WEBVTT - What Would Adam Smith Think of a Carbon Tax?

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 2>Hello, Bren Talks Money Listeners, It's Maren Sunset Web. We

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 2>are bringing you something very special over the next week,

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 2>recordings of the conversations I had at Pamier House for

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 2>the Edinburgh Fringe Festival. Now, for those of you who

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:22.960
<v Speaker 2>don't know, and I'm sure there aren't very many of

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:24.599
<v Speaker 2>you who don't know this, The Friends is a three

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 2>week arts and culture festival that began in nineteen forty

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 2>seven and takes place in Edinburgh in Scotland every August.

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 2>For the past few years, I've been hosting conversations about markets,

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 2>economics and investings from one of the most special locations

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 2>as part of this festival. I do it from Pamier House,

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 2>which is the last home of Adam Smith, philosopher and

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 2>father of modern economics. It's where he completed the last

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 2>editions of his best sellers, The Theory of Moral Sentiments

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:51.560
<v Speaker 2>and The Wealth of Nation's top reads, both of them.

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>This year we did a four day.

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Run in mid August, and we are bringing you the

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 2>slightly edited conversations from three of those days for this

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 2>panelized spoke with Bloomberg Senior reported John Steppeck, James Ferguson,

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 2>who is the founder and partner at macro Strategy, and

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Ed Conway, author of Material World, a substantial story of

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 2>our past and the future, which is an excellent reading.

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:12.680
<v Speaker 1>If you haven't read that, go out by it right now.

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>It's fantastic. Enjoy listening. Thank you for coming.

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 2>I know there's an awful lot of shows at the

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 2>festival and there are a million things you could have

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:25.680
<v Speaker 2>been to which are Builder's comedy and might have been

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:26.400
<v Speaker 2>more amusing than this.

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>So we're very very grateful to you for coming here today.

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Thank you.

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 2>The way this works is I ask all my brilliant

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 2>guests to come up with their favorite Adam Smith quote.

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Although that's difficult because everyone has a lot of favorites,

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 2>they're one that is both their favorite and most relevant

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 2>to today. They give their quote, and then we talk

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:44.040
<v Speaker 2>about the context of that quote, where they like it,

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:45.960
<v Speaker 2>where it matters today, and then we talk about all

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 2>sorts of other things that we didn't intend to talk

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 2>about but which kind of come up as we go.

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 2>So each one will do that, we'll discuss it, then

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 2>we'll move on the next one, and then in forty

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 2>minutes or so we will have questions and someone win

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 2>the book and it'll be great. So we are going

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 2>to start with ed who is broken the first rule

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 2>of the show before you even starts, the first rule

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 2>being please have a short quote.

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't really me that broke it.

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:09.399
<v Speaker 4>I think that was Adam Smith because he was not

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 4>not known for his brevity. He was and he wrote

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 4>very very as a result my quotes.

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 3>If the audience is going to see here, and.

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 2>That's what I mean when I say we may not

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 2>have a full twenty minutes of questions.

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 3>So that's that's our hour, isn't it. Do you want

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 3>me to reader? I'm going to do it. I'll do

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:22.839
<v Speaker 3>a bit.

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:24.799
<v Speaker 2>Well, well, I tell you what, why don't you pull

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 2>out a bit of the c and then I mean

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 2>you can you can read, you know, maybe Okay.

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 4>So it's it's from the Wealth of Nations and it's

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 4>about woolen coats. The woolen coat, for example, which covers

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 4>the day laborer, as coarse and rough as it may appear,

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:40.839
<v Speaker 4>is the produce of the joint labor of a great

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 4>multitude of workmen, the shepherd. The sort of the wool,

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 4>the woolcomba, or kada, the dire, the scribble, you to

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 4>get the idea, and it goes on a bit. The dire,

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:50.640
<v Speaker 4>the scribbler, the spinner, the weaver, the full of the dresser,

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 4>with many others must all join their different arts in

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 4>order to complete this homely production. How many merchants and

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 4>carriers besides must have been employed in tron splant, transporting

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:03.959
<v Speaker 4>the materials from some of those workmen to others who

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 4>often live in very different different parts of the country.

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna stop there, because you get the ideas. So

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 4>when I started kind of getting interested in economics, there

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 4>was this essay called Eye Pencil by a guy called

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 4>Leonard Reed, an American economist, and it was all about

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:20.519
<v Speaker 4>the story of a pencil and how a pencil is made.

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 3>And that's fascinating because in.

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 4>The course of this essay you learn how you know

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 4>that actually this is a very complex thing.

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:26.920
<v Speaker 3>To make a pencil.

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 4>You need the wood that's chopped down from a tree

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 4>in the US, You need the lead, the graphite that

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 4>comes from another part. You need the metal that becomes

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 4>the bit that attaches the eraser. You need the rubber,

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 4>and so on and so forth, and the kind of

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 4>punchline of this is there is no single person who

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 4>knows how to make a pencil, and I remember being quite.

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 3>Obsessed with this.

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 4>But of course, as with so many of these themes,

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 4>Adam Smith came up with at first, and actually his

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 4>point here is that the complexity of even supply chains

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 4>back in the eighteenth century was way beyond what any

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 4>single per and could fathom. And each of us carry

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 4>around or where in the case of wool and coats,

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 4>we carry a oron products that are made by so

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 4>many different people in different parts of the world, with

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 4>such complexity, and we just don't spend much time thinking

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 4>about it. And it's one of the wonders I think

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:19.840
<v Speaker 4>of the modern world that the market often can help

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:23.359
<v Speaker 4>us produce these things which are just amazing. And so

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 4>you know, I'm going to try not as much as

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 4>I can not to puff my book in the course

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 4>of doing this, but it's hard because it's been ingrained

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 4>in me in the last year. So one of the

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 4>things I tried to do in that book is to

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 4>do the same thing for a smartphone, and it's just

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 4>it's obviously it's impossible, but even before the semiconductor that

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:43.359
<v Speaker 4>becomes the heart of that smartphone, you know, is actually made,

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 4>the silicon that you need to make that goes through

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 4>this incredible transformation, goes around the world multiple times, it

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 4>gets kind of vaporized, turns into all sorts of different things.

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 4>Hundreds of different companies are working on it. These things

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 4>are just hidden away. And I think the more that

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 4>we spent some time thinking about how stuff is made,

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:03.599
<v Speaker 4>how it got to us, then the more a I

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 4>think we would appreciate the stuff, the more b I

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 4>think we'd have wonder in the world around us, because

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 4>it really is kind of amazing what's happening inside our devices.

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 4>And also see I think we would understand a little

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 4>bit more about the kind of compromises that happen along

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:21.279
<v Speaker 4>the way, because to make anything involves quite a lot

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 4>of emissions. It involves a lot of energy and involves

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 4>a lot of effort, and in economics we're not particularly

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 4>good at kind of embedding those things within it each

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 4>of different models. There's a vague talk about externalities, but

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 4>the closest I've come to kind of actually trying to

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 4>understand the challenges facing us as we do that zero

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 4>and also just understanding the wonder of the world is

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:44.840
<v Speaker 4>to think about an item of product and what it

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:47.720
<v Speaker 4>takes to make it. So, you know, Adam Smith, I think,

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 4>had that kind of principle early on. It's inspiring to

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 4>think about how things are made and how many people

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 4>are underneath that kind of hidden, that hidden backstory of

0:05:57.279 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 4>all the things that we're touching.

0:05:58.240 --> 0:05:59.720
<v Speaker 2>And when it kind of starts frightening, doesn't it when

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 2>you think there isn't a single person who knows how

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 2>to make a whole hair, a plane, Oh, knows how

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 2>to make a whole car.

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 3>No, well, they don't know how to make a pencil.

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 4>And so let's alone, you know, the plane, or the

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 4>semiconductor or all of these other things. But that's the

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 4>wonder of economics. And I think that's what Smith was

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 4>trying to get across it. This is quite an early

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 4>quote in the book. It is this is amazing because

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 4>this is the human story, is how we cooperate to

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 4>make things. And so he was talking about wool and

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 4>co at that point. You know, wool was one of

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:27.719
<v Speaker 4>the great industries of this nation. But it goes today,

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 4>it goes today, and I think we need to tell

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 4>those kind of stories in an inspiring sense, but also

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 4>in a kind of realistic sense about there's some challenges

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 4>there about carbon emissions, about water use, all of the

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 4>other things as well.

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 2>It's the drive to zero that really made you start

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 2>thinking about this and that one of the things.

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:42.840
<v Speaker 1>And it becomes very interesting.

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:44.160
<v Speaker 2>When you look at it because we listened to politicians

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 2>speak and we listen to activists speak, and they make

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 2>it sounds.

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.119
<v Speaker 1>So incredibly simple. We should just do this, we should

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:49.600
<v Speaker 1>just do this.

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 2>But in fact, if you read your book, the underlying

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 2>the mining, the materials, the energy required to produce an

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:02.839
<v Speaker 2>energy transition make it much much more complicated, much harder

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 2>than most of the people who discussed it understand.

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 5>Well.

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean, in a way, actually it's the other way around.

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 4>I didn't intend to write a book that touched on

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 4>you know, net zero and all of that different stuff.

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 4>I didn't intend to get into covering the energy transition.

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 4>But when you start to think, I kind of just

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 4>wanted to understand how smartphone it's made. You know, how

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 4>the different pits and pieces actually came together. You know

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 4>what it actually takes. But when you go down that

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 4>rabbit hole, you just see that making everything everything involves

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 4>an enormous amount of energy and involves a enormous amount

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 4>of carbon emissions. You know, to make the semiconductor, just

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 4>to make the silicon that comes up the ground, you

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 4>quarry some rock, you turn it into what's called metallurgical silicon.

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 4>By the way, there's a whole load of other processes

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 4>before it becomes a silicon chip. But just that process

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 4>you have to throw it into a furnace alongside coal.

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 4>You know, when people are kind of tweeting about are

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 4>we really need to have fewer emissions, they are doing

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 4>it on an item that has coal in its production,

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 4>Doing it on an item that whose battery has has

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 4>literally has oil inside it. And understanding those complexities and

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 4>realizing that it is everywhere just made me think, like

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 4>I can't. There's no way of describing the current world,

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 4>which is the idea, without touching enormously on this, this thing,

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 4>this undertaking that we have we well, the country the

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 4>government has signed up to you. By the way, does

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 4>anyone know how many hours of debate there was in

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 4>the House of Commons before we officially signed zero into law?

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:38.679
<v Speaker 3>Actually zeros, no, it's one, it was one. It was

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:39.839
<v Speaker 3>actually eighty eight minutes.

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 4>Eighty eight minutes to debate the single most consequential because

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 4>I think it is the single most consequential thing law

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 4>that we have ever agreed to. And then it was

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 4>There wasn't even a vote, It wasn't there wasn't there

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 4>was no division, It was just a and then it

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 4>went through because it was done as a statutory instrument.

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 4>We signed up to these things, I think, you know.

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 4>Having having then gone into these kind of various rabbit holes,

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 4>I realized that we have just not still at all

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 4>about what this involves.

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 2>And this is because we're one of the things you

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 2>talk about. Whatever we discussed, this is everyone believing they

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 2>live in an ethereal world or forgetting that they really

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 2>live in a material world. So that debate was all

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 2>about something theoretical without a thought of the practicalities behind us.

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 4>Looks very easy if you live in and I inhabit

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 4>that world as well. You know, I live in kind

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 4>of London. I spend a lot of time talking to

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 4>policymakers and think tank peoples and finance people and economists,

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:29.680
<v Speaker 4>and it's just ideas, and we kind of think that

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 4>the physical things don't really matter for ideas, and that's

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 4>just couldn't be more wrong, you know, anything, Any communication

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 4>that we have goes these days in the Internet via

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 4>some fiber optic cable. And what's that fiber optic cable

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 4>made of. It's made of glass, and that what's that

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:48.199
<v Speaker 4>glass made of, It's made of sand. And understanding that

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 4>physical kind of set of foundations that underlies everything, it's

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:54.839
<v Speaker 4>like the GDP that we kind of think of. I

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 4>don't want to kind of get into slagging off GDP

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 4>because that's very well we slag of all sorts of

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 4>things are but gross messag product. It gives its enormous

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 4>value because we pay enormous value and it generates enormous

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 4>values to things like social networks. But you wouldn't have

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 4>any social networks without the fiber optic cables. You wouldn't

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 4>have any social networks without the servers that you need

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 4>to provide that. You wouldn't have social networks without the

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:17.319
<v Speaker 4>energy that we need. And the whole point is that

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 4>that GDP is like a big inverted pyramid with all

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 4>of the big stuff, you know that kind of constitutes

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 4>a lot of the value at the top, and everything

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 4>is balanced on this tiny, precarious little bit of GDP,

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:31.839
<v Speaker 4>which technically speaking, is only a few dollars. But it's

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 4>the stuff that makes everything else tick, you know. It's

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 4>the concrete, it's the materials, it's the fiber optics, it's

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 4>the semiconductors. They're worth a bit more, to be honest

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 4>with you, these a but still that stuff is relatively small,

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 4>and all we kind of tend to think about a

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 4>lot of the time is the slice at the top.

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 4>But without the stuff at the bottom, the whole thing

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 4>just falls. And I think, particularly in this country, we

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:56.680
<v Speaker 4>need to think about that quite importantly, because we don't

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 4>make much of the stuff anymore, for better or for worse,

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 4>and it matters because without it, we're all screwed.

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>We we need to think about all the dirty stuff at.

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 3>The bottom, and it's very dirty to make it.

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>All that's were filthy, Yeah, we did.

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 2>We were talking about rare earth metal to Ecceter on

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:11.719
<v Speaker 2>a podcast recently and.

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Saying that if we if we really really believed in

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>that zero, we would have to dig up most of cornwall.

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah you get out, Well, there's a lot of copper.

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:21.079
<v Speaker 4>There's a lot of copper. In fact, some of the

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 4>grades you find of copper in Cornwall are better than

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:25.559
<v Speaker 4>some of the grades that you get in Chile, which

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 4>has the world's biggest reserves of copper. So technically speaking,

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 4>we could go there and mind the hell out of

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 4>Cornwall and be probably copper independence.

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 3>From the rest of the world. But so we're not

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:38.680
<v Speaker 3>going to do that. Seem reluctant. Nim seem reluctant too.

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>And personally, you know, I reckon we could do with

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that bottle minimal but well.

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, nonetheless it's it's protected, so it's so no chance

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:47.719
<v Speaker 4>and and and that's that's one of the issues I

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 4>think we're coming into at the moment that our ability

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:52.959
<v Speaker 4>to make all this amazing kind of stuff happen is

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 4>is it's limited not so much by the geology, you know,

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 4>there's no shortage of any of the stuff we need.

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 4>It's limited by our reluctance to go and get it,

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 4>and also to some extent by our expertise, because we're forgetting,

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 4>we're forgetting how to do this stuff. One of the

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 4>world's most important mining colleges in Cornwall, at Cambourne, they've

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:12.559
<v Speaker 4>they've they've shut down one of their courses for the

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 4>last few years because there's not enough people who want

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 4>to go and learn about mining.

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 2>And this is absolutely extraordinary, isn't it, Because we're now

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:21.079
<v Speaker 2>to anyone got kids to university age done, just done

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 2>a levels, looking for courses, and it's amazing how few

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 2>go go into this. And you hear it over and

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 2>over and over that they have trouble filling the geology courses,

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 2>the mining courses, that mining engineering courses, et cetera.

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 3>Because they want to save the environment.

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but that's where the money is. Actually, by the way,

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 2>they'll tell your children to go into the oiland.

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's how that's how you save the environment. But

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:38.439
<v Speaker 3>bye bye.

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 4>By understanding how to how to get stuff out of

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 4>the ground and turn it into another kind of amazing

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 4>thing that will help change the world, that is how

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 4>we do it. And right now, particularly in this country,

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 4>we're kind of forgetting about this.

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 1>But we've forgotten about it across the West.

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean gen to bring you in and we see

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 2>this stuff, I know, sorry, we see this in the

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 2>stock market right where we see the mining sector in

0:12:57.160 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 2>the US. In the UK, smaller and smaller and smaller

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 2>section of the mind getting the big tech companies are

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:02.959
<v Speaker 2>bigger and bigger and bigger. Part so you can see

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 2>people adding value to the ethereal world and no value

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 2>to the material world.

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:09.719
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, but you know this is potentially a function of

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 5>weird things in the market rather than necessarily how things

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 5>always going to be. If you have passive ETFs, then

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 5>big components like the Magnificent seven and the passive ETF

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 5>go on.

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Not everyone's an investor explaining the Magnificent seven.

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 5>Oh well, the Magnificent Seven was a group of seven

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 5>stocks in the US which were more than their weight

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:32.079
<v Speaker 5>in the action of the of the index was very,

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:34.079
<v Speaker 5>very high. So if you look at the formans of

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 5>the S and P, it's gone up quite substantially. With

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 5>the SMP equal weight, it's been pretty much flat, and

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 5>the only components that have made it go up are

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 5>the biggest stocks in the index. But there's kind of

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:45.559
<v Speaker 5>a catch twenty two going on here, because if people

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 5>put their money into the index and ETF, then the

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:51.199
<v Speaker 5>index has to buy the stocks more of the stocks

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 5>that have gone up than of the stocks that didn't

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 5>go up, which means you're compounding your error. If it

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 5>is an error. We'll probably go into whether it is

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 5>an error or not. Well, I got I say one

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 5>thing quickly back so the main it's no longer a

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 5>magnificent seven. Tesla dropped at and then Amazon dropped at

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 5>and you know, it's brilliant Vidia. So basically, in Vidia

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 5>is sort of driving this whole story. But in Vidia

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 5>is is precariously balanced. I thought of this when you

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 5>were doing your pyramid. In Vidia is precariously balanced on

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 5>three numbers. It has very high margins because it charges

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 5>very high prices, and because it's doing this, it's creating growth,

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 5>so it has a very high multiple. But it does

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 5>mean that those are three very vulnerable. You don't need

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 5>to kill more than one of those and it's all over,

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 5>and if you kill more than one at once, maybe

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 5>all three go. So so we've built ourselves a very

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 5>precarious situation that will be revealed soon but not yet.

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 5>And I think that's quite analogous to what's happening in

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 5>the world of students who all think that, you know,

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 5>all you've got to do is buy an electric vehicle,

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 5>and you're saving the planet genuinely, probably, and even the

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 5>people teach and then probably genuinely, they haven't thought through

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 5>it much more than that, and we'll discover.

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so back to lydia error AI bubble.

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 5>The thing about AI is that a I don't know

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 5>anything about it, but they're telling us that they can

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 5>create artificial intelligence with large language models. This is generative

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 5>AI as opposed to sort of narrower I think narrower

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 5>functioning AI is fine, you give it a specific task,

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 5>but then that's not really AI, is it. But once

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 5>you talk about sort of wider use AI your tea,

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 5>you're basically saying, learn it from this data.

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 6>What data?

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 5>Well, the stuff on the internet. Go and read the internet.

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 5>So they go and use these large language models and

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 5>they read the Internet, and they come back and go, right,

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 5>I know everything you okay? Can you tell them there's

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 5>been stuff that's true, stuff that's false? Define sarcasm. Do

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 5>you know when someone's taking making a joke or being

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 5>rude or being naughty? You know they have doesn't got

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 5>a clue. So we've got this major I think block

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 5>between what a child learns and really, you know, we

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 5>should look at young children and what they learn. And

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 5>they learn a language in three years, even though no

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 5>one tells them what it is, what a language is,

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 5>but they learn it, you know, and they and they

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 5>understand how to walk, rebalance themselves, not fall over too often,

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 5>and they all the time they're they're looking at these

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 5>I remember once when the earliest stages of AI, the

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 5>military was trying to design software to identify foreign enemy

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 5>tanks versus friendly tanks. And that was fine, except then

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 5>they discovered that all the pictures of the tanks that

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 5>they'd taken, which were enemy tanks, they've taken on cloudy days,

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 5>and all the friendly tanks were blue sky days. So

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 5>they had this problem that the software was identifying the weather.

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 5>So then they said, okay, that we've got to make

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 5>it cleverer than that. And then they had tanks driving

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 5>through bushes and you know, the software is going like, well,

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 5>that's a bush. And so in the end they tore

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 5>their hair out and went back to it. So AI

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 5>is going to come along in my career in finance,

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 5>which is now Mariam waspening the other day, far too long,

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 5>we've had probably every at least every sort of cycle,

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 5>there's been some fantastic new mathematical idea that's going to

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 5>take off and revolutionize investing. Start all the way back in

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 5>eighty seven with portfolio insurance, and then we had you

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:17.119
<v Speaker 5>know iterations of similar types of iterations ever since, and

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 5>almost all of them fall down on almost always really

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 5>quite basic stuff. For example, the reason why we had

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 5>the collapse of sort of subprime housing securities was because

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 5>they made a decision that when modeling securities that all

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:39.880
<v Speaker 5>the datall be independent. Well, most people aren't statistians probably

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 5>know what that means. But that assumption is that whatever

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 5>happens today is going to have it's going to be

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 5>totally independent from what happens tomorrow. So you go, okay, fine,

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 5>So in your world, if the market crashes today, everyone

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 5>wakes up tomorrow and trains as if it hadn't. It's

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 5>obviously unrealistic because obviously nonsense. They go, Yeah, it's really

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:00.639
<v Speaker 5>hard to model otherwise, Well, okay, in case, you should

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 5>mention the fact that the model may not be very reliable,

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 5>particularly not when things when.

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 2>It matters back roomly to AI, I mean that that

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 2>is incredibly energy intensive, so that that makes the whole

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:14.880
<v Speaker 2>electricity shortage problem.

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 1>It works.

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 4>If you look at the kind of the domestic electricity

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 4>demand and projections in the United States, it is going

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 4>through the roof.

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of amazing.

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Having been flat for quite a long time, and let's

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 2>keep electricity demand.

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 4>Is better, almost diminishing, and then suddenly it's kind of

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 4>going up through the roof, and it's it's because of AI.

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:35.920
<v Speaker 3>It's because it takes it. It takes an incredible amount.

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 4>Of energy, particularly to train the AI models but also

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 4>to run them as well. And a lot of the people,

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:43.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, they want the servers to be to be there,

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 4>so and of course you need a lot of chips

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 4>for it, and making those chips partly users cold. But

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:52.679
<v Speaker 4>you know, in it's relatively small quantities. The thing that

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 4>the thing that I kind of feel about AI is,

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 4>on the one hand, it will it will be far

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 4>more material centric than people kind of expect, because it

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:02.119
<v Speaker 4>just is the world is. People discount this stuff, and

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:04.679
<v Speaker 4>that's the point of the book. But I think the

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 4>other the other thing that gives me hope is that

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 4>I think if you were looking for various different challenges,

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 4>so I'm not I am desperately uninterested in the l

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:17.680
<v Speaker 4>M side of AI, the you know, chat, GPT and

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 4>all of this nonsense, because I just am I'm sorry,

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:23.160
<v Speaker 4>I just can't, I can't get.

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 3>That enthusiastic about it. Too old, I'm just too I'm

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 3>just too old.

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:32.360
<v Speaker 4>However, the side that I am interested in is, for instance,

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 4>recently deep Mind, the Google bit of AI, they discovered

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 4>various different ways to kind of protein folding basically, so

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 4>they were able to anticipate how different proteins would form.

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:51.479
<v Speaker 4>This is a challenge that that that mainstream science has

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 4>spent so much time trying to work out. Then I

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 4>think even more recently they came up with millions and

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 4>millions of different new novels, entirely novel crystal formations how

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 4>you make crystals. Now, all of that stuff just different

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 4>crystalline forms, different kind of molecular forms that if you

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 4>were looking for some sort of thing which is potentially

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:15.120
<v Speaker 4>going to revolutionize the world, it's stuff like that. Because

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:17.159
<v Speaker 4>if you think about what's happening in labs, for instance,

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:19.160
<v Speaker 4>when people are trying to work out you know, whether

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 4>it's new medicines or whether it's they're working out a

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 4>cleverer way of squeezing lithium out of a rock, it's

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 4>working out it's experimenting with different types of crystals.

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:31.120
<v Speaker 3>And historically people have just.

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 4>Gone into the lab and they've just try and tried

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 4>to come up with the best thing they can think of.

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:38.160
<v Speaker 4>But if AI is able to come up with millions

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 4>of these things, and I think humans so far have

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 4>only come up being able to come up with either

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 4>tens or hundreds of thousands of novel crystal forms, if

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 4>AI can do that that is totally transformational, then potentially

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 4>we do have a way of reducing our energy consumption

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:55.119
<v Speaker 4>in the future. I think for every extra ten percent

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 4>of energy demands that AI will be responsible for, I

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 4>think it will also be responsible for mass reducing energy

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 4>demand by making all of our various different processes better.

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:06.679
<v Speaker 4>But that's not the chat GPT side of things that

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 4>most people are most excited about, and so I have

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:11.920
<v Speaker 4>I don't know how much that's costed into the market

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:12.119
<v Speaker 4>or not.

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 7>Isn't isn't this? This is kind of the fundamental issue

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 7>is energy because as you're saying, the economy is energy transformed,

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 7>and the problem we net zero to an extent is

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:24.679
<v Speaker 7>that we're kind of kidding ourselves on that we can

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 7>use less energy without reducing the quality of our lives.

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 7>And the problem is, actually the only way out is

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 7>this is actually is true. We need to find ways

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 7>of making energy less damaging. So basically we need to

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 7>have exponentially more energy with kind of whatever, the opposite

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 7>of exponentially less environmental consequences, as opposed to the approach

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 7>which is kind of we'll replace everything with something somewhat

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 7>less efficient. But then all that ends up happening is

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 7>that we, I guess stagnate.

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Being that almost all economic growth, great periods of progress

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:00.719
<v Speaker 2>have been majoring periods of cheap energy, and so if

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 2>you go through a process where you make your energy

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 2>more expensive rather than cheaper, you can't really expect to

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 2>have very fast growth as a result. And you can

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 2>pretend they having fast growth because you're spending so much

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 2>on a transition, but it's not real growth.

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 4>Economic progress is energy deployment. It's deploying more energy to

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 4>do more stuff. That's what we've done. You know, every

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 4>industrial revolution through history has been about getting more energy

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 4>and doing more things. You know, whether it was kind

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 4>of water wheels, or whether it's using coal, or whether

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:30.639
<v Speaker 4>it's using oil, whether it's using nuclear. We've been on

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:33.640
<v Speaker 4>this kind of trend of getting ever more energy out

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 4>of the different fuels that we're using. And the thing

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 4>that happened in the nineteen seventies, it's kind of sixties

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 4>seventies is everyone got a bit scared of nuclear understandably

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 4>given the accidents that you had there, and everyone got

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 4>kind of scared about just the environments. And again understandably,

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:49.360
<v Speaker 4>you know when you look at some of the conditions

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 4>back then. Nonetheless, if you're looking back at our kind

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:55.919
<v Speaker 4>of economic history and looking at kind of you know,

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 4>when it was that we suddenly saw our productivity starting

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 4>to diminish, I don't think it is a coincidence that

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 4>was in that period where we started to fixate on

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 4>trying to reduce our energy consumption around the world. Yes,

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 4>by all means we need to kind of do stuff

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 4>with fewer emissions. But the idea that we need to

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:14.919
<v Speaker 4>do less stuff, which is kind of what you know

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:18.399
<v Speaker 4>is implied by deploying less energy, that to me is

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 4>quite tragic. I think we need you know, you know,

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:23.439
<v Speaker 4>as John was saying, we need to have way more energy.

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 4>We need to have energy abundance. The question, of course,

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 4>is how we can do that in a way that

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 4>doesn't that isn't kind of massively environment.

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's nuclear, isn't it. There is only one answer.

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think I think big part of it is nuclear.

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 4>But but I think it's just that look that this

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:40.880
<v Speaker 4>association and extra energy is bad. That's been the thing

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:42.399
<v Speaker 4>that's sunk in. I think, you know, since the kind

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:44.639
<v Speaker 4>of Jimmy Carter days, the energy is bad is just

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 4>sunk in to I think throughout the corporate world to some.

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 3>Extent as well.

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 4>No energy, energy is good, but it needs to be

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 4>a cleaner form of energy that doesn't actually you ruin

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:54.719
<v Speaker 4>the planet.

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 3>But we need more energy.

0:23:56.760 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 4>We need to do more stuff because the more energy

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 4>that you have, then at that point point, you know,

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:02.879
<v Speaker 4>the potential is kind of limitless. You know, you can

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:04.439
<v Speaker 4>have as much water as you want, you can have

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 4>as much materials as you want, you can do anything

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 4>at all. But until we have that limitless energy, and

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:12.119
<v Speaker 4>the problem is, of course nuclear is massively expensive, and

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 4>we need to find a way of confronting that. But

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 4>we could if only we had this startup with the

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:19.359
<v Speaker 4>mindset of we need to do more stuff rather than

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:21.159
<v Speaker 4>we need to do less stuff. And it's been that

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 4>let's do less stuff that's been the dominant kind of

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 4>mindset in the last kind of thirty forty years.

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Of course, we may and we have one podcast guest

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 2>he's been on a couple of times. She tells us

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 2>we don't need worry about any of this because it

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 2>won't be long now that we can just beam solar

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 2>power direct from the Sun from space through a series

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 2>of mirrors directly Earth.

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:38.640
<v Speaker 1>And sorry about it anymore.

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it does, but through the mirrors, through the mirrors

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 2>that beams down directly.

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I don't. Okay, we didn't completely understand it.

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you understand it completely the time? And I didn't either.

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I can't pretend it.

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:50.480
<v Speaker 4>It's nice to people thinking of these ideas, though, isn't it.

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:51.919
<v Speaker 4>I think it's interesting ideas.

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Right, we've got to move to another quote, and we're

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:55.119
<v Speaker 2>not going to get the questions as wish we use

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 2>your quote next.

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:59.159
<v Speaker 7>John, Well, we did already talk touch on passive invest

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:03.160
<v Speaker 7>and but this is this is interesting. This is Adam

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:08.119
<v Speaker 7>Smith's view or in basically shareholder companies. So the companies

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 7>were used to listed companies that are called joint stock

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 7>companies in those days, and he's actually not a huge fan.

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 7>So he says the trade of a joint stock company

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 7>is always managed by a court of directors, and this

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 7>is frequently subject in many respects to the control of

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 7>a general court of proprietors, so that should board of

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 7>directors and your shareholders, he says, But the greater part

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 7>of those proprietors seldom pretend to understand anything in the

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 7>business of the company, and give themselves no trouble about it,

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 7>but receive contentedly such half yearly are rearly dividend as

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 7>the directors think proper to make to them. And he says,

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:43.200
<v Speaker 7>but the problem is the directors of such companies, being

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 7>the managers of other people's money rather than their own,

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:49.240
<v Speaker 7>it cannot be well expected that they should watch over

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:52.360
<v Speaker 7>it with the same anxious vigilance with which the partners

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:56.919
<v Speaker 7>in a private partnership frequently watch over their own. Negligence

0:25:56.960 --> 0:26:00.080
<v Speaker 7>and profusion therefore must always prevail more or less in

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:03.480
<v Speaker 7>the management of the affairs of such a company. So basically,

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 7>what he's saying is that the problem is it's it's

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 7>kind of like it's a classic economics problem where the

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 7>owners of an asset and the managers of an asset

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 7>have different incentives. So the owners just want the money

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:20.679
<v Speaker 7>that the asset generates, and the manager just wants to

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:22.680
<v Speaker 7>do the least amount of what they can possibly do

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 7>whilse satisfying the needs of the owners. And what I

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 7>think is interesting why is this kind of relevant today,

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 7>is because increasingly the shareholder class actually is kind of

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 7>absentee landlords. You know, this has been one for a

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 7>long time. Like everyone in this room, I don't know,

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 7>I suspect them. Actually, probably more people in this room

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 7>are slightly active investors than the average population. Your average

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 7>person just pays a bit of money into their pension

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 7>every month. The money in their pension gets handled by

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 7>money managers, but a lot of the time now that

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 7>might just go straight into a passive tracker of the

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 7>type that was just talking about. So money just flows

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 7>into the biggest companies with no real interest as to

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 7>what those companies are doing, whether there are better options

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 7>for the money. And the problem with that is we

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 7>gradually undermines, or you can argue that it gradually undermines

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 7>market efficiency. And market efficiency is basically the principle that

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:28.400
<v Speaker 7>if you take everyone's opinions, then the average averages out

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 7>to be roughly the correct price for a company or

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:34.879
<v Speaker 7>for an asset, whereas the passive investment, it's more like

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:38.119
<v Speaker 7>you get one person's opinion and then everyone else is

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:41.359
<v Speaker 7>following them, and so the market becomes horribly skewed towards

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 7>one set of companies, such as the Mega texts. And

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 7>I think that this is not necessarily what Adam Smith

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 7>would have had in mind as being the best way

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 7>to efficiently allocate capital and human resources.

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 2>But you fix it, John, We've had this problem has

0:27:57.119 --> 0:28:00.119
<v Speaker 2>been around so since you had this original insight that

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 2>if you have an owful lot of owners of a company,

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:04.439
<v Speaker 2>you automatically give the power to the manager of the

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 2>company rather than to the shelders. Right, that's a managerial capitalism.

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:09.399
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 2>We've been worrying about that for decades, but it hasn't changed,

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 2>and there's been all sorts of conversation. I've written a

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 2>book about this myself, about how to give power back

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:20.880
<v Speaker 2>to the shareholders and how to get shelders to use

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:22.120
<v Speaker 2>the rights they should have to.

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Do more than just accept evidence. And I'm not going

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:24.879
<v Speaker 1>to change this.

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 7>It's a really tricky issue. I think it's I think

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 7>it's one of those annoying subjects where it's more about

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 7>just haven't any government and population has to stay on

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 7>top of where the most likely abuse of power is.

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 7>So the moment, for example, So you've got there's basically

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 7>three big passive funds providers, so you get black Rock,

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 7>Fine Garden, State Street, and then also underneath that you've

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 7>got three big dominant index providers. So not only do

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 7>you have a concentration of power among the asset managers,

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:04.479
<v Speaker 7>the indexes that are constructed that these funds follow and

0:29:04.520 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 7>that they pay license fees to to use are also dominant.

0:29:08.280 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 7>So I think it's S and P and Footsie, Russell

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 7>and one of the other ones. So you kind of

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 7>got this this agglomeration of power at the top of

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 7>the market, and they are almost like a toll road

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 7>through which all of our money goes, and they take

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 7>their wee cut and they get very well off of it,

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 7>and it matters. But it's not obvious because they're technocrats,

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 7>not like Larry think that black Rock will occasionally stand

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 7>up and say something semi political, but most of the

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 7>time they understand that their position depends on them not

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 7>being political and not being overtly influential. You know, whenever

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 7>you've got you know, one company owning say, I mean,

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 7>like some people have started to write papers wondering is

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 7>this undermining competition as a whole because for example, like

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 7>in the airline sector, almost every airline is at least

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 7>I think it's about twenty percent owned by Black Roxy.

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 7>And then you start to think, well, wait, man, mostly

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 7>black roll going to twenty percent of the overall airline sector.

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 7>Then doesn't that encourage them to say, well, it doesn't

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 7>matter if Ryanair is better or a Visy Jet is better.

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 7>And actually the good thing would be as if they

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 7>all colluded a bit to set prices, because then the

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 7>overall airline sector would make higher profits as a whole.

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 7>Now that's a very contentious view, and personally speaking, I

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 7>don't think that anything that overt is happening. But the

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:38.479
<v Speaker 7>point is you can erode capitalism, and as I say,

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 7>they kind of.

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 2>That all the gooblazing monopolies and appeal from the same

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 2>business meeting together in credit rooms to discuss price fixing exactly.

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 7>I mean, the wealthy nations is basically a massive diatribe

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 7>against monopoly type arrangements. And I think it's more that

0:30:56.720 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 7>it's almost like a game of Lacker mole, and you

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 7>do see it. I mean, obvious governments are starting to

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 7>look at regulating the big tech companies harder for example,

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 7>because I mean, and I guess that's just part of

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 7>the whole game of if you know, they get ahead

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 7>and then the kind of population gets ahead. Because we

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:20.480
<v Speaker 7>spent lots of time being distracted by arguments about network effects,

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 7>but then we kind of ignored the fact that Facebook

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:27.480
<v Speaker 7>just went over and bought Instagram because that network was

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 7>getting more popular than Facebook, so that that was like

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 7>a red hearing. So I think that, yeah, it's more

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 7>like an arms race between governments and populations and corporations.

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Did anyone ever, anyone who owns shows evergain voted in AGM?

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, very engaged of.

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 7>You, right, I mean, how could you get more people

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 7>to do that?

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 2>You know?

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 7>I mean, at the end of the day, even if

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 7>you own testco shares, and you actually do individually owned

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 7>testco shares, it's.

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 2>A lot of work, but it shouldn't be a lot

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:57.840
<v Speaker 2>of work, and you can game a file this stuff, right.

0:31:57.880 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 2>And one of the things that that are a lot of

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 2>people been talking about, and I've written about GUD a lot,

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 2>is the idea that it's possible for your pension provider

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 2>to give you the ability to use every vote and

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 2>every fraction of vote that you might have relative to

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 2>the shares that you're holding your pension portfolio, and that

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 2>you should be able to go on a website, see

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 2>what that company does, see what votes are coming up, and.

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Just you know, click through.

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Of course, this would ruin everything for the managers and

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:21.680
<v Speaker 2>ruin everything for the fund managers.

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 1>You like to have that kind of control.

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 4>Ask question, did everything just start going wrong when we

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 4>had kind of unlimited liability? And would everything just be

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 4>better if if everything was a partnership? Would that be possible?

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 7>There is an a'll doom in a boat idea for

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:37.120
<v Speaker 7>and so that's one of the big arguments I think

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 7>in the way of the nations all haven't reade then

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 7>at all.

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 2>I know he that Adam Smith was very very suspicious

0:32:42.680 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 2>of the idea of bringing in limited liability.

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Very suspicious.

0:32:45.880 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 2>But on the other hand, it's the idea of not

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 2>having liability that allows people to continually innovate. You know,

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 2>it's very hard if you say to people, you know,

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:54.720
<v Speaker 2>if you if you go ahead with your brilliant idea

0:32:55.000 --> 0:32:57.400
<v Speaker 2>and it fails, you're going to lose everything. Who's going

0:32:57.440 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 2>to go ahead with a brilliant idea? So limited the

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 2>limited liability company. If you look at it like that,

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 2>A lot of people think, and I agree, it was

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 2>possibly the greatest invention of all.

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 3>Time and coincided with all the industrialal.

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Because it allowed people to suddenly go okay and have

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 2>a go at this, and I'll only lose what I

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 2>put in, and They'll be able to have another go

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 2>and another go and another going take risks.

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 1>It can innovate etca.

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 5>It's called America, right.

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 7>I suppose it's fairly sill. If the investment banks had

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 7>still been partnerships when before eight, then probably wouldn't have happened,

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 7>or it wouldn't have been as bad as it was,

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:33.680
<v Speaker 7>you know, if they were all owed the hook for whatever.

0:33:33.760 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 7>Then But then that is that arguing a risk taking

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 7>versus lescer version.

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 5>Do you know how many people went to jail for

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:48.360
<v Speaker 5>abusing the rules on bank leverage? Next zer it was

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 5>much more importantly? Why why did they not do any

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 5>perp walks? Why was no one even prosecuted the war

0:33:56.520 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 5>idiots for the bureaucrats, the ones who were the ones

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 5>who were in charge of policing it were the ones

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 5>who caused it, damn.

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 7>But and then you can also argue that the poor

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 7>buggers that get done for labor or a bit five

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 7>years later when they're all exploited in the public. You know,

0:34:09.360 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 7>perception will scapegoats. I mean, I know that's slightly off topic.

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 2>I think what happened in Libor is probably a little

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:19.279
<v Speaker 2>much for this this panel and podcast. So we're going

0:34:19.320 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 2>to go to our last quote, James, make it snappy

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 2>because I'm running out of my question.

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 5>Time, right. There is no art which one government sooner

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 5>learns than another of another than that draining more from

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:33.440
<v Speaker 5>the pockets of the people.

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Would you like me to read it?

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:38.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's a miracle. I got through that. It was

0:34:38.440 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 5>one smudge going to another smage and the shortest smudge

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:41.040
<v Speaker 5>in the middle.

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 2>There is no art which one government sooner learns of

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:46.840
<v Speaker 2>another than that of draining money from the pockets of

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 2>the people.

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:49.960
<v Speaker 5>And remember that quote because it's going to become incredibly

0:34:50.000 --> 0:34:55.879
<v Speaker 5>important over the next ten years. So this country's debt

0:34:55.920 --> 0:35:00.040
<v Speaker 5>to GDP just prior to the financial crisis was a

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 5>about thirty six percent, and it's now around about one

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 5>hundred percent. Now, if you divide up the increase in

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:09.239
<v Speaker 5>government debt by years, that's an increase of about four

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:11.879
<v Speaker 5>percent a year. Do you remember the economy roaring along

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 5>at four percent a year? Probably not. In the last

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:19.440
<v Speaker 5>two years, the US government has borrowed three trillion dollars

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:22.720
<v Speaker 5>and from that managed to generate two whole trillion dollars

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:26.800
<v Speaker 5>of nominal, not even real GDP. So it turns out

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 5>that government expenditure is incredibly unproductive and does nothing really

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 5>in the even the short term, other than add to

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 5>the debtedness of the country and therefore the future interest bill.

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 6>Who knew, but.

0:35:40.000 --> 0:35:43.240
<v Speaker 5>This really matters because basically under our watch without anyone

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 5>really noticing. By the way, the data gave for the

0:35:45.800 --> 0:35:48.600
<v Speaker 5>UK excludes bailing out the banks, so it's done nothing

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:50.799
<v Speaker 5>to do with financial crisis. This is just the fact

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:52.719
<v Speaker 5>that they thought, well citive had a financial crisis, and

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 5>no one seems to be watching, and interest rates and

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 5>yields have gone really low. We can borro up a

0:35:57.200 --> 0:36:00.839
<v Speaker 5>storm and spend lots of money gerrymandering and buying votes

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 5>and all the rest of it, although there's not much

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:05.359
<v Speaker 5>evidence that even works in terms of buying votes. But

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 5>the fact is that when the government takes over half

0:36:08.120 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 5>the economy, which is the case now in the UK

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:13.920
<v Speaker 5>and in fact, if you exclude England, it's more than

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:16.000
<v Speaker 5>two thirty the economy in all the other parts of

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:19.520
<v Speaker 5>the UK, So you know the economy the private sector

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 5>e comomy don't get Government doesn't fend any money at all.

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:25.600
<v Speaker 5>It just redirects private sector money and redistributes it to

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:29.920
<v Speaker 5>worthy causes that are reliant on government hand adds and

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:33.480
<v Speaker 5>pretends it's their money. So government takes private sector tax

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:36.240
<v Speaker 5>revenues or future tax revenues if they borrowed the money,

0:36:36.400 --> 0:36:38.919
<v Speaker 5>and gives it to other people and says, we gave

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 5>it to you, not the other people who'd actually earned it. Now,

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:43.800
<v Speaker 5>this is a major problem because when you get to

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:46.840
<v Speaker 5>the stage where you have far too many people receiving

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 5>as beneficiaries of these payments, they're obviously disinclined. As I

0:36:51.680 --> 0:36:55.440
<v Speaker 5>think the great American agony Aren't whose name escapes me

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 5>for a second said, The givers have to say when

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:02.160
<v Speaker 5>enough is enough, because the takers rarely do for which

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:04.440
<v Speaker 5>we never do. So we've got this, We've got this

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:07.399
<v Speaker 5>massive problem. Bill Brice was pointing out in his book

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:10.239
<v Speaker 5>about his childhood that in nineteen fifty seven, I think

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:12.480
<v Speaker 5>it was Americans were as happy as they've ever been,

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:17.880
<v Speaker 5>and it's been downhill since then. The Encyclopedia of Mental Disorders,

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:20.879
<v Speaker 5>the big dictionary of mental disorders in the US, had

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:25.920
<v Speaker 5>one hundred and four different psychiatric problems in nineteen in

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 5>the nineteen fifties, it now has over four hundred. So

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:31.919
<v Speaker 5>what has happened is that everyone has become much less

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 5>happy because they've become much more mentally ill.

0:37:34.880 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 1>How are you? How are you doing this? Back to

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:39.719
<v Speaker 1>the tax take, because and I'm going with it so far.

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:41.880
<v Speaker 5>That makes what makes many people mentally ill is the

0:37:41.920 --> 0:37:44.960
<v Speaker 5>fact that it is a gateway to personal independence payments,

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:48.960
<v Speaker 5>which are far higher than boring bogs do. Added unemployment payments.

0:37:49.120 --> 0:37:51.719
<v Speaker 5>The unemployment benefit is very, very low. But if you

0:37:51.760 --> 0:37:56.279
<v Speaker 5>can add some interesting tassels to your unemployment, then not

0:37:56.360 --> 0:37:57.880
<v Speaker 5>only do they tell you don't have to look for

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:00.719
<v Speaker 5>a job, you'll get more money. It's very hard for

0:38:00.760 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 5>people who are given free money for doing nothing to

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:05.839
<v Speaker 5>turn around and say, actually, one of the reasons I'm

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:07.919
<v Speaker 5>feeling low is I haven't got a job. I better

0:38:07.960 --> 0:38:10.319
<v Speaker 5>go and get a job, particularly if they start by

0:38:10.360 --> 0:38:13.040
<v Speaker 5>taking a job lower down before they work their way

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:17.759
<v Speaker 5>up where the effective tax rate. Because they're not making

0:38:17.800 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 5>much more money than they got me. You know, it

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:22.720
<v Speaker 5>is very is very punitive. So we've got a situation

0:38:22.760 --> 0:38:27.240
<v Speaker 5>where nine million working age adults in the UK are

0:38:27.280 --> 0:38:28.680
<v Speaker 5>not in work and not looking for work.

0:38:28.760 --> 0:38:31.560
<v Speaker 1>And this is a results through incentive structure, yes, but.

0:38:31.520 --> 0:38:33.600
<v Speaker 5>It's an unaffordable incentive structure. So the real point I

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:35.440
<v Speaker 5>want to make is is that you could just about

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:37.600
<v Speaker 5>keep this thing going as long as interest rates were

0:38:37.760 --> 0:38:41.160
<v Speaker 5>just about zero because the payment the interest payments on

0:38:41.200 --> 0:38:44.240
<v Speaker 5>the debt, the debt was never coming due like a console,

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:46.799
<v Speaker 5>and the interest payments were super low. We could kind

0:38:46.840 --> 0:38:49.560
<v Speaker 5>of keep this gig going. And the politicians went, yeah,

0:38:49.680 --> 0:38:51.400
<v Speaker 5>I mean, you know, let's buy another election if we can.

0:38:51.520 --> 0:38:53.279
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, James, look at it this way. There is

0:38:53.280 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 2>no way that state spending is going to full. State

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 2>spending is definitely going to rise that certainly of this

0:38:57.680 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 2>government and probably the next government. There is absolutely no

0:38:59.680 --> 0:39:02.480
<v Speaker 2>way that we're going to see a full in overall

0:39:02.520 --> 0:39:03.240
<v Speaker 2>government spending.

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:04.120
<v Speaker 1>It's going to go up.

0:39:04.320 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 2>How's it going to be financed? Where do you think

0:39:06.120 --> 0:39:08.120
<v Speaker 2>that taxes? Tax risers are going to come?

0:39:08.520 --> 0:39:10.879
<v Speaker 5>Well, initially, the tax risers will come all all over

0:39:10.920 --> 0:39:12.719
<v Speaker 5>the place. But don't forget that we already have a

0:39:12.760 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 5>government that's spending forty eight I think is percent of

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:20.319
<v Speaker 5>GDP tax revenues are all like about thirty four sense,

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:21.279
<v Speaker 5>so the rest is dead.

0:39:21.440 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean this is inmpting, isn't it, Because certainly in

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:26.720
<v Speaker 2>the UK, all nations seem to have their own limit

0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:28.640
<v Speaker 2>of the amount of tax that they're prepared paying. If

0:39:28.680 --> 0:39:30.680
<v Speaker 2>you look at the history of the UK, we kind

0:39:30.680 --> 0:39:33.200
<v Speaker 2>of top out of thirty seven percent of GDP A

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:35.160
<v Speaker 2>taxpayers simply refused to pay more.

0:39:35.280 --> 0:39:37.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean it comes a stage where if it's

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 5>if you're if you're someone else is taking money off you,

0:39:40.560 --> 0:39:43.240
<v Speaker 5>then you're okay with ten percent, You're okay with twenty percent,

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:46.239
<v Speaker 5>probably okay with thirty percent, you're okay with forty percent,

0:39:46.280 --> 0:39:48.080
<v Speaker 5>as long as it's a marginal rate at least recular.

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:50.319
<v Speaker 5>But if it comes a stage we just get or

0:39:50.680 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 5>I won't bother working. So if you all people are

0:39:53.120 --> 0:39:54.640
<v Speaker 5>bothering working being paid for a while, all the people

0:39:54.680 --> 0:39:56.319
<v Speaker 5>who are bothering working, but then the people who are

0:39:56.320 --> 0:39:58.960
<v Speaker 5>bothering working turn around and say I'm no longer incentivized

0:39:59.000 --> 0:39:59.239
<v Speaker 5>to work.

0:39:59.480 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Will you lead?

0:40:00.280 --> 0:40:02.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh, you leave I mean here we have this growing

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:04.960
<v Speaker 2>problem the UK of our very rich leaving and are

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:05.600
<v Speaker 2>young leaning.

0:40:05.760 --> 0:40:07.920
<v Speaker 5>I'm not sure they are very rich, but there's some

0:40:08.000 --> 0:40:10.799
<v Speaker 5>very rich who temporarily popped over and then went, you're

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:13.760
<v Speaker 5>changing my tax datus, I'm off, which is interesting in itself.

0:40:14.080 --> 0:40:15.320
<v Speaker 5>You know, if you want to if you want to

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:18.279
<v Speaker 5>lose rich people, you increase the tax and they either

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 5>stop working, move abroad like the brain drain from the

0:40:22.800 --> 0:40:26.080
<v Speaker 5>from the labor period, or if they're foreigners, they go well,

0:40:26.080 --> 0:40:28.200
<v Speaker 5>I don't If they're really rich, they can be living anywhere.

0:40:28.360 --> 0:40:30.120
<v Speaker 2>What everyone really wants to know is if the capital

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:31.239
<v Speaker 2>gains tax is going to go up.

0:40:32.200 --> 0:40:34.160
<v Speaker 5>Well, if you look at the list of taxes that

0:40:34.239 --> 0:40:37.640
<v Speaker 5>people don't mind going up, there, it is exactly the

0:40:37.640 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 5>same as the list of taxes that most people don't

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:43.240
<v Speaker 5>expect to pay. So it's higher rate taxes on high earners,

0:40:43.440 --> 0:40:47.560
<v Speaker 5>capital gains tax and corporation tax. Of course, what everyone

0:40:47.640 --> 0:40:50.680
<v Speaker 5>is still forgetting is that, you know, the art of

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:53.320
<v Speaker 5>taxing is to pluck the goose with the minimum amount

0:40:53.360 --> 0:40:56.760
<v Speaker 5>of hissing. And if you basically keep plucking the goose

0:40:57.600 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 5>and the hissing gets too loud, you'll end up losing

0:41:00.120 --> 0:41:02.239
<v Speaker 5>as well. So you know, corporation tax goes up, what

0:41:02.280 --> 0:41:04.480
<v Speaker 5>you think companies won't put their bricers up to come

0:41:04.520 --> 0:41:06.279
<v Speaker 5>and say, you know, suddenly you're going like, oh my

0:41:06.280 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 5>tax hasn't gone up, but by cost of living health?

0:41:08.600 --> 0:41:12.720
<v Speaker 5>Can you start taxing higher? Owners? Owners start saying, well.

0:41:12.520 --> 0:41:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Well work that hard. Okay, On that happy note, Let's

0:41:15.160 --> 0:41:16.040
<v Speaker 1>have questions.

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:19.680
<v Speaker 6>Do you not think the growth stuff index funds? It

0:41:19.800 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 6>is because most upon managers are skeptics, but the two

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:26.759
<v Speaker 6>of you and therefore miss out investing in some of

0:41:26.840 --> 0:41:30.520
<v Speaker 6>these incredible prosinesses which faky apps bed for it from

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:34.880
<v Speaker 6>the internet and smartphones and all this sort of stuff.

0:41:35.080 --> 0:41:38.680
<v Speaker 6>And he's a world really driven index is forward and

0:41:39.120 --> 0:41:42.120
<v Speaker 6>you know most fund managers haven't had enough invest in

0:41:42.200 --> 0:41:44.600
<v Speaker 6>these companies and there therefore underperformed. And there for most

0:41:44.640 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 6>investors see what we're not going to put money into

0:41:47.600 --> 0:41:50.000
<v Speaker 6>acted for managers, We're we're going to a gust our

0:41:50.000 --> 0:41:52.360
<v Speaker 6>harder sendings and to turn next spunds.

0:41:52.840 --> 0:41:54.920
<v Speaker 2>So the question is really are passive funds there to

0:41:55.000 --> 0:41:56.800
<v Speaker 2>protect investors from fund managers?

0:41:57.280 --> 0:41:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Now jams John.

0:41:59.040 --> 0:42:03.000
<v Speaker 5>My opinion would be that it depends whether the movement

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:07.040
<v Speaker 5>into ETFs is sort of cyclical or structural in the

0:42:07.120 --> 0:42:09.680
<v Speaker 5>sense that we went from a position not having much

0:42:09.680 --> 0:42:11.480
<v Speaker 5>money in ets to now almost all the money is

0:42:11.480 --> 0:42:14.120
<v Speaker 5>in ETFs. And whilst the money is still increasingly going

0:42:14.120 --> 0:42:17.880
<v Speaker 5>into ETFs, it will keep pushing ETF's performance ahead of

0:42:19.360 --> 0:42:25.120
<v Speaker 5>active fund managers. But once that submarine surfaces and flops

0:42:25.200 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 5>onto the.

0:42:25.560 --> 0:42:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Surface, and what would make that happen, well, we'll get.

0:42:27.840 --> 0:42:30.400
<v Speaker 5>To get to the tipping point. Trouble with tipping points

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:33.000
<v Speaker 5>is it's easier to say there's a tipping point coming

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:35.000
<v Speaker 5>than to say when it is or where it is.

0:42:35.040 --> 0:42:38.120
<v Speaker 5>But if that tipping point comes and it turns out that,

0:42:38.520 --> 0:42:40.680
<v Speaker 5>you know, active fund managers seem to have quietly been

0:42:41.040 --> 0:42:43.480
<v Speaker 5>performing very very well. You know, the Russell two thousand

0:42:43.520 --> 0:42:46.040
<v Speaker 5>has done nothing, the S and P equal weight has

0:42:46.080 --> 0:42:48.520
<v Speaker 5>done nothing, and the S and P and NASDAQ have

0:42:48.600 --> 0:42:51.520
<v Speaker 5>gone through the roof. But the last time that happened

0:42:52.080 --> 0:42:55.320
<v Speaker 5>was in nineteen ninety nine, and then two thousand happened,

0:42:55.640 --> 0:42:58.000
<v Speaker 5>and by the end of two thousand and one, the

0:42:58.080 --> 0:43:01.360
<v Speaker 5>Russell two thousand and the SMB equal massively at performed

0:43:02.239 --> 0:43:04.239
<v Speaker 5>the S and P and NASDAK. So the problem with

0:43:04.640 --> 0:43:08.520
<v Speaker 5>taking views at any moment in time, and then extrapolating

0:43:08.920 --> 0:43:11.399
<v Speaker 5>that that will happen forever, is that by the time

0:43:11.440 --> 0:43:13.600
<v Speaker 5>everyone agrees that it will appen forever, that's the day

0:43:13.680 --> 0:43:15.120
<v Speaker 5>the market tops and it all changes.

0:43:15.560 --> 0:43:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, John, did you have that either.

0:43:17.400 --> 0:43:19.000
<v Speaker 7>Oh? Yeah, I think it's a good question. I think's

0:43:19.000 --> 0:43:21.560
<v Speaker 7>so a good point, and I think passive investment is

0:43:21.600 --> 0:43:23.799
<v Speaker 7>a good thing. I mean, to be very clear, I

0:43:23.800 --> 0:43:25.719
<v Speaker 7>mean when we were at money Week, we were among

0:43:25.719 --> 0:43:28.320
<v Speaker 7>the first to go on about how passive investment is

0:43:28.320 --> 0:43:31.000
<v Speaker 7>a lot better than active investment because active managers, and

0:43:31.040 --> 0:43:33.280
<v Speaker 7>I don't to be fair, I don't think it's because

0:43:34.440 --> 0:43:36.839
<v Speaker 7>of what people are investing in. I think it's more

0:43:36.880 --> 0:43:39.440
<v Speaker 7>to be the cost. Passive investment is much much cheaper

0:43:39.560 --> 0:43:43.439
<v Speaker 7>than active investing, and certainly in the last five years

0:43:43.560 --> 0:43:47.040
<v Speaker 7>or so, there's also been a regulatory move to focus

0:43:47.080 --> 0:43:51.479
<v Speaker 7>on costs, which is also persuaded financial advisors and pension funds,

0:43:51.480 --> 0:43:55.040
<v Speaker 7>et cetera to focus very much on cost and therefore

0:43:55.400 --> 0:43:59.279
<v Speaker 7>essentially price out active managers. So I don't think there's

0:43:59.520 --> 0:44:03.360
<v Speaker 7>bad about that. It is, but it is more that

0:44:03.480 --> 0:44:06.160
<v Speaker 7>issue of eventually going to tasee stuff up too far.

0:44:07.040 --> 0:44:10.359
<v Speaker 7>And again it's interesting that the US has outperformed to

0:44:10.520 --> 0:44:13.680
<v Speaker 7>the point where people now assume the US has always outperformed,

0:44:14.000 --> 0:44:17.239
<v Speaker 7>and so that's not the case. The US was underperformed

0:44:17.280 --> 0:44:19.360
<v Speaker 7>in the UK as recently is kind of two thousand

0:44:19.400 --> 0:44:22.480
<v Speaker 7>and four, two thousand and five, so it's more, you know,

0:44:22.560 --> 0:44:24.680
<v Speaker 7>this has been a long cycle, which I would say

0:44:24.680 --> 0:44:28.000
<v Speaker 7>is also to do with zero percent interest rates. But yeah,

0:44:28.239 --> 0:44:29.920
<v Speaker 7>passion is a good thing. Beaking of too much a

0:44:29.960 --> 0:44:30.480
<v Speaker 7>good thing.

0:44:30.480 --> 0:44:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Basically, fair enough, more questions, but one right here in

0:44:33.719 --> 0:44:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the front.

0:44:36.600 --> 0:44:39.680
<v Speaker 6>Today he would be an advocate or at paramids but

0:44:39.800 --> 0:44:41.560
<v Speaker 6>become sective calmon taxes.

0:44:44.560 --> 0:44:45.520
<v Speaker 3>It's a really good question.

0:44:46.320 --> 0:44:51.840
<v Speaker 5>Yes, this is the shortest answer I could think of

0:44:51.880 --> 0:44:52.800
<v Speaker 5>that didn't have a compact.

0:44:55.360 --> 0:44:55.880
<v Speaker 3>HI don't know.

0:44:56.000 --> 0:44:57.799
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I probably don't know enough about Adam Smith

0:44:57.840 --> 0:45:00.720
<v Speaker 4>to give a really kind of to the answer.

0:45:00.800 --> 0:45:02.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's always a mistake to try and extrapolate

0:45:03.000 --> 0:45:03.440
<v Speaker 2>from people.

0:45:03.560 --> 0:45:04.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, what would they think today?

0:45:05.120 --> 0:45:08.040
<v Speaker 4>Carbon taxes are so so want economists love them so

0:45:08.200 --> 0:45:12.200
<v Speaker 4>much because they solve everything, but they just you know,

0:45:12.440 --> 0:45:14.400
<v Speaker 4>we are biggest carbon tax in this country.

0:45:14.560 --> 0:45:16.719
<v Speaker 3>We keep cutting it.

0:45:16.719 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 4>It's fuel duty by far and away our biggest carbon tax.

0:45:20.280 --> 0:45:22.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, Jason was talking earlier about the taxes that

0:45:22.000 --> 0:45:23.359
<v Speaker 4>people say they're willing to pay.

0:45:23.400 --> 0:45:26.520
<v Speaker 3>The ones they think they're not going to ever. The other, Yeah,

0:45:26.560 --> 0:45:27.359
<v Speaker 3>they think other we will pay.

0:45:27.480 --> 0:45:29.719
<v Speaker 4>But the issue with carbon taxes is often, often they

0:45:29.800 --> 0:45:32.960
<v Speaker 4>feel often these are the things that people notice. And

0:45:32.960 --> 0:45:36.880
<v Speaker 4>that's the difficulty is it solves everything. It's great, it's amazing,

0:45:37.000 --> 0:45:39.160
<v Speaker 4>it solves everything if you can put a price on carbon.

0:45:39.640 --> 0:45:42.839
<v Speaker 4>But like, show me a country that has actually been

0:45:42.840 --> 0:45:46.440
<v Speaker 4>able to implement it properly and hasn't gone through exactly

0:45:46.480 --> 0:45:48.440
<v Speaker 4>the same issue that we're going through. So I imagine

0:45:48.440 --> 0:45:50.920
<v Speaker 4>I don't know whether would would Adam Smith have been

0:45:50.960 --> 0:45:52.239
<v Speaker 4>able to kind of see all the way through that?

0:45:52.280 --> 0:45:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think probably not.

0:45:53.200 --> 0:45:54.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, obviously, as I say, it's very high and

0:45:55.120 --> 0:45:57.000
<v Speaker 2>very against saying, what would so and so who's been

0:45:57.000 --> 0:45:58.359
<v Speaker 2>dead for three hundred years think about that?

0:45:58.400 --> 0:45:58.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't think.

0:45:58.760 --> 0:45:59.920
<v Speaker 3>But I don't think he would. I don't think you

0:46:00.320 --> 0:46:00.520
<v Speaker 3>like her.

0:46:00.840 --> 0:46:03.000
<v Speaker 2>He spoke a lot about taxes, and he wrote about

0:46:03.040 --> 0:46:06.240
<v Speaker 2>taxes relentlessly, and who is very very clear that taxes

0:46:06.280 --> 0:46:10.279
<v Speaker 2>should be simple, straightforward, completely understandable, easy to pay, all.

0:46:10.200 --> 0:46:10.799
<v Speaker 1>This kind of thing.

0:46:13.480 --> 0:46:16.000
<v Speaker 2>And I suspect that a carbon tax would actually fail

0:46:16.040 --> 0:46:19.080
<v Speaker 2>on pretty much every single one of his criteria, because.

0:46:18.880 --> 0:46:21.320
<v Speaker 3>He's very pragmatic. It's like super pragmatic.

0:46:21.440 --> 0:46:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Yet he'd be just wanted taxes to be simple, straightforward,

0:46:24.280 --> 0:46:26.840
<v Speaker 2>easy for anyone to pay at any time. And obviously

0:46:26.840 --> 0:46:29.680
<v Speaker 2>our tax sysm is absolutely not be anymore. And if

0:46:29.680 --> 0:46:31.520
<v Speaker 2>she were to extrapolate what he might have thought, I

0:46:31.520 --> 0:46:33.120
<v Speaker 2>think he would look at our taxes stem to say

0:46:33.160 --> 0:46:36.360
<v Speaker 2>and go and disable that economy is destroyed, absolutely destroyed,

0:46:36.480 --> 0:46:39.879
<v Speaker 2>because a taxysm of that length and complexity creates such

0:46:39.920 --> 0:46:43.800
<v Speaker 2>appalling incentives and difficulties and such an overlay above admin

0:46:43.920 --> 0:46:46.759
<v Speaker 2>hell for everybody that this can't possibly work. I think

0:46:46.760 --> 0:46:48.719
<v Speaker 2>he'd be horrified already. And if you then said to him,

0:46:48.719 --> 0:46:50.200
<v Speaker 2>how about a carbon tax? I think he would turn

0:46:50.239 --> 0:46:51.359
<v Speaker 2>over in his grave. So many times.

0:46:51.560 --> 0:46:55.680
<v Speaker 5>Well he wondered aloud at the amazing fortuitousness of an

0:46:55.719 --> 0:47:00.520
<v Speaker 5>economic system that allocated resources are productively and efficiently, even

0:47:00.560 --> 0:47:02.640
<v Speaker 5>though no one was doing it. And now we have

0:47:02.640 --> 0:47:06.520
<v Speaker 5>a system where we have people allocating resources deliberately and aggressively,

0:47:06.560 --> 0:47:08.880
<v Speaker 5>unproductively and inefficiently. I think you'd be horrible.

0:47:09.160 --> 0:47:10.839
<v Speaker 1>The invisible hands is not going to work.

0:47:10.880 --> 0:47:14.920
<v Speaker 2>Under these circumstances, right, I'm not going to do any

0:47:14.920 --> 0:47:16.960
<v Speaker 2>more questions because I want to ask the panel one

0:47:17.040 --> 0:47:20.080
<v Speaker 2>last question before we end, which is because this is

0:47:20.200 --> 0:47:21.160
<v Speaker 2>technically we should be.

0:47:21.080 --> 0:47:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Talking more about investment.

0:47:22.320 --> 0:47:24.839
<v Speaker 2>If you could just make one investment today, only one,

0:47:25.160 --> 0:47:26.000
<v Speaker 2>what would it be?

0:47:26.239 --> 0:47:28.759
<v Speaker 1>James quickly, quickly.

0:47:30.400 --> 0:47:31.520
<v Speaker 5>Come back to John.

0:47:32.600 --> 0:47:33.080
<v Speaker 6>I've been.

0:47:34.719 --> 0:47:36.640
<v Speaker 7>A point in UK equities for a while, and I

0:47:36.800 --> 0:47:40.919
<v Speaker 7>still think ukcaus are a good bit because Britain spent

0:47:41.080 --> 0:47:44.200
<v Speaker 7>so so long being detested by the world's fund managers,

0:47:44.320 --> 0:47:47.360
<v Speaker 7>and that's very recently, probably only this year, started to

0:47:47.400 --> 0:47:51.000
<v Speaker 7>turn around. And now they've all got the excuse for saying, oh, well,

0:47:51.040 --> 0:47:53.080
<v Speaker 7>I wanted to eat until the Tories without a government,

0:47:53.280 --> 0:47:55.440
<v Speaker 7>so I think that'll continue.

0:47:55.520 --> 0:47:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you coats, thank you. James. You can't look at it.

0:47:58.719 --> 0:48:00.319
<v Speaker 1>He's not an investor, okay.

0:48:00.760 --> 0:48:07.160
<v Speaker 5>Well I silver, Oh, gold's gone to new highs. I'm

0:48:07.160 --> 0:48:08.759
<v Speaker 5>a little bit worried about gold because gold, if you

0:48:08.800 --> 0:48:12.479
<v Speaker 5>look at gold compared to the price index, it's looking

0:48:12.520 --> 0:48:15.680
<v Speaker 5>awfully high. And if gold's supposed to protect real wealth

0:48:15.840 --> 0:48:19.080
<v Speaker 5>and stuff will be a real reflection of inflation, then

0:48:19.239 --> 0:48:21.440
<v Speaker 5>you know you'd really wanted a discount to that, but

0:48:21.680 --> 0:48:25.920
<v Speaker 5>silver historically tracks gold, not very tightly, but it does

0:48:26.080 --> 0:48:29.000
<v Speaker 5>sort of track it. It usually goes to a premium

0:48:29.120 --> 0:48:31.319
<v Speaker 5>to gold near the top. That's how you know it's

0:48:31.360 --> 0:48:34.000
<v Speaker 5>the top. And at the moment it's a substantial discoup.

0:48:34.280 --> 0:48:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, all well, stuff UK silver a lot of silver

0:48:37.640 --> 0:48:38.600
<v Speaker 3>and sellar panels as well.

0:48:38.800 --> 0:48:41.000
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, Ed, you don't have to answer this one.

0:48:41.080 --> 0:48:41.920
<v Speaker 6>But I can't.

0:48:42.160 --> 0:48:47.080
<v Speaker 4>I can't mainly because I don't know. Theoretically I'm not

0:48:47.239 --> 0:48:48.799
<v Speaker 4>you know, I'm not laty, but also I have I have.

0:48:48.880 --> 0:48:49.799
<v Speaker 3>No clue you have no chant.

0:48:49.840 --> 0:48:51.120
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, I think that's a great place to

0:48:51.200 --> 0:48:52.640
<v Speaker 2>end with it. Don't know, because I don't how we

0:48:52.680 --> 0:48:54.000
<v Speaker 2>all feel about most things, isn't it.

0:48:55.719 --> 0:48:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to this week's Maren Talks Money.

0:48:57.640 --> 0:49:00.160
<v Speaker 2>If you like, I show, rate, review, and subscribe wherever

0:49:00.200 --> 0:49:02.520
<v Speaker 2>you listen to podcasts, and keep sending your questions or

0:49:02.520 --> 0:49:05.360
<v Speaker 2>comments to Merrin Money at Blueberg dot net. This editors

0:49:05.360 --> 0:49:07.800
<v Speaker 2>were produced by me Marren Sunset Web. It was produced

0:49:07.800 --> 0:49:10.440
<v Speaker 2>by SUMMERSAIDI, Production support and sound.

0:49:10.239 --> 0:49:11.520
<v Speaker 1>By Moses and Best.

0:49:11.560 --> 0:49:13.839
<v Speaker 2>All thanks to John Stebeck, Thank you again, John, James

0:49:13.920 --> 0:49:14.360
<v Speaker 2>Bergas and.

0:49:14.480 --> 0:49:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Ed Conway and Blairbarrows.

0:49:15.719 --> 0:49:17.800
<v Speaker 2>At Pania House and be sure to follow me and

0:49:17.840 --> 0:49:21.040
<v Speaker 2>John on Twitter or exitt Mariness w and at John

0:49:21.320 --> 0:49:22.360
<v Speaker 2>Underscores STEPIC.

0:49:22.480 --> 0:49:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening.