WEBVTT - From Broken Record: Rick Rubin in Conversation with Malcolm Gladwell

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:15.796
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin.

0:00:20.316 --> 0:00:23.636
<v Speaker 2>Hello, Hello revisionist history fans, it's been way too long.

0:00:24.276 --> 0:00:27.436
<v Speaker 2>In case you're curious, we are hard at work cooking

0:00:27.516 --> 0:00:30.636
<v Speaker 2>up all sorts of mischief for you already. I've been

0:00:30.676 --> 0:00:34.316
<v Speaker 2>to Alabama twice. That's how deep we're going this year.

0:00:35.276 --> 0:00:38.156
<v Speaker 2>But while we wait for all those new episodes, I

0:00:38.236 --> 0:00:40.516
<v Speaker 2>wanted to share with you an interview I did with

0:00:40.596 --> 0:00:44.036
<v Speaker 2>my friend and colleague Rick Rubin. If you know your

0:00:44.036 --> 0:00:46.676
<v Speaker 2>Pushkin shows, you'll know that Rick is the driving force

0:00:46.756 --> 0:00:50.676
<v Speaker 2>behind our music podcast Broken Record, in addition, of course,

0:00:51.076 --> 0:00:54.036
<v Speaker 2>to being maybe the most important music producer of his generation.

0:00:54.436 --> 0:00:57.636
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he's worked with Metallica, Adele, Johnny Cash, the

0:00:57.636 --> 0:01:00.956
<v Speaker 2>Beastie Boys, jay Z, the Chili Peppers, Neil Young, on

0:01:01.076 --> 0:01:04.036
<v Speaker 2>and on. I met Rick years ago, and I've been

0:01:04.076 --> 0:01:07.476
<v Speaker 2>out to Shangrilot many times, which is the famous recording

0:01:07.516 --> 0:01:10.316
<v Speaker 2>studio Rick runs up in Malibu. Rick and I once

0:01:10.356 --> 0:01:13.876
<v Speaker 2>interviewed Bruce Springsteen together, which is an experience I'll never forget.

0:01:14.356 --> 0:01:17.516
<v Speaker 2>If you meet Rick, you'll understand immediately what makes him

0:01:17.556 --> 0:01:20.196
<v Speaker 2>such a brilliant producer, because he's one of the most

0:01:20.316 --> 0:01:24.996
<v Speaker 2>open and generous listeners I've ever met. Anyway, over the

0:01:25.036 --> 0:01:27.916
<v Speaker 2>last couple of years, very quietly, Rick's been working on

0:01:27.996 --> 0:01:32.276
<v Speaker 2>a book about creativity called The Creative Act, A Way

0:01:32.316 --> 0:01:35.916
<v Speaker 2>of Being. I read it in one sitting. I loved it,

0:01:36.436 --> 0:01:38.356
<v Speaker 2>and I called up Rick and I asked him, can

0:01:38.396 --> 0:01:41.396
<v Speaker 2>we talk about it? And what follows is that interview

0:01:41.756 --> 0:01:44.316
<v Speaker 2>which I wanted to share with all of you. We

0:01:44.356 --> 0:01:47.236
<v Speaker 2>read it in the Broken Record feed for the music diehards,

0:01:47.436 --> 0:01:49.636
<v Speaker 2>but I thought it made sense to oneted again here

0:01:50.116 --> 0:01:53.436
<v Speaker 2>because although it's a book about creativity by a music producer,

0:01:53.916 --> 0:01:57.156
<v Speaker 2>and many of the examples Rick talks about are about music,

0:01:57.636 --> 0:02:02.036
<v Speaker 2>it's not a music book. It's this beautiful exploration about

0:02:02.036 --> 0:02:04.796
<v Speaker 2>how to open up your imagination that I believe has

0:02:04.916 --> 0:02:09.996
<v Speaker 2>useful insights for all of us. Anyway, here goes our conversation.

0:02:10.556 --> 0:02:11.676
<v Speaker 2>I hope you enjoy it.

0:02:20.156 --> 0:02:22.116
<v Speaker 3>Rick Hey.

0:02:22.276 --> 0:02:24.396
<v Speaker 2>So I have a million questions, and I thought the

0:02:24.636 --> 0:02:28.836
<v Speaker 2>fun thing to do would be to go through and

0:02:29.516 --> 0:02:32.516
<v Speaker 2>I would just read you things I underlined, because there

0:02:32.516 --> 0:02:33.956
<v Speaker 2>are things that I would love for you to talk

0:02:34.036 --> 0:02:36.276
<v Speaker 2>or that we could talk about, but to you in particular.

0:02:36.316 --> 0:02:38.236
<v Speaker 2>But one of the fantastic things about this book is

0:02:38.236 --> 0:02:42.236
<v Speaker 2>that I'm almost rarely read a book where I felt

0:02:42.236 --> 0:02:45.796
<v Speaker 2>like I was being invited to contribute.

0:02:46.476 --> 0:02:47.076
<v Speaker 3>Do you know what I mean?

0:02:47.116 --> 0:02:49.676
<v Speaker 2>Like, every time you made a point, I was like, Oh,

0:02:49.796 --> 0:02:53.396
<v Speaker 2>I have something to add about that or this. I mean,

0:02:53.476 --> 0:02:55.036
<v Speaker 2>I've never read a book like that where I'm like,

0:02:55.276 --> 0:02:57.956
<v Speaker 2>half the time I'm talking to myself as I'm reading it.

0:02:58.436 --> 0:03:00.156
<v Speaker 2>So that's what I thought. We would get into that

0:03:00.196 --> 0:03:00.996
<v Speaker 2>as well a little bit.

0:03:01.436 --> 0:03:04.796
<v Speaker 1>But that's great, that's great. I'm so happy. First of all,

0:03:04.796 --> 0:03:07.836
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy you like it, happy you read it, happy

0:03:07.876 --> 0:03:09.676
<v Speaker 1>you like it, and I'm happy that it had that

0:03:09.716 --> 0:03:11.876
<v Speaker 1>effect on you. And there was I will tell you

0:03:11.916 --> 0:03:15.316
<v Speaker 1>there was a version of the book, an unsuccessful version

0:03:15.356 --> 0:03:20.556
<v Speaker 1>of the book, maybe four years ago, that talked about

0:03:20.596 --> 0:03:22.596
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the same stuff that the book talks about.

0:03:22.596 --> 0:03:28.476
<v Speaker 1>The content was similar and the writing was beautiful, but

0:03:28.596 --> 0:03:32.476
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't have elicited the reaction that you had, and

0:03:32.516 --> 0:03:36.276
<v Speaker 1>that's why it didn't come out then. And from the beginning,

0:03:36.396 --> 0:03:39.516
<v Speaker 1>the purpose of the book was always I want people

0:03:39.556 --> 0:03:42.076
<v Speaker 1>to make great things. I want people, I want as

0:03:42.196 --> 0:03:44.636
<v Speaker 1>much beautiful art in the world as possible. I'm a

0:03:44.636 --> 0:03:47.716
<v Speaker 1>fan of beautiful things and exciting things and new things

0:03:48.276 --> 0:03:52.676
<v Speaker 1>happening all the time. And the book was like a

0:03:52.716 --> 0:03:56.556
<v Speaker 1>call to arms to go out and make something beautiful

0:03:57.116 --> 0:03:58.276
<v Speaker 1>change the world. You know.

0:03:59.756 --> 0:04:02.556
<v Speaker 2>So I've known questions, but I wanted to start with

0:04:02.596 --> 0:04:05.956
<v Speaker 2>a very general one, which is, because you're in a

0:04:06.036 --> 0:04:09.596
<v Speaker 2>world of music, we're reading a lot of this through

0:04:09.636 --> 0:04:12.756
<v Speaker 2>the lens of music. We're assuming you're talking about musicians,

0:04:12.756 --> 0:04:15.596
<v Speaker 2>and you give examples of musicians from timesam From time

0:04:15.636 --> 0:04:19.716
<v Speaker 2>to time. You also talk about visual artists. You add

0:04:19.756 --> 0:04:23.196
<v Speaker 2>that into the mix. But I was curious about are

0:04:23.236 --> 0:04:27.196
<v Speaker 2>we really talking about all art here or is there

0:04:27.236 --> 0:04:29.996
<v Speaker 2>a difference in the way that music and visual art

0:04:30.036 --> 0:04:33.356
<v Speaker 2>are done that you're specifically speaking to.

0:04:34.556 --> 0:04:39.276
<v Speaker 1>I think it's how all creative choices are made. So

0:04:40.236 --> 0:04:43.396
<v Speaker 1>not only does it include the visual arts, it includes

0:04:43.796 --> 0:04:48.076
<v Speaker 1>starting a new business, a new recipe you're making as

0:04:48.116 --> 0:04:53.396
<v Speaker 1>a chef, architectural choices you might make, solving a problem

0:04:53.436 --> 0:04:58.036
<v Speaker 1>in life where you're not getting along with a family

0:04:58.076 --> 0:05:01.756
<v Speaker 1>member and you want to get closer to them and

0:05:01.796 --> 0:05:05.316
<v Speaker 1>have better communication. Yeah. Originally I thought of it as

0:05:05.356 --> 0:05:10.196
<v Speaker 1>more of a how to book about creativity. It became

0:05:10.476 --> 0:05:13.596
<v Speaker 1>a book about how to be, how to be in

0:05:13.636 --> 0:05:16.236
<v Speaker 1>the world to allow creativity to happen, and as it

0:05:16.276 --> 0:05:18.036
<v Speaker 1>turns out, how to be in the world that allows

0:05:18.076 --> 0:05:21.436
<v Speaker 1>creativity to happen, solves a lot of issues.

0:05:21.796 --> 0:05:25.236
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I did feel like about halfway through, I began

0:05:25.356 --> 0:05:28.716
<v Speaker 2>to forget you were in music, and I felt like

0:05:28.796 --> 0:05:32.196
<v Speaker 2>he was starting to talk more broadly about everyone. It's

0:05:32.196 --> 0:05:34.916
<v Speaker 2>hard to escape the assumption that this is going to

0:05:34.916 --> 0:05:37.596
<v Speaker 2>be a book about music at the very beginning. But

0:05:37.916 --> 0:05:39.436
<v Speaker 2>so there's a couple I'm want to start reading to

0:05:39.436 --> 0:05:42.796
<v Speaker 2>you some things and getting you to to talk about

0:05:42.796 --> 0:05:47.356
<v Speaker 2>them a little bit. One is without the spiritual components

0:05:47.396 --> 0:05:50.356
<v Speaker 2>from page from the chapter called the Unseen. Without the

0:05:50.396 --> 0:05:55.236
<v Speaker 2>spiritual component, the artist works with a crucial disadvantage. It's

0:05:55.276 --> 0:05:59.636
<v Speaker 2>a really really interesting idea, and one weirdly that I

0:05:59.756 --> 0:06:03.316
<v Speaker 2>had heard that phrase that way before. What is a

0:06:03.396 --> 0:06:08.156
<v Speaker 2>disadvantage here? And what are you meaning by the term

0:06:08.316 --> 0:06:09.916
<v Speaker 2>spiritual component?

0:06:11.036 --> 0:06:15.996
<v Speaker 1>The spiritual component is belief in something bigger, something different,

0:06:16.036 --> 0:06:21.636
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is. It could be believing in some universal power,

0:06:22.356 --> 0:06:24.916
<v Speaker 1>believing that if you walk under a ladder you'll have

0:06:24.996 --> 0:06:27.796
<v Speaker 1>bad luck. You know, it could it could be anything

0:06:27.836 --> 0:06:33.956
<v Speaker 1>that takes you out of the ordinary to allow you

0:06:34.076 --> 0:06:40.076
<v Speaker 1>to see a wilder potential is good. When you're making art.

0:06:40.876 --> 0:06:43.196
<v Speaker 1>The goal of making art is not to show you

0:06:44.196 --> 0:06:49.436
<v Speaker 1>just what everybody else sees. It's to see what's possible,

0:06:49.756 --> 0:06:54.876
<v Speaker 1>and what's possible is radical. It really is radical. It's

0:06:54.876 --> 0:06:58.796
<v Speaker 1>like we've built very a very small world for ourselves

0:06:59.116 --> 0:07:03.196
<v Speaker 1>with our reason. Have you ever had a mystical experience

0:07:03.556 --> 0:07:04.236
<v Speaker 1>in your life?

0:07:04.556 --> 0:07:04.796
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:07:05.756 --> 0:07:08.076
<v Speaker 1>Okay, do you want to describe it at all?

0:07:08.436 --> 0:07:12.076
<v Speaker 2>Oh? Well, I mean maybe my definition of mystical I

0:07:12.116 --> 0:07:12.676
<v Speaker 2>have had him.

0:07:12.676 --> 0:07:15.756
<v Speaker 1>I'm open, I'm wide open whatever however you describe it.

0:07:15.916 --> 0:07:21.116
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I've had moments probably around the death of

0:07:21.156 --> 0:07:24.396
<v Speaker 2>my father would be an example of the death of

0:07:24.396 --> 0:07:26.196
<v Speaker 2>my father, was a lot more than just about the

0:07:26.236 --> 0:07:27.876
<v Speaker 2>death of my father. I guess that's the best way.

0:07:28.156 --> 0:07:31.996
<v Speaker 2>You become aware in that moment that oh, he's part

0:07:32.036 --> 0:07:36.436
<v Speaker 2>of joining going somewhere whatever, much much, much, much, much

0:07:36.516 --> 0:07:39.996
<v Speaker 2>larger and older than we would have imagined. That's that

0:07:40.116 --> 0:07:42.476
<v Speaker 2>was probably the closest I came to that, that I

0:07:42.516 --> 0:07:46.676
<v Speaker 2>saw that in the gift of my grief, was that, yes,

0:07:47.276 --> 0:07:48.476
<v Speaker 2>was becoming aware of that.

0:07:49.276 --> 0:07:52.476
<v Speaker 1>Would you say that based on that you have been

0:07:52.516 --> 0:07:56.756
<v Speaker 1>able to live at times in a deeper way based

0:07:56.796 --> 0:07:59.196
<v Speaker 1>on that experience. Did it opened something into you to

0:07:59.316 --> 0:08:02.036
<v Speaker 1>allow you to see more than you saw before?

0:08:02.716 --> 0:08:05.876
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I have, absolutely I would. I would count that

0:08:05.996 --> 0:08:09.956
<v Speaker 2>experience as one of the most crucial of my life.

0:08:09.956 --> 0:08:11.676
<v Speaker 2>And in a million years, I would never have thought

0:08:11.676 --> 0:08:14.476
<v Speaker 2>that the death of someone I love more than anyone

0:08:14.476 --> 0:08:16.676
<v Speaker 2>else would open me up in that way.

0:08:17.716 --> 0:08:21.756
<v Speaker 1>That would be an example of touching something. I would

0:08:21.756 --> 0:08:27.596
<v Speaker 1>say spiritual, something unseen, something from beyond, something that wouldn't

0:08:27.596 --> 0:08:31.796
<v Speaker 1>have made sense to you before it happened. Yeah, if

0:08:31.796 --> 0:08:33.636
<v Speaker 1>someone would have described it to you, you might have thought,

0:08:33.716 --> 0:08:36.076
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't really make sense to me, But then you

0:08:36.116 --> 0:08:40.516
<v Speaker 1>got to feel it, and then you understood. And belief

0:08:40.596 --> 0:08:42.076
<v Speaker 1>is that way. There's a part in the book that

0:08:42.156 --> 0:08:46.716
<v Speaker 1>talks about what you believe in doesn't have to be true,

0:08:46.876 --> 0:08:51.716
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't really matter, but belief has a power, and

0:08:52.196 --> 0:08:54.916
<v Speaker 1>belief allows you to go further than you thought you

0:08:54.956 --> 0:09:00.916
<v Speaker 1>can go. Yeah, and there are a lot of tools

0:09:00.956 --> 0:09:06.676
<v Speaker 1>in the book that talk about overcoming voices that tell

0:09:06.756 --> 0:09:10.156
<v Speaker 1>us we can't do things because we've learned we can't

0:09:10.156 --> 0:09:13.876
<v Speaker 1>do things. You know, we've learned what's possible and what's impossible.

0:09:14.716 --> 0:09:17.716
<v Speaker 1>And if we accept what's possible and what's impossible, we

0:09:17.796 --> 0:09:21.316
<v Speaker 1>can't go beyond. If the Wright brothers accepted it was

0:09:21.356 --> 0:09:25.276
<v Speaker 1>impossible for man to fly, we still wouldn't be flying.

0:09:26.916 --> 0:09:32.636
<v Speaker 1>All of the great revolutions that have happened have happened

0:09:32.676 --> 0:09:36.396
<v Speaker 1>because someone believed in something that everyone thought wasn't possible.

0:09:36.756 --> 0:09:40.396
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this taps into a larger theme in your book,

0:09:40.396 --> 0:09:44.076
<v Speaker 2>which I thought was really powerful, which is time and

0:09:44.076 --> 0:09:46.356
<v Speaker 2>again you come back to the idea that the artists

0:09:47.076 --> 0:09:51.316
<v Speaker 2>one of the artist's jobs is our obligations is to

0:09:51.356 --> 0:09:54.236
<v Speaker 2>look outside of him or herself. I mean, you do

0:09:54.316 --> 0:09:57.156
<v Speaker 2>talk about how you need there's that chapter where you

0:09:57.156 --> 0:10:00.036
<v Speaker 2>talk about the importance of paying very close attention to

0:10:00.116 --> 0:10:03.756
<v Speaker 2>what's going on inside your own head and heart. Like

0:10:03.956 --> 0:10:07.116
<v Speaker 2>here's an example not long after that first quote, when

0:10:07.156 --> 0:10:09.956
<v Speaker 2>looking for a solution to a creative problem, pay close

0:10:09.956 --> 0:10:12.956
<v Speaker 2>attention to what's happening around you. And what I love

0:10:12.996 --> 0:10:17.076
<v Speaker 2>about that is like, it's not that you think back

0:10:17.116 --> 0:10:20.596
<v Speaker 2>over your history, remember some important thing you read five

0:10:20.676 --> 0:10:22.956
<v Speaker 2>years ago written by some genius. No, No, you're talking

0:10:22.996 --> 0:10:27.276
<v Speaker 2>about in the moment here and that look around and

0:10:27.316 --> 0:10:31.956
<v Speaker 2>you can find kind of solutions clues, what have you

0:10:32.156 --> 0:10:35.716
<v Speaker 2>just in the kind of most prosaic details of your

0:10:36.316 --> 0:10:38.636
<v Speaker 2>existence at that moment, like in the room where you.

0:10:38.596 --> 0:10:42.956
<v Speaker 1>Are, yes now I can't say it works one hundred

0:10:42.956 --> 0:10:46.076
<v Speaker 1>percent of the time. It's not saying that, it's saying

0:10:46.116 --> 0:10:48.836
<v Speaker 1>that if you live in a way where you're really

0:10:48.876 --> 0:10:52.716
<v Speaker 1>open and paying attention to everything around you, the answers

0:10:52.756 --> 0:10:56.716
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for are knocking on the door all the time.

0:10:57.316 --> 0:11:02.236
<v Speaker 1>They don't come when you're searching for them. They come

0:11:02.316 --> 0:11:05.276
<v Speaker 1>when you're open and allow them to come. One of

0:11:05.276 --> 0:11:06.836
<v Speaker 1>the things that I talk about in the book is

0:11:08.236 --> 0:11:11.476
<v Speaker 1>if you have a problem them to solve, instead of

0:11:11.516 --> 0:11:15.756
<v Speaker 1>thinking about it, hold the question in your awareness and

0:11:15.796 --> 0:11:18.796
<v Speaker 1>go for a walk or swim or do something that

0:11:19.796 --> 0:11:22.636
<v Speaker 1>takes your mind off of what you're trying to solve

0:11:23.236 --> 0:11:27.396
<v Speaker 1>and engages you in something else. Yeah, and most often

0:11:27.436 --> 0:11:30.676
<v Speaker 1>when you're engaged in something else, the part of you

0:11:30.756 --> 0:11:34.436
<v Speaker 1>that's in the way of solving the problem loses its

0:11:34.516 --> 0:11:39.556
<v Speaker 1>control over you, and you through whatever it is. You

0:11:39.596 --> 0:11:42.876
<v Speaker 1>can find a way to go for a drive something

0:11:42.916 --> 0:11:45.316
<v Speaker 1>where you have to you have to pay attention enough.

0:11:45.436 --> 0:11:49.436
<v Speaker 1>If you're driving, you can sort of drive on autopilot

0:11:49.556 --> 0:11:52.436
<v Speaker 1>in you know, without really paying attention. But if you're

0:11:52.476 --> 0:11:54.796
<v Speaker 1>really not paying attention, you'll crash. You mean, you can

0:11:55.116 --> 0:11:58.476
<v Speaker 1>you can tune out that much. So there is some

0:11:58.676 --> 0:12:02.916
<v Speaker 1>part of you that's occupied when you're driving with the

0:12:03.236 --> 0:12:03.876
<v Speaker 1>work at hand.

0:12:04.356 --> 0:12:07.236
<v Speaker 2>The reason I thought that was interesting was I wondered,

0:12:07.276 --> 0:12:08.996
<v Speaker 2>I mean that one thing that struck me, And I

0:12:09.196 --> 0:12:12.716
<v Speaker 2>could be totally wrong, but my sense is that increasingly,

0:12:13.276 --> 0:12:15.796
<v Speaker 2>in a lot of creative fields, creativity is defined as

0:12:15.836 --> 0:12:21.356
<v Speaker 2>something that is internal and deliberate. You look within yourself

0:12:21.396 --> 0:12:23.756
<v Speaker 2>and your own experience and you mind them for and

0:12:23.796 --> 0:12:27.996
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about something that is in part external and unconscious.

0:12:28.676 --> 0:12:32.156
<v Speaker 2>And I have a good friend who's a screenwriter, and

0:12:32.196 --> 0:12:35.916
<v Speaker 2>I think by virtue of being my friend and watching,

0:12:36.276 --> 0:12:38.436
<v Speaker 2>I'm a reporter, a journalist, you know, I call people

0:12:38.476 --> 0:12:42.076
<v Speaker 2>up and interview them and record what they say. He's

0:12:42.196 --> 0:12:45.076
<v Speaker 2>changed the way he writes screenplays. Now he does as

0:12:45.156 --> 0:12:48.316
<v Speaker 2>much reporting as he does as much as someone who's

0:12:48.316 --> 0:12:51.236
<v Speaker 2>writing a nonfiction book. And he's doing it not because

0:12:51.236 --> 0:12:53.796
<v Speaker 2>he's just cutting and pasting what he hears in the world.

0:12:53.836 --> 0:12:55.516
<v Speaker 2>To do is but he's doing a version of what

0:12:55.556 --> 0:12:58.636
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about, which is he's opening himself up to

0:12:58.716 --> 0:13:02.276
<v Speaker 2>the if he wants to talk about, you know, scientists,

0:13:02.356 --> 0:13:04.196
<v Speaker 2>he goes and talks to lots and lots of scientists,

0:13:04.236 --> 0:13:06.756
<v Speaker 2>and it opens him up to the way they think

0:13:06.836 --> 0:13:11.836
<v Speaker 2>and feel, and that kind of approach to creativity strikes

0:13:11.836 --> 0:13:13.476
<v Speaker 2>me as being one that seems out of vogue in

0:13:13.516 --> 0:13:15.236
<v Speaker 2>a certain way. I mean, it's not what they're teaching

0:13:15.236 --> 0:13:16.076
<v Speaker 2>in writing schools.

0:13:16.596 --> 0:13:18.956
<v Speaker 1>No, it's not what they're teaching. And there was a line,

0:13:18.996 --> 0:13:20.476
<v Speaker 1>there's a line in the book and I only know

0:13:20.596 --> 0:13:22.716
<v Speaker 1>it because I was working on the audiobook yesterday and

0:13:23.076 --> 0:13:27.356
<v Speaker 1>I read it yesterday, and it's against funny, counterintuitive line

0:13:27.796 --> 0:13:34.756
<v Speaker 1>that self expression is not about you and it's just

0:13:34.796 --> 0:13:37.596
<v Speaker 1>such a and when I read it, you know, it's

0:13:37.596 --> 0:13:40.756
<v Speaker 1>stopped me in my tracks, even though it's an idea

0:13:40.796 --> 0:13:43.556
<v Speaker 1>from several years ago, but it hit me hard again,

0:13:43.956 --> 0:13:49.036
<v Speaker 1>you know, recognizing it. So everything we are comes from

0:13:49.036 --> 0:13:52.356
<v Speaker 1>outside of us. The data that we take in from

0:13:52.436 --> 0:13:54.636
<v Speaker 1>which we make, whatever it is that we make comes

0:13:54.636 --> 0:13:56.916
<v Speaker 1>from outside of us, all of it. None of it

0:13:56.956 --> 0:14:01.396
<v Speaker 1>starts with us. Everything starts outside of us. So we

0:14:01.436 --> 0:14:03.556
<v Speaker 1>have a storehouse of all of the stuff that we've

0:14:03.556 --> 0:14:07.156
<v Speaker 1>experienced over the course of our lives. And then we

0:14:07.276 --> 0:14:12.516
<v Speaker 1>can find connect between those things, and we can find

0:14:12.516 --> 0:14:16.356
<v Speaker 1>connections between those things from the past and these things

0:14:16.356 --> 0:14:20.156
<v Speaker 1>happening now, whatever it may be. And when you're looking

0:14:20.196 --> 0:14:25.316
<v Speaker 1>for it. It's surprising how often the answers are right there. Yeah,

0:14:25.596 --> 0:14:25.996
<v Speaker 1>this is.

0:14:26.476 --> 0:14:30.196
<v Speaker 2>Read another one of my favorite lines. Distraction is not procrastination.

0:14:30.956 --> 0:14:34.956
<v Speaker 2>Procrastination can consistently undermines our ability to make things. Distraction

0:14:35.236 --> 0:14:38.116
<v Speaker 2>is a strategy in service of the work, which is

0:14:38.156 --> 0:14:41.396
<v Speaker 2>to your point. So a lot of what this exposure

0:14:42.396 --> 0:14:44.436
<v Speaker 2>to the world outside of us is about is a

0:14:44.516 --> 0:14:47.996
<v Speaker 2>kind of productive distraction, right, That's what you're saying.

0:14:47.756 --> 0:14:51.516
<v Speaker 1>With that, it's a combination. There's a productive distraction and

0:14:51.556 --> 0:14:55.036
<v Speaker 1>an inspiration. The connection with the outside world also can

0:14:55.076 --> 0:14:57.516
<v Speaker 1>be really inspiring. It can be inspiring if you pick

0:14:57.556 --> 0:15:00.236
<v Speaker 1>places that are inspiring. I try to pick places to

0:15:00.316 --> 0:15:02.996
<v Speaker 1>be where I find inspiration on a daily basis.

0:15:03.316 --> 0:15:05.756
<v Speaker 2>You have a little moment where you're talking about how

0:15:05.796 --> 0:15:10.876
<v Speaker 2>different all of us have different strategies, or that kind

0:15:10.916 --> 0:15:14.076
<v Speaker 2>of inspirational place, and you said Andy Warhol was said

0:15:14.116 --> 0:15:16.476
<v Speaker 2>to create with a television, radio, and record player all

0:15:16.476 --> 0:15:19.556
<v Speaker 2>on simultaneously. For eminem the noise of a single TV

0:15:19.636 --> 0:15:22.876
<v Speaker 2>set is his preferred backdrop. Marcel Bruce lined his walls

0:15:22.876 --> 0:15:26.796
<v Speaker 2>with soundless absorbing cork clothes, the drapes and warrior plugs.

0:15:27.316 --> 0:15:29.596
<v Speaker 2>And I was curious what's yours. Do you have a

0:15:29.716 --> 0:15:30.676
<v Speaker 2>kind of mode like that.

0:15:31.556 --> 0:15:34.836
<v Speaker 1>I would say I like to be in a quiet place,

0:15:35.676 --> 0:15:41.116
<v Speaker 1>big beautiful nature, less people. Yeah, i'd say natural beauty

0:15:41.156 --> 0:15:42.836
<v Speaker 1>and less people. It's funny.

0:15:42.836 --> 0:15:44.436
<v Speaker 2>I'm exactly the opposite.

0:15:44.756 --> 0:15:45.236
<v Speaker 3>I was right.

0:15:45.276 --> 0:15:47.716
<v Speaker 2>I had a very productive morning in a coffee shop.

0:15:47.956 --> 0:15:51.196
<v Speaker 2>It was crowded and I was seating it like literally

0:15:51.676 --> 0:15:55.596
<v Speaker 2>right up against this six foot four kid, I think

0:15:55.596 --> 0:15:58.476
<v Speaker 2>it was like twenty two years old, sitting next to

0:15:58.516 --> 0:16:01.756
<v Speaker 2>his parents, and the kid was super interesting, and he

0:16:01.876 --> 0:16:05.436
<v Speaker 2>was talking about the PLO in the nineteen seventies and

0:16:05.556 --> 0:16:10.596
<v Speaker 2>wow yair Arafat and there was something about like, I

0:16:10.636 --> 0:16:12.236
<v Speaker 2>don't know, I can't put my finger on what. That

0:16:12.356 --> 0:16:14.836
<v Speaker 2>kind of triggered. After a while, I kind of he

0:16:14.916 --> 0:16:17.876
<v Speaker 2>became my background noise. But it was such a different

0:16:18.076 --> 0:16:21.356
<v Speaker 2>voice that I was fixing a chapter of something I

0:16:21.356 --> 0:16:24.556
<v Speaker 2>was working on, and I just saw suddenly sound a solution,

0:16:24.636 --> 0:16:26.636
<v Speaker 2>And I think it was what we were talking about.

0:16:26.676 --> 0:16:30.316
<v Speaker 2>It was some combination of there's something about that being

0:16:30.356 --> 0:16:34.916
<v Speaker 2>surrounded by unusual voices that really wakes me up to

0:16:34.996 --> 0:16:37.956
<v Speaker 2>the range of solutions. Right, I'm a reminder. Oh, there's

0:16:38.036 --> 0:16:40.436
<v Speaker 2>like there's this kid who's thinking about something I don't

0:16:40.476 --> 0:16:45.636
<v Speaker 2>think about in a context I'm not in. Who's super interesting, Like, wow,

0:16:45.716 --> 0:16:47.356
<v Speaker 2>so you know there's a solution out there.

0:16:47.396 --> 0:16:47.716
<v Speaker 4>It was that.

0:16:47.756 --> 0:16:49.996
<v Speaker 2>It was funny because I had just read your chapter

0:16:50.036 --> 0:16:51.956
<v Speaker 2>which talks about that, and I was in that situation.

0:16:52.596 --> 0:16:54.876
<v Speaker 1>Is is that a place that you go to every day?

0:16:56.196 --> 0:17:00.636
<v Speaker 2>Many days? I like, I need I need so, I

0:17:00.676 --> 0:17:04.316
<v Speaker 2>need voices, I need noise and voices and activity in

0:17:04.396 --> 0:17:08.596
<v Speaker 2>order to be able to create. During the pandemic, I

0:17:08.596 --> 0:17:12.276
<v Speaker 2>had one Stirgle Simpson album that I played over and

0:17:12.276 --> 0:17:13.076
<v Speaker 2>over and over again.

0:17:13.676 --> 0:17:14.556
<v Speaker 3>He was my voice?

0:17:14.916 --> 0:17:15.716
<v Speaker 2>Was it meta? Modern?

0:17:15.836 --> 0:17:16.076
<v Speaker 3>Meta?

0:17:16.156 --> 0:17:17.876
<v Speaker 2>What is that album? Fantastic album?

0:17:17.876 --> 0:17:18.116
<v Speaker 4>Whatever?

0:17:20.556 --> 0:17:23.356
<v Speaker 2>He's great. I don't know if he's out there. He

0:17:23.356 --> 0:17:27.556
<v Speaker 2>helped me through is that many many lean times during

0:17:27.596 --> 0:17:32.116
<v Speaker 2>the pandemic. But that idea, I almost feel like you're

0:17:32.156 --> 0:17:36.316
<v Speaker 2>describing the things you have learned by working with elite

0:17:36.356 --> 0:17:39.716
<v Speaker 2>practitioners of the art of creativity. But I was struck

0:17:39.756 --> 0:17:43.036
<v Speaker 2>by the gap between what you've learned from the top

0:17:43.076 --> 0:17:47.236
<v Speaker 2>performers and what we're teaching to people at the outset,

0:17:47.716 --> 0:17:50.596
<v Speaker 2>and that it concerned me. I almost feel like there's

0:17:50.596 --> 0:17:53.836
<v Speaker 2>a gap between what we're telling people and what the

0:17:53.916 --> 0:17:54.916
<v Speaker 2>truly creative.

0:17:54.636 --> 0:17:58.156
<v Speaker 1>Are doing Yes, yes, that's true.

0:17:58.516 --> 0:18:01.796
<v Speaker 2>On the same point on this gap. There's a moment

0:18:01.836 --> 0:18:03.716
<v Speaker 2>when you're talking about it's actually my favorite part of

0:18:03.716 --> 0:18:07.996
<v Speaker 2>the book, when you're talking about strategies for unblocking yourself

0:18:08.396 --> 0:18:11.516
<v Speaker 2>into all the different ways that you think about that

0:18:11.636 --> 0:18:14.836
<v Speaker 2>or approach that. When you're working with people and one

0:18:14.876 --> 0:18:17.996
<v Speaker 2>of them was right, writ in the voice of someone else,

0:18:18.276 --> 0:18:21.276
<v Speaker 2>that's right, that's what we said, and Rick, once again,

0:18:21.916 --> 0:18:26.556
<v Speaker 2>in the world we live in, that is an incendiary thought.

0:18:27.356 --> 0:18:30.996
<v Speaker 2>That's called appropriation. And you have this beautiful I want

0:18:31.036 --> 0:18:35.476
<v Speaker 2>to quote in a similar vein you say there are

0:18:35.516 --> 0:18:39.756
<v Speaker 2>countless examples of imitation turning into legitimate innovation. Having a

0:18:39.836 --> 0:18:42.996
<v Speaker 2>romanticized vision of an artist, genre, or tradition may allow

0:18:43.036 --> 0:18:45.716
<v Speaker 2>you to create something new because you see it from

0:18:45.756 --> 0:18:49.236
<v Speaker 2>a different perspective than those closer to it. So not

0:18:49.276 --> 0:18:51.196
<v Speaker 2>only are you saying that it can be really useful

0:18:51.236 --> 0:18:55.476
<v Speaker 2>to inhabit someone else's voice or tradition, you're also saying

0:18:55.516 --> 0:19:00.276
<v Speaker 2>that that can spark a whole new, more beautiful, greater

0:19:01.156 --> 0:19:04.436
<v Speaker 2>kind of innovation because you're approaching it from your own perspective.

0:19:04.476 --> 0:19:06.956
<v Speaker 2>You talk about Sergio Leoni spaghetti westerns, being a good

0:19:06.956 --> 0:19:09.956
<v Speaker 2>example of that that they transform understanding of what a

0:19:10.156 --> 0:19:12.876
<v Speaker 2>what a question is. I thought a lot about the

0:19:12.956 --> 0:19:16.676
<v Speaker 2>audiobook we did with Paul Simon when he's talking about Graceland,

0:19:17.036 --> 0:19:18.996
<v Speaker 2>which is that right, yes?

0:19:20.316 --> 0:19:24.116
<v Speaker 1>Or or talking heads you know, remain in light or

0:19:24.156 --> 0:19:28.596
<v Speaker 1>fear of music. Those were inspired by African rhythms. Yeah,

0:19:29.036 --> 0:19:32.716
<v Speaker 1>there's a great tradition in doing this. I mean pretty

0:19:32.756 --> 0:19:37.476
<v Speaker 1>much the best of everything was based on something else always,

0:19:38.156 --> 0:19:41.196
<v Speaker 1>and then it's the it's through the new interpretations. Like

0:19:41.236 --> 0:19:45.476
<v Speaker 1>the Beatles were doing American motown music, but because they

0:19:45.476 --> 0:19:49.276
<v Speaker 1>were English and because of the distance, they weren't trying

0:19:49.356 --> 0:19:51.956
<v Speaker 1>to do it different. They did it different because they

0:19:51.956 --> 0:19:54.436
<v Speaker 1>were different, and that was the beauty of it. And

0:19:54.436 --> 0:19:57.716
<v Speaker 1>that's how the Beatles became the Beatles. You know. Yeah,

0:19:57.756 --> 0:20:00.476
<v Speaker 1>they became the Beatles because they are the Beatles. But

0:20:00.596 --> 0:20:03.156
<v Speaker 1>the music they were doing was they were trying to

0:20:03.156 --> 0:20:04.196
<v Speaker 1>do motown.

0:20:04.276 --> 0:20:06.036
<v Speaker 2>Or as you point out, the Ramones were trying to

0:20:06.076 --> 0:20:08.316
<v Speaker 2>be the Bay City Rollers, yes.

0:20:08.516 --> 0:20:09.116
<v Speaker 3>Which is a true.

0:20:09.556 --> 0:20:09.716
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:20:09.796 --> 0:20:13.076
<v Speaker 1>Johnny Ramone told me that himself, so I know that

0:20:13.156 --> 0:20:13.756
<v Speaker 1>to be true.

0:20:13.876 --> 0:20:15.756
<v Speaker 2>It is so for those of you who don't know

0:20:15.796 --> 0:20:19.476
<v Speaker 2>the basy De Rollers, they were just about the dumbest

0:20:19.516 --> 0:20:22.356
<v Speaker 2>bubble bubble gum band of the they were't like the

0:20:22.396 --> 0:20:27.356
<v Speaker 2>boy band of the early seventies, and the Ramones think that.

0:20:27.356 --> 0:20:29.596
<v Speaker 1>Well, they had that song s A t U r

0:20:29.836 --> 0:20:32.876
<v Speaker 1>d A y s A t u y. And then

0:20:32.916 --> 0:20:36.636
<v Speaker 1>if you listen to the Ramones, they have those type

0:20:36.676 --> 0:20:40.996
<v Speaker 1>of gabba gabba we accept, you know, similar types of chance.

0:20:41.596 --> 0:20:43.836
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's right, Yeah, they take it and they twist

0:20:43.836 --> 0:20:48.596
<v Speaker 2>it in this brilliant, beautiful, revolutionary way. But so we

0:20:48.876 --> 0:20:50.476
<v Speaker 2>walk about it was sort of harp on this, but

0:20:50.996 --> 0:20:53.756
<v Speaker 2>how do we get away from that notion? So it

0:20:53.876 --> 0:20:55.916
<v Speaker 2>is legitimately the case. And I know this because I

0:20:55.956 --> 0:20:59.516
<v Speaker 2>are examples of people who I know who are legitimately

0:20:59.596 --> 0:21:03.636
<v Speaker 2>terrified of even so much as dipping their toe in

0:21:03.716 --> 0:21:08.996
<v Speaker 2>another traditionary voice for fear of being criticized. It's almost

0:21:08.996 --> 0:21:13.956
<v Speaker 2>like we're terrified of the sources of creativity. We're terrified

0:21:13.956 --> 0:21:15.996
<v Speaker 2>to admit to ourselves what we're doing in the name

0:21:16.036 --> 0:21:16.756
<v Speaker 2>of creativity.

0:21:17.516 --> 0:21:22.876
<v Speaker 1>The reason someone imitates someone else is because they love

0:21:22.956 --> 0:21:27.236
<v Speaker 1>someone else. That's why it's only flattery when someone is

0:21:27.276 --> 0:21:29.916
<v Speaker 1>inspired by someone else. If you if you decided to

0:21:29.916 --> 0:21:33.236
<v Speaker 1>write because someone else wrote and you like their writing,

0:21:33.276 --> 0:21:36.996
<v Speaker 1>and you decide to become a writer that's not against them,

0:21:37.276 --> 0:21:40.916
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't take anything away from them. That's a tribute

0:21:40.916 --> 0:21:44.156
<v Speaker 1>to them. Yeah, and all of the music that gets

0:21:44.196 --> 0:21:48.516
<v Speaker 1>made based on loving someone else's music is a tribute

0:21:48.516 --> 0:21:51.156
<v Speaker 1>to them, whether it be people of the same color

0:21:51.196 --> 0:21:53.316
<v Speaker 1>or different color. It doesn't matter that it has nothing

0:21:53.356 --> 0:21:55.796
<v Speaker 1>to do with that. That's not what it's about. Yeah,

0:21:55.996 --> 0:21:59.276
<v Speaker 1>it's a current misread of the situation.

0:22:00.076 --> 0:22:01.876
<v Speaker 2>Yes, you know what it is. And it goes to

0:22:01.876 --> 0:22:03.556
<v Speaker 2>something else. You talk a little bit. You talk about

0:22:03.556 --> 0:22:06.756
<v Speaker 2>the abundance mindset. In getting to that part of the book.

0:22:06.836 --> 0:22:10.756
<v Speaker 2>You talk about the importance of understanding that number of ideas,

0:22:10.836 --> 0:22:14.556
<v Speaker 2>essentially the number of ideas out there is infinite, not finite. Yes,

0:22:14.676 --> 0:22:18.356
<v Speaker 2>when you understand it's infinite, then you're not scared of

0:22:18.956 --> 0:22:21.876
<v Speaker 2>imitating someone because you're like, there's a million things out there.

0:22:22.076 --> 0:22:24.036
<v Speaker 2>We don't we don't have to hold tightly to what

0:22:24.076 --> 0:22:28.476
<v Speaker 2>we've done and be react in a hostile manner if

0:22:28.476 --> 0:22:32.596
<v Speaker 2>someone tries to imitate us because there's a million efficiency,

0:22:32.716 --> 0:22:35.596
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's fine. I think the idea that the

0:22:35.676 --> 0:22:39.076
<v Speaker 2>number of new ideas is infinite has kind of fallen

0:22:39.076 --> 0:22:40.156
<v Speaker 2>out of favor somehow.

0:22:40.876 --> 0:22:44.116
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's it's just odd. It's I mean, people can

0:22:44.156 --> 0:22:47.316
<v Speaker 1>be wrong and it's okay, you know, like that's fine.

0:22:47.516 --> 0:22:49.316
<v Speaker 1>In some ways, the fact that it's falling out of

0:22:49.316 --> 0:22:54.516
<v Speaker 1>favor means the people who embrace the tried and true

0:22:54.516 --> 0:22:58.116
<v Speaker 1>methods that have worked will find greater success and they'll

0:22:58.156 --> 0:23:00.196
<v Speaker 1>be less stuff in between.

0:23:00.516 --> 0:23:06.236
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, is your understanding of this notion of abundance? Is

0:23:06.276 --> 0:23:09.636
<v Speaker 2>it a product of having worked for I don't know

0:23:09.636 --> 0:23:11.756
<v Speaker 2>how many years you've been in the industry, many decades.

0:23:12.156 --> 0:23:13.956
<v Speaker 2>Did you feel the same way when you were twenty one?

0:23:14.076 --> 0:23:16.236
<v Speaker 2>In other words, is it natural for the very for

0:23:16.636 --> 0:23:19.836
<v Speaker 2>the very young to be much more jealous, much more

0:23:19.916 --> 0:23:23.516
<v Speaker 2>jealousy guard their ideas because they haven't had years and

0:23:23.596 --> 0:23:26.516
<v Speaker 2>years of experience in seeing the kind of waterfall of

0:23:26.556 --> 0:23:28.276
<v Speaker 2>ideas that's out there. Is that fair?

0:23:28.716 --> 0:23:32.596
<v Speaker 1>No, it's fair. I've always felt this way because I

0:23:32.636 --> 0:23:34.956
<v Speaker 1>see it, you know, I see all of the ideas

0:23:34.996 --> 0:23:37.396
<v Speaker 1>I see. I want to learn everything. There's no time.

0:23:37.476 --> 0:23:39.196
<v Speaker 1>There's no time to learn all the things I want

0:23:39.236 --> 0:23:44.036
<v Speaker 1>to learn. I'm endlessly curious, and I'm always looking I'm

0:23:44.076 --> 0:23:47.596
<v Speaker 1>thinking back to It's really more about what we were

0:23:47.636 --> 0:23:50.516
<v Speaker 1>just talking about But the reason I learned about reggae

0:23:50.636 --> 0:23:53.436
<v Speaker 1>music was because of the Clash. If it weren't for

0:23:53.476 --> 0:23:55.476
<v Speaker 1>the Clash, I don't know if I would have ever

0:23:55.676 --> 0:23:59.316
<v Speaker 1>come in contact with reggae music. So is it bad

0:23:59.396 --> 0:24:02.396
<v Speaker 1>that the Clash did reggae music? Yeah, because they turned

0:24:02.436 --> 0:24:07.196
<v Speaker 1>on a whole generation of people who otherwise may not

0:24:07.276 --> 0:24:10.036
<v Speaker 1>have ever heard about it. Do you know? It's like,

0:24:10.396 --> 0:24:15.676
<v Speaker 1>it's a crazy idea to think that, not to be

0:24:15.756 --> 0:24:18.716
<v Speaker 1>inspired by the things that are inspiring us and to

0:24:18.876 --> 0:24:21.836
<v Speaker 1>show it and to own it and to fly the

0:24:21.876 --> 0:24:28.076
<v Speaker 1>flag of these great trends or genres is nothing more beautiful. Yeah.

0:24:28.876 --> 0:24:30.836
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna pause for a quick break, and then we'll

0:24:30.876 --> 0:24:33.636
<v Speaker 4>be back with more from Rick Rubin and Malcolm Gladwell.

0:24:37.916 --> 0:24:40.796
<v Speaker 4>We're back with more from Rick Rubin and Malcolm Gladwell.

0:24:41.436 --> 0:24:44.396
<v Speaker 2>I remember pretty early in my writing career when I

0:24:44.476 --> 0:24:47.916
<v Speaker 2>was unhappy. I thought I was limited as a writer.

0:24:47.996 --> 0:24:50.956
<v Speaker 2>And I remember sitting down with I've forgotten which book

0:24:50.996 --> 0:24:54.076
<v Speaker 2>it was, one of Michael Lewis's books and one of

0:24:54.156 --> 0:25:00.316
<v Speaker 2>Janet Malcolm's books, two narrative nonfiction writers who are extraordinarily

0:25:00.356 --> 0:25:02.836
<v Speaker 2>good at the one thing I thought I was weak at,

0:25:03.116 --> 0:25:07.116
<v Speaker 2>which is character literally sitting down and studying them like

0:25:07.196 --> 0:25:10.356
<v Speaker 2>they were with a talmud, Like, what's he doing here?

0:25:10.436 --> 0:25:13.236
<v Speaker 2>How much time does he spend literally measuring how much

0:25:13.236 --> 0:25:17.836
<v Speaker 2>time does he spend describing someone? I was getting itchy feet.

0:25:17.916 --> 0:25:20.196
<v Speaker 2>I would I did introduce a character and I think, oh,

0:25:20.196 --> 0:25:21.636
<v Speaker 2>you must be bored of the character list.

0:25:21.596 --> 0:25:22.156
<v Speaker 3>And then I would.

0:25:22.156 --> 0:25:24.156
<v Speaker 2>Then it would Michael Lewis and is like, he has

0:25:24.236 --> 0:25:26.076
<v Speaker 2>the same character the whole book and we're not bored

0:25:26.076 --> 0:25:27.036
<v Speaker 2>of him. How does he do that?

0:25:27.196 --> 0:25:27.356
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:25:27.596 --> 0:25:30.436
<v Speaker 2>Or Jed and Malcolm would like peel one layer after

0:25:30.516 --> 0:25:32.636
<v Speaker 2>another off the onion. You'd be like, there can't be

0:25:32.636 --> 0:25:35.316
<v Speaker 2>any onion left. There was always onion left. I was like,

0:25:35.796 --> 0:25:38.556
<v Speaker 2>how does she do that? To your point about you

0:25:38.636 --> 0:25:41.236
<v Speaker 2>got that lovely thing about the back and forth between

0:25:41.276 --> 0:25:45.676
<v Speaker 2>the Beatles and the Beach Boys. Brian Wilson sees White

0:25:45.716 --> 0:25:48.716
<v Speaker 2>Album and says, is it White album that inspired always?

0:25:48.796 --> 0:25:51.996
<v Speaker 1>It starts with it starts with rubber Soul. It starts

0:25:51.996 --> 0:25:55.596
<v Speaker 1>with rubber soul. Yeah, And then based on Brian Wilson

0:25:55.636 --> 0:25:59.596
<v Speaker 1>hearing Rubber Soul, he makes pet sounds based on the

0:25:59.596 --> 0:26:05.916
<v Speaker 1>song God only Knows. Paul has the idea for Sergeant pepper. Yeah,

0:26:06.236 --> 0:26:08.916
<v Speaker 1>And the point that I make there is not they

0:26:09.156 --> 0:26:12.996
<v Speaker 1>weren't doing that at a competition. It was out of

0:26:13.596 --> 0:26:19.116
<v Speaker 1>love and inspiration, and it was an upward spiral between

0:26:19.156 --> 0:26:23.436
<v Speaker 1>them of inspire a reaction, inspire a reaction, inspire, lifting

0:26:23.476 --> 0:26:26.636
<v Speaker 1>the level, lifting the level. It was they made each

0:26:26.676 --> 0:26:29.916
<v Speaker 1>other better. They weren't trying to beat each other. It

0:26:30.036 --> 0:26:31.836
<v Speaker 1>was different than that they loved each other.

0:26:32.436 --> 0:26:34.916
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, explain to me. It's sort of obvious, but I'd

0:26:34.956 --> 0:26:37.356
<v Speaker 2>love for you to talk about it. Why is it

0:26:37.396 --> 0:26:39.716
<v Speaker 2>important that it comes out of love and not competition.

0:26:39.996 --> 0:26:44.116
<v Speaker 2>What is it about a competitive drive that is more

0:26:44.156 --> 0:26:46.036
<v Speaker 2>limiting than a drive of love.

0:26:46.796 --> 0:26:48.996
<v Speaker 1>Well, first of all, we're talking about. Majority of what

0:26:48.996 --> 0:26:52.116
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about is art, and the way that I

0:26:52.156 --> 0:26:55.956
<v Speaker 1>see art is it really is about our own self expression.

0:26:56.476 --> 0:26:59.676
<v Speaker 1>So I'll give you an example. I just wrote a book.

0:26:59.836 --> 0:27:03.236
<v Speaker 1>You write a lot of books. The idea of Rick's

0:27:03.236 --> 0:27:07.836
<v Speaker 1>book competing with Malcolm's book is an insane idea. You

0:27:07.876 --> 0:27:12.196
<v Speaker 1>write a Malcolm book, I write a Rick book. No

0:27:12.236 --> 0:27:14.996
<v Speaker 1>one but Malcolm can write a Malcolm book. No one

0:27:15.036 --> 0:27:18.916
<v Speaker 1>but Rick can write a Rick book. They're mutually exclusive things.

0:27:20.236 --> 0:27:24.516
<v Speaker 1>Everything is like that. So if you're focused on beating

0:27:24.516 --> 0:27:28.476
<v Speaker 1>someone else. It makes me think you're not actually playing

0:27:28.516 --> 0:27:30.756
<v Speaker 1>the same game that I'm playing. The game that I'm

0:27:30.796 --> 0:27:33.036
<v Speaker 1>playing is I want to make the best thing that

0:27:33.076 --> 0:27:37.476
<v Speaker 1>I can make for me, that's all, and if someone

0:27:37.476 --> 0:27:40.076
<v Speaker 1>else likes it, it's great. There's a chapter in the

0:27:40.116 --> 0:27:43.036
<v Speaker 1>book about success, which is success is when you feel

0:27:43.036 --> 0:27:45.796
<v Speaker 1>good enough about it a piece of work you've made

0:27:46.636 --> 0:27:49.116
<v Speaker 1>to share it in the world. That's the moment of success.

0:27:49.156 --> 0:27:51.956
<v Speaker 1>Whatever happens after that's completely out of our control. But

0:27:52.076 --> 0:27:54.436
<v Speaker 1>the moment that you sign off, it's like you're okay,

0:27:54.516 --> 0:27:57.356
<v Speaker 1>here we go, and then move on to your next project.

0:27:57.556 --> 0:28:02.756
<v Speaker 1>That's where success lies. So to work on a vibration

0:28:03.116 --> 0:28:07.076
<v Speaker 1>of competition. It's one thing. If it's about running a race,

0:28:07.476 --> 0:28:10.996
<v Speaker 1>this is not running a race. This really is always

0:28:11.036 --> 0:28:12.036
<v Speaker 1>apples and oranges.

0:28:12.436 --> 0:28:16.236
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, although you know it's funny, I think you're selling

0:28:16.276 --> 0:28:19.076
<v Speaker 2>your idea a little short. I was thinking about this

0:28:19.116 --> 0:28:21.956
<v Speaker 2>when I read that part. I'm a big fan of cars,

0:28:22.756 --> 0:28:27.556
<v Speaker 2>and there's a very particular moment in the early aughts

0:28:28.276 --> 0:28:33.596
<v Speaker 2>when car design goes through a stage that I think

0:28:33.676 --> 0:28:36.756
<v Speaker 2>everyone in the who loves cars thinks was one of

0:28:36.796 --> 0:28:40.076
<v Speaker 2>a kind of extraordinary moment of it was a kind

0:28:40.076 --> 0:28:42.596
<v Speaker 2>of when cars started to look very kind of bowhusy.

0:28:42.636 --> 0:28:44.436
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you know cars, but there was

0:28:44.476 --> 0:28:46.956
<v Speaker 2>a very beautiful E Class that Mercedes put out in

0:28:46.956 --> 0:28:50.676
<v Speaker 2>the early aughts, which is veryy, clean lines, round headlights.

0:28:51.036 --> 0:28:54.916
<v Speaker 2>At the same time, Audi put out the first iteration

0:28:54.956 --> 0:28:56.796
<v Speaker 2>of Estyle. They're still in but it was very clean

0:28:56.836 --> 0:29:00.076
<v Speaker 2>and very They all were doing this a very similar aesthetic,

0:29:00.076 --> 0:29:02.276
<v Speaker 2>which was a rejection of a lot of the kind

0:29:02.316 --> 0:29:05.156
<v Speaker 2>of clutter and complication that had gone on in the

0:29:05.316 --> 0:29:07.796
<v Speaker 2>in the previous generation of car design. And you could

0:29:07.836 --> 0:29:11.156
<v Speaker 2>see it across all the kind of elite car makers.

0:29:11.596 --> 0:29:13.956
<v Speaker 2>And you know, normally you would say, these are guys

0:29:13.956 --> 0:29:16.236
<v Speaker 2>who really are in competition with each other. They are

0:29:16.276 --> 0:29:19.476
<v Speaker 2>battling over a finite marketplace. They're making the same thing

0:29:19.676 --> 0:29:22.996
<v Speaker 2>cars that people drive. But they weren't all pursuing this

0:29:23.556 --> 0:29:27.116
<v Speaker 2>Bauhaus design strategy. It was out of love.

0:29:27.556 --> 0:29:28.156
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely.

0:29:28.396 --> 0:29:32.236
<v Speaker 2>The guy at Audi saw the E Class and it's like,

0:29:32.396 --> 0:29:34.956
<v Speaker 2>oh my god, that's a gorgeous car. I want to

0:29:34.956 --> 0:29:36.316
<v Speaker 2>do my version of it. I mean it was no,

0:29:36.756 --> 0:29:39.756
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't like let's take market share from you know,

0:29:40.636 --> 0:29:42.436
<v Speaker 2>at that level. I mean, maybe it was in the

0:29:42.436 --> 0:29:45.636
<v Speaker 2>marketing group, but at the level of the designer it

0:29:45.756 --> 0:29:49.916
<v Speaker 2>was clearly they all fell in love, yes, with this

0:29:49.996 --> 0:29:54.236
<v Speaker 2>particular So I think it goes beyond what we think

0:29:54.276 --> 0:29:57.436
<v Speaker 2>of as the as the art narrowly as the arts.

0:29:57.476 --> 0:30:01.396
<v Speaker 2>I think you see it everywhere that fundamentally, in a

0:30:01.436 --> 0:30:05.356
<v Speaker 2>million different ways. Even people who are locked in competition

0:30:05.476 --> 0:30:08.716
<v Speaker 2>with each other sometimes push that aside and do things

0:30:08.756 --> 0:30:11.316
<v Speaker 2>out of a genuine affection for what they were just

0:30:11.316 --> 0:30:13.276
<v Speaker 2>they're just blown away by something they see and know, like,

0:30:13.276 --> 0:30:13.796
<v Speaker 2>oh my god.

0:30:14.276 --> 0:30:19.956
<v Speaker 1>Here's an even more metaphysical version of that, where the

0:30:20.076 --> 0:30:25.036
<v Speaker 1>same thing happens, but it's not a reaction. So in

0:30:25.116 --> 0:30:28.876
<v Speaker 1>the example you gave, Mercedes came out with a beautiful

0:30:28.916 --> 0:30:34.036
<v Speaker 1>new design, and Audi, inspired by that design, made something new.

0:30:35.236 --> 0:30:42.916
<v Speaker 1>They're also throughout history examples of two or three similar

0:30:44.396 --> 0:30:49.916
<v Speaker 1>novel approaches entering at the same time, not based on

0:30:50.076 --> 0:30:56.316
<v Speaker 1>seeing each other, yeah, just based on it's time for this. Yeah.

0:30:56.636 --> 0:31:00.716
<v Speaker 1>And maybe it's possible that the thing that inspired Mercedes

0:31:00.756 --> 0:31:03.276
<v Speaker 1>to want to do it is the thing that inspired

0:31:03.396 --> 0:31:06.036
<v Speaker 1>Audi to want to do it. But that's different than

0:31:06.116 --> 0:31:10.316
<v Speaker 1>Audi wanting to copy what Mercedes did, And that's a

0:31:10.436 --> 0:31:13.636
<v Speaker 1>fascinating thing when there are these movements of art where

0:31:14.316 --> 0:31:16.396
<v Speaker 1>it just springs up all over the planet at the

0:31:16.396 --> 0:31:18.476
<v Speaker 1>same time, not because they saw it and wanted to

0:31:18.476 --> 0:31:21.116
<v Speaker 1>do it, but because now is the time for this

0:31:21.276 --> 0:31:22.556
<v Speaker 1>new thing, whatever it is.

0:31:23.356 --> 0:31:26.756
<v Speaker 2>But at its root, it's the same thing, because they're

0:31:26.756 --> 0:31:30.716
<v Speaker 2>falling in love with the same idea in the world simultaneously.

0:31:31.196 --> 0:31:33.116
<v Speaker 2>You can d of fall in love with what Joe

0:31:33.116 --> 0:31:36.316
<v Speaker 2>across the pond is doing, or me and Joe can

0:31:36.356 --> 0:31:38.796
<v Speaker 2>fall in love with something you know in the world

0:31:38.836 --> 0:31:42.636
<v Speaker 2>of ideas that's really beautiful and novel. But I think

0:31:42.676 --> 0:31:45.036
<v Speaker 2>the engine is the same, which is it's love.

0:31:45.636 --> 0:31:49.756
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it seems more magical when there isn't when you

0:31:49.796 --> 0:31:53.116
<v Speaker 1>don't see one like it first. There's something about it

0:31:53.156 --> 0:31:55.636
<v Speaker 1>when I don't know if it's ever happened to you,

0:31:55.876 --> 0:31:57.876
<v Speaker 1>it has happened to me where I'll have an idea

0:31:57.916 --> 0:32:00.796
<v Speaker 1>for something and I don't act on that right away,

0:32:01.276 --> 0:32:04.076
<v Speaker 1>and then within six months or a year someone else

0:32:04.116 --> 0:32:07.556
<v Speaker 1>does it. They didn't steal my idea. It was time

0:32:07.596 --> 0:32:08.396
<v Speaker 1>for that to happen.

0:32:09.196 --> 0:32:11.156
<v Speaker 2>Let's keep going to so much wonderful stuff here. I

0:32:11.796 --> 0:32:14.396
<v Speaker 2>want to give listeners more of a taste of it.

0:32:14.436 --> 0:32:16.956
<v Speaker 2>Was several moments when I was out of surprise and

0:32:16.996 --> 0:32:22.036
<v Speaker 2>in one case really genuinely wanted more of a explanation,

0:32:22.676 --> 0:32:26.316
<v Speaker 2>and that was when the work has five mistakes, it's

0:32:26.316 --> 0:32:29.556
<v Speaker 2>not yet completed. When it has eight mistakes, it might

0:32:29.636 --> 0:32:31.316
<v Speaker 2>be yes, Rick, what does that mean?

0:32:32.356 --> 0:32:35.756
<v Speaker 1>We get hung up on the idea of perfection, and

0:32:35.996 --> 0:32:39.516
<v Speaker 1>we think perfection is what we're looking for, when really

0:32:39.556 --> 0:32:44.116
<v Speaker 1>what we're looking for is something with emotion in it,

0:32:44.196 --> 0:32:48.876
<v Speaker 1>something with humanity in it, and humanity has flaws. So

0:32:49.996 --> 0:32:53.876
<v Speaker 1>we can use the example of the leaning Tower of Pisa.

0:32:53.956 --> 0:32:55.716
<v Speaker 1>At the time that it was made, it was a mistake,

0:32:56.476 --> 0:32:58.676
<v Speaker 1>and now it's one of the most visited buildings in

0:32:58.716 --> 0:33:02.436
<v Speaker 1>the world, and it's visited purely because of the mistake.

0:33:02.996 --> 0:33:07.876
<v Speaker 1>You know, we collect old Persian rugs that were handmade

0:33:08.196 --> 0:33:10.476
<v Speaker 1>and that had been lived in whereas you can buy

0:33:10.516 --> 0:33:14.716
<v Speaker 1>a new machine made rug. Now that's more perfect than that,

0:33:15.236 --> 0:33:19.276
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't have the same humanity in it. And

0:33:19.876 --> 0:33:21.956
<v Speaker 1>the reason I use the example of five and eight

0:33:21.996 --> 0:33:27.916
<v Speaker 1>are their random choices. Those are not specific. Those are

0:33:27.916 --> 0:33:29.716
<v Speaker 1>not if you have five, you got to get to

0:33:29.796 --> 0:33:32.116
<v Speaker 1>eight for it to work. But it's a way of

0:33:32.156 --> 0:33:36.996
<v Speaker 1>thinking where we're not looking to make it perfect. We're

0:33:36.996 --> 0:33:40.916
<v Speaker 1>looking for the soulful version that could either be going

0:33:41.436 --> 0:33:45.676
<v Speaker 1>further towards perfection or backwards away from it, and it

0:33:45.756 --> 0:33:48.236
<v Speaker 1>might just as well be backwards away from it for

0:33:48.276 --> 0:33:48.916
<v Speaker 1>it to feel good.

0:33:48.956 --> 0:33:52.196
<v Speaker 2>When we're making art, can you think about a project

0:33:52.236 --> 0:33:56.036
<v Speaker 2>you've worked on that you think is beautiful and authentic

0:33:56.876 --> 0:34:00.316
<v Speaker 2>in precisely this imperfect way, that has mistakes that you

0:34:00.396 --> 0:34:02.036
<v Speaker 2>think it benefited from.

0:34:02.636 --> 0:34:05.636
<v Speaker 1>I can give you an example close to both of

0:34:05.716 --> 0:34:09.676
<v Speaker 1>our hearts, which is interesting. When we had the Broken

0:34:09.796 --> 0:34:15.596
<v Speaker 1>Record logo designed, it was originally done. It was designed

0:34:15.636 --> 0:34:18.956
<v Speaker 1>on a computer, and it was a very formal design,

0:34:19.036 --> 0:34:23.196
<v Speaker 1>graphic design, and a friend of mine suggested, you don't

0:34:23.236 --> 0:34:26.516
<v Speaker 1>have tried doing that by hand? Yeah, And then we

0:34:26.556 --> 0:34:28.716
<v Speaker 1>suggested to the design and try it by hand. And

0:34:28.756 --> 0:34:30.356
<v Speaker 1>the one that we ended up picking was the one

0:34:30.436 --> 0:34:34.196
<v Speaker 1>done by hand. It was less perfect, yeah, than the

0:34:34.276 --> 0:34:38.076
<v Speaker 1>original version, but it had more personality. Yeah.

0:34:38.316 --> 0:34:41.556
<v Speaker 2>It's very clarifying because I think it's very easy to

0:34:41.596 --> 0:34:45.436
<v Speaker 2>lose sight of what the audience for a work of

0:34:45.556 --> 0:34:49.076
<v Speaker 2>art wants. They want the creator, they want it. It's

0:34:49.116 --> 0:34:51.876
<v Speaker 2>a way of looking into the mind or heart of

0:34:51.876 --> 0:34:54.996
<v Speaker 2>the creator. They want, don't want some abstract thing that

0:34:55.756 --> 0:34:59.876
<v Speaker 2>fits every criteria of perfection, right we're looking for, you know,

0:34:59.996 --> 0:35:03.716
<v Speaker 2>to give the example back of when I was went

0:35:03.756 --> 0:35:06.156
<v Speaker 2>through my period where I was obsessively reading Michael Lewis

0:35:06.476 --> 0:35:09.356
<v Speaker 2>and Janet Malcolm. Jenna Malcolm is a good eample.

0:35:09.236 --> 0:35:09.876
<v Speaker 1>This or both.

0:35:10.436 --> 0:35:14.636
<v Speaker 2>When you read them, you feel like you know the

0:35:14.676 --> 0:35:16.676
<v Speaker 2>two of those writers. When you read their writing, at

0:35:16.676 --> 0:35:19.116
<v Speaker 2>the end of a Michael Lewis book, you feel like

0:35:19.156 --> 0:35:21.756
<v Speaker 2>you've been hanging out with him and have a window

0:35:21.756 --> 0:35:25.596
<v Speaker 2>into his world. Jenna Malcolm's books are weird and quirky

0:35:25.636 --> 0:35:29.476
<v Speaker 2>and sometimes disturbing, but you love that because you're like, oh,

0:35:29.516 --> 0:35:32.756
<v Speaker 2>she's such a kind of fascinating character. And my worry

0:35:32.916 --> 0:35:37.116
<v Speaker 2>when I was reading them was that people weren't having that.

0:35:37.116 --> 0:35:39.916
<v Speaker 2>That was not the experience my readers were having. That

0:35:39.956 --> 0:35:44.076
<v Speaker 2>they were getting something that was too abstract. They were

0:35:44.076 --> 0:35:48.196
<v Speaker 2>getting information, but not that kind of they were really

0:35:48.236 --> 0:35:51.436
<v Speaker 2>getting me. You know, it took a long time. We're

0:35:51.436 --> 0:35:54.756
<v Speaker 2>talking about. That thing I've describing was twenty years into

0:35:54.756 --> 0:35:55.716
<v Speaker 2>my writing career.

0:35:56.356 --> 0:36:01.236
<v Speaker 1>And what you're talking about is really moving away from

0:36:01.316 --> 0:36:06.476
<v Speaker 1>classical journalism. Yeah, because my understanding of journalism is the

0:36:06.516 --> 0:36:10.036
<v Speaker 1>writer is invisible it's only the story, and it's just

0:36:10.196 --> 0:36:13.076
<v Speaker 1>you know, just facts, that's all it is. Yeah. So,

0:36:13.676 --> 0:36:18.716
<v Speaker 1>in a way, this would be a bastardization of journalism.

0:36:19.356 --> 0:36:22.316
<v Speaker 1>But that's why it's engaging, and that's why it's interesting,

0:36:22.436 --> 0:36:27.556
<v Speaker 1>and that's why it's popular. It's not regular journalism. It's

0:36:27.676 --> 0:36:32.516
<v Speaker 1>journalism through your filter, the personal filter. There's a documentarian

0:36:32.596 --> 0:36:36.716
<v Speaker 1>named Nick Broomfield who I love, who makes these crazy movies.

0:36:37.316 --> 0:36:41.436
<v Speaker 1>He tends to pick outrageous characters to focus on, but

0:36:41.596 --> 0:36:45.396
<v Speaker 1>he always ends up part of the movie. And usually

0:36:45.476 --> 0:36:49.356
<v Speaker 1>when documentarians make a movie, you just see the subject,

0:36:49.356 --> 0:36:52.516
<v Speaker 1>but he ensconces himself into the finds a way to

0:36:52.556 --> 0:36:56.756
<v Speaker 1>insinuate himself into the story. And it's wild and bizarre,

0:36:56.956 --> 0:37:00.316
<v Speaker 1>and it's unusual for the director of a documentary to

0:37:00.316 --> 0:37:03.476
<v Speaker 1>become a main character in every one of the documentaries

0:37:03.476 --> 0:37:07.636
<v Speaker 1>he makes about different people. Fascinating. Yeah, so I love it.

0:37:07.956 --> 0:37:08.276
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:37:08.636 --> 0:37:10.756
<v Speaker 2>Wait, couple of other things I wanted. I want to

0:37:10.756 --> 0:37:13.876
<v Speaker 2>make sure we you you had a little section that

0:37:13.956 --> 0:37:18.196
<v Speaker 2>I loved. When you're talking about Alpha Go, the AI

0:37:18.956 --> 0:37:22.676
<v Speaker 2>software system that was designed to master the game of

0:37:22.676 --> 0:37:27.116
<v Speaker 2>the Japanese game of Go, and how there's this famous

0:37:27.116 --> 0:37:30.796
<v Speaker 2>showdown between the computer and a Go grand master, and

0:37:30.836 --> 0:37:34.396
<v Speaker 2>the computer wins by making a move that had never

0:37:34.436 --> 0:37:36.996
<v Speaker 2>occurred to any Go player. You know, they had you say,

0:37:36.996 --> 0:37:39.556
<v Speaker 2>you say it was most Go players would have considered

0:37:39.636 --> 0:37:41.996
<v Speaker 2>A or B choice, and the computer went to C

0:37:42.436 --> 0:37:45.916
<v Speaker 2>and it blew everyone's mind. And you said, when you

0:37:45.956 --> 0:37:47.996
<v Speaker 2>read about that that you cried.

0:37:48.596 --> 0:37:51.116
<v Speaker 1>I did, and it was it wasn't. I didn't read

0:37:51.156 --> 0:37:53.956
<v Speaker 1>about it. I watched the documentary, But you watched the documentary. Yeah,

0:37:53.956 --> 0:37:56.556
<v Speaker 1>I was watching a documentary about it and it made

0:37:56.596 --> 0:38:00.556
<v Speaker 1>me cry. And when I cried, I didn't understand it

0:38:01.076 --> 0:38:04.636
<v Speaker 1>at first. It took it took a while. I thought

0:38:04.636 --> 0:38:08.796
<v Speaker 1>about it more. My reaction forced me to think about

0:38:08.796 --> 0:38:11.676
<v Speaker 1>it more. It's like, why am I crying? I'm not investing.

0:38:11.716 --> 0:38:14.516
<v Speaker 1>I don't play Go, I'm not invested in this story

0:38:14.556 --> 0:38:21.636
<v Speaker 1>at all. Yet I'm crying. And originally my first thought was,

0:38:22.516 --> 0:38:27.196
<v Speaker 1>am I crying because machines are beating humans? No, that's

0:38:27.236 --> 0:38:32.396
<v Speaker 1>not what it is. I'm crying because the way that

0:38:32.436 --> 0:38:37.596
<v Speaker 1>the computer won wasn't by knowing more than the grand master.

0:38:38.436 --> 0:38:42.036
<v Speaker 1>The computer one because it knew less than the grand master.

0:38:42.636 --> 0:38:46.196
<v Speaker 1>And that's what made me cry. It's that the computer

0:38:46.396 --> 0:38:53.036
<v Speaker 1>didn't have all of the baggage and cultural dogma of

0:38:53.076 --> 0:38:57.236
<v Speaker 1>how you're supposed to play Go. It only knew these

0:38:57.276 --> 0:38:58.836
<v Speaker 1>are the rules of the game. I'm playing the rules

0:38:58.876 --> 0:39:02.116
<v Speaker 1>of the game. And it was fascinating to me because

0:39:02.116 --> 0:39:06.156
<v Speaker 1>it made me realize, if we can let go of

0:39:06.276 --> 0:39:11.236
<v Speaker 1>the beliefs of what we're how we're supposed to do things,

0:39:11.796 --> 0:39:15.316
<v Speaker 1>anything maybe possible. It's the tip of the iceberg for

0:39:15.356 --> 0:39:19.556
<v Speaker 1>the game Go, for sure, but maybe it's the tip

0:39:19.556 --> 0:39:22.436
<v Speaker 1>of the iceberg for everything. And if we can get

0:39:22.476 --> 0:39:27.476
<v Speaker 1>back to that beginner's mind of not knowing, of accepting

0:39:27.916 --> 0:39:31.436
<v Speaker 1>that we don't know, we can break through in ways

0:39:31.516 --> 0:39:35.116
<v Speaker 1>never understood before. Yeah, never thought possible before.

0:39:35.436 --> 0:39:39.516
<v Speaker 2>It's funny because I didn't see this documentary, and when

0:39:39.516 --> 0:39:42.396
<v Speaker 2>I read about your description of how much you were

0:39:42.476 --> 0:39:46.236
<v Speaker 2>moved by that moment, I was also moved, but not

0:39:46.356 --> 0:39:50.996
<v Speaker 2>for the reasons you were. I was moved because what

0:39:51.116 --> 0:39:54.236
<v Speaker 2>that told me was that when human beings play Go,

0:39:55.276 --> 0:39:59.396
<v Speaker 2>they're not playing Go. In other words, the computer saw

0:39:59.476 --> 0:40:04.196
<v Speaker 2>Go in its entirety, in a technical sense, saw every

0:40:04.276 --> 0:40:06.876
<v Speaker 2>conceivable move you could make, made one that would never

0:40:06.916 --> 0:40:09.876
<v Speaker 2>have occurred to us. When human beings played We're playing

0:40:09.876 --> 0:40:15.916
<v Speaker 2>this very small parochial version, governed not just by the

0:40:15.996 --> 0:40:25.756
<v Speaker 2>rules and potentials of the board, but by our own assumptions, habits, practices, culturals.

0:40:26.076 --> 0:40:29.476
<v Speaker 2>And I actually kind of love that about us, in

0:40:29.596 --> 0:40:33.916
<v Speaker 2>other words, that we've colonized and humanized and brought all

0:40:33.956 --> 0:40:39.716
<v Speaker 2>of our kind of heartrending limitations even to something like

0:40:39.716 --> 0:40:44.636
<v Speaker 2>a board game. That's very moving to me. That was like,

0:40:45.196 --> 0:40:48.556
<v Speaker 2>the computer has the chile impersonal version of Go, and

0:40:48.596 --> 0:40:51.596
<v Speaker 2>this reminds us we're not playing the chile impersonal version.

0:40:51.916 --> 0:40:56.556
<v Speaker 2>Our Go bears the imprint of our own limitations and

0:40:57.236 --> 0:41:01.516
<v Speaker 2>cultural specificities. And I find that really endearing, you know, Like,

0:41:03.196 --> 0:41:06.396
<v Speaker 2>but it's funny we both see the same thing and

0:41:06.476 --> 0:41:08.516
<v Speaker 2>are moved by it. I don't think what I'm saying

0:41:08.596 --> 0:41:11.596
<v Speaker 2>what you're saying incompatible. I think they're actually competiven.

0:41:11.116 --> 0:41:13.956
<v Speaker 1>Know, I think they're almost opposites, and the fact that

0:41:13.956 --> 0:41:17.516
<v Speaker 1>they are both something to fall in love with about

0:41:17.556 --> 0:41:19.196
<v Speaker 1>the story is amazing. I love that.

0:41:19.636 --> 0:41:23.676
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but this is actually something that you What I've

0:41:23.716 --> 0:41:25.996
<v Speaker 2>just described is something you do a lot in this book,

0:41:26.036 --> 0:41:29.956
<v Speaker 2>which is there are a lot of moments where it

0:41:30.036 --> 0:41:33.996
<v Speaker 2>appears that you're making points that contradict each other, but

0:41:34.036 --> 0:41:37.436
<v Speaker 2>you're not. This is the furthest from Black and White.

0:41:37.836 --> 0:41:39.316
<v Speaker 2>This book, there is a lot of this kind of

0:41:39.396 --> 0:41:42.396
<v Speaker 2>yinging and yanging in it. I thought was really very

0:41:42.516 --> 0:41:47.236
<v Speaker 2>very you. It's very like it's not like you do

0:41:47.276 --> 0:41:50.236
<v Speaker 2>it this way, not this way, like the necessity of

0:41:50.276 --> 0:41:55.716
<v Speaker 2>being both inwardly sensitive and outwardly sensitive. It's not one

0:41:55.836 --> 0:41:58.076
<v Speaker 2>or the other. It's like just there's a balance that

0:41:58.116 --> 0:41:59.116
<v Speaker 2>you have to kind of observe.

0:42:00.156 --> 0:42:02.156
<v Speaker 4>We'll be right back with the rest of Malcolm Gladwell

0:42:02.196 --> 0:42:10.236
<v Speaker 4>and Rick Rubin's conversation. After a quick break, we're back

0:42:10.236 --> 0:42:12.676
<v Speaker 4>with more from Rick Rubin and Malcolm Gladwell.

0:42:13.276 --> 0:42:15.836
<v Speaker 2>There's a passage there that I really love. Were you

0:42:15.876 --> 0:42:19.556
<v Speaker 2>talking about Sometimes there is a musician who you'll listen

0:42:19.596 --> 0:42:23.476
<v Speaker 2>to when they're trying something radically new. Do you remember

0:42:23.476 --> 0:42:26.476
<v Speaker 2>this and you're baffled by it the first time you listen,

0:42:26.516 --> 0:42:28.356
<v Speaker 2>and baffle the second time, and you keep listening and

0:42:28.436 --> 0:42:32.036
<v Speaker 2>keep listening, and then finally become something you can't live without.

0:42:32.676 --> 0:42:34.756
<v Speaker 2>And I was wondering, was there someone in mind?

0:42:34.756 --> 0:42:39.316
<v Speaker 1>Would you several the first my first experience of that

0:42:39.516 --> 0:42:42.196
<v Speaker 1>was a group called Trouble Funk in the early days

0:42:42.196 --> 0:42:45.676
<v Speaker 1>of hip hop. When I was in high school, the

0:42:45.716 --> 0:42:48.636
<v Speaker 1>only place you could hear hip hop was once a week,

0:42:49.196 --> 0:42:54.316
<v Speaker 1>one hour show on WHBI called Mister Magic's Rap Attack,

0:42:54.996 --> 0:42:56.956
<v Speaker 1>and that was the only and I recorded it. I

0:42:56.996 --> 0:42:59.716
<v Speaker 1>Cassette recorded it every week, as did all the other

0:42:59.876 --> 0:43:02.796
<v Speaker 1>hip hop heads in my high school and you know,

0:43:02.876 --> 0:43:06.276
<v Speaker 1>maybe the six of us, and we would record that

0:43:06.356 --> 0:43:08.236
<v Speaker 1>every week and then that would be all we would

0:43:08.236 --> 0:43:10.236
<v Speaker 1>listen to all week because there were at this point

0:43:10.236 --> 0:43:13.876
<v Speaker 1>in time, there really were no hip hop records available

0:43:14.036 --> 0:43:16.396
<v Speaker 1>to buy. There may have been the Sugar Hill Gang's

0:43:16.996 --> 0:43:20.796
<v Speaker 1>Rappers Delight, but that was the only one. Yet on

0:43:20.836 --> 0:43:22.956
<v Speaker 1>this radio show, he played all these songs. It's like,

0:43:22.996 --> 0:43:24.436
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know where they came from, and they

0:43:24.436 --> 0:43:27.956
<v Speaker 1>were all like twelve inch you know, DJ living where

0:43:27.996 --> 0:43:31.196
<v Speaker 1>I live, it didn't exist. So listen to that every

0:43:31.236 --> 0:43:33.836
<v Speaker 1>week and hear whatever was going on in rap music.

0:43:33.836 --> 0:43:37.916
<v Speaker 1>And again it was a very tight time because all

0:43:37.956 --> 0:43:40.436
<v Speaker 1>there was was an hour and with you know, plus

0:43:40.436 --> 0:43:44.116
<v Speaker 1>it had commercials in it for places like Brad's Record

0:43:44.156 --> 0:43:45.916
<v Speaker 1>Den in the Bronx, which is I guess where you

0:43:45.916 --> 0:43:48.676
<v Speaker 1>could have bought some of those other songs that I

0:43:48.676 --> 0:43:50.756
<v Speaker 1>had never gone at that time. I have gone since.

0:43:52.876 --> 0:43:57.036
<v Speaker 1>And one week, in the middle of these all rap songs,

0:43:57.676 --> 0:44:00.236
<v Speaker 1>he played a Troublefunk song, which is not rap music.

0:44:00.316 --> 0:44:03.596
<v Speaker 1>It's go go music, and it's long. And the song

0:44:03.676 --> 0:44:07.916
<v Speaker 1>was maybe seven or nine minutes long. So a seven

0:44:08.036 --> 0:44:12.236
<v Speaker 1>or nine nine rap song took up seven to nine

0:44:12.276 --> 0:44:17.716
<v Speaker 1>minutes of my sixty minutes plus commercials removed my little

0:44:17.756 --> 0:44:20.276
<v Speaker 1>bit of rap music for the week, and I was

0:44:20.476 --> 0:44:24.356
<v Speaker 1>so angry, and I would every time I would listen

0:44:24.356 --> 0:44:26.316
<v Speaker 1>to the cassette, I would forward through the Troublefunk song

0:44:26.396 --> 0:44:28.756
<v Speaker 1>to get to the rap music. And I did this,

0:44:28.836 --> 0:44:31.316
<v Speaker 1>and then one time I listened to the Troublefunk song.

0:44:32.316 --> 0:44:36.836
<v Speaker 1>And then it took time, but eventually, within a couple

0:44:36.876 --> 0:44:39.116
<v Speaker 1>of weeks, the only thing I was listening to on

0:44:39.116 --> 0:44:43.636
<v Speaker 1>that tape was the Troublefunk song. Yeah, so that's one example,

0:44:43.716 --> 0:44:45.876
<v Speaker 1>but I'm sure there are many more. When the first

0:44:45.956 --> 0:44:47.516
<v Speaker 1>I first I remember the first time I heard nine

0:44:47.556 --> 0:44:52.156
<v Speaker 1>inch Nails. I didn't like any of the industrial music

0:44:52.236 --> 0:44:54.836
<v Speaker 1>I had heard up until the point of nine inch Nails,

0:44:55.556 --> 0:44:58.396
<v Speaker 1>and when I heard nine inch Nails, my initial reaction

0:44:58.556 --> 0:45:01.196
<v Speaker 1>to it was, this is that kind of music I

0:45:01.196 --> 0:45:03.716
<v Speaker 1>don't like. I don't like the production. I don't like

0:45:03.756 --> 0:45:10.236
<v Speaker 1>those sounds. And then eventually took probably a year, Nine

0:45:10.276 --> 0:45:13.516
<v Speaker 1>Inch Nails became my favorite group. But the things that

0:45:13.556 --> 0:45:16.756
<v Speaker 1>I didn't like about it weren't the things that were

0:45:16.756 --> 0:45:18.636
<v Speaker 1>good about it in the case of Nine Inch Nails,

0:45:18.716 --> 0:45:24.356
<v Speaker 1>case in Nine Nails case, Trent's songwriting was so far

0:45:24.436 --> 0:45:28.276
<v Speaker 1>superior to anyone else making that kind of music that

0:45:28.516 --> 0:45:32.316
<v Speaker 1>once I could hear his songs, it didn't matter whether

0:45:32.396 --> 0:45:35.316
<v Speaker 1>or not I liked the style. And then when I

0:45:35.476 --> 0:45:38.876
<v Speaker 1>liked the songs, eventually I grew to even like the

0:45:38.916 --> 0:45:42.556
<v Speaker 1>style because his songs made me like the style. Oh,

0:45:42.596 --> 0:45:43.196
<v Speaker 1>I see.

0:45:43.476 --> 0:45:47.436
<v Speaker 2>It's this interesting thing about for different kinds of experience

0:45:47.436 --> 0:45:51.156
<v Speaker 2>and creative experiences, there are different thresholds. The familiar has

0:45:51.156 --> 0:45:54.636
<v Speaker 2>a very low threshold. The unfamiliar has a much longer threshold.

0:45:55.076 --> 0:45:57.396
<v Speaker 2>But what's interesting with that story that is, and it's

0:45:57.516 --> 0:46:00.436
<v Speaker 2>very particular to you, is that you had the patience

0:46:01.236 --> 0:46:04.316
<v Speaker 2>to wait long enough so you could reach the threshold

0:46:04.356 --> 0:46:07.716
<v Speaker 2>of understanding what was what Troublefunk was doing or what

0:46:07.756 --> 0:46:11.236
<v Speaker 2>Trent Resident was doing. That's unusual. So a lot of

0:46:11.276 --> 0:46:13.956
<v Speaker 2>what you're talking about in this book really does seem

0:46:13.996 --> 0:46:17.836
<v Speaker 2>to be things that can be taught and understood. And

0:46:17.876 --> 0:46:20.916
<v Speaker 2>the shift you're this, what you're describing now is something

0:46:21.036 --> 0:46:24.396
<v Speaker 2>very not impossible to teach, but very hard to teach.

0:46:25.276 --> 0:46:30.236
<v Speaker 2>To persist with something you didn't like, the Troublefunk, and

0:46:30.316 --> 0:46:33.316
<v Speaker 2>yet somehow you kept coming back in one way, you

0:46:33.356 --> 0:46:36.396
<v Speaker 2>didn't dismiss it. You disliked it without dismissing it. That's

0:46:36.396 --> 0:46:39.276
<v Speaker 2>I guess what I'm trying to say. That ninety nine

0:46:39.276 --> 0:46:43.596
<v Speaker 2>percent of people when they disliked, they dismiss, but you didn't.

0:46:43.916 --> 0:46:45.676
<v Speaker 2>I want to understand why didn't you.

0:46:46.796 --> 0:46:49.956
<v Speaker 1>I may have back then, I may have dismissed it,

0:46:50.316 --> 0:46:52.836
<v Speaker 1>but for whatever reason, because it was on a cassette,

0:46:52.916 --> 0:46:54.916
<v Speaker 1>and because I had to keep coming back and forward

0:46:54.916 --> 0:46:56.916
<v Speaker 1>when it would come on and I might be doing

0:46:56.916 --> 0:46:59.796
<v Speaker 1>something else in my room, it was able to get

0:46:59.796 --> 0:47:01.796
<v Speaker 1>through to me. And this again we get to the

0:47:01.836 --> 0:47:05.916
<v Speaker 1>metaphysical aspect of it. The universe wanted me to hear Troublefunk.

0:47:06.036 --> 0:47:08.316
<v Speaker 1>That's why I was able to hear it. If it

0:47:08.356 --> 0:47:12.196
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have resented itself over and over to me, I

0:47:12.236 --> 0:47:17.796
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have. So yes, I allowed it in, but it

0:47:17.876 --> 0:47:22.996
<v Speaker 1>wasn't all me. I'll give you another example. It's not

0:47:23.076 --> 0:47:26.396
<v Speaker 1>uncommon when I'm out and about to have someone recommend

0:47:26.476 --> 0:47:29.116
<v Speaker 1>something that they think I'll like, and when they recommend

0:47:29.156 --> 0:47:30.636
<v Speaker 1>it to me, I listen and it sounds like a

0:47:30.716 --> 0:47:33.036
<v Speaker 1>terrible thing, something that I don't like, the kind of

0:47:33.076 --> 0:47:36.156
<v Speaker 1>thing I don't like. Whatever it is. An example would

0:47:36.156 --> 0:47:39.236
<v Speaker 1>be it's not a real example. A hypothetical example is, oh,

0:47:39.276 --> 0:47:41.716
<v Speaker 1>you love this new horror movie. I don't like horror movies.

0:47:41.756 --> 0:47:43.636
<v Speaker 1>There's no chance I'm going to watch a horror movie.

0:47:44.236 --> 0:47:48.756
<v Speaker 1>That wouldn't work. If three different people who don't know

0:47:48.876 --> 0:47:53.596
<v Speaker 1>each other all suggests to me to watch that horror movie,

0:47:54.276 --> 0:47:56.876
<v Speaker 1>I will watch that horror movie, even though I know

0:47:56.956 --> 0:48:00.276
<v Speaker 1>it's something I don't like. And the reason is the

0:48:00.396 --> 0:48:03.356
<v Speaker 1>universe really wants me to be aware of this. People

0:48:03.356 --> 0:48:06.276
<v Speaker 1>are telling me. Why are people telling me this is

0:48:06.316 --> 0:48:09.316
<v Speaker 1>not for me? So that's an example of a and

0:48:09.356 --> 0:48:13.516
<v Speaker 1>paying attention to the signs around you. If several of

0:48:13.556 --> 0:48:18.196
<v Speaker 1>your friends tell you the same thing that you initially discounted,

0:48:18.676 --> 0:48:19.716
<v Speaker 1>it might be worth a look.

0:48:20.116 --> 0:48:22.756
<v Speaker 2>This is funny because this goes into one of my

0:48:23.316 --> 0:48:26.116
<v Speaker 2>It's similar to one of my little I have a rule.

0:48:26.156 --> 0:48:28.476
<v Speaker 2>I have these implicit rules I carry around in my

0:48:28.516 --> 0:48:32.876
<v Speaker 2>head and one of my rules is never say some

0:48:32.996 --> 0:48:36.556
<v Speaker 2>things that you consume or see or whatever is bad,

0:48:37.636 --> 0:48:41.516
<v Speaker 2>only say I think it's bad right now.

0:48:42.076 --> 0:48:43.076
<v Speaker 1>Yes? Great.

0:48:43.596 --> 0:48:48.916
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, the whole world social media particularly

0:48:48.996 --> 0:48:53.156
<v Speaker 2>would be so greatly improved by that rule. Right, I

0:48:53.196 --> 0:48:56.156
<v Speaker 2>don't like what you I don't like what you said

0:48:56.236 --> 0:48:56.756
<v Speaker 2>right now?

0:48:57.356 --> 0:48:57.516
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

0:48:57.636 --> 0:48:57.836
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:48:58.396 --> 0:49:01.276
<v Speaker 2>It's very different from saying what you said is wrong,

0:49:01.756 --> 0:49:05.356
<v Speaker 2>right it's absolutely whole or opposite. And but adopting that

0:49:05.436 --> 0:49:09.956
<v Speaker 2>with art, I wonder about how many I'm talking about

0:49:09.996 --> 0:49:14.356
<v Speaker 2>some of the critical community, how much criticism, how much

0:49:14.356 --> 0:49:17.716
<v Speaker 2>it would change our understanding of art if critics universally

0:49:17.756 --> 0:49:20.836
<v Speaker 2>followed that rule, and it was if they always acknowledged

0:49:21.156 --> 0:49:23.036
<v Speaker 2>that they may be in a situation that you were

0:49:23.076 --> 0:49:26.836
<v Speaker 2>in with trouble Funk, that the universe wasn't there yet,

0:49:27.356 --> 0:49:31.156
<v Speaker 2>You weren't there yet. And also that story about Troublefunk

0:49:31.236 --> 0:49:34.396
<v Speaker 2>is that you weren't looking for trouble Funk, you were

0:49:34.396 --> 0:49:37.156
<v Speaker 2>looking for hip hop. So like it was an intrusion

0:49:37.796 --> 0:49:40.796
<v Speaker 2>in the beginning, It wasn't a treasure. It was something

0:49:40.836 --> 0:49:42.836
<v Speaker 2>that didn't belong, yes, and.

0:49:42.796 --> 0:49:45.876
<v Speaker 1>It was something that didn't belong and was taking up valuable.

0:49:45.436 --> 0:49:50.076
<v Speaker 2>Time, valuable cassette tech cassette deck space. Yes, because it

0:49:50.116 --> 0:49:52.916
<v Speaker 2>was only sixty minutes. Did you have the nineties back

0:49:52.916 --> 0:49:53.956
<v Speaker 2>then or just the sixties?

0:49:54.196 --> 0:49:56.556
<v Speaker 1>We had sixties and nineties and eventually one twenties.

0:49:57.156 --> 0:50:00.276
<v Speaker 2>I remember that when twenties were huge. But that idea

0:50:00.316 --> 0:50:06.036
<v Speaker 2>of building into our critical assessments some notion about probability,

0:50:06.436 --> 0:50:10.836
<v Speaker 2>that my judgment is conditioned on two things. It do

0:50:10.956 --> 0:50:13.596
<v Speaker 2>seem credic to me, and it is at this moment,

0:50:14.276 --> 0:50:16.916
<v Speaker 2>and both of those things may not be true in

0:50:16.996 --> 0:50:19.876
<v Speaker 2>some future date. I just that just is so insanely

0:50:19.956 --> 0:50:23.556
<v Speaker 2>liberating to me, Like, and I don't understand. Can we

0:50:23.636 --> 0:50:27.436
<v Speaker 2>pass this law that says you're only allowed you must

0:50:27.436 --> 0:50:30.596
<v Speaker 2>always use I think and right now in any creative judgment.

0:50:31.196 --> 0:50:35.036
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. It's also related to another thing mentioned in the book,

0:50:35.076 --> 0:50:38.356
<v Speaker 1>the idea of I can't do that. Yes, we never

0:50:38.436 --> 0:50:41.156
<v Speaker 1>say I can't do that. You can say I haven't

0:50:41.156 --> 0:50:41.956
<v Speaker 1>done that yet.

0:50:42.636 --> 0:50:43.436
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that's yes.

0:50:43.436 --> 0:50:46.516
<v Speaker 2>That is the same that functions the same way. The

0:50:46.556 --> 0:50:48.356
<v Speaker 2>reason I think a book like this is so important

0:50:48.436 --> 0:50:50.516
<v Speaker 2>is this is a little bit of a tangent. But

0:50:50.876 --> 0:50:53.596
<v Speaker 2>I went to give a talk at a university two

0:50:53.596 --> 0:50:55.676
<v Speaker 2>weeks ago and I was to the psychology department and

0:50:55.716 --> 0:50:58.676
<v Speaker 2>I was talking to these psychologists and they were talking

0:50:58.676 --> 0:51:02.236
<v Speaker 2>about mental health, and they were talking about a lot

0:51:02.276 --> 0:51:05.396
<v Speaker 2>of really lovely research right now about how the language

0:51:05.436 --> 0:51:09.596
<v Speaker 2>that you use to describe your feelings in emotions and

0:51:09.716 --> 0:51:13.796
<v Speaker 2>traumas and things is enormously important. You know, to describe

0:51:13.796 --> 0:51:16.676
<v Speaker 2>something this way or that way is not a difference

0:51:16.716 --> 0:51:18.876
<v Speaker 2>in style. It is actually a difference in the way

0:51:18.876 --> 0:51:23.516
<v Speaker 2>that you are processing, understanding, recovering all those kinds of things.

0:51:23.836 --> 0:51:26.796
<v Speaker 2>And one of the things this book did to me was,

0:51:27.116 --> 0:51:30.036
<v Speaker 2>I think this one way of understanding your book is

0:51:30.116 --> 0:51:34.036
<v Speaker 2>it is in that spirit the categories that we use

0:51:34.236 --> 0:51:36.596
<v Speaker 2>and the language that we bring to our understanding of

0:51:36.596 --> 0:51:41.556
<v Speaker 2>creativity really really matters. Like in that section I love

0:51:41.596 --> 0:51:43.316
<v Speaker 2>this that I love so much about when you're talking

0:51:43.316 --> 0:51:45.836
<v Speaker 2>about all the ways you can jog someone out of

0:51:45.876 --> 0:51:49.436
<v Speaker 2>being stuck. When you're stuck, you don't think you don't

0:51:49.476 --> 0:51:51.596
<v Speaker 2>think you can be jogged out by some change in

0:51:51.596 --> 0:51:55.076
<v Speaker 2>your setting or some but in truth, you can. You

0:51:55.156 --> 0:51:59.676
<v Speaker 2>remain acutely sensitive to the influences of your environment. And

0:52:00.356 --> 0:52:03.156
<v Speaker 2>it's so hard for us to understand that those kinds

0:52:03.196 --> 0:52:08.316
<v Speaker 2>the influence and impact of those kinds of framing devices

0:52:08.356 --> 0:52:13.956
<v Speaker 2>and settings. Language are framing devices, right, that is often

0:52:13.996 --> 0:52:17.116
<v Speaker 2>what causes us to suffer unnecessarily.

0:52:17.836 --> 0:52:22.396
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. There's a teacher named Marshall Rosenberg who wrote a

0:52:22.396 --> 0:52:26.196
<v Speaker 1>book which is not a great book, called Nonviolent Communication,

0:52:26.996 --> 0:52:29.156
<v Speaker 1>and he's a great teacher, but he's not a great writer,

0:52:29.316 --> 0:52:33.236
<v Speaker 1>and he passed recently unfortunately. But I would suggest people

0:52:33.756 --> 0:52:37.156
<v Speaker 1>if they're interested in Marshall Rosenberg, there is an audio

0:52:37.516 --> 0:52:42.316
<v Speaker 1>called speaking Piece that is better than the book, and

0:52:42.356 --> 0:52:47.436
<v Speaker 1>then watch videos of him on YouTube, just because the book.

0:52:47.676 --> 0:52:51.236
<v Speaker 1>I found the book hard to understand, but it's basically

0:52:51.276 --> 0:52:54.676
<v Speaker 1>all about this. The language of our culture is violent,

0:52:55.396 --> 0:52:58.276
<v Speaker 1>and it's not just violent towards each other, it's violent

0:52:58.276 --> 0:53:02.836
<v Speaker 1>towards ourselves. Every time we say I should have done that,

0:53:03.076 --> 0:53:06.156
<v Speaker 1>When you say I should, it's called a make wrong.

0:53:06.716 --> 0:53:09.596
<v Speaker 1>So by saying I should have done it means I

0:53:09.836 --> 0:53:12.236
<v Speaker 1>was wrong. This is the right way to do it

0:53:12.476 --> 0:53:15.076
<v Speaker 1>when at the time you were doing the best you could.

0:53:14.596 --> 0:53:18.236
<v Speaker 1>So when at the time you're doing the best you can,

0:53:18.356 --> 0:53:22.716
<v Speaker 1>to make yourself wrong isn't helpful. Yeah, And there's a

0:53:22.716 --> 0:53:28.596
<v Speaker 1>whole list of trigger words and ways of sharing a

0:53:28.676 --> 0:53:33.556
<v Speaker 1>vocabulary of feeling that helps us better communicate, and when

0:53:33.556 --> 0:53:37.476
<v Speaker 1>we communicate better, we tend to get along better. It's beautiful,

0:53:37.636 --> 0:53:38.396
<v Speaker 1>beautiful teaching.

0:53:38.756 --> 0:53:42.596
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a couple other smaller things. There's a couple of

0:53:42.636 --> 0:53:45.556
<v Speaker 2>bones in this book where I scribbled in the in

0:53:45.596 --> 0:53:48.436
<v Speaker 2>the margins who is Rick talking about? But there was

0:53:48.516 --> 0:53:52.316
<v Speaker 2>one that I wanted you to if you don't mind.

0:53:52.836 --> 0:53:55.716
<v Speaker 2>You talked about how you were working with an artist

0:53:55.756 --> 0:53:58.676
<v Speaker 2>on a song which was a love song, and you

0:53:58.756 --> 0:54:00.956
<v Speaker 2>were trying to solve the problem, and you finally solve

0:54:00.996 --> 0:54:04.756
<v Speaker 2>the problem by telling the artists don't think of a

0:54:04.876 --> 0:54:07.516
<v Speaker 2>romantic partner, think of it as a devotional to God.

0:54:08.236 --> 0:54:09.716
<v Speaker 2>Who is the song and who was the artist?

0:54:09.756 --> 0:54:12.236
<v Speaker 1>Can you tell me? That was Johnny Cash? And the

0:54:12.276 --> 0:54:14.836
<v Speaker 1>song was the first time ever I saw your face.

0:54:15.636 --> 0:54:20.316
<v Speaker 2>Oh my goodness. Oh that's so interesting. I know that

0:54:20.476 --> 0:54:25.436
<v Speaker 2>version so well. That's totally blowing my mind because that's

0:54:25.476 --> 0:54:28.636
<v Speaker 2>what it listens like. Yeah, oh my god, it's genius, Rick,

0:54:28.756 --> 0:54:29.636
<v Speaker 2>that is genius.

0:54:29.716 --> 0:54:33.036
<v Speaker 1>And it was also Oh and I interviewed Roger mcgwinny

0:54:33.036 --> 0:54:37.236
<v Speaker 1>the other day and he talked about the first Bird

0:54:37.356 --> 0:54:41.956
<v Speaker 1>single was Mister Tambourine Man and out of the blue.

0:54:42.036 --> 0:54:43.836
<v Speaker 1>He said, yeah, when I sang it in the studio,

0:54:43.916 --> 0:54:47.276
<v Speaker 1>no one knows this, but I sang it as a

0:54:47.316 --> 0:54:50.396
<v Speaker 1>devotional to God. I said, but the lyrics aren't about that.

0:54:50.436 --> 0:54:53.156
<v Speaker 1>I was like, yeah, I know, but that's how I

0:54:53.236 --> 0:54:56.236
<v Speaker 1>was able to sing it and feel it, and it

0:54:56.276 --> 0:54:57.036
<v Speaker 1>blew my mind.

0:54:57.556 --> 0:55:00.436
<v Speaker 2>Oh that's really interesting. This is why I missed liner

0:55:00.476 --> 0:55:03.716
<v Speaker 2>notes so much. I feel like this is the functional

0:55:03.796 --> 0:55:07.116
<v Speaker 2>but ray those two facts about the first time I

0:55:07.116 --> 0:55:11.156
<v Speaker 2>saw your face and mister Tamery Man, those both changed

0:55:11.556 --> 0:55:15.716
<v Speaker 2>radically change the way you hear those songs. Yes, the

0:55:15.756 --> 0:55:20.116
<v Speaker 2>Cash song makes way more sense. I've almost not understood

0:55:20.156 --> 0:55:23.356
<v Speaker 2>why I found that song so powerful. Yes, it really

0:55:23.996 --> 0:55:26.196
<v Speaker 2>in the context of all those ones, it's one of

0:55:26.236 --> 0:55:29.636
<v Speaker 2>the ones that it pops in this kind of strange

0:55:29.676 --> 0:55:32.556
<v Speaker 2>way and it's haunting in a way you don't And

0:55:32.596 --> 0:55:35.116
<v Speaker 2>now I understand why he's singing it with a completely

0:55:35.116 --> 0:55:36.556
<v Speaker 2>different intention than I imagined.

0:55:37.316 --> 0:55:40.076
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's and if you listen to the original song,

0:55:40.196 --> 0:55:43.396
<v Speaker 1>it's unbelievable. Or when I say the original the popular version,

0:55:43.436 --> 0:55:46.636
<v Speaker 1>because the popular version is not the original either. You

0:55:46.676 --> 0:55:50.676
<v Speaker 1>know it was written by Iwan McCall and it's an

0:55:50.716 --> 0:55:53.476
<v Speaker 1>Irish folk song. And if you've ever heard the Irish

0:55:53.476 --> 0:55:55.796
<v Speaker 1>folk song version of it, it's almost like a yodel,

0:55:56.076 --> 0:56:00.796
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's very unlike all the versions that we're

0:56:00.996 --> 0:56:01.636
<v Speaker 1>familiar with.

0:56:01.956 --> 0:56:03.596
<v Speaker 2>I realized when I read that as well, that I

0:56:03.596 --> 0:56:06.476
<v Speaker 2>have a version of that, which is years and years ago.

0:56:06.596 --> 0:56:09.476
<v Speaker 2>I sat down on an airplane next to a guy

0:56:09.476 --> 0:56:11.276
<v Speaker 2>who happened to be reading one of my books, and

0:56:11.356 --> 0:56:14.436
<v Speaker 2>I had this very very long conversation with him, and

0:56:15.116 --> 0:56:16.716
<v Speaker 2>he was I s don't know what he did.

0:56:16.756 --> 0:56:17.476
<v Speaker 3>He opened.

0:56:18.596 --> 0:56:21.236
<v Speaker 2>His job was to go around the country opening Trader Joe's.

0:56:21.996 --> 0:56:23.596
<v Speaker 2>He was coming from New York. They were opening a

0:56:23.596 --> 0:56:25.676
<v Speaker 2>store like in Brooklyn or something. And he'd just been

0:56:25.676 --> 0:56:30.276
<v Speaker 2>in Brooklyn for a month, lived in Atlanta, had two kids,

0:56:31.316 --> 0:56:34.596
<v Speaker 2>was about thirty, you know, eight years old, business school degree.

0:56:34.636 --> 0:56:37.756
<v Speaker 2>I think maybe not. Anyway, I had a lovely chat

0:56:37.756 --> 0:56:40.596
<v Speaker 2>with him, and I realized, oh, that's my reader. And

0:56:40.676 --> 0:56:43.956
<v Speaker 2>every time I'm stuck I think about him. Beautiful, it's

0:56:43.996 --> 0:56:46.676
<v Speaker 2>for him. He was beautiful and he said because he

0:56:46.716 --> 0:56:48.916
<v Speaker 2>only read. He told me. He said, I'm very very busy.

0:56:48.956 --> 0:56:51.476
<v Speaker 2>I teach Sunday school, like I'm a coach in my

0:56:51.636 --> 0:56:53.236
<v Speaker 2>kids little league, and I have this job which is

0:56:53.276 --> 0:56:55.916
<v Speaker 2>very demanding. I have time to read three books a year.

0:56:56.716 --> 0:56:59.916
<v Speaker 2>And I realized, oh, and he's chosen one of mine.

0:57:00.676 --> 0:57:04.796
<v Speaker 2>I'm one of his three, which is like phenomenally flattering thing.

0:57:05.396 --> 0:57:07.956
<v Speaker 2>And I realized, Oh, if I can keep being one

0:57:07.996 --> 0:57:11.316
<v Speaker 2>of his three books every year, then I I will succeed.

0:57:12.116 --> 0:57:14.836
<v Speaker 2>Beautiful and that beautiful about them all the time it

0:57:14.876 --> 0:57:15.116
<v Speaker 2>was like.

0:57:15.036 --> 0:57:15.836
<v Speaker 1>A let's love great.

0:57:16.076 --> 0:57:19.796
<v Speaker 2>Yeah really really but it is. It's insanely liberating to

0:57:19.996 --> 0:57:23.356
<v Speaker 2>know that's what it's for, right, Yes.

0:57:23.716 --> 0:57:29.796
<v Speaker 1>On the fact that you randomly got assigned that seat

0:57:30.196 --> 0:57:34.676
<v Speaker 1>he happened to be reading your book on that particular flight. Yeah,

0:57:34.796 --> 0:57:38.196
<v Speaker 1>it could be it's all a coincidence. Yet it's what

0:57:38.276 --> 0:57:40.356
<v Speaker 1>you needed to hear to be able to keep doing

0:57:40.396 --> 0:57:42.716
<v Speaker 1>what you've been doing for all these years since then

0:57:43.636 --> 0:57:47.956
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's accidental. Who knows. That's that's that's the points,

0:57:47.996 --> 0:57:52.956
<v Speaker 1>Like these things happen all the time. Yeah, maybe they're

0:57:53.196 --> 0:57:55.516
<v Speaker 1>all accidents. It's fine, it doesn't matter if they are

0:57:55.636 --> 0:57:59.196
<v Speaker 1>or not. Yeah, but if they happen, and if you

0:57:59.276 --> 0:58:03.796
<v Speaker 1>can use that information like you do, we all win.

0:58:04.356 --> 0:58:09.356
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all to the better or one last thing, the

0:58:08.876 --> 0:58:12.476
<v Speaker 2>last the underlines in your book, Page three sixty five,

0:58:13.676 --> 0:58:17.076
<v Speaker 2>and I was like, wait, I didn't expect this. Rich

0:58:17.396 --> 0:58:20.796
<v Speaker 2>was hold on, let me just go there. Also, I

0:58:20.876 --> 0:58:23.516
<v Speaker 2>don't know why in retrospect I found this so surprising,

0:58:24.196 --> 0:58:26.796
<v Speaker 2>but you say, when I work with artists, we make

0:58:26.836 --> 0:58:30.076
<v Speaker 2>an agreement, we continue the process until reaching the point

0:58:30.196 --> 0:58:34.916
<v Speaker 2>where we are all happy with the work. All in

0:58:35.676 --> 0:58:39.716
<v Speaker 2>is italicized in that. And I was like, I realize,

0:58:39.876 --> 0:58:42.356
<v Speaker 2>and maybe this is because how badly I needed your book.

0:58:43.076 --> 0:58:46.156
<v Speaker 2>It never occurred to me that there would be art

0:58:46.236 --> 0:58:48.276
<v Speaker 2>on the level that you have been a part of

0:58:48.316 --> 0:58:53.116
<v Speaker 2>creating without dissent. I just I was just shocked by

0:58:53.156 --> 0:58:56.436
<v Speaker 2>I was like, wait, You've done all this for so

0:58:56.516 --> 0:59:00.436
<v Speaker 2>many years, with so many different people under an explicit

0:59:00.556 --> 0:59:03.956
<v Speaker 2>promise of unanimity. That blew my mind.

0:59:04.356 --> 0:59:08.036
<v Speaker 1>They'll be descent along the way. Yeah, but that just

0:59:08.116 --> 0:59:10.956
<v Speaker 1>means we haven't gone are enough. It just means if

0:59:11.556 --> 0:59:14.116
<v Speaker 1>you like it and I don't, it's not good enough.

0:59:14.236 --> 0:59:16.196
<v Speaker 1>And if I like it and you don't, it's not

0:59:16.276 --> 0:59:19.636
<v Speaker 1>good enough. And if we can get to the point

0:59:19.636 --> 0:59:22.556
<v Speaker 1>where we both love it, it's probably better than the

0:59:22.556 --> 0:59:24.756
<v Speaker 1>one that one of us loved and the other didn't.

0:59:25.036 --> 0:59:28.236
<v Speaker 1>And if there are five people in a band, and

0:59:28.316 --> 0:59:31.156
<v Speaker 1>if three of them like it and two of them don't,

0:59:32.036 --> 0:59:33.636
<v Speaker 1>and you get to the point where all five of

0:59:33.636 --> 0:59:37.196
<v Speaker 1>them like it, chances are it's better and not.

0:59:37.316 --> 0:59:41.156
<v Speaker 2>Just that you're done. Yes, yeah, No, it was just

0:59:41.196 --> 0:59:44.276
<v Speaker 2>like such a kind of I just thought of that.

0:59:44.276 --> 0:59:46.956
<v Speaker 2>That idea that what you're building in the end is

0:59:46.956 --> 0:59:49.996
<v Speaker 2>a kind of harmony among all the all of the voices,

0:59:50.076 --> 0:59:53.956
<v Speaker 2>is a beautiful way to end a very very beautiful book.

0:59:54.556 --> 0:59:56.196
<v Speaker 1>There's there's a part in the book where we talk

0:59:56.236 --> 1:00:00.756
<v Speaker 1>about cooperation, which is exactly this working with other people. Historically,

1:00:01.396 --> 1:00:05.556
<v Speaker 1>I'll say most times that people work together, there's a

1:00:05.756 --> 1:00:10.996
<v Speaker 1>rivalry of ideas. Each person is arguing to win the

1:00:11.076 --> 1:00:14.316
<v Speaker 1>debate to have their idea be the one that's chosen.

1:00:15.196 --> 1:00:19.516
<v Speaker 1>And I'm saying that's not productive, and the best way

1:00:19.556 --> 1:00:22.756
<v Speaker 1>to do it is for everyone to demonstrate their ideas.

1:00:22.796 --> 1:00:25.476
<v Speaker 1>It's even better if they're demonstrated in a blind way

1:00:25.516 --> 1:00:28.956
<v Speaker 1>where we don't even know whose idea is what. We

1:00:29.156 --> 1:00:34.836
<v Speaker 1>just hear the ideas and then everybody picks and usually

1:00:35.076 --> 1:00:37.956
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty obvious, and it really does happen naturally, and

1:00:38.276 --> 1:00:41.836
<v Speaker 1>it's only through the ego of wanting it to be

1:00:42.076 --> 1:00:47.556
<v Speaker 1>my way. That they are these conflicts, but if everyone

1:00:47.636 --> 1:00:49.916
<v Speaker 1>is working together for it to be the best that

1:00:49.956 --> 1:00:52.996
<v Speaker 1>it can be, and if we respect each other enough

1:00:52.996 --> 1:00:54.716
<v Speaker 1>to know, if I think it's the best it can

1:00:54.756 --> 1:00:57.276
<v Speaker 1>be and you think it can be better, I'll go

1:00:57.316 --> 1:01:02.076
<v Speaker 1>on that ride and same the other way. Ultimately we

1:01:02.116 --> 1:01:05.076
<v Speaker 1>get to a beautiful place Rick. That is lovely.

1:01:05.436 --> 1:01:09.356
<v Speaker 2>And thank you for writing such a beautiful book. Any

1:01:09.396 --> 1:01:11.236
<v Speaker 2>many many people enjoy it as much as I have.

1:01:11.956 --> 1:01:13.996
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. I really appreciate you reading it.

1:01:13.996 --> 1:01:18.956
<v Speaker 1>It's fantastic. It makes me happy.

1:01:19.236 --> 1:01:21.236
<v Speaker 4>I want to thank Rick on the Record for taking

1:01:21.276 --> 1:01:25.236
<v Speaker 4>the time to put his philosophies around creativity and a book.

1:01:25.636 --> 1:01:28.436
<v Speaker 4>The Creative Act, A Way of Being is out now.

1:01:28.756 --> 1:01:30.676
<v Speaker 4>Be sure to check it out. You can subscribe to

1:01:30.676 --> 1:01:34.036
<v Speaker 4>our YouTube channel at YouTube dot com slash Broken Record Podcast.

1:01:34.356 --> 1:01:36.916
<v Speaker 4>We can find all of our new episodes. You can

1:01:36.916 --> 1:01:40.596
<v Speaker 4>follow us on Twitter at broken Record. Broken Record is

1:01:40.636 --> 1:01:44.076
<v Speaker 4>produced with help from Leah Rose, Jason Gambrel, Ben Talliday,

1:01:44.316 --> 1:01:48.796
<v Speaker 4>and Eric Sandler. Our editor is Sophie Crane. Broken Record

1:01:48.836 --> 1:01:51.396
<v Speaker 4>is a production of Pushkin Industries. If you love this

1:01:51.476 --> 1:01:54.756
<v Speaker 4>show and others from Pushkin, consider subscribing to Pushkin plus

1:01:55.396 --> 1:01:58.996
<v Speaker 4>Pushkin Plus is a podcast subscription that offers bonus content

1:01:59.076 --> 1:02:02.356
<v Speaker 4>an uninterrupted ad free listening for four ninety nine a month.

1:02:02.756 --> 1:02:06.196
<v Speaker 4>Look for Pushkin Plus on Apple podcast subscriptions, and if

1:02:06.236 --> 1:02:08.396
<v Speaker 4>you like the show, please remember to share, rate, and

1:02:08.436 --> 1:02:12.156
<v Speaker 4>review us on your podcast app. I Think Music, Expectkenny Beats.

1:02:12.676 --> 1:02:13.716
<v Speaker 4>I'm Justin Richmond

1:02:17.996 --> 1:02:18.316
<v Speaker 1>M HM.