1 00:00:11,240 --> 00:00:14,880 Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast. 2 00:00:14,960 --> 00:00:19,079 Speaker 1: I'm Joe Wisntal and I'm Tracy Halloway. Tracy, So you 3 00:00:19,079 --> 00:00:23,720 Speaker 1: guys are going into hard lockdown again in Hong Kong. Yeah, 4 00:00:23,760 --> 00:00:28,440 Speaker 1: we are. We're experiencing our third wave of coronavirus and 5 00:00:28,560 --> 00:00:33,080 Speaker 1: unfortunately it's worse than the first and second waves. So yeah, 6 00:00:33,080 --> 00:00:36,080 Speaker 1: we're going back into social distancing measures. People are being 7 00:00:36,080 --> 00:00:39,480 Speaker 1: told to work from home, bars are closed, and restaurants 8 00:00:39,520 --> 00:00:44,240 Speaker 1: are implementing new restrictions. So yep, back to lockdown. So 9 00:00:44,479 --> 00:00:49,240 Speaker 1: obviously this is all getting pretty tiresome. I think people 10 00:00:49,280 --> 00:00:52,879 Speaker 1: are ready for real life to resume. But there's actually 11 00:00:52,920 --> 00:00:56,320 Speaker 1: one well there's a few aspects of lockdown life that 12 00:00:56,440 --> 00:00:59,200 Speaker 1: I kind of prefer, but there's one thing in particular 13 00:00:59,560 --> 00:01:02,480 Speaker 1: that I and to be better. You know what it is? Yeah, 14 00:01:02,560 --> 00:01:05,440 Speaker 1: I think I do. I think I've actually done it 15 00:01:05,520 --> 00:01:09,440 Speaker 1: with you a couple of months ago. Oh yeah, yes, 16 00:01:09,800 --> 00:01:14,160 Speaker 1: I find playing poker online with friends to be much 17 00:01:14,200 --> 00:01:18,039 Speaker 1: better than playing poker, uh in real life with friends. 18 00:01:18,120 --> 00:01:20,840 Speaker 1: I'm not sure poker is a better game online period, 19 00:01:21,280 --> 00:01:23,840 Speaker 1: but at least unlike a sort of social version, I 20 00:01:23,920 --> 00:01:27,319 Speaker 1: much prefer like playing in a room with a zoom 21 00:01:27,400 --> 00:01:31,600 Speaker 1: chat going on than actually like gathering around a table 22 00:01:31,640 --> 00:01:34,399 Speaker 1: with friends and playing poker. Wait, You're going to have 23 00:01:34,440 --> 00:01:36,640 Speaker 1: to explain that, because I thought poker, you know, when 24 00:01:36,680 --> 00:01:39,400 Speaker 1: people play on a casual level like that, it's supposed 25 00:01:39,440 --> 00:01:42,039 Speaker 1: to be a social activity. You're not supposed to like 26 00:01:42,200 --> 00:01:45,960 Speaker 1: doing it via zoom chat. Well I get that, and 27 00:01:46,000 --> 00:01:48,000 Speaker 1: so I think that's maybe it's because of a little 28 00:01:48,040 --> 00:01:52,360 Speaker 1: bit anti social or something like that. But normally, when 29 00:01:52,360 --> 00:01:56,160 Speaker 1: I've played poker among friends or casually, people start talking 30 00:01:56,160 --> 00:01:59,720 Speaker 1: about sports and they that flows down the dealing, and 31 00:01:59,800 --> 00:02:02,880 Speaker 1: a really care about those conversas sports, or like someone 32 00:02:03,160 --> 00:02:05,560 Speaker 1: or someone is like, oh, let's order pizza and they 33 00:02:05,600 --> 00:02:10,920 Speaker 1: bring up to the table or chips and I'm like, 34 00:02:11,000 --> 00:02:13,679 Speaker 1: come on, like let's just deal, or like someone gets distracted, 35 00:02:13,720 --> 00:02:16,160 Speaker 1: they start telling a story while they're dealing. That gets 36 00:02:16,200 --> 00:02:19,920 Speaker 1: really annoying. With the zoom chat in the you know, 37 00:02:20,000 --> 00:02:23,280 Speaker 1: the online poker room, you can have all that stuff. 38 00:02:23,280 --> 00:02:25,960 Speaker 1: You can still people having a name conversations or getting 39 00:02:26,000 --> 00:02:28,360 Speaker 1: up for a snack, but it doesn't slow down the 40 00:02:28,440 --> 00:02:29,959 Speaker 1: game at also have all you want to do is 41 00:02:30,000 --> 00:02:33,679 Speaker 1: focus on the cards. Actually think it's a better experience. Well, 42 00:02:33,680 --> 00:02:36,440 Speaker 1: I have a question how much does doing poker via 43 00:02:36,560 --> 00:02:40,680 Speaker 1: zoom help when it comes to actual strategy and for instance, 44 00:02:40,760 --> 00:02:43,440 Speaker 1: hiding your tells. Is that the reason you like it 45 00:02:43,480 --> 00:02:46,080 Speaker 1: because maybe when you're playing in person, everyone knows what 46 00:02:46,120 --> 00:02:48,400 Speaker 1: you're thinking, and when you're on zoom, it's much easier 47 00:02:48,440 --> 00:02:52,760 Speaker 1: to hide your motivations. Well, let's time I was playing 48 00:02:52,800 --> 00:02:55,280 Speaker 1: with a friend who was wearing glasses and I thought 49 00:02:55,280 --> 00:02:58,200 Speaker 1: I could almost make out his whole cards in the 50 00:02:58,240 --> 00:03:01,640 Speaker 1: reflection of his glasses. I couldn't, and that you know 51 00:03:01,639 --> 00:03:04,040 Speaker 1: that would be unethical, But you know, I do think 52 00:03:04,040 --> 00:03:06,480 Speaker 1: that's the thing. And I've noticed myself on the videos, 53 00:03:07,080 --> 00:03:09,160 Speaker 1: like when I'm like, oh shoot, I'm really like leaning 54 00:03:09,200 --> 00:03:11,320 Speaker 1: back at my chair here, I'm really staring. I wonder 55 00:03:11,360 --> 00:03:13,920 Speaker 1: if people can you know I'm giving it away. I 56 00:03:13,960 --> 00:03:16,840 Speaker 1: haven't played enough to like figure out patterns, but if 57 00:03:16,840 --> 00:03:20,160 Speaker 1: I were to play enough with zoom uh calls, you know, 58 00:03:20,160 --> 00:03:23,200 Speaker 1: you would probably start to notice. I gotta say so. 59 00:03:23,320 --> 00:03:26,000 Speaker 1: I don't think it's a secret to all lots listeners 60 00:03:26,040 --> 00:03:29,560 Speaker 1: that I am not a big poker fan or player, 61 00:03:29,600 --> 00:03:32,440 Speaker 1: but when I do play, I find it much much 62 00:03:32,440 --> 00:03:35,440 Speaker 1: more enjoyable when it's with actual people, and I think 63 00:03:35,440 --> 00:03:38,080 Speaker 1: it's much more interesting to try to look at the 64 00:03:38,120 --> 00:03:41,640 Speaker 1: psychological aspect of it all versus just the cards and 65 00:03:41,840 --> 00:03:46,760 Speaker 1: doing the maths, which feels like what Zoom is mostly about. Yeah, no, 66 00:03:47,000 --> 00:03:49,440 Speaker 1: I hear that, And actually I think without the Zoom 67 00:03:49,480 --> 00:03:51,360 Speaker 1: it could get a little boring. And I think poker 68 00:03:51,400 --> 00:03:53,280 Speaker 1: in general, even though I really enjoy it as a 69 00:03:53,320 --> 00:03:54,880 Speaker 1: game or as a sport or whatever you want to 70 00:03:54,920 --> 00:03:57,560 Speaker 1: call it, it can be boring and you just have 71 00:03:57,680 --> 00:04:01,440 Speaker 1: long stretches of doing nothing, and the attempt to create 72 00:04:01,520 --> 00:04:05,600 Speaker 1: action to create excitement can often be very costly. So 73 00:04:06,080 --> 00:04:08,760 Speaker 1: I certainly am sympathetic to the view that it's more 74 00:04:08,840 --> 00:04:13,440 Speaker 1: enjoyable in real life with actual people. Yeah, people definitely 75 00:04:13,440 --> 00:04:16,000 Speaker 1: seem to do stupid things when they're playing the online 76 00:04:16,040 --> 00:04:18,520 Speaker 1: games just to sort of whoa, just because they can. 77 00:04:18,800 --> 00:04:21,520 Speaker 1: But anyway, um, so I take it we are doing 78 00:04:21,760 --> 00:04:25,360 Speaker 1: a poker episode. Yeah, it's been a long time since 79 00:04:25,400 --> 00:04:28,960 Speaker 1: we've done a poker episode, but I'm really excited about 80 00:04:29,000 --> 00:04:32,400 Speaker 1: the one today because we're gonna be talking to an 81 00:04:32,440 --> 00:04:34,840 Speaker 1: author of a new book, and unlike some of our 82 00:04:34,839 --> 00:04:40,120 Speaker 1: previous guests who are professional online poker, longtime professional poker players. 83 00:04:40,920 --> 00:04:44,120 Speaker 1: Our new guest is sort of relatively new to the 84 00:04:44,200 --> 00:04:48,560 Speaker 1: upper echelons of the game. Oh that sounds great. I'm 85 00:04:48,640 --> 00:04:52,200 Speaker 1: always well as someone who came to it, um relatively recently. 86 00:04:52,480 --> 00:04:56,400 Speaker 1: I am always interested to hear what other people think 87 00:04:56,400 --> 00:04:58,839 Speaker 1: of the game and how they're strategizing around it and 88 00:04:58,880 --> 00:05:03,120 Speaker 1: actually playing. Yeah, I'm looking forward to learning some lessons. 89 00:05:03,160 --> 00:05:06,719 Speaker 1: Our guest today is Maria Kannakova. She used to be 90 00:05:06,880 --> 00:05:11,080 Speaker 1: a writer at The New Yorker and uh now she 91 00:05:11,279 --> 00:05:13,839 Speaker 1: is a professional poker player and she is the author 92 00:05:13,920 --> 00:05:17,240 Speaker 1: of the Biggest Bluff How I learned to pay attention, 93 00:05:17,400 --> 00:05:21,680 Speaker 1: master myself and win. And she decided one day to 94 00:05:21,800 --> 00:05:24,760 Speaker 1: be a poker success and she became one, which is 95 00:05:24,960 --> 00:05:28,400 Speaker 1: extremely impressive. So, Maria, thank you very much for joining us. 96 00:05:28,800 --> 00:05:30,760 Speaker 1: Thank you so much for having me. It's a pleasure. 97 00:05:31,279 --> 00:05:34,440 Speaker 1: So you just decided one day, you're like I am 98 00:05:34,480 --> 00:05:36,520 Speaker 1: going to be a great poker player, and you just 99 00:05:36,560 --> 00:05:40,279 Speaker 1: will yourself and trained yourself and you became one. You 100 00:05:40,320 --> 00:05:42,920 Speaker 1: actually just manufactured it and made it happen. Is that 101 00:05:43,160 --> 00:05:48,600 Speaker 1: is that accurate? Um? Not entirely, Not entirely. UM. I 102 00:05:48,680 --> 00:05:51,440 Speaker 1: was someone like like you, Tracy, who had zero interest 103 00:05:51,520 --> 00:05:55,120 Speaker 1: in poker whatsoever. I'm not a games player. I have 104 00:05:55,200 --> 00:05:58,279 Speaker 1: no interesting games like any of them for my In 105 00:05:58,320 --> 00:06:01,679 Speaker 1: my free time, I like to read and do things 106 00:06:01,720 --> 00:06:04,320 Speaker 1: like that. I've never grown up in a household. I 107 00:06:04,360 --> 00:06:06,240 Speaker 1: don't even think we had a deck of cards, and 108 00:06:06,320 --> 00:06:09,880 Speaker 1: definitely no board games. Um they bore me. And I 109 00:06:09,960 --> 00:06:12,560 Speaker 1: think the scariest thing that my niece and nephew can 110 00:06:12,560 --> 00:06:15,520 Speaker 1: do is take out travelers of Katan. I just I 111 00:06:15,520 --> 00:06:18,160 Speaker 1: start having a panic attack right away, thinking, Oh, no, 112 00:06:18,360 --> 00:06:20,799 Speaker 1: are we actually going to have to play this? So 113 00:06:20,800 --> 00:06:23,719 Speaker 1: so that's not my world at all. I wanted to 114 00:06:23,720 --> 00:06:26,440 Speaker 1: write a book about luck, about the role that chance 115 00:06:26,440 --> 00:06:28,479 Speaker 1: plays in our lives, but to do so in a 116 00:06:28,480 --> 00:06:31,560 Speaker 1: more systematic way, to try to figure out, Okay, can 117 00:06:31,600 --> 00:06:33,920 Speaker 1: we learn to tell the difference between the things that 118 00:06:33,960 --> 00:06:37,400 Speaker 1: we can control and the things we can't control? Can 119 00:06:37,480 --> 00:06:40,159 Speaker 1: we learn to figure out where skill ends and where 120 00:06:40,240 --> 00:06:43,920 Speaker 1: chance begins? And I needed a way into that topic, 121 00:06:44,360 --> 00:06:47,880 Speaker 1: and I actually found one through one of the great 122 00:06:47,960 --> 00:06:52,119 Speaker 1: geniuses of the twentieth century, John von Neuman. I turned 123 00:06:52,160 --> 00:06:54,520 Speaker 1: to him because he's the father of game theory, and 124 00:06:54,560 --> 00:06:58,400 Speaker 1: I wanted to look at that framework for looking at chance. 125 00:06:58,720 --> 00:07:02,200 Speaker 1: And it turns out that von Neuman was a poker 126 00:07:02,240 --> 00:07:05,839 Speaker 1: player and that game theory is actually based on poker. 127 00:07:06,160 --> 00:07:09,159 Speaker 1: That man Neuman believed that poker was the game that 128 00:07:09,400 --> 00:07:14,040 Speaker 1: best resembled strategic decision making in real life, because real life, 129 00:07:14,640 --> 00:07:17,440 Speaker 1: unlike a lot of games like chess, like go um, 130 00:07:17,440 --> 00:07:20,040 Speaker 1: which are games of complete information where you can actually 131 00:07:20,080 --> 00:07:23,000 Speaker 1: see the entire board, you can see all the pieces, 132 00:07:23,040 --> 00:07:25,280 Speaker 1: you can figure out the right move, and you can 133 00:07:25,360 --> 00:07:28,400 Speaker 1: compute what the right decision is, that's not real life. 134 00:07:28,880 --> 00:07:30,840 Speaker 1: Real life is a game with a lot of unknowns, 135 00:07:30,880 --> 00:07:33,080 Speaker 1: with a lot of uncertainty, with a lot of ambiguity. 136 00:07:33,160 --> 00:07:35,880 Speaker 1: And that's what poker is. And so von Neuman believed 137 00:07:35,920 --> 00:07:39,480 Speaker 1: that if you could actually solve poker, then you'd have 138 00:07:39,520 --> 00:07:43,080 Speaker 1: the key to some of the most complex strategic decisions 139 00:07:43,120 --> 00:07:45,920 Speaker 1: in reality. Um. And at the time, the guy was 140 00:07:46,120 --> 00:07:49,080 Speaker 1: working on the hydrogen bomb, so so he really knew 141 00:07:49,080 --> 00:07:51,280 Speaker 1: what he was talking about. He was at the highest 142 00:07:51,360 --> 00:07:56,800 Speaker 1: echelons of governmental advising on strategy. This really really intrigued man. 143 00:07:56,840 --> 00:07:59,240 Speaker 1: I thought, Oh, what is this poker thing? You know, 144 00:07:59,320 --> 00:08:01,920 Speaker 1: I am really don't know what it is. But if 145 00:08:02,320 --> 00:08:06,600 Speaker 1: this man thinks that poker is such a crucial element 146 00:08:06,680 --> 00:08:10,160 Speaker 1: to understanding the exact questions I'm interested in. Maybe I 147 00:08:10,160 --> 00:08:13,200 Speaker 1: should read a little bit about it. Started reading about it, 148 00:08:13,200 --> 00:08:15,040 Speaker 1: and I thought, this is my book. Why don't I 149 00:08:15,160 --> 00:08:17,239 Speaker 1: learn this game? Why don't I get someone really really 150 00:08:17,240 --> 00:08:19,640 Speaker 1: good to teach me? Um? And why don't I use 151 00:08:19,680 --> 00:08:22,160 Speaker 1: that kind of as a life metaphor to to explore 152 00:08:22,280 --> 00:08:24,800 Speaker 1: all of these questions of skill and chance that I'm 153 00:08:24,840 --> 00:08:27,400 Speaker 1: interested in. And I didn't actually say I'm going to 154 00:08:27,440 --> 00:08:30,440 Speaker 1: become a great poker player. I had no expectations. I 155 00:08:30,480 --> 00:08:31,960 Speaker 1: didn't know if I was going to be good, if 156 00:08:32,000 --> 00:08:34,439 Speaker 1: I was going to be bad. It didn't really matter. 157 00:08:34,640 --> 00:08:38,800 Speaker 1: What it mattered to me was the journey, the learning process, Tracy. 158 00:08:38,880 --> 00:08:42,080 Speaker 1: I just want to point out that Maria has won 159 00:08:42,320 --> 00:08:47,120 Speaker 1: three hundred eleven thousand dollars playing poker tournaments according to 160 00:08:47,160 --> 00:08:50,959 Speaker 1: the Hendon mob database, including her best cash of an 161 00:08:51,000 --> 00:08:54,559 Speaker 1: eighty four thousand dollar eighty four thousand six D pay day. 162 00:08:54,679 --> 00:08:57,320 Speaker 1: So something to keep in mind when someone just says, oh, 163 00:08:57,320 --> 00:08:59,319 Speaker 1: I want to learn how to do it, I'm I'm 164 00:08:59,360 --> 00:09:03,360 Speaker 1: extremely impressed. Anyway, keep going. I just want to just 165 00:09:03,400 --> 00:09:06,600 Speaker 1: sort of set the stage of how how successful that 166 00:09:06,880 --> 00:09:10,880 Speaker 1: decision was. Yeah, fair enough, So you didn't set out 167 00:09:10,920 --> 00:09:12,920 Speaker 1: to become a great poker player, but it looks like 168 00:09:12,920 --> 00:09:15,240 Speaker 1: you got there anyway. But I have to say that 169 00:09:15,440 --> 00:09:18,360 Speaker 1: mix of skill and luck that you were describing this 170 00:09:18,400 --> 00:09:21,480 Speaker 1: is one of my own personal frustrations with poker, because 171 00:09:21,520 --> 00:09:24,640 Speaker 1: I feel like, even if I personally play a really, 172 00:09:24,640 --> 00:09:26,960 Speaker 1: really good game, if I just get a bunch of 173 00:09:27,040 --> 00:09:30,760 Speaker 1: terrible cards, there's not that much I can do about it. 174 00:09:30,840 --> 00:09:34,679 Speaker 1: So I'm very intrigued by your thesis. Um, I'm curious 175 00:09:35,240 --> 00:09:39,040 Speaker 1: as you set out to learn more about poker, where 176 00:09:39,040 --> 00:09:42,160 Speaker 1: did you begin? You mentioned reading a lot, but but 177 00:09:42,200 --> 00:09:44,120 Speaker 1: where did you go from there? And who did you 178 00:09:44,160 --> 00:09:48,960 Speaker 1: talk to? So I enlisted Eric Sidell, who is one 179 00:09:48,960 --> 00:09:51,760 Speaker 1: of the best players in the world, some considered him 180 00:09:51,800 --> 00:09:54,800 Speaker 1: to be the greatest player of all time, to serve 181 00:09:54,840 --> 00:09:57,920 Speaker 1: as my coach and mentor throughout this journey. Um, I 182 00:09:57,960 --> 00:10:00,360 Speaker 1: got incredibly lucky. You know. My Luks started from day 183 00:10:00,400 --> 00:10:03,080 Speaker 1: one when he agreed to take on this project even 184 00:10:03,080 --> 00:10:07,080 Speaker 1: though he's never taken a student before me, and said, Okay, 185 00:10:07,080 --> 00:10:10,679 Speaker 1: this is interesting, this is intriguing. Let's see if someone 186 00:10:10,720 --> 00:10:13,720 Speaker 1: with your mind set, with a background in psychology, who's 187 00:10:13,720 --> 00:10:16,480 Speaker 1: a blank slate for poker basically, if we can teach 188 00:10:16,480 --> 00:10:20,000 Speaker 1: you to play well, and he set my agenda and 189 00:10:20,080 --> 00:10:23,200 Speaker 1: he was able to introduce me to a lot of 190 00:10:23,200 --> 00:10:26,280 Speaker 1: the best minds in the game. So don't get me wrong, 191 00:10:26,320 --> 00:10:29,920 Speaker 1: I I did work incredibly hard. Um I When I 192 00:10:29,960 --> 00:10:31,960 Speaker 1: decided to do this, you know, I left the New Yorker. 193 00:10:32,320 --> 00:10:34,600 Speaker 1: I said, I'm going to do this full time, seven 194 00:10:34,679 --> 00:10:37,160 Speaker 1: days a week, seven eight nine, ten hours a day. 195 00:10:37,160 --> 00:10:40,440 Speaker 1: I was living in breathing poker, either playing or analyzing 196 00:10:40,520 --> 00:10:44,400 Speaker 1: hands or studying or doing something. But but that aside, 197 00:10:44,480 --> 00:10:47,120 Speaker 1: I also had access to the best minds in the game. 198 00:10:47,400 --> 00:10:50,280 Speaker 1: So Eric introduced me to Dan Harrington, who literally wrote 199 00:10:50,280 --> 00:10:54,120 Speaker 1: the textbooks on introduction to poker. I started working a 200 00:10:54,160 --> 00:10:56,880 Speaker 1: lot with Phil Galfond, who is the founder of Run 201 00:10:56,880 --> 00:10:59,240 Speaker 1: at Once, which is both a training site which is 202 00:10:59,280 --> 00:11:02,440 Speaker 1: some of the best or training content and a poker site, 203 00:11:02,559 --> 00:11:05,320 Speaker 1: um which you can't play on in the United States unfortunately, 204 00:11:05,360 --> 00:11:07,560 Speaker 1: but you can play on in the rest of the world. 205 00:11:08,080 --> 00:11:10,439 Speaker 1: And he's one of the greatest players of all time. 206 00:11:10,480 --> 00:11:12,760 Speaker 1: And then all of these other great names just came 207 00:11:12,760 --> 00:11:15,840 Speaker 1: along and helped me, and we're there to answer any 208 00:11:15,920 --> 00:11:19,600 Speaker 1: question that I could possibly have. And that's rare when 209 00:11:19,600 --> 00:11:22,560 Speaker 1: you have an opportunity to just pick the brains of 210 00:11:23,120 --> 00:11:26,360 Speaker 1: the best practitioners in that world. I don't take that 211 00:11:26,480 --> 00:11:29,440 Speaker 1: for granted, you know, I'm I could have been someone 212 00:11:29,440 --> 00:11:32,800 Speaker 1: who worked really, really hard and never achieved success because 213 00:11:32,960 --> 00:11:36,080 Speaker 1: I didn't have access to that. And Tracy, you know, 214 00:11:36,160 --> 00:11:40,360 Speaker 1: to to answer your your frustration with the game. That's 215 00:11:40,400 --> 00:11:43,640 Speaker 1: also the beautiful thing about it because it teaches you 216 00:11:43,720 --> 00:11:46,600 Speaker 1: how to deal with that in life. It's one of 217 00:11:46,640 --> 00:11:49,040 Speaker 1: these things where one of the lessons that all of 218 00:11:49,080 --> 00:11:51,840 Speaker 1: my all of my teachers, but mostly Eric would stress 219 00:11:51,960 --> 00:11:54,880 Speaker 1: over and over and over is that you have to 220 00:11:54,920 --> 00:11:58,640 Speaker 1: divorce yourself completely from the outcome. What poker teaches you 221 00:11:58,720 --> 00:12:00,720 Speaker 1: is to focus only on the thing you can control, 222 00:12:00,760 --> 00:12:03,120 Speaker 1: which is the process, which is making the best decisions 223 00:12:03,480 --> 00:12:07,000 Speaker 1: you possibly can and putting yourself in a position to win, 224 00:12:07,120 --> 00:12:10,199 Speaker 1: because then over the long term, if you master the process, 225 00:12:10,200 --> 00:12:11,960 Speaker 1: you're going to be a winning player. No matter what. 226 00:12:12,320 --> 00:12:14,520 Speaker 1: In the short term, variance can go against you, and yeah, 227 00:12:14,559 --> 00:12:16,640 Speaker 1: you can get bad cards, someone else can be hit 228 00:12:16,679 --> 00:12:18,720 Speaker 1: in the face with the deck. Um, you might win it, 229 00:12:18,800 --> 00:12:20,559 Speaker 1: you might lose a hand, you might lose a game, 230 00:12:20,600 --> 00:12:23,160 Speaker 1: you might lose a tournament, but if you play over 231 00:12:23,200 --> 00:12:27,000 Speaker 1: and over and over and you've always just completely disregarded 232 00:12:27,040 --> 00:12:29,360 Speaker 1: the outcome and focused on making your process as good 233 00:12:29,400 --> 00:12:33,760 Speaker 1: as possible, eventually you're going to win a lot of funeym. 234 00:12:47,559 --> 00:12:52,160 Speaker 1: Can you talk a little bit more about what what 235 00:12:52,320 --> 00:12:56,600 Speaker 1: you get out of professional guidance? And obviously everyone knows 236 00:12:56,640 --> 00:12:59,360 Speaker 1: there's a million poker books that's been that have been written. 237 00:12:59,840 --> 00:13:02,560 Speaker 1: I read a handful of them. What is it that 238 00:13:02,600 --> 00:13:06,480 Speaker 1: when you talk to someone like Eric Sidell or Dan Harrington? 239 00:13:07,120 --> 00:13:09,040 Speaker 1: What is it that they can do for you? Is 240 00:13:09,080 --> 00:13:13,920 Speaker 1: it hand analysis? Is it helping you identify patterns of 241 00:13:14,040 --> 00:13:17,000 Speaker 1: play among the people with whom you're at a table. 242 00:13:17,280 --> 00:13:19,560 Speaker 1: Talk to us about like what is it how that 243 00:13:19,720 --> 00:13:22,560 Speaker 1: coaching works and what specifically they can offer to help 244 00:13:22,600 --> 00:13:25,840 Speaker 1: someone's game go to the next level. Well, I think 245 00:13:25,880 --> 00:13:29,640 Speaker 1: that personalization is key. Eric got to know me incredibly well. 246 00:13:29,679 --> 00:13:31,520 Speaker 1: I mean, at this point, you know, I count him 247 00:13:31,520 --> 00:13:33,920 Speaker 1: as a good friend because of just the sheer amount 248 00:13:33,920 --> 00:13:35,960 Speaker 1: of time that I spent with his family. They basically 249 00:13:35,960 --> 00:13:40,640 Speaker 1: adopted me. The Sidels are are amazing, um, and you know, 250 00:13:40,720 --> 00:13:43,880 Speaker 1: I just I tagged along and spent more time with 251 00:13:43,880 --> 00:13:46,600 Speaker 1: with them than I did with my own family for 252 00:13:46,600 --> 00:13:50,920 Speaker 1: for over a year, um, and he really knew how 253 00:13:50,960 --> 00:13:53,520 Speaker 1: I thought and who I was, and so that enabled 254 00:13:53,600 --> 00:13:56,560 Speaker 1: him to see my weaknesses and to be able to 255 00:13:56,760 --> 00:14:00,480 Speaker 1: really teach me how to think properly in a way 256 00:14:00,480 --> 00:14:02,400 Speaker 1: that he couldn't have done had I just been some 257 00:14:02,880 --> 00:14:05,240 Speaker 1: random person. And so I do think that that level 258 00:14:05,240 --> 00:14:08,800 Speaker 1: of immersion was absolutely essential. And yes, hand analysis this 259 00:14:08,960 --> 00:14:11,520 Speaker 1: is very important to that because a book can only 260 00:14:11,559 --> 00:14:15,120 Speaker 1: teach you so much, but actually being able to discuss 261 00:14:15,200 --> 00:14:18,040 Speaker 1: things with people actually and this is true of anything, 262 00:14:18,200 --> 00:14:23,120 Speaker 1: of learning, absolutely anything, Having someone with whom to talk 263 00:14:23,240 --> 00:14:27,120 Speaker 1: through ideas, talk through your thought process really helps you 264 00:14:27,160 --> 00:14:31,320 Speaker 1: grow and learn because you're forced to explain your thought process, 265 00:14:31,360 --> 00:14:34,200 Speaker 1: you're forced to pay attention to it, you're forced to 266 00:14:35,000 --> 00:14:37,320 Speaker 1: analyze it in a way that allows you to spot 267 00:14:37,360 --> 00:14:40,160 Speaker 1: loopholes that you otherwise wouldn't fat. One of the best 268 00:14:40,160 --> 00:14:42,720 Speaker 1: teaching tools is to try to explain something to someone. 269 00:14:42,960 --> 00:14:45,080 Speaker 1: If you're unable to explain a concept, that means you 270 00:14:45,080 --> 00:14:47,440 Speaker 1: don't not understand it, and that is one of the 271 00:14:47,480 --> 00:14:50,240 Speaker 1: first ways that a teacher can see whether someone has 272 00:14:50,280 --> 00:14:53,000 Speaker 1: actually understood something. It's very easy to say, oh, yeah, 273 00:14:53,040 --> 00:14:55,160 Speaker 1: I get that, but then say Okay, now teach someone 274 00:14:55,160 --> 00:14:57,600 Speaker 1: who doesn't get it um, and most people of flounder 275 00:14:57,720 --> 00:14:59,720 Speaker 1: and not be able to do that, and so that 276 00:15:00,120 --> 00:15:04,040 Speaker 1: and forth made it impossible for me to hide. I 277 00:15:04,120 --> 00:15:06,840 Speaker 1: actually had to learn these ideas. I actually had to 278 00:15:06,840 --> 00:15:10,240 Speaker 1: think through them for myself. And most of what Eric did, 279 00:15:10,560 --> 00:15:12,880 Speaker 1: it's not like we never sat down and he said, okay, 280 00:15:12,920 --> 00:15:14,480 Speaker 1: this is how you played this hand in that position. 281 00:15:14,680 --> 00:15:18,160 Speaker 1: We didn't have a single conversation like that. It was all, okay, well, 282 00:15:18,240 --> 00:15:21,160 Speaker 1: let's think through this. It's very socratic method um, which 283 00:15:21,160 --> 00:15:24,520 Speaker 1: could have been which could be incredibly frustrating. And sometimes 284 00:15:24,560 --> 00:15:26,080 Speaker 1: I just wanted to shake him and say, just tell 285 00:15:26,120 --> 00:15:28,120 Speaker 1: me how to play this. You know, I don't know 286 00:15:28,160 --> 00:15:31,240 Speaker 1: what I'm doing. Um. But what he was doing was 287 00:15:31,240 --> 00:15:33,840 Speaker 1: giving me the building blocks of thought, the building blocks 288 00:15:33,840 --> 00:15:36,800 Speaker 1: of analysis, so that I could survive on my own 289 00:15:37,320 --> 00:15:40,840 Speaker 1: rather than UM, I have to constantly turn to him 290 00:15:40,840 --> 00:15:43,480 Speaker 1: and try to memorize things. Memorization is not the way 291 00:15:43,480 --> 00:15:45,880 Speaker 1: to go by the way. That's that's a really bad 292 00:15:45,880 --> 00:15:47,560 Speaker 1: way of learning poker. And that's what a lot of 293 00:15:47,560 --> 00:15:49,560 Speaker 1: people do. They're like, oh, this is my hand range. 294 00:15:49,600 --> 00:15:51,560 Speaker 1: I know that I'm opening these hands. I know I'm 295 00:15:51,600 --> 00:15:53,960 Speaker 1: doing this, I know I'm doing that. It's all based 296 00:15:54,000 --> 00:15:57,800 Speaker 1: on memory. And while it's good to memorize certain things 297 00:15:57,920 --> 00:15:59,920 Speaker 1: like the odds of hitting a flush, you know, very 298 00:16:00,160 --> 00:16:03,040 Speaker 1: just very basic things. It's like a handfeld like ten things. 299 00:16:03,320 --> 00:16:05,800 Speaker 1: And then otherwise in terms of how you play, it's 300 00:16:05,800 --> 00:16:08,600 Speaker 1: all about the process, not about oh this is what 301 00:16:08,640 --> 00:16:11,120 Speaker 1: I do with this hand. No, let me look at 302 00:16:11,160 --> 00:16:13,920 Speaker 1: the situation. Let me look at all the factors, because 303 00:16:14,160 --> 00:16:17,240 Speaker 1: no two hands are the same, No two situations are 304 00:16:17,320 --> 00:16:20,640 Speaker 1: the same. And if you learn to conct contextualize every 305 00:16:20,640 --> 00:16:23,000 Speaker 1: decision that way, you're going to be a much better 306 00:16:23,040 --> 00:16:25,560 Speaker 1: decision maker, not just in poker, but in all decisions 307 00:16:25,640 --> 00:16:28,800 Speaker 1: that you make. M Well, just on that note, So, 308 00:16:28,960 --> 00:16:31,480 Speaker 1: once you had the building blocks of how to actually 309 00:16:31,640 --> 00:16:34,840 Speaker 1: play poker, can you describe what worked for you and 310 00:16:34,880 --> 00:16:39,800 Speaker 1: what you're playing style eventually looked like. That's a really 311 00:16:39,840 --> 00:16:42,400 Speaker 1: excellent question. Um. One of the things that I had 312 00:16:42,680 --> 00:16:46,040 Speaker 1: trouble with from the very beginning was aggression and bluff. 313 00:16:46,040 --> 00:16:49,360 Speaker 1: Thing that's really not my personality. UM, that's not something 314 00:16:49,400 --> 00:16:51,840 Speaker 1: I was ever good at, and that's something that people 315 00:16:51,840 --> 00:16:56,120 Speaker 1: took advantage of. UM. I found myself being bullied a 316 00:16:56,160 --> 00:16:59,840 Speaker 1: lot and actually bowing down to the pressure. And it 317 00:16:59,880 --> 00:17:04,199 Speaker 1: was a really unpleasant realization. I had always thought of 318 00:17:04,240 --> 00:17:07,240 Speaker 1: myself as, you know, a pretty successful, strong willed female, 319 00:17:07,600 --> 00:17:10,400 Speaker 1: and it ends up that I'd actually internalized so many 320 00:17:10,440 --> 00:17:13,520 Speaker 1: gender stereotypes. I would be much more passive because I 321 00:17:13,560 --> 00:17:15,520 Speaker 1: wanted people to like me, and that was more important 322 00:17:15,520 --> 00:17:17,400 Speaker 1: to me than winning a lot of money. I would 323 00:17:17,440 --> 00:17:19,520 Speaker 1: fold hands because I didn't want people to say, oh, 324 00:17:19,560 --> 00:17:22,639 Speaker 1: there's that horrible girl again who always raises me. I 325 00:17:22,720 --> 00:17:25,639 Speaker 1: didn't want to. I wanted them to have a pleasant experience. 326 00:17:26,040 --> 00:17:28,399 Speaker 1: This was really not a good way to play poker 327 00:17:28,440 --> 00:17:30,240 Speaker 1: and not a good way to go through life. And 328 00:17:30,359 --> 00:17:33,560 Speaker 1: I was really upset with myself when I realized that 329 00:17:33,600 --> 00:17:35,919 Speaker 1: I was doing it, and so I really had to 330 00:17:35,960 --> 00:17:39,960 Speaker 1: work hard at that and eventually came to a style 331 00:17:40,119 --> 00:17:43,800 Speaker 1: that was much more my own and that actually took 332 00:17:43,800 --> 00:17:45,840 Speaker 1: advantage of the things that I was innately good at. 333 00:17:46,320 --> 00:17:48,880 Speaker 1: This is something that I learned from Phil Galfund. Phil 334 00:17:49,040 --> 00:17:52,880 Speaker 1: is a very mild mannered person, and he told me, 335 00:17:53,119 --> 00:17:55,080 Speaker 1: you know, when I was trying to be aggressive all 336 00:17:55,200 --> 00:17:57,480 Speaker 1: the time, he said, look this, you don't have to 337 00:17:57,520 --> 00:18:00,320 Speaker 1: be You have to find your own style and Peel 338 00:18:00,359 --> 00:18:02,800 Speaker 1: himself isn't a terribly aggressive player, even though he's one 339 00:18:02,800 --> 00:18:05,080 Speaker 1: of the most successful players in the world. He said, 340 00:18:05,080 --> 00:18:07,400 Speaker 1: there's no one size fits all. Find the style that's 341 00:18:07,400 --> 00:18:10,080 Speaker 1: best for you, and so yes, be aggressive, but be 342 00:18:10,119 --> 00:18:12,840 Speaker 1: aggressive in a way that works for you. Not everyone 343 00:18:12,880 --> 00:18:16,160 Speaker 1: can be hyper aggressive. It's something that has to fit 344 00:18:16,200 --> 00:18:19,080 Speaker 1: with your personality. It didn't fit with mine, and so 345 00:18:19,160 --> 00:18:24,520 Speaker 1: eventually I developed a very very I don't want to 346 00:18:24,720 --> 00:18:27,200 Speaker 1: say the word reactive because it sounds kind of negative, 347 00:18:27,280 --> 00:18:32,359 Speaker 1: but it's an adjustable playing style. Let's let's call it that, um. 348 00:18:32,440 --> 00:18:35,040 Speaker 1: But it is reactive because I was reacting to people's 349 00:18:35,119 --> 00:18:38,119 Speaker 1: perceptions of me and how they see women, because I 350 00:18:38,240 --> 00:18:40,840 Speaker 1: realized that everyone saw me as a female first and 351 00:18:40,880 --> 00:18:43,399 Speaker 1: as a poker player second, and if I could figure 352 00:18:43,440 --> 00:18:45,840 Speaker 1: out how they thought women played, because by the way, 353 00:18:45,840 --> 00:18:48,880 Speaker 1: poker's ninety seven percent male the professional world and three 354 00:18:48,880 --> 00:18:52,520 Speaker 1: percent female. So most of the time people will be like, oh, 355 00:18:52,560 --> 00:18:54,760 Speaker 1: my girlfriend plays, this is how she plays, so I 356 00:18:54,760 --> 00:18:56,880 Speaker 1: think you're going to play like that. They take their 357 00:18:57,200 --> 00:18:59,920 Speaker 1: you know, these very strange notions of how women are 358 00:19:00,000 --> 00:19:02,520 Speaker 1: supposed to play or not play, and they apply them 359 00:19:02,560 --> 00:19:04,399 Speaker 1: to me, at least at the beginning, and if I 360 00:19:04,440 --> 00:19:06,800 Speaker 1: can figure out what that is, then I can play 361 00:19:06,920 --> 00:19:10,440 Speaker 1: into it and actually take advantage of it. Because it's 362 00:19:10,480 --> 00:19:13,320 Speaker 1: an incredibly strong it's a it's a wonderful thing to 363 00:19:13,359 --> 00:19:16,720 Speaker 1: be underestimated. It's something that you can really really use. 364 00:19:17,119 --> 00:19:19,240 Speaker 1: And once I realized that, then I turned it on 365 00:19:19,280 --> 00:19:21,440 Speaker 1: its head and instead of letting myself people and I 366 00:19:21,480 --> 00:19:23,520 Speaker 1: was like, Okay, if you underestimate me and think that 367 00:19:23,640 --> 00:19:26,119 Speaker 1: I will fold to everything, then I know how to 368 00:19:26,240 --> 00:19:30,840 Speaker 1: I know how to counteract that. How should someone go 369 00:19:30,960 --> 00:19:34,280 Speaker 1: about the process of self evaluating? So I, like I said, 370 00:19:34,320 --> 00:19:36,199 Speaker 1: I like to play. I don't consider myself to be 371 00:19:36,400 --> 00:19:39,399 Speaker 1: particularly good at it. I just enjoy it sometimes I do. 372 00:19:39,480 --> 00:19:43,479 Speaker 1: All right, what are the first questions or what are 373 00:19:43,520 --> 00:19:47,040 Speaker 1: the first you know, you mentioned the Socratic approach to learning, 374 00:19:47,080 --> 00:19:49,520 Speaker 1: but what is what are the first things one should 375 00:19:49,520 --> 00:19:54,040 Speaker 1: look for in themselves to just a identify, um, how 376 00:19:54,119 --> 00:19:58,639 Speaker 1: they play currently and then be How might one go 377 00:19:58,760 --> 00:20:04,359 Speaker 1: about evaluating a style of aggression or reaction that they're 378 00:20:04,480 --> 00:20:08,320 Speaker 1: comfortable with themselves? Well, I think that self analysis starts 379 00:20:08,600 --> 00:20:11,600 Speaker 1: far away from the poker table. I think everyone needs 380 00:20:11,640 --> 00:20:16,240 Speaker 1: to take some time to just sit down and kind 381 00:20:16,240 --> 00:20:18,760 Speaker 1: of do a little self assessment, think, Okay, what are 382 00:20:18,800 --> 00:20:22,000 Speaker 1: my strengths, what are my weaknesses, What are the things 383 00:20:22,080 --> 00:20:24,520 Speaker 1: that annoy me? What are the things that make me happy? 384 00:20:24,840 --> 00:20:27,520 Speaker 1: Because at the poker table, all of these things are 385 00:20:27,520 --> 00:20:30,800 Speaker 1: going to come out. All of the psychological baggage that 386 00:20:30,840 --> 00:20:33,199 Speaker 1: you carry with you is going to come out, and 387 00:20:33,200 --> 00:20:36,159 Speaker 1: it's going to affect your game. Also, very important to 388 00:20:36,200 --> 00:20:38,600 Speaker 1: poker and to a lot of other strategic decisions are 389 00:20:38,880 --> 00:20:41,679 Speaker 1: how do I react to risk and to stress? So 390 00:20:41,800 --> 00:20:45,080 Speaker 1: am I in what kinds of situations? Am I risk seeking? 391 00:20:45,119 --> 00:20:47,679 Speaker 1: And what kinds of situations? And my risk averse? So 392 00:20:47,760 --> 00:20:52,159 Speaker 1: in poker, you'll see that one of the best scenarios 393 00:20:52,440 --> 00:20:55,840 Speaker 1: to pay attention to for other players if you want 394 00:20:55,840 --> 00:20:58,720 Speaker 1: to take advantage of them, is how do they react 395 00:20:59,040 --> 00:21:03,080 Speaker 1: when they lose huge pot? And relatedly, how do they 396 00:21:03,080 --> 00:21:06,280 Speaker 1: react when they win a huge pot. Most players are 397 00:21:06,280 --> 00:21:08,880 Speaker 1: actually going to react in some way, but that way 398 00:21:09,000 --> 00:21:11,440 Speaker 1: is not going to be the same. So some people, 399 00:21:11,480 --> 00:21:13,480 Speaker 1: for instance, when they lose a lot of money, all 400 00:21:13,520 --> 00:21:15,680 Speaker 1: of a sudden, they'll get hyper aggressive because they want 401 00:21:15,720 --> 00:21:18,680 Speaker 1: to win those chips back. They'll become much more risk seeking. 402 00:21:19,160 --> 00:21:21,640 Speaker 1: Other people when they lose a lot they'll suddenly become 403 00:21:21,720 --> 00:21:23,919 Speaker 1: very cautious and very risk averse because they want to 404 00:21:23,960 --> 00:21:26,600 Speaker 1: protect the little they have left. By the way, now 405 00:21:26,920 --> 00:21:29,760 Speaker 1: put in investing or whatever it is for poker, and 406 00:21:29,800 --> 00:21:32,639 Speaker 1: I think this is very true. Other people, when they 407 00:21:32,640 --> 00:21:35,040 Speaker 1: win a lot of money, they'll again become very risk seeking. 408 00:21:35,040 --> 00:21:36,399 Speaker 1: You say, oh, yeah, I'm on a roll. I have 409 00:21:36,480 --> 00:21:39,400 Speaker 1: the hot hand, gotta take more risks, gotta gotta keep 410 00:21:39,400 --> 00:21:42,359 Speaker 1: the role going. Others, when they win a lot, they'll say, Okay, 411 00:21:42,359 --> 00:21:44,400 Speaker 1: I'm done. You know, now I'm gonna be really conservative. 412 00:21:44,440 --> 00:21:47,080 Speaker 1: I want to protect what I already have. I don't 413 00:21:47,119 --> 00:21:50,040 Speaker 1: want to lose this because I could get unlucky. You 414 00:21:50,040 --> 00:21:53,240 Speaker 1: need to figure out how people are responding to those situations, 415 00:21:53,440 --> 00:21:55,960 Speaker 1: and then you can take advantage of that. But by 416 00:21:55,960 --> 00:21:57,840 Speaker 1: the same token, you need to figure out how you 417 00:21:57,880 --> 00:22:01,640 Speaker 1: respond to that. Most people are honest with themselves. They say, oh, 418 00:22:01,880 --> 00:22:04,320 Speaker 1: I don't let that affect me. You know, I'm a 419 00:22:04,480 --> 00:22:08,000 Speaker 1: very rational person. No nobody is at the beginning, and 420 00:22:08,080 --> 00:22:11,600 Speaker 1: you actually have to honestly do that self assessment and 421 00:22:11,600 --> 00:22:14,240 Speaker 1: figure out, Okay, if I'm in that situation, how am 422 00:22:14,240 --> 00:22:16,520 Speaker 1: I going to react? Because it's not going to be 423 00:22:16,640 --> 00:22:19,840 Speaker 1: rational and how do I counteract that? So you you 424 00:22:19,880 --> 00:22:22,560 Speaker 1: start from that, you start to be honest with yourself, 425 00:22:22,840 --> 00:22:25,639 Speaker 1: put yourself in those most common situations, the ones that 426 00:22:25,720 --> 00:22:28,399 Speaker 1: are most likely to get you off of a rational 427 00:22:28,440 --> 00:22:31,800 Speaker 1: decision making path and onto an emotional decision making path, 428 00:22:32,160 --> 00:22:35,480 Speaker 1: and figure out ahead of time what your emotional reactions are, 429 00:22:35,480 --> 00:22:37,399 Speaker 1: so that you can figure out a game plan for 430 00:22:37,440 --> 00:22:40,680 Speaker 1: how to counteract that, and how to actually identify ahead 431 00:22:40,720 --> 00:22:43,760 Speaker 1: of time, so that you become someone who in the 432 00:22:43,840 --> 00:22:47,920 Speaker 1: moment is more able to control your thought process, more 433 00:22:47,960 --> 00:22:50,639 Speaker 1: able to control your emotions, and then you take it 434 00:22:50,640 --> 00:22:53,560 Speaker 1: from there. So I feel like whenever we have a 435 00:22:53,560 --> 00:22:57,159 Speaker 1: conversation about how best to play poker, and Joe and 436 00:22:57,200 --> 00:22:59,239 Speaker 1: I have had quite a few of those on on 437 00:22:59,280 --> 00:23:02,200 Speaker 1: the podcast over the past few years, but there's always 438 00:23:02,200 --> 00:23:06,320 Speaker 1: this emphasis on being rational for obvious reasons. Right, it's 439 00:23:06,320 --> 00:23:09,680 Speaker 1: a game of logic, it's a game of numbers and probabilities. 440 00:23:09,720 --> 00:23:15,040 Speaker 1: But is there any room for for emotions, for gut feeling. 441 00:23:15,240 --> 00:23:18,159 Speaker 1: Is there a way to use that to your advantage? 442 00:23:18,200 --> 00:23:23,760 Speaker 1: I feel like that aspect of it rarely gets to um, Okay, 443 00:23:23,760 --> 00:23:26,359 Speaker 1: you've you've hit on one of my one of my 444 00:23:26,440 --> 00:23:30,679 Speaker 1: big passions which is to get the term gut feeling 445 00:23:30,760 --> 00:23:35,959 Speaker 1: out of people's um action vocabulary. Ever, so we what 446 00:23:36,200 --> 00:23:39,800 Speaker 1: we love to react with our gut and a lot 447 00:23:39,840 --> 00:23:41,560 Speaker 1: of people will say, oh, you know, I'm a gut 448 00:23:41,600 --> 00:23:44,280 Speaker 1: I'm a field player, I'm a gut player. So I 449 00:23:44,720 --> 00:23:47,720 Speaker 1: as a psychologist, I studied this a lot. And what 450 00:23:47,760 --> 00:23:50,159 Speaker 1: we find and study after study is that people have 451 00:23:50,359 --> 00:23:54,040 Speaker 1: very very strong gut feelings, and they're equally strong when 452 00:23:54,040 --> 00:23:57,440 Speaker 1: they're correct and when they're wrong. And if you ask 453 00:23:57,560 --> 00:24:01,520 Speaker 1: people to tell the difference, they're on able to coin flips. 454 00:24:01,560 --> 00:24:04,840 Speaker 1: So we have zero ability to tell which of our 455 00:24:04,880 --> 00:24:07,879 Speaker 1: gut feelings are our intuitions is accurate and which is 456 00:24:07,880 --> 00:24:12,400 Speaker 1: completely wrong minded. And our memories are very false when 457 00:24:12,400 --> 00:24:15,399 Speaker 1: it comes to this, they're very biased. So we'll remember 458 00:24:15,400 --> 00:24:17,439 Speaker 1: the times that we, you know, followed our gut and 459 00:24:17,440 --> 00:24:20,080 Speaker 1: we're right, or didn't follow it and our gut was right, 460 00:24:20,320 --> 00:24:22,399 Speaker 1: and we'll forget all of those other times where our 461 00:24:22,440 --> 00:24:24,760 Speaker 1: gut was full of crap, which is what our gut 462 00:24:24,800 --> 00:24:30,040 Speaker 1: is normally filled with. And so what I urge people 463 00:24:30,080 --> 00:24:33,399 Speaker 1: to do is to realize that there's only one type 464 00:24:33,440 --> 00:24:35,400 Speaker 1: of gut feeling that you should be able to pay 465 00:24:35,440 --> 00:24:38,879 Speaker 1: attention to. And that's when it's not really a gut feeling. 466 00:24:39,240 --> 00:24:42,600 Speaker 1: That's when it's thousands and thousands and thousands of hours 467 00:24:42,600 --> 00:24:46,360 Speaker 1: of hard earned expertise of something that you are truly 468 00:24:46,760 --> 00:24:48,680 Speaker 1: good at and that you've spent a lot of time 469 00:24:48,720 --> 00:24:52,159 Speaker 1: studying that your mind might not have conscious access to, 470 00:24:52,720 --> 00:24:55,480 Speaker 1: and so you actually experienced it as gut when it's 471 00:24:55,560 --> 00:24:59,280 Speaker 1: really expertise. So for someone like Eric Seidel, if he 472 00:24:59,400 --> 00:25:01,879 Speaker 1: has a got feeling that this person is bluffing at 473 00:25:01,880 --> 00:25:04,040 Speaker 1: the poker table, you should go with that gut because 474 00:25:04,080 --> 00:25:06,480 Speaker 1: it's not gut, it's pattern recognition. It's the fact that 475 00:25:06,520 --> 00:25:10,360 Speaker 1: he's seen this situation play out over the last thirties 476 00:25:10,400 --> 00:25:14,400 Speaker 1: some odd years countless times. He just hasn't actually sat 477 00:25:14,440 --> 00:25:17,080 Speaker 1: down every time and then an analysis and said, oh, 478 00:25:17,119 --> 00:25:20,080 Speaker 1: when this happens, this person is bluff thing. But his 479 00:25:20,160 --> 00:25:22,240 Speaker 1: brain was doing that analysis even though he might not 480 00:25:22,280 --> 00:25:25,159 Speaker 1: have consciously been writing it down because he doesn't have 481 00:25:25,200 --> 00:25:27,919 Speaker 1: conscious access to it. He says, oh, gut feeling, But 482 00:25:27,960 --> 00:25:31,400 Speaker 1: it's not gut feeling. It's over thirty years of winning 483 00:25:31,480 --> 00:25:33,719 Speaker 1: at this game and seeing this play out over and 484 00:25:33,840 --> 00:25:36,560 Speaker 1: over and over. If I have that same gut feeling 485 00:25:36,600 --> 00:25:39,240 Speaker 1: this person is bluffing, I should ignore that and try 486 00:25:39,280 --> 00:25:42,159 Speaker 1: to look at all of the other things that I 487 00:25:42,200 --> 00:25:45,439 Speaker 1: can be using to make my decision. Because I do 488 00:25:45,520 --> 00:25:48,919 Speaker 1: not have the expertise. I've not been playing poker nearly 489 00:25:48,960 --> 00:25:51,800 Speaker 1: long enough. I cannot calm myself an expert. I'm not 490 00:25:51,800 --> 00:25:54,080 Speaker 1: allowed to calm myself an expert for another ten years 491 00:25:54,080 --> 00:25:57,440 Speaker 1: at least. Um, And so that's you have to be really, 492 00:25:57,520 --> 00:26:00,240 Speaker 1: really careful. And that's not something that people really like 493 00:26:00,320 --> 00:26:03,280 Speaker 1: to hear. We really love our guts, but you know 494 00:26:03,359 --> 00:26:06,080 Speaker 1: our our guts. That's you don't want to be deciding 495 00:26:06,080 --> 00:26:07,960 Speaker 1: with your stomach. You want to be deciding with your head. 496 00:26:09,160 --> 00:26:13,320 Speaker 1: So talk to us a little bit more about your 497 00:26:13,359 --> 00:26:16,760 Speaker 1: actual experience and uh, you know you mentioned okay, you 498 00:26:16,840 --> 00:26:21,600 Speaker 1: decided you wanted to do this, you sought out instruction, 499 00:26:22,240 --> 00:26:24,919 Speaker 1: but then actual put it into gameplay, And what was 500 00:26:25,000 --> 00:26:27,880 Speaker 1: the learning curve like? And how long did it take 501 00:26:27,920 --> 00:26:31,160 Speaker 1: you from going to someone who's like, okay, just sort 502 00:26:31,160 --> 00:26:34,920 Speaker 1: of understanding the rules to feeling like you had a 503 00:26:35,000 --> 00:26:37,719 Speaker 1: good chance at making money when you sat down at 504 00:26:37,720 --> 00:26:40,399 Speaker 1: the poker table. What was that process like, Um, I 505 00:26:40,440 --> 00:26:42,639 Speaker 1: still don't think I have a good chance of making 506 00:26:42,680 --> 00:26:45,320 Speaker 1: funny when it sent out at the poker table. I 507 00:26:45,359 --> 00:26:49,920 Speaker 1: think that impostor complex has has never entirely gone away. UM, 508 00:26:50,000 --> 00:26:52,760 Speaker 1: but it was a very it was it took a 509 00:26:52,800 --> 00:26:57,240 Speaker 1: long time. So the way that I started learning UM 510 00:26:57,280 --> 00:26:59,720 Speaker 1: at first, I played online UM, even though I always 511 00:26:59,800 --> 00:27:02,800 Speaker 1: knew that my goal was to play live my edges live. UM. 512 00:27:02,840 --> 00:27:05,360 Speaker 1: I'm a psychologist. I'm not a mathematician. The last time 513 00:27:05,359 --> 00:27:07,320 Speaker 1: I took a math class was in high school. My 514 00:27:07,440 --> 00:27:12,040 Speaker 1: edges people UM and online. Sure some of that matters, 515 00:27:12,080 --> 00:27:14,920 Speaker 1: but most of it is mathematics, So I'm not someone 516 00:27:14,960 --> 00:27:18,439 Speaker 1: who was ever going to train there. But online you 517 00:27:18,480 --> 00:27:20,880 Speaker 1: can get a lot more experience, and you can get 518 00:27:20,920 --> 00:27:23,359 Speaker 1: live because the hands are much faster. So in a 519 00:27:23,359 --> 00:27:26,000 Speaker 1: week of playing online you can get six months worth 520 00:27:26,440 --> 00:27:30,080 Speaker 1: of live playing experience. So so that's very important. So 521 00:27:30,080 --> 00:27:34,440 Speaker 1: I started there UM and until I started consistently making 522 00:27:34,440 --> 00:27:37,119 Speaker 1: money online, Eric did not let me play live. He 523 00:27:37,320 --> 00:27:41,119 Speaker 1: was very big about building your bank roll organically and 524 00:27:41,200 --> 00:27:45,199 Speaker 1: making sure that you were very savvy financially with your decisions. 525 00:27:45,520 --> 00:27:49,760 Speaker 1: What stakes when you the first tables that you said, So, 526 00:27:49,840 --> 00:27:52,280 Speaker 1: I always played tournaments. I did not play cash games, 527 00:27:52,520 --> 00:27:55,440 Speaker 1: so these were like five dollar buying tournaments. I made 528 00:27:55,440 --> 00:27:58,520 Speaker 1: the decision at the beginning because it's a very if, 529 00:27:58,800 --> 00:28:02,280 Speaker 1: it's a very different style of play, and um, we 530 00:28:02,480 --> 00:28:04,640 Speaker 1: had to decide what was I going to do? And 531 00:28:04,720 --> 00:28:07,960 Speaker 1: as if you're talking about life analogy, tournaments are definitely 532 00:28:08,080 --> 00:28:10,720 Speaker 1: the way the way to go because they have a dynamic. 533 00:28:10,760 --> 00:28:12,640 Speaker 1: There's a beginning, there's a middle, there's an end. It's 534 00:28:12,720 --> 00:28:15,600 Speaker 1: much more of a progressive story as opposed to a 535 00:28:15,640 --> 00:28:18,400 Speaker 1: cash game, which is much more static. So we decided 536 00:28:18,440 --> 00:28:21,560 Speaker 1: I was going to focus exclusively on tournaments. So I 537 00:28:21,600 --> 00:28:24,119 Speaker 1: was playing, you know, five dollar tournaments online. Once I 538 00:28:24,160 --> 00:28:26,560 Speaker 1: started winning some of those, and I want to think 539 00:28:26,560 --> 00:28:28,679 Speaker 1: a little over two thousand dollars, and I took that 540 00:28:28,680 --> 00:28:31,760 Speaker 1: money and went to Vegas and started playing in the 541 00:28:31,800 --> 00:28:35,280 Speaker 1: dailies and nightlies. Um, you know, the thirty five dollar 542 00:28:35,400 --> 00:28:38,000 Speaker 1: buying tournaments, because that's as low as you can go 543 00:28:38,120 --> 00:28:40,920 Speaker 1: for live poker. And I really wanted to play in 544 00:28:40,920 --> 00:28:43,360 Speaker 1: these hundred dollar tournaments, and Erica wouldn't let me. He said, 545 00:28:43,360 --> 00:28:45,080 Speaker 1: that's way too high for you. You You can't do it 546 00:28:45,160 --> 00:28:47,960 Speaker 1: until you start winning at the lower ones. And I 547 00:28:48,000 --> 00:28:51,440 Speaker 1: spent multiple months in Vegas playing every single day, multiple 548 00:28:51,480 --> 00:28:55,320 Speaker 1: tournaments a day, and I was losing money for for 549 00:28:55,360 --> 00:28:58,800 Speaker 1: a while, and I became very frustrated because I thought, 550 00:28:58,920 --> 00:29:01,720 Speaker 1: you know, I'm i'm studying, I'm working really hard, um, 551 00:29:01,800 --> 00:29:06,280 Speaker 1: and nothing's working. And then it started working. Everything just 552 00:29:06,400 --> 00:29:09,600 Speaker 1: kind of came together and I won my first tournament 553 00:29:09,600 --> 00:29:11,760 Speaker 1: at Planet Hollywood. It was you know, forty five or 554 00:29:11,800 --> 00:29:14,880 Speaker 1: something dollar buy and and I won over over nine 555 00:29:14,960 --> 00:29:17,920 Speaker 1: hundred dollars and I was just over the over the moon. 556 00:29:18,120 --> 00:29:20,440 Speaker 1: It was amazing. And then I started being able to 557 00:29:20,440 --> 00:29:23,120 Speaker 1: play the hundred dollar tournaments and I started final tabling 558 00:29:23,160 --> 00:29:26,400 Speaker 1: those and coming in second place and doing doing well there. 559 00:29:26,480 --> 00:29:29,040 Speaker 1: And then I was able to move up gradually too, 560 00:29:29,120 --> 00:29:31,520 Speaker 1: higher and higher stakes. And I think that that original 561 00:29:31,560 --> 00:29:35,200 Speaker 1: win up Planet Hollywood made me realize, okay, um, I 562 00:29:35,240 --> 00:29:39,640 Speaker 1: can do this. UM. I really needed that burst of confidence, 563 00:29:39,760 --> 00:29:43,440 Speaker 1: because after two months of playing almost every day and 564 00:29:43,520 --> 00:29:49,080 Speaker 1: not making any money, UM, it can be very frustrating. 565 00:29:49,240 --> 00:29:51,800 Speaker 1: And eventually it can be enough to say, you know, 566 00:29:51,840 --> 00:29:54,600 Speaker 1: maybe I'm just really really bad at this. But what 567 00:29:54,720 --> 00:29:57,680 Speaker 1: it shows you is that Sue or at the beginning, 568 00:29:57,720 --> 00:29:59,640 Speaker 1: I was very very bad. But it also takes a 569 00:29:59,680 --> 00:30:02,600 Speaker 1: while for everything to come together. Being bad. It doesn't 570 00:30:02,600 --> 00:30:04,880 Speaker 1: mean you're not learning, it doesn't mean you're not improving, 571 00:30:05,200 --> 00:30:08,080 Speaker 1: and you can't judge based on outcome. You have to 572 00:30:08,160 --> 00:30:11,760 Speaker 1: just keep on, keep on plugging away at the process. 573 00:30:11,840 --> 00:30:14,239 Speaker 1: And then I know, after after that first when I 574 00:30:14,280 --> 00:30:16,880 Speaker 1: didn't look back because I was able to kind of 575 00:30:16,920 --> 00:30:22,200 Speaker 1: finance my way through UM and then my big breakthrough 576 00:30:22,400 --> 00:30:25,720 Speaker 1: at pc A, The Poker Stars carribean adventure UM when 577 00:30:25,720 --> 00:30:29,200 Speaker 1: I made UM in you know, in one week, I 578 00:30:29,200 --> 00:30:32,520 Speaker 1: made over a hundred thousand dollars UM. That happened almost 579 00:30:32,560 --> 00:30:34,240 Speaker 1: a year to the day from the first time I 580 00:30:34,280 --> 00:30:38,080 Speaker 1: played a live poker tournament. So I have two questions 581 00:30:38,080 --> 00:30:40,080 Speaker 1: based on that. But the first one is Joe and 582 00:30:40,120 --> 00:30:43,160 Speaker 1: I started this podcast by discussing the sort of pros 583 00:30:43,200 --> 00:30:47,720 Speaker 1: and cons of doing online poker versus live games. What 584 00:30:47,800 --> 00:30:51,120 Speaker 1: was your experience of that and how was the process different? 585 00:30:51,640 --> 00:30:53,760 Speaker 1: And then secondly, when you were doing the live games, 586 00:30:53,880 --> 00:30:57,480 Speaker 1: what did you tell people about who you are? You know, 587 00:30:57,560 --> 00:30:59,560 Speaker 1: did anyone ask you what you were doing there? And 588 00:30:59,680 --> 00:31:02,280 Speaker 1: you sort of appeared out of nowhere and and started 589 00:31:02,320 --> 00:31:04,480 Speaker 1: to do very well. So I'm just wondering if people 590 00:31:04,480 --> 00:31:09,880 Speaker 1: were curious about about you. Yeah, So, so the first 591 00:31:09,880 --> 00:31:13,840 Speaker 1: part online and live is very different. I vastly prefer 592 00:31:14,040 --> 00:31:17,160 Speaker 1: live poker, um, both because I'm better at it, but 593 00:31:17,200 --> 00:31:20,360 Speaker 1: also I find it more interesting, there's more going on. Um. 594 00:31:20,400 --> 00:31:22,360 Speaker 1: This isn't true of all people. A lot of people 595 00:31:22,800 --> 00:31:26,080 Speaker 1: prefer playing online um, and they're different both in terms 596 00:31:26,080 --> 00:31:28,920 Speaker 1: of speed and in terms of the player pools. Although 597 00:31:29,000 --> 00:31:32,120 Speaker 1: right now things have gone a little bit murky because 598 00:31:32,160 --> 00:31:34,680 Speaker 1: a lot of live players have moved online because with 599 00:31:34,760 --> 00:31:37,640 Speaker 1: COVID you can't play live UM, so so now the 600 00:31:37,680 --> 00:31:40,080 Speaker 1: player pools have become a little bit mixed. But before 601 00:31:40,120 --> 00:31:42,800 Speaker 1: there were very different player tendencies, and you learned to 602 00:31:42,840 --> 00:31:45,960 Speaker 1: play a little bit differently online than live, and online 603 00:31:46,000 --> 00:31:49,080 Speaker 1: was actually tougher. The good online games were much harder 604 00:31:49,120 --> 00:31:53,280 Speaker 1: than the live games because people were more mathematically minded. Um. 605 00:31:53,320 --> 00:31:57,000 Speaker 1: The best players use software to analyze everything they have overlays, 606 00:31:57,440 --> 00:32:00,480 Speaker 1: You're you're just seeing a table, They're seeing your sticks. 607 00:32:00,520 --> 00:32:03,920 Speaker 1: They're seeing exactly what percentage Japan's you open pre flop, 608 00:32:03,960 --> 00:32:05,760 Speaker 1: how often you three bet, how often you fold to 609 00:32:05,800 --> 00:32:08,280 Speaker 1: a three bed, how often you forebet. All of those 610 00:32:08,360 --> 00:32:11,160 Speaker 1: numbers are there because they have that software crunching in 611 00:32:11,200 --> 00:32:13,520 Speaker 1: the background. If you want to play seriously, online you 612 00:32:13,560 --> 00:32:16,200 Speaker 1: have to have it UM, even though some sites no 613 00:32:16,240 --> 00:32:19,360 Speaker 1: longer allow it, but all of the sites that do UM, 614 00:32:19,440 --> 00:32:22,080 Speaker 1: you're at this huge disadvantage if you don't use that. 615 00:32:22,360 --> 00:32:24,520 Speaker 1: None of that exists live. You have to just learn 616 00:32:24,560 --> 00:32:26,320 Speaker 1: to do that on your own. You have to learn 617 00:32:26,320 --> 00:32:28,720 Speaker 1: to pay attention to it. So in that sense, live 618 00:32:28,840 --> 00:32:31,880 Speaker 1: is harder UM. But I like it a lot better 619 00:32:31,960 --> 00:32:35,040 Speaker 1: because I actually think that those muscles are very important 620 00:32:35,120 --> 00:32:38,400 Speaker 1: too to train, and I think because I play live, 621 00:32:38,920 --> 00:32:41,280 Speaker 1: I actually have a bit of an advantage on the 622 00:32:41,360 --> 00:32:46,520 Speaker 1: sites that don't allow the HUDs, those that those software overlays, 623 00:32:46,920 --> 00:32:50,280 Speaker 1: because I'm used to paying attention to players and I'm 624 00:32:50,360 --> 00:32:52,720 Speaker 1: used to kind of counting for myself. Okay, how often 625 00:32:52,720 --> 00:32:54,840 Speaker 1: does this person raise? How often do they three bet? 626 00:32:54,840 --> 00:32:57,000 Speaker 1: How often do they fold to afford bit? You know, 627 00:32:57,320 --> 00:33:00,200 Speaker 1: I'm used to tracking that in my mind, whereas players 628 00:33:00,240 --> 00:33:02,600 Speaker 1: who have software that does it for them are not 629 00:33:02,640 --> 00:33:05,760 Speaker 1: necessarily used to it. So that's but that's a big difference. 630 00:33:06,080 --> 00:33:10,080 Speaker 1: So online much more mathematical, Live much more psychological, a 631 00:33:10,120 --> 00:33:13,880 Speaker 1: lot more software number crunching online UM, a lot more 632 00:33:13,880 --> 00:33:18,800 Speaker 1: people crunching live UM. In terms of whether people asked 633 00:33:18,800 --> 00:33:21,920 Speaker 1: me questions at the beginning, I think they just when 634 00:33:21,920 --> 00:33:24,880 Speaker 1: I was playing in most days tournaments, no one really 635 00:33:25,160 --> 00:33:29,480 Speaker 1: gave me a second look, um, because otherwise other than saying, oh, 636 00:33:29,520 --> 00:33:32,360 Speaker 1: there's a girl in the game, well that's weird. Um. 637 00:33:32,400 --> 00:33:36,040 Speaker 1: But over time, yeah, absolutely, and people started figuring out 638 00:33:36,760 --> 00:33:38,720 Speaker 1: what I was doing. I never volunteered it, but I 639 00:33:38,760 --> 00:33:41,320 Speaker 1: never lied about it if someone asked, UM. And I 640 00:33:41,360 --> 00:33:44,560 Speaker 1: think that it stood out because when I was traveling, 641 00:33:44,920 --> 00:33:47,560 Speaker 1: I would be sitting, you know, in these smaller tournaments, 642 00:33:47,560 --> 00:33:50,120 Speaker 1: and then all of these high roller players, not just 643 00:33:50,200 --> 00:33:51,959 Speaker 1: Derek but all his friends would come over and say 644 00:33:52,040 --> 00:33:53,840 Speaker 1: hi to me and give me a hug, because those 645 00:33:53,880 --> 00:33:55,560 Speaker 1: were the people I knew. Those were my friends in 646 00:33:55,600 --> 00:33:58,120 Speaker 1: the game. And so people started realizing, wait, who is 647 00:33:58,160 --> 00:34:00,840 Speaker 1: this girl who knows all of these people both um. 648 00:34:00,880 --> 00:34:03,800 Speaker 1: And then the poker media picked up on it, um 649 00:34:03,800 --> 00:34:05,480 Speaker 1: and did a few stories about me, and then I 650 00:34:05,600 --> 00:34:22,479 Speaker 1: lost a little bit of my anonymity. M I wanted 651 00:34:22,480 --> 00:34:25,320 Speaker 1: to ask another question about the only reason we talked 652 00:34:25,360 --> 00:34:29,920 Speaker 1: sometimes about poker on this podcast, which is nominally about 653 00:34:30,280 --> 00:34:32,640 Speaker 1: markets and economics, is there are a lot of people 654 00:34:33,200 --> 00:34:36,400 Speaker 1: in the investing world who play poker and are interested 655 00:34:36,400 --> 00:34:39,440 Speaker 1: in then and there's obviously a lot of theoretical cross 656 00:34:39,440 --> 00:34:44,480 Speaker 1: over right now in investing. We've seen just in the 657 00:34:44,520 --> 00:34:47,400 Speaker 1: last several months, but for a while, this absolute explosion 658 00:34:48,280 --> 00:34:53,040 Speaker 1: of online trading and retail money coming into trading like 659 00:34:53,120 --> 00:34:56,040 Speaker 1: we've never seen before. And if I wanted to do 660 00:34:56,120 --> 00:34:59,880 Speaker 1: some sort of like you know, forced torture analogy, maybe 661 00:34:59,880 --> 00:35:03,319 Speaker 1: a sort of like the Chris Moneymaker phenomenon where after 662 00:35:03,320 --> 00:35:05,680 Speaker 1: everyone saw him when the World Series of Poker without 663 00:35:05,680 --> 00:35:07,759 Speaker 1: a bunch of people got into playing online poker. But 664 00:35:07,880 --> 00:35:12,000 Speaker 1: for whatever reason, lots of people are entering the investing 665 00:35:12,000 --> 00:35:15,719 Speaker 1: world trading like crazy online. And I'm curious, um, you 666 00:35:15,760 --> 00:35:19,120 Speaker 1: know how that's changed the game even in person? You know, 667 00:35:19,160 --> 00:35:22,520 Speaker 1: when you're at a live table against people who have 668 00:35:22,560 --> 00:35:26,600 Speaker 1: like had their experience, um playing mostly online, have seen 669 00:35:27,120 --> 00:35:30,600 Speaker 1: more hands online because they're multi tabling it perhaps than 670 00:35:30,760 --> 00:35:33,480 Speaker 1: someone like even like Eric Sidell has seen in the 671 00:35:33,600 --> 00:35:36,600 Speaker 1: thirty year career, just because they could play so many 672 00:35:36,640 --> 00:35:41,120 Speaker 1: hands so so much. How has that fundamentally changed the 673 00:35:41,160 --> 00:35:44,000 Speaker 1: game from your perspective that so many people have seen 674 00:35:44,360 --> 00:35:48,279 Speaker 1: so much, uh, in a way that historically never been 675 00:35:48,280 --> 00:35:52,239 Speaker 1: the case before. Well, it's actually changed it live much 676 00:35:52,320 --> 00:35:55,160 Speaker 1: less than you would think, because, um, a lot of 677 00:35:55,200 --> 00:35:58,239 Speaker 1: the online players when they actually make the transitions to live, 678 00:35:58,320 --> 00:36:02,240 Speaker 1: are horrible. Uh. They you don't understand live poker. They 679 00:36:02,280 --> 00:36:05,840 Speaker 1: give off way too much information. And when you're multi tabling, 680 00:36:05,880 --> 00:36:09,400 Speaker 1: you don't You're not You're good at the mathematical, tiny edges, 681 00:36:09,480 --> 00:36:11,880 Speaker 1: you're not good at the very big spots because you 682 00:36:11,880 --> 00:36:13,880 Speaker 1: don't have to be. That's not how you play. You 683 00:36:13,920 --> 00:36:16,719 Speaker 1: play for volume and for making a tiny bit of money. Um, 684 00:36:16,800 --> 00:36:19,160 Speaker 1: multi tabling is not the way to get good at 685 00:36:19,200 --> 00:36:21,480 Speaker 1: live poker. But it's a wonderful They would kick my 686 00:36:21,520 --> 00:36:24,319 Speaker 1: ass on online, don't get me wrong, But a lot 687 00:36:24,320 --> 00:36:26,560 Speaker 1: of times I love playing with them live because they 688 00:36:26,600 --> 00:36:28,680 Speaker 1: don't know what they're doing. Um, and they give off 689 00:36:28,719 --> 00:36:33,360 Speaker 1: way too much information. Um. However, a lot of the 690 00:36:33,440 --> 00:36:36,560 Speaker 1: really best players these days who have come up both 691 00:36:36,640 --> 00:36:41,120 Speaker 1: online and live, have made the game more challenging, or 692 00:36:41,200 --> 00:36:43,680 Speaker 1: so I've been told. So a lot of people say, WHOA, 693 00:36:43,760 --> 00:36:46,000 Speaker 1: you know you came in at such a horrible time 694 00:36:46,080 --> 00:36:49,759 Speaker 1: when you know poker is dying because it's getting so complex. 695 00:36:49,840 --> 00:36:51,960 Speaker 1: I have no idea. It's all I've ever seen, it's 696 00:36:51,960 --> 00:36:54,240 Speaker 1: all I know. I don't know what it was like before. 697 00:36:54,680 --> 00:36:58,279 Speaker 1: I've been told it's tougher now, um, But I think 698 00:36:58,320 --> 00:37:01,200 Speaker 1: that they bring a much more mathemat radical mindset. They're 699 00:37:01,280 --> 00:37:05,920 Speaker 1: using solvers programs that actually run you know, thousands of 700 00:37:05,920 --> 00:37:08,799 Speaker 1: Monte Carlo simulations and try to figure out what's the 701 00:37:08,800 --> 00:37:12,799 Speaker 1: approximate way to play this hand, um, And so they're 702 00:37:12,840 --> 00:37:16,120 Speaker 1: thinking about it in a much more precise way. Um. 703 00:37:16,200 --> 00:37:18,440 Speaker 1: That said, I actually think that it can give a 704 00:37:18,480 --> 00:37:22,840 Speaker 1: false sense of confidence, because it's really important to remember 705 00:37:22,920 --> 00:37:25,879 Speaker 1: that poker has not been solved, that these solvers are 706 00:37:25,920 --> 00:37:28,839 Speaker 1: only approximations, and they're only as good as with any 707 00:37:28,840 --> 00:37:31,520 Speaker 1: algorithms as the inputs that you put in, and a 708 00:37:31,520 --> 00:37:33,799 Speaker 1: lot of people missed use solvers. They don't know how 709 00:37:33,800 --> 00:37:35,960 Speaker 1: to put it in ranges correctly, they don't know how 710 00:37:35,960 --> 00:37:38,319 Speaker 1: to put in the build the game trees correctly, and 711 00:37:38,640 --> 00:37:42,000 Speaker 1: garbage and garbage out. As with every single algorithm, and 712 00:37:42,040 --> 00:37:44,239 Speaker 1: even the players who do use them correctly, who know 713 00:37:44,320 --> 00:37:46,239 Speaker 1: exactly what they're doing, and who are the best in 714 00:37:46,280 --> 00:37:49,960 Speaker 1: the world at them, a lot of times they won't see, 715 00:37:50,120 --> 00:37:54,160 Speaker 1: they won't think creatively, they won't actually see um, some 716 00:37:54,280 --> 00:37:56,759 Speaker 1: of the nuances that are happening live because they're so 717 00:37:56,880 --> 00:37:59,839 Speaker 1: locked into their solutions and they know exactly what they're 718 00:38:00,040 --> 00:38:02,839 Speaker 1: post to do, and you can really exploit that. So 719 00:38:02,880 --> 00:38:05,880 Speaker 1: some of sometimes the mathematical guys are the easiest players 720 00:38:05,920 --> 00:38:10,640 Speaker 1: to play against. Usually they're gonna they're gonna really excel um, 721 00:38:10,680 --> 00:38:13,239 Speaker 1: But there are moments where you can just completely take 722 00:38:13,280 --> 00:38:16,160 Speaker 1: advantage of them, and I have. I've actually won against 723 00:38:16,200 --> 00:38:18,720 Speaker 1: some of the absolute best players in the world by 724 00:38:18,920 --> 00:38:21,680 Speaker 1: knowing exactly how they were thinking about things because I 725 00:38:21,719 --> 00:38:24,040 Speaker 1: also use solvers. You have to if you're playing at 726 00:38:24,040 --> 00:38:26,600 Speaker 1: a high level. Um, But I use them as a 727 00:38:26,600 --> 00:38:29,319 Speaker 1: way to enhance my thinking, not as a way of 728 00:38:29,360 --> 00:38:33,440 Speaker 1: saying of gaining certainty. There's really there's I think a 729 00:38:33,480 --> 00:38:36,880 Speaker 1: big risk, not just in poker, but in financing everything, 730 00:38:37,200 --> 00:38:40,239 Speaker 1: in thinking that algorithms and big data and all of 731 00:38:40,280 --> 00:38:42,360 Speaker 1: this stuff that it's going to give you certainty that 732 00:38:42,440 --> 00:38:44,840 Speaker 1: you don't actually have. And I think that there's a 733 00:38:44,840 --> 00:38:47,560 Speaker 1: big risk of over confidence there and of failing to 734 00:38:47,600 --> 00:38:50,920 Speaker 1: pay attention to other things because you think you've got it. 735 00:38:50,960 --> 00:38:54,200 Speaker 1: I'll figured out I'm going to make an assumption in 736 00:38:54,239 --> 00:38:57,080 Speaker 1: this next question, and do tell me if it's incorrect. 737 00:38:57,160 --> 00:38:59,720 Speaker 1: But when we started the discussion and you were describing 738 00:38:59,719 --> 00:39:03,279 Speaker 1: your project, you you sort of said or you suggested 739 00:39:03,360 --> 00:39:06,640 Speaker 1: that poker was you know, your interest in it was 740 00:39:06,880 --> 00:39:09,920 Speaker 1: came from intellectual curiosity and you saw as this mix 741 00:39:09,920 --> 00:39:14,400 Speaker 1: of skill and luck that best reflected life. It sounds 742 00:39:14,480 --> 00:39:17,000 Speaker 1: like as you embarked on this project that you came 743 00:39:17,040 --> 00:39:21,880 Speaker 1: to really enjoy your poker experience. I'm just wondering, when 744 00:39:22,000 --> 00:39:25,640 Speaker 1: you know, if that happened, what made it happen? Like, 745 00:39:25,920 --> 00:39:28,480 Speaker 1: what was that moment when you when you thought, actually 746 00:39:28,560 --> 00:39:32,919 Speaker 1: I really like this and I'm having fun. It definitely happened. Um, 747 00:39:32,960 --> 00:39:35,400 Speaker 1: there wasn't one moment um. I think it was a 748 00:39:35,440 --> 00:39:39,840 Speaker 1: realization over time. And I think that the reason that 749 00:39:39,960 --> 00:39:42,400 Speaker 1: I love poker is because of what it's teaching me 750 00:39:42,480 --> 00:39:46,239 Speaker 1: about non poker is because of how complex the game is. 751 00:39:46,600 --> 00:39:49,160 Speaker 1: It's because the more I learned about it, the more 752 00:39:49,160 --> 00:39:52,600 Speaker 1: difficult it becomes. And I feel like it's teaching me 753 00:39:52,640 --> 00:39:55,560 Speaker 1: to stretch my mind, to think in new ways, to 754 00:39:55,760 --> 00:39:59,760 Speaker 1: challenge myself on both an intellectual and an emotional human 755 00:39:59,840 --> 00:40:03,840 Speaker 1: love ball And until COVID, you know, I was playing 756 00:40:03,920 --> 00:40:07,839 Speaker 1: live regularly. I was still traveling all over the world. Um. 757 00:40:07,840 --> 00:40:10,000 Speaker 1: In fact, you know I had to cancel plans for 758 00:40:10,120 --> 00:40:14,360 Speaker 1: my what was going to be my UM next big tournament. 759 00:40:14,480 --> 00:40:17,360 Speaker 1: Um it became one of the last live poker tournaments 760 00:40:17,360 --> 00:40:19,880 Speaker 1: to be held in this country. UM. So I was 761 00:40:19,960 --> 00:40:22,640 Speaker 1: on my way there and ended up going back because 762 00:40:22,760 --> 00:40:25,440 Speaker 1: of what was happening, and I realized that this was 763 00:40:25,480 --> 00:40:27,400 Speaker 1: not good and that the casino was not where I 764 00:40:27,400 --> 00:40:31,399 Speaker 1: should be. Um And But until that moment, I had 765 00:40:31,480 --> 00:40:34,760 Speaker 1: no intention of quoting, end of pulling back from playing 766 00:40:35,320 --> 00:40:39,600 Speaker 1: seriously live because it was still giving me so much. 767 00:40:39,760 --> 00:40:42,280 Speaker 1: And I was still learning so much about thinking about 768 00:40:42,320 --> 00:40:46,279 Speaker 1: decision making, about emotional regulation, about people, about all of 769 00:40:46,320 --> 00:40:49,359 Speaker 1: these different elements, and that, to me is beautiful. There 770 00:40:49,360 --> 00:40:51,960 Speaker 1: are so few things that will give you that kind 771 00:40:52,000 --> 00:40:54,880 Speaker 1: of richness of experience. And now my PhD not just 772 00:40:54,920 --> 00:40:58,319 Speaker 1: in psychology, but I studied for years decision making under 773 00:40:58,440 --> 00:41:02,680 Speaker 1: risk and uncertainty and under hot emotional conditions. I made 774 00:41:02,719 --> 00:41:04,840 Speaker 1: people play stock market games. I looked at all of 775 00:41:04,880 --> 00:41:08,480 Speaker 1: their decisions, and I spent so long studying all of 776 00:41:08,480 --> 00:41:11,160 Speaker 1: this stuff, and nothing has taught me more about it 777 00:41:11,200 --> 00:41:13,719 Speaker 1: than poker basically stopped me. It's not me much more 778 00:41:13,760 --> 00:41:17,239 Speaker 1: than my PhD. Actually, I want to ask you about that. 779 00:41:17,400 --> 00:41:21,800 Speaker 1: The the emotional valance part because you can learn about 780 00:41:21,920 --> 00:41:25,160 Speaker 1: you know, get really good at uh, pattern recognition, you 781 00:41:25,200 --> 00:41:28,360 Speaker 1: can get really good at math. You can get to 782 00:41:28,400 --> 00:41:31,120 Speaker 1: know yourself and your bluffing strategy and what you feel 783 00:41:31,239 --> 00:41:34,160 Speaker 1: comfortable with what. At some point, you get to a 784 00:41:34,160 --> 00:41:36,560 Speaker 1: position where you're in a tournament or maybe you're sort 785 00:41:36,560 --> 00:41:38,560 Speaker 1: of on the bubble with a chance to make money, 786 00:41:38,840 --> 00:41:42,040 Speaker 1: and you're in a huge pot and the stakes are 787 00:41:42,040 --> 00:41:45,799 Speaker 1: really high, and uh, you know, people's heart start to 788 00:41:45,960 --> 00:41:49,960 Speaker 1: beat faster. How do you do you have a process 789 00:41:50,040 --> 00:41:54,680 Speaker 1: for sticking to your method of analysis and not letting 790 00:41:54,680 --> 00:41:58,440 Speaker 1: the emotions of those moments dictate what you ultimately decide 791 00:41:58,480 --> 00:42:00,799 Speaker 1: to do. Yeah. Absolutely in I mean part of it 792 00:42:00,880 --> 00:42:02,799 Speaker 1: is experience. At the beginning, I would give off a 793 00:42:02,800 --> 00:42:05,200 Speaker 1: lot of information just because these situations were new to 794 00:42:05,239 --> 00:42:07,160 Speaker 1: me and it was really difficult for me to to 795 00:42:07,239 --> 00:42:09,839 Speaker 1: deal with the emotions and I hadn't thought through them, 796 00:42:09,920 --> 00:42:12,000 Speaker 1: you know. Part way through my journey, I actually got 797 00:42:12,000 --> 00:42:14,480 Speaker 1: a mental coach, so someone who helped me with the 798 00:42:14,520 --> 00:42:17,400 Speaker 1: mental elements of the game, someone named Jared Tendler, who 799 00:42:17,480 --> 00:42:20,880 Speaker 1: was very very good, um at teaching me to to 800 00:42:21,320 --> 00:42:24,920 Speaker 1: have some of these you know, mental cooling and emotional 801 00:42:24,960 --> 00:42:27,920 Speaker 1: cooling strategies because you do need someone to look at 802 00:42:27,920 --> 00:42:30,560 Speaker 1: you from the outside. Even though I'm someone who studied 803 00:42:30,760 --> 00:42:34,719 Speaker 1: self control and who really knows all of these strategies theoretically, 804 00:42:35,000 --> 00:42:37,360 Speaker 1: practically speaking, it's much more difficult to apply them to 805 00:42:37,400 --> 00:42:40,440 Speaker 1: yourself because you when you're on tilt that's the poker 806 00:42:40,560 --> 00:42:43,919 Speaker 1: term for letting emotions into your decision process, it's really 807 00:42:43,920 --> 00:42:47,239 Speaker 1: really hard to identify and analyze it in yourself. It's 808 00:42:47,320 --> 00:42:49,839 Speaker 1: much easier to see it in someone else. We're not 809 00:42:49,880 --> 00:42:53,640 Speaker 1: objective about ourselves, especially when we get into emotional situations. 810 00:42:53,920 --> 00:42:55,719 Speaker 1: And so a lot of the work happened away from 811 00:42:55,760 --> 00:42:59,000 Speaker 1: the poker to table. A lot of it involved going 812 00:42:59,040 --> 00:43:02,759 Speaker 1: through games, going through hands, going through tournaments. I would 813 00:43:02,760 --> 00:43:04,520 Speaker 1: take lots and lots of notes and try to figure 814 00:43:04,560 --> 00:43:07,879 Speaker 1: out after the fact, Okay, what situations got me off 815 00:43:07,920 --> 00:43:11,240 Speaker 1: my game, what things tilted me, what types of things 816 00:43:11,280 --> 00:43:15,000 Speaker 1: made me emotional? Okay, now now I'm going to actually 817 00:43:15,080 --> 00:43:17,799 Speaker 1: physically write all of those things down. Jared made me 818 00:43:17,840 --> 00:43:21,440 Speaker 1: make spreadsheets um where I would then say, Okay, what's 819 00:43:21,480 --> 00:43:24,160 Speaker 1: the emotion I was experiencing and what am I going 820 00:43:24,239 --> 00:43:26,080 Speaker 1: to do? What are the things I'm going to say 821 00:43:26,080 --> 00:43:30,399 Speaker 1: to myself in the moment to to counteract that, how 822 00:43:30,400 --> 00:43:33,120 Speaker 1: am I going to avoid this happening next time? You 823 00:43:33,239 --> 00:43:35,759 Speaker 1: have to do that work ahead of time, because once 824 00:43:35,800 --> 00:43:38,520 Speaker 1: you're already on tilt, it's too late. So if you 825 00:43:38,640 --> 00:43:42,400 Speaker 1: don't do that hard work in advance, UM, it's not 826 00:43:42,480 --> 00:43:44,960 Speaker 1: going to happen, and you're going to end up letting 827 00:43:44,960 --> 00:43:47,920 Speaker 1: emotions into your decision process, which is not good. If 828 00:43:47,920 --> 00:43:51,720 Speaker 1: they're incidental emotions. You know, sometimes the emotions are correct, um, 829 00:43:51,760 --> 00:43:55,239 Speaker 1: and they're actually integral to the decision, But of the time, 830 00:43:55,320 --> 00:43:57,920 Speaker 1: or even of the time, that's not the case. So 831 00:43:57,960 --> 00:44:00,759 Speaker 1: you need to learn to identify them and dismiss them. 832 00:44:00,800 --> 00:44:04,520 Speaker 1: And you need to learn techniques of cooling your hot 833 00:44:04,560 --> 00:44:07,480 Speaker 1: emotional states and figuring out how do I get back 834 00:44:07,520 --> 00:44:10,600 Speaker 1: to a rational place. And the only way to do 835 00:44:10,640 --> 00:44:13,359 Speaker 1: that is if you know and advance what your triggers are, 836 00:44:13,640 --> 00:44:16,120 Speaker 1: if you know and advance how you're likely to react, 837 00:44:16,239 --> 00:44:21,719 Speaker 1: because then you can be proactive as opposed to emotionally reactive. UM. 838 00:44:21,760 --> 00:44:24,400 Speaker 1: I want to go back to um, the point you 839 00:44:24,480 --> 00:44:27,880 Speaker 1: were making about women, how women are treated in the 840 00:44:27,960 --> 00:44:30,440 Speaker 1: game versus men, because I feel like whenever Joe and 841 00:44:30,440 --> 00:44:33,520 Speaker 1: I do a poker episode, it sort of sounds like 842 00:44:33,560 --> 00:44:36,719 Speaker 1: a massive cliche because Joe clearly enjoys the game and 843 00:44:36,840 --> 00:44:39,839 Speaker 1: plays it a reasonable amount, and I don't really see 844 00:44:39,880 --> 00:44:41,799 Speaker 1: what the big deal is. And although I play it 845 00:44:41,840 --> 00:44:44,160 Speaker 1: when I'm forced to and talk about it when I'm 846 00:44:44,160 --> 00:44:47,640 Speaker 1: forced to, Joe, UM, I don't find it that compelling. 847 00:44:48,120 --> 00:44:51,160 Speaker 1: Why do you think women aren't as attracted to poker 848 00:44:51,360 --> 00:44:55,279 Speaker 1: as men? And what can be done to change that 849 00:44:55,360 --> 00:44:58,799 Speaker 1: and maybe interest women a bit more in the game. Yeah, 850 00:44:58,840 --> 00:45:01,560 Speaker 1: I don't think there's anything inherent. I think that actually 851 00:45:02,000 --> 00:45:04,640 Speaker 1: women are incredible poker players. Some of the best poker 852 00:45:04,680 --> 00:45:07,839 Speaker 1: players in the world, and the most impressive people are female. UM. 853 00:45:07,880 --> 00:45:10,440 Speaker 1: And there are people who have succeeded in all sorts 854 00:45:10,440 --> 00:45:12,560 Speaker 1: of other areas of life. And you have someone like 855 00:45:12,640 --> 00:45:15,440 Speaker 1: Vanessa Selps who went to Yale undergrad yea law school, 856 00:45:15,920 --> 00:45:18,839 Speaker 1: brilliant lawyer. UM worked at some of the best touch 857 00:45:18,880 --> 00:45:23,160 Speaker 1: funds in the world, professional poker player, Livebury astrophysicist, professional 858 00:45:23,160 --> 00:45:26,000 Speaker 1: poker player. You know, you have you have these very 859 00:45:26,120 --> 00:45:31,600 Speaker 1: very very impressive females. And I think that historically it's 860 00:45:31,600 --> 00:45:34,120 Speaker 1: been a male game, and so the culture is not 861 00:45:34,200 --> 00:45:37,520 Speaker 1: necessarily welcoming to women, and women don't realize I think 862 00:45:37,520 --> 00:45:40,400 Speaker 1: a lot of the times what poker is. They just 863 00:45:40,440 --> 00:45:42,600 Speaker 1: see it as this gambling thing. And one of the 864 00:45:42,640 --> 00:45:44,160 Speaker 1: things I've tried to stress in my book, and I 865 00:45:44,200 --> 00:45:46,799 Speaker 1: hope my book actually brings more women to the game, um, 866 00:45:46,920 --> 00:45:49,640 Speaker 1: is that poker is not gambling. It's actually different from 867 00:45:49,640 --> 00:45:52,319 Speaker 1: every single other game in a casino. It's a game 868 00:45:52,360 --> 00:45:54,920 Speaker 1: of skill. It's a game where you can win with 869 00:45:55,040 --> 00:45:57,400 Speaker 1: the worst hand and where you can lose with the 870 00:45:57,400 --> 00:46:00,759 Speaker 1: best hand. Because eight percent of time, and this is 871 00:46:00,800 --> 00:46:02,879 Speaker 1: not a number that I'm just kind of pulling out 872 00:46:02,920 --> 00:46:05,080 Speaker 1: of thin air, um, there was actually a study that 873 00:46:05,080 --> 00:46:09,120 Speaker 1: economists did who analyzed hundreds of thousands of poker hands 874 00:46:09,120 --> 00:46:12,720 Speaker 1: online and found that the best hand one twelve percent 875 00:46:12,800 --> 00:46:15,160 Speaker 1: of the time, which means that pent of the time 876 00:46:15,160 --> 00:46:17,560 Speaker 1: it's the best player who forces someone with the better 877 00:46:17,600 --> 00:46:21,440 Speaker 1: hand to fold. And that, to me, that's just the 878 00:46:21,480 --> 00:46:25,240 Speaker 1: epitome of skill. It's all about becoming better and mastering 879 00:46:25,440 --> 00:46:29,200 Speaker 1: your process so that you can maximize your decisions, um 880 00:46:29,520 --> 00:46:33,200 Speaker 1: and basically be the be the more skilled person in 881 00:46:33,239 --> 00:46:36,560 Speaker 1: the game. And I think that that's not clear from 882 00:46:36,560 --> 00:46:39,000 Speaker 1: the popular culture. I think a lot of women think 883 00:46:39,040 --> 00:46:41,560 Speaker 1: of poker as you know, oh everyone's smoking, you know, 884 00:46:41,600 --> 00:46:44,239 Speaker 1: these guys in the back realm with cigars. I don't 885 00:46:44,280 --> 00:46:46,399 Speaker 1: want to do that. I don't want to gamble. And 886 00:46:46,440 --> 00:46:48,919 Speaker 1: I think a lot of times when if you don't 887 00:46:49,000 --> 00:46:51,399 Speaker 1: understand the game, and if you haven't taken the time 888 00:46:51,440 --> 00:46:54,160 Speaker 1: to actually study in and to figure out, oh, this 889 00:46:54,320 --> 00:46:56,399 Speaker 1: is a game that can teach me a lot um, 890 00:46:56,440 --> 00:46:58,680 Speaker 1: you're like, you know what, this is boring. I don't 891 00:46:58,680 --> 00:47:00,719 Speaker 1: want to do this. It's not a boring game at 892 00:47:00,719 --> 00:47:04,320 Speaker 1: all if you actually start figuring out what it's about. 893 00:47:04,719 --> 00:47:08,000 Speaker 1: But it's boring if you just are sitting there and 894 00:47:08,040 --> 00:47:10,160 Speaker 1: no one wants to include you because you're not in 895 00:47:10,360 --> 00:47:12,879 Speaker 1: the boys club. I think that that turns a lot 896 00:47:12,880 --> 00:47:14,960 Speaker 1: of women off. And I think a lot of times 897 00:47:15,040 --> 00:47:17,160 Speaker 1: when they walk into a casino and sit down at 898 00:47:17,200 --> 00:47:20,440 Speaker 1: a poker table at those lower stakes, it's not a 899 00:47:20,480 --> 00:47:23,040 Speaker 1: welcoming experience. A lot of men are drinking. There's a 900 00:47:23,040 --> 00:47:25,520 Speaker 1: lot of sexism. I mean, I've been called everything under 901 00:47:25,520 --> 00:47:28,080 Speaker 1: the moon. Some of the stuff is not not fit 902 00:47:28,160 --> 00:47:31,319 Speaker 1: for a radio consumption. So I'm not I'm not going 903 00:47:31,440 --> 00:47:33,279 Speaker 1: to say what I've been called. But if you can 904 00:47:33,320 --> 00:47:36,240 Speaker 1: think of it. I've been called it. I've been propositioned, literally, 905 00:47:36,239 --> 00:47:38,400 Speaker 1: given a key card and told what my rate was 906 00:47:38,440 --> 00:47:42,080 Speaker 1: going to be. I've experienced things I never thought i'd experience, 907 00:47:42,480 --> 00:47:45,040 Speaker 1: and that's a problem, and I think that keeps a 908 00:47:45,080 --> 00:47:47,279 Speaker 1: lot of women from the game. And honestly, had I 909 00:47:47,280 --> 00:47:49,200 Speaker 1: not been a journalist going into this for a book 910 00:47:49,239 --> 00:47:51,319 Speaker 1: and had I not seen what was possible, had I 911 00:47:51,360 --> 00:47:53,600 Speaker 1: not had a lot of the best players showing me 912 00:47:53,640 --> 00:47:56,200 Speaker 1: that their excitement, their love of the game, the fact 913 00:47:56,239 --> 00:47:59,799 Speaker 1: that it's a really beautiful game before I sensed it 914 00:47:59,840 --> 00:48:02,880 Speaker 1: for myself, and I kind of took their word for 915 00:48:02,920 --> 00:48:04,680 Speaker 1: it because I said, well, you guys are brilliant and 916 00:48:04,680 --> 00:48:06,560 Speaker 1: you could do anything in the world, and you've chosen 917 00:48:06,600 --> 00:48:08,839 Speaker 1: to play poker, So I guess, I guess there must 918 00:48:08,880 --> 00:48:11,480 Speaker 1: be something to this. If I didn't have that, there's 919 00:48:11,480 --> 00:48:13,160 Speaker 1: a very good chance that I would have gotten right 920 00:48:13,239 --> 00:48:16,200 Speaker 1: up and walked out and never come back. Well, it's 921 00:48:16,200 --> 00:48:18,600 Speaker 1: good that you didn't. I think that's a great place 922 00:48:18,640 --> 00:48:21,920 Speaker 1: to leave it. What just real quickly, Um, how have 923 00:48:21,960 --> 00:48:27,040 Speaker 1: you been spending the the crisis, the quarantine and what 924 00:48:27,120 --> 00:48:30,919 Speaker 1: are your plans for when it's over? Um, I've been 925 00:48:31,320 --> 00:48:33,600 Speaker 1: focusing on my book launch. So this was not the 926 00:48:33,640 --> 00:48:36,040 Speaker 1: way I planned to release my book. But my book 927 00:48:36,040 --> 00:48:38,080 Speaker 1: came out in the middle of quarantine. So I'm in 928 00:48:38,080 --> 00:48:42,400 Speaker 1: New York. Um. I barely have left Brooklyn, or I mean, 929 00:48:42,440 --> 00:48:44,880 Speaker 1: I barely have left my apartment since the end of February, 930 00:48:44,920 --> 00:48:48,600 Speaker 1: except for two weeks UM in July, where I actually 931 00:48:48,680 --> 00:48:51,479 Speaker 1: got an airbnb in New Jersey to play the World 932 00:48:51,480 --> 00:48:53,960 Speaker 1: Series of Poker online because in the US to have 933 00:48:54,040 --> 00:48:56,640 Speaker 1: to be physically located in New Jersey or Nevada in 934 00:48:56,760 --> 00:48:59,120 Speaker 1: order to be able to play. UM. And so I 935 00:48:59,160 --> 00:49:02,440 Speaker 1: did that, and now I'm back in Brooklyn. UM. And 936 00:49:02,960 --> 00:49:06,000 Speaker 1: do you not foresee any more travel in in my 937 00:49:06,120 --> 00:49:10,080 Speaker 1: immediate future? But yeah, my quarantine has been has been 938 00:49:10,080 --> 00:49:14,040 Speaker 1: spent on trying to get the book out there, even 939 00:49:14,080 --> 00:49:16,600 Speaker 1: though it's not See this this, this is the thing. 940 00:49:16,760 --> 00:49:19,120 Speaker 1: This is what poker teaches. You focus on the process, 941 00:49:19,120 --> 00:49:21,520 Speaker 1: and you can't control you can't control the outcomes, you 942 00:49:21,560 --> 00:49:24,040 Speaker 1: can't control what's going on around you. So everything that's 943 00:49:24,080 --> 00:49:26,960 Speaker 1: happening right now, that's just that's out of my hands. UM. 944 00:49:27,000 --> 00:49:29,600 Speaker 1: That's the variance, and that's the things that you can't 945 00:49:29,600 --> 00:49:33,440 Speaker 1: predict for UM. And that you can't control for so 946 00:49:33,480 --> 00:49:35,560 Speaker 1: what I can do is focus on myself and focus 947 00:49:35,600 --> 00:49:37,880 Speaker 1: on trying to make this as good of an experience 948 00:49:37,920 --> 00:49:41,880 Speaker 1: as I possibly can. Maria, that was great, really, uh 949 00:49:42,160 --> 00:49:45,439 Speaker 1: really enjoyed you coming on and uh, best of luck 950 00:49:45,480 --> 00:49:48,600 Speaker 1: and congrat something and looking forward to see you rising 951 00:49:48,680 --> 00:49:52,200 Speaker 1: on the Hendon mob. I'll keep both you're re checking 952 00:49:52,239 --> 00:49:56,320 Speaker 1: your profile and I see your your cash your cash winnings, 953 00:49:56,360 --> 00:49:59,560 Speaker 1: continue to write. Thank you guys so much, thanks for it. 954 00:49:59,719 --> 00:50:14,360 Speaker 1: That was really interesting, crazy, I found that really inspiring, 955 00:50:14,400 --> 00:50:16,319 Speaker 1: you know, Like I always say I like the game, 956 00:50:16,360 --> 00:50:17,920 Speaker 1: but I admit that I'm not good at it. But 957 00:50:17,960 --> 00:50:20,200 Speaker 1: maybe I should just decide to try to get good 958 00:50:20,200 --> 00:50:22,480 Speaker 1: at it, and maybe we both should, Like, maybe we 959 00:50:22,480 --> 00:50:25,040 Speaker 1: should both stop talking about it so much and just 960 00:50:25,120 --> 00:50:27,680 Speaker 1: both become good at it. That'd be fun, wouldn't it. 961 00:50:28,200 --> 00:50:30,120 Speaker 1: I have a feeling that Maria makes it look a 962 00:50:30,200 --> 00:50:34,200 Speaker 1: lot easier than it actually. Um and that said clearly, 963 00:50:34,239 --> 00:50:36,719 Speaker 1: I haven't read the book, but just talking to her, like, 964 00:50:37,640 --> 00:50:40,319 Speaker 1: it's clear that she's a talented player, and it's it's 965 00:50:40,320 --> 00:50:44,240 Speaker 1: pretty phenomenal that she managed to do so, like completely 966 00:50:44,400 --> 00:50:47,280 Speaker 1: out of her own will. She just wilds this professional 967 00:50:47,320 --> 00:50:51,239 Speaker 1: poker career into being that's amazing. We kind of did 968 00:50:51,320 --> 00:50:56,120 Speaker 1: that with like podcast, right, I think it's slightly different. 969 00:50:57,000 --> 00:50:59,680 Speaker 1: But okay, um, well we could do we could do 970 00:50:59,719 --> 00:51:01,719 Speaker 1: a part cast series where where we all go to 971 00:51:01,800 --> 00:51:03,600 Speaker 1: Vegas and why don't we just see who makes the 972 00:51:03,640 --> 00:51:06,160 Speaker 1: most money. I think that's what we should do. Let's 973 00:51:06,160 --> 00:51:08,400 Speaker 1: just do that. Yeah, rather than putting too much pressure 974 00:51:08,400 --> 00:51:11,000 Speaker 1: to actually become good when it's all over, let's just 975 00:51:11,040 --> 00:51:13,520 Speaker 1: both go and just see who wins more money. Yeah, 976 00:51:14,160 --> 00:51:17,560 Speaker 1: and we'll record everything. It would be great. Yeah, that's 977 00:51:17,560 --> 00:51:20,640 Speaker 1: actually something to look forward to. Yeah, that's something to 978 00:51:20,640 --> 00:51:23,960 Speaker 1: look forward to and all that. But you know, I 979 00:51:24,320 --> 00:51:26,600 Speaker 1: do think I do think her a description of poker 980 00:51:26,800 --> 00:51:30,160 Speaker 1: as this mixture of luck and skill is a really 981 00:51:30,200 --> 00:51:33,120 Speaker 1: important one. And it's sort of similar in financial markets 982 00:51:33,160 --> 00:51:36,800 Speaker 1: as well. You can get lucky on a single call, 983 00:51:37,080 --> 00:51:40,640 Speaker 1: but over the long run, all your investment decisions sort 984 00:51:40,640 --> 00:51:43,520 Speaker 1: of average out, and eventually, if you're making just tons 985 00:51:43,520 --> 00:51:47,879 Speaker 1: and tons of stupid decisions, your your luck is going 986 00:51:47,960 --> 00:51:51,439 Speaker 1: to get overwhelmed by your stupidity and your long term 987 00:51:51,480 --> 00:51:55,040 Speaker 1: average is going to go down. Yeah it's a cliche, 988 00:51:55,520 --> 00:51:58,160 Speaker 1: but fund managers, you know, they love to talk about 989 00:51:58,600 --> 00:52:01,279 Speaker 1: my process. I follow on a process that I may 990 00:52:01,320 --> 00:52:04,279 Speaker 1: have lost money at this quarter, but my process, my process. 991 00:52:04,320 --> 00:52:07,000 Speaker 1: But that is essentially what that means, which is like, 992 00:52:07,040 --> 00:52:10,239 Speaker 1: you know, sometimes you're have an approach that's not gonna work, 993 00:52:10,280 --> 00:52:13,640 Speaker 1: you got bad cards, the company you invested in, whatever. 994 00:52:14,239 --> 00:52:16,560 Speaker 1: But that is what they're talking about, is that discipline 995 00:52:16,600 --> 00:52:20,160 Speaker 1: to have an approach. And you know, the the greatest 996 00:52:20,200 --> 00:52:23,319 Speaker 1: ones investors are not just someone who randomly got lucky 997 00:52:23,360 --> 00:52:26,080 Speaker 1: because they bought Netflix fifteen years ago or whatever, but 998 00:52:26,160 --> 00:52:30,759 Speaker 1: actually have some sort of process and discipline to evaluate investments. 999 00:52:30,800 --> 00:52:34,759 Speaker 1: It's just extremely, extremely hard. If someone were to ask 1000 00:52:34,760 --> 00:52:37,279 Speaker 1: me what my poker process was, I would say a 1001 00:52:37,400 --> 00:52:42,560 Speaker 1: mixture of panic and confusion. See that's what you know. 1002 00:52:42,600 --> 00:52:45,279 Speaker 1: You have the self evaluation part, So that's good, that's 1003 00:52:45,280 --> 00:52:47,560 Speaker 1: the first step. I don't know, I would probably say 1004 00:52:47,600 --> 00:52:50,520 Speaker 1: something pretty similar with a couple of that, with like 1005 00:52:50,560 --> 00:52:52,839 Speaker 1: some sort of like overconfidence or trying to do hard, 1006 00:52:52,880 --> 00:52:56,479 Speaker 1: to be clever but probably but no better. All right, Well, 1007 00:52:56,560 --> 00:52:58,640 Speaker 1: I am looking forward to testing all of this out 1008 00:52:58,640 --> 00:53:06,040 Speaker 1: in Vegas once the whole coronas fingers crossed, I'm looking forward. Okay, 1009 00:53:06,600 --> 00:53:09,440 Speaker 1: this has been another episode of the All Thoughts Podcast. 1010 00:53:09,520 --> 00:53:12,080 Speaker 1: I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at 1011 00:53:12,160 --> 00:53:15,400 Speaker 1: Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe wisn't Thal. You can follow 1012 00:53:15,440 --> 00:53:18,520 Speaker 1: me on Twitter at The Stalwart and you should follow 1013 00:53:18,560 --> 00:53:22,440 Speaker 1: our guests on Twitter Maria kna Cova. Her handle is 1014 00:53:22,600 --> 00:53:25,719 Speaker 1: at m conda Cova. Also be sure to check out 1015 00:53:25,760 --> 00:53:28,000 Speaker 1: her new book, The Biggest Blow How I Learned to 1016 00:53:28,040 --> 00:53:31,160 Speaker 1: pay attention, master myself and Win, and be sure to 1017 00:53:31,200 --> 00:53:34,839 Speaker 1: follow our producer Laura Carlson at Laura M. Carlton. Follow 1018 00:53:34,880 --> 00:53:38,480 Speaker 1: The Bloomberg had a podcast, Francesca Levi at Francesca Today 1019 00:53:38,880 --> 00:53:41,480 Speaker 1: and check out all of our podcasts under the handle 1020 00:53:41,760 --> 00:54:00,800 Speaker 1: at podcast. Thanks for listening to