1>copyright infringement. Sure, I mean, I mean the problem that

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:19.200
<v Speaker 1>you get into is when you start mucking around to

0:37:19.280 --> 0:37:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the terry territory of what construes um, what construes stealing,

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:29.239
<v Speaker 1>and what construes commentary. Because art, as part of art,

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:32.560
<v Speaker 1>it comments on itself and on other stuff around it. Yeah,

0:37:32.600 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 1>in fact, that's a great, great transition. Art does not

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 1>exist in a vacuum, right, Well, y'all mentioned controversies about

0:37:39.680 --> 0:37:42.000
<v Speaker 1>sampling in the hip hop industry a while back, and

0:37:42.880 --> 0:37:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that's definitely a case where you can make the claim

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:50.400
<v Speaker 1>that great pieces of cultural value of art entertainment have

0:37:50.760 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 1>needed the ability to sample sound that might be protected

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:57.640
<v Speaker 1>by copyright. But they're they're doing it in a way

0:37:57.719 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that's not just exploiting the original creator. They're doing it

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 1>in a way that makes a new work of art

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 1>is transformative. Yeah. Absolutely, yeah, And this is you know,

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:10.520
<v Speaker 1>this is a point. And if you did listen to

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:13.400
<v Speaker 1>that Negative Land episode, you'll hear um Our Costler make

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:16.560
<v Speaker 1>this point to that that commentary the world we live

0:38:16.600 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 1>in we're surrounded by this stuff. We're surrounded by art,

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:24.640
<v Speaker 1>we're surrounded by commercials and and messages that are consumerist messages.

0:38:25.200 --> 0:38:28.600
<v Speaker 1>And therefore, any kind of art that's to comment on

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:32.359
<v Speaker 1>what life is will at least some of it will

0:38:32.480 --> 0:38:35.400
<v Speaker 1>end up incorporating that kind of stuff into the art.

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's how art works. So there has to

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:41.320
<v Speaker 1>be some way of doing that. Yeah. Yeah, And and

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:42.759
<v Speaker 1>there are I mean there there are a bunch of

0:38:42.880 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting examples of court cases that have settled things like this, Like,

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 1>for example, um I believe Mattel tried to sue the

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:52.080
<v Speaker 1>band Aqua when they put out the song Barbie World

0:38:53.200 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Barbie Girl, not the title of you Can Brush My Hair, No,

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I know the all the lyrics, okay, but yeah yeah,

0:39:07.840 --> 0:39:10.959
<v Speaker 1>Mattell said, Hey, that's our property. You can't. You can't

0:39:11.000 --> 0:39:14.680
<v Speaker 1>just trot her out like that, And the courts essentially said, uh,

0:39:15.000 --> 0:39:18.239
<v Speaker 1>yeah they can, because she's a cultural icon, She's a

0:39:18.280 --> 0:39:22.719
<v Speaker 1>cultural phenomenon. So so creating a transformative work based on

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:25.520
<v Speaker 1>your characters absolutely loud, right. And this is this is

0:39:25.560 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 1>similar too. I mean I've actually know plenty of stories

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:30.360
<v Speaker 1>of people who have put up YouTube videos that have

0:39:30.440 --> 0:39:33.880
<v Speaker 1>incorporated clips from stuff order to comment on it, to

0:39:33.920 --> 0:39:36.920
<v Speaker 1>actually do it in a news commentary way, then got

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:39.600
<v Speaker 1>taken down. Uh, and then they had they actually went

0:39:39.640 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 1>through the fight. In fact, Tom Merritt has gone through

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 1>this where tom Merritt does various technology shows and he

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:48.839
<v Speaker 1>did an episode where he did a commentary on a video.

0:39:49.360 --> 0:39:52.520
<v Speaker 1>The owners of the video ordered to take down the

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:55.440
<v Speaker 1>entire episode that tom had produced, which is like a

0:39:55.920 --> 0:39:58.960
<v Speaker 1>forty five minute hour long news show. Uh, and he

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:01.400
<v Speaker 1>had to fight for quite some time before it was

0:40:01.880 --> 0:40:03.839
<v Speaker 1>reintroduced to YouTube and of course by then, I mean

0:40:03.880 --> 0:40:05.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a daily news show, so by then it was

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:08.239
<v Speaker 1>like two weeks later or something. Yeah, And and that's

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:11.480
<v Speaker 1>a very specific YouTube situation because because once you start

0:40:11.560 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about an independent, uh privately owned website, then that's

0:40:16.520 --> 0:40:18.879
<v Speaker 1>a different issue than the US government. It's like, it's

0:40:18.920 --> 0:40:21.560
<v Speaker 1>not like the company in question, the owners of the

0:40:21.640 --> 0:40:24.080
<v Speaker 1>original video and question, we're going through the government in

0:40:24.239 --> 0:40:26.480
<v Speaker 1>order to get this result. Right, they didn't sue. They

0:40:26.560 --> 0:40:32.360
<v Speaker 1>simply took advantage of YouTube liberal taking stuff down policy,

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:35.400
<v Speaker 1>which and again, if you are a company that provides

0:40:35.440 --> 0:40:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a platform, then obviously you're going to air on the

0:40:38.000 --> 0:40:41.000
<v Speaker 1>side of the people who have the most money. That's

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:43.319
<v Speaker 1>just how that works, all right. And here's where we're

0:40:43.360 --> 0:40:47.239
<v Speaker 1>going to wrap up for this particular conversation, because, as

0:40:47.280 --> 0:40:49.719
<v Speaker 1>it turns out, we had a lot more to say

0:40:49.800 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 1>about copyright, creative comments, and various use cases, and it

0:40:55.400 --> 0:40:57.239
<v Speaker 1>was just too much, like Joe said the beginning of

0:40:57.280 --> 0:40:59.480
<v Speaker 1>this episode, to make it one. So we are going

0:40:59.560 --> 0:41:02.240
<v Speaker 1>to leave off here and rejoin on the next episode.

0:41:02.280 --> 0:41:05.840
<v Speaker 1>To conclude our conversation. We have to thank Dave, because

0:41:06.200 --> 0:41:08.759
<v Speaker 1>holy cow, we got a lot of material to talk

0:41:08.800 --> 0:41:10.880
<v Speaker 1>about from that one email. It turns out we like

0:41:11.000 --> 0:41:13.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about aren't here, yeah, so join us for the

0:41:13.920 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 1>next one, so that for the conclusion of this conversation

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:18.520
<v Speaker 1>where we will we will talk about the rest of

0:41:19.000 --> 0:41:21.840
<v Speaker 1>all the things that came up in that particular episode.

0:41:22.440 --> 0:41:24.440
<v Speaker 1>And remember you can get in touch with us to

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:28.080
<v Speaker 1>leave us comments, questions, suggestions, what you want to hear

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:31.799
<v Speaker 1>on future episodes by writing to f W Thinking at

0:41:31.960 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 1>how Stuff Works dot com, or drop us a line

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:37.040
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook, Twitter or Google Plus. A Twitter and Google

0:41:37.080 --> 0:41:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Plus we are f W Thinking, and on Facebook just

0:41:39.680 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 1>search f W Thinking. We'll pop up, leave us a

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:44.600
<v Speaker 1>message there and we will talk to you again really soon.

0:41:48.960 --> 0:41:51.360
<v Speaker 1>For more on this topic in the future of technology,

0:41:51.719 --> 0:42:04.440
<v Speaker 1>visit forward Thinking dot com, brought to you by Toyota.

0:42:04.920 --> 0:42:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's Go Places,