WEBVTT - Episode 20: Joe Mayo

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.400
<v Speaker 1>The guys from Ping. They've kind of showed me how

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:05.120
<v Speaker 1>much the equipment matters. I just love that I can

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:06.600
<v Speaker 1>hit any shot I kind of want.

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:08.520
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna be able to tell some fun stories about

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:10.640
<v Speaker 2>what goes on here to help golfers play better golf.

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to the Pink Proving Grounds Podcast.

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm Shane Bacon.

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 3>That is Marty Jertsen, who apparently maybe just got a haircut,

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 3>looks really high and tight right now.

0:00:20.239 --> 0:00:23.640
<v Speaker 2>My friend who summertime in Phoenix been been rough Shane,

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, you gotta keep it short in the summertime.

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 4>No reason to be messing with it. We got exciting

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 4>guests today.

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 3>A man that is also in a worn climate right now,

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Joseph Mayo joining us, instructor of an instructor for discovery

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:40.559
<v Speaker 3>properties based out of the summit in Las Vegas. And

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:44.879
<v Speaker 3>another of a person much smarter than I am. So Joseph,

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 3>we appreciate you taking a little.

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:47.160
<v Speaker 4>Bit of time.

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 3>And I was reading that you saw a track man

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 3>for the first time and it kind of opened up

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 3>your brain to this new world and that's how you

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 3>got back into golf. Can you take us back to

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 3>that moment when you first saw track Man and how

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 3>it kind of opened up this world that is now

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 3>your life.

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, and first of all, thank you guys for having me.

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate it. I got out of golf and around

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>two thousand because I was so frustrated that, you know,

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 1>there was no way to measure anything, there was no

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>way to answer questions, there was no way to validate anything.

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>And I got out of golf and I thought nothing

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>of it. I never thought that I would be a

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:30.319
<v Speaker 1>part of golf again. And I can't remember exactly where

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>we were, but my father was a cancer patient, still is,

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and we were in a physicians off at some point

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:39.119
<v Speaker 1>and I picked up some type of a golfing magazine,

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 1>don't remember what it was, and I heard about TrackMan

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>to Opper Radar, and that really really made me go, Wow,

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe this is what I've been looking for. There was

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a doctor and a caesiologist here in Las Vegas that

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>knew me and liked me, and he believed in my abilities.

0:01:57.160 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why, but he did. And he said, hey,

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>let's get a track Man. I'm like, wow, sure, let's

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and do that. I've got five hundred bucks

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>in my checking account, so let's go ahead and get one.

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>There were twenty six thousand dollars and we got that thing.

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know, at that time, there are no there's

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>no Internet forums, there's no user's manual. I mean, you're

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>on your own. It's sink or swim. So I just

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>plopped that bad boy down and I just let everybody

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>come hit shots for me. And I started seeing all

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>these patterns and began putting together ball flight, if you will.

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>And I started to notice that, you know, no disrespect

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to those of the past, but I began to see

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 1>that what we believe to be true was not true.

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>And the golf ball did not start on the club path.

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:45.799
<v Speaker 1>It started, you know, as you guys know, basically where

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the face is pointed, not one hundred percent, but basically.

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>And I took that and I started putting videos on

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the internet, I don't know, twenty ten and some people

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>saw those videos. Brant Waite, you guys know, PJ tour

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>player saw it, and we developed a friendship and literally

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>it changed my life.

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Joe, I think you're kind of like a pioneer. You're

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:11.359
<v Speaker 2>you're you're the early adopter of track man using three D.

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think I'm a PJ of America member.

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Now I know the PGA of America knows that they

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 2>had to they have to level up their ballfly laws,

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 2>so to speak, and everything that was taught there. You've

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 2>influenced a lot of folks in using you know, kind

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 2>of bringing in three D problem solving. You know, you've

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 2>kind of taken that scientific method and applied it to golf.

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 2>I think that's one of the things you've inspired so

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 2>many not only helped so many golfers, but inspired a

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 2>lot of golf teachers to open their eyes to that.

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 2>So I feel like you've reached a lot of folks.

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Who were some of the other teachers. I know you

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 2>just talked about figuring out a lot of this on

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 2>your own because there was no instruction, Manuel, But who

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 2>are some of the teachers, PhDs, academics, whoever, Because you

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 2>have not been afraid to, you know, reach out and

0:03:57.320 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 2>make a phone call and ask questions. That's what I

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 2>love about you. Who are some of those folks that

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 2>have helped you along this journey level up your knowledge?

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>That is a great question. I have bugged you guys

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>at ping As you know, for the last ten years

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>you have been an invaluable resource. Paul would I just

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:16.599
<v Speaker 1>I called Paul to hear his accent. You know, I

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>don't really care what he says. I want that sexy

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>accent that he's got. Eric Hemrinson there of course also

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>doctor Soshil Mackenzie. I have bugged the daylights out of him,

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Young hou Kwan down in Dallas, Texas. I've bugged

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 1>him about biomechanics as well. And I'm sure I'm leaving

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:39.160
<v Speaker 1>others out, But I don't ever want to make it

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>sound like I did this on my own, because that

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely not true. And you guys at ping have

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>been an invaluable resource and I really appreciate your help

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and support over the last ten years.

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 3>Joe, I was interested in something you said. You said

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:56.280
<v Speaker 3>when you started to dive into TrackMan numbers, everything that

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:58.359
<v Speaker 3>had been kind of thought about in terms of the

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 3>golf swing was either incorrect or maybe misevaluated, or maybe

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 3>it was just simply wrong.

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 4>What was wrong.

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 3>About the way we thought about the way golfers hit it,

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:13.239
<v Speaker 3>pros hit it, and what have you changed in terms

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:15.359
<v Speaker 3>of the minds of some of the people in and

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 3>around golf instructors, professional golfers that you feel like is

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 3>now something everybody agrees on or believes that, well, believe.

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>It or not. I don't think we still have a consensus.

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>People will still send me screenshots of people on the internet,

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, saying hit down to make it go up,

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>which we know is that's silly. That doesn't happen. The

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 1>ball starts on the club path, which we know that

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't happen except in very very specific cases. And I

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:44.159
<v Speaker 1>don't think it still starts on the path. It might

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:46.279
<v Speaker 1>become fifty to fifty or fifty five to forty five,

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>but without question, the number one ball flight issue was

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the golf ball starts where the path of the club

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 1>is and it curves towards the face, and that is

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 1>dead wrong. As we know, that's absolutely backward. Which it

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 1>starts basically where the face is pointed, and it actually

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.720
<v Speaker 1>curves away from the club path assuming your face hit.

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>And I think one of the biggest revelations of track

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.239
<v Speaker 1>Man for the masses, and it should be the biggest revelation,

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 1>is how the angle of attack, the angle of attack

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:22.840
<v Speaker 1>can be judge, jury and executioner. And I remember, oh

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 1>my god, twelve years ago this is twenty twenty three.

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Right guys. Twelve years ago minimum when I did a

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>video where I said, if your angle of attack changes

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>from down of you know, I eat iron to driver

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and you're trying to hit the same shot, you cannot

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>be aimed in the same place. Yes, when you start

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 1>thinking of the three dimensional aspect of ballflight, the three

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 1>dimensional aspect of the club movement. You know, we've been

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>told for one hundred years that you got to have

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>good grip, good stance, good posture, but you got to

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>have good alignment. And I don't know what good alignment

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 1>is because the best players in the world are aimed

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>all over the place. Yeah, And I'd like to give

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:08.599
<v Speaker 1>just a quick, quick, little synopsis if if someone wants

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:11.559
<v Speaker 1>to hit a nice little draw with a seven iron

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>right handed golfer, Well, we know that the club phase

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>needs to be pointed somewhere right of the flag at

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>impact to start it there, and we know the club

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>path needs to be slightly right of that phase to

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>make it curved back to the hole. That's what we know. Well,

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>ball sitting on the ground and with a seven iron

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>it should be that means that golf club is going

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>to be moving down toward that golf ball, but it's

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be moving out to the right some amount,

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and that out helps us produce the path that we

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>need to hit a draw. It does. So what I'm

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>getting at is, with that seven iron, it's very reasonable.

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>It's it's very plausible for the golfer to have good

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:54.119
<v Speaker 1>old fashioned straight railroad track alignment because the down helps

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the out, which helps the draw. Next thing, you know,

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>he goes to the next te box, he tees up

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>a driver to hit that same draw. Well, not his

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>angler attack is up. Let's say it's up to it,

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>which is very plausible as well. He and not have

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that same alignment because with the seven iron, that down

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>produced the out, which helped him. But now with the driver,

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the up produces a leftward path, which does not help him.

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>So now you got to ask yourself two questions. A.

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Are we going to change his upward angle of attack?

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>And I would say, heck no, not with modern golf,

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>not with the modern equipment. No, we want to launch

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>this thing in the air. That's that's a good thing.

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a healthy thing. So if we're not going to

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>change the angle of attack being upward, how are we

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>going to defeat the leftward club path, which is actually

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:48.319
<v Speaker 1>our enemy. The answer is, we're going to aim to

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the right, and we're and this is what I say.

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I've been saying it for ten years. You have to

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>aim right enough to counteract the left created by the up.

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Joe, I think like roar, he's a good example

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 2>of that. You see him aim and you've seen him

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 2>am as irons with rail look like railroad, and then

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:07.679
<v Speaker 2>he gets to the driver and you know, looks like

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 2>he's am in thirty yards right.

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes Victor Hovin comes along and just throws the monkey

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 1>bench and the whole darn thing. He aims right, hits cuts.

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so there you go. You know, you've got

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Roy Mackworth, what is he in the world rankings now

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>number three and he's aimed to the right and drawing it.

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>You got Victor number four in the role aim and

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>right and cutting it. You're like, oh my god, what's

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>going on. So at the end of the day, the

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>bottom line is this, In my opinion, every modern instructor

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:38.559
<v Speaker 1>not only should know this stuff, in my opinion, he

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>must know this stuff. He must understand the three dimensional

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>travel of that golf club.

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Joe I think it's pretty fun with Victor. You know,

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 2>we had him on the podcast. We talked to him,

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, between Olympia Fields and when he won that

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Tour championship, and he was describing some of his best

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 2>iron shots and working the ball all shifting his baseline,

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 2>shifting his alignments. I mean, what is it like to

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 2>have a player like Victor that's really adopted understanding three

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:10.560
<v Speaker 2>D geometry, three D delivery, but then he can bring

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 2>it onto the course with his feels. You know, how

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 2>do you marry having that technical side of things with Okay,

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:17.679
<v Speaker 2>I'm an athlete.

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 4>I got to hit this shot.

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm winning the biggest tournament in the world.

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, first of all, Victor is an extremely intelligent kid

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>out of golf. He's very inquisitive, and I've always believed

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 1>that the sign of intelligence is not what you say

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that you know, it's the questions that you ask. And

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Victor is an extremely good question asker, and he keeps

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 1>me on my toes. And I'll be completely honest with you.

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Working for Victor's demanding because he wants answers now, he

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>actually wants them five minutes ago, and he wants correctness.

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 1>And you if you not that I have how, but

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you if you try to slot something

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 1>by him that just doesn't pass must or you're gonna

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 1>hear about it. And so he's a smart kid, which

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 1>is good for me, because you know me, guys, I

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>like to get a little technical with times and talk

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:09.719
<v Speaker 1>about wrist angles and tilts and all that kind of

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>good stuff, and he loves it. He's that stuff like candy.

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, make no mistake

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 1>about it. What you have seen out of Victor the

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>last two weeks, specifically, what you've seen this year, It's

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>not been some magical, mythical golfing phenomenon that I've been

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>brought that I've brought him through teaching. You're just simply

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>dealing with a Ferrari. You're dealing with an absolute world

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>class primetime player. And as I said in an interview I

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>did a few days ago Withgitor International, all he needed

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 1>was a little good math and a little good science.

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>This is what I told Victor when we started. I said,

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>with your talent level, with your ability level, if my

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:58.199
<v Speaker 1>information is correct, if what I'm telling you is correct,

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:01.320
<v Speaker 1>then we must see results. There can be no other way.

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 1>And if we're not seeing results, then most likely what

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you is not valid. And guys, not to

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 1>fluff my feathers. But what I have told him to do,

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 1>he has caught on to it immediately. You guys have

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>seen the results. The golfing world has seen the results.

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>And one last little snippet, we did not be in

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>short game until Riviera on Tuesday. He had a photo

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>shoot on Monday. We started on Tuesday and he and

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>his caddy, Shay were standing there and his agent, butler

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Butler Melnott were standing there with me, and I looked

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 1>at him and I said, guys, this isn't going to

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>take long. This ain't gonna take long. And I'm not

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:49.679
<v Speaker 1>so sure they believe me, but I believe not in

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying. I believe that he could do it.

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 1>And as you guys have heard me say before, anybody

0:12:57.000 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that can take a four iron and put it on

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the back of the ball at one hundred and five

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:03.959
<v Speaker 1>miles an hour and hit a shot dead straight from

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and fifty yards away to a flag, don't

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:10.319
<v Speaker 1>tell me he can't chip a golf ball. Don't tell

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>me that he can't pitch a golf ball because I

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>don't accept that theory. I don't accept that hypothesis that

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>this kid can't chip a golf ball. Yeah, and now

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the world is seeing that he can. Yeah.

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Joe kind of reminds me a little bit of you know,

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Tiger had those struggles a little bit with chipping. It's

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 2>not a confidence thing. He doesn't need. He doesn't need

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 2>like a sports psychologist. He needs like mechanics. He needs

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 2>to improve the kinetics, you know what I mean, what

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 2>he's feeling. So give a little overview there of those

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 2>changes in the three D delivery and maybe some of

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 2>the angular rates right of victor short game, you know,

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 2>before and after some of these changes that were making

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:53.679
<v Speaker 2>you know, angle of attack, delivery, things of that nature.

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, first and foremost it is my opinion, I stress

0:13:56.760 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>opinion that people are bad shippers, or they become bad

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 1>shippers because they hit the ground too soon and or incorrectly.

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 1>And Victor Palvin was a living embodiment of hitting the

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:14.679
<v Speaker 1>ground too soon and hitting it incorrectly. He had them

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:17.319
<v Speaker 1>both going on. He had double whammies. And the more

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>he would stick it in the ground and the more

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 1>he would lay the sod over it, and the more

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>he would flob it, the more he believed he was

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>too steep. Yeah, I'm not engaging the bounce. Oh my god,

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I've heard engaged the bounce for two million times. I've

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>heard that. And he believed that he was too steep.

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Well as Marty, as you know, that was absolutely incorrect.

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 1>And all things being equal, a steep angle of attack

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>moves the low point more forward. And if the low

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>point is more forward or shall we say contact with

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the ground, because contact with the grounds not thisssarily your

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>low point. I'm just trying to keep it simple for

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>our viewers our listeners. So as the angle of attack

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>becomes more steeper, all things being equal, the low point

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>becomes more forward. Well, if the low point or the

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>contact point with the ground is more forward, then that

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>means I'm not chili dipping it anymore. That means I'm

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 1>not fatting it anymore. It means I'm catching ball first,

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>And make no mistake about it. When you are trying

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to chip at the PJ tort well, when you're trying

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>to chip at any level, if you cannot accurately predict contact,

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>if you cannot accurately predict the speed of the ball

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>off of that face, you cannot chip, and you sure

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 1>cannot chip at the tour level. So what I did

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>was I said, no, you're not too steep or too shallow.

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>We started moving the angle of attack dramatically more down.

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>When he came to me, his angle of attack on

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>a chip or a pitch was three or four degrees down,

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and now it's twelve. He can stand there and rip

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>them all day long with his eyes closed now, because

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>what the technique has allowed him to do is catch good,

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>solid contact with a high frequency, which allows him to

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>predict what the ball is going to do before he

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>hits it. And if you think about it in common

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>sense terms, that's that's that's that's the good sauce. That's

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that's the secret to chimping is being able to predict

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 1>what the ball is going to do. Uh. And with

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>that steep angle attack, now that low point is dramatically

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>more forward, which increases the probability of a solid hit.

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>That's all he needed, guys. And unfortunately he was told, well,

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you can't shift if your wrist angles like that going back.

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Well we know that's true because Jordan Spied does it,

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and Dustin Johnson does it, and Brooks Koepka does it.

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>And the last time I checked, they're all major champions.

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>They were all normal in the world. When I showed

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>him those videos of those guys doing that, there was

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>like a light bulb moment. He was like wow, because

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>all this time he had been trying to roll that

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>risk in the backswing cup cup that wrist. No one

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 1>had ever said, no, no, no, no, no no no. Let's

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>get the bottom vector of spin loft, which for the

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>viewers out here, that's the angle of attack. Let's work

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 1>on the bottom vector, which moves the low point forward,

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 1>which allows you to predict contact. Because Marty, this is

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>what I believe to be true when we're talking spin loft.

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:12.919
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Victor had that little spin loft thing

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:14.400
<v Speaker 1>on the interview the other day. He said he learns

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:16.879
<v Speaker 1>spin loft. Well, as we know, spin loft is just

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>an angle. You got the angle attack on the bottom,

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>you got the dynamic loft on the top. In my opinion,

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the bottom vector is where the money's made. Anybody can

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:28.680
<v Speaker 1>have a good top vector. I can just just open

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the face that points the top vector up in there.

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Just open the face, yep. But bottom vector that's where

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the money is made, and that was his problem, and

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, it is the problem when people cannot

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>chip and pitch. They don't have the low point or

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the contact point with the ground far and a forward.

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Therefore they're hitting the ground too soon and then they're

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>hitting it incorrectly. And after about ten thousand unsuccessful attempts,

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 1>then you start doing things to not hit the ground,

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:02.439
<v Speaker 1>and that's when this thing can get sideways quickly.

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yeah, Joe, I was just gonna ask, how did

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 3>you and Victor? How did you guys get in contact?

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:12.199
<v Speaker 3>Like what was that initial introduction like to start to

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 3>work together.

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I called him he needed to loan me money? When

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>not to play poker with? I needed a loan, So

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that's what I called him, though, I'm just kidding. I'm

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:20.680
<v Speaker 1>just kidding.

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Hey, listen, now you can call him and I think

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 3>he'd probably give you that loan pretty quick.

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 1>No, he won't give it to me, or he'll charge

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>me twenty percent interest. So no, he's no. The Bank

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of Hobblood is closed up. Not getting in there. I've

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 1>known Victor now five years, give or take. Met him

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 1>when I went to Oklahoma State coach Bratton and coach

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:45.119
<v Speaker 1>Darr out there had me out there to do a

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:47.199
<v Speaker 1>little chatting with them. I met him, I met him

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Ben and we stayed in contact. But Victor contacted me

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>in late twenty nineteen, I believe it was October. He

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:57.639
<v Speaker 1>sent me his swings and I did a video analysis

0:18:57.640 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>like this. He was like a twenty minute analysis where

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:02.199
<v Speaker 1>I was pre to him and guys, this is the

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:05.680
<v Speaker 1>honest truth. Sent that video analysis to coach Brighton, coach

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:08.919
<v Speaker 1>Dharr because I wanted complete transparency. I wanted everyone to

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 1>hear what I was saying to this kid. I told him,

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>if I'm not mistaken, I told him five times in

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that video, stay away from golf instruction, stay away from golf,

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:23.919
<v Speaker 1>including me. Stay away. You are going bleat. It's a

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>matter of time. And I said, you need a good

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>caddy and a good lawyer, not a good golf bro.

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 1>So he decided to come out and see me in

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>November of twenty nineteen and we went out to TPC

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Summerlin and he just put on a ball hitting exhibition.

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:42.719
<v Speaker 1>He's hitting four irons off the ground, He's barely touching

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the turf, launching this thing two forty straight as you

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:49.120
<v Speaker 1>can point. He put out the driver and he's hitting

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>it out there three hundred and twenty yards with a

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 1>two yard cut. And when it was over, he said,

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>what do you think. I think that you don't need

0:19:57.040 --> 0:20:00.200
<v Speaker 1>a golf instructors. What I think? And we went back

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to my house that night and I had a little

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:06.359
<v Speaker 1>bourbon and I said, Victor, you're a great kid. I

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>want to be your friend. And I said, if if

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 1>you want to drink bourbon, if you want to play poker,

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that's fine. I'm your guy. But we're not going to

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 1>do golf instruction. We're not gonna do that. So as

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 1>an instructor, guys, As an instructor, I knew that I

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:25.679
<v Speaker 1>had a generational talent sitting in front of me. I

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:28.119
<v Speaker 1>knew that I had a player sitting in front of

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>me that quote unquote could take me places. He could

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 1>he could take me places. I was not going to

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:38.959
<v Speaker 1>have that. I was not going to allow that. He

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 1>did not need my help. He did not need instruction,

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion. And I told him no. And that's

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:49.399
<v Speaker 1>a factual statement. If you asked Victor, he'll tell you that.

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 1>And then he went on his way. And fast forward

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 1>to December, he calls me and says, Joe, would you

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>take a look at some swings? And I did, and

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 1>when I saw them, I hit rid. I'll immediately, I said, Victor,

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>what on earth is going on? And I gave him

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:10.679
<v Speaker 1>some preliminary thoughts on what to do. He was not

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 1>extending his nearly fast enough. We'll just keep it there

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 1>to make it short and sweet. Had some success, comes

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:21.880
<v Speaker 1>out to see me in Las Vegas. We go out

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 1>to the Summit Club and when he called me in December,

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>his angle of attack with a seven n iron was

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 1>almost nine degrees down, eight and a half degrees down.

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:32.880
<v Speaker 1>And as I said five minutes ago, when that angle

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 1>of attack is down, that's trying to push the path

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>to the right. He's trying to get cuts pass moving

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to the right. And the more he tried to swing

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>out into the left, the more the angle of attack

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:47.439
<v Speaker 1>went down, which the path went to the right. He

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:50.159
<v Speaker 1>was a cat chasing its tail. He couldn't get the

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>path left of the face. When he comes out to

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Vegas and I get him to extend his hips, angle

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of attack goes to four degrees down immediately, and now

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>he can get the path over to the left of

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the face and start cutting the ball. But the big

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>deal was I sent him down to Dallas, Texas to

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:11.159
<v Speaker 1>see my good friend John Sinclair and Marty. I know

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you know John, and I trust John Sinclair implicitly when

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>it comes to three D capture, specifically with AMM three D,

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 1>which in my opinion, as of today, it's the best.

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:25.719
<v Speaker 1>It's the best we have today, and John is the

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>best with that. And never forget what I'm about to

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>say for you instructors out there, if you ever are

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 1>fortunate enough to teach a player of this caliber, you

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>must get three D. You must because the camera will

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 1>lie to you, your eyes will lie to you, and

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 1>if you didn't need three D, there would be no

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>such thing. But I knew that dealing with Victor and

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 1>dealing with a player of this caliber, I had to know.

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I sent him down there. My suspicions were confirmed, not

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to say, wow, Joe, you're right, but fisions were confirmed

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:04.880
<v Speaker 1>which allowed me to then proceed further down the road

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:10.400
<v Speaker 1>of helping him. And there is no way, no way

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:12.679
<v Speaker 1>that I'm going to touch the golf swing of a

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:15.399
<v Speaker 1>player at this level without knowing what I'm doing, and

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the way to know what you're doing is to get

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to three D.

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Joe, I like to think about that as like,

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, maybe you you fall, you got an injury

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 2>on your arm, it looks bruised, let's take an X ray.

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 2>That might be what you can do with your launch monitor.

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 2>But then you got to get an MRI, right, and

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:37.439
<v Speaker 2>then you know, so that's kind of the spectrum. You know,

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 2>you're not going to treat that without getting the MRI.

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 2>And that's that's where I think, you know, the future

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 2>is very bright for the everyday golfer because more and

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 2>more that technology is coming right and we're using things

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 2>like learnings from our focal our three D motion system,

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 2>which is very focused on what the club is doing,

0:23:56.960 --> 0:24:00.439
<v Speaker 2>and passing along insights from there to the everyday golfer.

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 2>One interesting thing Joe I wanted to ask you about

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:06.399
<v Speaker 2>Victor was he has the lowest you know, there's a

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:09.879
<v Speaker 2>lot of different ways we can define closure rate, but

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 2>he has the lowest closure rate of any of our

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 2>tour players we've measured. This means like coming in from

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 2>P six chaft parallel to the ground to impact, that

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 2>face is already relatively square and it's only closing like

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:27.879
<v Speaker 2>twenty degrees from P six to impact, where we know

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 2>one of our other tour players it might be forty

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 2>to fifty degrees right in there. Right, what is the

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:37.160
<v Speaker 2>relation between Victor's unique wrist angles and that closure rate?

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:40.199
<v Speaker 2>And then my relate to that, to that Joe is like,

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, how do you tie what he does in

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 2>his full swing to his short game? And maybe that

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 2>can that could come second to that that question, Well.

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:51.479
<v Speaker 1>The first answer touching on right closure, yes, he is.

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 1>When Johnston Claiter measure is the lowest I've ever measured

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 1>in John's statabase is probably two hundred players, two Hunred

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>tour players. Yeah, I want to make it perfectly clear.

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I had nothing to do with this right of QUI stuff.

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I had nothing to do with that. Yeah, I'm not

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>so certain any instructor alive can touch into that. As

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, Marty, rate of closure is a touchy subject

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:13.879
<v Speaker 1>how it's measured. Yes, but let's be fair, let's be honest.

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:15.879
<v Speaker 1>There are world class players who have a high rate

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>of closure. Yes, there are, uh and the key word

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:23.199
<v Speaker 1>is rate. So if you look at a player that

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>has this this big swivel after impact, that doesn't mean

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 1>they had a high rate of closure because they could

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>have been closing this thing all the way down, which

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 1>means the rate is not quick. The rate was slow.

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>The total amount of closure was great, but the rate

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 1>of closure was high. But as far as Victor is concerned, Marty,

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:50.719
<v Speaker 1>I had nothing to do with it. How he learned

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>to do that?

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead, Marty, because yeah I could could Yeah, I

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 2>could just be how he grew up playing and and

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:59.120
<v Speaker 2>what what those risk conditions are, and how that kind

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 2>of relates. I think related to that, Joe would just be,

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, and you talked about his wrist angles and

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 2>what you've seen given him permission to play with a

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 2>certain risk condition in his short game. Has that helped

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Mary now that he's performing so good with short game

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 2>and full swing together at the same time.

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:21.919
<v Speaker 1>I think it's absolutely critical because as I told you before,

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, everyone wanted him to roll that form and

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:28.640
<v Speaker 1>cut that wrist that's one hundred eighty degrees against his DNA.

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 1>How are you supposed to step up on a green

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>at Augusta, Nashal on Sunday at the Masters and roll

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>your form, cut your wrist, roll the face wide open,

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and hit a chip shot off of that tight line

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>on national television trying to win a green jacket. It's

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>not gonna happen. And as I said, when he saw

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the videos of Dustin Brooks and Jordan, it gave him

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:54.119
<v Speaker 1>the freedom mentally to say, wait a minute, this is okay. Yeah,

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:55.719
<v Speaker 1>And this is what I told him. I said, if

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you want the face open, just open the darn thing

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 1>in address. Just just let it. Lay it wide open

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>on the bunker, lay it flatten the bunker opened the

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 1>face of a dress. And I think, without question, part

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 1>of his success of being able to pick up on

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 1>this stuff was I did not tamper anyway with grill

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:18.400
<v Speaker 1>for rotations and wrist angles. I did not so any

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of the little finite moves that he's making that's on him.

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I didn't touch it, Joe.

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 3>I was interested in something you said earlier about the

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 3>golf swing, like when we first started about how there's

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:32.199
<v Speaker 3>so many unique ways to do this now and how

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:34.680
<v Speaker 3>we're learning so much more about the golf swing. There

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 3>was a time, you know, around the two thousands with Tiger.

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 3>It was Tiger, it was Adam Scott, and it was

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:44.160
<v Speaker 3>this perfect move, right, everybody's got to have this perfect move.

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 3>Are we going towards a world where the best in

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 3>the world's golf swings are all going to look relatively different,

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 3>considering guys like Victor can kind of do it in

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 3>a different way than a Rory does it or a

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Brooks does it and be just as effective.

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we're gowing that direction. I think we're

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:04.880
<v Speaker 1>already there. We've always been there. Jack Nicholas and Lee

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:10.119
<v Speaker 1>Trevino looked nothing alike nothing, and Roy looks nothing like Victor.

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Victor has a little John Romney stuff going on, and

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:16.680
<v Speaker 1>you're just a little bit. The only thing they've got

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:18.440
<v Speaker 1>in common is are holding on to a golf club

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 1>getting the ball. I think now with three d uh

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and with information being released, it's helping the instructor understand

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 1>what's going on and say, you know what, it's okay

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:33.159
<v Speaker 1>to be different. And I'm just gonna go on the

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 1>record right now with Victor hoven Uh. Anybody that tampers

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>with that gross motor pattern, that overall gross motor pattern,

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 1>that signature that he has, you should be horse whipped

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>because you are looking at a world class machine. And guys,

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 1>what I've done with him has been minimalistic, and I

0:28:56.640 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>just tried to put him back to what he used

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to be. That's all, nothing more. And I want to

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>stress the credit goes to the kid. Yeah, involvement in

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 1>this was you know, like I said, just a little

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 1>bit of math, just a little bit, but yeah, that

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 1>is that you're looking at a finely tuned machine. And

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I also want to say, if we had a clone

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of Victor, if we had Victor A and Victor B

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and they're both standing on the range hitting balls, and

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Victor B cosmetically looks like Victor A, that doesn't mean

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Victor B is going to play like Victor A. The

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 1>cosmetics are just that part of it. When we start

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about kinetics, then you've got to ask yourself, what

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:41.560
<v Speaker 1>about the emotional component that Victor has to play golf

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 1>under this tremendous pressure. There's not an instructor on the

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 1>face of this earth that can teach that.

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Joe, I want to talk a little bit about friction.

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 2>So you mentioned Victor's more down now and he's getting

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 2>more predictability out of his shots. So in my mind,

0:29:57.800 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 2>from the physics of it, it's it's a double win.

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 2>It's you get more predictability of where he's going to

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 2>land that club or the low point or the interaction

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 2>between the ball and the face. And the other one

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 2>that compounds that and adds to it is you get

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:14.720
<v Speaker 2>better predictability of the coefficient of friction. Yeah, so we

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 2>kind of define that as MEW. We've talked about this

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 2>this thing MEW. Victor and I, Me and you and

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 2>Victor have this funny running joke going about it. But

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 2>the more you hit down, the less time you have

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 2>to pick up water debris, get grasp between the ball

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 2>and the face. He's also switched to our glide wedges,

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 2>so we have really we have a hydro pearl finish

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 2>which sheds the water. It's hydrophobic and this type of stuff. Overall,

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:42.000
<v Speaker 2>we're just kind of compounding the alignments with having a

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 2>better predictability of the friction. And I think that's also

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 2>as a player, what's put you at ease, right, it's

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 2>that unpredictability that can kind of drive you crazy with

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 2>the short game, right one hundred.

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Percent, Marty Well said, because think of it like this

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 1>guy is because now that he can predict contact, now

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that the bottom of vec or is doing its job,

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 1>now he can predict spin loft, which, as we know,

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the spin loft predicts ball speed and spin rate.

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 1>And what's amazing, guys, is this he now finds himself

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 1>swinging the club faster and the ball's going slower. Ye. Yes, ah.

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 1>And I remember long ago when I was on Twitter,

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 1>back in the old track man Maestro days, good lord,

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I made a tweet long long ago and I said,

0:31:29.240 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the expert golfer knows how to speed the ball up

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 1>in the long game and slow it down in the

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 1>short game. Yes, the poor golfer slows it down in

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the long game and speeds it up in the short game.

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 4>They do.

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 1>And the key for this is we want you know, obviously,

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 1>there's times in a short game where you want the

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 1>ball kind of hot and running. There's times when you

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 1>don't want it spending a lot, I get it. But

0:31:51.240 --> 0:31:54.160
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking, in the short game, we want slow balls.

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 1>We want slow ball speed, we want high spin generally speaking.

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 1>And as you said, Marty, that comes from friction and

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 1>it comes from spin loft. And now he has both.

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 1>And when a player of Victor's talent level, when they

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 1>get out there and they do this, you know, a

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 1>few hundred times a few thousand times, and he sees

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the predictability.

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 4>It's game on.

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 2>I want to bring up something that's topical to the

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 2>top to friction, which is Shane. Shane is on a

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 2>golf heater himself right now. He just he just played

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 2>in the USAM at Cherry Hills a few weeks ago

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 2>and just made a hole in one. And what is it,

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:39.360
<v Speaker 2>Shane the Connecticut Midam recently. Yeah, Yeah, tell us about

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 2>your hole in one, what club you hit? What was

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 2>the yard age? Did you see the ball up or not?

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Because this kind of relates to that friction topic.

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:48.719
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean friction was involved. It was.

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 3>It was kind of like a little shorty Part three

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 3>was about one hundred and twenty yards and I ted

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 3>up sand wedge and ripped it back into the hole.

0:32:56.360 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 3>So it was one of the holes in one you

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 3>dream of hitting that actually spin back in Joe. But yeah,

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 3>I got a lot of Yeah, got a lot of

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 3>got a lot of spin off of tea. I feel

0:33:07.160 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 3>like some of the time when you tee it up,

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 3>maybe I don't rip it back as much because I'm

0:33:11.240 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 3>not hitting down into it. But you obviously would would

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 3>would know more about that than I would.

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Well be careful when you just say it comes from

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:21.760
<v Speaker 1>hitting down into it. It comes from not only the

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 1>hitting down part, but the loft. Remember, you got to

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 1>get the spin loft to open up. But when you

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 1>put the ball on the tee, you highly increase the

0:33:29.440 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>probability of clean contact, which means you highly increase the

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 1>probability of the friction, which that's where the spinner is

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna come from. So the viewers or the listeners need

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to be cautioned that hitting down in and of itself

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 1>is not the answer, because remember spin loft has two components.

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 1>You got the down and you got the loft. I could,

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I could. I could hit down more and just take

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the loft with me. I need to hit down more

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and get the loft. I need to open that angle up.

0:33:56.640 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I need to open that thing up. Right there, you go.

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Need to open that spin loft angle up. And when

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 1>you do that with friction, you're going to get that

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 1>high spin rate, no question about it.

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's one of the fun things about that topic

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 2>of spin loft Mountain Joe, is that the cleaner the friction,

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:14.879
<v Speaker 2>so the better your lie. You're off a tee, your

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:17.400
<v Speaker 2>zoysia a lot of folks out there get fit or

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:22.839
<v Speaker 2>evaluate equipment indoors. Right, you have really clean contact, then

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:25.959
<v Speaker 2>your maximum spin or the peak of that spin loft

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:28.560
<v Speaker 2>mountain is gonna be when your spin loft is much

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 2>much greater. Right, that's where you can get tons of

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:33.759
<v Speaker 2>spin off of tea correct. But then chip, you know,

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 2>normal chipping and short game and this kind of goes

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:39.760
<v Speaker 2>back Shane, I kind of thought of that topic of Shay.

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:42.920
<v Speaker 2>Victor's caddy talked about the wind being light and variable

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:46.719
<v Speaker 2>r give some nightmares. Well, I think reading your lie

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:50.279
<v Speaker 2>around the greens, you got light and variable friction. You know,

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of light and variable wind, and that's where

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:55.399
<v Speaker 2>a lot of that short game in predicting the lie,

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 2>reading the lie in Joe, I think that's where you've

0:34:57.560 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 2>done magic with Victor, getting to hit more down, get

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:02.800
<v Speaker 2>more clean contact, more predictable friction, a higher percentage of

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 2>the time.

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:08.279
<v Speaker 1>Yes, one hundred percent at the end of the day.

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 1>What I think the viewer needs to understand going back

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 1>is if we can increase the probability of clean contact. Agree,

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:24.319
<v Speaker 1>if we can increase the probability of that and we

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 1>have you know, a good ball and we have clean grooves,

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:29.319
<v Speaker 1>if we can increase the probability of the clean hit,

0:35:29.880 --> 0:35:32.839
<v Speaker 1>assuming that we know how to manipulate spin loft, that's

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 1>all this is. That's all this is. And and with

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Victor getting him to understand that he was too shallow,

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:47.239
<v Speaker 1>the low point was actually back, not forward. And you know,

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:51.560
<v Speaker 1>with him, when he hit the ground behind the ball

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:54.520
<v Speaker 1>about two thousand times in a row, what's he going

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to do? He started actually leaning the shaft forward right

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to not hit the ground. Well, when you lean the

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 1>shaft too far forward, now you start closing the spin

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:11.799
<v Speaker 1>loft down because the bottom vector's not down enough and

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:16.239
<v Speaker 1>you're delofting the club, so you're shutting spin loft down. So,

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:18.760
<v Speaker 1>as you know, Marty, even if you do get clean

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 1>contact with a shut down spin loft.

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 4>The spin's gone, yeah, exactly.

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 1>And he's throwing fastballs, which we don't want. So he

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:31.400
<v Speaker 1>either had flubs or chips or he had fastballs, and

0:36:31.520 --> 0:36:33.439
<v Speaker 1>neither one of those are in a good situation when

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:34.399
<v Speaker 1>you're playing on the PGA tour.

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, in those chips where the speed comes out way

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:41.319
<v Speaker 2>hotter than your brain you know, has wired up to do.

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Think about the fear and anxiety when that happens to

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:47.359
<v Speaker 1>you under the high schools of pressure, think about that.

0:36:47.840 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Now your brain is spinning out there, and now you're like, oh,

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 1>dear God, don't miss a green. So I mean, guys,

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 1>this this short game stuff, it goes on. It transcends

0:36:57.560 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 1>all the way back through the bag. No question.

0:36:59.360 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Joe had a question.

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:02.880
<v Speaker 3>Victor was telling us when we interviewed him that he

0:37:02.960 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 3>is into playing poker right now. If you've got a

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:06.480
<v Speaker 3>chance to play any poker with him or seen him

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:08.240
<v Speaker 3>in action and houses game.

0:37:08.800 --> 0:37:12.359
<v Speaker 1>He is. He has improved dramatically. He has. The Only

0:37:12.400 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 1>thing about Victors he's a little impatient. He likes acting

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:19.239
<v Speaker 1>and now with his bank role playing for playing for

0:37:19.320 --> 0:37:21.960
<v Speaker 1>five hundred dollars is not. It doesn't keep his interest

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:22.600
<v Speaker 1>like it should.

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:25.400
<v Speaker 3>He's hanging around with tens that he doesn't need to be.

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:26.759
<v Speaker 3>It's just like it's fine.

0:37:26.680 --> 0:37:28.600
<v Speaker 1>He meant about a thirty thousand dollars buy in one

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:30.279
<v Speaker 1>night at Bolajo, and we're going to see what he's got.

0:37:31.440 --> 0:37:33.520
<v Speaker 3>Joe, I had I had another question for you. I

0:37:33.560 --> 0:37:36.960
<v Speaker 3>know you're into sports memorabilia. What's your what's your kind

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:39.320
<v Speaker 3>of golden goose at home? Right? Now what do you

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:40.800
<v Speaker 3>What do you have or what have you purchased that

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 3>your favorite item?

0:37:42.320 --> 0:37:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, I modestly, guys, I think I have

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a museum caliber pieces. I yeah, I've got I've got

0:37:50.120 --> 0:37:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the jersey that Tom Brady wore Bucks versus Eagles in

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:57.359
<v Speaker 1>October of twenty twenty one. I bought that directly from

0:37:57.400 --> 0:38:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Tom's charity himself. I've got Peyton Manning's AFC championship jersey

0:38:03.160 --> 0:38:05.200
<v Speaker 1>that he wore to beat the Patriots to get to

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl and end that he threw his final

0:38:08.000 --> 0:38:09.920
<v Speaker 1>NFL touchdown because he did not throw one in the

0:38:09.920 --> 0:38:13.239
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl. Yep, Peyton saw How the hell did you

0:38:13.280 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 1>get that? And I know people, Peyton, I know people.

0:38:18.080 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 1>So I've got I've got some really really good pieces

0:38:20.640 --> 0:38:22.279
<v Speaker 1>and it's just been a hobby of mine. I enjoy

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the history behind it. But believe it or not, guys,

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:28.840
<v Speaker 1>some of my most important pieces are the three victories,

0:38:29.400 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the shirt that Victor was wearing on Sunday at Memorial

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:35.960
<v Speaker 1>at BMW, and the Tour Championship. I have all three

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of those. So those are three great the great pieces

0:38:39.120 --> 0:38:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that I'm that I'm very proud of, very.

0:38:40.520 --> 0:38:42.279
<v Speaker 2>Special to Joe, I want to give you a nod.

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 2>I want to say. I want to say, I think

0:38:44.120 --> 0:38:48.120
<v Speaker 2>the whole golf industry owes you, you know, credit, because

0:38:48.160 --> 0:38:50.279
<v Speaker 2>you can't teach all the golfers out there, but you

0:38:50.280 --> 0:38:53.320
<v Speaker 2>you've helped push us at ping you. You know, Victor

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:55.839
<v Speaker 2>asked you a question. You get stumped, you call us,

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 2>we get stumped. Somebody's got to keep researching. It's kind

0:38:58.680 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 2>of the synergy that we have right of keeping pushing

0:39:01.760 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 2>us on the R and D side. And I think

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:09.239
<v Speaker 2>you've influenced a lot of the golf instructors out there,

0:39:09.800 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 2>and so I just want to thank you for your

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:15.360
<v Speaker 2>help to Victor, but also helping level up all the

0:39:15.400 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 2>golf industry. You and Grant Waite early adopters, a tract

0:39:18.680 --> 0:39:22.319
<v Speaker 2>man and being practitioners, I think has really helped a

0:39:22.320 --> 0:39:25.719
<v Speaker 2>lot of us. And and we appreciate everything you've done

0:39:25.719 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 2>for the industry and you're doing for Victor right now.

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 2>So thank you for coming on and spending time with us, Joe,

0:39:30.560 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 2>and sharing a little insights about you know, this this

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:36.880
<v Speaker 2>great athlete that we've had the pleasure to watch here lately.

0:39:37.440 --> 0:39:40.400
<v Speaker 1>It's been incredible and as I said before, I appreciate

0:39:40.440 --> 0:39:42.239
<v Speaker 1>your guy support over the last ten years. So I

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:44.319
<v Speaker 1>know I've bugged the daylights out of you. Paul doesn't

0:39:44.320 --> 0:39:46.080
<v Speaker 1>even answer the phone anymore. What I call it goes

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:50.320
<v Speaker 1>straight to voicemail, no more answering. He'll call back in

0:39:50.360 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a week or so. But now there's no more answering

0:39:52.200 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 1>with Paul. I think I've burned that bridge. I bugged

0:39:54.719 --> 0:39:57.680
<v Speaker 1>him so much, but no, Paul is very kind. But

0:39:57.840 --> 0:40:01.200
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, guys, this has been

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a pleasure for me and I have learned just as

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:08.160
<v Speaker 1>much from Victor as he has learned from me. And

0:40:08.200 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, full disclosure, I've never had a player that

0:40:11.800 --> 0:40:13.799
<v Speaker 1>is going to be potentially number in the world one day.

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I've never had a kid that can do what this

0:40:16.960 --> 0:40:20.320
<v Speaker 1>kid can do. Yeah, for all of you old college

0:40:20.360 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 1>basketball fans out there, there was a famous coach called

0:40:23.320 --> 0:40:26.040
<v Speaker 1>His name was Adolph Rupp. He coached the Kentucky Wildcats

0:40:26.080 --> 0:40:28.439
<v Speaker 1>long ago. He had a great statement and he said,

0:40:28.440 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you don't win to Kentucky derby riding a mule. Don't

0:40:31.640 --> 0:40:35.439
<v Speaker 1>ever forget that. So if you want, I tell people,

0:40:35.480 --> 0:40:38.600
<v Speaker 1>if you want to become a great tour instructor, find

0:40:38.640 --> 0:40:39.880
<v Speaker 1>yourself a great tour.

0:40:39.640 --> 0:40:44.919
<v Speaker 3>Player, and Victor Hovelin is definitely that. Joseph Mayo really

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:48.160
<v Speaker 3>appreciate the time. Very interesting conversation, not just on the

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:51.279
<v Speaker 3>golf side, but the memorabilia stuff is fascinated as well.

0:40:51.360 --> 0:40:53.319
<v Speaker 4>I'm I'm now like looking behind.

0:40:53.040 --> 0:40:56.120
<v Speaker 3>You in your video in your world saying I wonder

0:40:56.120 --> 0:40:58.040
<v Speaker 3>what that image is, I wonder what's signed there.

0:40:58.239 --> 0:41:00.479
<v Speaker 4>So we really appreciate the time.

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Those back there are photographs from signed photographs from different

0:41:05.760 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 1>actors from different movies and TV shows, and that's that's

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:09.239
<v Speaker 1>what that is.

0:41:09.719 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 3>Love it awesome, awesome, Thank you so much for the time.

0:41:12.200 --> 0:41:15.520
<v Speaker 4>We really appreciate it. This is the Ping Proving Grounds Podcast.