1
00:00:02,720 --> 00:00:09,560
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. China is not able

2
00:00:09,680 --> 00:00:13,800
Speaker 1: or winning to replace the US as the underwriter of globalization.

3
00:00:14,280 --> 00:00:17,200
Speaker 1: So we are to quote my Prime Minister in US

4
00:00:17,200 --> 00:00:21,400
Speaker 1: interacting them a state of messy transition. Cromwell world in

5
00:00:21,440 --> 00:00:26,640
Speaker 1: which there was an underwriter an enforcer, and then underwriter

6
00:00:26,720 --> 00:00:29,760
Speaker 1: and enforcer has now decided to become disruptor in chief

7
00:00:30,320 --> 00:00:32,200
Speaker 1: for domestic political reasons.

8
00:00:41,680 --> 00:00:44,600
Speaker 2: I'm Stephanie Flanders, head of Government and Economics at Bloomberg,

9
00:00:44,720 --> 00:00:47,320
Speaker 2: and this is Trumpnomics, the podcast that looks at the

10
00:00:47,360 --> 00:00:50,839
Speaker 2: economic world of Donald Trump, how he's already shaped the

11
00:00:50,840 --> 00:00:54,000
Speaker 2: global economy and modern earth is going to happen next

12
00:00:57,040 --> 00:01:00,880
Speaker 2: This week, I'm sharing a conversation with Singapore's top diplomat,

13
00:01:01,080 --> 00:01:04,480
Speaker 2: Vivian Balakrishnan. If we look back at the global economy

14
00:01:04,480 --> 00:01:07,039
Speaker 2: in twenty twenty five, much of what we might have

15
00:01:07,160 --> 00:01:11,080
Speaker 2: expected from a second Trump term has happened. And then

16
00:01:11,160 --> 00:01:14,679
Speaker 2: some a rupture in the Western Alliance, are withdrawal or

17
00:01:14,720 --> 00:01:18,000
Speaker 2: stepping back from multilateral decision making fora like the G

18
00:01:18,120 --> 00:01:21,920
Speaker 2: twenty and the cop A more aggressive stance towards enemies

19
00:01:21,920 --> 00:01:25,160
Speaker 2: in America's backyard. It's all there, but one thing we

20
00:01:25,240 --> 00:01:29,440
Speaker 2: haven't seen is a global trade war. Though the US,

21
00:01:29,480 --> 00:01:31,880
Speaker 2: we know, has imposed hefty tariffs on all of its

22
00:01:31,920 --> 00:01:35,480
Speaker 2: trading partners, those countries, with the notable exception of China,

23
00:01:35,880 --> 00:01:39,240
Speaker 2: have not fought back. Instead, in effect, they've said, we

24
00:01:39,280 --> 00:01:40,760
Speaker 2: don't like this, but we're darn if we're going to

25
00:01:40,800 --> 00:01:43,440
Speaker 2: make it worse. The US might wish to raise high

26
00:01:43,520 --> 00:01:46,600
Speaker 2: tariff walls around its economy, rest of US are going

27
00:01:46,640 --> 00:01:49,120
Speaker 2: to keep on opening up and if possible, do even

28
00:01:49,160 --> 00:01:52,920
Speaker 2: more trade amongst ourselves. That is a big good news

29
00:01:52,920 --> 00:01:55,080
Speaker 2: story from this year that we shouldn't forget, and I

30
00:01:55,120 --> 00:01:58,280
Speaker 2: was reminded of again last week at the Bloomberg New

31
00:01:58,320 --> 00:02:02,080
Speaker 2: Economy Forum in Singapore, where you sit looking out at

32
00:02:02,080 --> 00:02:07,320
Speaker 2: the mass of container ships in the Singapore Strait. About

33
00:02:07,600 --> 00:02:10,400
Speaker 2: twenty five percent or so of global exports and imports

34
00:02:10,480 --> 00:02:14,600
Speaker 2: passes through that crucial shipping corridor, giving small but super

35
00:02:14,600 --> 00:02:18,400
Speaker 2: successful Singapore a very large stake in sustaining a global

36
00:02:18,400 --> 00:02:22,640
Speaker 2: trading system and incidentally a bird's eye view of everything

37
00:02:22,680 --> 00:02:27,040
Speaker 2: happening in Asia. This country also has a knack of

38
00:02:27,040 --> 00:02:30,919
Speaker 2: producing rather aerodyite public servants, so at the start of

39
00:02:30,960 --> 00:02:33,800
Speaker 2: the forum on November nineteenth, I sat down with one

40
00:02:33,840 --> 00:02:37,160
Speaker 2: of them, Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan, to talk about the

41
00:02:37,240 --> 00:02:40,240
Speaker 2: meaning of the recent trade deal between the US and China,

42
00:02:40,800 --> 00:02:44,919
Speaker 2: what the shifting global landscape means for Asia. He was

43
00:02:44,960 --> 00:02:47,760
Speaker 2: at both the Asian and APEX summits where some of

44
00:02:47,800 --> 00:02:50,520
Speaker 2: those deals were done, and I began by asking him

45
00:02:50,520 --> 00:02:53,320
Speaker 2: whether the new trade partnerships that Singapore and others were

46
00:02:53,360 --> 00:02:56,600
Speaker 2: hoping to build without the US could really reshape the

47
00:02:56,639 --> 00:02:57,840
Speaker 2: future of global trade.

48
00:03:03,520 --> 00:03:07,400
Speaker 1: Well, there's a quote attributed to Ernest Hemingway, how did

49
00:03:07,440 --> 00:03:12,440
Speaker 1: you go bankrupt? It says two ways, gradually and then suddenly.

50
00:03:12,639 --> 00:03:15,919
Speaker 1: So hold that thought in mind. This year has been

51
00:03:15,960 --> 00:03:21,160
Speaker 1: the year of sudden changes, but actually the gradual changes.

52
00:03:21,240 --> 00:03:24,440
Speaker 1: The pressure has been building up for a long time.

53
00:03:25,040 --> 00:03:27,160
Speaker 1: The first point I wanted to leave with you is

54
00:03:27,400 --> 00:03:32,480
Speaker 1: the role of the United States for the last eight decades. Actually,

55
00:03:32,480 --> 00:03:36,560
Speaker 1: it is historically unprecedented. The ultimate winner of the Second

56
00:03:36,560 --> 00:03:40,480
Speaker 1: World War, forty percent of global GDP, that was his

57
00:03:40,600 --> 00:03:45,360
Speaker 1: share of global GDP, decided, instead of conquering and eliminating

58
00:03:45,400 --> 00:03:50,680
Speaker 1: the Vanquish, rebuilt Germany Europe through the Marshall Plan, and

59
00:03:50,760 --> 00:03:57,720
Speaker 1: it set really a rules based globalization with economic integration

60
00:03:57,840 --> 00:04:02,880
Speaker 1: at the core. And this is highly, highly unusual and unprecedented.

61
00:04:03,560 --> 00:04:07,120
Speaker 1: So that's the first point. It is about the US.

62
00:04:07,560 --> 00:04:12,440
Speaker 1: Second point is that actually the pressures on the US

63
00:04:13,120 --> 00:04:15,240
Speaker 1: to give up on this has been building up for

64
00:04:15,240 --> 00:04:17,120
Speaker 1: a long time. And what I mean, if you think

65
00:04:17,160 --> 00:04:20,279
Speaker 1: about it, what the US did for eight decades was

66
00:04:20,320 --> 00:04:28,640
Speaker 1: to provide first the market, second technology, third capital, and

67
00:04:29,000 --> 00:04:33,400
Speaker 1: rules based economic integration. The first beneficiary of it, apart

68
00:04:33,400 --> 00:04:36,960
Speaker 1: from Europe, was Japan, and then you had the Asian

69
00:04:37,080 --> 00:04:41,280
Speaker 1: tigers Hong Kong career to Singapore and then the rest

70
00:04:41,279 --> 00:04:46,440
Speaker 1: of Southeast Asia. But the real winner of rules based

71
00:04:46,960 --> 00:04:50,880
Speaker 1: free trade has actually been China. And the US is

72
00:04:50,920 --> 00:04:54,280
Speaker 1: only two hundred and forty nine years. It has never

73
00:04:54,440 --> 00:04:59,280
Speaker 1: met a peer competitor with the scale, the ability, and

74
00:04:59,320 --> 00:05:03,400
Speaker 1: the willingness to reorder the world in a way that's

75
00:05:03,440 --> 00:05:04,280
Speaker 1: favorable to it.

76
00:05:04,760 --> 00:05:09,400
Speaker 3: But the point is that China, if you.

77
00:05:09,360 --> 00:05:12,640
Speaker 1: Look at this per capita GDP, it's still a middle

78
00:05:12,680 --> 00:05:16,760
Speaker 1: income country. And China is not able or willing to

79
00:05:16,839 --> 00:05:21,960
Speaker 1: replace the US as the underwriter of globalization. So we are,

80
00:05:22,120 --> 00:05:25,440
Speaker 1: to quote my Prime Minister, in an interregnum, a state

81
00:05:25,520 --> 00:05:28,920
Speaker 1: of messy transition from a world in which there was

82
00:05:29,080 --> 00:05:34,240
Speaker 1: an underwriter an enforcer, and that underwriter and enforcer has

83
00:05:34,279 --> 00:05:38,520
Speaker 1: now decided to become disruptor in chief for domestic political

84
00:05:38,560 --> 00:05:44,279
Speaker 1: reasons because after eight decades of providing capital, technology, and markets,

85
00:05:44,640 --> 00:05:47,359
Speaker 1: what the middle class in America has seen is the

86
00:05:47,440 --> 00:05:55,800
Speaker 1: industrialization russ belts, hopelessness and middle income stagnation. And guess

87
00:05:55,839 --> 00:06:01,520
Speaker 1: what elections are local. So it is a completely legitimate

88
00:06:01,600 --> 00:06:04,600
Speaker 1: question for the American water to say, wait a minute,

89
00:06:04,640 --> 00:06:07,800
Speaker 1: why should we underwrite in blood and treasure, this system

90
00:06:07,880 --> 00:06:11,000
Speaker 1: which seems to have profited the rest of the world

91
00:06:11,240 --> 00:06:16,080
Speaker 1: and especially a big peer competitor, And I think we

92
00:06:16,120 --> 00:06:19,560
Speaker 1: need to pull back. So you see my point about

93
00:06:19,640 --> 00:06:22,960
Speaker 1: gradually and then suddenly you know it's like an iceberg

94
00:06:23,839 --> 00:06:28,640
Speaker 1: or a continental ice shelf falling. But actually the climate

95
00:06:28,680 --> 00:06:33,719
Speaker 1: warming was predated that. So my point is what we're

96
00:06:33,760 --> 00:06:36,400
Speaker 1: witnessing today is not just a change of whether this

97
00:06:36,560 --> 00:06:40,839
Speaker 1: is real climate change, dual political climate change.

98
00:06:41,200 --> 00:06:42,680
Speaker 3: So that's contact setting.

99
00:06:43,160 --> 00:06:47,560
Speaker 2: I think it's historically unprecedented also to have a single

100
00:06:48,400 --> 00:06:53,359
Speaker 2: global superpower almost voluntarily step back from a lot of

101
00:06:53,360 --> 00:06:55,680
Speaker 2: its obligations, not be forced to do so, not lose

102
00:06:55,680 --> 00:06:57,960
Speaker 2: a war, but just decide I don't want to do

103
00:06:58,000 --> 00:06:58,560
Speaker 2: this anymore.

104
00:06:58,720 --> 00:07:02,039
Speaker 1: Yes, an unusual to have such a benige hegemon in

105
00:07:02,080 --> 00:07:06,040
Speaker 1: the first place, and for us now to say, where.

106
00:07:05,800 --> 00:07:06,880
Speaker 3: Did that hagamon go?

107
00:07:07,839 --> 00:07:11,360
Speaker 1: I'm saying, if you take a longer view of history

108
00:07:12,080 --> 00:07:15,200
Speaker 1: in jee politics, the point is this was a unique period.

109
00:07:15,440 --> 00:07:17,720
Speaker 1: I've tried to go back in it. I can't find

110
00:07:17,760 --> 00:07:20,760
Speaker 1: another period in history when we had such a benine

111
00:07:20,760 --> 00:07:22,440
Speaker 1: hegamon when you just.

112
00:07:22,400 --> 00:07:24,480
Speaker 2: Think back even just a few years ago, and then

113
00:07:24,520 --> 00:07:27,320
Speaker 2: we would have been on this stage talking about decoupling. Yes,

114
00:07:27,360 --> 00:07:30,840
Speaker 2: and that may be the climactic change, to distinguish from

115
00:07:30,880 --> 00:07:33,720
Speaker 2: the change in the weather, as you've said. But the

116
00:07:33,760 --> 00:07:36,280
Speaker 2: Biden administration, I think for many of it, of the

117
00:07:36,440 --> 00:07:40,840
Speaker 2: US allies, it felt that the US was asking countries

118
00:07:40,880 --> 00:07:43,920
Speaker 2: to choose between the US and China, and that was

119
00:07:43,920 --> 00:07:49,680
Speaker 2: obviously challenging. Nowhere more than here, President Trump has had

120
00:07:49,680 --> 00:07:54,840
Speaker 2: a much many people would say, less consistent, certainly more freewheeling,

121
00:07:55,680 --> 00:07:59,200
Speaker 2: unilateralist approach. It feels a little bit like the world

122
00:07:59,280 --> 00:08:01,800
Speaker 2: is less divided between US and China now and more

123
00:08:01,840 --> 00:08:04,800
Speaker 2: the US and the rest of the world just left

124
00:08:04,840 --> 00:08:07,760
Speaker 2: in a mess. Well, is that easier or harder for well.

125
00:08:07,760 --> 00:08:10,880
Speaker 1: First of all, the American ambassador is here, so I'm

126
00:08:10,880 --> 00:08:14,760
Speaker 1: not here to be an apologist. But I would say

127
00:08:14,920 --> 00:08:20,160
Speaker 1: President Trump as a person in fact, has been uniquely

128
00:08:20,400 --> 00:08:21,760
Speaker 1: consistent for decades.

129
00:08:22,160 --> 00:08:22,840
Speaker 3: What do I mean?

130
00:08:23,040 --> 00:08:26,360
Speaker 1: Watch the interview with Operah Winfrey back in nineteen eighty eight,

131
00:08:26,680 --> 00:08:30,520
Speaker 1: his views on war, anti war, his views on free trade.

132
00:08:31,760 --> 00:08:34,640
Speaker 1: It's an avenue for America to be taken advantage of

133
00:08:34,840 --> 00:08:38,640
Speaker 1: his views on business in a main street real estate

134
00:08:38,679 --> 00:08:42,800
Speaker 1: way as opposed to Wall Street and financial engineering.

135
00:08:43,000 --> 00:08:47,080
Speaker 3: His views on immigration actually have been remarkedably.

136
00:08:46,520 --> 00:08:49,599
Speaker 1: Consistent, and I think people don't give enough marks for

137
00:08:49,760 --> 00:08:53,280
Speaker 1: that point. So he is consistent. It's just that his

138
00:08:53,520 --> 00:08:58,320
Speaker 1: methodology his presentation is somewhat novel, and people get react

139
00:08:58,360 --> 00:09:01,199
Speaker 1: to that. But my point is American policy and the

140
00:09:01,240 --> 00:09:05,600
Speaker 1: President Trump in fact is reflecting long held, deep convictions.

141
00:09:06,480 --> 00:09:09,520
Speaker 2: I think you are right. I guess the exception to that,

142
00:09:09,760 --> 00:09:11,600
Speaker 2: and I'm interested in whether you read it the same

143
00:09:11,600 --> 00:09:14,640
Speaker 2: way you've been at the recent meetings with your Prime

144
00:09:14,679 --> 00:09:18,560
Speaker 2: Minister in Malaysia and Korea, where we did see this

145
00:09:19,440 --> 00:09:22,280
Speaker 2: deals between the US and China. Yes, but it will

146
00:09:22,320 --> 00:09:24,200
Speaker 2: not have been lost on many of the people around

147
00:09:24,240 --> 00:09:26,520
Speaker 2: the table. That China was ending up with a relatively

148
00:09:26,559 --> 00:09:30,640
Speaker 2: better position than many of the other countries in the

149
00:09:30,640 --> 00:09:33,080
Speaker 2: region who had thought that they were going to be

150
00:09:33,120 --> 00:09:36,720
Speaker 2: an alternative to China. For US manufacturers, well, that feels

151
00:09:36,760 --> 00:09:41,160
Speaker 2: a little inconsistent with wanting to wean American industry off

152
00:09:41,559 --> 00:09:42,440
Speaker 2: Chinese manufacers.

153
00:09:42,440 --> 00:09:47,240
Speaker 1: Well, again, I would distinguish between strategic and tactical. I

154
00:09:47,240 --> 00:09:50,080
Speaker 1: think what we've witnessed so far is the tactical pause.

155
00:09:50,960 --> 00:09:54,400
Speaker 1: The fundamental problem in the US and China is an

156
00:09:54,480 --> 00:09:59,320
Speaker 1: almost complete lack of strategic trust, and that means each

157
00:09:59,360 --> 00:10:02,560
Speaker 1: side has to assume the worst of each other, and

158
00:10:02,640 --> 00:10:06,959
Speaker 1: even if you're taking precautions, it's viewed as escalatory. Both

159
00:10:07,000 --> 00:10:10,959
Speaker 1: sides have identified pain points, and I think what you've

160
00:10:10,960 --> 00:10:15,200
Speaker 1: seen so far is not a strategic realignment or southern

161
00:10:15,280 --> 00:10:18,679
Speaker 1: dawn of strategic trust, is that both sides have decided

162
00:10:18,800 --> 00:10:23,920
Speaker 1: they need time, they need a tactical pause whilst you

163
00:10:24,000 --> 00:10:26,520
Speaker 1: get on with the real business. And the point about

164
00:10:26,520 --> 00:10:30,880
Speaker 1: decoupling is worth unpacking because what we are witnessing the

165
00:10:30,880 --> 00:10:34,360
Speaker 1: world right now is a couple of phenomena. Number One,

166
00:10:34,440 --> 00:10:38,760
Speaker 1: you've witnessed the weaponization of everything, weaponization of the dollar,

167
00:10:38,840 --> 00:10:45,160
Speaker 1: weaponization of finance, weaponization of critical minerals, global supply choins.

168
00:10:45,280 --> 00:10:50,040
Speaker 1: Interdependency used to be a good thing. Now it's a vulnerability.

169
00:10:50,840 --> 00:10:54,160
Speaker 1: But my point about weaponization of everything, you know, Newton's

170
00:10:54,240 --> 00:10:57,880
Speaker 1: third law applies in diplomacy too. For every action, there's

171
00:10:57,880 --> 00:11:02,760
Speaker 1: an equal and opposite reaction. So the weaponization where everything

172
00:11:02,760 --> 00:11:06,000
Speaker 1: has led to an erosion of trust, has led to

173
00:11:06,040 --> 00:11:10,120
Speaker 1: a need to assume the worst and to prepare for it.

174
00:11:10,200 --> 00:11:13,080
Speaker 1: And in the absence of trust, it's very hard to

175
00:11:13,200 --> 00:11:16,360
Speaker 1: actually have strategic alignments. So that's first part. What you're

176
00:11:16,400 --> 00:11:21,120
Speaker 1: witnessing now is a tactical pause. The strategic problem remains.

177
00:11:21,880 --> 00:11:25,040
Speaker 1: The next aspect of what's going on now is the

178
00:11:25,080 --> 00:11:29,120
Speaker 1: fracturing of supply chains. And it's not an ideological point,

179
00:11:29,280 --> 00:11:32,720
Speaker 1: but I think especially during COVID, you found it.

180
00:11:32,760 --> 00:11:34,520
Speaker 3: Even simple things like making.

181
00:11:34,280 --> 00:11:37,760
Speaker 1: A mask, which it's not rocket science, but the essential

182
00:11:37,800 --> 00:11:42,200
Speaker 1: components were not within reach and everyone was panicking and

183
00:11:42,240 --> 00:11:44,720
Speaker 1: you didn't have access to it. So the fracturing of

184
00:11:44,800 --> 00:11:48,000
Speaker 1: supply chains in the name of national security and in

185
00:11:48,080 --> 00:11:53,240
Speaker 1: search of resilience actually means a world which hitherto has

186
00:11:53,320 --> 00:11:58,600
Speaker 1: been based on efficiency, is now building supply chains on

187
00:11:58,640 --> 00:12:04,480
Speaker 1: a basis of near ding on shoring French showing. Economically,

188
00:12:04,480 --> 00:12:08,280
Speaker 1: what that must mean is some inflation because you're no

189
00:12:08,360 --> 00:12:12,280
Speaker 1: longer choosing the cheapest and the best, most efficient, You're

190
00:12:12,320 --> 00:12:16,080
Speaker 1: now having other considerations. So watch that a bottom inflation.

191
00:12:16,760 --> 00:12:21,560
Speaker 1: The third point is the global comments. I've been involved

192
00:12:21,559 --> 00:12:24,000
Speaker 1: in this game long enough, so I'll give you an example,

193
00:12:24,160 --> 00:12:27,400
Speaker 1: the Paris Climate Change Agreement. The only reason that got

194
00:12:27,440 --> 00:12:30,480
Speaker 1: done is because America and China are on the same side,

195
00:12:30,880 --> 00:12:33,840
Speaker 1: and we're able to drag the rest of us an

196
00:12:33,960 --> 00:12:39,840
Speaker 1: imperfect but important agreement. Today if the two main players

197
00:12:40,200 --> 00:12:42,920
Speaker 1: are not in the same room, and it goes further

198
00:12:43,000 --> 00:12:43,280
Speaker 1: than that.

199
00:12:44,480 --> 00:12:46,960
Speaker 3: In fact, it's not just a.

200
00:12:46,840 --> 00:12:49,199
Speaker 1: Matter of picking out your marbles and leaving the game,

201
00:12:49,320 --> 00:12:54,040
Speaker 1: but you're actually disrupting the game. And my worry is

202
00:12:54,080 --> 00:12:56,240
Speaker 1: that we're going to be unable to deal with the

203
00:12:56,240 --> 00:13:01,800
Speaker 1: global comments. It means climate change, pandemic, the challenges from AI.

204
00:13:02,960 --> 00:13:06,760
Speaker 1: We won't be able to respond adequately to it because

205
00:13:06,840 --> 00:13:13,079
Speaker 1: the two key players either are disrupting actively or are

206
00:13:13,160 --> 00:13:16,800
Speaker 1: spoiling for a fight and are certainly not willing to

207
00:13:16,920 --> 00:13:23,240
Speaker 1: restrain themselves with multilateral rules imposed by lil Putin countries

208
00:13:23,480 --> 00:13:26,079
Speaker 1: begins medium and small elsewhere.

209
00:13:27,080 --> 00:13:28,400
Speaker 3: I hope that's not too depressing.

210
00:13:41,080 --> 00:13:46,319
Speaker 2: It just seems a muddier picture than the decoupling team US.

211
00:13:46,679 --> 00:13:47,240
Speaker 3: It's resty.

212
00:13:47,400 --> 00:13:51,320
Speaker 2: But as your concern, the long term trend, yes, I

213
00:13:51,360 --> 00:13:54,280
Speaker 2: mean someone has likened it to a couple saying we're

214
00:13:54,320 --> 00:13:56,160
Speaker 2: going to divorce in ten years, but we have to

215
00:13:56,200 --> 00:13:59,400
Speaker 2: live together before then. You still need. Long term trend

216
00:13:59,600 --> 00:14:01,679
Speaker 2: is dec coupling between the US and China.

217
00:14:01,840 --> 00:14:06,880
Speaker 1: I think without the strategic trusts, the logic for decoupling,

218
00:14:08,520 --> 00:14:12,800
Speaker 1: at least partially in the name of national security and

219
00:14:13,480 --> 00:14:18,120
Speaker 1: anxiety over competitiveness, will continue to play out.

220
00:14:18,720 --> 00:14:20,720
Speaker 3: And that's that's what we're witnessing.

221
00:14:20,840 --> 00:14:22,920
Speaker 1: But if I can come back to where you started

222
00:14:22,960 --> 00:14:25,680
Speaker 1: with a piece of good news, I said, why hasn't

223
00:14:25,680 --> 00:14:28,320
Speaker 1: the rest of the world retaliated? I think a couple

224
00:14:28,360 --> 00:14:31,840
Speaker 1: of reasons. Number One, they're a far bigger elephant or

225
00:14:31,960 --> 00:14:35,560
Speaker 1: ego than the rest of us. So what's the point

226
00:14:35,600 --> 00:14:39,560
Speaker 1: of retaliating when in fract the little guy will be

227
00:14:39,640 --> 00:14:43,320
Speaker 1: the ultimate loser. So that's the first thing. Second, and

228
00:14:43,520 --> 00:14:46,920
Speaker 1: I'm coming to your good news. If you leave aside

229
00:14:47,000 --> 00:14:50,840
Speaker 1: the two big powers, and if you think if you

230
00:14:50,920 --> 00:14:56,400
Speaker 1: open a World Atlas and draw a diagonal Europe, the

231
00:14:56,440 --> 00:15:00,800
Speaker 1: Middle East, South Asia, Southeast Asia, Australi in New Zealand,

232
00:15:00,840 --> 00:15:03,600
Speaker 1: and then you draw two spokes, one to Northeast Asia

233
00:15:03,640 --> 00:15:10,800
Speaker 1: particular Japan Career, and another spoke southwest through Africa and

234
00:15:10,920 --> 00:15:11,720
Speaker 1: South America.

235
00:15:12,520 --> 00:15:12,920
Speaker 3: Guess what.

236
00:15:13,480 --> 00:15:17,400
Speaker 1: In fact, there is still a majority of countries and

237
00:15:17,440 --> 00:15:20,760
Speaker 1: even I would say the majority of global GDP, that

238
00:15:21,000 --> 00:15:26,479
Speaker 1: still wants to operate on supply chain efficiencies, on economic integration,

239
00:15:26,680 --> 00:15:31,040
Speaker 1: on rules based globalization. The only thing is the enforcer

240
00:15:31,360 --> 00:15:34,360
Speaker 1: in chief is no longer there and there is a

241
00:15:34,400 --> 00:15:36,760
Speaker 1: need therefore to assemble or coalition of the willing. So

242
00:15:36,800 --> 00:15:40,080
Speaker 1: what you're watching now, all that's scurrying around by medium

243
00:15:40,120 --> 00:15:46,960
Speaker 1: and small economies is to keep globalization alive, reform what

244
00:15:47,080 --> 00:15:49,880
Speaker 1: needs to be reformed, and there's a lot that needs reform,

245
00:15:50,040 --> 00:15:53,560
Speaker 1: but to work together in a more collegiate way, knowing

246
00:15:53,640 --> 00:15:57,320
Speaker 1: full well that the underwriter, the enforcer, is not going

247
00:15:57,400 --> 00:16:00,120
Speaker 1: to be doing the heavy lifting. So that's where I

248
00:16:00,120 --> 00:16:02,640
Speaker 1: think there is a glimmer of hope. And that's why

249
00:16:02,800 --> 00:16:05,920
Speaker 1: you know, my Prime Minister and I've been discovering around

250
00:16:06,440 --> 00:16:10,040
Speaker 1: to regional and international conferences and the good news I

251
00:16:10,080 --> 00:16:14,440
Speaker 1: agree with you. The majority people in fact want some order,

252
00:16:15,320 --> 00:16:21,160
Speaker 1: some stability, and some benefits, economic benefits from working together,

253
00:16:21,520 --> 00:16:25,280
Speaker 1: from inter operating, And what we are hoping ultimately is

254
00:16:25,320 --> 00:16:28,080
Speaker 1: that when things settle down between the two big bodies,

255
00:16:28,880 --> 00:16:34,040
Speaker 1: they will then rediscover the benefits of globalization.

256
00:16:34,600 --> 00:16:36,440
Speaker 2: One of the initiatives that you had in the summer

257
00:16:36,600 --> 00:16:39,880
Speaker 2: was with the Gulf and the GCC. Do you see

258
00:16:39,880 --> 00:16:40,960
Speaker 2: that moving forward?

259
00:16:41,240 --> 00:16:43,720
Speaker 1: Well, if you look earlier this year, we had that

260
00:16:43,800 --> 00:16:45,800
Speaker 1: when we had an RC and some that we included,

261
00:16:45,840 --> 00:16:49,720
Speaker 1: the GCC and China in Singapore were members of both

262
00:16:49,840 --> 00:16:54,600
Speaker 1: the CPTPP and our CP which are big mega free

263
00:16:54,600 --> 00:16:59,080
Speaker 1: trade deals. We're trying to convince the European Union, who

264
00:16:59,240 --> 00:17:03,480
Speaker 1: is also a flexy pro trade pro rules.

265
00:17:04,080 --> 00:17:06,320
Speaker 3: Are they going to join? No, I think that's a

266
00:17:06,359 --> 00:17:07,120
Speaker 3: bridge too far.

267
00:17:07,840 --> 00:17:12,000
Speaker 1: But can we get a partnership between the European Union

268
00:17:12,119 --> 00:17:15,480
Speaker 1: and the CPTPP, especially a CPTPP which is.

269
00:17:15,440 --> 00:17:18,679
Speaker 2: Expanding, You've got to think we need a bit.

270
00:17:18,800 --> 00:17:21,159
Speaker 3: I know, I know, In fact, I.

271
00:17:21,119 --> 00:17:23,440
Speaker 2: Think that's why everyone talks about it, honestly.

272
00:17:23,400 --> 00:17:23,800
Speaker 3: I know.

273
00:17:24,080 --> 00:17:27,720
Speaker 1: But if it's strip aside the labels and the names,

274
00:17:27,960 --> 00:17:32,120
Speaker 1: I mean, the point is, is there benefit from globalization,

275
00:17:32,760 --> 00:17:38,800
Speaker 1: from efficiency, from interoperability, from standards, from peaceful resolution of disputes,

276
00:17:39,640 --> 00:17:45,560
Speaker 1: including trade disputes. The answer is unequivocally yes. But we

277
00:17:45,680 --> 00:17:48,359
Speaker 1: need to do it now and everyone needs to chip in.

278
00:17:48,880 --> 00:17:52,320
Speaker 1: So I think the EU is a natural partner with

279
00:17:52,440 --> 00:17:55,240
Speaker 1: the CPTP. So think of the EU and the Pacific.

280
00:17:55,440 --> 00:18:00,200
Speaker 1: Can we construct something that cuts a diagonal across go

281
00:18:00,560 --> 00:18:03,680
Speaker 1: and it's Africa keen on this. I think they are

282
00:18:04,240 --> 00:18:07,080
Speaker 1: South America. I mean, you may be surprised, even little Singapore.

283
00:18:07,119 --> 00:18:14,120
Speaker 1: We've signed free trade deals with Mercasol, which is Argentina, Brazil, Ecuador, Paraguay, Uruguay.

284
00:18:14,760 --> 00:18:17,240
Speaker 1: We've even signed a free trade agreement with the Pacific

285
00:18:17,280 --> 00:18:23,040
Speaker 1: Alliance Mexico, Colombia, Chile. So the point is you'll be surprised.

286
00:18:23,240 --> 00:18:28,080
Speaker 1: The appetite for economic integration remains, and that's what Singapore

287
00:18:28,160 --> 00:18:28,720
Speaker 1: is working now.

288
00:18:28,720 --> 00:18:31,240
Speaker 3: Of course, I'll tell you, of course we are biased.

289
00:18:31,680 --> 00:18:35,280
Speaker 1: This is Manhattan without upstate New York, or this is

290
00:18:35,359 --> 00:18:39,359
Speaker 1: one fifth of Rhode Island without continental United States, or

291
00:18:39,400 --> 00:18:43,359
Speaker 1: if you want another uncomfortable analogy, Singapore is just twice

292
00:18:43,359 --> 00:18:46,840
Speaker 1: the size of Gaza, but with three times the population.

293
00:18:47,640 --> 00:18:50,920
Speaker 1: So we're a tiny place in which our trade volume

294
00:18:51,000 --> 00:18:54,360
Speaker 1: is three times our GDP. So I hope you understand

295
00:18:54,359 --> 00:18:58,600
Speaker 1: when we promote free trade, it's lifeblood. It's not a

296
00:18:58,680 --> 00:19:04,000
Speaker 1: negotiating point, right, And when we say rules are better

297
00:19:04,040 --> 00:19:07,360
Speaker 1: than the alternative, because the alternative is right, it might

298
00:19:08,280 --> 00:19:12,440
Speaker 1: be it's beautiful and small. It's irrelevant. So I will

299
00:19:12,480 --> 00:19:15,400
Speaker 1: confess this is a self interested argument.

300
00:19:15,920 --> 00:19:18,720
Speaker 2: But you've talked about importance of rules, but also a

301
00:19:18,800 --> 00:19:20,360
Speaker 2: country is working together.

302
00:19:20,240 --> 00:19:21,719
Speaker 3: Yes, absolutely, not enforced.

303
00:19:21,920 --> 00:19:24,960
Speaker 2: Should the Southeast Asian economies, even the Asian countries have

304
00:19:25,040 --> 00:19:28,200
Speaker 2: worked together more in negotiating these trade deals with the US.

305
00:19:28,240 --> 00:19:30,440
Speaker 2: You talk, No, I don't. I don't buy nactual arm

306
00:19:30,480 --> 00:19:31,480
Speaker 2: wrestling you describe.

307
00:19:31,640 --> 00:19:34,959
Speaker 1: Yes, No, I don't think that was necessary, not certainly,

308
00:19:35,000 --> 00:19:37,840
Speaker 1: not at this stage. I mean, if you look at

309
00:19:37,880 --> 00:19:41,440
Speaker 1: Asian as a horse, you know the terris range from

310
00:19:41,720 --> 00:19:45,720
Speaker 1: ten percent, nineteen percent, maybe twenty percent, and those.

311
00:19:45,680 --> 00:19:46,680
Speaker 3: Numbers keep changing.

312
00:19:47,080 --> 00:19:53,280
Speaker 1: Anyway, my point is, don't overreact to the headline of

313
00:19:53,280 --> 00:19:53,800
Speaker 1: after Day.

314
00:19:54,560 --> 00:19:55,760
Speaker 3: Understand what's going on.

315
00:19:56,000 --> 00:19:59,720
Speaker 1: So if you now bring your zoom lens to Arcian,

316
00:20:00,400 --> 00:20:04,520
Speaker 1: have we systematically brought down our trade barriers non tariff barriers?

317
00:20:05,200 --> 00:20:07,320
Speaker 3: Is RCN fulfilling its mission?

318
00:20:07,359 --> 00:20:11,479
Speaker 1: Of becoming a single production zone, a single investment zone.

319
00:20:11,840 --> 00:20:15,080
Speaker 1: Has there been economic growth in URSA? What are the

320
00:20:15,119 --> 00:20:17,560
Speaker 1: prospects of RCN in the next two decades. We think

321
00:20:17,560 --> 00:20:20,320
Speaker 1: we can double our combined GDP. If you add up

322
00:20:20,320 --> 00:20:23,280
Speaker 1: the combined GDP of RCN, which by the way, has

323
00:20:23,280 --> 00:20:28,000
Speaker 1: a population slightly larger than the EU, we're about number five.

324
00:20:28,960 --> 00:20:30,800
Speaker 3: And because half of population is.

325
00:20:30,800 --> 00:20:34,199
Speaker 1: Below the age of thirty five and our middle class

326
00:20:34,280 --> 00:20:38,200
Speaker 1: is growing, the long term prospects are right. So long

327
00:20:38,320 --> 00:20:42,040
Speaker 1: as we don't overreact, we don't do stuff that actually

328
00:20:42,080 --> 00:20:44,879
Speaker 1: boomer ranks back on us. And we just look at

329
00:20:44,880 --> 00:20:48,440
Speaker 1: what we did this year. We upgraded the RCAN agreement

330
00:20:48,600 --> 00:20:51,879
Speaker 1: on trading goods within r CM, we upgraded the rc

331
00:20:52,040 --> 00:20:55,520
Speaker 1: and China Free Trade Agreement, and we're still looking at

332
00:20:55,560 --> 00:20:59,359
Speaker 1: building more more bridges across the world. So my point

333
00:20:59,400 --> 00:21:03,199
Speaker 1: is that in fact, Southeast Asia is a zone of

334
00:21:03,280 --> 00:21:04,600
Speaker 1: hope and growth.

335
00:21:05,560 --> 00:21:08,960
Speaker 3: The key thing is to focus on.

336
00:21:09,080 --> 00:21:11,560
Speaker 1: The long term. And what does long term mean? It

337
00:21:11,680 --> 00:21:15,600
Speaker 1: means technology. Bearing in mind that we've got three technological

338
00:21:15,680 --> 00:21:21,600
Speaker 1: revolutions going on in real time simultaneously, AI, biotech, renewable energy,

339
00:21:22,240 --> 00:21:25,960
Speaker 1: and we're focusing on building up the infrastructure for that.

340
00:21:26,119 --> 00:21:30,160
Speaker 1: With focusing on educating a workforce, work creaty for that

341
00:21:30,240 --> 00:21:33,880
Speaker 1: kind of work, the world of AI and robotics, and

342
00:21:33,920 --> 00:21:37,400
Speaker 1: we're focusing on integrating, we can still increase our intrascient

343
00:21:37,480 --> 00:21:42,879
Speaker 1: trades significantly. And what about Asian Africa, Asian South America.

344
00:21:43,000 --> 00:21:45,760
Speaker 1: You know, it's some people call it South South. I

345
00:21:45,800 --> 00:21:48,800
Speaker 1: don't really like term, but my point is there is

346
00:21:48,840 --> 00:21:52,639
Speaker 1: still a majority in favor of this. I would also

347
00:21:52,680 --> 00:21:59,920
Speaker 1: point out the CPTPP began as four tiny states Singapore, Bruna,

348
00:22:00,880 --> 00:22:05,040
Speaker 1: New Zealand and Chile, and it only became TPP when

349
00:22:05,119 --> 00:22:10,119
Speaker 1: America and Japan came in. Now we knew by the

350
00:22:10,160 --> 00:22:15,280
Speaker 1: time Hillary Clinton had to withdraw from her support from

351
00:22:15,320 --> 00:22:17,359
Speaker 1: the TPP, which in fact she had a lot to

352
00:22:17,400 --> 00:22:21,480
Speaker 1: do with starting, that the cause of free trade was

353
00:22:21,600 --> 00:22:25,639
Speaker 1: in political problem. And I think all of us in

354
00:22:25,680 --> 00:22:29,200
Speaker 1: this room, who I would say are probably instinctive free traders,

355
00:22:29,240 --> 00:22:32,480
Speaker 1: need to realize that we didn't make the political case

356
00:22:32,880 --> 00:22:38,440
Speaker 1: for it. And you have to convince your local electorate

357
00:22:39,520 --> 00:22:44,840
Speaker 1: the jobs and wages and opportunity come from free trade. Otherwise,

358
00:22:45,400 --> 00:22:50,080
Speaker 1: if you don't understand the political reality that for every

359
00:22:50,119 --> 00:22:53,439
Speaker 1: free trade agreement, they are winners and losers. You need

360
00:22:53,760 --> 00:22:57,800
Speaker 1: to put seat belts on. You need to have compensatory mechanisms.

361
00:22:57,960 --> 00:23:01,280
Speaker 1: And whilst you don't expect governments to choose winners and

362
00:23:01,359 --> 00:23:06,359
Speaker 1: losers at the enterprise level, but governments do need to

363
00:23:06,400 --> 00:23:13,119
Speaker 1: be activists infrastructure, education, pro enterprise regulatory environments.

364
00:23:13,600 --> 00:23:15,760
Speaker 3: You do need an active government.

365
00:23:16,119 --> 00:23:21,680
Speaker 1: But what you don't want is completely state directed capitalism

366
00:23:21,720 --> 00:23:24,000
Speaker 1: where you pick winners and lois. So we think that's

367
00:23:24,200 --> 00:23:28,160
Speaker 1: ultimately a dead end. So anyway, my point is, watch

368
00:23:28,240 --> 00:23:31,480
Speaker 1: this space. That's why there's still buzz in this part

369
00:23:31,520 --> 00:23:32,000
Speaker 1: of the world.

370
00:23:32,320 --> 00:23:33,600
Speaker 2: We're going to run out of time. So I want

371
00:23:33,600 --> 00:23:36,040
Speaker 2: to just quickly ask you I started talking about the US.

372
00:23:36,400 --> 00:23:39,880
Speaker 2: I mean you have said obviously trade is the lifeblood

373
00:23:39,920 --> 00:23:42,479
Speaker 2: of Singapore, and you're absolutely at the center of looking this.

374
00:23:42,800 --> 00:23:45,800
Speaker 2: The one country that despite all these tariffs and trade

375
00:23:45,840 --> 00:23:48,480
Speaker 2: wars by the US, the one country that has managed

376
00:23:48,520 --> 00:23:52,399
Speaker 2: to increase its export growth this year's China. See that

377
00:23:52,520 --> 00:23:58,760
Speaker 2: country in many ways doubling down on a focus on manufacturing,

378
00:23:58,920 --> 00:24:02,119
Speaker 2: on export led growth, when many economists might have said

379
00:24:02,520 --> 00:24:04,600
Speaker 2: long term they have to be on a different path.

380
00:24:05,240 --> 00:24:08,880
Speaker 2: How destabilizing is that for this region, especially now they

381
00:24:08,880 --> 00:24:10,240
Speaker 2: have a slightly more well.

382
00:24:10,040 --> 00:24:12,960
Speaker 1: I think what you're referring to you're being too delicate.

383
00:24:13,240 --> 00:24:17,600
Speaker 1: You're referring to over capacity. Actually, the world has had

384
00:24:17,720 --> 00:24:22,920
Speaker 1: unsustainable imbalances for some time. If you outsource all manufacturing

385
00:24:22,960 --> 00:24:27,680
Speaker 1: to China, you outsource all energy to Russia, and you

386
00:24:27,800 --> 00:24:31,800
Speaker 1: outsource security to America, I'm referring to the EU.

387
00:24:33,200 --> 00:24:34,760
Speaker 3: That's not a sustainable model.

388
00:24:35,359 --> 00:24:38,760
Speaker 1: And if the EU wants sort of strategic autonomy or independence,

389
00:24:39,240 --> 00:24:42,280
Speaker 1: it needs to get a grip on manufacturing, on its

390
00:24:42,359 --> 00:24:47,840
Speaker 1: industrial capacity, on its defense, and on its energy policies.

391
00:24:47,960 --> 00:24:52,040
Speaker 1: And I'm just giving you one example. In the case

392
00:24:52,080 --> 00:24:56,760
Speaker 1: of China, it's worth also reflecting because China became the

393
00:24:56,800 --> 00:25:00,520
Speaker 1: manufacturing center well and enjoying economies of skin. And by

394
00:25:00,560 --> 00:25:05,159
Speaker 1: the way, I must say, Chinese workers happened to be

395
00:25:05,240 --> 00:25:08,640
Speaker 1: really hard working and efficient. I don't think you can

396
00:25:08,680 --> 00:25:12,640
Speaker 1: follow China for that. But a world in which all

397
00:25:12,680 --> 00:25:17,880
Speaker 1: manufacturing is accumulating on one half, trade surpluses are accumulating there,

398
00:25:18,000 --> 00:25:20,520
Speaker 1: but those trade surplus are being recycled it used to

399
00:25:20,560 --> 00:25:21,840
Speaker 1: be recycled.

400
00:25:21,280 --> 00:25:22,560
Speaker 3: Into T bills.

401
00:25:22,880 --> 00:25:26,040
Speaker 1: What it meant is, for a while the Western consumer

402
00:25:26,240 --> 00:25:30,760
Speaker 1: enjoy low inflation, low interest rates, high quality.

403
00:25:30,320 --> 00:25:32,720
Speaker 3: Goods at affordable rates.

404
00:25:32,760 --> 00:25:36,479
Speaker 1: But actually we're consuming beyond what they were producing, and

405
00:25:36,520 --> 00:25:40,000
Speaker 1: we should not be surprised that this system based on

406
00:25:40,040 --> 00:25:45,080
Speaker 1: the imbalance was not sustainable. Now, if you imagine that

407
00:25:45,240 --> 00:25:49,639
Speaker 1: Americas shuts its market to the productive capacity of China

408
00:25:50,200 --> 00:25:53,280
Speaker 1: and the EU also follows suit I mean, and think

409
00:25:53,320 --> 00:25:56,480
Speaker 1: of automotives as an example.

410
00:25:56,359 --> 00:25:59,640
Speaker 3: Then the question will be will China be able.

411
00:25:59,440 --> 00:26:04,040
Speaker 1: To expand is domestic consumption to match its capacity or

412
00:26:04,080 --> 00:26:08,840
Speaker 1: will it still try to export its way? And if

413
00:26:08,880 --> 00:26:10,800
Speaker 1: it does, where will it export to?

414
00:26:11,400 --> 00:26:12,840
Speaker 2: But that is what they do, right.

415
00:26:13,640 --> 00:26:14,160
Speaker 3: No, I think.

416
00:26:14,160 --> 00:26:19,520
Speaker 1: But I'm saying, let's, without being pejorative or making value judgments,

417
00:26:19,640 --> 00:26:24,320
Speaker 1: just ask yourself, do you need domestic changes to the

418
00:26:24,400 --> 00:26:25,720
Speaker 1: economic structure of China?

419
00:26:25,880 --> 00:26:26,520
Speaker 3: I think we do.

420
00:26:27,200 --> 00:26:31,920
Speaker 1: What does Southeast Asia, Africa and South America?

421
00:26:32,000 --> 00:26:34,080
Speaker 3: One do we need infrastructure? We do?

422
00:26:34,480 --> 00:26:37,959
Speaker 1: Is the productive capacity of China for the development of

423
00:26:38,000 --> 00:26:44,960
Speaker 1: that infrastructure, particularly green energy, AI and even biotech, which,

424
00:26:45,000 --> 00:26:47,639
Speaker 1: by the way, speaking as a doctor, the Chinese are

425
00:26:47,800 --> 00:26:51,679
Speaker 1: no slouches in that area too. So what I'm saying

426
00:26:51,800 --> 00:26:55,439
Speaker 1: is watch this space. I am sure adjustments will occur

427
00:26:55,560 --> 00:27:00,560
Speaker 1: both domestically and across borders. And across loads, and the

428
00:27:00,680 --> 00:27:04,920
Speaker 1: opportunity will be to try to catch these waves, catch

429
00:27:05,000 --> 00:27:09,760
Speaker 1: these new tides and wins so that we maximize opportunities

430
00:27:09,760 --> 00:27:12,000
Speaker 1: for the rest of us. So, don't you know, I'll

431
00:27:12,000 --> 00:27:14,160
Speaker 1: come back to the hopeful note in which you started.

432
00:27:14,840 --> 00:27:18,160
Speaker 1: Not all of us have lost our heads and reacted

433
00:27:18,200 --> 00:27:23,879
Speaker 1: in panic or even acted on sense of retribution. But

434
00:27:23,920 --> 00:27:26,480
Speaker 1: we've tried to take a longer term view of the

435
00:27:26,520 --> 00:27:31,640
Speaker 1: imbalances and of the trends, and to seek opportunities in

436
00:27:31,680 --> 00:27:33,280
Speaker 1: these interact names.

437
00:27:34,000 --> 00:27:35,800
Speaker 3: Well, I think that's the basis of ourbitrage.

438
00:27:35,920 --> 00:27:37,920
Speaker 2: For sixty years, things been fairly good at now.

439
00:27:37,880 --> 00:27:40,399
Speaker 1: Now, but sixty years is you know, in Asia, sixty

440
00:27:40,480 --> 00:27:43,720
Speaker 1: years it's far too early to tell, So we never

441
00:27:43,760 --> 00:27:46,160
Speaker 1: take our survival for granted.

442
00:27:46,800 --> 00:27:49,639
Speaker 2: Documentarish thank you so much for joining us and for

443
00:27:49,680 --> 00:27:51,560
Speaker 2: starting ourself on a hopeful footing.

444
00:27:51,960 --> 00:27:55,159
Speaker 1: I hope, so, so don't lose your head, you know,

445
00:27:55,320 --> 00:27:56,520
Speaker 1: understand what's going on.

446
00:27:56,800 --> 00:27:59,520
Speaker 3: Look for opportunities. There are opportunities.

447
00:28:09,359 --> 00:28:11,960
Speaker 2: Thanks for listening to Trumpnomics from Bloomberg. It was hosted

448
00:28:11,960 --> 00:28:14,359
Speaker 2: by me Stephanie Flanders, and I was joined by Singapore's

449
00:28:14,400 --> 00:28:19,639
Speaker 2: Foreign Minister, Vivian Balachristian Trumponomics was produced by Samasadi and

450
00:28:19,720 --> 00:28:23,200
Speaker 2: Moses and with help from Amy Keen. Sound design was

451
00:28:23,280 --> 00:28:27,760
Speaker 2: by Blake Maples and Kelly Gary, and Sage Bowman is

452
00:28:27,800 --> 00:28:31,359
Speaker 2: Bloomberg's head of podcasts. To help Brothers find it, please

453
00:28:31,480 --> 00:28:34,920
Speaker 2: rate and review this podcast highly wherever you listen