WEBVTT - Trump-Putin and Inflation Data

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple CarPlay or Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Kate Moore, CIO City Wealth this morning. Kate does your

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:34.560
<v Speaker 2>team of security and analyst at City Group, but claimed

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 2>we use them all the time, great, great benefit. Do

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 2>they have any framework of what September thirty earnings look like?

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 3>I think it's incredibly hard Tom right now to make

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 3>a call on what third border earnings are going to

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 3>look like, because, and this is a point I've been

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 3>making as we were even getting reporting during for second

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 3>quarterer season, is that there is a growing gap between

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 3>the winners and users where it's around CERAs round Ai.

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, no, igain to continue.

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:08.680
<v Speaker 2>I think this is, folks, the absolute heart of the matter,

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:13.119
<v Speaker 2>growing direct This is political economics with Kate Moore from Chicago.

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 2>The answer is, Kate Moore, it's a growing gap of America,

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 2>a growing gap of society and a growing gap of investment.

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Remember Tom, We've talked a lot about in the

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 3>past you know, K shaped economies, but I'm seeing a

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 3>very K shaped market at this point in terms of

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:33.039
<v Speaker 3>the fundamentals, particularly even as we get these trading rallies,

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:36.040
<v Speaker 3>whether it's around small caps or home builders or some

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 3>of the lower quality and more rate sensitive areas at

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 3>the market.

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:41.039
<v Speaker 6>And what I mean by the K shape is.

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:44.400
<v Speaker 3>That you're increasingly seeing companies that have the ability to

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 3>navigate policy changes and have the ability to navigate you know,

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 3>sort of weaker end demand in general, because we had

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 3>a slowing economic trend even before this policy introduction. And

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 3>those that are adopting AI and becoming more efficient and

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 3>really focusing on their productivity. And then those that are

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 3>kind of left behind, maybe they didn't have the cash

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 3>to make that investment, maybe they were you know, they

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 3>don't have the right people in place to make those

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 3>business decisions. But there is a real gap in each

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:15.519
<v Speaker 3>industry between the haves and have nots. In theory, this

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 3>should be a great environment for alpha seeking and active investors.

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:22.919
<v Speaker 7>So Kate, it seems if you look at the stock

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 7>markets making seemingly new highs every day, does that suggest

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 7>too that the markets said tariff risk is in the

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 7>rearview mirror. I mean, do you agree with that?

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So here's my problem.

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 3>I feel like the markets are overly complacent when it

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 3>comes to terror risks, and then you see these, you know,

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 3>knee jerk reactions to the PPI data yesterday and big

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 3>reversals from what had been a very kind of risk

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 3>on high beta move for the previous two weeks. I

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 3>think that, you know, there's a lot of room for

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 3>the market to quiet down. That's another way of saying

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 3>getting to the bottom end of its trading range. You know,

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 3>as some of this tariff data comes through, obviously we're

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:05.119
<v Speaker 3>going to be watching retail sales and a few quick

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 3>seconds here to get a sense for how consumers spared

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 3>over the course of July. I mean that that's going

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 3>to be important.

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 6>But more important than.

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 3>That is really what the trend is in terms of

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 3>prices and in margins, corporate margins over the next few quarters.

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:23.920
<v Speaker 7>How have earning has been so far, in your opinion,

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 7>looks pretty darning good for the second quarter, came in

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 7>better than expected it so it looks like Corporate America delivered.

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I thought the earning has looked pretty good.

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 3>The one thing I will say though, is some of

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 3>these aggregate numbers, whether it's on the sector level or

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 3>on the index level, do mask some of that discrepancy

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 3>or that you know, sort of K shaped experience underneath

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 3>the surface. But one thing I've always said is that

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 3>you don't want to bet against the resiliency of corporate America.

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 3>That the decision making to really kind of manage overall expenses,

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 3>to focus on the business lines that have the greatest

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 3>potential for growth, and to really kind of dial up

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 3>and dial down spending when economic conditions necessitated, you know,

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 3>should not be discounted. This flexibility from US companies, particularly

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 3>US listed companies, is so much greater than the rest

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 3>of the world, and it's a reason why I prefer

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 3>the USK over other regions for the most part.

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 4>Kate, up, we go in the equity market. We get

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 4>it right back in one minute. What's it mean?

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, the one thing I'm sort of focused

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 3>on as I'm looking at this data, it may have

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:29.720
<v Speaker 3>to remember that, like, while these were visions to June

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:32.160
<v Speaker 3>data are excellent, you know, it looks like there was

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 3>a significant amount of retail activity, that the retail sales

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:39.160
<v Speaker 3>data are nominal, So there's a chance that that's capturing

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 3>some of the increase in prices that we're starting to

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 3>see in other bits of economic data. So this is

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 3>not necessarily an indicative like a real acceleration in terms

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 3>of overall retail spending. And that's what I want to

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 3>dig into a little bit later this morning as we

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 3>get off right.

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the low point of your Sunday morning is you've

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 2>got to read Andrew Hollandhorst for three hours. What is

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 2>the city girl belief on the tariff pass through to

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 2>the consumer?

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 6>Well, the pass through.

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:12.840
<v Speaker 3>We were having a pretty robust debate across city on

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 3>what the pass through might be. And I think, as

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 3>we all know, they're the three buckets. You know, what

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 3>does a supplier do, what is the importer do, and

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 3>what you know kind of gets passed through to the consumer.

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 3>And it feels like it's a moving target, depending not

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 3>just on the industry and the commodity, but on the

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:32.719
<v Speaker 3>flexibility of that company and how sort.

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 6>Of captive their consumer base is.

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 3>I think we're going to see, you know, fewer companies

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 3>absorbing the costs, both on the supplier side and on

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 3>the importer side, and more costs passed through to the consumer.

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 5>We'll have to see m Thank you so much for

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:50.840
<v Speaker 5>learting me.

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 2>We'll let you get back to an incredibly busy morning

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:57.359
<v Speaker 2>at City Group Kate Moore driving all of Citygroup Wealth.

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 5>Thrilled to have her with us this morning. Stay with us.

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 5>More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple Karplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 2>We're to go sixty thousand feet right now. Peter's share

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 2>with us here on a Friday in the summer as

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 2>we reset for Q three. The end of Q three

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 2>and into Q four is where Peter the technology juggernaut

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 2>we're all living and experiencing. Do you assume that academy

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 2>securities that we're just going to have the haves get

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 2>heavier and the have nots get have not here I

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 2>mean a greater divide within society.

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 8>Unfortunately, you know, we keep looking at and I really

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:57.840
<v Speaker 8>am from a market standpoint, I really want to buy

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 8>the Russell two thousand right waiting for the opportunity where

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 8>the small caps and midcaps can outperform. And yet you

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 8>look at it, the story is really still is very

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:08.720
<v Speaker 8>AI driven. It's the spending on AI, it's the electricity

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 8>generation that needs to be done so that entire industry

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 8>is like doing extremely well.

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 5>That's where the growth is.

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 8>And away from that, I think the impact of tariffs

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 8>are impacting small and mid sized companies. Just feel there's

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 8>an overall weight on the economy from that.

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 2>But somebody live in three towns outside Cincinnati right now

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 2>and they're seeing, you know, the reds are going down

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 2>at Flames.

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 5>I mean, you know, this is not happening. What the

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 5>poets are doing.

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, somebody out of a job or a his daughters

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 2>out of a job outside Cincinnati.

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 5>They don't give a damn about AI. And to me,

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 5>it's just a further I mean, you're brilliant at this.

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 4>It's a further severance of society.

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 8>And you know, I think part of the reason I'm

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 8>slightly nervous, more maybe nervous than most guests about the

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 8>economy is I'm worried about the job situation. I'm particularly

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 8>worried about, you know, the recent college graduate situation right,

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 8>the unemployment rate seems to be fairly high. They're not

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 8>getting jobs. I look at law school applications, they're skyrocketing.

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 8>That to me is another sign that jobs are very tough,

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 8>especially for the college graduates. And those are the people

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 8>I think who currently are being displaced by AI. Right.

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 5>That's people are.

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 8>Comfortable kind of giving those sorts of assignments to AI,

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 8>and you know, they're not going to let big decisions

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 8>being made, but they're letting some of that work be done.

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 8>And I'm not sure what that does for that job

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 8>market opportunity. I'm not sure what that does for a

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 8>future where those people supposed to get those jobs that

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 8>lead them into management and things like that over time.

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 8>So some of this I think we're getting close probably

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 8>you know, six months a year away. There's going to

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 8>be a little bit of pushback on AI, the deployment

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 8>and you know, you keep looking at the cost of

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 8>electricity rising, that's going to be an issue.

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:38.680
<v Speaker 7>Inflation also an issue for these markets for this Futter reserve.

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 7>It got's inflation data this week. Uh, the brucer pricing

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:45.199
<v Speaker 7>next is yesterday, I think really got people's attention. What

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 7>did you make of that? And some of the cooler

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 7>CPI with data we got earlier.

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 5>You know, I always ignore a little bit PPI.

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 8>To me, that's always been kind of a tertiary data point,

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 8>and it's always hard to see that it actually ever

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 8>follows through into true inflation. So it was a bit disturbing,

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 8>but nothing you know, to alarm me. I still think

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 8>goods inflation is going to be there a little bit

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:04.599
<v Speaker 8>away from that, though, I think, if I'm right, in

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 8>the economy slowing, you've seen some pressure on services inflation,

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 8>and to be honest, even in CPI, which was somewhat cool,

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:12.559
<v Speaker 8>I think it's even overstated there because we continue to

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 8>use owner's equivalent.

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 5>Rent as the metric.

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 8>I'm not sure why we won't adopt Cleveland has a

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 8>real time you know, rentric metric, you know Zillow. And

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:23.079
<v Speaker 8>to me, the one thing this comes to back to

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 8>so much of our data. There is so much real time,

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 8>reasonably accurate information out there, and we still tend to

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 8>rely on surveys and these old methodologies. We have to

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:32.839
<v Speaker 8>revamp that. So I think CPI is overstated. So I

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:34.839
<v Speaker 8>think the FED will be in position to cut three

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 8>times this year because jobs are going to weaken enough,

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 8>and inflation is going to remain contained.

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 7>Given that backdrop, can this market expand out the breadth

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:48.439
<v Speaker 7>of this market here, which has been so concentrated, Yeah.

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 5>I think it can.

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 8>And to me, I think the real growth is going

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:53.079
<v Speaker 8>to have to come from what we've been calling national

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:55.559
<v Speaker 8>production for national security. And I think last time I

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 8>was on, we talked about the Department Defense made the

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 8>investment in MP. Now we're hearing potentially the government's going

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 8>to make an investment in Intel. And actually I've got

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 8>admit I'm an owner of Intel, so that's a full disclosure.

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 8>But on those things, I think, right this has to

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 8>come national production for national security, and this administration is

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 8>going to do it through investment. They're not just going

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:16.440
<v Speaker 8>to give subsidies. They're not because they want the American

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 8>citizen to benefit.

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 6>Can I ask a.

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Stupid question in our new capitalism, It's Friday stupid question, right?

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Why don't they make an investment in Microsoft?

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 5>Why buy a dog?

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 4>I mean, if the President Trump wants to attach himself

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 4>to our technological superiority.

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 8>By two percent of Microsoft, you know, And I think

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 8>what we're really looking I'll come back to national production

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 8>for national security. So I think someone in the administration

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 8>is taking time. What do we need to be producing

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.679
<v Speaker 8>here to be safe. It's going to include pharma, biochemical

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 8>or bio biotech, those sorts of industries. Look for investments

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 8>there because those are things we want to be producing

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 8>we need to do domestically. Chips is all over this, right,

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 8>and Intel's kind of the cheapest way to get involved

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 8>in it, like.

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 4>Tiss is in Norway.

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 2>I'll give you in Singapore the sovereign Wealth fun I mean,

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 2>I had an office once in Boston near the Kuwait Authority.

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:12.679
<v Speaker 4>Whatever, I'd get a sovereign wealth fund. That's not what

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 4>we're talking about, Peter, right.

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:16.599
<v Speaker 8>No, I think this is much more strategic, right. I

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 8>think again, the deals we are looking for rarerst critical minerals,

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:22.599
<v Speaker 8>the processing, refining, and I think this is meant to

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 8>boost things along.

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 5>It also ties in very nicely for.

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 8>These companies with the big beautiful bill where you get

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:30.839
<v Speaker 8>accelerated depreciation. So if you can get this influx of

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:33.959
<v Speaker 8>money and excitement because the US government's involved, presumably the

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 8>US governments can be buying from the They've got that

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 8>impetus to grow and build. And I think It's going

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 8>to be targeted though, around the industries that we are

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 8>behind and that we need to be doing domestically to

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:45.359
<v Speaker 8>compete with China economically.

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 7>Should investors, should the market be paying attention to what

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 7>happens today in Alaska?

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 5>I think a little bit.

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 8>In the end, I think all this probably leads to is,

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 8>you know, I think your prior guest is, you know,

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:59.839
<v Speaker 8>miss Baker did a great job discussing that normally, you know,

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 8>these presidents and leaders only meet when there's a deal

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:03.959
<v Speaker 8>already laid out.

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 5>You know, this could go any which way.

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 8>Our suspect at Academy security is what we suspect will

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 8>come out of this is a little bit of pushback

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:13.079
<v Speaker 8>on Putin and finally a little bit more of this

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 8>stick because if you think about in the last few weeks,

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 8>the President has talked a lot more about going after

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 8>the sanctions again, re upping them. They've pushed on India,

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 8>and they've also now find a way to get weapons

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:25.719
<v Speaker 8>to Ukraine that's palatable to this administration. Right, we sell

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 8>them to europeasses them Moudt Ukraine. This administration seems fine

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 8>with that. Phuda needs to feel the stick, I think

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 8>to really cave on anything.

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 4>I haven't seeing the new barons for tomorrow, Pierce sheer barons.

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 5>Let's pretend he's on page eleven.

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 4>Can you buy that Meg's seven and barons tomorrow.

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 8>I'm trying to not buy that. I'm trying to buy

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 8>the other things. I'm looking for, these new growth stories.

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 8>I think, you know electricity, and this is one of

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 8>my key things. I'm still you know, Tom, you might

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 8>be iilthy of this as yourself. Well, when I think energy,

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:54.959
<v Speaker 8>I used to think oil, right, energy and oil equated.

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 8>You know, It's how it's always been, can he It's

0:12:57.280 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 8>energy equals electricity. You look at things like China's doing

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 8>in terms of their nuclear power plants in the Saudia's

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:05.959
<v Speaker 8>on solar. I think we have a huge opportunity in

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 8>the electricity space and it's going to drive a lot

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 8>of production, and it's so necessary to keep the AI

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 8>game afloat.

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 4>Peter, in this room, when we think energy, we think uncrustables.

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 5>I did hear that the other day. It's better. Thank

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:23.719
<v Speaker 5>you for listening, Peter Share. We are thrilled to have

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:26.199
<v Speaker 5>Peter Share with us this morning. Thank you so much.

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 5>With academy, I'm security, Stay with us. More from Bloomberg

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:33.679
<v Speaker 5>Surveillance coming up after this.

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:51.559
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:53.199
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Akindi Krabo Retiker a right to the console on Foreign

0:13:56.600 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 2>Relations adjunct Senior fellow. We're thrilled she could catch up

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 2>with us on Trump Putin as well. Hiding within your

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 2>note and I think this is the embarrassing question. Does

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Putin want to cease fire?

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 9>I think that he absolutely does not want to cease fire.

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:17.199
<v Speaker 9>And I would say, you know, I think it's a

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 9>win for Putin to actually get this meeting in the

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 9>first place with President Trump in Alaska of all places.

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 9>But Putin thinks he's winning the war right now and

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 9>that time is on his side. So I don't think

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 9>he's altered any of his demands. I don't think he's

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 9>negotiating in good faith. And why would he declare that

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 9>he would have that he would support a ceasefire when

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 9>the only way that he will actually agree to that

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 9>is on terms that neither Ukraine nor Europeans would agree to.

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 7>So what is a quote unquote win for President Trump

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 7>here in this meeting in Alaska?

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 9>So I think a win would be I think what

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 9>President Trump is looking to do is to arrange that

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 9>second meeting with with Putin and with Zelenski, so that

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 9>trilateral meeting, which you know President Trump has said and

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 9>dangled that it could be as early as this weekend

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 9>and in Alaska.

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 7>But I do not think that.

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 9>I do not think that that the Ukrainians have high

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 9>hopes in that President Putin will actually agree to meet Zelenski.

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 6>He has not done so in the past.

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 7>What do we what do we know about the I

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 7>don't know the discussions that President Trump president Zelensky had

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 7>with European Union leaders earlier this week. Do we know

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 7>what was agreed upon there at all?

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 9>Well, you know, I think that the Europeans made very

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 9>clear what their you know, what their position is on

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 9>on on Ukraine and what Ukraine's physician is. I think

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 9>that they want the justin lasting peace, and they want

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 9>respect for international law and the principles of independence and sovereignty.

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 9>And this is one of the big sticking points a

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 9>Ukraine that can defend itself effectively. And one of the

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 9>key asks of President Putin is a demilitarized Ukraine. The

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 9>Ukraine has in the meantime been building up some really

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 9>both indigenous military capacity that is cutting edge.

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 6>It was the one of the key.

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 9>Pillars of the Soviet defense industrial economy, so they actually

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 9>have the expertise the capability. Having a militarized Ukraine is

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 9>really foundational for Ukraine to defend itself.

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 2>Explain the economic reality of the map, Heidi, which you

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 2>have memorized and Paul and I can't pronounce it, but

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 2>basically eastern Ukraine from the north, down to the south

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 2>and down to the Black Sea and of course down

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 2>below that crimea of a decade ago. What's the economic

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 2>advantage of mister Putin to own that territory.

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:08.119
<v Speaker 9>Well, I mean it's it's obviously resource rich, and I

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:14.400
<v Speaker 9>I believe not only not only is it a it's

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 9>a forward it's a forward base for additional expansion. I

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 9>don't think that that President Putin really has in the

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 9>next you know, in between now and when he leaves

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 9>the position as as President of Russia, that he is

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 9>going to stop the imperi the sort of expansion of

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 9>how he sees imperial Russia, and so I don't I

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:36.399
<v Speaker 9>don't believe that.

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:37.439
<v Speaker 6>I think it's it would be.

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 5>A win.

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 9>For many reasons that are economic, rare Earth's industrial capacity,

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 9>a lot of the a lot of the access to

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 9>the Black Sea that comes with with with the with

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 9>the control of that territory. It's really, it really was

0:17:57.119 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 9>a powerhouse for the economy. I think a lot of

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 9>it's been destroyedoid over the past couple of years. But

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 9>in terms of what Putin wants, I think it's both

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 9>power as projection and it's economic.

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:12.399
<v Speaker 7>What leverage, if any does the does President Trump have

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:15.439
<v Speaker 7>at this negotiation today? How do you think that lays out?

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 9>So I think that it's it's important for President Trump

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 9>to make sure that he has the backing of the

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 9>Europeans and the Ukrainians. I don't know the leverage that

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:34.640
<v Speaker 9>he has both carrots and sticks. The ability to actually

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 9>impose greater pain through sanctioning. For example, for example, the

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 9>dark shadow fleets of oil tankers that are that are

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 9>prolific in actually exporting Russian oil right now would be meaningful.

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 9>So I think that there are sticks, there are also

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 9>carrots that he's looking to put on the table.

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:55.360
<v Speaker 5>I thank you for the brief.

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Heidi Kramer, writing writing for the Writing for Foreign Affairs

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 2>should say in the Council on Foreign Relations.

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 5>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:23.880
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch us

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:30.679
<v Speaker 1>live every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 4>Jennifer Lee one of the toughest jobs on Global Wall Street.

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 2>She has to put up with Ian Lincoln and Brian

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Belski at the same point, and she has the single

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 2>best sentence in a research report of the week.

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 5>Here's Jennifer Lee. I quote what now, question Mark? We wait,

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 5>We watch Jennifer poetry. It's like a haiku. It's so

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 5>so true.

0:19:56.280 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 2>We wait and we watch. What are you watching? To

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 2>unfold the mystery of the back half of twenty twenty five?

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 6>Well, good morning, and thank you very much for having

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:10.239
<v Speaker 6>me on. And just quickly about the airline breakfasts. It's

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:11.919
<v Speaker 6>kind of hard to screw up yogurt. I think that's

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 6>basically what I get.

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 10>Every every time I'm on an early.

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 6>Morning flight.

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 10>Watching the data watching. I think inflation is probably like

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:24.200
<v Speaker 10>the biggest report right now to keep an eye on.

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 10>But of course, this morning's retail sales numbers were also

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:29.719
<v Speaker 10>very interesting, and I was very torn. I gotta tell

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 10>you this, I was very torn. I was like, do

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 10>I want a strong number to signify, you know, that

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 10>the US eclimate remains resilient, or do I want a

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 10>weak number because it shows that the FED is going

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 10>to have to start cutting rates starting next month and

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 10>by how much it's always torn?

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 6>But you know, I'm kind of lying.

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 10>I kind of lean toward, you know, I want a

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 10>stronger economy, more resilient economy. And the retail sales numbers

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:54.400
<v Speaker 10>approved that it wasn't wall to wall strength. We saw

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:56.919
<v Speaker 10>some pullback and play in things like eating out, dining out,

0:20:56.920 --> 0:20:58.919
<v Speaker 10>for example, which is something I like to keep an

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 10>eye on all the time. But there's more spending on

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 10>things like sporting goods and on clothing and things like that.

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 10>So cannot write off the US consumer just yet. You know,

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:10.360
<v Speaker 10>we should almost never write right off the US consumer.

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 10>But it shows that again, the US economy is still

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 10>holding up there. The backward revisions, by the way, show

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 10>that there's a lot more momentum coming in into the

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 10>second half. But what happens at this point on with

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 10>signs of higher inflation bubbling, You know, this is where

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 10>everything hits the fan.

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 5>My summary, Paul is simple, what now we wait? Watch exactly?

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 7>So, Jennifer, what do you think or how do you

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:37.360
<v Speaker 7>think the FED interpreted this week's inflation data in today's

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:40.439
<v Speaker 7>retail sales? How do you think that may or may

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 7>not affect kind of what they do in September.

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 6>I think it potentially makes them dig in their heels

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:47.239
<v Speaker 6>a little bit.

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 10>And you know, there is talk about a fifty basis

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:54.159
<v Speaker 10>point cut, perhaps maybe from just one individual with the

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 10>initials s B, but I think the inflation reports this

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 10>week sort of put that under the put that on

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 10>the side, at least.

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:05.360
<v Speaker 6>Off the table for now. On twenty five basis places.

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 10>Still looks like the way we looks like what we're

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 10>going to be seeing come come the next meeting in September.

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:14.399
<v Speaker 6>Again, we still have I mean, we just had like

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 6>the two pretty.

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 10>Scary you know, inflation reports this week for July, but

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 10>we still have And then of course this morning is

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:24.439
<v Speaker 10>hotter than expected import price report that you've already mentioned.

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 10>So we've got one of each, by the way, one

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 10>more CPI, one more PPI, one more import.

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:31.120
<v Speaker 6>Price report before the September seventeenth PEN meeting.

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 10>We also have a couple of ISM surveys and I

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:35.920
<v Speaker 10>always love to read those because I like to see

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:38.400
<v Speaker 10>what the respondents of there are doing or what they're

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 10>seeing in terms of prices. And those are like the

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 10>boots on the ground, right, It's not these numbers that

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:45.679
<v Speaker 10>are being calculated in whatever format and whatever fashion. These

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:47.399
<v Speaker 10>are actually talking to the people out there who are

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:50.400
<v Speaker 10>making their purchases, on actual purchasing managers, and we wanted

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 10>to see what they are seeing out there.

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:53.879
<v Speaker 7>What do you make of the US labor market here?

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 7>That was the discussion point a week ago. This week's

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 7>been all about inflation. Last week was about labor. What's

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 7>your on the guest labor market?

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 10>So this is I mean, obviously the last report was

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 10>a little shocking showing like slowing demand, but there is

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.159
<v Speaker 10>still demand for jobs and we still have you know,

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 10>well over seven million jobs job openings out there across

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 10>the country, so you know, it depends on what sector

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 10>we're talking about, but clearly the demand is slowing. But

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 10>it's also interesting, just given from what we've seen from

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:23.880
<v Speaker 10>some of these surveys, from what some of the hiring

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:26.679
<v Speaker 10>managers have been saying, you know, they're basically holding off

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:29.400
<v Speaker 10>to see what happens with the economy, what happens with tariffs.

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 10>Is this trade war worth trying to going to continue

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 10>dragging on or not. So that's going to determine whether

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 10>not they're going to be starting to get rid of

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 10>people or if they're going to lay people off or hire.

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:42.400
<v Speaker 10>Everyone is on hold right now until there is more clarity.

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:44.160
<v Speaker 10>We have a little bit more clarity now, but there's

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 10>still not one hundred percent. It's still a little fussy

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 10>to short of.

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:50.240
<v Speaker 5>Visit Jennifer Lee. I promise I will wait and I

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 5>will watch.

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Jennifer Lee, Senior Economist, beam A Capital Markets.

0:23:55.760 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, available on Apple's Spotify

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal