WEBVTT - #405 Jason Flom with Pierre Rushing

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Our coverage of Pierre Rushing's case originally aired on July eighth,

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty. We will now re release that episode with

0:00:06.280 --> 0:00:12.720
<v Speaker 1>additional content to reflect some exciting new developments. In the

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:16.439
<v Speaker 1>early morning of April fifteenth, twenty eleven, Duwan Taylor stole

0:00:16.480 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 1>an iPod for an Oakland drug dealer named c. Two

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of his other customers, Patrick Smith and Robert green gave

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>Ce a ride in search of the iPod thief. They

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>spotted mister Taylor pulled up next to him, and See

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:32.840
<v Speaker 1>proceeded to shoot and kill him Over this trivial slight.

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Nearly a week would go by before Robert Green would

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>offer cops information and an uncertain description of the shooter.

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>A few weeks and several descriptions later, Green would claim

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>to have seen s wearing a red hat. A few

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>days after that, police would approach Pierre Rushing, a man

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 1>who had never been known as SA but wearing a

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>red hat. They'd bring Pierre's juvie photo and his name

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to Robert Green, who went on to identify him as

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the shooter. Despite a solid alibi, no physical evidence whatsoever

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>or anything to corroborate Robert Greene's highly questionable identification. Pierre

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Rushing's burgeoning rap career and promising future were stolen by

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Green and the criminal legal system. He's currently serving fifty

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to life for a frivolous and tragic crime committed by

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a drug dealer need See. Patrick Smith has since signed

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:28.559
<v Speaker 1>affidavits and testified to Pierre's innocence, and another of C's

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>customers that night has bravely set a legal name to

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the culprit, and even though mister Rushing did not name See,

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>we have censored his name from this episode for mister

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 1>Rushing's safety. Meanwhile, the state of California continues to ignore

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>evidence of Pierre's actual innocence and to fight his honest

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>attempts to regain his freedom. This is Wrongful Conviction with

0:01:51.720 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Jason Flamm. Welcome back to Wrongful Conviction with Jason Flamm.

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>That's me and today we're going to tell you about

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the case of Pierre Rushing. We'll speak with one of

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>his post conviction attorneys, Marvin Lou as well as taking

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a call from Kern Valley Correction in California to hear

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 1>from Pierre himself. This is Global's HELLNK.

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 2>You have a three post call from your version.

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 3>This call Angelo telephone number will be monitored and recruited

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 3>to accept this call soon or.

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 2>Dial five now. Thank you for using Globaltalink.

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:42.399
<v Speaker 1>Hello, good morning, Good morning. I'm glad you're here. I mean,

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry you're here under these circumstances, but I'm definitely

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>glad you're here. I know we have limited times, so

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>let's get right into it. Today's episode, we're going to

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>tell the story of the man we have on the

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 1>phone now, Pierre Rushing, who's serving fifty years. The Nightmare

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>starts on April fifteen, twenty eleven, at three forty five

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>as when there's a murder. But let's go back to

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>your childhood, because you had a difficult upbringing and you

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>were coming out of that and building a career in

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:10.119
<v Speaker 1>music when it all went haywire.

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 2>So I grew up in Oakland, California. My father was

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 2>a ascent fee in and out of prison. Smart was

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 2>a digit crack cocaine. So I don't want to say

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 2>like any other Oakland kid, but I mean a lot

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 2>of kids in the in the that grew up in

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:27.639
<v Speaker 2>the nineties were just product of the our environment. We

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 2>grew up looking at things that we believed to be right,

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 2>so we as we mature, we get to see that

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 2>they were really wrong.

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>And how did you get into music?

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 2>My auntie used to work for She switt her name

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 2>with Tracy Rush, and she since passed in twenty thirteen.

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 2>But just being around her, she took me in her wing,

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 2>just taking me to the studio or her as I

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 2>became addicted to you.

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Is it fair to say by twenty eleven things were

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>starting to look up for you in terms of possibly

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>building a career.

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, when I was arrested for this face, Actually

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 2>friends of mine has said that the police were looking

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 2>for me for this time, and we all laughed about

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 2>it because everybody knew that I couldn't have done. And

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 2>I have been wrapping and going to the studio, staying assistant,

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 2>shooting videos. And actually when I was arrested, I was

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 2>open up for Bay Area Ledge by the name of

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 2>surname Queen, and we had a big tour van with

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 2>my pictures on and promoting my music and everything. So, yeah,

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 2>it was coming up for me.

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you were on exactly, You're on your way up,

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and then everything went completely haywire. Now let's turn the

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>conversation to Marvin lou. Marvin is a criminal defense attorney

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 1>of some repute and he has been representing Pierre for

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 1>some time. Now, let's just paint a picture of what happened.

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:53.799
<v Speaker 3>The date was April fifteenth, twenty eleven, and what happened

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 3>was two individuals by the name of Patrick Smith and

0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Robert Green. We're doing crack cocaine or the day and

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 3>a half leading up to this young man's killing, and

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 3>Patrick Smith and Robert Green went to an apartment in

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 3>Oakland to purchase more crack cocaine. Patrick Smith was driving,

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:15.360
<v Speaker 3>Robert Green stayed in the car while Patrick Smith went

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 3>up to the apartment to purchase more drugs. So Patrick

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 3>Smith meets up with his drug dealer. Patrick Smith knows

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 3>him as see the letter c who is the actual

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 3>person responsible for the murder of Dewane Taylor. While Patrick

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 3>Smith was in the apartment, there were several other people present,

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 3>and mister Taylor left the apartment. Shortly after mister Taylor left,

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 3>then sees iPod turned up missing and someone in the

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 3>apartment said that mister Taylor had taken sees iPod. What

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 3>happened next was Patrick Smith the shooter Se and another

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 3>individual who was also charged as a co defendant named

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 3>Andre Morris. They all left the apartment and went and

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 3>got in Patrick Smith's car to go find mister Taylor,

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 3>who had allegedly taken C's iPod. Robert Green was waiting

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 3>in the car, sitting in the front passenger seat. So

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 3>pat Smith drives around the corner. They see mister Taylor

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 3>walking down the street and See or Andre Morris. Pat

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 3>Smith wasn't sure which told him to stop the car.

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 3>C and Andre Morris got out of the car, confronted

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 3>mister Taylor, and Se shot and killed mister Taylor on

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 3>the sidewalk in front of a fast food restaurant. They

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 3>then got back into the car. Pat Smith drove a

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:41.599
<v Speaker 3>short distance. Both See and mister Morris got out of

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 3>the car and ran away. So that's the factual backdrop

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 3>for this thing.

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Follow along here because Pierre, who were on the phone

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>with now had no connection to viction, no knowledge of

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the actual perpetrator, and he was at his grandmother's at

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:58.359
<v Speaker 1>the time with a young lady named Lauren Richardson. On

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the time and date of the murder. Have you ever

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 1>had a nickname of C for it?

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Never never, I've always went by the name of Stink

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 2>or people from my neighborhoods to call me peace, thank

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 2>being for my first name is Pierre. I have never

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 2>never went by the Namac.

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>So what happened? How did you end up getting wrong

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>for convicted here?

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 2>Well? One of the past is Robert Green. He goes

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 2>to the police ninety five days after he allegedly see

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 2>this crime, and he tells them that he's seen as

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:31.679
<v Speaker 2>murdering a guy named see commissed this murder. He gives

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 2>the police multiple different descriptions. I believe his first description

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 2>is five a light skin, one hundred and twenty pounds.

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 2>I haven't been one hundred and twenty pounds since I

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 2>was eighteen years old, let alone at nineteen years old,

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 2>and I'm not light skinned. The second time I believe

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 2>he sees the police, he switches it up again. So

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 2>allegedly he says he sees c on April thirties, which

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 2>would have been fifteen days after the crime, and he

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 2>went back to the police and say, you know what,

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 2>I lied again. I believe he was six foot two,

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 2>brown skin, and they had on red shirt and a

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 2>red hat. I'm not sure what kind of lineup they

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 2>were showinging, but he still couldn't identify who they believed

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 2>to be seen. The police seen an area that he

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 2>said that he had seen seeing. I believe it was

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 2>May third, wearing a red hat, and they stopped me.

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 2>And when they stopped me, they said, what is your name?

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't lie to the police. Year Russian is my name?

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 2>I say, hey, we're looking for a guy that beat

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 2>a guy up. I haven't beaten the guy up. And

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 2>then they leave when they take that name back to

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 2>I believe Robert Green, who was at the police station,

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 2>and they show him the picture four days after he's

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 2>seen a guy with a red hat. He said, you

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 2>know what, he had asked me, I'm Bessie. And that's

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 2>how the whole way of his spawn them looking for

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 2>a guy would have red hat four days after Robert

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:48.679
<v Speaker 2>grig because he's seen this guy and.

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>A month after the crime. When they first questioned you,

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to know what you were doing on the

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:55.599
<v Speaker 1>day of the crime. But when they were asking you

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>this question, it was already five weeks later, right, And

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a trick that they you Sometimes you're like

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you're supposed to remember exactly like, I don't ask anybody

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:07.080
<v Speaker 1>in the audience right now what were you doing. Let's

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>go back thirty five days from whatever day you're listening

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to this. Tell me right now what you were doing

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>at a particular time on that day, and I'll give

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you a dollar. Because that's impossible, but it is very

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>effective because then they can say you lied, because there's

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:22.719
<v Speaker 1>no way anyone could possibly remember that unless it was

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:25.960
<v Speaker 1>their birthday or some other like really important day.

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Right April fifteenth, as you would have it, is my

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 2>father's birthday. So without me even thinking, you say April fifteen, Hey,

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:34.599
<v Speaker 2>there's nothing I was with my dad. I seen my

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 2>dad on his birthday. Not one time at any trial transcript,

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:41.680
<v Speaker 2>police evidence Torty's Germany do they ever say where were

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:44.959
<v Speaker 2>you three forty five a m. So if they say no,

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 2>you weren't with your dad. I also remember that I

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 2>had a traffic shot that day, and they win, chick.

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 2>It showed that I was on the truth of the

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 2>say no not at that time. It took me, i

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 2>believe my attorney, for about a week of jog in

0:09:57.320 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 2>my memory to figure out where did I sleep at

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:02.840
<v Speaker 2>three four forty five am That morning, and I've remembered

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 2>it was my grandma. So it was because my mom

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 2>came to me that morning and said, where are you

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:09.679
<v Speaker 2>going to get your dad for his birthday? That's how

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 2>I was able to put the pieces and a pleazure together.

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 2>But by that time it was trial, so they looked

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 2>at it as if, oh, this is a third alibi. Well, no,

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 2>I've given you everywhere I went from April fifteenth, and

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 2>so that's how they played it, which is very nefarious

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:27.559
<v Speaker 2>because they see that I was trying to tell them

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 2>everything at.

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>The time that this crime was committed at three forty

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:33.959
<v Speaker 1>five in the morning. Now we know what you were

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>doing when you were supposedly out shooting somebody who you

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>never knew and don't know and still don't know and

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>never will know.

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, April fourteenth, I was shooting a video and if

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 2>you go on YouTube right now, the song was called

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 2>you Next, Thank take a Trip. Lauren Richardson was an

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 2>associate of the camera man helped shoot the video. She

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 2>was also my girlfriend April fourteenth, going in table fifteen,

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 2>she came to my randma, talked roughly about nine fund

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:07.199
<v Speaker 2>tenn'clock and we spent the night we enjoyed each other's company.

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:09.960
<v Speaker 2>We deal with any other boys from the girlfriend.

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 4>Hello.

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:16.959
<v Speaker 5>My name is Lauren Richardson. I am an Oakland resident

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 5>and current legal apprentice. I entered the field with a

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 5>lot of motivation from the tragic situation that happened with

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 5>Pierre Rushing. I originally was into video. On April fourteenth,

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 5>Pierre went to shoot a video. It's called take a Trip.

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 5>We were super excited because he has so much support

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 5>from our neighborhood. Everybody knew he was a great rapper,

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 5>so when he finally shot the video, we were super excited.

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:47.079
<v Speaker 5>We went back to his grandmother's house afterwards just to

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 5>kind of recap, and we stayed up all night watching movies, laughing,

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 5>making plans for the future. We you know, did what

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 5>couples do late night, and I left early in the

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 5>morning because I had to take my son to school.

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 5>And it was some weeks after that he kind of disappeared,

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 5>you know, when somebody else found me, it was like,

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 5>you know.

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:10.839
<v Speaker 3>He's in jail.

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm like what.

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 5>Because I was kind of mad, you know, I was.

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 5>I thought he ghosted me, to be honest, So it

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 5>was no way that he could have committed the crime.

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 5>I have never felt as powerless as I felt in

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 5>this situation to express reality and be believed, and you know,

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 5>this huge power structure for them to be able to

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 5>create a false reality, like even with the witness, the

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 5>witness is not a credible witness, nowhere near as credible

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 5>as I am. Because I'm not going to go perjure myself.

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 5>I'm not going to risk my life to keep a

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 5>killer out of jail. So for me to go up

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 5>there in front of all of these people and for

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 5>them to not take my word for it when they

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 5>had no other evidence, it bothers me to this day.

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 5>It's a big part of the motivation for me to

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 5>go into this apprenticeship program because I want to learn

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 5>how to speak up for other people who can't speak

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 5>up for themselves, because this has to stop. They ruined

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 5>an entire family.

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>The idea that we in this country can send somebody

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:25.839
<v Speaker 1>like you, a promising young man with his life ahead

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>of him, to fifty years based on the testimony of

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>an admitted crackhead it was up for two days or

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 1>changed the story four times, really should make everybody a

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 1>little scared. YEERH, can you tell us a little bit

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 1>about the trial itself. The killing is on camera.

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 2>When I heard they had it on camera, I'm starting

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 2>to kick my feet up and just wait for the

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 2>trial days because I'm like, if it's on camera, I'm

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 2>going on. I never in a million years imagined that

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 2>the camera would be low quality or you really can't

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 2>see anything on the camera. You see a vehicle pull

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 2>up and it's just green, so you can't release anything.

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 2>And I remember my heart just dropping because I knew

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 2>that that was what was supposed to exonerate music. They

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 2>had no evidence, no physical They have the murdered vehicle

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 2>with twelve fingerprints inside the car and say I got

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 2>inten out of that car four times. None of the

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 2>fingerprints mats made. One of the prosecution's witness was a

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 2>lady by the name of the Carli smith Orf. She

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 2>witnessed the crime her and pass men for best friends.

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 2>She had been in that car a week before. When

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 2>the police forensic pathologists became the call on Avery twenty second,

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 2>they tried to call his fingerprints in that car. Therefore,

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 2>when she testified she hadn't been in the car seven

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 2>days prior to the killing, that means that the car

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 2>couldn't have possibly been wiped down. And if the car

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 2>wasn't wiped down, and you found twelve to fourteenth fingerprints

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 2>in that car, and per Robert Green's testimony, I got

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 2>in and out of that car four times and I

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 2>killed this guy with no gloves. Why don't wear my

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 2>fingerprints on the car. Second, if Robert Greens took the leave,

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 2>why would you ever call me five days light skinned

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and twenty pounds? Why would you ever change

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 2>it to five teens one hundred and sixty pounds? In

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 2>that preliminary hearing when the judge allowed me to leave

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 2>the court room, they brought Robert Breen in and they said,

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 2>could you please describe to killer? This guy switched it

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 2>up to six to two hundred and twenty pounds. This

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 2>guy's not to be believed. He was addicted to cracking.

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Heroon said he had been up for two days off cracking. Araon,

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 2>I had bitnessie seven time failings. Third, you have to

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 2>call a smith another prosecutions with us. I didn't see him.

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't know who that is.

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, I mean our standard in this country is

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be reasonable doubt and this goes way beyond

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that standard.

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 2>I had hope that you know, I would be exaggerated.

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>And did you have proper representation?

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 2>Now, I went to a trial with a pub defender

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 2>and I went speedy trial. I was arrested in May,

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 2>I was convicted and all of this, And the reason

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 2>I went speedy truck because I felt like I had

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 2>nothing to hide. I didn't do it, So why would

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 2>I wait? Where I see in my counting people weigh

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 2>four or five years to fight the case because they're

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 2>trying to wait for the better deal. The first day

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 2>a trial, I remember the judge saying something like, hey,

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 2>I know the DA is going to give you a deal.

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 2>She looked to your left, get a deal because I

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 2>know that he's going to give you one. And I

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 2>just remember shaking my head, no, no, no, because why

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 2>would I take time for something if I didn't do it.

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 2>They know I'm not seen, so they want to know

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 2>if what we call in the urban community, if I'm

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 2>going to snitch, I know a lot of seas. That's

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 2>that's the one for two. It's not my job to

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 2>do the police a job for them, you know, So

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 2>if I wasn't there, what do you expect me to

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 2>do or maybe it could have been this guy. Maybe

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 2>it could be this guy. If I do that, I'm

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 2>worse than Robert Green because you were not there and

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 2>they know that and they feed off that.

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, jailhouse snitches has just sort of become like standard

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>operating procedure.

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Correct. It's a nightmare. It's a living nightmare. But that

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 2>was that was the summer of the.

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Tru Yeah, that is a nightmare scenario. So the jury

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>goes out when they came back in what was that

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 1>moment like when they actually found you guilty of a

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 1>crime you didn't commit.

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 2>When they came back with it. It was weird because

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 2>the whole trial, I had twenty to thirty people every

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 2>single day of my trial, friends from the neighborhood, family, girlfriend, associates.

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 2>But on that day, nobody was in the courtroom, not

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 2>even the victim's family, nobody from my family. That was

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 2>just like a sense of loneliness, a sense of like

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 2>me against the world, because you're sitting here, convicted me

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 2>for a crime that I didn't commit, and I know

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:34.639
<v Speaker 2>that you know I didn't commit this crime. And I

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 2>couldn't even look back to the look in the eyes

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 2>of my mother my father and my grandmother, and I

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 2>felt like that was already said for I'm like, why

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:45.439
<v Speaker 2>wasn't even the victims family like where? It was just

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 2>a feeling that I never want to feel again.

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>This episode is underwritten by AIG, a leading global insurance company.

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 1>AIG is committed to corporate social responsibility and is making

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a positive difference in the lives of its employees and

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 1>in the communities where we work and live. In light

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 1>of the compelling need for pro bono legal assistance and

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 1>in recognition of AIG's commitment to criminal and social justice reform,

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 1>the AIG pro Bono Program provides free legal services and

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>other support to underrepresented communities and individuals. Marvin, take it

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 1>back to how you first met Pierre or how you

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 1>first became aware of his case, and why you chose

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to get involved in this case. You must get hit

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 1>with cases all the time.

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 3>I actually came to represent Pierre after a different attorney,

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:46.359
<v Speaker 3>Stephen Bedrick, who was handling his direct appeal in state court,

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 3>also filed the habeas corpus petition in the California State

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 3>Court of Appeal.

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 1>What is the literal interpretation of habeas corpus.

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 3>Habeas corpus means to produce the body in Latin, and

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 3>what that means is that it's an allegation by us

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:06.640
<v Speaker 3>that Pierre is being unlawfully incarcerated. And once I dug

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:09.440
<v Speaker 3>into the case and reviewed the evidence in Pierre's case

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:12.640
<v Speaker 3>and did some investigation of my own, that very much

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 3>turned out to be true.

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 1>What went wrong here?

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:18.159
<v Speaker 3>I think a number of things went wrong, but most critically,

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 3>there was evidence which could have exonerated Pierre which was

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:26.639
<v Speaker 3>not introduced. The only witness in the case, Robert Green,

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 3>testified that Pierre was supposedly the person who committed this crime.

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 3>That is the only evidence in the case. And in

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:38.120
<v Speaker 3>the trial against Pierre, that witness testified that the person

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 3>who committed this crime was talking on his cell phone

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 3>a mirror minutes before shooting the victim. In this case,

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 3>Pierre's phone records were available and that was part of

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 3>the habeas petition and got him a hearing subsequently, and

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 3>those phone records established conclusively that Pierre was not talking

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:02.719
<v Speaker 3>on his cell pH at the time when the perpetrator was.

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 3>And if those records were introduced, I think that it

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 3>would be a pretty compelling piece of evidence to establish

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:13.959
<v Speaker 3>that in fact, Pierre is not the person responsible for

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:16.920
<v Speaker 3>this murder, But they weren't introduced, The jury never heard

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 3>of them.

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:20.439
<v Speaker 1>What about the fingerprint stuff? How did they manage to

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 1>get around that? That seems like that could have been

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:26.920
<v Speaker 1>enough on its own. How did he not leave his fingerprints?

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Is he a ghost? Well?

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 3>The fingerprint evidence was introduced by way of a stipulation

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 3>or the evidence technician who actually gathered the latent fingerprints

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 3>from the car that was used in the homicide. That

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 3>witness did not testify. Rather, Pierre's trial attorney chose to

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 3>have that evidence admitted by way of an agreement with

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 3>the prosecutor simply the conclusion that Pierre's fingerprints were not

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:54.360
<v Speaker 3>in fact recovered from that car, and had that witness

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 3>been called, it would have led to another important piece

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 3>which was not introduced and known to the jury. That

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 3>evidence technician also collected DNA from that car, swabbed all

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:11.440
<v Speaker 3>of the areas of that car where the killer sat

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:16.199
<v Speaker 3>just before the murder occurred. In addition, there was a

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 3>cigarette but that was recovered from the floorboard of that car,

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:26.879
<v Speaker 3>which was also swabbed for DNA. That DNA evidence was

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 3>not tested in time for Pierre's trial, and that was

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 3>also the subject of his subsequent Avias petition. So what

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 3>happened was after we obtained an evidentiary hearing in state

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 3>court to attempt to prove Pierre's innocence. As I started

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 3>reviewing the case materials, I realized that this DNA evidence

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 3>existed which would completely exonerate him, and no one had

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 3>tested it. So there's a procedure under California law that

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 3>allows the convicted individual to ask the court to now

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 3>have that evidence tested because it would prove that he's innocent.

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 3>The government opposed our efforts to have that evidence tested,

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 3>and ultimately the judge in this case refused to allow

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 3>us to test that evidence. I then appealed that refusal,

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 3>and the Court of Appeal refused to allow us to

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 3>test that evidence. Why is it that they wouldn't want

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 3>to have the DNA evidence in the case tested if

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 3>they're so confident that, in fact, he's the perpetrator.

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I never can understand in any case, especially in a

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:34.120
<v Speaker 1>case as serious as this one, a murder case, why

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:39.119
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't want to have every stone turned over and

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 1>have every piece of evidence tested so that they can

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:44.400
<v Speaker 1>find out not only that in this case, Pierre didn't

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>do it, but they can find out who actually did. Marvin,

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Yolanda Washington, and Patrick Smith are pivotal players in this

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:56.439
<v Speaker 1>whole wrongful conviction. Can you explain their role in what

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:58.639
<v Speaker 1>went wrong here? Sure?

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 3>Of course, Pat Smith was a charged co defendant in

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 3>the case at the time of Pierre's trial, so he

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 3>did not testify at the trial. He had his fifth

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:11.199
<v Speaker 3>Amendment right. But after Pierre's trial was long over and

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 3>after Patrick Smith resolved his part of the case for

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 3>accessory after the fact, he then signed an affidavid which

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:22.959
<v Speaker 3>helped Pierre get an evidentiary hearing. He indicated both in

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 3>his affidavit as well as in his testimony at the

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 3>evidentiary hearing that his drug dealer is a man who

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 3>goes by the name of c and that individual was

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:37.639
<v Speaker 3>not Pierre Rushing. Pat Smith at the hearing refused to

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 3>name that individual because he was afraid for his life.

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:44.919
<v Speaker 3>But one of the people who was in that apartment

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:48.119
<v Speaker 3>was a woman by the name of Yolanda Washington, and

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 3>she also did not testify a trial, but after Pierre

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 3>was convicted, she signed an affidavid under penalty of perjury,

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 3>indicating that she, of course, having been in that apartment,

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:03.199
<v Speaker 3>knew who C was. She obviously knew who Andre Morris was.

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 3>And what she said in her affid David was that

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 3>Pierre Rushing is not the drug dealer who shot and

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:15.200
<v Speaker 3>killed mister Taylor. Pierre Rushing is not C. But that's

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 3>not all. Indeed, Yolanda Washington went so far as to

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:23.679
<v Speaker 3>identify who that person was. Now, before we get into this,

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 3>let me make one thing clear, which is that Pierre

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 3>does not know the identity of the perpetrator of this homicide.

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 3>Yolanda Washington, in her affid David did name that individual

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 3>who goes by the nickname C. In fact, his first

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 3>name is his name is and of course it would

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:47.160
<v Speaker 3>make perfect sense that he would go by the nickname

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:51.439
<v Speaker 3>C because his name is Pierre Rushing, does not have

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 3>a sea in his name, and she has never been

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 3>Pierre's nickname. Because Pierre is not the person responsible for

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 3>this killing. That affidavit was part of what enabled Pierre

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 3>to get a hearing in superior court. Unfortunately, Miss Washington

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 3>was a homeless individual at that time, and my investigator

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 3>was essentially unable to locate her to get her to

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:20.120
<v Speaker 3>testify in court. So I filed a motion essentially asking

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 3>that her affidavit be considered because she was unavailable, and

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:26.160
<v Speaker 3>that request was denied.

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Wow, it's pretty courageous, even after the fact that these

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:37.159
<v Speaker 1>two people both were willing to put their own lives

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:41.200
<v Speaker 1>at risk to identify someone who they know is a killer.

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:45.679
<v Speaker 1>And I think that speaks volumes to the veracity of

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:48.160
<v Speaker 1>their statements.

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 2>For me, And I don't mean to say it like

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 2>it's because of the social climate that we have one

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:57.960
<v Speaker 2>on the United station right now. But growing up, I've

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:01.359
<v Speaker 2>always thoughts us because I grew up in an agent

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:04.360
<v Speaker 2>of police. But I just watch how they need those

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:08.159
<v Speaker 2>that look likely here at these we're talking about a

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 2>guy give a description on April thirty of a red hat,

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 2>and you see me on the DR say, well, hey,

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 2>that's a guy wearing a red hat. Let me stop him.

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:19.639
<v Speaker 2>And now my whole life is spending in a spider

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 2>with not a thread of physical evidence links me to

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 2>this crime. And if it could happen to me, it

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:27.360
<v Speaker 2>can't happen to anybody.

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I'm glad you brought that up. I mean,

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:33.360
<v Speaker 1>we you know, every day there's more information coming out,

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:35.399
<v Speaker 1>and I'm grateful that the public is starting to have

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 1>really heightened awareness to the fact that black people, it's

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>just put it right out there, are so much more

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:46.399
<v Speaker 1>likely to be victimized by not just police brutality, but

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 1>by wrongful convictions, by wrongful prosecutions, being forced into taking

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:54.440
<v Speaker 1>plea bargains to things they didn't do. The whole system

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 1>is stacked. Wrongful convictions, though, do happen to people from

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 1>all races all that. Now, these all different creeds, all

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>different religions. I mean, we've had people on the show

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 1>from every walk of life.

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you can take the case of Mayan Ferguson

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 2>in a two thousand and one Columbus, Missouri killing. He

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:14.879
<v Speaker 2>was wrongfully convicted and he's a white man, you know

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 2>what I mean. Like, wrathful convictions don't have a skin color.

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's usually what I'm going through. I witness misidentifications,

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 2>i'm valid, forensic science, false confiicients, you know, police or

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 2>prosecutor misconduct. This is a slew of things on why

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:31.639
<v Speaker 2>wrathful convictions happened.

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Then there's just laziness too. It's like, oh, we got

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:35.440
<v Speaker 1>a guy with a red hat good enough, you know

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:38.159
<v Speaker 1>what I mean? Yeah, yeah, But the idea that the

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 1>justice system at every level, now we see it on

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>video of how the system treats people like yourself, like

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 1>George Floyd, like so many others, as expendable, disposable, and

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:53.200
<v Speaker 1>yet I mean, there are very very real consequences. That's

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 1>why we're on the phone with you from prison now,

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 1>or you and I might be working together on a

0:27:57.160 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 1>record instead of.

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:12.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm innocent. If you have any doubt in my innocence,

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:15.680
<v Speaker 2>I would actually just think on these key points, what

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 2>guilty person would push for DNA testing of the materials

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:23.640
<v Speaker 2>that were sought out the vehicle if I wasn't innocent,

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 2>What guilty man would push for the enhancement of the

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:30.680
<v Speaker 2>video if I wasn't innocent, Or man, I'm gonna push

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 2>for the phone records. I'm minister, I didn't commit this crime.

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 2>I have nothing to do with this.

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Crime, Pierre. Last time we spoke Dawan Taylor's actual murderer,

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the guy known as Sea now his co conspirator Andre Marris,

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 1>as well as an accessory after the fact, Patrick Smith,

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 1>they had both come forward to definitively state that you

0:28:57.080 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 1>had absolutely nothing to do with the ones murder and

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 1>are not in fact C, that's not you. You and

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 1>C are different people, but for their own safety understandably

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 1>they would not name C. However, a woman named Yolanda Washington,

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>who was prepared to do just that, she couldn't be

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>located for your evidentiary hearing. And then Smith and Morris

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 1>were just explained away. And additionally, your request for DNA

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>testing against items from the car was denied. And you're right,

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 1>why would a guilty person, what guilty person would be

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 1>seeking DNA testing on items that might contain their own DNA?

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:36.239
<v Speaker 1>What do you want to cebmit your own guilt if

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you were doing that, if you actually had a guilty conscience,

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Or why would they try to enhance crime scene video

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 1>if they knew it was going to point to their guilt.

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 1>All of this in addition to how flimsy the state's

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 1>evidence was to begin with the sole witness I'm talking

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 1>about Robert Green, of course, the sole witness who cooperated

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>with police to avoid being charged as well, whose description

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of C changed three count up three times, and one

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of those times Green said that she had worn a

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 1>red hat. Again, Robert Green, Newcy knew just how dangerous

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 1>he really was, yet he felt quite comfortable identifying you, Pierre,

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>after you were picked up while wearing a red hat.

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 6>Keep in mind they stopped me two days after that

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 6>description was given, so I guess this quote unquote killer

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 6>was supposed to have been wearing the same clothes and

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 6>hat for two days straight. I mean, like it was

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 6>bananas from the beginning. I've never fitted description of being

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 6>five to eight light skinned. I've never rocked the ball.

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 6>It haven't been one hundred and twenty pounds since I

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 6>was ten years old.

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it just has been bananas from the game.

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 6>Nobody can convince me that he thought I was ever

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 6>the guy in the car.

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>With him, because you weren't. What you were was you

0:30:50.240 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 1>were with Lauren that night at your grandmother's house, and

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 1>her testimony was corroborated by the absence of your fingerprints

0:30:57.480 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 1>in the vehicle. Since your episode aired in your case

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:04.240
<v Speaker 1>was picked up from Marvin lou pro bono, by the way,

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 1>by one of the biggest and baddest law firms in

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the country, Greenberg Trauick, and one of their star attorneys,

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Gratzinger, has been hard at work. I mean that's

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 1>an understatement.

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, he's a beast. We have a great investigator by

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 6>the name of Grant Fine overturning all the stones in

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 6>the case, getting half a Davis that wasn't gotten before,

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 6>talking to witnesses that hadn't spoken before, and tracked Robert

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:32.480
<v Speaker 6>Green down. I was sitting here on my bunk and

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 6>Jordan Grassinger he sent me a message and he just

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 6>was saying Robert green every candidate and I had to

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 6>look at the message twice take.

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 4>It all in, and I was like, damn, Like I

0:31:41.480 --> 0:31:41.960
<v Speaker 4>thought it was.

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 6>Like some kind of like April Fool's joke or something,

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 6>and I just immediately dropped his tears. So from what

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 6>I've been told, it was just like you know, weighing

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 6>on his soul. He finally did the right thing, would

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 6>just tell the truth. I mean, I've gotten with anybody

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 6>in my position of fighting Roun Forkovision as asked for

0:31:57.520 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 6>the one and only witness has fully recanted.

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 1>So I'm both well, very happy for you, but also

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 1>i gotta admit I'm confused. Why am I? Why are

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:10.280
<v Speaker 1>we talking to you over a prison phone. It seems

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 1>like that should have been it should have resolved the case,

0:32:12.960 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 1>you should have walked out the door. And now there's

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 1>actually literally zero evidence against you. So where does that

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 1>leave your case.

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 6>We're in court and we're trying to get this case dismissed.

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 6>Speaking with a progressive da by the name of Pamela Price,

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 6>and she has eyes on it. I don't have the

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 6>declaration in front of me, but Robert Green says he

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 6>knew the whole time that it wasn't me, and it

0:32:37.560 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 6>just gave validation and what I've been saying the whole

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:42.520
<v Speaker 6>time that I didn't commit this crime and there was

0:32:42.840 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 6>no way that I would have or could have committed

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 6>this crime. As well as one of the guys that

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:51.880
<v Speaker 6>were actually convicted after me, Andre Morris, he did a

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 6>written declaration and said that he was a participant in

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 6>the killing and that I wasn't with him.

0:32:57.880 --> 0:33:00.240
<v Speaker 4>That was that. So we're just waiting in praying for

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 4>good news very soon.

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's hope that Pamela Price doesn't just put on

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the progressive sort of bona fides at election time, right,

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 1>but that she takes this case as what it is,

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 1>which is an example of why we need prosecutors with

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the brains and the heart that we know she possesses.

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, it shouldn't take a reform minded

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 1>prosecutor when we're dealing with actual innocence. Every prosecutor should

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 1>want to get the innocent guy out and go after

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the person that actually did it. And this is a

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 1>guy whose name we know and we know they know,

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 1>So what is the hold up?

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 4>I believe Pamela Price is under a lot of scrutiny.

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 6>She's cleaning up Alameda County, and she's being took to

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 6>town by some as being too soft on crime. And

0:33:51.320 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 6>really there's all type of guys walking around here in

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:57.719
<v Speaker 6>three strikes and weed and all type of just craziness.

0:33:57.720 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 6>She's by the book, and by her being by the

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 6>books making her seem as if she's soft on krime

0:34:03.080 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 6>if you don't have enough evidence to convict beyond a

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:10.200
<v Speaker 6>reasonable doubt, she's not taking it into some that seems

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 6>if she's soft on krin In my instance, as far

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 6>as my habeas petition, I haven't heard from him uch

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:18.439
<v Speaker 6>Price and Jordan hasn't either.

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 4>She's aware of the situation.

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:22.840
<v Speaker 6>She's aware of the Joe Rogan podcast, She's aware of

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 6>the Wrong for Provision podcast. She's aware of the Breakfast

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:28.880
<v Speaker 6>Club interview, and she still hasn't responded to Jordan Grassinger,

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 6>and she's supposed to file some kind of rebuttal to

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 6>my release. I'm not sure where we're at. We're close

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 6>to justice, but I still feel like they're trying to

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 6>hold on to something that they know is wrong, because

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:42.319
<v Speaker 6>why are they not talking to us? Why are they

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 6>following the rebubdle? What are you rebudding? You have every

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 6>single person that was in the vehicle except to kill

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 6>her yourself, that has done sworn declarations and given testimony

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 6>that I did not comment the crime. Everybody has said

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:59.760
<v Speaker 6>wrong guy. There is no physical or tangible or corrob

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:02.800
<v Speaker 6>rating evidence that goes with this case.

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:03.840
<v Speaker 4>What are you rebudding?

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't get it either. I mean, are they going

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to say we don't find Robert Green's recantation credible? And

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:13.839
<v Speaker 1>if so, was he then credible before when he was

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 1>facing accessory after the fact doing all kinds of drugs.

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:21.480
<v Speaker 1>And don't forget he changed the description of c three times,

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a guy who he knew to be capable of murder,

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:28.359
<v Speaker 1>yet he was brave enough to identify you, a man

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:31.320
<v Speaker 1>who did not fit any one of his multiple descriptions.

0:35:31.560 --> 0:35:33.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's hard not to think that maybe he

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 1>thought that you were the type of guy who wouldn't

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:37.920
<v Speaker 1>come after him, which leads us to believe that you

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:40.319
<v Speaker 1>were not a dangerous guy in the first place, never were,

0:35:40.520 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and never will be. I mean, this conviction happened well

0:35:44.080 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 1>over a decade before Pam Price was elected. She could

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:49.960
<v Speaker 1>fix this. It wouldn't reflect badly on her or her office,

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:53.480
<v Speaker 1>because after all, it was one of her predecessors that

0:35:53.600 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 1>made these mistakes.

0:35:54.880 --> 0:35:57.200
<v Speaker 6>It was a lady but the name of Nancy O'Malley,

0:35:57.400 --> 0:35:59.799
<v Speaker 6>So I understand she has a lot to go on.

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:03.960
<v Speaker 6>It's like Jordan says, there is no case in Alameda

0:36:04.080 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 6>County that is as compelling in an innocence claim as mine.

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:11.040
<v Speaker 1>So is there anything our audience can do to help?

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Is there a petition to sign? At a very minimum, I.

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:16.799
<v Speaker 6>Think we're past signing a petition. I believe that we

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 6>have to do as Heep Newton said. We have to agitate,

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 6>we have to call, we have to email, we have

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:26.440
<v Speaker 6>to show up unannounced to the DA's office. Some might

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 6>say that's hurtful. Sitting in jail for twelve years with

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:32.640
<v Speaker 6>a fifty to life sentence is hurtful. Dwan Taylor's family

0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:36.439
<v Speaker 6>deserves justice like this is not justice, So I would

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:40.000
<v Speaker 6>ask that they call Family Prices office and ask for

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:41.400
<v Speaker 6>justice for Pierre Russian.

0:36:41.560 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, this is all hands on deck, people. We

0:36:44.239 --> 0:36:47.280
<v Speaker 1>can we can do this. We put out the original

0:36:47.320 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 1>coverage three and a half bucking years ago. All right,

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:54.400
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna post her office's number, her email, her

0:36:54.440 --> 0:36:57.960
<v Speaker 1>snail mail address, all of it in the bio, and remember,

0:36:58.000 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 1>be respectful when you call. Doesn't help anyone in or

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 1>does she deserve Everyone deserves to be treated with respect

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 1>in that office. Whoever answers the phone, So please keep

0:37:06.600 --> 0:37:10.839
<v Speaker 1>that in mind, but do call, write, email, whatever. And

0:37:10.920 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 1>with that we're going to move on to closing arguments,

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 1>where I think you Pierre for calling in once again.

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:20.240
<v Speaker 1>You know you're in our thoughts here at rofuel conviction

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:23.000
<v Speaker 1>more often than you know. And now I'm just gonna

0:37:23.000 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>sit back and listen to anything else you want to say.

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:28.760
<v Speaker 4>I would just like to speak directly to her. Yeah,

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:30.320
<v Speaker 4>go for it, Pamela Price.

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 6>Robert Green get his declaration in February when he lied

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:37.040
<v Speaker 6>on me, they inastially put a warrant out the same day.

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 6>That's tooking longer to exonerate me than it took to

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:40.719
<v Speaker 6>convict me.

0:37:41.480 --> 0:37:42.920
<v Speaker 4>There's no evidence in this case.

0:37:43.400 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 6>Rely on your common sense, Rely on your your expertise

0:37:46.560 --> 0:37:49.880
<v Speaker 6>and the Civil Rights Arena. Rely on your intelligence. I

0:37:49.880 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 6>didn't commit this crime. You know I didn't commit this crime.

0:37:52.880 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 6>Every milli second that passes by is an injustice. I

0:37:56.560 --> 0:37:58.760
<v Speaker 6>could be your son, I could be your little brother.

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:02.760
<v Speaker 6>I could be your I do not deserve to continue

0:38:02.800 --> 0:38:07.719
<v Speaker 6>to sit here while you and your office place politics.

0:38:08.120 --> 0:38:10.520
<v Speaker 6>I have a family to get to. My little sister

0:38:10.560 --> 0:38:13.000
<v Speaker 6>was murdered in twenty eighteen. My niece has no mother,

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:16.560
<v Speaker 6>she has no father. She needs My family needs me.

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:20.440
<v Speaker 6>My mother needs me, my father needs me. The community

0:38:20.520 --> 0:38:23.719
<v Speaker 6>needs me. I have a story. I can stop a

0:38:23.760 --> 0:38:27.280
<v Speaker 6>lot with my story. I'm asking you to please step

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:29.799
<v Speaker 6>up and do the right thing. Give Jordan Grassen your

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:32.160
<v Speaker 6>a call, and please do the right thing.

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for listening to Wrongful Conviction. You can listen

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:44.399
<v Speaker 1>to this and all the Lava for Good podcasts one

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:47.360
<v Speaker 1>week early by subscribing to Lava for Good Plus on

0:38:47.520 --> 0:38:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts. I want to thank our production team, Cutter

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Hall and Kathleen Fake, as well as my fellow executive

0:38:53.719 --> 0:38:57.440
<v Speaker 1>producers Jeff Kepler, Kevin Warnis, and Jeff Cliber. The music

0:38:57.440 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 1>in this production was supplied by three time OSCAR nominated

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 1>composer Jay Ralph. Be sure to follow us across all

0:39:03.120 --> 0:39:06.760
<v Speaker 1>social media platforms at Lava for Good and at Wrongful Conviction.

0:39:07.160 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also follow me on Instagram at it's Jason Vlaum.

0:39:10.400 --> 0:39:13.319
<v Speaker 1>Wrongful Conviction is the production of Lava for Good podcasts

0:39:13.360 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 1>in association with Signal Company Number one