WEBVTT - Sailing Solo Again | Salty Dogs 0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:03.800 What do you call two guys were there when this happened? 0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:06.280 Back to return at Spurlock Michael Spurlock at the chin, 0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:08.200 and he's still the twenty. He still the twenty five 0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:14.400 thirty top forty yardline history, fifty forty thirty yards. Michael Rot, 0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:18.640 Michael Rock, Michael Rod stop tap, here you go, and 0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:27.200 then sixty two yard for your goal attempts. It is God, God, God, 0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:34.640 God box Eagles. Who can forget again? I'm looking again already. 0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:39.640 Derek Bucks, diredy touchdown tamp a day, Derek Bucks, spariable player. 0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:43.400 You're the national football like third is Tuck Daggers in 0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:45.920 where are you gonna win the Super Bowl? We call 0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:50.239 them the salty Dogs? He done there? Jeff, are you 0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:52.760 doing today? Awesome? Awesome? You're ready to do a little 0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:55.680 podcast for the fans here I am. I am pumped up. 0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:57.560 I don't know what day it is, but I'm ready 0:00:57.560 --> 0:00:59.600 to go. It is hard to keep tray. It is crazy. 0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:02.440 It's Wednesday. It is. Yeah, Well it could be a 0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:04.880 Monday because I watched football last night, so I know 0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:08.640 that's I'm just saying it could be Tuesday since you 0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:11.480 watched last night. It could be Friday, crazy time. We're 0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:14.800 not gonna stop until the NFL's on every night. Uh, 0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:16.880 that was weird football being on last night. It was 0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:19.440 a good game, though, Yeah, I can't say I saw 0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:21.440 a ton of it because I was pretty interested in 0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:23.520 the Rays as well. I was doing both. I was 0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:26.840 flipping back and forth. How about those Rays? Well, actually, 0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:32.039 I have to confess I was not doing the flipping. 0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:34.160 The Dodgers are on, so I had to deal with 0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:38.840 that last night. Jeff wife is a big Goddress fan. Therefore, 0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:41.480 she's feeling the pain once again once again as it 0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:44.200 looks like they could squander yet another opportunity when it 0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:46.080 looks like they have the best right and and and 0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:48.200 she wouldn't say this to you, but I will. At 0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:52.400 least her team's in it. I was taking a sip 0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:54.880 when you said that nearly had a spit tach. My 0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:58.600 team was in it. So both teams either playoffs but 0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.480 not very far well made the playoffs and neither one. Well, 0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:03.200 the Dodger are still a shot. We can't write them all. 0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:05.960 And congrats to the Rays. They could wrap it up. Yeah, 0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:12.160 amazing you they're just throwing like one nineties six and 0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:16.000 nasty think you think Houston would have Steve Sacks playing 0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:21.680 second and then they're they're playing phenomenal defense, Joey Windle 0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:24.240 over their thirds like a vacuum and then uh, and 0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:26.840 then they just wait for the Astros to make a mistake. 0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:29.240 And this is a nice part about the Salty Dogs. 0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:32.799 We're all about football and Buccaneers stuff, but we're also 0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:35.400 sports film. Well, it's kind of an incredible it's kind 0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:37.480 of an incredible time for this area after the lightning 0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:40.320 one Stanley Cup and now the Rays could win their 0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:42.920 first championship and and I still have a lot of 0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:45.280 faith that the Bucks are going to be on prime contender. 0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:49.360 When it's all a sudden Yeah, no pressure, Tom. You know, 0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:51.840 I was just talking about the Salty Dogs defense. Let 0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:55.200 me get your salty dog can't come in here very 0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:59.520 quick and fast, get out of here. Um the raised defense. 0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:02.560 Did you see the catch by Manuel Margot when he 0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:06.720 went flying over the sideline? I have long held and 0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:08.680 I want to see how you feel about this, that 0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:11.079 if you cannot stay in the field of play while 0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:14.600 making a catch, it should not count as a catch. 0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:18.840 You did not keep that ball in the field of 0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:21.520 play when you're trying to rob a homer or Rob's 0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:24.040 going in a foul territory. You're trying to keep it 0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.919 from landing out of play. And if you fall over 0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:29.880 the wall into into the out of play, then you 0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:32.720 didn't succeed, No, because you're out of bounce. Yeah, if 0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:35.360 you if you jump over the center, now, if you 0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:38.600 stick your arm over there, that's the whole idea. That 0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:40.760 means the ball never landed on the ground. Right, Well, 0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:42.440 the ball never land on the ground just one either, 0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:45.760 although you could say, but yeah, if you were if 0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:47.400 there was a fence short enough for a guy in 0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:49.440 the outfield to jump and he makes an incredible catch 0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:51.280 but then flips over it, which I'm sure has happened 0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:55.240 at some point in baseball history. He lands out there, 0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:59.120 that shouldn't kind. If he can't stand out there and 0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:02.080 wait for Homer and catch it, that wouldn't be an out. 0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:03.880 So why isn't it out if you fall out there 0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:08.520 while catching it? I just don't agree. I I love 0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:10.440 baseball and I like most of the rules, but I 0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:12.880 think that that's the beauty about sports. You don't have 0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:17.120 to agree. Um, all right, do you want to talk 0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:21.000 about some I do? I had about a million roster 0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:25.440 moves yesterday. Holy smokes it, it is crazy. Well, the first, 0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:28.000 the first Domino and all that, of course, was Vida 0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:30.920 Vella's injury, which was I'm still not over that. Sorry. 0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:33.279 I know, I woke up the next day in such 0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:36.200 a bad mood. And it's not like it's affecting me 0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:40.640 more than his teammates or he was really off to 0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:42.440 a good stuf. I don't know if some people realize 0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:44.159 just how good he was playing and just how big 0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:46.120 of a loss that is. And it's sad because it 0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:49.760 was all coming together for him. We'll see what one 0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:52.520 loss means by the end of the year. But I 0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:56.960 think it's possible that the on that Thursday night, the 0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:59.640 loss of Vita Vea was worse for us than the 0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:02.760 loss of the game. Oh, I agree, because it's never 0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:05.400 I mean, you can forget the Chicago game. It's done, 0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.640 it's over, a move on. But uh, having Via Vega 0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:12.120 gone is going to be every single game well every yeah, 0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:13.800 but every win and every lost counts, and when we 0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:15.120 count them up at the end of the year, if 0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:19.600 you if you find out you're you missed by one. Yeah, 0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:23.760 Well I don't envision that in a but but if 0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:25.960 as I look at that Chicago game, it was bad 0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:28.040 enough that that we lost for you to vea But 0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:35.080 I just what I felt, really, I just really just 0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:39.719 didn't understand all the penalties. And I know I couldn't 0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:43.160 be careful because if you have a team that played 0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:46.839 so well the week before, you have the offensive player 0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:50.400 of the week, and then this week you're having all 0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:53.719 these issues. And Bruce Arian said, it's you know, we 0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.040 got to coach them up better. But I don't know 0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:59.359 how in three days they forgot Okay, I thought you 0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:01.000 were going a different No, no, no, I'm not No, 0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:03.159 I'm not talking about Zebras at all, not at all. No, 0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:05.839 I'm talking about the fact that I think that's just 0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:07.800 a game that got away from them, and I think 0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:12.960 that hurts more. I I really believe that that that 0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:15.760 loss bothered me more than the last time we were 0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.280 in Chicago. And law well, that one was you were 0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:21.720 kind of over it by midway through the second you're 0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:24.480 getting spanked and it's overwhe with it. That was about 0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:29.920 Mitch Robiskie's career production in that game alone. But yeah, 0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:31.680 of course, a tougher loss that you think you're gonna 0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.240 win is a harder one to swallow. Uh. As far 0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:37.400 as penalty, as far as the the referees, let's just 0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:39.719 say that Bruce arians was just asked in a zoom 0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:43.120 call if the Buccaneers had submitted the play where Shack 0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:45.240 Barrett was called for rough in the pass her and 0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:48.320 if there had been any response, and his answer was no, 0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:50.680 common brother. Yeah, So that's about as far as we 0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:55.560 can go with that. No, I agree. Yeah, I concur 0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:59.120 with Bruce Sians on now, uh that you concur with 0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:04.200 no common in me keeping your wallet there? Uh yeah. Um, 0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.039 there there have been a penalty There have been penalty problems. Um. 0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:09.880 And I think our offensive line is playing very well 0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:12.080 for the most part, and I think they have some 0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:14.560 games that are great. The Chargers game, the offensive line 0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:17.480 was great. Could have been the m V p uh 0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:22.560 the Chicagogy and they weren't great, although the pressure still 0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:25.200 wasn't terrible and the running and they did open some 0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:27.880 good holes for Ronald Jones. There are penalty problems. We've 0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:31.360 had nine holding calls. That's not the most. Kansas City 0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:34.080 actually has more. It's funny because you look at it, 0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:37.320 the teams with the most holding calls are US, Kansas City, Buffalo, 0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:40.800 they're all doing pretty well. Seattle has some of the 0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:43.320 most false starts. They've always been a highly penalized team, 0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:46.040 and they keep winning. So a high number of penalties 0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:48.800 in and of itself has not been correlated with winning 0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:51.280 and losing teams. Like I said, Seattle has been a 0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:53.800 highly penalized team for a long time. Raiders used to 0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:58.440 be great and they didn't care about the penalties they got, right, Um, 0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:01.600 So it's not really the number, it's it's the situations, 0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:03.880 and it's too many of them are putting the Bucks 0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:06.600 in bad down and distant situations. So nine holding calls, 0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:08.400 one of those was on the receiver. So eight holding 0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:11.560 calls on our offensive lineman and eight false starts, five 0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:14.559 of which were on offensive linemen. So, uh, that's probably 0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:16.240 the only thing that they need to clean up. And 0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:18.880 then and then you could say it's already above average 0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:21.480 line according to the stats. Yeah, And and it's something 0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:23.600 that you can clean up really quickly. I mean, it's 0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:26.160 not it's not like you gotta figure out how to 0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:30.160 run faster, you know, I mean, it's it's it's a 0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:33.560 mental it's a mental approach. Well, some of it is Yeah. 0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:36.120 Some of it though, is attention to detail. Cruiserans are 0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:39.520 just saying if you're you know, it's techniques. Sometimes on 0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:41.720 these holding calls, you get your feet beat as as 0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:43.040 the way you put it, and then the guy beats 0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:45.480 you because your footwork was wrong. And then he's like, 0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:47.120 if he beats you and his head to the quarterback, 0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:49.120 I want you to hold him. I don't want their quarterback. Yeah, 0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:51.360 he staid, he'll take the fifteen yard penalty rather than 0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:55.120 having his quarterback kids whatever. Well, if it's a personal foul, 0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:58.400 but whatever, yes, so and that is a problem, and 0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:01.000 I'll throw another number at you. Um. The Bucks are 0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:03.240 pretty good. They're about mill of the pack in third 0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:05.800 down conversions this year at forty one point five percent, 0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:08.640 which is amazing to me that the middle of the 0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:12.719 pack in the NFL right now is conversion rate ten 0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:14.360 fifteen years ago, that would have been one of the 0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:16.720 best teams in the league. Now that there's three teams 0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:19.679 over fift the Packers are coming here at fifty one 0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:23.760 percent and they're not even number one in the league. Uh. 0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:27.640 The Buccaneers are pretty good. They're very good. If they 0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:29.480 can keep it short. They're one of the best teams 0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:31.840 in the league third and third and one, third and six, 0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:34.440 and so when we've been able to do well on 0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:37.160 first and second down and crucially avoid penalties that put 0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:39.319 you in behind the eight ball and done in distance, 0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:43.240 the offense moves along just fine once you go from 0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:45.560 third and seven and back. We're three of thirty so 0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:50.160 far this year, and um so as soon as you 0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.160 hurt yourself a little bit, you kill your drive. Third 0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:56.120 and third and lung is always hard. But I think 0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:58.200 we probably could do a little better. We did convert 0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:00.520 one in that game on a pass too camp break. 0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:03.920 By the way, I went to point out the very 0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:06.600 top of this that we are fun. We're sailing solo 0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:09.600 again for another week. And last week that was on 0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:12.200 on purpose because the schedule was so compressed. This week 0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:14.200 we just got caught up a little bit. The schedule 0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:18.400 changed because of testing changes. Players now get tested on 0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:20.560 game day, which means they can come back in the 0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:23.600 building on Monday, so they're so the Bucks are going 0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:26.400 back to the normal NFL routine of getting their players 0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:29.040 in on Monday, giving them treatment, breaking down the film, 0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:31.559 then giving them Tuesday off, then coming back on Wednesday 0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:33.000 to start the new week. This week is a little 0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:35.560 bit different because we got a bonus practice song Tuesday. 0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:37.520 But anyway, the whole schedule got mixed around, and then 0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:39.600 today got mixed around a little bit. We thought we 0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:41.640 had a guest lined up. It didn't work out, and 0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.400 rather than ask somebody at short notice, we're like, okay, 0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:47.880 well we'll just get We'll just we'll just have to 0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:51.199 be better at our jobs, very obtaining. We have to 0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:53.040 be on our a game. So did you have something 0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:54.880 more to say about the third downs? Those sounds like 0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:58.400 you're about no. I just it was just frustrating. I 0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:01.160 just thought it was very, very frustrating in game. You know, 0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:03.840 it was there for the taking, as they say, and 0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:06.120 and you know what, Chicago deserves credit because they did 0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:07.800 what they needed to do to get to to get 0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:11.719 it done, you know. And so but it's like you said, 0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:13.280 you're gonna go back, and you look at it, and 0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:15.440 as time goes on, you look at the games that 0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:18.720 you think you should have capitalized on and you and 0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:26.080 you didn't and that and it's not just us saying, um, 0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:29.560 the team kind of hurt themselves more than than the 0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:33.760 Bears did. I mean, nationally, Yeah, everybody's been talking about 0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.520 the players are saying it, but also other people viewing 0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:43.240 it or like, but I will say Chicago. Um, I 0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:45.520 don't know who it was, but someone what do they 0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:48.640 four and one? Now someone's I don't know, they're the 0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:51.080 worst four and one team in the league. You always 0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:53.040 hear that, but you go, you know what, you know, 0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:55.480 you know, give them credit. E they're getting it. They 0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:57.920 made a quarterback change. It seemed to be the right 0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:00.240 thing to do. When they needed to make the play, 0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:02.840 they made the play. Um, when they need to make 0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:06.800 a defensive stop, they made the defensive stop. So it's 0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:08.880 their win, it's their w I guess it's I don't 0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:10.480 know if it's on the same level. But last year 0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:13.200 the Packers win thirteen three and people were calling them 0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:15.559 the worst thirteen and three team ever. They made it 0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:18.160 to the NFC Championship, and now there are four or oh, 0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:21.200 and they look fantastic, Like maybe they were actually good 0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:22.920 and it's hard to get to thirteen and three without 0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:25.120 being really good. Yeah, there's some teams you just like 0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:26.840 to hate on, you know. I mean, I don't like 0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:30.360 the Bears. Well it's just say perfect example. Well, I'm 0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:34.880 from St. Louis, so um there there is that and 0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:38.360 soldier field and we all both know people who are 0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:41.959 rooting for the Bears. Who happened keep reminding you do? 0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:45.200 Oh yeah, actually you know all right then and there 0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:48.400 and so you just kind of you know, Grin and 0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:52.240 Barrett no pun intended. Yeah, okay, I'm glad that's over. 0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:58.160 So back to yes, how do you respond? How do 0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:01.040 you fill that void? You can't. You don't have another view, 0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:04.079 Joe Man, So you just you can you get a 0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:05.760 variety of guys to step up. I don't think it's 0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:08.240 gonna be one guy and he and if you don't know, 0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:11.160 Nacho refers to over Keim Newonias roaches and I also 0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:14.000 think it. I think other guys you know you, you say, 0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:15.400 the guy you know not you has to come in. 0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:18.040 He has to step up. But I also I also 0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:20.880 think the guys around him have to. You know, they're 0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:23.440 playing a certain game with vitav in there. Now their 0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.800 game kind of changes a little bit. Yeah, it depends 0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:29.560 on how well. I don't think that the Bucks approach 0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:32.760 on defense will change the last Nacho to try to 0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:34.480 do the same stuff that Vida was doing as much 0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:37.840 as possible. But if he can't keep blockers multiple blockers 0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:41.120 off as well as Vita does, because hardly anybody can. 0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:45.760 That's why he's nat was having a fantastic training camp. 0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:47.360 One of the he was one of the biggest buzzes 0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:49.680 of all the camp, and some of the defenders are clearly, 0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:52.360 even though they hate how it happened, clearly decided he's 0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:53.720 gonna get a chance to show what he can do. 0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:57.160 So we'll see, uh, and maybe everything will be just 0:13:57.200 --> 0:13:58.840 as good as close to it. But let's just say 0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:01.319 there's some more blockers and a free because they don't 0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:02.640 have a Vita be in there to hold up one 0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:05.439 guy with one arm and one with the other arm. Uh. Yeah, 0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:07.160 I could change it, could change the game for the 0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:09.160 linebackers a little bit, and they may have to work 0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:11.280 their way off blocks a little bit more. I don't know, 0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:14.160 we'll see. Yeah, well, it's definitely a great test. I mean, 0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:16.680 you're gonna find out real quick how good, how good 0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:20.160 it is. I think last week I asked you did 0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:22.560 you know who? And this is true anymore, but at 0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:25.080 the time who led led the team in receiving arts 0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:27.840 and you surprise me by knowing it Scotty Miller because 0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:29.400 I thought that was a little bit of a tricky question. 0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:32.000 Do you know who leads the team in quarterback hits 0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:39.640 right now? No? No, I was wondering if you could 0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:42.920 go for two for two. Will Goldston, who you do 0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:45.200 not tend to think of as a pass rusher, he's 0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:47.280 got seven. That's the most of anybody on the team, 0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:51.400 more than j PP. He's been quietly making a lot 0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.480 of impact in the backfield. And that's in that's even 0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:57.480 though his role really isn't that's not really his role. 0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:00.280 It wasn't. Maybe we'll be more now because you go 0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:02.640 into your sub packages. You know, in our base you 0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:05.200 have three down linemen Vita b In and in Tomming, Gun, 0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:07.680 Sue and well Ghoston. You go into a sub package 0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:10.480 with five defensive backs and it's a lot more like 0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:12.200 a four or three front, and you only have two 0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:15.120 down linemen in the middle, and it's more often been 0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:17.240 Sue and Ya. But maybe we'll will play a little 0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:19.480 bit more in there now, uh and get more chances 0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:21.960 to rush the pastor and uh. That will be interesting 0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:24.760 to see. Yeah, it'll be fun to see too what 0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:28.480 what Todd Bowles does with um with the defense if 0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:30.720 he changes it up a little bit like you just said, no, 0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:32.440 you didn't think, I don't think. I don't think it'll 0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:35.920 be drastically unless unless, unless you're not getting the results. 0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:37.840 I think you try to do the same thing. I 0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:40.600 gotta turn them loose, and if you get the results, great. 0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:43.200 If you're not, then you have to make adjustments. Maybe 0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:45.160 you have to blitz more. Although he already is one 0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:46.880 of the most aggressive blitzers out there, I don't know 0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:49.240 how much more you can blitz. But been on a 0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:51.760 game to game basis. To be honest with you, here's 0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:55.040 another thing I found interesting in that UM Chicago game, 0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:58.480 and it was actually a good moment um. I think 0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:01.520 it was the second quarter, fourth and one at our 0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:06.560 own nineteen, and Bruce went for it. I liked it. Oh, 0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:10.000 I loved it. I need it. But we we had 0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:12.680 another fourth and short and we didn't go for it. 0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:16.760 Correct or I don't actually recall that this was fourth 0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:18.560 and inches and you have Tom Brady, who's proven throughout 0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:20.360 his career quarter he can make that play work. So 0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:24.360 I understand it's such. It's just something you don't see. 0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:27.360 And I want to tell you how rare this is 0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:31.120 because I looked it up uh on a site that 0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:35.000 the Pro Football Reference. Unfortunately, their database only goes back 0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:40.440 to still since all across the NFL, there have only 0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:44.200 been twenty times that teams have gone for it on 0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:47.080 fourth and one from inside their own twenty yard line. 0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:51.600 Twenty times and then what's that six years quarter of 0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:56.240 a century, so less than one time a year. Really, yes, 0:16:56.520 --> 0:17:01.480 but it gets better because most of the there's more Okay, 0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:04.920 if you're losing, if you're losing, if you're a fourth 0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:06.960 of one at your own nineteen in the fourth quarter 0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:10.280 with three minutes left and you're losing, it's not a 0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:11.760 crazy thing to go for it there because it's like, 0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:13.000 if we don't go for it, we don't get the 0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:16.199 ball back. That's not a crazy decision going for it 0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:20.200 when you have the lead in the first half. How 0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:23.400 many times does that happen? Three? This is the third 0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:26.560 time since that a coach has gone for it in 0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:31.359 the first half with his team winning, and they all worked. 0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:36.040 By the way they all worked well fourth and inches, 0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:37.879 you would think you should be able to get there. 0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:40.360 It worked. Out of twenty times that teams have done 0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:43.000 this since then, it's worked twelve times. But really it's 0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:44.920 told on eighteen because one of those was one where 0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:48.400 the punter on took the ball and they just took 0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:50.680 it a safety on purpose so that they could free 0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:52.600 kick with hardly any time left. And another one was 0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:54.520 when the quarterback kneeled in a tie game with one 0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:57.879 second left, so instead of punting and risking getting getting 0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:01.200 a block. So really, twelve out of eighteen times it's 0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:03.320 worked all three times when the coach has done it 0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:06.320 when leading in the first half. And that's what I 0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:09.080 found crazy about it, that that makes a much more 0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:12.359 bold decision because we've already got the lead. He really 0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:17.320 wanted dead biscuit. No, we're just getting no biscuit. So 0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:21.320 he um. I think that's what the analytics would tell 0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:23.040 you to do, but coaches still aren't doing it in 0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:26.320 that drastic of a situation because one of the one 0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.359 argument against it, Jeff is yeah, if you go for 0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:30.800 it and fourth and one, I see you did bring 0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:32.399 your phone in this time. If you go for it 0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:34.120 now I'm looking I'm actually looking at the re quarter 0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:36.480 of my phones over here, remember, and it's and it's dark. 0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:38.320 You did remember the recording? Yeah, that's what I was 0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:40.199 looking at to see if it was clicking because I 0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:42.760 was gonna go, how am I gonna tell Scott? Movie 0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:49.359 are good? I lost my tryan thought, oh okay, so 0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:50.720 you go for it and fourth and one and you 0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:53.640 make it. Okay, So now you're at like the twenty one. 0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:56.280 You're still a long way away. The drive could still 0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:58.320 three plays later and then you then you might look 0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:00.439 back and goal. Is that Gambell really worth it? But 0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:02.360 I think it is because I think what the analyts 0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:05.320 say is you're trying to steal as many possessions as possible, 0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:07.439 and by not punting it away there, you're basically stealing 0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:09.800 a possession. And if you can do that, maybe it 0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:11.200 wouldn't have worked this time. It did. We got a 0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:13.399 field goal. Maybe it wouldn't have worked this time. But 0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:16.560 if you do it all the times you should do it, 0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:18.840 it will work overall. Even I mean, it did work 0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:21.919 in terms of getting not getting stuck down there, but 0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:24.119 it could have not worked in terms of leading to 0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:26.520 a scoring drive. But in this case it did, so 0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:32.920 good stuff. I did a little research, did a little research. 0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:35.359 That's as far back as it went. I would have 0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:39.359 gone further. Well, that's still pretty far back. You know, 0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:41.959