WEBVTT - And, This The Chaos Within The GOP Featuring Ben Shapiro 

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Either to go pull the principle or you don't pull

0:00:02.080 --> 0:00:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the principle. If you don't unap hold the principle, I'm

0:00:03.840 --> 0:00:05.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna call you out for not upholding the principle. On

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:09.039
<v Speaker 1>his epitaph, we'll read forty fifth and forty seven President

0:00:09.119 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>of the United States, he said, a lot of shit.

0:00:11.080 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Thank story, jurisdictions have lower crime rates. You moved to

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:17.280
<v Speaker 2>a state that has higher insurance, right, higher car insurance,

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 2>not just home insurance, has higher property taxes many of

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:20.799
<v Speaker 2>these red states.

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>And I think that we should start from a position

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.319
<v Speaker 1>in the United States of gratitude and recognition that we

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>live in a free country where the vast majority of

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>decisions are your own. This is Gavin Newsom, and this

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>has been Shapiro. All right, Ben Shapiro, welcome, Hey, thanks

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:38.639
<v Speaker 1>for having me.

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:40.559
<v Speaker 2>I love it all the way from Florida. We'll get

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:42.520
<v Speaker 2>to that, you know, moment.

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Seem a little bit spicy about it, Yeah, a little

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:45.559
<v Speaker 1>sot well, you know.

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 2>Texas, that would have been more spicy. But you know,

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:53.559
<v Speaker 2>especially come on, you're a Hollywood kid, at least Hollywood adjacent.

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>You'reeah Burbank, born and bred and born in Saint Joe's

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>in Burbank.

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 2>I love that. And well, year nineteen eighty four and

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 2>you went, you know you, And it's interesting because you were,

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, in sort of middle class family, grew up

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:06.960
<v Speaker 2>and I, you know, got a new book we're going

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 2>to get to in a moment, Lions and Scavengers. But

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 2>in that you talk about your your home where I

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 2>think six members of your family living in a two

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 2>bedroom home, one bathroom Burbank, California, and you describe it,

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:22.039
<v Speaker 2>at least briefly as pretty Bucolic.

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was great. It was great. I mean, Burbank

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:25.320
<v Speaker 1>was a great place to grow up. It was like

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 1>kids playing in the street. And I had the greatest

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:29.680
<v Speaker 1>privilege of all. Right, I'm an American growing up in

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the greatest country and the history of the world. And

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I've got a two parent household. My parents love each

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>other and they take care of us, and they're able

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to make a middle class income. My mom started off

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>as a secretary and worked her way up to become

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>vice president of a small film and TV company. My

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>dad came out here to be a composer, and he

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>ended up playing piano at a restaurant on venturable of

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>var I believe it was in or actually it was

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>it was in across from Universal Studios. It was the

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Mitchell's over there.

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Like a five night a week piano guy.

0:01:57.760 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>A couple of nights a week, you go in there

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and play jazz piano because since he was fourteen and

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>so that's that's how I grew up. And you know again,

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's the American dreams. You start there

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and then you end up making a better life for

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>your kids, and they end up making a better life

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:14.679
<v Speaker 1>for themselves, and that upper trajectory is is kind of

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 1>what America is all about.

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 2>I love it. How many brothers and sisters?

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>So I have three younger sisters, three younger sisters, three

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>younger sisters.

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Were they music because you were? You were a violinist, right, Yeah.

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I started playing violin when I was five, and then

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I was pretty good. I mean I was it.

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 2>You were. It was your dad just saying you're going, son,

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 2>you will be. I mean they threw that at you

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 2>and they made you and your crying.

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 1>No, it definitely wasn't there.

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 2>You loved No.

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I I was pretty dedicated to it, for sure. I

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 1>was practicing by the time I was sixteen. Maybe three

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>hours a day or something. And then I looked at

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 1>at sort of the life of musician, and I thought, well,

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>again that upper trajectory is very difficult, particularly in classical music,

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and I thought, you know, maybe I better shift career

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>strategies here. But when I went to UCLA, or I

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>went to UCLA for undergrad When I went to UCLA

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>extent at the time, my parents didn't want me going

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>out of state for school. So I was living at

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>home sixteen, and I thought I was going to double

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>major in biology and in music. Actually, and I got

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>on campus and I found myself drawn to politics. And yeah,

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the rest is I want.

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 2>To get back to that a little bit more about

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 2>How about your sisters? What where did they end up

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 2>in terms of their professional pursuits and careers.

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>So all of us grew up obviously here, only one

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>is still here. I still have one sister who lives

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>in Orange County. I have a couple of sisters who

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>live within a mile and a half of me in Florida.

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>So basically the whole family ended up in Florida. My

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>parents ended up near me in Florida. My in laws,

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>who lived in Sacramento ended up near me in Florida. Yeah,

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>there may be some reasons for that, Governor.

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 2>We'll get to that. We're going to get to all

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 2>of that and a lot more. I just want to

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 2>paint the picture a little bit of camptriciated. Not everybody

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 2>knows your child, but also connected. I mean, as you said,

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 2>UCLA undergrad and then your interests.

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>My wife went U SA LA Medical School. I mean

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>we're very California ambedded.

0:03:56.920 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 2>I love that. But politics had its calling there. Would

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 2>you remember sort of a moment or issues or was

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 2>politics part of the even your child, it was a

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 2>part of the conversation around the dinner table. Were your

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 2>parents politically active.

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>And they weren't super politically active. I would say they

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>were kind of Reagan Republicans, and you know, growing up

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>we talk politics in the house. But the thing that

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>sort of sent me in a political direction overtly is

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:22.479
<v Speaker 1>I got to college campus at UCLA and I picked

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>up a copy of the UCLA Daily Bruin. And this

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>is back in the year two thousand. There was an

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:32.920
<v Speaker 1>editorial from the Bruin editorial board, I believe, comparing Ariol

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Scheron than the Prime Minister of Israel who in two

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand and one, I guess to Aolf Eichmann, the Nazi,

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and so I walked in and I said, I'd like

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to write a counter to that, and that turned into

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a point counterpoint column that I would write every week.

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>That became pretty popular. It turned into kind of a

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>normal column. And then I went to my father one

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 1>day and I said, do you think that my stuff

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:51.719
<v Speaker 1>is good enough to be published in like a normal paper?

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>And he said, you know, it might be. Let me

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>do some research. So he found this place called Creator

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Syndicate again out of California, and they syndicate a bunch

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of columns to for newspapers around the country. At the time,

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>it was everybody from Molly Ivans on the left to

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>David Limbaugh on the right. And so I applied cold

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and they called me three weeks later. I was seventeen

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and they said, we'd love you to write a syndicated column.

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>So pretty much all of my bad ideas since I

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>was seventeen have been public, which is, you know, an

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>interesting way to live for sure.

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 2>S seventeen, I mean, that's pretty remarkable that young age,

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 2>you have a syndicated national column. And a few years later,

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 2>twenty you have published what two books?

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:27.159
<v Speaker 1>So you write? My first book came out when I

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 1>was twenty from It was sort of an expose of

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>leftism on college campuses. I think some might say it

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>was a little ahead of its time. And then I

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>went to Harvard Law School at twenty and I wrote

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:40.720
<v Speaker 1>a couple of more books while I was at Harvard Law.

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>And when I came out, I came back to LA

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and I practiced at a real estate firm or real

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 1>estate wing of a major law firm called Goodwin Proctor.

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I practiced there. I lasted for about ten months, decided

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I hate it quit. I remember walking into the boss's

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 1>office and saying, I hate it here and I want

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to leave. And I remember him turning to me and saying,

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>you're never going to make as much mone needs you're

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 1>making right now. And I've been wanting to send them

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:07.720
<v Speaker 1>some tax returns for now. But you know, it all

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>worked out. Politics was something that I was always very

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>invested in, and so my sort of political approach generally

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:17.039
<v Speaker 1>is that I'm much more invested in principles than personalities.

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I care much more about the ideas than I do

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>about sort of the the gossip aspect of politics. I

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>think that that's unfortunately becoming less common. I think that

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's great that you're having me on. I

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate that. I like the exchange of ideas. I've

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>always liked the exchange of ideas, and so that's that's

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>still I hope when animates may when animates the.

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:41.280
<v Speaker 2>Show love that. What I mean, you're you're obviously known

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 2>as you know, I mean, people have described you in

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 2>so many different ways, but debate brow I mean, is

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 2>there a quick wits I mean, obviously next level intellect

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 2>ability to quickly distill facts and figures. You talk about

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 2>facts over emotion, et cetera. But were you that person

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 2>in high school? Were you that person in middle score?

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 2>Did that?

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty combative? In high school, I would say I'd

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>skipped a couple of grades. So I skipped third and

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I skip ninth. Wow, And so I was much younger,

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>and much shorter, and much skinnier, and much more of

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>a wise the ass probably in some of the other

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>kids in my high school class, and so high school

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>was not exactly a joy for that reason. But I've

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>said before that obviously bullying is terrible, but being bullied

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>can be sort of a make or break situation for you,

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>meaning that a lot of the people that I know

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>who are very successful went through a lot of adversity

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>in that age range, and then you sort of develop

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>an attitude, and the attitude is okay, I can either

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>use this as fuel and grist for the mill and say, listen,

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to take all that negativity and channel it

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>toward you know, more strength and more positivity and building

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and maybe you get a little bit of a chip

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>on your shoulder sometimes or you can kind of let

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>it break it down.

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Do you remember, I mean some of the specific instances

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 2>where you sort of you had that kind of exchange.

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Where was it political? Was it? Because I mean the

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 2>fact you're always younger, a little bit smarter, maybe you're

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 2>quick witted. I mean, was do you remember political?

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Interpersonal? But I remember, you know, being the kind of

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>kid who when I was sixteen years old, there was

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>a program at the UC system that was all about

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>affirmative action at the UC system. I remember there were

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>about a thousand people who were protesting down in the

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>plaza or there, and I believe I was the only

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>counter protester interesting and I would show up in and

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>do that that sort of stuff.

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:32.199
<v Speaker 2>Did you have you have the was it the confidence

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:33.839
<v Speaker 2>or was the gumption? What was it? I mean, was

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 2>it something your parents distilled in you just stand up

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 2>for ideals? Striking?

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it was more stand up for ideals. But

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>but also you know, from the time that I was young,

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>I never had any problem with being in crowds or

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>being in front of people or yeah, exactly, I played violin,

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and so if if you spend a lot of time

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 1>playing you know, a rigorous sort of set of pieces

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>in front of people, and you do that over and

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 1>over and over, it kind of gets rid of whatever

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:01.199
<v Speaker 1>trepidation you might have in front of people and doing

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that sort when did you.

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Was there a moment when you sort of developed a

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 2>next level confidence you're like, wait, I'm pretty good at

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 2>this or was it the writing.

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>That was doing you know, I'm not sure. I will

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:12.680
<v Speaker 1>say I don't think that it's ever good to develop

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>next level confidence, meaning I think you got to prep

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:17.719
<v Speaker 1>for everything. One of the things that I try to

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>do is really over prepare for my show. If I'm

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>going to have a debate or a discussion with somebody,

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I really try to dig in and get into what's

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>true what's not true. I would much rather be overprepared.

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a certain level of insecurity that's good.

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:34.679
<v Speaker 1>I think when you're overconfident, that's when you made mistakes.

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I think in my career, whenever I've made a mistake,

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>it's typically because I didn't take a challenge seriously enough

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>or I sort of brushed it off. Yeah, and you

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 1>see that happen. A lot of people sort of rely

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:45.559
<v Speaker 1>on their native intelligence as opposed to assuming that you're

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 1>not going to be the smartest person in the room

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 1>all the time. Remember when I was in middle school,

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>so some went to Walter Reed in North Hollywood, and

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 1>they had a Magnet school, like a highly gifted program.

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:56.679
<v Speaker 1>And I remember there was an IQ test actually kind

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>of a rudimentary IQ test that was the baseline to

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>get in. And I got in, but I didn't get

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:05.959
<v Speaker 1>in leaps and bounds, and we you know, I remember

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>first day of class, everybody's kind of passing around their

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 1>IQ scores and all this kind of stuff, and one

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 1>girl had had above one eighty, really really really high IQ.

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 1>And I remember going back home and talking to my

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>father about it. He said, listen, you should assume that

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you're never the smartest person in the room, but you

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>can always be the hardest working person in the room.

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I love that, and that I think has been sort

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>of the motto.

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 2>I love it. So you went, you know, UCLA undergrad.

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Here you are seventeen national syndicated columnists. A few years

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 2>later he got two published books about issues around the universe.

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 2>As you say, you may have been a step or

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 2>two ahead of most in that respect, and then issues

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 2>around I mean, it was interesting, is the porn industry

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 2>broadly defined it?

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:45.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I was writing books about how the pornography industry

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 1>was going to really carve out, particularly young men's souls

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:51.200
<v Speaker 1>in about two thousand and five, and at the time

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:53.199
<v Speaker 1>people were saying, oh, this is crazy. What is he

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about now? Of course, I think that there are

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of young men who have fallen prey to

0:10:57.200 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that industry, who needs less family formation and less general happiness,

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:05.679
<v Speaker 1>less sex, Actually people who are kind of falling out

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>of the social fabric that's necessary to build societies. I

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>was calling that out in about two thousand, so to.

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Say, even in my state of the state last week,

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:15.959
<v Speaker 2>I referenced just one of many different statistics but roughly

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 2>half of young men have never asked a woman out

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 2>in person on a date. So your point emphasis and

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 2>that and we I want to unpack that a little

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 2>bit later as well in the conversation. But you started

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 2>then to not only identify yourself in the context of

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 2>your intellectual pursuits and expressing your point of view through

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 2>writing also sort of gifted capacity to engage in debate

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:41.680
<v Speaker 2>and speech. But then you found Andrew Breitbart was out

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 2>and about in southern California, and you took a job

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 2>there working at Breitbart.

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>That went in twenty twelve. During the twenty twelve election,

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I joined Brightbart. I'd known Andrew actually since my UCLA days,

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>so I'd known him already for quite a number of years.

0:11:58.280 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 2>What did you think of Andrew?

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>A lot of Andrews and so I think that there's

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of that. I mean, you're in public life, so

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's for a lot of people that are

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:06.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of like the private person, there's the public person.

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 1>They're not quite the same. So Andrew, the private person

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:11.319
<v Speaker 1>in the public person were actually very much the same,

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I would say up until the end. Toward the end,

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that Andrew became very frustrated with a lot

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of the political system media coverage. But the truth is

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 1>that Andrew was, for the vast majority of the time

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I knew him, very garrulous, willing to have conversations with

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>nearly anyone. I think that if you talk to people

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>who knew Andrew really well, they're their best memories of

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 1>him are things like him just rollerblading in Venice and

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>then just having like political conversations, taking somebody to coffee

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>like a random person. What I used to say to

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>people about Andrew is that I knew Andrew for over

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a decade before he passed away, and if you knew

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Andrew for five minutes, you knew him about ninety five

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>percent as well as I did, because he was just

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 1>very much there, Like he was just on the surface

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>everything that what you saw is what you got with Andrew.

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I joined Bright Barton in about two thousand

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and twelve, who was during the Romney the Romney Obama

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 1>election cycle. I was there for a few years. I

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:04.559
<v Speaker 1>believe I ended up leaving in two thousand and sixteen,

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 1>like early twenty sixteen. There had been some sort of

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>career transitions there in which I was taking other jobs

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. There's a point again going under

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that sort of working hard rubric. There's one which I

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>was working effectively for jobs. I was doing a morning

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:19.559
<v Speaker 1>show in la where I interviewed you, actually, and then

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>there was an afternoon show that I was doing in Seattle,

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>so has six hours of radio day. I was the

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>editor at larger Brightbart, which meant writing a piece or

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>two a day for Breitbart, and then I had also

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>taken a job as the editor in chief of a

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>website called truth Revolt for the David Horwitz Freedom Center.

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>So I was working for jobs simultaneously. And yeah, again,

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>my advice to young people particularly want to be successful,

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 1>say yes to doing everything, even if it's for free

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning, because eventually saying yes a lot gets

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 1>you the power to say no later on in your

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:49.559
<v Speaker 1>career when you can sort of winnow down what will

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 1>make you successful.

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 2>And people A lot of folks know this, but a

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 2>lot of folks don't. Steve Bannon was down there working

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:57.959
<v Speaker 2>by Bard at the time you guys got along. Initially.

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I know the beginning, and Steve is not the easiest

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 1>person too. I will say that we'll talk a little

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>bit more, just briefly.

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to over index with Steve, but so

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 2>you left in twy sixteen, but twenty fifteen you more

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 2>formally established what more commonly is identified with the Day

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 2>to call it, right.

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was it was Daily Wires, right, So

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Daily Wire we established formally in twenty so it would

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>have been in the middle of the primary, so it

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>had been twenty sixteen. That's when we formally launched. Was

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a few months before the election of twenty sixteen. I'd

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>been working at the David Horwitz Freedom Center. It was

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of a funny story there where we had Jeremy

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Boring and I who are business partners. He'd been working

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>there and he basically hit upon what was a social

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>media arbitrage plan. He basically saw that you could market

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 1>on social media in new ways and that would bring

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you traffic. And we proposed this to the board. They

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 1>legitimately did not understand what we were talking about, because

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>boards of nonprofits are famously, you know, sort of elderly

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and non tech involved, and so we made a presentation.

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Jeremy was kind of fondly known as the as the

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Stupid Whisperer because we'd met with many congress people, and

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I speak quickly, and Jeremy spoke slowly with the Southern accent,

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and so he would very often get across better see

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 1>those congress people who shall remain unnamed. Anyway, we met

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 1>with the board, Jeremy sort of explained the marketing plan.

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>They had no idea what he was talking about. They

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 1>turned to me and they said, Ben, can you explain

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the marketing plan? I said, sure, very easy. I was

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 1>frustrated by this point, so I took out a napkin

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and I wrote on it dollar sign arrow, Facebook, arrow, website,

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>arrow back to dollars in your book. Yeah, exactly. And

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>that was the marketing plan, right. It was that you're

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 1>going to spend money on social media in order to

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>gain eyeballs. Those eyeballs would then provide advertising on your website,

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and then you would just direct that money back into Facebook.

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>And so it's kind of a flywheel. And they fired

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Jeremy the next day. I quit a couple of days later,

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and then we basically took that plan out to market.

0:15:57.400 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>We found a little bit of seed funding, five million

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>dollars in seed funding originally, and we launched daily Wire,

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>which last year did two hundred million dollars plus in revenue.

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 2>How many how many employees now daily we.

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Have about two hundred and twenty employees. Wow at daily ware.

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 2>And you guys are doing the I mean, well we

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 2>can talk more specifically, but I mean it's documentaries, it's movies. Yes,

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 2>it's all this show. I mean, it's a whole suite

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 2>of Yeah.

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>We tried to turn it into a semi major media company. Right,

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>it's probably the second biggest conservative media company in the

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 1>country after Fox.

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 2>So at the time, who were your mentors who were

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 2>looking up to at the time? Who did you want

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 2>to become?

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Was?

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean Andrew obviously had a big impact, I assume

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 2>in terms of your trajectory. Who else was out there

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 2>you were watching? Was it the limbas of the world?

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Was it the savages of the world? Who? I mean

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 2>on radio?

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>So I think it was sort of a different thing

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>in every industry. So from a sort of ideological point

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>of view, just being a great writer, be people like

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Charles Crowdhammer, Yeah, which, of course I love the writing.

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>That's actually my favorite thing that I do because I

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>can sit there, organize my thoughts and I happen to

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>write incredibly quickly. So that's that's very nice. And then

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, from a from a you know, radio or

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 1>podcast point of view, obviously Rush Russia is sort of

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the granddaddy was all in this industry. And so Rush

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:10.159
<v Speaker 1>was the guy who I grew up listening to on

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>talk radio, you know him, Larry Elderly, everybody who's sort

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>of in the LA radio sphere when I was growing up.

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>And then in sort of social media land, obviously Andrew

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>was a major force in sort of showing what you

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>could do in the in the new media. And so

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 1>I would say that that triumph, it would be a

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 1>pretty good way of defining.

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 2>What else and were you inspired? I mean at the time,

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 2>just even beyond those examples where there are books you

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 2>were reading at the time, periodicals that really inspired.

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:37.719
<v Speaker 1>So I read incessantly. I've been reading three to five

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>books a week since I was probably old enough to

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 1>read wow. So you know, the books that I was

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.399
<v Speaker 1>reading on economics were things like hyek.

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:48.399
<v Speaker 1>I spent actually less time engaging, I would say, with

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the non traditional media space that I

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>do engaging with books and great ideas. I hope, I

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 1>mean that that's where I'd like to spend my time. Also,

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm lucky. From Friday night to Saturday night.

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I can't engage with media, right I'm Northodox Jews, so

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 1>all of the electricity goes away, And so I read

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:08.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of books. You know, if you are now

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:09.920
<v Speaker 1>then I used to because I have four kids now.

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>But that means that if I want to. What's great

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>about that, for what I do is that if a

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 1>topic comes up in the news, I have a pretty

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>good memory bank to draw on in terms of a

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:22.360
<v Speaker 1>baseline of knowledge that I can then supplement with sort

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of further research. But I have a very strongly defined

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of worldview about everything from economics to foreign policy

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 1>to social policy that I hope is rooted in some

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.640
<v Speaker 1>fundamental values, which means that I would say my level

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>of political consistency has been pretty high over the course

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of decades. And forty two, that's turn

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 1>forty two years old this week, and I've been in

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>this industry for a quarter century. I started writing at seventeen,

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and if you read stuff from when I'm seventeen, if

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't highly dumb, which some of it is, but

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>if you were to find a column I wrote when

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I was twenty three, and it wasn't one of the

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>ones that was like trying to get attention and look

0:18:57.240 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 1>at me. If it was one of my more serious columns,

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you'd probably look like lot like the stuff that I'm

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 1>saying today.

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 2>What do you make of the current media landscape? I mean,

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:08.439
<v Speaker 2>it seems to be the sort of dialectic between the

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:10.679
<v Speaker 2>old and the new, sort of the digital first and

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 2>these legacy media companies and obviously podcasts becoming at least

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:17.199
<v Speaker 2>part of the normal. It's a conversation. I don't know.

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 2>We can get into the merits to merits of overstating

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 2>or over indexing podcast influence, but so much of what

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:28.160
<v Speaker 2>you seeded and influenced in terms of the right wing

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 2>media even now in some respects what folks are trying

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 2>to replicate with more progressive media voices. What do you

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:37.679
<v Speaker 2>make of the landscape today? How would you describe the

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 2>current landscape.

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm highly fragmented. I think in some ways that's good.

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I think in some ways that's bad. It's had tremendous

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>benefits in the sense that you don't have three networks

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and you have to rely on just those three networks,

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you can in real time fact check things. It's bad

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:54.680
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that, while gatekeeping is difficult and obviously

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>can silo off information that you need to have, if

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:02.199
<v Speaker 1>you have people who are algorithmically driven or desperate for

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 1>clicks and desperate for attention and don't seem to carry

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:06.919
<v Speaker 1>very much about the truth, and if there's kind of

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 1>no pushback, then bad information can spin its way around

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 1>very very quickly, and it doesn't take long for people

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to draw extremely hard narratives about I would say, convoluted

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>sets of facts. And I think that you know, frankly,

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 1>politicians sometimes have a position in doing this because if

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:26.919
<v Speaker 1>you're catering to a base, and obviously an everybody has

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:29.639
<v Speaker 1>to be aware of audience capture. In my industry, in politics,

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you have to be very aware of audience capture because

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you need to win votes. But I mean, just to

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 1>take as a recent example what happened in Minneapolis, I

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 1>think that the enormy response to what happened in Minneapolis

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 1>is this is obviously a tragedy. From a sort of

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 1>legal perspective, putting on my lawyer hat, the intent of

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 1>renee Good is not relevant to the question of the

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:52.199
<v Speaker 1>intent of the officer. Right if you're going to if

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>you're going to prosecute the officer, then you'd have to

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:58.439
<v Speaker 1>determine whether an objective reasonable officer would have perceived that

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:00.679
<v Speaker 1>he was being threatened by her vehicle when when he

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>shot her. And it seems to me that you could,

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you could voice a fairly strong defense in a court

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 1>of law that an objectively reasonable offster, since he actually

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>was nudged with the car at the very least, would

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 1>would have perceived it that way. Now, this immediately broke

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:15.120
<v Speaker 1>down into two separate narratives, both of which I think

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 1>are untrue. One was a narrative that was immediately pushed

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>by the Trump administration and Secretary of Homeland Security Christino

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and that she was a domestic terrorist who's attempting to

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>run over officers with her car and was legitimately trying

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 1>not not just this officer, but multiple officers. That was

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the original statement I said at the time. I thought

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>that was untrue. And then your press office tweeted out

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that it was state sponsored terrorism, which I mean, Governor,

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I have to ask you about that that that sort

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of thing makes our politics worse. I mean it does,

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and our ice officers obviously are not terrorists. A tragic

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>situation is not state sponsored terrorism. When it comes to ICE,

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'll ask you this just generally about policy

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:58.199
<v Speaker 1>with REGARDIS, because obviously it's become incredibly contentious given what

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the federal government is doing. In states like California, it

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 1>seems to me that there have been a number of

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 1>deportations from red states where there are governors in localities

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>working with ICE. California is a sanctuary state, which makes

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 1>it much more difficult for local law enforcement to hand

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:17.920
<v Speaker 1>over information to ICE about deportation status. What's the purpose

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>of that? Wouldn't best policy? You're pragmatic, You talk about

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:23.199
<v Speaker 1>your pragmatism all the time. Wouldn't best policy be to

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 1>cooperate with ICE in the vast majority of cases? So

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>instead of ICE going to, as you say, hospitals and

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>churches to f pike people up, they be going to

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:30.119
<v Speaker 1>jail houses.

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly what they do in California, And we have

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:34.639
<v Speaker 2>over ten thousand that I've cooperated with since I've been

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:38.680
<v Speaker 2>governor of California. We worked very directly with ICE as

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:43.399
<v Speaker 2>it relates to CDCR state prison. Californias cooperated with more

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 2>ICE transfers probably than any other state in the country,

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 2>and I've vetoed multiple pieces of legislation that have come

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 2>from my legislature to stop the ability for the state

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 2>of California to do that. So, when it comes to

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 2>the issues of violent criminals, when it comes to Falon's

0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 2>people that are being released from the largest state system

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 2>in the United States of America, California cooperates with ICE.

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, But why is it then? What makes it a

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 1>sanctuary state.

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:11.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, the broader sanctuary policies that are established, and we

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 2>had a policy it was established under Governor Brown SB.

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Fifty four. You have city sanctuary policies that go back

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 2>quite literally to the time Ronald Reagan was governor, and

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:22.400
<v Speaker 2>it relates to some of the issues in Central America

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:24.959
<v Speaker 2>sort of the origin stories. But at bottom line, it

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 2>relates to those policies. This notion that federal law should

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 2>be enforced by federal law enforcement agencies, that we should

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 2>not consign local law enforcement to federal responsibilities and prioritization.

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Right, we shouldn't the states step in with localities and

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:40.880
<v Speaker 1>tell localities that they ought to cooperate better with ICE.

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Thus to facilitate well, you.

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Know, I have sort of Rudy Giuliani's point of view,

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 2>who made the point as an advocate for sanctuary policy

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 2>when he was mayor of New York. He said, it

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:52.959
<v Speaker 2>keeps people safer, healthier, and more educated. Safer in the

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 2>context that it allows community members to be more likely

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:58.639
<v Speaker 2>to participate as witnesses of crime or victims of crime

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:02.159
<v Speaker 2>in going after the perpetrators, more likely to get an

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 2>immunization shot if they're not worried about the nurse turning

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:07.479
<v Speaker 2>them over to ice, more likely to go to school

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 2>and get educated if they're not worried about the school

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 2>crossing guard crossing them and ultimately turning them over to ice.

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:18.360
<v Speaker 2>So it's the tool of pragmatism because of the complete

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 2>abject failure of the federal government. A sanctuary policy is

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:24.439
<v Speaker 2>unnecessary if we had comprehensive immigration reform and we had

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 2>a federal response that was adequate to the task. But

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 2>in the absen of that, it's grown from the seventies

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 2>and eighties and nineties two thousands, and obviously I got

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:36.119
<v Speaker 2>here as governor, and we had an established framework before

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:36.640
<v Speaker 2>I got here.

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>It is true that sanctuary policy obviously has had a

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>massive impact as a driver of tremendous number of illegal

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 1>immigrants in the state of California.

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know about that. I mean, you see in

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot of states that don't have sanctuary policies, huge

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 2>increase in immigration, illegal immigration, massive increases, even far greater

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 2>than the state of California.

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Just look as in terms of the cost structure. I

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>mean you recently, for example, had to freeze the enrollment

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>of undocumented immigrants in state health systems to save money.

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Right, That's that's a separate issue. There twelve states that

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 2>provide health care for undocs, and we believe in universal

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 2>health care regardless. Break is a condition.

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:17.399
<v Speaker 1>The colst structures extraordinarily burdensome.

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 2>But I don't think it's in unpacking it. I don't

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:24.439
<v Speaker 2>think it's a sanctuary policies that are driving that. And

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 2>I give you a proof point. Florida don't have sanctuary policy,

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 2>a huge increase in undocumented community, huge increase in Texas.

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:35.439
<v Speaker 2>It's not a driver. They're sanctuary policies. They don't have

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:40.359
<v Speaker 2>sanctuary policies in those states. The State of California's policies,

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't think in that respect have invited people into

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 2>our state. And I use those as I think proof

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 2>points of that, and that's a difference. So the notion

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 2>of how do you deal with people that are here

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 2>ten fifteen years, how do you deal with mixed status

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 2>families in this state, and how do you provide for

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 2>health care as opposed to emergency care and stabilized populations

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:04.679
<v Speaker 2>and community health. It's a different approach. It's one that

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 2>we've been very transparent about it. It's one that's hardly unique

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:10.879
<v Speaker 2>because in every state they provide compensated care for on

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 2>docks at the emergency room. Many states provide it for children,

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 2>many for seniors. California provides it across the board. I mean.

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 1>The biggest problem though, is, as somebody who left the state,

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>is that the cost structure in the state has become

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>so birds, not just because of illegal immigration but generally,

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and so the idea that policy has no impact as

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>a magnet for particular human behavior or alienating people from

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a state, that's clearly untrue. And when you look at

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the homeless population, for example, friendlier policies toward providing services

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:40.119
<v Speaker 1>in Santa Monica.

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Point though, but now you're getting a homeless policy, non

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 2>immigration policy.

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Of immigration policy. I want to make it easier for

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 1>illegal immigrants. Let's stick with immigration to what ICE than

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>presumably no.

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Look, I appreciate this, so we've established important I appreciate

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 2>the question because I'm glad we've established that we do

0:26:56.200 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 2>cooperate with ICE in California, in particular this governor, who,

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:03.399
<v Speaker 2>as I said, on multiple ocasions, vetoed efforts to stop

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 2>me from that coordination for dangerous criminals. And we've done

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:08.160
<v Speaker 2>that over ten thousand folks.

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>So it'd been wrong for us. So when AOC said

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 1>this week that I should be abolished, you disagree, Oh.

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 2>I disagree. When I think a candidate for president by

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:18.159
<v Speaker 2>the name Maharris said that in the last a cana

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 2>I came out, it was I remember being on Chris

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:22.919
<v Speaker 2>Hayes hours later saying, I think that's a mistake. So

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:25.920
<v Speaker 2>absolutely Number two, as it relates to the issue of

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:28.360
<v Speaker 2>sanctuary policy, I think it's important to establish because it's

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:33.639
<v Speaker 2>not well established. Sanctuary jurisdictions have lower crime rates, lower

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:37.239
<v Speaker 2>crime rates than non sanctuary jurisdictions. So this notion that

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 2>it somehow increases crime is also I think contradicted on

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:44.639
<v Speaker 2>the basis of the facts. So this notion that population

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 2>it becomes an attractive nature for population increases. I think

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 2>is contradicted by the facts as it relates to crime.

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 2>It's contradicted by the facts. But there's unquestionably, and you're

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 2>right about this as it relates to an expansion of services,

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 2>but not just for sanctuary jurisdictions, for population diverse populations. Yes,

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 2>there are states like California that have chosen a different approach.

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:11.199
<v Speaker 1>And that approach I mean means that when you came

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:13.879
<v Speaker 1>into office, for example, the budget was two hundred billion dollars,

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:15.879
<v Speaker 1>and your proposed budget last year or this year is

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and fifty billion dollars.

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 2>The general funds two hundred and forty eight billion. We

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:24.360
<v Speaker 2>have forty two point three billion dollar additional revenue structure

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 2>then we anticipated. By the way, another two point eight

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 2>came in in December, and California is now replenishing its

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 2>reserves twenty three billion dollars, paying down pension obligations eleven

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:37.439
<v Speaker 2>point eight billion dollars. There's no question there cost pressures,

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 2>its rates to medicate are medical and medical in California,

0:28:41.920 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 2>and those pressures are going to be made worse because

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 2>of the big beautiful bill.

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean I think that the main pressures in

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the state of California in terms of kind of future

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 1>cost looks like some of the programs that you mentioned,

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 1>mainly if we're going to look at it, CalPERS cost hours,

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you have perhaps five hundred billion dollars

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>in unfunded liabilities going forward, well.

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 2>In which we've substantially improved in the last seven years.

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 2>I just mentioned the eleven point eight billion dollar commitment.

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 2>We've highlighted that in the state of the state to

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 2>pay down long term pension obligations stirs and purrs. Their

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 2>funded liability has been improving over the last five or

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 2>six years, can make up for the last thirty years.

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 2>You may recall a decade plus ago we did reforms

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 2>for new employees moving in. We dealt with spiking and

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 2>other issues and abuses in that space. We're hardly unique

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 2>in this country as it relates to unfunded liability.

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>But there are fraud issues obviously, and fraud issues.

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Let's we can talk about fraud all day. I'd love

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:37.960
<v Speaker 2>to talk about that, and we could get back to

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 2>that because I think it's incredibly important topic in California

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 2>has been actually out front on a lot of these

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 2>anti fraud efforts, and you know, I think there's a

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 2>lot of you know, a lot of bs in this

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 2>space as it relates to sort of targeted assaults and

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 2>offense that obviously are big pentapolgects. But I want to

0:29:54.760 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 2>go back because we're going to get all of this.

0:29:57.080 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 2>I know everyone came here for all this stuff.

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Of course, before we do, they just want to ask.

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>There's sort of a general take that I have, and

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that is I heard the podcast Theater with Esra Client.

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I think Ezra is wonderful. You know, he and I

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>disagree about nearly everything. And I think as was really

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 1>really a fascinating person with a lot of really interesting

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and heterodox ideas. And he talked with you a lot

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>about sort of governance, and you talked with him a

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>lot about how you were trying to remove regulatory barriers

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to for example, building units, right because when you came

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 1>into office you wanted to build I believe it was

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>three point five million units that was that was.

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 2>The stated need.

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Then we created a legal framework a two and a

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 2>half million.

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:35.479
<v Speaker 1>And it will come as shorty to that, but it's

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 1>like twenty thirty what is it about one hundred one

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty thousand units that are being.

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Little little less thane hundred and fifty thousand. You're right

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 2>about one hundred and eleven hundred and eight thousand.

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 1>And this isn't this isn't rip on you.

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, because it's going to have major national issues,

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 2>you know in the Mauth economics of this with interistrate

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 2>environment sort of post COVID environment made this housing crisis across.

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Although to be fair that the housing crisis in California

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 1>is particularly bad. I mean their places like Phoenix or Austin,

0:30:58.200 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 1>or there's.

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 2>The original said yesterday and last week in the state

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 2>of State. It's the original sin our inability to get

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 2>out of our own way and all the regulatory thinks right,

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 2>and we blew through those in the last couple of years.

0:31:09.440 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 2>Sixty one housing reform bills we just passed, and Ezra

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 2>was highlighting that interesting in New York just moved in direction.

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 2>I think finally we Democrats broadly are moving now finally

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 2>in the right damage direction after decades and decades Democrats

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:28.239
<v Speaker 2>and Republicans in California neglect in this space, right.

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that one of the problems that that people

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 1>see and you know, there's been a big question You've

0:31:32.240 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 1>asked you. You've talked about it a lot, actually about

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the frustration that people have with politics and the disenchantment

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that people have, and the feeling that no matter what

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>they do, they can't get ahead, and that's manifesting into

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:44.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of political polarization. And this gets too, I think,

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a sort of broader issue. It's not just you, So

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean this to be a specific critique of you.

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a critique of a lot of politicians

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that I have left and right, and that is you

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:54.959
<v Speaker 1>look at the system. You realize as the governor, how

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 1>complex the system is, how difficult it is to get

0:31:57.000 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>things done, how much gridlocked there is in the system.

0:31:59.840 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 1>But politicians, in order to get elected, have to make

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of promises about how much things are going

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to change in the future, and they usually are talking

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 1>about using the power of government in order to facilitate

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and make that change happen, particularly on the democratic side

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 1>of the aisle. And it seems to me that that

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 1>is a recipe for disaster for the American body politic,

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 1>because if you make promises that cannot be fulfilled because

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the system does not allow for it to be fulfilled.

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 1>People inherently end up frustrated. And you know, I have

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:29.080
<v Speaker 1>relatives who still live in the state of California. I

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 1>visit it routinely, and they're making a very good living.

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I have a sister in law and brother in law

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 1>live in LA. They make a combined excellent living, and

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 1>they're barely making their mortgage. And the housing costs are

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>too high. The cost of living is too high. I

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:45.959
<v Speaker 1>believe the poverty rates in California on a cost adjusted

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>basis are some of the highest in the nation.

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Right there with Florida. When you look at the supplemental poverty. Next,

0:32:50.880 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 2>when you look at poverty broadly, to find it's slightly

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 2>above average supplemental Florida and California a right.

0:32:56.000 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 1>If you're looking at real estate costs in particular, are

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary in the state of calif As you say, you know,

0:33:01.040 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to remove regulations. But the problem is that

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 1>unless we are willing to recognize a fundamental reality, which

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:10.800
<v Speaker 1>is that the relationship of the American people with their

0:33:10.840 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 1>government needs to change. And what that means is that

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 1>we need to radically, radically remove the regulatory structures that

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 1>allow for more building. That we need to radically stop

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 1>perverting markets when it comes to how we make housing policy.

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 1>That we need to stop wasting money in taxpayer funding

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 1>on things like, for example, a gigantic once called the

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>boon Zago high speed rail that is going to cost

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 1>an access of one hundred billion dollars in this state,

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the guarantee. And again I see it rising

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 1>on the populist right too, which is sort of a

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:48.720
<v Speaker 1>big government right, which is something I object to on

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 1>a sort of classically conservative level. The promises that are

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 1>made that if you give government more power and more

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 1>tax payer revenue, that suddenly these problems are going to

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 1>be alleviated, and the actual result, which is less ability

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to move to do what my parents did, to move

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 1>from a two bedroom small house in Burbank to a

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:08.799
<v Speaker 1>four bedroom, slightly larger house in North Hollywood, and then

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:11.840
<v Speaker 1>for me to go to a great state school like UCLA,

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and then for me to go to Harvard Law School,

0:34:14.200 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and now to have a really really nice house. You know,

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:17.919
<v Speaker 1>I did have a nice house in California before before

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 1>we left. Obviously, you know, those obstacles need to be.

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:24.319
<v Speaker 2>Well, you sound like me. I couldn't agree the more

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we get high speed rail aside, you made

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 2>my speech in my argument last three years in terms

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:31.319
<v Speaker 2>of the housing reforms we pursued, could not agree more.

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 2>I highlighted the sixty one bills just last year. I

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:36.840
<v Speaker 2>didn't highlight the forty two secret reform bills. The origin

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 2>you talk about process and regulatory thickets those environmental rules

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 2>that were established, ironically by Ronald Reagan himself when he

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 2>was governor of California. So we've been in the process

0:34:45.600 --> 0:34:47.920
<v Speaker 2>of doing precisely what you're suggesting we need to do,

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 2>and we've been doing it very meaningfully and been nation

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 2>leading reforms in this space. Now, of course, the private

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:55.880
<v Speaker 2>sector needs to catch up in the context of interest

0:34:55.920 --> 0:35:00.360
<v Speaker 2>rate environment becoming more favorable. But now we are cities

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 2>and counties we put on notice. Maybe recall when I

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:05.719
<v Speaker 2>first became governor, I sued Huntington Beach, the first city,

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:07.920
<v Speaker 2>because they were out of compliance with their housing element.

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 2>We established a legally legally binding goal of two and

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:13.319
<v Speaker 2>a half million units. We talked about the stretch goal,

0:35:14.160 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 2>what needed to get some equilibrium in our prices, the

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 2>supply demand imbalance, but we created a legally binding goal

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 2>of two and a half million.

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:21.759
<v Speaker 1>So what we've done to make that happen in not

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Hunting Beach, but La San Francisco.

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:26.359
<v Speaker 2>Was Well, we've we created a housing of accountability unit.

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 2>We pursued forty six actions we've unlocked.

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess the question is from like the common man perspective,

0:35:31.000 --> 0:35:33.760
<v Speaker 1>right from my perspective where I left, I took my business.

0:35:33.920 --> 0:35:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Right from that perspective, how do we get to the

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:41.400
<v Speaker 1>material change? And if we cannot, then perhaps that requires

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:46.960
<v Speaker 1>a complete rethink. Come over to my classical libertarian economics.

0:35:46.960 --> 0:35:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Here the owner is I guess I'm what I'm saying,

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and maybe recognize that the amount of tax revenue that's

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 1>taken in in the state perverts the market incentives. That

0:35:56.520 --> 0:35:59.959
<v Speaker 1>what's been generated in the state is a middle class

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that is really struggling, vast social services for people who

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:07.360
<v Speaker 1>are at poverty line or below and slightly above. And

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:09.319
<v Speaker 1>then you know a group of people who are either

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>so wealthy they don't care, or so wealthy now that

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 1>now they're leaving right because of the perspective wealth tax,

0:36:13.160 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 1>which I know you oppose, right, you understand markets. So

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 1>that's why I'm always a little bit bewildered when their

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:22.520
<v Speaker 1>measures taken by the state legislature that end up perverting

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 1>markets in fairly serious way.

0:36:24.160 --> 0:36:26.879
<v Speaker 2>Well, we can get into the corony capitalism, state capitalism,

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 2>and the tithings from Nvidia and AMD and what's going

0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:35.480
<v Speaker 2>on with Intel and what's happening with the Trump administration

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:37.239
<v Speaker 2>in that respect. But I agree with you broadly in

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 2>all this. I mean, the fact is we've been tackling

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:41.360
<v Speaker 2>all I can make up for fifty sixty years, and

0:36:41.360 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about literally a fifty year trend line as

0:36:44.680 --> 0:36:47.399
<v Speaker 2>it relates to the issues of cost of housing and affordability.

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 2>But I can talk in terms of the substance of

0:36:50.200 --> 0:36:53.760
<v Speaker 2>actions we've taken, tripling their income tax credits for working families,

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:56.919
<v Speaker 2>creating a child tax credit, foster tax credit, doing more

0:36:56.960 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 2>as it relates to predistribution opportunity.

0:36:59.160 --> 0:37:00.680
<v Speaker 1>About radically lowering income tax.

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:04.359
<v Speaker 2>Rates in the California has a tax. I mean, there's

0:37:04.400 --> 0:37:06.879
<v Speaker 2>sixteen states right now, let's talk about those sixteen states.

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Why don't we talk about California.

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 2>That's why we're going to the tax. They're low wager

0:37:10.200 --> 0:37:13.120
<v Speaker 2>earners more than California taxes. It's highwag earners. Let's talk

0:37:13.160 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 2>about those lowering those tax rates in those sixteen states.

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:18.319
<v Speaker 2>How about the middle class. Forty percent of the middle

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:21.400
<v Speaker 2>class in Texas pay higher taxes than they do in California.

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:24.840
<v Speaker 2>The tax we have the highest tax rate for the

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:28.319
<v Speaker 2>one percent, but the overall tax burden, and there's been

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:33.320
<v Speaker 2>independent analysis after independent analysis, is marginally higher than the

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:37.280
<v Speaker 2>national average. Okay, so the tax rate for the one percent,

0:37:37.360 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 2>you're in that bubble, but ninety nine percent empyeriodically.

0:37:40.360 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 1>And a person who who grew up in Californians but

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:44.719
<v Speaker 1>my entire career in California, I paid every single tax

0:37:44.800 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 1>rate in the same California I started off making when

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:48.399
<v Speaker 1>I when I first got out of school and i'd

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:49.960
<v Speaker 1>quit the law firm, I was making maybe sixty grand

0:37:49.960 --> 0:37:50.200
<v Speaker 1>a year.

0:37:50.280 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 2>So you started out paying less than you would in

0:37:52.320 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 2>a dozen plus other.

0:37:53.360 --> 0:37:54.040
<v Speaker 1>States, and I didn't.

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:55.439
<v Speaker 2>It's a progressive tax.

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I understand it's a progressive tax. Date the problem is

0:37:57.840 --> 0:38:00.160
<v Speaker 1>that when I left, I also took eighty employees, and

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:03.440
<v Speaker 1>there's somebody who's got to pay the bills for those employees,

0:38:03.480 --> 0:38:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's typically not the state. The person who is

0:38:05.400 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 1>paying the bills for the employees and the person.

0:38:07.480 --> 0:38:10.239
<v Speaker 2>That's the guy who, by the way, you're talking to

0:38:10.239 --> 0:38:12.080
<v Speaker 2>a guy who started to right out of college pen

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:16.240
<v Speaker 2>to paper and started twenty three small businesses, literally twenty

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:17.759
<v Speaker 2>three created almost.

0:38:17.480 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 1>As so you know, as a person who round small business,

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to pay salaries to your people, aren't well, right?

0:38:22.680 --> 0:38:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's not about the greed of the one

0:38:24.480 --> 0:38:25.399
<v Speaker 1>of the person.

0:38:25.480 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 2>I hated a lot of the regulations, and I've been

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:28.600
<v Speaker 2>fighting against a lot of.

0:38:28.520 --> 0:38:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Them, and having to fire people because of that stuff

0:38:30.440 --> 0:38:33.279
<v Speaker 1>is awful, I agree, And losing your profit margin, which

0:38:33.320 --> 0:38:35.719
<v Speaker 1>allows you to hire more people is a bad thing

0:38:36.239 --> 0:38:38.000
<v Speaker 1>when you were seeing I mean, I've talked to major

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:40.640
<v Speaker 1>tech founders who say today that they would not if

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:42.000
<v Speaker 1>they had to do it over again, they would not

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:45.399
<v Speaker 1>found in California specifically because of the regulatory and text rules.

0:38:45.400 --> 0:38:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's talk about the largest startup in world history

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:51.279
<v Speaker 2>could have chosen any place to open its headquarters. Just

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:54.399
<v Speaker 2>recently Open AI and the folks there decided to open

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:55.120
<v Speaker 2>in San Francisco.

0:38:55.760 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Story of the talent is I mean, there's no question there.

0:38:58.000 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 2>In lies the formula for success. Californ has more fortune

0:39:01.160 --> 0:39:05.520
<v Speaker 2>five hundred companies than it's ever had in twenty plus years, to.

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Be forty million people who live.

0:39:07.000 --> 0:39:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Oh, hold on. But four years ago that wasn't the case.

0:39:09.719 --> 0:39:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Today it's the case. We have fifty eight fortune five

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:14.160
<v Speaker 2>hundred companies. When I started was forty nine. We're the

0:39:14.200 --> 0:39:17.200
<v Speaker 2>sixth largest economy. Now we're the fourth largest economy. You

0:39:17.239 --> 0:39:18.880
<v Speaker 2>look at the three point one million jobs that are

0:39:18.920 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 2>being created since I've been governed. You can look across

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:24.480
<v Speaker 2>the spectrum. I'm not denying its challenges, but those persistent

0:39:24.560 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 2>exist in every other state. You moved to a state

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:29.400
<v Speaker 2>that has higher insurance rate, higher car insurance not just

0:39:29.400 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 2>home insurance, has higher property taxes. Many of these red

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 2>states they've hired a murder rates, lower wages, lower productivity,

0:39:35.840 --> 0:39:39.920
<v Speaker 2>less innovation and entrepreneurialism. They're less contributory to the GDP.

0:39:39.719 --> 0:39:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Of this country. So I mean not not to defend

0:39:41.719 --> 0:39:44.040
<v Speaker 1>my current state Florida. I mean obviously headed debate with

0:39:44.040 --> 0:39:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Governor DeSantis where you guys had had this discussion, but

0:39:47.320 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 1>will I will say that some of the statistics that

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you use with regard to California are aggregate statistics, not

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:55.759
<v Speaker 1>on a per capita basis. So I've heard you say,

0:39:55.760 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 1>for example, that California is the top innovation state because

0:40:00.520 --> 0:40:02.360
<v Speaker 1>it has the highest number of new businesses founded on

0:40:02.400 --> 0:40:03.799
<v Speaker 1>a per capita basis, that isn't true.

0:40:03.800 --> 0:40:06.319
<v Speaker 2>You talk about on a per capita basis, more Floridians

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:08.600
<v Speaker 2>moving to California than Californians to Florida.

0:40:08.760 --> 0:40:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's per capita base. That's fine and on appy.

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:14.200
<v Speaker 2>I just want to know it's established a per capit

0:40:15.000 --> 0:40:17.160
<v Speaker 2>per cap at a murder rate. Let's look at infant

0:40:17.160 --> 0:40:18.240
<v Speaker 2>mortality per capital.

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:20.640
<v Speaker 1>You can look at look at violent assault rates. We

0:40:20.640 --> 0:40:21.640
<v Speaker 1>can look at property crime rate.

0:40:21.680 --> 0:40:24.839
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, that's not I mean, I mean Jacksonville

0:40:24.920 --> 0:40:25.840
<v Speaker 2>versus San Francisco.

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:29.040
<v Speaker 1>California, outside of immigration has had a loss of population

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:31.080
<v Speaker 1>for the past several years. Immigration.

0:40:31.160 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 2>It's part of the secret sauce of California, going back

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:34.520
<v Speaker 2>to its its origin.

0:40:34.520 --> 0:40:36.239
<v Speaker 1>I understand. But if you lose people like me and

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the EDI employees I took with me, I'm.

0:40:38.320 --> 0:40:40.680
<v Speaker 2>Not happy about anyone leaving the state. But population has

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:42.840
<v Speaker 2>grown three years in a row. Last time it declined,

0:40:42.840 --> 0:40:44.920
<v Speaker 2>it went down with eleven other states, and we lost

0:40:44.960 --> 0:40:46.080
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and fifty one people.

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 1>If you're talking not about immigration. If you're just talking

0:40:48.040 --> 0:40:50.279
<v Speaker 1>about people who lived in California horle leaving, that number

0:40:50.360 --> 0:40:52.440
<v Speaker 1>is high. And again I'm not blaming that on you.

0:40:52.280 --> 0:40:54.960
<v Speaker 2>You give be the case in many many states, as

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:56.839
<v Speaker 2>you know, across this country, by the way, a lot

0:40:56.840 --> 0:40:59.080
<v Speaker 2>of red states, which I'm surprised you guys don't talk

0:40:59.120 --> 0:41:01.480
<v Speaker 2>more about. What about the last few years all these

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:04.520
<v Speaker 2>red states losing folks. California hasn't been the last few years.

0:41:04.560 --> 0:41:07.880
<v Speaker 2>These red states are Louisiana, Mississippi. Let's talk about those states.

0:41:07.880 --> 0:41:09.879
<v Speaker 2>But let's talk about the murder rate. Adding a top

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:12.640
<v Speaker 2>ten murder rates in America are in red states. I

0:41:12.640 --> 0:41:15.640
<v Speaker 2>think there's some real probably the most regressive taxes in

0:41:15.680 --> 0:41:17.840
<v Speaker 2>the country are in these red states. Who are you for?

0:41:18.320 --> 0:41:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean the question really again, you're the governor of

0:41:21.160 --> 0:41:23.320
<v Speaker 1>California and not the governor of Louisiana. If I'm speaking

0:41:23.320 --> 0:41:25.000
<v Speaker 1>with the governor of Louisiana, I'd be very happy to

0:41:25.040 --> 0:41:26.200
<v Speaker 1>talk about just never hear.

0:41:26.120 --> 0:41:29.440
<v Speaker 2>Anyone and talk about the governor Louisiana in the population day.

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because the last I'm aware of the governor of Louisiana,

0:41:32.719 --> 0:41:37.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, probably wasn't running for president. And also everyone

0:41:37.440 --> 0:41:38.920
<v Speaker 1>else to be running for president.

0:41:39.440 --> 0:41:41.359
<v Speaker 2>Were running for president. By the way, let's get back

0:41:41.400 --> 0:41:43.880
<v Speaker 2>to that Bannon is running for president. He said, Oh.

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Goodness, you don't buy that. No, I bet that Steve

0:41:46.480 --> 0:41:48.680
<v Speaker 1>would run a vanity campaign in order to garner a

0:41:48.680 --> 0:41:50.480
<v Speaker 1>few dollars and some more attention from self. Sure, why not.

0:41:50.680 --> 0:41:52.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to get back to all the California bashing

0:41:52.840 --> 0:41:54.520
<v Speaker 2>here in a second, because I know everyone wants to

0:41:54.520 --> 0:41:55.719
<v Speaker 2>tune in on that, but I want to talk. I

0:41:55.800 --> 0:41:57.400
<v Speaker 2>want to keep going a little bit, and just in

0:41:57.440 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 2>the interest of you coming all the way off from

0:41:59.160 --> 0:42:03.840
<v Speaker 2>that red short floor, because it is interesting just in

0:42:03.920 --> 0:42:06.239
<v Speaker 2>terms of just as you laid out the framework of

0:42:06.239 --> 0:42:10.520
<v Speaker 2>the media environment in this country, and how fragment it's become, etcetera,

0:42:10.600 --> 0:42:13.480
<v Speaker 2>this notion of trust and truth, and how things are weaponized,

0:42:13.520 --> 0:42:16.560
<v Speaker 2>and how everybody, you know, society becomes, how we behave

0:42:16.640 --> 0:42:19.240
<v Speaker 2>and how you and diet a little bit my press office,

0:42:19.280 --> 0:42:24.000
<v Speaker 2>which I appreciated the direct point you made on that,

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:26.360
<v Speaker 2>and I'm not naive about that. I think about that

0:42:26.400 --> 0:42:27.960
<v Speaker 2>all the time. When we put up a mirror to Trump,

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:30.719
<v Speaker 2>we've become more like him. And I'm complicit in that,

0:42:30.760 --> 0:42:31.160
<v Speaker 2>not unique.

0:42:31.239 --> 0:42:32.799
<v Speaker 1>You obviously we've had things in our company that have

0:42:32.840 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 1>been said. That's not unique. I will say that I

0:42:35.040 --> 0:42:37.400
<v Speaker 1>think that for elected politicians who are hoping for a

0:42:37.440 --> 0:42:40.440
<v Speaker 1>better future or we all come together, it is a problem.

0:42:40.600 --> 0:42:44.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I don't like to catastrophism. I've criticized

0:42:44.120 --> 0:42:46.319
<v Speaker 1>it on the right too, the sort of catastrophism that

0:42:46.360 --> 0:42:48.239
<v Speaker 1>you see in a functioning democracy, which is what the

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:50.960
<v Speaker 1>United States is. It is a functioning republic. You know, when,

0:42:51.640 --> 0:42:54.719
<v Speaker 1>for example, when the president decided to push for redistricting

0:42:54.760 --> 0:42:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and then you push back with your proposition. I actually

0:42:57.400 --> 0:42:58.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a problem with that. I thought, you know,

0:42:59.000 --> 0:43:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that is a that is a normal use of the

0:43:00.560 --> 0:43:03.319
<v Speaker 1>political mechanisms in order to fight back by one side

0:43:03.360 --> 0:43:05.719
<v Speaker 1>against another. What I do have a problem with is

0:43:06.320 --> 0:43:07.960
<v Speaker 1>if you go on Stephen Colbert and say you're word

0:43:08.000 --> 0:43:10.120
<v Speaker 1>there won't be a legit election in twenty twenty eight.

0:43:10.239 --> 0:43:11.960
<v Speaker 2>I die. But I feel that. I mean, if I

0:43:11.960 --> 0:43:13.040
<v Speaker 2>believe it, do you really believe that?

0:43:13.080 --> 0:43:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I really believe that, But then why are you running

0:43:16.120 --> 0:43:17.040
<v Speaker 1>or why would you consider it?

0:43:17.120 --> 0:43:19.520
<v Speaker 2>I want to make sure those because we have agency,

0:43:19.560 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 2>we can shape the future. It's not something to experience.

0:43:21.760 --> 0:43:23.360
<v Speaker 1>But I didn't believe when President Trump said it's a

0:43:23.360 --> 0:43:24.120
<v Speaker 1>President Trump said in.

0:43:24.080 --> 0:43:26.400
<v Speaker 2>Twenty twenty, he wants I believe in it.

0:43:26.880 --> 0:43:28.520
<v Speaker 1>He tried to truly believe the preident Trump is going

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to try to run in twenty twenty eight.

0:43:29.800 --> 0:43:31.720
<v Speaker 2>No, I believe that I'll try to wire the outcome

0:43:31.719 --> 0:43:32.440
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty eight.

0:43:32.440 --> 0:43:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I really see. This sort of stuff is very dangerous

0:43:34.320 --> 0:43:36.759
<v Speaker 1>to me. It really because I heard it from the

0:43:36.840 --> 0:43:38.879
<v Speaker 1>right in the aftermath of twenty twenty, and you'll recall

0:43:38.960 --> 0:43:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I was one of the few on the right who

0:43:40.680 --> 0:43:43.680
<v Speaker 1>said this is not true, right, that Joe Biden was legitimately,

0:43:43.760 --> 0:43:46.200
<v Speaker 1>legitimately elected in twenty twenty, and that if someone could

0:43:46.200 --> 0:43:48.520
<v Speaker 1>provide me evidence that he was not, that was sufficient

0:43:48.560 --> 0:43:51.680
<v Speaker 1>to overcome the Burgin. What Trump tried to do well,

0:43:51.680 --> 0:43:53.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what is the thing that you think many

0:43:53.400 --> 0:43:54.040
<v Speaker 1>dialing up.

0:43:53.920 --> 0:43:57.000
<v Speaker 2>For twelve thousand votes in Georgia you end up partying.

0:43:57.080 --> 0:43:59.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, where you signed, I'm not justifying, I'm not

0:43:59.200 --> 0:44:01.960
<v Speaker 2>justifying and trying to democracy, not justifying what he said

0:44:01.960 --> 0:44:04.840
<v Speaker 2>to Brad Raffinsburg or over over in Georgia, Brad.

0:44:04.760 --> 0:44:07.279
<v Speaker 1>Raffis wat Mike Pens did the right thing. By the way,

0:44:07.280 --> 0:44:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and sortifying the election. But my point is that when

0:44:09.800 --> 0:44:13.120
<v Speaker 1>it comes to if you want the country to continue

0:44:13.200 --> 0:44:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to work together, then if you set the predicate if

0:44:16.520 --> 0:44:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I lose, it was rigged and I can't stand that,

0:44:19.600 --> 0:44:21.799
<v Speaker 1>and then then we need some objective metric on that.

0:44:21.800 --> 0:44:23.359
<v Speaker 1>Then then if you're going to say that we need

0:44:23.360 --> 0:44:26.759
<v Speaker 1>some objective metrics by which we can adjudicate whether or

0:44:26.880 --> 0:44:30.880
<v Speaker 1>not the election will be fairly decided. And it seems

0:44:30.880 --> 0:44:33.239
<v Speaker 1>to me that just in terms of how elections are

0:44:33.239 --> 0:44:35.680
<v Speaker 1>conducted globally, and again I'm in favor of many of

0:44:35.760 --> 0:44:38.280
<v Speaker 1>these sort of election reforms that have been proposed. For example,

0:44:38.320 --> 0:44:40.360
<v Speaker 1>voter I d I think it's kind of silly to

0:44:40.680 --> 0:44:42.439
<v Speaker 1>argue that you shouldn't have to show idea when you vote.

0:44:42.560 --> 0:44:45.040
<v Speaker 1>But do I think that we are at high risk

0:44:45.080 --> 0:44:47.640
<v Speaker 1>in the United States a full scale national elections with

0:44:47.719 --> 0:44:51.160
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifty million voters being stolen, and then

0:44:51.160 --> 0:44:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that the the elective leadership is then fundamentally illegitimate, which

0:44:55.200 --> 0:44:57.279
<v Speaker 1>leaves you with no choice, presumably but to go to

0:44:57.280 --> 0:44:59.839
<v Speaker 1>the mattresses, which is what you don't want. That sort

0:44:59.840 --> 0:45:01.960
<v Speaker 1>of language I think is really ray and I.

0:45:01.960 --> 0:45:04.279
<v Speaker 2>Don't see it. But back to the point you were

0:45:04.320 --> 0:45:07.319
<v Speaker 2>making earlier about the aggregate. We're talking about a few

0:45:07.400 --> 0:45:10.640
<v Speaker 2>thousand votes here and there that ultimately determine that election

0:45:10.840 --> 0:45:12.839
<v Speaker 2>for the nation on the basis of the electoral map.

0:45:13.280 --> 0:45:17.040
<v Speaker 2>So I think it's more prone to concern than you may.

0:45:16.920 --> 0:45:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Suggest specific problems that we can actually agree on the

0:45:20.640 --> 0:45:21.600
<v Speaker 1>specifical I'm.

0:45:21.480 --> 0:45:23.400
<v Speaker 2>With you, and that's why I'm calling it out now

0:45:23.440 --> 0:45:26.120
<v Speaker 2>and I've been I try to provide evidence to back

0:45:26.160 --> 0:45:27.840
<v Speaker 2>up my point as it relates to the Department of

0:45:27.960 --> 0:45:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Justice and how it gets weaponized. And I've seen it

0:45:30.280 --> 0:45:32.239
<v Speaker 2>from my party as well, sure as hell's seen it

0:45:32.239 --> 0:45:34.640
<v Speaker 2>from Trump's part. Some perspective what they try to do

0:45:34.680 --> 0:45:36.840
<v Speaker 2>with the bord tag teams the day of the election

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:39.600
<v Speaker 2>here under Prop fifty, where they send folks out and

0:45:39.640 --> 0:45:42.080
<v Speaker 2>these guys are all dressed up to try to chill

0:45:42.120 --> 0:45:44.719
<v Speaker 2>free expression and free speech on election day, where Trump

0:45:44.800 --> 0:45:47.000
<v Speaker 2>tweets out that morning saying this is a rigged election.

0:45:47.719 --> 0:45:50.440
<v Speaker 2>The fact that he's out there suggesting that all the

0:45:50.480 --> 0:45:53.080
<v Speaker 2>vote by mail is illegal, and a bunch of immigrants,

0:45:53.320 --> 0:45:56.000
<v Speaker 2>illegal immigrants are out there doing all of these things.

0:45:56.000 --> 0:45:59.000
<v Speaker 2>You start stacking them, including trying to MiG term elections

0:45:59.040 --> 0:46:01.560
<v Speaker 2>as it relates to changing maps and what he tried

0:46:01.600 --> 0:46:04.320
<v Speaker 2>to do on January sixth, Yeah, I start getting a

0:46:04.320 --> 0:46:04.799
<v Speaker 2>little big one.

0:46:05.040 --> 0:46:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to look about those things in together

0:46:06.520 --> 0:46:07.840
<v Speaker 1>because I don't. But I think they're saying.

0:46:08.040 --> 0:46:10.000
<v Speaker 2>They're not all the same, but they stacked together from

0:46:10.040 --> 0:46:12.600
<v Speaker 2>my perspective, not one action to some total of all

0:46:12.640 --> 0:46:14.759
<v Speaker 2>of those things, including sending out ice.

0:46:14.840 --> 0:46:18.120
<v Speaker 1>But it is very target targets. Here's the thing, it's

0:46:18.160 --> 0:46:20.320
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to argue over intentions because now I'm in

0:46:20.320 --> 0:46:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the business of mind reading, which I can't do. I

0:46:22.200 --> 0:46:24.200
<v Speaker 1>can well, Joump's not.

0:46:24.360 --> 0:46:25.800
<v Speaker 2>He's telling you what he thinks.

0:46:26.000 --> 0:46:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I know, and but he when he says what he thinks,

0:46:29.600 --> 0:46:31.799
<v Speaker 1>all criticize. So for example, when he said twenty twenty

0:46:31.840 --> 0:46:34.480
<v Speaker 1>was a rigged election, he said, you'll recall in twenty twenty.

0:46:34.760 --> 0:46:36.120
<v Speaker 1>On the night of the election, he said I won

0:46:36.200 --> 0:46:39.600
<v Speaker 1>before all the results were in. I came out before anybody.

0:46:39.719 --> 0:46:42.040
<v Speaker 1>And I said, that's wrong. The election is not over yet,

0:46:42.040 --> 0:46:44.279
<v Speaker 1>all the votes have not been counted, so so that

0:46:44.760 --> 0:46:47.080
<v Speaker 1>so I tried to I try, and I think the

0:46:47.120 --> 0:46:49.640
<v Speaker 1>responsible thing to do is and I don't always do this,

0:46:49.719 --> 0:46:52.200
<v Speaker 1>but I think that the responsible thing to do is

0:46:52.280 --> 0:46:55.160
<v Speaker 1>to try and hone in on the specific behavior. So

0:46:55.360 --> 0:46:57.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, you mentioned that it would be election rigging.

0:46:57.520 --> 0:46:59.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, if President Trump is pushing for jerrymandering and

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:02.000
<v Speaker 1>in Indiana, I don't think that's election rigging. I don't

0:47:02.000 --> 0:47:04.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's election rigging when you jerrymander in California. I

0:47:04.080 --> 0:47:06.560
<v Speaker 1>think that is a long practice part of American politics.

0:47:06.760 --> 0:47:08.840
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think that you did anything wrong actually

0:47:09.040 --> 0:47:11.080
<v Speaker 1>in pushing fort in California, as much as it does

0:47:11.120 --> 0:47:13.359
<v Speaker 1>not benefit the party that I tend to vote for

0:47:13.600 --> 0:47:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and of whom i'm a member of which i'm a member.

0:47:15.800 --> 0:47:18.719
<v Speaker 1>So you know, when the general tenor and this is

0:47:18.719 --> 0:47:22.759
<v Speaker 1>what I see in democraphic, in democratic crises that you

0:47:22.800 --> 0:47:24.560
<v Speaker 1>see around the world, one of the things that I

0:47:24.600 --> 0:47:27.560
<v Speaker 1>see is both sides saying if the other side wins,

0:47:27.880 --> 0:47:28.520
<v Speaker 1>it was Ray.

0:47:28.440 --> 0:47:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm with you on that, though I want to

0:47:29.960 --> 0:47:32.239
<v Speaker 2>make a double down on being crystal clear. I can't

0:47:32.280 --> 0:47:34.040
<v Speaker 2>stand that anymore than you can stand that. I couldn't

0:47:34.040 --> 0:47:37.280
<v Speaker 2>agree with you more. I'm concerned about the inputs between

0:47:37.320 --> 0:47:41.759
<v Speaker 2>now in twenty twenty eight, including concerned about folks that

0:47:41.840 --> 0:47:44.640
<v Speaker 2>you know well, Steve Bannon and others saying there'll be

0:47:44.680 --> 0:47:46.839
<v Speaker 2>a third Trump term. The fact that I was in.

0:47:46.760 --> 0:47:48.440
<v Speaker 1>The he's totally full of shit. And by the way,

0:47:48.440 --> 0:47:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that people should stop giving Steve attention for

0:47:50.440 --> 0:47:52.080
<v Speaker 1>saying things that are complete horseship, and.

0:47:52.200 --> 0:47:55.959
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate that. But should I give attention to Donald Trump?

0:47:56.000 --> 0:47:57.880
<v Speaker 2>When I sat there in the Oval office for ninety

0:47:57.880 --> 0:48:00.919
<v Speaker 2>minutes and he tells me to turn around and there's

0:48:00.960 --> 0:48:03.080
<v Speaker 2>a picture on the wall or painting on the wall

0:48:03.120 --> 0:48:04.840
<v Speaker 2>of FDR and I look at him and I smiled,

0:48:04.840 --> 0:48:06.759
<v Speaker 2>and he goes, I said, oh, here's the third term.

0:48:06.760 --> 0:48:09.160
<v Speaker 2>He goes, what about four terms? Should I take him seriously?

0:48:09.200 --> 0:48:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay? Soorry?

0:48:09.760 --> 0:48:11.600
<v Speaker 2>I take him literally? Will I? Will? I don't know.

0:48:11.600 --> 0:48:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm just a question, you know, and my my general

0:48:13.760 --> 0:48:15.719
<v Speaker 1>the president and my general answer to this is if

0:48:15.719 --> 0:48:18.520
<v Speaker 1>we've watched Donald Trump for ten years, ten years and

0:48:18.520 --> 0:48:20.319
<v Speaker 1>we're still doing the thing where we all take him

0:48:20.560 --> 0:48:26.080
<v Speaker 1>explicitly literally, I think that did so people has Okay,

0:48:26.480 --> 0:48:29.360
<v Speaker 1>it turns out should But you know, one of the

0:48:29.400 --> 0:48:31.680
<v Speaker 1>things that I remember I would get this critique about

0:48:31.680 --> 0:48:33.920
<v Speaker 1>President Trump a lot, is President Trump, who, as I've

0:48:33.960 --> 0:48:37.600
<v Speaker 1>said multiple times on his on his epitaph, it will

0:48:37.760 --> 0:48:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it will read forty fifth and forty seven presidents of

0:48:40.040 --> 0:48:42.799
<v Speaker 1>the United States. He said, a lot of shit, you know,

0:48:42.920 --> 0:48:44.279
<v Speaker 1>like the the thing that I.

0:48:45.600 --> 0:48:47.360
<v Speaker 2>I take my presidents a little more seriously.

0:48:47.680 --> 0:48:49.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't see I don't think you do. And this

0:48:49.320 --> 0:48:50.839
<v Speaker 1>is this is the thing where I really, I really

0:48:50.880 --> 0:48:52.480
<v Speaker 1>doubt it. I see a lot of people who will

0:48:52.520 --> 0:48:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Trump will will fire off a random tweet and everybody

0:48:56.680 --> 0:49:00.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of laughs because it's President Trump. If I'm to

0:49:00.280 --> 0:49:02.480
<v Speaker 1>pretend that that is coming from the same thought process

0:49:02.840 --> 0:49:05.759
<v Speaker 1>as whatever comes from Joe Biden's press office, which went

0:49:05.800 --> 0:49:08.160
<v Speaker 1>through seven layers and maybe not the president very different,

0:49:08.200 --> 0:49:10.120
<v Speaker 1>then I'm not gonna I'm not gonna pretend that's the

0:49:10.160 --> 0:49:11.480
<v Speaker 1>same thing, because I'm not an idiot, you know.

0:49:12.120 --> 0:49:13.920
<v Speaker 2>Side look, and by the way, I could not agree

0:49:13.960 --> 0:49:16.120
<v Speaker 2>the more. And that's I think reflected in the humor

0:49:16.160 --> 0:49:18.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to put back in on my social idiot.

0:49:18.680 --> 0:49:20.319
<v Speaker 1>And actually, I think it's a problem for you because

0:49:20.320 --> 0:49:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that, frankly, the stuff that you're doing is

0:49:22.600 --> 0:49:24.520
<v Speaker 1>more thought out than the stuff that President Trump does.

0:49:24.680 --> 0:49:26.359
<v Speaker 1>Meaning I think the President Trump is waking up at

0:49:26.360 --> 0:49:27.920
<v Speaker 1>three in the morning if you want to sleep at all,

0:49:28.120 --> 0:49:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and he's firing off stuff on truth social right, and

0:49:30.360 --> 0:49:32.200
<v Speaker 1>so am I supposed to take that as seriously as

0:49:32.239 --> 0:49:34.400
<v Speaker 1>you in a methodical fashion and saying, you know what,

0:49:34.400 --> 0:49:36.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to prank him back. And I think that

0:49:36.320 --> 0:49:39.319
<v Speaker 1>people on you know, people who are your supporters, do

0:49:39.440 --> 0:49:43.319
<v Speaker 1>take you in that way more literally then they would

0:49:43.360 --> 0:49:44.680
<v Speaker 1>be apt to take president.

0:49:44.920 --> 0:49:46.440
<v Speaker 2>I think, I mean, a lot of my support has

0:49:46.440 --> 0:49:49.960
<v Speaker 2>been offended by by what we're trying to do. But

0:49:49.960 --> 0:49:52.320
<v Speaker 2>but no, look and and a lot I think appreciate

0:49:52.360 --> 0:49:54.680
<v Speaker 2>the humor that we bring to it, and I do

0:49:54.719 --> 0:49:57.640
<v Speaker 2>think it. I think it's reflected, and I think a

0:49:57.680 --> 0:49:59.640
<v Speaker 2>sense of agreement that we have in that respect a

0:49:59.840 --> 0:50:01.239
<v Speaker 2>really so what Trump puts out all the time.

0:50:01.239 --> 0:50:02.800
<v Speaker 1>But like, if you win the twenty twenty eight election,

0:50:03.040 --> 0:50:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I will call you presidents of the United States, right

0:50:04.880 --> 0:50:07.200
<v Speaker 1>because that election will be legitimate.

0:50:07.280 --> 0:50:12.560
<v Speaker 2>And if it's I was, you know, as an American

0:50:13.120 --> 0:50:16.200
<v Speaker 2>called Donald Trump president ed States, mister president, I mean,

0:50:16.440 --> 0:50:19.400
<v Speaker 2>of course, And so I'm with you on that, But

0:50:19.719 --> 0:50:23.200
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't suggest that I believe for a second, and

0:50:23.239 --> 0:50:26.840
<v Speaker 2>you haven't respectfully convinced me that I'm wrong or errant

0:50:27.120 --> 0:50:30.040
<v Speaker 2>that he won't do everything in his power to manipulate

0:50:30.080 --> 0:50:33.160
<v Speaker 2>the outcome. Do I expect. I think it's time of life.

0:50:33.160 --> 0:50:36.359
<v Speaker 2>If he was twenty years younger, I absolutely believe he'd

0:50:36.440 --> 0:50:38.640
<v Speaker 2>run for a third term. But at time of life

0:50:38.920 --> 0:50:41.239
<v Speaker 2>suggests that that's not going to be the case. But

0:50:41.280 --> 0:50:42.480
<v Speaker 2>I do think he's going to try hard.

0:50:42.560 --> 0:50:44.840
<v Speaker 1>This also implicated that you see the reason I'm concerned

0:50:44.880 --> 0:50:49.120
<v Speaker 1>about this because it also implicates the guardrails. So, as

0:50:49.160 --> 0:50:51.560
<v Speaker 1>you've talked about in your state, there's a lot of gridlock,

0:50:51.640 --> 0:50:53.440
<v Speaker 1>right There are a lot of various moving parts when

0:50:53.440 --> 0:50:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to get something done at the state level.

0:50:55.000 --> 0:50:56.880
<v Speaker 1>You've got local governments that can impede you. You've got

0:50:56.880 --> 0:50:59.279
<v Speaker 1>a legislature that can say no to you. You've got

0:50:59.280 --> 0:51:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of be judiciary that will that will tell

0:51:01.560 --> 0:51:04.759
<v Speaker 1>you no in in certain areas. You know, there's there's

0:51:04.760 --> 0:51:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a ruling a couple of weeks ago that I that

0:51:06.040 --> 0:51:08.279
<v Speaker 1>I strongly agree with from the judiciary with regard to,

0:51:08.360 --> 0:51:11.400
<v Speaker 1>for example, school districts and what they can and should

0:51:11.400 --> 0:51:13.439
<v Speaker 1>tell parents about about their kids.

0:51:13.560 --> 0:51:18.080
<v Speaker 2>That'll get but but you know what decision, Yeah, but

0:51:18.120 --> 0:51:20.239
<v Speaker 2>when when it when it comes to you know what

0:51:20.280 --> 0:51:21.880
<v Speaker 2>President Trump is or is not trying to do.

0:51:22.000 --> 0:51:24.160
<v Speaker 1>The problem is when we say that he will try

0:51:24.200 --> 0:51:26.240
<v Speaker 1>to he will try to steal iss will the election

0:51:26.440 --> 0:51:29.359
<v Speaker 1>be stolen? That relies now on a an opinion about,

0:51:29.400 --> 0:51:31.719
<v Speaker 1>for example, the Supreme Court of the United States, or

0:51:31.719 --> 0:51:35.319
<v Speaker 1>an opinion about the various state legislatures and courts, and

0:51:35.320 --> 0:51:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and so now you're not just implicating what President Trump

0:51:37.680 --> 0:51:40.719
<v Speaker 1>might try to do, You're now implicating pretty much every

0:51:40.719 --> 0:51:42.640
<v Speaker 1>major institution that is electoral in nature.

0:51:42.760 --> 0:51:45.799
<v Speaker 2>Well, there's a lot of evidence, and I know both

0:51:45.840 --> 0:51:48.960
<v Speaker 2>sides have argued a lot of evidence as relates the

0:51:49.000 --> 0:51:51.960
<v Speaker 2>weaponization justice and the bias that's expressed in a lot

0:51:52.000 --> 0:51:56.319
<v Speaker 2>of these federal judicial opinions. And and it's, uh, yeah,

0:51:56.360 --> 0:51:58.040
<v Speaker 2>it's a little arming. I mean, as a father of

0:51:58.080 --> 0:52:02.480
<v Speaker 2>a judge who revers thes and you know, as someone

0:52:02.520 --> 0:52:04.520
<v Speaker 2>that I was very proud my father may have been

0:52:04.520 --> 0:52:07.960
<v Speaker 2>accused of being an activist judge, but many occasions call

0:52:08.000 --> 0:52:10.239
<v Speaker 2>in balls and strikes, and you know, I revere that

0:52:10.280 --> 0:52:12.960
<v Speaker 2>sense of justice. That's that's where justice is found with

0:52:13.040 --> 0:52:15.759
<v Speaker 2>an objective analysis. But no, I do worry about the

0:52:15.760 --> 0:52:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court. You may not. I'm concerned about the Supreme

0:52:18.320 --> 0:52:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Court of the United States. I'm concerned about what Donald

0:52:20.920 --> 0:52:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Trump did after January sixth, the degree that he went

0:52:25.120 --> 0:52:28.400
<v Speaker 2>to ultimately try to stay in office. Yes, I'm concerned

0:52:28.440 --> 0:52:30.919
<v Speaker 2>about the actions he's taken, not any one of them

0:52:31.360 --> 0:52:35.240
<v Speaker 2>from the midterm redistricting, but the sum total of many

0:52:35.320 --> 0:52:37.560
<v Speaker 2>of them. And yes, I'm concerned. If we don't take

0:52:37.600 --> 0:52:39.920
<v Speaker 2>back the House of Representatives and we have no oversight

0:52:40.080 --> 0:52:42.759
<v Speaker 2>and we continue to have the Supine Congress, we may

0:52:42.800 --> 0:52:44.920
<v Speaker 2>not have a country that we recognize. I really believe

0:52:44.920 --> 0:52:45.799
<v Speaker 2>that I do.

0:52:46.239 --> 0:52:48.719
<v Speaker 1>And it's fine to believe all of those things. I

0:52:48.760 --> 0:52:50.600
<v Speaker 1>will say that to articulate them as though they are

0:52:50.640 --> 0:52:53.040
<v Speaker 1>all of equal levels of alarm, or that the sum

0:52:53.120 --> 0:52:55.560
<v Speaker 1>total of them is that if we don't win the

0:52:55.560 --> 0:52:57.640
<v Speaker 1>next election, the country's over, which again is something that

0:52:57.880 --> 0:53:00.600
<v Speaker 1>you hear very often from the right too. Yeah. I

0:53:00.600 --> 0:53:02.480
<v Speaker 1>think that that sort of alarmism is quite bad for

0:53:02.480 --> 0:53:04.960
<v Speaker 1>American politics. And I don't think that anyone who's in

0:53:05.000 --> 0:53:07.480
<v Speaker 1>electoral politics actually believes that, because I promise you that

0:53:07.520 --> 0:53:10.440
<v Speaker 1>if a Republican wins in twenty twenty eight, a Democrat

0:53:10.480 --> 0:53:12.640
<v Speaker 1>will then run in twenty thirty two, and if the

0:53:12.680 --> 0:53:14.560
<v Speaker 1>reverse is true, the same thing will happen.

0:53:14.600 --> 0:53:16.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agree with that. Look, I do. I just

0:53:16.880 --> 0:53:17.799
<v Speaker 2>the level, and I.

0:53:17.800 --> 0:53:19.479
<v Speaker 1>Think the American people should know that because it gives

0:53:19.480 --> 0:53:21.600
<v Speaker 1>them a sense Okay, I didn't win this time, but

0:53:21.600 --> 0:53:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I might win next time. And once American people start

0:53:23.680 --> 0:53:25.799
<v Speaker 1>to believe they can never win or their side is

0:53:25.840 --> 0:53:26.720
<v Speaker 1>always cut out.

0:53:26.680 --> 0:53:29.319
<v Speaker 2>Then that's what you're starting to get. I despaired of

0:53:29.320 --> 0:53:31.520
<v Speaker 2>what you're saying. What you're saying, I completely concur with.

0:53:31.600 --> 0:53:35.840
<v Speaker 2>I just I have a different level of anxiety based

0:53:35.920 --> 0:53:39.600
<v Speaker 2>upon my own direct experience, not just indirect, direct experience

0:53:39.640 --> 0:53:42.680
<v Speaker 2>with Donald Trump, my concern about the rule of law,

0:53:43.080 --> 0:53:45.120
<v Speaker 2>this notion of co equal branch government. In your book,

0:53:45.160 --> 0:53:48.320
<v Speaker 2>you talk about sort of the fundamental Judeo Christian values

0:53:48.320 --> 0:53:50.880
<v Speaker 2>in this country with the best the Greek democracy. I

0:53:51.000 --> 0:53:51.799
<v Speaker 2>worry about.

0:53:51.520 --> 0:53:54.279
<v Speaker 1>Those classes are fab checks and balances too. Yeah, and

0:53:54.320 --> 0:53:55.480
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I think that the best way to

0:53:55.520 --> 0:53:57.400
<v Speaker 1>do that actually, and this benefit is governor of the

0:53:57.400 --> 0:54:00.400
<v Speaker 1>state is devolution of more authority back down to the

0:54:00.400 --> 0:54:03.240
<v Speaker 1>state's evolution, more governmental authority back down to the local levels,

0:54:03.360 --> 0:54:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and more robust checks and balances.

0:54:04.800 --> 0:54:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Your lips to God in the White House's ears. Yeah,

0:54:08.239 --> 0:54:10.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm a little and I hope you remember that this

0:54:10.800 --> 0:54:13.600
<v Speaker 2>notion of federalism and Tenth Amendment. Yeah, I remember, I remember,

0:54:13.920 --> 0:54:16.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, the Red States. We're arguing for that during

0:54:17.000 --> 0:54:19.640
<v Speaker 2>those obomba years. God bless you. No back to your

0:54:19.719 --> 0:54:21.799
<v Speaker 2>being more consistent, and I respect that, and that's why

0:54:21.800 --> 0:54:24.480
<v Speaker 2>we're here, and I respect you, and I appreciate this

0:54:24.560 --> 0:54:27.800
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to engage even though obviously we have fundamental disagreements

0:54:27.840 --> 0:54:29.719
<v Speaker 2>on a lot of these issues. Maybe not fundamental, just

0:54:29.760 --> 0:54:32.520
<v Speaker 2>disagreements on a lot of these issues. Let me go

0:54:32.640 --> 0:54:34.480
<v Speaker 2>back to some of the disagreements. And I don't want

0:54:34.520 --> 0:54:37.440
<v Speaker 2>to paint too much and color this in because as

0:54:37.480 --> 0:54:40.719
<v Speaker 2>a Democrat it's in my interest to do so. But

0:54:40.840 --> 0:54:44.319
<v Speaker 2>you got a lot of attention for going recently to

0:54:44.480 --> 0:54:49.640
<v Speaker 2>America Fest turning Point USA. You made a terrible decision

0:54:49.640 --> 0:54:52.640
<v Speaker 2>of being the first speaker. That's just me saying editorially, what.

0:54:52.520 --> 0:54:55.759
<v Speaker 1>The he that is not? That is not my decision. Right.

0:54:55.880 --> 0:54:58.360
<v Speaker 1>They invited me, they gave me a lot. That's just

0:54:58.400 --> 0:55:00.600
<v Speaker 1>your luck because then every speaker can come on and

0:55:00.640 --> 0:55:02.439
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, I got to say what I wanted

0:55:02.480 --> 0:55:04.919
<v Speaker 1>to say, and the picture what did you say?

0:55:04.960 --> 0:55:07.000
<v Speaker 2>So people tuning in don't know what the hell we're

0:55:07.000 --> 0:55:10.640
<v Speaker 2>talking about you went in and a pretty somber time.

0:55:11.320 --> 0:55:14.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, Charlie's widow was there. He had a lot

0:55:14.560 --> 0:55:17.640
<v Speaker 2>of you know, the sort of branded celebrities in the right,

0:55:17.719 --> 0:55:22.360
<v Speaker 2>and Candace Owens was there and not there but became

0:55:22.400 --> 0:55:25.360
<v Speaker 2>part of the conversation, part of the conversation, and Bannon

0:55:25.560 --> 0:55:28.440
<v Speaker 2>and Megan Kelly, O, there's so many others, uh, certainly

0:55:28.520 --> 0:55:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Tucker Carlson. So give a sense what did you say

0:55:31.080 --> 0:55:32.920
<v Speaker 2>and why did you say it, and why did you

0:55:33.000 --> 0:55:34.839
<v Speaker 2>choose that moment to say it.

0:55:35.080 --> 0:55:37.399
<v Speaker 1>So the reason that I chose the moment to say

0:55:37.400 --> 0:55:41.080
<v Speaker 1>it is that Candice Owens, who has some issues of

0:55:41.080 --> 0:55:44.239
<v Speaker 1>her own, she has been saying since Charlie's death that

0:55:44.280 --> 0:55:47.560
<v Speaker 1>there was effectively a conspiracy to kill him. She's implicated

0:55:47.680 --> 0:55:51.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty much everybody ranging from believe it or not, French

0:55:52.200 --> 0:55:57.600
<v Speaker 1>intelligence to the Israelis, to various friends and family members

0:55:57.640 --> 0:56:01.560
<v Speaker 1>possibly of Charlie in his work. And there have been

0:56:01.600 --> 0:56:04.600
<v Speaker 1>an enormous number of people in the influencer space on

0:56:04.600 --> 0:56:06.279
<v Speaker 1>the right who have gone along with this, who have

0:56:06.320 --> 0:56:09.399
<v Speaker 1>massaged it, pretended not to notice it, tried to defend her,

0:56:09.640 --> 0:56:11.239
<v Speaker 1>tried to pretend that it was an aspect of that

0:56:11.600 --> 0:56:13.520
<v Speaker 1>questioning her was an aspect of free speech, which of

0:56:13.560 --> 0:56:16.759
<v Speaker 1>course was a violation of free speech, rather which of

0:56:16.800 --> 0:56:18.640
<v Speaker 1>course it isn't you know, criticism is not a violation

0:56:18.680 --> 0:56:20.759
<v Speaker 1>of free speech. It's a form of free speech. And

0:56:21.760 --> 0:56:24.239
<v Speaker 1>so I got up on stage and I basically gave

0:56:24.239 --> 0:56:27.840
<v Speaker 1>a speech saying our responsibility as people with influence in

0:56:27.840 --> 0:56:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the public space, we have some responsibilities, and those responsibilities

0:56:32.000 --> 0:56:35.239
<v Speaker 1>include truth above all. We ought to give you. We

0:56:35.280 --> 0:56:36.760
<v Speaker 1>ought to be clear about what we believe. We should

0:56:36.760 --> 0:56:39.360
<v Speaker 1>not hide the ball. We should not allow quote unquote

0:56:39.360 --> 0:56:41.959
<v Speaker 1>friendship to trump what is true. Just because you're friends

0:56:41.960 --> 0:56:44.440
<v Speaker 1>with someone does not alleviate the responsibility for you to

0:56:44.440 --> 0:56:46.920
<v Speaker 1>say when they're doing something that is wrong or immoral.

0:56:47.680 --> 0:56:49.880
<v Speaker 1>We should not engage an audience capture. Just because our

0:56:49.880 --> 0:56:51.799
<v Speaker 1>audience wants us to say a thing doesn't mean that

0:56:51.840 --> 0:56:55.800
<v Speaker 1>we ought to say it. And we ought to ensure

0:56:56.280 --> 0:56:59.759
<v Speaker 1>that we are held responsible for the things that we

0:56:59.760 --> 0:57:01.560
<v Speaker 1>say and also the people that we have on and

0:57:01.600 --> 0:57:04.880
<v Speaker 1>how we question those people. So, of course, anybody has

0:57:04.920 --> 0:57:07.239
<v Speaker 1>the right to have anybody on their show who they want,

0:57:07.280 --> 0:57:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and then they should treat those people how they want

0:57:09.239 --> 0:57:11.279
<v Speaker 1>to treat those people. I mean, if if I were

0:57:11.320 --> 0:57:13.359
<v Speaker 1>to have on somebody who's, you know, in a deeply

0:57:13.400 --> 0:57:15.560
<v Speaker 1>adversarial position. I think what's great about this conversations you

0:57:15.600 --> 0:57:17.840
<v Speaker 1>can see how adversarial we are with regard to some

0:57:17.880 --> 0:57:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of our positions, but at the same time still have

0:57:19.520 --> 0:57:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the discussion. You know, if you are if you are

0:57:22.640 --> 0:57:24.840
<v Speaker 1>going to have on, for example, as Tucker Carlson did,

0:57:24.880 --> 0:57:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Nick Flentes, who is a self stated Nazi apologist, and

0:57:29.160 --> 0:57:31.080
<v Speaker 1>then you're going to treat him with kid gloves, then

0:57:31.240 --> 0:57:33.720
<v Speaker 1>you ought to be held responsible for that in the

0:57:33.720 --> 0:57:36.880
<v Speaker 1>court of public opinion. And if we as influencers do

0:57:36.960 --> 0:57:39.720
<v Speaker 1>not do that job, if we if we lie to you,

0:57:39.880 --> 0:57:42.120
<v Speaker 1>if we fibb to you, if we make predictions which

0:57:42.160 --> 0:57:44.200
<v Speaker 1>we are then not held responsible for, if we hide

0:57:44.200 --> 0:57:46.120
<v Speaker 1>behind quote unquote just asking questions. This is one of

0:57:46.160 --> 0:57:48.800
<v Speaker 1>my buggaboos. I hate it. You hear this a lot

0:57:48.840 --> 0:57:50.960
<v Speaker 1>in the influencer space, mostly on the right of someone

0:57:50.920 --> 0:57:53.080
<v Speaker 1>on the left as well, this sort of you know,

0:57:53.160 --> 0:57:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not putting out a theory, I'm just asking questions. Well,

0:57:55.880 --> 0:57:59.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a difference between seeking answers and just asking questions.

0:57:59.160 --> 0:58:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Seeking answers, that's what questions are for. It's to get

0:58:02.080 --> 0:58:04.960
<v Speaker 1>better information, more clarification. You know, I actould have a

0:58:05.000 --> 0:58:07.200
<v Speaker 1>better idea after the question of the answer than I

0:58:07.200 --> 0:58:10.280
<v Speaker 1>did before. Just asking questions is usually a guy's for

0:58:10.360 --> 0:58:14.000
<v Speaker 1>willful ignorance and for positing a theory without having to

0:58:14.040 --> 0:58:16.480
<v Speaker 1>carry the responsibility for positing that theory. So if I said,

0:58:16.480 --> 0:58:19.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm just asking questions about whether you have

0:58:19.400 --> 0:58:22.240
<v Speaker 1>peculiar sexual proclivities, and I'm having evidence, I'm just asking

0:58:22.280 --> 0:58:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the question, and then you say, well that what you

0:58:24.520 --> 0:58:26.720
<v Speaker 1>were said, even coming from listen, I'm just asking questions.

0:58:26.800 --> 0:58:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not asking questions. I'm obviously attempting to impute something

0:58:29.640 --> 0:58:32.320
<v Speaker 1>to you. And so this is what this speech was about.

0:58:32.320 --> 0:58:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I named names in it. I mentioned I mentioned Tucker Carlson.

0:58:35.480 --> 0:58:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned Megan Kelly, who had sort of gone out

0:58:37.560 --> 0:58:41.840
<v Speaker 1>of her way to massage Candice Owens in her pursuit

0:58:41.880 --> 0:58:46.280
<v Speaker 1>of bizarre conspiracy theories about about Erica and Charlie's murder.

0:58:46.680 --> 0:58:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned Steve because I think Steve has been doing

0:58:49.040 --> 0:58:52.080
<v Speaker 1>many of the same things. And so that was that

0:58:52.200 --> 0:58:54.000
<v Speaker 1>was the speech at antheisy.

0:58:53.560 --> 0:58:56.160
<v Speaker 2>And that you felt it was necessary to name names

0:58:56.200 --> 0:58:58.320
<v Speaker 2>as opposed to imply he just felt it was important.

0:58:58.040 --> 0:58:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Because because I think that I think that people should

0:58:59.760 --> 0:59:02.040
<v Speaker 1>know exactly who they are listening to, particularly since they

0:59:02.040 --> 0:59:03.600
<v Speaker 1>were going to hear from some of those people at

0:59:03.640 --> 0:59:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the same event. And so I thought that people should,

0:59:06.360 --> 0:59:08.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, be forewarned about the people they are going

0:59:08.480 --> 0:59:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to hear about. Then they can make their own decisions

0:59:10.040 --> 0:59:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and determined whether my assessment of those personalities is accurate

0:59:13.960 --> 0:59:14.520
<v Speaker 1>or inaccurate.

0:59:14.880 --> 0:59:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Uh. And the reaction was exactly as you anticipated.

0:59:19.920 --> 0:59:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that the reaction in the in the in

0:59:21.960 --> 0:59:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the room was I think overwhelming because a lot of

0:59:23.760 --> 0:59:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people were very upset that people had

0:59:25.880 --> 0:59:29.640
<v Speaker 1>been saying this about Charlie's murder, which again was carried

0:59:29.680 --> 0:59:35.080
<v Speaker 1>out by all available evidence by a person motivated by

0:59:35.800 --> 0:59:40.919
<v Speaker 1>hatred of Charlie's position on transgender issues in particular. And

0:59:41.280 --> 0:59:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, all the evidence points to Tyler Robinson as

0:59:43.520 --> 0:59:44.960
<v Speaker 1>being the person who shot Charlie Kirk. And so I

0:59:45.000 --> 0:59:46.320
<v Speaker 1>think that a lot of people in the audience were

0:59:46.360 --> 0:59:49.400
<v Speaker 1>deeply offended and upset, correctly so, at the kind of

0:59:49.440 --> 0:59:53.439
<v Speaker 1>specious conspiracy conspiracy theories that are promoted by this group,

0:59:53.640 --> 0:59:56.120
<v Speaker 1>by the group of folks, The sort of blowback that

0:59:56.160 --> 0:59:59.440
<v Speaker 1>came afterward was really interesting. You know, there are a

0:59:59.480 --> 1:00:02.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of people who obviously we're very upset, and many

1:00:02.200 --> 1:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of the people who had named I'm not surprised came

1:00:04.040 --> 1:00:05.880
<v Speaker 1>back and you know, fired back. I will say that

1:00:05.920 --> 1:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think any of them actually argued with the

1:00:07.760 --> 1:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>point that I was making. They seem to make collateral attacks,

1:00:10.880 --> 1:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>imputing intents to me, suggesting that my speech had something

1:00:14.800 --> 1:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to do with Isral, which is funny since I didn't

1:00:16.160 --> 1:00:19.400
<v Speaker 1>mention Israel one time in the entire speech, and I

1:00:19.440 --> 1:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>found that sort of bizarre. And then obviously you've seen,

1:00:22.000 --> 1:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of the influencer war is going on.

1:00:24.120 --> 1:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>But the whole point that I was making is here's

1:00:25.840 --> 1:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>a principle. Either to go hold the principle or you

1:00:28.080 --> 1:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>don't up hould the principle. If you don't uphold the principle,

1:00:30.160 --> 1:00:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna call you out for not upholding the principle.

1:00:32.400 --> 1:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>And it really is quite simple. It's not about friendship,

1:00:34.680 --> 1:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not about whether we go fishing together. None of

1:00:37.600 --> 1:00:40.840
<v Speaker 1>that has anything to do with the principle that's at stake,

1:00:40.920 --> 1:00:42.560
<v Speaker 1>because if we want to have an honest discussion with

1:00:42.600 --> 1:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>one another, then we actually should be honest about the

1:00:44.680 --> 1:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>principles that we hold and if we disagree, we disagree,

1:00:46.760 --> 1:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>but clarity before agreement. As my friend Donis Prager says.

1:00:49.120 --> 1:00:51.080
<v Speaker 2>What were you close with Charlie?

1:00:51.680 --> 1:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to pretend that we were best friends

1:00:53.440 --> 1:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>or anything. One of the things I said in the

1:00:54.960 --> 1:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>speech is I think that it's pretty rare actually in

1:00:57.080 --> 1:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>politics for people say that they're friends in politics, these

1:00:59.320 --> 1:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>are usually not well, you're going and hanging out with

1:01:01.200 --> 1:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>on the weevenings. It's not real, okay, Like whenever you

1:01:03.960 --> 1:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>hear politicians, oh, we're best for them, it's such bullshit.

1:01:07.240 --> 1:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, bullshit. There may be a couple of exceptions.

1:01:10.600 --> 1:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>They're rare, okay. The reality is that they are business

1:01:13.200 --> 1:01:15.320
<v Speaker 1>colleagues and associates in the same way that most people

1:01:15.320 --> 1:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>have business colleagues and associates that they see at the office.

1:01:18.360 --> 1:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>We see each other rare, more rarely than you probably

1:01:20.200 --> 1:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>see your business colleagues or associates at the office.

1:01:22.640 --> 1:01:25.560
<v Speaker 2>You respected how he organized on the campus level. Yeah,

1:01:25.560 --> 1:01:28.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Charlie, all the echoes of things you were doing.

1:01:28.600 --> 1:01:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Charlie was incredibly gifted as an organizer. I won't say

1:01:32.120 --> 1:01:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that we agreed on everything politically, because clearly we didn't.

1:01:35.120 --> 1:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>But I think that you know Charlie as a as

1:01:38.200 --> 1:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>a person who was willing to go into fraud spaces obviously,

1:01:42.360 --> 1:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and he was killed doing this, and to and to

1:01:44.520 --> 1:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>speak his principles to people who disagreed and do so

1:01:47.840 --> 1:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>in what I think overwhelmingly was sort of an honest

1:01:50.200 --> 1:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>and decent fashion. I think that was a very good thing.

1:01:52.800 --> 1:01:56.160
<v Speaker 2>What Tucker Carlson in you history? Do you?

1:01:56.680 --> 1:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm not sure that we have a history

1:01:58.320 --> 1:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>so much as Tucker seems to object to my politics

1:02:02.280 --> 1:02:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and I object to his.

1:02:03.400 --> 1:02:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

1:02:03.720 --> 1:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I think Tucker tries to personalize this. I think Megan

1:02:06.280 --> 1:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>has tried to personalize this. I don't believe in personalizing

1:02:09.800 --> 1:02:12.800
<v Speaker 1>these things. I was asked by somebody, you know, would

1:02:12.840 --> 1:02:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Tucker and I ever before I'd go fishing with Tucker.

1:02:15.160 --> 1:02:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't care. I mean, that doesn't matter to me.

1:02:17.520 --> 1:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>The question is his principles and the things that that

1:02:19.920 --> 1:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>he says. I think that Tucker. I gave a speech

1:02:21.800 --> 1:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>right before TPUs a Heritage Foundation where I pointed out

1:02:24.320 --> 1:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that the Tucker is not an advocate for conservatism in

1:02:27.000 --> 1:02:29.240
<v Speaker 1>any way that I can identify conservatism. He is he's

1:02:29.280 --> 1:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>not in favor of a more limited government of checks

1:02:32.560 --> 1:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and balances. He's come out in favor of feudalism fairly recently.

1:02:36.080 --> 1:02:40.240
<v Speaker 1>He's not in favor of traditional institutions. He seems to

1:02:40.320 --> 1:02:42.919
<v Speaker 1>think that they have lost their way. He is, he's

1:02:43.080 --> 1:02:45.240
<v Speaker 1>in favor of what appears to me a sort of

1:02:45.240 --> 1:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>horseshoe theory. No, I'm Chomsky foreign policy, where America is

1:02:47.960 --> 1:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>always the bad actor in the world. And so I

1:02:50.960 --> 1:02:56.920
<v Speaker 1>think I read surprised, and I think that you know

1:02:56.960 --> 1:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>when when the biggest thing that the Tucker engages in

1:02:59.640 --> 1:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and the just asking questions, which which he's very fond of,

1:03:02.920 --> 1:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>is And this is something again that is a both

1:03:04.720 --> 1:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>sides problem, and that is a general conspiracism about the world.

1:03:08.480 --> 1:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>The worst thing happening in our politics is a grievance

1:03:11.640 --> 1:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>based politics that is being set up by actors on

1:03:14.040 --> 1:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>both sides, which basically says, the failures in your life

1:03:18.000 --> 1:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>are generally speaking, not your fault. You have no responsibility

1:03:21.520 --> 1:03:23.360
<v Speaker 1>for them, and you need to and you need to

1:03:23.360 --> 1:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>shift the burden of your own responsibility over to systems.

1:03:26.600 --> 1:03:28.960
<v Speaker 1>And so those systems could be the free market is

1:03:29.000 --> 1:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>responsible for your failures, or the systems of history are

1:03:33.240 --> 1:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>responsible for your failures. And listen, there are real conspiracies

1:03:37.200 --> 1:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>out there. They exist and usually can provide evidence for them.

1:03:40.200 --> 1:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>That's the difference between a conspiracy and a conspiracy theory.

1:03:42.880 --> 1:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>But if they you're going theory is that the reason

1:03:46.200 --> 1:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that you are lacking in life is because the most

1:03:48.080 --> 1:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>successful people in your society have rigged the system on

1:03:50.400 --> 1:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>their own behalf, and therefore they must be brought low

1:03:52.880 --> 1:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>in order for you to succeed. First, you need to

1:03:55.840 --> 1:03:59.439
<v Speaker 1>show me that that's actually evidentiarily the case. You can't

1:03:59.480 --> 1:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>just make that claim and then abdicate all responsibility for

1:04:02.680 --> 1:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>doing the right things in your own life. And the

1:04:05.160 --> 1:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>number one message that I would that I constantly am

1:04:07.720 --> 1:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to give to what I would now call young people,

1:04:10.280 --> 1:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>since you know I'm of the older generation now and

1:04:12.840 --> 1:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I exactly is get off your ass and do the thing.

1:04:17.160 --> 1:04:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I hear people complaining I can't get married. It's just

1:04:19.400 --> 1:04:20.720
<v Speaker 1>so hard to get married, and no one can get

1:04:20.720 --> 1:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>married these days. Bullshit. I'm sorry, that's not true. You

1:04:23.840 --> 1:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>absolutely can find someone in You absolutely can get married.

1:04:26.400 --> 1:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Your grandparents are way poorer than you, and they got

1:04:28.440 --> 1:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>married and they had more kids. Hey, this is just nonsense.

1:04:31.200 --> 1:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>You are the richest, most privileged people in the history

1:04:34.520 --> 1:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of the world living in the United States today. Just

1:04:37.040 --> 1:04:39.840
<v Speaker 1>relatively speaking, doesn't mean everything's perfect because I'm not comparing

1:04:39.840 --> 1:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>it to perfect. You can't compare anything in life to perfect.

1:04:42.920 --> 1:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>What you can say is that if you are sitting

1:04:45.520 --> 1:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>around in a country that has a GDP per capital

1:04:48.080 --> 1:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>among the highest on planet Earth, and open jobs and

1:04:51.720 --> 1:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the ability to move to those open jobs, and the

1:04:53.840 --> 1:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>ability to vote on your leaders, and I get shot

1:04:55.560 --> 1:04:56.920
<v Speaker 1>in the streets like people are getting shot in the

1:04:56.920 --> 1:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>streets in Iran, you should consider yourself pretty damned fortune.

1:05:00.360 --> 1:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>And maybe you should start with what can I do

1:05:01.840 --> 1:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>to make my life better today before you figure that

1:05:04.200 --> 1:05:05.920
<v Speaker 1>it's the system. Now, that doesn't mean they're on problems

1:05:05.920 --> 1:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>with the system. And this is why I like these conversations.

1:05:08.040 --> 1:05:09.920
<v Speaker 1>And we can get very specific about policy and how

1:05:09.960 --> 1:05:12.080
<v Speaker 1>we fix a policy. So it's to make it easier.

1:05:12.120 --> 1:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>But I think that the biggest the American dream is

1:05:15.160 --> 1:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>you can make it. You can right, get government out

1:05:17.960 --> 1:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>of your way, get everybody out of your way, Let

1:05:20.000 --> 1:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>let people succeed. And we do need, obviously a functional

1:05:23.680 --> 1:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>social fabric, right which is why you've seen a lot

1:05:26.000 --> 1:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>of the institutions, like I would say churches, synagogues break down.

1:05:29.320 --> 1:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>That social fabric breaking down is a massive problem because

1:05:31.800 --> 1:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>that's your safety net when family breaks down, that's your

1:05:34.320 --> 1:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>supportive safety net for when for when things go wrong.

1:05:37.600 --> 1:05:39.280
<v Speaker 1>We need to, we need to, you know, on a

1:05:39.280 --> 1:05:43.280
<v Speaker 1>social level, help restore all of that. But the desire

1:05:43.320 --> 1:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>by politicians to say I alone can fix, which is

1:05:45.960 --> 1:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>something President Trump said but has also been said by

1:05:49.120 --> 1:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of that Zarmmdani talking about the

1:05:51.680 --> 1:05:53.959
<v Speaker 1>warm embrace of collectivism, which is insane by.

1:05:53.880 --> 1:05:56.960
<v Speaker 2>The way nature of campaigns. The campaign promises you may

1:05:57.080 --> 1:06:00.240
<v Speaker 2>on day one, right on day one and the crane

1:06:00.320 --> 1:06:01.000
<v Speaker 2>Russian War.

1:06:01.080 --> 1:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Day one, or give me more power, and I will

1:06:03.320 --> 1:06:05.880
<v Speaker 1>solve the affordability crisis. Or give me more power and

1:06:06.320 --> 1:06:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I will ensure that you have a good paying job

1:06:08.400 --> 1:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and you can buy a house on a single income

1:06:09.920 --> 1:06:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the way that your grandfather could in nineteen fifty two.

1:06:12.440 --> 1:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, first of all, let's just be real,

1:06:15.200 --> 1:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the heusard grandpa was buying in nineteen fifty two, you

1:06:17.800 --> 1:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't want to live in. They're kind of crappy, Okay,

1:06:20.360 --> 1:06:21.720
<v Speaker 1>it was like a brick It was like a brick

1:06:21.800 --> 1:06:24.280
<v Speaker 1>box in Detroit, and your grandpa was working on a

1:06:24.760 --> 1:06:28.720
<v Speaker 1>ford line riveting. Okay, now you're not how many people

1:06:28.760 --> 1:06:30.720
<v Speaker 1>are riveting today? The answer is none. The machines are

1:06:30.760 --> 1:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>doing the riveting. Right. We should recognize the reality of

1:06:34.800 --> 1:06:37.600
<v Speaker 1>our situation as opposed to creating either a false promise

1:06:37.640 --> 1:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of utopia or a false utopian past that wasn't really

1:06:41.120 --> 1:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>existing in nineteen fifty two. The reason the United States,

1:06:43.960 --> 1:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the reason we in the United States were able to

1:06:45.360 --> 1:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>survive on one on a one parent's income, two tax

1:06:50.360 --> 1:06:53.840
<v Speaker 1>versus one hundred and four, it's because it's because the

1:06:54.000 --> 1:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>entire rest of the world did not. It had been destroyed.

1:06:56.920 --> 1:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Every place on Earth had been destroyed. As of nineteen

1:06:59.040 --> 1:07:01.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty two. United States was basically left untouched in the

1:07:01.840 --> 1:07:04.959
<v Speaker 1>homeland by World War two, and literally every place else

1:07:05.280 --> 1:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>had been destroyed. And so that was all in export

1:07:07.160 --> 1:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>market for the United States. So much so we had

1:07:08.680 --> 1:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to prop up our export markets by doing things like

1:07:10.680 --> 1:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the Marshall Plan so people would actually have money to

1:07:12.520 --> 1:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>buy things. Right, And then it turns out that, you know,

1:07:15.280 --> 1:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>by the nineteen sixties, reality was setting in many of

1:07:17.560 --> 1:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the union contracts that had been negotiated weren't sustainable, and

1:07:20.080 --> 1:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>we were being out competed by foreign sources. You know,

1:07:22.160 --> 1:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>like let's just again, ignorance of sort of economic history

1:07:25.680 --> 1:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and how people have actually lived throughout history leads to,

1:07:28.360 --> 1:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I think, on the right of nostalgia for an economic

1:07:30.200 --> 1:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>time that didn't exist, and on the left to a

1:07:32.560 --> 1:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of utopianism about what is possible that is also

1:07:35.440 --> 1:07:37.560
<v Speaker 1>not possible. And I think that we should start from

1:07:37.560 --> 1:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a position in the United States of gratitude and duty

1:07:41.240 --> 1:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>and hard work and virtue and recognition that we live

1:07:44.440 --> 1:07:46.520
<v Speaker 1>in a free country where the vast majority of decisions

1:07:46.560 --> 1:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>are your own. And then if you and then let's

1:07:49.080 --> 1:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and then let's seal what the problems.

1:07:50.640 --> 1:07:52.760
<v Speaker 2>And you laid all this out on line. Since Scavengers

1:07:52.840 --> 1:07:56.600
<v Speaker 2>in detailed with historic context and traveled the globe, I mean,

1:07:56.640 --> 1:08:00.800
<v Speaker 2>each chapter begins in different places of place from you know, London,

1:08:01.240 --> 1:08:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Oxford and Aaron, Poland. Which is interesting that that section

1:08:04.840 --> 1:08:06.560
<v Speaker 2>with Elon Musk and others. But let me ask just

1:08:06.560 --> 1:08:08.960
<v Speaker 2>a little bit. It's interesting the politics and nostalgia and

1:08:09.000 --> 1:08:10.880
<v Speaker 2>I tried to paint this forgive me keep going back

1:08:10.920 --> 1:08:12.320
<v Speaker 2>to the state of the state I just gave. But

1:08:12.520 --> 1:08:14.640
<v Speaker 2>we talked about the politics in nostalgia, try to put

1:08:14.640 --> 1:08:18.000
<v Speaker 2>America in reverse, but try of selling this notion of

1:08:18.360 --> 1:08:25.160
<v Speaker 2>this utopian notion. And it's interesting you cast some critique

1:08:25.160 --> 1:08:26.760
<v Speaker 2>not just on the right, but also on the left

1:08:26.760 --> 1:08:28.720
<v Speaker 2>in that respect. And I imagine you weren't a big

1:08:28.720 --> 1:08:31.920
<v Speaker 2>fan of Elizabeth Warren's speech yesterday. No, on the basis

1:08:31.920 --> 1:08:32.880
<v Speaker 2>of what you just said.

1:08:33.800 --> 1:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>But Elizabeth Horne was much more interesting when she was

1:08:35.920 --> 1:08:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a professor at Harvard Law. I was there at the time,

1:08:37.800 --> 1:08:39.519
<v Speaker 1>and she's writing The Two Income Trap, which was a

1:08:39.560 --> 1:08:40.479
<v Speaker 1>much more interesting book.

1:08:40.680 --> 1:08:44.479
<v Speaker 2>Interesting, let me just talk about it. And I appreciate

1:08:44.479 --> 1:08:47.479
<v Speaker 2>the trap of promises being promoted in politics and the

1:08:47.560 --> 1:08:50.920
<v Speaker 2>nature of politics both political parties and Trump sort of

1:08:51.120 --> 1:08:54.559
<v Speaker 2>trapped now on this affordability question. As we tape this,

1:08:54.840 --> 1:08:59.320
<v Speaker 2>he's in Michigan. He's part of this affordability tour you've

1:08:59.360 --> 1:09:03.240
<v Speaker 2>been in and again just to your credit, calling balls

1:09:03.240 --> 1:09:06.439
<v Speaker 2>and strikes. You know, it goes back even your Brightbart days,

1:09:06.479 --> 1:09:08.920
<v Speaker 2>as you had some issues with the early aspects of

1:09:08.960 --> 1:09:10.639
<v Speaker 2>Trump in terms of this sort of just the character

1:09:10.680 --> 1:09:13.040
<v Speaker 2>personality issues. But you've been a big supporter of him.

1:09:13.040 --> 1:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>More broadly, Yeah, I did not vote for either candidate

1:09:15.000 --> 1:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>in twenty sixteen. I voted for a President Trump in

1:09:17.200 --> 1:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty and I actually campaigned on behalf of a

1:09:20.000 --> 1:09:22.559
<v Speaker 1>bunch of centate candidates and and did some events for

1:09:22.560 --> 1:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>President Trump.

1:09:23.160 --> 1:09:26.040
<v Speaker 2>And you've been very forceful in your support of what

1:09:26.080 --> 1:09:29.760
<v Speaker 2>he did in Venezuela. And I think more broadly, just

1:09:29.800 --> 1:09:33.559
<v Speaker 2>in terms of looking at the picture across the across

1:09:33.560 --> 1:09:36.120
<v Speaker 2>the globe, but back here in the United States, it

1:09:36.280 --> 1:09:39.240
<v Speaker 2>relates to tariff policy you've very critical of. You've been

1:09:39.240 --> 1:09:44.680
<v Speaker 2>critically tariff policy on other domestic issues. How do you

1:09:44.760 --> 1:09:47.400
<v Speaker 2>score the first full year of Donald Trump?

1:09:47.600 --> 1:09:49.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think that when it came, I think the

1:09:49.760 --> 1:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>number one domestic issue for President Trump was closing the

1:09:52.320 --> 1:09:54.720
<v Speaker 1>southern border A plus, right, I mean that I think

1:09:54.800 --> 1:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>put the law to the Democratic proposal that you needed

1:09:57.080 --> 1:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>comprehensive immigration.

1:09:58.160 --> 1:10:01.200
<v Speaker 2>You also acknowledged for about six months it was substantially

1:10:01.240 --> 1:10:05.600
<v Speaker 2>eighty seven eighty ninety percent closed when Biden decided that he, ultimately,

1:10:06.160 --> 1:10:08.479
<v Speaker 2>to your point, could do something about it, which they

1:10:08.560 --> 1:10:09.800
<v Speaker 2>suggested they couldn't.

1:10:09.479 --> 1:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Right, And the fact that they basically lied about that

1:10:12.680 --> 1:10:14.479
<v Speaker 1>for several years, saying there's nothing we can do. We

1:10:14.479 --> 1:10:16.639
<v Speaker 1>need congressional action in order to shut the southern border.

1:10:16.800 --> 1:10:21.360
<v Speaker 2>We have more areas of agreement on this. That's put

1:10:21.400 --> 1:10:23.800
<v Speaker 2>almost foreigner national guard down on the border going back

1:10:23.840 --> 1:10:27.040
<v Speaker 2>to twenty nineteen. So I've been pretty consistent on that basis,

1:10:27.080 --> 1:10:29.360
<v Speaker 2>And of course, California I do absorb a lot of

1:10:29.360 --> 1:10:32.599
<v Speaker 2>that on our own with migrant facilities in three major counties,

1:10:32.600 --> 1:10:35.719
<v Speaker 2>five migrants that working for Jewish family services, Catholic charities

1:10:35.720 --> 1:10:38.280
<v Speaker 2>that did God's work. But at the same time try

1:10:38.320 --> 1:10:41.360
<v Speaker 2>to put a lid on what was, you know, an

1:10:41.439 --> 1:10:43.439
<v Speaker 2>unacceptable commission.

1:10:43.439 --> 1:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's that's a big win for presidents for sure,

1:10:46.080 --> 1:10:47.479
<v Speaker 1>so much so that it's not even a top issue

1:10:47.479 --> 1:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>for voters anymore.

1:10:48.200 --> 1:10:49.519
<v Speaker 2>Well, he seems to forget about it.

1:10:49.560 --> 1:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean I don't think he's forgotten about it.

1:10:51.240 --> 1:10:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that he made again. I think a lot

1:10:52.960 --> 1:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of promises with regards to mass deportations that in practicality

1:10:56.640 --> 1:10:59.200
<v Speaker 1>are probably not fulfillable. And what you see is, you know,

1:10:59.280 --> 1:11:01.479
<v Speaker 1>Tom Homan, his orders are, who's being a little bit

1:11:01.520 --> 1:11:02.439
<v Speaker 1>more meticulous about his.

1:11:02.360 --> 1:11:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Life and word the temperance come from home and jeez, yeah,

1:11:05.200 --> 1:11:06.679
<v Speaker 2>I know we're.

1:11:06.560 --> 1:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Going to go out, We're going to go after criminal

1:11:08.160 --> 1:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>illegal immigrants. Those are the people who are mostly going

1:11:10.120 --> 1:11:11.320
<v Speaker 1>to deploy resource.

1:11:10.960 --> 1:11:11.439
<v Speaker 2>They said.

1:11:12.040 --> 1:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think that overwhelmingly by the numbers that that

1:11:15.840 --> 1:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>has been the case as far as I'm aware. But

1:11:18.400 --> 1:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>when it.

1:11:18.960 --> 1:11:22.320
<v Speaker 2>Comes to questionable but I appreciate but still.

1:11:22.479 --> 1:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Different data on that As a general rule, I think

1:11:24.400 --> 1:11:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that's a win for President Trump. Obviously, I agree with

1:11:26.800 --> 1:11:29.519
<v Speaker 1>the extension of the current tax rates and not allowing

1:11:29.520 --> 1:11:30.080
<v Speaker 1>them to rise.

1:11:31.400 --> 1:11:32.920
<v Speaker 2>You don't agree with I mean, I hate to bring

1:11:32.960 --> 1:11:34.800
<v Speaker 2>up Steve Banner. I mean this notion of a more

1:11:34.840 --> 1:11:38.360
<v Speaker 2>progressive tax rate for corporations and the wealthiest among us,

1:11:38.360 --> 1:11:38.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean no.

1:11:38.760 --> 1:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a bunch of I think it's a

1:11:39.800 --> 1:11:41.479
<v Speaker 1>bunch of nonsense. And the reason I think that, yes,

1:11:41.479 --> 1:11:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and the reason I think that it's a bunch of

1:11:42.680 --> 1:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>nonsense is because if because corporations are just legal entities,

1:11:46.000 --> 1:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>those legal entities are comprised by people. If you tax

1:11:48.439 --> 1:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a corporation, that is still money that in the end

1:11:50.200 --> 1:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>is coming away from the people who comprise the corporation.

1:11:52.280 --> 1:11:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Sounding like Romney when you were covering them in with bridepart.

1:11:54.920 --> 1:11:57.679
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean that this is just like basic black

1:11:57.720 --> 1:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>letter econ one O one. Corporation doesn't like a magical

1:12:00.960 --> 1:12:03.320
<v Speaker 1>existence or whereby it hires people. It's not how there's

1:12:03.479 --> 1:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>there are people who make those decisions. People get paid

1:12:05.360 --> 1:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>by the corporation. Most people in the country are getting

1:12:07.240 --> 1:12:07.639
<v Speaker 1>a paycheck.

1:12:07.960 --> 1:12:09.799
<v Speaker 2>You know, we have established you like the big beautiful

1:12:09.800 --> 1:12:11.840
<v Speaker 2>bill is where they the tax structure. You don't give

1:12:11.840 --> 1:12:13.719
<v Speaker 2>a damn about debt, But that's another conversation.

1:12:13.800 --> 1:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>No, I definitely give a damn about debt, but I.

1:12:15.760 --> 1:12:17.479
<v Speaker 2>Do not think I don't appear too does he.

1:12:17.720 --> 1:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anyone seems to care very much about that.

1:12:19.840 --> 1:12:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Government.

1:12:20.320 --> 1:12:21.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean to be fair.

1:12:21.520 --> 1:12:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, we balance our budgets just for the record, just

1:12:23.640 --> 1:12:24.040
<v Speaker 2>for the right.

1:12:24.080 --> 1:12:25.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean kind of one.

1:12:25.600 --> 1:12:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Hundred percent legally statutorily required, talked about by reserves. We

1:12:30.120 --> 1:12:32.240
<v Speaker 2>talk about pandemic that's totally.

1:12:32.000 --> 1:12:35.679
<v Speaker 1>Required that we are running. You know, the last several

1:12:35.800 --> 1:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>years the budget is run what a twenty billion dollars

1:12:37.439 --> 1:12:38.200
<v Speaker 1>do No.

1:12:38.240 --> 1:12:40.600
<v Speaker 2>We just I just submitted a balanced budget, and I

1:12:40.640 --> 1:12:45.960
<v Speaker 2>mean a dominumous two billion dollar, two point stuff billion dollar,

1:12:46.640 --> 1:12:49.120
<v Speaker 2>which is a rounding error in the state balance budgets.

1:12:49.160 --> 1:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, period and half a billion dollars unfunded liabilities,

1:12:52.880 --> 1:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>increased tax rates.

1:12:54.240 --> 1:12:56.639
<v Speaker 2>Well, we have increased taxes since twenty eleven. I haven't

1:12:56.680 --> 1:12:59.080
<v Speaker 2>increased any taxes. That's just factually untrue.

1:12:59.240 --> 1:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying I'm not saying that you increased axes.

1:13:01.560 --> 1:13:05.080
<v Speaker 2>You but your friends continue to believe Newsome's tax rates. Anyway,

1:13:05.200 --> 1:13:07.840
<v Speaker 2>let's go back to Trumps. I appreciate when you go

1:13:07.840 --> 1:13:09.599
<v Speaker 2>down the rabbit hole California, but I want to talk

1:13:09.600 --> 1:13:12.360
<v Speaker 2>about in interesting so we established from your perspective, he

1:13:12.640 --> 1:13:15.680
<v Speaker 2>fulfilled his promises on the border, mastery, importations of work

1:13:15.720 --> 1:13:18.320
<v Speaker 2>in progress, and good people can disagree as it relates

1:13:18.320 --> 1:13:20.920
<v Speaker 2>to whether or not he'll achieve that. I think it's

1:13:20.920 --> 1:13:21.600
<v Speaker 2>apples when it.

1:13:21.560 --> 1:13:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Comes to when it comes to when it comes to

1:13:23.880 --> 1:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>dismantling structures inside the federal government. On DEEI, I think

1:13:26.800 --> 1:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>that's a very good thing. I think a meritocracy is

1:13:28.680 --> 1:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>what ought to be about the economy.

1:13:30.640 --> 1:13:34.360
<v Speaker 2>What about the quality of our lives in the context

1:13:34.360 --> 1:13:36.320
<v Speaker 2>of what we deal with day in and day out,

1:13:36.840 --> 1:13:40.680
<v Speaker 2>just your typical family, What his Trump done that has

1:13:40.720 --> 1:13:42.280
<v Speaker 2>significantly benefited us and less.

1:13:42.320 --> 1:13:44.200
<v Speaker 1>So this is where I'll go back to my funds

1:13:44.280 --> 1:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not getting right.

1:13:44.880 --> 1:13:45.400
<v Speaker 2>That's a big text.

1:13:45.720 --> 1:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>This is this where I'll go back to my sort

1:13:47.320 --> 1:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of fundamental point, which is that I think that the

1:13:49.040 --> 1:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>government guaranteeing that your life is going to be enormously

1:13:52.160 --> 1:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>better based on what our at best marginal changes to

1:13:56.160 --> 1:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the structure of the federal government. I think that's an

1:13:57.920 --> 1:14:00.599
<v Speaker 1>over promise. So I think that how our lives better. Well,

1:14:00.640 --> 1:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, inflation is obviously down. It started to drop

1:14:02.880 --> 1:14:04.960
<v Speaker 1>under the late Biden and then it started to.

1:14:05.040 --> 1:14:07.040
<v Speaker 2>I just saw the numbers today. I mean you saw

1:14:07.160 --> 1:14:09.920
<v Speaker 2>the food was up eight percent. You saw grocery groceries

1:14:09.960 --> 1:14:12.360
<v Speaker 2>up eight percent, and food was up seven percent.

1:14:12.400 --> 1:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean the overall CPI is running about two point

1:14:15.840 --> 1:14:17.519
<v Speaker 1>six two point seven percent. That's the way down from

1:14:17.520 --> 1:14:18.439
<v Speaker 1>where it was two years ago.

1:14:18.520 --> 1:14:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Still now that goes to that too, I agree, but

1:14:21.360 --> 1:14:22.479
<v Speaker 2>stuck where it was a year ago.

1:14:22.560 --> 1:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>This is why I'm not in favor of, for example,

1:14:24.160 --> 1:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>luring the interest rates. I think that the Federals the.

1:14:25.840 --> 1:14:29.479
<v Speaker 2>Worst job market in sixteen years, manufacturing factory jobs down.

1:14:30.000 --> 1:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Tariffs have not helped the manufacturing.

1:14:31.560 --> 1:14:34.600
<v Speaker 2>I average person's paying more for Halloween.

1:14:34.800 --> 1:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>We paid a little more than they were last than

1:14:36.840 --> 1:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>they were last year on a margin, sort of sort

1:14:38.840 --> 1:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>of on on a low rate. I mean, the I

1:14:40.800 --> 1:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>think that.

1:14:41.240 --> 1:14:44.719
<v Speaker 2>Can get rid of those terriffs, that would be significant. Pause.

1:14:44.760 --> 1:14:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I've been a big advocate of getting rid of the

1:14:46.160 --> 1:14:49.719
<v Speaker 1>tariff since literally day one. The biggest, you know, issue

1:14:49.880 --> 1:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>that I see with the Trump administration on the economy

1:14:52.680 --> 1:14:54.479
<v Speaker 1>is that the promise that Trump thought he was making

1:14:54.560 --> 1:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>is not the promise. I think that it actually came

1:14:56.160 --> 1:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>out latorically so rhetorically he was saying, everything's going to

1:14:59.080 --> 1:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>become affordable again. And what people mean by affordable is

1:15:02.280 --> 1:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I want twenty nineteen prices. Yeah, okay, no one is

1:15:05.040 --> 1:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>getting twenty nineteen prices much. We can do it, so

1:15:07.920 --> 1:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>we get in exactly if we get into a recession stagflation,

1:15:11.560 --> 1:15:13.400
<v Speaker 1>would know, you need actual stagnation, right, you need you

1:15:13.479 --> 1:15:16.679
<v Speaker 1>need like an actual thing, depression or recession stand correct.

1:15:16.920 --> 1:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>And so the the sort that that promise is not

1:15:20.400 --> 1:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a coherent one. It's why I actually had some sympathy

1:15:23.120 --> 1:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>for one. He said, you know, affordability is you know, nonsense.

1:15:26.560 --> 1:15:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I think what he meant by that actually is that affordability.

1:15:29.960 --> 1:15:32.680
<v Speaker 1>When have you ever thought, hey, everything is affordable?

1:15:32.960 --> 1:15:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Right?

1:15:33.200 --> 1:15:35.559
<v Speaker 1>Pretty rare in anyone's life to say things are just

1:15:35.680 --> 1:15:38.600
<v Speaker 1>affordable because a dollar store, right, it's a comparative.

1:15:38.200 --> 1:15:40.040
<v Speaker 2>To me, now it's a dollar twenty nine at the dollars.

1:15:40.200 --> 1:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>And so specifically saying and specifically speaking, I think it's

1:15:42.800 --> 1:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>good that inflation is down. I think it's good that

1:15:44.840 --> 1:15:47.599
<v Speaker 1>the stock market is up. Fifty percent of Americans hold stocks,

1:15:47.640 --> 1:15:49.519
<v Speaker 1>and when the stock market is robust, that means there

1:15:49.520 --> 1:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>can be more investments in, for example, infrastructure projects and

1:15:52.800 --> 1:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>data centers and all the rest.

1:15:54.640 --> 1:15:54.800
<v Speaker 2>You know.

1:15:55.040 --> 1:15:57.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm a believer that there is in fact a bubble

1:15:57.640 --> 1:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>that's going on in the stock market because there's an

1:15:59.439 --> 1:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>enormous amount momentum at the top end, and most of

1:16:01.760 --> 1:16:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the games in the stock market are happening in stocks.

1:16:04.880 --> 1:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't mean that a I won't be an amazing thing.

1:16:06.760 --> 1:16:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it is an amazing thing. But I do

1:16:08.200 --> 1:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>think that there will be a winning at the top

1:16:10.040 --> 1:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>end of the market. When that happens, then there will

1:16:11.760 --> 1:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>probably be a depression of some sort. Not a great depression,

1:16:15.040 --> 1:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>but I mean, like the depressed prices in the markets.

1:16:17.120 --> 1:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that a lot of these stocks are trading

1:16:18.920 --> 1:16:22.679
<v Speaker 1>at unsustainable pe ratios. So you know, I'm concerned about

1:16:22.760 --> 1:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>all those things. That the main critique I have for

1:16:25.439 --> 1:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>President Trump on the economic front is that investors what

1:16:28.880 --> 1:16:33.439
<v Speaker 1>they are really looking for is number one, less regulation

1:16:33.680 --> 1:16:37.200
<v Speaker 1>is an investment, but number two consistency and the lack

1:16:37.240 --> 1:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of consistency at the federal level is incredibly difficult for

1:16:40.720 --> 1:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>investors to navigate. And actually I think that if the

1:16:43.400 --> 1:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court steps in and says no to the tariffs,

1:16:45.320 --> 1:16:48.760
<v Speaker 1>you'll actually see a rather large economic boost because of it,

1:16:48.800 --> 1:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>because the Supreme Court will place the limitation then on

1:16:51.120 --> 1:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the executive branch records so.

1:16:53.320 --> 1:16:55.280
<v Speaker 2>That he can oppose with other means, though that's going

1:16:55.320 --> 1:16:56.519
<v Speaker 2>to be the one the other and then that the.

1:16:56.520 --> 1:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court will you know, will likely step in at

1:16:58.680 --> 1:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>that point.

1:16:59.240 --> 1:17:00.760
<v Speaker 2>Six months here. Yeah.

1:17:01.120 --> 1:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Probably Again, I'm very critical of the Terran.

1:17:03.920 --> 1:17:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, I appreciate the consistency, yes, just but on

1:17:07.240 --> 1:17:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Trump generally, I'm curious just the.

1:17:10.320 --> 1:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>On foreign policy, which you put it to the side.

1:17:12.000 --> 1:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I think Trump has been the greatest foreign policy president

1:17:14.800 --> 1:17:16.640
<v Speaker 1>in my lifetime. I don't think it's close. I think

1:17:16.680 --> 1:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>he's been spectacular and foreign policy and that's with and

1:17:19.080 --> 1:17:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that's with many of my critiques with regards to, for example, Ukraine,

1:17:21.880 --> 1:17:24.200
<v Speaker 1>where I'm significantly more hawkish than the administration has been.

1:17:24.320 --> 1:17:26.439
<v Speaker 2>And did you feel that way in his first term?

1:17:26.520 --> 1:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I thought yes, I was very much an advocate

1:17:29.320 --> 1:17:31.439
<v Speaker 1>of his foreign policy. I thought that that in terms

1:17:31.439 --> 1:17:34.479
<v Speaker 1>of his foreign policy, he is, as he said before,

1:17:34.520 --> 1:17:36.559
<v Speaker 1>he has not got us into any major wars, which

1:17:36.600 --> 1:17:37.680
<v Speaker 1>is a good thing.

1:17:38.000 --> 1:17:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Do you use the military sixty seven significant.

1:17:40.479 --> 1:17:43.559
<v Speaker 1>Time he has used the military, and I think targeted

1:17:43.600 --> 1:17:47.599
<v Speaker 1>and pinpointed ways that do not reinforce the Iraq war

1:17:47.640 --> 1:17:49.479
<v Speaker 1>syndrome that you know, we need to put hundreds of

1:17:49.479 --> 1:17:52.360
<v Speaker 1>thousands of troops on the ground. I think the President

1:17:52.479 --> 1:17:55.800
<v Speaker 1>has a very good feel for The thing about foreign

1:17:55.840 --> 1:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>policy is it kind of works like the New York

1:17:57.320 --> 1:17:59.360
<v Speaker 1>real estate market. It actually is a sort of zero

1:17:59.360 --> 1:18:01.400
<v Speaker 1>s winner lose game, and President Trump actually is quite

1:18:01.400 --> 1:18:04.200
<v Speaker 1>good at those. And I think that on domestic economics,

1:18:04.240 --> 1:18:06.639
<v Speaker 1>the President tends to bring a zero some approach sometimes

1:18:06.640 --> 1:18:09.599
<v Speaker 1>to his economic issues that I don't agree with because

1:18:09.600 --> 1:18:11.439
<v Speaker 1>I think that you can expand the pie for everybody.

1:18:11.560 --> 1:18:13.639
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think the same thing holds true generally

1:18:13.680 --> 1:18:16.599
<v Speaker 1>in foreign policy, where when it comes to geopolitics, there's

1:18:16.600 --> 1:18:19.160
<v Speaker 1>a winner and there's a loser, and it's all about

1:18:19.200 --> 1:18:22.240
<v Speaker 1>relative power and power dynamics, and the President seems to

1:18:22.240 --> 1:18:24.599
<v Speaker 1>get that on a very gut level, which is why

1:18:24.600 --> 1:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>in the Middle East. I think he did the right

1:18:25.800 --> 1:18:27.559
<v Speaker 1>thing with Gaza. I think he's done the right thing

1:18:27.840 --> 1:18:30.360
<v Speaker 1>with the Iran strike on Photo nuclear facility. I think

1:18:30.360 --> 1:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>he did the right thing in extraditing Nicholas Maduro. I

1:18:32.840 --> 1:18:34.960
<v Speaker 1>think those are all good things. I think that he

1:18:35.000 --> 1:18:38.160
<v Speaker 1>has found ways to continue the funding of Ukraine via

1:18:38.400 --> 1:18:42.599
<v Speaker 1>this sort of Jerry Rignato NATO buying weapons and funding.

1:18:42.720 --> 1:18:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that he has gotten a bunch of countries

1:18:44.439 --> 1:18:46.639
<v Speaker 1>in Europe to increase their defense spending, which is something

1:18:46.640 --> 1:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that even Mark Rudy over at NATO has said is

1:18:48.720 --> 1:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>generally a good thing. I think all of that.

1:18:50.840 --> 1:18:52.679
<v Speaker 2>I don't argue with that. I mean, we can, boy,

1:18:52.720 --> 1:18:55.600
<v Speaker 2>and people are looking for us to unpack that. We

1:18:56.400 --> 1:18:58.680
<v Speaker 2>can spend hours and hours on every single one of

1:18:58.680 --> 1:19:02.360
<v Speaker 2>these specific examples. Let me ask you, and just before

1:19:02.360 --> 1:19:05.480
<v Speaker 2>we get off the foreign policy, I am curious Greenland.

1:19:05.600 --> 1:19:08.439
<v Speaker 1>Come on, I don't I don't understand why we are

1:19:08.439 --> 1:19:10.680
<v Speaker 1>we are attempting to make Greenland our fifty first date.

1:19:11.920 --> 1:19:14.439
<v Speaker 1>It seems to me, we already have defense agreements.

1:19:14.040 --> 1:19:16.519
<v Speaker 2>In well established in nineteen fifty one, we were the

1:19:16.520 --> 1:19:18.600
<v Speaker 2>ones that pulled back. We can re enter and inn

1:19:18.600 --> 1:19:19.200
<v Speaker 2>theah of the week.

1:19:19.360 --> 1:19:22.439
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that Greenland. I think that that,

1:19:22.560 --> 1:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, despite the desire to rename it trumplin, I

1:19:25.720 --> 1:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>think that I have ever heard that.

1:19:27.400 --> 1:19:29.760
<v Speaker 2>But it's not trying to deal with the Donni or

1:19:29.800 --> 1:19:30.200
<v Speaker 2>whatever it.

1:19:30.160 --> 1:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Is, you know. I think that's I think that's only

1:19:34.520 --> 1:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that the the you know, attempts to strengthen

1:19:38.200 --> 1:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>our bases in Greenland would be good thing. But I

1:19:40.800 --> 1:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>think that's an.

1:19:41.200 --> 1:19:43.479
<v Speaker 2>Interest thing to do tomorrow, which they've already agreed to agree.

1:19:43.520 --> 1:19:46.600
<v Speaker 2>I agree the whole things seems folly, but it not seems.

1:19:46.280 --> 1:19:47.640
<v Speaker 1>It is invading Canada. That's it.

1:19:48.840 --> 1:19:50.760
<v Speaker 2>I want to just because you write about it in

1:19:50.800 --> 1:19:53.599
<v Speaker 2>lines in Scavengers, you talk about this notion of free enterprise,

1:19:53.680 --> 1:19:56.479
<v Speaker 2>You talk about markets. What do you make of of

1:19:56.560 --> 1:20:00.240
<v Speaker 2>Trump's interventionist attitudes, not just overseas, but as really to

1:20:00.560 --> 1:20:05.000
<v Speaker 2>corporations and companies so many disproportionately based out here, including

1:20:05.560 --> 1:20:07.640
<v Speaker 2>MP materials, which.

1:20:07.560 --> 1:20:09.439
<v Speaker 1>Is I don't think the federal government should be taking

1:20:09.479 --> 1:20:12.120
<v Speaker 1>stakes in private companies. I don't believe in what has

1:20:12.160 --> 1:20:14.760
<v Speaker 1>been called the crony capitalism or stake capitalism really is

1:20:14.760 --> 1:20:17.360
<v Speaker 1>just corporatism. I'm not a fan of the idea that

1:20:17.360 --> 1:20:20.519
<v Speaker 1>the government ought to, you know, be involved in command

1:20:20.520 --> 1:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and control economics with with regard to private companies. So

1:20:24.560 --> 1:20:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I've opposed that pretty much every step of the way.

1:20:27.360 --> 1:20:29.439
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a mistake. I think that the market

1:20:29.640 --> 1:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>has a magical ability to make things better and cheaper

1:20:32.280 --> 1:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>over time if left to its own devices, and that includes.

1:20:34.680 --> 1:20:36.920
<v Speaker 2>By the way, not interfering in the independence of the FED.

1:20:37.200 --> 1:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I'm an Austrian school of economics guy. I think

1:20:41.080 --> 1:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that there's a good case to be made that the

1:20:42.360 --> 1:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>FED really should not have control over inflation rates in

1:20:44.360 --> 1:20:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the first place. I think the target inflation rate should

1:20:46.160 --> 1:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>be zero, not too and I think that we should

1:20:49.240 --> 1:20:52.400
<v Speaker 1>allow interest rates generally to free float because I think that,

1:20:52.760 --> 1:20:54.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, sometimes one of the great problems with the

1:20:54.720 --> 1:20:57.639
<v Speaker 1>American economy is artificial bubbles that are created by loose

1:20:58.160 --> 1:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy. I think that's what leads to the Great Recession.

1:21:01.439 --> 1:21:03.519
<v Speaker 1>I think it's what also led to the inflationary spiral.

1:21:03.560 --> 1:21:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Andro Joe Biden, what.

1:21:04.960 --> 1:21:08.200
<v Speaker 2>Do you make of Donald Trump, and forgive me, this

1:21:08.320 --> 1:21:11.120
<v Speaker 2>is you know, zigging and zagging around a little bit.

1:21:11.200 --> 1:21:13.680
<v Speaker 2>But I still can't get over the fact that he

1:21:13.800 --> 1:21:16.040
<v Speaker 2>sat down and had dinner with Nick Flins.

1:21:16.360 --> 1:21:19.640
<v Speaker 1>So I think that that was a bad thing to do. Obviously,

1:21:20.120 --> 1:21:22.479
<v Speaker 1>I think that Nick Flinn, says, is a scumbag. I

1:21:22.479 --> 1:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>think that the president has, you know, an unfortunate tendency

1:21:26.160 --> 1:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to make nice with people who want to make nice

1:21:29.360 --> 1:21:31.920
<v Speaker 1>with him. He did come out this week, by the way,

1:21:32.000 --> 1:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and you know, in the New York Times said the

1:21:34.040 --> 1:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party wants nothing to do with people like Nick Flints,

1:21:36.320 --> 1:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want to do with anti Semites. I'll continue to

1:21:39.240 --> 1:21:41.360
<v Speaker 1>be critical of Republicans who who flirt with this sort

1:21:41.400 --> 1:21:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. I whish that the Democratic Party were as

1:21:43.760 --> 1:21:46.559
<v Speaker 1>critical of sitting Congress members who not only flirt with

1:21:46.560 --> 1:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>this sort of stuff, but overtly traffic in this sort

1:21:49.080 --> 1:21:49.439
<v Speaker 1>of stuff.

1:21:49.439 --> 1:21:49.640
<v Speaker 2>You know.

1:21:49.920 --> 1:21:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'll ask you about Zoramum Donnie Ormum Donnie

1:21:52.600 --> 1:21:55.679
<v Speaker 1>literally in the campaign. In the campaign, he was asked

1:21:55.680 --> 1:21:57.639
<v Speaker 1>on Fox News about from Austin. He refused to announce

1:21:57.640 --> 1:21:58.400
<v Speaker 1>it as a terrorist group.

1:21:58.520 --> 1:22:00.519
<v Speaker 2>They are terrorist group and they should have been announced.

1:22:00.560 --> 1:22:02.160
<v Speaker 2>I was there, as you know, a few weeks after

1:22:02.320 --> 1:22:05.080
<v Speaker 2>October seventh, met with BB. Not a big fan of BB.

1:22:05.240 --> 1:22:08.720
<v Speaker 2>This is where we have fundamental disagreements. Quite the contrary in.

1:22:08.640 --> 1:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Fact, but it stay in semester politics for a second. Yeah,

1:22:11.360 --> 1:22:13.440
<v Speaker 1>it seems to be have become a sort of Debrigore

1:22:14.160 --> 1:22:18.120
<v Speaker 1>requirement for Democrats who are running for office to now suggest,

1:22:18.200 --> 1:22:20.559
<v Speaker 1>for example, Scott Wiener just did this, he's running for Congress,

1:22:20.640 --> 1:22:23.160
<v Speaker 1>that Israel committed to genocide and Gaza. That is, forget

1:22:23.160 --> 1:22:25.200
<v Speaker 1>about anti simitism and discussions of it, because I think

1:22:25.240 --> 1:22:27.599
<v Speaker 1>that those have become really loose and people don't have

1:22:27.640 --> 1:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>a consistent definition of anti Simmitism. Let's just talk about

1:22:30.000 --> 1:22:30.400
<v Speaker 1>what's true.

1:22:30.439 --> 1:22:33.240
<v Speaker 2>That's true. I think it's true about the definition. I mean, we,

1:22:33.360 --> 1:22:35.840
<v Speaker 2>as you know, been struggling with that in California as

1:22:35.840 --> 1:22:37.040
<v Speaker 2>it relates to a lot of laws.

1:22:37.040 --> 1:22:41.240
<v Speaker 1>And anti simitism is a fundamentally different cat than, for example, racism.

1:22:41.240 --> 1:22:43.880
<v Speaker 1>It's basically a conspiracy theory about Jewish power in the world.

1:22:43.960 --> 1:22:46.000
<v Speaker 2>But and it makes me sick to my stomach. And

1:22:46.040 --> 1:22:48.599
<v Speaker 2>I say that clearly, but not just of course. I mean,

1:22:48.640 --> 1:22:50.719
<v Speaker 2>we've we've tried to lead in terms of our response,

1:22:51.040 --> 1:22:53.799
<v Speaker 2>and we've called out and called balls and strikes terms of.

1:22:53.640 --> 1:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>The outrageous without I would you know, in my own

1:22:56.880 --> 1:22:59.479
<v Speaker 1>framework of anti semitism, I think that's saying overtly false

1:22:59.520 --> 1:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>things about the Jewish state is a form of anti Semitism.

1:23:04.000 --> 1:23:08.080
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think that that is really important as

1:23:08.160 --> 1:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>much as it is is it true or not? So

1:23:10.640 --> 1:23:14.439
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have now been dragged into this conversation, some drags,

1:23:14.439 --> 1:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>some run with you know, flags waving into the conversation

1:23:19.080 --> 1:23:19.599
<v Speaker 1>of geneside.

1:23:19.760 --> 1:23:21.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I mean, look at.

1:23:21.240 --> 1:23:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Israel did not commit a genocide in Gaza. There is

1:23:23.760 --> 1:23:25.880
<v Speaker 1>no standard by which is Reel committed to genocide in Gaza.

1:23:25.960 --> 1:23:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Just then a factual level.

1:23:27.479 --> 1:23:28.759
<v Speaker 2>A legal and factual level.

1:23:28.960 --> 1:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, what is your opinion of this?

1:23:31.880 --> 1:23:37.840
<v Speaker 2>My opinion is I understand the tendency for people to

1:23:38.000 --> 1:23:42.479
<v Speaker 2>make that, to assert that why on the basis of

1:23:42.760 --> 1:23:49.200
<v Speaker 2>the images and the proportionality genocide? No. No, And by

1:23:49.240 --> 1:23:50.559
<v Speaker 2>the way, I agree with you, and.

1:23:52.960 --> 1:23:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't mean that if you kill my child and I

1:23:55.400 --> 1:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>then kill seven criminals, that I've been disproportionate.

1:23:57.840 --> 1:24:01.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm not disagreeing with you, but I think the But

1:24:01.560 --> 1:24:06.120
<v Speaker 2>I understand that tendency on the basis of trying to

1:24:06.240 --> 1:24:10.920
<v Speaker 2>reconcile the proportionate nature of how the war was ultimately.

1:24:10.560 --> 1:24:15.479
<v Speaker 1>Conduct to question, why do you feel the need to

1:24:15.600 --> 1:24:18.160
<v Speaker 1>create a permission structure for that sort of stuff? I mean,

1:24:18.400 --> 1:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>meaning it's not true? Why not you say it's not true?

1:24:22.400 --> 1:24:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Look, I don't know the definition or I don't

1:24:24.200 --> 1:24:26.560
<v Speaker 2>know the legal threshold. That's not my opinion, so I

1:24:26.640 --> 1:24:29.040
<v Speaker 2>don't I don't share that opinion. This relates to genocide,

1:24:29.200 --> 1:24:32.040
<v Speaker 2>not I do not agree with that notion that you.

1:24:31.960 --> 1:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Do understand that if you accuse Israel of committing a genocide,

1:24:34.960 --> 1:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>that now puts Israel in the position of it should

1:24:36.840 --> 1:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>be a pariah state, because states the commit genocide should

1:24:39.000 --> 1:24:42.920
<v Speaker 1>be pariah states. So granting legitimacy to that position inherent.

1:24:42.800 --> 1:24:47.519
<v Speaker 2>I'm not granted legitimacy. I'm just saying the devastation in

1:24:47.600 --> 1:24:50.639
<v Speaker 2>Gaza at the human level you've got four of course,

1:24:50.680 --> 1:24:52.760
<v Speaker 2>it's terrible, No, but I think it's also important to

1:24:52.840 --> 1:24:55.080
<v Speaker 2>absorb that a little bit more just as it was

1:24:55.520 --> 1:24:58.000
<v Speaker 2>sick and we were clear in our condemnation of these

1:24:58.040 --> 1:25:00.360
<v Speaker 2>people like me, as it relates to what Hamah did

1:25:00.640 --> 1:25:02.519
<v Speaker 2>in that act of barbarism and terrorism.

1:25:02.880 --> 1:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>That was christroism and wartime collateral damage of wars, and

1:25:07.040 --> 1:25:09.519
<v Speaker 1>if we refused to acknowledge that reality, then we end.

1:25:09.520 --> 1:25:12.680
<v Speaker 2>Up collateral damage. I just I have stronger opinions. It

1:25:12.720 --> 1:25:17.880
<v Speaker 2>wasn't just collateral, you know. I think some of the

1:25:17.920 --> 1:25:19.960
<v Speaker 2>double tapping issues I have. I have a lot of

1:25:20.040 --> 1:25:22.599
<v Speaker 2>issues without Babe ultimately conduct the war, I personally do,

1:25:22.880 --> 1:25:24.200
<v Speaker 2>and I have a lot of issues that are also

1:25:24.240 --> 1:25:26.720
<v Speaker 2>painted on the basis of the conversation I had UH

1:25:27.280 --> 1:25:30.559
<v Speaker 2>a few weeks later after October seventh, the way he

1:25:30.680 --> 1:25:33.240
<v Speaker 2>talked about the Palestinians. I kept talking about a moss.

1:25:33.360 --> 1:25:35.960
<v Speaker 2>He kept talking about the Palestinians. I kept coming back

1:25:36.000 --> 1:25:39.280
<v Speaker 2>to a moss and then ultimately how the war was conducted. Uh.

1:25:39.439 --> 1:25:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Not saying it was a genocide, I'm not, but I

1:25:42.080 --> 1:25:43.599
<v Speaker 2>have issues. What is the thing that he said that

1:25:43.600 --> 1:25:45.880
<v Speaker 2>that you particularly, there was a dehumanization. I didn't like

1:25:45.880 --> 1:25:48.040
<v Speaker 2>the way he talked about the Palestinian people. I just

1:25:48.080 --> 1:25:50.599
<v Speaker 2>didn't What is the specific they can't govern them? I

1:25:50.640 --> 1:25:54.320
<v Speaker 2>didn't specific. I don't want to get into the details.

1:25:54.240 --> 1:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Because when it was that he is conflating Hamas and

1:25:57.080 --> 1:26:00.040
<v Speaker 1>the Palestinians he wasn't does lead to the conclusion they were.

1:26:00.040 --> 1:26:02.400
<v Speaker 2>If it wasn't. No, no, no, it was. I'm just

1:26:02.439 --> 1:26:05.519
<v Speaker 2>saying the way he ultimately conducted it. I look back

1:26:05.560 --> 1:26:09.360
<v Speaker 2>at that conversation, I reflect on rather that conversation, it

1:26:09.360 --> 1:26:12.400
<v Speaker 2>doesn't surprise me. And uh and I did not think

1:26:12.439 --> 1:26:15.240
<v Speaker 2>it was proportionate, Okay, and I thought I was overwhelming.

1:26:15.960 --> 1:26:19.800
<v Speaker 2>And the devastation instruction breaks my heart.

1:26:19.800 --> 1:26:22.879
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So your President of the United States, somebody invades

1:26:23.040 --> 1:26:26.439
<v Speaker 1>from Mexico, they take several thousand American citizens, get it,

1:26:26.640 --> 1:26:28.439
<v Speaker 1>and by the way, they hold them all the way

1:26:28.520 --> 1:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>until the end of the war, until the end of

1:26:29.960 --> 1:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the war, their hostages being held.

1:26:31.320 --> 1:26:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Don't get me wrong on any of this. I'm with

1:26:33.240 --> 1:26:36.240
<v Speaker 2>you in terms of the ultimate accountability and bringing the

1:26:36.280 --> 1:26:38.680
<v Speaker 2>hostages home. I like the clarity and conviction as it

1:26:38.720 --> 1:26:41.080
<v Speaker 2>relates to getting all the hostages dead and alive home

1:26:41.640 --> 1:26:43.400
<v Speaker 2>and all of that. I'm not denying that.

1:26:43.439 --> 1:26:45.479
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, still has not been extra paid

1:26:45.600 --> 1:26:46.679
<v Speaker 1>in the areas where we're.

1:26:46.600 --> 1:26:51.599
<v Speaker 2>Is and and there's and and clearly this truce, uh

1:26:51.640 --> 1:26:54.280
<v Speaker 2>and detente is still a work in progress, has been

1:26:54.280 --> 1:26:55.000
<v Speaker 2>a lot of destructions.

1:26:55.439 --> 1:26:59.439
<v Speaker 1>Was supposed to be armed look, there's no crystal clear.

1:27:00.160 --> 1:27:01.960
<v Speaker 1>The point is that they're still clear about it. But

1:27:02.560 --> 1:27:05.799
<v Speaker 1>the point is that I think clear my love.

1:27:05.640 --> 1:27:08.639
<v Speaker 2>For Israel and my condemnation of BB. And there's a distinction.

1:27:08.720 --> 1:27:11.360
<v Speaker 2>I condemned Donald Trump. I love my country.

1:27:10.720 --> 1:27:13.439
<v Speaker 1>And listen, anyone is free to disagree with Prime Minister

1:27:13.560 --> 1:27:15.879
<v Speaker 1>naithania Who any time that they want. I will point out.

1:27:15.680 --> 1:27:18.320
<v Speaker 2>That they're not anti Semitic when they say, of course not.

1:27:18.640 --> 1:27:21.840
<v Speaker 2>And that's also important because some people like that there's

1:27:21.960 --> 1:27:23.559
<v Speaker 2>don't you don't know, but others do.

1:27:24.520 --> 1:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I've critique b B myself, mainly for not being right wing

1:27:26.800 --> 1:27:29.160
<v Speaker 1>enough in my opinion on many issues to master actually

1:27:29.560 --> 1:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>but when it comes to but when when it when

1:27:31.320 --> 1:27:34.120
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the the I mean, we can get

1:27:34.160 --> 1:27:36.880
<v Speaker 1>into perceptions of Ninia, Who's leadership and all this. I

1:27:36.880 --> 1:27:39.840
<v Speaker 1>will say this, I know every major politician in Israel.

1:27:39.880 --> 1:27:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Just I know many of major politicians in Ukraine and

1:27:42.320 --> 1:27:45.599
<v Speaker 1>Hungary and in a wide variety of places in Israel.

1:27:45.640 --> 1:27:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I happen to know the last several prime ministers. If

1:27:49.200 --> 1:27:51.519
<v Speaker 1>anyone outside of the State of Israel believes, then I

1:27:51.680 --> 1:27:55.320
<v Speaker 1>tally Bennett or yeah, you're Lapede's on the left in

1:27:55.400 --> 1:27:58.360
<v Speaker 1>response that is not that's not it's not true.

1:27:58.439 --> 1:27:59.000
<v Speaker 2>No fair point.

1:27:59.040 --> 1:28:00.880
<v Speaker 1>And look, hey, and the and the IDEAF, by the way,

1:28:00.920 --> 1:28:05.120
<v Speaker 1>operates largely independently in some ways of the Prime Minister's office.

1:28:05.120 --> 1:28:06.800
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of a strange duel system that they have

1:28:07.400 --> 1:28:09.120
<v Speaker 1>over there. And I know too many soldiers who I mean,

1:28:09.120 --> 1:28:10.559
<v Speaker 1>I talk about one in the book who had three

1:28:10.640 --> 1:28:13.320
<v Speaker 1>limbs blown off going door to door in Gaza. Not

1:28:13.320 --> 1:28:16.759
<v Speaker 1>not using trom not using overwhelming air power to eviscerate

1:28:16.840 --> 1:28:17.559
<v Speaker 1>millions of people.

1:28:17.800 --> 1:28:21.920
<v Speaker 2>I was in the hospital meeting victims on October seventh

1:28:21.920 --> 1:28:25.559
<v Speaker 2>in Israel. So I look, look, you know and been

1:28:25.600 --> 1:28:27.400
<v Speaker 2>the memorials, and I.

1:28:27.360 --> 1:28:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Want to be clear in the terminology we use about

1:28:29.000 --> 1:28:30.880
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff because right now, for example, but the

1:28:30.960 --> 1:28:33.360
<v Speaker 1>gener the protests, where the protest Where are the members

1:28:33.400 --> 1:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>of the Democratic Party protesting and wearing pins for the protesters?

1:28:36.800 --> 1:28:39.240
<v Speaker 1>And ron we're getting mowed down maybe by the tens

1:28:39.240 --> 1:28:40.400
<v Speaker 1>of thousands this week.

1:28:40.520 --> 1:28:41.880
<v Speaker 2>I know where I am. I put out a pretty

1:28:41.880 --> 1:28:42.920
<v Speaker 2>clear statement.

1:28:42.600 --> 1:28:44.479
<v Speaker 1>This week and see more Democrats.

1:28:44.640 --> 1:28:46.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't disagree with you, By the way, I

1:28:46.520 --> 1:28:48.280
<v Speaker 2>also thought it was I thought it was the right

1:28:48.320 --> 1:28:49.920
<v Speaker 2>thing to do that strike and I thought it was

1:28:50.000 --> 1:28:54.160
<v Speaker 2>unbelievably effective and efficient and had no problems saying that

1:28:54.920 --> 1:28:59.040
<v Speaker 2>during the strike, not didn't wait for the outcomes. So yeah,

1:28:59.040 --> 1:29:01.160
<v Speaker 2>in March to beat a little bit of a different drum,

1:29:01.200 --> 1:29:03.679
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more nuance here. But there is Look,

1:29:03.800 --> 1:29:07.559
<v Speaker 2>it's everything's so black and white. It's just there's nuance here.

1:29:07.640 --> 1:29:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, for sure, But I think that that's point

1:29:09.080 --> 1:29:10.799
<v Speaker 1>that I'm making back to sort of where he originally

1:29:10.840 --> 1:29:13.080
<v Speaker 1>departed here, was that, you know, I'm trying to call

1:29:13.160 --> 1:29:16.760
<v Speaker 1>out what I see as bad behavior, untrue and moral

1:29:16.800 --> 1:29:18.519
<v Speaker 1>behavior on my own side. I'd like to see that

1:29:18.560 --> 1:29:20.920
<v Speaker 1>more from a Democratic party that seemed to be perfectly

1:29:20.920 --> 1:29:23.000
<v Speaker 1>willing to wrap an arm around Armandani the minute he

1:29:23.000 --> 1:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>got a little bit of momentum, the same man who

1:29:25.760 --> 1:29:28.080
<v Speaker 1>had said that whenever the NYPD boot is on the

1:29:28.120 --> 1:29:31.639
<v Speaker 1>throat of Americans, the IDF is lacing the boot, that's

1:29:31.640 --> 1:29:33.719
<v Speaker 1>sort of nonsense. Is terrible.

1:29:33.800 --> 1:29:36.040
<v Speaker 2>No, I don't associate with those comments at all. I mean,

1:29:36.080 --> 1:29:36.920
<v Speaker 2>and look.

1:29:37.360 --> 1:29:39.360
<v Speaker 1>For me, be in the mayor of New York.

1:29:39.600 --> 1:29:42.360
<v Speaker 2>That's that's for people in New York to make that decision.

1:29:42.400 --> 1:29:44.240
<v Speaker 2>That's not for me. Tom out here in California, and

1:29:44.400 --> 1:29:49.760
<v Speaker 2>thousands of miles away. Well that that directly impacts me,

1:29:49.800 --> 1:29:52.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean New York may indirectly, but I mean it's

1:29:52.280 --> 1:29:53.920
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of different question. We'll see how he

1:29:54.000 --> 1:29:56.680
<v Speaker 2>ultimately does. Thought he ran an incredibly effective campaign. I

1:29:56.680 --> 1:29:58.800
<v Speaker 2>think there's a lot of interesting attributes that he has.

1:29:58.840 --> 1:30:00.759
<v Speaker 2>Incredibly bright, it'll be capable.

1:30:00.800 --> 1:30:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I delivered a lot of terrible people who say brighton

1:30:03.240 --> 1:30:03.759
<v Speaker 1>and capable.

1:30:03.760 --> 1:30:06.160
<v Speaker 2>No, I get it, but and I absolutely disagree with

1:30:06.200 --> 1:30:07.720
<v Speaker 2>them on a lot of those comments. And I was

1:30:07.760 --> 1:30:11.200
<v Speaker 2>also I also maintained that posture pretty consistently over a

1:30:11.200 --> 1:30:13.320
<v Speaker 2>great period a long period of time. And no, I

1:30:13.400 --> 1:30:16.559
<v Speaker 2>was not a Cuomo fan. Uh so just for the record,

1:30:17.040 --> 1:30:21.360
<v Speaker 2>uh and sorry, yeah, And I say this with respect.

1:30:21.400 --> 1:30:23.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I you know, the Cuomo family is a

1:30:23.880 --> 1:30:26.960
<v Speaker 2>good democrat. You know his father, and there's some members

1:30:26.960 --> 1:30:29.160
<v Speaker 2>of the family I like a lot. But look, these

1:30:29.200 --> 1:30:31.400
<v Speaker 2>are these are tough issues, and they are tough issues,

1:30:31.439 --> 1:30:34.439
<v Speaker 2>and I look, look, I appreciate your willingness to call

1:30:34.439 --> 1:30:36.960
<v Speaker 2>balls and strikes and a lot of folks, you know, frankly,

1:30:36.960 --> 1:30:39.559
<v Speaker 2>a lot of folks in your world as we sort

1:30:39.600 --> 1:30:43.920
<v Speaker 2>of castigate the right wing media ecosystem, your willingness to

1:30:43.920 --> 1:30:46.000
<v Speaker 2>call this stuff out and this.

1:30:45.960 --> 1:30:47.799
<v Speaker 1>Is the well, you know, I think that in general,

1:30:47.840 --> 1:30:49.680
<v Speaker 1>this is the the way if we want to have

1:30:49.720 --> 1:30:51.479
<v Speaker 1>a way forward in American politics, just to get a

1:30:51.520 --> 1:30:54.479
<v Speaker 1>little generally, yeah, it has to be predicated on certain

1:30:54.520 --> 1:30:57.599
<v Speaker 1>basic premises about truth. And that's why I keep saying,

1:30:57.920 --> 1:31:01.600
<v Speaker 1>forget about you know, categoriesmic is it true or is

1:31:01.640 --> 1:31:04.200
<v Speaker 1>it not true? I think one of the major failings

1:31:04.200 --> 1:31:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Democratic Party in the last election cycle is

1:31:06.160 --> 1:31:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the unwillingness to say whether it was true untrue that

1:31:08.000 --> 1:31:10.360
<v Speaker 1>a boy could become a girl. For example. I think

1:31:10.360 --> 1:31:11.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people looked at that and they said,

1:31:12.120 --> 1:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, how is this. Forget about the political ramifications

1:31:15.320 --> 1:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>or the policy ramifications for just a second, can you

1:31:18.360 --> 1:31:19.759
<v Speaker 1>say a boy is not a girl?

1:31:19.920 --> 1:31:24.920
<v Speaker 2>And we can go down And I feel like a

1:31:25.000 --> 1:31:28.920
<v Speaker 2>year ago, as with Charlie having this conversation, which is remarkable,

1:31:30.400 --> 1:31:33.639
<v Speaker 2>I'm cured, did you And this is I'm just honestly

1:31:33.640 --> 1:31:35.680
<v Speaker 2>curious when I'm asking this, I'm not even it's not

1:31:36.160 --> 1:31:39.040
<v Speaker 2>not a loaded question. Did you or others in the

1:31:39.120 --> 1:31:42.800
<v Speaker 2>right condemn the Trump policies as it relates to gender

1:31:42.800 --> 1:31:47.240
<v Speaker 2>affirming care for including a reassignment surgeries in the federal

1:31:47.280 --> 1:31:49.599
<v Speaker 2>prison system under the Trump administration's first term.

1:31:49.680 --> 1:31:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if I'd been aware of them, would have

1:31:50.880 --> 1:31:52.839
<v Speaker 1>condemned them. My company was the only company in America

1:31:52.880 --> 1:31:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I believe that on a media level refused to use

1:31:55.040 --> 1:31:58.080
<v Speaker 1>preferred pronouns for anyone. We use only biological pronouns since

1:31:58.120 --> 1:31:59.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifteen, since we launched the company.

1:32:00.360 --> 1:32:02.240
<v Speaker 2>And I say that because it's just not well known.

1:32:02.280 --> 1:32:06.479
<v Speaker 2>But the Trump Administration's policies allowed for general assignment general

1:32:06.680 --> 1:32:10.080
<v Speaker 2>uh firm and care. I've been a hormone treatment. Actually,

1:32:10.120 --> 1:32:14.360
<v Speaker 2>I think that's change the operations. I mean, yeah, it was,

1:32:14.439 --> 1:32:15.559
<v Speaker 2>it was in federal policies.

1:32:15.600 --> 1:32:17.519
<v Speaker 1>Listen, and I think that's wrong. And then I wish

1:32:17.600 --> 1:32:19.639
<v Speaker 1>that frankly, you you would go further. You've talked about

1:32:19.640 --> 1:32:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the unfairness in sports, But for me, the bigger the

1:32:21.560 --> 1:32:23.559
<v Speaker 1>bigger question is not in fairness in sports. The bigger

1:32:23.600 --> 1:32:26.760
<v Speaker 1>question is whether we should be allowing the administration of

1:32:26.840 --> 1:32:30.440
<v Speaker 1>chemical or surgical mutilation of minors based on generativesphoria.

1:32:30.479 --> 1:32:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, we're gonna, I mean, Trump administration has long opinions.

1:32:33.000 --> 1:32:36.000
<v Speaker 2>They've they've sued states like California, many ch other states

1:32:36.040 --> 1:32:39.559
<v Speaker 2>twenty plus states. Yes, And my position is that's between

1:32:39.600 --> 1:32:43.479
<v Speaker 2>the physician, it's between the family member and UH and

1:32:43.479 --> 1:32:45.439
<v Speaker 2>and these these patients themselves.

1:32:45.560 --> 1:32:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Why are there and are there there are there any

1:32:47.439 --> 1:32:50.040
<v Speaker 1>surgical or chemical interventions that you would oppose even if

1:32:50.080 --> 1:32:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the patients.

1:32:51.120 --> 1:32:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Here, We go. I mean, I know exactly where this

1:32:52.640 --> 1:32:53.240
<v Speaker 2>debate goes.

1:32:53.760 --> 1:32:55.280
<v Speaker 1>But I'm asking. I mean, it's it's it's a real,

1:32:55.320 --> 1:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a real just because it does have public policy implications.

1:32:58.320 --> 1:33:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Meaning in the state of California, there is a judicial ruling.

1:33:00.439 --> 1:33:01.360
<v Speaker 1>We referenced it earlier.

1:33:02.160 --> 1:33:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's a different That judicial ruling was ridiculous on

1:33:04.439 --> 1:33:07.800
<v Speaker 2>this basis. Any teacher, and what you're talking about is

1:33:07.800 --> 1:33:10.880
<v Speaker 2>a law that I signed as it relates to this,

1:33:10.880 --> 1:33:14.559
<v Speaker 2>this idea that school you can that you can fire teachers,

1:33:14.560 --> 1:33:19.360
<v Speaker 2>that you can fire someone for not telling on a

1:33:19.479 --> 1:33:23.559
<v Speaker 2>child and saying that they're talking about being gay, not

1:33:23.640 --> 1:33:28.240
<v Speaker 2>just trans issues, any LGBTQ issues, that you can be fired.

1:33:28.479 --> 1:33:30.799
<v Speaker 2>There's nothing in the law. The law that I signed

1:33:30.960 --> 1:33:34.800
<v Speaker 2>does not preclude these teachers from telling.

1:33:34.560 --> 1:33:37.400
<v Speaker 1>The parents, school districts from.

1:33:36.840 --> 1:33:40.599
<v Speaker 2>Mandating and firing someone for not but but it allows

1:33:40.640 --> 1:33:42.600
<v Speaker 2>the teacher to make that judgment. On the basis of

1:33:42.800 --> 1:33:45.479
<v Speaker 2>seeing someone that's being bullied and the requirements they have

1:33:45.560 --> 1:33:46.920
<v Speaker 2>under the law to keep people safe.

1:33:46.960 --> 1:33:48.559
<v Speaker 1>As a parent, don't you believe that a teacher should

1:33:48.560 --> 1:33:50.519
<v Speaker 1>facilitate information to you?

1:33:50.920 --> 1:33:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Why would that on every basis? I mean, I mean

1:33:53.840 --> 1:33:55.040
<v Speaker 2>that they should somehow.

1:33:55.400 --> 1:33:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Teacher is going to call you. I meant safety about safety.

1:33:59.280 --> 1:34:01.360
<v Speaker 2>The law is pretty clear and is it about, and

1:34:01.520 --> 1:34:04.639
<v Speaker 2>the teachers have that ability, and the teachers maintain that ability.

1:34:04.760 --> 1:34:06.799
<v Speaker 2>We didn't deny that. We didn't say to the teachers

1:34:06.800 --> 1:34:09.920
<v Speaker 2>you cannot no, quite the contrary. This is critical because

1:34:09.920 --> 1:34:15.600
<v Speaker 2>it's been a lot of misinformation. I mean, the school,

1:34:15.840 --> 1:34:18.839
<v Speaker 2>you should fire someone and in many cases, look, anyone

1:34:18.880 --> 1:34:22.360
<v Speaker 2>that's members of the LGBTQ community. How many stories, uh

1:34:22.560 --> 1:34:24.720
<v Speaker 2>that you've heard of people that say, I went to

1:34:24.800 --> 1:34:27.360
<v Speaker 2>my parents with my teacher that was a safe place

1:34:27.360 --> 1:34:29.000
<v Speaker 2>for me in school. There's a lot of grace in

1:34:29.040 --> 1:34:31.000
<v Speaker 2>this space. There's a lot of testimony in this space

1:34:31.280 --> 1:34:32.880
<v Speaker 2>that I think should just provide a little bit of

1:34:32.880 --> 1:34:35.439
<v Speaker 2>grace and humility. It's not a black and white issue.

1:34:35.560 --> 1:34:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Teachers can still quote unquote turn in a child. They

1:34:39.120 --> 1:34:39.880
<v Speaker 2>just can't be fired.

1:34:39.920 --> 1:34:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, but my question on that and again this

1:34:43.280 --> 1:34:46.559
<v Speaker 1>is a subset of a broader issue is why does

1:34:46.560 --> 1:34:52.519
<v Speaker 1>the parent not have an absolute moral ability to receive

1:34:52.560 --> 1:34:55.400
<v Speaker 1>that information and require is there not a requirement there

1:34:55.400 --> 1:34:58.120
<v Speaker 1>should be a requirement for teachers to turn over that information.

1:34:57.840 --> 1:34:58.639
<v Speaker 2>Health and safety.

1:34:58.960 --> 1:35:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Health and safety are if a teacher truly believes that

1:35:02.680 --> 1:35:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a parent is a threat to a child, they can

1:35:04.080 --> 1:35:05.040
<v Speaker 1>report it to child services.

1:35:05.120 --> 1:35:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so health and safety is still the standard, so

1:35:07.439 --> 1:35:09.680
<v Speaker 2>that you maintain that standard. That standard is the law.

1:35:09.720 --> 1:35:11.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot of wiggle room for a teacher to apply.

1:35:11.400 --> 1:35:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's also but it's a lot of law in

1:35:13.280 --> 1:35:15.440
<v Speaker 2>terms of the way of that law and that responsibility

1:35:15.439 --> 1:35:17.479
<v Speaker 2>to take care of it, make sure your kids are safe.

1:35:17.520 --> 1:35:20.919
<v Speaker 2>But this idea that people are going to public schools

1:35:21.120 --> 1:35:24.160
<v Speaker 2>and coming back having surgeries and coming back the next

1:35:24.280 --> 1:35:25.519
<v Speaker 2>day is absurd.

1:35:25.760 --> 1:35:28.040
<v Speaker 1>But there are certainly cases in which in which kids

1:35:28.040 --> 1:35:30.360
<v Speaker 1>are being quote unquote socially transitioned to school without parents

1:35:30.439 --> 1:35:31.600
<v Speaker 1>knowing about it. I know some of the parents to

1:35:31.600 --> 1:35:35.040
<v Speaker 1>whom this has happened. I mean, this is the fundamental

1:35:35.080 --> 1:35:36.479
<v Speaker 1>question that lies at the root of all of this

1:35:36.520 --> 1:35:39.400
<v Speaker 1>is the question that you're not wanting to answer, which

1:35:39.400 --> 1:35:41.960
<v Speaker 1>is whether boys can become girls.

1:35:42.080 --> 1:35:44.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I just don't. Well, I think for the grace

1:35:44.720 --> 1:35:46.120
<v Speaker 2>of God, yeah.

1:35:46.000 --> 1:35:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I appreciate the sympathy. I always I also

1:35:48.120 --> 1:35:51.000
<v Speaker 1>feel terrible for is it anybody who's suffering with any sort.

1:35:50.920 --> 1:35:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Of I mean, I think it's the case generations for

1:35:54.360 --> 1:35:57.400
<v Speaker 2>the time and memorial you know, God bless I just

1:35:58.080 --> 1:35:58.479
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

1:35:58.520 --> 1:36:00.160
<v Speaker 1>That's hard one. I just don't understand because.

1:35:59.920 --> 1:36:03.759
<v Speaker 2>I don't know why. Why is it such a I'm curious.

1:36:03.920 --> 1:36:07.880
<v Speaker 2>I understand the political potency of its politically, but it's

1:36:07.880 --> 1:36:11.320
<v Speaker 2>just how it's so few. We're talking about so few people.

1:36:11.400 --> 1:36:14.439
<v Speaker 2>It's not about that that are that are struggling with

1:36:14.439 --> 1:36:17.840
<v Speaker 2>with with with with gender ident issues. A lot of

1:36:17.920 --> 1:36:21.040
<v Speaker 2>remarkable people, a lot of wildly successful people, and they've

1:36:21.040 --> 1:36:23.600
<v Speaker 2>gone in their life, have credible lives. I just I

1:36:23.640 --> 1:36:27.280
<v Speaker 2>don't know. There's so much hate and bigotry, so much condemnation.

1:36:27.800 --> 1:36:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Much This is the part where I start to object. Okay,

1:36:30.240 --> 1:36:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the idea that you.

1:36:31.000 --> 1:36:33.559
<v Speaker 2>May not be spealing it no like some others. Trust

1:36:34.439 --> 1:36:35.280
<v Speaker 2>this is the business.

1:36:35.280 --> 1:36:37.400
<v Speaker 1>There there are lots of terrible people who say lots

1:36:37.400 --> 1:36:39.439
<v Speaker 1>of terrible things. But yes, it is not an act

1:36:39.479 --> 1:36:41.360
<v Speaker 1>of bigotry to say that a boy cannot become a girl,

1:36:41.479 --> 1:36:43.559
<v Speaker 1>nor should my children be taught in K through twelve

1:36:43.560 --> 1:36:45.519
<v Speaker 1>public schools that a boy can become a girl. That

1:36:45.600 --> 1:36:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is not an act of bigotry. That's an act of

1:36:47.160 --> 1:36:49.080
<v Speaker 1>rationality and biological simplicity.

1:36:49.160 --> 1:36:52.240
<v Speaker 2>I respect your point of view, and you know, but people,

1:36:53.360 --> 1:36:56.280
<v Speaker 2>good people disagree on this, and a lot of states,

1:36:56.320 --> 1:36:59.200
<v Speaker 2>not just California, well established rules, by the way, that

1:36:59.320 --> 1:37:02.840
<v Speaker 2>predate me. Again, this is not where I started campaigning

1:37:02.880 --> 1:37:07.639
<v Speaker 2>and advocating on these issues, as some suggest. And uh

1:37:07.680 --> 1:37:11.800
<v Speaker 2>and look, I'm with the governor, Governor Spencer Cox, who

1:37:12.040 --> 1:37:14.679
<v Speaker 2>said about many of these issues, never so much attention

1:37:14.760 --> 1:37:15.960
<v Speaker 2>been placed on so few people.

1:37:16.120 --> 1:37:17.920
<v Speaker 1>And the problem is, I do think that on the

1:37:17.920 --> 1:37:20.040
<v Speaker 1>electoral level, to go to the politics, it is a

1:37:20.040 --> 1:37:21.320
<v Speaker 1>barrier to entry for a lot of people.

1:37:21.600 --> 1:37:22.200
<v Speaker 2>I agree with that.

1:37:22.520 --> 1:37:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I agree with, boy, you can become a girl. And

1:37:24.240 --> 1:37:26.200
<v Speaker 1>then just I do agree and realistic and.

1:37:26.280 --> 1:37:28.360
<v Speaker 2>By the way, and I respect if that's your barrier

1:37:28.439 --> 1:37:31.719
<v Speaker 2>to then listening to people on myriad of other issues, Uh,

1:37:32.120 --> 1:37:32.559
<v Speaker 2>so be it.

1:37:32.640 --> 1:37:33.920
<v Speaker 1>It is what it is. I just find it. I

1:37:33.960 --> 1:37:36.400
<v Speaker 1>find it strange that even if you wish to have

1:37:36.479 --> 1:37:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a public policy that pursues something different. We cannot just

1:37:39.280 --> 1:37:41.360
<v Speaker 1>admit that boys and girls are two different things and

1:37:41.360 --> 1:37:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that a boy cannot become a girl. Why is this

1:37:44.040 --> 1:37:44.599
<v Speaker 1>so difficult?

1:37:44.960 --> 1:37:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I understand your point of view, and you know,

1:37:48.680 --> 1:37:51.840
<v Speaker 2>and I also respect Caitlyn Jenner, you know I do and.

1:37:51.920 --> 1:37:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Not respect for individuals. No, I can tell you a story.

1:37:53.760 --> 1:37:56.320
<v Speaker 1>This is there's the way I speaking at university.

1:37:56.439 --> 1:37:58.439
<v Speaker 2>This is a harder thing for me too, as you

1:37:58.520 --> 1:38:00.880
<v Speaker 2>may know, I probably do. That's God's son, and it

1:38:01.000 --> 1:38:03.240
<v Speaker 2>just it's, uh, there's a little more. I just I

1:38:03.280 --> 1:38:05.680
<v Speaker 2>find the humanity. I find different aspects of this a

1:38:05.720 --> 1:38:07.599
<v Speaker 2>different layers. This goes back to my sort of truth,

1:38:07.840 --> 1:38:08.960
<v Speaker 2>trying to know your facts.

1:38:09.800 --> 1:38:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, here's the story. So I was, I was

1:38:11.640 --> 1:38:13.519
<v Speaker 1>speaking at the University of British Columbia. This must have

1:38:13.560 --> 1:38:16.200
<v Speaker 1>been now five years ago or so, and a person

1:38:16.240 --> 1:38:18.760
<v Speaker 1>who identified as Trands got up at the microphone. And

1:38:19.040 --> 1:38:20.679
<v Speaker 1>obviously I do a lot of these things on campus.

1:38:20.720 --> 1:38:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I used to do more of them and this this

1:38:22.840 --> 1:38:26.080
<v Speaker 1>issue came up. But the person started talking about his

1:38:26.200 --> 1:38:29.400
<v Speaker 1>family's biological mail. Again, you can use whatever pronouns you

1:38:29.439 --> 1:38:32.160
<v Speaker 1>shoes use a free country, but you can't force me

1:38:32.200 --> 1:38:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to use pronouns that I believe are grammatically incorrect.

1:38:35.040 --> 1:38:37.519
<v Speaker 2>By the way, I'm not sitting here, you know, trying to.

1:38:41.320 --> 1:38:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Anyway. So this so this, this person gets up and

1:38:44.880 --> 1:38:47.120
<v Speaker 1>starts talking about his family and how they how they

1:38:47.120 --> 1:38:48.879
<v Speaker 1>treat him, and I said, you know, i'd really appreciate

1:38:48.960 --> 1:38:50.680
<v Speaker 1>if we're going to have a conversation on sort of

1:38:50.680 --> 1:38:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a general and philosophical level about this issue, if you

1:38:53.600 --> 1:38:55.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't invoke your family, because I don't want to be

1:38:55.160 --> 1:38:57.599
<v Speaker 1>in a position of having to talk to you about

1:38:57.600 --> 1:39:00.200
<v Speaker 1>what your family thinks or believes. And the person and

1:39:00.680 --> 1:39:02.800
<v Speaker 1>continue to invoke their family said, well, you know, my

1:39:02.840 --> 1:39:05.080
<v Speaker 1>family keeps saying that I am a woman, that I'm

1:39:05.080 --> 1:39:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a woman. And finally, after about seven eight minutes of this,

1:39:08.280 --> 1:39:10.519
<v Speaker 1>I said, listen, you've now forced me to the corner

1:39:10.520 --> 1:39:11.960
<v Speaker 1>where I have to give my opinion. My opinion is

1:39:11.960 --> 1:39:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that your family is treating you with sympathy, but they

1:39:13.640 --> 1:39:15.559
<v Speaker 1>don't actually believe that you're a woman because they care

1:39:15.600 --> 1:39:17.360
<v Speaker 1>about you and they love you, but they will fib

1:39:17.360 --> 1:39:19.720
<v Speaker 1>to you because they believe that it is better for

1:39:19.840 --> 1:39:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you or or that you will not hurt yourself if

1:39:22.920 --> 1:39:24.880
<v Speaker 1>you say this thing that is that is not true

1:39:25.000 --> 1:39:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the person, I'm very upset, rushed out of the room. Now,

1:39:27.080 --> 1:39:29.360
<v Speaker 1>normally that's the kind of thing that ends up online

1:39:29.439 --> 1:39:31.640
<v Speaker 1>as a you know, destroys video kind of thing. I

1:39:31.680 --> 1:39:33.400
<v Speaker 1>went to the people who are in charge of the event.

1:39:33.439 --> 1:39:35.160
<v Speaker 1>I had them cut it from the tape because I

1:39:35.200 --> 1:39:37.400
<v Speaker 1>was worried about the person's mental health status. I appreciate.

1:39:37.479 --> 1:39:39.639
<v Speaker 1>I called up a person who I knew, who knew

1:39:39.640 --> 1:39:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the person because they'd mentioned it to me, and I

1:39:42.200 --> 1:39:44.280
<v Speaker 1>actually had breakfast with the person the next morning to

1:39:44.280 --> 1:39:46.800
<v Speaker 1>make sure that he was okay, good, free. So my

1:39:46.840 --> 1:39:48.720
<v Speaker 1>only part way is not what a wonderful person I am.

1:39:48.720 --> 1:39:50.920
<v Speaker 1>It's that sympathy does not preclude truth telling. And when

1:39:50.920 --> 1:39:53.879
<v Speaker 1>you're making public policy, it is very important that sympathy

1:39:53.920 --> 1:39:57.080
<v Speaker 1>not preclude truth telling. And I think that again, it's

1:39:57.080 --> 1:39:58.360
<v Speaker 1>not just the trans issue.

1:39:58.520 --> 1:39:58.680
<v Speaker 2>You know.

1:39:58.760 --> 1:40:00.840
<v Speaker 1>If the idea is that I have to protect my

1:40:00.920 --> 1:40:03.200
<v Speaker 1>friends and I have to attack my enemies and politics,

1:40:03.280 --> 1:40:07.280
<v Speaker 1>things get really squirrellly, really quickly, because again, public policy

1:40:07.320 --> 1:40:09.120
<v Speaker 1>is for everyone. It is not just for subgroups.

1:40:10.080 --> 1:40:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Ah, I hear you. We just see the world with

1:40:13.280 --> 1:40:15.519
<v Speaker 2>a different set of eyes on this. I appreciate you

1:40:15.800 --> 1:40:17.960
<v Speaker 2>of intellectual argument and the sort of soundness and the

1:40:18.000 --> 1:40:21.720
<v Speaker 2>firmness in that space. I can't help but unpack the

1:40:22.640 --> 1:40:26.439
<v Speaker 2>relationship to families and people and lives lived and and

1:40:26.439 --> 1:40:29.439
<v Speaker 2>and the grace and you know, people's lives that are

1:40:29.439 --> 1:40:32.360
<v Speaker 2>lost and and people that are struggling and going through this.

1:40:32.439 --> 1:40:35.920
<v Speaker 2>I I just, uh, that's that's that's how and and

1:40:35.960 --> 1:40:39.719
<v Speaker 2>to me, that does shape the way I make policy

1:40:40.200 --> 1:40:43.599
<v Speaker 2>because it is it's it's it's it's not just science,

1:40:43.640 --> 1:40:47.760
<v Speaker 2>it's art. It's it's lived experience. It's reality. And it

1:40:47.800 --> 1:40:52.040
<v Speaker 2>goes back to sanctuary. Think there's certain lived realities and uh,

1:40:52.120 --> 1:40:54.040
<v Speaker 2>and and one has to sort of deal with the

1:40:54.080 --> 1:40:56.320
<v Speaker 2>cards that are dealt as imperfect as things are and

1:40:56.400 --> 1:40:56.880
<v Speaker 2>life is.

1:40:56.920 --> 1:40:59.240
<v Speaker 1>And as you know, you know, but you're you're you're.

1:40:59.200 --> 1:41:01.240
<v Speaker 2>One of these. That's why you got one hundred and

1:41:01.240 --> 1:41:02.400
<v Speaker 2>eighty IQ. What was it?

1:41:02.760 --> 1:41:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I do.

1:41:05.479 --> 1:41:07.519
<v Speaker 2>Jesus? And you can read your book to learn more.

1:41:07.600 --> 1:41:10.360
<v Speaker 2>By the way, when I was listening to reading Lines

1:41:10.360 --> 1:41:17.719
<v Speaker 2>and Scavengers, this notion of victimization and envy, the scavenger mindset,

1:41:18.160 --> 1:41:19.960
<v Speaker 2>I thought you were writing about Donald Trump.

1:41:20.439 --> 1:41:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean when I was on with azro As,

1:41:22.479 --> 1:41:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I said, it feels like you're talking about a lot

1:41:24.200 --> 1:41:26.200
<v Speaker 1>of people on both sides, And I said, that is true.

1:41:26.760 --> 1:41:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I am talking about a lot of people on both sides.

1:41:29.360 --> 1:41:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that, you know, one of the points I

1:41:30.920 --> 1:41:34.040
<v Speaker 1>make in the book, you know, is that the model

1:41:34.080 --> 1:41:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of lines and scavengers, it's really about kind of peopleho

1:41:36.040 --> 1:41:39.320
<v Speaker 1>build versus people who wish to destroy. And the point

1:41:39.320 --> 1:41:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that I make is that's actually an internal battle inside

1:41:41.160 --> 1:41:43.200
<v Speaker 1>of all of us. If you go back to the

1:41:43.400 --> 1:41:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Book of Genesis and the story of Cain and Nabel,

1:41:47.600 --> 1:41:50.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a fascinating story, obviously for a variety of reasons,

1:41:50.000 --> 1:41:52.240
<v Speaker 1>which is why it's lasted for several thousand years. But

1:41:52.760 --> 1:41:55.360
<v Speaker 1>what happens is that that Caine actually initiates the idea

1:41:55.439 --> 1:41:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of let's let's give sacrifices to God. And then God

1:41:57.960 --> 1:42:00.360
<v Speaker 1>takes able to sacrifice, but not Cain's and say in

1:42:00.360 --> 1:42:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the Bible, why that is? That's just what happens. And

1:42:03.080 --> 1:42:06.439
<v Speaker 1>King gets angry and God actually goes to Candy. He says, listen,

1:42:06.720 --> 1:42:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you have the ability to fix yourself right, send crouches

1:42:11.160 --> 1:42:13.200
<v Speaker 1>at your door. But in the word in Hebrew is

1:42:13.280 --> 1:42:15.360
<v Speaker 1>tim shall you can overcome that. You have the capacity

1:42:15.439 --> 1:42:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to overcome that, And so in every human heart is

1:42:18.080 --> 1:42:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the capacity to be the person who builds, makes things

1:42:20.880 --> 1:42:23.360
<v Speaker 1>strong or makes makes you know, if you're a politician,

1:42:23.439 --> 1:42:25.760
<v Speaker 1>better policy makes the country stronger in terms of its

1:42:25.760 --> 1:42:29.200
<v Speaker 1>social fabric. Or the person who's going to grift, or

1:42:29.240 --> 1:42:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the person who's going to engage in conspiracy theories, or

1:42:31.720 --> 1:42:33.439
<v Speaker 1>the person who's going to tear things down because they're

1:42:33.520 --> 1:42:36.600
<v Speaker 1>unhappy with their life and therefore of decided false lee

1:42:36.720 --> 1:42:38.800
<v Speaker 1>with no evidence that the system is to blame for

1:42:39.120 --> 1:42:41.679
<v Speaker 1>all that. I see politicians who do both of those things.

1:42:41.880 --> 1:42:43.759
<v Speaker 1>I think that that sometimes I look at what President

1:42:43.760 --> 1:42:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Trump says and I think, you know, that's a real

1:42:45.400 --> 1:42:46.960
<v Speaker 1>lion thing to do. I think that that's sending the

1:42:47.640 --> 1:42:49.280
<v Speaker 1>sending the b twos to Florid, Oh was a lion

1:42:49.320 --> 1:42:51.880
<v Speaker 1>thing to do. I think that that grabbing Maduro is

1:42:51.920 --> 1:42:53.880
<v Speaker 1>a lion thing. And then sometimes he says things and

1:42:53.880 --> 1:42:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, that is a scavenger thing to do. So,

1:42:55.960 --> 1:42:58.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, this week, for example, you know, he's he's

1:42:58.200 --> 1:43:00.600
<v Speaker 1>doing some populous things on economics thatrobably some members of

1:43:00.600 --> 1:43:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the left woul would agree with that credit card. I

1:43:03.280 --> 1:43:04.760
<v Speaker 1>think that that's silly. I think that that is that

1:43:04.880 --> 1:43:09.960
<v Speaker 1>is again it's externalizing people's debt problem to a place

1:43:10.439 --> 1:43:12.400
<v Speaker 1>that does not solve the problem, and in fact, is

1:43:12.520 --> 1:43:14.200
<v Speaker 1>more likely to lead to people not being able to

1:43:14.240 --> 1:43:16.479
<v Speaker 1>get credit cards. Because obviously, if you.

1:43:16.720 --> 1:43:19.439
<v Speaker 2>Sound like the head of JP Morgan, what about rolling

1:43:19.520 --> 1:43:23.640
<v Speaker 2>up all the corporate purchases of private single family owns.

1:43:23.800 --> 1:43:25.479
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's I think that that is a

1:43:25.720 --> 1:43:28.559
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous misdirect. Okay, that the fact is that in the

1:43:28.560 --> 1:43:32.560
<v Speaker 1>state of California, for example, exorbitantly low percentage.

1:43:31.880 --> 1:43:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Relative to other states.

1:43:32.960 --> 1:43:34.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah relative does this for sure?

1:43:34.640 --> 1:43:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

1:43:34.840 --> 1:43:37.639
<v Speaker 1>Okay, And guess what real estate here really really expensive.

1:43:37.800 --> 1:43:39.839
<v Speaker 1>And meanwhile, if you go over to Charlotte, North Carolina,

1:43:39.880 --> 1:43:42.080
<v Speaker 1>where the real estate prices actually have been diving, you

1:43:42.120 --> 1:43:45.000
<v Speaker 1>actually do have pretty significant corporate ownership. And you were

1:43:45.000 --> 1:43:47.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about large corporations, not like small mom and pop

1:43:47.280 --> 1:43:49.120
<v Speaker 1>operations where you own a second home to rent it out.

1:43:49.439 --> 1:43:52.439
<v Speaker 1>Typically speaking, when a corporation invests in an area like

1:43:52.439 --> 1:43:55.040
<v Speaker 1>say Phoenix, and then builds up an enormous number of

1:43:55.240 --> 1:43:57.800
<v Speaker 1>rental units, because that's what happens. They buy let's say

1:43:57.800 --> 1:43:59.519
<v Speaker 1>a single family home, now they rent it out. Okay,

1:43:59.560 --> 1:44:02.599
<v Speaker 1>so they just increased the stock of rent right, which

1:44:02.640 --> 1:44:05.440
<v Speaker 1>means that the rental prices go down, and then corporations

1:44:05.439 --> 1:44:08.080
<v Speaker 1>typically are investing in areas where it's easier to buy

1:44:08.200 --> 1:44:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and easier to renovate and easier to build. Like renovating

1:44:11.240 --> 1:44:12.920
<v Speaker 1>is very difficult in places like New York and in

1:44:12.920 --> 1:44:15.280
<v Speaker 1>certain parts of California, it's a lot easier in say

1:44:15.280 --> 1:44:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Austin or Phoenix or Florida. And so what you've seen

1:44:17.920 --> 1:44:20.839
<v Speaker 1>is actually there is not only zero correlation between corporate

1:44:20.880 --> 1:44:25.799
<v Speaker 1>ownership of real estate assets and price of rent. For example,

1:44:26.000 --> 1:44:28.599
<v Speaker 1>in many cases, there's a reverse correlation. And so trying

1:44:28.640 --> 1:44:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to refocus on look at this terrible it is in

1:44:32.280 --> 1:44:34.640
<v Speaker 1>black Rock. Blackrack does an own real estate assets in

1:44:34.640 --> 1:44:37.680
<v Speaker 1>this fashion. But if you're doing at Blackstone and then

1:44:38.200 --> 1:44:41.679
<v Speaker 1>it's Blackstone's fault that the real estate prices are going up, No,

1:44:41.880 --> 1:44:45.320
<v Speaker 1>it isn't. And again I think that that's.

1:44:45.160 --> 1:44:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Why is he pursuing two policies that you vehemently disagree with,

1:44:48.120 --> 1:44:49.880
<v Speaker 2>because I think that it is failing on the issue

1:44:49.880 --> 1:44:50.439
<v Speaker 2>of the economy.

1:44:50.439 --> 1:44:52.360
<v Speaker 1>With the Americ governor, I think that that it is

1:44:52.360 --> 1:44:56.200
<v Speaker 1>politically beneficial for politicians to tell people that their problems

1:44:56.240 --> 1:44:58.400
<v Speaker 1>are easily solvable with the stroke of a pen and

1:44:58.479 --> 1:45:00.360
<v Speaker 1>by blaming somebody who's richer than they are. I think

1:45:00.360 --> 1:45:02.840
<v Speaker 1>that is a very easy way to get away with

1:45:03.120 --> 1:45:04.320
<v Speaker 1>really bad public policy.

1:45:04.360 --> 1:45:06.240
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's talk about it when we're a limited

1:45:06.280 --> 1:45:09.800
<v Speaker 2>time here. Then, my gosh, we've covered.

1:45:09.439 --> 1:45:11.120
<v Speaker 1>So much and I know everyone's it's been fine.

1:45:11.120 --> 1:45:15.160
<v Speaker 2>Wait, haven't we gotten into politics and Nigeria? We can

1:45:15.200 --> 1:45:18.519
<v Speaker 2>talk about Somali land and we can get into some

1:45:18.560 --> 1:45:21.200
<v Speaker 2>more interesting, nuanced issues and you know, we didn't even

1:45:21.240 --> 1:45:24.280
<v Speaker 2>get to Shi And there's there's a legitimately a lot

1:45:24.320 --> 1:45:26.559
<v Speaker 2>of issues that I think are fascinating that we'll define

1:45:26.560 --> 1:45:28.400
<v Speaker 2>more things in more ways on more days. But what

1:45:28.400 --> 1:45:31.200
<v Speaker 2>do you make of I mean, uh, Republicans have no

1:45:31.280 --> 1:45:32.839
<v Speaker 2>chance in this midterm right.

1:45:33.280 --> 1:45:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that they are in for a world of

1:45:34.840 --> 1:45:37.280
<v Speaker 1>hurt right now in the midterms. I mean, they're the

1:45:37.280 --> 1:45:41.439
<v Speaker 1>they're the incumbent party. They have a bare majority. Uh,

1:45:41.840 --> 1:45:44.519
<v Speaker 1>that alone would put them behind the eight ball. There

1:45:44.520 --> 1:45:46.240
<v Speaker 1>are not a lot of swing districts that are that

1:45:46.240 --> 1:45:48.200
<v Speaker 1>are kind of left because of all the redistricting, But

1:45:48.439 --> 1:45:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the swing districts that that are left seemed to be

1:45:50.320 --> 1:45:52.560
<v Speaker 1>trending more blue. President Trump isn't on the ballots. He

1:45:52.600 --> 1:45:57.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really have coattails among the low propensity electorate. So yeah,

1:45:57.120 --> 1:45:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that Republicans are gonna are gonna have a

1:45:59.240 --> 1:45:59.799
<v Speaker 1>rough ride.

1:46:00.120 --> 1:46:02.599
<v Speaker 2>Scale one to ten. How big a mistake was not

1:46:02.720 --> 1:46:05.080
<v Speaker 2>expanding the healthcare subsidies or extending them.

1:46:05.200 --> 1:46:07.000
<v Speaker 1>So I have made the case that on just a

1:46:07.120 --> 1:46:09.640
<v Speaker 1>raw political level, and again I will say that what

1:46:09.680 --> 1:46:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I do is different than what you do, right, I mean, like,

1:46:11.280 --> 1:46:13.200
<v Speaker 1>you're in the podcast space now, so this is my ballgame,

1:46:13.240 --> 1:46:15.920
<v Speaker 1>But the reality is that you're in the policy making space.

1:46:15.920 --> 1:46:18.080
<v Speaker 1>And I've said this to Republican and Democratic politicans.

1:46:18.080 --> 1:46:20.160
<v Speaker 2>That's why I have to bring the human element into this,

1:46:20.880 --> 1:46:21.719
<v Speaker 2>the human elements.

1:46:21.720 --> 1:46:23.080
<v Speaker 1>See, this is where I would say, you never removed

1:46:23.080 --> 1:46:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the human element, governor, But you know the I would

1:46:26.000 --> 1:46:29.080
<v Speaker 1>say that the one of the things that I hope

1:46:29.080 --> 1:46:31.799
<v Speaker 1>that people appreciate about the difference is that in podcast

1:46:31.840 --> 1:46:33.719
<v Speaker 1>space you can be a purist, and in the political space,

1:46:33.760 --> 1:46:35.240
<v Speaker 1>you get you try to get seventy percent of the

1:46:35.240 --> 1:46:39.160
<v Speaker 1>buy and so when you are looking at, for example,

1:46:39.200 --> 1:46:42.400
<v Speaker 1>extending the Obamacare subsidies, it is a political loser obviously

1:46:42.400 --> 1:46:44.600
<v Speaker 1>for Republicans, and not to extend the Obamacare subsidies and

1:46:44.600 --> 1:46:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to let it hit a cliff. Clearly, then the question becomes,

1:46:47.120 --> 1:46:50.320
<v Speaker 1>what can you do that shortens the duration? If you're

1:46:50.400 --> 1:46:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a conservative, if you're a Republican, what can you do

1:46:53.120 --> 1:46:56.599
<v Speaker 1>that that creates a soft a softer landing for people

1:46:56.640 --> 1:46:58.720
<v Speaker 1>who are reliant on those subsidies in a transition to

1:46:58.760 --> 1:47:01.400
<v Speaker 1>policies that you believe will in general bend the cost

1:47:01.439 --> 1:47:03.760
<v Speaker 1>curved down in the meantime, because if you have kind

1:47:03.760 --> 1:47:06.200
<v Speaker 1>of a hard stop, then that's going to affect a

1:47:06.240 --> 1:47:08.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of people. There's a reason why Purple state Republicans,

1:47:08.360 --> 1:47:11.519
<v Speaker 1>Purple district Republicans are trying to cut deals right now

1:47:11.600 --> 1:47:14.519
<v Speaker 1>with Democrats in order to extend those healthcare subsidies. Hopefully

1:47:14.760 --> 1:47:17.400
<v Speaker 1>in return they will get some provisions on fraud, maybe

1:47:17.439 --> 1:47:21.240
<v Speaker 1>some release of certain regulations around Obamacare. I think the

1:47:21.240 --> 1:47:24.439
<v Speaker 1>healthcare system is so complex, it's so mixed. You know.

1:47:25.760 --> 1:47:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's put this way. If you and I were sitting

1:47:27.360 --> 1:47:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and designing a healthcare system there was none, then I

1:47:30.800 --> 1:47:33.280
<v Speaker 1>think that we might have very differing ideas of where

1:47:33.280 --> 1:47:36.720
<v Speaker 1>it goes. But trying to extricate ourselves from what is

1:47:36.760 --> 1:47:39.880
<v Speaker 1>an incredibly difficult situation, I think that the easiest and

1:47:39.920 --> 1:47:41.800
<v Speaker 1>dumbest way to do policy is to just keep tossing

1:47:41.800 --> 1:47:43.800
<v Speaker 1>money at it. But I also think that on a

1:47:43.800 --> 1:47:47.200
<v Speaker 1>political level, if you never have the power to do

1:47:47.320 --> 1:47:49.400
<v Speaker 1>better things, then you never have the power to do

1:47:49.479 --> 1:47:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the better things. You got to get as much of

1:47:50.680 --> 1:47:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the pie as you can. And that's the nature of pragmatism.

1:47:52.760 --> 1:47:54.439
<v Speaker 1>As you are constantly talking about.

1:47:54.280 --> 1:47:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Well said, well, I agree, rather as sentiment, it's interesting.

1:47:58.840 --> 1:48:00.920
<v Speaker 2>On the issue of subsidy, it's an important point. I mean,

1:48:00.920 --> 1:48:02.559
<v Speaker 2>we'd have to lower the cost out care. It's why

1:48:02.920 --> 1:48:06.400
<v Speaker 2>very proud of California we created our own insulin branded

1:48:06.439 --> 1:48:08.960
<v Speaker 2>drug under cal r X. We're just lowering costs, not

1:48:09.000 --> 1:48:13.280
<v Speaker 2>subsidizing costs, which means socializing that cost on the rest

1:48:13.560 --> 1:48:17.400
<v Speaker 2>of the rate payers more broadly, or premium payers. But

1:48:17.479 --> 1:48:23.400
<v Speaker 2>on the issue of Vance and Rubio Vance or Rubio Ben,

1:48:23.600 --> 1:48:25.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean in terms of whom twenty eight was, I mean,

1:48:26.240 --> 1:48:27.599
<v Speaker 2>so I think that look, JD.

1:48:27.720 --> 1:48:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Vance has already you know, sort of been deemed by

1:48:30.800 --> 1:48:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Marco Rubios as the presumptive nominee barring some sort of

1:48:34.320 --> 1:48:36.599
<v Speaker 1>cataclysmic circumstance. In terms of who I tend to agree

1:48:36.600 --> 1:48:38.839
<v Speaker 1>with more politically, obviously, I would think that the Secretary

1:48:38.840 --> 1:48:41.400
<v Speaker 1>of State Rubio on foreign policy, I tend to be

1:48:41.400 --> 1:48:44.439
<v Speaker 1>more aligned with. Yeah, I think that that the Vice

1:48:44.439 --> 1:48:46.679
<v Speaker 1>President obviously a very high IQ guy. There are certain

1:48:46.720 --> 1:48:48.519
<v Speaker 1>areas of policy I agree with him on. There are

1:48:48.520 --> 1:48:51.280
<v Speaker 1>certain areas of policy I strenuously disagree with the Vice

1:48:51.320 --> 1:48:52.960
<v Speaker 1>president right now, if you have to lay odds, then

1:48:53.320 --> 1:48:56.599
<v Speaker 1>then JD is the most likely nominee. Things can change. Obviously,

1:48:56.600 --> 1:48:57.200
<v Speaker 1>it's very early.

1:48:57.320 --> 1:49:01.599
<v Speaker 2>Who leaves first, Hexit or Pam Bondi.

1:49:02.920 --> 1:49:05.360
<v Speaker 1>You know again, Yeah, in terms of this is where

1:49:05.400 --> 1:49:06.880
<v Speaker 1>you get in this sort of the personality side of

1:49:06.880 --> 1:49:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the business that I care less about. But I think

1:49:09.360 --> 1:49:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that is significantly more likely the Pam Bondi is out

1:49:11.320 --> 1:49:12.920
<v Speaker 1>before the Secretary of Defense.

1:49:13.520 --> 1:49:16.799
<v Speaker 2>Interesting. Thanks for coming all the way out.

1:49:16.720 --> 1:49:18.479
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thank you, Thanks for having me. I appreciate it's

1:49:18.520 --> 1:49:18.840
<v Speaker 1>been fun.

1:49:19.160 --> 1:49:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Ben Shapiro, You're always welcome back home.