WEBVTT - Talking With Mike Alfred

0:00:00.000 --> 0:00:02.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, welcome back. You are listening to another episode

0:00:02.000 --> 0:00:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of The Mark Moss Show where we talk about bitcoin.

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>We talk about the decentralized revolution the world is going through,

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and we look at it through the lens and the

0:00:09.760 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>convergence of politics, finance, and technology to try to understand

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:17.640
<v Speaker 1>what the heck is going on in this crazy, crazy world. Um,

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, I try to bring to you some education

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>so you can understand really what's going on behind the scenes,

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>because of course you were never taught it and you're

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>being misled all the time. Try to bring to you

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the latest breaking news, and of course I try to

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>bring some interesting guests on so you can hear from

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>some other people. But me talking all the time. And

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:35.559
<v Speaker 1>I am joined in the studio right now with one

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 1>of my good friends, Mike Alfred. Mike, thanks so much

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 1>for joining me today. Yeah. Thanks Mark. It was good

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to meet you in Miami. Yeah. Yeah, we just got

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to meet each other recently. We've been kind of following

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:48.599
<v Speaker 1>each other on Twitter for a while and we got

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to hang out there in uh in Miami, go to

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>go to go to some some of the parties together.

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>That was That was a fun way to get going.

0:00:56.680 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I enjoyed that. Um. I think we met at the

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>unchained cab little party and then the Gemini party or whatever.

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:05.040
<v Speaker 1>But you know what's cool about that is um social media.

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:07.959
<v Speaker 1>You know. UM, I have a daughter who's just graduated

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:11.399
<v Speaker 1>high school and all her friends parents are like, UM,

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>so eager to send their kids off to college. And

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm just not a big believer in that. And there's

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:17.759
<v Speaker 1>certainly things you need to college degree for, but unless

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:19.759
<v Speaker 1>you need that, I'm just not a big believer in it.

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>And I'm I would ask them, like, you know, okay,

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>what's you know, what do you see as big benefit?

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>And most of them would always go back to not

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:29.399
<v Speaker 1>the education, um, the experiences. They lean on that, but

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>then they lean on the connections. They're gonna get the connections.

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, dude, have you heard of Twitter? Because like,

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I've like met everybody in the world on Twitter, Like

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Mike and I we were like friends on Twitter before

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>we were like friends in real life. You know, pretty amazing.

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you use it the same way. I thought

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>it was overvalued for most of the time I use it.

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't until last summer when I left Nideck that

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>for the first time I tried to actually engage with

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the platform every day, And now I see how valuable

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>it is because I've met maybe hundreds of people through

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Twitter just over the last twelve months. It's opened up

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:04.279
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of doors. It's allowed me to invest

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>in a couple of new bitcoin companies. I joined a

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>couple of boards all from Twitter, and that surprised me

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>because I used to think it was kind of a

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>foo fou thing that people did. It was sort of

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:17.119
<v Speaker 1>a waste of time for CEOs to be engaging with

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>social media. But I've seen the light now, Mark, and

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you came right up to me at a at a

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:23.799
<v Speaker 1>party and you you knew who I was. I knew

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>who you were. And it's all because of Twitter. So yeah,

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:29.240
<v Speaker 1>do you think do you think it's changed? So like, um, obviously,

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>like you have network effects, right, So the bigger than

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>network gets, the more valuable it gets. And so maybe

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>it was kind of more foofy as you in your words,

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>or not not as usable. But now today since everybody's

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>on there using it more, it's it's become more viable.

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.959
<v Speaker 1>I think it depends on your interest graph. So before Bitcoin,

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, Twitter was less interesting. I think the bitcoin

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>community is one of the most rapid communities on the Internet,

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and Twitter is sort of like one of the primary

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>places where people involved in bitcoin come together and share

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:00.080
<v Speaker 1>information and build relationships. And so I think for me,

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it was just becoming kind of a

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>full time bitcoiner in a sense, like really embracing that

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>as part of my identity is something I wanted to

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>talk about and think about every single day. Um, and

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>when I when that switch flipped, Twitter all of a

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>sudden made more sonse right, and the community here has

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>been incredible. I mean, look, I I sometimes get in

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>battles with with people. I mean that just seems to

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 1>be part of the space. It's funny how many friends

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I have that are like enemies of each other. But

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that's just sort of the fun part of of of

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 1>using Twitter. Yeah. Well, I think it's important to battle,

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, not not in a bad way, but

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>in a good way, because good ideas are one through discussion, right,

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and so we need to kind of I call it

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>like verbally sparring, right, if we need to spar back

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and forth and in a in a good way. And um,

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>we learned from that a lot of times, I'll see

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody's post and I'm like, oh, wow, that's that's that's

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that's so good, that's that's that that's right. I hadn't

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>thought of that. And then I'll just read the comments

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of people sparring back and forth, the baiting if you will, right,

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, oh, I didn't think about that. I

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't think about that. So you know, it's important to

0:03:57.960 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>be able to have that discussion, and it's worked good

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>for that. I I didn't start using Twitter until um

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I was in I was in Hawaii. It was January

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and um I was on the north shore of Oahu.

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Were there for a month and I woke up in

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:17.039
<v Speaker 1>the morning and my phone was like making this like

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>weird alarm and uh, I think it was seven in

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the morning and something like pretty early, And I grabbed

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>my phone and I looked at it and it says

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:30.159
<v Speaker 1>imminent threat inbound missile alert. This is not a test.

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm like what. And then like I look at my

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>wife and like she's got the same alert on her

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 1>phone and we're like like and this was right at

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the height of like the whole North Korea thing with

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Trump and the Korea is going to fire this missile

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:44.799
<v Speaker 1>and here we are and it's like alert inbound missile,

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>imminent threat, not a not a you know, not a

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>not test and uh and then that was it. And

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>then there was like no news about it. You could

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 1>turn on the TV, jump on the internet. There was nothing.

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:57.280
<v Speaker 1>And people were freaking out. All the neighbors were jumping

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>in their cars and taking off all the where you're

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna go hide in the island, right. Um, And my

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>business partner at the time, um, he was on Twitter.

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't, and so he jumped on Twitter. And then

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>all the information was on Twitter, right, and like I

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>couldn't find any information, and so I was like, okay,

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I started on Twitter. And that's great how the information goes.

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>But let's uh, let's jump past that. That's some fun stuff.

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>But um, some of the things that's been going on

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>in the bitcoin and cryptocurrency space the last couple of weeks,

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 1>it's been fun to see happening on Twitter. Well, fun

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 1>depend on what side of the ball you're on. But

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>we're starting to see crazy liquidity crisis happening and almost

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>like this domino effect, uh, maybe starting with Tera Luna

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:41.479
<v Speaker 1>and now going through into other platforms, um Celsius, Voyager.

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, maybe Genesis Block Fi next, so and

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 1>we don't know how far this gets. Let's talk about

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that for a little bit. I know you've been like

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty vocal and outspoken on that, Like what's your take

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>on that on the big picture, and then we can

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of dive into that. At a very high level,

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I think we're at the tail end of like a

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 1>ten to twelve year kind of fed fueled bowl market

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 1>where interest rates have been held at a very low

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>level for too long. There's been too much money creation,

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>there's been too much risk taking, everybody's way out on

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the risk spectrum. Um. And so even before you get

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>to crypto, I mean, you just look at what happened

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 1>to Tiger Global, uh this year. You look at the

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>decline and some of these large cap technology stocks, including

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:25.600
<v Speaker 1>some like Facebook and Netflix that were viewed as kind

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>of teflon up until about the last kind of call

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 1>it nine to twelve months, um. And so I just

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:34.799
<v Speaker 1>think we're seeing what happens at the end of every

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 1>liquidity cycle, where there's this cascade of folks that get

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:43.280
<v Speaker 1>liquidated because they convinced themselves, um that the world was

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:45.359
<v Speaker 1>going to continue on in the same trajectory that it

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>had been on for the last ten or fifteen years.

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 1>And that's the problem with an unstable monetary policy. I mean,

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I do fault the Fed and politicians. I mean there

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:58.720
<v Speaker 1>they didn't see inflation coming, and then they don't understand

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that all of the activities that they've engaged in, including

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>zero interest rate policy, quantitative easing, stimulus, etcetera. You can

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>give out checked you know, six hundred bucks or bucks

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to people and then you can lie to them and

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>say that won't cause inflation. But the reality is they've

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>basically hauled out the middle class and and and the

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>poor in this country um through this policy, um. And

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:24.239
<v Speaker 1>so that that's filters over into crypto. You know, people

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>can't get a yield because interest rates or zero, they

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>can't put their money in a savings account, and so

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>they become deluded into thinking that it's okay to deposit

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>money into a platform like Celsius, which is essentially an

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>unregulated shadow bank offering unsustainable yields in an environment where

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>yields are basically zero. And so the first red flag

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>for something like Celsius is just that if you see

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>yields of sevent when your bank is offering twenty BIPs

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>like you might want to ask yourself how much risk

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>is I am I taking? And then when you see

0:07:54.760 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>a CEO that engages um and essentially weakly uh, you know,

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>conversations with the community where he repeatedly lies about the

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>risk that we're taking, fails to disclose risks, irresponsible risk

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 1>that lead to loss of client capital, and then consistently

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>makes sort of irresponsible decisions across the business. You know,

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't be surprised. My current view on this mark

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>is that Celsius is probably one of the worst actors

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>in this entire ecosystem. It's completely it was completely predictable

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, that it eventually was going to have problems.

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I also knew that Block five had had made bad,

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>poor decisions as well. The difference seems to be that

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the investor community completely lost respect uh and trust in

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Alex Mashinsky and the Celsius team. Somehow, some way, the

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the sort of inexperienced team at Block five managed to

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>hold onto some credibility in the market, and therefore they're

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>able to kind of get bailouts at this point. Yeah, yeah,

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that's a good breakdown. I want to I want to

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 1>break that down a little bit more and dig into

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>some of this, including like the short squeeze that's like

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:01.439
<v Speaker 1>maybe they're trying to warm up, and the credit extension

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>that's been thrown to block Fly. What that consolidation means. Um.

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I got a quote from Lenin that I want to

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:07.839
<v Speaker 1>read to you as well that I think helps some

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>up kind of where we're at um and maybe talk

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:13.680
<v Speaker 1>about you know who swimming naked and kind of like

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>a warm Buffett type type of quote. So anyway, listen

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to the Mark Mo Show. We're talking about the decentralized

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>revolution the world's going through. We're talking about bitcoin and cryptocurrencies.

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Of course, I'm in the studio with Mike Alfred. You

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:28.199
<v Speaker 1>can find them on Twitter at Mike Alfred and uh,

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>we got a lot more to cover when we get back,

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>so don't go away, all right, Welcome back. You are

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Mark Mo Show. We're talking about the

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>decentralized Revolution. We're talking about bitcoin, we're talking about what's

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:41.559
<v Speaker 1>happening in the cryptocurrency space, and I'm in the studio

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 1>with Mike Alfred. You can find on on Twitter. At

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Mike Alfred and uh, you're explaining Mike, how Um, you know,

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 1>this is basically kind of the the the end effects

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:52.559
<v Speaker 1>of this long term bowl market, the long's bowl market

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>we've been in history and what happens, and um, it

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>made me think of this Lenin quote that I wanted

0:09:56.600 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>to pull up real quick. Um, Vladimir Lenin from Russia,

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 1>not someone that we should model after, but he said, quote, Um,

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the the best way to destroy the capitalist system was

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>to debouch the currency by a continuing process of inflation.

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Governments confiscates secretly and unobserved an important wealth of their

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>citizens by this method not only confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily,

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:23.719
<v Speaker 1>so through inflation and deflation. And then and then at

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the end, he says, as the inflation proceeds and the

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 1>real value of the currency fluctuates wildly from month to month,

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:33.839
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate foundation of capitalism becomes so utterly disordered as

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to be almost meaningless, and the process of wealth getting

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>degenerates into a gamble and a lottery. And so I

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>think that's kind of where we're at. Where it's like, um,

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, at the end of this long term death cycle,

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>through all this inflation. That's happened. Um, there's no yield

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 1>left anymore. Right, the interest rates are down at zero.

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 1>They've pushed everybody out on this crazy risk risk of

0:10:58.080 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>to try to get any kind of yield they hand

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:03.959
<v Speaker 1>they can, but ultimately they've turned it into a generation gamble.

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>And so now everybody has to gamble. And I think

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>to your point, they think everything just goes up in perpetuity,

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't and they and they find out, unfortunately,

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>they find out the hard way. Yeah. And if you

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>were raised in the nineteen fifties or sixties, right, um,

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:21.679
<v Speaker 1>you were told, hey, save money by government bonds, put

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>in the bank, right, or earn more than you spend.

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>And that whole model was flipped on his head because

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the FED change the rules. The rule for the last

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>twelve years was big bar and steal as much capital

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>as you can get, take as much risk as possible,

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>use as much leverage as possible. It doesn't matter because

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>if you mess up, we will bail you out. So

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that FED put incentivized increasingly risky behavior, and only some

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 1>people understood the rules of the game. Right, So when

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>people were overlevered going into the COVID situation, in the

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>spring of guess what the government did. They basically bailed

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>those people out with p PP loans. So these companies

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>got five million, ten million, twenty million dollar p PP

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>loans that were forgiven. And yes, some of the employees

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>got to keep their fifteen dollar an our job for

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 1>an extra six months, but the owners of those firms

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>should have been wiped out by that irresponsible leverage that

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>was on those firms. So look, I think when the

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Fed manipulates the market like this, nobody knows which prices

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to trust, nobody knows which rules of the game to follow,

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>And so people got sucked into things like Celsius, where, yeah,

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:23.319
<v Speaker 1>if you can't get a reasonable return in your bank,

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 1>you might you might be convinced that, even though it

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 1>makes no sense, something like Celsius might work. Yeah, what

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>about um, what about the Wall Street raiders whatever we

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>want to call them, right, I mean, they've been they've been,

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:38.959
<v Speaker 1>They've been at this game for a long time. George

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Soros became infamously rich, making a billion dollars a day

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>by breaking the peg of the Bank of England. And

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>so it seems like Wall Street traders or raiders, they're

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna want to always want to go after these you know,

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>they smell a little blood in the water. They want

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to attack, and so, um, I don't want to dig

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>into this, but it looks like that's there's some big

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street fund, Blue Street or Boost Blue guys going

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 1>after the bo g A right now, which is pretty interesting,

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:03.560
<v Speaker 1>but they want to be a George Soros. But back

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to the crypto space, it's almost like they spot these

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 1>things like Tera Luna or Celsius, see how they're over leveraged,

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 1>understand their over leverage, and they can start to see

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:15.560
<v Speaker 1>where their liquidation levels are, and they just start hunting

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:18.599
<v Speaker 1>those liquidation levels. Um. I think that's what happened with

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Terry Luna. It looks like that was what's happening with Celsius,

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and they keep trying to lower their liquidation levels, but

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:25.439
<v Speaker 1>of course everybody knows where they're at, so it's like

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the raiders want to keep pushing that down. Do you

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 1>do you see something like that happening? You think that's

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 1>what happened. Yeah, I mean, look, that's the essence of capitalism, right.

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Markets systematically hunt down and kill any sort of weakness.

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>So if you're you have weakness in any form the

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>full extent of any capital cycle, right if it's allowed

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>to happen, which again, the FED is sort of this

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of put a pause on normal cycles in some senses. Right,

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 1>we're supposed to suspend disbelief and believe that bowl markets

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>can go on forever with no interruption. But in a

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>typical cycle, all of the week as players at some

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>point get taken out. When times are good, right, you

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:06.679
<v Speaker 1>can get away with all kinds of shenanigans, But as

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 1>soon as the tide goes out, you find out who's

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 1>swimming naked. And I think that's what happened with Tara Luna, right,

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Like it was a weak system. It was sort of

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>designed to fail from the beginning, and so it only

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>took uh one powerful actor who identified the risk in

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>that system and put a little bit of pressure. You

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>just lean a little bit on the weakest part of

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that system, and the whole thing collapses. Um, and you know,

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Japan's in a tough spot. I mean, the yen actually

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 1>used to be a safety trade. If you remember, back

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>in the last financial crisis, last major one, people bought

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the yet and it actually went up, uh you know,

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 1>over a five or ten year period recently. Now they've

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>got to print a lot of you and just to

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>protect their bond market, and their bond market may go

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 1>down before our bond market. And obviously we have huge

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>advantages in terms of being the global reserve currency that

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 1>they don't have. But we'll see what happens there. I

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>actually hope that that doesn't happen because I think it'll

0:14:56.640 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>end up being bad for everybody. Yeah, well, I I

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>think it's inevitable. I mean, it's it's only a matter

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of time. It's it's uh, I think more um if,

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, more when not if? But back to back

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to kind of the crypto space a little bit. So

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously Terry Luna got taken down. You know, you said

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a capitalism doing this thing, which which it is,

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and um, I agree with that. I'm not super happy

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>about it because, like you know, some rich Wall Street

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>guy made an extra couple of bucks and he ruined

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the life of a lot of people. But that's that's capitalism.

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>It's more, it's it's not their fault. Don't hate the player,

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>hate the game, right, it's the game that enables them

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to play that. Um, it's this fiat money system and

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>it's the FED behind them that's enabled them to get

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to this point, and so I think we have to

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>put the blame where the blame is due. Um. But uh,

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, back to Celsius. You know, they they froze Withdraws,

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>which was kind of the death kneel. Right. They were

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 1>getting a run on the bank, which is always going

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>to happen when you're overleveraged. It's kind of like the

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 1>free banking era that we had in the late eighteen

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of the United States. Right, each of these banks

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>were over levered. There wasn't enough mone me there. Um

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>they had they had to they had to shut down

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>with Draws. Um. Have you seen did you see this

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>week they started getting a little short squeeze. They were

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to organize a rally on the cell token. Yeah.

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's a guy named the Real plan C

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>who is an influencer on Twitter or a hundred thousand

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>plus followers, who told everybody it was safe to use

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>uh Celsius. Up until the last moment. There were other

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>influencers like this invest answers guy who literally had Maschinsky

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>on days before the withdraw all shut down, basically giving

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>him a platform to continue to spew all kinds of

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>potentially definitely misrepresentations but potentially fraudulent misrepresentations about the state

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 1>of the platform to customers, and so that's that's bad stuff.

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 1>These same people who um did that are now trying

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>to organize a short squeeze on an essentially worthless token,

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>which is fine, that's the free market too, But like

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the token has nothing to do with whether or not

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>people are gonna get their money back. So I'm really

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>more focused on the underlying solve and see and liquidity

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:05.399
<v Speaker 1>issues experienced by the corporate entity Celsius network, and whether

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 1>or not the sort of half a million or so

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>depositors into that institution ever see any of their money back.

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:13.919
<v Speaker 1>My current view is unless there is a bailout, unless

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>there's some sort of acquisition of all of the assets

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:19.439
<v Speaker 1>and liabilities of Celsius, that it almost certainly will go

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:23.360
<v Speaker 1>into Chapter eleven over the next call it a month

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 1>or two, and then it will take at least a

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>year to start distributing assets to the underlying customers. That's

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>what I'm focused on. I think the short squeezes a

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>total side show. Yeah, I would agree, and uh, you

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>know that that sounds like the most probable outcome. Right,

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>they've already brought on the people to kind of help

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that wind down. I think there's a difference of money

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.359
<v Speaker 1>they had in custody versus money that was being earning yield,

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 1>so then they'll probably get divided up between that a

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit better. Um, there's a chance there's a chance

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:50.919
<v Speaker 1>you might get some of your money back. I wouldn't

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 1>hold your breath, but there's a chance it might be

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 1>pennies on the dollar. Um, we'll see how that shakes out.

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk more about this block fine this

0:17:57.119 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 1>credit from ft X. I think that's kind of interesting.

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about in a minute. I'm in

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the studio with Mike Alfred. You can find him at

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Mike Alfred on Twitter. You listen to the Mark Mo

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Show talking about bitcoin and the decentralized Revolution. Be back

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 1>with that and more in a minute, So don't go away,

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 1>we'll be right back, all right, Welcome back. You are

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Mark Mo Show talking about bitcoin. We're

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:19.959
<v Speaker 1>talking about cryptocurrencies, we're talking about the decentralized Revolution, and

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I am in the studio with Mike Alfred. You can

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>find them on Twitter. At Mike Alfred and we've been

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:29.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about, you know, the capitalistic system, how the FED

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 1>kept things too low too long, and we ended up

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.159
<v Speaker 1>here and some of the damna is being done in

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:38.119
<v Speaker 1>the cryptocurrency space. We were talking about Celsius. Uh, maybe

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe someone gets some of their pennies back. We'll see

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:42.920
<v Speaker 1>what happens with that. But with Block five, maybe they're

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>in the same boat. Of course, the problem with all

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>these companies is we don't know. When I was at

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the Bitcoin conference in Miami a couple of months ago,

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I met with one of the one of the head

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>guys over at Celsius, and I told him as much.

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I said, look, I said, I can't give you money

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>because I have no way to quantify the risk. I said,

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:02.920
<v Speaker 1>if you could give more transparency over the assets and

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:05.399
<v Speaker 1>where they're at, etcetera. I said, then I could quantify

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the risk and I could decide if I wanted to.

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:08.160
<v Speaker 1>And I said, I thought, I think if you would

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:11.120
<v Speaker 1>give more visibility or transparency, that would help your business.

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Apparently they didn't do that, but blocked fire. Kind of

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>same thing. We don't know right, it's like this black box. Um.

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:22.919
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they handled credit or or risk better. We don't know, um,

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:25.160
<v Speaker 1>but it looks like they just got an credit line

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:29.160
<v Speaker 1>from f t X. I'm sure you saw that. Yeah, Yeah,

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>that was what two or fifty million, Yeah, which which

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 1>is probably a drop in the bucket, I would imagine, right,

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 1>considering what funds they have. Yeah. Well, I mean Sam

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Bankman Fried is personally worth over twenty billion dollars, right,

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and he personally did a half a billion dollar investment

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:50.880
<v Speaker 1>into a company that I was involved with last year,

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and so like, the guy seems to have almost unlimited

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>liquidity at this point in to his credit I mean,

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 1>FTX only has like two or three dred employees, so

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 1>they're far smaller than most of the other venues and

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:05.440
<v Speaker 1>exchanges that have done the same amount of volume. And

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:09.640
<v Speaker 1>he's an exceptional entrepreneur. Nobody's perfect. I'm not lionizing him.

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that, like everything he's doing is right right,

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 1>like necessarily good for space and long term. But you've

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 1>got to give him credit for helping both Voyager and

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 1>block Fight at this point, because both of those firms

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:24.919
<v Speaker 1>might have already gone out of business without some support

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 1>from him. Did he also extend a credit line to Voyager?

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 1>As well previously. Um, yes, I don't know the exact

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>numbers there, but I've seen a lot of figures flying around.

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>But all that said, I mean Voyager lost so much

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>money with three a c that the stock was down

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to was down like at some point um this morning,

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>it was under fifty cents. So I mean the markets

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:48.640
<v Speaker 1>basically saying Voyager could go to zero at any point. Yeah,

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the stock. If the stock goes to zero, does that

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>mean the company goes out of business? Stocks barely go

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to zero in the absence of bankruptcy. But remember, even

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>in a bankruptcy scenario of the stock can still trade

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 1>above zero for a period of time because sometimes during

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:07.199
<v Speaker 1>a reorganization, people still managed to get something out of

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the company depending on what the what the balance sheet

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:12.479
<v Speaker 1>looks like. But I'd much rather be a senior secured

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 1>lender to those companies than an equity shareholder. You know.

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Block Fight was one of the first companies in this

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>space to to really show cracks, So I think at

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>this sort of beginning of one there was no substantive

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 1>difference in my view. Uh and qualitatively between the risk

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 1>books of Celsius and block Fire and block five got

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 1>caught in that gray scale bitcoin trust trade, which looked

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>like a no brainer, right, you buy the trust and

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>n a V. As long as you hold it for

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:41.199
<v Speaker 1>six months, you can dump it back on the market

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.199
<v Speaker 1>at that premium. And for most of the history of

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>g BTC up until that point, it traded at a

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 1>twenty plus percent premium, so it looked like free money,

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and so kids with no risk management experience in a

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:55.919
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street experience probably would think that's fine, and they

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>piled into that trade. They locked up a huge chunk

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of the deposits in block FI in that trade, and

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:03.120
<v Speaker 1>then when that premium discount flip negative during the draw

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>down in the spring of last year, all of a sudden,

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 1>they were completely upside down. So if they had experienced

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a similar bank run to what Celsius just experienced over

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the last month or so, they would have gone bust.

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh last brick um. But again, they had such good

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>equity backing that they were able to continue to raise

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>equity and plug the hole in their balance sheet. Celsius

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 1>did a similar thing. They raised a round of equity

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:26.920
<v Speaker 1>last summer, they didn't announce it until the fall, and

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:29.199
<v Speaker 1>they used that to paper over their balance sheet. So

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the only difference today, Mark, honestly, is that

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 1>block Fire grew up faster. Somebody on the board or

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 1>somebody in that investor base said, listen, Zach and team,

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:41.199
<v Speaker 1>you guys need to grow up. You guys need to

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>have put your big boy pants on and actually developed

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:46.719
<v Speaker 1>some adult level risk framework so you don't lose all

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 1>of the positors money and go bankrupt. And they listen,

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and they stopped doing the same types of crap that

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:54.239
<v Speaker 1>Selsie's was doing all the way up until now. I mean,

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:57.199
<v Speaker 1>you can see on chain Celsie's continues to gamble with

0:22:57.280 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the positive money even as they've frozen the customers assets. Yeah, yeah,

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I think. I mean, you know, the narrative that I've

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:07.119
<v Speaker 1>always kind of believed, and I guess maybe I was

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>naive although I wasn't using these services, but um, I

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 1>always believe that they were doing over collateralized loans and

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:15.199
<v Speaker 1>so it was supposed to be risk free because they

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 1>had overclatteralized loans. But then it turns out like Celsius

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>is losing money and there's like Badger Dow attack, Like

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 1>what the heck are they doing in something called badger

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Dow in the first place? Right, um, and so they

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:27.719
<v Speaker 1>were like way out on the risk curve, it sounds like,

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's just the tip of the iceberg. I mean,

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>they lost seventy five million in stay count because the

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:36.719
<v Speaker 1>protocol team managing that protocol lost the keys. They put

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:38.919
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of money into a mining business at

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the peak of the market when they have no expertise

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 1>in mining. They would run around the market telling everybody

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 1>they were one of the biggest North American miners. I

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:46.879
<v Speaker 1>mean those of us in the space just kind of

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 1>chuckled and said, what the hell are these guys doing.

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Then they put out an s one about a month

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 1>ago to take a mining business public. It is a

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:57.119
<v Speaker 1>waste land in the publicly traded bitcoin mining space. I mean,

0:23:57.160 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 1>there are stocks that are down, some of them are

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>going to go to zero. I know of at least

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 1>one publicly traded mining company that's already about the default

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:08.199
<v Speaker 1>on some of their loans. And so this is not

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>an environment to take a mining business public. But it

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 1>speaks to the desperation of the Celsis management team because

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>they had made so many poor decisions compounded on top

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 1>of each other that they literally had to file on

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>us one for an liquid mining business at the worst

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>time in human history to do that. Um, so it's

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:27.360
<v Speaker 1>just an absolute disaster. I really think the people who

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 1>lost money in this, they need to accept that they're

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:33.159
<v Speaker 1>probably going to lose a big chunk, probably up to

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty of the money at the low end. Right, they're

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 1>lucky they'll get eighty cents on the dollar back. But

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 1>instead of attacking the people who pointed out the risk here,

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:46.159
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe spend more time looking at all the management

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>decisions that led to this so that you can avoid

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 1>it in the next for future times, right, because I

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>think if you learn from this, great, maybe you won't

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 1>make the same mistake again. If you spend all your

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>time attacking folks that were just trying to call out

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the misdeeds. Um again, I think people are wasting their

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:06.160
<v Speaker 1>time on that. Yeah, I mean it's uh it again.

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:10.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a capitaliststs capitalistic system, right, So, um in any market, right,

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:13.879
<v Speaker 1>you have short sellers, and then um they might decide

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to put big short positions, and then of course they're

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:18.160
<v Speaker 1>going to start talking about how bad that that position

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>is that company is to try to drive it lower.

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 1>And it's just part of the capitalist system. And so

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:25.359
<v Speaker 1>you have to identify the risk. Um, all this leverage

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:27.120
<v Speaker 1>builds up, and if you're going to put your money

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 1>there and you don't know that the celsis is going

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 1>into Badge or Dow or whatever this other one here

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:34.119
<v Speaker 1>is talking about it, then if you're not paying attention

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to that, then why do you have money there? Right?

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>And so you kind of have to figure that out.

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 1>To your point, they think they have to kind of,

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>um take this lesson and learn. What is that saying?

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:43.119
<v Speaker 1>I never lose either either win or I learned, and

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 1>so hopefully they'll learn from that. I was thinking about

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Block five just in regards to this and to your point, Um,

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you know Sam Makmun freed, but he's got a lot

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 1>of money. I mean f t X. You know, between

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:55.919
<v Speaker 1>f t X and Alameda they seem to be pretty

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>much in bed with Tether as well. Um, big big,

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>big pockets. I would imagine if um, he's putting two

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>d fifty million in, he's probably not gonna want to

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 1>lose that two million. So we might have done a

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:10.679
<v Speaker 1>little bit due diligence and he might be prepared to

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>do whatever it takes to keep them afloat. Do you

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>think they might have dodged a bullet with it. Was

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:18.679
<v Speaker 1>that was that kind of like a vote of confidence

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:22.479
<v Speaker 1>from SPF? Yeah? I think so. And you know, if

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>you've got SPF on your side, there's a good chance

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that you won't go out of business, right And the

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>other thing to keep in mind is they were already

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>out raising a down round in Oliver raising a billion

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:34.120
<v Speaker 1>dollar valuation. I don't think they were finding a lot

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 1>of success with that. But after an equity investor sees

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:40.959
<v Speaker 1>a vote of confidence on the debt side from an SPF,

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:42.439
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be more likely to put equity in

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>because they can underwrite it with a lower risk of

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 1>losing all of the capital that goes on. I want

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to make one quick distinction though, mark On if we

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>can just go back real quick, I think there's a

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:56.679
<v Speaker 1>big difference between Tara Luna and Celsia's Tara Luna. You

0:26:56.800 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 1>actually had a somebody, some sort of chanization or trader

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>attacking Tara Luna directly. In the Celsius case, it was

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 1>literally just mismanagement. There was no particular single incident, There

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:11.880
<v Speaker 1>was no particular single actor that that precipitated that situation,

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>whereas Tara Luna was very clearly one actor that was

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 1>was moving on the on the against that tokens. That's

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:20.479
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a that's a really good point to bring up.

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 1>So I appreciate that. I'm listening to the Mark mo Show.

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm in the studio with Mike Alfred. We are talking

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 1>about bitcoin. We're talking about the cryptocurrency space. We're talking

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:30.719
<v Speaker 1>about the state of the markets with the Federal Reserve

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:33.359
<v Speaker 1>driving them to a level never seen in the last

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>well the longest ball run in history, and here we

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:38.919
<v Speaker 1>are de levering the system. I want to talk a

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit more about who swimming naked when we come

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 1>back in a minute, So don't go away, all right,

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back. You are listening to the Mark moa show.

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about bitcoin and the decentralized revolution, specifically in

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the studio with Mike Alfred, and we are talking about um,

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the blow up in the I don't know what we

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 1>call it, se FI central heist finance world if we

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:02.400
<v Speaker 1>call it that, talking about Celsie is talking about block fire,

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about Voyager. Um. You know a couple of people

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:09.359
<v Speaker 1>that I haven't heard a whole lot about. Maybe you

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:13.120
<v Speaker 1>have is a genesis that seems to probably be behind

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 1>all of these people. And then NEXTO as well, what

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 1>have you heard about them? So, I mean, Genesis is

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:22.919
<v Speaker 1>a digital currency group company, it's Barry Silbert, and that

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:26.919
<v Speaker 1>is probably one of the best financed funded organizations in

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the entire space. Barry systematically buys back stock every single

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:36.119
<v Speaker 1>year and also pays a dividend, which is very unusually

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>for a non public growth company. And they have some

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 1>of the strongest equity shareholders in the world. And so

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Genesis probably the last lender that would ever fail in

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the space. And from what I hear, they terminated three A,

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>C and and UH some of the other bad counterparties

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 1>alongside block Fire others right pretty early. And even if

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 1>they took losses, they have a big enough on sheet

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 1>across DCG that like probably not going to go anywhere.

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>The rumors about next are much worse. Right, there's a

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of conversation about whether or not NEXTO is actually solvent.

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any smoking gun or particular issue to

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 1>take with NEXTO like I did with Celsius, where with

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Celsie's I felt like it was definitely going to collapse. Uh,

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and I said that multiple times on the record. I'm

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 1>not gonna say that about Next because I don't have

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>enough information, But if I was a depositor there, I'd

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 1>be thinking about pulling my assets out based on based

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 1>on just the chatter that I'm I'm hearing in the market. Yeah,

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I was. I was always skeptical of Next. So just

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>because one there European company, if forget exactly what country

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 1>they're from, um, and their founder has some you know,

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 1>rumors about where he's from and maybe some nefarious things

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 1>that he's done in the past, and that lack of transparency,

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the lack of US regulation concerned me. But I saw

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>it today. They came out with this UH post talking

0:29:57.520 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 1>about how they're partnered up with City to do some

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:03.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if they're going to try to provide

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 1>liquidity to the space. They put out a press release

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about how they ad buy Celsious. I think it

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 1>was just like a press release. UM. It wasn't like

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 1>an actual you know, l o I or anything like that. Um,

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>so it looks like they're trying to make some noise,

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of trying to prove that maybe they're above all that.

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I would probably pretty skeptical of that as well, yeah,

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 1>my impression is that City is quite desperate to be

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>in the space all of a sudden. I'm not sure

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 1>where that's coming from at the executive level within City,

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 1>but somebody gave a directive that they need more exposure,

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and so they seem to be thrashing around trying to

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 1>get into the custody space, trying to back certain companies.

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Their their analysts keep making comments about how high bitcoining

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 1>can go, even though they knew nothing about bitcoin like

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 1>three weeks ago. Um So, I wouldn't read too much

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 1>into anything related to any of the banks because frankly,

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 1>none of the banks have proven the big US banks

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 1>at least have proven to have any real expertise in

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the space. They'll come when the hedge funds are clamoring

0:30:57.440 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 1>for services, but the moment the price goes down, they

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 1>seem to disappear. Um so I wouldn't read into that.

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I would focus more on whether next To itself is

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 1>actually solvent and what kind of lending they've done behind

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the scenes, and if there's real risk there. Again, um,

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 1>my vote would be to remove your capital from all

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 1>of these centralized landing platforms if you haven't already. Yeah,

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I would agree with we agree with that statement. And

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 1>what about the big news that broke this week with

0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 1>UM the first UM short et F that Ginsler just

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 1>approved on bitcoin. What's your thoughts on that? Is that?

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Is that bullish or is that barish? Or is it neutral?

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean it could be it could be bullish, right, Uh,

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 1>just because usually by the time a short ETF comes out, right,

0:31:41.640 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 1>most of the move is is sort of over. Uh.

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Michael Sonenshein, the CEO of Gray Scale, actually put out

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 1>a tweet store arguing that was actually bullish. But I

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 1>think the SEC regulation angle is actually the more interesting one,

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and just that the SEC is allowing these futures based

0:31:56.480 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 1>what I call garbage products with ten percent fully loaded cost.

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 1>When you when you look at the cost of rolling

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 1>those contracts every month, UM, it's it's just kind of

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous that they would allow those products to exist. But

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't allow the biggest bitcoin fund, the Great Skill

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin Trust, to just convert to an ETF and remove

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the discount from n a V that the fund is

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 1>currently trading out. I mean, that would help so many

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>more people than giving the general public another vehicle to

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 1>speculate with and to trade. Yeah, you know, it's crazy,

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 1>it's absolutely I almost I'm starting to think the SEC

0:32:32.880 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 1>is trying to hurt the public through some of these actions,

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 1>because it actually makes no logical sense why you would

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 1>allow a futures based short product before you'd allow us

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 1>body t F. Well, I think you could look at

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 1>most of the SEC's actions and probably draw that conclusion.

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Just look at the credit investor rule for example, right,

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 1>so they can't get into the early round deals, but

0:32:53.240 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>they can get dumped on by retail as soon as

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 1>it goes public. I mean it's uh, I think you

0:32:57.520 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 1>could probably draw that conclusion with most of them. And

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I think if you look at um Gary Ginsler, head

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of the SEC, I mean, he obviously knows bitcoin, he

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:07.080
<v Speaker 1>was teaching at m I T he gets it. He's

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's quoted Satoshi. He seems like he gets it.

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 1>So then you kind of have to look at that

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and then look at his actions, and then I think, like, um,

0:33:16.000 --> 0:33:19.200
<v Speaker 1>with these synthetic you know, degenerate gambling, you know, naked

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 1>shorting for example, that they're bringing out, or even this

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 1>these long synthetics or whatever, it's like almost like it

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:28.959
<v Speaker 1>hurts the cryptocurrency space more and even potentially hurts bitcoin,

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 1>So like, are they doing it maybe as the way

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 1>for the government to kind of attack bitcoin and crypto

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:37.400
<v Speaker 1>potentially um or maybe he doesn't want to have a

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 1>physical so he can encourage people to buy the physical.

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It's a it's interesting either way, I

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 1>guess yeah. I mean, I actually think it's probably more ineptitude,

0:33:48.200 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 1>um than than conscious effort to destroy bitcoin, Like, I

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 1>honestly don't think the government is smart enough to do that.

0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 1>What about for somebody like myself and probably yourself as well.

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to put words in your mouth, but

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, Michael Sailor type right, I'm long bitcoin. I'm

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna hold bitcoin. I want my grandkids to own my bitcoin.

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm never going to sell, so I'm not trying to

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:10.799
<v Speaker 1>trade it. I'm not trying to sell the peaks and

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 1>re buy back at the dips, etcetera. You think having

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:16.359
<v Speaker 1>a shorting et F could be beneficial in that type

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of environment where I don't want to sell my bitcoin

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:20.840
<v Speaker 1>m at the top, but I could take a little

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 1>leverage on the short to protect myself on the downside.

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I think net of all the expenses and the potential

0:34:27.880 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 1>taxes on that. You'll find most people over a ten

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 1>year period come out behind. Any trading at all generally

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a drag on long term returns,

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 1>especially for an asset like bitcoin that has the potential

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to compound at a year across the decade. So my

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:47.759
<v Speaker 1>advice is never going to change on that. No matter

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:50.839
<v Speaker 1>how many new fangled products that Wall Street comes out

0:34:50.840 --> 0:34:52.960
<v Speaker 1>with and try to tempt people to trade more, tend

0:34:53.000 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 1>people to hedge more, or whatever, the vast majority of

0:34:55.560 --> 0:34:57.920
<v Speaker 1>people will not use those products properly no matter how

0:34:57.920 --> 0:35:00.719
<v Speaker 1>hard they try, and they'll end up poorer and worse

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:04.080
<v Speaker 1>off by even using them at all. Yeah, So for

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the listeners, what Mike's referring to is that I believe

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 1>on this short fund, they recalculate on a monthly basis

0:35:10.200 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and then they put the fees about two percent per month,

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:14.280
<v Speaker 1>So over the course of the year cost you between

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:17.240
<v Speaker 1>ten and fifteen percent in fees, and so you're gonna

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 1>have to beat that just to break even on that.

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:21.240
<v Speaker 1>And then on top of that, if you have profits,

0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you have to pay taxes on that as well. So

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:25.359
<v Speaker 1>when you let out the fees and the taxes, like

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty hard to get ahead. I guess is that

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of we're referring to. Yeah, I'm saying the stated

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 1>expense ratios are always lower, right, They're not going to

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:34.640
<v Speaker 1>tell you center fient. But the cost of rolling because

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the futures contracts and the contango, right, that that happens

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:42.359
<v Speaker 1>sometimes in these contracts as the prices change across those

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:44.960
<v Speaker 1>months as you look out, and just the trading fees

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:47.359
<v Speaker 1>that are internal to the fund, the market impact of

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:50.760
<v Speaker 1>those trades, um, that's what creates the real cost versus

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:54.759
<v Speaker 1>just holding spot bitcoin. Most people should just buy bitcoin, uh,

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:57.399
<v Speaker 1>put it in cold storage, leave it alone, don't try

0:35:57.400 --> 0:35:59.399
<v Speaker 1>to lever it, don't try to earn yield on it.

0:35:59.600 --> 0:36:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Don't you any other products. Just hold bitcoin and leave

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 1>it alone for five or ten years. That's the only

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:08.480
<v Speaker 1>way that I can sort of make sort of assurance

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to somebody that I think they'll do pretty well. As

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 1>soon as they start bringing in options, leverage, uh ets

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 1>with futures, etcetera, there's a good chance they're gonna mess

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:21.040
<v Speaker 1>something up. Yeah. Brings me back to a quote from

0:36:21.080 --> 0:36:23.399
<v Speaker 1>Warm Buffet's partner, Charlie Munger. He says that the big

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:26.319
<v Speaker 1>money isn't made in the buying and the selling. The

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:29.120
<v Speaker 1>big money is made in the waiting. So you wait

0:36:29.120 --> 0:36:30.799
<v Speaker 1>for the right opportunity, and then you wait for that

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to come to fruition. And to what Mike is saying,

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:36.839
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is average, I mean it had been average annual

0:36:36.880 --> 0:36:39.439
<v Speaker 1>compounding growth rate. Even if that slows down to half

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of that or even a quarter of that fifty times,

0:36:42.080 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's still still amazing. And so just wait,

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 1>just waited out. Um. That's that's been my approach as well,

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and it seemed to work out pretty good. Sometimes it

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:53.279
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look perfect, but like right now, but over the

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 1>long run of you zoom out, it's been pretty good

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:57.719
<v Speaker 1>of buying. So it's worked out. Um. You listen to

0:36:57.719 --> 0:36:59.719
<v Speaker 1>the Mark Moss Show. We're talking about bitcoin. We're talking

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:02.440
<v Speaker 1>about the decentralized revolution. I've been in the studio with

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Mike Alfred. You can give him a follow on Twitter

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:09.439
<v Speaker 1>at Mike Alfred talking about the the contagion that we've

0:37:09.440 --> 0:37:12.160
<v Speaker 1>seen in the scripto lending space. Word of the word

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:14.719
<v Speaker 1>word to you from Mike is get your money out

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 1>of those platforms around there. That's what I got for

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 1>today Thanks for listening to The mark Ma Show. Until

0:37:18.600 --> 0:37:18.960
<v Speaker 1>next time,