WEBVTT - Iger Returns to Disney As Chapek Exits

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carole Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanobek. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world of business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all partnising the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio, or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>YouTube and now also on Bloomberg Quick Take. I don't

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>know about U, Katie, but last night I about ten

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>o'clock Eastern time saw in my email at a message

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>opened it up all caps headline from the Bloomberg Professional Service,

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Bob Iger coming back to Disney after retiring Bob J

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:49.199
<v Speaker 1>peck out while was the only word that came to

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>mind at some other choice where its came to mind

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 1>as well. But this is a big deal in the

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>world of media. We've got Felix to Lette with us.

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>He's Media, Entertainment and Telecom editor for Bloomberg Business Week.

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Is also the author of the great new book It's

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>called It's Not TV. The Spectacular, Rise, Revolution and Future

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:06.559
<v Speaker 1>of HBO. He joined us via zoom from New York City. Felix,

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>what was your first reaction when you saw this last night?

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>It was pretty jaw dropping. I had to close my

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 1>fantasy football app and you know, pay attention to what's

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>happened in the media world again. Um yeah, total shock, surprise, excitement.

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>This is just a totally wild move. Um And I

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:27.960
<v Speaker 1>think underscores what a crazy time it is in the

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>entertainment business and how challenging and tumultuous this transition from

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the cable era to the streaming era is going to

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>be for pretty much every big player in the space,

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 1>including Disney. I'll admit I was asleep at ten pm.

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 1>You got an early morning. I was resting up for

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a big day of reporting for Bloomberg News. But uh

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>so you described shock. Was anyone expecting this or was

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>this across the board shocking? I think that there were

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>definitely people calling for a change at the top of Disney,

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>particularly coming off of this last quarter, which was really

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>truly a disastrous quarter for Disney. Um And I think

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>shapeck performance during the earnings call, uh, left a lot

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>of people scratching their head. You know, the Disney had

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>announced this one point five billion dollar loss on streaming

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:24.920
<v Speaker 1>for the quarter, which was you know, way bigger than

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>people thought it was going to be. And yet SHAPEC

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>was really cheerful and sunny during that call. And uh

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>so we think in one sense, people were thinking, Okay,

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe this guy is in over his head. There's been

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>all these series of missteps. There was, you know, his

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 1>clumsy handling of the culture War issues down in Florida.

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>There was this dismissile of Peter Rice, the head of television,

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 1>earlier this year, which upset a lot of creative people

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>in Hollywood. Um. You know, so there's been a series

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>of airs. Um so, I think the decision to move

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>on from SHAPEC, I think is not that shocking. It's

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>really just the bringing Eiger back, um, you know, replacing

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>his hand chosen you know, pick to succeed him originally. Uh.

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, for years, every time he's been out in public,

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 1>people have asked them about would you ever consider coming

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>back to Disney? And he said again and again and

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>again like no, I'm not interested. I'm not interested. So

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:23.679
<v Speaker 1>that part of it is is pretty wild. Never say never.

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Bob Iger seventy one years old. He was

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>was at Disney before he quote unquote retired more than

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>for more than four decades. He was its CEO for

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years. He oversaw some of the biggest acquisitions that

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the company made, including Marvel, Pixar and other acquisitions. So, Felix,

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>what does it mean for the future of Disney and

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>what we can expect over the next two years, which

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>is from what we understand, uh, what we'll see with Iger. Yeah,

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think the argument for bringing him back

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>is this guy had a fifteen year run that was

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>seen as this incredible uh time for Disney, this great

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>series acquisitions he made. And you know, we're at this

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>point in this transition from cable to streaming where everybody

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>is suffering because the linear networks that was making everybody

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>profits are you know, continue to decline very quickly. The

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:19.159
<v Speaker 1>streaming services are essentially these huge giant holes of money

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>at this point of people are just shoveling money into them.

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 1>They're still not profitable. Um. So I think it's a

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>time when almost anything could be up for um for sale.

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:34.159
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going to see more consolidation space. People

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>are going to have to team up further in order

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to survive this era. And I think the argument for

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 1>bringing your back is you want that guy uh making

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>those big decisions over the next couple of years, um,

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know you have some faith that he's going

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 1>to make smart moves. Well, Wall Street is definitely cheering

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:55.839
<v Speaker 1>both of you. Look at the shares also at least

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>one upgrade on this news. But tell us about the

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:04.480
<v Speaker 1>potential fly in the ointment here the activist investor Nelson

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:09.239
<v Speaker 1>pelts his fund. What could potentially go wrong here? Yeah,

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think that there's plenty that could go wrong.

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I think, um, you know, part of it is again

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the funny. The thing that's kind of funny to me

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>is like, you know, I kept pushing back his retirement

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:25.799
<v Speaker 1>again and again during his previous reign, and he kept,

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, there was all this speculation about you know,

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 1>who are who's going to succeed you? Or do you

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 1>have a leader in mind? You know, who's going to

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>carry this future company into the future. He really kept

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>running off potential candidates, um, and then in the end

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:43.280
<v Speaker 1>he picked this guy Shapebeck, who left everyone kind of

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>scratching it has why do you do that? Um And

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 1>now you know, on the one hand, it's great that

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 1>Iger's back to deal with whatever acquisitions they're gonna have

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to make in the next couple of years. On the

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>other hand, now he's back in charge of picking another

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>successor for the future of Disney, and it doesn't give

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>you a lot of faith that he is very good

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>at that process. Um. So, I think that's going to

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:07.720
<v Speaker 1>be part of the challenge that all investors are going

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to be looking at, like what is the plan beyond

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.719
<v Speaker 1>these two years? That's certainly the question that many people

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:16.600
<v Speaker 1>are going to have it at least, as you mentioned,

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Katie uh And you pointed to Disney shares up more

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:22.599
<v Speaker 1>than five percent right now, and they were high as

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 1>high as nine point nine percent earlier in the day.

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:28.479
<v Speaker 1>Felix Gillette Media Entertainment telecom editor for Bloomberg Business Week.

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 1>He's the author of the great new book just came

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>out earlier this month. It's called It's Not TV The

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Spectacular Rise Revolution in Future of HBO. Joining us this

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>afternoon via zoom from New York City. You're listening to

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes.

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. We've talked in the past

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 1>about what it means for people who have been laid

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>off from some of the biggest tech firms. I mean,

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about companies like meta platforms, Uber, Lift, Salesforce, Stripe,

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:01.839
<v Speaker 1>and more. And we talked about it oftentimes in the

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>context of what it means in the bigger picture of

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:07.479
<v Speaker 1>what it says about the economy. But there's a different

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>way of looking at it that's really important, and it

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>has to do with people who hold H one B

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>visas and what they're doing if they've been laid off.

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>We've got Sinduja Rodnegrogen on the phone with us. She's

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>senior investigative data reporter. Actually, she joins us via zoom

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>from San Francisco for a Bloomberg News You can read

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>her story right now on the Bloomberg terminal and at

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com. Slash business Week also with us as

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Joel Webber, the editor of Bloomberg Business Week. He's with

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 1>us right now in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker's studio. So, Joel,

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>how how should we be thinking about these layoffs? Well,

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>one thing that really UH struck me with UH. Saint's reporting.

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>UH and companies reporting is about H one B visas

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and H one B visus have been uh something that

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the magazine has written about before. UM, skilled workers that

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>have largely been in the tech industry. UH from a

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 1>rod and you're we're talking some pretty incredible stories about

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>where a lot of these people come from. But the

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>tech industry has really benefited from this workforce. But what's

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting is effectively it's a company sponsored. So the

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>moment that any of these people get laid off or fired,

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>it puts them in a really difficult place. A lot

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of these people end up with mortgages, childcare, all kinds

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>of stuff because they're you know, banking on a on

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a future here um oftentimes putting permanent residents residency in

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:35.920
<v Speaker 1>motion at the same time. So, so Sin brings us

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>inside this having having seen this data, how significant of

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a hit to the tech industry are these firings having

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:47.679
<v Speaker 1>as as it puts a lot of these people in jeopardy. UM,

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>So this is a very interesting question. So it's like

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of employees we know have been laid off just

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>from Twitter and Meta. I think around three fifty. And

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to say it's an under account because we're

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>looking at people who have been posting on LinkedIn, putting

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>their name out there in a crowd crowdsourced spreadsheet or

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>something saying hey, I'm in need of a visa sponsorship them.

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:12.079
<v Speaker 1>You know. Overall, like when we did our analysis, we

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>realized just with like six companies you know that have

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>been recently doing the layoffs Meta, Twitter, Amazon, Stripe, Salesforce,

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>and um Um and Left, we found that they just

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the six of them employee sixty forty five thousand um

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 1>H one B workers. That's an estimate we look, we

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>created based on our our data analysis and just between

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and Meta, we found hundreds of people who claim

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to be visa holders who have been um um laid

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 1>off in the in the in the last few weeks.

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's a pretty significant number, you know, and it's

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>in the hundreds for sure. As you and our colleagues

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Brody Ford and Katrina Madison right, people who do hold

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 1>H one B visas who then become unemployed, they can

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 1>only remain in the US legally for sixty d is

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 1>without finding new employers to sponsor them. Do we know

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 1>anything about the terms that these employees are given when

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>they are laid off from companies because they faced this

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 1>special circumstance, Like are they given better terms because they're

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 1>on this kind of timeline here? Yeah, I mean, I

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>think you know, that was the interesting thing we found

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:23.079
<v Speaker 1>while reporting the story. You know, we started out thinking

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 1>of the story is like a human story. You know,

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>what happens when you have this few weeks a few

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>months of deadline and you're trying to scramble for another

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>job and visa sponsorship. But what we realize is that

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>some companies are doing better than others in terms of

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>how they treat their immigrant workforce and what policies they

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 1>lay out. For example, you know, we found that Twitter

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of didn't give a lot of assistance or support

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to these employees, and some other companies have like a

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>little wealth out slightly better thoughtout policies. So for example,

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, your sixty day clock starts sticking after the

0:10:57.320 --> 0:10:59.679
<v Speaker 1>last day that you've you know, worked there, So if

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>you could extend that last day, you know, if if

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>there's like a notice period given that you're going to

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>be laid off, but after two months, so that gives

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>like people four months, you know, two months when they're

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:13.680
<v Speaker 1>working at that company, and then UM an additional sixty days.

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>So if that can be a form of relief and

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to saying, you know, you're later off today, Uh,

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and then you know we're going to give you severance

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>for three weeks or whatever or eight weeks or something,

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and then you know your clock starts right now. So

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that extension of time is really important. And you know

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>some companies, I think Meta has done that, particularly for

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 1>immigrant visa holders. Lift was another one. Um stripe when

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:35.679
<v Speaker 1>they wrote that email. I don't know if they offered

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a notice spirit, but they know definitely acknowledged that this

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 1>would be very difficult for immigrant visa holders. And Twitter,

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>you know sort of they didn't think through as much

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:49.680
<v Speaker 1>based on our reporting, and yeah, and there was there was,

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the and when employees wrote to them, they

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>many of them were really confused about you know, when

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>does my clock start ticking? Does it start the day

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>of January four? When you know you've said that that

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>would be our last day? But you know, we're not productive,

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>We're not on the are we on payroll? Are we not?

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>And you know, like, uh, is it going to be

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 1>a member for them. So there was like a lot

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:13.479
<v Speaker 1>of confusion amongst employees and they got very little guidance,

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>very little like immigration one on one counseling or even

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>or even you know, um, anything that says more definitively yeah,

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>this is the day you need to this is your

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 1>last day, or that is your last day. They just said,

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, you should consult your own immigration attorney. So

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, employees, that's like the least you

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>could do for this workforce if invested so much time

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:36.559
<v Speaker 1>in this country, like you mentioned, and you know, at

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 1>least give them like the most they can get so

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 1>they can like succeed in finding that job, especially now

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>at the start of a place when a lot of

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 1>tech companies are instituting hiring freezers and holiday season when

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 1>things slow down. So you know, the more you can

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>do for them, the better it is for them. Okay,

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>So we I want to talk a little bit more

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 1>about the Indians, because there there are a ton of

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>H one b h A visa holders from India, uh

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>many of them. As we were writing this story. I've

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:13.720
<v Speaker 1>been here for for years, and it seems like it's

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>really hitting that country hard. These numbers right, So whom

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:20.080
<v Speaker 1>did you talk to and what do you learn from

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>on the India quotion? I think you know, um a

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of people who come on H one B V.

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>So it's like you mentioned drole, like the the goal

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>is to eventually, you know, get permanent residency and citizenship.

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>And for for a lot of folks like you know,

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you you stay on H one B for anywhere from

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>three to six years. Your company starts working on your

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:41.679
<v Speaker 1>green card application, they file it and then you get

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:43.680
<v Speaker 1>your green card and you know, I want to say

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>anywhere between one year or the three years or something

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 1>of that sort. But with Indians and actually Chinese nationals

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>like you file that green card and there's like a

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>huge backlog because there's this rule that says that you know,

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>you can own every country is allowed to get only

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>seven percent of the green card and Indians and Chinese

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 1>being a huge part of the tech force, have you know,

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 1>immigrated on this reason larger numbers. So you know, particularly

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 1>for Indians, you know, there are seven percent of the

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 1>green cards reserved for them every year, which comes to

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>around ten thousand green cards, and then there are five

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand, uh nearly five hundred thousand um. You know

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>holders who have applied for the green cards, so that

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>so only ten thousand will keep getting every year. And

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the backlog is huge and it's growing. So you know,

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>if you live for your green card today or if

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you applied for it in then the sillery could take

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>as long as you may not. We unfortunately have to

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>leave it there. Sindoja ranaj and Uh senior investigative data

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>reporter for Bloomberg News. To be assume from San Francisco.

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. We're to welcome

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>in once against Sheen contractor. People listen to the program

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>are familiar with her voice. She's E s G analysts

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Intelligence. She's with us once again in the

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Interactor Broker Studio, fresh off of her recent trip

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>to the Conference of Parties twenty seven. That's copy as

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>it's known. She good to have you with us this afternoon.

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>You just got back from Charmel Sheik, Egypt resort town.

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I know you did a lot of working there and

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>not resorting. Okay, maybe some resorting, maybe some vacation. I

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>hope you had some fun. First of all, what was

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>cop like? I know this was your first one, so

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Tim Cupp was like nothing I've seen before. It was,

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, this two week conference where forty people just

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>descent to talk about climate. I don't think I've ever

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 1>been in that kind of environment. It's like very focused

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and there was so many interesting discussions, so many different things,

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>especially around two things in particular. The first was really

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>carbon markets. There was you know, people who were great supporters,

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 1>there were people who are great sort of disbelievers. And

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the second one was around companies corbon reduction goals and

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the need to sort of just go beyond just paper

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>de carbonization. I guess tell us about that debate there

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 1>on carbon what is sort of the rallying cry for

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the advocates and what are the non believers saying. So

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to carbon markets, the goal is for

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>companies to basically offset their own emissions by purchasing these

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 1>credits from projects that remove common from the atmosphere. And

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>basically the goal there has to be that sort of

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the price of carb and the cost of carbon has

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to pay for that additionality sort of without that the

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>project might not have been viable, which makes it sort

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>of an additionality. The the people who are against it

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>believed that a lot of this money is going to

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 1>go to works projects that are already financially viable. It's like,

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, a renewable project where it's cost competitive, it's

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be built anyway, there's no additionality, So the

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>money is really going to nothing, I guess. So it's

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>basically the point that you have to fund a project

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>through offsets which otherwise wouldn't have existed. Okay, Well, you

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>cover E s G for Bloomberg Intelligence, and a big

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>part of your trip, of course, had to do with

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the way that you're writing reports about what you learn

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 1>there and what investors can learn from the way that

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you know SG is being talked about at events like this.

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.120
<v Speaker 1>What's a big takeaway that you have for the Bloomberg

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence audience. So the one thing is, and I've said

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 1>this before, but before God this year, before last year,

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 1>companies are setting these Gorbon reduction goals at a pace

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:24.439
<v Speaker 1>we've never seen before. There were quite a few interesting

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>talks that happened around actually sort of implementation, Like the UK,

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 1>for example, had this new proposal during COP where you know,

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:34.639
<v Speaker 1>if a company has a goal, they have to have

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a plan on how to meet that good. I think

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that's the biggest takeaway. Even in our research, we find

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that out of the companies we've looked at, about eight

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:47.360
<v Speaker 1>have gobbon goals. But what do these actually mean? It's

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a huge gap. Yeah, I mean this is something I

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:53.400
<v Speaker 1>always think about, like how do you factor in goals

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:56.640
<v Speaker 1>such as that one when you're you know, thinking about

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a company's E s G score. Yeah, So that's sort

0:17:59.920 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>of interesting because you know, when carbon is material, like

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 1>for sectors like utilities, really sort of environmentally heavy sectors,

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that's when actually having a goal could have some kind

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>of financial impacts. I think it comes down to materiality,

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>what are the sectors by carbon matters, and how does

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>it actually fuctor into your financial performance. I want to

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:22.439
<v Speaker 1>talk bigger picture COP because you were there and I

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>haven't gotten to speak to many folks who were there.

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Does it do you leave with the impression that it's

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 1>useful to the extent that all of these countries are

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>going to leave and go back and work to reduce

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:40.920
<v Speaker 1>carbon emissions so we ultimately see a reduction in climate change.

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 1>So Tim, I'll be honest. You know, before I went

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to this, I was really skeptic. I was like, why,

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>what is the point of gathering? Blah blah. But then

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:54.479
<v Speaker 1>I spoke to a negotiator there and he told me

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>one thing. He said, you know, shying, think back to

0:18:56.600 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Tift right. No, no, country don't net zero gulo had

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>anything really to do with what sort of climate ambition.

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 1>But look at where we are today, about a hundred

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and thirty plus companies have net zero goos. So you're

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 1>to your it's kind of frustrating, but over the big picture,

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:19.199
<v Speaker 1>we've we have achieved something I guess and compared to

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:21.879
<v Speaker 1>business as usually if you think about it. So I

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>feel better now we're talking about it. Yeah, exactly. See.

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Are you optimistic? Are you going next year? I hope?

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know. Are you optimistic though, just in

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the last thirty seconds that we have I am? I am?

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, given what companies are doing, given

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 1>what countries are saying, given some of the things we've seen,

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I think I definitely am. Well, welcome back and thanks

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:49.679
<v Speaker 1>for sharing some of your experience with us. That Shaheen Contractors.

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:54.359
<v Speaker 1>She's environmental, social, and governance analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence, fresh

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 1>offer trip from Charmel Shake where she was there for

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Copy seven a journal. Yeah, I'll bet you. Let me drive.

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, no, no no, no, honey, please, I'll do the

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:17.400
<v Speaker 1>bride revels. I want to drive. It's good question. Drive.

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:26.679
<v Speaker 1>This is the drive to the globe up on Bloomberg Radio.

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:29.359
<v Speaker 1>It's that time, already less than ten minutes to go

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 1>to the end of trading here on this Monday, November two,

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stantovick and Katie Grydfeld relive in the Bloomberg Interactive

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Brokers the studio. Let's get to our drive to the close.

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Guest Eric Clarks, portfolio manager at Rational Dynamic Brands Fund.

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:46.120
<v Speaker 1>He joins us via Zoom from San Diego. Eric, good

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:48.640
<v Speaker 1>to have you with us. How are you, hey, Tim?

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 1>How are you We're doing well. Thanks, It's good to

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>have you back with us. Um, So help us understand

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the way that you're viewing the markets right now. We're

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>getting to the close of the year, sort of the

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>final sprint to the end of the year. It's a

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 1>holiday week. We're seeing volumes down right now versus last

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty days on the SP five. How does the year end. Uh.

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>You know that one's a bit of a toss up,

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to be quite honest with you, because we have tax

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 1>laws selling, you know, at the end of the year,

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 1>but we also have prices coming down to what I

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:25.680
<v Speaker 1>consider to be much more attractive than we've seen in

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>in a number of years. And so you know, it's

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 1>anybody's guests on the timing and when people do their

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:34.119
<v Speaker 1>tax laws selling. But we've certainly already done all that stuff,

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:36.159
<v Speaker 1>and now we're trying to pick away at some of

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the opportunities that tax laws selling is gonna is giving

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 1>us the kind of right off the rest of the

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 1>year then, and trying to you don't even have to

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 1>come in, Katie, Okay, that's what I'm trying to get.

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 1>I have been hearing more about tax as harvesting and

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>what a brutal year. But I want to bring you

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 1>into a debate we we're having at the start of

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the program about the consumer because we're going to get

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of black data or Friday data on Friday

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>after Thanksgiving. Uh, we know that the consumer is still

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 1>strong here when you see headlines and economic reports to

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>that effect. What is your takeaway is that bullish or

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>bearish for you when you think about what the FED

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 1>is trying to accomplish. Well, I mean, listen, that the

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 1>FED is a whole different story that we could probably

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>spend a lot of time on. But from a consumer,

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, when we are starting to feel squeezed, we

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>start to make different decisions. We start to play that

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 1>this versus that game. What do I need to buy?

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:38.679
<v Speaker 1>Even if I don't love the prices that are higher?

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>What do I have to buy? I gotta keep doing that?

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 1>What can I defer maybe for now if I'm feeling

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the pinch a little bit, particularly towards holidays, and you

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:49.640
<v Speaker 1>want to have good holiday spending. So I think we're

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:54.199
<v Speaker 1>in that period of consumers just making a decision about

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:57.399
<v Speaker 1>what to spend on and where to go, and which

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 1>brands are the most relevant. I mean that that's where

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>we we spend all of our time on brand relevancy.

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:05.639
<v Speaker 1>So so we feel like that we we have a

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 1>good expertise in that area. But clearly the consumers, you know,

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:11.880
<v Speaker 1>feeling the pinch a little bit with prices being up

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 1>literally across every category that we see. Okay, so that's

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the perfect segue to talk about what you're concerned with,

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's an earnings recession? Did we I mean, given

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>what we've heard about from companies that have reported already,

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 1>and we still got zoom after the bell, but we're

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty much done with earning season. Q four is not

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>going to look great for a lot of companies. Amazon,

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>for example, already gave us a heads up about that

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 1>target as well. What did what did you see? And

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 1>what does that portend for Q one? Well? I think

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 1>the thesis is the next shoot a drop is earnings

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 1>will start to reflect all the things that the FED

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>has done, and that slow down will be here. My

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>problem is, you know, the valuations have been reset so

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>much already. Who knows if it's a full reset or

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 1>a two thirds reset whatever the numb briz. I suspect

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:04.359
<v Speaker 1>we have an earnings trough for the year. You know,

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 1>probably reported in the April quarter, and historically markets bottom

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>three to six months before earnings and and GDP, etcetera.

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, if we're in late November now,

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 1>where you know the market probably has fully discounted or

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>at least you know, almost fully discounted the earnings recession

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:26.199
<v Speaker 1>that I think everybody expects. So does that mean we've

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>hit bottom. Well, I I don't know that we've hit bottom.

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 1>That it's that's above my pay grade. I'm trying to

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 1>find the right price points for the brands that we love.

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:39.199
<v Speaker 1>It's really hard. I think, you know, Michael Symbolis from

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:42.880
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan put out a report. I think that thirty

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>on the smp IS is a reasonable place to go.

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't mean we have to go there. Doesn't we

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:50.919
<v Speaker 1>stay there, But I think if we get to that level,

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna see some you know, multi year wonderful buying opportunities,

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:58.360
<v Speaker 1>and sentiment is probably gonna be dreadful if we get

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>down there, But that's usually when the best buying opportunities

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 1>happen when it feels bad. All right, Erica, want to

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>get specific here. I want to talk about the brands,

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 1>the names that you're excited about. What are you looking at? Well,

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:14.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we focus on a lot of trends, and

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:17.439
<v Speaker 1>so some of them are consumer trends, and that's not

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>just buying and selling of goods and services. You know,

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I love, we love this mega trend in alternative assets,

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>people migrating a little bit of money from stocks and

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>bonds into alternatives. Regal assets, infrastructure, private equity, all those things.

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Black Stone and k K are the two biggest. They

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>are fairly cheap. Now. The stocks have come off pretty

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:44.680
<v Speaker 1>meaningfully this year. I'm looking for really good snapbacks in

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>three within regular consumer spending. You know, I still like

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the the at Leisure, the Lulu Lemons, and the Nikes.

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>They've cut down pretty meaningfully. We still like the home

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I know, there's you know, home sales have have cooled

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 1>off pretty dramatically with the Fed actions and mortgage rates rising.

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 1>That just means that people are going to stay in

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:07.160
<v Speaker 1>their homes rather than move. And so I'm not surprised

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to see home Depot and Low's still do pretty well.

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, inventories are up a little bit, but pricing

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 1>powers is really strong. Eric, Tesla is on your list

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:18.239
<v Speaker 1>as well, thanks to the notes that you sent our

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:21.400
<v Speaker 1>producer Paul a little earlier today. I'm I've got Tesla's

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 1>one of my decliners today. It's down to what another

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:27.439
<v Speaker 1>close to six percent six and a half percent right now, um,

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 1>down from when Ellen's deal for Twitter clothes. Why are

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>you bullish on Tesla? Well, we we sold it much

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 1>higher ago and we just started nibbling literally put a

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>pinky toe in the water a little bit higher than

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:43.199
<v Speaker 1>where we are and and we'll start to it's the

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 1>smallest position in the fund. I just you know, right now,

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:51.119
<v Speaker 1>the distractions that Ellen has had with this Twitter I

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 1>think are providing long term opportunities. And so I'm going

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to be very slow and methodical to put money into

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Tesla as it declines. But anything on her I think

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>one fifty, you know, one between that level, I think

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:07.359
<v Speaker 1>are pretty good places to to to add to that

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 1>name for the long term. But it's been a it's

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>a teeny tiny port portfolio position right this minute. That

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 1>this is really interesting that the Tesla discussion, that Elon

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Musk discussion. I mean we hear all the time as

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>a bear case for Tesla that you know this is

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk is a distracted CEO. Obviously he spread very

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:35.159
<v Speaker 1>thin with the most recent Twitter fiasco. How much of

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:37.159
<v Speaker 1>a concern is that for you? You say, this is

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a long term sort of nibbling that you're doing, But

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 1>how do you factor that concern in? Well, I I

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 1>think that he is getting the message. But let's use

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Disney as a good example. You know, Bob Jpeck probably

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:54.400
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the right guy Bob Iger's coming back. Ellen said

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>he hates managing day to day business. That's not for strength.

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 1>He needs a Tim Cook type up Garador to run Tesla,

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and he probably needs one to run Twitter. Let him

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 1>be the kind of the chief chief information or innovation

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 1>officer that's really He's just doing too much, and I

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:15.400
<v Speaker 1>think he finally realizes he Eric, we gotta run. Unfortunately,

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>got to get you back. Eric Clark, portfolio manager at

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Rational Dynamic Brands Fund. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week.

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com.

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:27.360
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, or watch us live on

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:33.200
<v Speaker 1>YouTube and now also on Bloomberg Quick Take