1 00:00:05,880 --> 00:00:08,960 Speaker 1: Welcome in everybody to Fantasy Pros MLB. It's time to 2 00:00:09,000 --> 00:00:11,480 Speaker 1: talk trades. It is me, Joey P. Joe Pisapia with me, 3 00:00:11,560 --> 00:00:13,800 Speaker 1: of course is the Welsh and today we're gonna talk 4 00:00:13,840 --> 00:00:15,640 Speaker 1: about some names to buy to sell. We're going to 5 00:00:15,720 --> 00:00:18,360 Speaker 1: debate and ultimately you can make the decision of the 6 00:00:18,360 --> 00:00:21,840 Speaker 1: players you want to add to your roster. So before 7 00:00:21,880 --> 00:00:24,000 Speaker 1: we do, just a quick reminder, subscribe to the channel 8 00:00:24,120 --> 00:00:25,880 Speaker 1: like this video, drop your comments below and you might 9 00:00:25,960 --> 00:00:29,080 Speaker 1: win yourself a Juan Gonzales jersey that's right from Pristine 10 00:00:29,080 --> 00:00:31,920 Speaker 1: Auction this month. That's the big giveaway, Welsh. I think 11 00:00:31,960 --> 00:00:33,199 Speaker 1: a lot of people are going to start to give 12 00:00:33,200 --> 00:00:37,240 Speaker 1: away Juli Rodriguez probably one of the most disappointing Round 13 00:00:37,280 --> 00:00:40,639 Speaker 1: one selections of the MLB season. So far, he has 14 00:00:40,680 --> 00:00:43,120 Speaker 1: just eleven home runs as we approach the All Star break, 15 00:00:43,400 --> 00:00:47,199 Speaker 1: fifteen stolen bases. Is obp looks a little bit more 16 00:00:47,240 --> 00:00:50,440 Speaker 1: like you wish as batting average was. But again, we've 17 00:00:50,479 --> 00:00:52,440 Speaker 1: been doing this for the last couple weeks, buying on 18 00:00:52,560 --> 00:00:55,280 Speaker 1: principle with players I want to buy on principle. The 19 00:00:55,320 --> 00:00:58,960 Speaker 1: talent of Julio Rodriguez historically always a better second half player. 20 00:00:59,240 --> 00:01:01,800 Speaker 1: His expected adding average is two sixty five, despite the 21 00:01:01,800 --> 00:01:04,640 Speaker 1: fact he's hitting two forty seven. Has expected slugging is 22 00:01:04,680 --> 00:01:08,199 Speaker 1: four forty three despite just three eighty nine. Cal Rawley's 23 00:01:08,240 --> 00:01:11,280 Speaker 1: been the story in Seattle. But I think Julio is 24 00:01:11,319 --> 00:01:13,320 Speaker 1: the best kept secret, and I want to buy him 25 00:01:13,360 --> 00:01:15,600 Speaker 1: because I think the price is at rock bottom. What 26 00:01:15,640 --> 00:01:17,160 Speaker 1: do you think, Yeah. 27 00:01:17,040 --> 00:01:19,640 Speaker 2: I'm not sure if the price is at like rock bottom, 28 00:01:19,680 --> 00:01:22,920 Speaker 2: but if the person in your league is kind of 29 00:01:22,959 --> 00:01:24,840 Speaker 2: treating that like that, then I want to be the 30 00:01:24,880 --> 00:01:29,120 Speaker 2: buyer of it because I like in how you presented it, 31 00:01:29,360 --> 00:01:31,280 Speaker 2: you wouldn't you'd be surprised if you heard he has 32 00:01:31,319 --> 00:01:33,400 Speaker 2: eleven homers in fifteen stolen bases. We're like, oh, he's 33 00:01:33,400 --> 00:01:36,560 Speaker 2: the most disappointed. Still pretty decent counting stats on a 34 00:01:36,600 --> 00:01:39,840 Speaker 2: team that's held up. But I think the biggest thing 35 00:01:39,920 --> 00:01:41,520 Speaker 2: is what people have come to terms with in why 36 00:01:41,520 --> 00:01:44,240 Speaker 2: it's a disappointment, is he is not the first round player, 37 00:01:44,959 --> 00:01:47,000 Speaker 2: not the second round player. You know, there are some 38 00:01:47,080 --> 00:01:52,000 Speaker 2: free agents out there. Byron Buxton is dramatically outperforming Julio Rodriguez, 39 00:01:52,000 --> 00:01:54,760 Speaker 2: and Byron Buxton was probably taken like two fifty plus, 40 00:01:54,800 --> 00:01:56,680 Speaker 2: so those are the type of things that are going 41 00:01:56,720 --> 00:01:59,320 Speaker 2: to like stick with people. But to your point, you know, 42 00:01:59,360 --> 00:02:04,480 Speaker 2: the profile, the profile has lacks which you would really 43 00:02:04,480 --> 00:02:06,400 Speaker 2: want in like a crazy buye. But we do have 44 00:02:06,480 --> 00:02:10,400 Speaker 2: this just like historical Julio Rodriguez, the type of player 45 00:02:10,440 --> 00:02:12,120 Speaker 2: that he is at sitting with us. You mentioned he's 46 00:02:12,120 --> 00:02:15,800 Speaker 2: a second half player, absolutely right. Twenty twenty three, he 47 00:02:15,840 --> 00:02:18,760 Speaker 2: had a fifty plus almost sixty point differential in his 48 00:02:18,840 --> 00:02:20,920 Speaker 2: batting average first and second half. He hit over three 49 00:02:21,000 --> 00:02:23,640 Speaker 2: hundred and the second half last season, same thing, This 50 00:02:23,680 --> 00:02:25,919 Speaker 2: is about twenty point difference, but it was between two 51 00:02:26,000 --> 00:02:29,120 Speaker 2: sixty seven and two eighty five. So now we're going 52 00:02:29,120 --> 00:02:32,440 Speaker 2: into twenty twenty five, he's got a roughly two fifty 53 00:02:32,960 --> 00:02:35,920 Speaker 2: first half batting average, which historically it has shown us 54 00:02:35,960 --> 00:02:37,680 Speaker 2: that he'll start hitting left, he's a little bit better, 55 00:02:37,919 --> 00:02:39,800 Speaker 2: and then he's going to have a higher batting average. 56 00:02:39,800 --> 00:02:43,280 Speaker 2: The XBA is there, his barrel and hard hit her down, 57 00:02:43,360 --> 00:02:45,680 Speaker 2: so I hope he can kind of materialize there. But 58 00:02:46,080 --> 00:02:48,400 Speaker 2: I think the key to this is I don't think 59 00:02:48,480 --> 00:02:50,519 Speaker 2: he's going to return to being the first round player. 60 00:02:50,960 --> 00:02:54,720 Speaker 2: But this version of Julio Rodriguez still is projecting out 61 00:02:54,720 --> 00:02:56,360 Speaker 2: to be at least a twenty twenty guy, and if 62 00:02:56,360 --> 00:02:58,720 Speaker 2: he bounces in the second half, you might get fifteen 63 00:02:58,760 --> 00:03:01,200 Speaker 2: to fifteen out of him on a shorter second half. 64 00:03:01,240 --> 00:03:03,800 Speaker 2: So I like the idea. If someone is panicked and 65 00:03:03,840 --> 00:03:06,160 Speaker 2: they're selling them rock Low, I'm buying. 66 00:03:06,800 --> 00:03:10,080 Speaker 1: Statistically speaking, he is basically having an identical season to 67 00:03:10,120 --> 00:03:11,960 Speaker 1: Lawrence Butler, who I think all of us think of 68 00:03:11,960 --> 00:03:15,280 Speaker 1: as a massive disappointment. Also a disappointment, but nowhere near 69 00:03:15,360 --> 00:03:17,080 Speaker 1: the disappointment I got you take in the first round. 70 00:03:17,200 --> 00:03:21,800 Speaker 1: So Julio, huge disappointment, Bye bye bye. Also another disappointing 71 00:03:21,800 --> 00:03:25,239 Speaker 1: first round pick, Gunner Henderson this year hitting two seventy one. 72 00:03:25,520 --> 00:03:28,320 Speaker 1: That's okay. Ops is at seven to seventy eight. That's 73 00:03:28,320 --> 00:03:30,640 Speaker 1: all right. He's got ten homers, ten steals. Look, the 74 00:03:30,720 --> 00:03:32,720 Speaker 1: argos have just been a disaster, but the twenty four 75 00:03:32,800 --> 00:03:35,480 Speaker 1: year old Henderson has already done enough in two previous 76 00:03:35,480 --> 00:03:38,440 Speaker 1: seasons for me to be buying in on him. You 77 00:03:38,440 --> 00:03:41,240 Speaker 1: look at the paceballs of on page. You look at 78 00:03:41,280 --> 00:03:43,000 Speaker 1: a lot of red. The exit vlow is so good, 79 00:03:43,000 --> 00:03:44,840 Speaker 1: hard hit rate so good, bat speed's still good. So 80 00:03:44,920 --> 00:03:46,480 Speaker 1: all of those things are good. It just seems like 81 00:03:46,800 --> 00:03:50,080 Speaker 1: a season where you know, losing sucks and everyone's kind 82 00:03:50,080 --> 00:03:52,400 Speaker 1: of losing focus, and injuries and all the things that 83 00:03:52,440 --> 00:03:54,960 Speaker 1: have happened that could have gone wrong. But there's still 84 00:03:55,000 --> 00:03:57,200 Speaker 1: plenty of season left for Gunnar Henderson to be helpful. 85 00:03:57,200 --> 00:03:59,440 Speaker 1: And I do feel like if you had Gunner Henderson 86 00:03:59,480 --> 00:04:01,880 Speaker 1: in your first off all pick, the season probably hasn't 87 00:04:01,920 --> 00:04:05,040 Speaker 1: gone all that well for you potentially, so you could 88 00:04:05,240 --> 00:04:09,080 Speaker 1: lend a helping hand and take that hand and pull 89 00:04:09,120 --> 00:04:11,280 Speaker 1: Gunner handers and off someone's roster and put it on yours. 90 00:04:11,960 --> 00:04:14,840 Speaker 2: I'm always a buyer of guy. Actually probably feel better. 91 00:04:15,080 --> 00:04:17,040 Speaker 2: I don't think the prices are the same, but if 92 00:04:17,080 --> 00:04:19,240 Speaker 2: somehow the prices were the same on Julio and Gunner, 93 00:04:19,680 --> 00:04:22,000 Speaker 2: it would be all Gunner for me. Ten homers, ten 94 00:04:22,040 --> 00:04:24,680 Speaker 2: stolen bases, two seventy one. Like, I think he's doing 95 00:04:24,760 --> 00:04:27,960 Speaker 2: versions of what people expect. The problem is here. This 96 00:04:28,279 --> 00:04:30,720 Speaker 2: is lining up to like maybe he can be a 97 00:04:30,800 --> 00:04:34,560 Speaker 2: second round ish fantasy value, but he's just still he's 98 00:04:34,560 --> 00:04:37,520 Speaker 2: not sniffing that first round return. But there's still a 99 00:04:37,560 --> 00:04:40,800 Speaker 2: lot in his game. The hard hit rates extreme, average 100 00:04:40,800 --> 00:04:43,760 Speaker 2: exo velocities are extreme. The expected batting average I think 101 00:04:43,760 --> 00:04:46,640 Speaker 2: you mentioned like almost two to eighty and he's sitting 102 00:04:46,680 --> 00:04:49,599 Speaker 2: off speed and fastballs really well, just got to probably 103 00:04:49,600 --> 00:04:51,160 Speaker 2: start pulling the ball a little bit more. He's got 104 00:04:51,160 --> 00:04:53,640 Speaker 2: a good zone contact. He's just been unhealthy in the 105 00:04:53,680 --> 00:04:56,320 Speaker 2: first half. The question will be like, if the Oriels 106 00:04:56,320 --> 00:04:59,800 Speaker 2: are selling off, what happens, Like is he gonna step up? 107 00:05:00,240 --> 00:05:02,599 Speaker 2: The whole team context is gonna kind of come back down? 108 00:05:02,640 --> 00:05:04,240 Speaker 2: Are they not going I don't know what it's gonna 109 00:05:04,240 --> 00:05:06,320 Speaker 2: look like, but I just know that, Like, I trust 110 00:05:06,360 --> 00:05:09,920 Speaker 2: Gunner Henderson, So if you're giving me discounts, I absolutely 111 00:05:09,920 --> 00:05:12,560 Speaker 2: want to jump on any opportunity to buy Gunner because 112 00:05:12,640 --> 00:05:15,120 Speaker 2: the first half is done. Maybe we get that first. 113 00:05:15,320 --> 00:05:17,280 Speaker 2: We know there's a first round talent in there. Seems 114 00:05:17,279 --> 00:05:20,159 Speaker 2: to be stealing more bases, you know, this year, So 115 00:05:20,279 --> 00:05:22,719 Speaker 2: I don't think it's unheard of that, Like he could 116 00:05:22,880 --> 00:05:26,640 Speaker 2: end this season with near thirty twenty again and that 117 00:05:26,680 --> 00:05:28,520 Speaker 2: would just be due to a big second half. 118 00:05:28,680 --> 00:05:30,599 Speaker 1: Yeah. Look, he had thirty seven homers and twenty one 119 00:05:30,640 --> 00:05:32,520 Speaker 1: steals last year at two eighty one. The year before 120 00:05:32,560 --> 00:05:35,880 Speaker 1: his rookie season twenty eight homers ten steals, hit two 121 00:05:35,960 --> 00:05:37,840 Speaker 1: fifty five. So look, even if he's a two to 122 00:05:37,880 --> 00:05:40,920 Speaker 1: seventy hitter, and that's what he really is. Okay. I 123 00:05:41,080 --> 00:05:42,480 Speaker 1: just want to see a little bit more power here 124 00:05:42,480 --> 00:05:44,240 Speaker 1: in the second half, and I think he's capable of that. 125 00:05:44,720 --> 00:05:48,640 Speaker 1: What is Zach Gallon capable of? Well, lately, good starts. 126 00:05:48,880 --> 00:05:51,160 Speaker 1: Don't look now, boys and girls. But over his last 127 00:05:51,200 --> 00:05:52,880 Speaker 1: three starts he's two and one with a two nine 128 00:05:52,880 --> 00:05:56,800 Speaker 1: to five ERA, eighteen innings, twenty one strikeouts, just two 129 00:05:57,480 --> 00:06:00,839 Speaker 1: two walks. Unbelievable turn around for Zach Gowen, whose whip 130 00:06:01,000 --> 00:06:03,400 Speaker 1: is at one point zero nine and the rest of 131 00:06:03,400 --> 00:06:05,840 Speaker 1: the season has been fugly. That's right, it has been 132 00:06:05,880 --> 00:06:09,400 Speaker 1: absolutely downright terrible for Zach Gallen. Something has clicked recently, 133 00:06:09,440 --> 00:06:12,400 Speaker 1: which means if somebody still has Zach Gallen on their roster, 134 00:06:12,760 --> 00:06:14,479 Speaker 1: they're looking at this as an opportunity to say, okay, 135 00:06:14,520 --> 00:06:16,520 Speaker 1: let me get out from under this more than likely, 136 00:06:17,160 --> 00:06:19,880 Speaker 1: and chances are the Diamondbacks are looking to make some 137 00:06:19,880 --> 00:06:22,320 Speaker 1: moves here at the deadline. There's a good possibility you 138 00:06:22,320 --> 00:06:24,760 Speaker 1: could land on the Cubs or some other contending team, 139 00:06:25,160 --> 00:06:29,080 Speaker 1: and if so, Zach Gallen's potential is even better. In fantasy. 140 00:06:29,120 --> 00:06:31,839 Speaker 1: He has been awful, He has been unstartable, and the 141 00:06:31,880 --> 00:06:34,599 Speaker 1: last three starts, all of a sudden things have turned around. Welsh, 142 00:06:34,640 --> 00:06:37,080 Speaker 1: I know you were a tough sell, but now I 143 00:06:37,080 --> 00:06:39,720 Speaker 1: feel like you're also a buyer of Zach Gallen after 144 00:06:39,760 --> 00:06:40,960 Speaker 1: his most recent performance. 145 00:06:42,040 --> 00:06:47,240 Speaker 2: I'm interested in a buye. I'm come on, there's only 146 00:06:47,279 --> 00:06:49,839 Speaker 2: one reason that the last start didn't do anything for me. 147 00:06:49,920 --> 00:06:51,800 Speaker 2: It hasn't done a whole lot. I mentioned this on 148 00:06:51,960 --> 00:06:54,080 Speaker 2: leading off, but like you know, san al Contra had 149 00:06:54,120 --> 00:06:56,279 Speaker 2: like four really good starts. You kind of peered together. 150 00:06:56,640 --> 00:07:00,520 Speaker 2: The biggest difference in why outside of his story data, 151 00:07:00,520 --> 00:07:03,279 Speaker 2: Like Zach Gallen has historically been like just a really 152 00:07:03,440 --> 00:07:05,560 Speaker 2: good pitcher, you know, strikeouts to there, can go deep 153 00:07:05,560 --> 00:07:09,320 Speaker 2: into games. But this last start that he had, we 154 00:07:09,360 --> 00:07:12,400 Speaker 2: saw vilo increases. That's the biggest thing for me. Fastball 155 00:07:12,440 --> 00:07:14,760 Speaker 2: about a mile per hour slider was like close to 156 00:07:14,800 --> 00:07:18,400 Speaker 2: two miles per hour. Seeing those vilo increases is critical 157 00:07:18,400 --> 00:07:20,880 Speaker 2: because what Gallen wants to do is he wants to 158 00:07:20,960 --> 00:07:24,280 Speaker 2: pump strikes with a cutter and fastball and then he 159 00:07:24,320 --> 00:07:27,320 Speaker 2: wants to bury his change up and his curveball. And 160 00:07:27,920 --> 00:07:29,440 Speaker 2: you can't do that a if you don't throw your 161 00:07:29,440 --> 00:07:31,560 Speaker 2: fastball for strikes, and be also if your fastball is 162 00:07:31,600 --> 00:07:34,880 Speaker 2: just super hittable. Well, he increased the velo, he had 163 00:07:34,920 --> 00:07:37,720 Speaker 2: a high zone percentage, and then he buried his secondary 164 00:07:37,720 --> 00:07:40,920 Speaker 2: stuff and what happened just ate up the padres. That's 165 00:07:40,960 --> 00:07:42,920 Speaker 2: the winning Zach Gallen that has not been there for 166 00:07:43,000 --> 00:07:45,920 Speaker 2: two months. So am I all the way bought back 167 00:07:45,960 --> 00:07:49,560 Speaker 2: in No, because I think there's still volatility in his game. 168 00:07:49,600 --> 00:07:52,080 Speaker 2: And it comes down to one thing. If he is 169 00:07:52,120 --> 00:07:55,200 Speaker 2: not throwing his fastball in the zone and having any 170 00:07:55,200 --> 00:07:57,800 Speaker 2: command of it, he screwed. He doesn't have that other 171 00:07:57,840 --> 00:08:00,760 Speaker 2: stuff that's going there. He throws his curveball fifteen percent 172 00:08:00,760 --> 00:08:02,600 Speaker 2: of the time in the zone. At some point guys 173 00:08:02,640 --> 00:08:04,360 Speaker 2: are going to just stop swinging at it if he 174 00:08:04,360 --> 00:08:07,320 Speaker 2: can't throw his fastball for strikes. So that's what's susceptible 175 00:08:07,320 --> 00:08:10,920 Speaker 2: to me, and that's what I'm questioning. But things looked 176 00:08:11,280 --> 00:08:14,240 Speaker 2: so much better in this last start. We know he 177 00:08:14,400 --> 00:08:16,320 Speaker 2: is a just been a great pitcher. I do think 178 00:08:16,320 --> 00:08:18,480 Speaker 2: there's a possibility he could turn it around. So I 179 00:08:18,480 --> 00:08:20,960 Speaker 2: think if somebody is like wanting to get out, I 180 00:08:21,000 --> 00:08:23,400 Speaker 2: would buy on the cheap and maybe the new team, 181 00:08:23,480 --> 00:08:25,920 Speaker 2: a new team context might kind of rev him up 182 00:08:25,960 --> 00:08:28,280 Speaker 2: and get him excited. If he does get traded. So yeah, 183 00:08:28,400 --> 00:08:30,800 Speaker 2: I'm I'm definitely interested in it, but I'm not all 184 00:08:30,840 --> 00:08:31,360 Speaker 2: the way back. 185 00:08:31,440 --> 00:08:34,720 Speaker 1: See, I think if you wait too long, the window closes. 186 00:08:35,080 --> 00:08:37,319 Speaker 1: So to me, it's now he had two good. 187 00:08:37,120 --> 00:08:38,200 Speaker 2: Now you can do it now. 188 00:08:38,280 --> 00:08:40,520 Speaker 1: I think I'll have to do it now because otherwise 189 00:08:40,559 --> 00:08:42,560 Speaker 1: the person who's held on long enough has had this patience. 190 00:08:42,600 --> 00:08:45,240 Speaker 1: It's like, oh, my patience has been rewarded, and the 191 00:08:45,240 --> 00:08:47,320 Speaker 1: next thing you know, he gets traded and then gets 192 00:08:47,320 --> 00:08:50,000 Speaker 1: completely shut. I think this is a very tiny window. 193 00:08:50,360 --> 00:08:52,600 Speaker 1: It's got huge risk attached to it. I'm willing to 194 00:08:52,600 --> 00:08:54,320 Speaker 1: take that risk, and I think a lot of managers 195 00:08:54,320 --> 00:08:55,880 Speaker 1: are right now with the way pitching injuries have gone 196 00:08:55,920 --> 00:08:58,400 Speaker 1: this year. So if you want Gallon, this is the 197 00:08:58,400 --> 00:09:00,720 Speaker 1: week to make that deal off this last start. If 198 00:09:00,720 --> 00:09:03,199 Speaker 1: you want out from Gallen, this is probably the time 199 00:09:03,280 --> 00:09:06,560 Speaker 1: to do it. But again, huge risk reward. We're gonna 200 00:09:06,559 --> 00:09:08,360 Speaker 1: talk about some more players here, some to sell. We 201 00:09:08,440 --> 00:09:11,000 Speaker 1: might disagree on some of these names, but before we 202 00:09:11,080 --> 00:09:14,239 Speaker 1: get to them, just don't forget about the trade analyzer. 203 00:09:14,280 --> 00:09:16,600 Speaker 1: When you sink your leagues for free with Fantasy pros 204 00:09:17,000 --> 00:09:20,520 Speaker 1: MLBMI playbook at Fantasypros dot com slash MLB My Playbook. 205 00:09:20,840 --> 00:09:23,320 Speaker 1: You can use tools like the Trade Analyzer to evaluate 206 00:09:23,440 --> 00:09:25,760 Speaker 1: all of your trades that you're thinking about. It'll suggest 207 00:09:25,800 --> 00:09:28,360 Speaker 1: trades for you too, and which trades could help you 208 00:09:28,480 --> 00:09:31,320 Speaker 1: in the standings and your starting lineup. So hit up 209 00:09:31,480 --> 00:09:34,240 Speaker 1: Fantasy Pros MLB My Playbook. Download the app, use the 210 00:09:34,240 --> 00:09:37,440 Speaker 1: Trade Analyzer, and go to Fantasypros dot com slash MLB 211 00:09:37,559 --> 00:09:40,400 Speaker 1: my Playbook to sink your leagues for free. Still plenty 212 00:09:40,440 --> 00:09:42,360 Speaker 1: of time and football seasons around the corner, so you 213 00:09:42,400 --> 00:09:45,559 Speaker 1: can get all six months of the premium tools right 214 00:09:45,559 --> 00:09:47,160 Speaker 1: now to take you through the rest of your baseball 215 00:09:47,200 --> 00:09:51,280 Speaker 1: season and straight on into NFL. Let's start with Jason Demingez, 216 00:09:51,280 --> 00:09:53,040 Speaker 1: a player I want to sell. Why because he's had 217 00:09:53,040 --> 00:09:55,520 Speaker 1: a bunch of home runs recently and I'm still not 218 00:09:55,679 --> 00:09:59,280 Speaker 1: buying in wholeheartedly. His expected batting average at two forty six, 219 00:09:59,320 --> 00:10:01,920 Speaker 1: despite the fact that batting averages two sixty seven. His 220 00:10:02,040 --> 00:10:04,959 Speaker 1: expected slugging is under four hundred, despite the fact that 221 00:10:05,040 --> 00:10:07,960 Speaker 1: slugging is four to twenty six. The weight on bases 222 00:10:08,440 --> 00:10:12,199 Speaker 1: below average, the barrel percentage, exit velocity average at best. 223 00:10:12,600 --> 00:10:14,600 Speaker 1: Look Jason Dominguez to me, I think is still work 224 00:10:14,600 --> 00:10:17,680 Speaker 1: in progress, and I think the recent hot streak might 225 00:10:17,720 --> 00:10:21,440 Speaker 1: make him more palatable to some potential suitors. So I 226 00:10:21,480 --> 00:10:24,080 Speaker 1: want to get out from Jason Dominguez now because I 227 00:10:24,120 --> 00:10:26,599 Speaker 1: don't like some of the deeper stats. What do you 228 00:10:26,600 --> 00:10:28,240 Speaker 1: think about moving on from Dominguez? 229 00:10:29,080 --> 00:10:31,920 Speaker 2: Well, it's I mean, I look at them a little 230 00:10:31,920 --> 00:10:33,960 Speaker 2: bit different. There's some that I'm still in. The hard 231 00:10:34,040 --> 00:10:36,800 Speaker 2: hit rate is still fifty percent, which I love. His 232 00:10:36,920 --> 00:10:39,400 Speaker 2: launch angle it's one of the biggest differences, which might 233 00:10:39,400 --> 00:10:43,720 Speaker 2: be like just a game theory changed for him because 234 00:10:43,760 --> 00:10:45,200 Speaker 2: he had like a five degree launch angle last year. 235 00:10:45,200 --> 00:10:47,040 Speaker 2: It's up to thirteen, so he's getting the ball in 236 00:10:47,080 --> 00:10:50,240 Speaker 2: the air and barrels down a little bit, which I 237 00:10:50,280 --> 00:10:52,920 Speaker 2: would like to improve. But the things that keep me 238 00:10:52,960 --> 00:10:54,720 Speaker 2: going is if you can start pulling the ball with 239 00:10:54,800 --> 00:10:56,719 Speaker 2: that hard hit rateer and that launch angle, things are 240 00:10:56,720 --> 00:10:59,679 Speaker 2: going to fly. He has not been, but he's got 241 00:10:59,679 --> 00:11:02,400 Speaker 2: some splits. He has most of his homers and a 242 00:11:02,480 --> 00:11:04,720 Speaker 2: high batting average on the road, and we're talking about 243 00:11:04,720 --> 00:11:07,040 Speaker 2: like a very hit or friendly environment in New York, 244 00:11:07,240 --> 00:11:09,080 Speaker 2: which I think if things click a little bit more 245 00:11:09,080 --> 00:11:11,360 Speaker 2: and he pulls the ball tiny bit more, we're gonna 246 00:11:11,360 --> 00:11:13,520 Speaker 2: have even better results where he has eight homers and 247 00:11:13,559 --> 00:11:14,880 Speaker 2: fourteen stolen bases. 248 00:11:15,160 --> 00:11:16,440 Speaker 1: But also he's. 249 00:11:16,280 --> 00:11:20,520 Speaker 2: Absolutely destroyed righties. This year is a he's kind of 250 00:11:20,520 --> 00:11:22,360 Speaker 2: looking like he might have to be a platoony player, 251 00:11:22,360 --> 00:11:24,120 Speaker 2: which I know you don't like. I'm okay if a 252 00:11:24,120 --> 00:11:26,640 Speaker 2: guy can be put in situations where they are going 253 00:11:26,679 --> 00:11:28,560 Speaker 2: to succeed at all times, and this is a strong 254 00:11:28,600 --> 00:11:31,720 Speaker 2: side platoon guy hitting two ninety seven against rities, and 255 00:11:32,240 --> 00:11:34,760 Speaker 2: as far as like what he's done over the season, 256 00:11:34,880 --> 00:11:37,960 Speaker 2: and he's like a homer outburst here. He has improved 257 00:11:38,000 --> 00:11:41,000 Speaker 2: his batting average every single month of the season. The 258 00:11:41,000 --> 00:11:43,280 Speaker 2: next month has always been better. He hit two seventy 259 00:11:43,400 --> 00:11:46,640 Speaker 2: nine last month, with a three ninety one early on 260 00:11:46,679 --> 00:11:48,520 Speaker 2: in this month. So I guess at the end of 261 00:11:48,520 --> 00:11:50,960 Speaker 2: the day, like we're starting to see some of the pieces. 262 00:11:51,000 --> 00:11:53,280 Speaker 2: He walks, he hits the ball hard, he's getting the 263 00:11:53,320 --> 00:11:55,480 Speaker 2: ball in the air, he's hitting fastballs. 264 00:11:55,679 --> 00:11:56,880 Speaker 1: There's just a few little. 265 00:11:56,600 --> 00:11:58,760 Speaker 2: Things that need to click. While all of this is 266 00:11:58,800 --> 00:12:01,679 Speaker 2: still happening, he looks a little raw. He's still putting 267 00:12:01,720 --> 00:12:04,319 Speaker 2: up a pretty good fantasy season, and those splits I 268 00:12:04,320 --> 00:12:07,480 Speaker 2: think are pretty interesting. Where you're struggling at home, you're 269 00:12:07,600 --> 00:12:10,720 Speaker 2: hitting two thirty five with only two homers at home, 270 00:12:10,760 --> 00:12:13,000 Speaker 2: that's probably not going to continue in New York. So 271 00:12:13,000 --> 00:12:15,960 Speaker 2: if he keeps getting his opportunities, he's succeeding on the road. 272 00:12:16,360 --> 00:12:18,600 Speaker 2: I think Jason Dimingez is gonna walk into a twenty 273 00:12:18,640 --> 00:12:21,160 Speaker 2: twenty season, and I don't think he's going to continue 274 00:12:21,200 --> 00:12:23,600 Speaker 2: like every month is better, but I think there's an 275 00:12:23,640 --> 00:12:26,640 Speaker 2: opportunity he might be finding some consistency. So if Jason 276 00:12:26,640 --> 00:12:28,840 Speaker 2: Dimingez is still a fringy player for a lot of people, 277 00:12:29,720 --> 00:12:30,440 Speaker 2: I'm gonna buy. 278 00:12:30,360 --> 00:12:32,280 Speaker 1: Him, all right, I'm gonna sell them. Let's get to 279 00:12:32,360 --> 00:12:35,920 Speaker 1: Nico Horner. A guy doesn't have much power, and recently 280 00:12:35,920 --> 00:12:37,560 Speaker 1: he has been a little bit of a power surge, 281 00:12:37,640 --> 00:12:39,839 Speaker 1: but again when you look at the deeper metrics, it's 282 00:12:39,880 --> 00:12:42,280 Speaker 1: not going to support everything he's expected. Slugging his three 283 00:12:42,440 --> 00:12:46,640 Speaker 1: sixty nine that's just absolutely gross. It's the worst look. 284 00:12:46,679 --> 00:12:48,960 Speaker 1: A guy doesn't hit the ball particularly hard. He's a 285 00:12:49,000 --> 00:12:50,960 Speaker 1: guy that if a team is looking for stolen base 286 00:12:51,000 --> 00:12:52,920 Speaker 1: help in your league and you've got him, you could 287 00:12:52,960 --> 00:12:54,600 Speaker 1: sell him off because the rest of the hit tool, 288 00:12:54,640 --> 00:12:56,559 Speaker 1: I think is very unimpressive. So for me, this is 289 00:12:56,600 --> 00:12:59,720 Speaker 1: a single category cell where if you're okay on stone 290 00:12:59,800 --> 00:13:02,000 Speaker 1: base and he's a bonus for you, you move on. 291 00:13:02,480 --> 00:13:04,280 Speaker 1: And I think a lot of teams in those roto 292 00:13:04,280 --> 00:13:06,600 Speaker 1: head to head category leagues especially, are looking for guys 293 00:13:06,600 --> 00:13:08,680 Speaker 1: like Nico Horner who can help you out there. If 294 00:13:08,720 --> 00:13:10,679 Speaker 1: you picked up Chandler Simpson off the waiver wire, I 295 00:13:10,760 --> 00:13:13,280 Speaker 1: think you'd rather roll with him rest of season than 296 00:13:13,320 --> 00:13:16,160 Speaker 1: Nico Horner. That's my thought process. What's yours when it 297 00:13:16,160 --> 00:13:17,600 Speaker 1: comes to Nico So. 298 00:13:17,559 --> 00:13:19,320 Speaker 2: I like that you said Chadler Simpson. So I don't 299 00:13:19,320 --> 00:13:20,960 Speaker 2: think he's a single category. 300 00:13:21,040 --> 00:13:22,320 Speaker 1: He's a three category guy. 301 00:13:22,640 --> 00:13:25,200 Speaker 2: But that's it. Like he is not He will not 302 00:13:25,320 --> 00:13:27,480 Speaker 2: compete in RBIs and Homer. So it's not like, oh, 303 00:13:27,480 --> 00:13:28,920 Speaker 2: he's a good three and he could be this. No, 304 00:13:29,400 --> 00:13:32,000 Speaker 2: he's three. That's it. He has fifty one runs, which 305 00:13:32,040 --> 00:13:34,679 Speaker 2: is pretty good this year. He's got a high batting average, 306 00:13:34,679 --> 00:13:37,280 Speaker 2: and he's got stolen bases. Those are the three categories 307 00:13:37,280 --> 00:13:39,800 Speaker 2: that you're getting. I don't buy really any of the 308 00:13:39,800 --> 00:13:43,400 Speaker 2: rest of it. What a you know, a worrisome part 309 00:13:43,440 --> 00:13:45,360 Speaker 2: would be is if the if one of those goes, 310 00:13:45,480 --> 00:13:48,440 Speaker 2: like specifically the batting average, the batting average will then 311 00:13:48,720 --> 00:13:51,320 Speaker 2: you know, affect the runs affect the stolen bases, and 312 00:13:51,360 --> 00:13:53,440 Speaker 2: that is something that could come back down to earth. 313 00:13:53,440 --> 00:13:57,040 Speaker 2: It's a little bit more supportive with his expected batting average, 314 00:13:57,040 --> 00:13:59,040 Speaker 2: but I'm fine with it. And the reason I mentioned 315 00:13:59,080 --> 00:14:01,680 Speaker 2: like the Chandler Simpsons because Chandler Simpson was just another 316 00:14:01,720 --> 00:14:03,680 Speaker 2: one of those guys that was floating back out that 317 00:14:03,720 --> 00:14:06,640 Speaker 2: you could have picked up. He's probably going to get 318 00:14:06,800 --> 00:14:11,600 Speaker 2: same categorical stuff that I do think Chasing's batting average 319 00:14:11,600 --> 00:14:13,560 Speaker 2: in runs can be important, maybe not as much as 320 00:14:13,559 --> 00:14:16,240 Speaker 2: stolen bases. If someone is willing to pay like a 321 00:14:16,280 --> 00:14:19,680 Speaker 2: premium on these stolen bases and a high current batting 322 00:14:19,680 --> 00:14:21,560 Speaker 2: average in Nico Horner, I am willing to sell, so 323 00:14:21,560 --> 00:14:23,800 Speaker 2: I'm with you. I've never been a Nico Horner guy, 324 00:14:23,920 --> 00:14:25,280 Speaker 2: but I do think he is more than just a 325 00:14:25,320 --> 00:14:29,760 Speaker 2: one category player. He's a strong three category player that 326 00:14:29,800 --> 00:14:33,120 Speaker 2: if you can materialize into something else, great, I'm very 327 00:14:33,120 --> 00:14:34,040 Speaker 2: comfortable doing it. 328 00:14:34,320 --> 00:14:36,440 Speaker 1: The recent update for Hunter Green has not been great, 329 00:14:36,480 --> 00:14:38,880 Speaker 1: a little bit of a potential setback on his return 330 00:14:38,920 --> 00:14:42,240 Speaker 1: from a groin injury, which gives Chase Burns value. I 331 00:14:42,240 --> 00:14:45,280 Speaker 1: think a little bit of extra float, and I think 332 00:14:45,320 --> 00:14:47,080 Speaker 1: I want to take advantage of that in the trade market. 333 00:14:48,120 --> 00:14:51,200 Speaker 1: I still say Chase Burn's very talented. Chase Burns could 334 00:14:51,240 --> 00:14:54,040 Speaker 1: potentially develop into a really nice major league pitcher. I 335 00:14:54,080 --> 00:14:55,680 Speaker 1: think he's more of a thrower than a pitcher at 336 00:14:55,680 --> 00:14:57,320 Speaker 1: the stage in his career. Have said it on leading Off. 337 00:14:57,320 --> 00:14:59,280 Speaker 1: I say it here again, just to reiterate for those 338 00:14:59,280 --> 00:15:02,760 Speaker 1: who missed it. And so far it's been mixed results 339 00:15:02,800 --> 00:15:05,040 Speaker 1: at the big league level. Ten innings for him, nine 340 00:15:05,040 --> 00:15:07,360 Speaker 1: earned runs, and we had the one blow up start, 341 00:15:07,400 --> 00:15:09,200 Speaker 1: but still the blow up starts there, and he still 342 00:15:09,200 --> 00:15:10,760 Speaker 1: has only gotten to the fifth inning in one of 343 00:15:10,800 --> 00:15:13,520 Speaker 1: his three starts, so he's gonna be limited innings. He 344 00:15:13,600 --> 00:15:16,400 Speaker 1: is gonna be a bit inefficient, it seems like early going. 345 00:15:17,080 --> 00:15:19,720 Speaker 1: And on top of that, the fact that he is 346 00:15:19,720 --> 00:15:21,520 Speaker 1: probably gonna stick in the rotation for the next couple 347 00:15:21,480 --> 00:15:23,600 Speaker 1: of weeks. There's a lot of reasons where I think 348 00:15:23,640 --> 00:15:27,280 Speaker 1: you can sell the hype of Chase Burns, the electric fastball, 349 00:15:27,360 --> 00:15:29,640 Speaker 1: all those things that make a lot of us fantasy 350 00:15:29,720 --> 00:15:34,000 Speaker 1: nerves extremely excited. Chase Burns clicks a lot of those boxes, right. 351 00:15:34,560 --> 00:15:37,800 Speaker 1: But if you're talking about fantasy productivity down the stretch, 352 00:15:38,280 --> 00:15:40,400 Speaker 1: if you could turn Chase Burns and the Zach Gallon. 353 00:15:40,720 --> 00:15:42,880 Speaker 1: That's a trade that I make every single day, and 354 00:15:42,960 --> 00:15:45,480 Speaker 1: I think that kind of trade might be out there 355 00:15:45,840 --> 00:15:48,160 Speaker 1: to be had. Welsh, who would you rather have? Rest 356 00:15:48,200 --> 00:15:49,040 Speaker 1: of season Gallen? 357 00:15:49,200 --> 00:15:52,000 Speaker 2: Okay, So into that scenario, I do think that's interesting. 358 00:15:52,400 --> 00:15:55,640 Speaker 2: I think I think Zach Gallen is like maybe the play, 359 00:15:55,760 --> 00:15:58,040 Speaker 2: especially if he gets traded for wins and stuff like that. 360 00:15:58,200 --> 00:16:00,720 Speaker 2: But this is another one of our debate ones. I'm 361 00:16:00,760 --> 00:16:02,600 Speaker 2: not with you on the Chase Burns. I don't think 362 00:16:02,600 --> 00:16:04,400 Speaker 2: it's a great time because he's got an eight II. 363 00:16:04,520 --> 00:16:06,600 Speaker 2: Regardless of like how electric you know, some of the 364 00:16:06,640 --> 00:16:08,800 Speaker 2: stuff is. People are still going to look at surface 365 00:16:08,800 --> 00:16:10,680 Speaker 2: stats and they're going to see an eight era, they're 366 00:16:10,680 --> 00:16:13,000 Speaker 2: going to see almost six expected era, and they're going 367 00:16:13,000 --> 00:16:14,520 Speaker 2: to see the walk So people are going to think 368 00:16:14,600 --> 00:16:15,760 Speaker 2: like you, I mean, he only gave up one er 369 00:16:15,760 --> 00:16:17,360 Speaker 2: and run in the last start, and you were like 370 00:16:17,360 --> 00:16:18,840 Speaker 2: this is not a good start, and it's like, yeah, 371 00:16:18,880 --> 00:16:22,080 Speaker 2: the walks are bad, but he did maintain. He did 372 00:16:22,120 --> 00:16:24,040 Speaker 2: maintain one er and run. He struck out seven and 373 00:16:24,080 --> 00:16:26,720 Speaker 2: every single start that he's had that big blow up 374 00:16:26,760 --> 00:16:31,160 Speaker 2: has inflated everything. I think there's massive strikeout potential with 375 00:16:31,320 --> 00:16:34,400 Speaker 2: Chase Burns. I love the bounce back, and he's also 376 00:16:34,520 --> 00:16:36,880 Speaker 2: had a pretty rough go if you look at his 377 00:16:36,960 --> 00:16:37,600 Speaker 2: start so far. 378 00:16:38,000 --> 00:16:38,920 Speaker 1: His career started. 379 00:16:39,040 --> 00:16:41,120 Speaker 2: Yankees, Red Sox and the Phillies. 380 00:16:41,240 --> 00:16:43,360 Speaker 1: But give me some decent starts, and I think you're 381 00:16:43,440 --> 00:16:45,440 Speaker 1: exactly the kind of manager I'm looking for is the 382 00:16:45,480 --> 00:16:48,520 Speaker 1: one that certainly plays in Dynasty Leagues two, but also 383 00:16:48,560 --> 00:16:50,200 Speaker 1: that sees the potential. Because I think Burns has a 384 00:16:50,240 --> 00:16:52,720 Speaker 1: lot of potential. I don't think that's false. I want 385 00:16:52,760 --> 00:16:55,640 Speaker 1: to maximize that potential and change it in for productivity 386 00:16:55,640 --> 00:16:57,360 Speaker 1: rest of season to win, because I don't think it 387 00:16:57,400 --> 00:16:59,600 Speaker 1: happens in twenty twenty five for him. I think twenty 388 00:16:59,640 --> 00:17:01,480 Speaker 1: th I was a bit of a slog where he 389 00:17:01,560 --> 00:17:04,359 Speaker 1: goes five innings, has some starts where you're like, wow, 390 00:17:04,400 --> 00:17:06,160 Speaker 1: look at that start, and so I'm like, wow, look 391 00:17:06,200 --> 00:17:08,240 Speaker 1: at that start. I think that is something I don't 392 00:17:08,240 --> 00:17:10,240 Speaker 1: want to deal with. I'd rather turn them into something 393 00:17:10,240 --> 00:17:12,600 Speaker 1: that I think a little bit more comfortable starting on 394 00:17:12,600 --> 00:17:13,359 Speaker 1: a weekly basis. 395 00:17:13,400 --> 00:17:15,320 Speaker 2: And my advice would be is, if that is what 396 00:17:15,400 --> 00:17:17,840 Speaker 2: you want to do, you need to wait one more start. 397 00:17:17,960 --> 00:17:21,000 Speaker 2: This is not the time we get era. And I 398 00:17:21,040 --> 00:17:23,000 Speaker 2: think I want to say if I remember correctly, the 399 00:17:23,000 --> 00:17:25,720 Speaker 2: matchups coming up are good. I want to say it 400 00:17:25,760 --> 00:17:29,960 Speaker 2: might be like the Rockies or something like, let's have 401 00:17:30,080 --> 00:17:32,760 Speaker 2: one of those really good matchups, one more good start, 402 00:17:32,880 --> 00:17:34,840 Speaker 2: then you sell him off after he's paired, all these 403 00:17:34,880 --> 00:17:38,600 Speaker 2: strikeouts start. And I don't think that's the It's not 404 00:17:38,680 --> 00:17:41,600 Speaker 2: the worst thing in the world. And I particularly I 405 00:17:41,720 --> 00:17:42,840 Speaker 2: just like your gallon idea. 406 00:17:42,880 --> 00:17:43,880 Speaker 1: That is a way to maximize. 407 00:17:43,960 --> 00:17:46,400 Speaker 2: But just remember there's a ton of upside with Burns, 408 00:17:46,600 --> 00:17:50,160 Speaker 2: but there's volatility in his walks him Mislerowski, these young 409 00:17:50,160 --> 00:17:51,680 Speaker 2: guys walks are going to be a problem. 410 00:17:51,880 --> 00:17:53,080 Speaker 1: You just do like to see. 411 00:17:52,920 --> 00:17:54,560 Speaker 2: Guys that have a little bit of walk issues be 412 00:17:54,640 --> 00:17:57,399 Speaker 2: able to work around it and out. And two of 413 00:17:57,440 --> 00:17:59,879 Speaker 2: the three starts with Burns, he has just an electric 414 00:18:00,000 --> 00:18:03,119 Speaker 2: aspall and slider. But you know, people do overpay for rookies, 415 00:18:03,160 --> 00:18:04,120 Speaker 2: so you might not be wrong. 416 00:18:04,240 --> 00:18:06,840 Speaker 1: They overpay for rookies, but also wels. You know, if 417 00:18:06,840 --> 00:18:08,960 Speaker 1: you wait too long again, the window closes. I think 418 00:18:08,960 --> 00:18:11,560 Speaker 1: it's the one hundred green news that makes Chase Burns 419 00:18:11,560 --> 00:18:13,119 Speaker 1: all of a sudden get a bigger bump in that 420 00:18:13,160 --> 00:18:15,919 Speaker 1: trade market because people go, oh, he ain't going anywhere, 421 00:18:15,920 --> 00:18:18,240 Speaker 1: even if he struggles, and I think that is very important. 422 00:18:18,240 --> 00:18:19,439 Speaker 1: But what do you think? Who would you rather have 423 00:18:19,480 --> 00:18:23,200 Speaker 1: rest of season? Gallon or Chase Burns. Drop your comments below. 424 00:18:23,240 --> 00:18:25,760 Speaker 1: You might win yourself a jersey from Pristine auction of 425 00:18:26,240 --> 00:18:29,000 Speaker 1: signed one Gonzalez quality. That'll do it for us, but 426 00:18:29,040 --> 00:18:31,080 Speaker 1: the story of the game goes on for the Welsh. 427 00:18:31,080 --> 00:18:33,320 Speaker 1: I'm Joey P. We'll see you next time. Kids. 428 00:18:34,440 --> 00:18:37,639 Speaker 3: Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball podcast. 429 00:18:37,920 --> 00:18:40,280 Speaker 3: If you love the show, the best freeway to support 430 00:18:40,320 --> 00:18:43,200 Speaker 3: us is by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts 431 00:18:43,320 --> 00:18:47,000 Speaker 3: or Spotify. Follow us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at 432 00:18:47,040 --> 00:18:50,000 Speaker 3: Fantasy Pros, and subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube 433 00:18:50,000 --> 00:18:52,199 Speaker 3: dot com slash Fantasy Pros MLB