WEBVTT - From ‘Roe’ To Impeachment

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>House Democrats wrap up their case against the president. The

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>President's arguments will begin tomorrow, and we all march for

0:00:07.600 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>life on the forty seventh anniversary of Roe v. Wade.

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>And that sounds like it's two very different stories. Actually

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:17.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a key connection between the two. We will get

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 1>into all of that. This is Verdict with Ted Cruz.

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back. I'm Michael Knowles, and I actually should have

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>been more specific. What I meant to say was, this

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>is Verdict with Ted Cruz, the third biggest podcast on

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the charts right now. Congratulations, senator, Well back at you

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>we are. We are number three on the charts of

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>all podcasts and number one in news. We are beating

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times. I'm sorry, could you say that again? Oh?

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Did you? Maybe? Perhaps you couldn't couldn't hear me? I

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to say, we're beating the New York Times.

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Well that that is a wonderful thing in a testament

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to all the good people are listening. Man, It sounds

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>like birds chirping sort of in the studio. But we

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>have a lot to get to today. We have the

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:09.399
<v Speaker 1>Democrats wrapping up their arguments. We've got the Trump team

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>is going to begin tomorrow, and in the fifteen minutes

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>that you got free today you ended up marching for

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 1>life out on the national mall. All true. And it's

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>ten forty five, so we're getting started tonight earlier than

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>we have any day this week. This is a very

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>early night, so let's not squander the time. How do

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>you think the Democrats did in their closing arguments? Well,

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I think all hundred senators are grateful that the twenty

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>four hour marathon is over. I think it's an interesting

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>decision of the house managers to consume practically every minute

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>of those twenty four hours. Listen, Adam Schiff gave the clothes,

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and there were moments of it that were powerful. I mean,

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>he is an effective trial lawyer, is a talented trial lawyer.

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>He can be an effective orator. I think we saw

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>throughout the opening arguments the house managers used multimedia quite effectively.

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>So there were moments that they drove in with different

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>video clips that that worked and it broke up the

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of long arguments and it did it did manage

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 1>to pull people's attention well. And that's something you're seeing,

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>by the way, in trial courts much more often now. Videos.

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's effective. Trial lawyers know how to

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:24.639
<v Speaker 1>do that, and we saw that on display. I also

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>think shifted a good job. He had a big chunk

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of his closing that was trying to preempt the president's arguments.

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>And it's because of the structure of it. House managers

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>have twenty four hours and the president has twenty four hours,

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 1>and there's not a rebuttal. So he knew they're getting

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 1>ready to start, and so he went through dozens of

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>potential arguments that they will almost surely make, and he

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>tried to give responses to it. What was he preempting,

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what were the big arguments that he expects

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>from I mean he went through whether their process, arguments,

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>whether I mean, he went through a whole host But

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>you actually put your finger on a major failing I

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:03.079
<v Speaker 1>think he had, which is he didn't shine a lantern

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>on his biggest problem. So he briefly noted, well, the

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>house managers might suggest Joe Biden's corrupt, but there's no

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>evidence of that. And that's all he said. He's setting

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>himself up. It's it's the biggest weakness of their entire

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:22.920
<v Speaker 1>case is that they have built their case on the

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 1>proposition there is zero evidence, none, whatsoever, of any corruption

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>concerning Joe Biden, concerning his son Hunter Biden, concerning barism,

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the Ukrainian Natural Gas Company was paying Hunter Biden a

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>million bucks a year. That's a straw map, because yesterday

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that the House Democrats in making their case, they kept saying,

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing wrong with Barize mother, there's nothing wrong with

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the Bidens. There's nothing to see here, folks. And because

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>they kept talking about it, it actually brings that to

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the forefront, right, And then today in their closing arguments

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 1>they failed to address him. They just dismissed it. And

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's like leading with your jaw um that

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that they're setting up to just get get get it

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>knocked knocked crazy. Look, I'll say Schiff had some very

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>good moments, but he also tends to get self righteous

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and and and so he'll be he'll be making an

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>argument that's effective, that's real, and then he suddenly starts

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>lecturing you. And I think the moment where that was

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>most acute is when he cited this CBS story and

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>said Trump was threatening if any Republican voted against him,

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to have their head on a Pike, and I got

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to tell you that pissed Republican senators off. I heard

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>probably a half dozen senators surround me like openly, like

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>gasp and and and like express anger. And that's a

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>great argument if you're talking to a you know, a

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 1>bunch of you know, left wing activists at a California

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>rally and Shift's base. But it ain't a good argument

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're trying to get some Republican votes, right, if

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:06.840
<v Speaker 1>you're actually trying to persuade the few Republicans who maybe

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you could persuade, not a good way to do it.

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>You bring up the reaction among the Republican senators today.

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Have you wandering around the holes of the Senate heard

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 1>any gossip from the Democratic side. I mean, what is

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the reaction, if anything, at all to how they're doing well?

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 1>It was interesting one of the Democratic senators was talking

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to a reporter walking out, and the reporter asked, what

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>do you think of the closing and the head on

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the pikeline and the comment from the Democratic senators? Look,

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>every argument has a discordant note or too. I mean

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:44.840
<v Speaker 1>it may not have come across on TV, but he

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:48.599
<v Speaker 1>was almost booed for saying that right. I mean, Republican

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>senators were offended by it. But in many ways, his

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:55.679
<v Speaker 1>audience for that was not the hundred people in the room.

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 1>It was TV that have to render a verdict. It

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>was TV. And I'll tell you a very interesting observation.

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>So why did they fill twenty four hours? Why did

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>they repeat the same arguments over and over and over again,

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Because for most of the argument they weren't talking to

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the hundred senators that will vote on impeachment. They were

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>talking to three hundred and thirty million Americans. And you know,

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the fascinating things that several senators noticed, if

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>you look at their order of speaking, it followed prime

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>time depending on where the house manager was from. In

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:29.359
<v Speaker 1>other words, they started off with the East coast house managers.

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 1>They then moved to the central So you looked at,

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the congressman from Colorado. They'd put them on

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:36.600
<v Speaker 1>in primetime in Colorado, and it would always close with

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the West coast, and they were they were very deliberately.

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>More than a couple of people observed that this was

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 1>at least more than a little bit about about Adam

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Schiff launching either his governor candidacy or his Senate candidacy.

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>And look, this stuff I'm sure plays very well in

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a California Democratic prime. So that to me raises the

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:01.840
<v Speaker 1>question have the House Democrats give up on actually persuading

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the senators? I mean, are they are they now tuning

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 1>out the senators and just playing this to TV to

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>launch their own political careers. So yes, and no, ninety

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>percent plus was launching their political careers, was energizing their base,

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>was speaking to the angry mob. There was a ten

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>percent in the closing where Schiff was trying to throw

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a hail Mary. Look, he knows that they don't have

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the votes, he knows that they haven't proven their case.

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:31.239
<v Speaker 1>But their hope now as they want more witnesses because

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 1>they want to go in a fishing expedition, right, and

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>so you know, for example, he had some actually pretty

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>moving oratory about moral courage and standing up and how

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>it's harder to stand against your party, and he said,

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you risk being called. You risk people saying he's a

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Democrat in name only or she's a Republican in name only.

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the choice of pronoun was accidental. No,

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>he might be referring specifically to some senators well, and

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>it was now I will confess. As I was walking out,

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>there was a group of reporters and I said to him,

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I said, wow, shifts call for moral courage to stand

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>up against your party was powerful, and I really wonder

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>how many Democrats are going to do that and vote

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 1>to a quit the president. And of course the reporters

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>look at you like no, no, no no, no. Moral courage

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>is always Republicans abandoning of course their party. Of course,

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 1>never Democrats doing it. Now, before we move on from

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>their arguments, I do want to be clear. They spent

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>most of the time talking about the first article of impeachment,

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>which was abuse of power, and we've talked about that

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>now in the last couple of episodes. The argument that

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump engaged in a quid pro quo and he withheld

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the military aid from Ukraine in exchange for Ukraine investigating

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>his political rival Joe Biden, even though he didn't end

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>up with withholding the aid and they didn't end up

0:08:57.040 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>investigating Joe Biden. We talked about that on previous episode.

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:04.719
<v Speaker 1>The second article of impeachment is called obstruction of Congress.

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Half the reason I voted for the president is so

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>that he would obstruct Congress. What does that even mean?

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>How do you obstruct Congress? Look, they're basing it on

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>a refusal to allow witnesses to testify, defying subpoenas, and

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>refusing to produce documents. And you know, look, I will

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>say where the Democrats were effective in making this case

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>is the Trump administration didn't hand over documents from any

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:36.319
<v Speaker 1>of the cabinet agencies in response to subpoenas. I got

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>to say, most of the Republican senators, I think that

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:43.839
<v Speaker 1>was pretty dumb that the administration would have been better

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>off complying, producing some documents in response, and preserving the

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>fights for the things that really matter. And part of

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the obstruction charge that the Democrats waged against the President

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>is that he wouldn't allow certain people who worked for him,

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>such as John Bolton, the National Security Advisor, to testify.

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Are you saying should should they have testified? Well, and

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>that's where this argument collapses, and it's why the Democrats

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 1>are not going to prevail on it, because, look, front

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and center, John Bolton is the most notable example. They're like,

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:19.680
<v Speaker 1>we need John Bolton's testimony. Well, we talked about earlier

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 1>this week in one of these podcasts how John Bolton

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:26.680
<v Speaker 1>did something something very clever. He went to a federal

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>district court in DC and he went before the court

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and he said, look, I've got two conflicting demands on me.

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 1>The House is asking me to testify, and the President

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>is instructing me not to citing executive privilege. And he said,

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>which one do I comply with? And John Bolton said, Judge,

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll do whatever you tell me. Right. The House Democrat's

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 1>response was fascinating. They just said never mind. They actually

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>informed the court we're not going to subpoena John Bolton

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and we don't need his testimony. So the fact that

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>John Bolton does not end up testifying during the House

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:07.439
<v Speaker 1>impeachment investigation is on the House Democrats. And in fact,

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Bolton's lawyer said, if they withdraw the subpoena, the choice

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 1>for John Bolton not to testify is not John Bolton's,

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>it's the House Democrats. Why is that? I mean, why

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>would the House withdraw their their pull to get them

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:25.679
<v Speaker 1>to testify, because I think they were in hurry. They

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>did this whole thing, and they just wanted them forty

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>some odd days. They were moving rocket fast, you know.

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Part of it. I think there are a number of us.

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we were speculating the other night. Why did

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 1>they not drag this out and delay it more? I

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 1>think part of it is that Nancy Pelosi at least

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>thinks this is a political allusion. Tachment is hurting the Democrats'

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>chances in twenty twenties, so I think she wanted to

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 1>get this over with now. House managers have different interests.

0:11:57.440 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I think they're enjoying the national chef has his eyes

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>on other offices. You know, I will confess I did

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 1>ask in the Republican cloak room. I said, hey, what

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>do y'all think of us having emotion? To give him

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>another twenty four hours to keep talking? Just let everyone

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 1>else's numbers go up. So, all right, the arguments are over.

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I do want to move on to the March for Life. Yeah.

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Before we do that, though, if you had to give

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats a grade, They've made their arguments. You've argued

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>many high profile cases. How did they do on presentation

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and style, I'd say an A minus that they actually did.

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 1>This was a talented group presenting okay on substance a D. Yeah,

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>they sounded good and they have little snippets, but but

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>they also were very selective in terms of what they cited.

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I expect to see I expect to see the president's

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>lawyers come back hard. I expect to see the president's lawyers,

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>in particular to make a powerful case about the evidence

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:12.839
<v Speaker 1>of corruption that justified an investigation into Barisma and weather.

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Vice President Joe Biden was part of that corruption, and

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the House managers have now built their whole case on

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the proposition. There's zero evidence that proposition is going to

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>be blown out of the water, So I guess we'll

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 1>see tomorrow. Tomorrow is going to be a really big

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>day because finally the Trump team gets to make their arguments.

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I have to tell you, after going through all these

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>hours and hours of the Democrat case, I'm glad you

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 1>gave me this recommendation to have a nice, delicious glass

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of milk, because it's really fortified. Well, there's nothing like

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a cool glass of milk. There is a strange rule

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate that goes around impeachment trials. You are

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:49.679
<v Speaker 1>not allowed as a senator to bring in a cup

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 1>of coffee or a bottle of whiskey or a soft drink.

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>You are only allowed to drink two things in the

0:13:56.480 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Senate during the impeachment trial, water and milk. You have

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>availed yourself of this, I noticed I have, and you look.

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 1>The Senate is a strange place. It is a plate

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>in many respects. It is governed by tradition. But the

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>reason you can drink milk all stems back to January

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty fourth, nineteen sixty six, so before you and I

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>were born. Okay. Senator Everett Dirkson is on the Senate

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>floor and he raises a question with the presiding officer.

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 1>He asks, He says, is it in violation of the

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Senate rules if the Senator from Illinois asks one of

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the page boys to go to the restaurant and bring

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>him a glass of milk? If it is in violation

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>of the rules, I will forget it. And the presiding

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>officer answered, there is nothing in the rules to prohibit

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the senator from requesting a glass of milk. When that

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 1>exchange happened, that formed a precedent. This is actually a

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>governing precedent. So when you're a newly elected senator, you

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>get in your desk, in the drawer of your desk,

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you get something called Riddicks precedence. And it is printed

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that Riddick's precedent stating going back to January twenty fourth,

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixty six, Riddicks precedents. Just just to Clifford, this

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>is like the rules of the it is, but it's

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 1>just rulings from the chair become binding precedent because Everett

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Dirkson wanted a glass of milk, and the presiding officers

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>said said, yes, now the two things you can drink

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>or water and milk. And so the first night of

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the impeachment tribe and we went till two in the morning.

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>At midnight, I decided, you know what, I'm gonna try

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>this out. So I went to the cloakroom. I said, Hey,

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>does anyone here actually have milk? And they're like, no,

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>no one, no one ever orders it. I'm like, can

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>we track some down? And one of the guys in

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the cloak room said, I'll find you some and it

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>ran out. So at midnight I just sat there quietly

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>sipping milk, and and it was you can't have coffee,

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>you can't. You can't have doctor pepper, you can't have caffeine,

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>but but you can enjoy glass of milk. Now, what

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to know, Senator as a taxpayer myself, who

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>paid for that glass of milk that you had in

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the Senate. I'll tell you the cloak room actually called

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>our office and said we need to charge the senator

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>from the glass of milk. We ain't paying for it.

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>And I laughed and said, look, I'm glad to hear

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>some fiscally conservative policies being implemented. And now I can't

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>necessarily promise. So look, if milk is allowed at the

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, all you see is it's a

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 1>white liquid. So I can't promise you that there aren't

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>senators having white Russians, especially the longer this drags on.

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>And you know what, that would probably drive the conspiracy

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>theorist crazy, particularly Postmonarch. That's true. And you know we've

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 1>been coming here in the middle of the night now

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>all week, so there's really nothing to say that we

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>haven't had a couple of white Russians on the very

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>same drink. Now, speaking of your health and refreshing yourself today,

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>when you had a little bit of a break, you

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>decided to use that by going outside and actually marching

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>in the March for life. This was forty seven years

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>after Rover. This way the March for Life has gone

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 1>on every single year since then, and it's it's the

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>largest pro life gathering in the world. And you participated

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 1>in it today. It's something I've done a number of years.

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Today it was going on right during the impeachment trial,

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>so when the march started, I couldn't participate, but but

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>around three o'clock we had a break that ended up

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 1>being about a half hour, and so I just went

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:24.399
<v Speaker 1>outside and joined the marchers. It's a wonderful chance. I

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>spent a lot of the time. They're just thanking people

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and and and thanking them for coming out. It's usually

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>a cold day when the march happens, and it's amazing

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to see people from all over the country coming together

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:39.479
<v Speaker 1>and stand up for life. I got to say it.

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 1>It is always wonderful to participate, but it but it

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:46.400
<v Speaker 1>was particularly affirming in the middle of all this craziness.

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 1>It was moving. I was there myself today. It was

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:51.439
<v Speaker 1>very moving, and it actually got me thinking about the

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>relation between ROV. Wade and this impeachment trial because Rov.

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.919
<v Speaker 1>Wade is decided in nineteen seventy three, and it was

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:05.680
<v Speaker 1>when the Supreme Court discovered this previously undiscovered constitutional right

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to abortion, as though the framers of our constitution secretly

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 1>invisible Ink wrote in a right to an abortion, you

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:18.400
<v Speaker 1>know a lot more about the Constitution than I do.

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a bogus argument, right, it was. The Court created

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>it in versus Wade. But the effect it had in

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 1>our country is it took one of the most deeply personal,

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 1>emotional public policy issues and the Supreme Court said, you, idiot,

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>voters don't get to decide this. We're deciding it for you,

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and you have no say. Look. Prior to that, abortion

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 1>had been a question for the states to consider, and

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 1>people could debate it at state state issues. You could

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>get up and make arguments as to why. Look, you

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and I both believe that life should be protected. But

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>as voters, we ought to be able to make those decisions.

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 1>And the Supreme Court said, nope, we're seizing this. And

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that decision has produced a lot of the

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 1>bitterness the rank or the division. People are frustrated on

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>both sides of that aisle that they don't have a

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>natural outlet to debate the issues because it all becomes

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the battle for the courts, because it's now nine elected

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 1>judges that decide everything. Because This was in twenty sixteen,

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:29.399
<v Speaker 1>probably the top issue especially and by the way, I

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 1>think I said nine elected judges, Let me be very clear,

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:36.679
<v Speaker 1>nine unelected unelected, because unelected is the whole problem, no

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:40.639
<v Speaker 1>accountability whatsoever. In twenty sixteen, the big issue was the judges.

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Who's going to replace Justice Scalia? Who? And you saw

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>on the left and the right, and especially for the left,

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>so much of that comes down to Roe v. Wait.

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:51.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you see it in their campaign materials. Let

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>me make two observations from today. One, when I went

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 1>out to march in the protest, I encountered one anti

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump protester, a woman who was angry, and part of

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 1>what she was screaming is why aren't you in the trial.

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.479
<v Speaker 1>It's like, well, we're on a break. Um, I just

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:08.879
<v Speaker 1>had my glass of milk and I've got a lot

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of energy. But it was a striking contrast one anti

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 1>Trump protesters and then tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:22.719
<v Speaker 1>of protesters, or not protesters, but marks standing for life.

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 1>And the contrast was interesting and it actually made me think,

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:29.879
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of us getting ready for the impeachment trial,

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>we're anticipating bitter, nasty, confrontations like we had during Brett

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Kavanaugh and Brett Cavanaugh. The left had paid protesters who yelled,

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:42.679
<v Speaker 1>who's stalked who? You know? One of them went to

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:44.919
<v Speaker 1>Susan Collins's home, and I mean, I mean it was

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 1>nobody needs to be reminded because it was such a

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 1>national story. But Brett Cavanaugh was the second Trump pick

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 1>for the Supreme Courts. Wasn't even the first one, is

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the second one. But but it underscores just how bitter

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:57.879
<v Speaker 1>and divisive it is. I gotta tell you, the Capitol

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:01.680
<v Speaker 1>police were anticipating the we may see some of the same,

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:06.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, vigorously, you know, threatening, almost violent some of

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:09.399
<v Speaker 1>those confrontations on with Kavanaugh. I mean you had people

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 1>getting in your face and screaming and bitter and angry.

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's interesting that even though Trump inspires strong emotions,

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the impeachment trial has seemed to be a snoozer from

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>that totally, totally, I mean, frankly, That's why I think,

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I really think that's why this podcast is doing so

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:30.439
<v Speaker 1>well is people are not going to watch ten hours

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a day of impeachment. They want, I think they want

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:34.199
<v Speaker 1>to come here. You've done an excellent job giving us

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>a behind the scenes view. Look that there were times

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>when it when it felt like like like listening to

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a reading of Vogon poetry, which for the handful of

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:47.239
<v Speaker 1>Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy geeks who are listening to this,

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>you'll get what I'm saying, and everyone else is right

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and don't worry about it. Yeah that I think you're

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>right now. And I just wonder if if a decision

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:03.160
<v Speaker 1>like ro versus Wade had not stolen this very important

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>question from the legislature, from the citizens to decide for

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 1>themselves and taken it into the arms of nine unelected

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 1>lawyers wearing robes, if if maybe we wouldn't even see

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>an impeachment like this, if if the presidential elections were

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>not so incredibly tense and important. Well, and it's much

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the same you look at impeachment and the House Democrats argument.

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Their central argument is we can't trust the voters to

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:33.399
<v Speaker 1>make this decision. That they believe the voters got it

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>wrong in twenty sixteen, and a lot of the Democrats,

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 1>when they're being candid, they're worried if Trump is on

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:41.239
<v Speaker 1>the ballot in twenty twenty, he'll win again. And so

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:45.159
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to undo a democratic election, right, and and

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:52.879
<v Speaker 1>that that is a persistent problem of politicians wanting to

0:22:52.920 --> 0:23:00.880
<v Speaker 1>force an agenda against the wishes of let the people. Well,

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>fortunately the Trump team is going to get the chance

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow to make their arguments. I very much look forward

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to that. We're going to be covering it again. Please,

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 1>thank you to everybody who has made this podcast the

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 1>number three biggest podcast in the world. It's really terrific. Please,

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:17.119
<v Speaker 1>if you can subscribe, leave us a five star review

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:19.119
<v Speaker 1>before we go. Lightning round on the mail bag. All

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>right from Tom. Will the whistleblower testify the impeachment trial?

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Probably not. I think it's more likely than not that

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>next week will vote not to have additional witnesses. So

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 1>not only will we not get the so called whistleblower,

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:37.119
<v Speaker 1>the guy who started this whole Ukraine business really started

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the whole impeachment. But then we wouldn't get Hunter Biden,

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 1>we wouldn't go any fire were to order. Likely outcomes

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 1>next week will vote on whether or not additional witnesses

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>are needed beyond those have already testified. The House fifty

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>one senators will decide. I think it is more likely

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 1>than not fifty one senators will say we've heard enough,

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>we're ready to decide, let's move to judgment, and the

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:01.919
<v Speaker 1>President gets acquitted. That may not happen. If all forty

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>seven Democrats will vote for more witnesses, maybe four Republicans

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:09.400
<v Speaker 1>join them. If that happens, the second most likely outcome

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I think is fifty one senators say yes, we want

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>more witnesses, the Democrats call John Bolton, the President calls

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Biden, and I think, and then it's a blood

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 1>best but but but I think that the second most

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 1>likely outcome is those two additional witnesses come in Bolton

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and Biden, and only those two. I would say that's

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the second most likely outcome. The third most likely outcome

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>is you end up having several witnesses. That that that

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and I do think, and this is something I've been

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 1>pitching to other Republicans, is the principle of reciprocity, that

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:45.640
<v Speaker 1>that we need to be fair, we need to give

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 1>both sides. We can't be like the House and have

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 1>it only on one side. And so I think I

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:57.159
<v Speaker 1>feel quite confident that's where the Republican conference is, that

0:24:57.200 --> 0:25:00.080
<v Speaker 1>there's consensus, and I gotta say, by the way, yesterday

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 1>in the press there were a bunch of stories that

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:06.479
<v Speaker 1>said Chuck Schumer has rejected the deal of Bolton for Biden,

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:09.679
<v Speaker 1>and I actually had today spent a while like laughing

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 1>with reporters, going, well, that's all fine and good. Of course,

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Schumer doesn't want Hunter Biden to testify because the

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Democrats are trying to cover that up, right, But he

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have the votes if they go down the road

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to John Bolton. I guarantee you the other side, right,

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have the votes among Republicans to ensure

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:29.400
<v Speaker 1>that both sides are treated fans, So that will come

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 1>down to four Republicans. Last question before we had added

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>here from Marty with very specific punctuation, when is it

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>our turn? Can't watch these clowns tomorrow morning ten am.

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Tomorrow morning ten am, and you will be right back

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:47.679
<v Speaker 1>here in this studio to break it down for us.

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I will now tomorrow is likely to be relatively short.

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it'll probably go from about ten to one,

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 1>so we'll get you about three hours of opening arguments

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>from the president's team. So we'll record this tomorrow afternoon

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and then will come back on Monday at one pm

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and we'll get another probably extended stretch of argument from

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the President's team. I'm looking forward to the first chance

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the president's cantaign has had to present his defense and

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:14.879
<v Speaker 1>to present. Look, what I've urged them to do is

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 1>present the substantive evidence of innocence. Don't just just talk

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 1>about process the whole time, but lay out the facts.

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Because on the facts, I think the President, well, I

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 1>hope they take some messaging from this podcast, because I

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 1>think when you lay out the facts, the case is

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:33.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty clear. And tomorrow we will see the President strike

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 1>back and it should be a lot of fun. Well,

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:38.200
<v Speaker 1>you know the Barisma timeline that that we tweeted out

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 1>yesterday and talked about yesterday on the show, iserox that

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 1>and put it in the box of every single Republican senator,

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>so every one of them has that right. I sure

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:47.119
<v Speaker 1>hope they read it, and I hope they listen to

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:48.639
<v Speaker 1>the show, and I hope you all will listen to

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the show. We will be back here tomorrow. I'm Michael Knowles.

0:26:51.400 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>This is Verdict with Ted Cruz. This episode of Verdict

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>with Ted Cruz is being brought to you by Jobs,

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Freedom and Security Pack a political action committee dedicated to

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:13.119
<v Speaker 1>supporting conservative causes, organizations, and candidates across the country. In

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two, Jobs, Freedom, and Security Pack plans to

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:19.879
<v Speaker 1>donate to conservative candidates running for Congress and help the

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party across the nation.