WEBVTT - The History of the White Power Movement (Rebroadcast) 

0:00:15.396 --> 0:00:24.436
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin from Pushkin Industries. This is Deep Background, the show

0:00:24.436 --> 0:00:27.596
<v Speaker 1>where we explored the stories behind the stories in the news.

0:00:28.076 --> 0:00:31.396
<v Speaker 1>I'm Noah Feldman. We're going to have a new episode

0:00:31.396 --> 0:00:34.836
<v Speaker 1>in your feed on Wednesday, but before then, I wanted

0:00:34.876 --> 0:00:38.276
<v Speaker 1>to share this episode with you from our archives. I

0:00:38.316 --> 0:00:40.836
<v Speaker 1>couldn't stop thinking about it in the light of the

0:00:40.916 --> 0:00:45.076
<v Speaker 1>insurrection at the Capitol. It's a conversation I had with

0:00:45.196 --> 0:00:48.996
<v Speaker 1>Kathleen Bellou, a historian at the University of Chicago. Her

0:00:49.036 --> 0:00:52.316
<v Speaker 1>book Bring the War Home, The White Power Movement and

0:00:52.396 --> 0:00:56.916
<v Speaker 1>Paramilitary America is the definitive look at the modern history

0:00:57.196 --> 0:01:00.436
<v Speaker 1>of the white power movement. I spoke to Kathleen in

0:01:00.476 --> 0:01:03.516
<v Speaker 1>May of twenty nineteen, just after a shooting at a

0:01:03.556 --> 0:01:06.916
<v Speaker 1>synagogue outside San Diego in which one person was killed

0:01:07.116 --> 0:01:10.356
<v Speaker 1>and three were injured. She held me then see how

0:01:10.356 --> 0:01:12.876
<v Speaker 1>that shooting was not just an isolated action by a

0:01:12.876 --> 0:01:16.556
<v Speaker 1>white supremacist, but part of a broader social movement, and

0:01:16.636 --> 0:01:21.676
<v Speaker 1>she predicted that there would be more attacks. Unfortunately, Kathleen

0:01:22.076 --> 0:01:25.356
<v Speaker 1>was right. I've been thinking about our conversation because it

0:01:25.476 --> 0:01:29.556
<v Speaker 1>helped me put what happened at the Capitol into historical context.

0:01:30.316 --> 0:01:33.676
<v Speaker 1>It's no surprise that Kathleen has been widely interviewed and

0:01:33.796 --> 0:01:36.996
<v Speaker 1>quoted in the last week. I hope listening to her

0:01:37.076 --> 0:01:40.676
<v Speaker 1>now helps you contextualize the same way it has done

0:01:40.876 --> 0:01:52.396
<v Speaker 1>for me. Kathleen, welcome to Deep Background. Before we dive

0:01:52.596 --> 0:01:56.796
<v Speaker 1>into the history and prehistory of white power and white supremacy,

0:01:56.876 --> 0:01:59.156
<v Speaker 1>can I ask you just a personal question, how did

0:01:59.196 --> 0:02:01.516
<v Speaker 1>she get interested in this topic? It is not the

0:02:01.596 --> 0:02:05.196
<v Speaker 1>most obvious topic for historian to work on. It isn't

0:02:05.196 --> 0:02:08.596
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, when I began the dissertation, I was

0:02:08.636 --> 0:02:10.996
<v Speaker 1>told by more than one person that it technically could

0:02:10.996 --> 0:02:13.916
<v Speaker 1>not count as history, because the usual rule of thumb

0:02:13.916 --> 0:02:15.716
<v Speaker 1>when you're starting a dissertation is that you should be

0:02:15.756 --> 0:02:19.036
<v Speaker 1>studying things twenty five years ago or further is the rule.

0:02:19.756 --> 0:02:21.196
<v Speaker 1>It turns out that it took me so long to

0:02:21.196 --> 0:02:23.236
<v Speaker 1>finish the book that I had cleared that mark by

0:02:23.276 --> 0:02:26.636
<v Speaker 1>the time it was all said and done. But I

0:02:26.676 --> 0:02:30.556
<v Speaker 1>actually think that the study of the recent past has become,

0:02:30.596 --> 0:02:32.956
<v Speaker 1>as you can see with this project, urgently important to

0:02:33.076 --> 0:02:37.676
<v Speaker 1>understanding our political moment and the debates and challenges that

0:02:37.716 --> 0:02:40.396
<v Speaker 1>we now find ourselves embroiled in. I wanted to start

0:02:40.396 --> 0:02:44.516
<v Speaker 1>by asking about the category of white power or white supremacy,

0:02:45.116 --> 0:02:48.076
<v Speaker 1>certainly in a country like the United States, which had

0:02:48.116 --> 0:02:50.716
<v Speaker 1>slavery from the very beginning of the country, and of

0:02:50.716 --> 0:02:53.236
<v Speaker 1>course there was slavery long before there was a United States.

0:02:53.716 --> 0:02:59.196
<v Speaker 1>In North America. The idea that white people are superior

0:02:59.236 --> 0:03:02.196
<v Speaker 1>to the black people, that people of African descent, is

0:03:02.636 --> 0:03:05.996
<v Speaker 1>almost baked in to the earliest history of the country

0:03:05.996 --> 0:03:09.636
<v Speaker 1>and the prehistory of the country. And I wonder, how

0:03:09.636 --> 0:03:11.556
<v Speaker 1>do you know where to start? You know, when you

0:03:11.596 --> 0:03:14.716
<v Speaker 1>talk about white power or white supremacy. You know, how

0:03:14.716 --> 0:03:16.036
<v Speaker 1>do you know that you don't have to start all

0:03:16.036 --> 0:03:17.916
<v Speaker 1>the way back in the sixteen hundreds when the first

0:03:17.956 --> 0:03:21.116
<v Speaker 1>African slaves were brought to the Americas, or in seventeen

0:03:21.116 --> 0:03:24.516
<v Speaker 1>eighty seven with the US Constitution, which enshrines slavery in

0:03:24.556 --> 0:03:29.236
<v Speaker 1>certain respects. The what's you are working starting place when

0:03:29.236 --> 0:03:32.516
<v Speaker 1>you start thinking about white power. So when I teach

0:03:32.556 --> 0:03:34.916
<v Speaker 1>this to my undergraduates, we do start with those long

0:03:35.076 --> 0:03:39.676
<v Speaker 1>histories of racial inequality, the ways that white supremacy is

0:03:39.716 --> 0:03:42.836
<v Speaker 1>not only a matter of ideological belief for some people

0:03:42.836 --> 0:03:45.996
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, but has become imbricated in our

0:03:45.996 --> 0:03:49.276
<v Speaker 1>systems of government, our distribution of resources, are policing and

0:03:49.396 --> 0:03:52.276
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of other ways. It's everywhere. Race is everywhere

0:03:52.276 --> 0:03:55.316
<v Speaker 1>in this country. Race is everywhere. I think reasonable people

0:03:55.356 --> 0:04:00.316
<v Speaker 1>can agree on that. I think that the definitions part

0:04:00.836 --> 0:04:05.756
<v Speaker 1>is critically important, especially now. So what white power refers

0:04:05.796 --> 0:04:09.636
<v Speaker 1>to is a movement that comes out of the Nam War,

0:04:10.116 --> 0:04:14.156
<v Speaker 1>brings together a bunch of ideologically diverse activists who had

0:04:14.196 --> 0:04:18.196
<v Speaker 1>not been working together before, such as clansmen, Neo Nazis, skinheads,

0:04:18.276 --> 0:04:22.796
<v Speaker 1>radical tax resistors, white separatists, and others, and kind of

0:04:22.796 --> 0:04:26.236
<v Speaker 1>amalgamates them into one social movement, using the narrative of

0:04:26.236 --> 0:04:29.236
<v Speaker 1>the war to bind them together, and then declares war

0:04:29.396 --> 0:04:33.436
<v Speaker 1>on the federal government. So that begins in nineteen eighty three.

0:04:34.556 --> 0:04:39.516
<v Speaker 1>Before that, I would characterize things like the mini iterations

0:04:39.516 --> 0:04:43.676
<v Speaker 1>of the KKK, the Neo Nazi Party in the United States.

0:04:43.996 --> 0:04:48.036
<v Speaker 1>Those things are more like vigilante violence, in that the

0:04:48.196 --> 0:04:53.196
<v Speaker 1>violence is either supporting the state or supporting local status

0:04:53.276 --> 0:04:56.836
<v Speaker 1>quo power. Post nineteen eighty three, we're dealing with a

0:04:56.836 --> 0:05:00.796
<v Speaker 1>completely different thing. After that, it is a revolutionary movement

0:05:00.836 --> 0:05:03.556
<v Speaker 1>that is attempting to overthrow the United States, either through

0:05:04.396 --> 0:05:07.796
<v Speaker 1>a kind of long asymmetrical war of sabotage or through

0:05:07.876 --> 0:05:13.436
<v Speaker 1>a direct revolution. So that's the white power movement. The

0:05:13.796 --> 0:05:17.956
<v Speaker 1>tricky one for a lot of people is white nationalism.

0:05:17.996 --> 0:05:20.436
<v Speaker 1>And actually, I think it's easier to understand right now

0:05:20.476 --> 0:05:23.276
<v Speaker 1>because all of these stories in the news about Hindu

0:05:23.396 --> 0:05:27.916
<v Speaker 1>nationalism make this distinction really, really clear. So Hindu nationalism,

0:05:27.956 --> 0:05:31.076
<v Speaker 1>for listeners who meant to be familiar, is a movement

0:05:31.116 --> 0:05:35.316
<v Speaker 1>in India in which people who are a Hindu nationalists

0:05:35.316 --> 0:05:39.956
<v Speaker 1>and they call themselves that are organizing to make India

0:05:40.556 --> 0:05:44.956
<v Speaker 1>more oriented around Hinduism in culture and in policy. Right,

0:05:45.076 --> 0:05:47.636
<v Speaker 1>so they're trying to inject the nation of India with

0:05:47.836 --> 0:05:52.716
<v Speaker 1>Hinduism more than an Ardias. It's complicated in India by

0:05:52.756 --> 0:05:56.316
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the name for India in the language

0:05:56.276 --> 0:06:00.516
<v Speaker 1>and Hindi is Hindustan. So you know, the word itself,

0:06:00.596 --> 0:06:03.716
<v Speaker 1>Hindu doesn't only mean the religion. It also means a culture,

0:06:03.756 --> 0:06:06.556
<v Speaker 1>also means a civilization. It's a tricky one, indeed. But

0:06:06.596 --> 0:06:11.556
<v Speaker 1>the category is India white nationalism. The category is not

0:06:11.636 --> 0:06:15.556
<v Speaker 1>the United States. The nation imagined by white nationalism after

0:06:15.716 --> 0:06:19.756
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty three is fundamentally opposed to the United States

0:06:19.756 --> 0:06:22.116
<v Speaker 1>and also to New Zealand and Australia and other nations

0:06:22.116 --> 0:06:25.956
<v Speaker 1>where this takes hold. White nationalism is attempting to create

0:06:26.036 --> 0:06:30.756
<v Speaker 1>a transnational group of white people that will take over

0:06:30.796 --> 0:06:33.996
<v Speaker 1>white homelands, and eventually many of them hope to wage

0:06:34.036 --> 0:06:37.116
<v Speaker 1>war such that they can achieve an all white world.

0:06:37.636 --> 0:06:41.356
<v Speaker 1>That's not the same thing as say the Clan in

0:06:41.396 --> 0:06:44.716
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen twenties, where people were marching on the National

0:06:44.756 --> 0:06:48.196
<v Speaker 1>Mall with their robes and hoods but their faces uncovered, which,

0:06:48.316 --> 0:06:52.716
<v Speaker 1>among other things, anti immigrant. It was both suppressing African Americans,

0:06:52.716 --> 0:06:54.876
<v Speaker 1>but also the Clan in the nineteen it's nineteen twenties

0:06:54.876 --> 0:06:58.916
<v Speaker 1>iteration was very focused on immigrants, especially from Catholic countries.

0:06:59.076 --> 0:07:01.236
<v Speaker 1>The white power movement also is anti immigrant. But the

0:07:01.236 --> 0:07:04.956
<v Speaker 1>thing that's different is that after nineteen eighty three, this

0:07:05.036 --> 0:07:08.476
<v Speaker 1>is an anti government, anti nation movement. It's not an

0:07:08.516 --> 0:07:12.956
<v Speaker 1>over exert of patriotism. It's not just too much nationalism.

0:07:12.996 --> 0:07:17.036
<v Speaker 1>You talked about opposition to the United States as opposed

0:07:17.036 --> 0:07:20.556
<v Speaker 1>to vigilante violence. But in its first iteration, when the

0:07:20.636 --> 0:07:23.996
<v Speaker 1>ku Klux Klan came into existence after the Civil War

0:07:24.556 --> 0:07:27.636
<v Speaker 1>in part to resist the attempts at the creation of

0:07:27.716 --> 0:07:30.716
<v Speaker 1>racial equality that we're being imposed in the South by

0:07:30.836 --> 0:07:34.316
<v Speaker 1>military reconstruction, that is, by an occupation of Union troops.

0:07:35.356 --> 0:07:37.876
<v Speaker 1>Wasn't it also in its origins the clan at that

0:07:37.916 --> 0:07:41.356
<v Speaker 1>point in a sense revolutionary. It was opposed to the

0:07:41.356 --> 0:07:44.636
<v Speaker 1>government of the United States, and it was supporting the

0:07:44.716 --> 0:07:49.156
<v Speaker 1>already defeated ideals of the Confederacy. So in some sense,

0:07:49.596 --> 0:07:52.516
<v Speaker 1>wasn't there a revolutionary impulse implicit in the clan from

0:07:52.516 --> 0:07:55.716
<v Speaker 1>the beginning? I think yes, But I think this one

0:07:55.796 --> 0:07:58.156
<v Speaker 1>is highly debatable, and I think it depends on what

0:07:58.236 --> 0:08:01.476
<v Speaker 1>historians would call periodization, meaning when you choose to stop

0:08:01.516 --> 0:08:03.956
<v Speaker 1>that story. So, the first clan was founded in eighteen

0:08:04.036 --> 0:08:09.716
<v Speaker 1>sixty six in Pulaski, Tennessee, by frustrated veterans of the Federacy.

0:08:10.596 --> 0:08:13.836
<v Speaker 1>It very quickly grew, but at the beginning was mostly

0:08:14.676 --> 0:08:19.276
<v Speaker 1>understood as sort of like a burlesque prankster group. And

0:08:19.316 --> 0:08:23.076
<v Speaker 1>then there is this moment when it formalizes and turns violent,

0:08:23.556 --> 0:08:27.916
<v Speaker 1>and that violence is directed at African Americans, school tax collectors,

0:08:28.836 --> 0:08:31.876
<v Speaker 1>school teachers, and people from the North who come in

0:08:31.916 --> 0:08:36.236
<v Speaker 1>to implement reconstruction and people in the South who support reconstruction.

0:08:36.676 --> 0:08:40.716
<v Speaker 1>In other words, it is an attempt either to resist

0:08:41.596 --> 0:08:46.316
<v Speaker 1>the federal government's efforts to reconstruct the South or to

0:08:47.476 --> 0:08:51.396
<v Speaker 1>form a new system of power. So right in there

0:08:51.436 --> 0:08:56.476
<v Speaker 1>is the distinction between revolutionary and something else. Historians have

0:08:56.556 --> 0:09:00.596
<v Speaker 1>sort of argued a lot over this, but I think

0:09:00.636 --> 0:09:03.676
<v Speaker 1>it's important to remember that the Jim Crow regime in

0:09:03.676 --> 0:09:06.956
<v Speaker 1>the South is not sort of just a continuation of slavery,

0:09:07.516 --> 0:09:10.596
<v Speaker 1>but something that has to be built and constructed and

0:09:10.676 --> 0:09:18.436
<v Speaker 1>invented after reconstruction. The clan doesn't disappear when reconstruction ends. Instead,

0:09:18.676 --> 0:09:23.796
<v Speaker 1>it largely just relocates into citizen militias, into groups like

0:09:23.836 --> 0:09:26.996
<v Speaker 1>the Red Shirts and the White Shirts, into rifle clubs,

0:09:27.036 --> 0:09:31.036
<v Speaker 1>and into spectacle lynchings, which are these mass public participation

0:09:31.116 --> 0:09:33.356
<v Speaker 1>events that carry out a lot of the same kind

0:09:33.356 --> 0:09:35.876
<v Speaker 1>of violence that the clan was already doing, but a

0:09:35.916 --> 0:09:37.116
<v Speaker 1>lot of it in public. I mean, one of the

0:09:37.156 --> 0:09:41.236
<v Speaker 1>things that always amazes me about lynching is that there

0:09:41.236 --> 0:09:45.436
<v Speaker 1>are postcards that were spread through the South of people

0:09:45.716 --> 0:09:49.516
<v Speaker 1>white people gathered around a lynched African American with a

0:09:49.516 --> 0:09:52.316
<v Speaker 1>photograph being taken as a kind of commemoration of the event,

0:09:52.396 --> 0:09:54.516
<v Speaker 1>and no one, no one's wearing a mask, no one's

0:09:54.556 --> 0:09:57.356
<v Speaker 1>hiding his face. Not only that, but there are women

0:09:57.356 --> 0:10:00.476
<v Speaker 1>and children in their Sunday best clothes. These events are

0:09:59.676 --> 0:10:03.436
<v Speaker 1>all very often happening on the courthouse or at local

0:10:03.516 --> 0:10:06.316
<v Speaker 1>sites of power. And it's also not just in the South.

0:10:06.396 --> 0:10:10.436
<v Speaker 1>These are happening in Indiana and the Pacific Northwest, in Texas,

0:10:11.156 --> 0:10:14.196
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, for one stretch in South Texas, the

0:10:14.276 --> 0:10:17.196
<v Speaker 1>chance of being lynched as much higher for Mexican Americans

0:10:17.236 --> 0:10:19.516
<v Speaker 1>and Mexicans than it is for African American men in

0:10:19.556 --> 0:10:25.036
<v Speaker 1>the South. It's that move into lynching that makes me

0:10:25.156 --> 0:10:28.156
<v Speaker 1>reluctant to think of it as revolutionary violence, because lynching

0:10:28.156 --> 0:10:32.836
<v Speaker 1>has mostly been understood as scholars as conveying a kind

0:10:32.996 --> 0:10:36.756
<v Speaker 1>of popular sovereignty of the community, in other words, in

0:10:36.796 --> 0:10:39.636
<v Speaker 1>other words, that when you lynch somebody, the whole community

0:10:39.716 --> 0:10:41.476
<v Speaker 1>is getting together to do it. It's a kind of

0:10:41.596 --> 0:10:45.716
<v Speaker 1>perverted version of small d democracy, where we're doing this

0:10:45.956 --> 0:10:49.476
<v Speaker 1>as a collective. Yes, it's a claim to that power.

0:10:49.516 --> 0:10:52.116
<v Speaker 1>It's a taking back of sovereign power from the state.

0:10:52.596 --> 0:10:56.516
<v Speaker 1>Let's turn now to that revolutionary movement which, as you

0:10:56.636 --> 0:11:01.716
<v Speaker 1>described in nineteen eighty three, unites itself to some degree

0:11:01.996 --> 0:11:05.836
<v Speaker 1>and declares war on the United States of America. Tell

0:11:05.916 --> 0:11:07.956
<v Speaker 1>us that story, because I don't think that's very well known.

0:11:08.076 --> 0:11:12.316
<v Speaker 1>The nineteen eighty three turn comes after this big infrastructure

0:11:12.356 --> 0:11:15.796
<v Speaker 1>build up, an organization of a social movement that happens

0:11:16.196 --> 0:11:20.596
<v Speaker 1>in the years proceeding. The clan builds paramilitary training camps

0:11:20.636 --> 0:11:23.956
<v Speaker 1>all around the country, It trains people in paramilitary warfare.

0:11:24.636 --> 0:11:28.036
<v Speaker 1>It works on amassing weapons and material, getting money, getting

0:11:28.036 --> 0:11:31.636
<v Speaker 1>people organized, getting people in contact with one another. And

0:11:31.716 --> 0:11:35.276
<v Speaker 1>by nineteen eighty three, I think there are two major

0:11:35.356 --> 0:11:38.316
<v Speaker 1>things that happen. One is that that infrastructure is in place.

0:11:38.396 --> 0:11:40.636
<v Speaker 1>Activists know each other, They're all in the same room.

0:11:40.716 --> 0:11:42.956
<v Speaker 1>They're kind of coherent around this common story of the

0:11:43.036 --> 0:11:46.916
<v Speaker 1>Vietnam War, which has allowed some connections possible between different

0:11:46.956 --> 0:11:49.836
<v Speaker 1>groups that weren't possible before. And the other thing that

0:11:49.876 --> 0:11:54.476
<v Speaker 1>happens is they get really frustrated with Reagan. Activists in

0:11:54.516 --> 0:11:57.956
<v Speaker 1>the movement don't make this revolutionary turn in a moment

0:11:57.956 --> 0:12:01.836
<v Speaker 1>of leftist state power, but instead under the second term

0:12:01.836 --> 0:12:04.756
<v Speaker 1>of the Reagan administration. And their argument about this is

0:12:04.756 --> 0:12:10.636
<v Speaker 1>that the distance between Reagan's campaign promises and what they

0:12:10.676 --> 0:12:14.396
<v Speaker 1>see as his moderation proves to them once and for

0:12:14.476 --> 0:12:17.236
<v Speaker 1>all that electoral change will never deliver the kind of

0:12:17.276 --> 0:12:19.996
<v Speaker 1>world they want, and therefore they need to declare war.

0:12:20.316 --> 0:12:23.196
<v Speaker 1>Now this is this is really relevant to us in

0:12:23.196 --> 0:12:25.956
<v Speaker 1>the present moment, because it means that even at moments

0:12:25.996 --> 0:12:30.276
<v Speaker 1>when the center through the left might see kind of

0:12:30.276 --> 0:12:34.276
<v Speaker 1>a moment of conservative orientation and executive power, that doesn't

0:12:34.276 --> 0:12:36.476
<v Speaker 1>mean that activists on the fringe right will be assuaged

0:12:36.516 --> 0:12:39.156
<v Speaker 1>by that, And in fact that's had just the opposite

0:12:39.276 --> 0:12:42.596
<v Speaker 1>effect in this case. So that's extremely important, as you say,

0:12:42.716 --> 0:12:46.836
<v Speaker 1>for the question of the relationship between recent rounds of

0:12:47.596 --> 0:12:51.156
<v Speaker 1>white power of violence and the Trump administration, there's a

0:12:51.156 --> 0:12:55.236
<v Speaker 1>tendency on the left to say, well, look at Charlottesville,

0:12:55.756 --> 0:13:00.956
<v Speaker 1>which followed Donald Trump's assenting to the presidency, and then

0:13:01.036 --> 0:13:03.956
<v Speaker 1>look at subsequent events the Tree of Life shooting, for

0:13:03.996 --> 0:13:07.076
<v Speaker 1>example in the United States, the Christchurch, New Zealand attacks,

0:13:07.116 --> 0:13:10.356
<v Speaker 1>and to see this all as much a result of

0:13:10.396 --> 0:13:14.116
<v Speaker 1>the election of Donald Trump. And if I understand you correctly,

0:13:14.196 --> 0:13:17.596
<v Speaker 1>you're telling a slightly different story about the way that

0:13:17.796 --> 0:13:20.476
<v Speaker 1>white power activists reacted, for example, to the election of

0:13:20.716 --> 0:13:23.716
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Reagan. It's not that they were empowered or emboldened

0:13:24.156 --> 0:13:26.756
<v Speaker 1>by the election of a conservative president. It's rather that

0:13:26.796 --> 0:13:29.116
<v Speaker 1>they felt that it wasn't enough, and that therefore they

0:13:29.196 --> 0:13:33.996
<v Speaker 1>needed to take some revolutionary action. Is that in your mind?

0:13:33.996 --> 0:13:36.036
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're jumping ahead to the president, which will

0:13:36.076 --> 0:13:38.636
<v Speaker 1>come to you in good time as well. But is

0:13:38.836 --> 0:13:41.396
<v Speaker 1>your view that something like that is happening now among

0:13:41.516 --> 0:13:44.636
<v Speaker 1>white power activists. It's not that they're emboldened so much

0:13:44.676 --> 0:13:46.636
<v Speaker 1>by Trump's election, it's that it's not enough and it

0:13:46.636 --> 0:13:50.396
<v Speaker 1>gives them reason to do more. I suspect that's what

0:13:50.436 --> 0:13:53.476
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing. This is when I have to give the

0:13:53.596 --> 0:13:56.956
<v Speaker 1>historian caveat that the thing that lets me see the

0:13:56.996 --> 0:13:58.796
<v Speaker 1>story that I write about in the book is this

0:13:58.956 --> 0:14:03.876
<v Speaker 1>archive that spans newspapers, primary source materials, FBI and other

0:14:03.956 --> 0:14:07.516
<v Speaker 1>surveillance documents, court testimony. We don't get that kind of

0:14:07.516 --> 0:14:10.636
<v Speaker 1>source base in real time. When you talk about as

0:14:10.676 --> 0:14:13.956
<v Speaker 1>a historian, talk about the archive, you mean some literal

0:14:14.036 --> 0:14:16.876
<v Speaker 1>archives in some cases cashes of documents. But it's also

0:14:16.956 --> 0:14:18.996
<v Speaker 1>the word archive is also a metaphor that a starin's

0:14:19.076 --> 0:14:22.516
<v Speaker 1>used to describe all the materials that you guys use

0:14:22.636 --> 0:14:25.676
<v Speaker 1>to try to make sense of his artical events. Exactly.

0:14:25.676 --> 0:14:27.516
<v Speaker 1>You can think about it as like the receipts for

0:14:27.556 --> 0:14:30.276
<v Speaker 1>the story I'm going to tell I don't have that

0:14:30.396 --> 0:14:34.196
<v Speaker 1>kind of information about events from about nineteen ninety six forward,

0:14:34.236 --> 0:14:35.916
<v Speaker 1>and there are some reasons for why that is in

0:14:35.996 --> 0:14:41.796
<v Speaker 1>this particular cash of sources, but the earlier period does

0:14:41.916 --> 0:14:45.556
<v Speaker 1>tell us a couple of things that make me concerned

0:14:45.596 --> 0:14:48.156
<v Speaker 1>about the present moment in the ways that you've just described.

0:14:48.236 --> 0:14:51.716
<v Speaker 1>One of them is that when there is this moment

0:14:51.716 --> 0:14:57.596
<v Speaker 1>of perceived sympathetic administration that has not assuaged these activists,

0:14:57.596 --> 0:14:59.476
<v Speaker 1>and in fact that has been seen as a call

0:14:59.516 --> 0:15:02.276
<v Speaker 1>to arms. The other one is that there have always

0:15:02.316 --> 0:15:05.636
<v Speaker 1>been sort of two spheres of activity in this movement.

0:15:06.196 --> 0:15:10.596
<v Speaker 1>One of them is the sort of mass mobilizations like

0:15:10.676 --> 0:15:19.516
<v Speaker 1>Charlottesville marches, political campaigns, organizing events, recruitment drives, campus campaigns

0:15:19.916 --> 0:15:23.876
<v Speaker 1>to recruit students, speed was public speaking to ours, things

0:15:23.876 --> 0:15:28.476
<v Speaker 1>like that. The other one is this massive network of

0:15:28.676 --> 0:15:34.756
<v Speaker 1>paramilitary camps, cell style terror, illegal communication in many cases,

0:15:34.916 --> 0:15:38.956
<v Speaker 1>and different kinds of crime ranging from assassination to the

0:15:39.716 --> 0:15:44.716
<v Speaker 1>obtaining of stolen military weapons and material to mass violence attacks.

0:15:45.316 --> 0:15:47.796
<v Speaker 1>In the period that I study, those two spheres of

0:15:47.796 --> 0:15:51.076
<v Speaker 1>activity happened at the same time, and often there were

0:15:51.116 --> 0:15:53.956
<v Speaker 1>people who crossed the line between those two kinds of activism.

0:15:54.196 --> 0:15:57.036
<v Speaker 1>And we're undertaking both of those things as a coordinated

0:15:57.116 --> 0:15:59.996
<v Speaker 1>kind of kind of campaign. The fact that we can't

0:16:00.116 --> 0:16:03.756
<v Speaker 1>see that underground in real time doesn't mean that that's

0:16:03.796 --> 0:16:08.036
<v Speaker 1>not happenings, as we are noticing more of these above

0:16:08.076 --> 0:16:12.076
<v Speaker 1>board events and in fact, this wave of violent attacks

0:16:12.116 --> 0:16:15.356
<v Speaker 1>that you describe, which I might also add Dylan Roofs

0:16:15.356 --> 0:16:21.196
<v Speaker 1>shooting in Charleston absolutely, I oh no, yeah, well, also

0:16:21.236 --> 0:16:25.436
<v Speaker 1>include Penders Bravik in Norway. Yes. Putting those all together

0:16:25.476 --> 0:16:27.916
<v Speaker 1>in one story is very, very important because then we

0:16:27.916 --> 0:16:30.116
<v Speaker 1>can start to say, oh, wow, this is a wave

0:16:30.156 --> 0:16:32.556
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about. You know, three attempted attacks in the

0:16:32.636 --> 0:16:35.876
<v Speaker 1>last six months. Um. A lot of these are mass attacks,

0:16:35.916 --> 0:16:37.956
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these are people who are using the

0:16:37.996 --> 0:16:41.836
<v Speaker 1>same coordinated messaging. UM. That indicates to me that we

0:16:41.876 --> 0:16:45.116
<v Speaker 1>do have this two spheres model of activism going again,

0:16:45.236 --> 0:16:47.996
<v Speaker 1>even if I can't see the sources in real time

0:16:48.036 --> 0:16:51.436
<v Speaker 1>to be able to describe it in detail. One element

0:16:51.516 --> 0:16:53.876
<v Speaker 1>that I think we need to also add to your

0:16:54.116 --> 0:17:00.836
<v Speaker 1>depiction of people's common narrative of the Vietnam War having

0:17:00.876 --> 0:17:03.916
<v Speaker 1>been lost because of betrayal by the American government and

0:17:04.476 --> 0:17:07.916
<v Speaker 1>anti communism, and they're bringing together of clan members and

0:17:08.036 --> 0:17:11.996
<v Speaker 1>neo Nazis, and other is the religious component. Would you

0:17:12.036 --> 0:17:19.556
<v Speaker 1>say something about the apocalyptic religious elements of the combined

0:17:20.196 --> 0:17:23.516
<v Speaker 1>viewpoints that are coming together around nineteen eighty three in

0:17:23.556 --> 0:17:27.636
<v Speaker 1>this revolutionary movement. Sure, there are kind of two major

0:17:27.876 --> 0:17:32.196
<v Speaker 1>theological innovations of this movement. One of them is Norse paganism,

0:17:32.276 --> 0:17:37.596
<v Speaker 1>so Odinism and other kind of neopagan ideologies that put

0:17:37.636 --> 0:17:40.396
<v Speaker 1>forward the greatness of white cultures in different ways. So

0:17:40.516 --> 0:17:44.596
<v Speaker 1>the idea is to take Nordic mythology, of which Odin

0:17:44.716 --> 0:17:48.156
<v Speaker 1>is a central figure, and to say, ah, Nordic mythology

0:17:48.636 --> 0:17:52.636
<v Speaker 1>equals white people's mythology, something like that exactly so, and

0:17:52.716 --> 0:17:55.316
<v Speaker 1>it comes with a whole cultural apparatus of things like

0:17:55.356 --> 0:17:58.556
<v Speaker 1>writing in ruins and using the Viking imagery and things

0:17:58.596 --> 0:18:01.916
<v Speaker 1>like that. The other one is Christian identity, and I

0:18:01.916 --> 0:18:05.996
<v Speaker 1>think this one is more impactful for a couple of

0:18:05.996 --> 0:18:08.676
<v Speaker 1>different reasons. One is that it has a very clear

0:18:08.836 --> 0:18:11.836
<v Speaker 1>role for women, who turn out to be enormously important

0:18:11.876 --> 0:18:16.236
<v Speaker 1>to motivating this movement and holding it together. The other

0:18:16.556 --> 0:18:19.876
<v Speaker 1>is for its depiction of the end of the world.

0:18:20.476 --> 0:18:23.916
<v Speaker 1>So the nineteen eighties in general are a time of

0:18:24.116 --> 0:18:27.356
<v Speaker 1>deep fixation on the end of the world. There's deep,

0:18:27.396 --> 0:18:32.396
<v Speaker 1>deep apocalyptic belief kind of across American culture, including in

0:18:32.516 --> 0:18:36.596
<v Speaker 1>evangelical churches, which are recruiting much larger congregations and much

0:18:36.596 --> 0:18:41.396
<v Speaker 1>more politicized congregations in the nineteen eighties. Now in evangelical Christianity,

0:18:41.476 --> 0:18:44.076
<v Speaker 1>that comes with a belief in a day called the Rapture,

0:18:44.436 --> 0:18:46.796
<v Speaker 1>which is a moment when all of the faithful are

0:18:46.836 --> 0:18:50.796
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be peacefully transported to Heaven before this big,

0:18:50.876 --> 0:18:54.876
<v Speaker 1>bloody last battle that will come right before the return

0:18:54.916 --> 0:18:59.596
<v Speaker 1>of Christ. So Christian identity has no Rapture, but it

0:18:59.636 --> 0:19:03.116
<v Speaker 1>does have the battle. So what Christian identity does is

0:19:03.636 --> 0:19:07.436
<v Speaker 1>turn its believers into either survivalists. You either have to

0:19:07.436 --> 0:19:11.116
<v Speaker 1>survive this end times before or Jesus returns, or you

0:19:11.156 --> 0:19:13.476
<v Speaker 1>have to become a soldier of God to clear the

0:19:13.516 --> 0:19:17.636
<v Speaker 1>world of non white populations before you know, before Christ

0:19:17.676 --> 0:19:20.156
<v Speaker 1>can return to the world. So what it does is

0:19:20.196 --> 0:19:24.716
<v Speaker 1>transfigure this whole host of social issues that are important

0:19:24.716 --> 0:19:28.676
<v Speaker 1>to the white power movement into a holy war. And

0:19:28.756 --> 0:19:30.796
<v Speaker 1>one way to think about this is that it comes

0:19:30.796 --> 0:19:34.436
<v Speaker 1>with this intense sense of emergency about something that people

0:19:34.436 --> 0:19:38.596
<v Speaker 1>talk about very casual, casually in American culture, which is

0:19:38.996 --> 0:19:42.516
<v Speaker 1>this kind of imagined moment of demographic change when the

0:19:42.556 --> 0:19:45.996
<v Speaker 1>country will switch over from a majority white population to

0:19:46.236 --> 0:19:50.236
<v Speaker 1>something else, And as different communities begin to make that

0:19:50.276 --> 0:19:52.796
<v Speaker 1>transition in the eighties and the nineties, these activists get

0:19:52.796 --> 0:19:57.396
<v Speaker 1>more and more preoccupied with this. For people in the

0:19:57.436 --> 0:20:03.076
<v Speaker 1>white power movement, the issues that might be conservative or

0:20:03.196 --> 0:20:08.276
<v Speaker 1>understandable to us as conservative, like opposing immigration, opposing abortion,

0:20:09.156 --> 0:20:14.796
<v Speaker 1>GBT rights, opposing feminism, being in favor of racial segregation,

0:20:14.876 --> 0:20:18.196
<v Speaker 1>or freedom of association, all of that stuff for white

0:20:18.196 --> 0:20:23.276
<v Speaker 1>power activists is attached to this deep preoccupation with the

0:20:23.276 --> 0:20:27.276
<v Speaker 1>future of the race through the production of white babies.

0:20:27.716 --> 0:20:32.316
<v Speaker 1>So it's not for white power activists just they oppose

0:20:32.396 --> 0:20:34.916
<v Speaker 1>abortion because it's a conservative issue or because they have

0:20:34.956 --> 0:20:39.396
<v Speaker 1>concerns about unborn life. It's that they oppose abortion because

0:20:39.436 --> 0:20:42.436
<v Speaker 1>abortion is one thing that is threatening the white birth rate,

0:20:42.756 --> 0:20:46.676
<v Speaker 1>along with immigration integration, which they think will result in

0:20:46.716 --> 0:20:48.836
<v Speaker 1>the birth of non white children or mixed race children

0:20:48.836 --> 0:20:53.436
<v Speaker 1>who they see as non human. LGBT rights they think

0:20:53.476 --> 0:20:58.036
<v Speaker 1>will take white women out of the work of birthing children.

0:20:58.036 --> 0:21:00.196
<v Speaker 1>They're worried about feminism because they think women should be

0:21:00.196 --> 0:21:03.516
<v Speaker 1>at home raising children. This whole production of white children.

0:21:03.596 --> 0:21:05.916
<v Speaker 1>Thing is like the glue that holds together this whole

0:21:05.916 --> 0:21:08.036
<v Speaker 1>belief system. And in order for it to make sense,

0:21:08.076 --> 0:21:11.516
<v Speaker 1>you really have to think about how vivid and immediate

0:21:11.596 --> 0:21:14.916
<v Speaker 1>this sense of emergency is to these activists. They feel

0:21:14.956 --> 0:21:18.516
<v Speaker 1>this as an apocalyptic threat, so not as kind of

0:21:18.556 --> 0:21:21.196
<v Speaker 1>like a soft demographic change that's going to come at

0:21:21.196 --> 0:21:34.676
<v Speaker 1>some point. We'll be right back, okay. So you get

0:21:34.716 --> 0:21:41.756
<v Speaker 1>this attempt to unify these disparate, potentially disparate social groups

0:21:42.196 --> 0:21:45.676
<v Speaker 1>around a common vision and a kind of a common ideology.

0:21:46.276 --> 0:21:49.996
<v Speaker 1>It's happening in the middle of the nineteen eighties, and

0:21:50.276 --> 0:21:56.596
<v Speaker 1>it then leads to some rather extraordinary consequences, most saliently

0:21:56.756 --> 0:21:58.876
<v Speaker 1>in your book. And this is the kind of climactic

0:21:58.956 --> 0:22:03.836
<v Speaker 1>point in your book, the nineteen ninety five bombing of

0:22:03.876 --> 0:22:08.116
<v Speaker 1>the Oklahoma City Federal Building by Timothy McVay and a

0:22:08.196 --> 0:22:10.996
<v Speaker 1>group of others, And will say more about that group.

0:22:11.356 --> 0:22:15.276
<v Speaker 1>How did that spectacular bombing spectacular in the sense that

0:22:15.316 --> 0:22:18.956
<v Speaker 1>it was a spectacle. It created a spectacle in which

0:22:19.036 --> 0:22:22.716
<v Speaker 1>nearly one hundred and seventy people were killed grow out

0:22:22.756 --> 0:22:25.196
<v Speaker 1>of this movement? How did the movement go from as

0:22:25.196 --> 0:22:29.316
<v Speaker 1>it were, a group of possibly crazy looking peripheral people

0:22:29.836 --> 0:22:33.236
<v Speaker 1>to a cohesive movement that could produce an attack like this.

0:22:34.996 --> 0:22:37.196
<v Speaker 1>That's a great question, and the short answer is through

0:22:37.276 --> 0:22:41.956
<v Speaker 1>women during the nineteen eighties. What unfolds is not sort

0:22:41.996 --> 0:22:49.316
<v Speaker 1>of a popularly understood collection of shrieking and ignorant activists

0:22:49.356 --> 0:22:54.156
<v Speaker 1>in backwoods something, you know, doing their own thing and

0:22:54.276 --> 0:22:57.476
<v Speaker 1>fighting with each other. What we see is actually a

0:22:57.676 --> 0:23:02.196
<v Speaker 1>broad ranging social movement. It includes men, women, and children.

0:23:02.396 --> 0:23:06.996
<v Speaker 1>It includes people in all regions of the country, including rural, suburban,

0:23:07.076 --> 0:23:09.836
<v Speaker 1>and urban spaces, and include people of a lot of

0:23:09.876 --> 0:23:13.636
<v Speaker 1>different age groups, people with education ranging from high school

0:23:13.716 --> 0:23:19.596
<v Speaker 1>dropout and to homeschool to I mean rocket launch engineer

0:23:19.716 --> 0:23:24.956
<v Speaker 1>kind of people. Um. Religious leaders and felons and civilians,

0:23:25.076 --> 0:23:29.956
<v Speaker 1>veterans and active duty troops. So it's really a sprint

0:23:29.996 --> 0:23:35.516
<v Speaker 1>group of people at group for everybody. Yeah, well done. No, No,

0:23:35.556 --> 0:23:37.556
<v Speaker 1>not at all. It's a very diverse group of people

0:23:37.556 --> 0:23:41.636
<v Speaker 1>except racially, yes, um. And it even has multiple faiths

0:23:41.676 --> 0:23:44.476
<v Speaker 1>in it. As we talked about, so that UM, that

0:23:44.676 --> 0:23:48.636
<v Speaker 1>structure UM, together with this turn against the state, leads

0:23:48.636 --> 0:23:51.596
<v Speaker 1>them to adopt a strategy called leaderless resistance. In nineteen

0:23:51.676 --> 0:23:53.916
<v Speaker 1>eighty three, so talked to us about leaderless resistance, because

0:23:53.956 --> 0:23:57.116
<v Speaker 1>that's hugely important for the present moment as well. It

0:23:57.276 --> 0:24:01.716
<v Speaker 1>is leaderless resistance is easy to understand now as just

0:24:01.956 --> 0:24:04.996
<v Speaker 1>cell style terrorism. The idea is that you're going to

0:24:05.516 --> 0:24:12.516
<v Speaker 1>um indoctrinate and shape activist and maybe small cohorts of cells,

0:24:12.796 --> 0:24:15.596
<v Speaker 1>like one to six people, maybe the occasional larger cell

0:24:15.636 --> 0:24:18.596
<v Speaker 1>of twelve people, maybe just one to two activists. You're

0:24:18.596 --> 0:24:22.596
<v Speaker 1>going to get them all aligned towards the same targets,

0:24:22.636 --> 0:24:25.916
<v Speaker 1>and then they're going to act independently without communication with

0:24:26.036 --> 0:24:29.676
<v Speaker 1>leadership and without communication with each other. Now, there's actually

0:24:29.676 --> 0:24:32.716
<v Speaker 1>a historical reason for why they adopt this strategy, which

0:24:32.756 --> 0:24:36.156
<v Speaker 1>is that in the earlier clan in the fifties and

0:24:36.196 --> 0:24:38.356
<v Speaker 1>the sixties, the Third Era clan, which is the one

0:24:38.356 --> 0:24:42.156
<v Speaker 1>that opposes the Civil Rights movement, the federal government had

0:24:42.236 --> 0:24:46.956
<v Speaker 1>sent in a ton of informants under the FBI's Counterintelligence

0:24:46.996 --> 0:24:51.156
<v Speaker 1>Project and other initiatives, and clansmen got really really frustrated

0:24:51.236 --> 0:24:53.116
<v Speaker 1>with how many of these people were getting into their

0:24:53.116 --> 0:24:55.436
<v Speaker 1>meetings and messing up their stuff and getting people arrested

0:24:55.476 --> 0:24:57.236
<v Speaker 1>and turning over mailing lists and all kinds of things

0:24:57.236 --> 0:25:01.276
<v Speaker 1>like that. So leaderless resistance is actually implemented in large

0:25:01.316 --> 0:25:05.916
<v Speaker 1>part to foil surveillance, and it has the other kind

0:25:05.956 --> 0:25:11.236
<v Speaker 1>of immediate benefit of foiling core prosecution, but the lasting

0:25:11.276 --> 0:25:14.596
<v Speaker 1>impact of it has actually been to foil public understanding

0:25:14.876 --> 0:25:18.436
<v Speaker 1>because what happens is leaderless resistance plays right into this

0:25:18.476 --> 0:25:23.356
<v Speaker 1>sort of media narrative about lone wolf violence or crazy

0:25:23.396 --> 0:25:26.716
<v Speaker 1>people or a few bad apples or mad gunmen, right

0:25:26.796 --> 0:25:29.676
<v Speaker 1>where we get a lot of different stories about one

0:25:29.756 --> 0:25:32.436
<v Speaker 1>person committing an act of violence and don't get the

0:25:32.476 --> 0:25:35.436
<v Speaker 1>apparatus to put those things together into the same history.

0:25:36.396 --> 0:25:38.956
<v Speaker 1>So leaderless resistance is one of the ways that we

0:25:38.996 --> 0:25:41.676
<v Speaker 1>get from the formation of the movement to Oklahoma City.

0:25:42.436 --> 0:25:46.716
<v Speaker 1>The other one is the implementation of computer social networking.

0:25:47.956 --> 0:25:51.916
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen eighty three eighty four, they implement a series

0:25:52.036 --> 0:25:55.636
<v Speaker 1>of code word accessed message board is called liberty net.

0:25:56.676 --> 0:25:59.036
<v Speaker 1>This is before the Internet, so technically this is not

0:25:59.076 --> 0:26:01.356
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, but we can understand this is like the

0:26:01.396 --> 0:26:04.396
<v Speaker 1>proto Internet. It's it's networked computers that can speak to

0:26:04.396 --> 0:26:07.076
<v Speaker 1>one another. And also, by the way, it takes the

0:26:07.076 --> 0:26:09.316
<v Speaker 1>FBI like two years to crack the code and see

0:26:09.316 --> 0:26:12.236
<v Speaker 1>what they're posting, kind of amazing that white power might

0:26:12.276 --> 0:26:15.476
<v Speaker 1>be might be the very first social movement to have

0:26:15.636 --> 0:26:21.116
<v Speaker 1>actively exploited computer technology in that way. Yeah, not only that,

0:26:21.356 --> 0:26:24.236
<v Speaker 1>but the way that they do this is very much

0:26:24.276 --> 0:26:28.476
<v Speaker 1>like Facebook, long before Facebook was invented. What they post

0:26:28.596 --> 0:26:31.396
<v Speaker 1>to these message boards includes a lot of you know,

0:26:31.596 --> 0:26:36.836
<v Speaker 1>practical content like assassination lists and you know, propaganda messaging

0:26:36.836 --> 0:26:39.356
<v Speaker 1>and things like that, but it also includes things like

0:26:39.596 --> 0:26:42.716
<v Speaker 1>personal ads. So what these boards are meant to do

0:26:42.836 --> 0:26:45.636
<v Speaker 1>is to connect activists together in a movement in order

0:26:45.716 --> 0:26:49.676
<v Speaker 1>to motivate this cell style activism. So it's in a way,

0:26:49.716 --> 0:26:52.076
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to have leader list resistance, you need

0:26:52.116 --> 0:26:54.436
<v Speaker 1>cells and they need to communicate with each other somehow,

0:26:54.476 --> 0:26:57.476
<v Speaker 1>even if not in coordination, and then the message sports

0:26:57.516 --> 0:27:01.116
<v Speaker 1>become the mechanism in your story for how that happens. Yeah, well,

0:27:01.116 --> 0:27:03.636
<v Speaker 1>you also need a big You need the social movement

0:27:03.636 --> 0:27:06.956
<v Speaker 1>to share resources and also to connect everybody in common

0:27:06.996 --> 0:27:09.436
<v Speaker 1>culture such that they can understand what the tarts are

0:27:09.476 --> 0:27:12.396
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be. It's interesting that Timothy McVeigh I think

0:27:12.436 --> 0:27:14.676
<v Speaker 1>you show in your book, also engage in one of

0:27:14.676 --> 0:27:18.036
<v Speaker 1>these models of get some resources by robbing somebody, right,

0:27:18.036 --> 0:27:20.756
<v Speaker 1>He and a couple of the associates robbed a gun

0:27:20.756 --> 0:27:23.676
<v Speaker 1>dealer to get the money to have the resources to

0:27:23.756 --> 0:27:28.796
<v Speaker 1>buy to buy the material to blow up the federal building. Yes,

0:27:29.676 --> 0:27:32.356
<v Speaker 1>and that's a strategy from the order, and also from

0:27:32.396 --> 0:27:34.996
<v Speaker 1>a novel called The Turner Diaries, which kind of becomes

0:27:36.236 --> 0:27:39.436
<v Speaker 1>a I mean, it's it's important as a cultural text,

0:27:39.876 --> 0:27:42.836
<v Speaker 1>but and as a manual of operations. But it's also

0:27:42.916 --> 0:27:45.796
<v Speaker 1>kind of a cultural loadstar from the movement in the

0:27:45.836 --> 0:27:48.676
<v Speaker 1>sense that it does that work of explaining to everybody

0:27:49.116 --> 0:27:50.796
<v Speaker 1>what they're trying to do and how they're going to

0:27:50.876 --> 0:27:53.916
<v Speaker 1>do it. I was fascinated reading your book about the

0:27:53.956 --> 0:27:57.276
<v Speaker 1>centrality of this novel, The Turner Diaries, which seem to

0:27:57.316 --> 0:28:01.676
<v Speaker 1>include in your account actually a blueprint even for blowing

0:28:01.756 --> 0:28:04.076
<v Speaker 1>up a federal building with a truck bomb. I mean,

0:28:04.196 --> 0:28:08.796
<v Speaker 1>very very detailed, sort of sort of envisioning process. Yeah,

0:28:09.316 --> 0:28:11.156
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about that about that novel, because again

0:28:11.236 --> 0:28:12.516
<v Speaker 1>it was a novel that I had not heard of

0:28:12.556 --> 0:28:16.156
<v Speaker 1>before reading your book. Oh okay, So it's a novel

0:28:16.236 --> 0:28:18.716
<v Speaker 1>that's published in Cereal in the late nineteen seventies and

0:28:18.756 --> 0:28:22.596
<v Speaker 1>then comes out in paperback. And it is very difficult

0:28:22.796 --> 0:28:28.316
<v Speaker 1>to overstate how important this novel is to the movement.

0:28:29.036 --> 0:28:32.676
<v Speaker 1>The Turner Diaries shows up everywhere, so McVeigh sells it

0:28:32.716 --> 0:28:36.236
<v Speaker 1>for a while on the gun show circuit. The Order

0:28:36.276 --> 0:28:38.196
<v Speaker 1>that I talked about a moment ago keeps a stack

0:28:38.236 --> 0:28:40.596
<v Speaker 1>of them in the bunk house. Other white power groups

0:28:40.636 --> 0:28:44.756
<v Speaker 1>distribute them at paramilitary training. It shows up in bookstores

0:28:44.876 --> 0:28:47.756
<v Speaker 1>and other places where the movement is trying to recruit

0:28:48.076 --> 0:28:51.996
<v Speaker 1>far aways South Africa, and it's it's mentioned in advertisements

0:28:51.996 --> 0:28:55.276
<v Speaker 1>and all kinds of different white power publications. And I

0:28:55.316 --> 0:28:57.316
<v Speaker 1>think one of the reasons it's so important is it

0:28:57.356 --> 0:29:01.836
<v Speaker 1>sets out to answer a question that is sort of

0:29:02.796 --> 0:29:05.196
<v Speaker 1>baffling on its face, and that actually has stood in

0:29:05.196 --> 0:29:08.076
<v Speaker 1>the way of prosecution more than once, which is, how

0:29:08.116 --> 0:29:11.716
<v Speaker 1>could this fringe movement right. It's a very small movement

0:29:12.276 --> 0:29:15.876
<v Speaker 1>possibly hope to do what it's setting out to do,

0:29:15.996 --> 0:29:19.636
<v Speaker 1>which is to overthrow the United States, the most militarized

0:29:19.716 --> 0:29:23.916
<v Speaker 1>superstate in world history. This is a kind of baffling

0:29:23.996 --> 0:29:26.756
<v Speaker 1>problem for these activists. And in the novel, I think

0:29:26.756 --> 0:29:29.756
<v Speaker 1>he describes it as a nat trying to assassinate an elephant.

0:29:30.876 --> 0:29:33.796
<v Speaker 1>So the imaginative work that the Turner Diaries does in

0:29:34.036 --> 0:29:37.236
<v Speaker 1>laying out how such a thing could be possible is

0:29:37.276 --> 0:29:40.316
<v Speaker 1>really important for this movement in terms of being able

0:29:40.396 --> 0:29:44.036
<v Speaker 1>to have an imaginary in which this could happen. And

0:29:44.116 --> 0:29:47.156
<v Speaker 1>it tells us something very very important and alarming about

0:29:47.156 --> 0:29:49.236
<v Speaker 1>the kind of violence we're seeing today, which is that

0:29:49.836 --> 0:29:53.836
<v Speaker 1>acts like Christchurch or the Pittsburgh shooting or the Oklahoma

0:29:53.876 --> 0:29:57.516
<v Speaker 1>City bombing are not imagined to be the endpoint of

0:29:57.556 --> 0:30:01.036
<v Speaker 1>this activism. The endpoint is not the act of violence.

0:30:01.596 --> 0:30:04.396
<v Speaker 1>These are supposed to be political acts of violence that

0:30:04.596 --> 0:30:08.476
<v Speaker 1>white power activists hope will awaken other white people to

0:30:08.796 --> 0:30:12.196
<v Speaker 1>what as the self evident state of emergency facing the

0:30:12.236 --> 0:30:15.636
<v Speaker 1>white race, and they think that that will eventually lead

0:30:15.676 --> 0:30:20.076
<v Speaker 1>to a armed uprising that will create an all white world.

0:30:20.516 --> 0:30:24.556
<v Speaker 1>And the turnidiaries imagines this very violently and very vividly,

0:30:25.156 --> 0:30:28.836
<v Speaker 1>and it includes things like like many nuclear weapon blasts,

0:30:29.356 --> 0:30:32.516
<v Speaker 1>the forced march of people of color out of the

0:30:32.596 --> 0:30:36.636
<v Speaker 1>United States, and the eventual genocide of all populations except

0:30:36.676 --> 0:30:40.476
<v Speaker 1>for white people in the world. And so then Oklahoma

0:30:40.476 --> 0:30:44.876
<v Speaker 1>City does happen and the bombing does occur, and then

0:30:45.156 --> 0:30:49.996
<v Speaker 1>from the standpoint of public perception, instead of the world

0:30:50.036 --> 0:30:56.196
<v Speaker 1>sitting up and taking notice and ordinary concerned Americans saying,

0:30:56.476 --> 0:31:00.996
<v Speaker 1>there's this powerful, dangerous social movement that's seeking revolution and

0:31:01.356 --> 0:31:04.076
<v Speaker 1>is using terrorist techniques, and it's just blown up a

0:31:04.076 --> 0:31:07.596
<v Speaker 1>building and killed a lot of people. We get, basically

0:31:07.796 --> 0:31:11.436
<v Speaker 1>the opposite. We get a narrative of this was a

0:31:11.436 --> 0:31:14.796
<v Speaker 1>few people. I remember a narrative that, you know, timoth

0:31:14.916 --> 0:31:18.116
<v Speaker 1>Kay McVeigh was so radical that even the militias wouldn't

0:31:18.156 --> 0:31:20.796
<v Speaker 1>have him as a member, thereby implying that maybe these

0:31:20.796 --> 0:31:25.196
<v Speaker 1>militias actually aren't so bad after all. McVeigh doesn't put

0:31:25.236 --> 0:31:27.316
<v Speaker 1>up much of a defensive trial, and then he allows

0:31:27.396 --> 0:31:31.836
<v Speaker 1>himself to be executed by not challenging the death sentence,

0:31:32.236 --> 0:31:35.356
<v Speaker 1>and he's executed in record time, and it says, though

0:31:35.476 --> 0:31:39.236
<v Speaker 1>the story disappears, why did this happen? I mean to

0:31:39.276 --> 0:31:43.916
<v Speaker 1>take a comparison. After September eleventh, whatever skepticism there might

0:31:43.956 --> 0:31:47.876
<v Speaker 1>have been about the capacities of terrorists operating the name

0:31:47.876 --> 0:31:51.476
<v Speaker 1>of Islam to change global affairs was eliminated, and a

0:31:51.596 --> 0:31:55.516
<v Speaker 1>generation of experts or pseudo experts in some cases, but nevertheless,

0:31:55.516 --> 0:31:58.196
<v Speaker 1>a generation of concerned people who cared about this was

0:31:58.236 --> 0:32:02.236
<v Speaker 1>born in a moment and created an industry that hasn't

0:32:02.276 --> 0:32:06.076
<v Speaker 1>gone away since. In contrast, in radical contrast, in the

0:32:06.116 --> 0:32:09.716
<v Speaker 1>aftermath of the Oklahoma City bombing, things sort of don't

0:32:09.756 --> 0:32:12.276
<v Speaker 1>happen in that way. Talk about why, because I think

0:32:12.276 --> 0:32:17.116
<v Speaker 1>it's so important. The Oklahoma City bombing represents the largest

0:32:17.116 --> 0:32:20.956
<v Speaker 1>deliberate mass casualty in the United States between Pearl Harbor

0:32:21.076 --> 0:32:23.916
<v Speaker 1>and nine to eleven, and the fact that we don't

0:32:23.956 --> 0:32:25.756
<v Speaker 1>have a narrative about it in the ways that you've

0:32:25.796 --> 0:32:30.956
<v Speaker 1>outlined is both alarming and surprising, given how thoroughly these

0:32:31.356 --> 0:32:33.996
<v Speaker 1>events that I cover in the book were talked about

0:32:34.076 --> 0:32:36.596
<v Speaker 1>at the time. So if you think about something like

0:32:36.636 --> 0:32:40.476
<v Speaker 1>a shooting at Greensboro, people knew about that. That was

0:32:40.556 --> 0:32:45.436
<v Speaker 1>front page news. Yeah, that made the front pages of many, many,

0:32:45.476 --> 0:32:49.396
<v Speaker 1>many newspapers and eventually also became a Saturday night life

0:32:49.396 --> 0:32:52.476
<v Speaker 1>sketch like that was in the zeitgeist. But somehow we

0:32:52.556 --> 0:32:56.236
<v Speaker 1>haven't connected that event with Oklahoma City. We haven't connected

0:32:56.396 --> 0:32:58.796
<v Speaker 1>either of them with a narrative about a social movement.

0:32:59.156 --> 0:33:01.116
<v Speaker 1>We don't have really a durable way at all of

0:33:01.236 --> 0:33:04.836
<v Speaker 1>thinking about how to narrate these events. So with Oklahoma City,

0:33:04.876 --> 0:33:07.116
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that happens is that the federal

0:33:07.156 --> 0:33:10.996
<v Speaker 1>government tries to do a big prosecution of these activists

0:33:11.036 --> 0:33:15.236
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen eighty seven eighty eight in Fort Smith, Arkansas.

0:33:15.676 --> 0:33:19.396
<v Speaker 1>And so it's a federal trial on charges including seditious conspiracy.

0:33:20.756 --> 0:33:25.076
<v Speaker 1>Seditious conspiracy in this case was wholly evident. The jury

0:33:25.236 --> 0:33:29.476
<v Speaker 1>heard testimony about white power activists plotting to poison the

0:33:29.516 --> 0:33:32.196
<v Speaker 1>water supply of a major city with cyanide. They seized

0:33:32.236 --> 0:33:37.876
<v Speaker 1>thirty gallons of cyanide. The jurors saw laundry hampers full

0:33:37.956 --> 0:33:41.436
<v Speaker 1>of illegal weapons and material pushed through the courtroom, and

0:33:41.436 --> 0:33:44.236
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about things like anti tank weapons and claim

0:33:44.236 --> 0:33:47.156
<v Speaker 1>war minds. They saw the writings of these activists where

0:33:47.156 --> 0:33:49.916
<v Speaker 1>they had said that they were involved in seditious conspiracy.

0:33:49.956 --> 0:33:54.196
<v Speaker 1>It goes on and on like this. That trial got

0:33:54.276 --> 0:33:57.996
<v Speaker 1>no convictions. So you get these acquittals in these cases

0:33:58.156 --> 0:34:00.716
<v Speaker 1>of trying people for trying to overthrow the government. I

0:34:00.796 --> 0:34:04.116
<v Speaker 1>get that that's a part of the disappearance of a

0:34:04.556 --> 0:34:08.436
<v Speaker 1>story that there's a coherent movement say more about how yeah,

0:34:08.476 --> 0:34:11.116
<v Speaker 1>go ahead. More than that, what emerges from it is

0:34:11.116 --> 0:34:15.036
<v Speaker 1>that it is a disaster for the prosecuting agencies, the

0:34:15.716 --> 0:34:20.556
<v Speaker 1>atf DOGA, FBI. Everyone is embarrassed by this entire thing.

0:34:21.556 --> 0:34:25.476
<v Speaker 1>And afterward there's a policy institutionalized at the FBI that

0:34:25.556 --> 0:34:29.316
<v Speaker 1>says they will make no attempt to tie white power

0:34:29.396 --> 0:34:34.396
<v Speaker 1>violence to a movement. They will prosecute only individual crimes.

0:34:34.796 --> 0:34:38.396
<v Speaker 1>They will not attempt to prosecute as part of a movement.

0:34:38.836 --> 0:34:41.276
<v Speaker 1>So you have a piece of paper written at the

0:34:41.356 --> 0:34:44.116
<v Speaker 1>end of this Sedition trial that when the Timothy mcveay

0:34:44.156 --> 0:34:46.876
<v Speaker 1>case comes up, says they will not try to prosecute

0:34:46.916 --> 0:34:50.316
<v Speaker 1>as part of a movement. And why do they say

0:34:50.396 --> 0:34:53.156
<v Speaker 1>in this document that they won't do that, because because

0:34:53.196 --> 0:34:55.316
<v Speaker 1>it's a no win proposition that they thought that was

0:34:55.396 --> 0:34:58.356
<v Speaker 1>why they lost those prosecutions. It's a kind of tactical judgment.

0:34:58.796 --> 0:35:01.476
<v Speaker 1>It's a tactical judgment and a recognition that there's not

0:35:01.556 --> 0:35:05.356
<v Speaker 1>a sufficient public will to prosecute white power violence as

0:35:05.396 --> 0:35:06.916
<v Speaker 1>the work of a movement. And I mean, if anything,

0:35:06.956 --> 0:35:09.396
<v Speaker 1>that's only deepened by the events of the early nineteen

0:35:09.476 --> 0:35:13.356
<v Speaker 1>ninety Ridge and Ridge and Waco and the sieges, where

0:35:13.516 --> 0:35:19.116
<v Speaker 1>where the state very clearly oversteps in and uses militarized

0:35:19.196 --> 0:35:22.236
<v Speaker 1>violence against against white power activists in one case and

0:35:23.636 --> 0:35:27.076
<v Speaker 1>followers of the branch Davidian compounded the other case. So

0:35:27.556 --> 0:35:28.956
<v Speaker 1>the FBI is a part of the story and the

0:35:28.996 --> 0:35:33.476
<v Speaker 1>deal Department of Justice. They decline to treat white white

0:35:33.476 --> 0:35:37.716
<v Speaker 1>power or white supremacy movements as a coordinated and coherent

0:35:38.476 --> 0:35:41.956
<v Speaker 1>set of terrorist groups even after Oklahoma City. Why does

0:35:41.996 --> 0:35:43.916
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world go along with that? Why

0:35:43.956 --> 0:35:48.156
<v Speaker 1>does the media accept that instead of pushing against the

0:35:48.676 --> 0:35:51.956
<v Speaker 1>government's failure to construct a narrative. I think that there

0:35:52.116 --> 0:35:56.236
<v Speaker 1>is a very durable narrative form about the lone wolf gunman.

0:35:56.716 --> 0:36:01.036
<v Speaker 1>And when there is a mass violent event that is

0:36:01.076 --> 0:36:03.756
<v Speaker 1>carried out by a white perpetrator, we almost always see

0:36:03.756 --> 0:36:06.356
<v Speaker 1>the same story about it. It almost always goes to

0:36:06.676 --> 0:36:11.396
<v Speaker 1>lone wolf mental health and sort of like a psychological profile,

0:36:12.036 --> 0:36:18.436
<v Speaker 1>rather than going to connections and ideology and politics, even

0:36:18.516 --> 0:36:22.796
<v Speaker 1>when there is clear clear evidence that these are white

0:36:22.796 --> 0:36:24.836
<v Speaker 1>power gunmen. So it's a kind of denial, and it

0:36:24.916 --> 0:36:27.436
<v Speaker 1>may be an individual psychological denial, or it may be

0:36:27.516 --> 0:36:32.236
<v Speaker 1>a white people wide social denial. I mean, my assumption

0:36:32.396 --> 0:36:36.156
<v Speaker 1>is that you know that many African Americans would not

0:36:36.316 --> 0:36:38.556
<v Speaker 1>instinctively think, oh, it must be a lone wolf, but

0:36:38.676 --> 0:36:41.396
<v Speaker 1>might think they are organized people who are who are

0:36:41.476 --> 0:36:44.116
<v Speaker 1>out to get us. Well, not only that, but the

0:36:44.236 --> 0:36:48.116
<v Speaker 1>term lone wolf comes from this movement, So we are

0:36:48.316 --> 0:36:51.596
<v Speaker 1>allowing this movement to disappear. Every time we say that phrase.

0:36:51.876 --> 0:36:54.276
<v Speaker 1>One question that I hear a lot about this story

0:36:54.596 --> 0:36:58.076
<v Speaker 1>is who failed to stop this movement? Because in the

0:36:58.196 --> 0:37:01.036
<v Speaker 1>entirety of my book, there's never a moment when there's

0:37:01.076 --> 0:37:04.956
<v Speaker 1>like a decisive court case that renders the movement unable

0:37:04.996 --> 0:37:07.516
<v Speaker 1>to organize even for a short time. Yeah, you don't

0:37:07.516 --> 0:37:09.476
<v Speaker 1>have an Eliots in your book. You don't have no

0:37:09.636 --> 0:37:11.036
<v Speaker 1>you know, it will be hard to make a movie

0:37:11.036 --> 0:37:13.556
<v Speaker 1>out of it because you don't have the heroic cop

0:37:13.836 --> 0:37:17.116
<v Speaker 1>or you know, FBI agent who stands up and says enough,

0:37:17.196 --> 0:37:20.316
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to change this around. There's one actually who

0:37:20.436 --> 0:37:23.676
<v Speaker 1>quits and frustration after this edition. Trial policy is instituted

0:37:23.716 --> 0:37:26.476
<v Speaker 1>about not tying the individual crimes of the broad movement.

0:37:26.516 --> 0:37:29.196
<v Speaker 1>And there are some heroic local reporters who have like

0:37:29.276 --> 0:37:31.836
<v Speaker 1>one piece of this story in real time, which is amazing.

0:37:32.036 --> 0:37:33.836
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are people who are trying right, but

0:37:34.156 --> 0:37:39.516
<v Speaker 1>the failure is exists at I have to use one

0:37:39.716 --> 0:37:45.276
<v Speaker 1>historical jargon term, which is transscalar, meaning that the failure

0:37:45.556 --> 0:37:50.196
<v Speaker 1>of response to this movement lives both at the level

0:37:50.276 --> 0:37:53.556
<v Speaker 1>of like personal prejudice of people in various positions of

0:37:53.556 --> 0:37:57.036
<v Speaker 1>power that allow it to go unchecked, right all the

0:37:57.076 --> 0:38:01.996
<v Speaker 1>way up through failures of media reporting, failures of juror education,

0:38:02.276 --> 0:38:07.036
<v Speaker 1>failures of prosecutorial policy and the law, failures of military

0:38:07.076 --> 0:38:10.036
<v Speaker 1>policy to stop this kind of organizing, and active duty troops,

0:38:11.116 --> 0:38:17.076
<v Speaker 1>failures in all kinds of different allocation of surveillance resources,

0:38:17.116 --> 0:38:20.356
<v Speaker 1>all the way up right, so transcalar, meaning it goes

0:38:20.516 --> 0:38:23.636
<v Speaker 1>every level of every level, all the way up to

0:38:23.836 --> 0:38:26.196
<v Speaker 1>every level of systemic power you can think of, and

0:38:26.236 --> 0:38:30.556
<v Speaker 1>it's all so imbricated that I think to really change

0:38:30.596 --> 0:38:34.636
<v Speaker 1>it would require a massive shift in public discourse such

0:38:34.676 --> 0:38:36.636
<v Speaker 1>that people start to think about it as a movement,

0:38:37.076 --> 0:38:39.956
<v Speaker 1>all the way up to reforming those policies and laws

0:38:39.956 --> 0:38:42.636
<v Speaker 1>that allow these things to continue. Well, one change that

0:38:42.876 --> 0:38:49.556
<v Speaker 1>might potentially becoming is ironically driven by a rapidly growing

0:38:49.716 --> 0:38:58.116
<v Speaker 1>number of wildly successful and heavily publicized terrorist attacks. Yeah,

0:38:58.156 --> 0:39:01.196
<v Speaker 1>which is what we've seen in the last few years.

0:39:01.356 --> 0:39:03.756
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm oversimplifying a bit, but I would say

0:39:03.756 --> 0:39:08.396
<v Speaker 1>since Charlottesville, American public consciousness, US public consciousness has really

0:39:08.436 --> 0:39:12.236
<v Speaker 1>been profoundly raised around these issues, such that even events

0:39:12.276 --> 0:39:15.076
<v Speaker 1>that take place abroad like the christ Church, New Zealand

0:39:15.076 --> 0:39:20.796
<v Speaker 1>attacks are incorporated into our understanding or our wake up call,

0:39:20.876 --> 0:39:22.996
<v Speaker 1>which I think was not so much true for the

0:39:23.116 --> 0:39:27.156
<v Speaker 1>unders Bravick attacks, which although there was interested in the

0:39:27.196 --> 0:39:28.876
<v Speaker 1>United States, and there was a movie and there was

0:39:28.876 --> 0:39:31.036
<v Speaker 1>a long New Yorker article, there was still some tendency

0:39:31.076 --> 0:39:33.916
<v Speaker 1>to see this as though it were a Northern European problem,

0:39:34.196 --> 0:39:37.276
<v Speaker 1>you know, something, not a problem of the US. On

0:39:37.276 --> 0:39:39.436
<v Speaker 1>top of that, there was the fact that Bravik, you know,

0:39:39.636 --> 0:39:41.516
<v Speaker 1>was a white guy who killed a lot of white people,

0:39:41.716 --> 0:39:44.196
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and so it was it seemed possible not

0:39:44.236 --> 0:39:47.716
<v Speaker 1>to construct this narrative. But the recent events don't look

0:39:47.796 --> 0:39:51.516
<v Speaker 1>that way. They look like a coordinated set of events

0:39:51.556 --> 0:39:53.836
<v Speaker 1>around the world. And what's more, we also now have

0:39:54.316 --> 0:39:58.196
<v Speaker 1>a powerful comparison to make, which is the comparison to

0:39:58.356 --> 0:40:02.156
<v Speaker 1>self radicalized terrorists who were acting in the name of Islam,

0:40:03.036 --> 0:40:07.036
<v Speaker 1>who also have practiced a kind of leaderless resistance. But

0:40:07.196 --> 0:40:09.196
<v Speaker 1>that's not how a lot of the most effective the

0:40:09.276 --> 0:40:11.476
<v Speaker 1>tacks of the Islamic state operate. They operate on a

0:40:11.596 --> 0:40:14.876
<v Speaker 1>leaderless resistance principle. So we now have a salient example

0:40:14.876 --> 0:40:17.756
<v Speaker 1>in our minds and lots and lots of attacks. Do

0:40:17.836 --> 0:40:21.796
<v Speaker 1>you have a sense that these attacks are actually speeding

0:40:21.876 --> 0:40:24.316
<v Speaker 1>up or is that an artifact of our starting to

0:40:24.356 --> 0:40:27.276
<v Speaker 1>notice them more. It feels to me like a wave

0:40:27.596 --> 0:40:31.556
<v Speaker 1>of attacks that we're in. And something that I have

0:40:31.716 --> 0:40:36.876
<v Speaker 1>been trying to talk about since Charlottesville is that the

0:40:36.916 --> 0:40:41.916
<v Speaker 1>body count is very very low. Still, given the kind

0:40:42.036 --> 0:40:45.556
<v Speaker 1>of public facing activism that we can observe, the body

0:40:45.636 --> 0:40:48.036
<v Speaker 1>count is low relative to what it could be. Well,

0:40:48.876 --> 0:40:51.556
<v Speaker 1>so if we compare the earlier moment with this moment

0:40:52.436 --> 0:40:56.916
<v Speaker 1>and compare something like similar amounts of public sphere activity

0:40:58.196 --> 0:41:01.116
<v Speaker 1>with where we are right now, the comparative body count

0:41:01.156 --> 0:41:04.356
<v Speaker 1>is very low, meaning that I would expect there to

0:41:04.396 --> 0:41:07.476
<v Speaker 1>be more death. But does that mean, just to clarify,

0:41:07.516 --> 0:41:10.036
<v Speaker 1>does that mean you expect more death is coming or

0:41:10.076 --> 0:41:12.876
<v Speaker 1>that you're surprised that it hasn't come yet. No, no, no no, no,

0:41:12.956 --> 0:41:16.956
<v Speaker 1>I would expect more mass attacks to becoming. Yes, And

0:41:17.916 --> 0:41:20.836
<v Speaker 1>we should pause on that for a moment. You're saying,

0:41:20.876 --> 0:41:24.076
<v Speaker 1>in light of the historical examples and evidence, you would

0:41:24.116 --> 0:41:29.796
<v Speaker 1>predict that there are more very violent public attacks coming. Yeah, Um,

0:41:29.996 --> 0:41:32.996
<v Speaker 1>that would be my hunch. I mean, historians always are

0:41:33.076 --> 0:41:36.356
<v Speaker 1>reluctant to make prognosis about the future, and understandably, I

0:41:36.596 --> 0:41:39.756
<v Speaker 1>am Like I said, I don't have an archive, but

0:41:39.916 --> 0:41:43.956
<v Speaker 1>my hunch is that given how much public facing activity

0:41:43.996 --> 0:41:48.036
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in the last say five years, I am

0:41:48.156 --> 0:41:51.516
<v Speaker 1>staggered that the body count is not already higher. So

0:41:51.596 --> 0:41:55.556
<v Speaker 1>I would be very surprised if it did not amplify UM.

0:41:56.196 --> 0:41:58.516
<v Speaker 1>And that's also true because we have this other X

0:41:58.556 --> 0:42:02.676
<v Speaker 1>factor about so if you look at rises in the

0:42:02.756 --> 0:42:06.636
<v Speaker 1>clan throughout its life, so from eighteen sixty six to

0:42:06.676 --> 0:42:09.076
<v Speaker 1>the present, we have these clearly defined ebbs and flow

0:42:09.436 --> 0:42:14.916
<v Speaker 1>of the clan. UM. The the high points always align

0:42:15.156 --> 0:42:18.236
<v Speaker 1>with the aftermath of warfare in American society, and they

0:42:18.236 --> 0:42:20.396
<v Speaker 1>do that more consistently than they align with things like

0:42:20.476 --> 0:42:24.796
<v Speaker 1>economic hardship or poverty, or even anti immigration sentiment or

0:42:25.276 --> 0:42:31.676
<v Speaker 1>um segregation law changes. UM. And the fact that we

0:42:31.716 --> 0:42:35.716
<v Speaker 1>are now in a prolonged aftermath of war period that

0:42:35.836 --> 0:42:38.476
<v Speaker 1>is stretched out coming out of Iraq and eventually out

0:42:38.516 --> 0:42:40.996
<v Speaker 1>of I mean we're in We're in kind of like

0:42:41.036 --> 0:42:47.356
<v Speaker 1>a forever aftermath right now, forever wars aftermath exactly. And

0:42:47.396 --> 0:42:48.796
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is a this is a kind of

0:42:48.836 --> 0:42:51.436
<v Speaker 1>aftermath that we have never seen before. If you think

0:42:51.436 --> 0:42:54.796
<v Speaker 1>about kind of the cycles of combat and aftermath um

0:42:54.796 --> 0:42:57.276
<v Speaker 1>in that it is mostly focused on one sector of

0:42:57.316 --> 0:43:00.596
<v Speaker 1>society that interacts less and less with other sectors of society. Right,

0:43:00.596 --> 0:43:04.756
<v Speaker 1>we see increasing segregation of military families into communities apart

0:43:04.836 --> 0:43:08.716
<v Speaker 1>from other families. UM. We see increasing use of things

0:43:08.756 --> 0:43:12.156
<v Speaker 1>like op loss and multiple tours to put people back

0:43:12.196 --> 0:43:14.556
<v Speaker 1>in combat over and over rather than drafting new people.

0:43:14.836 --> 0:43:18.876
<v Speaker 1>I teach at a university which is as wonderful students,

0:43:18.916 --> 0:43:24.636
<v Speaker 1>but I hardly ever have students who have themselves served,

0:43:24.756 --> 0:43:27.876
<v Speaker 1>or have even have family members who've served. So there's

0:43:27.916 --> 0:43:30.876
<v Speaker 1>a profound social segregation around who is doing this work

0:43:30.876 --> 0:43:34.836
<v Speaker 1>of violence, and a stretching out of the combat aftermath period.

0:43:35.636 --> 0:43:38.436
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what that will do in those earlier periods.

0:43:38.436 --> 0:43:42.356
<v Speaker 1>It's really interesting because at one point I wondered if

0:43:42.396 --> 0:43:45.036
<v Speaker 1>we might be seeing like a Rambo effect, right where

0:43:45.116 --> 0:43:47.556
<v Speaker 1>veterans come back and just can't stop doing the violence

0:43:47.556 --> 0:43:51.076
<v Speaker 1>of warfare. But it turns out that violence increases for

0:43:51.156 --> 0:43:56.316
<v Speaker 1>everybody in American society after warfare. People who definitely didn't serve,

0:43:56.396 --> 0:44:00.476
<v Speaker 1>like older people and women and children, across all of

0:44:00.516 --> 0:44:03.956
<v Speaker 1>those groups. There's just more violence in the aftermath of

0:44:03.956 --> 0:44:07.636
<v Speaker 1>warfare in American society. So in this long aftermath period.

0:44:07.956 --> 0:44:12.556
<v Speaker 1>I think we should be concerned about this effect where

0:44:12.636 --> 0:44:15.156
<v Speaker 1>vigilante or excuse me, revolutionary groups in this case are

0:44:15.156 --> 0:44:20.476
<v Speaker 1>able to either mobilize that violent sentiment or I don't know,

0:44:20.556 --> 0:44:23.836
<v Speaker 1>contribute to infanon in some way. I want to close

0:44:23.836 --> 0:44:27.636
<v Speaker 1>by asking you about a phenomenon that is obviously very

0:44:27.676 --> 0:44:32.956
<v Speaker 1>significant for the post nineteen ninety five of white supremacy

0:44:32.996 --> 0:44:35.196
<v Speaker 1>the era that we're in now, and that is the Internet,

0:44:35.276 --> 0:44:39.316
<v Speaker 1>not in its proto message board form, but in the

0:44:39.756 --> 0:44:43.156
<v Speaker 1>contemporary form that we know, which includes not only Internet

0:44:43.156 --> 0:44:46.196
<v Speaker 1>one point oh, but also social media, and in which,

0:44:46.236 --> 0:44:49.316
<v Speaker 1>among other things, it's much easier to spread information to

0:44:49.396 --> 0:44:53.196
<v Speaker 1>people who never have to have individual human contact with

0:44:53.236 --> 0:44:55.476
<v Speaker 1>each other. They might, but they don't need to have done.

0:44:56.036 --> 0:44:58.596
<v Speaker 1>It strikes me that, on the one hand, the phenomenon

0:44:58.636 --> 0:45:01.156
<v Speaker 1>of self radicalization, the Dylan roof whom, as you say

0:45:01.316 --> 0:45:04.396
<v Speaker 1>and the close of your book, never actually had to

0:45:04.436 --> 0:45:07.676
<v Speaker 1>meet any people who shared his views to develop them.

0:45:07.676 --> 0:45:09.156
<v Speaker 1>So in that sense you could sort of imagine and

0:45:09.276 --> 0:45:12.676
<v Speaker 1>that the Internet is a social media are our vehicles

0:45:12.716 --> 0:45:16.116
<v Speaker 1>to spread ideology and to spread violence. But on the

0:45:16.116 --> 0:45:18.556
<v Speaker 1>other hand, we did have Charlottesville, which was less we

0:45:18.636 --> 0:45:21.516
<v Speaker 1>Forget began with a march that was called Unite the Right,

0:45:21.996 --> 0:45:26.516
<v Speaker 1>which was trying precisely to translate Internet connections to the

0:45:26.596 --> 0:45:31.236
<v Speaker 1>real life sphere. Talk about, if you would, the Internet

0:45:31.236 --> 0:45:34.796
<v Speaker 1>and how it's going to affect or is affecting white

0:45:34.796 --> 0:45:38.396
<v Speaker 1>power in our present moment. The actual violence of even

0:45:38.476 --> 0:45:42.156
<v Speaker 1>public facing events like Charlottesville that led to the death

0:45:42.156 --> 0:45:45.556
<v Speaker 1>of Heather Higher and the beating of other demonstrators is

0:45:45.596 --> 0:45:48.716
<v Speaker 1>important to queue up as we have that conversation. The

0:45:48.756 --> 0:45:55.396
<v Speaker 1>Internet is both concerning and immensely hopeful. The use of

0:45:55.516 --> 0:45:59.596
<v Speaker 1>viral videos and live streaming of the attacks is new

0:45:59.836 --> 0:46:02.316
<v Speaker 1>and strikes me as very much of a piece with

0:46:02.396 --> 0:46:06.036
<v Speaker 1>our present moment. And I'm thinking of the christ Church

0:46:06.076 --> 0:46:09.276
<v Speaker 1>shooter live streaming the attack, and also the militia is

0:46:09.276 --> 0:46:14.156
<v Speaker 1>on the border detaining undocumented immigrants and live streaming, you know,

0:46:14.196 --> 0:46:17.556
<v Speaker 1>their agony as they were held by a non government

0:46:17.916 --> 0:46:21.116
<v Speaker 1>group in order to turn them over to the border patrol.

0:46:21.636 --> 0:46:24.636
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, I do want to say that

0:46:24.716 --> 0:46:28.036
<v Speaker 1>like there is, there is a way that the Internet

0:46:28.516 --> 0:46:32.396
<v Speaker 1>could also be an agent of change and could offer

0:46:32.516 --> 0:46:35.596
<v Speaker 1>us a seed of hope. The idea that we talked

0:46:35.636 --> 0:46:38.796
<v Speaker 1>about with connecting these stories together as a form of

0:46:38.876 --> 0:46:42.116
<v Speaker 1>understanding the history such that we can talk about Christchurch

0:46:42.116 --> 0:46:45.516
<v Speaker 1>and the Tree of Life shooting and Charlottesville and Dylan

0:46:45.596 --> 0:46:48.836
<v Speaker 1>Roofs shooting and Charleston all as the act of the

0:46:48.836 --> 0:46:52.516
<v Speaker 1>white power movement. One potential there is to connect the

0:46:53.036 --> 0:46:56.636
<v Speaker 1>impacted communities with one another and to create a kind

0:46:56.676 --> 0:47:00.476
<v Speaker 1>of coalition politics that could resist this kind of violence.

0:47:01.676 --> 0:47:04.756
<v Speaker 1>And so, you know, the Internet gives and takes away,

0:47:04.796 --> 0:47:07.876
<v Speaker 1>I suppose, but there is a way that it might

0:47:07.956 --> 0:47:12.036
<v Speaker 1>also provide an instrument for public understanding that wasn't available

0:47:12.076 --> 0:47:15.916
<v Speaker 1>to us in that earlier period. Kathleen, thank you very

0:47:15.996 --> 0:47:18.396
<v Speaker 1>very much, not just for talking with us, but for

0:47:18.476 --> 0:47:22.796
<v Speaker 1>your extraordinarily important work to help us come to terms

0:47:22.836 --> 0:47:28.556
<v Speaker 1>with by recognizing a genuine, organized, unified set of ideologies

0:47:28.556 --> 0:47:31.996
<v Speaker 1>that are in fact a social movement with real violent tendencies.

0:47:32.116 --> 0:47:34.796
<v Speaker 1>Unless we recognize that, we're not going to be anywhere.

0:47:34.916 --> 0:47:37.236
<v Speaker 1>And when we do recognize that, and I have some

0:47:37.276 --> 0:47:40.516
<v Speaker 1>confidence that we will, it will be thanks to your

0:47:40.516 --> 0:47:42.556
<v Speaker 1>work and to the work of other other people like you.

0:47:42.676 --> 0:47:44.996
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very very much for being with us. Well,

0:47:44.996 --> 0:47:54.836
<v Speaker 1>thank you for having me listening to my conversation with Kathleen.

0:47:55.276 --> 0:47:59.036
<v Speaker 1>Now in the aftermath of the Capital attack is an

0:47:59.076 --> 0:48:03.276
<v Speaker 1>excellent reminder that white supremacists are not merely peripheral loaners,

0:48:03.636 --> 0:48:07.956
<v Speaker 1>but part of a large, significant, organized movement that shares

0:48:08.116 --> 0:48:13.596
<v Speaker 1>coordinated plans, literature, and objectives. The novel The Turner Diaries

0:48:13.836 --> 0:48:17.796
<v Speaker 1>that Kathleen and I discussed was invoked again by Kathleen

0:48:18.156 --> 0:48:20.796
<v Speaker 1>in an article she wrote for The Washington Post in

0:48:20.876 --> 0:48:23.876
<v Speaker 1>January of twenty twenty one. She points out there that

0:48:23.876 --> 0:48:28.116
<v Speaker 1>The Turner Diaries also involves an attack on the US Capital,

0:48:28.596 --> 0:48:31.556
<v Speaker 1>one that was not designed in the novel to destroy

0:48:31.636 --> 0:48:35.356
<v Speaker 1>the capital altogether, but to show on the fence white

0:48:35.396 --> 0:48:38.716
<v Speaker 1>Americans that nothing is out of bounds, that the Capital

0:48:38.796 --> 0:48:42.916
<v Speaker 1>is a soft target, and that ultimately even the Capital

0:48:43.036 --> 0:48:48.596
<v Speaker 1>can be attacked. Food for thought going forward, until the

0:48:48.636 --> 0:48:50.996
<v Speaker 1>next time I speak to you with a fresh new episode,

0:48:51.476 --> 0:48:57.436
<v Speaker 1>Be careful, be safe, and be well. Deep background is

0:48:57.476 --> 0:49:00.956
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by Pushkin Industries. Our producer is Lydia Gencott,

0:49:01.196 --> 0:49:04.476
<v Speaker 1>our engineer is Martin Gonzalez, and our showrunner is Sophie

0:49:04.476 --> 0:49:08.356
<v Speaker 1>Crane mckibbon. Theme music by Luis Guerra at Pushkin. Thanks

0:49:08.356 --> 0:49:12.316
<v Speaker 1>to Mia Loobell, Julia Barton, Heather Faine, Carlie mcliori, Mackie Taylor,

0:49:12.476 --> 0:49:15.316
<v Speaker 1>Eric Sandler, and Jacob Weisberg. You can find me on

0:49:15.316 --> 0:49:17.996
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and Noah R. Feldman. I also write a column

0:49:17.996 --> 0:49:20.636
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Opinion, which you can find at bloomberg dot

0:49:20.636 --> 0:49:24.916
<v Speaker 1>com slashfeld To discover Bloomberg's original slate of podcasts, go

0:49:24.996 --> 0:49:28.356
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg dot com slash podcasts, and if you liked

0:49:28.356 --> 0:49:30.756
<v Speaker 1>what you've heard today, please write a review or tell

0:49:30.796 --> 0:49:32.876
<v Speaker 1>a friend. This is deep in background