WEBVTT - The WikiLeaks Story

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Get in touch with technology with text Stuff from half

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff Brooks dot com. Hayley, and welcome to text Us.

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jonathan Strickland and I'm Lauren Day. We want to

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:21.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about a very controversial subject. It's actually one that

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>we have covered on tech Stuff before, at least to

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>some extent. Chris and I talked about this a little

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>bit in previous episodes. We're talking about wiki leaks. So

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>before we even get into wiki leaks, we do have

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to say this is an incredibly emotionally charged subject with

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 1>lots of political players, right, and Jonathan and I are

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>going to eight we you know, if you've listened to

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the show, you probably know a little bit about a

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:49.279
<v Speaker 1>personal politics. We're going to be really careful with this

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>one to to report the facts as they are and

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>not slam our foreheads into the microphone. Um. Also, real quick,

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>before we get into this, I do want to give

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a brief trigger warning. It's it's a light trigger warning, really. UM.

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Juliana Sang being Um, one of the so called founders

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:06.479
<v Speaker 1>of wiki leaks, has been brought up on some rape

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:10.479
<v Speaker 1>charges and so there will be a non graphic discussion

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 1>of that later on in the podcast. Um, if that

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 1>is the kind of thing that you would rather avoid hearing,

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>than perhaps you would like to uh skip the rest

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of this episode now spoiler alert. Both Lauren and myself

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and and with our particular political views, feel that no

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>one in this story really comes out being a complete hero.

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>It's it's it's just it's humans being humans, which means

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>it's complex. It's it's complex and gets kind of messy. Yeah,

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:39.119
<v Speaker 1>so we're gonna get messy. But before we get messy,

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>let's just clear things up a little bit. Let's talk

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>about what wiki leaks is. Now. First of all, the

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 1>name wiki gives you this sense that it has this

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of collaborative, open structure that allows people to come

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>in and add things and tweak things. Not so much.

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>They tried that early on in the timeline of wiki leaks,

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>but eventually moved away from it. The name has stuck, however, right,

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and I think that I think that really what they

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>wanted to do was, um, it was used, was used

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that that easy reading format of wikis without you know,

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and then they decided to really close down the part

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>where hey, anyone can edit it, because that's bad times right,

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>right when you're talking about what it is WikiLeaks is

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to do and uh and be yes, the sourcing

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of information in order to remain um anonymous and pertinent. Yeah. Yeah,

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:31.079
<v Speaker 1>these are all things that make it. You know, if

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you were to just open it up for what wiki

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>leaks does, it would just be a mess very quickly.

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>It also has created a lot of confusion among people

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 1>who are just casually following this or have just heard

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:43.679
<v Speaker 1>about it, who think that wiki leaks has some sort

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of connection to Wikipedia, which it does not know. The

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:49.799
<v Speaker 1>Wikipedia and wiki leaks are not at all related. So

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:53.519
<v Speaker 1>what is wiki leaks. Well, it's a not for profit organization,

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and the purpose of wiki leaks is to publish information

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 1>that would uh normally not be available to the public. Right,

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:07.359
<v Speaker 1>normally normally be the stuff that's either been classified or yeah,

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:09.359
<v Speaker 1>it could be trade secret stuff, it could be a

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>corporate uh communications that normally would not be available to

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>anyone outside a certain group of people within that corporation. Really,

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>it's any information that would be of public interest but

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>is not publicly available. And in fact, WikiLeaks go so

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 1>far as to say that the organization does not want

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:34.079
<v Speaker 1>anything that's been published elsewhere. That's not the purpose for WikiLeaks.

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>They also make pains to say that they do not

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>solicit any kind of information or files. They accept it,

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>but they don't solicit, which is an important distinction they

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>have to make so that they can, yeah, because otherwise

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>they could start getting charges about being a spy or

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>or trying to bribe officials or people in who have

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>access to to classified information too then share it. If

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>they merely accepted donations of information, that absolves them of

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>of some of that responsibility kind of technically, yeah, and

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>just at least prints a better picture of them, right

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>as far as it makes it more difficult to make

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>a case against them, doesn't necessarily mean that a case

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:23.479
<v Speaker 1>would not be made against them and it wouldn't be successful.

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:26.599
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, we're kind of getting ahead of ourselves now. Um.

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>According to Columbia University's Journalism School, I read this, there

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>was a very long article about wiki leaks and it's

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>association with the Guardian newspaper, a newspaper in the UK,

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:46.279
<v Speaker 1>and uh, in fact, there was quite a strong relationship

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>between the two for a while until an event that

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>we will discuss later. Yeah, yeah, that will come important later.

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>But according to that particular article, it said that Julian Assange,

0:04:57.120 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>who is often referred to as a founder, found or

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>or at the very least the spokesperson for wiki leaks,

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 1>he's certainly the most identifiable personality associated with yeah figurehead,

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>if if nothing else. Yeah, Yeah, and that gets complicated too,

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and we'll explain that in a bit. But according to

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>this article, he registered the domain name back in nine However,

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>every other source I could find six was the earliest

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>that it was actually UM registered. This is another part

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 1>that makes talking about wiki leaks challenging, in that there's

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of misinformation about the site itself, not just

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 1>about all the shenanigans that went on both within wiki

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:46.359
<v Speaker 1>leaks and surrounding Wiki leaks, but just when it really

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:49.720
<v Speaker 1>got started. Right, And part of the problem we should

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>mention now is that a lot of the information out

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>there about wiki leaks comes from either Juliana Sounds himself

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 1>or um other other personalities that have been involved with

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the organization and have left it violently and bitterly. Yeah,

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and so so all of all of this is uh

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily it's difficult to track down the exact truth. Yeah,

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:12.599
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of subjectivity here. I mean, everyone involved

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:16.159
<v Speaker 1>has their own agenda and uh, and that doesn't that

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't necessarily align with the organization stated mission. Right, So

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 1>this is this is what makes this complicated. Now what

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>is that stated mission? Well, the whole idea here is

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 1>that what wiki leaks is trying to do is make

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 1>available information that the public that that that you know,

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:34.919
<v Speaker 1>the organization feels the public should have access to but

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>otherwise would not because of the secrecy of either governmental

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>or corporate organizations or even just other organizations in general,

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and that it's an attempt to make these organizations more transparent. Right.

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:52.919
<v Speaker 1>They cite the Universal Declaration of Human Rights UM, in

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>particular Article nineteen UM, which which just says that that

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>everyone has the right to freedom, freedom of opinion and

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>expression right and that they should be able to pursue

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>information regardless of frontiers, Which is kind of like saying,

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, a person in in say, China, who

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>otherwise might not have access to certain information completely has

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the universal right to that, even if the Chinese government

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>says they don't. So in other words, it's kind of

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>this idea that everyone has this right regardless of what

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>your government says. This is the United Nations that has

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. And it's not like

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 1>this is somehow legally binding for all. It's a very

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>nice idea. Yeah, it's it's an ideal, right, It's not

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 1>so much legal wording. It's it's saying, ideally, we would

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>say all people have the right to these expectations, and

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>one of them would be this right to freedom of expression. Now,

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 1>depending on where you are in the world, your right

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to freedom of expression maybe fairly generous or it might

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>be really restrictive. In the United States, we like to

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>think that we have the freedom of speech, but there

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>are certain limitations. I mean, obviously, if you are using

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that freedom of speech to inflict harm upon someone and

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>it is completely unjustified, and you know, you could be

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>taken to court for things things like lives, um. You know,

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the whole there's the whole argument about you can't yell

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>fire in a crowded theater because it could cause people

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>your your right or freedom of expression does not override

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>someone else's right to safe safety right or at least

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the expectation of safety. Um. And so there are a

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of complications here. But even in the United States,

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's fairly wide open people will argue as

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to how wide open it is because of their own

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>personal views. If you go to someplace like the United Kingdom,

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>there rights of free speech are are more narrow. There

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:55.559
<v Speaker 1>are very specific laws that prevent newspapers, for example, from

0:08:55.640 --> 0:09:01.839
<v Speaker 1>violating secrecy agreements. So something The Guardian had to make

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>some really tough decisions when they got information from Wiki

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>leaks onto whether or not to publish it, because it

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>could result in some injunctions from the government, So that

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>gets really complex as well. Anyway, Wiki Leaks essentially says

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>we don't subscribe to any of these regional concepts. We

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to this universal concept and that's what it's all about.

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>And so they try to provide the material that journalists

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>can use to tell the stories that otherwise would be untold.

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Right um Assan Assam said in one interview with Time

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Um that this organization practices civil obedience. It tries to

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>make the world more civil and act against abusive organizations

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>that are pushing it in the opposite direction. So it's

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:51.319
<v Speaker 1>kind of funny to call it civil obedience considering that, uh,

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>you know that they are directly disobeying. Yes, they're being

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>disobedient by by very nature. But it's it's all an

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>argument about who has the power responsibility if you have

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of you know, as as Uncle Ben would say,

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>with great power becomes great responsibility. Now that's that's one

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of those little cliche sayings, but there is truth to that.

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>It's very true that if you are a governmental agency

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 1>or a corporation that has a lot of power, then

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>there is a certain expectation that you will use that

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>power in a responsible way and not do it in

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>such a way that you are going to violate people's rights, right.

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>You know. At the same time, frequently information is withheld

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 1>by by governments, in particular because because of of of

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>measures of national security, because they're trying to protect um,

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, either their their military interests or their scientific interests,

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>or or you know, the people and the research that

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>go into making that country a safe place to be. Right.

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>So there is a very delicate balance here, right. I mean,

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you could argue that there are there's certain information that's

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>out there that it's good that it's secret, because that

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>means that the people who are doing valuable work, and

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 1>it may be valuable work that in no way is

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>violent towards any other person it may be completely humanitarian

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>work that their lives could be in jeopardy if the

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>information were made public, and that is something that you know,

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>needs to be taken into consideration. Now, the what Wicked

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Leaks would say is, on the other hand, you also

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>have these instances where UH agencies or the military or

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a corporation are behaving in an unethical or corrupt or

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>illegal manner, and without this information becoming public, they can

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>never be held accountable for that. And so if they

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, this transparency gives accountability to those agencies. And

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>in fact, they go so far as to say it's

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the media's role to to reveal this kind of information

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to the public, to to make the public informed enough

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to be good citizens, right, because this is that that

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:56.200
<v Speaker 1>big relationship. You know, we often think of the government

0:11:56.200 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>as being this kind of separate entity. That is, in

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 1>some cases we think of as sort of that big

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 1>brother Orwellian idea of this this other that dictates what

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>we do. But in reality, at least in in you

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 1>can argue to watch right. You know, they're definitely fringe

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>theories about how much your your average citizen does or

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have power over over these things. But but but

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>saying that, you know, if we take democracy in the

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>United States for what it's supposed to be, if we

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>assume that that in fact is the case, then what

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Wiki Leak's role is to tell the public, Hey, this

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>is what your officials are up to, and if you

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>don't approve of that, you need to be aware of

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>it so that you can the next time voting comes

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>around behave in a way that that allows you to

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>get the right people in charge, assuming of course that

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the right people are the ones who are running for office.

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 1>That's that's a different political discussion. That's the whole other,

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 1>whole other cannon worms. I'm honestly, I'm I'm probably coming

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 1>across is really cynical. I'm actually not at cynical. I'm

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>just aware of a lot of cynicism. So it's one

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of those things where you kind of dance around it anyway. Well, yeah,

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the thing is that I read one

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>thing about how the US Information Security Oversight Office reported

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that um the number of new secrets designated as such

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>by the government rose from two tho nine and so

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 1>so partially what this has to do with is the

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 1>way that governments are processing information and UM and releasing

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>it to the public right and and to be fair,

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the Obama administration in the United States specifically

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:41.679
<v Speaker 1>said that one of its cornerstones was going to be transparency.

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>And so in a way, you can think of the

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 1>media in general and wiki leaks in particular in this case,

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to hold them accountable for that claim, saying you

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>said you're going to be transparent. Here are all these

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>things that have not been reported. What is your stance

0:13:56.280 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>on this? And so, I mean, you know, I can't

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 1>disagree with that motivation. I think that that's very important.

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that any nation where you have a free press,

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that presses job to keep an eye and make sure

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>that things are not being uh, that people are not

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 1>behaving in an unethical manner or taking advantage of a situation,

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and if they are, that that's reported. I think that's

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>very important. It's a key role in journalism, and it's

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>something that some people would say has really been slipping

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>from journalism over the last couple of decades. Again, I'm

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>not a journalists, so I'm not going to comment on that. Well,

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that's that's another you know, there's also a lot of

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>ideas about out there about how entertainment based the journalism

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>industry is these days. Yes, yeah, the whole idea of

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>of the the commercialization of journalism. Uh well, anyway, Wiki

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>leaks does have some policies that try to guide the

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 1>organization and how it behaves. One of those is that

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>that they do sometimes delay or remove some details in

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>stories in order to protect people from immediate harm, especially

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>either current victims of of harm somewhere or the whistleblowers

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>who are reporting this information right. And then on top

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>of that, they also try to make sure that every

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>single leaked report that they receive, which by the way,

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 1>they they've set up an electronic dropbox, that's their preferred

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>method of receiving information is electronically, and that this dropbox

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 1>is encrypted so that again in theory, you wouldn't be

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>able to trace the origin of that other than being

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>able to see that this is original source material, but

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not tied to any particular person. So the electronic

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>dropbox is supposed to be a secure way of getting

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>files two Wiki leaks, and they have said that they

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>would also receive files or or documents in other forms

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 1>like including through the mail, but they prefer not to

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>because that kind of stuff can be intercepted in securities

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and questions, Sharon, and also also if they have a

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 1>physical mailing add dress, that makes it more difficult for

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>them to uh avoid entanglements, all right. So anyway, they

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 1>they do refer to their electronic drop box as being

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the preferred method, and they say that everything they get

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>they use traditional investigative journalism techniques as well as more

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>modern technology based methods to verify that that information is

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>in fact accurate and true, and that it really is

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>from a verifiable source, right, that the documents are actually

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>from wherever the person the anonymous source says they're from.

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>So if an anonymous source drops off a enormous file

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that is supposed to contain all these documents from the

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Department of Justice in the United States, for example, they

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>would go through and try to verify that those were

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 1>in fact d o J documents and not just someone

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>using some logos or whatever to fabricate something. Right. This

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 1>is through a largely volunteer based system, they've They've reported

0:16:57.560 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and again you know, these members are kind of whibbly wobbly,

0:16:59.880 --> 0:17:04.440
<v Speaker 1>but um they reported having up to eight hundred volunteer members,

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:08.440
<v Speaker 1>mostly mostly journalists. I think helping helping them out with

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>stuff like this, right, and some of those volunteers have

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:14.199
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stuff to say about wiki leaks, but

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>again we'll cover that probably in the second half. I

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>think of this of this episode. So they their policies

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:24.880
<v Speaker 1>to verify everything, to keep it secure, and then once

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 1>they verified it, the next step is deciding on when

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to publish this information. And wiki leaks has done uh well.

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>They've done their own journalism. They've had their own journalists right,

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 1>stories that were based off of the documents that they

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 1>had found. That I think you mentioned earlier that that

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>part of what wiki leaks holds very DearS that they

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 1>want to publish original material. They don't want to republish anything,

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and and that's and so yes, so um so actually

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>doing writing an investigation, it's a big part of that.

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 1>They also will partner with existing media outlets, although there's

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>been sort of a contentious relationship between wiki leaks and

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:09.680
<v Speaker 1>several high profile newspapers UH in multiple nations, and and

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:11.159
<v Speaker 1>part of that I think has to do with the

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 1>sana's personal handling of situations. But anyway, they they their

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>goal is to have stories written about the information they

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>have because It's kind of like if you were to

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>walk into a laboratory that's doing scientific experiments and you

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 1>see the experiment going on, but you can't really necessarily

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>make any meaningful conclusion based on that. You need to

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:36.119
<v Speaker 1>have the report written up where you can see what

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the actual methodology was, what the results were, and what

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the conclusions are. That's what is digestible to the average person.

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Same thing with these wiki leaks reports. It's usually the

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:52.680
<v Speaker 1>raw material is something that they hand over to journalists,

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and the journalists and up rutting the stories, and then

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the raw material is published along with the story, so

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:02.360
<v Speaker 1>that way transparency that they're really going for right that way,

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>so that you can check their sources exactly exactly. Like

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 1>if if Lauren reads the story and then you know,

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:11.160
<v Speaker 1>she reads one journalist's perspective on that story and they're

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the way that they have taken this information and then

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>communicated it, she can then go to the the source material,

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 1>read the source material and see if her own interpretation

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 1>of that source material is aligned with what the journalists said.

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Because remember, no matter what, we're all humans, so we

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 1>all view things through our own kind of lens in

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 1>the world, and we try and be as you know,

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:36.199
<v Speaker 1>a journalists try to be as objective as possible, at

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:40.919
<v Speaker 1>least most people call themselves journalists try that's the hypothetical ideal.

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah so, but it's it's you know, there's no way

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to ever truly attain that sure And and and in

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 1>some of these cases, they the Assange and and other

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>folks at wiki leaks have admitted to wanting to market

0:19:57.040 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>some of these bigger releases, uh, to to really get

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 1>things into the public eye. Right, I don't I haven't

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 1>personally read any any ill intent to change details, but

0:20:08.600 --> 0:20:11.440
<v Speaker 1>but just to bring the most important details to the forefront,

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 1>because they are a political organization, right and when you

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>look at it, you're you're talking about sometimes they're getting

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>files that are enormous, Like they're talking about pages and

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 1>pages and pages of documentation. It's like like over over

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 1>three hundred thousand documents and ago that that's you know,

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 1>obviously way too much for anyone to just wade through

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 1>beginning to end and find the nuggets that are meaningful,

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of this stuff has information that's not

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 1>really um, you know, important in the grand scheme of things.

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>It might have been important for a very specific purpose,

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 1>but you know, beyond that, it doesn't really matter so much.

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 1>So well, we'll mention a few examples of stuff like

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that a little bit later. Yeah, so they you know,

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:56.680
<v Speaker 1>this is this is their basic purpose and their basic approach.

0:20:57.600 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 1>To go into more detail, we'll have to kind of

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 1>look at the timeline and discuss what had happened throughout

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:06.199
<v Speaker 1>the history of wiki leaks, which course is still in

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 1>existence today. I don't mean to suggest that that history

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>is over, but it is. It is a continuing story.

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 1>But um, but most of the most of the action

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>within wiki leaks was going on around Yeah, that's when

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:23.119
<v Speaker 1>the big big stuff was going on, although it's played

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a part in other stories since then, and of course

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>before then too. But before we get into that discussion,

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:33.680
<v Speaker 1>let's take a quick break. Alright, so we've had an

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 1>overview of what wiki leaks is, what its purpose is,

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>what you know, role it's it's ideally would fill within

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the world of journalism and transparency and accountability. Let's talk

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about the timeline. So it was around

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:51.439
<v Speaker 1>two thousand six that wiki leaks began to coalesce, and

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 1>it was officially launched in two thousand seven. Right, either

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:57.880
<v Speaker 1>December two thousand six or early two thousand seven. Yeah,

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>it's right around then. The first public nations were coming

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 1>out in in December of two thousand and six, but

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>most folks just say that are the official launch where

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:11.400
<v Speaker 1>we've had a thing was in early two thousand seven, right,

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 1>And and I did want to mention that this is

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 1>coming on the heels of in two thousand five, the

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>commission that had been investigating the nine eleven terrorists attacks

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>here in the United States had found that that poor

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>information sharing was a huge failure of the government in

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the in the lead up to the attacks, of of

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of preventing this sort of thing from happening, and and

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:36.360
<v Speaker 1>that that had led to internally a lot of reorganization

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 1>of how information is shared in between different departments department. Yeah,

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:43.879
<v Speaker 1>this this is something that we see in all levels

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of organization where you have multiple departments and then the

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>communication between departments. Sometimes the communication within a department tends

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:55.119
<v Speaker 1>to get bogged down by red tape. And uh, you know,

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 1>you see this all the time. If you ever read

0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>any stories about UH police investigations that spanned multiple jurisdictions,

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that's always part of the story is how complicated it

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:11.399
<v Speaker 1>was to get the cooperation of one police office versus another,

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and if their federal UH investigators, then that adds another

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>layer of complexity. And and it was it wasn't until

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 1>around that time that UM, I think that a lot

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of agencies had been kind of resisting going digital just

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:25.640
<v Speaker 1>because of the ease of flow of information, which isn't

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>really considered a good thing when you're trying to keep

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 1>things secret. UM. And but but it was after after

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:33.360
<v Speaker 1>two five after that report from that commission, that things

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 1>started going going online. And the first story that wiki

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 1>leaks partnered with The Guardian on was for around August

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>thirty one, two thousand seven. It was a story about

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 1>the alleged corruption of Daniel A Rotmi, the former president

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>of Kenya, and it was a leaked report. The Kenyan

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 1>government had elected to keep this report secret, and UH

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 1>someone leaked the information to wiki leaks. Wiki leaks then

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:03.919
<v Speaker 1>approached The Guardian and the Guardian was very cautious about

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>this kind of relationship. It was one of those things

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:09.439
<v Speaker 1>where they saw the value in what WikiLeaks was doing.

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 1>WikiLeaks was setting itself up to be a completely independent

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>safe house of information leaked information. UH. The idea being

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that of course anyone who would submit to it would

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 1>remain anonymous, WikiLeaks would not point the finger at anybody,

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and that that information could then get to some sort

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:29.439
<v Speaker 1>of outlet that could communicate it to the wider world.

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>So this was the first attempt of The Guardian and

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>WikiLeaks to work together. From the story I read from

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 1>Columbia University, it really did sound like Julian Assange was

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a big part of this early early on, and that

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:47.679
<v Speaker 1>that was both a good thing in the early days

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and turned into a complicated thing as time went on. Um.

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 1>From what I understand, he can he can have an

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>effect on people, uh and make them feel like they're

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>not really being listened to. He's frequently described as being

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a very um dynamic personality. That's a very generous way

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 1>of putting it. Uh. Yeah, people who have taught to

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 1>him have had some pretty contentious things to say about him.

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I've never met the man, so I know nothing about

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>him personally, nor have I had any interactions with him,

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 1>But just going from what other people said, it seems

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:25.120
<v Speaker 1>like he seems he seems very intense. Yeah, he could

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>be a handful, yes, um Uh. This the WikiLeaks would

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:33.120
<v Speaker 1>later be presented with an award from Musty International um

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of the Kenyan folks who leaked this information.

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Um uh. Now that's one of the awards that Wiki

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:44.120
<v Speaker 1>leaks has won. Wiki Leaks, of course, you know, it's

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:47.879
<v Speaker 1>it is very controversial, but there are organizations that have

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 1>recognized its role in UH in uncovering corruption and even

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 1>going so far as to uh giving enough information so

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:03.359
<v Speaker 1>that authorities could end up pursuing and correcting problems. UM

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 1>or that people could end up going out and voting

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:10.360
<v Speaker 1>what would what some would call a corrupt administration out

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of power. This is, of course, you know, on a

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:16.479
<v Speaker 1>global scale, not not limited to just one country. Uh.

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 1>In February of two eight, a Wiki leaks report along

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 1>with The Guardian exposed a Swiss bank called Julius Bear

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 1>for money laundering uh and UH that ended up getting

0:26:30.280 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Wiki leaks hit with one of their first major lawsuits,

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:36.919
<v Speaker 1>which is not something unusual for the organization. They've been

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>hit with many of them. Right. Also in two eight,

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>they posted a bunch of scientologies secret membership manuals. Yeah. Uh.

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>And it's funny because there's there are some stories that

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:54.359
<v Speaker 1>talk about how Wiki leaks expected certain things to get

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot more attention than what they what it actually did,

0:26:57.200 --> 0:26:59.679
<v Speaker 1>and that these manuals were that was one of the

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:02.439
<v Speaker 1>things thought that a lot more attention would be devoted

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to the scientology manuals than what actually happened. And that's

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:09.479
<v Speaker 1>another reason why wiki leaks was looking to partner with

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 1>various newspapers around the world, because they were discovering that

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to direct people to wiki leaks to find out

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 1>about the information was tricky. Anyone who makes a website

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 1>learns pretty quickly it's hard to get folks to go

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to your website. It is folks need to want to

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:29.640
<v Speaker 1>go to your website, you can't really make them go.

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 1>So uh, you know, if WikiLeaks was going to fulfill

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 1>its mission and being this this uh depository of secret

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:41.360
<v Speaker 1>information that could then be used by journalists, they determined

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that they had to reach out to more journalists to

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 1>make that happen. Um, the next thing I have is

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 1>November two thousand nine. Do you have anything before that? Okay?

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 1>That's when they published a comprehensive list of text pager

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 1>messages that were sent during September eleventh, two thousand one,

0:27:56.560 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 1>which of course was the date of the terrorist attacks

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:02.119
<v Speaker 1>that that that ended thousands of lives here in the

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 1>United States. Um. And they were criticized for this because

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:10.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those text messages were just simple messages

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 1>from between family members or co workers to let people

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 1>know that they were all right, that they had um

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:21.919
<v Speaker 1>managed to to stay clear of the impact zones, that

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing, and that there was a real question

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:29.120
<v Speaker 1>of is this actually newsworthy? Is this is this valuable

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:32.639
<v Speaker 1>information to publish? Is this are is this getting a

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:37.680
<v Speaker 1>little too voyeuristic into the personal tragedies that happened during

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 1>this day? And and and there was a little bit

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 1>of a question um. And this ties back into the

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>scientology bit of of whether wiki leaks was was publishing

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 1>things to get attention and to be sensational um rather

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>mission right. Yeah, And that's that's played wiki leaks throughout

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 1>its history as well. Like the again, the goal that

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 1>it states seems very noble in the journalistic sense, but

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the behavior of at least some of the people in

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 1>wiki leagues may have been so is aligned quite with that.

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 1>It seemed it seemed like you said, a little more sensationalists,

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and that might not have ever been the intent of

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the people in wiki leaks. It just maybe the impression

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that everyone got from the way it was handled. Um. Now,

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 1>getting back in, one last little thing about these these

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 1>text pager messages, UM, was that Wiki leaks said their

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 1>response to the criticism of is this actually newsworthy? Their

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>response was, this helps create a more complete picture of

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>what happened on that day. And I'm not. I mean, yeah,

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 1>it's more complete. I just don't know that it's more relevant. Sure,

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 1>sure I could, I could. I could argue that one

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you know that that that could easily be argued either way.

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 1>But um, but yeah, I did want to mention also

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand nine, UM, that was the year that

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 1>President Obama signed the executive order requiring a whole bun

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of people who hold classified status here in the States

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>um to receive extra training on what actually needs classification

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and UM and also forced people who who are creating

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 1>these classified documents to identify themselves on those documents. And

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 1>again this is that this is that effort for official

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 1>transparency to say, you know, let's not just blanket whitewash

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:29.160
<v Speaker 1>everything is classified, because that just all that really does

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 1>is engender a spirit of distrust in the government to say,

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>like what, why are they hiding this? What else do

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 1>they have to hide? And uh, And of course, I

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 1>mean this is an ongoing story, stuff that we're finding

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:43.560
<v Speaker 1>out about now, about things like clandestine surveillance, which are

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>these are stories that are breaking as we are recording

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>this podcast in early June two thousand thirteen. There are

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 1>all these stories about the n s A and surveillance

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and cell phones and things like that. And some might

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 1>even argue that the things that happened with wiki leaks

0:30:57.280 --> 0:31:00.720
<v Speaker 1>are what kind of led to those policies, which is

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the antithesis of what they were supposed to be doing.

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:05.479
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that there's been a lot of

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 1>that actually from from I think a lot of governments

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>have kind of cracked down on openness in response to

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the sort of thing, yeah it's it's you know. And

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 1>some might argue they're cracking down on one side while

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>really doubling down on the shady stuff on the other side.

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 1>So it's almost like the Wookie defense. Hey it's Chewbacca.

0:31:24.600 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 1>So um, yeah, I mean, these is complicated issue. April

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that's when Assane goes to the National Press Club in

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 1>d C and shows a video of a two thousand

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 1>seven incident. Now this is the the most probably the

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 1>most notorious Wiki leaks release. Yeah, of I mean, there's

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of high profile ones, but this one

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 1>is like the defining one, I think. And this is

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>one that showed an incident in two thousand seven in

0:31:54.440 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 1>which UH two US Apache helicopter pilots allegedly executed UH

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 1>innocent people on the ground in Iraq, including to Reuter's correspondence.

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 1>The whole thing was caught on video, and Assange called

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 1>it collateral murder. That's what he named the video. And

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 1>again that seems very sensationalist. Now, at the same time,

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the video itself really did portray a horrific act. Yeah,

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and and I mean, and there's and there's full audio

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 1>in it, so there's this very chillingly calm discussion of

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 1>everything that they're doing and um and and yeah, it's

0:32:28.960 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 1>it's you. You can you can see. I think at

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>least eighteen people are killed during the course of the

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 1>y and two of them were Reuters reporters, right, right.

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:39.840
<v Speaker 1>This has been a project that had been going on

0:32:39.920 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 1>since March and had been they had received these files

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and UH kind of went into a frenzy of work

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 1>in Iceland putting them together. It was called Project B

0:32:51.200 --> 0:32:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and and they knew that it was big. Yeah, they

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:56.479
<v Speaker 1>knew it was big. And and again as Sange was

0:32:56.520 --> 0:33:00.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to find a way to get more visibile be

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 1>for wiki leaks. So part of that sensationalism was in

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 1>fact intended because it was meant to to get as

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 1>much press as possible. But also, I mean, you know,

0:33:09.680 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 1>it was an absolutely pressworthy release. Yes, I mean, you

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 1>know you can't Yeah, it was, I mean, I mean,

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I was a legitimate It was a completely legitimate story.

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 1>It was something that needed to be broken because it

0:33:20.960 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 1>was people needed to be held accountable. Although it should

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>be said that the military never did charge those helicopter

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:32.480
<v Speaker 1>pilots with anything illegal or the official statement was essentially

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that the people were in an area where there was

0:33:36.120 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a suspected um uh ambush that was going to attack

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 1>US forces and that the helicopter pilots acted responsibly. That's

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the official response. So anyway, definitely was newsworthy. Uh. Then again,

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 1>it was the handling of it that I think was sensational,

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 1>not the material itself, but that was again completely valid. Uh.

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:04.479
<v Speaker 1>On the Pentagon arrested US Army private Bradley Manning on

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:09.200
<v Speaker 1>charges of downloading and then leaking thousands of classified US documents,

0:34:09.239 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 1>including this video. And uh, that's sort of been the

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 1>The video and and the handling of Bradley Manning and

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:22.239
<v Speaker 1>and Bradley Manning's case have been this sort of defining

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 1>element to what Wiki leaks is and the way that

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 1>it's portrayed in general. I mean, this story is still

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 1>ongoing to this day, right, I believe that the trial

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:35.240
<v Speaker 1>for Manning is going on right now as we're recording

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:38.399
<v Speaker 1>this podcast. Yes, it is, although it apparently it's going

0:34:38.480 --> 0:34:41.360
<v Speaker 1>much more quickly than what they had originally planned. They

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 1>thought it was going to take It was gonna be

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a three month trial, but apparently there moving through witnesses

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 1>much more quickly than they had previously thought. And uh,

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and there were thousands of documents involved in this, not

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 1>just the video, right right. Uh. WikiLeaks ended up publishing

0:34:57.719 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 1>over two documents from Manning. He had downloaded all of

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:05.359
<v Speaker 1>these diplomatic cables while he was in an Iraq Army

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:09.880
<v Speaker 1>outpost between November two thousand nine in April um reportedly

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 1>having burned them to a c d R labeled Lady

0:35:12.000 --> 0:35:15.239
<v Speaker 1>Gaga and told a told a hacker friend that he

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 1>had them. The hacker turned him in, and apparently that

0:35:18.640 --> 0:35:23.600
<v Speaker 1>hacker has since felt a great deal of conflict about

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that act. UH. The charge, the main charge against Bradley

0:35:27.960 --> 0:35:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Manning is that he knowingly gave intelligence to the enemy

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:36.960
<v Speaker 1>through indirect means. And UH because before he was arrested

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and put on you know, put on trial, he had

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:43.239
<v Speaker 1>obviously leaked these documents to wiki leaks, right, and so

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:46.400
<v Speaker 1>in the trial I can say this because this was

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 1>reported very recently as of the recording of this podcast. UH.

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:54.520
<v Speaker 1>The defense called the senior intelligence or one senior intelligence

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:59.239
<v Speaker 1>analyst from Manning's unit. Her name is Casey Fulton, and

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Fulton's said that the unit received no specific warning about

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 1>sites visited by al Qaeda. She did say that al

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:08.439
<v Speaker 1>Qaeda would visit sites like Facebook or Google or even

0:36:08.440 --> 0:36:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Google Maps to gather information, but she did not mention

0:36:12.000 --> 0:36:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Wiki leaks among them. And the defenses case is saying that, UH,

0:36:15.880 --> 0:36:19.880
<v Speaker 1>that there was information went directly to right well that

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the al Qaeda was not using wiki leaks specifically together

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 1>information that that was not Manning's intent, and in fact,

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:28.719
<v Speaker 1>the judge in the case has said that the prosecution

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:31.880
<v Speaker 1>has to show that Manning had actual knowledge that he

0:36:32.040 --> 0:36:35.319
<v Speaker 1>was actually giving intelligence to the enemy through a third

0:36:35.320 --> 0:36:39.319
<v Speaker 1>party and intermediary or in some other indirect way, and

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 1>that the soldier must have had quote a general evil

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:46.240
<v Speaker 1>intent unquote, and to have known he was dealing directly

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:48.400
<v Speaker 1>or indirectly with an enemy of the United States in

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:52.239
<v Speaker 1>order for this particular charge to hold. Now keep in

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:55.799
<v Speaker 1>mind this one charge out of all the trial. So

0:36:56.160 --> 0:37:00.400
<v Speaker 1>but it sounds to me that it's a it's a

0:37:00.480 --> 0:37:04.160
<v Speaker 1>really tough case to make, you know, to prove the

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:08.279
<v Speaker 1>intent parts specifically, but improving intent is one of those

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:13.399
<v Speaker 1>things that's uh, basically impossible, but doesn't when people don't

0:37:13.520 --> 0:37:17.279
<v Speaker 1>do it or don't don't achieve it. Now to say

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 1>they also point out that this is a military trial.

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:22.360
<v Speaker 1>It's different from other trials in the United States. Typically

0:37:22.360 --> 0:37:24.840
<v Speaker 1>in the United States you have a trial with in

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 1>front of a jury of your peers. But in this case,

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 1>it is a judge that is overseeing the case and

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:34.000
<v Speaker 1>her word is final at least unless you go through

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:36.240
<v Speaker 1>an appeals process. But and you do not have exactly

0:37:36.280 --> 0:37:37.719
<v Speaker 1>the same the same rights to see what is a

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 1>normal citizen in a court of law. So getting back

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to two Wiki leaks back in UH July two thousand

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:48.239
<v Speaker 1>and ten, so so Bradley Manning had been arrested. By

0:37:48.239 --> 0:37:51.840
<v Speaker 1>this point, three news organizations released separate accounts of the

0:37:51.840 --> 0:37:55.760
<v Speaker 1>war logs gathered from Wiki Leaks regarding the war in Afghanistan.

0:37:56.280 --> 0:38:02.480
<v Speaker 1>And in August UH, that's when another big controversial event

0:38:02.560 --> 0:38:05.080
<v Speaker 1>in the history of Wiki leaks in general and Julian

0:38:05.120 --> 0:38:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Assange in particular happens. UH. Two former employees of Wiki

0:38:09.520 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 1>leaks filed rape charges against Julian Assange, and Assange has

0:38:13.239 --> 0:38:16.560
<v Speaker 1>essentially spent the rest of his life from that point

0:38:16.800 --> 0:38:20.719
<v Speaker 1>evading any extradition to Sweden to stand trial for this.

0:38:20.840 --> 0:38:23.239
<v Speaker 1>All right, right, these charges were brought up in Sweden. UM.

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:25.280
<v Speaker 1>The the two women who have brought up the charges,

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:28.400
<v Speaker 1>their names have not been revealed to the press. UM

0:38:28.440 --> 0:38:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and UH. In Sweden there are laws about using using condoms.

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:33.440
<v Speaker 1>If partner tells you to use one and you do not,

0:38:34.200 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 1>then you can be brought up on what is called

0:38:37.160 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a rape charge and and the technical definition I shall

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:45.239
<v Speaker 1>leave up to other political parties. Yeah. At any rate,

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:50.160
<v Speaker 1>he has been fighting extradition since then, and at this

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:55.640
<v Speaker 1>point he's actually um been a granted asylum from by Ecuador.

0:38:55.719 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Ecuador has granted asanjea sailing. I'll tell him more about

0:38:58.560 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 1>that when we get a little further down. Yeah, that

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:04.320
<v Speaker 1>whole the whole drama is a story and of itself.

0:39:04.600 --> 0:39:07.000
<v Speaker 1>But because again it's so hard to get to the

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:09.720
<v Speaker 1>truth of the matter, there's just we actually talked about

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 1>doing an episode just about Julian Sange, but instead of

0:39:12.719 --> 0:39:15.200
<v Speaker 1>about wiki leaks. But the more we looked into it,

0:39:15.239 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the more we realize that this there's no way to

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:22.600
<v Speaker 1>verify half the information that's out there, right, you know,

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 1>as as I said at the beginning of the episode,

0:39:25.080 --> 0:39:27.919
<v Speaker 1>all of the information about Julian Assange comes from either

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Assange himself UM or from very close personal ex compatriots

0:39:34.400 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 1>who are pretty angry at him. Right, So there are

0:39:36.640 --> 0:39:39.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of biases, and neither of those sources are

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:45.919
<v Speaker 1>really necessarily reliable. So the UH in July you had

0:39:45.920 --> 0:39:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the UH, the the Afghanistan reports released. Now that was

0:39:50.160 --> 0:39:53.839
<v Speaker 1>one third of three big blocks of information that we're

0:39:53.840 --> 0:39:57.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be released UH that year. The other two

0:39:57.880 --> 0:40:01.839
<v Speaker 1>were about the ira Key War, which that information came

0:40:01.840 --> 0:40:06.920
<v Speaker 1>out in October, and then there was a huge block

0:40:07.040 --> 0:40:11.360
<v Speaker 1>of classified US diplomatic cables, and a cable is essentially

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:14.760
<v Speaker 1>a message, So these were all these thousands and thousands

0:40:14.800 --> 0:40:17.719
<v Speaker 1>of diplomatic messages that came out in November twenty ten.

0:40:17.840 --> 0:40:22.759
<v Speaker 1>That was the trifecta of big, big bombshell releases that

0:40:22.800 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 1>came out in twenty that really established what wiki leaks

0:40:25.600 --> 0:40:27.560
<v Speaker 1>was all about. I think I think there's in November

0:40:27.600 --> 0:40:30.880
<v Speaker 1>where the ones are specifically from Manning. Yeah, yeah, and

0:40:30.920 --> 0:40:34.680
<v Speaker 1>then in September twenty a little bit earlier, that's when

0:40:34.840 --> 0:40:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Daniel dom Scheideberg left Wiki leaks, right, that's when he walked.

0:40:39.000 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 1>He had joined in two thousand eight and had become

0:40:41.640 --> 0:40:44.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of Asannge's right hand man. Yeah, he was kind of.

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:47.920
<v Speaker 1>He was specifically a spokesperson four Wiki Leaks in Europe,

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 1>mainly in Germany, and he had a major falling out

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:55.680
<v Speaker 1>with a Sange to the point where it went from

0:40:55.840 --> 0:40:58.840
<v Speaker 1>he and Assange sharing the same ideals to both of

0:40:58.880 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 1>them demonizing one another whenever they had the opportunity to

0:41:01.680 --> 0:41:03.920
<v Speaker 1>speak to the media. And they were roommates somewhere in

0:41:03.960 --> 0:41:06.960
<v Speaker 1>between there. So this is like talking about that band

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you used to love and then they broke up, and

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 1>now no one has anything good to say about each other,

0:41:10.960 --> 0:41:14.920
<v Speaker 1>multiplied by about a billion. Right later, later on, he

0:41:14.960 --> 0:41:18.200
<v Speaker 1>would publish a book called Inside wiki Leaks, My Time

0:41:18.239 --> 0:41:21.359
<v Speaker 1>with Julian Assange at the World's Most Dangerous Website. Yeah,

0:41:21.360 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 1>he was not particularly complementary of Osange in that book

0:41:25.040 --> 0:41:28.000
<v Speaker 1>or in any of his interviews. He left to try,

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and his goal was to found a competing leak site.

0:41:32.600 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 1>He felt that wiki leaks had lost sight of its ideals,

0:41:35.719 --> 0:41:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that it was not following, it was not behaving in

0:41:37.680 --> 0:41:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a way that again was aligned with its ideals. Perhaps

0:41:40.360 --> 0:41:43.480
<v Speaker 1>he felt that it was more sensationalized, the kind of

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:46.560
<v Speaker 1>way that we've been talking about. How you know, that's

0:41:46.560 --> 0:41:51.920
<v Speaker 1>always been my personal impression, But again that's a personal impression. Um.

0:41:52.040 --> 0:41:54.800
<v Speaker 1>So he wanted to found a company called open leaks

0:41:55.480 --> 0:41:58.799
<v Speaker 1>that would be essentially a competitor to wiki leaks. Uh,

0:41:58.840 --> 0:42:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and he wanted it to be more transparent than wiki

0:42:02.160 --> 0:42:05.239
<v Speaker 1>leaks was. So he didn't want to have these kind

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 1>of deals with various news organizations where it was almost exclusive,

0:42:10.760 --> 0:42:12.719
<v Speaker 1>like a partnership saying Hey, I'm going to give you

0:42:12.760 --> 0:42:14.920
<v Speaker 1>this information and then you can run it, and you know,

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:17.879
<v Speaker 1>we'll we'll have this buddy buddy relationship. Just link back

0:42:17.920 --> 0:42:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to my site. Make sure you do that. If you

0:42:19.560 --> 0:42:22.360
<v Speaker 1>link back to my site, we're all good. He didn't

0:42:22.360 --> 0:42:26.040
<v Speaker 1>want to do any of that, but eventually he ended

0:42:26.080 --> 0:42:29.600
<v Speaker 1>up changing his tune for open leaks because it just

0:42:29.640 --> 0:42:34.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't go well. Part of it was that when he left,

0:42:34.080 --> 0:42:36.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the things he did was he copied about

0:42:36.920 --> 0:42:40.360
<v Speaker 1>thirty five hundred files and then deleted them from wiki

0:42:40.400 --> 0:42:46.120
<v Speaker 1>leaks's database, and he left with those files. Depending upon

0:42:46.120 --> 0:42:49.799
<v Speaker 1>whom you ask, he was either trying to partially sabotage

0:42:49.840 --> 0:42:53.720
<v Speaker 1>wiki leaks and establish open leaks by getting a jump

0:42:53.760 --> 0:42:58.520
<v Speaker 1>start with these files, or from his point of view,

0:42:58.840 --> 0:43:01.720
<v Speaker 1>he felt that what wiki weeks was doing was irresponsible

0:43:01.760 --> 0:43:05.279
<v Speaker 1>and endangering the information that was within these thirty files,

0:43:05.320 --> 0:43:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and he was only copying it so that that information

0:43:07.920 --> 0:43:11.080
<v Speaker 1>would remain safe until such time that he could return

0:43:11.200 --> 0:43:14.359
<v Speaker 1>those files to wiki leaks. This is why this gets

0:43:14.360 --> 0:43:17.160
<v Speaker 1>really complicated, because people get you know, they get a

0:43:17.160 --> 0:43:20.120
<v Speaker 1>little irritated at each other and then they act out

0:43:20.120 --> 0:43:23.520
<v Speaker 1>a bit. So um Anyway, open leaks never really took off.

0:43:23.560 --> 0:43:27.040
<v Speaker 1>It ended up sort of transforming into more of a

0:43:27.160 --> 0:43:30.239
<v Speaker 1>site that's designed to teach other people how to set

0:43:30.280 --> 0:43:34.759
<v Speaker 1>up sites that that can accept and publish leaked material.

0:43:35.400 --> 0:43:38.160
<v Speaker 1>So it really did change quite a bit. So then

0:43:38.200 --> 0:43:41.160
<v Speaker 1>we had October and November where those other big releases

0:43:41.200 --> 0:43:43.840
<v Speaker 1>came out. In two thousand eleven, that's when wiki leaks

0:43:43.880 --> 0:43:47.520
<v Speaker 1>was hit by a pretty hard blow, and it didn't

0:43:47.600 --> 0:43:51.400
<v Speaker 1>have anything to do with a lawsuit. This was a blockade,

0:43:51.760 --> 0:43:57.480
<v Speaker 1>a financial blockade. This was when several major financial companies,

0:43:58.120 --> 0:44:03.640
<v Speaker 1>banks and credit card companies all decided to end any

0:44:03.680 --> 0:44:08.400
<v Speaker 1>transfer of funds towards Wiki leaks. Wiki leaks existed solely

0:44:08.480 --> 0:44:13.480
<v Speaker 1>upon uh submissions of of monetary donations to the site.

0:44:13.560 --> 0:44:15.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, people were donating money in order for wiki

0:44:15.960 --> 0:44:19.360
<v Speaker 1>leaks to keep going. This was essentially all those methods

0:44:19.360 --> 0:44:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of transmission saying we are no longer allowing payments to

0:44:22.680 --> 0:44:25.280
<v Speaker 1>go to wiki leaks, So even if you want to donate,

0:44:25.680 --> 0:44:29.759
<v Speaker 1>there was no route for you to go right. Um.

0:44:30.560 --> 0:44:32.440
<v Speaker 1>It actually got to a point where Assange said that

0:44:32.520 --> 0:44:37.800
<v Speaker 1>wiki leaks had burned through of its assets UH and

0:44:37.800 --> 0:44:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and that it wasn't able to really regenerate them in

0:44:40.160 --> 0:44:43.640
<v Speaker 1>any meaningful way because this blockade was preventing payments to

0:44:43.640 --> 0:44:46.319
<v Speaker 1>go to wiki leaks. Absolutely, and this was also going

0:44:46.320 --> 0:44:48.799
<v Speaker 1>on at the same time that um or or a

0:44:48.800 --> 0:44:53.359
<v Speaker 1>little bit before this, UH servers had started withdrawing their

0:44:53.400 --> 0:44:58.879
<v Speaker 1>services from wiki leaks. Amazon dumped them, every DNS had

0:44:58.960 --> 0:45:02.040
<v Speaker 1>terminated their service, right it got to a point where

0:45:02.080 --> 0:45:04.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, you could still get there. It was you know,

0:45:04.760 --> 0:45:07.480
<v Speaker 1>they would have work around so that people could still

0:45:08.000 --> 0:45:11.400
<v Speaker 1>get to UH to wiki leaks, but it was a

0:45:11.480 --> 0:45:15.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of that that support was going away, and you know,

0:45:16.000 --> 0:45:19.120
<v Speaker 1>there were theories on all sides of this as well,

0:45:19.160 --> 0:45:22.040
<v Speaker 1>saying that was a conspiracy that these companies had been

0:45:22.040 --> 0:45:25.600
<v Speaker 1>pressured by various governments around the world to end any

0:45:25.680 --> 0:45:28.120
<v Speaker 1>support so that way wiki leaks would essentially kind of

0:45:28.840 --> 0:45:31.160
<v Speaker 1>starved to death, that no one would be able to

0:45:31.160 --> 0:45:33.600
<v Speaker 1>get there, that it would no one would be able

0:45:33.640 --> 0:45:35.719
<v Speaker 1>to financially support it, and that it would just go

0:45:35.840 --> 0:45:38.840
<v Speaker 1>away and then hey, no more problems with all this

0:45:38.920 --> 0:45:40.920
<v Speaker 1>leaked information because no one has any place for this

0:45:41.000 --> 0:45:45.239
<v Speaker 1>leaked information to go. So UH, whether or not that's

0:45:45.320 --> 0:45:47.319
<v Speaker 1>true or if it was just the company saying, you know,

0:45:47.440 --> 0:45:49.920
<v Speaker 1>this is something that is going to cause us problems

0:45:49.920 --> 0:45:51.279
<v Speaker 1>and we just don't want to be a part of it,

0:45:51.400 --> 0:45:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and they were independently coming to that decision. I don't know.

0:45:55.480 --> 0:45:57.399
<v Speaker 1>I guess if there was a leak about it, we'd

0:45:57.400 --> 0:46:00.000
<v Speaker 1>find out this was. This was also around the same

0:45:59.880 --> 0:46:03.160
<v Speaker 1>time that UM that they had published in September of two,

0:46:03.239 --> 0:46:07.799
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eleven, they had published over two cables that

0:46:08.160 --> 0:46:11.960
<v Speaker 1>did not contain redactions, which means that UM that the

0:46:12.160 --> 0:46:16.320
<v Speaker 1>sources of this information and in some places victims names

0:46:16.320 --> 0:46:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and etcetera, had not been blacked out. Yeah. In other words,

0:46:20.080 --> 0:46:24.240
<v Speaker 1>there were names of individuals within these cables that someone

0:46:24.280 --> 0:46:28.279
<v Speaker 1>who is reading over this could then target, either politically

0:46:28.480 --> 0:46:32.160
<v Speaker 1>or literally target these these folks that are mentioned in

0:46:32.200 --> 0:46:34.480
<v Speaker 1>these cables, And so there were there's a lot of

0:46:34.480 --> 0:46:37.719
<v Speaker 1>criticism leveled against Wiki leaks and against Assange, saying that

0:46:37.760 --> 0:46:41.960
<v Speaker 1>it was being irresponsible and endangering people's lives. Assange has

0:46:42.000 --> 0:46:46.799
<v Speaker 1>not been the most um compassionate person in regards to this.

0:46:46.920 --> 0:46:50.400
<v Speaker 1>He's often said that, uh, his goal is to save

0:46:50.520 --> 0:46:53.200
<v Speaker 1>innocent lives, but if it endangers a few people because

0:46:53.200 --> 0:46:56.200
<v Speaker 1>of the information that's revealed in these in these cables,

0:46:56.200 --> 0:47:00.359
<v Speaker 1>then that's you know, that's acceptable. I'm paraphrase thing that's

0:47:00.360 --> 0:47:02.759
<v Speaker 1>not exactly what he said. But it's it's more or

0:47:02.840 --> 0:47:06.360
<v Speaker 1>less the message that has been given collateral murder. Yeah,

0:47:06.560 --> 0:47:08.960
<v Speaker 1>it's yeah. That's the problem is that the Lauren seems

0:47:09.000 --> 0:47:11.839
<v Speaker 1>to feel that this might be a little touch hypocritical,

0:47:11.960 --> 0:47:16.960
<v Speaker 1>considering the uh, the criticisms that WikiLeaks has levied against UH,

0:47:17.200 --> 0:47:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, governments and corporations that WikiLeaks itself seems to

0:47:20.640 --> 0:47:23.800
<v Speaker 1>be engaging in the same sort of cavalier behavior towards

0:47:23.840 --> 0:47:26.520
<v Speaker 1>people's safety. And to be fair, it is absolutely not

0:47:26.600 --> 0:47:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a parallel to compare um, uh putting putting a source

0:47:30.960 --> 0:47:35.400
<v Speaker 1>in hypothetical danger of persecution versus and Apache pilot killing

0:47:35.400 --> 0:47:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a child in a car. That's that's different. Yeah, that's

0:47:38.719 --> 0:47:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the obviously very different things. But it does seem to

0:47:42.719 --> 0:47:45.000
<v Speaker 1>suggest that there's a little bit of hypocrisy going on.

0:47:45.480 --> 0:47:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't disagree with Lauren, is what I'm saying. UM.

0:47:48.480 --> 0:47:50.160
<v Speaker 1>But but but that's but but that is that is

0:47:50.160 --> 0:47:52.919
<v Speaker 1>my personal opinion and uh and I apologize a little

0:47:52.920 --> 0:47:55.919
<v Speaker 1>bit for injecting it. Um. This this move did did

0:47:55.960 --> 0:47:59.000
<v Speaker 1>create a great rift between WikiLeaks and UM. Several of

0:47:59.040 --> 0:48:02.359
<v Speaker 1>those newspapers or or reporting organizations that we had been

0:48:02.400 --> 0:48:05.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about them being in cahoots with earlier at The Guardian,

0:48:05.800 --> 0:48:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times, UM, a bunch of papers around

0:48:09.120 --> 0:48:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the world. Der Spiegel was another one. Yeah, it was

0:48:11.600 --> 0:48:16.040
<v Speaker 1>actually uh. And the way that Assange was handling the

0:48:16.120 --> 0:48:20.080
<v Speaker 1>relationship between wiki leaks and these news organizations was starting

0:48:20.080 --> 0:48:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to cheese them off. Like the Guardian had certain expectations,

0:48:25.440 --> 0:48:28.799
<v Speaker 1>The New York Times had certain expectations uh, And the

0:48:28.840 --> 0:48:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Guardian had felt that the New York Times was going

0:48:30.760 --> 0:48:33.080
<v Speaker 1>to be able to report on certain things which the

0:48:33.080 --> 0:48:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Guardian actually wanted to have happened, because again the Guardians

0:48:36.600 --> 0:48:39.279
<v Speaker 1>in the UK and the secrecy laws are such that

0:48:39.760 --> 0:48:42.279
<v Speaker 1>there were there were these partnerships between the Guardian and

0:48:42.360 --> 0:48:44.960
<v Speaker 1>New York Times where New York Times could publish some

0:48:45.040 --> 0:48:47.719
<v Speaker 1>stuff that would possibly get the Guardian into trouble but

0:48:47.760 --> 0:48:51.480
<v Speaker 1>would still benefit the Guardian in some way. So it

0:48:51.640 --> 0:48:54.359
<v Speaker 1>was this this kind of weird relationship that was going on.

0:48:54.440 --> 0:48:57.719
<v Speaker 1>But then Assange got essentially got ticked off at the

0:48:57.719 --> 0:48:59.879
<v Speaker 1>New York Times for the way that the New York

0:48:59.880 --> 0:49:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Time Times handled its information because one thing that the

0:49:02.080 --> 0:49:05.480
<v Speaker 1>New York Times would do is approached the government and say, hey,

0:49:05.840 --> 0:49:08.239
<v Speaker 1>we receive these cables and we plan on running with

0:49:08.239 --> 0:49:10.319
<v Speaker 1>a story, but we're letting you know ahead of time,

0:49:10.640 --> 0:49:13.279
<v Speaker 1>whereas in the UK that's generally not done. Generally in

0:49:13.280 --> 0:49:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the UK, they run the story. So that put pressure

0:49:16.760 --> 0:49:18.720
<v Speaker 1>on the Guardian. It also put pressure on a Sange.

0:49:18.719 --> 0:49:22.279
<v Speaker 1>And then Assange was apparently very much upset about this

0:49:22.320 --> 0:49:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and wanted to sever the relationship with the New York Times,

0:49:24.760 --> 0:49:26.600
<v Speaker 1>but the Guardians still wanted this relationship with the New

0:49:26.680 --> 0:49:29.560
<v Speaker 1>York Times. If this is starting to sound like the

0:49:29.640 --> 0:49:33.960
<v Speaker 1>relationships in middle school drama club, that's kind of what

0:49:34.040 --> 0:49:36.719
<v Speaker 1>it comes out to being, except the stakes are obviously

0:49:37.120 --> 0:49:42.359
<v Speaker 1>way higher. Absolutely, and uh yeah, they the newspapers five

0:49:42.440 --> 0:49:44.960
<v Speaker 1>five global newspapers found up putting out a joint statement

0:49:45.000 --> 0:49:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that said, um, we deplore the decision of Wiki Leaks

0:49:47.520 --> 0:49:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to publish the unredacted State Department cables, which may put

0:49:50.560 --> 0:49:53.480
<v Speaker 1>sources at risk. The decision to publish by Julian Assange

0:49:53.520 --> 0:49:56.080
<v Speaker 1>was his and his alone, right, yeah, because they all

0:49:56.120 --> 0:49:59.960
<v Speaker 1>had the policy of actually going through and very carefully

0:50:00.320 --> 0:50:05.799
<v Speaker 1>uh redacting any identifiable information to protect sources and to

0:50:05.800 --> 0:50:09.400
<v Speaker 1>protect people who could potentially become a victim of some agency.

0:50:10.040 --> 0:50:12.680
<v Speaker 1>And uh and you know that was an important part

0:50:12.800 --> 0:50:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of their process to the point where you had people

0:50:15.239 --> 0:50:19.680
<v Speaker 1>entire departments in charge of reviewing every single cable to

0:50:19.719 --> 0:50:22.520
<v Speaker 1>make certain that all the stuff they published was going

0:50:22.560 --> 0:50:25.560
<v Speaker 1>to be safe. And so for this move to happen

0:50:25.560 --> 0:50:27.759
<v Speaker 1>on Wiki leaks and meant that a lot of that

0:50:27.840 --> 0:50:31.960
<v Speaker 1>work was just nullified. And obviously that is a good

0:50:32.000 --> 0:50:36.440
<v Speaker 1>reason to become upset. Well. Once you get into about

0:50:36.560 --> 0:50:40.239
<v Speaker 1>May two thousand twelve, so Assange had been fighting extradition

0:50:41.480 --> 0:50:45.080
<v Speaker 1>attempts and he had been living in London while Sweden

0:50:45.200 --> 0:50:47.560
<v Speaker 1>authorities were trying to extradite into Sweden. He had he

0:50:47.600 --> 0:50:49.400
<v Speaker 1>had spent about a week in jail in December of

0:50:50.280 --> 0:50:53.880
<v Speaker 1>on on those um extradition charges. Yeah, and he had

0:50:54.040 --> 0:50:56.960
<v Speaker 1>been released on bail, been in and out of court

0:50:57.040 --> 0:51:02.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to appeal extradition, and by May two thousand twelve,

0:51:02.560 --> 0:51:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the British Supreme Court, it had gone all the way

0:51:05.000 --> 0:51:07.959
<v Speaker 1>up to the British Supreme Court said no, we're not

0:51:08.040 --> 0:51:10.239
<v Speaker 1>going to prevent your extradition. You are going to have

0:51:10.280 --> 0:51:12.719
<v Speaker 1>to go to Sweden to stand trial. That's when a

0:51:12.840 --> 0:51:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Sange then started to appeal to Ecuador the embassy in

0:51:16.880 --> 0:51:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the UK and actually saying will you grant me asylum.

0:51:20.480 --> 0:51:23.120
<v Speaker 1>And um, it was at a point where he was

0:51:23.280 --> 0:51:25.880
<v Speaker 1>in the he was staying in the embassy, he had

0:51:25.920 --> 0:51:29.719
<v Speaker 1>not officially been granted asylum by Ecuador, and then there

0:51:29.800 --> 0:51:33.359
<v Speaker 1>was going to be apparently a raid on the Ecuador

0:51:33.719 --> 0:51:35.960
<v Speaker 1>embassy in order to get a Sange out, and that's

0:51:35.960 --> 0:51:39.480
<v Speaker 1>when Ecuador said we're giving you asylum. So it's almost

0:51:39.880 --> 0:51:44.120
<v Speaker 1>it's possible that that that raid was the precipitating Yeah,

0:51:44.160 --> 0:51:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that was exactly the moment where the Ecuador said, you know,

0:51:46.600 --> 0:51:48.839
<v Speaker 1>we weren't going to but now we totally are because

0:51:48.840 --> 0:51:54.160
<v Speaker 1>now it's political. So still very complicated issue. Um, and

0:51:54.239 --> 0:51:57.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, guilt or innocence aside. It's it's one of

0:51:57.800 --> 0:52:02.480
<v Speaker 1>those stories that is really complicated and tough to to

0:52:02.600 --> 0:52:06.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of unwind and follow. So anyway, Wiki leaks is

0:52:06.080 --> 0:52:09.440
<v Speaker 1>still still a thing still around. It's still you know,

0:52:09.880 --> 0:52:14.720
<v Speaker 1>accepts leaked information. Uh. It has uncovered lots of stories,

0:52:14.760 --> 0:52:17.399
<v Speaker 1>not just with governments, but like we said, with corporations,

0:52:18.040 --> 0:52:21.520
<v Speaker 1>some of which have caused newspapers to get into trouble

0:52:21.560 --> 0:52:24.600
<v Speaker 1>for running the stories. Things like you know, major corporations

0:52:24.640 --> 0:52:28.359
<v Speaker 1>that may have fallen short on promises for doing things

0:52:28.360 --> 0:52:30.960
<v Speaker 1>like cleaning up a gasoline spill. There was a specific

0:52:30.960 --> 0:52:35.719
<v Speaker 1>example of that, UM, and it continues to fulfill that role.

0:52:35.840 --> 0:52:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Some argue that it's even possible that the whole Ossange

0:52:40.440 --> 0:52:44.800
<v Speaker 1>story could just be a smoke and mirrors for Wiki

0:52:44.840 --> 0:52:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Leaks to continue doing what it does without having to

0:52:47.080 --> 0:52:50.960
<v Speaker 1>worry about so much focus because there's this fall guy. Right. Yeah,

0:52:50.960 --> 0:52:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you've got this very flash bang kind of person over

0:52:53.120 --> 0:52:56.279
<v Speaker 1>here who's going like, look at me, extradition charges. Yeah,

0:52:56.719 --> 0:53:02.719
<v Speaker 1>and then they can continue doing their their political political work. Right. So, uh,

0:53:02.880 --> 0:53:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I doubt that anything is that planned out because life

0:53:07.440 --> 0:53:10.319
<v Speaker 1>is just complicated and messy and it's tough to ever

0:53:10.440 --> 0:53:14.600
<v Speaker 1>have a plan that, like James bondishes be very impressed.

0:53:14.920 --> 0:53:20.040
<v Speaker 1>But but you know it's possible. You know, if they

0:53:20.080 --> 0:53:23.200
<v Speaker 1>did do that, then it's it's the stuff of movie legend.

0:53:23.440 --> 0:53:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of movie legends, there is a film being made, well,

0:53:26.680 --> 0:53:29.359
<v Speaker 1>there's there. There are two films that that have been

0:53:29.760 --> 0:53:33.799
<v Speaker 1>UM in production recently. One is a documentary that was

0:53:34.520 --> 0:53:40.239
<v Speaker 1>just released I believe, um Alex Gibney's We Steal Secrets, right,

0:53:40.320 --> 0:53:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and that one focused both on a Sange and on

0:53:43.040 --> 0:53:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Manning and uh and sort of it was supposed to be,

0:53:47.560 --> 0:53:50.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, like a warts and all kind of portrayal,

0:53:50.400 --> 0:53:53.839
<v Speaker 1>and some people say that his portrayal of Assange does

0:53:53.960 --> 0:53:56.040
<v Speaker 1>give sort of a warts and all approach. In fact,

0:53:56.080 --> 0:53:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, Assange definitely did not make that

0:53:59.600 --> 0:54:04.040
<v Speaker 1>relationship shop a sweet one because apparently he demanded outright

0:54:04.600 --> 0:54:06.960
<v Speaker 1>that if Gibney where to talk to a Sane it

0:54:06.960 --> 0:54:10.560
<v Speaker 1>would cost him a million bucks, and the documentary filmmaker,

0:54:10.680 --> 0:54:12.760
<v Speaker 1>that's probably not the best way to win that person

0:54:12.840 --> 0:54:16.520
<v Speaker 1>over to your side. No, Yeah, Sane has come out

0:54:16.880 --> 0:54:21.120
<v Speaker 1>very vocally against this documentary, which is funny because people

0:54:21.239 --> 0:54:24.560
<v Speaker 1>other people have also on both sides, have come down

0:54:24.600 --> 0:54:27.440
<v Speaker 1>upon this documentary right and and some some people are

0:54:27.440 --> 0:54:30.840
<v Speaker 1>proponents of it. One uh four more Wiki Leaks employee

0:54:30.840 --> 0:54:35.440
<v Speaker 1>in particular, James ball Um reported reported it being a

0:54:35.560 --> 0:54:38.120
<v Speaker 1>very accurate portrayal, like to the point that it was

0:54:38.440 --> 0:54:41.279
<v Speaker 1>deja vu seeing the film. Now, there are some who

0:54:41.360 --> 0:54:47.399
<v Speaker 1>say that the Manning's portrayal was overly sympathetic. That they

0:54:47.480 --> 0:54:52.080
<v Speaker 1>do you know, it's hard to say that that it's

0:54:52.160 --> 0:54:55.919
<v Speaker 1>unjustified because you're talking about one person who may very

0:54:55.960 --> 0:54:58.799
<v Speaker 1>well have been acting in what he thought was the

0:54:58.920 --> 0:55:01.120
<v Speaker 1>right way to to exp supose what he saw as

0:55:01.200 --> 0:55:06.040
<v Speaker 1>unethical behavior and there's no you know, there's no official

0:55:06.040 --> 0:55:09.400
<v Speaker 1>way of doing it and any hope of it being addressed,

0:55:09.719 --> 0:55:11.719
<v Speaker 1>and so he went outside the system in order to

0:55:11.760 --> 0:55:14.400
<v Speaker 1>try and have this done. That's that's that's kind of

0:55:14.400 --> 0:55:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the story that's being told. There are other people who

0:55:16.719 --> 0:55:18.960
<v Speaker 1>say it's more complicated than that, and that you know,

0:55:19.000 --> 0:55:22.600
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't truly altruistic motivations that had him do what

0:55:22.640 --> 0:55:26.520
<v Speaker 1>he did. But again, that's a really complicated story. When

0:55:26.560 --> 0:55:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you're doing a documentary film, you have to simplify things

0:55:29.320 --> 0:55:34.319
<v Speaker 1>so that you can and so two hours long and not. Yeah,

0:55:34.440 --> 0:55:36.200
<v Speaker 1>So that was one of the criticisms I saw was

0:55:36.280 --> 0:55:39.759
<v Speaker 1>that it made uh Manning out to be more sympathetic

0:55:39.800 --> 0:55:43.719
<v Speaker 1>than than the person felt that he should be. Uh.

0:55:44.320 --> 0:55:47.399
<v Speaker 1>I think it's really hard to say that you can't

0:55:47.480 --> 0:55:50.000
<v Speaker 1>feel sympathy for someone who's being held for a military

0:55:50.040 --> 0:55:54.759
<v Speaker 1>trial that doesn't have the same same protections as a

0:55:54.800 --> 0:55:57.879
<v Speaker 1>criminal or civil case would in a normal court of law.

0:55:58.520 --> 0:56:03.839
<v Speaker 1>But you know, again, I don't know, so we don't

0:56:03.880 --> 0:56:06.680
<v Speaker 1>know the guy, don't know all the details. So uh,

0:56:06.840 --> 0:56:09.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, that will play out and the judge will

0:56:09.520 --> 0:56:12.480
<v Speaker 1>come to a decision. So the other one is, um,

0:56:12.760 --> 0:56:15.279
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a fictional film, or I mean fictional, it's

0:56:15.320 --> 0:56:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a biopic. Maybe Barnaby cumber bund in it benefitted cumber

0:56:22.920 --> 0:56:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Batch right right, I'm sorry, John Harrison? Is that John Harrison?

0:56:27.520 --> 0:56:30.640
<v Speaker 1>And um? This this film is called The fifthest Stage.

0:56:30.640 --> 0:56:33.960
<v Speaker 1>It's being directed by Bill Condon, UM and it is

0:56:34.080 --> 0:56:39.160
<v Speaker 1>slated to be released on October eleventh, um and uh.

0:56:39.520 --> 0:56:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Cumber Batch has said that Assange directly asked him to

0:56:42.680 --> 0:56:48.160
<v Speaker 1>not do the film, um, calling it a massive propaganda attack. Yeah,

0:56:48.480 --> 0:56:51.040
<v Speaker 1>then maybe it is. I haven't seen it. I don't know.

0:56:51.360 --> 0:56:54.200
<v Speaker 1>We'll have to wait yet. But if you want to

0:56:54.200 --> 0:56:58.840
<v Speaker 1>see some really cool pictures of Benedict cumber Batch looking

0:56:58.960 --> 0:57:03.960
<v Speaker 1>intense with Bleach with um, those are on the internet. Yeah,

0:57:04.000 --> 0:57:06.239
<v Speaker 1>it's uh. I remember seeing that for the first time.

0:57:06.239 --> 0:57:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking, what the what? Uh So anyway, Yeah, this

0:57:10.520 --> 0:57:12.799
<v Speaker 1>it's a complicated story Wiki leaks, you know. It's one

0:57:12.800 --> 0:57:14.640
<v Speaker 1>of those things we actually debated on whether or not

0:57:14.680 --> 0:57:16.360
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to do a full episode on it because

0:57:16.400 --> 0:57:19.120
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a tough topic. It's and it's got a

0:57:19.160 --> 0:57:22.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of controversial elements to it, but it's important. It's

0:57:22.320 --> 0:57:25.240
<v Speaker 1>definitely one of those things that has raised a lot

0:57:25.320 --> 0:57:32.320
<v Speaker 1>of questions about, you know, transparency, surveillance, expectations of privacy,

0:57:32.480 --> 0:57:35.120
<v Speaker 1>what is classified information, I mean, and the role the

0:57:35.200 --> 0:57:37.080
<v Speaker 1>role of the media and the role of the of

0:57:37.200 --> 0:57:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the government in reporting to citizens what's going on in

0:57:40.800 --> 0:57:43.880
<v Speaker 1>their world. Yeah, and the role of the Internet and

0:57:44.040 --> 0:57:47.160
<v Speaker 1>net neutrality. I mean, all of these things have been

0:57:47.200 --> 0:57:49.320
<v Speaker 1>tied up in this and if wiki leaks had not

0:57:49.440 --> 0:57:52.760
<v Speaker 1>been a thing, the conversation might be very, very different

0:57:52.760 --> 0:57:55.280
<v Speaker 1>in all of those arenas. So we felt that it

0:57:55.400 --> 0:57:58.000
<v Speaker 1>had to be something we would cover. So hopefully you

0:57:58.000 --> 0:58:02.240
<v Speaker 1>guys appreciated and and enjoyed this episode, even though it

0:58:02.320 --> 0:58:05.280
<v Speaker 1>was one of the probably darker ones that we've done recently.

0:58:06.080 --> 0:58:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you have any suggestions for future episodes of text Stuff,

0:58:09.200 --> 0:58:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Please get in touch with us and let us know.

0:58:11.400 --> 0:58:13.760
<v Speaker 1>You can send us an email that addresses tex Stuff

0:58:13.840 --> 0:58:16.600
<v Speaker 1>at Discovery dot com, or you can drop us a

0:58:16.640 --> 0:58:19.280
<v Speaker 1>line on Facebook or Twitter or handle There is tech

0:58:19.360 --> 0:58:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Stuff H. S. W. M. Laren and I will talk

0:58:21.480 --> 0:58:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to you again really soon for more on this and

0:58:30.280 --> 0:58:32.840
<v Speaker 1>thousands of other topics. Does it how staff works dot

0:58:32.840 --> 0:58:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Com