WEBVTT - Too Many Chiefs In The Kitchen?

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:06.640 --> 0:00:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from my Heart Radio,

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy football advice, speculation,

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and whatever stupid stuff they decided to drop into the show. Now,

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:24.600
<v Speaker 1>here's your host, Paul. Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly. I

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>am Paul charchy In. My co host this week is

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Matt Harrison. Hello, Matt, hey church. Do you know who

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>does like the like by name, who does the cool

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 1>voice intros for our for our show? I think this

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>one was a guy named Miguel Okay, I think really Yeah?

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it has a good job? Yeah, he does.

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:45.639
<v Speaker 1>He does a great job. I just wonder if that's

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:51.160
<v Speaker 1>his real voice. Hey, can you make me some pancakes?

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>At which point you go, yes, I kind of make

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>you pancakes. That's uh. We can all get into the

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>smooth voice so you know, Um, I can't do it

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>as well right now, but just because I just did

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:09.399
<v Speaker 1>three hours of radio, but I can IF voice. I

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>can do FM voice if I need to, but I'm

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:13.320
<v Speaker 1>not gonna do it right now. All right, let's we

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>got a bunch of stuff to get to now, because

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>our last several shows. Last four shows were all about

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 1>breaking down all the teams in the NFL from a

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:24.319
<v Speaker 1>fantasy standpoint, and then we had our COVID show. This

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:26.119
<v Speaker 1>is our first time to catch up on news from

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>around the league. So I want to really orient today's

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 1>discussion around some of the bigger topics of the past

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 1>month or so. And um, just sit on a few

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>of these things, and then um and also at the end,

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>this isn't necessarily new news, but I've been fascinated but

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the by the idea of a starting backfield of Clyde

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Edwards Hilaire and Damian Williams, and you just you start

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>those two chief running backs every week, but they're by

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>week You're you're fascinated by idea. I am, So we'll

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll we'll look into the viability of that strategy a

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>little later in the show. Let's start here with more

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>recent news. Derrick Henry signs a four year extension and

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>by the way, brilliant on his part. When you look

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 1>at all of the players that are coming into free

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>agency next year, Alvin Kamarin, Dalvin Cook, and it's of

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>course they all on deals done too, they do. But

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Henry was smart enough to get. There's a good deal.

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 1>It's not bad deal. He took twenty five million and

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>guaranteed money fifty million dollar upside if he plays through

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:30.119
<v Speaker 1>the whole contract, and he doesn't have to sweat being

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:33.679
<v Speaker 1>one of a dozen meaningful running back free agents. And

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:36.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm not kidding, there's a dozen guys coming. Yeah. And

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.519
<v Speaker 1>the nice part is it's also a team friendly contract

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>really because there is a potential out in two with

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the dead cap of only six million for those final

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:50.239
<v Speaker 1>two seasons of the deal. So it it's if if

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>his knee explodes in the next year or two, the

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Titans can get out of it scott free. And if

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:58.639
<v Speaker 1>if Derrick Henry performs, he's going to get paid some

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>decent money where he at fifteen million each for those

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>last two years. So I think it's a good deal

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>for everyone around right there. You know, there's some people

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>who feel like, well, they could have paid Jack conkle

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>in their star tackle or Derrick Henry. I don't that's

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, in this world, tackles are a lot more

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>valuable than running backs. Derrick Henry is pretty special. But man,

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that that's the choice I would have

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>made for the Titans. But it's let's talk about Derrick

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Henry's fantasy value. Let's start with redraft. How do you

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 1>feel does this and does this signing in any way

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>change this year's No, because I think everybody in redraft

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>leagues they knew Derrick Henry wasn't making any noise. There

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>was no holdout speculation on him. Everybody knew that he

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>was going to run into this year as as the

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>lead back there. So I don't think it changes anything

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>at all from a redraft person. Now, you spent a

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of your time on Dynasty and Empire League related matters.

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>You've got the best cheat sheet in existence for Dynasty

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and Empire players of trade values and all kinds of stuff.

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>So let's look a lot more long term and let's

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about this Henry deal. For those people that own

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Henry or maybe are interested investing in Henry, how do

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you feel like this changes his his value for Dynasty

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and Empire League owners. For Derrick Henry, I mean I'm

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna bump him up a little bit. Um. I currently

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 1>have him as tied for running back eight with a

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 1>few guys who are on a little bit longer contracts

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and are a little bit younger Josh Jacobs and Miles Sanders.

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>So he's right in that neighborhood, but I'll probably bump

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>him up above them, and he's going to be in

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the right between Joe Mixon and Alvin Kamara. You know,

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he just doesn't catch passes to me

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:40.840
<v Speaker 1>just caps his upside. He can never be the top

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>running back, of the top two or top three, because

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>those guys just he's the Adrian Peterson. Yeah he is.

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean he really is. And and he he runs

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>with violence. He runs with Vim and Vigor. Yes, they

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:56.720
<v Speaker 1>always go together, don't they. Nobody runs with Vim without

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>also running with Vigor. I think with Vigor without Vim, though,

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you can have Viggers got it way better

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:06.839
<v Speaker 1>you're not attached to vim um. I saw this stat

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that blew me away regarding Derrick Henry. Once Ryan Tannehill

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>took over last year, the Titans averaged seven and a

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>half yards per play, most in the His line was

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty years of the NFL, going back to

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:29.719
<v Speaker 1>two thousand. That's unbelievable. And they started handing off to

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Terry Henry, and Henry is obviously a huge part of that,

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>right you know, when you're running back is getting you

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>chunk yardage of five and eight and twenty yards and carry,

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>it certainly helps. So brief aside on that, who is

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the offensive coordinator that essentially ruined his value for the

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>first two three years of his career. Not Mike mclarkey.

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>That was Uh, he's currently a head coach right in

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the Packers, Matt La Matt Lafleur. Yeah, I think that

0:05:57.040 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones is kind of in the market for the

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>same aggression this year. But other people would say, look

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>at Aaron Jones had last year in r Matt la floor.

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>But Matt, Aaron Jones is one of my my biggest

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>fades this fantasy season. I really worry about what A J.

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Dillon is going to do to him, especially near the stripes.

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>So much of the fantasy value that Aaron Jones had

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>was because they used him a lot near the stripe.

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>If those go away his and he's just now he's

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:27.039
<v Speaker 1>in and now he's in a three person time share. Yeah,

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and Jamal Williams wasn't the guy they were handing off

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>in the five too, So it was all Aaron Jones was.

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>A J. Dillon is two hundred fifty pounds. He's as

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>big as Derrick Henry. Yes, he's Derrick Henry. It's it's

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:43.279
<v Speaker 1>bonkers what he's gonna be like. So, uh, I think

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>for me Derrick Henry also, I love him in this offense.

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I like the way they want to use him here. Um,

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's a proven commodity. If Derrick Henry had

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>hit free agency next year, he could have ended up

0:06:56.760 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>anywhere and maybe, you know, maybe into a time himeshare role.

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Who knows. Here he remains one of the few locked

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>in workhorse backs for the remainder of his contract. In

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>all probability, it's pretty nice consistency, that's for sure. It

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>definitely is. All right, So we're high on on Derrick Henry.

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to touch on this as well before we

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>jump into uh some other matters. Dak Prescott is has

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>let the uh the deadline to sign a guess he

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 1>could always sign a new deal, but um, he's let

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the deadline pass. He's gonna pay the play this year

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>as a as a under the franchise tag and will

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>probably enter next year. People assume enter next year as

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a free agent, and the team could refranchise him again.

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>At that point, So he's heading down the Kirk Cousins path.

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you think is there any real scenario here where

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Dak ends up missing, doesn't play. Is there a scenario

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>here where he just this season he just goes stop,

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>mom out. Well, I'm gonna hold out until I get

0:07:57.720 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>my You know, he turned out a hundred million dollar deal.

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>He turned on a hundred and seventy five million dollar deal.

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I saw that was worth a hundred and ten and

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>guaranteed me on a five year deal. Now he is

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>on the franchise tag and I don't know how this works.

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 1>But according to spot track, yeah, um who, I think

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>most of my contract information from his cap hit of

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty one point four million this year under the franchise

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>tag makes him the highest paid player in the NFL

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>this year. But according to them, so if he's if

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>he's not going to play this year as the highest

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 1>paid player in the NFL, what is he doing? Yeah,

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>when push comes to show, the players want their game checks,

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and at that level of game checks, when you're making

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>two million dollars a game, sure, yeah, you're gonna show

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>up for those games. Don't think you will? I think

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you will too. Now I also saw this that was

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>interesting about Dak. If they have to refranchise him next year,

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:54.319
<v Speaker 1>the thirty one and a half a million only goes

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>only goes to thirty eight million. Year after that it

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 1>explodes to like fifty million or something. Um. So it

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>could be that they he gets the franchise take twice

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>just like Kirk did. It could be, could be, We'll

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>see it's Dak remains my quarterback number three. Is a

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>your quarterback three or four? I think I have him

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:15.680
<v Speaker 1>at three or four one of the two. I'm probably

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 1>more on the three bandwagon. I'm pretty on the on

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the Dack thing. Seed. I love Ceedee Lamb and once

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>they picked Seed. Once Ceedee Lamb was on that team,

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Like that's at these three. Yeah, Dak and c d

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:27.839
<v Speaker 1>are on my Scott Fish Bowl roster. I'm pretty pleased

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 1>about that. I bet you are. I'm jealous of that.

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>As a matter of fact, let's take a quick break, Matt.

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, I want to talk about Cam Newton.

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:40.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm contending no fantasy quarterback has a bigger variance impossible

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>outcomes than Cam Newton. Will touch on him. When we

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>returned to Fantasy Football Weekly, Welcome back to Fantasy Football Weekly,

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Paul Charchi and Matt Harrison with you. Cam Newton replaces

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady obviously in New England. I believe, as I

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:58.439
<v Speaker 1>said going into the break, no play, no quarterback has

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>more variance impossible outcome than Cam Newton. He could lose

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the job outright, We're not We don't know for sure

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>before the season starts. It costs the team nothink him.

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>They literally, I don't think they would. He's an ideal

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 1>backup and he's cheap, but he may not even be

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the starter. There's a slim but non zero chance that

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>he gets beaten out by him. Man, it's I don't

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 1>know where he is as a passer, but what we

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:28.439
<v Speaker 1>do know is he's only four seasons removed from being

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the best fantasy player in the league. Um. When he's

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a running quarterback, he's awfully good. So what what are

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:36.599
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts in Cam Newton? You with me on the

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>upside and downside that he can that he can bring,

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:41.679
<v Speaker 1>and what's your strategy if any, on selecting it. So

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm with you on on the on the variants,

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and but Bill Belichick obviously saw something that he likes

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>that and I got a few stats to dig into

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>this might might help us make this decision. As you mentioned,

0:10:55.760 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>was his huge year. Um, He's never hit four thousand

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and passing yards in a season though. Yeah, it's kind

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>of surprising for a quarterback of his MP stature. He

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>was an m v P one year, never once and

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of guys hit four thousand yards every year.

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Jake Cutler was a four thousand. It's it's pretty easy

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>mark to hit. He's had only one season of more

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>than twenty four touchdown passes UM. That was again when

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 1>he threw thirty five and last year, by the way,

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>fourteen quarterbacks through touchdown passes or more. It's not that high.

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>It's not that high marks. It's easy. Now I'm gonna

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna jump in because I have a stat that

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>is right into the same wheelhouse that you're in. If

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I looked at his past three full seasons for Cam Newton,

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 1>his average game two hundred thirty one passing yards and

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>one point four passing touchdowns. That is exactly Andy Dalton.

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 1>So when you draft Cam Newton's arm, you are getting

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:59.359
<v Speaker 1>Andy Dalton's arm. Yeah. Um, I guess the the interesting

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>thing that I think that Belichick saw was his teen season,

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:07.679
<v Speaker 1>the last season he was mostly healthy. Um, that was

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 1>an outlier in one category specifically for Cam, and that

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 1>was completion percentage. He almost completed sixty eight percent of

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>his balls. That right, that's a really good number. He

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 1>never topped more than sixty one and a half the

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>rest of his career, so he really rocketed up the

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>completion percentage. That coincided with Christian McCaffrey grabbing a hundred

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and seven passes. Does this make you think a little

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:41.439
<v Speaker 1>bit about James White? He's absolutely becomes very serviceable. I

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 1>think James White becomes really really interesting in these leagues.

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>But really, you're buying Camp for his rushing ability. Yes

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you are. How comfortable are you in investing in a

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty one year old running back? Chart? Um? Most running backs,

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:59.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm not comfortable old. How about when they're coming off

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:03.559
<v Speaker 1>a sgnificant injury well through and yep, that's that is

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>absolutely fair. Cam did record four eight rushing yards and

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 1>four rushing tds age twenty nine season. Let's say the

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Pats can magically get seventy of that. Yeah. Uh, that's

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>three sixty six yards and three scores. That's about what

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson had last year, and people do pay for

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the Russell Wilson. But Russell Wilson's got way more passing upside,

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>way more passing. So I think the long and short

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>of this is, I think Cam just finishes as the

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>middle of the pack quarterback. He's got, He's got the

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 1>upside variants, he's got the downside variants. He's gonna finish

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>his quarterback seventeen on the year, and I think everybody's

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>almost exactly ranked right now, go back sixteen here, let

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 1>me give you another scenario where Cam can hit the upside.

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Your Belichick, You've watched what Baltimore has done with Lamar

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:55.199
<v Speaker 1>Jackson running in with abandoned, and you know that Cam

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>can still run. It's just the last several seasons teams

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.680
<v Speaker 1>he's and hurt, and the teams of consciously Panthers constantly

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:04.439
<v Speaker 1>chose not to have him run as much. Do I

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>want to keep him healthy? But does Belichick have a

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>motivation to keep him healthy the same way. It's not

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 1>a one year deal that cost him nothing, so Belichick

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>might just figure I'm gonna run him for sixteen games

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and if he makes it and it helps us win, fine,

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and if it doesn't, who cares. I'll do it doesn't

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>cost me anything, and I'll go to Jared' Stidham. It

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>could go that way. Belichick might just figure I'll run

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>him and just see how long it lasts and maybe

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>all the way to the super Bowl. I don't know.

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>There's I think there is there is I think upside

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>for that. Um, your worst case scenario we've already documented.

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>He could get benched Andy Dalton, who you know we

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>said he's and he's Andy Dalton is a phassor Andy

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 1>don't got bench last year? And keep in mind Camp

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>has been a sub five quarterback in six of his

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>nine seasons. Subid Belichick may not stand for that. Wins.

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Just talk about wins. That's right. So, um, here's where

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>here's the drafting strategy for me. I love Cams my

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 1>second quarterback. Yeah, oh, because you get you get all

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the upside and none of the risk. So I'm willing

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to take Cam around before a DP if I've already

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>got a quarterback. Okay, And so regardless of where I

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>took that first quarterback, although if I took Patrick Mahomes,

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson, I'm probably not gonna waste what would have

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>to be ultimately about a ninth or tenth round pick

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to go get Cam. But you know, if I if

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I let that quarterback position slide and I'm taking my

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, my number ten rand quarterback and round seven,

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I'd come back in round nine for Cam. Now, I

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>think it'll be interesting to see where his ADP kind

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of falls as we get into mid delay at August,

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>because there are a lot of Patriots fans that might

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>bump up his value. They see that he's with Belichick

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and Josh McDaniels over there, and and we're really gonna

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>bump up this value. Does does he sneak into like

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the top twelve is ADP quarterbacks? You might? I think

0:15:57.400 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>he might by the by the end of this. So

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you're going to get him as a

0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>second quarterback in a lot of cases. And if you're

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>not getting him as a second quarterback, I'm probably letting

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>him pass fantasy. If it's any indication right now in

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>late July seasons, getting close the drafts I'm in, nobody

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>wants the other Patriots. It's like they're still in the

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Precam mindset. We just got done with the scott Fish Bowl.

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Jay I got James White in the eighth round of

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the scott Fish Bowl. Eighth round, A guy who's been

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a top twenty handcuffs Sony Michelle. Didn't you god know? Nikkil?

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Harry is um, I'm I'm doing this upcome Nikkill. Harry

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>went somewhere in the neighborhood of round fifteen. Julian Edelman

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:49.240
<v Speaker 1>went somewhere in the neighborhood of round eight nine. It

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>seems like people haven't figured out even if you even

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>if you acknowledge the cam's there and he's a massive

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>improvement over Jared Stidham. I don't hear anybody taken. I don't.

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I just it doesn't. It doesn't seem like the ADP

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:04.679
<v Speaker 1>has moved accordingly for the rest of the Patriots. No,

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think the ADP for for the Patriots has

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>just remained low. And I mean when we started the draft,

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 1>we weren't quite on the Cam bandwagon yet. So right,

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>all right, final segment for this podcast, Paul Charging and

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Matt Harrison with you. I am fascinated by a starting

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>backfield of Clyde Edwards, A Laire and Damian Williams. Let's

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>start with this. So obviously you're getting the two chiefs

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 1>running back. So we think you give me all the

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:36.920
<v Speaker 1>positives here because I'm gonna come with the Okay, I'm

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>fascinated by it. Here's here's why. First I got we

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 1>think the timeshare is gonna be somewhere sixty one way

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>or the other. Okay, does that seem fair? It seems

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 1>fairish sixty, you know, and I I think it'll insert

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Darwin Thompson like, hey, we're not fall for that again.

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Remember excited we were for Darwin Thompson in the preseason.

0:17:55.760 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Dwayne Washington's like, what's going on right? Um, it's gonna

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>be sixty? You don't, you don't. The part of the

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>beauty of this is I don't need to know who's

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna be sixty and who's gonna be forty because I

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>got both guys and together they're gonna get close to

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the work. The other guys should not be

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 1>any kind of significant factor here. So here's let's start

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 1>with this. And the most important thing is what is

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 1>it gonna cost you to get Clyde Edwards Hilaire and

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Damian Williams. It's gonna cost you a third round pick

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>for Clyde, it's gonna cost you an eighth round pick

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 1>for Damian Williams, who, by the way, it's gonna be

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the starter on week one. Okay, I mean you know,

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>for all the things that are that are working against

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 1>rookies here in this offseason and this preseason, I think

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a nine chance Damian Williams is gets the majority

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of the work in the beginning of the season. Eighth

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:46.400
<v Speaker 1>round pick. So I'm I'm gonna start both guys as

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>my starters. So that means now available to me matt

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.640
<v Speaker 1>is my first round pick, my second round pick, my fourth,

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>my fifth, my six, and my seventh to not be

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>running backs. Those picks can be other stuff. That means

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>of other stuff I love. Who doesn't love other stuff?

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 1>That's the next Oreo. They should make other stuff. They

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>could anything. No, they got every variation of Oreo possible,

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>but not other stuff. But the big question mark on

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the package, that's right, that's it's the sawdust they swept

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:25.880
<v Speaker 1>from under the factory floor. Um So now my first

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:28.880
<v Speaker 1>round pick I can go. I can go wide receivers,

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I can go tight ends. I've got all this these

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.479
<v Speaker 1>other picks. I could even go other running backs. If

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to, with the intention of still starting Clyde Edwards,

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Hiller and Damian Williams, I could still work in another

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 1>running back or two. Now in how would it work

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:45.439
<v Speaker 1>if if I'm if I'm really bundling the two the

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:47.679
<v Speaker 1>one A and the one B running backs from the Chiefs,

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 1>what am I getting? Well, this is the best offense

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 1>in football in two seasons under Patrick Mahomes. These are

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes starts. The Chiefs average day staggering thirty three

0:19:57.119 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>points per game. Keep in mind the NFL average over

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the as two years is twenty one, so basically getting

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>two extra touchdowns into your scoring. In rushing touchdowns scored,

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs were third last year their fourth year before,

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>so you're getting You're getting top tier production from the

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 1>running backs in terms of touchdowns. In the Homes era,

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>running backs are averaging over one and a half touchdowns

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 1>per game over one and a half, So that means

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.359
<v Speaker 1>in a typical week, I'm getting a touchdown out of

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 1>one and in the next week, I'm getting a touchdown

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>out of each one, or I'm getting two combined touchdowns.

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:35.640
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty good production out of my third and eighth

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 1>round pick a running back. Now, both Clyde Edwards Hilaire

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 1>and Williams are elite level pass catchers. And I'll remind

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 1>listeners two years ago Kareem Hunt, in the eleven games

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that he played before he went dumbass, he caught he

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>caught seven touchdowns, caught seven. So if I had those

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>seven in with the one and a half touchdowns per

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>game that we were getting before of rushing touchdowns, these

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>two running backs are going to average two touchdowns a

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>game between them. Fatsy elite running back production right now? Yes,

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 1>it is. If you have one running back position you're

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>using in your starting lineup. To do it, you gotta

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>use two though. You have to use both of your

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 1>running back starting slots on these guys, and that means

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:25.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't get to have a second running back in play.

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing. But or you're taking these two guys,

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>you're combining them together. They're fantastic running back, right Yeah, Well,

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:36.400
<v Speaker 1>but you gotta take two touchdowns. You gotta take those

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>two guys and put them into two starting spots where

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:41.400
<v Speaker 1>if I get a bell cow back in the first

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>two rounds or the first three rounds, I slot him

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:46.919
<v Speaker 1>into one of my running back spots, and then I

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 1>still have an extra running back spot where I can

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>start and get gravy from anybody else. So here you

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 1>want the negatives, bring it on, although I want to

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:59.119
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to respond to that too. Okay, go for it. Okay,

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:01.919
<v Speaker 1>So you're you're suggesting Dalvin Cook, for example, is my

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>first round pick? The beauty of my system is with

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Clyde Edwards, Laer and Damian Williams. Is I just drafted

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Michael Thomas or Davante Adams? You know, you know I've

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>got I've got Michael Thomas on my team, don't you do?

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Get to use your draft picks for other things, But

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:22.199
<v Speaker 1>when it comes down to your starting lineup, you're taking

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>a roster spot out of your starting lineup. By starting

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:28.920
<v Speaker 1>two Chiefs running backs, I'm contending to get their they're

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:32.879
<v Speaker 1>both effectively RB one's combined. Ahead, Let's bring it on.

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Bring some more perfect right? Okay? Good? How many times

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:41.160
<v Speaker 1>in the last four years have two running backs from

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 1>the same team finished in the top twenty four? And

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:47.160
<v Speaker 1>now it's time for a guessing game chart. Here we go.

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand nineteen, we had one pair of running

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>backs finish in the top twenty four, because you want

0:22:56.880 --> 0:23:00.639
<v Speaker 1>two top twenty four running backs. They're both starting running

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>back worthy for last year. If if I can just

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 1>use the second half of the season, I know both

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Kareem Hunt and Nick Chubb were top twenty four while

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:13.879
<v Speaker 1>they were while once Kareem Monk got off suspension. Okay,

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>but I'm sure that's the answer to this. You're asking

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:20.679
<v Speaker 1>me for a full season, all right, I don't Melvin

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Gordon ast Neckler, that is correct? Ding ding? Do we

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:27.400
<v Speaker 1>have a ding ding on there? There? We get the duck.

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh Eckler finished seventh, Gordon finished In two thousand eighteen,

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:37.159
<v Speaker 1>there was one pair of running backs who both finished

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:39.879
<v Speaker 1>in the top twenty four. You're not gonna get it, no,

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>all right, tell me the Chicago Bears duo of Tariko

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 1>and at number seventeen and Jordan Howard. In two thousand

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 1>seventeen we had three sets. That was the most successful

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:57.159
<v Speaker 1>year by far of the last four. Okay, can you

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:00.880
<v Speaker 1>guess any of those well history now years you can

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>get and you can get a couple of these. Um

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:13.680
<v Speaker 1>uh NFC South, NFC South Okay? Oh? Was it Freeman

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and uh it was it Freeman and Coleman? Coleman was

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:23.920
<v Speaker 1>one of Okay, Freeman finished twelfth, Coleman, Alvin Kamara and

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Market finished four and six. How did they? Yeah, Okay,

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 1>you surprised they didn't hit that two years ago. That

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:34.719
<v Speaker 1>Freeman camera weren't in two years ago? Okay. And then

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 1>and then shocking the Vikings the duo of Littavius Murray

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>and Jerick McKinnon four now, okay now, and and then

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:49.439
<v Speaker 1>in one pair again it was the Falcons again. I

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>would say, all right, list to the teams, just the

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>teams that you just said for all these pairs of

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:57.160
<v Speaker 1>running your backs that finished in the top twenty four,

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers and the Bears, and the Saints and Atlanta,

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings, do I think the Chiefs are a lot

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>better than all those. The Chiefs are awesome. There's a

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 1>lot of Chiefs. There's a lot of touchdowns. There's a

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of touchdowns go around. In four years with thirty

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 1>two teams in the league, that's a hundred and twenty

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:24.679
<v Speaker 1>eight chances for running back due to finish in the

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:27.679
<v Speaker 1>top seven times. It has done six times, success rate

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of four point six pc. I just think the chiefs

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 1>are special enough that they can do that. They they're

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>definitely special enough that they can That doesn't mean that

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 1>you should do what you're thinking about doing. Don't you

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>just want to get one to run away with this

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>job and feel confident that's the other and one of

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 1>them running away with the job. I don't mind having

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:47.399
<v Speaker 1>both on my team. It's gonna be really difficult for

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 1>me to go into a draft and going, I'm getting

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 1>these two. Let's play this out. Okay. So let's say,

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>either through injury or incompetence, one of them breaks away

0:25:57.320 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>from the other one and this thing turns into an

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:02.880
<v Speaker 1>eight instead of you can't really start the other one.

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Can I find a running back? Is it impossible to

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:08.639
<v Speaker 1>get a running back? Am I gonna? You know, if

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna If I'm gonna execute this plan as I

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:13.360
<v Speaker 1>mentioned before, You're gonna have a first and fourth, first

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and second and fourth, fifth, six and seventh round picks.

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 1>One of those might be another running back. And then

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 1>after that, after the eighth round, I'm gonna, you know,

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>throw a bunch of picks at running back again. Can't

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:24.399
<v Speaker 1>I be seeing that in the waiver wire? Can't I

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>find me going back. I don't mind the handcuff of

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs backs. What I do mind is the forethought

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 1>of going into your draft going I'm getting these two

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs backs that I'm sluffing the rest of the position

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:38.199
<v Speaker 1>and not thinking about it and starting these two and

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 1>going everywhere else with it with all my other picks.

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 1>I want some safety. I want a little bit of

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 1>insurance to back this up. What if Mahomes goes down?

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:49.880
<v Speaker 1>What if that what if that offense goes upside down?

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:51.679
<v Speaker 1>If Mahomes goes down and he did go down for

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:55.200
<v Speaker 1>a couple of games last year, That's something that's pretty

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>nerve racking to me because I have two guys that

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:00.679
<v Speaker 1>are tied to two positions on my team, him and

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>if another guy who's completely separate goes belly up, it

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 1>might torpedo all of my value. I think I could

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:08.239
<v Speaker 1>say that about almost every right back, that they're all

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>in trouble when their quarterbacks down. But I guess you

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>double you double the risk, and I'll give you this.

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 1>You didn't bring this up. What if Covid sweeps through

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs lock. I was going to mention that that's

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a Williams and Clyde stay in separate running back rooms

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:26.359
<v Speaker 1>throughout the air. Probably not PLEXI glass them apart. You

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:28.120
<v Speaker 1>know that to me is to me, that's as big

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a risk as anything of the Edwards A layer Williams strategy.

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Is that right, there could be trouble. I hope not.

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to execute this. By the way, I think

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 1>way x easier to execute this plan in a draft

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>than an auction. Here's why. In an auction, when you

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 1>somebody's gonna throw out Clyde Edwards a laire pretty or leaks,

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:48.439
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna you know, I think he's gonna be a

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 1>hot pick and people are gonna want to throw them out,

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 1>So you go get when you, Matt, go get Clyde

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Edwards a layer. And then I hear you bidding on

0:27:55.600 --> 0:28:00.119
<v Speaker 1>Damien Williams. Why you see through this strata of g

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 1>in a second, if you're gonna if you're gonna go

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 1>in with that strategy, you need to get Damian Williams first.

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I think you do need to get him first. And

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:09.159
<v Speaker 1>people might still bid you up on Clyde Edwards a

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 1>layer at that point, but you could back out and

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:13.919
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't cost you that much. How about this charge? Um,

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I know guillotine leagues are a whole another beast because

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 1>they're seventeen team drafts. Would you feel comfortable You'd have

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 1>to probably draft Clyde in the second round and it

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 1>would probably increase Damien Williams to like the sixth maybe

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:31.680
<v Speaker 1>probably because it's seventeen teams. Yes, Clyde is going to

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 1>go on the side. Would you feel comfortable using this

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>strategy and a guillotine league? Less comfortable because it is

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 1>because it's a sixty forty. There's gonna be a lot

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 1>of games where one of them has two touchdowns in

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and twenty total yards and the other one

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 1>has forty total yards, and in totality, I'm willing to

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>take that. But if I've only got one guy or

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the other, I'm in deep trouble if it's not his week,

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know, I'm nervous about that. It seems

0:28:57.600 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 1>like you're looking for safety and guillotine area, and what's

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 1>what's more safe than to have the combination of these

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 1>two running backs. It is that that's a pretty safe way. Actually,

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, maybe you're right because between them,

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 1>how many duds are they going to post? You're probably

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:16.960
<v Speaker 1>not getting many done. Maybe we're onto something with the

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>handcuffing backfields, but you've got to be a Chiefs level

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 1>offense to pull it off. Thirty three points per game

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>under Patrick Mahomes. I don't know if there's another running

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 1>back duo out there that you could that could be

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>this interesting. Now, probably not. They're probably maybe Dobbins and Ingram,

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, maybe although the quarterback worries me, you know,

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to touchdowns, yeah, you know, and Patrick Mahomes will you know,

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 1>he'll steal five over the season or four, But um,

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 1>these guys between them could end up scoring eight touchdowns

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and I you know, between them, I wouldn't be surprised

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 1>if one has a ten eleven twelve touchdown season and

0:29:57.160 --> 0:30:00.360
<v Speaker 1>one has a twelve fourteen, sixteen touchdown season. Well, I

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 1>would be super interested to see what somebody's draft to

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 1>look like if they drafted these in a guillotine league.

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>So probably go over to guillotine leagues dot com. Good idea, Uh,

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>take a couple of Chiefs yeah and for running backs,

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and then show me what the rest of your roster

0:30:16.480 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 1>looks like, because I'd be fascinated to see it. Tweeted

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 1>at me. If you can execute it that is at

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:24.200
<v Speaker 1>explosive output is where we would tweet you and at

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Paul Charchie, it's where we would tweet me. Um. So yeah,

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 1>all there's it's a fascinating turn and we'll we'll spend

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 1>more time I think looking at this particular draft strategy

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 1>as the preseason unwindes. Let's hope we have a regular preseason.

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 1>The two games is great. I just want to just

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 1>give me a month of you know, all the preseason stuff,

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the training camps and everything else. Yeah, is that okay? Yeah?

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, in some ways we're better off not having

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 1>those first couple of games where we get bad intel

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 1>in those first games Darwin time. Everybody just wants this

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 1>all to go back to normal. We just want to

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>have a football season where you can sit on the

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 1>couch with your family and watch some football games and

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 1>cheer on the numbers on Sunday night and Monday night,

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and I just want that back. Phenomenal great job, thanks Matt,

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. By the way. Reminder, for those that are

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 1>listening to Fantasy Football Weekly, for the markets that carry

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the radio show, we're back on the air in two weeks.

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 1>We're on there August first, The long form two hour

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 1>version of Fantasy Football Weekly is coming in just two

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 1>episodes from now. You know, this is a scamp thirty

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 1>one minutes right now. This is a piece of cake. Yea,

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 1>this is nibble exactly. H Matt, great job. We'll talk

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to you next week. Fantasy Football Weekly is a production

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of I Heart Radio. For more podcast from my Heart Radio,

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>visit the i heart Radio app, Apple podcast, or wherever

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.