WEBVTT - BFFs 7/23 Hour 2: Browns Fantasy Preview, MLB Best Bets

0:00:01.560 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports Radio Network. In Major League Baseball, as the

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>trade deadline approaches, many rumors will come and go. John

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Hayman with a new one. He's an MLB network. He's

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>reporting that Jason Vargas is the quote most likely to

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>go of the starting pitchers on the Mets. He did

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>say the Mets are committed sellers, but add the caveat

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 1>that they don't believe they can do a complete tear down.

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>In New York, John Rosey of MLB Network reports that

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the Rockies could consider dealing Charlie Blackman before the trade deadline.

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>And in Tampa Bay, third baseman the Andy Daz will

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>undergo x rays after leaving Monday's game versus the Red

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Sox following a foul ball off his left foot. And

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:40.880
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL, a couple of transactions with New York Times,

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jones finally signed on the dotted line for the

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:46.599
<v Speaker 1>New York Giants and former Jets quarterback, amongst others, Mark

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Sanchez has retired from the NFL and they'll start commentating

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 1>in the fall. On Van Strafford. This has been your

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports Radio Network news update. Stay tuned to the

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports Radio Network for more updates at the top

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>of every hour listen Matter ten. Yeah, now Love's welcome

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:40.960
<v Speaker 1>your baby your host by date from mine. That's fun.

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Your co host by died from St. Francis Frank Stand ball,

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>ladies and tell me your PEP S Action Hour is

0:01:57.480 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>live here from New York City. Any Stampleed gregg susman

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Eric Young. I'm starting to sound like you there, man,

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 1>it was diet. It is like I heard my voice

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of sound gravity like yours. Like this is how

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>he feels all the time. It's not good. Best thing

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>is when when people meet me and they're like, oh,

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you really sound like that somehow magically putting on this

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>voice for fifteen years. Yeah. Not. This is not a gimmick, folks.

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>This is how he speaks in real life. This is

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 1>real life, absolute real life for for Greg too. Evidently

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:35.360
<v Speaker 1>this guy coughed up a lung as soon as we

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 1>threw the brain. I don't I don't think we made

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:41.239
<v Speaker 1>it to break now. Oh my god, it's so embarrassing.

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I apologized. I about to hear that my mike was

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>off for that reason, and for some reason I had

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to still talk. It was bad. But anyway, before we

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:51.640
<v Speaker 1>hit the break. We were talking. I was trying to

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about David Joko um Frank of his thoughts

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 1>these adp ultimately is fine, he wants one of the

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>top five guys. But where he's going whatever? Uh, Eric,

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>what do you think here about Joko? It? I mean

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>he's a dart throw like you know, every tight end

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 1>from six to thirty, Like, yes, you're going to be frustrated,

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>but there's not another guy that you can own that

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to be frustrated frustrated with some weeks

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>like last year I think was the hardest year I

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>can remember ever playing fantasy football, where like at least

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>they would get you some yards, you mean, like they

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 1>were good for a touchdown, you know, every other week

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. Last year, if you didn't have

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the top four or five guys, you were

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>pulling your hair out and it was insane. And na

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Joko is he's in the top part of that thirty

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>or forty other tight ends, you know, like the you

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>know guys that that could do it or could be something.

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 1>He's got every tool. He's in a in a good

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>offense with a good quarterback, He's going to you know,

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>he he showed last year that his hands improved. Um

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Man really came on at the end of the year

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>last year. But now, uh you know, O b J

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>being there, um Freddy Kitchens calling the place full time.

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Another year in the system with Baker Mayfield. These are

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>all positives for him. But I believe it's just going

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>to be like the other you know, starting tight ends

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>where it's just you know, weekend and week out. You know,

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>you just put him in and hope. So it's you

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>could do worse than David and Joker, That's for sure.

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 1>That's true. The ball, the man throwing the ball to

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:30.279
<v Speaker 1>Tam to Joker and the rest of these wide receivers

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>is Baker Mayfield. And Mayfield the four Hisman winner and

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>number one overall pick in the NFL Draft currently is

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 1>going in the top five at the quarterback spot, right

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:46.679
<v Speaker 1>behind Patrick Mahomes, Andy Luck, DeShawn Watson, and Aaron Rodgers.

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>He's going in front of Matt Ryan, Jerry Golf, Carson

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 1>Wentz and a host of other guys. It's really interesting

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 1>because they finally feels like the quarterback Landskip was really changed,

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>frank like after the top four really really from the

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>number one on Mahomes, Watson beings at the top three.

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a totally different quarterback crew than we are used

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to see. And initially I look at Baker Mayfield like man,

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 1>top five seems mighty mighty high for him. But then

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I looked down whence case probably Ryan, You definitely make

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>a case from Matt Ryan Jerry Goff on the Rams. Okay,

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:32.280
<v Speaker 1>what this range is probably makes sense, right I think

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:36.159
<v Speaker 1>right now, if you're drafting Baker Mayfield, you're drafting him

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>at his ceiling because I don't know how he's going

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to finish much higher than QB five, So I'll just

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>throw that out there. Last year, he was QB ten

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>in fantasy points per game from weeks nine through seventeen.

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Again when Freddy Cook Kitchens took over the play calling duties,

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the average one point eight yards per game, nineteen touchdowns,

0:05:57.320 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>eight interceptions. Baker Mayfield reminds me a lot of Ben

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Roethlisberger in that he can make all the throws, but

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>he's also going to turn the ball over a decent amount,

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Like it wouldn't surprise me one bit if Baker throws

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>for you know, thirty plus touchdowns. Let's say, anywhere from

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>like thirty to thirty three touchdowns, but he's also gonna

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:19.279
<v Speaker 1>throw for fifteen plus interceptions. We saw it that game

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>against the Houston Texans last year. They completely faked him

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>out into throwing throws that like a rookie quarterback throws,

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>not that the normal Baker Mayfield with throw, and that

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:33.039
<v Speaker 1>was you know, maybe that was just him as a rookie,

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully he got better in the off season, but

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I still think that he's going to be turnover prone

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:40.720
<v Speaker 1>at times. Greg. Right now, it just feels like, even

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:42.679
<v Speaker 1>with all the weapons that he has. He has Odell Beckham,

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Jarvis Andry David and Joeku great running backs behind him

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>as well, offensive line got a little bit worse. It

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>feels like at QB five, you're drafting him at his ceiling.

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 1>And it sucks because I want to have as much

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:59.559
<v Speaker 1>exposure to this Brown's offense as I possibly can, and

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I would love to have the guy throwing the ball

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to all these weapons, But I just don't know that

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to have many shares of Baker Mayfield at

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the current ADP that he's going in. Yeah, it's like

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I said, the people are probably right like the players

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>rather are probably right, But as I look at their

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>their ADP number, Bicker may Fields going about seventy eight,

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>it's seven picks later from Matt Ryan. I'd rather have

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>those seven picks back r Roethlisberger going because I don't

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that their numbers one far off team

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and Baker Mayfields at what se You're getting him that

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>much later picks later? And it is is Baker Mayfield

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be that much better than Ben Roethlisberger. The

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Steelers were the most past happy offense in the NFL

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>last season, and I still think that they're going to

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>throw the ball at toun like they don't have Levian Bell.

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I think they drafted Benny Snell. We'll get more into

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers tomorrow. I'm sure that they're gonna try try

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to be more balance this year, but they're still going

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>to throw the ball a lot. I don't know that

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield and Ben Roethlisberger's umbers are going to be

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that far off that he should be going forty spots

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 1>ahead of Ben Robins. I think it's really interesting is

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>that when he had Jerry Goff, Goff, Winston, Murray Breeze

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and Wilson, this crew of well five guys, I'll go

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>into two picks of each other. Like, that's a range

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>of quarterbacks right there, and then you have Newton Roethlisberger

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>or within the next ten picks or so. So I

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>think like that's a range I can see myself diving

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>into all super bunched up right now, the quarterbacks, and

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>it's just super deep. Yeah, you know, we keep we

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 1>keep telling everyone to play in in super flex leagues,

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people aren't used to having an

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>extra quarterback in their lineup, and they're they're hesitant to

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 1>change things. Were all creatures of habit, right, But the

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>fantasy landscape is changing, and with that, you should change

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the way that you play the game. Quarterbacks is super deep.

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>That's why I would recommend most people play the super

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>flex format running back. It's also super deep. What are

0:08:53.000 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 1>we thinking, Nick Chubb? We'll let you know where we return. Hey,

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:03.439
<v Speaker 1>thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you want

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app, download

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the tune and app and just search for Fantasy Sports

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on Twitch, or on Periscope

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>We are back here on the Buffs, Eric Young sticking

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>around as we continue to talk with the Cleveland Browns.

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>A lot going on, not just of course, from my

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>fansy perspective, the Browns are eight favorite of those in

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>videos people are want to bet on the Browns to

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>win the NFC North. There the favorite at the moment

0:09:57.200 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to win the NFC North over the Steelers. No, Frank,

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you would love the Steelers as a bet there. Uh

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the it's crazy, um that the Browns have such better

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>odds than the Steelers at this point. Yeah, I mean

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not a huge difference to the Browns are plus

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>one thirty five the Pittsburgh Steelers are plus one seventy.

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>But this just kind of a little bit. This still

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 1>goes back to what Gabe has talked about a lot

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>on the Morning after is that the Steelers have done it.

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:24.080
<v Speaker 1>They've been there before. They have a arguably maybe not

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>arguably Hall of Fame quarterback, someone who's won a Super Bowl.

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>He's been there before. I think the defense will be better,

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>still have an elite offensive line, still have really good weapons.

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I know they lost Antonio Brown, but I think Juju

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be awesome this year. I think, you know,

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Vance McDonald takes a step up. Overall. I just feel like,

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Steelers are not getting enough respect here.

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I like the moves that the Browns have made in

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the off season, Greg, but we still have to see

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>them put it together. And it's you know, it's a

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a first time head coach at the NFL level,

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:52.559
<v Speaker 1>So I'm a little skeptical when it comes to the

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:55.079
<v Speaker 1>Browns being the favorite right now. Now. Part of the

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>brown success last year, especially when Freddy Kitchens took over,

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>was the emergence of Nick Chubb. They traded away Carlos

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Hi midway through the year and Nick chubbing emerged and

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>he was fantastic, and we saw him climbing and climbing

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>and climbing and now sadly really uh into the second round,

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:15.839
<v Speaker 1>early second round of fantasy football drafts at this point,

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 1>he's the twelfth running back off the board at the moment,

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>with an ADP right in the middle of the second round.

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>But and I mentioned this with Kenny and Drake here

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 1>e y that as good as Nick Chubb is, Kareem

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Hunt is lingering. He's out there, he's coming. He suspended

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>for eight games. That leaves eight more games for Kareem

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Hunt to compete with Nick Chubbs for carries. And I

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 1>believe that the Browns don't ultimately, and Marlin Mack as well.

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>He's talking about with Marlon Mack. Ultimately, the Browns don't

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>take the pr hit and they don't take everything that

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:57.199
<v Speaker 1>comes with signing Kareem Hunt unless they plan on using

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:01.319
<v Speaker 1>Kareem Hunt his current ADP in the middle of second round.

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think. I don't think I could do it. Man,

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>what are you? Are you talking Hunt or chump? Chump?

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I got him as my running back six Uh. Some

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>of the turned me onto this was Chris Harris, formerly

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of ESPN. He's does Harris Football and he's he's a

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 1>big proponent of like us, trying to project, you know,

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>how many carries they are going to have and and

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>game plan and strength the schedule. Nobody knows. I mean

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:33.959
<v Speaker 1>like nobody knows at all. Not even the coaches on

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the team that are around these players every day know

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen and how many guys times again,

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you can it's it's all just guessing. But what you

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>can know is what they've done athletically. And uh, Nick

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Chubb was a guy. He's a freak. I mean he's

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>he's got size, he's got power, he's got speed, he's

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>got lateral agility, he's got good hands. He can do everything.

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>This is another guy like mixing Um. But I like

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>his offensive line better and I like his offense better,

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:04.079
<v Speaker 1>so I have him really, really high. He's a guy

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:06.679
<v Speaker 1>that I had all over the place last year and

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I held him and I held him and I held him,

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and then when he started to play, I looked. You know,

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I reap the benefits of having Nick Chubb. I think

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>he'll be even better this year. He's a guy that

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I absolutely love. He's got all the tools. And people

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>are like, oh, well, what about Creeman. He's not going

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to play until week A ten or eleven. He kept

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 1>practice with the team like he's it's not gonna be

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Luck not a football player. But at that point

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 1>he's not a football player. I mean he's gonna have

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to get back up to game speed. Nick Nick Chubb.

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:38.079
<v Speaker 1>If he's running with it and running like how he

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I think he will. You know, Creem Hunt is going

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to be a guy that spells him now and then

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>when he gets tired, and that's going to be it.

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Look at Creem Hunt has shown us that he he

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 1>is the real deal. But this is a new system,

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a different system. He's not playing in Kansas City,

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>um so, so we don't know what he's going to

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>be there. We saw, especially at the end of the year,

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 1>what Nick Chubb can be and I'm all over him, honestly,

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Greg and I said this yesterday when it comes to

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Kareem Hunt, if you can predict what he is going

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to be when he steps back into this lineup and

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>if the team, then show me your crystal ball, because

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I would I would love to get my hands on it.

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I would love to be able to use it because honestly,

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>nobody knows. All we can do is try and project

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>what we think is going to happen with Kareem Hunt.

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know, if you ask me today when he's

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>eligible to play, whether it's in week ten, whatever it is,

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>he's probably I'll say it's maybe a seventy split Still,

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Nick Chubb getting a large majority of this. You know,

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe they want to keep Chubb fresh down the stretch

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>if they, you know, have aspirations to make it into

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the to the postseason and and make some noise there.

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>But overall, nobody knows how Kareem Hunt is going to

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>be used. We know how Nick Chubb was used last

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>year and his numbers once he took over as a

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>starter Week seven on, he was the RB eight overall.

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>His numbers during that span ten games, one seventy six

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>carries at seventeen point six carries per game, eight hundred

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and twenty three yards, eighty two rushing yards per game,

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>four point seven yards per carry, six rushing touchdowns, two

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>receiving touchdowns, twenty eight targets, so that's right around three

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 1>targets per game, twenty receptions. I don't know that he's

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>going to catch the ball at a time. I think

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>that much like Leonard four Nett, he's probably someone that

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>can do it. I just don't know that he's going

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to be asked to do it, just because the Browns

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>have as many options in the past game as they do,

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>so that's a knock on him. But I think that

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the yards is gonna be there. I think that the

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns are gonna be there. And look, we just spent

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the past thirty minutes talking about all these weapons on

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>this team, Odell Beckham, Baker Mayfield throwing the ball down

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the field to these guys Jarvis Landry, David and Joeku.

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>That opens up running lanes for Nick Chubb. I don't

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>think that it's obviously I don't want to just compare

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>this Brown's team to the Chief's offense from last year

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>because that was a historic offense. But much of what

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Kareem Harnt was able to do you in that Chief's

0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>offense last year was because of all the weapons that

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>they have and every everyone that you have to worry

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 1>about down the field just opens up so much running

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>room for the running backs, and specifically here on this

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Browns team, Nick Chubbs. So I don't really have a

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>problem with where he's going right now. I think, you know,

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 1>in the NFC, which is a full point PPR league,

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>you might have some question marks about how many catches

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 1>he's going to pass. I think he's probably in that

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty to forty reception range this year. But overall, I mean,

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I think he's just some ridiculously, ridiculously good running back.

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>He tested extremely well top twelve in yards created do

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 1>great evaded tackles, breakaway runs last year, which is runs

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>of fifteen plus yards. The only knock on him really

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>is the fact that Kareem Hunt will be back, but

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>we don't know how cream unts can be used. And

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that he's going to catch as many

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>passes as maybe some other running backs that are going

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>in this second round range, like a Dalvin Cook or

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>a Damian Williams for example. Those guys are going to

0:16:56.400 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>catch more passes. But I think it's unquestionable at Nick

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Chubb will rush for more yards and probably score more touchdowns.

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>So you have no issue drafting him in this spot. No,

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a fair spot in the middle of

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the second round, right And you know he's wise, like

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>he said in the inside that top six as a

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>running back for him, um so ey, you'd be willing

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to pull the trigger on him in like the late

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:21.439
<v Speaker 1>first round range if he's your your best player on

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the board. Yep, do you have that? Means above James

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Conner and and yes, sir, a righty right now, look

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:34.640
<v Speaker 1>like they're not there yet, but that's where I have him. Now,

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:37.120
<v Speaker 1>totally get it. You're the James Conner guy, E wise,

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the Nick Chubb guy. I guess I'm like the Joe

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Mixing guy. I guess that's fair. We'll take each each

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 1>running back in the A f C North also like

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 1>mark Ingram allt we'll talk about that tomorrow. Come on

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>with some respect on mark Ingram's name, would you guys

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>draft Cream Hunt? No? No, I mean you're gonna end

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>up drops of because of what he did and and

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 1>because of his name. He's going way too early. You

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 1>can't use them intil week eleven. I mean, who knows? Like,

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>who know? Like that's just silly. I mean to me,

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's missing half the season, Greg, I mean

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 1>we talked about last year, you know, sashing the aformentioned

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 1>mark Ingram. He was missing four games. That's a lot

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 1>different than missing eight games. That's half of the season.

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:23.360
<v Speaker 1>By the time we get to week nine in fantasy,

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:25.640
<v Speaker 1>we're already starting to think about like the fantasy playoffs

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and stuff, and like the stretch run there in fantasy run.

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:32.639
<v Speaker 1>But let someone else get them, they'll drop him. Then

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>you pick them up week five or six, and you

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>only have to hold on to him for four or

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>five weeks. I'll say this because that's going to happen

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>in keeper or dynasty leagues, like that's where I would

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>pounce on him, Like I would still draft him there.

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>If I own Nick Chubbing a keeper league, I would

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>want to own Kareem Hunt there as well, to speak,

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:48.920
<v Speaker 1>just so I can lock up the Browns running backs

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 1>of the future, just in case something happens in the

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 1>second half where Kareem Hunt magically takes over and you

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>have that guy in your roster four years to come.

0:18:56.840 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 1>In a redraft league, your standard fifteen sixteen round draft, graid,

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you really afford to hold the guy for half the

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>season with as many injuries that are going to occur

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>in fantasy football, the answers probably know, what do you,

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>wy said? If someone else drops him in that you know,

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:12.399
<v Speaker 1>week four to six range, you probably pounce hi pick

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>him up. Then out of the rounds. Conversation continue in

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 1>to the Action hour coming up next. From the NFL

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to the NBA. Daily Rodo dot Com is the place

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>to win millions in daily fantasy. You can get the

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>best DFS NFL coverage all season long for a price

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 1>of one or dominate the entire Daily Fantasy Sports realm

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 1>with the Elite package a month. If you use the

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:43.920
<v Speaker 1>promo code f n t s Y, you get ten

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>percent off your Daily Rodo package. Go to Daily Rodo

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com, pick your NFL Elite Package, enter promo code

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 1>f n t s Y, and you'll be on your

0:19:51.920 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 1>way to becoming the next Daily Rhodo millionaire. Put your

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 1>money where your mouth is a shot by opening a

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>sports wagering account, the Fandel New Jersey's larger sports book

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>could have Fandel dot Com slash great Wood received a

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 1>freebet up to five hundred dollars. It's a free betto

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 1>five hundred dollars when you open a sports wagering account

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 1>at Fandel dot com. Slash Grid Point spreads game totals, props,

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 1>parlays and in game wagering on college pro sports and

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>you're in control. To fand dot com slash grid open

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:30.959
<v Speaker 1>your new account and claiming your free wage. We're up

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.439
<v Speaker 1>to five hundred dollars today. Do you have a gambling problem?

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Coal one hundred gambler twenty one over New Jersey only.

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details. You've kind of

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:44.199
<v Speaker 1>run out of time and stuff talking about w cover

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:46.679
<v Speaker 1>to the Browns. But I know, frank you another questions Ferk,

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:49.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah you y. When we were talking about Baker Mayfield,

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I noticed that we didn't really get a chance for

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:53.919
<v Speaker 1>you to opine on Baker Mayfield and where he's currently

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:56.920
<v Speaker 1>going and uh, just frankly, where you have him ranked

0:20:56.920 --> 0:20:59.400
<v Speaker 1>this year? So how do you feel about Baker Mayfield

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:01.919
<v Speaker 1>in effect that he's being drafted as a top five

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:05.359
<v Speaker 1>quarterback right now? Yeah, I've got him number seven. I

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:08.440
<v Speaker 1>got him just behind Carson Wentz, and I'm going back

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and forth on them, and I think it's just gonna

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 1>depend on what goes on during the preseason and what

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:15.120
<v Speaker 1>we're here coming out of camps and stuff like that.

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>So he's a guy like I'm in this really crazy,

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>super intense dynasty league, the only dynasty league I'm in

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>with a bunch of analysts from sirius Um. Michael Rathburn

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>invited me over. I took a guy's team over and

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:31.479
<v Speaker 1>I drafted him. Uh and the rookie draft, so uh,

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I look really really smart. First year, I took Dalvin Cook.

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>In the second year, I took uh. I took Baker Mayfield,

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>So I'm doing okay building my team back up to strength. Uh.

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 1>He's a guy that I love. He's interesting, makes the

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 1>game interesting. Uh new quarterbacks, you know, Like I think

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>like five years ago him coming out, people would have

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>just said, ah, he's short. You know, he's a guy

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that runs. I mean, you know he will be able

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to play in the NFL because he's not tall enough.

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>And this that the other I mean, Drew Brees has

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>proven the short quarterbacks can play. Um, it's more rare

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>than than taller guys because just the mechanics of throwing

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and looking over the line. But Baker Mayfield a guy

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I love. I love watching him play. He's got confidence, swagger,

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want to call it cockiness. Uh, that's what

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:18.879
<v Speaker 1>I want my quarterback to have, and he's got it

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>in spades with all those weapons. I feel like this

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:24.880
<v Speaker 1>will be the breakout season for Baker Mayfield and he'll

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>be a top ten twelve quarterback going forward. For all

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>your Dynasty fantasy football needs, make sure to hit up

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>e y at the Eric Young on Twitter. How don't

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you do this guy? Dynasty aficionado Greggy Yeah, Domin Cook

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and uh, Baker Mayfield say he's doing a pretty good job. Absolutely,

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Damien Harris this year, Damien Harris this year. You know

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that Gregg is team Sony Michelle, I'm team Harris to

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 1>rookie only draft, like like, I mean you know, I mean,

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you're You're not gonna You're only gonna get so many

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:57.440
<v Speaker 1>players in a rookie only draft. Greg Um, Well, we

0:22:57.440 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 1>have a couple of minutes before we get into our

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>best bets forever. We like why I go. You asked

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 1>me a really interesting question before Frank and he said,

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>when I look at my drafts, I look at tibetso

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and make what do I take into account or how

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 1>much are we take into account a player that begins

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>on the active pubulist? And my response was I do.

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:19.400
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter to me, Like Julian Edelman is gonna

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>be on this publist for the next month because he

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 1>is a broken thumb. I don't care. He's Julian Edelman.

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>He'll be fine. He doesn't really need training camp at

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:29.640
<v Speaker 1>this point. Correct e Y, what about you? How much

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>do you take it into account during your early season

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:35.200
<v Speaker 1>draft about guys that are on the active publist. I mean,

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:38.199
<v Speaker 1>at this time of year active populists. It doesn't change

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 1>anything for me. Um, It's just I think it's more

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:43.919
<v Speaker 1>of a tool for front offices for contract things and

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:47.119
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that, shuffling guys around, keeping other guys in

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>camp to see what they are uh, maybe give them

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:52.679
<v Speaker 1>another look for another team because they liked the player.

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's all it really is at this point. A

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:58.679
<v Speaker 1>broken thumb on a wide receiver that I mean that

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>does We're me as a person that has broken both

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:05.639
<v Speaker 1>of his thumbs. It's not something that heals quickly. Um.

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>It takes a while for for a thumb to heal

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and be back to strength. So um that that worries

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 1>me is a wide receiver with a broken finger I mean,

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and thumb being the most important UH digit on the hand,

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:18.919
<v Speaker 1>So that that's something that I would look at. But

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he's on that active pup, I wouldn't

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:25.880
<v Speaker 1>care about that, but I would really monitor the finger situation. Yeah,

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a case by case basis as well. Greg.

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:31.919
<v Speaker 1>I think obviously you want rookies and younger players to

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:34.119
<v Speaker 1>get as many reps, or players on new teams to

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:36.360
<v Speaker 1>get as many reps with their UH with their new

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:38.719
<v Speaker 1>coaches and with around their new team, and so they

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 1>could pick up the playbook and and and the scheme

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and everything and learn within that system. So I think

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a case by case basis. But when it comes

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 1>to guys like Julian Edelman, yes, pay attention to the

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>thumb injury, but if he was just on the pup

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 1>list with something that wasn't that serious, like, Okay, it's

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Julian Edelman, He's been with the Patriots forever, he knows

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the system. There's not really much to see here. So

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:00.639
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a case by k spasis. When it

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:02.920
<v Speaker 1>comes to like veterans, I don't really care as much,

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 1>but specifically younger players and guys moving over new teams,

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that's something that I would pay attention to more. And

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that I think that's fine. I I think

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>that um makes plenty of sense. That's what you're gonna

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to those guys. Fine, new teams, new places,

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 1>new opportunities that they're not a lot too, So please

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>be all right. Julian Edeman, he talks about that, talks

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>that you know, one guy, I really I think we

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 1>see a career here, career year in terms of touchdowns

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>this year for Julian Edelman. You know, one guy, we

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess I wasn't. I wasn't really there, so I didn't.

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know what you guys thought. Are you guys

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 1>buying Adam home freezes year in Tennessee? Not really. I

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:42.959
<v Speaker 1>mean we spoke more about like we kind of just

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:45.199
<v Speaker 1>barely touched on him because there's just a lot of

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:48.120
<v Speaker 1>mouths to feed in the Tennessee Titans passing attack right now, Greg,

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 1>And you know, if people are buying in on the

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 1>third year breakout for Corey Davis, just the fact that

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 1>the Titans are not going to be a very uh

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:58.919
<v Speaker 1>past happy team means that there's not gonna be a

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 1>ton of targets to go around. And personally, I like

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>a J. A J. Brown. He looks like an NFL

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 1>player to me. I'm I'm pretty excited about him. So

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I just think that there's a lot of mouths to

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 1>feed from Corey Davis to A J. Brown, Adam Humphries,

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:13.159
<v Speaker 1>Laney Walker is gonna return. We know he has a

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>good rapport with Marcus Mariotta and all the while they

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 1>want to be a run first football team. So I

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>just don't really think that there's much to go around there.

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I just know that they they same

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>thing like Jian Lewis right, like they invested money in

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>this guy. He signed with him over New England. I

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>love Dan Lewis this year. I think he's coming out

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:34.439
<v Speaker 1>a huge discount like RB something like that. I just

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>think that because of it, like probably gonna side They're

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna utilize them more than any of us wants.

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 1>Why Adam Humphries anything, Yeah, I mean it's interesting with

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the Dion Lewis thing and that Adam Humphrey, like they mean,

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:50.880
<v Speaker 1>especially with Adam Humphries. I know the Patriots we were

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 1>in on this guy. Adelman is not a spring chicken,

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that's for sure. And Humphreys is a guy that's younger

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:00.040
<v Speaker 1>than and that could replace him down the road. It

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you're a slot receiver, I mean, is

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 1>there a better team to play on than the Patriots?

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>But whatever, the coaching staff here told him that enticed

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 1>him to come here. Uh so that's exciting for me.

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:15.439
<v Speaker 1>A guy that's I think he's going to have, uh

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, a fair amount of volume. It's just going

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 1>to dependent Like we said earlier, is like everyone wants

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to be a running team, but the Tennessee Titans. I

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I believe that to be true. They're they're going to

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 1>base the offense around Derrick Henry. Um. They proved that

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 1>near the end of the year last year by giving

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:34.640
<v Speaker 1>him a ton of carries, and I think they're going

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to do that out of the gate this year. Uh

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:40.119
<v Speaker 1>and and go with that strategy. Look, that could all change.

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>You get down and you're losing by fourteen. Guess what,

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry isn't running the ball twenty five times. So um,

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:48.959
<v Speaker 1>that'll be a big thing for Dion Lewis and for

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Adam Humphrey. So it's gonna be an interesting thing. Look

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 1>at like, I live in the city. I mean, it

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:55.919
<v Speaker 1>doesn't surprise me that he wants to live here. I

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 1>think Humphreys is a better NFL player in real life

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>play or for what the Titans want to do then

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:04.200
<v Speaker 1>what he will actually be for fantasy football this season,

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:07.640
<v Speaker 1>if that makes sense. I think the Titans basically put

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Mariota in the best possible position that they can

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and they're putting it on him now. They're saying, look,

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 1>you have no excuses, you have a top five offensive

0:28:17.720 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>line in the league. You have three really good wide receivers,

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 1>You're getting a veteran tight end back who you really like.

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:26.959
<v Speaker 1>You have a strong running back in Derrick Henry. You

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 1>have another running back that can catch passes in Diana Lewis.

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 1>So the Titans are laying it all out on the

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:34.720
<v Speaker 1>table this season. Everything is set up for Marcus Mariota

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to have a career year in terms of success for

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the Titans. I don't know that that's going to translate

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>necessarily for fantasy purposes, but they're basically saying, carry this team. Now,

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 1>let's see what the Titans can do with Marcus Mariota

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 1>as their quarterback. Really good offensive line, really good weapons,

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that you know, Derrick Henry should be

0:28:56.440 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 1>their their workhorse running back. So there's no more excuses

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 1>left for Marcus Mariota. I think that was their thinking overall,

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 1>with surrounding him with this many weapons. The Tennessee Titans

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 1>actually the worst odds here. Do you win the a

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>f C South? They are plus five, But there's there's

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of parody in that division right now, Like

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't surprise me if any team won that division.

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't agree with that. It wouldn't surprise the Jaggers

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 1>were five and eleven last year, Greg, and it wouldn't

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>surprise me if they wanted to Titans on the division.

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Very surprised. What I'm telling you what I what I feel. Okay,

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>what you feel is wrong. I'm just telling you that

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you might have to put some money down on that

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 1>be interesting. Yeah, the Titans that plus five fifty Nashville, Tennessee.

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 1>That's e y right. But again I said this last

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 1>week when we were previewing the Titans. You weren't here

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that day, Greg. They have the they have the recipe

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to succeed right in front of them, and it's what

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys do. It's control of the ball, run

0:29:53.000 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the football, don't expose your defense too much, because I

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 1>don't think that they have a world beating defense. But

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 1>if they're not exposed all that much, then that obviously helps.

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's been the same thing for the Cowboys.

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Marcus Mariotta only has to make plays

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>when he's asked to do so, much like Dak Prescott.

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 1>So the blueprint, yes, is there for the Tennessee Titans

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>to succeed this season, it's just for them to execute

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>it absolutely all right. So coming up we're going to

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>get into our true action. Now we're gonna have a

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of best to talk about from last light where

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 1>we were successful. Frank, we were a combined two in

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 1>one because we both liked the Cardinals, so so we

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>both got that one right right, and then you had

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the Reds only had to sweat that one out. Greg,

0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Is that a success or not? It was? It was

0:30:38.240 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 1>a success you were to and O I was one

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 1>on one, thank you. So we're gonna do that coming up,

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Um after the break e y, it's it's been awesome.

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Tomorrow we have these Steelers and the Ravens and it's

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:53.160
<v Speaker 1>my guy, James Conner, Frank Skuy mark Ingram quick preview.

0:30:53.200 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Are you know mark Ingram this year? I like marketing.

0:30:57.080 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna run the ball, that's no secret. Uh. The

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 1>starting running there is going to have a lot of

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 1>out volume, um and a lot of value. So mark

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Ingram is a guy that's interesting and I think being

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the guy, um, he's got something to prove. I mean,

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I feel like a professional athlete. When they were giving

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 1>a chance to say, okay, you're the guy we're giving

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 1>you the keys. I mean, this is this is a

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 1>proven for him. He's not he's not old, but he's

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 1>not young either. So it's gonna be a very interesting

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 1>year for the Baltimore Ravens. I think it's gonna be

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a very interesting year for the Baltimore Ravens. We'll talk

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 1>more about that tomorrow. You appreciate the time and staying

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit after with us, and alright, gout next

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 1>best past for tonight we go over the entire m'll

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 1>be car but you know what you need to know

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and we'll break it down as only we can. Let's

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>keep the money coming in, keep cashing out. We'll be back. Hey.

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember if you want

0:31:56.160 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app, download

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a tune in app and just search for Fantasy Sports

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 1>or Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:13.240
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on Twitch, or on Periscope

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess dude Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and face for listening.

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Final if minutes the program here bff's action our so

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's get some action, Frank, let's go, let's put some

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>cash on the line. Two and one yesterday. Crushed it

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 1>with the Reds, crushed it with the Cardinals. Not so much.

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Richards seen that one coming. Yeah, I'm sorry, buddy,

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 1>but hey, you can get rich going to in one,

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Yes you can. It's a new day, Yes it is.

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 1>The Washington Nationals and Steven Strasburg are home to night,

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 1>facing off against Peter Lambert and the Rockies. Frank, Rocky

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 1>is probably gonna lose this going. Oh you don't say, Greg.

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 1>The Nationals are too minus two forty five favorites here

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 1>on the money line with the total at nine runs.

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 1>There's weather concerns in Washington got rained out yesterday, so

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 1>if you started any Nationals or Rockies for fantasy baseball purposes,

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 1>it might not play again tonight. So that that sucks.

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 1>But overall, obviously there's not much value to go along

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to go with here. The only way I'm taking the

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:32.719
<v Speaker 1>Nationals is if I'm parlaying them with another team. Perhaps

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 1>we can aps we can find that team later on,

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:37.720
<v Speaker 1>so we can find a nice little parlay. Yesterday I

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 1>wanted to do the Astros and somebody else good. It

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 1>was the Astros in the Diamondbacks. I think in both

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 1>teams won. Diamond Backs were the other really big favorite.

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they were, and they were a big favorite,

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 1>don't get me wrong, but I think it was here.

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Wasn't the Nationals. I think it was the actually was

0:34:01.800 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and both teams, both teams, um, it was the Indians

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:09.239
<v Speaker 1>one and the Astros one big. That's something that would

0:34:09.239 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>have passed out at like it was like plus one

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:15.239
<v Speaker 1>oh two remember that and uh and Garrett Cole money line,

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:17.440
<v Speaker 1>So we'll we'll give you out another parlay today. He

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>likes to pay out what he didn't like the al

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I said, raises, Robbie, you didn't like yesterday, just because

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:27.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a huge Robbie Ray guy overall. How about

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I rod yesterday? Though? My man on the other side,

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:32.839
<v Speaker 1>how about this Craig, I saw jail and Beaks got rocked.

0:34:32.840 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 1>As I mentioned, there was a chance that you did

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 1>been because he doesn't normally start, he usually is used

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 1>as a follower, right. And actually one of those teams

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:41.320
<v Speaker 1>is where nine runs by themselves and the red sides

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:43.719
<v Speaker 1>did guess who had Jail and Beaks in their main

0:34:43.719 --> 0:34:47.399
<v Speaker 1>event lineup. Oh no, I forgot I put him in, dude,

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 1>So I went and checked it later on. I'm like, oh,

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:52.719
<v Speaker 1>I lost two points in Rodo. How did that happen? Oh?

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:55.799
<v Speaker 1>Had jail and Beaks in my line. It great. I

0:34:55.840 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 1>just keep losing pitching there. It's just so hard to

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:01.719
<v Speaker 1>recover anyway. So I've first season though. Yeah, I'm in

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:05.319
<v Speaker 1>third place right now. It's pretty good Cardinals and the Pirates.

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Chris Archer on them out for Pittsburgh, Dakota Hudson for

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:12.719
<v Speaker 1>the St. Louis Cardinals. Yeah, I think the Cardinals are

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 1>interesting value here, getting them at plus one fourteen on

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the money line. The total is nine runs in this game. Uh,

0:35:19.520 --> 0:35:22.359
<v Speaker 1>that's a good total. I could see it. I can

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:24.399
<v Speaker 1>see it going either way there, because Chris Archer has

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:26.920
<v Speaker 1>pitched well in the second half so far this season,

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:29.200
<v Speaker 1>but he is still prone to being blown up here.

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Based on the value, I'd lean with the Cardinals. But

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:35.440
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing I really love in this game. My my

0:35:35.520 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 1>value here is is over. The over is a favorite.

0:35:38.000 --> 0:35:40.399
<v Speaker 1>It's minus one eighteen, and I think we've seen Chris

0:35:40.520 --> 0:35:41.919
<v Speaker 1>Arger get blown up. He's a couple of good stores

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:43.920
<v Speaker 1>in the row. Like you said, Koda Hudson is smoking

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 1>mirrors too, because he has like a high three z

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 1>r A, but his whip is one point five one,

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:50.800
<v Speaker 1>So based on what that whip is, his EERA should

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 1>probably be closer to like the mid four range. Yeah,

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:56.399
<v Speaker 1>to me, I don't really want to get my best

0:35:56.400 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 1>bet yet. My favorite bet thus far, out of the

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:01.719
<v Speaker 1>two we've talked about, is the over in this Cardinals

0:36:01.719 --> 0:36:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and Pirates game, over nine Trevor Bauer Aaron Sanchez, Indians

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:09.799
<v Speaker 1>heavy favorite here for Cleveland obviously, Trevor Bauer nine and

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 1>seven with a three point six seven ear a hundred

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and seventy strikeouts on the season. Aaron Sanchez with the

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 1>old six point to six e r A. He is,

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:23.280
<v Speaker 1>this is not a typo three and fourteen on the season.

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:27.959
<v Speaker 1>Here the Indians minus one eight four on the road

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 1>against the Toronto Blue Jays. There's not really any value

0:36:32.080 --> 0:36:35.880
<v Speaker 1>in taking the Indians trade up, and I don't. I

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:38.520
<v Speaker 1>don't trust Trevor Bauer enough to make this the second

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:40.719
<v Speaker 1>leg of the parlay, so we'll have to find something else.

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 1>If I had to to something here, I would probably

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 1>go with the over nine and a half because Trevor Bauer.

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:48.319
<v Speaker 1>As good as he's been, he could still be prone

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to giving up home runs. And it wouldn't surprise me

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:51.919
<v Speaker 1>if the Indians alone put up like seven eight runs

0:36:51.920 --> 0:36:54.319
<v Speaker 1>against Aaron Sanchez. So if I had to take something

0:36:54.320 --> 0:36:55.680
<v Speaker 1>in this game would be over nine and a half.

0:36:55.680 --> 0:36:57.880
<v Speaker 1>But again, nothing I love yet on the sleep I

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:01.239
<v Speaker 1>agree with that. Continuing on Chris Sale and the Red

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Sox still in Tampa and either taking only Chinos and

0:37:04.160 --> 0:37:06.719
<v Speaker 1>the Rays, Sale and the Socks are a favorite in

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:09.400
<v Speaker 1>this one, and pulling up real quick to see how

0:37:09.440 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Chris Sale has done against the Tampa Bay Rai seven

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a half. Seven and a half is the total the

0:37:17.239 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 1>hot swinging Red Sox bats from last night will be

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:23.920
<v Speaker 1>going up against Yanni Charinos. And how about this, In

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the month of July, Christ Sale has made three starts.

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:29.719
<v Speaker 1>His previous star was awesome, he had like twelve strikeouts,

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:31.759
<v Speaker 1>but he has a five point five one e r

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:33.239
<v Speaker 1>A in the month of July, so there might be

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:35.479
<v Speaker 1>some value on that over the seven and a half

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:39.400
<v Speaker 1>because Christ Sale has not been the Chris Sale of

0:37:39.560 --> 0:37:43.600
<v Speaker 1>old recently. He's made one start against the Tampa Bay

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Rays this year, seven innings, two earned runs eight strikeouts.

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:52.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't love I don't like Chris Sale and the

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Red Sox enough to make them the second leg of

0:37:54.080 --> 0:37:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the parlay. If I had to choose something here, Greg,

0:37:55.840 --> 0:37:58.399
<v Speaker 1>over the seven and a half, But again, I don't

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 1>love it. The seven halves really small amount of runs.

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 1>It is a small amount of runs. But would's surprised

0:38:03.960 --> 0:38:06.600
<v Speaker 1>you of Chris Hale just is awesome tonight. It which

0:38:06.600 --> 0:38:10.560
<v Speaker 1>surprised me. The only Trenos is there. He's been pretty good. Fine,

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 1>come on, Aaron, Aaron Nola, Maddie Boyd, Tigers and Phillies,

0:38:15.680 --> 0:38:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and your pointing had to me yesterday that Boyd has

0:38:17.920 --> 0:38:21.600
<v Speaker 1>not been great over the past few starts. No, he

0:38:21.680 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 1>has not. His e R A has been on the rise.

0:38:24.600 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 1>It's up over four nowns at four point one three.

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:30.879
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Nola has mostly pitched better recently at three point

0:38:30.920 --> 0:38:32.759
<v Speaker 1>seven seven e R In the season, he is eight

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and two. I actually like the Phillies a decent amount

0:38:37.120 --> 0:38:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to to win this game here. It's minus one four,

0:38:40.800 --> 0:38:43.319
<v Speaker 1>so I'm not sure that I would. Uh, it's something

0:38:43.320 --> 0:38:44.959
<v Speaker 1>that I would just want to do alone. But let's

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 1>let's let's try this out right here, Greg, Strasburg and

0:38:47.680 --> 0:38:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the Nationals money line at minus two and Aaronola and

0:38:52.120 --> 0:38:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the Phillies hardly that together you get it at plus

0:38:55.440 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 1>one thirty two. I don't love the Phillies as much

0:38:59.920 --> 0:39:02.480
<v Speaker 1>as you do, really, I mean the Tigers are a

0:39:02.480 --> 0:39:05.840
<v Speaker 1>bad team, very very very bad, very terrible. Yeah. Actually

0:39:05.880 --> 0:39:08.360
<v Speaker 1>think I like the Phillies. More common in the Phillies

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:11.200
<v Speaker 1>to win than I am the Nationals really, even though

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:14.360
<v Speaker 1>they're huge favors. Yeah, Like the Rockies still have a

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:18.080
<v Speaker 1>really good lineup. They could give Strasburg a run for

0:39:18.080 --> 0:39:22.360
<v Speaker 1>his money theoretically. All right, there's also rain concerns in

0:39:22.400 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 1>that game. I like the Phillies a lot. Tonight. Is

0:39:24.760 --> 0:39:30.239
<v Speaker 1>one of your best pets, Sure it is, So it's

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:32.040
<v Speaker 1>not you're not You're not getting them at great value

0:39:32.120 --> 0:39:34.839
<v Speaker 1>or anything. Chris Paddock and the Padres are in the

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:38.360
<v Speaker 1>New York to face the New York Metropolitans. Paddock minus

0:39:38.400 --> 0:39:39.840
<v Speaker 1>one forty and I eight and a half. As the

0:39:39.960 --> 0:39:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Winter was your best bet so far was the over

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 1>nine in the Cardinals and the Pirates, alright was Pitt

0:39:47.760 --> 0:39:50.560
<v Speaker 1>over nine? Next up, we have, as you mentioned, Chris

0:39:50.600 --> 0:39:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Paddock going up against Jason Vargas. Huh YEA like the

0:39:55.400 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Padres a decent bit here as well. Just pat coming

0:39:58.040 --> 0:40:01.400
<v Speaker 1>off that monster start against the Miami Arlens. The Padres

0:40:01.400 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 1>actually performed quite well against left handed pitching on the season.

0:40:06.080 --> 0:40:09.080
<v Speaker 1>They have a three thirty weighted on base average against

0:40:09.120 --> 0:40:12.480
<v Speaker 1>left handed pitching that is ninth best in baseball. I

0:40:12.600 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 1>like the Padres a decent amount tonight as well. And

0:40:16.400 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 1>we know that he just kind of has like a

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:20.719
<v Speaker 1>vendetta against Pete Alonso because Alonso is probably gonna win

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:22.759
<v Speaker 1>the National League Rookie of the Year. He is gonna

0:40:22.800 --> 0:40:24.480
<v Speaker 1>win the National League View of the Year. So we

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:27.120
<v Speaker 1>saw last time Paddock played the Mets, he was fired up.

0:40:27.640 --> 0:40:29.800
<v Speaker 1>He was like freaking out every time he pitched against

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the Pete Alonso. I like the Padres to win tonight

0:40:33.239 --> 0:40:35.040
<v Speaker 1>as well. How about this, Craig, and I interest you

0:40:35.080 --> 0:40:37.520
<v Speaker 1>in this? Probably not because you don't like the Phillies

0:40:37.560 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that much. Parlay the Phillies money line and the Patres

0:40:41.760 --> 0:40:45.279
<v Speaker 1>money line two road favorites. You get them at plus

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:47.920
<v Speaker 1>one eight two combined. That makes sense. It's pretty good. Well,

0:40:47.960 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 1>it's good them, yeah, yeah, I mean Paddick against Vargas,

0:40:52.760 --> 0:40:59.279
<v Speaker 1>Aaronola against the Tires like upset Special tonight. I hope

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:03.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not Jason. It is not, okay, Jason Vargas. It

0:41:03.840 --> 0:41:07.000
<v Speaker 1>is Danny Duffy and the Royals. He was part of

0:41:07.080 --> 0:41:10.279
<v Speaker 1>my parlay last week. That's correct, my upset Special of

0:41:10.320 --> 0:41:12.799
<v Speaker 1>the night. Folks. You're getting the Royals at plus one

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:16.919
<v Speaker 1>in Atlanta, a Royals team that is seven and three

0:41:17.120 --> 0:41:19.160
<v Speaker 1>in their last ten games. How are they gonna hit

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the ball? Is Bo Jackson coming back to play for them?

0:41:21.120 --> 0:41:24.440
<v Speaker 1>To Bo Jackson doesn't need to Yeah, they got no

0:41:24.719 --> 0:41:27.799
<v Speaker 1>Adelbertomond to see Greg, you don't need them. I think

0:41:27.800 --> 0:41:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I think they could use them right now. Well, they

0:41:29.120 --> 0:41:31.000
<v Speaker 1>could use them, but they don't need them any Duffy

0:41:31.040 --> 0:41:34.560
<v Speaker 1>plus I like it. Braves this year against left handed

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:37.840
<v Speaker 1>pitching seventh and waited on bass average grad Does that

0:41:37.880 --> 0:41:40.120
<v Speaker 1>matter at all? Just letting you know upset Special the

0:41:40.200 --> 0:41:46.319
<v Speaker 1>night Royals against lefties Dallas, Kiko left. I'm just letting

0:41:46.360 --> 0:41:48.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, Frank, is your upset special tonight is one

0:41:48.280 --> 0:41:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of your best bets. No, it's just your upset upset

0:41:51.120 --> 0:41:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Special of the night. So you can just throw a

0:41:53.680 --> 0:41:55.160
<v Speaker 1>bunch of stuff out. I know, I don't do that

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:57.879
<v Speaker 1>every day. That's fine, that's fine. Don't you do throw

0:41:57.920 --> 0:42:01.080
<v Speaker 1>out some some interesting upset special And here's one alright, alright,

0:42:01.120 --> 0:42:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati Reds in the Milwaukee Brewers. Greg, now the Reds

0:42:03.760 --> 0:42:06.399
<v Speaker 1>last night tonight, it's Tanna row Ark pitcher for since

0:42:06.920 --> 0:42:09.759
<v Speaker 1>Zack Davies on the mound for the Milwaukee Brewer crew.

0:42:09.920 --> 0:42:13.319
<v Speaker 1>How do you like Tanna ROWARKG. I don't like this game.

0:42:13.520 --> 0:42:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I feel like you used to be the Tanner Rowark

0:42:15.200 --> 0:42:18.000
<v Speaker 1>guys that I had him last year called yeah, because

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I always start even underratedly solid everybody. It seems like

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:25.759
<v Speaker 1>everybody owns Tanna Rowark once per season in Fantasy per year. Yeah,

0:42:26.280 --> 0:42:28.319
<v Speaker 1>Tanner Rowork at three point nine seven ear a going

0:42:28.360 --> 0:42:31.040
<v Speaker 1>up against Zach Davies a two point seven nine ear a.

0:42:31.520 --> 0:42:34.360
<v Speaker 1>This game's taking place in Milwaukee in Miller Park. The

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:36.920
<v Speaker 1>total is nine and a half. I like the over

0:42:36.960 --> 0:42:39.279
<v Speaker 1>a decent amount here, Greg. Do you think nine and

0:42:39.320 --> 0:42:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a half Davies against Yeah, Tanna roar, No, no, no,

0:42:44.360 --> 0:42:47.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a little a little bit too high for you. Yeah,

0:42:47.239 --> 0:42:50.320
<v Speaker 1>all right, we'll stay away. Sorry, Marlins and White Sox

0:42:50.560 --> 0:42:54.680
<v Speaker 1>next no work, No, um, they'll let you down last night.

0:42:54.960 --> 0:42:58.799
<v Speaker 1>This is Trevor Richard is right here. It is Smith.

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:03.880
<v Speaker 1>He's doing coming slight favorite here that at nine dealing

0:43:03.960 --> 0:43:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Covie not good pitching for the White Sox tonight. I

0:43:08.080 --> 0:43:11.200
<v Speaker 1>was on the Marlins last night. Greg, let's go back

0:43:11.280 --> 0:43:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to the well. The Marlins minus one twenty. I have

0:43:16.640 --> 0:43:18.400
<v Speaker 1>a little round robin here, Greg, what do you think

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:24.920
<v Speaker 1>about that? You're crazy, man? Marlins minus one twenty, the

0:43:25.040 --> 0:43:29.279
<v Speaker 1>Padres minus one forty, the Phillies minus one fifty four.

0:43:29.719 --> 0:43:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's round robin that. Get it every which way we

0:43:32.280 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 1>possibly can play them individually. You're gonna be a winner tonight.

0:43:38.120 --> 0:43:43.319
<v Speaker 1>Tell you that right now. Sure to know you ever

0:43:43.400 --> 0:43:45.360
<v Speaker 1>went wrong, you know, betting on the Phillies, the Padres

0:43:45.360 --> 0:43:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and the Marlins in the same night, right, Greg Domingo

0:43:47.360 --> 0:43:50.719
<v Speaker 1>Herrman and the Yanks in Minnesota face the Twins. I

0:43:50.800 --> 0:43:53.200
<v Speaker 1>like CC last night. I was dead wrong about that one.

0:43:53.760 --> 0:43:55.319
<v Speaker 1>You weren't far off. I mean they lost the game

0:43:55.360 --> 0:43:57.680
<v Speaker 1>eight to six. Yeah, but they were bad last night. Yeah.

0:43:57.719 --> 0:44:00.560
<v Speaker 1>CC specifically was awful. Yeah, he was even seven runs

0:44:01.600 --> 0:44:04.600
<v Speaker 1>not good? A harmon minus one twenty. Tonight, Yankee slight

0:44:04.719 --> 0:44:07.400
<v Speaker 1>favorites on the road against the Twins. Kyle Gibson has

0:44:07.440 --> 0:44:09.560
<v Speaker 1>been up and down this year. The Yankees have actually

0:44:09.640 --> 0:44:12.359
<v Speaker 1>been much better against right handed pitching. If there's ever

0:44:12.400 --> 0:44:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a night to bet on the Yankees, I think it's

0:44:13.920 --> 0:44:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a night, Greg. Yeah, sense being a harmon has probably

0:44:17.800 --> 0:44:21.239
<v Speaker 1>been their most consistent starting they for some reason, I

0:44:21.320 --> 0:44:23.520
<v Speaker 1>really don't. Yeah. I mean they're not part of my

0:44:23.840 --> 0:44:27.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, awesome parley here. But the A's and the Astros,

0:44:27.840 --> 0:44:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Wade Miley, Mike Fires not a mess, the Astros minus

0:44:33.000 --> 0:44:36.240
<v Speaker 1>one sixty six. I feel like Wade Miley pitched against

0:44:36.280 --> 0:44:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the the A's recently and it did not go over well. No,

0:44:43.320 --> 0:44:47.840
<v Speaker 1>because I mean, along with betting on the Phillies, Padres

0:44:47.880 --> 0:44:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and Marlin's all on the same night, Greg, the one

0:44:50.040 --> 0:44:51.560
<v Speaker 1>thing that I don't want to add to that is

0:44:51.600 --> 0:44:55.480
<v Speaker 1>betting on Mike Fires in the Oakland A's. So I

0:44:55.520 --> 0:44:59.799
<v Speaker 1>will avoid this game. Continuing on, we get to these

0:45:00.200 --> 0:45:03.000
<v Speaker 1>very big tonight Slate Man the Os and d Backs.

0:45:03.280 --> 0:45:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Meryll Kelly versus Dylan Bundy heavy heavy favorite. You're Dylan Bundy.

0:45:09.800 --> 0:45:11.560
<v Speaker 1>You're trying to talk me into Dylan Bundy like two

0:45:11.560 --> 0:45:15.880
<v Speaker 1>months and I succeeded in that. Dylan Bundy and the

0:45:15.960 --> 0:45:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Oreos underdogs here at plus one sixties six divon backs

0:45:20.200 --> 0:45:22.600
<v Speaker 1>are just they're too big a favorite here. I just

0:45:22.640 --> 0:45:24.839
<v Speaker 1>don't trust Meryl Kelly as far as I can throw them.

0:45:25.000 --> 0:45:28.279
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen Meryll Kelly in person, so maybe i'd

0:45:28.280 --> 0:45:31.480
<v Speaker 1>be able to throw him a decent amount. But minus

0:45:31.480 --> 0:45:34.719
<v Speaker 1>one just don't like those odds here. Here's my next pick.

0:45:34.960 --> 0:45:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Best bet coming up. It's the Cubs and the Giants,

0:45:37.640 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Bunny and those stupidly hot Giants pictures duel taken on

0:45:42.000 --> 0:45:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you darbish and the Cubs. This is an easy one.

0:45:46.880 --> 0:45:49.719
<v Speaker 1>I hope we're gonna say two different things, all right.

0:45:49.760 --> 0:45:53.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm three, Greg, reveal your bet one to three line,

0:45:54.040 --> 0:45:56.399
<v Speaker 1>all right. I was actually gonna say the coud money

0:45:56.400 --> 0:45:58.239
<v Speaker 1>line too, but then I thought you manage it over

0:45:59.440 --> 0:46:02.839
<v Speaker 1>because your best to yeah minus one twelve us ever said, uh,

0:46:03.080 --> 0:46:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Angels and Dodgers tonight, Dodgers are heavy favorite. I'll hate

0:46:05.560 --> 0:46:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the Angels here. Rangers and Mariners don't touch that one.

0:46:08.120 --> 0:46:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Want to thank Y for joining us, Danny and everybody

0:46:10.320 --> 0:46:13.880
<v Speaker 1>else downstairs. He's for example, I'm Greg so much for watching.

0:46:13.920 --> 0:46:20.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll do go tomorrow, we hope from the NFL to

0:46:20.200 --> 0:46:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the NBA Daily Rodo dot Com is the place to

0:46:22.480 --> 0:46:24.839
<v Speaker 1>win millions in daily fantasy. You can get the best

0:46:24.920 --> 0:46:27.960
<v Speaker 1>DFS NFL coverage all season long for a price of one,

0:46:29.280 --> 0:46:32.000
<v Speaker 1>or dominate the entire Daily Fantasy Sports realm with the

0:46:32.040 --> 0:46:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Elite package at month. If you use the promo code

0:46:35.600 --> 0:46:37.960
<v Speaker 1>f n T s Y, you get ten percent off

0:46:38.080 --> 0:46:40.640
<v Speaker 1>your Daily Rodo package. Go to Daily Rodo dot com,

0:46:40.760 --> 0:46:43.680
<v Speaker 1>pick your NFL Elite Package, enter promo code f n

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:45.600
<v Speaker 1>T s Y, and you'll be on your way to

0:46:45.680 --> 0:46:51.560
<v Speaker 1>becoming the next Daily Rhodo millionaire. So what did happen?

0:46:55.239 --> 0:46:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Here's what you missed on the BFS. Let me start

0:46:59.239 --> 0:47:01.120
<v Speaker 1>with running back. I always imagined Tyler Boyd before I

0:47:01.160 --> 0:47:02.600
<v Speaker 1>was getting him a j Green a little bit. But

0:47:02.680 --> 0:47:04.919
<v Speaker 1>let me store the running backs and let me start

0:47:04.920 --> 0:47:07.200
<v Speaker 1>with Joe Mixon. Where's Joe Mixon going right now, Frankie,

0:47:08.280 --> 0:47:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Joe Mixon is going right now at that late first

0:47:12.080 --> 0:47:15.440
<v Speaker 1>early second round range. Specifically, I'm gonna start using um

0:47:15.960 --> 0:47:20.560
<v Speaker 1>July as the dates because that was the day that

0:47:20.640 --> 0:47:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the Tyreek Hill news was announced, so I obviously changes everything.

0:47:24.960 --> 0:47:28.560
<v Speaker 1>So Joe Mixon since then over the past five days

0:47:28.840 --> 0:47:31.640
<v Speaker 1>is a DP is fifteen point six four is RB

0:47:31.880 --> 0:47:34.720
<v Speaker 1>nine off the board sandwich between Melvin Gordon and Todd Gurley.

0:47:35.200 --> 0:47:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Very interesting range of running backs, must say so myself. Yeah,

0:47:38.680 --> 0:47:40.719
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a really interesting spot between Melvin Gordon and

0:47:40.800 --> 0:47:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Joe Mixon anti Gurley, and I'd like to think that

0:47:45.080 --> 0:47:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to think that Joe Mixon at this moment

0:47:48.960 --> 0:47:51.839
<v Speaker 1>is the safest of those three, given the contract from

0:47:51.840 --> 0:47:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Melvin Gordon, given the knee of Todd Gurley. Nixon is

0:47:56.760 --> 0:47:59.920
<v Speaker 1>also going right after my guy James Connor as well.

0:48:00.000 --> 0:48:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh you I thought like mixing more than Connor, didn't you.

0:48:02.520 --> 0:48:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I have Connor rank once about higher. You do? Yeah? Ok,

0:48:05.000 --> 0:48:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Even when I did the first round mock for the

0:48:06.440 --> 0:48:09.080
<v Speaker 1>FanDuel hurry up, I had Conrad of Levin and I

0:48:09.160 --> 0:48:11.239
<v Speaker 1>had mixed nets waight I convinced you that, yes, yes,

0:48:11.280 --> 0:48:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I forgot. I forgot Joe mixed him. It's funny because

0:48:14.520 --> 0:48:16.239
<v Speaker 1>because of the offensive line, I wasn't on him at all.

0:48:16.280 --> 0:48:18.279
<v Speaker 1>And then again, it's the end of July. Kind knows

0:48:18.280 --> 0:48:20.719
<v Speaker 1>how what will change, But I wasn't really on it

0:48:20.719 --> 0:48:24.040
<v Speaker 1>at all because they did have multiple injuries along the

0:48:24.120 --> 0:48:26.279
<v Speaker 1>offensive line, not just the rookie left tackle, and I'm

0:48:26.320 --> 0:48:28.000
<v Speaker 1>just like, I don't want to do this. And you

0:48:28.080 --> 0:48:29.680
<v Speaker 1>went up to me a little while ago. I was like, Hey,

0:48:30.239 --> 0:48:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the same crap offensive line and they finished as a

0:48:32.760 --> 0:48:36.800
<v Speaker 1>top twelve running back last season. Why can't he do

0:48:36.920 --> 0:48:38.839
<v Speaker 1>that again in a better offense than when you said?

0:48:38.880 --> 0:48:41.600
<v Speaker 1>That kind of made sense. So let me throw this

0:48:41.680 --> 0:48:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to you, e y, where do you have Joe Mixon ranks?

0:48:44.040 --> 0:48:46.319
<v Speaker 1>And how would you compare him to both Melvin Gordon

0:48:46.520 --> 0:48:49.920
<v Speaker 1>and Todd Gurley given their situations? Uh? Yeah, currently I

0:48:49.960 --> 0:48:53.239
<v Speaker 1>think I have him a number eleven, and uh I

0:48:53.360 --> 0:48:55.760
<v Speaker 1>had him higher than that. And then the left tackle

0:48:55.840 --> 0:48:58.279
<v Speaker 1>got hurt and they're moving the guy I believe the

0:48:58.520 --> 0:49:01.600
<v Speaker 1>right tackle back to left tack coal um. But the

0:49:01.640 --> 0:49:03.319
<v Speaker 1>more I'm thinking about it, I mean I could move

0:49:03.400 --> 0:49:06.440
<v Speaker 1>him back up the offensively. I said, his opportunity, and

0:49:06.520 --> 0:49:10.640
<v Speaker 1>for someone with his skill set and his his crazy athleticism,

0:49:10.920 --> 0:49:14.319
<v Speaker 1>all he needs his opportunity. He has a three down back.

0:49:14.440 --> 0:49:16.960
<v Speaker 1>He can play all three downs. He can catch, he

0:49:17.040 --> 0:49:19.560
<v Speaker 1>can run in space, he's got size, he's got speed.

0:49:19.960 --> 0:49:22.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's I mean literally, if you're going to

0:49:22.400 --> 0:49:25.520
<v Speaker 1>build a running back from scratch, I mean I believe

0:49:25.520 --> 0:49:27.880
<v Speaker 1>he would turn out just loud Joe Mixon looks, so

0:49:28.280 --> 0:49:30.319
<v Speaker 1>it's uh, I might have to move him up. He's

0:49:30.320 --> 0:49:32.000
<v Speaker 1>at eleven now, but I mean we're so far out

0:49:32.000 --> 0:49:34.239
<v Speaker 1>from the season, like they're just starting training camp, so

0:49:34.280 --> 0:49:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is all up for debate, but uh,

0:49:37.000 --> 0:49:38.279
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking about it now. I might have to move

0:49:38.360 --> 0:49:41.479
<v Speaker 1>him up a little bit. I like mixing. Be sure

0:49:41.600 --> 0:49:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to follow all our social media at EV and t

0:49:43.840 --> 0:49:46.000
<v Speaker 1>s Y sports Net and at EV and t s

0:49:46.160 --> 0:49:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Y Radio and now I'm tweeting about you, Bra. Couldn't

0:49:50.440 --> 0:49:53.319
<v Speaker 1>you catch the live show? Make sure to download our

0:49:53.400 --> 0:49:55.640
<v Speaker 1>podcast at the v N T s Y Sports Network

0:49:55.680 --> 0:49:56.879
<v Speaker 1>Audio Boom channel. Oh