Speaker 1: I'm gonna tell you something. This, this this Obama character
Speaker 1: is showing everybody what low character in high office is
Speaker 1: all about. This spike in a football two days in
Speaker 1: a row, now actually three over getting bin Laden. There's
Speaker 1: only one guy. There's only one guy who said we
Speaker 1: shouldn't go get bin Ladden. You know who it was.
Speaker 1: It was Biden, by its President Biden. I have the story.
Speaker 1: It was an ABC News story and it's from January thirty.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden advised against the Osama bin Laden raid. Not
Speaker 1: mid Romney, not John McCain, not Jimmy Carter, not But
Speaker 1: Joe Biden is the only guy that said don't go
Speaker 1: get bin Ladden. And Obama's out there ticking everybody off
Speaker 1: with this. So you know we are our choices, folks.
Speaker 1: Barack Hussein Oba Mamma chose to figuratively parade Osama bin
Speaker 1: Laden's dead body around the public square in an attempt
Speaker 1: to bring singular glory to himself. How pathetic the guy
Speaker 1: they had to drag off the golf course. Look at
Speaker 1: the UK Daily Mail. There's all kinds of blog stories today,
Speaker 1: internet stories with the picture of that great group of
Speaker 1: courageous heroes in the situation room, watching the raid take place.
Speaker 1: The only person in that room who looks like she's
Speaker 1: even emotionally involved at all is Mrs Clinton. She got
Speaker 1: her mouth covered by her hand. Her eyes are wide open.
Speaker 1: It's almost like she saw Bill come home at six
Speaker 1: o'clock at night for the first time in a long time.
Speaker 1: She can't believe it. Everybody else is just sitting there
Speaker 1: staring at Obama is slump down. He's he's sitting lower
Speaker 1: in his chair than anybody in the room. They hustled
Speaker 1: him in from the golf course. They put up I'm
Speaker 1: President jacket on him. He's got his white golf shirt
Speaker 1: buttoned up to the top underneath it and he's looking
Speaker 1: there and as they said, yes, Mr President, this is
Speaker 1: a video feed of military operation taking place that Mr
Speaker 1: mcgraven authorized two weeks ago that we decided is go
Speaker 1: ahead and do it. Is what that picture looks like.
Speaker 1: And this is Obama's kickoff to his campaign for re election. Now,
Speaker 1: there is no better way to illustrate an utter lack
Speaker 1: of judgment and character than how the president is behaving.
Speaker 1: This is shameful. I mean, if and for and for
Speaker 1: two what is it maybe three days in a row,
Speaker 1: now suggesting that Romney would not have had the guts
Speaker 1: to pull the trigger, and lying well, taking as out
Speaker 1: of context as possible Romney's comments about getting been lauded
Speaker 1: versus the entire War on Terror. A decade of courage, sacrifice, cooperation,
Speaker 1: co ordination, investigation, brains and discipline on the part of
Speaker 1: the U. S Military, the special ups, the CIA interrogators,
Speaker 1: the entire intelligence community has been exploited now for the
Speaker 1: personal gain of one small man who had the easiest
Speaker 1: job in this long chain of command of all the
Speaker 1: people involved in the war on Terror, which this president
Speaker 1: was totally opposed to as a senator, This one guy
Speaker 1: had the easiest job of all of the people in
Speaker 1: this chain, from the boots on the ground, the Intel
Speaker 1: people to u UH, the CIA interrogators. You know, it's
Speaker 1: arguable had Obama's policies regarding interrogation at Guantanamo Bay or
Speaker 1: at at CIA black Side's secret prisons, had Obama's policies
Speaker 1: not been or had had Obama's policies been in force,
Speaker 1: we may not have ever gotten been lad. And that's
Speaker 1: the real irony here. There was one man, There was
Speaker 1: a courier, one person who carried messages to and from
Speaker 1: Osama Bin Laden from that luxurious hideout in Pakistan. The
Speaker 1: identity of that courier was uncovered by CIA interrogators using
Speaker 1: enhanced techniques opposed by Obama. It wasn't waterboarding. I don't
Speaker 1: know what the techniques were had it not been for
Speaker 1: the policies put in place by bush Cheney. And that,
Speaker 1: by the way, it's impossible to talk about this honestly
Speaker 1: and not have its sound political. I am doing my
Speaker 1: best have this not sound political. But the bush Cheney
Speaker 1: policies of enhanced interrogation and the conduct of the War
Speaker 1: on Terror in general led to the identity of the
Speaker 1: courier and his location, which led to Obama's location, oh
Speaker 1: Osama's location, And if Obama's policies had been in place,
Speaker 1: that was an honest what the full paw freudiance. If
Speaker 1: Obama's policies as articulated during the Iraq War, all of
Speaker 1: his opposition to portray us, his opposition to enhance techniques, derogation,
Speaker 1: his opposition. Had his policies been in place, we would
Speaker 1: not probably have gotten been Laden. That's the irony here.
Speaker 1: So the guy with the easiest job and the least
Speaker 1: qualified and any roomy walks into is now beating his
Speaker 1: chest and spiking the football, and furthermore and criticizing the
Speaker 1: very policies that he opposed, and now running around and
Speaker 1: saying that Romney is gutless and wouldn't have had the
Speaker 1: guts the pool of trigger had he been in Obama
Speaker 1: who And furthermore, do you think got a great story here?
Speaker 1: By the way, ABC News, a Republican focus group of
Speaker 1: Democrat focus group organization, went out and talked to Walmart
Speaker 1: moms and Walmart moms don't care about this. Now. Walmart moms,
Speaker 1: according to this story, are a very important voting block.
Speaker 1: They are of a certain age, they are a certain
Speaker 1: income level, they have a certain number of kids, and
Speaker 1: there are a lot of them, and they don't care.
Speaker 1: Only eleven percent of him, I think, is gonna care
Speaker 1: about this. They all care about the economy. And so
Speaker 1: the story from ABC is how none of this Obama
Speaker 1: stuff on bin Laden is going to penetrate and get
Speaker 1: through to them because they don't care. They say he's
Speaker 1: blowing it, but it's all he's got to hang his
Speaker 1: hat on because he can't run around and convince he's
Speaker 1: Walmart moms at the economy is going to get better
Speaker 1: if we just keep doing what we're doing. They know
Speaker 1: it isn't. So Obama's out there. Basically, he is trying
Speaker 1: folks to call himself or have us think of him
Speaker 1: as a hero for doing something that if Bush or
Speaker 1: Cheney had done, Obama probably would have called him war criminals.
Speaker 1: That's another real irony. If Bush and Scheney had found
Speaker 1: Osama bin Laden and he was exactly where he was,
Speaker 1: and they sent the seals in there and they got
Speaker 1: him exactly the way they did, and then there were
Speaker 1: no pictures and then Miniloden was buried at sea, and
Speaker 1: there's no real evidence other than we have to take
Speaker 1: a his word for it. Obama and Pelosi and Harry
Speaker 1: Reid and Hillary Clinton and the whole bunch of them
Speaker 1: would be accusing Bush and Shaney of lying for political purpose.
Speaker 1: They didn't even get bin Laden, where's the proof? And
Speaker 1: he would accuse him if it did happen to being
Speaker 1: war criminals. The ironies here are multiple and frequent. To
Speaker 1: give the go ahead to take out an unsuspecting terrorist
Speaker 1: with the best sealed team America has, that's what Obama
Speaker 1: wants the credit for and he wasn't even the man
Speaker 1: in charge of the actual operation. That was a guy
Speaker 1: named McRaven. We had the details of that story for
Speaker 1: you yesterday. But Obama can't help it. It's a narcissist.
Speaker 1: World revolves around him, as you know, and so he
Speaker 1: has to put the spotlight on himself, which is wrong
Speaker 1: in its own This is like a guy who gives
Speaker 1: money to charity only for the press release that the
Speaker 1: companies it and maybe gets his name on the medical building.
Speaker 1: Did they name after him for giving the money? The
Speaker 1: guy that does everything for public consumption does everything for
Speaker 1: public notice, for public approval, not because of the genuineness
Speaker 1: of the act. Remember, my friends, it was a few
Speaker 1: years ago, two thousand eight, one week prior to the election,
Speaker 1: Charlie Rose and Tom broke Off spent an entire show
Speaker 1: telling each other how they didn't know who the guy
Speaker 1: they couldn't wait to be president was. You know anything
Speaker 1: about him? I don't know what books you're ready, I
Speaker 1: don't know who his mentors or which are good question?
Speaker 1: It's an important quote? And who are the people and
Speaker 1: his innerstrate? Well, we don't know, Charlie. It was an
Speaker 1: hour of we don't know who Obama is, but boy,
Speaker 1: it's going to be historical if we elected. Well, now
Speaker 1: we know who Barack Obama is. Insecure is um at
Speaker 1: least one thing some people on the left save that
Speaker 1: Obama's likable cool. I've always thought he was cold. And
Speaker 1: I rush Baumont records saying that early on. Yeah, Obama
Speaker 1: be running around saying Osama wasn't mirandy. You sent you
Speaker 1: sent the seals in there and didn't even read these rights.
Speaker 1: That's what they'd be doing, so Occupy Wall Street to
Speaker 1: be doing. I see desperation here, sad desperation with unlimited
Speaker 1: funds and enablers doing your anything make him to make
Speaker 1: him feel good about himself. That's what's going on here.
Speaker 1: And I'll tell you folks that you know this as
Speaker 1: well as I do. Needy and selfish are not attractive features.
Speaker 1: Needy and selfish I don't know about you. Needy, selfish,
Speaker 1: and complaining are off putting to me. I don't know
Speaker 1: how to I don't know how to deal with it.
Speaker 1: I really people complain, and Obama is always complaining what
Speaker 1: Bush left him, the mess that was worse than anybody knew.
Speaker 1: Whatever it is, I don't know how to deal with
Speaker 1: people who complain. I don't know what to say to him.
Speaker 1: I don't know whether to be sympathetic because that doesn't
Speaker 1: accomplish anything. I don't know what to do when people
Speaker 1: start whining and moaning and complaining about stuff, because it
Speaker 1: never gets anything done. I don't know what to do.
Speaker 1: I don't know how to deal with it. Needy, selfish, whining,
Speaker 1: complaining not attractive. And when they are being tray it's
Speaker 1: exhibited by people in positions of responsibility. It's not attractive.
Speaker 1: So you know the old adage when your opponent is
Speaker 1: in the process of destroying as if you get out
Speaker 1: of the way and let it happen. It's an old
Speaker 1: adage here on talk radio, and the caller is making
Speaker 1: a fool of himself. Get out of the way, let
Speaker 1: it happen. Well, there's another version, when your opponent is drowning,
Speaker 1: throw him an anvil. I kind of like that one.
Speaker 1: Your opponent is drowning, throw him. And weren't we told
Speaker 1: that we needed to close down Club git Mo because
Speaker 1: it was a recruitment tool for the terrorists? That's right?
Speaker 1: And who was it? It told us that? Why? And
Speaker 1: another than Senator Barack Obama and presidential candidate Barack Obama
Speaker 1: that we had two shut down club gettm? Were we
Speaker 1: told that using enhanced interrogation is a recruitment tool for
Speaker 1: the terrorists, and that's what we were doing, and of
Speaker 1: course that means we were helping terrorists recruit members. Were
Speaker 1: we told we had to bury Osama bin Laden at
Speaker 1: sea because his grave might be used as a recruiting
Speaker 1: tool for terrorists and we couldn't allow him to be
Speaker 1: martyred in that way? Now, weren't we told ladies and
Speaker 1: gentlemen that the government could not release the photos of
Speaker 1: the body we Samaban Laden because the photos would be
Speaker 1: used as a recruiting tool for terrorists. Yeah, we were
Speaker 1: just like the liberals. In every instance of a crime,
Speaker 1: if we go after the perpetrator, it's going to make
Speaker 1: the perpetrator and his friends even matter. We don't want
Speaker 1: to do that, So we don't want to don't want
Speaker 1: to celebrate victory over these guys, don't want to put
Speaker 1: him a club. Getting moll just gonna make a matter,
Speaker 1: make more committed, A're gonna recruit more terrorists? Right? Well,
Speaker 1: isn't Obama's campaign ad where he brags about killing Osama
Speaker 1: a recruiting tool for terrorists using his own definition. Isn't
Speaker 1: his endless crowing about killing Bin Ladden a recruiting tool?
Speaker 1: Isn't dancing on Min Laden's grave and beating his chest
Speaker 1: agoing like Tarzan did a recruiting tool? So are some
Speaker 1: recruiting tools for terrorists worse than others? Is there a
Speaker 1: way we can learn to figure this out? Let's go
Speaker 1: to audio sound bites. Uh, ladies and gentlemen, this is
Speaker 1: yesterday afternoon at the White House Obama, the Japanese Prime Minister,
Speaker 1: but the joint press conference, and there was a question
Speaker 1: from the Chicago Tribute Washington Bureau chief Christie Parsons. Here's
Speaker 1: the question. We're coming up on the one year anniversary
Speaker 1: of the killing of Bin Laden. I'm wondering if you
Speaker 1: would share some thoughts on that anniversary. And I also
Speaker 1: wanted to mention that your likely opponent said anybody would
Speaker 1: have made that call, even Jimmy Carter, So I am
Speaker 1: curious what would you say about that? And Mr Prime Minister,
Speaker 1: I wonder if you could reflect from an international perspective,
Speaker 1: if the US is playing it right and marking this
Speaker 1: anniversary if you might advise against excesses. Now, does somebody
Speaker 1: want to try to tell me that that's not a
Speaker 1: set up? Somebody want to tell me that's not a
Speaker 1: planted question? What don't we just lost satellite on on
Speaker 1: on on DVR? What that means? I probably had fourteen
Speaker 1: power failures at home just in the last ten minutes,
Speaker 1: got rugged weather out there. We've got forty five sustained
Speaker 1: winds out there on the beach after the second power
Speaker 1: failure last and I found out that Florida Power and
Speaker 1: Light was out trying to get branches off of power lines.
Speaker 1: I initially blamed them, but then it kept happening long
Speaker 1: after they left, so it couldn't have been them. Anyway.
Speaker 1: Here's here's Obama answering that set up, planted question. Listen
Speaker 1: to this. I hardly think that you've seen any excessive
Speaker 1: celebration taking place here as far as uh really personal
Speaker 1: role and what other folks would do. I just recommended
Speaker 1: that everybody take a look at people's previous statements in
Speaker 1: terms of whether they thought it was appropriate to go
Speaker 1: into Pakistan and take out Bin Laden. I said that
Speaker 1: I'd go after Bin Laden if we had a clear
Speaker 1: shot at him, and I did. If there are others
Speaker 1: who have said one thing and now suggest they do
Speaker 1: something else, then I'd go ahead and let them explain it.
Speaker 1: Pockey Stunt, you know this, This is such an obvious
Speaker 1: attempt here to take what Romney said out of context.
Speaker 1: It was during a Republican debate, I believe, and what
Speaker 1: Romney essentially said was that he disagreed with the Democrats
Speaker 1: that the definition of the war on Terror was whether
Speaker 1: or not we got one man bin Laden, and the
Speaker 1: overall war on terror, the money spent would be much
Speaker 1: better spent on the on the on the broader conflict
Speaker 1: than throwing millions and gazillions of whatever inna getting one guy.
Speaker 1: And the reason Romney said it is because Democrats like
Speaker 1: Obama since two thousand four, two thousand five, have been
Speaker 1: claiming Bush failed in the war on Terror because they
Speaker 1: didn't get bit Laden. Do you find it interesting a
Speaker 1: year after bin Laden is found and taken out, Obama
Speaker 1: last week announces the end of the war on terror.
Speaker 1: Snerdley did not know that. He'd been so busy screaming calls.
Speaker 1: He hadn't heard that. But we had clearly been told
Speaker 1: last week by the regime, the war on terror was over,
Speaker 1: And the next day there was a story front page
Speaker 1: one of the newspapers about another drone strike and drone policy.
Speaker 1: Why are we still flying drones if the war on
Speaker 1: terror is over? And why is alkaitis still killing people?
Speaker 1: And why is the Muslim brotherhood here and doing what
Speaker 1: they're doing in Egypt and wanting permission to have sex
Speaker 1: with her dead wives for six hours after she dies.
Speaker 1: Why if the war on terror is over and the
Speaker 1: war on terror is over, because the Democrats always defined
Speaker 1: it as Osama bin Lading being killed for this, This
Speaker 1: is infanty, this is childish immaturity that answered that Obama
Speaker 1: gain Will anybody just go look at the record, take
Speaker 1: a look at people's previous statements terms of what they
Speaker 1: thought was appropriate to go into Pakistan? Pakistan, that's the
Speaker 1: way Americans say it. Pakis then tired hearing Pakistan every
Speaker 1: damn day. Here's the story, and there's much more to
Speaker 1: it than was reported about the war on Terror is over.
Speaker 1: It was from the National Journal last week and here's
Speaker 1: what the story said. The war on terror is over.
Speaker 1: One senior State Department official works on the issues told
Speaker 1: me this is whoever wrote this piece. Now that we
Speaker 1: have killed most of al Qaeda, now that people have
Speaker 1: come to see legitimate means of expression, the hell is
Speaker 1: that that's the Arab Spring. We had a State Department officials,
Speaker 1: the Arab Spring. That's a legitimate means of expression. People
Speaker 1: who once might have gone into al Qaida se an
Speaker 1: opportunity for a legitimate Islamism. It is a State Department
Speaker 1: official in explaining why the war on terror was over.
Speaker 1: Now that we've killed most of al Qaida, now that
Speaker 1: people have come to see legitimate means of expression, that's
Speaker 1: the Arab spring. People, the ones might have gone into
Speaker 1: al Qaeda see an opportunity for a legitimate Islamism, which
Speaker 1: is the Muslim Brotherhood. So the war on terror is over,
Speaker 1: got bin Laden, That's what this State Department official is saying.
Speaker 1: He's saying the Arab spring has ended the war on
Speaker 1: terror when he says people who once might have gone
Speaker 1: into Alkaita see an opportunity for a legitimate Islamism. In
Speaker 1: other words, we have made it so that these Muslim
Speaker 1: extremists can gain power without even having to fight for it.
Speaker 1: Just joined the Muslim brotherhood. They don't have to go
Speaker 1: and join al Qaeda now become terrorists. The Arab spring
Speaker 1: has made it possible for Muslim extremists to gain power
Speaker 1: without even having to fight for it. That's well, I mean,
Speaker 1: they had to do their little revolution. They had seen ends.
Speaker 1: Nick Robertson out there in the square interviewing guys about
Speaker 1: how important Obama's role was. But that's it. That's that's
Speaker 1: the Obama administrator. War on terror is over. They got Albama,
Speaker 1: got Osama, and al Quaite is dead and the Muslim
Speaker 1: Brotherhood is alive, and that's why it's over. But we're
Speaker 1: still gonna fly some drones just because we have the fuel.
Speaker 1: That's exactly right. That's the kind of people. It's no
Speaker 1: different than al armandar is at e p A. We're
Speaker 1: going to crucify any successful oil and gas company. That's
Speaker 1: who these Yes, Mr Snurdley, this he's a gas at
Speaker 1: the naivete and the rose colored glasses. That's exactly who
Speaker 1: populate every agency, bureau, cabinet department. That's who they are.
Speaker 1: That's were there nothing but idealist utopian theory ists. That's
Speaker 1: their people. No, this is um Well, the State Department
Speaker 1: of Yeah, that's right, that's that's who's there, led by
Speaker 1: Mrs Clinton another Lyinsky Height. Now Romney was on CBS
Speaker 1: this morning, Charlie Rose, see here's how it works. Obama
Speaker 1: says Romney wouldn't even have pull a trigger. Okay, so
Speaker 1: that becomes the narrative. Romney wouldn't pull a trigger. So
Speaker 1: now we gotta go get Romney and say why won't
Speaker 1: you pull a trigger? Not will you, but why won't you?
Speaker 1: Obama has established we believe Obama you wouldn't pull a trigger.
Speaker 1: You wouldn't go get Obama? Why not? It's like our
Speaker 1: parody of James Carver going on Larry King saying Ken
Speaker 1: Stars from Mars and rather say you're an idiot Carval
Speaker 1: Larry King, and our parody says Ken Starr, are you
Speaker 1: really from Mars? How did you get here? So? Ama
Speaker 1: says Romney wouldn't pull a trigger. Now, Charlie Rose dutifully says,
Speaker 1: why wouldn't you pull a trigger? Um, how would you
Speaker 1: characterize that? Add you believe it was a politicization of
Speaker 1: the president's decision. It was unfair, should not have been
Speaker 1: done right to take ordered that that attack. At the
Speaker 1: same time, I think it was very disappointing for the
Speaker 1: President to try and make this a political item by
Speaker 1: suggesting that I wouldn't have ordered at such a rate.
Speaker 1: Of course I would have. Any thinking American would have
Speaker 1: ordered exactly the same thing. But of course you give
Speaker 1: the president the credit for the fact that he did so. No,
Speaker 1: this is what you gotta stuff. That's not going to
Speaker 1: get you a single vote. But of course we're gonna
Speaker 1: give the president. No, no, no, no no. The President
Speaker 1: got his credit a year ago. You stay on message here,
Speaker 1: you throw the anvil. Okay, So Charlie Rose wasn't through it.
Speaker 1: Charlie was, well, how do you know you would have
Speaker 1: How do you know you would have pulled a trigger?
Speaker 1: You're to Romney a Swiss bank account. You look like
Speaker 1: you grew up in the fifties and still live then.
Speaker 1: And your wife huh, what makes you think you'd I'm
Speaker 1: making it up, But that's that's what's in his mom
Speaker 1: What what? What? What? How do you know you would
Speaker 1: have pulled a trigger? What? How do you know you
Speaker 1: would have pulled a trigger? I mean because within that
Speaker 1: room at the time of the decision, evidently people who
Speaker 1: were there say there was an argument not to do it,
Speaker 1: and it may have come from the Secretary of Defense,
Speaker 1: even the Secretary of State, but there was the only
Speaker 1: guy didn't want to do it in that room was Biden.
Speaker 1: And he wasn't yeh, he was in the room. So
Speaker 1: here's Romney's answer to how do you know you would
Speaker 1: have pulled a trigger? The idea to try and politicize
Speaker 1: this is really disappointing. Let's not make the capture killing
Speaker 1: of Osumaman Ladon a politically divisive event. And there are
Speaker 1: plenty of differences between President Obama and myself, but let's
Speaker 1: not make up ones based on, well, he might not
Speaker 1: have done this, and it's it's disappointing, it's and it's unfortunate,
Speaker 1: and I think it's taking an event that really brought
Speaker 1: America together. There was the culmination of a lot of
Speaker 1: work by a lot of people, an enormous confice and
Speaker 1: some people who put their lives very much in the line.
Speaker 1: Let's not use this as a political football. And that's
Speaker 1: what the president is doing in his campaign team. I
Speaker 1: think them taking credit for the right decision is it
Speaker 1: entirely appropriate. I think trying to attack me on that
Speaker 1: basis is disappointing. In the wrong course. Remember the two
Speaker 1: thousand eight presidential campaign, there was a very prominent person
Speaker 1: who didn't think Obama would be ablepul trigger and that
Speaker 1: was Mrs Clinton. Remember her three am phone call ad
Speaker 1: who do you want answering the phone at three am?
Speaker 1: We all said, Hillary, so you can tell Bill how
Speaker 1: to get home. But that was a good ad, who
Speaker 1: do you want answering the phone at three a m.
Speaker 1: And all the reports on this say the Obama the
Speaker 1: Gold decision had been in the works for two weeks,
Speaker 1: that it took a little while to lobby him to
Speaker 1: actually make the give the order to go