Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunt. President Trump signs an
Speaker 1: executive order that will stop children and parents from being
Speaker 1: separated the border. And guess what, his critics still hate him.
Speaker 1: They aren't giving him any credit for it. In fact,
Speaker 1: they're just going to continue to complain and try to
Speaker 1: push for a day facto open border status while pretending
Speaker 1: that they are reasonable and just want legislation to fix problems.
Speaker 1: We'll get to that, plus the latest on where the
Speaker 1: i G Report is going to lead us next in
Speaker 1: the hunt to find the deep state collaborators. That are
Speaker 1: more coming up on the buck Sexton Show. This is
Speaker 1: the buck Sexton Show where the mission or mission is
Speaker 1: to decode what really matters with passionable intelligence. Make no
Speaker 1: mistake American, You're a great America Again. The buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show begins analys were signing an executive order I consider
Speaker 1: to be a very important executive order. It's about keeping
Speaker 1: families together, while at the same time be sure that
Speaker 1: we have a very powerful, very strong border and border
Speaker 1: security will be equal, if not greater than previously. It
Speaker 1: continues to be a zero talers. We have zero talers
Speaker 1: for people that enter our country illegally. Welcome to the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show. Everybody, great to have you here with me.
Speaker 1: Oh what a day in the news cycle. I actually
Speaker 1: just got back from the White House. I was over
Speaker 1: there a few minutes ago talking to some folks about
Speaker 1: what's been going on here. And let me tell you,
Speaker 1: I knew it. I think you did too. Here we
Speaker 1: are Trump had we have had stories and stories and
Speaker 1: people crying, an audio of babies crying. I mean, they
Speaker 1: could not have pushed this whole narrative of Trump is
Speaker 1: mean and heartless any more than they did. I mean
Speaker 1: they were talking about how it's it's like Burke in
Speaker 1: bukinvolved or Auschwitz or Beer Canal, you know, different concentration, cancer,
Speaker 1: like the like the interment of the Japanese during World
Speaker 1: War Two, all these different things, child abuse, we play this,
Speaker 1: Oh my gosh, President Trump, you must do something, President Trump,
Speaker 1: do something. Please And guess what President did something? So
Speaker 1: I an executive order said we will no longer separate families. Now,
Speaker 1: I just want to I just wanna do you think
Speaker 1: do you think that they respond to this by saying, wow, well, President,
Speaker 1: we really appreciate you hearing us out. We think that
Speaker 1: this is an area where we've found some common round
Speaker 1: and we're just glad that the children now are going
Speaker 1: to be in a better situation. And that's now what happened.
Speaker 1: Now they're just going crazy saying Trump is locking up
Speaker 1: whole families. Oh what a surprise. I thought the problem
Speaker 1: with the kids were separated from the parents. So now
Speaker 1: it's Trump is locking up families, you see. So so
Speaker 1: they goaded the administration into changing the policy so that
Speaker 1: you won't have parents separate from kids. And now the
Speaker 1: game they're playing is, oh my gosh, they're gonna put
Speaker 1: parents and children, entire families in these cages. So I
Speaker 1: guess what they want is that no one gets detained.
Speaker 1: That means open borders, folks. That means show up to
Speaker 1: the border with the kid and you're good, you get
Speaker 1: to stay. I mean, come on. And they keep saying,
Speaker 1: oh no, they'll they'll go through the legal asylum process. Now,
Speaker 1: now the world'll get out. But the legal asylum process.
Speaker 1: Guess what a lot of people won't get legal assylum.
Speaker 1: Are they going to be to poor it? Because that's
Speaker 1: what's supposed to happen. The administration also is not recognizing
Speaker 1: domestic violence or gang violence as grounds for asylum, so
Speaker 1: and just being you know, seeking a better life. Economically
Speaker 1: that doesn't count either. So you've got all these people
Speaker 1: now that are showing up at the border that are
Speaker 1: going to be sent home, and Democrats aren't okay with that.
Speaker 1: But this was never what have I been telling you, folks?
Speaker 1: And I know you know right this is guys. You
Speaker 1: are you are my sanity. You know I'm here in
Speaker 1: the swamp. I'm here trying to deal with the deep state,
Speaker 1: and and I'll be talking to you you more about how
Speaker 1: this is kind of fun now the buck is running sources.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm I'm going to war with the liars
Speaker 1: here in d C. And I'm in the trench with
Speaker 1: the Trump team, and it's gonna be great. It's gonna
Speaker 1: be great. But you know, I get to sit here
Speaker 1: and finally talk to you sane, normal Americans. Darry just
Speaker 1: say say normal human beings that do not suffer from
Speaker 1: some symptom of mass delusion where you think that we're
Speaker 1: about to fall into Nazism or fashion is m where
Speaker 1: that Trump is, you know, it hates babies and children,
Speaker 1: just crazy I'm surrounded by because yeah, the White House.
Speaker 1: You know, you've got senior officials here that are Republican.
Speaker 1: But d C is a blue, blue, blue city plus
Speaker 1: Democrat voting here in the last election. This is this
Speaker 1: is you know, the deep state's hometown. Folks. Don't forget it.
Speaker 1: I am in I'm behind enemy lines here, deep in
Speaker 1: the swamp. But on this issue, it is just hard
Speaker 1: to imagine how anybody could take Schumer, Kamala, Harris Pelosi,
Speaker 1: the mainstream media, CNN, all these others that are out there,
Speaker 1: take them seriously. They've been they've been losing their minds
Speaker 1: now over how it's so terrible that babies, the children
Speaker 1: and the border. Oh what are you gonna do? And
Speaker 1: now Trump's takes not Trump takes action. And the same
Speaker 1: people that are saying, or we're saying that Trump is
Speaker 1: a monster and talking about Nazism because is there are
Speaker 1: a couple of thousand kids who have shown up at
Speaker 1: the border, either with people who don't know their parents
Speaker 1: or with no parents and their own facilities where they're clean,
Speaker 1: they're fed, their house, they're safe. But you know, yeah,
Speaker 1: it's not it's not an episode of Captain Kangaroo, right,
Speaker 1: I mean, it's it's not perfect. I get it, but
Speaker 1: they're all. They're also not running summer camps at the border.
Speaker 1: That's not what they're supposed It's not a giant daycare center.
Speaker 1: Immigrations and Customs Enforcement is really not supposed to be
Speaker 1: in the business of warehousing thousands and thousands of kids.
Speaker 1: The Obama administration created this problem with its lawlessness. Trump
Speaker 1: is trying to fix it. But now that he's just
Speaker 1: trying to fix this one part of it for now,
Speaker 1: you know, if they could save just one eight month
Speaker 1: old baby from being traumatized being separated from his mother,
Speaker 1: shouldn't Democrats agree? Oh no, they don't. They're not agreed
Speaker 1: on this one. Don't just take my word for it.
Speaker 1: I'll give you some some evidence here, some examples. Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris I mentioned her senator and possible presidential contender. She
Speaker 1: wrote this, this executive order doesn't fix the crisis in definitely,
Speaker 1: detaining children with their families and camps is inhumane and
Speaker 1: will not make us safe. Well, here's the problem with that.
Speaker 1: The Flora has Consent Decree, which is a law that
Speaker 1: stolen the books from what NIES seven I think from,
Speaker 1: says that you can only detain them for up to
Speaker 1: twenty days. Children can only be detained for up to
Speaker 1: twenty days. So guess what. They're gonna have to expedite
Speaker 1: the process now of asylum claims very quickly. I don't
Speaker 1: know how they'll do it. Orf they'll be able to
Speaker 1: do it, but it would not be legal to keep
Speaker 1: the children beyond twenty days. That's gonna be and then
Speaker 1: they'll challenge that in courts too. But they're not happy.
Speaker 1: They're not celebrating, they're not pleased that the president has
Speaker 1: listen to this coordinated campaign to make this seem like
Speaker 1: a huge issue, a terrible problem that is falling on
Speaker 1: the shoulders of the American people. Here, um, and you've
Speaker 1: got journalists. Here's a journalist. It doesn't matter. He's a
Speaker 1: blue check lefty journalist. He wrote, Let's be clear, Trump's
Speaker 1: solution to the problem of treating children inhumanely by separating
Speaker 1: from their parents is to break the law and remove
Speaker 1: legal protections for children that prevent their indefinite attention. Oh,
Speaker 1: I get the game now, So you see now the
Speaker 1: law is the law. Earlier this week, if you said
Speaker 1: the law is the law, you were fascist, you were Nazi,
Speaker 1: you hate babies, and probably Santa Claus too. That was
Speaker 1: the Democrat party line. That's what they were all saying,
Speaker 1: and Rachel Man out tearing up on TV the whole thing. Right,
Speaker 1: everyone's also upset about this. And you say, look, the
Speaker 1: laws of law were society laws. Ow dare you you don't?
Speaker 1: You just don't care about babies. You probably hate puppies.
Speaker 1: Tune didn't send your father a nice card for Father's Day?
Speaker 1: You know that. That's what we were hearing. And now,
Speaker 1: oh my gosh, how can you do this. You're gonna
Speaker 1: detain whole families and violate the law, and how long
Speaker 1: you can keep children together with their families? And so
Speaker 1: now the law is the law, even if it means
Speaker 1: that it's harder to keep families together. Here's the real
Speaker 1: here's the real deal. Here's the real point. They want
Speaker 1: all of them to be able to stay. They will
Speaker 1: not be satisfied as long as we have immigration laws
Speaker 1: that do not allow anyone from an impoverished, developing or
Speaker 1: third world nation who is likely to vote Democrat to
Speaker 1: show up here, stay here. And that's it. American people
Speaker 1: are realizing this, at least a lot of us are.
Speaker 1: We got a problem with it. I think I'm exaggerating,
Speaker 1: which I know you probably don't, but if you do.
Speaker 1: Here is a uh, here is a congressional candidate. Do
Speaker 1: we have this guy who's saying that we should shut Yeah,
Speaker 1: Democrat Matt Hagman. Hagman says that we should in a
Speaker 1: campaign aid. Well, I'll let him say a play clip six,
Speaker 1: I sender Trump targets children in Congress, I'll work to
Speaker 1: close eyes down. We can protect our borders without being
Speaker 1: cruel to kids. Donna Lela, she's at our chance. It's
Speaker 1: time for a new day. I'm Matt Hagman, and I
Speaker 1: approved this message. Shut ice down. That's what he said, Folks.
Speaker 1: This is the equivalent of somebody saying, Hey, you know,
Speaker 1: there's all these arrests that are happening in this high
Speaker 1: crime neighborhood. Let's just let's just get rid of the
Speaker 1: let's just get rid of the police. Let's just tell
Speaker 1: them that we don't need them anymore. Because you know
Speaker 1: that the police are targeting criminals. That needs to stop.
Speaker 1: Excuse me, police, can you stop with all your targeting
Speaker 1: of criminals. We have laws in the books that folks,
Speaker 1: We have laws about a lot of things that aren't
Speaker 1: about not being a mass murderer. You know, there's all
Speaker 1: kinds of one of us, like paying your taxes, you
Speaker 1: know what happens you don't do that under sending to prison? Why?
Speaker 1: Because that's the law? The fair is it? Right now?
Speaker 1: They don't care. It's the law. That's the way things are.
Speaker 1: Democrats have embraced lawlessness because in the pursuit of political power,
Speaker 1: nothing can be allowed to stand in the way. But
Speaker 1: the turnaround here, the the shamelessness and the breakneck speed
Speaker 1: with which they have just shifted from oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: you can't you can't split up families to you mean,
Speaker 1: you're gonna detain whole families at once, you monster. These
Speaker 1: these people have no scruples, no principles, nothing. It's just
Speaker 1: a game to them. And and you know what, you
Speaker 1: know what really bothers me almost as much as anything
Speaker 1: else about this. It was never really about the kids.
Speaker 1: And what did I tell you? I said, I said,
Speaker 1: listen to me, man. Anytime the government, especially Democrats, say
Speaker 1: it's for the children, We're doing this for the children,
Speaker 1: they're usually lying. They're usually lying and and and they're
Speaker 1: and they're saying it so that they can get away
Speaker 1: with doing things they should not be allowed to do.
Speaker 1: And they were lying here all along. You know, I
Speaker 1: saw headline Earliday, you know that Trump is going to
Speaker 1: reverse you know, his policy on It's not his policy,
Speaker 1: it's just it is the law. But you see this fascinating,
Speaker 1: it's fascinating. You know, white as black, black as white,
Speaker 1: Up is down, left is right, right is left. Now
Speaker 1: the law has become a problem in and of itself.
Speaker 1: To believe that the law has meaning is to put
Speaker 1: constraints on progressivism that it will not accept in our
Speaker 1: current era. It doesn't it doesn't allow for there to
Speaker 1: be codes that they just can't reinterpret or ignore at will.
Speaker 1: And that also reminds me that, by the way, the
Speaker 1: executive order is not the right way to fix this.
Speaker 1: I Politically, I understand when the President did it. Emotionally,
Speaker 1: I understand when the president, you know, probably just had
Speaker 1: enough of all the nonsense and decided, fine, we'll we'll,
Speaker 1: we'll change this policy. But this needs to be an
Speaker 1: Act of Congress. We need the people who have the
Speaker 1: constitutional authority to right and pass laws to do that,
Speaker 1: and this is one of those issues. This one of them.
Speaker 1: By the way, I've got some really interesting audio to
Speaker 1: share with you guys, from an interview down to the
Speaker 1: board with a member of Border Patrol that gave CNN
Speaker 1: some answers that I don't think they were expecting. You're
Speaker 1: definitely gonna want to hear that. We'll get into this
Speaker 1: and and and oh oh so much more of my
Speaker 1: friends eight four eight to five, eight four four nine buck.
Speaker 1: The freedom hunt train is just getting just getting rocketing,
Speaker 1: So stay right there. Unfortunately, I haven't yet had a
Speaker 1: chance to read the order itself, but we know two things.
Speaker 1: Number one, the likelihood that this order means that families
Speaker 1: will be incarcerated together, meaning the children will be incarcerated
Speaker 1: with the parents, is high. So long as these parents
Speaker 1: are being prosecuted criminally, they will be separate did from
Speaker 1: their children, and the children will be separated from their
Speaker 1: parents for at least a few days. So she hasn't
Speaker 1: read it. That was an activist that would they put
Speaker 1: an immigration activist, which another way of saying, you know,
Speaker 1: open borders internationalists that they put on CNN. And she
Speaker 1: keeps thinking, if they're prosecuted criminally, what else are they
Speaker 1: gonna do? You know, we we really have to start
Speaker 1: asking democrats activists, people in the media that pretend to
Speaker 1: be objective need to start asking them the question does
Speaker 1: everyone get to does everyone get to stay? If not,
Speaker 1: who who doesn't get to stay? Who doesn't get to
Speaker 1: come here? It's not that hard to get to America.
Speaker 1: The plane ride away, or if you're coming from south
Speaker 1: the border, it's you know, a walk or a truck
Speaker 1: or a bus ride, right, it's not hard. So do
Speaker 1: we not turn anyone away anymore? Is that what's gonna happen?
Speaker 1: Because folks, at some point we're gonna have to say,
Speaker 1: you know what, I'm just actually not gonna pay taxes anymore.
Speaker 1: At some point I'm not going to obey the laws either.
Speaker 1: If if this is what's gonna happen, if we don't
Speaker 1: have a country anymore, if we don't have sovereignty, if
Speaker 1: it's just you know, arrest stop in a soup kitchen
Speaker 1: for the whole world, that anyone can come and go
Speaker 1: as they as they please, without so much as the
Speaker 1: buy you or leave, we got a big problem. I
Speaker 1: think that's what democrats want. I would like them to
Speaker 1: explain if if a child and a parent arrives right
Speaker 1: now at our southern border and says, I want to
Speaker 1: come to America. Is it the Democrat position that they
Speaker 1: get to stay or that they are turned away and deported?
Speaker 1: They want to answer the question, because as far as
Speaker 1: we can tell, they say that everybody should stay, nobody
Speaker 1: should be turned away. And it's just completely, completely and
Speaker 1: utterly outrageous. By the way, for those who forget this,
Speaker 1: you know, Trump is mean, He's a nazis the worst
Speaker 1: than everything else. This is the kind of stuff that
Speaker 1: Obama actually used to say about illegal immigration. Play a team.
Speaker 1: You know, we are a general US and welcoming people
Speaker 1: here in the United States, but those who enter the
Speaker 1: country illegally and those who employ them disrespect the rule
Speaker 1: of law, and they are showing disregard for those who
Speaker 1: are following the law. We simply cannot allow people to
Speaker 1: pour into the United States undetected, undocumented, unchecked, and circumventing
Speaker 1: the line of people who are waiting patiently, diligently, and
Speaker 1: lawfully to become immigrants in this country. See, Democrats don't
Speaker 1: really believe any of that. This is this is one
Speaker 1: of the great Democrat party head fakes of of our
Speaker 1: modern era. Here, just like Democrats are contemptuous of of
Speaker 1: Christians who who are believers, they really are, they pretend
Speaker 1: not to be. But the Democrat Party at its core
Speaker 1: is is an anti Christian party. I know there are
Speaker 1: a lot of Christians who Democrats. I get that. I
Speaker 1: know there are Marxist, Catholic and all kinds of stuff
Speaker 1: going on there. But ultimately, if atheism has a home
Speaker 1: in government, it's with the Democrat Party. And they they
Speaker 1: that's why they're you know, they're okay with Obama talking
Speaker 1: about God and Bill Clinton talking about God as long
Speaker 1: as it kind of fools enough of the country that
Speaker 1: they can institute godless antitheist policies like abortion on demand
Speaker 1: for all nine months of a pregnancy and essentially eradicating
Speaker 1: freedom of religion in American life and society. Right that
Speaker 1: that's all coming from the Democrats, coming from the left.
Speaker 1: But they lie about immigration to they don't care about
Speaker 1: immigration security. They don't want they don't want the border
Speaker 1: to be secure. They they love this the more of
Speaker 1: the merrier right to turn turn America into a giant
Speaker 1: refugee camp. They could care less. And when you start
Speaker 1: to think about what this would really mean over the
Speaker 1: long term, it changes the character of this country. It
Speaker 1: would change the character of this country. You know, assimilation
Speaker 1: is you know, those of you who have any experienced cooking, right,
Speaker 1: you know, if you're gonna if you're making a sauce
Speaker 1: and you have to reduce that sauce, you can add
Speaker 1: some and then you cook and you reduce it down.
Speaker 1: It becomes a part of the dish. You add some,
Speaker 1: you cook, reduce it down. If you just flood the
Speaker 1: dish with a whole bunch of of let's say it's
Speaker 1: white wine or something, you can ruin it. Right. You
Speaker 1: have to do it as you go. You can't just
Speaker 1: pour in a big thing and then serve on our plate.
Speaker 1: It's gonna be a sloppy mess. Right. You can overwhelm
Speaker 1: the system, you know, the bathtub can flow over, so
Speaker 1: to speak. We can only handle so much. This isn't
Speaker 1: about assimilation. This is about fundamentally transforming the democrat a
Speaker 1: demographic character of the United States in favor of a
Speaker 1: status left wing social Democrat party. That's what's really at Hardier.
Speaker 1: That is the mission. He's holding the line for America,
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton his back. They are facing certain death and
Speaker 1: they want to come to a country that they believe
Speaker 1: where they at least have a smidgen of hope. This
Speaker 1: is an abomination. It is dictatorial, it is inhumane, it
Speaker 1: is diabolical. And that is why you have supporters of
Speaker 1: President Trump who have been with him on everything up
Speaker 1: until now. His evangelical leaders are saying that they disgusting
Speaker 1: taken from their fur country. We have from their mother's
Speaker 1: your keep kids in Chao in turn make camps and
Speaker 1: definitely and hidden away from public view. What country is that?
Speaker 1: Everyone who's getting hysterical over children being separated from their parents,
Speaker 1: this is this is child just not hysterical. I am
Speaker 1: totally calm. Everybody needs to calm down. Oh no, I
Speaker 1: am so calm. I'm not a star ug. You can't
Speaker 1: make this. Tell these people have lost it. I'm not
Speaker 1: making it up. They've lost it. They this is it's
Speaker 1: it's it's getting harder and harder to see how we
Speaker 1: find our way out of this mess without having to.
Speaker 1: I don't know I have some kind of real nationwide
Speaker 1: sit down and chat with each other about Hey, everyone,
Speaker 1: you need to get it together a little bit here.
Speaker 1: We just played that a group of different people from
Speaker 1: the media. They're all, oh my god, it's the worst
Speaker 1: thing I ever wrong. There's a lot of bad things
Speaker 1: happening all over the world. Some kids that are separated
Speaker 1: from their parents for a few days while you know,
Speaker 1: the government has to figure out what to do because
Speaker 1: the parents made the decision to break the law. Folks,
Speaker 1: Let's not forget that they know it's illegal, they know
Speaker 1: they're not supposed to do it, and they're breaking the law.
Speaker 1: This isn't that they're not they're not victims of circumstance
Speaker 1: here when they're at the border and that no, no, no,
Speaker 1: and and now they're just they're piling on even more.
Speaker 1: I see here in New York Times, separated families won't
Speaker 1: be reunited immediately. Okay, so now it's not fast enough.
Speaker 1: Now the change in policy is not fastive. And then
Speaker 1: they're gonna they're gonna claim that the detention of parents
Speaker 1: with children violates other laws. And then they're gonna say
Speaker 1: that if they keep the children beyond the detention phase
Speaker 1: uh that mandated in the Floristic consent decree, then they're gonna,
Speaker 1: you know, they're just they're gonna tie this up into
Speaker 1: legal knots. Ultimately, they just want everyone from Latin America
Speaker 1: wants to come to America to state that's it. Democrat
Speaker 1: voters line them up, bring them in that you will
Speaker 1: not hear Democrats say people should be turned away at
Speaker 1: the border because they will not be honest about it.
Speaker 1: By the way, there there was a CNN reporter um
Speaker 1: who was down there at the border asking border patrol agent,
Speaker 1: what is what is going on? And here is how
Speaker 1: some of that would I think I think the CNN
Speaker 1: was a little surprised here to actually get a bit
Speaker 1: of ground truth as to what's going on here. Here
Speaker 1: is what they they came upon. Play face. Don't think
Speaker 1: everybody understands what's actually happening down here. You have a
Speaker 1: lot of these kids that are coming here and put
Speaker 1: through through terrible, terrible situations by their parents, and all
Speaker 1: this can be avoided if they just go through the
Speaker 1: port of entry. If you guys have seen some of
Speaker 1: the stuff that we've seen down here, you would understand
Speaker 1: just how important it is to have a tough stance
Speaker 1: to divert people from coming here. When you see a
Speaker 1: twelve year old girl with a Plan B pill or
Speaker 1: with their their parents put around birth control because they
Speaker 1: know that getting violated as part of the journey. That's
Speaker 1: just a terrible way to live. That's right there. They're
Speaker 1: putting children in situations there being sexually abused so the
Speaker 1: parents get to come into America. That's where that Board
Speaker 1: of trol Agent just said, that's tough. That's almost parents,
Speaker 1: by the way. They're making those decisions, not the I mean,
Speaker 1: the abuse is obviously on the abuser, but they're making
Speaker 1: the decisions to put these kids in situations that are
Speaker 1: risky to their health, their safety. They're putting them in danger.
Speaker 1: And there are other ways, there are other ways to
Speaker 1: try to come to America, the other ways to do this,
Speaker 1: they're they are choosing to skip ahead and break the
Speaker 1: law because the Obama administration decided that it was better
Speaker 1: to just allow them to break the law than to
Speaker 1: enforce it. That's how we got into this current circumstances.
Speaker 1: But this word prologing continues on dropping some knowledge on CNN,
Speaker 1: which CNN obviously hates. Play fifteen. I can tell you
Speaker 1: with absolute certainty that they're being treated humanely, and nobody
Speaker 1: saves more lives along the southwestern border than the US
Speaker 1: Border Patrol. And these kids are traveling solo across two
Speaker 1: or three countries and when they get here, they're reunited
Speaker 1: with the families. And to me, that's mind blowing because
Speaker 1: you can't do that as the United States citizen. You
Speaker 1: can't send your your five year old kids to right
Speaker 1: on top of a train through three states and when
Speaker 1: they get there they're coming back to you. You'd get prosecuted. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's right, he's saying. It's child endangerment. Folks. We want
Speaker 1: to talking about child abuse. Telling you're you're eight year old,
Speaker 1: you know, go hop on this train and go link
Speaker 1: up with this you know, this coyote and and they'll
Speaker 1: bring you across the border and hopefully they won't leave
Speaker 1: in the border to dive exposure. Hopefully they won't sexually
Speaker 1: abuse you or sell you into slave trafficking and or
Speaker 1: human trafficking. That's child abuse. But oh, you know, we
Speaker 1: can't all the poor immigrants that everything. By the way,
Speaker 1: immigrant is a legal term. These are illegal aliens, folks.
Speaker 1: These are people who are breaking the law. We are
Speaker 1: losing sight of that in this whole process. Here's what
Speaker 1: Tom Cotton has sa they played nineteen. It's very important
Speaker 1: that we protect our border. If we cannot allow a
Speaker 1: child to be a get out of del free card
Speaker 1: and to get into the USS free ticket. But at
Speaker 1: the same time, as you said, as we've all said,
Speaker 1: we'd like to keep families together, keep them together at
Speaker 1: the border for the orderland time. We're processing of the
Speaker 1: adults immigration claim. If it's a lawful, legitimate claim, we
Speaker 1: can admit the family into the country. If not, they'll
Speaker 1: have to go back to their home country. That means deportation.
Speaker 1: That's what he's saying that. You know, the Congress is
Speaker 1: supposed to vote on this, I think tomorrow. Republican bills
Speaker 1: are being pushed around, right the good Lab good Lab bill,
Speaker 1: Costello bill, all this stuff, and and here's where that's going,
Speaker 1: absolutely nowhere. Democrats won't sign on for anything. Democrats have
Speaker 1: one focus and one focus only when it comes immigration amnesty.
Speaker 1: They want as many illegals as possible to stay in
Speaker 1: the country forever. They want you to have to pay
Speaker 1: for the goods and services that those illegals will rely
Speaker 1: upon in this country. And if you disagree with it,
Speaker 1: if you don't like it, they want to tell you
Speaker 1: you are a bigot, you're a xenophobe, you're a bad person,
Speaker 1: you hate babies, you hate foreigners. That's what That is
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party's position, whether it's official or not, I
Speaker 1: don't care, that is their position. Some of the Republicans
Speaker 1: on this aren't really all that much all that much
Speaker 1: better than than the Democrats. Like I gotta say, it's
Speaker 1: you cannot trust Paul Ryan on immigration. He is not
Speaker 1: good on this issue at all. Play Cliff twelve. Additional
Speaker 1: funding is possible to be made available sold that DHS
Speaker 1: has sufficient resources to house and care for families during
Speaker 1: this entire process. This is obviously something we discussed last
Speaker 1: night with the President at our conference, and I hope
Speaker 1: that we will be able to pass this tomorrow. Bottom
Speaker 1: line is this, we are going to take action to
Speaker 1: keep families together while we enforce our immigration laws. The
Speaker 1: problem is that this is a concession that one is
Speaker 1: not strictly speaking legal right. The executive order doesn't really
Speaker 1: change the laws as they exist in the books, and
Speaker 1: these whimsical utilizations of executive authority aren't a good way
Speaker 1: for any of these problems to be settled or solved,
Speaker 1: because it doesn't settle or solve them, just sets you
Speaker 1: up for the next executive come along and say no,
Speaker 1: I think it needs to be this way. I think
Speaker 1: we need to do it a different way. But Ryan
Speaker 1: and many of the Republicans out there, they talk about
Speaker 1: the laws, they talk about being tough on this. They
Speaker 1: want a huge expansion of guessworker programs. They want amnesty
Speaker 1: for the illegals who are already in the country. They
Speaker 1: are not that they're they're not concerned with what this
Speaker 1: will do to the political character of the United States.
Speaker 1: They're not concerned with anything other than what does the
Speaker 1: you know, the Chamber of Commerce and and what do
Speaker 1: the business interests, the donor class of the GOP. What
Speaker 1: do they want here? The answer is an endles supply
Speaker 1: of cheap labor. We keep hearing that the wages of
Speaker 1: American workers are not keeping up with inflation. They are stagnant. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: the country is getting wealthier and wealthier all the time.
Speaker 1: There is a wealth disparity here, my friends. I'm not
Speaker 1: gonna pretend that it's not a and a gap that
Speaker 1: is being aggravated all the time. Those who have capital
Speaker 1: and the means of growing capital versus those who are
Speaker 1: trying to make a living and get out of the
Speaker 1: lower rungs of the of the employment and wage scale.
Speaker 1: You know, try to pull themselves up. It's getting hard
Speaker 1: for them because when you have to compete with these
Speaker 1: vast pools of labor that have lower expectations for job
Speaker 1: uh for for wages, and and also you can get
Speaker 1: paid off the books in many cases, that's a huge advantage, right,
Speaker 1: the huge advantage for the employer. I don't they do
Speaker 1: with all that liability. If you're not gonna actually have
Speaker 1: enforcement actions where you can get in trouble for employing illegals, well,
Speaker 1: then you're going to see more of this, right, although
Speaker 1: I did see here that Immigrations and Customs enforcement has
Speaker 1: arrested according to the Daily Call, or a hundred people
Speaker 1: at a meat packing plan. You need interior enforcement too.
Speaker 1: This is not being discussed enough. If you want to
Speaker 1: shut down the incentives for legal immigration, INTERI enforcement has
Speaker 1: to be at the top of the list. You're never
Speaker 1: gonna be able to stay. Even if we got an
Speaker 1: amazing wall, the most beautiful wall that Trump could ever
Speaker 1: possibly build, it would not stop everyone from coming into
Speaker 1: the country. We would still have illegals, hundreds of thousands
Speaker 1: of them probably overstaying their visas. We have a half
Speaker 1: million visa over stays a year. I mean this is
Speaker 1: you know, people say, oh, we're not Europe. Actually, we
Speaker 1: had a big debate off camera at Brett Batters in
Speaker 1: front of a bunch of people, so I'm not portraying
Speaker 1: any confidence here and a lot of people in the
Speaker 1: room is it was public in that sense. We had
Speaker 1: a big debate with one of the panelists, Moraliason, who's
Speaker 1: from an NPR I think or something or one of
Speaker 1: those places. You know, she's front producer, Mike. I don't know,
Speaker 1: smart lady, but you know Democrat, and we have a
Speaker 1: big deba. She's saying, we're not Europe. We're not Europe.
Speaker 1: Where this huge country we can take in it. We
Speaker 1: have so much land, we can take in so many people,
Speaker 1: so much resources. And I said, yeah, but no one's
Speaker 1: saying we are Europe. But we see the dynamic happening
Speaker 1: in some of these European countries and we don't want
Speaker 1: to replicate that at the national or local level here.
Speaker 1: There there is a reason why people believe in national sovereignty.
Speaker 1: There's a reason why the political culture of a country
Speaker 1: is something that has to that can only be replicated
Speaker 1: by the people in that country, and that assimilation has
Speaker 1: to be a small percent requires immigrants to be a
Speaker 1: relatively small percentage of the overall population, and it takes time. Right,
Speaker 1: the americanization process is a beautiful thing. We do a
Speaker 1: better job with immigrants than any any other country in
Speaker 1: the world. You know, we we we love our legal
Speaker 1: immigrants now there. They are an essential part of the
Speaker 1: They are the American story in many many ways. I
Speaker 1: mean there were settlers as well before them, but that's
Speaker 1: legal immigrants. The twentieth century, post World War Two model
Speaker 1: of immigration has been we have a massive and growing
Speaker 1: welfare state, and also we're bringing in a lot of
Speaker 1: people from the Third World, a lot of people that
Speaker 1: have different cultural expectations for their society that we do,
Speaker 1: and that if you have enough of that over time,
Speaker 1: it can change the political character of a people. You know,
Speaker 1: make your own thought experiments with this too. You know,
Speaker 1: the Netherlands a relatively small country, fifteen or twenty million people,
Speaker 1: I think something like that in total. Do you bring
Speaker 1: in a million people from Iraq into the Netherlands. That
Speaker 1: changes things there? It's gonna feel like a little bit
Speaker 1: of a different country. I'm not saying the whole thing
Speaker 1: has gone and changed I'm not saying it's it's necessarily
Speaker 1: good or bad, but definitely a change. Are leadership class
Speaker 1: in this country or those who think they are the
Speaker 1: leadership class, you know, the Democrats and a lot of
Speaker 1: Republicans along with them, seem to be of the mind
Speaker 1: that there is nothing that there There is no change
Speaker 1: in the character of this nation that is going to
Speaker 1: result from having over ten million and who knows what
Speaker 1: the real number is fifteen million. I mean, people to
Speaker 1: keep telling me they know the number. I don't believe
Speaker 1: that in the number of immigrants from one other culture,
Speaker 1: Latin American culture, and predominantly one other country, which is Mexico.
Speaker 1: That's different than having an immigration policy bringing people in
Speaker 1: from all over the world that creates a massive political
Speaker 1: voting block. All right, and this is a country that
Speaker 1: we have, you know, differences of opinion with on trade
Speaker 1: and other things. I mean, you know, US, US and
Speaker 1: Mexico relationship is contentious in a number of ways. Cartels
Speaker 1: are flooding our streets with drugs, killing tens of thousands
Speaker 1: of Americans through overdoses every year. A tremendous amount of
Speaker 1: violence and corruption and poverty that we are dealing with
Speaker 1: that flows over our border from Mexico. And we have
Speaker 1: a very large voting block in this country now of
Speaker 1: people who are either immediately related to or tied to
Speaker 1: illegal immigrants, or just view illegal immigrants as a reflection
Speaker 1: of their own experience here. And the Democrats are exploiting
Speaker 1: that to the hilt. Is so shameless, but this is
Speaker 1: what they do because, Yeah, Nancy Pelosi really cares about
Speaker 1: illegal immigrants. I but she cares about them if they're,
Speaker 1: you know, doing her yard work for her. I'm sure
Speaker 1: she doesn't know their names. I mean, she cares about
Speaker 1: them doing manual labor for her. She wants to pay
Speaker 1: them very very little. But other than that, I promise
Speaker 1: you Nancy Pelosi does not care about illegal immigrants in
Speaker 1: any meaningful way, illegal aliens in any meaningful way. Um.
Speaker 1: And with that, I want to hear from some of you.
Speaker 1: We had a lot of lines lid. I gotta check
Speaker 1: and see what we got. Now, might have a spot
Speaker 1: or two open eight four four nine hundred buck eight
Speaker 1: eight to five. We are rocking, and let's talk about
Speaker 1: something no one's talking about. Do you know who the
Speaker 1: vast majority of these children are. They're not part of
Speaker 1: a family unit. These weren't children taken away from their parents.
Speaker 1: These are children that were smuggled into this country by
Speaker 1: criminal organizations. So these parents already separating themselves. That most
Speaker 1: of these kids get released to an illegal alien parent
Speaker 1: or relative here in the United States. The decision was
Speaker 1: made by that family to put that child in a
Speaker 1: trunk of a car or back from tractor trailer hire,
Speaker 1: criminal organization to transport that child to the United States.
Speaker 1: But the U. S governments a bad guy. We actually
Speaker 1: take pretty good care of these children that come in
Speaker 1: our custody. So that's thought that I thought, that's not
Speaker 1: being talked about. Who these children really are? There? You
Speaker 1: and Ah Ice for his former ice director home and
Speaker 1: are still acting, start acting and director home and talking
Speaker 1: about the situation. And we got a bunch of calls.
Speaker 1: I want to take some of them. John up in Alaska,
Speaker 1: Hey John, John going once, Hi, how you doing. I'm
Speaker 1: good John, Thank you for anyway. I came up with
Speaker 1: an idea that will work and we could do it
Speaker 1: today and we could then, um stop all people crossing
Speaker 1: the border. If we said we're going to build it
Speaker 1: as a building, then it becomes a construction site. If
Speaker 1: you have it just a wire fence, They're gonna break
Speaker 1: it to come in. You've got breaking and entering. They'll
Speaker 1: be felons and you can immediately deport them. You're talking
Speaker 1: about the wall, the wall, right, Okay, the wall built
Speaker 1: as a building as of today. If we said we're
Speaker 1: doing it, then anyone crossing the border could be arrested
Speaker 1: as a felon. All right, Thanks Matt, Thanks for calling
Speaker 1: in John Bill and West Virginia. What's up, hello, Bill? Hi,
Speaker 1: thanks for taking my call. Buck. Is there anything from
Speaker 1: stopping Trump from taking and sending troops to the southern
Speaker 1: border of Mexico trying to get into agree with Mexico
Speaker 1: and stopping them there? The law would be Mexico's law
Speaker 1: to handle them. Right, Well, if we if we militarize
Speaker 1: the border and had the what the National Guard doing
Speaker 1: border forces that were talking about in Mexico their at
Speaker 1: their southern border, waited Mexico's southern border. I'm getting confused. Say,
Speaker 1: we protect Korea's border, don't we in South Korea? So
Speaker 1: why why couldn't we protect Mexico's border get into agree
Speaker 1: with them. If they don't want to agree with then
Speaker 1: we tell Mexico. We're gonna put tarras on your stuff
Speaker 1: until you do agree to let us put troops on
Speaker 1: your southern border. Huh so like the border with Central
Speaker 1: American countries. One thing it is interesting about this is
Speaker 1: that Mexico has a very strict has very strict policies
Speaker 1: for its own immigration and who gets to stay and
Speaker 1: what happens if you over stay? Viasies. But Bill, thanks
Speaker 1: for calling it. From West Virginia. Bill was thinking outside
Speaker 1: the box there. I wasn't really able to follow all
Speaker 1: that close, but he was outside the box. Big our
Speaker 1: coming up our two summertime. If you want some gear
Speaker 1: that's really gonna turn head's gonna be comfortable. It's gonna
Speaker 1: represent your values and what you care about most. Nine
Speaker 1: Line a perilous for you, my friends. Nine Line is
Speaker 1: a veteran owned and operated patriotic lifestyle brand. They have
Speaker 1: lots of different styles and designs that are all about
Speaker 1: patriotism and love of country. They support the military, they
Speaker 1: support first responders. They also aren't aren't afraid to call
Speaker 1: out the lies of the left and do so with
Speaker 1: bold designs that celebrate their love of this country, their
Speaker 1: love of freedom, and their support for the troops. Go
Speaker 1: check them out for yourself. Nine Line Apparel offers a
Speaker 1: wide range of gear and accessories. Visit nine line apparel
Speaker 1: dot com and use the pupon code buck twenty off
Speaker 1: your next order. That's nine line apparel dot com coupon
Speaker 1: code buck two zero b U c K two zero.
Speaker 1: Use that at checkout at nine line apparel dot com.
Speaker 1: You'll get twenty percent off a great deal your next order.
Speaker 1: Buck sextons decoding the news and disseminating information who with
Speaker 1: actionable intelligence, make no mistakes American, You're a great American again.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show Activity Analyst, No welcome
Speaker 1: back to the Buck Sexton Show. Thank you for being here.
Speaker 1: It is an honor, it is a privilege. It is
Speaker 1: the best part of my day getting to hang out
Speaker 1: with all of you, So thank you very much for that.
Speaker 1: We are living in a time of anti Trump mass psychosis.
Speaker 1: That is my diagnosis of America right now. Eighties just
Speaker 1: like nothing else I've ever seen. I never imagined it
Speaker 1: could be this bad, and you're seeing it all over
Speaker 1: the place. I'll give you some examples just from today
Speaker 1: or last twenty four hours. This made the rounds a
Speaker 1: congressional intern saw that the president. Remember this is the president,
Speaker 1: United States. This is an intern. Okay, summer interns. So
Speaker 1: the President was meeting with Republican congressional leadership on the
Speaker 1: hill and decided that this was a chance to be
Speaker 1: a hashtag resistance hero and be wildly disrespectful to the
Speaker 1: commander in chief, to the dual elected president of these
Speaker 1: United States. This is what somebody who's spending their summer,
Speaker 1: at least it might be a congressional aid, which were
Speaker 1: even worse, but spending their summer in d C. To
Speaker 1: work in our nation's capital, in the Capitol Building, to
Speaker 1: learn about government, YadA YadA, all that stuff. Here's how
Speaker 1: that person acts when I think it's a she. I
Speaker 1: can't tell, but I'm assuming it's a she by the voice,
Speaker 1: uh sees the president in our capital building play the
Speaker 1: clip screaming it out across the capital. Mr President, f you.
Speaker 1: This is this is what being a hashtag resistance hero
Speaker 1: means these days. That's all it takes. Just be crass,
Speaker 1: be disrespectful, no honor, no decency, no integrity. Be a democrat,
Speaker 1: that's what's going on these days. Be a progressive revolutionary,
Speaker 1: just curse at people, treat them terribly because they disagree
Speaker 1: with you, act like they're subhuman, because they don't believe
Speaker 1: in a collectivist future determined for all of us by
Speaker 1: our betters in the elite media and academia and all
Speaker 1: the rest of it. There is a clear derangement. Trump's
Speaker 1: arrangement is a mass psychosis. As I've said, Uh, and
Speaker 1: we had another example is today from the act your
Speaker 1: I didn't I didn't even know. This guy was Peter Fonda,
Speaker 1: who said, of Baron Trump, who's like ten years old,
Speaker 1: I think ten or eleven years old, Actor Peter Fonda,
Speaker 1: from his official Twitter account, wrote quote, we should rip
Speaker 1: Baron Trump from his mother's arms and put him in
Speaker 1: a cage with pedophiles and see if mother will stand
Speaker 1: up against the giants a hole she is married to
Speaker 1: ninety million people in the streets on the same weekend
Speaker 1: in the country. Um, that's what this guy, Peter quote
Speaker 1: end quote. That's what this guy, Peter Fonda wrote. Yeah,
Speaker 1: locked the President United States son in a cage with
Speaker 1: pedophiles is what this guy writes. I mean, this is
Speaker 1: this is Does it sound like I'm overstating to call
Speaker 1: it psychotic? This is psychotic. These people have a problem.
Speaker 1: This is not this is not a reasonable disagreement. This
Speaker 1: is their sick sick in the head, and are willing
Speaker 1: to just seemingly say or do anything as long as
Speaker 1: it bashes the President United States, as long as it
Speaker 1: is a means of of hitting out at Trump, and
Speaker 1: Trump is um and and those of us who support Trump.
Speaker 1: This is getting uncomfortably. You know, Tucker Carlson tweeted something
Speaker 1: out last night that I thought was, you know, Tucker
Speaker 1: has been doing a really great job on his on
Speaker 1: his show lately, but this was particularly uh worthwhile sentiment.
Speaker 1: And I look, I think it it's I'm not gonna
Speaker 1: say it echoes what I do here. That might be
Speaker 1: a little self aggrandizing, but it's a similar sentiment to
Speaker 1: a lot of what I've been telling you. This is
Speaker 1: what he wrote on Twitter. What's on TV is a
Speaker 1: political tactic. This is about the whole immigration crisis, parents
Speaker 1: separation debate. What's on TV is a political tactic. But
Speaker 1: something else terrifying is going on. Formerly responsible people suddenly
Speaker 1: sound like extremists. The left no longer working to convince
Speaker 1: those who disagree. They're trying to destroy those in the way.
Speaker 1: It's not opposed, they're sincere. It's war. I don't think
Speaker 1: that's overstatement. I think we have entered an age of
Speaker 1: ideological and political warfare where all that matters is victory
Speaker 1: and vanquishing the other side, and that that means fellow
Speaker 1: Americans here, That's how the Democrats are approaching this, That's
Speaker 1: how the left is treating these issues of policy and
Speaker 1: and just the whole notion of a Trump presidency. And
Speaker 1: I'll tell you this. I I saw I was over
Speaker 1: at the White House today doing an interview and meeting
Speaker 1: with some folks, and I saw some CNN people over there.
Speaker 1: And I do like some people who work at CNN.
Speaker 1: I have some friends at CNN. I think that CNN
Speaker 1: is guilty of not just constant dishonesty. I think the
Speaker 1: whole venture is dishonest now because it is an extension
Speaker 1: of the Democratic National Committee, It's an extension of the
Speaker 1: hashtag resist stance and pretends to be an objective news organization,
Speaker 1: which is just laughable and a lie. But I also
Speaker 1: realized that the whole thing it makes me. They make
Speaker 1: me uncomfortable now in the sense that I don't want
Speaker 1: to talk to them. I don't want to talk to
Speaker 1: CNN folks about what I think is going on. I
Speaker 1: feel like I can't trust them because, with the exception
Speaker 1: of a few of my friends that I know well enough,
Speaker 1: but just you know, in casual, peer to peer professional conversation,
Speaker 1: because I think some of them have been infected by
Speaker 1: that same ideological virus that forces or that brings intern
Speaker 1: to yell f you to the president, that has pushed
Speaker 1: some celebrities to saying the most heinous things imaginable about
Speaker 1: the President, about the president's son, about the first lady,
Speaker 1: and and this is now breaking down the the basic
Speaker 1: camaraderie and sort of honor among journalist thieves that I
Speaker 1: think one would expect. I can't trust the CNN, Yeah,
Speaker 1: seeing an hashtag resistance squad, I can't tell them what
Speaker 1: I'm thinking, or what's going on or anything else, because
Speaker 1: they are treating this like a war. They are at
Speaker 1: war with the administration. That is that is a fact.
Speaker 1: CNN is trying to take down this administration and to
Speaker 1: end it. MSNBC is doing the same thing, but at
Speaker 1: least they're doing it from the you know, they're in uniform,
Speaker 1: so to speak. They are wearing the uniform of enemies
Speaker 1: of the administration. Fine, you know, we need to fight
Speaker 1: them and defeat them on the on the battlefield of
Speaker 1: ideas and communication. But CNN is that they're they're the
Speaker 1: thing they're saying, no, no, we're neutral war Switzerland. CNN
Speaker 1: is the is the news equivalent of Switzerland. That's like
Speaker 1: firing artillery shells in their next door neighbor all the time,
Speaker 1: like no, no, we're neutral or neutral. They're only attacking
Speaker 1: one other country, They're only fighting for one side, but
Speaker 1: they they pretend to be neutral. It's a gig that
Speaker 1: should get old very quickly, and any Americans paying attention
Speaker 1: should know what's really going on here. But people like
Speaker 1: the they like the myth, they like the delusion. They're
Speaker 1: like to buy into it. But but Tucker is right,
Speaker 1: this is now turned into any logical war. This is
Speaker 1: why I say that's then the enemy of truth. It's
Speaker 1: not just them, by the way, there's other networks to
Speaker 1: other publications. New York Times and Washington Post will not
Speaker 1: be happy no matter how many Emmy's are not Emmy's
Speaker 1: got I don't even know what these things are called pulletzers.
Speaker 1: Emmy's too. But no matter how many pulletzers they give themselves, uh,
Speaker 1: they won't be happy until they have finally gotten even
Speaker 1: with Trump. Only way to get even with Trump is
Speaker 1: to humiliate his supporters, Uh, make the culture so toxic
Speaker 1: that none of us can enjoy any peace and quiet
Speaker 1: if we support Trump, and to end his presidency, to
Speaker 1: bring it down. That's what they're trying to do, so
Speaker 1: very very troubling. I do want to talk to you
Speaker 1: with a little fall up about the United Nations from
Speaker 1: yesterday and how we're finally speaking truth to the U
Speaker 1: n which I think is a very very good thing.
Speaker 1: And then also I've got some thoughts on the Inspector
Speaker 1: General report. And in the third hour today we are
Speaker 1: going to get into all kinds of all kinds of
Speaker 1: fun stuff. It's gonna be amazing. I don't forget. By
Speaker 1: the way, we're putting up the Freedom Hut podcast, the
Speaker 1: Freedom Hup with Buck Sex, and please subscribe, please download it,
Speaker 1: share it. It's a huge vote of confidence for the show.
Speaker 1: If if all of you listening live across the country
Speaker 1: on radio or even on playback on this podcast, please
Speaker 1: download that podcast. It is different, it is new, it
Speaker 1: will be up tonight. We'll be right back in the office.
Speaker 1: Today at the Hill, some of the folks I work with, Sammy,
Speaker 1: they said, Buck, why aren't you using the coffee that
Speaker 1: we use? Because I was rifling through my k cups
Speaker 1: from Black Rifle Coffee, and I said, because I like
Speaker 1: delicious coffee and freedom, not into that comy swill that
Speaker 1: all the rest of you are drinking from nameless international
Speaker 1: conglomerate coffee co I'm all about the Black Rifle, my friends.
Speaker 1: Check it out for yourself. Go to Black Rifle Coffee
Speaker 1: dot com. Slash buck coupon code buck fifteen will get
Speaker 1: you fifteen percent off again. Black Rifle Coffee dot Com
Speaker 1: slash Buck coupon code buck one five. Silence are smooth
Speaker 1: these days, probably my favorite. But I'm also really into
Speaker 1: Freedom Blend. And there's also just caffeinated as f you'll
Speaker 1: see they've got all these different varieties, even decalf. If
Speaker 1: you want some decaf coffee, which I do on occasion.
Speaker 1: Black Rifle Coffee dot Com slash buck coupon code buck
Speaker 1: one five for fifty percent off. That's Black Rifle Coffee
Speaker 1: dot Com slash buck. President Trump wants to move the
Speaker 1: ball forward. From day one, he has called out institutions
Speaker 1: or countries who say one thing and do another. And
Speaker 1: that's precisely the problem at the Human Rights Council. There's
Speaker 1: a massive source of embarrassment to the United Nations that
Speaker 1: some governments with egregious human rights records sit on the
Speaker 1: Human Rights Council. We have no doubt that there was
Speaker 1: once a noble vision for this council, but today we
Speaker 1: need to be honest. The Human Rights Council is a
Speaker 1: poor defender of human rights. Worst than that, the Human
Speaker 1: Rights Council has become an exercise and shameless hypocrisy, with
Speaker 1: many of the world's worst human rights abuses going ignored
Speaker 1: and some of the world's most serious offenders sitting on
Speaker 1: the Council itself. The United States, which leads the world
Speaker 1: in humanitarian assistance and whose service members has sacrificed life
Speaker 1: and limb to free millions from oppression in tyranny, will
Speaker 1: not take lectures from hypocritical bodies and institution, as America's
Speaker 1: selflessly give their blood and treasure to help the defenseless.
Speaker 1: Love this statement today from Nicki Haley at the U
Speaker 1: n and and Secretary State Mike Pompeo. There are a
Speaker 1: dynamic duo on the foreign policy stage. I must say,
Speaker 1: doing a very good job. I was a supporter of
Speaker 1: Pompeo's I supported him in writing when he was up
Speaker 1: for the nomination for Secretary of State. And I think
Speaker 1: he's doing a great job so far. I'm I've got
Speaker 1: high hopes for him. But let's just think about this
Speaker 1: for a second. How is it controversial to pull out
Speaker 1: of the Human Rights count soul at the at the
Speaker 1: United Nations When when I I told you yesterday that
Speaker 1: NICKI Haley was given them warnings like stop stop all
Speaker 1: your Israel hating, stop all this stuff, and they wouldn't
Speaker 1: do it. And now you've got Haley and Pompeio saying
Speaker 1: that it's a cess pool of political bias. And I'm like, yes,
Speaker 1: it is a sesspool. But that is accurate, that is true.
Speaker 1: That is what is going on here. And so how
Speaker 1: is this such a shock? Oh my gosh, they're leaving
Speaker 1: the U on Human Rights Council. They used to call
Speaker 1: it the UN Human Rights Commission, as they told you,
Speaker 1: but they had to abandon it because it was such
Speaker 1: a joke. You know, this is this is craziness. Got
Speaker 1: these countries that have no, no reasonable expectation they should
Speaker 1: even be on any U N Council, Then I guess
Speaker 1: they're technically countries right doing such bad stuff. And you know,
Speaker 1: the Human Rights Council has forty forty seven member states
Speaker 1: task with upholding human rights? What does that even mean?
Speaker 1: One thing about the Trump era that I really like
Speaker 1: is we're allowed to ask questions that people used to
Speaker 1: say it is a dumb question, and now it's like, no, no, no,
Speaker 1: let's ask the question. Let's wait for an answer. Yeah,
Speaker 1: why why should we just accept Chinese trade policy and
Speaker 1: not do any In response? I want to hear an answer.
Speaker 1: Not true? Free trade is the best? Free trade is
Speaker 1: the okay, well, trade not free right now because China's
Speaker 1: got a whole bunch of tariffs in place, obviously, so
Speaker 1: what should we do? Free trade is the best free trade?
Speaker 1: You know? This is the This is the mantra. This
Speaker 1: is what's been going on at and with the United
Speaker 1: Nations because the left has unfortunately come to dominate academic
Speaker 1: foreign policy circles for a long time now. They have
Speaker 1: convinced people that anything that's you unrelated is worthwhile. That's
Speaker 1: not true about any that any multinational endeavor or major
Speaker 1: corporation or something. Not everything they do is worthwhile. Not
Speaker 1: everything that you want is up to we should be
Speaker 1: a part of. And if we dis prove, as we
Speaker 1: clearly do of what's been going on with the Human
Speaker 1: Rights Council, why wouldn't we step away from it? You know,
Speaker 1: I understand at some level people are probably like and
Speaker 1: you may be sitting there too, like, you know, Buck,
Speaker 1: who the heck cares? It's the u n right, Well,
Speaker 1: I just cared so far as it reflects the philosophy
Speaker 1: of the Trump administration and this particular era of politics
Speaker 1: we're in where we get to challenge the conventional wisdom.
Speaker 1: W we keep finding out time and again is the
Speaker 1: so called smart set, the conventional wisdom of those who
Speaker 1: would have laughed at Trump's positions on trade, on immigration,
Speaker 1: would have would have laughed at his notion that there
Speaker 1: could be a meeting and perhaps a new way forward.
Speaker 1: Kim Jong Owen. They are wrong again and again and again,
Speaker 1: and instead of having the capacity for self correction, the
Speaker 1: progressive laught and the coastal elites take this position of
Speaker 1: doubling down right, they go deeper into their echo chamber.
Speaker 1: They go further into their progressive bunker. They don't want
Speaker 1: to deal with the fact that's that they're baked in assumptions.
Speaker 1: The assumptions that they have held about a lot of
Speaker 1: issues are really assumptions that they have kept because of
Speaker 1: what they think it means for them personally. Right, you know,
Speaker 1: I'm believe in climate change because I'm a smart, good
Speaker 1: person who cares about the environment. Do you know any
Speaker 1: of that climate change? No, of course not. I believe
Speaker 1: in I believe in free trade because smart people say
Speaker 1: they're in favor of free trade. Okay, I'm in favorite
Speaker 1: free trade too. Do we have free trade right now
Speaker 1: in the country. No, we don't. So do you want
Speaker 1: to get beyond just saying I'm in favor of free trade,
Speaker 1: because that's a nonsense thing to say. Yeah, oh, you
Speaker 1: know other countries aren't sending us their best. Oh terrible,
Speaker 1: it's so racial, I can you say anything? Well, it
Speaker 1: turns out Canada, Australia, there are countries that have points
Speaker 1: systems in place and base their immigration on merit and
Speaker 1: trying to create an immigration system that benefit the citizens
Speaker 1: of the country already. Right, that puts you could say
Speaker 1: the interests of the citizens first, and not just the
Speaker 1: international community or the whole global order or whatever it
Speaker 1: is they want to call it. These are all positions.
Speaker 1: These are ideas that in a pre Trump era would
Speaker 1: have just been roundly mocked ridiculed. Now we're seeing that
Speaker 1: this is changing. It's changing all rounds, and the UN
Speaker 1: just another example of this. The UN is affectless bureaucracy.
Speaker 1: I know, people have worked there, It's been tons of
Speaker 1: time there. What is the u WN done that anyone
Speaker 1: can point you right now and say, yeah, that's okay.
Speaker 1: They do some charity in some places. Guess what, There
Speaker 1: are a lot of charities that do charity. What do
Speaker 1: you end for that they're The pathological hatred of the
Speaker 1: United Nations is really a blight on the international community
Speaker 1: because it shows us that. But the Muslim world is
Speaker 1: just still rife with anti Semitism. The Muslim world, not
Speaker 1: just a couple of countries here and there. There is
Speaker 1: far too much anti Semitism within Islam today. It is
Speaker 1: a really big problem. And anyone who says otherwise has
Speaker 1: not spent any time in Middle Eastern countries and talked
Speaker 1: to just you know, average folks in the street about
Speaker 1: if you heard what your average Cairo cab driver thinks
Speaker 1: about Jews, I think a lot of you would be
Speaker 1: really appauled. I'm always reminded of of the story that
Speaker 1: a friend of mine told me, uh years ago that
Speaker 1: he was at the movie And some of you have
Speaker 1: heard this before, so apologies for the digression, but so
Speaker 1: buddy of mine, who's also an Arabic speaker, spent a
Speaker 1: lot of time overseas and and left a center, not
Speaker 1: a not a conservative, but he was at the movie
Speaker 1: The Kingdom, which takes place in Saudi Arabia, and there
Speaker 1: is a sequence in the beginning the beginning of that
Speaker 1: movie that's really violent and and very jarring, where a
Speaker 1: terrorist cell attacks a an oil international oil compound, you
Speaker 1: know Americans and Brits uh, and it's just machine gunning men,
Speaker 1: women and children at a baseball at a softball game,
Speaker 1: at a picnic, and you know, explodes a bomb and
Speaker 1: they're just just mass murder of defenseless civilians. And my
Speaker 1: friend told me that he was in this theater in Cairo,
Speaker 1: and during that scene, the whole theater stood up and
Speaker 1: wildly cheered and clapped as Americans on screen, men, women
Speaker 1: and children were being mowed down with machine uns. Now.
Speaker 1: I know it's fiction. I know it's a movie, but
Speaker 1: come on, folks, there's something wrong there. There's there's a
Speaker 1: there's a real problem. And just like I'm telling you
Speaker 1: with Israel and the way that all these resolutions, whether
Speaker 1: it's in the Security Council of the Human Rights Council,
Speaker 1: there's such a focus on Israel, Israel, Israel, and it's
Speaker 1: because you have a lot you know, the Muslim world
Speaker 1: comprises a lot of states, dozens of states. They have
Speaker 1: created this narrative of international, internationally recognized victimology for the
Speaker 1: Palestinian people, and they just constantly pound on Israel and
Speaker 1: and you know we we shouldn't stand for it, and
Speaker 1: we're not going to stand for it. And also, by
Speaker 1: the way, pound on us. And you know they said
Speaker 1: I think they said something about our border too, and
Speaker 1: you know, like like we need to hear from any
Speaker 1: of these UN countries police step off. Okay, why don't
Speaker 1: you just say thanks for keeping the world a peaceful,
Speaker 1: prosperous place, and like make us a sandwich international community.
Speaker 1: America doesn't really need it, I don't really want to
Speaker 1: hear the garbage from countries that have more than their
Speaker 1: fair share problems or just don't carry much of of
Speaker 1: of of the weight of the international order at all either.
Speaker 1: As my thoughts on all that, I gotta talk to
Speaker 1: you about the uh So here here's what's going on.
Speaker 1: I've got a big interview coming up. I think tomorrow
Speaker 1: might be Friday, where I'm gonna get to ask some
Speaker 1: questions about what's going to happen with the Flynn interview.
Speaker 1: Information around that This could be one of the biggest
Speaker 1: This could be bigger than the IG report itself. This
Speaker 1: could be something that really blows a big hole in
Speaker 1: the whole of the deep state. If we can get
Speaker 1: this information, and I'm speaking to people that are in
Speaker 1: the process of trying to get it, we will get
Speaker 1: into some details in just a moment. He's back with
Speaker 1: you now, because when it comes to the fight for truth,
Speaker 1: the fuck never stops. You said last night, James Combe
Speaker 1: is going to jail. I believe he is. I believe
Speaker 1: Comey is honestly based on the way in which he
Speaker 1: initiated the probe with a illegal leak. I don't have
Speaker 1: no idea why hasn't been investigated about it before. Apparently
Speaker 1: he's being investigated now. The way in which he and
Speaker 1: McCabe have contradicted each other. Somebody's lying his deception about
Speaker 1: what he did with FBI three oh Two's that's a
Speaker 1: three or two the thing that he wrote. Uh, he's
Speaker 1: he's gone as a witness for anybody in anything with
Speaker 1: any credibility. It's hard enough to decide whether to indict
Speaker 1: or recommend some criminal action or re admend that somebody
Speaker 1: did something wrong. It's hard enough to do that when
Speaker 1: you've got a completely objective staff around you, when you
Speaker 1: have guys around you who are saying, stop the president.
Speaker 1: America must be saved. We have to stop him at
Speaker 1: all costs. You can't possibly trust that. I can't see
Speaker 1: a court allowing them. Uh, any our indictments to go forward,
Speaker 1: any reporter there is to be issued unless this gets solved.
Speaker 1: Rudy Giuliani is right when it comes to the trajectory
Speaker 1: of this investigation and and how the deep state rats
Speaker 1: are running from the ship. Folks. They are running for
Speaker 1: cover because we are finding out just how corrupt they
Speaker 1: really were. Uh. This notion that James Comey should be
Speaker 1: that any of his work on the investigations haven't do
Speaker 1: with Hillary Clinton's email or Russia collusion. How could we
Speaker 1: trust anything he's done? How can we give him the
Speaker 1: benefit of the doubt based on what we know not
Speaker 1: just from this i G report, but from everything his
Speaker 1: actions in the press and the public eye. Uh, he's
Speaker 1: obviously a very strange fellow. I think he's obviously also
Speaker 1: a quite dishonest and dishonorable fellow. And we are seeing
Speaker 1: it emerged here that there was a senior cabal. I
Speaker 1: said this months and months and months ago. In fact,
Speaker 1: I can tell you I used the word cabal on TV,
Speaker 1: and later on I heard that the White House won't
Speaker 1: say who exactly, but give you one guess. I was like,
Speaker 1: that's right, that's the word cabal. They liked it because
Speaker 1: it was true. It's not about all the FBI. It's
Speaker 1: not about hiding among the rank and file and acting
Speaker 1: like this is a war on the FBI. It is
Speaker 1: about finding out the truth about who trying to stop
Speaker 1: Trump from being president and who wanted to bail Hillary
Speaker 1: out and make her president. Now there's something else, though,
Speaker 1: that I think is going to be explosive when it
Speaker 1: hits I can tell you that we are. We're scheduled
Speaker 1: on my TV show, which is Hill dot T the
Speaker 1: slash Rising for those who haven't seen it yet, Rising
Speaker 1: is the show I can tell you that we are
Speaker 1: supposed to have on Mark Meadows, who is the Freedom
Speaker 1: Caucus Chair, to talk about a number of issues relating
Speaker 1: this investigation, but specifically the Flynn guilty plea and what
Speaker 1: happened around it. Because here's what we're here's what we
Speaker 1: need to know. The FBI three O two's right. The
Speaker 1: FBI three O two is are the handwritten record of
Speaker 1: the meetings that they conduct, the field meetings that the
Speaker 1: FBI is conduct, and they do not want to share
Speaker 1: the three O two from the Flynn investigation with Congress.
Speaker 1: And here's what I'm hearing from my sources. Okay, And
Speaker 1: and now I'm down here in the swamp, folks, this
Speaker 1: is a whole new layer, whole new chapter in the
Speaker 1: Freedom hot saga. Because I was over at the White
Speaker 1: House earlier today, I'm I'm leveraging. I love New York.
Speaker 1: I missed New York. And for those of you who
Speaker 1: live in in Austin or Charleston or any number of
Speaker 1: places across the country. I'd rather be, you know, hanging
Speaker 1: out with you in your city than here in the
Speaker 1: Deep State. I'm just I'm I never can get really
Speaker 1: comfortable in d C. But I'm leveraging this as best
Speaker 1: I can so that I have the best information possible
Speaker 1: to bring to you and to bring to life for
Speaker 1: the sake of the country. And when I'm hearing and
Speaker 1: some of this has already been reported on a bit,
Speaker 1: but I'm telling you I've got greater confirmation of it
Speaker 1: from my own sources, is that the FBI agent who
Speaker 1: conducted the interview with Flynn wants to come forward. The
Speaker 1: FBI agent who was the one involved in the actual
Speaker 1: sitting not struck right that there was another one, a
Speaker 1: career FBI agent. He wants to come forward, And they're
Speaker 1: they're playing all kinds of games that d o J
Speaker 1: and FBI to parenth this from happening. Because here's what
Speaker 1: I think we would find out if we got to
Speaker 1: see those Remember three oh two is the written account
Speaker 1: of the meeting in this case, the meeting with General
Speaker 1: Michael Flynn, incoming National Security Advisor. Flynn when they did
Speaker 1: not think the agent sitting in with him did not
Speaker 1: think that he lied, and then it looks like likely McCabe,
Speaker 1: although we don't know that yet, came out and said no, no,
Speaker 1: you gotta throw a one zero zero one charge at him.
Speaker 1: Whether it was McCabe or Muller, somebody from the top
Speaker 1: level came along and decided to reevaluate Flynn's statement of
Speaker 1: as flynn statements around the Serrogey Ambassador Sergey kisel yat
Speaker 1: call and decided they could get him with a prosecution. Folks,
Speaker 1: I know I'm getting into the weeds a little here,
Speaker 1: but let's just speak plainly. We may be finding out soon,
Speaker 1: and I believe we will find out beyond any reasonable
Speaker 1: doubt that they did Flynn dirty, that some of these
Speaker 1: deep state elements wanted to take Flynn down send a
Speaker 1: message to all the rest of them, and figured that
Speaker 1: they could get Flynn and Mana Ford and others to
Speaker 1: roll on Trump and his people. And before anybody would
Speaker 1: be the wiser about the aggressive tactics, the unethical tactics
Speaker 1: they used, they would have already taken out all the
Speaker 1: people with prosecutions that they need to so that you know,
Speaker 1: they look, this is all about revenge against Trump for
Speaker 1: Hillary and and also stopping what many people in the
Speaker 1: bureaucracy seem to think is a an existential threat to there,
Speaker 1: you know, their sense of their role in the country
Speaker 1: and their power. And the same reason the media hates
Speaker 1: this guy so much, there's every reason that that so
Speaker 1: many the journalists, overpaid, pamper journalists have just completely lost
Speaker 1: their minds over this whole situation. Right, think about this.
Speaker 1: We may find out soon we're I'm gonna have Mark
Speaker 1: Meadows on, I'm gonna ask him, and I'm gonna also
Speaker 1: keep pulsing my sources. It's great too, because people like, yeah, Buck,
Speaker 1: I think I can trust you because you know you
Speaker 1: used I'm like yeah, because I was c I A.
Speaker 1: And it's like, no, no, no, that's not why. They
Speaker 1: just know they can trust me. And it's true. Right.
Speaker 1: My whole thing about about sources and source protection is
Speaker 1: i've i've I'm used to thinking of that as as
Speaker 1: an honor issue, never mind a professional issue, as a
Speaker 1: safety issue too. So people will talk to me about stuff,
Speaker 1: and I'm getting some great info down here, folks. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna be able to you know. It's it's really cool
Speaker 1: that I'm partnering up here with the Hill and doing
Speaker 1: this show because we're gonna be breaking big stories the
Speaker 1: network that we've been able to put together. Look at
Speaker 1: the network that I have here from my previous time eremember,
Speaker 1: I used to live in the swamp. I used to
Speaker 1: be a d C creature for years. Some of my folks,
Speaker 1: some of the folks that I knew back then, I'm
Speaker 1: quite quite close with. They have now risen in government.
Speaker 1: They are rather prominent and powerful in the government. And
Speaker 1: they know that I'm a patriot, I love this country,
Speaker 1: I'm trustworthy, I'm a man of honor, and they want
Speaker 1: to make sure that I know what's going on. So
Speaker 1: that's the upside to my swamp adventure so far. And
Speaker 1: anyway with with Mark Meadows, and this will be I
Speaker 1: believe either tomorrow or the or tomorrow or Friday on rising.
Speaker 1: But with Mark Meadows, I think we're gonna be able
Speaker 1: to ask him, you know, are we gonna get the answers?
Speaker 1: Will Congress subpoena whoever the FBI agents were in the
Speaker 1: room with Flynn and their assessment initially, and can we
Speaker 1: find out whether it was McCabe or Mueller who came
Speaker 1: along and said, you've got to charge that guy. You know,
Speaker 1: you have to bring a felony perjury charge against General
Speaker 1: Flynn and why that decision was made and how it
Speaker 1: was made because and if we find out that that
Speaker 1: was a political hit, friends, we are gonna go bonkers
Speaker 1: as we should, as we should. The Deep States getting
Speaker 1: scared on this one, I think, as they should. Shame, shame,
Speaker 1: same same, same shame. Deportation, thousand children separated from their
Speaker 1: So that was last night. Because you have these uh,
Speaker 1: these imbeciles that called themselves the Democratic Socialists of DC
Speaker 1: or something like that, who wouldn't allow DHS Secretary Kirsten
Speaker 1: Nielsen to sit down and have dinner at a restaurant
Speaker 1: here in d C, right mere blocks from where I'm
Speaker 1: doing this broadcast. Right now, folks, I'm writing the swamp.
Speaker 1: I thought I was in the thick of it when
Speaker 1: I was in New York City. Let me tell you
Speaker 1: it is way worth of the progressive insanities, way worse here,
Speaker 1: at least New York. There's a lot of capitalists, you know,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of commerce in d C. Everybody thinks.
Speaker 1: Everybody thinks that they're you know, gonna be a combination
Speaker 1: of George Clooney, Stephen Colbert and like a civil rights hero,
Speaker 1: you know that they're just all gonna be some big deal.
Speaker 1: Their policies matter, their opinions matter, and activism has become
Speaker 1: a lifestyle anyway. So Nielsen sat down last night to
Speaker 1: have dinner restaurant and this this group called Metro DC
Speaker 1: Democratic Socialists of America. You heard them. They're chanting shame, shame,
Speaker 1: shame at her. Uh And I just have to say
Speaker 1: that they're idiots. I hate when people do this. I
Speaker 1: hate this notion that, you know, a public figure is
Speaker 1: not allowed to have private time. It's such a childish,
Speaker 1: disgraceful thing to do, really is It's it tells you
Speaker 1: all you need to know about the people that hold
Speaker 1: these positions that they would shout down others. So it's
Speaker 1: a woman, you know, this is a mob all essentially
Speaker 1: that forms in this restaurant. They tracked her down and
Speaker 1: a mob forms and starts yelling at her. Well, she's
Speaker 1: trying to have dinner, I mean, is she not allowed
Speaker 1: to eat either? There are lines here, folks, right, we
Speaker 1: all know what they are. There are lines of decorum,
Speaker 1: in decency, and the left just doesn't obey any of them.
Speaker 1: And this is why I don't want to hear it
Speaker 1: when they say, oh, Trump used a bad word. Yeah,
Speaker 1: get your left wing psychopaths in line Democrat party, you know,
Speaker 1: tell the Democratic Socialists of the Metro DC area to
Speaker 1: do something worthwhile with her times and show some show
Speaker 1: some class, show some dignity. There's so many ways now
Speaker 1: to have your message heard. You know, you can organize online,
Speaker 1: have your protest, do whatever you want, but don't hound
Speaker 1: and harass somebody. Remember this wasn't a press conference, This
Speaker 1: wasn't this was like she's sitting down to have dinner
Speaker 1: in d C. And you know this one day might
Speaker 1: feel a little personal for me because you know, I
Speaker 1: gotta tell you if I'm on my own time and
Speaker 1: somebody recognizes me from conservative media world, which you know,
Speaker 1: all these progressives don't really watch one's conservative media. But
Speaker 1: I'm gonna tell you right now, I'm I'm not gonna
Speaker 1: deal very well with people trying to harass me in public.
Speaker 1: And you know, and I wouldn't deal well with seeing
Speaker 1: others who are either part of the administration or are
Speaker 1: part of spreading the conservative message, seeing them be harassed
Speaker 1: and attacked and and treated as though they don't get
Speaker 1: to have any any rights, any any sense of of
Speaker 1: peace and and quiet. You know, they were yelling at Nielsen,
Speaker 1: how dare you spend your evening here eating dinner as
Speaker 1: your complicit in this separation uh and and deportation of
Speaker 1: thousands of of of ten thousand children separated from their
Speaker 1: parents when protests are yelled, How can you enjoy a
Speaker 1: Mexican dinner as you're deporting and imprisoning tens of thousands
Speaker 1: of people come here seeking a sound in the United States.
Speaker 1: By the way, a handful of other diners saw this
Speaker 1: happening and clapped for them. I I know that they
Speaker 1: aren't listening to this. They're probably busy, you know, watching
Speaker 1: MSNBC and watching all that garbage, or or they watch
Speaker 1: CNN because I think they watch real journalists. This is
Speaker 1: the funny you've seen. And people watch CNN because they
Speaker 1: think they're smart, and that's what smart people watch, because
Speaker 1: they're real journalists. But what I say is that the
Speaker 1: people watch CNN and believe that are just too stupid
Speaker 1: to realize that CNN is actually a Democrat partisan hack outfit.
Speaker 1: So that's the irony of that situation. But you know
Speaker 1: this is there are people in that restaurant who were
Speaker 1: cheering for these these imbeciles. These protesters were live streaming this,
Speaker 1: putting it out there and anything else. And then you
Speaker 1: have the idiot brigade that chimes in here too. So
Speaker 1: in response to this tweet, DHS Secretary Nielson just got
Speaker 1: driven out of a Mexican restaurant here on fourteen Street
Speaker 1: by activists and Anna Navarro rights, are there non Norwegian
Speaker 1: restaurants in Washington, d C? What a bizarre, idiotic thing
Speaker 1: to say. I mean, I've said this, Anna Navarro, I
Speaker 1: think maybe the dumbest person on television who is paid
Speaker 1: to give opinions on things. She's definitely in a in
Speaker 1: a very specific subset of Wow, you have nothing of
Speaker 1: intelligence or worth to say whatsoever. But she plays a character.
Speaker 1: She plays a role in CNN loves to have her
Speaker 1: go and attack people and just you know this is
Speaker 1: and they let her, they let her run. While on
Speaker 1: TV men she can do whatever she wants, say whatever
Speaker 1: she wants. Among the most unpleasant people off camera. Also
Speaker 1: I've ever dealt with in television. You know, has a
Speaker 1: very high self regard and a very very small degree
Speaker 1: of intellectual merit on matters of politics and policy. So anyway,
Speaker 1: Byron York, who is smart and a good writer and
Speaker 1: has things to say, wrote meanwhile CNNs Anna Navarro suggests Nielsen,
Speaker 1: a Florida native, should stick to her own at tthnicity
Speaker 1: and choosing restaurants. Byron's spot on here that that is
Speaker 1: what on a Navarro did. She said, why can't Nielsen?
Speaker 1: Basically she said, are there no Norwegian restaurants in Washington,
Speaker 1: d C? So now, if you believe in law and order,
Speaker 1: remember Navarro is a well paid, highly publicized CNN. I
Speaker 1: don't know what she's not an expert. I guess she
Speaker 1: said she's pundit doesn't she has expertise in nothing, expertise
Speaker 1: in saying how much she loves Jeb Bush and bashing Trump. Right,
Speaker 1: that's about it. And she she says this and then
Speaker 1: doesn't have to stand up, you know, stand up for it.
Speaker 1: Everything else she claimed that. You know, Byron York must
Speaker 1: have missed whatever. You know, she says she was not
Speaker 1: referring to Kirsten Nielsen's ethnicity in are there no Norwegian
Speaker 1: restaurants in Washington, d C? Tweet? Ah, you know, just
Speaker 1: such a stupid thing to say, but I think it's
Speaker 1: reflective of a broader mentality now too. You know, they
Speaker 1: there's a kind of left wing illegal pro illegal alien
Speaker 1: absolutism that is creeping into discourse now. And I just
Speaker 1: want the I just want the Democrat Party to have
Speaker 1: to finally be honest about the fact that they are
Speaker 1: an open borders party. That is what I want. That's
Speaker 1: my request at this point. Just say what you are,
Speaker 1: Admit that you want open borders, that is your preference,
Speaker 1: that is the policy that you want, and then we
Speaker 1: can have a discussion because what they leave is with
Speaker 1: otherwise is what we've got now, where oh we're gonna
Speaker 1: leave laws in the books, but don't enforce them. If
Speaker 1: you enforce them, you're a bad person, and we won't
Speaker 1: let you change them. We won't let you change them.
Speaker 1: Modern Democratic Party Democratic Party today is just is a
Speaker 1: complete joke. Unfortunately, it's a dangerous joke that I think
Speaker 1: is doing a lot of very bad things too the country.
Speaker 1: But it is it is a It is a joke,
Speaker 1: um and and a bad one of that. So anyway, man,
Speaker 1: you can tell that's definitely annoyed me. It's it's tough
Speaker 1: not to see this as a conservative. Look, I know
Speaker 1: I'm not the DHS secretary, I get it right. I'm
Speaker 1: not trying to get too big for my bridges here,
Speaker 1: But as a conservative, you feel like so at some point,
Speaker 1: if if my career grows, or if if my friends
Speaker 1: that work in media were out and some of them
Speaker 1: are very recognizable, some of the ones that I hang
Speaker 1: out with, people would know who they are. Would I
Speaker 1: be able to sit down and have a dinner and
Speaker 1: have a chat with that without you know, Antifa showing
Speaker 1: up and trying to ruin everything. I think that's a
Speaker 1: fair question. Or the Democrats, Socialists at DC or whatever
Speaker 1: these complete buffoons call themselves. All our three is coming
Speaker 1: up to you. Stay with buck Sexton, permission to coding
Speaker 1: the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake,
Speaker 1: American Great, You're a great American again. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show. Analysts, No, the Southern Powerty Law Center
Speaker 1: was wrong to include magged Noirs and Aquilliam Foundation and
Speaker 1: our Field Guide to anti Muslim extremists. Since we published
Speaker 1: the Field Guide, we have taken the time to do
Speaker 1: more research and have consulted with human rights advocates we respect.
Speaker 1: We've found that mister Noah's and Quilliam have made it
Speaker 1: valuable and important contributions to public discourse, including by promoting
Speaker 1: pluralism and condemning both anti Muslim bigotry and Islamist extremism.
Speaker 1: Although we may have our differences with some of the
Speaker 1: positions that Mr NOAs and Aquillium have taken, they are
Speaker 1: most certainly not anti Muslim extremists. We would like to
Speaker 1: extend our sincerest apologies to Mr NOAs, Quilliam and our
Speaker 1: readers for the era, and we wish Mr Noa's and
Speaker 1: Quillium all the best. Apology not accepted, your jerks, I'll
Speaker 1: say that on behalf of so let me let me
Speaker 1: take a step back, your folks. This is important. The
Speaker 1: goes This goes to the heart of one of the
Speaker 1: issues that we talked about here on the show Night
Speaker 1: after Night, which is that the left is engaged in
Speaker 1: a campaign to destroy the political opposition. They can't convince
Speaker 1: the American people to go along with them. They can't
Speaker 1: actually persuade enough Americans to their side of the debate,
Speaker 1: so they're just on a search and destroy mission for heretics.
Speaker 1: As I would say, they're not looking for converts, They're
Speaker 1: hunting for heretics. Southern Poverty Law Center is a lean,
Speaker 1: mean smear machine, an absolute disgrace, and it's sited although
Speaker 1: see you know, oh Southern Poverty Law Center says this, Oh,
Speaker 1: Southern Poverty Law Center says that. I don't give a
Speaker 1: crap with the Southern Poverty Law Center says about anything
Speaker 1: these days, because they are completely and utterly indefensible when
Speaker 1: it comes to some of their designations. They so so
Speaker 1: this is also now this is coming to light because
Speaker 1: not only have they gone after mont Noias, who is
Speaker 1: a former Islamic radical who I I've interviewed, I've done
Speaker 1: shows with him, very astute, cerebral guy. Actually also I
Speaker 1: believe kind of a liberal on most issues. But Magic
Speaker 1: will go around and say, no, the creative Islam is
Speaker 1: a problem for us here, folks. Not all Muslims are
Speaker 1: a problem, but some Muslims take the creed and use
Speaker 1: that to become a very big problem. So Magic is
Speaker 1: just honest about this stuff, and they hate him for it,
Speaker 1: you know, they want to destroy him because of his
Speaker 1: honesty and because he confronts them with a guy who
Speaker 1: is brown Muslim or you know, it's kind of becoming
Speaker 1: something of a a critic of the faith obviously. Uh
Speaker 1: and and understands what he's talking about when it comes
Speaker 1: to the Koran and radical Islam. A former radical himself.
Speaker 1: They as was said there by the I don't know
Speaker 1: who that guy was, is the the CEO or the
Speaker 1: general counsel. I don't know who that guy is. But
Speaker 1: that was an official statement from the Southern Poverty Law Center.
Speaker 1: They've also included Sam Harris is you don't know, has
Speaker 1: a podcast called Waking Up and you know he's a
Speaker 1: neuroscientist also a liberal and a lot of policy issues,
Speaker 1: but we'll have the difficult conversations about what science tells
Speaker 1: us that social scientists want to pretend doesn't happen, isn't real.
Speaker 1: Sam Harris was mentioned in the Southern Property Law Center,
Speaker 1: which is a site that will track storm Front and
Speaker 1: these other true extremist groups. He was mentioned because he
Speaker 1: spoke to Charles Murray, who is a the author of
Speaker 1: the Bell Curve and it's just written scholarly work on
Speaker 1: i Q testing and what i Q tells us about
Speaker 1: social policy. Here's a hint. It drives the progressive left
Speaker 1: completely up the wall. I mean, they lose their minds
Speaker 1: when you start looking at the luminous data on i
Speaker 1: Q testing and what the the the relevance to aggregate
Speaker 1: life outcomes and i Q testing as it affects different groups.
Speaker 1: Here here's a headline for you from Charles Murray's book.
Speaker 1: Highest highest i Q of any group test in Oshkenazi Jews.
Speaker 1: So also Asians have a particularly high i Q in
Speaker 1: the aggregate. But you know they you know, you talked
Speaker 1: about that, and people are, oh, they start to get
Speaker 1: really uncomfortable. So they put Sam Harris on the Southern
Speaker 1: Poverty Law Center as being kind of close to or
Speaker 1: or talking about um extreme extremism, uh doing things that
Speaker 1: you know I on her cy l E also another
Speaker 1: critic of Islam. Essentially, if you become an enemy of
Speaker 1: leftist orthodoxy, this organization, the Southern Property Law Center, which
Speaker 1: claims to be about combating bigotry and and promoting and
Speaker 1: protecting civil rights and and fighting against racism, has just
Speaker 1: become an attack dog organization for the left. And now
Speaker 1: the reason they had that statement. By the way, the
Speaker 1: press doesn't want to talk about this because they love
Speaker 1: quoting a Southern Property Law Center. It's just a fake
Speaker 1: objective left wing ideological attacks site right pretends to be objective.
Speaker 1: SPLC wrote a three or it has to write a
Speaker 1: three point four million dollar check for defamation. Two mog
Speaker 1: NOAs for including him. Here's what they said. Former Islamist
Speaker 1: and self described counter extremist Magas appeared in the SPLC
Speaker 1: Field Guide to Anti Muslim Extremists for using his platform
Speaker 1: to savage Islam. Okay, those are quotes, folks. So now
Speaker 1: if you criticize Islam, SPLC might say you're an anti
Speaker 1: Muslim extremist even if you're a Muslim, and they'll put
Speaker 1: you on the same site where you know, we generally
Speaker 1: think of like the clan and neo Nazis and oh
Speaker 1: but it's not just Magied. As I said I on
Speaker 1: her C L Eves woman, an incredible personal story. If
Speaker 1: you have not read the book Infidel, and I've said
Speaker 1: this on the show many times over the years, please
Speaker 1: please get a copy of Infudel. Read it cover to cover.
Speaker 1: It is a fantastic autobiography, tough to read in some
Speaker 1: parts in terms of the the subject matter. It's really
Speaker 1: it really affect you to really bother you, but you
Speaker 1: should know the story. She's an incredible woman, brilliant, and
Speaker 1: the Left hates her because she is black. She is
Speaker 1: a former Muslim, and she goes to town on Yes,
Speaker 1: radical Islam, but also the Islamic faith is it's practiced
Speaker 1: by far too many people today. So she is a
Speaker 1: threat to the notion that the diversity obsessed left uses
Speaker 1: that all religions are the same, all religions are equally problematic,
Speaker 1: and and all the rest of it. But other groups
Speaker 1: that the Southern Property Law Center is going after. The
Speaker 1: Family Research Council, which is a Christian nonprofit, has been
Speaker 1: classified as a hate group, okay, a hate group because
Speaker 1: of its stands about gay marriage, and in fact, in
Speaker 1: they don't talk about this much, do they. A gunman
Speaker 1: who read on the Southern Poverty Law Center's website that
Speaker 1: the Family Research Council was a hate group went up
Speaker 1: and shot up the groups headquarters in d C. That's right,
Speaker 1: SPLC created a violent extremist, isn't that interesting? The Center
Speaker 1: for Immigration Studies Mark Ricreyan, a frequent guest on this show.
Speaker 1: Mark Coreyan and his group have been targeted by the
Speaker 1: Southern Poverty smear Center, which is what we should call
Speaker 1: it from now on the Southern Poverty Smear Center. Uh
Speaker 1: and and then I also mentioned I on her cy
Speaker 1: l E. It is it is just absolutely appalling at
Speaker 1: this group, by the way, has raised over three hundred
Speaker 1: million dollars. Okay, it is a scam. It is not
Speaker 1: what it says it is, and it is a left
Speaker 1: wing attack group that needs to be confronted. And you know,
Speaker 1: any news organization that starts, you know that, that that
Speaker 1: puts this in articles that will cite Southern Property Loss
Speaker 1: Center articles is being either either they're just ignorant or
Speaker 1: being deeply disingenuous. And I'm just happy to finally see
Speaker 1: that there is some degree of uh, some degree of
Speaker 1: justice that is coming after a long time for this group.
Speaker 1: That is the thing is they're a hate group. And
Speaker 1: the Southern Poverty Law Center says that they track hate groups,
Speaker 1: but they have become a hate group. They are hateful
Speaker 1: toward Christians, They're hateful toward those who are critical of Islam.
Speaker 1: They are hateful toward conservatism and conservative values and conservative values.
Speaker 1: And I so that's why I said, you know, I
Speaker 1: do not accept the apology of their whoever that was
Speaker 1: I think it was their director. But it doesn't really matter,
Speaker 1: you know, I do not accept it. Um, they should
Speaker 1: be ashamed and they should be held in they should
Speaker 1: be held in contempt. The Southern Poverty Law Centers should
Speaker 1: be held in contempt by all people of goodwill and
Speaker 1: good faith across the country. It is a it is
Speaker 1: a a lie as an organization, and um, you know
Speaker 1: what's next on the list, folks, gotta gotta take down
Speaker 1: Media Matters, and Media Matters is a disgrace, and Media
Speaker 1: Matters tries to end careers, tries to put people out
Speaker 1: of work based on ideology, and it's also operating really
Speaker 1: as a fraud. It pretends to be a public education
Speaker 1: foundation when it's just a it's really a pack it's
Speaker 1: political action committee and it's good goes it's it's a
Speaker 1: dirty tricks outfit at that it goes after people. And
Speaker 1: you know, Media Matters, I think it falls under the
Speaker 1: category of a five oh one C four. Uh so
Speaker 1: it's a it's a non profit on top of everything else,
Speaker 1: you know, you know, I'm sorry, it's an I R
Speaker 1: S tax exempt five oh one C three organization that
Speaker 1: all all it does is just malign conservatives engage in
Speaker 1: constant character assassination, and it is just a giant, steamy
Speaker 1: pile of rhinoceros crap. Okay, that's what That's what media
Speaker 1: matters is. Let's be honest. Most alarmed companies stink. They
Speaker 1: try to lock you in a long term contracts, get
Speaker 1: all kinds of stuff in the fine print, and they
Speaker 1: don't even provide you with the kind of hands on, digital,
Speaker 1: all encompassing security service that you need and want. That's
Speaker 1: why you should just put all that aside and go
Speaker 1: with simply Safe. Simply Safe is the best in home security.
Speaker 1: They work hard to earn their customers business, and instead
Speaker 1: of relying on tricks and fine print, they treat you right.
Speaker 1: They rely on good service and a great product to
Speaker 1: earn your business. I've got simply Safe at home, and
Speaker 1: I can tell you it is so easy to use,
Speaker 1: so user friendly, and there are thousands and thousands of
Speaker 1: reviews online. You can check out for yourself about what
Speaker 1: a great company this is and how easy to use
Speaker 1: their home security system is that simply safe dot com
Speaker 1: slash buck. Go check it out simply safe dot com,
Speaker 1: slash buck to protect your home and family with an
Speaker 1: A plus security system, simply Safe, s I M p
Speaker 1: l I Safe dot Com, slash buck. We can call
Speaker 1: this the anatomy of a CNN ambush. This is how
Speaker 1: they do things over there. I got caught in many
Speaker 1: a CNN ambush in my day. They pretend they invite
Speaker 1: you on as a conservative to have a discussion about
Speaker 1: a topic, when in reality, the host is going to
Speaker 1: box you in, not let you refute any of the points.
Speaker 1: It's gonna turn weirdly personal, and you're actually there as
Speaker 1: a conservative just to have fake news. CNN pretend to
Speaker 1: be having a balanced conversation with reality. You're a clay pigeon.
Speaker 1: You're just there to get blown out of the sky.
Speaker 1: So here's how the setup works. You've got David Gurgan
Speaker 1: sure enough, although he won't be in this clip. I
Speaker 1: know you're sad. You're sad, Immigrants, niction, Reagan administration, nicon
Speaker 1: for earn fake news. That entire cover story has unraveled
Speaker 1: in forty eight hours, and now we're left with an administration.
Speaker 1: I mean, what's different about this administration from Johnson and Nixon?
Speaker 1: There is gurgling mcgregan baby anyway, Uh, Steve Cortez who
Speaker 1: used to be a Fox contributor now he's over at
Speaker 1: CNN a lot. And Maria Cardona, who's always very clear
Speaker 1: to make sure she pronounced it Cardonna, just because that's
Speaker 1: how she tends to pronounce it, and she'll remind everybody.
Speaker 1: And she's an immigrant. And I used to occasionally debate
Speaker 1: Maria and she is a straight up, rude, talking points machine,
Speaker 1: without a single ounce of intellectual hefter integrity to anything
Speaker 1: that she says. So Steve is in a no win
Speaker 1: situation here because on top of it, see the way
Speaker 1: they construct the segment. You've got Aaron Burnett. It's on
Speaker 1: Aaron Burnett's show. She's a liberal pretending to be a journalist. Right,
Speaker 1: Aaron Burnett liberal pretending to be a straight line journalist.
Speaker 1: Jake Tapper, liberal pretending to be a straight line journalist,
Speaker 1: Anderson Cooper, Don Lemon, etcetera, etcetera. Right, So she's there,
Speaker 1: and she's gonna jump in and pile in on Steve
Speaker 1: be like, you know, just just make sure it's very
Speaker 1: clear to the audience. Steve is the bad guy here.
Speaker 1: He's the heel, you know, he's the he's the jobber,
Speaker 1: He's the guy who shows up to the wrestling ring
Speaker 1: to get body slam time and time again. And Steve's
Speaker 1: a smart guy, by the way, but it doesn't matter
Speaker 1: how good he is. He's set up to fail here.
Speaker 1: And you get a sense of it with this. What
Speaker 1: Steve is saying actually breaks my heart because it underscores
Speaker 1: a complete and total lack of understanding. Whether you don't
Speaker 1: care about it, Steve, or you just don't get it
Speaker 1: and don't know the facts. I don't know. I don't
Speaker 1: know which one is worse. These immigrants and I am
Speaker 1: an immigrate, friend friend, immigrants, their invaders, They're not immigrants.
Speaker 1: Not interrupted immigrant are immigrants. Okay, Steve, Now you might
Speaker 1: have seen there. You had Burnett, you had Cardona, uh
Speaker 1: and and Gurgen just on his fish form shutting things.
Speaker 1: There's water Gate, war, great Nition administration. But you can
Speaker 1: tell everyone's against Cortez now and then it just turns
Speaker 1: into a combination. This is what all CNN debate segments become,
Speaker 1: combination virtue signaling and dump on and shame the conservative,
Speaker 1: Shame the conservative. Here's what happens. I am an immigrant,
Speaker 1: I I'm from a country who has also seen the
Speaker 1: kinds of atrocities that these families are fleeing. I know
Speaker 1: this firsthand. A family does not wake up in the
Speaker 1: morning that comes from these countries and they are fleeing
Speaker 1: certain death. Eron to say, oh, I think it would
Speaker 1: be fun to cross the border on a life threatening
Speaker 1: journey with my children in tow to see if I
Speaker 1: can break into the United States. Now for the we
Speaker 1: separate bananas from Apple's network. You know, this is an apple.
Speaker 1: This is a banana. You would think that maybe the
Speaker 1: anchor there, Aaron Burnett, would challenge the fact that these
Speaker 1: people are fleeing certain death. They are most certainly not
Speaker 1: fleeing certain death. There have been hundreds of thousands of
Speaker 1: them who have come into the United States using children
Speaker 1: as the means of getting access into this country, of
Speaker 1: exploiting a loophole on our immigration policy, and many, many,
Speaker 1: many thousands, tens of thousands of them have said they
Speaker 1: are fleeing either domestic violence, which is not an asylum
Speaker 1: claim should not be treated as in a silent claim,
Speaker 1: gang activity, which is not something that should be treated
Speaker 1: as an asylum claim, or they just say we want
Speaker 1: better economic options. I want to be in America. America
Speaker 1: is a better richer country, which, while true, does not
Speaker 1: mean that you just get to be here. So if
Speaker 1: they were all about facts, the anchors said, well, hold
Speaker 1: on a second, they aren't all fleeing certain death. That's
Speaker 1: a false statement. You could even say that's a lie
Speaker 1: from Cardona. But you see, it's not about getting to
Speaker 1: the truth. This is the CNN scam playing out in
Speaker 1: real time here on the show. They come here because
Speaker 1: they have no choice. They are facing certain death, and
Speaker 1: they want to. I wonder when the anchor is going
Speaker 1: to stop this monologue and allows the conservative to actually
Speaker 1: say something. They're children a better future on every conceivable level,
Speaker 1: and by every men, this is an abomination. It is dictatorial,
Speaker 1: it is inhumane, it is diabolical. And that is why
Speaker 1: you have supporters of President Trump who have been with
Speaker 1: him everything up until now. His evangelical leaders are saying
Speaker 1: that they almost like the conservative wasn't there right? You
Speaker 1: notice that. See what happens is the anchor jumps in
Speaker 1: kind of shouts down and shows the shouts down the conservative,
Speaker 1: shows the audience that the conservative is the bad guy.
Speaker 1: And then as soon as that little dust up clears out,
Speaker 1: as soon as the dust clears from that exchange, then
Speaker 1: what you have is okay, okay, let let's let the
Speaker 1: Democrat now set the record straight, win this round. Make
Speaker 1: the conservative just sit there like, oh, is she's selling mean?
Speaker 1: Thinks to me, I can't sell you anything back, and
Speaker 1: just sit there and get hammered on national TV. This
Speaker 1: is how they play the game. It's you know, there's
Speaker 1: there's no effort at at fair time or or fair debate.
Speaker 1: It's it's a complete and utter farce. And you just
Speaker 1: I see it play out time and time again. And
Speaker 1: because I've been involved in it, and I've been on
Speaker 1: the receiving end of these kinds of ambushes, although I'm
Speaker 1: a little cag so they couldn't ambush me as much
Speaker 1: as they wanted, which is one of the reasons why
Speaker 1: I don't notice. Some of them just never had me
Speaker 1: on their shows. Anderson Cooper never had me on on
Speaker 1: his show, and in two years of getting paid to
Speaker 1: do CNN, why they had complete clowns on that show
Speaker 1: on a regular basis, right, Jake Tapper never had me
Speaker 1: on his show two years. Why? Well, I think they
Speaker 1: realized that they don't know which direction the buck is
Speaker 1: gonna go in, and they don't want to get on
Speaker 1: the wrong side of a buck debate on air. I
Speaker 1: would smoke those fools, and I think they know it.
Speaker 1: I think the whole CNN squad knows that the only
Speaker 1: way they could do it with me was to put
Speaker 1: me on a panel, shout me down, talk over me,
Speaker 1: not let me get my points in, go to commercial,
Speaker 1: have the anchor double TV, and they do it to
Speaker 1: other people, and you know, it just bothers me. Steve
Speaker 1: Cortez a good guy. I feel bad that he's over
Speaker 1: there having to go through this, and they do the
Speaker 1: same thing to my buddy Ben Ferguson, another good guy,
Speaker 1: who they just hammer him at CNN, don't give him
Speaker 1: a real fair shot to talk to talk back, and
Speaker 1: I just get tired of it. And the whole thing.
Speaker 1: It's such an CNN is the enemy of truth and
Speaker 1: I will continue to pull apart how these segments works.
Speaker 1: You really understand the mechanics of the ambush, and this
Speaker 1: is really the guts of fake news. This is how
Speaker 1: fake news has made folks. This is how fake narratives
Speaker 1: are formed by these news networks. And CNN is the
Speaker 1: worst offender. He's holding the line for America buck Sexton
Speaker 1: his back. Let mean, look, I read today about a
Speaker 1: ten year old girl with Down syndrome who was taken
Speaker 1: from her mother and put in a cage. I read
Speaker 1: about a they just they want want to a ten
Speaker 1: year old with down rum an worked. But the bottom
Speaker 1: line is when you cra absolutely, you know, I gotta
Speaker 1: tell you, guys, something and something. You're going to disagree
Speaker 1: with you on this, and it's fine, okay, but I'm
Speaker 1: just I'm keeping it real with you. I'm giving it
Speaker 1: to you straight because we're friends here. You who listen
Speaker 1: to the show you are. We are all part of
Speaker 1: a tribe here together and the Freedom Hunt. That's what's
Speaker 1: what we do. So I'm just gonna tell you this.
Speaker 1: I really don't need to see any more of these Honestly,
Speaker 1: these failed former Trump associates politically failed. I'm not passing
Speaker 1: judgment on them as human beings, but I don't need
Speaker 1: to see the people that washed out of the campaign
Speaker 1: or that lasted a week or two working for the
Speaker 1: White House making the rounds explaining politics to us. All Right,
Speaker 1: I kind of feel like we've got this phenomenon going
Speaker 1: on of you know, if we were having a conversation about,
Speaker 1: let's say, what's going on at a at a university
Speaker 1: or at a college. And we kept having these people
Speaker 1: appearing on TV who are expelled from the college in
Speaker 1: the first semester, be the ones that are supposed to
Speaker 1: explain to the rest of us what's going on. I'd
Speaker 1: like to see that stop. And I think you know
Speaker 1: who we're talking about here. I do not need former
Speaker 1: Trump associates who did not last who don't bring much
Speaker 1: to the table out there speaking for this administration or conservatism,
Speaker 1: for the Republican Party, because I just think they do
Speaker 1: more harm than good. Now in this exchange here with
Speaker 1: Lewandowski and the guy who he looks like Moby, I
Speaker 1: don't say that in a mean way, but he does.
Speaker 1: Who goes on Fox a lot. Uh Zack is his
Speaker 1: is his first name. He look he looks like Moby.
Speaker 1: I don't know when people say I look like a
Speaker 1: whole bunch of people anyway. I just don't like having
Speaker 1: to clean up the mess that's left behind as a conservative,
Speaker 1: as a Republican, as somebody supporting Trump. I don't need
Speaker 1: to clean up after Lewandowski, you know, grabbing at people
Speaker 1: or whatever, or saying stuff like this. I want to
Speaker 1: clean up after the mooch, and you know, I feel
Speaker 1: like we have to sometimes. You know, Look, he's talking
Speaker 1: about that guy, Zach pet pet pet Knassis is his name,
Speaker 1: and he's he's talking about a child with Down syndrome.
Speaker 1: Come on, Corey, that's not the time to bust out
Speaker 1: of whamp whomp. Show some freaking sensitivity, all right. You know,
Speaker 1: we're we're talking about a particularly a serious situation of
Speaker 1: children down, children with Down syndrome who are being separated
Speaker 1: from the parents of the border. You know, I know
Speaker 1: there's a lot of demagoguery around the border debate. I
Speaker 1: know people are getting sick of all the media lies
Speaker 1: on this one. But you know, one show a little
Speaker 1: sensitivity to that. I mean, I I think that that's
Speaker 1: fair to say, right, I don't know what else. I
Speaker 1: don't know what else say about other than you know,
Speaker 1: don't be a jerk man. I mean, we are talking about,
Speaker 1: you know, kids, and I feel particularly protective and I
Speaker 1: know all of you listening to to for anybody who's
Speaker 1: has has a difficulty like that, you know, anybody who's
Speaker 1: been born with a tough condition, whether it's Down, Cydume
Speaker 1: or something else. You know, it's incumbent upon all of
Speaker 1: us to check those folks, to elevate them, to love them,
Speaker 1: to treat them well. So you know, Corey, he's just
Speaker 1: messing up here, and now he's not apologizing. I'm just
Speaker 1: like Corey, just say that's not what I meant. I
Speaker 1: wasn't referring to that child. I was referring to Zach's demagoguery,
Speaker 1: and I got caught off. You know, I should check
Speaker 1: on this. Maybe he's already apologized. I saw this earlier
Speaker 1: in the day. He wasn't apologizing. But you know, I
Speaker 1: just we don't need the C team going on TV
Speaker 1: representing Trump, is um right now? That all right? We
Speaker 1: we just don't need it. And people need to not
Speaker 1: let the Democrats trip them up. Or or also just look,
Speaker 1: if you're gonna go on TV and you're gonna be
Speaker 1: representing Trump and and the GOP in any capacity, try
Speaker 1: not to be an an idiot, you know, try to
Speaker 1: not do that. I'm just a little frustrated. I don't
Speaker 1: know Corey, you know, I don't know anything about him
Speaker 1: other than what he does on TV. But this was
Speaker 1: this was bad. Man. Say you're sorry, don't do that.
Speaker 1: You know down syndrome. Kids are sacred. Don't you know?
Speaker 1: He made a mistake here. That's is my take on it.
Speaker 1: People can say what they will about it. I want
Speaker 1: to switch gears here and get into a roll call
Speaker 1: in just a minute. Stay with me too. Ain't no party.
Speaker 1: Look a Team Buck party, because a Team Buck party.
Speaker 1: Don't stop. Yeah, we got Bucks turned up to eleven.
Speaker 1: It's time for roll call. Alright, team, We're gonna get
Speaker 1: into the emails today for our roll call. That means
Speaker 1: if you want to be a part of the next
Speaker 1: one official official Team Buck at gmail dot com. Please
Speaker 1: do also subscribe to the Freedom Hunt podcast, The Freedom
Speaker 1: Hunt with Buck Sexton. It is up, it is out,
Speaker 1: It is amazing. You can find it in the Apple
Speaker 1: podcast Store. We're also gonna put it up on Stitcher soon.
Speaker 1: But please please do give it a listen when you
Speaker 1: get a chance of as many of you as possible.
Speaker 1: Even if you're not a podcast listen, if you're just
Speaker 1: a radio listener, please do check out The Freedom Hut
Speaker 1: with Buck Sexton. All right, into you our inbox here,
Speaker 1: Lindsay Rights, Hey Buck, really enjoying the new morning show.
Speaker 1: It's so refreshing to see actual civil discourse. You mentioned
Speaker 1: your appreciation for international cuisine last week, so I wanted
Speaker 1: to give you a recommendation. As a now displaced DC native,
Speaker 1: the Swamp has some of the best Ethiopian food in
Speaker 1: the US. I highly recommend Ducam in the U Street
Speaker 1: Corridor for your gluten free listeners. Ethiopian cuisine is largely
Speaker 1: spicy stewed meat, veggies, and egg served on Indata bread,
Speaker 1: which is like a giant, delicious gluten free pancake that
Speaker 1: doubles as your fork. Congratulations on your ongoing success a
Speaker 1: new media Endevor Lindsay, Lindsay, thank you so much, very
Speaker 1: very kind to you. Uh, you are correct. I've been
Speaker 1: to Dukeam. I went to Duke him over a decade ago.
Speaker 1: So I've been on the Ethiopian cuisine side for a
Speaker 1: long time here. I think the open cuisine is great,
Speaker 1: and yes, d C has a very large Ethiopian popular
Speaker 1: Ethiopian American population, and so there's a lot of Ethiopian
Speaker 1: restaurants here and I do indeed like it and think
Speaker 1: it is quite delicious. Uh. Next up here, Daniel writes Buck,
Speaker 1: my brother, how have you not seen blazing saddles, Daniel.
Speaker 1: I know, man, I know, I know I need to
Speaker 1: see some blazing saddles. I will get around to it soon,
Speaker 1: I assure you. Gile Right, Buck, I heard you talking
Speaker 1: about minimum wage increases yesterday and would like to chime
Speaker 1: in more. People need to realize that every increase just
Speaker 1: separates the rich from the poor. The minimum goes up,
Speaker 1: the cost of living goes up to match it, but
Speaker 1: my check remains the same. Now the money I make
Speaker 1: will not go as far. So basically we are getting
Speaker 1: rid of the middle income class. I thought your balloon
Speaker 1: analogy was good, but not descriptive enough. Well, thank you, Guyle,
Speaker 1: and yeah, I went over it pretty quickly. But minimum
Speaker 1: wage sounds great. Everyone wants people to make a little
Speaker 1: more money, workers to get a little more bigger piece
Speaker 1: of the pie. Unfortunately, the real results of minimum wage
Speaker 1: increases do not accomplish what many of the proponents want
Speaker 1: them too. So that's something we need to keep in mind.
Speaker 1: Uh do Somebody from named DoD o u X writes,
Speaker 1: freaking remember your mom's listening, Buck, I think mom, Mama
Speaker 1: Sexton is okay with freaking. You know we're freaking. I
Speaker 1: think I think we're allowed to say that word. I
Speaker 1: don't know. I don't I don't see a problem with that.
Speaker 1: Uh and do also wrote Rising very good stuff, brother,
Speaker 1: and yep, Rising filter down to local talk radio around here.
Speaker 1: That was quick. Oh wow, alright cool. Well I'm glad.
Speaker 1: Look where we are trying to do something different, folks.
Speaker 1: If you want pure legit, straight up, unfiltered buck where
Speaker 1: I don't have to worry about being polite or not
Speaker 1: hurting anyone feelings or anything else, that's what you're here.
Speaker 1: You're already here. You're in the freedom hunt. This is
Speaker 1: where we do it. No one can get in my way.
Speaker 1: No one can say, not thored buck, we have to
Speaker 1: go to commercial break? Sorry not not not not not.
Speaker 1: Can I respond to that horrible comment that that moron
Speaker 1: you put next to me on this TV screen said,
Speaker 1: I pop up up up, No, you gotta go a break,
Speaker 1: otta gotta break here on radio. The lies cannot escape
Speaker 1: the buck. And that's why I love it here so much.
Speaker 1: It is my favorite thing to do. It always, it
Speaker 1: always is, always has been, and and getting the chat
Speaker 1: with all of you is the best part of my day.
Speaker 1: I really mean that. But Rising has been great so far,
Speaker 1: and we're having some really lively discussions. By the way,
Speaker 1: you're gonna see a lot of young conservative and liberal
Speaker 1: but conservative talent, because I'm in charge of that side
Speaker 1: of of the of the Rolodex. We had Antonio okafor
Speaker 1: on today. She is great. You're gonna see a lot
Speaker 1: more of her. She's very pro Second Amendment, very involved
Speaker 1: with you know, promoting gun rights. You's here in some
Speaker 1: n ra A stuff. I mean, she's great and uh,
Speaker 1: we're hoping to see more of her. I got a
Speaker 1: whole list of folks, you know Real News on the Blaze,
Speaker 1: which some of you listened to back and they're watched
Speaker 1: back in the day. If I sat here and told
Speaker 1: you all the people that came through Real News and
Speaker 1: now have gone on to bigger roles in media, you'd
Speaker 1: be like, Wow, It's almost like Real News was the
Speaker 1: farm team for not just Fox, but mostly Fox News
Speaker 1: and a lot of other places. People that in their
Speaker 1: early day, in the earlier days of their career, and
Speaker 1: in some cases the beginning of the very beginning of
Speaker 1: their career that were my either co hosts, coe panelists,
Speaker 1: or or guests on Real News include well, obviously co
Speaker 1: host se cup, Amy Holmes, Terras, set Mayor Will kain
Speaker 1: Um also guests. You've got Guy Benson, Katie Pavlitch, Jedediah Bila,
Speaker 1: Ellison Barber, Pete heg Seth who's now on the Fox
Speaker 1: and French Couch every day. Uh. I mean, and that's
Speaker 1: just comes to mind immediately. Ben Dominic now runs the Federalists.
Speaker 1: I mean, these are all people that were part of
Speaker 1: that real news family in the in the from the
Speaker 1: early days on the Blaze TV. And I'm gonna recreate
Speaker 1: that here with Rising. We're gonna have the youngest talent
Speaker 1: and I'm gonna say youngest by the way. I just
Speaker 1: mean the folks that aren't already on ABC and you
Speaker 1: know this week and all that stuff, right we're talking
Speaker 1: about under forty nah and maybe under forty five because
Speaker 1: they you know, those folks need to get some reps
Speaker 1: if if we're if we're looking for you know, Karl
Speaker 1: Rove has got plenty of time on on the big channels.
Speaker 1: He doesn't need, he doesn't need to come hang out
Speaker 1: of Rising. So anyway, but I'm excited about that part
Speaker 1: of because I really like being involved with people that
Speaker 1: are building their careers and that are making a splash
Speaker 1: on the scene. All right, next one here, uh Daniel writes, Hey, Buck,
Speaker 1: love the show. I've been listening for years. Now that
Speaker 1: you're stuck reading this, you have homework while you're in
Speaker 1: d C alone, watch Boondocks, Saints and Blazing Saddles. It
Speaker 1: is unexcusable or inexcusable that you haven't seen these classics.
Speaker 1: You are in danger of having your man card revoked.
Speaker 1: Shields high, and remember it's always in the reflexes. Well,
Speaker 1: it is indeed always in the reflexes. And and I
Speaker 1: I will, I will get around to both Boondock. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna tell you boon Doc Saints will be first, because
Speaker 1: that sounds like it's a little more up my alley.
Speaker 1: Blazing Saddles. I'll check out when I get the opportunity,
Speaker 1: but it will happen soon. Clay rights, Hey, Buck, I'm
Speaker 1: excited about your new show from the Swamp. However, I
Speaker 1: think it may not get through to the liberal audience,
Speaker 1: being that you, a man, is a conservative conservative voice,
Speaker 1: and your co host, a woman, is the liberal voice.
Speaker 1: No matter how well you explain the conservative point of view,
Speaker 1: you will be wrong. And the crazy liberals will tune
Speaker 1: you out to demand splanning and perhaps even toxic masculinity.
Speaker 1: But good luck with that and keep up the good work. Well, Clay,
Speaker 1: I hope, I hope that's not true. And and one
Speaker 1: thing we're really trying hard to do on the show
Speaker 1: is not we we always we joke around, but it's
Speaker 1: really become a mantra. I will not try to own
Speaker 1: the Libs and Crystal will not try to shame in
Speaker 1: the Republicans. You know, that's not what we're gonna do.
Speaker 1: And we're gonna see. We'll see how far we get it.
Speaker 1: That's see how well it works. It's not always easy, folks,
Speaker 1: you know. It's sometimes you just want to be like
Speaker 1: what you know, that's crazy and you want to go
Speaker 1: down the whole thing. And you know I can do that.
Speaker 1: I've done that in other places. I'm down to fight.
Speaker 1: But you know, think about it this way. When you're
Speaker 1: a boxer, you got your you've got a sparring partner,
Speaker 1: and then you got the big bout. You're not gonna
Speaker 1: try to knock your sparring partner's head off, right, That's
Speaker 1: just not what you do. And in this case, it's
Speaker 1: like I am Crystal, and Crystal is my sparring partner
Speaker 1: on these issues. We're not going for knockout punches. It
Speaker 1: doesn't mean that we won't go for knockout punches other places,
Speaker 1: like for example, here on radio. It just is a
Speaker 1: it's a time and place difference about the way that
Speaker 1: we're presenting the content and if you want to see it,
Speaker 1: you're having a chance. So far, hill dot tv slash
Speaker 1: Rising on any mobile device, any computer. All you need
Speaker 1: is Internet folks, no subscription, no payment, none of that required.
Speaker 1: Hill dot tv slash Rising. Uh. Chuck writes, Fuck, I
Speaker 1: thought you might like this. My German son sent me
Speaker 1: this during the Bill sex capades. Apparently not all yourls
Speaker 1: were cool with their behavior. And this is from Chuck
Speaker 1: and all right, Chuck, thank you for sending along. People
Speaker 1: can't see it, but I appreciate that. Eric writes, correct
Speaker 1: Scooby Doo quote. I would have gotten away with it
Speaker 1: if it wasn't for you meddling kids. Half tip to
Speaker 1: my sixteen year old daughter daughter. By the way, I've
Speaker 1: been a Saint fan since the Real News days. Well,
Speaker 1: thank you Eric for being early. Team Bucks squad appreciate it.
Speaker 1: Great to have you on. Really very much thankful for
Speaker 1: all that, and let's see what we got here. Alex writes, Hey,
Speaker 1: your face. You know, I'll tell you something, Ms Molly.
Speaker 1: I told her that your Face story, which I have
Speaker 1: to you have credit to my friend Steve really my
Speaker 1: my my right hand man all through high school. He
Speaker 1: was the one that would do your face. And it's
Speaker 1: so dumb that it's brilliant. That's the best way I
Speaker 1: could describe it. You know. Well, I disagree with them
Speaker 1: this polishy matter. Yeah, you face. It sounds like it
Speaker 1: doesn't It sounds like it doesn't work, but it kind
Speaker 1: of takes the tension out of it, I don't know,
Speaker 1: kind of settles things down. Gary writes book Great Show.
Speaker 1: I listened via podcast the following morning. My co workers
Speaker 1: sometimes give me a funny look when I laugh out
Speaker 1: loud when Hillary talks. I think you should spend a
Speaker 1: few minutes per day reading from her book What Happened
Speaker 1: Using your impersonation. On another note, last night's Roll Call
Speaker 1: had a listener named Andy who recommended the acapella group
Speaker 1: No uh, straight note Chaser. I went to YouTube and
Speaker 1: listened to them. They sound just like you, making fun
Speaker 1: of acapella groups. It was so funny. We're laughing out loud.
Speaker 1: I'm with you, nor more acapella. Step away, Gary in Ohio,
Speaker 1: Shields High. Thank you Gary, Bopapa. It's just guys, just
Speaker 1: step away from the acapella. I like the way you
Speaker 1: work it. No dignity. I like to bag it up,
Speaker 1: bag it up, Bop. You know no, no, no, don't
Speaker 1: do it. Don't do it telling you stay away from
Speaker 1: the acapella. Uh got rights in. Thanks for your podcast.
Speaker 1: Now I can listen to you two am after work.
Speaker 1: The story of the hammer smashing the Muslims in France
Speaker 1: was fascinating. Ps If if I were a swim were contestant,
Speaker 1: the ugly ones could wear a scuba outfit with wet suit,
Speaker 1: mask and finns. All right, Scott, well, thanks for liking
Speaker 1: the Charles Martel the Hammer. I I know we have
Speaker 1: kept Shields Ye Up as a podcast because one people
Speaker 1: can always listen to it never goes out of style.
Speaker 1: If you haven't listened to shield till I go check
Speaker 1: it out on iTunes. But also we will get back
Speaker 1: into it. I just I am at my max capacity
Speaker 1: right now for time. I I just got I got
Speaker 1: nothing left right now, so I'm I'm working on it.
Speaker 1: Uh next up here? Um well, actually you know what, team,
Speaker 1: we gotta leave it there for today. UM, leave it
Speaker 1: there for today. So there were there, we will there.
Speaker 1: We shall depart for the moment. Like I said, please
Speaker 1: do check out the Freedom up with Buck Sex and
Speaker 1: it's gonna it's gonna be a little you know, We're
Speaker 1: gonna kind of get it rolling. I'm gonna I've got
Speaker 1: some guests that will be joining in the future and everything,
Speaker 1: but for right now, it's just kind of a Buck
Speaker 1: unplugged Buck Wild segment, you know, or show where I'm
Speaker 1: just gonna talk you about some things on my mind. Uh.
Speaker 1: This week we got appearances by Commy Bear and also
Speaker 1: my review of Cobra Kai thus far and some general
Speaker 1: martial arts eighties talk. So that'll be a lot of fun.
Speaker 1: And with that, I'm gonna let you all get back
Speaker 1: to everything else you've got going on. But join me,
Speaker 1: same time, same place tomorrow, my friends. As always, no
Speaker 1: matter what comes your way, shields high in business, information
Speaker 1: is everything if you want to make the best decisions possible,
Speaker 1: if you want to know whether you should allow that
Speaker 1: least to be signed for a property you own, or
Speaker 1: bring in that employee that you've been searching for war
Speaker 1: for weeks, perhaps even months. You've got to make sure
Speaker 1: you've got the right people to have your back when
Speaker 1: it comes to background investigations and vetting. That's Global Verification Network.
Speaker 1: Global Verification Network is federally certified as a veteran owned
Speaker 1: small business and these guys are headquartered here in Chicago
Speaker 1: and do it all here in the US of A.
Speaker 1: A lot of their competitors, a lot of the background
Speaker 1: and vetting companies out there, will send stuff overseas. They
Speaker 1: have no real control over the data, the service, or
Speaker 1: the people working on the cases. Not so with Global Verification.
Speaker 1: They will have somebody answer the phone when you call
Speaker 1: and tackle any problems you need. Go to my GVN
Speaker 1: dot com. That's my g v N dot com or
Speaker 1: call eight seven seven six nine five eleven seventy nine
Speaker 1: eight seven seven six nine five one one seven nine