WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance TV: December 26, 2024

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 2>with Lisa Bromwitz and Amrie Hordern. Join us each day

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 2>for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 2>from our global headquarters in New York City. We are

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:27.640
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 2>am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:33.879
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 3>We begin this hour, though with US futures mostly unchanged,

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 3>a little bit softer following a Christmas Eve rally, investors

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 3>hoping the so called Santa Claus rally will continue from

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:48.879
<v Speaker 3>the final four trading days of the year. I was

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 3>looking at a stat this morning, Peter. Since nineteen fifty,

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 3>the S and P five hundred has generated average and

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 3>medium returns of one point three percent during the Santa

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 3>Claus period, wildly outpacing them market's average seven day gain

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 3>of three tens percent. And this is coming from LPL Financial.

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 3>So actually, if you're willing to be in the markets

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 3>around the holidays, maybe it'll be good for you.

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 4>You know, normally it has been.

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 5>I think this year though, everyone's kind of been looking

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 5>for that opportunity to buy. We had the dip post FOMC.

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 5>I think people bought that dip. I think we've already

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 5>had a lot of the Santa Rally, then we had

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 5>the weird stuff that went on with the budget. I

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 5>think people are going to have to digest what does

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 5>it look like in the new year with President Trump,

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 5>with Musk, how's the economy.

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 4>Going to shake out?

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 5>And I think that's actually going to you know, maybe

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 5>maybe we get the Santa rally, but I think come

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 5>early January, we're going to get a lot of volatility.

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 3>So you think the market has baked in all the

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 3>good stuff when it comes to Trump, I think.

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:41.759
<v Speaker 4>Lock got baked in again.

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 5>I think you go back to post election, everyone was

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 5>really worried about tariffs. Then all of a sudden consensus became, Oh,

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 5>it's just a negotiating point.

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 5>He tends to like volatility, he tends to like chaos.

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 5>So the more the market gets complacent, I think the

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 5>more he likely he is up to up the ante.

0:01:57.360 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 6>What do you think in terms of sequencing come January.

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 5>You know, I think he's going to go for easy wins.

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 5>So I think as he gets out there, he's going

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 5>to look what can be done. So anything that can

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 5>be done in executive order, look for him to go

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 5>ahead with that, right because he can do that simply.

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 5>Then he's going to look for the opportunities.

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 4>Again.

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 5>I think we're already seeing some progress in terms of immigration.

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 5>He's working with New York City Mayor Adams. So he's

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 5>going to go for those high visibility easy wins. And

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 5>he doesn't start getting those, That's when I think you

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 5>see a more messy and chaotic problem when it.

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 3>Comes to the easy wins though the market is looking for,

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 3>really is a tax bill. When do you start baking

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 3>in the fact that this could actually become real legislation.

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:36.119
<v Speaker 5>I think you have to wait until you really see

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 5>what people come back acting like. Again, this budget thing

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 5>was kind of weird, right. There's clearly some element, certainly

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:44.239
<v Speaker 5>even within the Republican Party that does not want to

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 5>grow the deficit. There's concern about the deficit growing. You're

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 5>seeing yields and entire almost every day for the last

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 5>few weeks we have I think it's about twelve trillion

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 5>dollars of debt that we have to refinance next year.

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 5>So one, you need that demand to be there, but

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 5>the higher if we're rolling that over to higher yields,

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 5>that's going to add problems to the budget deficit. So

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 5>I think the deficit is going to take front and center.

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 5>It's going to make it more difficult than most of

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:07.519
<v Speaker 5>us would like to get some of those policies pushed through.

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 6>You write about bonds, be wary of bonds.

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 3>Nothing from the past days tells us that there won't

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 3>be a lot of spending, just the direction of spending.

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 6>Will be altered.

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 3>You're talking about what happened in terms of the debt

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 3>ceiling debacle, which pretty much when silent once they pass

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 3>through this clean cr Do you think it's going to

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 3>be the bond market that is the ultimate check of

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:29.959
<v Speaker 3>power in twenty twenty five when it comes to Washington, DC.

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 4>I think it will be right.

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 5>It's become the interest expense is already a big part

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 5>of the deficit. It's growing, it's going to continue to grow,

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 5>and the bond market, I think is very wary. Right,

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 5>how are we going to pay for all these things?

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 5>I think everyone out the corner of the eye is

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 5>still looking at Doge and saying, Okay, maybe something gets

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 5>done there.

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 4>I think that's the.

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 5>Bright shining light that's kept market somewhat in check. Is well,

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 5>if those can really get some efficiencies, maybe we don't

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 5>see the deficit bloom.

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 4>Everything else, though, I think is just telling.

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 5>Us this deficit is going to go higher, and that's problematic.

0:03:57.320 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 6>Do you see any fiscal hawks left in Washington?

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 7>Apparently?

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 5>Maybe what the twenty seven Republicans who voted against the

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 5>cr They're thirty eight, so yeah, maybe that's it.

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 4>There is no one.

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 5>It's all a matter of where they spend their tax cuts.

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 5>And again, dog seems to be the one thing. Maybe

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 5>that's where they eke out some gains and do something

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 5>about the deficit. I just don't see that happening very

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 5>cleanly or very quickly.

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 3>You also say that there's hope of discipline discipline, but

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 3>quote the swamp seems well in trench. So I see

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 3>consistent upward pressure on bond yields. T row Price is

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 3>talking about maybe five percent. Some people are even saying

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 3>six percent on the ten year yield. Do you think

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 3>we can reach those levels?

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 5>I certainly think five percents in the cards. Six percent

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 5>might be high. We'd have to see some of the

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 5>policies actually get implemented, but yeah, I think five percent's

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 5>pretty realistic. Don't forget. Also, we might see some inflation

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 5>pressures come back again. One people were buying goods ahead

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 5>of the tariffs or potential tariffs. You're seeing that, You're

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 5>seeing the economy still move along reasonably, Well, it's that

0:04:57.960 --> 0:04:58.679
<v Speaker 5>shopping season.

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 4>Plus I do think there's been an artificial.

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:03.279
<v Speaker 5>Bias to the data pushing things higher than they really

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 5>are in terms of jobs and inflation January February, so

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 5>that could spook the market as well. Six percent seems

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 5>high though, unless we get really aggressive policy.

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 3>What do you make if we get five percent ten

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:17.359
<v Speaker 3>year yields? What happens to this idea of US exceptionalism Now?

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 5>I think the US economy will struggle at that level.

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 5>You're starting to see small companies default pick up.

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:24.160
<v Speaker 4>You're also One thing.

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 5>That kind of really caught my eye is they've gone

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 5>back in Q two and said now that we're actually

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 5>job losses rather than job gains in Q two. So

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 5>every time they do the revisions, the economy actually seems

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 5>slightly worse. So I'm not sure where we're managing to.

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 4>I do think the.

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 5>Fed's going to be much more cautious on rate cuts.

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 5>They did their one hundred BIPs. They're sending that message.

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:44.479
<v Speaker 5>So I think we're susceptible to a yield driven slowdown.

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:47.119
<v Speaker 6>What does that then mean for the equity market?

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 5>You know, I think we could see some pressure on

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 5>the big high flyers again. So much of this market

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 5>to me, is about the leverageddtfs you have now single

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 5>stock leverage gts. Have no idea why those have been improved.

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 5>They're out there. You're seeing a lot of high around that.

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:02.840
<v Speaker 5>You've seen a lot of hype around you know, Bitcoin,

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 5>it got to one hundred thousand a couple times. I

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 5>think it crossed ninety nine just yesterday, and now it's

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 5>back to ninety five thousand. So I feel that that's

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 5>that froth that's in the market. That's what the liquidity

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 5>is going to get taken out of, and it'll be

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 5>pretty aggressive and pretty quickly when it happens.

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:18.039
<v Speaker 3>Do you think there's any chance than in twenty twenty

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 3>five for broadening out or the concentration will remain in

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 3>these mag seven names.

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 5>I think we could see broadening out. We might even

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 5>see maybe globals start doing better. It's really going to

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 5>come down to, I think how many fights does Trump pick,

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 5>who do we pick fights with, are we winning them?

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 4>And what sort of policy do we get.

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:36.480
<v Speaker 5>So but with higher yields, I think that's going to

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 5>make it more and more difficult for this to really

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 5>broaden out.

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 3>Unfortunately, when you say you think globally we can potentially

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 3>see pickups where exactly right.

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 5>Now, I still wouldn't touch Europe. I think Europe's a disaster.

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 5>You mentioned I think at the start of the top

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.159
<v Speaker 5>of the show how the europe declined free fall.

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 4>So it's hard.

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 5>And what scares me about Europe is Germany's kind of

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 5>been the juggernaut. Europe's kind of Germany's been what's held

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 5>Europe together. They're doing very poorly right now. So I'm

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:05.720
<v Speaker 5>not yet there, But I do think sentiments become so

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 5>bad over there and so excessive over here that you

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 5>do get that potential for a reversal because.

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 6>It's so low. The entring point is that what you're

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 6>saying an entry point.

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 4>Right and really is a contrary you're looking for.

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 5>Okay, once everyone's given up on something that tends to

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 5>be where it doesn't take much to push that around,

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 5>and everyone is still so very focused mag seven over here.

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 5>Every time we've tried to rally, you know, small caps,

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 5>that's failed, and I keep thinking everyone's looking for that

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 5>small cap rally and maybe the surprise is going to

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 5>be Europe or someone does better. I don't think it

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 5>happens this month or next month, but that could be

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 5>the trade of the year where all of a sudden

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 5>people say, let's give the world a chance.

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 6>The Dacks, though, is up so much double digits on

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 6>this year.

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 3>Jonathan brings up this point all the time, yet the

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 3>German economy.

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 4>Is on its back.

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 7>You know.

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 5>I think one of the things with all these is

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 5>most of these companies are big and global. So that's

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 5>one reason I think you can look at this and say,

0:07:57.440 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 5>you know, I think the S and P five hundred,

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 5>close to fifty percent of your owns come from overseas.

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 5>So it's the same for some of those big German companies. Right,

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 5>Mercedes is not really a German company per se. Right,

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 5>They're very dependent on global So I think that's you know,

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 5>it's hard when we look at these things and really

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 5>nationalize them when some of the big companies really are

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 5>so global and why would they trade it a much smaller,

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 5>you know, as a market lower pe.

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 4>I think some of it makes sense.

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 5>Some of it's telcode things, banks that don't have that potential,

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 5>but there is that opportunity I think for growth there.

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 6>The one area you haven't mentioned is China.

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 3>China overnight is apparently giving local officials more leeway and

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 3>how they invest government bonds. We do see them coming

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:39.319
<v Speaker 3>out and trying whatever they can to stimulate the economy.

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 6>Is it enough for you to want to go there?

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I actually don't mind China as an investment, and

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 5>we'll be interested when we talked to the guests later today.

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 5>But I do think that this is almost an existential

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 5>sort of moment for GI and the Communist Party, So

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 5>they are going to keep throwing things at this until

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 5>they get.

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:56.440
<v Speaker 4>The economy turned around.

0:08:56.679 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 5>And I am a big believer that their whole strategy

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 5>is this made by So they're taking their brands, they're

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 5>trying to sell them globally. They're trying to use bricks

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 5>as another way to get their brands out there. So

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 5>I think Chinese companies actually might do pretty well. And again,

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 5>sentiment's been awful since, you know, there was that brief flurry,

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 5>you know when everyone said, oh, we have to buy

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 5>China late in the fall. It's kind of reversed again.

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:19.839
<v Speaker 5>I think there is some opportunity there. I think, to

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 5>me though, it's still a trade, it's not an investment.

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 3>You're a traveler, not a settler when it comes to Chenna, definitely.

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 3>Andy Schiller of the Taubman Center for American Politics at

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:43.559
<v Speaker 3>Brown University joins us now, Wendy, thank you so much

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 3>for joining us, and happy holidays to you.

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 6>Thank you for joining us the day after Christmas.

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 3>We have a long list of grievances coming from President

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:53.679
<v Speaker 3>elect Trump before he even gets into office, whether or not.

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 6>It's Canada, Mexico, China, Greenland.

0:09:57.960 --> 0:09:59.079
<v Speaker 3>And now the Panama Canal.

0:09:59.120 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 6>What do you make of all that?

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Yes, good morning, Henry.

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 6>Well.

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 8>President Trump, you know, did successfully renegotiate NAFTA, at least

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 8>in his eyes, in the eyes of a lot of people,

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 8>trying to secure better terms for the United States in

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 8>terms of trade. And this is something presidents can do

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:19.319
<v Speaker 8>in terms of executive authority. They have a trade representative.

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:22.679
<v Speaker 8>They do have a lot of leeway in determining what

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 8>our economic relationships are in terms.

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Of trade and also user fees with foreign nations.

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 8>And so there's a long history with the Panama Canal,

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 8>and so I'm not sure how much the president will

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:37.719
<v Speaker 8>invoke that history. But he's looking for victories, and he's

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 8>looking for victories that he can demonstrate using executive power

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 8>and really pretty much end running Congress. Because he was

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:49.199
<v Speaker 8>president for four years, he understands, even with a Republican trifecta,

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:51.719
<v Speaker 8>as he saw last week, you're not always going to

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 8>get your victories quickly or easily through Congress.

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:56.719
<v Speaker 1>So you're going to look to other venues and other

0:10:56.920 --> 0:11:00.199
<v Speaker 1>uses of presidential power to achieve quick victories. It's to

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>look successful.

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 3>China doesn't control the canal at all, but it does

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 3>have two of the main five ports adjacent to the canal.

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 6>Is that really what Trump is getting after?

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think observers would like to believe that the

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:17.439
<v Speaker 8>President wants to strengthen the United States position visa each

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 8>China in a lot of different ways. We know that

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 8>China is also investing in a lot of parts of

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:27.559
<v Speaker 8>South America and also Africa, and using its resources to

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 8>sort of gain leverage in those areas. That's been happening

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 8>for a long time and the United States hasn't really

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 8>confronted it head on. And I think these are going

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:37.599
<v Speaker 8>to be ways in which the Trump administration looks to

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 8>sort of counter China, beyond even tariffs in the places

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 8>that China is trying to gain a foothold.

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:44.959
<v Speaker 5>What do you think are the top two or three

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 5>things he could do basically on day one to set

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 5>that agenda and get that tone going.

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:50.959
<v Speaker 7>Well.

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:53.439
<v Speaker 1>I can certainly issues some executive orders.

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 8>He can certainly raise tariffs under a sort of national

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 8>security he can do those sorts of things. He can

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 8>certainly try to block some issues of visas or travel like.

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 1>You did with the Muslim ban.

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 8>You know, there's a fair number of things presidents can

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 8>do with executive horizon the first day.

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>What he can't do is get his ambassador cleared right away.

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 8>That's up to the Senate, and the Senate seems under

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:19.200
<v Speaker 8>John Thune, the incoming Repulican leader, to want to exert

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 8>its constitutional privilege and really examine his nominees. Now that

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 8>examination may take a day, a day and a half,

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 8>but they're still going to go through the process. So

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 8>all these ambassadors, all these cabinet levels, they have to

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:31.679
<v Speaker 8>still go through the Senate and that's going to take

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 8>a little while.

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>So how much that frustrates President Trump. We're about to see, Wendy.

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 6>What's the Democrats strategy for next year? Henry?

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 8>That is a question I think the Democrats themselves are

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 8>looking for an answer to. It depends which faction of

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 8>the Democratic Party emerges, you know, sort of as the

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 8>chief spokesperson against the incoming presidential Trump's administration. We saw

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 8>a little bit of playbook from the Democrats on the

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 8>budget bill, you know, referring to President Musk or co

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 8>President Elon Musk. I think the Democrats have real concerns

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 8>about these non elected influences on President Trump.

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, President Trump, we've seen four years in office.

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>There's a bit of a playbook. Unpredictable, but there's a playbook.

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 8>But new actors with this kind of influence, particularly with communications,

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 8>presents a challenge for the Democrats, and they're trying to

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 8>sort of drive a wedge between those influences, particularly Musk

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:27.199
<v Speaker 8>and the President. Because of the President, they know what

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 8>they're dealing with with Musk.

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 1>It's much more out of their control.

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 6>Right now.

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 3>We still have a sitting president Joe Biden. Yet when

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 3>it came to the debt, the potential shutdown debt ceiling

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:42.239
<v Speaker 3>debacle of last week, he pretty much seated the spotlight

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 3>to incoming President Trump. Are you surprised by how much

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 3>power Joe Biden is seeding right now on the global stage.

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:53.319
<v Speaker 8>Well, I mean, I think Joe Biden and even the

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:56.679
<v Speaker 8>Democrats do want to set this up as a relationship

0:13:56.720 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 8>between Republican President Trump and a Republican.

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Controlled House and Senate.

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 8>Because whatever happened in the next couple of months, maybe

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 8>things sail down, inflation goes down, maybe the economy stays solid,

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:07.439
<v Speaker 8>maybe not.

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>They want nothing to do with that.

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:12.199
<v Speaker 8>They want to start their twenty twenty six campaign now

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 8>against the trifecta. So it's not really a bad thing

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:17.319
<v Speaker 8>for the Democrats for President Biden to sort of, you know,

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 8>not be involved.

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>He's also doing things with executive power, things like clemency

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>for example.

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 8>I mean, he's trying to do all he can nilaterally

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 8>and somewhat quietly before the new president takes over. But

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 8>right now the strategy is to say it's the Republicans

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 8>government to run, and it's the Republican's government to succeed

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 8>or fail.

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 5>What do you think the rest of the world's going

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 5>to do in response to some of these things? Right,

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 5>so far we seem to be talking about this in isolation,

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 5>what Trump wants to do.

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 4>What's the world going to do to push back on that?

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 4>Or are they going to do anything?

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 8>Well, yeah, you have to think about economic markets, So

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 8>we also have to think about military security and security

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 8>of Europe. And with Germany's government very shaky, with France's

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 8>governm shaky, and even with Great Britain's government shaky, you

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 8>start to really have concerns about military encouragion.

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 1>You think about Putin, you think about Ukraine.

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 8>You know the instability that could come to Europe with

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 8>economically and even militarily.

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>That's a challenge. It's unclear that Trump.

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 8>Administration is prepared for, and we just don't know what

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 8>moves the Trump meministration will make to steady the ship,

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 8>and of course the global economy will depend on studying

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 8>that ship. So those are the kinds of unforeseen external

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 8>shocks that could come earlier in the Trump administration that

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 8>anyone's expecting.

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 3>Trump definitely takes a more bilateral view of the world,

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 3>while the Democrats or Biden administration had taken more of

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 3>a multilateral view of the world. If Trump used the

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 3>world bilaterally, who do you think is going to be

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 3>his best partner in Europe?

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, that is a really interesting question.

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 8>I just haven't seen any inclination from the prior Trump

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 8>administration or his rhetoric now that he's looking for a partner.

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 8>I mean, he you know, he sort of wants Poton

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 8>to stay in his corner, maybe resolve Ukraine and look

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 8>good for that. But you know, Trump is Trump, and

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 8>as we see in domestic politics and international politics, he

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 8>is a loner.

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>He wants to exert influence where he can and where he.

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 8>Can be successful, but he's not really interested in giving

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 8>anything to other partners. And that's something that's really strikingly

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 8>different from the US foreign policy posture than we've seen

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 8>from a lot.

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Of former presidents.

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 3>So we're less than a month away from his inauguration, Wendy,

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to this sequencing of things like tax cuts,

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 3>immigration policy, as well as tariffs, how do you expect

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 3>all of this to play out in Washington.

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 8>Well, you know, Emri as you well know because you've

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 8>discussed it reported on before. You know, there's a difference

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 8>between Mike Johnson and John Thune on getting reconciliation going

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 8>and getting an early version of the tax cut you know,

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 8>on the table and under consideration in both the House

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 8>and the Senate, an early victory to extend the tax cuts,

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 8>the Trump tax cuts, that would give the president a

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 8>lot of momentum to focus on other things like border security.

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 8>So border security he can do, and to some extent,

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 8>you know, if he invokes the military in trying to

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 8>do border security, that will create controversy and that could

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 8>upend other kinds of domestic priorities he has, like the

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:15.640
<v Speaker 8>tax cut bill. One thing that Trump administration doesn't seem

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 8>to quite get yet, which is surprising given they were

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 8>there for four years before, is that these things are interrelated.

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 8>If you ask somebody to make a politically difficult decision

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 8>on one issue, it's going to affect whether they're going

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:29.120
<v Speaker 8>to help you on another. And that's something these Republican

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 8>leaders will have to manage. But it's unclear how well

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 8>Trump will manage it.

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:35.159
<v Speaker 3>Wendy Schiler Best of holidays to you. Thank you so

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 3>much for joining us this morning.

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:46.640
<v Speaker 4>Jay.

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 6>I'm so excited he's going to join us for the

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:49.159
<v Speaker 6>next sixty minutes.

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 3>So what you're saying there, what it sounds like is

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 3>almost twenty twenty four was the peak when it comes

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 3>to US exceptionalism.

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 6>Is that accurate?

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.360
<v Speaker 7>Well, it could be, right, I mean US has led.

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 7>I mean it's one of the things that's interesting. We

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 7>talked about those big moments right. One of them was

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:07.439
<v Speaker 7>election night, where we talked about the great economic story

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:11.439
<v Speaker 7>of the Biden administration did not translate politically, but clearly

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 7>the US is a global growth leader, best performer on inflation.

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 7>And yet now we're looking at a situation where we

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 7>think there's uncertainty in the US with the new administration.

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 7>The rest of the world is responding. We're in what

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:28.360
<v Speaker 7>we call is that we touched on at the top

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 7>of the long cycle. It's really being driven by competition

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 7>within our tripolar world thesis of regional competition between Asia, Europe,

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 7>and the Americas in the three areas of climate AI.

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 7>In defense, that competition requires a new industrial policy. So

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:49.160
<v Speaker 7>we're talking about the marriage of fiscal and monetary policy,

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 7>and it has to be done well, right, and so

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 7>you really have to start putting a premium on the

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 7>policy makers and their ability to be in alignment with

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 7>public and private sector. We see that in China, right.

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:04.639
<v Speaker 7>You were talking earlier about the evs. China led the

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:07.879
<v Speaker 7>way in the climate space and they now dominate the

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 7>entire space. So now the fight is in AI and

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 7>people are throwing money at this. Every government, every company

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 7>in the world needs to compete in AI, and so

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 7>these investments are too big for anyone company. That's why

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:21.879
<v Speaker 7>the governments have to get involved. That's all. We have

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:24.440
<v Speaker 7>fiscal spending, but you have to do it well. And

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:26.919
<v Speaker 7>if you don't do it well, the markets rebel, as

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 7>we're seeing in Brazil right, nine ten percent fiscal deficit,

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 7>currency collapsing, rates skyrocketing, in equities underperforming, and so there

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:39.959
<v Speaker 7>really is this competition, and we think we're shifting now

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 7>where the rest of the world has to respond. So

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 7>you have deflation in China, you have stagnation in Europe,

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:49.959
<v Speaker 7>and so we're seeing policy mixes responding now to those issues.

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:53.959
<v Speaker 7>And we see President ELEC. Trump as an accelerator of that, right,

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:57.120
<v Speaker 7>I mean, he's renting caras on everybody. So people China,

0:19:57.160 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 7>in particular export led economy, they don't start to drive

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 7>domestic consumption. They're more at risk being held hostage by

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 7>the US, and so they are responding. And one of

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:10.639
<v Speaker 7>the great unknowns we talk about the US and the

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:16.360
<v Speaker 7>S and P. Guess what, China is outperforming the US FXI,

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 7>the large cap China ETF is up twenty nine percent

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 7>year to date, outperforming the S and P. Nobody knows

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:26.400
<v Speaker 7>about that, Nobody talks about that. But that's the reality.

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 7>So it's already starting to happen. And so our view

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:31.680
<v Speaker 7>is that year three in a bull market, which is

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 7>what we're in in the US in globally, tends to

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:37.959
<v Speaker 7>be a kind of rest here. Single digit type returns

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:40.680
<v Speaker 7>are the average for three year bull markets. So as

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:44.119
<v Speaker 7>we see global growth picking up outside the US, we

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:46.680
<v Speaker 7>think we're going to see earnings do better outside the

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 7>US then in the US. That's new, particularly in emerging markets,

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 7>and therefore we think investors can start to take profits

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 7>in the US, particularly if there's uncertainty with the new

0:20:56.560 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 7>Trump administration, and allocate to the on US markets which

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 7>are completely under owned at like fifty year lows in

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 7>relative evaluation, starting to pick up earnings growth, starting to

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 7>do the right policy mix. So that's the opportunity take

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 7>some money off the table in the US, move it

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 7>into the non US markets, and we think commodities as well,

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 7>and so there's really that pause. So you're three in

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 7>the US bowl market, single digit earnings growth, that's what

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:27.880
<v Speaker 7>we're driving with our single digit return expectation, and then

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 7>non US markets can go up fifteen percent, eighteen percent

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 7>earnings growth, economic growth. You know, investors start to allocate there,

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 7>you go.

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 6>Let's look at China a little bit more though. I

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 6>know equity market there you're saying is doing very well.

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 6>But the economy they are still struggling, don't you think.

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean you look at you five percent growth, look

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 3>at consumer healthy or non consumer demand, it's not really there.

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, at some point do you think China is

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 3>going to come out with an even bigger bazuka When

0:21:57.040 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 3>it comes to fiscal demand.

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 7>Well, a lot of it, as we've talked about, is

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 7>what's in the price right. And you know the China stimulus,

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 7>they are taking out the left tail risk. They've told

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 7>you months ago that they're not going to let the

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 7>equity market go down and guess what, they have the

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 7>ability to do that, and so they're doing it. And

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 7>so as an investor, you know, when you look at

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 7>single DIGITPE, which is what you know China trades on,

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 7>when you look at the government saying, you know, we're

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 7>going to we're going to stimulate the economy. When you

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 7>look at the tech stuff, right, so the US is

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:32.400
<v Speaker 7>trying to freeze China out of the high end tech

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:35.639
<v Speaker 7>so it could lead in AI. That's the game. The

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 7>way we look at that is that's an opportunity to

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:43.160
<v Speaker 7>buy China tech, which is now going to dominate the China. Yeah,

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 7>the China e commerce market, which is much bigger than

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 7>the US, growing much faster than the US, and the

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 7>companies that dominate them are trading at like a sixty

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:57.200
<v Speaker 7>percent discount to the US peer group. And so we're

0:22:57.320 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 7>long China tech because we think that's really where the opportunities.

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 7>And as we said before, China knows it has to

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 7>act because it's struggling with deflation. Right. The property sector

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 7>has been a big problem. By the way it's bottoming,

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 7>you can start the data starting to finally show properties

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 7>starting to pick up a little bit in China. And

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 7>now we have a situation where they are threatened by

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 7>President Trump with exports. Okay, they're export led economy. They

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:26.919
<v Speaker 7>need to switch that export focus to domestic demand focus,

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 7>and that's what they are doing. So stimulus, stimulus, stimulus,

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 7>not a huge bazooka. We all, we don't expect that,

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 7>but stimulus, stimulus, stimulus, more stimulus coming in the spring.

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 7>And therefore, you know, growing at five percent, earnings growth

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:44.639
<v Speaker 7>needs to pick up, So that's important. Earnings growth has

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 7>been disappointing in China, but we think it's going to

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 7>pick up. And as it does, stocks are completely under owned.

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 7>Nobody owns China. I mean I saw something and I

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 7>can't remember which firm because you know so many year

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:58.440
<v Speaker 7>ahead outfits, and I think there was a list of

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 7>like fifteen major banks and not a single one thought

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 7>China growth was going to be better in twenty twenty

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:08.399
<v Speaker 7>five than it is in twenty twenty four. I love that,

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:11.439
<v Speaker 7>you know, when everybody is thinking one thing, we.

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 3>Like to go the other way, right, when everyone's on

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:15.120
<v Speaker 3>one side of the book real and the other way.

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 6>Yes, Okay, so we talked about China.

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 3>You to this idea that potentially they have domestic consumption

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 3>trying to boost it. At the same time, many say

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:25.639
<v Speaker 3>that with the walls going up around the United States,

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:27.479
<v Speaker 3>they dump more on Europe.

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:28.879
<v Speaker 6>Can you handle that?

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, Europe is a challenge, right, So in our tripolar world,

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 7>you have China leading because they're the best at marrying

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 7>this industrial policy, fiscal and monetary, public and private. They've

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 7>shown that with the climate space right. US responds with

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 7>the Biden's Chip Act, Infrastructure Act, IRA Act, and now

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:51.120
<v Speaker 7>we're in the game best growth of the G seven?

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 7>And now where is Europe? So Europe has to respond.

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:56.200
<v Speaker 7>They know it. You know, there's report after report, the

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 7>draggy report, this, that and the other. They know what

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 7>they have to do. It's a matter of political will,

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 7>and I think you're going to see that political kind

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:09.159
<v Speaker 7>of logjam break this spring in Germany. Germany is the

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:13.200
<v Speaker 7>you know, the engine of Europe, and it's been going

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 7>nowhere for years, Okay, in part because Germany has not

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 7>gone down the fiscal stimulus route that pretty much every

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 7>other major economy has. They have the famous debt break right,

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:26.399
<v Speaker 7>very strict on how much debt they can issue. So

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 7>guess what they now understand They have to kind of

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 7>fudge that a little bit, and they need to stimulate

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 7>to pick get their economy to pick up, because they too,

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 7>like China, a very export dependent and their export dependency

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:42.680
<v Speaker 7>is on China. So China's weak consumption really hurts Germany.

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:47.159
<v Speaker 7>All right, So we expect in the upcoming election, right,

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 7>the government has failed. We wrote a piece last week

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 7>in our Musings was called vote of no confidence, right,

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:56.479
<v Speaker 7>because there's so many no confidence votes in Germany. Had

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 7>one new government we expect in the spring to be

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:03.359
<v Speaker 7>led by the more conservative side of Europe, of German

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 7>political space, and we think they are going to lead

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:10.359
<v Speaker 7>the talk about easing on the debt break. So we

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 7>expect fiscal stimulus in Germany next year in Europe more broadly,

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 7>and we think that is going to help attract capital

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 7>to the European.

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 6>Are they're potentially going to be though.

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:24.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, Donald Trump is being inaugurated January twenty and he's

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 3>a very different view on Europe than the Biden administration.

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 7>Well, I mean, look, I think the tariff thing is overstated.

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 7>Let me just go back to the auto to Europe

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 7>in Germany one second. Really, the auto companies show it, right,

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:41.119
<v Speaker 7>That is the leading edge of European manufacturing, and they

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 7>are getting their heads handed to them all around the world,

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:47.119
<v Speaker 7>but especially in China, so they know, they understand they

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 7>have got to act, and they're going to act on

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 7>the tariff side. I think the markets are telling you

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:56.239
<v Speaker 7>that for the most part, it's already in the price. Right.

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:59.679
<v Speaker 7>Trump came out twenty five percent on Mexico, on Canada.

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 6>Is it ready negotiating?

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:05.159
<v Speaker 7>But here's the thing, it's not the news. It's the

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:08.119
<v Speaker 7>reaction to the news that counts. And you look at

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 7>the reaction to these markets. There was no reaction, no,

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:14.919
<v Speaker 7>no reaction. Pay So higher after a week, China stocks

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 7>higher after a week, Europe, no stocks, no action. So

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 7>I think the tariffs for the most part are in

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 7>the price.

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:26.400
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, bringing you the best

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 2>in markets, economics, angiopolitics. You can watch the show live

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 2>on Bloomberg TV weekday mornings from six am to nine

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 2>am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify, or

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:41.440
<v Speaker 2>Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app.