WEBVTT - Jake Bittle on the Complexities of Climate Migration

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Drilled.

0:00:12.720 --> 0:00:17.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm Amy Westerveldt. We will be bringing you another season soon,

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 2>but in the meantime, I'm back with weekly updates on

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 2>various aspects of climate accountability and occasionally with some book

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 2>recommendations and interviews related to them. Like today, I have

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:36.519
<v Speaker 2>joining me Jake Biddle. He's a journalist for Grist, and

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 2>he also had a book come out just a couple

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 2>months ago about internal migration in the US caused by

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 2>climate change. It's called The Great Displacement. It's a great book.

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 2>All stick a link to it. In the show notes,

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 2>Jake talked to me about all kinds of things he

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 2>discovered while reporting this book, and it's pretty fascinating stuff.

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 2>That conversation is coming up after this quick break.

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Hi, my name is Jake Pittle. Okay.

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I want you to start by kind of setting the

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>stakes for people.

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:24.319
<v Speaker 3>I feel like we hear.

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Lots of numbers bandied about around climate migration. So, in

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 1>terms of internal migration within the US driven by a climate,

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:34.319
<v Speaker 1>what kinds of numbers are we seeing right now in

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the projections?

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 4>So, the most recent numbers suggest that each year, you know,

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 4>upwards of a million and closer in the past few

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 4>years to two or three million people are displaced from

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 4>their homes for any amount of time by a climate disaster, right,

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 4>and so the vast majority of those people end up

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 4>pretty quickly moving back to their homes, the original homes,

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 4>once they can repair the damage, or once the immediate

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 4>disaster is over. But a substantial number do not. And

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 4>we don't really know what that number is, but it's

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 4>probably safe to say that tens of thousands of people

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 4>every year end up having to spend you know, at

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 4>least a year out of their home, or they end

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 4>up moving to a different home eventually. So the cumulative

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 4>toll of this displacement over the next few decades is

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 4>going to get pretty large.

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 4>You could imagine that multiple millions of people over the

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 4>next few decades, certainly by the middle of the century,

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 4>will have made a permanent relocation, you know, as a

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 4>result of either pressure from a climate disaster or what's

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:35.679
<v Speaker 4>even harder to gauge, you know, they make a voluntary

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 4>movement away from a vulnerable area, you know, to avoid

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 4>a future disaster.

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:45.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, honestly, that played into my decision to leave. Yeah,

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:48.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure, and I know a few other people who

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:52.080
<v Speaker 1>also because we had it wasn't the snow. It was

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:56.359
<v Speaker 1>like we had multiple summers in a row of being

0:02:56.520 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>trapped inside by smoke from yeahs, like my kids' school

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>started to have more smoke days than snow days. Wow,

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>which was really just brutal.

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 3>Ye was it the Caldor fire that was all around

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 3>that all around for a few weeks, right, Yeah.

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we actually evacuated twice because of that fire. Like

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:21.399
<v Speaker 1>the first time was just the smoke got so bad

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>that like it was, you know, like my kids were

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>complaining about their eyes hurting inside the house even with

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>all the windows closed. I mean, you know, most of

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Tahoe's housing stock was like built in the nineteen seventies

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and never touched since, so it's not like we've had

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>really great, you know, seals on our windows. So I

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of was like, oh, I guess we could just

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:46.119
<v Speaker 1>leave for a few days to get a break from

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the smoke. That would probably be good. And since you

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>know we're able to do that, we should did. And

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>then the second was actually like they were worried it

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>was going to kind of like tear up the west

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>shore of Lake. So they were everyone in West and

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>North Tahoe to evacuate, so it wasn't like running from

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a fire.

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel like people have this idea that it's like

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 1>that it's always like disaster or not disaster emergency emergency,

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and like a lot of people end up, you know,

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>leaving for either a short period of time or forever

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:24.720
<v Speaker 1>just because of like a building of it.

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, definitely, definitely.

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, I want to have you talk about some

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>of the things that you heard from folks about how

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:37.480
<v Speaker 1>they make the decision to stay or leave, both temporarily

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and more permanently.

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 4>Right, Yeah, I think this is This was a really

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 4>interesting and kind of surprising part of the reporting process

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 4>for the book is that I guess I had kind

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 4>of assumed when I started that there would be a

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:51.920
<v Speaker 4>kind of you know, psychological shift that took place in

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:55.719
<v Speaker 4>most people, where as the risks got larger and more frequent,

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:59.280
<v Speaker 4>they would, you know, decide that they were more afraid

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 4>of then they were hesitant to leave and find a

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 4>new home. That was certainly true for a lot of people,

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 4>but I think there was this whole other set of

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 4>push and pull factors which were primarily financial that I

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 4>don't think I considered at the start. Right, So, the

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 4>availability and extent to which someone had bought homeowners insurance

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 4>or flood insurance and flood print areas was like a

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 4>prime driver of whether they had the resources to rebuild

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 4>the same kind of home that they lived in before.

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 4>And then the ambient sort of level of housing shortage

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:34.840
<v Speaker 4>in a place was really really important for renters. Right So,

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 4>in places like northern California, if there's a wildfire that

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 4>destroys hundreds or thousands of housing units, the rents go

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:45.359
<v Speaker 4>up precipitously overnight, and people, even if their homes didn't

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 4>actually get destroyed in the fire, they can't find a

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 4>place to rent that's anywhere near affordable and they have

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 4>to leave.

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 3>So there's these hool This is.

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Exactly what happened to me, Like my landlord decided to

0:05:56.560 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 1>sell the house that we were renting or maybe move

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:02.359
<v Speaker 1>a family member, and I don't.

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 3>Know, you wanted to you know, yeah, yeah, And it.

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Was right after the caled Or.

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 3>Fire, right right, right, Yeah, it.

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Was like, oh my god, there's nothing that we can

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>find that's less than four thousand dollars a month.

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 4>It's yeah, and I think, like, like the most people

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 4>that I spoke to who ended up having to move

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 4>or choosing to move, it seems to exist on a

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 4>spectrum between having to move and choosing to move. But

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 4>I guess I was sort of surprised about how, you know,

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 4>their attitudes about leaving kind of existed in this this

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 4>limbo where some of them didn't really think that they

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:38.280
<v Speaker 4>were leaving for good, some of them didn't want to leave,

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 4>but they were going to leave. Some of them still

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 4>thought of themselves as people who would never leave, even

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:44.720
<v Speaker 4>as they had to kind of come to grips with

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 4>the fact that maybe they weren't coming back. I think

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 4>I had sort of imagined there would be a binary

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 4>between people who chose to stay and people who chose

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:55.839
<v Speaker 4>to leave, and there was really not. The financial pressure

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 4>of the post disaster world, you know, really was the

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 4>main factor I think that made it impossible for people

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 4>to stay even when they thought that they would not leave.

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>That's so interesting. I mean, it makes total sense when

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you say it, But yeah, I think a lot of

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>times you hear about it in this kind of stay

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>or go binary. Okay, I want to talk about climate

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>gentrification and this way that black and brown people in

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>particular are getting pushed into more disaster prone zones. I

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 1>think the first time I heard the term climate gentrification

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>was in Miami, and I just had this image in

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>my head of people being literally pushed into the sea.

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I'm curious to hear about what you saw

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and your reporting on that.

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's really really interesting.

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 4>I think that that case study in Miami has been

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 4>really really influential for the way that a lot of

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 4>people see the problem. And it's certainly true that many

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 4>of the highest elevated areas in Miami have historically been

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 4>areas of quite low property values home to black and

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 4>brown communities, and now there's like a substantial placement pressure.

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 3>Going on in those communities.

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 4>Now, whether the developers are actively trying to make investments

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 4>on a high ground, I mean, they'll tell you that

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 4>they're not, and they just think it's a good place

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 4>to gentrify, which in many respects it actually is. It's

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 4>like right next to the other gentrified neighborhoods. But I mean,

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 4>it's hard to imagine that they don't have the ability

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 4>to look at a map, you know, and see what's

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 4>going to happen. But I think that there's this whole

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 4>other set of pressures that I think you could call

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 4>gentrification pressures, right like what I was talking about before

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 4>in northern California and also in other parts of Florida,

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 4>where as financial interests like insurance companies and mortgage lenders

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:44.839
<v Speaker 4>try to reduce their exposure, you know, they reduced the

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:49.080
<v Speaker 4>total available supply of credit and insurance coverage, and that

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 4>increases a lot of pressure, financial pressure on lower middle

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 4>class and middle class homeowners in particular. Renters have a

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 4>really hard time of it all the time. But I

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:02.319
<v Speaker 4>think that there's a kind of specific gentrification pressure that's happening,

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 4>especially in Florida with windstorm and flood insurance, where a

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 4>lot of homeowners can no longer keep up with the

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 4>financial burden of paying insurance and keeping that coverage and

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 4>sort of like pushing people out of the threshold of

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 4>homeownership already, especially in parts of Miami where winstorm insurance

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:22.959
<v Speaker 4>has gotten extremely expensive. I think this is like a

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 4>kind of invisible climate gentrification pressure that we don't always

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 4>hear about because it's not quite so graphic and visible,

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 4>but the risks are getting transferred onto homeowners and residents

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:37.959
<v Speaker 4>of these places, and that's like really really hard for

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people to bear, and it pushes people

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:41.359
<v Speaker 4>out of those areas.

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I know that in California, as insurers kind of

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>stopped offering really any fire insurance at all or really

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>raise premiums to the point that people couldn't afford them,

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the state kind of stepped in, which is obviously not

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>necessarily sustainable in the long term. Are you seeing that

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>in other states as well, like states kind of getting

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>in on the insurance game as a way to mitigate

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that impact.

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah.

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 4>In Florida and Louisiana, which have both seem sort of

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 4>downward spirals in their homeowners' insurance markets thanks to the hurricanes,

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 4>the state has gotten involved sort of bailed out insurance

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 4>that are collapsing, and then in Florida they pumped like

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 4>a bunch of money into what's called reinsurance to help

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 4>the insurers themselves get insurance. And then they also produced

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:33.679
<v Speaker 4>all these different legislative reforms to try to stabilize the system.

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 4>And in California, I think in particular, there's a lot

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 4>of interest in regulating the way that insurers can choose

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 4>to set prices not so much in Florida and Louisiana,

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 4>probably for obvious reasons. But in California, the state has said,

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 4>you know, if a homeowner takes steps to make her

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 4>home more resilient to wildfire, then the insurer has to

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 4>offer them a discount rate. You know, you have to

0:10:57.040 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 4>take that into account when you set the price of premiams.

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 3>I think that's like it's the probably the.

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 4>Best policy that the state really has the legal authority

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 4>to do, I think, or one of the best, and

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 4>it should incentivize homeowners to do some of this, and

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 4>hopefully the burdens are not so much that people just

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:16.679
<v Speaker 4>can't afford to pay the money up front, but it

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 4>would lead to some big discounts. Yeah, and I think

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 4>that that you're going to have to see probably more

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 4>that kind of policy in order to prevent like a

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 4>serious collapse in one of these markets, which we haven't

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:28.680
<v Speaker 4>quite seen yet.

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah, Okay.

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about a term that I find

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to be terrifying because it sounds so and bureaucratic, but

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:39.959
<v Speaker 1>it is like kind of a major deal and that

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 1>is managed to retreat.

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Like every time I.

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Hear that term, I think as people like slowly running

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and screaming exactly.

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 4>It is like a very sanitized term for something that's

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 4>often you know, very very painful.

0:11:56.920 --> 0:11:57.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:11:57.400 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So I'm curious just well, I want have you

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 1>defined this term for people? And then I want to

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>hear more about what you saw around that, you know,

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of across the country where people are at with

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>this idea, you know, where are their local governments that

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>are actually trying to plan how you know, how it

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>gets managed. I know, like sometimes when it gets mentioned

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 1>in any kind of official way, like you know, property

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>values plummet, and get really worried about that too. So yeah,

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:31.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious to hear what you saw in them from Yeah.

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so manager treat is, as you said, the kind

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:38.680
<v Speaker 4>of sanitized term for the government, a state sponsored you know,

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 4>relocation of people away from the most flood prone or

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 4>disaster prone areas, or I guess relocation to people, buildings

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 4>or infrastructure. Right, So any kind of you know, if

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 4>you're moving the wastewater treatment plant back from the ocean,

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 4>or if you're tearing down a neighborhood and giving people

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 4>money to move elsewhere, that's all under the sort of

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 4>unbrellt of managed retreat. I think that the main way

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 4>that this has happened in the United States so far

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 4>is through this FEMA's home buyout program, where basically FEMA

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 4>will give a local jurisdiction, a city or county, money

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 4>to pay everyone in a certain area to leave or

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 4>offer them the opportunity to leave.

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 3>Really, it's not a mandatory program.

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 4>FEMA gives you money, you leave your house, you find

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 4>another house, and then FEMA tears down your house or

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 4>the county really tears down your house, and then they've

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 4>removed a structure from the floodplain, and that you know,

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 4>they've reduced their future risk of flooding, and they've also

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 4>reduced your future risk of flooding.

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:38.319
<v Speaker 3>Hopefully.

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 4>This is like in theory, right, it's one of the

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 4>most cost effective and really like the most sort of

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 4>forward looking tools we have to adapt to climate change. Right,

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 4>you can build levy you know, x feet y feed

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 4>z feet. There's always potential risk that another flood will

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 4>overtop it in the future, but if you make sure

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 4>that you move somebody away from the world, then you

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 4>know the chances are if there's no home there the

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 4>home camp flood, right, and so like in theory this

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 4>this looks pretty good as the last resort option in

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 4>places where there's either no money to adapt, you know,

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 4>to build these structures, or where for some reason we

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 4>feel like it's not worth it, like the dangers are

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 4>just too extensive. The problem, and what I found in

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 4>the book is that almost everywhere that this happens, it

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 4>turns out to be really ugly and to leave people

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 4>in quite a bit of pain. So I wrote about

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 4>like a test case of this in eastern North Carolina,

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 4>there was this community called Lincoln City. It was a

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 4>historic African American community right on the banks of this

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 4>river on land that was sort of considered worthless by

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 4>the white planters who had dominated the area in the

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 4>late nineteenth century.

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 3>And the government, after two hurricanes, came in and said,

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 3>we would like to give you all money to leave.

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 4>We're never going to build a levee around you, we're

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 4>never going to help you elevate your homes because they're

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 4>not worth enough.

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Everyone basically took the offer. They left.

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 4>This community was raised in two years, and now they're

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 4>all scattered around and they still retained very painful memories

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 4>of like the government coming in ton and they had

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 4>to leave this place that was really the only place

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 4>that had ever felt like home for them. This has

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 4>happened all over the country. Some places people are okay

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 4>with leaving, you know, but other places, especially black communities,

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 4>where there's not enough home values in the government's has

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 4>to justify, you know, the expense of flood protection. This

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 4>is often a really painful process, and it's just sort

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 4>of like it's one of these things where, you know,

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 4>a lot of adaptation experts and sort of planners see

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 4>it as a really really sound tool for adapting, and

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 4>to a certain extent, it is, but it comes with

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 4>all kinds of implications for racial and economic justice that

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 4>we really haven't begun to tease out yet.

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, I mean, we haven't figured out how to

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>build housing or approach development in an equitable way, period,

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>So the idea that we're going to do manage to

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>retreat in an equitable way seems really implausible unfortunately. But

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I also think, like, you know, kind of leaving it

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to a disaster to take care of has similar impacts.

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, yeah, I mean, at least at least in

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 4>the case of you know, a manage retreat policy, you

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 4>could in theory design a policy that works better than

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 4>the one that they have currently does, right, Like, so

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 4>the buyout program, you just get a check for the

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 4>pre flood market value of your house, right So for

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people, that's not a sufficient payment for

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 4>them to find another house they can afford in the

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 4>same area, you know, Like, if you've got to buy

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 4>out right now in Austin, Texas, which they've tried to

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 4>do in the test, there's no home you could could

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 4>afford for the amount that your previous home probably costs

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 4>because costs have risen so much. But you could, in theory,

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 4>you design a program that would include like a top

0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 4>up for instance, or a long term relocation STIPE and

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 4>to help people make up that difference. But if you

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 4>just wait for people's houses to get destroyed and then

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:05.439
<v Speaker 4>let them go willy nilly wherever they want, then you

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 4>definitely know that it won't work, you know. I Mean,

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:10.679
<v Speaker 4>there's just no way that that will end well for

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:13.199
<v Speaker 4>most people. So I think like biots are like a

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 4>good start, and there's a way that it could be

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:17.160
<v Speaker 4>done well. It's just that it's not being done well

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 4>right now. But yeah, I mean, managed retreat probably preferable

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:23.640
<v Speaker 4>to unmanaged retreat if you have to retreat right.

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Have you seen any examples of either a managed retreat

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 1>policy or other types of mitigation policies that have worked well?

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I know you get into this in the book. I

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 1>want to have you like walk people through, you know,

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>some examples of things that either you've seen actually implemented

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>or you've heard people kind of talk about it sound

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>like they could be you know, effective solutions.

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, I mean so probably the best example of

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 4>this working well is in New Jersey. So after a

0:17:56.280 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 4>Hurricane Sandy, the state started this program called Acres, which

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 4>is basically like a they.

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 3>Took the FEMA bioprogram.

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 4>When they expanded it, they staffed up this office that

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:11.959
<v Speaker 4>does these individual consultations with homeowners. They keep the offer

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 4>to the homeowner on the table for a long time

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 4>so the homeowner can really think about it. They I

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 4>believe includes some sort of supplementary financial assistance or you know,

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.479
<v Speaker 4>connect people with resources that can help them find a

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 4>new home.

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 3>They really have approached it.

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:29.119
<v Speaker 4>From a longitudinal I guess perspective, like it's not just

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 4>we show up, we give you the money, and we

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 4>look away. Is that we're sort of guiding the homeowner

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 4>from the process of making the decision to sell to

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 4>finding a new home, you know, preferably in the same

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:41.360
<v Speaker 4>jurisdictions that the tax base doesn't suffer and people can

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 4>maintain their existing social and economic ties. And I think

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 4>the other example of something that's worked well in Norfolk, Virginia,

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 4>and this is not a perfect project by any means,

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:54.479
<v Speaker 4>but the Obama administration created a grant program, the National

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 4>Disaster Resilience Competition, and this program basically doled out a

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 4>billion dollars to some communities that wanted to experiment with

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 4>some climate adaptation projects that had never really been tried before.

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 4>And in Norfolk, Virginia, they took a pretty flood prone

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:11.680
<v Speaker 4>African American neighborhood on the banks of this tidal river,

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:14.119
<v Speaker 4>and they spend about one hundred and fifty million dollars

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 4>retrofiting basically every part of the neighborhood's infrastructure. They built

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 4>this big grassy berm along the water to stop storm

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:24.119
<v Speaker 4>search flooding. They fixed the entire sewer system and the

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 4>storm drain system. They created these new parks that sort

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:30.440
<v Speaker 4>of function as like tidal estuaries to soak up water.

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 4>They really took a kind of holistic approach, and it's

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 4>not perfect by any means. Some people are a little

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 4>discontented with what it's done to the way that the

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 4>neighborhood looks, for instance, but for most people it's created

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 4>a massive.

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:44.400
<v Speaker 3>Reduction in flood vulnerability.

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 4>You know, this was a neighborhood where property values were

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 4>falling thanks to the vulnerability, and now they've probably bought

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 4>the neighborhood thirty to fifty years, depending on sea the liverlizer,

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:56.439
<v Speaker 4>or even longer. And it really does show how with

0:19:56.600 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 4>enough money and enough willingness to take apart the way

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 4>that neighborhood was built, you know, and redo it from

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:07.360
<v Speaker 4>the bottom up, you can kind of control that these

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 4>impacts that seemed really scary on the surface of it.

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:14.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's super interesting. You mentioned one thing that surprised

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:17.160
<v Speaker 1>you before, which was the various factors that come into

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 1>people deciding whether to stay or go. I wonder if

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>there is anything else that was particularly surprising to you

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:28.679
<v Speaker 1>as you did the reporting for the book.

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:31.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think that for many people this might

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 4>not be surprising, but I was surprised by how many

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 4>people moved from one dangerous home to another without necessarily

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 4>realizing what it was that they were doing. Especially in Houston,

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:49.159
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people took biots or they decided to

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 4>move after a big hurricane, and they ended up doing,

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, really what the government would really not have

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 4>wanted them to do. They moved, They took the money,

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 4>and they moved to another flo zone because there was

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:04.919
<v Speaker 4>no long term monitoring what happened with these buyouts and

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:08.680
<v Speaker 4>in other places people moved from. This is surprising to me,

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 4>but it's not really surprising when you think about it.

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:11.640
<v Speaker 4>Like a lot of touch with a lot of people

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 4>who moved from New Orleans to Arizona, you know, after Katrina,

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:19.159
<v Speaker 4>or they moved from from Houston to northern California to

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 4>a very fire prone area. And it seems like people's,

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:27.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, their psychology is really affected by what they've experienced.

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 4>People don't really assess, you know, risk from a neutral ground.

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 4>You know, they don't really see, okay, what is a

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 4>place that's free of risk.

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 3>They just want protection from the trauma that.

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 4>They've already experienced in most cases, right, And so I

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 4>did speak to people who left Houston after flood and

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 4>went to California and got an RV there and then

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 4>the RV burned down in a fire. And there's just

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 4>things stories like this that are like, I think it's

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 4>sort of emphasized for me that you can't really divide

0:21:57.320 --> 0:21:59.679
<v Speaker 4>the United States into places that are safe and places

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:02.199
<v Speaker 4>that are not safe, right, you know, or really the

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 4>world for that matter of course, there's only degrees of risk,

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 4>and there's there's risk, and then there's you know risk

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:12.679
<v Speaker 4>like people in Miami face or or you know, Greenville

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 4>or somewhere in the sierras. But everywhere faces some level

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 4>of vulnerability, and so I think everywhere has the risk

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 4>of descending into this kind of like housing instability that

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:26.880
<v Speaker 4>I sort of tried to document in the places where

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:27.400
<v Speaker 4>I went.

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, what are some of the things that US either

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>federal or state government officials could learn or maybe have learned.

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Are learning from the kind of cross border climate migration stuff.

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Are there applicable lessons there for internal migration?

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 3>Oh, that's really interesting.

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 4>I had never thought of it that way, and I

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 4>kind of feel like, I guess at the end of

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 4>the book, I kind of said the opposite, which is

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 4>where I was, like, I basically said that, you know,

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 4>in this country, we don't really have even the beginnings

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 4>of a plan to deal with international climate migration. It

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:12.399
<v Speaker 4>all gets routed through the immigration system, in the asylum system,

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:15.399
<v Speaker 4>which are so deeply broken and they're fucked up, and

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 4>there's nobody who even wants to start trying to fix

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 4>it right. And I think that to me, the lessons

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 4>of the few places where we have done internal climate

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:30.679
<v Speaker 4>migration successfully have really demonstrated that you kind of have

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.640
<v Speaker 4>to have not only you know, a really really robust

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 4>post disaster recovery system where you're staying with people for

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:39.159
<v Speaker 4>a long period of time and making sure that they

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 4>get back in their feet, you know, three, four or

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 4>five years after a disaster, but you also have to

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 4>sort of get your own house in order, so to speak.

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 4>It's really hard to make sure that there's no climate

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 4>displacement unless you make sure that there's no housing displacement.

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 4>And so like a program like Section eight or a

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 4>social housing program. I sort of say at the end

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:00.680
<v Speaker 4>that those are like a really necessary second or third

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 4>step to solving this problem, because you know, people who

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 4>are displaced by climate disasters end up in the same

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 4>cycle of you know, displacement and relocation as people who

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 4>just get displaced from from normal so to speak, financial pressure.

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 4>And so that lesson I thought was really important when

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 4>you think about international climate migration, which is like, if

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 4>you think of all these displaced people as existing on

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:26.360
<v Speaker 4>a kind of continuum, the solution to both of them

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 4>is kind of the same, which is like the jurisdictions,

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:31.479
<v Speaker 4>the countries that have the most money and that have

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 4>the legacy responsibility for carbon emissions need to the state

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 4>needs to take a really really strong role in ensuring

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:42.120
<v Speaker 4>that there is like safe affordable housing for everybody.

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 3>And when I say everybody, I mean everybody.

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:47.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And the border thing is getting in the way

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:52.119
<v Speaker 4>of even acknowledging that, even the beginnings the twinkling of

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:56.120
<v Speaker 4>an acknowledgment of that, because this political roadblock is standing

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:56.880
<v Speaker 4>in the way of that.

0:24:57.440 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 3>So that's kind of how I was thinking about it.

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:02.160
<v Speaker 3>But the way you said it is really interesting too. Yeah.

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:04.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the US is obviously not great on this,

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 1>but I wonder if anywhere is good on it and

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 1>could potentially be you know, writing lessons. I mean, I

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:17.919
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I don't know the answer.

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:24.919
<v Speaker 4>I mean, like, I gosh, it's really hard for me

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 4>to think of an example. Well, okay, here's actually an

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:30.919
<v Speaker 4>example that I've always found really interesting and it was

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 4>going to be a big part of the book. And

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 4>then it wasn't because I didn't have enough space and

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 4>it just didn't work out. But so in the nineteen eighties,

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 4>the United States conducted nuclear tests on the Marshall Islands

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 4>in the Pacific, and they gave people unlimited ability. They

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:50.160
<v Speaker 4>gave Marshally's unlimited ability to come to the United States,

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 4>and many people did, and they ended up in Arkansas

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:53.919
<v Speaker 4>and Oklahoma.

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Oklahoma.

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 4>There's like pretty thriving Marshally's communities in those places.

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. And now that sea.

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 4>Level rice has been a big started to become a

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 4>big factor for the Marshall another generation of Marshals has

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 4>started to come to those same communities and they're taking

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 4>advantage of the same legal authority I believe, to end

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 4>up in the same places. And I think that this

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 4>is like really telling where it's like, once you take

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:18.879
<v Speaker 4>away the restriction of the border, people have the ability

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 4>to not only you know, get away from the big risks, right,

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:25.680
<v Speaker 4>but they end up being able to I mean, it's

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 4>not that those communities in Arkansas and Oklahoma are free

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 4>from any kind of struggle, but they end up kind

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:33.360
<v Speaker 4>of being able to build something new once you remove

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 4>that that blockage and once you don't make them go

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 4>through the you know, terrifying rigmarole of asylum claims, et.

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 3>Cetera, well, and they end up able to rebuild communities

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 3>exactly exactly right. And so I think that like this

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 3>is an example of something.

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 4>It's this is like point zero one percent of the

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 4>total population of people who would need to move because

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:57.880
<v Speaker 4>of climate change, But I think it does show that

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:01.639
<v Speaker 4>there's kind of nothing to be afraid of, I guess

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 4>was my conclusion. There is, like I think a lot

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 4>of times the numbers, you know, five hundred million or

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 4>a billion people moving get kind of bandied about as

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:14.199
<v Speaker 4>this terrifying you know, horde that's going to show up

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 4>at the United States border or in Europe, you know,

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:19.479
<v Speaker 4>trying to seek a sound. But I really don't think

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:21.679
<v Speaker 4>that there's anything scary about it. And I think that

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 4>if you just seems like if you provide people with

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:25.959
<v Speaker 4>the right amount of support and you don't put these

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 4>things in their way, you end up actually with potentially

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 4>eventually positive impacts both, you know, for the communities and

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:37.919
<v Speaker 4>for the people where they live from this kind of

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:41.199
<v Speaker 4>movement from you know, a risky area to a safer area.

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, kind of along those lines too. I'm curious what

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>you have seen in terms of the potential intersection between

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:53.640
<v Speaker 1>eco fascism and climate migration.

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:56.640
<v Speaker 3>Like I know, I was. Someone just sent me this.

0:27:56.840 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Insane video last month from a group called Progressives for

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Immigration Reform where there yes.

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 3>In the US, I'll send you the video. It's wild.

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 1>They are basically saying, like, if you care about climate

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and conservation, then you should be pushing for tighter immigration

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>controls because like all of these people coming into the

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:28.919
<v Speaker 1>US will increase the population, which will be bad for

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the environment and for climate action.

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 4>And that's really funny because it kind of implies that

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 4>they won't be part of the population if they aren't

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 4>in the case.

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Right, exactly, that's right, that's right. But also it's just

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 1>this thing that like, you know, everyone kind of knew

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 1>was going to happen, and now of like people going

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 1>from saying climate change isn't real to now using it

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>as a reason to be anti immigration.

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, yeah, this is far from my strongest subject

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 4>area into like my colleague Gaby delve Valla has done

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 4>a ton of work on this. I think Brendan O'Connor

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 4>has as well. But I do think that like, there's

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 4>there's a substantial risk of this becoming a mainstream political position,

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 4>and I think that, like, to me, this is maybe

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 4>a really maybe a really inapt comparison, But I've always

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 4>sort of thought of it in the same vein as

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 4>like the way that a lot of progressive people will

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 4>become really really nimbyish when there's some kind of affordable

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 4>housing project that's going to be built near them, or

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 4>like a homeless shelter. There's this tendency right of people

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 4>who have theoretically liberal political views, once there's like a

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 4>change in their local environment, they become really vile and

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 4>really opposed to any kind of like thing that could

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 4>improve other people's welfare by you know, slightly changing the

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 4>way it looks where they live. I'm not sure that

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 4>that isn't what goes on in part when people are

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, use conservation or climate risk as.

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 3>A weapon to kind of in a way all.

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 4>Kinds of like social policies or inclusivity or you know,

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 4>accommodation of other people and like, I mean, it feels

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 4>like eco fascism is not part of the mainstream political

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 4>conversation in the US right now, but I feel like

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 4>it certainly could be, right and it's hard to imagine

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 4>that it wouldn't be, you know, if the sort of

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 4>trajectory of international climate migration continues the way that it is.

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 4>But right now, it's hard to imagine our immigration control

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 4>is getting much stricter in the United States. I mean,

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 4>they're already really damn strict, and we just don't really

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 4>think of immigration and climate change as being connected. But

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 4>I think that if we ever did, there would be

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 4>a substantial downside because people could come to the precise

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 4>wrong conclusion by connecting those things. And that's something to

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 4>look out for, and that I kind of dread the

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 4>day that people do start to put those things in conversation,

0:30:57.560 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 4>because I think it's going to lead to more things

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 4>like that that video that you that you mentioned. That's

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 4>what's so scary about the way that those theoretical statistics

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 4>of future migration are discussed. I think that that Alexander

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 4>Tempest has written about this as well, right, and I

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 4>think she's arguing and I pretty much agree that they're

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:19.719
<v Speaker 4>not really useful numbers, Like you can't just add that

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 4>number to the population of the United States and they that, well,

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 4>this is like it's not useful. And I think a

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 4>really serious way to know the numbers to think about,

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 4>you know, the potential influx of people or the potential

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:35.400
<v Speaker 4>population growth. Like I think it can really only be

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 4>weaponized for for negative events, and I think that like

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 4>we have to start I guess that's sort of why

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 4>I said, like getting our own house in order, Like,

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 4>I think we just have to think through the implications

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 4>of what it would mean to take care of everyone

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 4>who's displaced by climate change, and then not so much

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 4>try to like schedule you know, this kind of influx

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 4>of people, but just think about what would what would

0:31:55.920 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 4>a benign policy look like for any number of people, right,

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 4>including the ones who already live here, right, Like, let's

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:03.800
<v Speaker 4>just imagure we're trying to keep track of everyone and

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:06.960
<v Speaker 4>keep safe everyone who already lives here, and then like

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 4>let's try to expand that out, you know, but do

0:32:10.040 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 4>not really do that well for current citizens, right, So

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 4>it's like, yeah, I think it's I think it's a

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 4>little it's a little like rich in a negative way

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 4>to be like, oh, we can't handle all that, Like

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 4>it's not really the question is can we handle It's

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 4>not really the question at all.

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, and I think to your point about, you know,

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 1>shoring up housing availability and affordability and access and all

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:38.720
<v Speaker 1>those things across the board in general could also mitigate

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:42.760
<v Speaker 1>some of the potential for anti immigration centiment because I

0:32:42.840 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 1>feel like the number one thing that you often hear

0:32:45.360 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 1>is like, well, I don't have access to a house,

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 1>so why should I care right about giving this person

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 1>who's not even from here an apartment or whatever, you know, Right, So,

0:32:57.320 --> 0:33:02.320
<v Speaker 1>like again, sort of just taking care of people, good

0:33:02.360 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 1>move across the board.

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 4>Right, Yeah, I mean it's really true. The reasons people

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 4>cite for why we couldn't and absorb a lot of

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 4>people in the United States are the same. Like, those

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 4>shortcomings are shortcomings that we actually should solve, but they're

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 4>not really a reason to do not let people in,

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 4>especially when you consider what it is that they're trying

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 4>to leave behind.

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Drilled is an original critical frequency production. Our producer is

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Entry. Sound design, mixing and mastering are by Peter Duff,

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 1>who also wrote our original score. Our first amendment attorney

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 1>is James Wheaton at the First Amendment Project, and the

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 1>show is reported written and hosted by me Amy Westervelt.