WEBVTT - Xi’s Big Challenge Is Getting People to Spend, Spend, Spend

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.720 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 2>This week, thousands of Chinese lawmakers are gathering in Beijing

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:16.760
<v Speaker 2>for the annual meeting of the NPC, the National People's Congress.

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>The National People's Congress is China's parliament. It reads drafts

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and passes laws.

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 2>John lu Is, Bloomberg's senior executive editor for Greater China

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:29.639
<v Speaker 2>based in Beijing.

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>The number one thing that happens at the Congresses on

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the first day, China's premiere gives what is equivalent to

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the State of the Nation Address for China. He comes

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:43.239
<v Speaker 1>out and says how the country is doing, how it

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>did in the past year, and then he lays out

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:47.959
<v Speaker 1>some very important targets for the coming year.

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 2>I want to report to you on the work of

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 2>the government for your deliberation and also for comments. For

0:00:57.040 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five, Beijing set an ambitious GDP growth target

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:04.680
<v Speaker 2>of about five percent, and Premier Lie Cheung declared that

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 2>vigorously boosting consumption is the government's top priority. To help

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 2>ramp up domestic demand, Beijing plans to expand its public

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 2>spending by borrowing at a record level. The government raised

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 2>the general budget deficit to around four percent of GDP,

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:25.759
<v Speaker 2>the highest level in more than three decades. But it's

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 2>unclear whether that kind of stimulus will be enough to

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 2>help the Chinese economy, whether the storm ahead, and then

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 2>of course there's the wild card.

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:37.960
<v Speaker 1>China's economy is in this really awkward position at the moment.

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Property is struggling, domestic consumption is weak. The only good

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:46.479
<v Speaker 1>thing about the economy has been exports, and now that's

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>in real danger because of Donald Trump and because of

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the tariffs of the United States is imposing. So going

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>into the future, the question is what can China do

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>to overcome all these challenges, And the problem is there

0:01:57.480 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>isn't a solid, guaranteed solution.

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to The Big Take Asia from Bloomberg News. I'm wanh.

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 2>Every week we take you inside some of the world's

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 2>biggest and most powerful economies and the markets, tycoons and

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:16.359
<v Speaker 2>businesses that drive this ever shifting region. Today on the show,

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Beijing plans to get people to spend, spend, and spend,

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 2>but how and will Trump's trade war get in the

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 2>way of those efforts. On Wednesday, Premier Lee Chiang kicked

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:35.360
<v Speaker 2>off the National People's Congress with China's twenty twenty five

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Government work report. It reviewed the health of China's economy

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 2>and laid out a policy roadmap for the coming year.

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:45.639
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's John Liu and his team have been closely reporting

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 2>on what's coming out of the meetings this week, John,

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 2>what's the biggest thing you were watching out for in

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 2>the government report this year?

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>So the three things we were really keen on finding

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 1>out were one, what was the GDP tar you're going

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to be for twenty twenty five? The target of about

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>five percent, which is the same as it was for

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four.

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 2>Now, keeping the country's growth rate level might not sound

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 2>like a big deal to an outsider, but the Chinese

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 2>economy is facing serious headwinds right now. John says. Just

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 2>how serious those headwinds are and how difficult it will

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 2>be to reach that goal was reflected in another number

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 2>that was released this week, the borrowing threshold.

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>They were going to expand the budget deficit for the

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:30.640
<v Speaker 1>central government to about four percent of GDP. That's the

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:34.839
<v Speaker 1>biggest that it's been since nineteen ninety four, since they

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>had some major changes in how they calculate fiscal deficits,

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and so it's really the biggest on record. What that says, though,

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>is they're going to spend a lot more money to

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>have the same growth they had in twenty twenty four,

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>So they're spending a lot more money to basically stay

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>in place. So that's actually not a very optimistic signal

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of the year.

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Consumption. People buying dishwashers are going out to restaurants made

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 2>up less than forty five percent of China's GDP growth

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 2>last year. That's the lowest since two thousand and six

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 2>and excludes the pandemic year of twenty twenty. In most

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 2>developed economies, that number would be typically between sixty percent

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 2>to eighty percent. Basically, people in China are feeling kind

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 2>of broke right now, so they're not spending as much

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:22.480
<v Speaker 2>as fast and this creates a vicious and dangerous cycle.

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>People are just not willing to spend, and that has

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>resulted in companies need to compete more aggressively to get business,

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:33.159
<v Speaker 1>and mostly they've been doing that by cutting prices. And

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>so if companies are cutting prices, they have less money

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 1>that they're bringing in that they can then give to

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>their workers that they can use to hire more workers,

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and that results in households feeling even more uncertain about

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the future, and it motivates people to save even more

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to spend even less. It's a very vicious and very

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 1>dangerous cycle.

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 2>To achieve the five percent growth target, the Chinese government

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 2>has a laundry list of issues to overcome. Some are

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:02.839
<v Speaker 2>long term, like the country's aging population, which is putting

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 2>pressure on an already strained pension system, but others are

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 2>more pressing, like the property market. The real estate market

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 2>used to be one of the country's biggest growth drivers,

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 2>but it's been in a slump for the last several

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 2>years and it remains deep in trouble today. John It

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 2>sounds like the real estate crisis has affected almost every

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 2>region of China and certainly every level of society. How

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 2>are local governments then dealing with that?

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Many local governments around China are very indebted. They've borrowed

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money to build the infrastructure over the

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 1>last decade or so, and now as economic growth slows,

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>they're finding it harder to generate tax revenue from those

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure projects to pay them off, and so as a result,

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>there's less money to go around. They have to pay

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the interest on those borrowings. That means they have less

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 1>for new projects, they have less potentially to pay government

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>workers to provide public services, and so the central government.

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>The plan has been for the central government to borrow

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:05.039
<v Speaker 1>and then to give that money over to the local

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>government to pay off the debt. And so basically you're

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>transferring the debt load from the local level to the

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>central level and.

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Also on the government's list of priorities turning around a

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:16.799
<v Speaker 2>sluggish job market.

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>So the job market, I think the pain point that

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 1>has been most pronounces with youth unemployment. There was even

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 1>a period when they stopped publishing the data for youth

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 1>unemployment because it was so high. In the summer of

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 1>this year, we are going to get a record number

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>of new graduates hitting the employment market, and so that's

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>going to add additional pressure on the government to create jobs.

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>How they go about doing that, I think it looks

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>like right now they are putting an emphasis on private enterprise,

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and if you look at the data, the vast majority

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of jobs, especially in Chinese cities, comes from the private sector,

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and so it looks like that the government's main push

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:56.040
<v Speaker 1>there is to try and reduce regulation, to try and

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>reduce the amount of scrutiny on private enterprises and hopefully

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>that translates into to a more robust sector and more jobs.

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the private sector does seem to be something

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 2>of a point of light for China's economy. We've certainly

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 2>seen some big gains made in the last year, right

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 2>particularly in tech. You've got deep seek on the AI front,

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 2>You've got tech giant Huawei surprising people with their phones,

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 2>and that seems to bode well for domestic consumption, which

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 2>is a big target for the Chinese government.

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Right So, I think if China, as it has proclaimed

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>at the NPC that it wants to make boosting domestic

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>demand the number one priority, if it can do that,

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>that would actually be very helpful for domestic innovation, I think,

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>because what you would see is companies here in China

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>being able to potentially raise prices, having more customers, and

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that would in turn results in greater profitability, which means

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>they have more to invest in R and T.

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 2>Now, John, is there anything that's going well in China's economy.

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that the stability in the housing market that

0:07:57.320 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in the last couple of months is very encouraged.

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that the AI innovations, the breakthroughs that we've

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>had with deep seek, even with Tenson and Ali Baba

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>introducing their own large language models, that's helped produced a

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of confidence. I think when the stock market goes

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>up as it has because of those innovations, that leads

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>people to feel more confident about the future, and maybe

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 1>they think, you know what, I'll go and have a

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 1>nice dinner out, I'll buy a nice bag, I'll splurge

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>on something. And if enough people do that, it could

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 1>start to turn things around.

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Another bright spot has been exports. About a third of

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 2>China's GDP growth came from net exports last year. And

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 2>what could possibly go wrong.

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 3>We've been ripped off for decades by nearly every country

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 3>on Earth, and we will not let that happen any longer.

0:08:54.040 --> 0:09:07.080
<v Speaker 2>That's after the break. As premierly wrapped up his work

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 2>report in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing,

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 2>President Trump, on the other side of the world, was

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 2>getting ready to address Congress in Washington, DC. In his

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 2>first speech to both chambers since returning to office, Trump

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:21.439
<v Speaker 2>defended the use of tariffs.

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:27.199
<v Speaker 3>Whatever they tariff US other countries, we will care off them.

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 3>Let's recip wi goal back and forth whatever they tax us,

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 3>we will tax them.

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 2>John, How do you think Trump's speech to Congress might

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:41.239
<v Speaker 2>have been received by Chinese leaders in Beijing?

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>If you talk to policymakers, there is a broad assumption

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:49.439
<v Speaker 1>amongst them that Trump is looking for a deal. That's

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:54.079
<v Speaker 1>reinforced by when President Trump talks about how great a

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>relationship he has with President husing Ping, and so I

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 1>think when Chinese officials here President Trump telling Congress these

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>things about more tariffs, more taxes, all of this stuff,

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I think they take it astride and they're trying to

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>figure out what they can do to get the best

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>deal they can and what President Trump wants.

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Do you think with these tariffs that we've seen so far,

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 2>this trade war could escalate like it did in twenty eighteen.

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the officialdom in Beijing expects things to get

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>more heated. But I think Beijing is balancing that with

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the damage that President Trump is causing to America's relationship

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:39.199
<v Speaker 1>with other countries Canada, Mexico, Europe, the Global South, and

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I think Beijing's sort of viewing it in a more

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:45.680
<v Speaker 1>holistic sense, in that, yes, all these tariffs on Chinese

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:47.319
<v Speaker 1>goods are going to hit the economy, and that is

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 1>going to have a negative impact. But at the same time,

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe all of these actions by the Trump administration undermining

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the American partnerships and relationships that it has with countries

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>around the world, that creates more space for China to

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 1>actually strengthen it's trading relationships, links, it's diplomatic relationships with

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>all these other countries who have been distanced by the

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration.

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, that would be a smart approach. Right when door closes,

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 2>you try to look for others. Is there a risk

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 2>there that US tariffs if they continue, if if they're

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 2>piling on, could that dent that five percent growth target?

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it certainly could. When those tariffs get high enough,

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>any advantage will be taken away, and so at a

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>high enough rate, it will do real damage to Chinese

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>exporters and that will have a real impact on the economy.

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>In turn. What rate that is, I think it's hard

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to theorize, but I would expect Beijing to be ready

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:45.839
<v Speaker 1>to provide more support as those tariffs go up.

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 2>So, with all that we've talked about, the challenges at

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 2>home and beyond, is China's growth target of five percent achievable?

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>The five percent target for GDP to me, is a

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>relatively pessimistic target. It's in combination with the fact that

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>they've also pledged a record amount of deficit spending and

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>so China is having to spend more to stay in place.

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>That to me suggests the government is looking around the world.

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:16.839
<v Speaker 1>It's looking at what the United States is doing, it's

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>looking at what's happening in Europe, and it's thinking this

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:22.079
<v Speaker 1>year is going to be a tough year, and they're

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to be realistic about what they can get done.

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I think they didn't want to lower the target because

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>it would have sent I think the wrong signal to

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:36.319
<v Speaker 1>bureaucrats around the country that maybe they didn't have to

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>work as hard, they didn't have to try as hard.

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:40.959
<v Speaker 1>It would have also sent the wrong message to financial

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>markets in terms of what to expect, how ambitious, how

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>much effort the government is going to put into making

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the economy better again, reviving growth again. And so it

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of is an acknowledgement of the challenges, but also

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to show that the central government is up to

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the task of trying to tackle those challenges.

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 2>This is the big take Asia from Bloomberg News. I'm

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 2>wan Ha. This episode was produced by Young Young, Naomi

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 2>M and Jessica Beck. It was edited by Patti Hirsh

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 2>and Daniel ten Kate. It was fact checked by Naomi

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 2>and Young and mixed and sound designed by Alex Duguerra.

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Our senior producer is Naomi Shaven. Our senior editor is

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Elizabeth Ponso. Our executive producer is Nicole Beemster Bower. Sage

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 2>Bowman is Bloomberg's head of podcasts. If you liked this episode,

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 2>make sure to subscribe and review The Big Take Asia

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 2>wherever you listen to podcasts. It really helps people find

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 2>the show. Thanks for listening, See you next time.