WEBVTT - Obama: Low Character in High Office

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna tell you something. This, this this Obama character

0:00:03.640 --> 0:00:10.039
<v Speaker 1>is showing everybody what low character in high office is

0:00:10.080 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>all about. This spike in a football two days in

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>a row, now actually three over getting bin Laden. There's

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>only one guy. There's only one guy who said we

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:23.640
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't go get bin Ladden. You know who it was.

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>It was Biden, by its President Biden. I have the story.

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>It was an ABC News story and it's from January thirty.

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden advised against the Osama bin Laden raid. Not

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>mid Romney, not John McCain, not Jimmy Carter, not But

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:47.479
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden is the only guy that said don't go

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>get bin Ladden. And Obama's out there ticking everybody off

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>with this. So you know we are our choices, folks.

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Barack Hussein Oba Mamma chose to figuratively parade Osama bin

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Laden's dead body around the public square in an attempt

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:13.199
<v Speaker 1>to bring singular glory to himself. How pathetic the guy

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>they had to drag off the golf course. Look at

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the UK Daily Mail. There's all kinds of blog stories today,

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>internet stories with the picture of that great group of

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>courageous heroes in the situation room, watching the raid take place.

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 1>The only person in that room who looks like she's

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>even emotionally involved at all is Mrs Clinton. She got

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:39.960
<v Speaker 1>her mouth covered by her hand. Her eyes are wide open.

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like she saw Bill come home at six

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>o'clock at night for the first time in a long time.

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>She can't believe it. Everybody else is just sitting there

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>staring at Obama is slump down. He's he's sitting lower

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>in his chair than anybody in the room. They hustled

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 1>him in from the golf course. They put up I'm

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>President jacket on him. He's got his white golf shirt

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>buttoned up to the top underneath it and he's looking

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>there and as they said, yes, Mr President, this is

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>a video feed of military operation taking place that Mr

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>mcgraven authorized two weeks ago that we decided is go

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>ahead and do it. Is what that picture looks like.

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>And this is Obama's kickoff to his campaign for re election. Now,

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>there is no better way to illustrate an utter lack

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>of judgment and character than how the president is behaving.

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>This is shameful. I mean, if and for and for

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>two what is it maybe three days in a row,

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 1>now suggesting that Romney would not have had the guts

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:54.799
<v Speaker 1>to pull the trigger, and lying well, taking as out

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of context as possible Romney's comments about getting been lauded

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 1>versus the entire War on Terror. A decade of courage, sacrifice, cooperation,

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>co ordination, investigation, brains and discipline on the part of

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the U. S Military, the special ups, the CIA interrogators,

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the entire intelligence community has been exploited now for the

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>personal gain of one small man who had the easiest

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>job in this long chain of command of all the

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>people involved in the war on Terror, which this president

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>was totally opposed to as a senator, This one guy

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>had the easiest job of all of the people in

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>this chain, from the boots on the ground, the Intel

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>people to u UH, the CIA interrogators. You know, it's

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>arguable had Obama's policies regarding interrogation at Guantanamo Bay or

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 1>at at CIA black Side's secret prisons, had Obama's policies

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:27.919
<v Speaker 1>not been or had had Obama's policies been in force,

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>we may not have ever gotten been lad. And that's

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the real irony here. There was one man, There was

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>a courier, one person who carried messages to and from

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Osama Bin Laden from that luxurious hideout in Pakistan. The

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:52.799
<v Speaker 1>identity of that courier was uncovered by CIA interrogators using

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>enhanced techniques opposed by Obama. It wasn't waterboarding. I don't

0:04:56.800 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 1>know what the techniques were had it not been for

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the policies put in place by bush Cheney. And that,

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>by the way, it's impossible to talk about this honestly

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 1>and not have its sound political. I am doing my

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 1>best have this not sound political. But the bush Cheney

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:16.840
<v Speaker 1>policies of enhanced interrogation and the conduct of the War

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:21.279
<v Speaker 1>on Terror in general led to the identity of the

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>courier and his location, which led to Obama's location, oh

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Osama's location, And if Obama's policies had been in place,

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that was an honest what the full paw freudiance. If

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Obama's policies as articulated during the Iraq War, all of

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 1>his opposition to portray us, his opposition to enhance techniques, derogation,

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>his opposition. Had his policies been in place, we would

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 1>not probably have gotten been Laden. That's the irony here.

0:05:57.480 --> 0:06:00.679
<v Speaker 1>So the guy with the easiest job and the least

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>qualified and any roomy walks into is now beating his

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>chest and spiking the football, and furthermore and criticizing the

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:14.359
<v Speaker 1>very policies that he opposed, and now running around and

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>saying that Romney is gutless and wouldn't have had the

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:19.359
<v Speaker 1>guts the pool of trigger had he been in Obama

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>who And furthermore, do you think got a great story here?

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>By the way, ABC News, a Republican focus group of

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Democrat focus group organization, went out and talked to Walmart

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 1>moms and Walmart moms don't care about this. Now. Walmart moms,

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:42.799
<v Speaker 1>according to this story, are a very important voting block.

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>They are of a certain age, they are a certain

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:49.359
<v Speaker 1>income level, they have a certain number of kids, and

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of them, and they don't care.

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Only eleven percent of him, I think, is gonna care

0:06:55.680 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>about this. They all care about the economy. And so

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the story from ABC is how none of this Obama

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:06.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff on bin Laden is going to penetrate and get

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>through to them because they don't care. They say he's

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 1>blowing it, but it's all he's got to hang his

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>hat on because he can't run around and convince he's

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Walmart moms at the economy is going to get better

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>if we just keep doing what we're doing. They know

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>it isn't. So Obama's out there. Basically, he is trying

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>folks to call himself or have us think of him

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>as a hero for doing something that if Bush or

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Cheney had done, Obama probably would have called him war criminals.

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>That's another real irony. If Bush and Scheney had found

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Osama bin Laden and he was exactly where he was,

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>and they sent the seals in there and they got

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>him exactly the way they did, and then there were

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>no pictures and then Miniloden was buried at sea, and

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 1>there's no real evidence other than we have to take

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>a his word for it. Obama and Pelosi and Harry

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Reid and Hillary Clinton and the whole bunch of them

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>would be accusing Bush and Shaney of lying for political purpose.

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>They didn't even get bin Laden, where's the proof? And

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>he would accuse him if it did happen to being

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>war criminals. The ironies here are multiple and frequent. To

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>give the go ahead to take out an unsuspecting terrorist

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 1>with the best sealed team America has, that's what Obama

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:46.439
<v Speaker 1>wants the credit for and he wasn't even the man

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>in charge of the actual operation. That was a guy

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>named McRaven. We had the details of that story for

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>you yesterday. But Obama can't help it. It's a narcissist.

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>World revolves around him, as you know, and so he

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 1>has to put the spotlight on himself, which is wrong

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>in its own This is like a guy who gives

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>money to charity only for the press release that the

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 1>companies it and maybe gets his name on the medical building.

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Did they name after him for giving the money? The

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>guy that does everything for public consumption does everything for

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>public notice, for public approval, not because of the genuineness

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of the act. Remember, my friends, it was a few

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>years ago, two thousand eight, one week prior to the election,

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Rose and Tom broke Off spent an entire show

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 1>telling each other how they didn't know who the guy

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>they couldn't wait to be president was. You know anything

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>about him? I don't know what books you're ready, I

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know who his mentors or which are good question?

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 1>It's an important quote? And who are the people and

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>his innerstrate? Well, we don't know, Charlie. It was an

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>hour of we don't know who Obama is, but boy,

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be historical if we elected. Well, now

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>we know who Barack Obama is. Insecure is um at

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>least one thing some people on the left save that

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Obama's likable cool. I've always thought he was cold. And

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I rush Baumont records saying that early on. Yeah, Obama

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 1>be running around saying Osama wasn't mirandy. You sent you

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>sent the seals in there and didn't even read these rights.

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>That's what they'd be doing, so Occupy Wall Street to

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:55.680
<v Speaker 1>be doing. I see desperation here, sad desperation with unlimited

0:10:55.880 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>funds and enablers doing your anything make him to make

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>him feel good about himself. That's what's going on here.

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>And I'll tell you folks that you know this as

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:11.319
<v Speaker 1>well as I do. Needy and selfish are not attractive features.

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:17.679
<v Speaker 1>Needy and selfish I don't know about you. Needy, selfish,

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and complaining are off putting to me. I don't know

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>how to I don't know how to deal with it.

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I really people complain, and Obama is always complaining what

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Bush left him, the mess that was worse than anybody knew.

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Whatever it is, I don't know how to deal with

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 1>people who complain. I don't know what to say to him.

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know whether to be sympathetic because that doesn't

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>accomplish anything. I don't know what to do when people

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>start whining and moaning and complaining about stuff, because it

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>never gets anything done. I don't know what to do.

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how to deal with it. Needy, selfish, whining,

0:11:54.120 --> 0:12:00.200
<v Speaker 1>complaining not attractive. And when they are being tray it's

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>exhibited by people in positions of responsibility. It's not attractive.

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>So you know the old adage when your opponent is

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:12.079
<v Speaker 1>in the process of destroying as if you get out

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 1>of the way and let it happen. It's an old

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 1>adage here on talk radio, and the caller is making

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>a fool of himself. Get out of the way, let

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:25.959
<v Speaker 1>it happen. Well, there's another version, when your opponent is drowning,

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 1>throw him an anvil. I kind of like that one.

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Your opponent is drowning, throw him. And weren't we told

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that we needed to close down Club git Mo because

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>it was a recruitment tool for the terrorists? That's right?

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:49.959
<v Speaker 1>And who was it? It told us that? Why? And

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:55.559
<v Speaker 1>another than Senator Barack Obama and presidential candidate Barack Obama

0:12:55.640 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>that we had two shut down club gettm? Were we

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>told that using enhanced interrogation is a recruitment tool for

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the terrorists, and that's what we were doing, and of

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>course that means we were helping terrorists recruit members. Were

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>we told we had to bury Osama bin Laden at

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 1>sea because his grave might be used as a recruiting

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 1>tool for terrorists and we couldn't allow him to be

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 1>martyred in that way? Now, weren't we told ladies and

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 1>gentlemen that the government could not release the photos of

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the body we Samaban Laden because the photos would be

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 1>used as a recruiting tool for terrorists. Yeah, we were

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>just like the liberals. In every instance of a crime,

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 1>if we go after the perpetrator, it's going to make

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:52.199
<v Speaker 1>the perpetrator and his friends even matter. We don't want

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:55.439
<v Speaker 1>to do that, So we don't want to don't want

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to celebrate victory over these guys, don't want to put

0:13:57.800 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 1>him a club. Getting moll just gonna make a matter,

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>make more committed, A're gonna recruit more terrorists? Right? Well,

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 1>isn't Obama's campaign ad where he brags about killing Osama

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a recruiting tool for terrorists using his own definition. Isn't

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>his endless crowing about killing Bin Ladden a recruiting tool?

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Isn't dancing on Min Laden's grave and beating his chest

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>agoing like Tarzan did a recruiting tool? So are some

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 1>recruiting tools for terrorists worse than others? Is there a

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>way we can learn to figure this out? Let's go

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to audio sound bites. Uh, ladies and gentlemen, this is

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>yesterday afternoon at the White House Obama, the Japanese Prime Minister,

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 1>but the joint press conference, and there was a question

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>from the Chicago Tribute Washington Bureau chief Christie Parsons. Here's

0:14:56.240 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the question. We're coming up on the one year anniversary

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>of the killing of Bin Laden. I'm wondering if you

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>would share some thoughts on that anniversary. And I also

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>wanted to mention that your likely opponent said anybody would

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>have made that call, even Jimmy Carter, So I am

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>curious what would you say about that? And Mr Prime Minister,

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if you could reflect from an international perspective,

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 1>if the US is playing it right and marking this

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>anniversary if you might advise against excesses. Now, does somebody

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>want to try to tell me that that's not a

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 1>set up? Somebody want to tell me that's not a

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>planted question? What don't we just lost satellite on on

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 1>on on DVR? What that means? I probably had fourteen

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 1>power failures at home just in the last ten minutes,

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>got rugged weather out there. We've got forty five sustained

0:15:55.480 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>winds out there on the beach after the second power

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>failure last and I found out that Florida Power and

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Light was out trying to get branches off of power lines.

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I initially blamed them, but then it kept happening long

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>after they left, so it couldn't have been them. Anyway.

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Here's here's Obama answering that set up, planted question. Listen

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>to this. I hardly think that you've seen any excessive

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>celebration taking place here as far as uh really personal

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>role and what other folks would do. I just recommended

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that everybody take a look at people's previous statements in

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>terms of whether they thought it was appropriate to go

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>into Pakistan and take out Bin Laden. I said that

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd go after Bin Laden if we had a clear

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>shot at him, and I did. If there are others

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>who have said one thing and now suggest they do

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>something else, then I'd go ahead and let them explain it.

0:16:54.960 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Pockey Stunt, you know this, This is such an obvious

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 1>attempt here to take what Romney said out of context.

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>It was during a Republican debate, I believe, and what

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Romney essentially said was that he disagreed with the Democrats

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that the definition of the war on Terror was whether

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>or not we got one man bin Laden, and the

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:28.360
<v Speaker 1>overall war on terror, the money spent would be much

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:32.119
<v Speaker 1>better spent on the on the on the broader conflict

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>than throwing millions and gazillions of whatever inna getting one guy.

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:39.679
<v Speaker 1>And the reason Romney said it is because Democrats like

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Obama since two thousand four, two thousand five, have been

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>claiming Bush failed in the war on Terror because they

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:51.679
<v Speaker 1>didn't get bit Laden. Do you find it interesting a

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>year after bin Laden is found and taken out, Obama

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>last week announces the end of the war on terror.

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Snerdley did not know that. He'd been so busy screaming calls.

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:07.400
<v Speaker 1>He hadn't heard that. But we had clearly been told

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>last week by the regime, the war on terror was over,

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>And the next day there was a story front page

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 1>one of the newspapers about another drone strike and drone policy.

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Why are we still flying drones if the war on

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>terror is over? And why is alkaitis still killing people?

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 1>And why is the Muslim brotherhood here and doing what

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:27.160
<v Speaker 1>they're doing in Egypt and wanting permission to have sex

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:29.640
<v Speaker 1>with her dead wives for six hours after she dies.

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:34.399
<v Speaker 1>Why if the war on terror is over and the

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 1>war on terror is over, because the Democrats always defined

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 1>it as Osama bin Lading being killed for this, This

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is infanty, this is childish immaturity that answered that Obama

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:51.120
<v Speaker 1>gain Will anybody just go look at the record, take

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a look at people's previous statements terms of what they

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:58.639
<v Speaker 1>thought was appropriate to go into Pakistan? Pakistan, that's the

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>way Americans say it. Pakis then tired hearing Pakistan every

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:07.199
<v Speaker 1>damn day. Here's the story, and there's much more to

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:13.440
<v Speaker 1>it than was reported about the war on Terror is over.

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 1>It was from the National Journal last week and here's

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:19.400
<v Speaker 1>what the story said. The war on terror is over.

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 1>One senior State Department official works on the issues told

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 1>me this is whoever wrote this piece. Now that we

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 1>have killed most of al Qaeda, now that people have

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:33.679
<v Speaker 1>come to see legitimate means of expression, the hell is

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 1>that that's the Arab Spring. We had a State Department officials,

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the Arab Spring. That's a legitimate means of expression. People

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>who once might have gone into al Qaida se an

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for a legitimate Islamism. It is a State Department

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>official in explaining why the war on terror was over.

0:19:57.080 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Now that we've killed most of al Qaida, now that

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.199
<v Speaker 1>people have come to see legitimate means of expression, that's

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the Arab spring. People, the ones might have gone into

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>al Qaeda see an opportunity for a legitimate Islamism, which

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 1>is the Muslim Brotherhood. So the war on terror is over,

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 1>got bin Laden, That's what this State Department official is saying.

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>He's saying the Arab spring has ended the war on

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>terror when he says people who once might have gone

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>into Alkaita see an opportunity for a legitimate Islamism. In

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>other words, we have made it so that these Muslim

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 1>extremists can gain power without even having to fight for it.

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Just joined the Muslim brotherhood. They don't have to go

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and join al Qaeda now become terrorists. The Arab spring

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>has made it possible for Muslim extremists to gain power

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:53.719
<v Speaker 1>without even having to fight for it. That's well, I mean,

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>they had to do their little revolution. They had seen ends.

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 1>Nick Robertson out there in the square interviewing guys about

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 1>how important Obama's role was. But that's it. That's that's

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the Obama administrator. War on terror is over. They got Albama,

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 1>got Osama, and al Quaite is dead and the Muslim

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Brotherhood is alive, and that's why it's over. But we're

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 1>still gonna fly some drones just because we have the fuel.

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right. That's the kind of people. It's no

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 1>different than al armandar is at e p A. We're

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:37.200
<v Speaker 1>going to crucify any successful oil and gas company. That's

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>who these Yes, Mr Snurdley, this he's a gas at

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the naivete and the rose colored glasses. That's exactly who

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>populate every agency, bureau, cabinet department. That's who they are.

0:21:56.720 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 1>That's were there nothing but idealist utopian theory ists. That's

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>their people. No, this is um Well, the State Department

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:12.880
<v Speaker 1>of Yeah, that's right, that's that's who's there, led by

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Mrs Clinton another Lyinsky Height. Now Romney was on CBS

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>this morning, Charlie Rose, see here's how it works. Obama

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>says Romney wouldn't even have pull a trigger. Okay, so

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:29.119
<v Speaker 1>that becomes the narrative. Romney wouldn't pull a trigger. So

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 1>now we gotta go get Romney and say why won't

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>you pull a trigger? Not will you, but why won't you?

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Obama has established we believe Obama you wouldn't pull a trigger.

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:41.120
<v Speaker 1>You wouldn't go get Obama? Why not? It's like our

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>parody of James Carver going on Larry King saying Ken

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Stars from Mars and rather say you're an idiot Carval

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Larry King, and our parody says Ken Starr, are you

0:22:55.200 --> 0:23:00.160
<v Speaker 1>really from Mars? How did you get here? So? Ama

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>says Romney wouldn't pull a trigger. Now, Charlie Rose dutifully says,

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>why wouldn't you pull a trigger? Um, how would you

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 1>characterize that? Add you believe it was a politicization of

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:13.479
<v Speaker 1>the president's decision. It was unfair, should not have been

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 1>done right to take ordered that that attack. At the

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 1>same time, I think it was very disappointing for the

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:23.360
<v Speaker 1>President to try and make this a political item by

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:26.360
<v Speaker 1>suggesting that I wouldn't have ordered at such a rate.

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Of course I would have. Any thinking American would have

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>ordered exactly the same thing. But of course you give

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.639
<v Speaker 1>the president the credit for the fact that he did so. No,

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:36.119
<v Speaker 1>this is what you gotta stuff. That's not going to

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>get you a single vote. But of course we're gonna

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 1>give the president. No, no, no, no no. The President

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>got his credit a year ago. You stay on message here,

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>you throw the anvil. Okay, So Charlie Rose wasn't through it.

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Charlie was, well, how do you know you would have

0:23:57.720 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 1>How do you know you would have pulled a trigger?

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 1>You're to Romney a Swiss bank account. You look like

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you grew up in the fifties and still live then.

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>And your wife huh, what makes you think you'd I'm

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:09.640
<v Speaker 1>making it up, But that's that's what's in his mom

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:11.400
<v Speaker 1>What what? What? What? How do you know you would

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>have pulled a trigger? What? How do you know you

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:18.159
<v Speaker 1>would have pulled a trigger? I mean because within that

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:20.239
<v Speaker 1>room at the time of the decision, evidently people who

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:22.400
<v Speaker 1>were there say there was an argument not to do it,

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 1>and it may have come from the Secretary of Defense,

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>even the Secretary of State, but there was the only

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:28.919
<v Speaker 1>guy didn't want to do it in that room was Biden.

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>And he wasn't yeh, he was in the room. So

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 1>here's Romney's answer to how do you know you would

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 1>have pulled a trigger? The idea to try and politicize

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>this is really disappointing. Let's not make the capture killing

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:43.479
<v Speaker 1>of Osumaman Ladon a politically divisive event. And there are

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 1>plenty of differences between President Obama and myself, but let's

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>not make up ones based on, well, he might not

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>have done this, and it's it's disappointing, it's and it's unfortunate,

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's taking an event that really brought

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:58.159
<v Speaker 1>America together. There was the culmination of a lot of

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 1>work by a lot of people, an enormous confice and

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 1>some people who put their lives very much in the line.

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's not use this as a political football. And that's

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:08.159
<v Speaker 1>what the president is doing in his campaign team. I

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>think them taking credit for the right decision is it

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 1>entirely appropriate. I think trying to attack me on that

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 1>basis is disappointing. In the wrong course. Remember the two

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 1>thousand eight presidential campaign, there was a very prominent person

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 1>who didn't think Obama would be ablepul trigger and that

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>was Mrs Clinton. Remember her three am phone call ad

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:34.440
<v Speaker 1>who do you want answering the phone at three am?

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 1>We all said, Hillary, so you can tell Bill how

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to get home. But that was a good ad, who

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:46.440
<v Speaker 1>do you want answering the phone at three a m.

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>And all the reports on this say the Obama the

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Gold decision had been in the works for two weeks,

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that it took a little while to lobby him to

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:01.199
<v Speaker 1>actually make the give the order to go